Latest / Reformed Thinking / Children, Calling, and the Nations A Reformed Essay on Missions and Parental Stewardship

Transcript

Children, Calling, and the Nations A Reformed Essay on Missions and Parental Stewardship · Reformed Thinking

0:00
You know, usually when we talk about a medical diagnosis, there
0:03
is this expectation of precision.
0:06
It's almost like engineering. You fall off a ladder, you break
0:08
your arm. The X-ray shows that jagged
0:10
white line right across the bone.
0:12
And the doctor just points at the screen and says, well there
0:15
it is. Right, it's binary.
0:16
It is either broken or not broken.
0:18
You put a cast on it, you wait six weeks and the problem is
0:21
basically resolved. Yeah, we really like things to
0:24
be visible and, you know, easily categorized.
0:26
We love a clean diagnosis, but then you step into the world of
0:30
theology and specifically the intersection of global
0:33
evangelism and family dynamics, and suddenly that X-ray machine
0:36
just shatters into a million pieces.
0:39
We are looking at a diagnostic landscape that is, frankly,
0:42
entirely murky. So welcome to Reformed thinking.
0:45
Today, we're taking a deep dive into an incredibly intense
0:48
tension. We're looking at the Christian
0:50
calling to cross cultural missions, taking the gospel to
0:53
the unreached, and putting that right up against the strict
0:56
biblical mandate for family stewardship.
0:58
Yeah, it is a heavy topic. It really is, and we're pulling
1:02
our information today from 2 extensive theological essays.
1:06
The first is children calling and the nations, and the second
1:09
is the first parish. Our mission for this deep dive
1:13
is to answer one highly specific question.
1:17
If God calls a family to the mission field, how do the
1:20
children dictate the parameters of that calling?
1:23
Which is a question that makes a lot of people very
1:25
uncomfortable. Oh, for sure.
1:27
Because historically, I mean, the mission field has operated
1:30
on a completely different paradigm.
1:31
The old paradigm was usually the adult gets the call and the
1:36
children just have to adapt. The tension here is structural,
1:39
it's theological, and honestly, it is highly psychological.
1:42
And it applies directly to you, the listener, because if you're
1:44
listening to this and you're, say, packing your bags for a
1:47
mission trip right now, or maybe you sit on an elder board
1:49
participating in ascending church that funds these
1:52
families, or even if you were simply trying to raise a family
1:55
in a highly secular culture right where you are,
1:57
understanding the strict biblical boundaries of a
2:00
household is vital for your own spiritual health.
2:03
Yeah, it applies to to everyone, right?
2:05
So we are going to look at biblical exegesis, historical
2:08
context, and some frankly alarming modern sociological
2:13
data. But to figure out how a family
2:15
fits into global missions, we first have to look at the very
2:19
origin of God's global plan to bless the nations.
2:22
And that takes us all the way back to the book of Genesis,
2:25
specifically Genesis chapter 18. Right.
2:27
So Genesis 18 is a remarkable text because of where it sits in
2:31
the historical record. If you look at the timeline,
2:34
Abraham is living in a very specific window of redemptive
2:37
history. He's living right between the
2:39
scattering at Babel, which happened a few chapters earlier,
2:42
and the impending judgment of Sodom, which is about to happen
2:46
in the very next chapter. Let's pause there for a second.
2:48
Because we throw those names around Babel and Sodom like
2:51
everyone just knows the vibe of those places.
2:54
But paint a picture for us. What do those two cities
2:57
represent in the biblical narrative?
2:58
Well, they represent distinct, polar opposite forms of human
3:01
rebellion against God. Think about Babel.
3:04
Babel was all about mankind's unified, arrogant pride.
3:07
Like corporate rebellion. Yeah, corporate technological
3:09
rebellion. They wanted to build a tower to
3:12
the heavens to make a name for themselves apart from God.
3:15
They wanted autonomy and self glorification.
3:18
God judges Babel by confusing their languages and scattering
3:21
them across the earth. So that is one side of the coin.
3:24
Sophisticated unified pride. OK.
3:26
And then you have Sodom on the other side.
3:28
Right. Sodom isn't about building a
3:29
sophisticated tower. Sodom shows severe, violent,
3:33
grievous moral wickedness. It's the absolute degradation of
3:37
human society. It's predatory, it's violent,
3:40
and it represents a society that has completely thrown off all
3:42
moral restraint. And God is about to judge them.
3:45
With fire from heaven, yes. So Abraham is standing
3:48
historically and geographically right between these two
3:51
monumental judgments. Babel is in the rearview mirror
3:54
and Sodom is on the horizon. In the middle of this dark
3:57
historical reality, God steps in with what the sources describe
4:00
as a divine soliloquy. A divine soliloquy.
4:03
I kind of love that phrase. It sounds like something out of
4:05
Shakespeare. God is essentially talking to
4:08
himself, right? The text says.
4:10
God asks Shall I hide from Abraham what I'm about to do?
4:15
But God isn't confused. He isn't asking for advice.
4:18
No, God definitely does not need counsel from anyone.
4:21
This phrasing is an accommodation to human
4:23
understanding. It's a literary device to show
4:26
Abraham's privileged covenant position.
4:28
God is drawing Abraham into the knowledge of divine judgment and
4:32
purpose, and God states in this passage that Abraham will become
4:35
a great and mighty nation, and that all the nations of the
4:38
earth will be blessed in him. That right there is the Great
4:41
Commission in seed form, the global universal blessing.
4:44
Yes, but then God explicitly connects this massive global
4:48
objective to a very local domestic reality.
4:51
God says, for I have chosen him, that he may command his children
4:54
and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by
4:57
doing righteousness and justice. Wait let me make sure I'm
5:00
tracking with this cause the scale shift is pretty jarring.
5:02
We have a massive worldwide objective.
5:05
Bless all the nations of the earth, cure the curse of Babel.
5:09
But the method, the actual mechanism for achieving that
5:11
global objective is a father teaching his kids right from
5:14
wrong in his own tent. That feels almost entirely
5:17
disproportionate. It feels disproportionate to our
5:20
modern sensibilities, sure, but it is the core of the biblical
5:23
method. Look at the phrase God uses for
5:26
I have chosen him in older translations it reads for I have
5:30
known him. That indicates covenantal
5:33
election. It means sovereign grace is at
5:36
work here. So it starts with God's action.
5:38
Right. God didn't look down the
5:39
corridors of time and see that Abraham had a really great five
5:42
year plan for global evangelism. Abraham didn't invent a strategy
5:46
and ask God to endorse it. Grace initiates the
5:48
relationship, but that sovereign grace establishes obedience as
5:53
the ordained path. The means and the ends.
5:55
Spot on. The God who ordains the end,
5:57
which is the blessing of the nations, also ordains the means,
6:01
which is the active discipling of the children under Abraham's
6:03
roof. So it's not just that God saved
6:06
Abraham and then handed him A to do list, it's that the salvation
6:09
of the nations is structurally dependent on Abraham running his
6:13
living room correctly. That is a great way to summarize
6:16
it. I mean, the ancient household
6:18
wasn't a modern individualistic construct.
6:21
It was a place of authority, instruction, and covenant
6:24
continuity. God did not treat Abraham's
6:27
family life as a side hustle or an afterthought to his main
6:30
calling. Household faithfulness was the
6:32
actual vehicle for the promise to travel through history.
6:36
I think about how modern culture views a career calling.
6:39
We have this idea of the solitary corporate relocation.
6:42
The worker focuses solely on the new job.
6:45
If you get transferred to Tokyo for a massive promotion, you are
6:48
thinking about the office in Tokyo.
6:49
You're thinking about the new boss, the new market.
6:51
Share You're totally focused on the work.
6:53
Right, You assume your family will just figure it out.
6:55
The kids will go to an International School, your
6:57
spouse will find some hobbies, and everyone will adjust because
7:00
hey, it is a great career move. But in the Genesis model, the
7:03
job explicitly includes the household.
7:06
You cannot separate the 2. You really can't.
7:09
You cannot separate them without destroying.
7:11
The mechanism got established and this brings up a massive
7:15
glaring issue when we apply this to modern cross cultural
7:18
missions. There is a severe structural
7:22
asymmetry in a family calling. OK, structural asymmetry, Break
7:26
that down for me. What does that actually look
7:29
like on a Tuesday morning when a family is packing up their house
7:32
to move to Senegal? Well, think about the internal
7:35
experience of the parents versus the internal experience of the
7:37
children. The parents have a robust
7:40
theological framework. They understand concepts like
7:44
the glory of God, the urgency of eternity, and the tragedy of
7:48
unreached people groups. They've been processing this for
7:50
years. Exactly.
7:51
They have probably spent years praying, fasting, reading
7:54
biographies of great missionaries, and feeling a
7:56
rising sense of excitement and conviction.
7:59
They have a subjective internal witness that God is directing
8:02
their steps. And the kids.
8:03
The children possess no such framework.
8:06
To A7 year old child, a foreign mission field is not a glorious
8:10
expansion of the Kingdom of God, It is an existential threat.
8:14
They're losing their bedroom, they're losing their friends.
8:17
They're losing their familiar language, the food they like,
8:20
their pets, their grandparents. Oh wow.
8:23
And they're losing all of this without their consent.
8:25
That is heavy. The kids are just drafted into
8:27
this army. They don't get to sign the
8:29
enlistment papers. They are passengers in this
8:31
calling. They do not possess the internal
8:34
theological anchor that the parents have, and this is where
8:37
the danger lies. A parent's failure to bridge
8:40
this cognitive gap through tender, age appropriate
8:43
communication turns the Great Commission into a structural
8:47
tyrant in the child's mind. A structural tyrant.
8:49
So from the kids perspective, God is the reason they are
8:52
miserable in a place they don't understand.
8:55
God is the one who stole their dog and made them eat food that
8:57
makes them sick. Yes, that is the literal thought
9:00
process. If the parent doesn't take the
9:03
time to explain the spiritual reasons behind the move, if they
9:06
do not validate the child's grief over what they left
9:09
behind, the child begins to associate the gospel with loss,
9:13
deprivation, and parental neglect.
9:16
The parents must exercise tender pastoral wisdom.
9:20
You have to slow down. Right.
9:22
They have to recognize that a young lamb cannot travel at the
9:25
same pace as a mature sheep. You can't drag a child across
9:29
the world and demand that they feel the same spiritual high
9:31
that you feel. That makes a lot of sense, but I
9:34
imagine that kind of patience is incredibly difficult when you
9:37
were dealing with culture shock, raising support, and trying to
9:39
learn a new language. Because parents and children
9:42
experience the mission field so differently, families frequently
9:45
fall into severe behavioral and theological errors when they are
9:48
attempting to cope with the stress.
9:50
The sources we're looking at point out two opposing errors
9:53
that missionary parents make. Yeah, and both errors are
9:56
destructive. The first error is idolizing the
9:59
child's comfort. This is highly prevalent in our
10:03
modern Western context. This happens when parents use
10:06
their children as a sophisticated cloak for
10:09
disobedience. Give me an example of that.
10:12
What does that actually look like?
10:13
Well, a couple might feel a legitimate, biblically tested
10:16
conviction to move overseas or plant a church in a hard area.
10:21
But as the time approaches, they start looking at their life.
10:24
They look at their suburban predictability.
10:26
They look at the quality of the local schools.
10:28
They look at their child's travel soccer schedule and they
10:31
back out. They just get cold feet.
10:33
Right. But they do not say we love our
10:35
comfort too much. They say we just feel God is
10:39
leading us to prioritize little Jimmy's stability right now.
10:43
They use the child as an excuse to ignore difficult command.
10:46
They baptize their own fear of discomfort by calling it good
10:49
parenting. Yeah.
10:51
But the second error, which is equally destructive, is on the
10:53
opposite end of the spectrum. It's idolizing ministry success.
10:58
This is when parents treat their children like luggage attached
11:01
to an adult calling. Like luggage?
11:03
Yes, the child becomes a nameless accessory to a
11:06
missionary resume. The parents are so consumed with
11:09
saving the lost, planting churches and reporting back to
11:12
their donors that the children are left to raise themselves in
11:15
the margins of the parents ministry.
11:17
They treat the kids like carry on baggage.
11:19
You just drag them through the terminal, shove them in the
11:22
overhead bin, and hope they survived the flight.
11:24
Neither of those aligns with scripture, but here's where it
11:27
gets really fascinating. There is a specific theological
11:30
error that often drives this second mistake.
11:34
The sources call it sovereign presumption.
11:36
What is that? So Southern presumption is a
11:38
psychological and theological trap.
11:41
It's the assumption that because a parent made massive sacrifices
11:44
for God's Kingdom, moving across the world, giving up a lucrative
11:47
career, living in a hostile climate, God is somehow
11:51
obligated to automatically save, protect and sanctify their
11:55
children. It's a transaction.
11:56
It is viewing God through a contractual lens rather than a
12:00
covenantal. One, I gave up my 401K for you
12:02
God, so the least you can do is make sure my teenager doesn't
12:05
rebel. That is the exact internal
12:07
monologue, but it is a dangerous presumption because it
12:11
fundamentally misunderstands the biblical doctrine of total
12:13
depravity. Let's stop and define that,
12:15
because total depravity sounds like everyone is running around
12:18
committing arson and murder all the time.
12:20
But that is not what reformed theology means by that term.
12:23
Right right now, total depravity doesn't mean that humans are as
12:27
evil as they could possibly be. It means that the fall of
12:30
humanity in Genesis 3 affected every part of our nature, our
12:33
minds, our wills, our emotions. We were born spiritually dead,
12:37
alienated from God. So we're completely unable to
12:40
save ourselves. Yes, this means that grace is
12:43
not caught like a cold. Children inherit original sin
12:46
from their parents, not their parents faith or ministerial
12:49
standing. A child does not become a
12:51
Christian simply by living in a missionary compound.
12:54
Proximity to holy things does not make a person holy.
12:57
Not at all. They need radical regeneration
12:59
by the Holy Spirit. Living in a foreign country,
13:02
attending 3 church services a week, and watching a parent
13:05
translate the Bible does not change the child's desperate
13:08
internal need for personal repentance and faith.
13:11
And parents miss this. All the time.
13:14
And this is where parents get fooled.
13:17
Outward compliance on the mission field does not equal in
13:19
her spiritual life. A child might learn to sing the
13:22
hymns and hand out tracks because they want their parents
13:24
approval, but their heart might be entirely hostile to God.
13:28
And when you strip away all the normal cultural anchors, you
13:31
know, the school system, the extended family, the youth group
13:34
back home, you get a hyper isolated family unit.
13:38
And that leads to this concept of psychological contagion in a
13:41
foreign environment. The parents emotional state
13:44
basically becomes the child's entire.
13:47
The principle of emotional contagion is a well documented
13:50
psychological phenomena, but on the mission field it's magnified
13:53
A hundredfold. Because the family is isolated
13:56
from their home culture, the parents act as the primary
13:58
filter for how the children interpret their new reality.
14:01
Negative attitudes are highly contagious.
14:03
So if a missionary dad comes home from a frustrating day
14:06
trying to get a visa renewed and he sits at the dinner table and
14:08
just unloads about how corrupt the local government is, how
14:12
lazy the local people are, and how much he hates the heat the
14:16
kids are absorbing, all of that. They absorb it and they amplify
14:19
it. If parents are constantly
14:22
complaining about the host culture, fretting over financial
14:25
worries or mocking the lack of infrastructure, it breeds a
14:28
cynical apostasy in the children.
14:30
It makes sense. Think about illogically.
14:32
If the national citizens are spoken of with contempt to the
14:35
dinner table, the child will never ever believe the gospel is
14:39
a message of self sacrificing love.
14:41
The hypocrisy will completely blind them to the truth.
14:45
Conversely, parents modeling gospel joy, patience and
14:48
suffering, and submission to Providence can anchor a child's
14:51
heart in a chaotic environment. I hear that, but let me play
14:53
devil's advocate for a minute. I am putting myself in the shoes
14:56
of a missionary parent. You are on the field.
14:59
You're overwhelmed. The needs are endless.
15:02
People are dying without knowing Christ.
15:04
The workers are few. If a family is desperate for
15:08
help on the field, isn't it logical to have the kids pitch
15:10
in? We do this on farms all the
15:12
time. The family runs the farm.
15:14
Why can't the family run the mission?
15:15
Where is the line between healthy family participation and
15:19
outright exploitation? That is an excellent question,
15:22
and it is the razor thin line of what we might call pragmatic
15:25
legalism. There is a vast difference
15:28
between a child helping with chores because they're part of a
15:31
family and a child being utilized as unpaid staff to prop
15:36
up an adult's ministry metrics. Where does that usually start?
15:39
The problem usually starts long before they even reach the field
15:41
during the support raising phase, which agencies often call
15:45
deputation. Deputation.
15:46
That's the season where the family drives around in a
15:49
minivan for two years, visiting 50 different churches, trying to
15:52
get people to pledge 50 bucks a month.
15:54
Yes, and during that phase children are frequently paraded
15:58
before donors. They're put on stages, asked to
16:01
sing songs in foreign languages they barely know, and told to
16:04
behave perfectly so people will write checks.
16:07
They are forced to perform a superficial piety for the
16:10
family's financial survival. They learn very early that their
16:15
smiles translate to funding. That is incredibly manipulative.
16:18
You are putting the financial weight of the family's survival
16:21
on a 9 year old's ability to sit still during a three hour
16:25
potluck. And the damage compounds once
16:27
they arrive on the field. Because they have been trained
16:30
to perform. They become an ever ready
16:32
volunteer bank for the Paris They're forced to run Sunday
16:35
schools for the local children, set up chairs in the sweltering
16:38
heat or hand out tracks on the street, all to satisfy Home
16:42
Office reporting metrics. They literally become free
16:44
labor. They do, and that teaches the
16:47
child a devastating theological lesson.
16:50
It teaches them that their value to their parents, and by
16:53
extension their value to God, is strictly functional.
16:56
It breeds massive resentment toward the church.
16:59
They begin to view God as a demanding taskmaster who
17:02
requires endless labor without offering grace, joy, or rest.
17:07
That's heartbreaking. We have to remember that a
17:09
child's primary role on the mission field is not to be a Co
17:12
church planter. Their primary role is to be a
17:14
child loved, protected and nurtured in a grace saturated
17:18
home, not exploited for ministry efficiency.
17:20
This is where the conversation takes a really dark turn.
17:23
These theological and psychological errors we're
17:25
talking about are not just theoretical musings in a
17:27
seminary classroom. They've produced a devastating
17:30
statistical reality on the modern mission field.
17:33
We need to look at the hard data because the numbers are
17:35
staggering. The empirical evidence is
17:37
sobering, and it should act as a massive wake up call to every
17:40
sending agency in local church. For decades, the evangelical
17:45
world operated under this pietistic assumption that the
17:48
sheer urgency of the missionary work would somehow insulate the
17:51
family from psychological decay. The thought was if we are doing
17:55
God's work, God will put a hedge of protection around our kids.
17:59
But the data completely shattered that assumption.
18:01
It did. A major sociological study
18:03
called the REMAP data, which stands for the Reducing
18:06
Missionary Attrition Project, looked at why missionaries leave
18:09
the field prematurely. They found that child related
18:12
struggles account for 10.1% of all preventable missionary
18:16
attrition worldwide. Let me make sure I'm doing the
18:18
math right. One in 10 missionaries who quit,
18:21
who pack up and go home before their work is done, do so
18:24
because their kids are in a state of crisis.
18:26
Yes, thousands of highly trained, heavily funded gospel
18:30
ministers who've spent years learning languages and building
18:33
relationships are forced off the field because their children
18:36
enter a state of spiritual, emotional, or psychological
18:39
collapse. A major driver of this collapse
18:42
is the Third Culture Kid, or TCK phenomenon.
18:46
I've heard that term TCK. It sounds cool, like some sort
18:48
of global citizen, but the reality is actually deeply
18:51
disorienting, isn't it? The TCK exists entirely in the
18:55
margins. 1/3 culture kid is someone who spends a significant
18:58
part of their developmental years outside their parents
19:01
culture. They do not fully belong to
19:02
their host nation. They will always be foreigners
19:04
there, but they also do not fully belong to their passport
19:07
nation. When they go back to America or
19:09
Britain or Korea. They don't understand the pop
19:12
culture, the slang or the social norms.
19:15
They developed this highly complex third culture that only
19:18
other TC KS really understand. It leads to a lifelong identity
19:22
crisis. I was reading in the sources
19:24
about the concept of furlough when the missionary family comes
19:27
back to their home country for a year to rest and raise more
19:30
money. The sources point out that going
19:32
home is often highly traumatic for the kids.
19:35
It is traumatic because the expectations are completely
19:37
misaligned. The sending church expects this
19:39
all American kid to step off the plane, but the kid feels utterly
19:43
detached. They're grieving the loss of
19:45
their friends overseas, they're overwhelmed by giant
19:48
supermarkets with fifty types of cereal, and they feel like
19:51
aliens in their own supposed homeland.
19:54
And the sociological assessments back up how damaging this
19:57
lifestyle can be if it isn't handled with massive
20:00
intentionality by the parents. An organization called TCK
20:03
Training released specific alarming statistics regarding
20:07
missionary kids. I have those numbers right here
20:10
and I want to read them slowly because they are heavy.
20:12
Yeah, go ahead. According to the data, 17% of
20:15
missionary kids score at high risk for adverse childhood
20:18
experiences, or AC ES. 40% report experiencing emotional
20:23
abuse in their environments. That is four times the rate of
20:26
the general public. 37% report croning emotional neglect and
20:31
14% live with continuous anxiety regarding physical and financial
20:35
neglect. Think about the sheer volume of
20:38
pain, representative those percentages.
20:40
You're not talking about kids who are just a little homesick.
20:42
We are talking about chronic emotional neglect.
20:45
We are talking about 40% experiencing emotional abuse.
20:48
But how does that happen? These are missionaries.
20:50
These are people who have dedicated their lives to
20:52
spreading a gospel of love. How do 37% of their kids end up
20:56
chronically emotionally neglected?
20:58
It happens because of spiritual triage.
21:00
Explain that. Triage is what happens in an
21:02
emergency room. You treat the gunshot wound
21:05
before you treat the sprained ankle.
21:07
In a missionary's mind, the unreached people group is the
21:10
gunshot wound. They are dying and going to hell
21:12
without the gospel. The missionary's child, on the
21:15
other hand, is the sprained ankle.
21:16
Because they already know the gospel.
21:18
Right child has a Bible. They know who Jesus is.
21:20
Their soul is theoretically safe.
21:22
So the parent constantly, day after day, week after week,
21:25
prioritizes the lost over their own child.
21:28
They miss bedtime stories to do more St. evangelism.
21:32
They ignore the child's emotional withdrawal because
21:35
they're too busy translating a chapter of Romans over a decade.
21:39
That triage creates a massive chasm of emotional neglect.
21:43
The child realizes. My parents love God, they love
21:46
the unreached, but they do not have time for me.
21:48
Wow, that puts the parents choices in such a stark, brutal
21:52
light. Think about what this data means
21:54
for sending churches. A missionary might go overseas
21:57
and plant 100 churches. He might translate the
21:59
Scriptures into a brand new dialect.
22:01
He might be hailed as a hero at mission conferences.
22:04
But if his own children fall into that 37% experiencing
22:07
chronic emotional neglect, his life's work is a catastrophic
22:10
failure of biblical stewardship. That's a heavy statement, but it
22:13
is the reality of the biblical standard.
22:16
This is why sending agencies and local elder boards must
22:19
fundamentally change how they operate.
22:21
They have to stop evaluating missionary candidates based
22:24
solely on their theological degrees, their public charisma,
22:27
or their ability to preach a rousing sermon.
22:31
They must start thoroughly inspecting the domestic health
22:33
of the family before they ever buy a plane ticket.
22:36
So having established the massive dangers of neglecting
22:39
the family and looking at the wreckage in the modern data, we
22:42
have to ask, did the early church receive this?
22:45
Did the apostles know this was a risk?
22:47
And the answer is yes. We turn to the New Testament to
22:49
see how the early church structurally prevented this
22:52
exact crisis. This brings us to First Timothy
22:54
chapter 3. The Apostle Paul is writing to
22:57
Timothy, who is pastoring in Ephesus, and Paul lays down a
23:00
strict, non negotiable qualification for elders,
23:03
overseers and church planters. He writes that a man must manage
23:06
his own household well, keeping his children submissive with all
23:10
dignity. I feel like we read that verse
23:12
so fast we missed the weight of it.
23:14
To really understand what Paul is demanding, we need the
23:17
historical context of Ephesus. What kind of city was Timothy
23:20
dealing with? Ephesus was a massive,
23:23
intimidating Greco Roman metropolis.
23:26
It was dominated by the cult of Artemis, A cult worship and
23:29
severe moral decay. But the key to understanding
23:32
Paul's instruction is understanding the architecture
23:35
of the early church. The local Christian Church in
23:38
Ephesus did not meet in large, dedicated ecclesiastical
23:41
buildings with a steeple in a parking lot.
23:44
They met in private homes. Which means the boundary between
23:46
the family and the church was basically non existent.
23:49
Yes, the boundary between the household, which in Greek is the
23:53
oikos, and the Church. The ecclesia was highly fluid.
23:57
The church was essentially a household of households.
23:59
The living room was the sanctuary.
24:00
That changes the dynamic completely.
24:02
It does, but false teachers were infiltrating the city, and they
24:06
were specifically targeting these house churches.
24:09
They were systematically destroying households, turning
24:11
family members against each other for financial gain.
24:14
Paul had to draw a strict line. A Christian leader, an elder or
24:19
a missionary must stand in stark contrast to those heretics.
24:23
His own home had be a fortress of order and grace.
24:26
The essays we read breakdown the Greek terminology Paul uses
24:29
here, and it is honestly fascinating how precise the
24:31
language is. Paul uses the word manage or
24:34
rule. The Greek word is prostomi.
24:37
Prostomi is a brilliant word choice by Paul.
24:40
Grammatically, it is a present middle participle.
24:42
OK, seminary flashback. What does a present middle
24:44
participle mean for a guy waking up on a Tuesday?
24:47
It signifies active, continuous daily governance and protective
24:51
oversight. It is not passive existence.
24:53
It's not a dad who just sits in a recliner and hopes his kids
24:56
figure it out. It is relentless daily
24:58
stewardship. It is anticipating threats,
25:00
providing for needs and leading from the front.
25:02
And the manner of this leadership is crucial.
25:05
It isn't just about getting results, it is about how you get
25:08
those results. The text says the father must
25:11
keep his children submissive with all dignity.
25:14
The Greek word there is seminotos.
25:16
Seminotos is the countercultural word in the 1st century Roman
25:20
world. The father had absolute legal
25:22
power over his household, a concept called patria potestas.
25:26
A Roman father could legally expose an infant to the elements
25:29
to die or physically beat a child into submission, and the
25:32
state would applaud him for maintaining order.
25:35
So Paul's pushing back against that.
25:37
Completely. Paul forbids tyrannical fear or
25:39
physical cruelty. Semotos demands a Christ like
25:42
honor, a gravity, a respectability that actually
25:45
wins the voluntary submission of the child's heart rather than
25:49
just demanding outward compliance through force.
25:51
It is the difference between a child obeying because they are
25:54
terrified of getting hit and a child obeying because they
25:56
deeply respect their father's character.
25:58
A father who uses worldly, manipulative methods to secure
26:02
outward compliance might look good to the church elders, but
26:04
he is destroying the child's soul in the process.
26:07
Yes, and then Paul drops this devastating rhetorical question,
26:11
which forms the core of our entire deep dive today.
26:14
Paul writes. If someone does not know how to
26:17
manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
26:21
The logic there is inescapable. It is, and the verb Paul uses
26:24
for care for is incredible. The word is epimelium I.
26:28
That is not a word you hear everyday.
26:30
It was rare notice that Paul does not use a word that means
26:33
to dominate, to rule, or to bureaucratically administer a
26:37
nonprofit organization. Epimelium I means tender,
26:41
medical, exhaustive care. It implies paying close
26:44
attention to the fragile details of someone's well-being.
26:47
Is it used anywhere else? It is the very same word used in
26:50
the Gospel of Luke to describe the Good Samaritan's gentle,
26:53
costly hands on care for the beaten traveler on the side of
26:56
the road. Oh wow, so Paul is licking the
26:58
care of an elder for the church to the care of the Good
27:00
Samaritan. He's saying if you cannot be the
27:03
Good Samaritan to your own children, you cannot be an
27:05
elder. This is an unyielding diagnostic
27:08
mirror. The home is the exact laboratory
27:11
for the church. The exact laboratory.
27:12
If a man lacks the proven skill, the patience, the emotional
27:16
intelligence to provide Epileomi that tender medical care to the
27:20
five people living under his own roof, it is logically impossible
27:24
for him to provide it to 50 people in a congregation.
27:28
The skills required to pasture the small flock at home are the
27:31
identical skills required to pasture the larger household of
27:34
God. Theologians refer to this as the
27:36
indivisible analogy of care. You cannot divide the two
27:40
realms. Domestic failure is a structural
27:42
disqualification for public ministry.
27:45
If your house is burning down, God does not want you running
27:47
down the street trying to put out fires in other people's
27:50
homes. You must tend to your own flock
27:52
first. So we need to take a breath here
27:54
because looking at the strict requirements of Genesis 18,
27:56
commanding the household and righteousness and justice, and
27:59
then looking at First Timothy 3, demanding flawless management
28:02
and tender Good Samaritan care, this is a crushing standard.
28:05
It could crush any parent under immense guilt.
28:08
If I am a dad listening to this, I'm thinking, I lost my temper
28:11
at breakfast today. I am disqualified.
28:14
We are all flawed. None of us manage our households
28:16
perfectly. That is a very real, very heavy
28:19
pastoral concern. If we stop the discussion at
28:23
First Timothy 3, we're just left with moralism and despair.
28:27
That requires looking at who actually fulfills these demands.
28:30
This is where Reformed theology shines, because it points us
28:33
away from our own performance and toward the federal headship
28:35
of Christ. Every moral qualification in
28:38
Scripture finds its flawless fulfillment in Jesus Christ.
28:42
He is the ultimate fulfillment of the Genesis 18 promise.
28:45
Yes, He is the promised seed of Abraham, where Abraham's
28:49
obedience was real but flawed. Remember, Abraham lied about his
28:53
wife. He had a child with Hagar.
28:55
Christ's obedience is spotless. Jesus perfectly keeps the way of
28:59
the Lord by doing righteousness and justice.
29:01
In Christ bears the judgment that Sodom warns about.
29:03
He takes the fiery wrath of God, not because he deserved it, but
29:06
as a substitute for his people. He is the perfect prophet,
29:09
priest and king for the missionary family.
29:12
When parents fail, and they will fail, they look to Christ.
29:16
As prophet, he gives the word that guides the home.
29:18
As priest, he constantly intercedes for weak, exhausted
29:21
parents and wandering, confused children.
29:24
As King, he rules over the Providence of the mission field,
29:27
opening and closing borders and orchestrating events for the
29:30
good of his people. Jesus is the ultimate elder and
29:34
the true householder. He runs his house with perfect
29:36
justice and infinite mercy. He acts as the true Good
29:40
Samaritan who provides epimeliomae to our sin, ruined
29:44
souls, binding up our wounds and pain the cost for a recovery.
29:48
Understanding that justification is by faith alone in Christ's
29:51
perfect record frees the parent from the paralyzing fear of
29:55
failure. You do not have to be a perfect
29:57
parent to be a faithful 1. You just have to be a repentant
30:00
1. Which brings us to the practical
30:02
realities of how we walk this out.
30:04
If you are listening to this and you are considering cross
30:06
cultural missions, how do you apply this data and this
30:09
theology? First, you must test the call
30:11
biblically, not mystically. A cold marriage or neglected
30:14
rebellious children are a clear sign from God's Providence to
30:18
stay home. The call to missions is not
30:20
authenticated by the intensity of your emotional feelings.
30:23
It is authenticated by your conformity to First Timothy 3.
30:26
And for the parents who are already on the field, the
30:29
application is clear. You must prioritize domestic
30:33
discipleship over public ministry metrics.
30:36
Family worship, teaching the catechism, practicing daily
30:39
repentance, and holding forth the grace of the Gospel at the
30:42
dinner table are non negotiable. Even if it means your monthly
30:46
newsletter to donors looks a little less impressive.
30:48
Especially then, the Great Commission in Matthew 28 never
30:52
under any circumstances overrides the command of
30:55
Ephesians 6.4 to bring up your children in the discipline and
30:58
instruction of the Lord. If the pressure of the field is
31:01
destroying the psychological and spiritual health of the
31:04
children, stepping back, taking a furlough, or even resigning
31:08
from the agency is an act of obedience to God, not a failure.
31:11
I love that framing. Taking care of your kids is not
31:14
quitting on God. It is obeying God's primary
31:17
assignment for you. And here is the beautiful irony
31:20
of all this. An obedient, peaceful, grace
31:22
filled home on the mission field is actually the most compelling
31:26
apologetic a missionary can offer to a dying world.
31:29
It proves that the theology they preach from a pulpit actually
31:32
works in the privacy of their own living room.
31:35
When the local people see a father asking his son for
31:37
forgiveness after losing his temper, they see the gospel in
31:40
action. The cross cultural call and the
31:43
call to covenantal parenting are not competing rivals fighting
31:47
for a missionary's time. They are integrated aspects of a
31:50
single obedience to the Lordship of Christ.
31:53
We have covered a massive amount of ground today.
31:56
We started with God's divine initiative in Genesis,
31:58
recognizing that reaching the nation's never overrides His
32:02
command to shepherd the home. We looked at the terrifying
32:05
statistical reality of preventable attrition, the
32:07
immense psychological weight placed on 3rd culture kids, and
32:11
the subtle, dangerous trap of sovereign presumption.
32:14
We analyzed the unyielding standard of First Timothy 3,
32:17
proving that the household is the first parish.
32:20
The skills needed to plant a church must first be proven by
32:22
tending to the souls under your own roof.
32:24
The home is the laboratory. The children are the first
32:27
flock. If we get that wrong, nothing
32:29
else we build will stand. I want to leave you with a final
32:31
thought to Mull over as you go about your week.
32:34
We spend so much time in the church analyzing sermon
32:36
preparation, funding language acquisition, and debating
32:40
strategic evangelism methods. But what if the unreached
32:43
nations are watching the missionaries dinner table just
32:46
as closely as they listen to the pulpit?
32:48
Does The way a family hand is conflict, extends forgiveness,
32:52
and shows grace in the privacy of their own home preach a
32:54
louder, clearer gospel than any translated sermon ever could.
32:58
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive.
32:59
We will catch you next time.