Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3423 BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Is About To Be INDICTED!!!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_01]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_01]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_01]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:20[SPEAKER_02]: So you know, we had Hillary Clinton down to whatever we wanted to do with it.
- 0:24[SPEAKER_02]: And I felt it was inappropriate.
- 0:25[SPEAKER_02]: She's the wife of a president who was a secretary of state.
- 0:29[SPEAKER_02]: And we could have done a very big number.
- 0:31[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
- 0:31[SPEAKER_02]: And I said, yeah.
- 0:33[SPEAKER_02]: We don't want to be doing that.
- 0:34[SPEAKER_02]: Let's, you know, put it into the country and not the concept of putting her in jail, in dating her, all the things that you have to do.
- 0:44[SPEAKER_02]: You know, it's tough stuff.
- 0:45[SPEAKER_02]: And I said, we don't want to do that.
- 0:47[SPEAKER_02]: In fact, you remember I made speeches when I mentioned a name they started.
- 0:51[SPEAKER_02]: Locklocker.
- 0:51[SPEAKER_02]: Locklocker.
- 0:52[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah.
- 0:52[SPEAKER_02]: And I said, no, no, this is after we won, this is one.
- 0:55[SPEAKER_00]: And I said, you want to become, we have to get it back.
- 0:57[SPEAKER_02]: We want to heal.
- 0:59[SPEAKER_02]: And yet they did it to me.
- 1:01[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
- 1:02[SPEAKER_02]: So I feel differently.
- 1:03[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, I'm a human being.
- 1:05[SPEAKER_02]: I have my feelings too.
- 1:07[SPEAKER_02]: And so I feel differently about it.
- 1:10[SPEAKER_02]: Obama, what he did was terrible.
- 1:12[SPEAKER_02]: What Brennan did and Klapper and Komi and all these light weights.
- 1:17[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, the stupid people actually.
- 1:19[SPEAKER_02]: But what they did.
- 1:20[SPEAKER_02]: And so unnecessary.
- 1:22[SPEAKER_02]: And they made it really hard.
- 1:25[SPEAKER_02]: But ultimately, I don't know, they toughen you up either learn that you can do that.
- 1:30[SPEAKER_02]: How many people can handle that?
- 1:31[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
- 1:32[SPEAKER_02]: I've had so many people say, how do you handle that every day and they come up with these different, different scams who are all scams and they're still doing it.
- 1:40[SPEAKER_02]: You know, they're doing it now.
- 1:42[SPEAKER_03]: So what I think I hear you saying is there is still an opportunity for indictments, potential prosecutions, accountability from those people who may have lied under oath, like John Brennan, James Komi, and perhaps Hillary Clinton.
- 1:58[SPEAKER_00]: Well, that's why I've made the referrals that I have, DNI Gabbard has made referrals.
- 2:02[SPEAKER_00]: And why we're going to continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair and just bring fair and just claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this staying on our country.
- 2:17[SPEAKER_03]: Director, one other question on this, Tulsi, as well as President Trump, use the word
- 2:23[SPEAKER_01]: If you were among these, she was about to say trees and you know exactly what she was about to say.
- 2:29[SPEAKER_01]: If you're among the tens of millions of Americans for years, I've been wondering if we would ever see Hillary Clinton handcuffs
- 2:38[SPEAKER_01]: The moment you've all been waiting for appears to have arrived.
- 2:43[SPEAKER_01]: What you just heard President Trump say there is being echoed by more and more federal officials and its sending shock waves throughout the DC swamp.
- 2:53[SPEAKER_01]: We're going to find out precisely what the Justice Department FBI are doing as we speak.
- 2:58[SPEAKER_01]: We're going to find out what it means for criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.
- 3:03[SPEAKER_01]: and the rest of her corrupt ilk and why the justice and accountability that we all voted for in November has finally and decisively arrived.
- 3:15[SPEAKER_01]: You're not going to want to miss this greetings everyone.
- 3:18[SPEAKER_01]: And it is I, Dr. Steve Livestream Friday, your patriot professor here to help you make sense of the madness is the radical left desperately tries to stop the unstoppable, the inevitable rise of a new conservative age all over the world.
- 3:34[SPEAKER_01]: So if you want to front row seat on how you are changing the world in ways you never even imagine.
- 3:39[SPEAKER_01]: Make sure to smack that bell and subscribe, but you're not going to want to miss a single episode here.
- 3:45[SPEAKER_01]: As always, we got a jam packed show for you today, our super chats are up.
- 3:48[SPEAKER_01]: So feel free to send in your comments or questions.
- 3:50[SPEAKER_01]: It will be my privilege to read them and answer them for everyone here on this live broadcast.
- 3:56[SPEAKER_01]: Also, we've got an event coming up.
- 3:58[SPEAKER_01]: Here on this channel, I think you're going to love.
- 4:01[SPEAKER_01]: You all know I just published my brand new book, America Awakened.
- 4:04[SPEAKER_01]: Where are you?
- 4:05[SPEAKER_01]: Where are you?
- 4:05[SPEAKER_01]: I got one right here.
- 4:06[SPEAKER_01]: America Awakened the collapse of globalism and the return to faith, family and freedom.
- 4:12[SPEAKER_01]: Thanks to you, it's number one on Amazon and a number of different categories.
- 4:17[SPEAKER_01]: We're doing a live America awake in masterclass and it's now open for registrations.
- 4:24[SPEAKER_01]: It's normally three hundred dollars to register, but you can as of today get an early bird discount of just seventy five dollars to register.
- 4:32[SPEAKER_01]: So if you're part of the courageous Patriot Club, you get even sweeter deal.
- 4:36[SPEAKER_01]: So just click on that link below to take advantage of this early bird discount.
- 4:40[SPEAKER_01]: today and lastly, I do want to give a huge shout out to one of the sponsors of today's line stream and that's our good friends over at black trust IRA at curly talks crypto dot com now if you've been wanting to get into crypto investing right bitcoin ethereum salon on the like
- 4:58[SPEAKER_01]: But you've always been turned off or intimidated by the volatility, meet your night in shining armor.
- 5:05[SPEAKER_01]: Block Trust IRA has a super AI system that Bitcoin magazine is named the number one crypto technology platform in the world among fifteen hundred global competitors.
- 5:19[SPEAKER_01]: And what that super AI does
- 5:21[SPEAKER_01]: is it works twenty four seven and analyze global market data and predicts with uncanny accuracy the highs and the lows of crypto volatility.
- 5:31[SPEAKER_01]: So block trust IRA will then sell at the highs and then buy again at the lows, which mitigates the volatility all the while you stand and making credible gains.
- 5:42[SPEAKER_01]: That's why I'm a proud client.
- 5:44[SPEAKER_01]: a block trust IRA.
- 5:45[SPEAKER_01]: I've got my own account with them.
- 5:46[SPEAKER_01]: And I absolutely love them.
- 5:49[SPEAKER_01]: They're mission perfectly aligned with President Trump's make America great again agenda smashing down the barriers between local page, a loyal Patriots in the financial freedom that we all deserve helping true Americans build impressive wealth in Trump's historic economic boom.
- 6:05[SPEAKER_01]: So whether you're
- 6:06[SPEAKER_01]: teacher, a truck driver, small business owner, or a retiree.
- 6:11[SPEAKER_01]: This is your chance to get into the crypto market with AI mitigating your volatility risk.
- 6:18[SPEAKER_01]: So what are you waiting for?
- 6:19[SPEAKER_01]: Click on that link below.
- 6:20[SPEAKER_01]: Visit TurleyTalkScriptor.com.
- 6:23[SPEAKER_01]: and find out how they can help you join the Trump financial revolution that's finally given forgotten Americans access to the greatest crypto wealth opportunity in history.
- 6:33[SPEAKER_01]: In the best part for a limited time, they're offering my viewers up to twenty five hundred dollars in bonus crypto when you open up an account with them.
- 6:40[SPEAKER_01]: This is amazing.
- 6:41[SPEAKER_01]: I do not wait on this.
- 6:42[SPEAKER_01]: Crypto created eighty thousand new millionaires last year.
- 6:47[SPEAKER_01]: Why not you next?
- 6:48[SPEAKER_01]: Visit turletoxcrypto.com.
- 6:50[SPEAKER_01]: That is turletoxcrypto.com.
- 6:53[SPEAKER_01]: dot com.
- 6:56[SPEAKER_01]: Three days ago, something absolutely unprecedented happened.
- 7:02[SPEAKER_01]: Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley released what's being called the Durham annex.
- 7:08[SPEAKER_01]: It's the classified appendix to John Durham's twenty twenty three special council report.
- 7:14[SPEAKER_01]: But here's what makes this so absolutely explosive.
- 7:18[SPEAKER_01]: FBI Director Cash Patel found these documents that have just been declassified.
- 7:24[SPEAKER_01]: He found these documents in what's called a burn bag in a secret room at the FBI headquarters.
- 7:30[SPEAKER_01]: Now, if you don't know, a burn bag is exactly what it sounds like.
- 7:34[SPEAKER_01]: It's a specialized bag used by the FBI for the secure disposal of classified documents designed to be incinerated.
- 7:43[SPEAKER_01]: So destroying the contents and preventing unauthorized access to sensitive information.
- 7:49[SPEAKER_01]: What we're about to see here is something that FBI officials did not want any human eye to see.
- 7:57[SPEAKER_01]: And as it turns out, for darn good reason.
- 8:02[SPEAKER_01]: What they revealed is stunning.
- 8:06[SPEAKER_01]: These documents contain previously classified intelligence from January and March of twenty sixteen.
- 8:17[SPEAKER_01]: that the Obama administration had obtained, which conclusively showed that Hillary Clinton's campaign
- 8:27[SPEAKER_01]: plan to falsely tie President Trump to Russia.
- 8:30[SPEAKER_01]: So this is absolutely key to get in putting all of this together.
- 8:34[SPEAKER_01]: And that's what we're going to do in this livestream.
- 8:36[SPEAKER_01]: Make sure you have all the information you need to be able to share it with others who may still be on the fence of this stuff.
- 8:43[SPEAKER_01]: This is absolutely key to get because it all starts with this, the beginning point in all of this.
- 8:51[SPEAKER_01]: is exactly what these classifying documents show is that the Obama White House knew this is key.
- 9:00[SPEAKER_01]: They knew in twenty sixteen they were informed by their own intelligence agencies that the Hillary Clinton campaign was going all out in fabricating a fraud against then Republican presidential candidate Donald J. Trump.
- 9:17[SPEAKER_01]: The Obama White House knew that now.
- 9:22[SPEAKER_01]: Why you may ask?
- 9:24[SPEAKER_01]: Why was Clinton so intent on fabricating this fraud?
- 9:29[SPEAKER_01]: And again, the answer here is rather simple.
- 9:33[SPEAKER_01]: And it just so happened that that answer was provided by one of the newly declassified documents.
- 9:40[SPEAKER_01]: In an email between a fellow by the name of Leonard Bernardo,
- 9:44[SPEAKER_01]: who we did a video on this yesterday.
- 9:46[SPEAKER_01]: He's the head of Soros' Open Society's Foundations.
- 9:50[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, you can't make this up.
- 9:51[SPEAKER_01]: George Soros is at the center of this.
- 9:54[SPEAKER_01]: So this guy Leonard Bernardo, sent an email to Dan C. Chair at the time, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
- 10:02[SPEAKER_01]: They openly discuss their plan to tie President Trump to Russia.
- 10:08[SPEAKER_01]: as a way to distract voters from Hillary Clinton's email server scandal.
- 10:16[SPEAKER_01]: The email, as you see it right there, you can read it yourself.
- 10:19[SPEAKER_01]: The email explicitly states that the hoax quote should distract people from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level.
- 10:32[SPEAKER_01]: And so this is the email that the Obama White House knew about.
- 10:39[SPEAKER_01]: They knew that the Clinton campaign had bought and paid for fraudulent, it's supposed intelligence dossier that was put together by the former British spy and rabid Trump hater, Christopher Steele.
- 10:53[SPEAKER_01]: Notice all the foreigners involved in this, whether it's Soros or Christopher Steele.
- 10:58[SPEAKER_01]: He's a British agent.
- 11:01[SPEAKER_01]: And the dossier that he put together this fake dossier details supposedly salacious and lurid behavior engaged and by then presidential candidate Trump in Russia, which supposedly Putin was using to blackmail him.
- 11:16[SPEAKER_01]: Obama knew this is key.
- 11:18[SPEAKER_01]: You've gone to get this.
- 11:20[SPEAKER_01]: You've got to burn it into your brain.
- 11:21[SPEAKER_01]: Obama knew that Hillary had greenlit that fraud in order to distract from her own scandal of using her own private emails server to house classified national security emails and documents.
- 11:35[SPEAKER_01]: And then immediately, immediately, you'll notice something that Obama did not do.
- 11:45[SPEAKER_01]: Not only did he pressure, uh, Komi and the FBI investigation led by that radical anti-Trump stroke agent stroke, not only did he pressure them to bury all this with Hillary Clinton with her email scandal.
- 12:06[SPEAKER_01]: Not only did he pressure to say, don't do not indict or don't don't go any further.
- 12:10[SPEAKER_01]: Not only did he do that.
- 12:12[SPEAKER_01]: But you'll also notice upon hearing this fraud involving a major nuclear power Russia.
- 12:20[SPEAKER_01]: Obama and the FBI knew about this intelligence showing Hillary's plan and they did absolutely nothing about it.
- 12:28[SPEAKER_01]: So this is at that this is in twenty-sixteen during the campaign.
- 12:32[SPEAKER_01]: They did nothing about.
- 12:35[SPEAKER_01]: They didn't shut it down.
- 12:37[SPEAKER_01]: They didn't investigate it.
- 12:39[SPEAKER_01]: They didn't alert the press to it.
- 12:41[SPEAKER_01]: They let it happen.
- 12:43[SPEAKER_01]: They let it play out.
- 12:45[SPEAKER_01]: That in and of itself is criminally.
- 12:47[SPEAKER_01]: Again, you've got to start there.
- 12:49[SPEAKER_01]: That's your starting point.
- 12:51[SPEAKER_01]: It's not just a matter of Obama telling Komi
- 12:56[SPEAKER_01]: don't indict Hillary, don't take this anywhere, exonerator, I don't care what you got to do.
- 13:01[SPEAKER_01]: It's not just that, that's bad enough in of itself.
- 13:05[SPEAKER_01]: It's that then they turned around and said, and let's just butter the popcorn and watch this fraud play itself out.
- 13:14[SPEAKER_01]: National security be damned since it has to do with the biggest nuclear power on the planet, vilifying them.
- 13:25[SPEAKER_01]: That in and of itself is a blatant abdication of Obama's law enforcement responsibilities.
- 13:34[SPEAKER_01]: According to the Durham annex, when the Obama administration received this intelligence back in March of twenty sixteen, FBI personnel, including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, shared it with high ranking DOJ officials.
- 13:51[SPEAKER_01]: The significance was so great that CIA director John Brennan, personally briefed President Obama, Vice President Biden, who's probably sleeping FBI director Komi and other senior officials about it on August third, twenty-sixteen.
- 14:07[SPEAKER_01]: So there's this whole temporal trail where they repeatedly knew this was happening.
- 14:14[SPEAKER_01]: But here's the kicker.
- 14:15[SPEAKER_01]: This literally says it all.
- 14:19[SPEAKER_01]: while the FBI opened a full investigation into Trump based on uncoroperated intelligence.
- 14:27[SPEAKER_01]: They of course never opened up any type of inquiry in the Hillary's plan to thwart his campaign despite having verified intelligence about it.
- 14:39[SPEAKER_01]: So you're already seeing sort of this three-fold web happening here.
- 14:45[SPEAKER_01]: As a result of these intelligence briefings, and Obama and his team learning about what Hillary had concocted with the Christopher steel dossier.
- 14:55[SPEAKER_01]: Three things all of a sudden began to merge.
- 14:57[SPEAKER_01]: Number one, leave her alone.
- 14:59[SPEAKER_01]: He tells Komi, don't prosecute her, don't do not pursue charges against her with this email scandal.
- 15:08[SPEAKER_01]: Just drop it, bury it.
- 15:09[SPEAKER_01]: Number one.
- 15:11[SPEAKER_01]: Number two, they're sitting back eating popcorn going, huh?
- 15:15[SPEAKER_01]: I wonder how this is gonna play out.
- 15:17[SPEAKER_01]: But then as time went on, number three, the FBI got actively involved.
- 15:24[SPEAKER_01]: not investigating Hillary for deliberately trying to thwart the democratic integrity of a presidential election with this fraud and a possible national security risk given that it's implicating Russia.
- 15:39[SPEAKER_01]: They didn't go after her for this intelligence of her actually doing something dubious and illegal.
- 15:45[SPEAKER_01]: No, instead they use that dubious illegality to try to further the fraud against Trump and investigate him.
- 15:57[SPEAKER_01]: This goes way beyond double standards here.
- 16:01[SPEAKER_01]: And that's of course because it was absolutely intentional.
- 16:04[SPEAKER_01]: Now, let's connect all the dots on how this fabricated intelligence operation actually ended.
- 16:13[SPEAKER_01]: how it actually ended up working, because understanding this process shows you, just how sophisticated this conspiracy really was, how intentional it was, and all the various actors involved, including the complicity of the legacy media.
- 16:27[SPEAKER_01]: That's gigantic.
- 16:29[SPEAKER_01]: That's huge.
- 16:30[SPEAKER_01]: By the way, this is why you shouldn't be holding your breath waiting for the legacy media to admit how wrong they've been over the years, these last eight years.
- 16:40[SPEAKER_01]: Because it wasn't a fact, it wasn't, how do I put this?
- 16:48[SPEAKER_01]: Their flaw was not factual.
- 16:51[SPEAKER_01]: Their flaw was moral.
- 16:55[SPEAKER_01]: They were wrong because they were intentionally wrong.
- 17:01[SPEAKER_01]: They were wrong because they were complicit in all of this, as we'll see.
- 17:05[SPEAKER_01]: So they're not going to correct themselves.
- 17:08[SPEAKER_01]: There's nothing to correct when you are morally flawed as it were.
- 17:14[SPEAKER_01]: So let's connect the dots.
- 17:16[SPEAKER_01]: It's forefold.
- 17:17[SPEAKER_01]: So if you're taking notes here, if you just want to make sure you're getting the complexity of this together, it's forefold structure to this whole thing.
- 17:26[SPEAKER_01]: First and foremost, Hillary's campaign
- 17:29[SPEAKER_01]: And the DNC funded this steel dossier, the fake dossier created by Christopher Steele through the law firm Perkins Koey with the opposition research firm Fusion GPS.
- 17:41[SPEAKER_01]: The law firm was very important because that provided the veneer of attorney client, client privilege.
- 17:48[SPEAKER_01]: So whatever they spent money on or whatever they could hide behind attorney client privilege.
- 17:54[SPEAKER_01]: So that's how Perkins Koey basically became up.
- 17:58[SPEAKER_01]: it became a front for this laundering operation.
- 18:03[SPEAKER_01]: So the dossier, the fake dossier contained completely fraudulent unverified allegations about Trump and Russia.
- 18:11[SPEAKER_01]: So that's where it starts.
- 18:13[SPEAKER_01]: Then secondly, as we now know from these declassified documents, Hillary's team coordinated
- 18:21[SPEAKER_01]: with George Soros' organization, open society foundations, to push the Trump Russia narrative through FBI-affiliated companies like CrowdStrike and Major Media Outlet.
- 18:35[SPEAKER_01]: So that's what you saw communicated in that Soros linked email that we just I read to you earlier from the very beginning of this.
- 18:44[SPEAKER_01]: They planned on using an FBI-filiated cyber security company called CrowdStrike to add credibility to their claims about Russian collusion.
- 18:54[SPEAKER_01]: CrowdStrike would provide sort of the cyber security bonafines to these claims to this fraud.
- 19:00[SPEAKER_01]: And then all of their allies in the legacy media who hated Trump and wanted to do everything they possibly could as advocacy journalists
- 19:09[SPEAKER_01]: to stop him, they fully cooperated with the Clinton campaign to publish all these salacious lies.
- 19:17[SPEAKER_01]: But then, all of this turned radically sinister.
- 19:23[SPEAKER_01]: Remember, in the original email, it was just be classified from the Soros operative.
- 19:28[SPEAKER_01]: He said that this fabrication was going to go through the FBI itself.
- 19:33[SPEAKER_01]: The FBI would be weaponized deliberately against the Trump campaign in the deliberate attempt to thwart it to interfere in the Democratic integrity of a presidential election.
- 19:43[SPEAKER_01]: And so that is when the FBI
- 19:46[SPEAKER_01]: use this Clinton-funded steel dossier to obtain FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign and particularly his the Trump campaign associate Carter Page.
- 19:58[SPEAKER_01]: They did this despite knowing that Hillary's campaign had created a plan to tie Trump to Russia.
- 20:06[SPEAKER_01]: They knowingly used
- 20:08[SPEAKER_01]: this fraudulent dossier as their basis to obtain a Pfizer warrant to surveil the Trump campaign.
- 20:16[SPEAKER_01]: The Pfizer judges to, you know, in fairness, who the ones who signed off on the warrants, they had no idea to my knowledge.
- 20:24[SPEAKER_01]: They had no idea that the dossier was a fraud, but the officials that signed the warrant, Colmy Rosenstein, McCabe, they all signed it and knowingly committed a fraud on a court.
- 20:36[SPEAKER_01]: And then the CIA director John Brennan and James Baker and James Clapper, and they intentionally leaked the lines of the dossier to the legacy media to discredit and disgrace Trump before the election.
- 20:50[SPEAKER_01]: And then the big one, the fourth step in all this are, so we got the fake steel dossier created, right?
- 20:56[SPEAKER_01]: Number one.
- 20:57[SPEAKER_01]: We got the email that detailed how they were going to feed that dossier to the FBI and the sympathetic legacy media.
- 21:03[SPEAKER_01]: Number two, we've got the FBI using that fake dossier to obtain Pfizer warns spy on Trump all the while leaking this fraud to the press.
- 21:13[SPEAKER_01]: Number three, so they're all working together.
- 21:16[SPEAKER_01]: And now fourth, and this is absolutely crucial when Trump won the election.
- 21:24[SPEAKER_01]: President Obama personally ordered a new intelligence assessment that would support the Russia collusion narrative contradicting months of intelligence reports, and said Russia was not trying to influence the elections.
- 21:40[SPEAKER_01]: So this is on December ninth, a month after Trump won the election.
- 21:47[SPEAKER_01]: just days after receiving an intelligence report that exonerated Russia from election interference.
- 21:53[SPEAKER_01]: And this intelligence report was corroborated by all intelligence agencies.
- 21:58[SPEAKER_01]: So we're talking about national security.
- 22:01[SPEAKER_01]: We're talking about the CIA.
- 22:03[SPEAKER_01]: We're talking FBI.
- 22:04[SPEAKER_01]: We're talking Homeland Security.
- 22:08[SPEAKER_01]: Regardless, Barack Obama the very next day after receiving that corroborated intelligence report that Russia had no effect on the election whatsoever.
- 22:18[SPEAKER_01]: Obama held a meeting in the situation room in the White House with FBI director James Komey and Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director CIA director John Brennan.
- 22:30[SPEAKER_01]: James Clapper was then the Director of National Intelligence.
- 22:33[SPEAKER_01]: John Kerry, Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Susan Rice.
- 22:38[SPEAKER_01]: And in that room, they together, along with Obama, made a decision that would poison American politics for years.
- 22:48[SPEAKER_01]: They decided to go with this.
- 22:51[SPEAKER_01]: They decided to put this on steroids.
- 22:53[SPEAKER_01]: They decided to manufacture fake intelligence.
- 22:57[SPEAKER_01]: that directly contradicted their own intelligence experts.
- 23:03[SPEAKER_01]: This wasn't political spin on how Trump won the election.
- 23:07[SPEAKER_01]: This was the systematic creation of false intelligence designed to delegitimize a duly elected president.
- 23:16[SPEAKER_01]: So what's so key here is that this obviously goes way beyond partisan politics.
- 23:22[SPEAKER_01]: I could care less that they were Democrats or Republicans.
- 23:26[SPEAKER_01]: what Tulsi and others are exposing here represents a fundamental attack on the Democratic process itself.
- 23:38[SPEAKER_01]: When intelligence agencies manufacture evidence at the order of a president who's about to leave office in a matter of weeks in order to undermine the incoming duly elected president
- 23:52[SPEAKER_01]: We're not talking about politics as usual anymore.
- 23:54[SPEAKER_01]: We're talking about a constitutional crisis.
- 23:56[SPEAKER_01]: We're talking about in Tulsi's words, treason.
- 24:01[SPEAKER_01]: That's the word she used treasonous behavior on all on the part of all those involved.
- 24:10[SPEAKER_01]: But when all is said and done from December, twenty sixteen through January of twenty seventeen, Obama's team,
- 24:22[SPEAKER_01]: manufactured a new intelligence assessment claiming Russian interference, which became the foundation for the entire Russian collusion investigation, which our legacy media became obsessed with for the next three and a half years.
- 24:38[SPEAKER_01]: And ironically, all of this was the very definition of a conspiracy to thwart a duly elected president and hence why Tulsi called it treasonous.
- 24:49[SPEAKER_01]: So now with all of these bombshells with these declassified documents, the question is, what's about to happen next?
- 25:01[SPEAKER_01]: And this is where Trump looks like he is finally about to drop the hammer.
- 25:08[SPEAKER_01]: and it is Hillary, more than anyone else who looks to be the central target.
- 25:16[SPEAKER_01]: Wait until you see this.
- 25:19[SPEAKER_01]: But first gang, if you are just joining us, I'd love to hear your thoughts on all of this.
- 25:23[SPEAKER_01]: Let us know what you think by sending us a super chatter by clicking on that link below.
- 25:27[SPEAKER_01]: And joining our courageous patriot club here, just for just one monthly fee, I'll feature your comments.
- 25:33[SPEAKER_01]: Our broadcasts, and you can ask me as many questions as you like, I'll be happy to answer them on this list.
- 25:38[SPEAKER_01]: Remember to send us a super chat, whatever you like.
- 25:41[SPEAKER_01]: Also, do you have a wonder why your brain feels foggy, right even when you're eating clean and exercising?
- 25:48[SPEAKER_01]: Well, it might not be burnout.
- 25:50[SPEAKER_01]: It could be a kid you've not parasites.
- 25:54[SPEAKER_01]: groundbreaking research from Dr. Allen McDonnell revealed a direct link between chronic parasitic infections and neurological disease like multiple scrosis.
- 26:03[SPEAKER_01]: Parasites can cause inflammation, nerve damage, long-term cognitive decline.
- 26:09[SPEAKER_01]: More reason to do a full body cleanse at least once a year.
- 26:12[SPEAKER_01]: And the wellness company has got you covered.
- 26:15[SPEAKER_01]: They got a solution for you.
- 26:16[SPEAKER_01]: I've remacked in plus, but my bend is all.
- 26:19[SPEAKER_01]: The gold standard Parasite solution now combined
- 26:22[SPEAKER_01]: in one cleanse combo, designed to eliminate harmful invaders and support your immune system naturally.
- 26:28[SPEAKER_01]: Medical grade, not some trendy herbal gimmicks.
- 26:31[SPEAKER_01]: All you have to do is just fill out a quick intake form and get a three-month supply ship straight to your door.
- 26:37[SPEAKER_01]: Maha is officially here and the wellness company is making hard to get medications digitally accessible so you can live your best life.
- 26:45[SPEAKER_01]: head on over to wc.health slash truly and use code to early to save ninety dollars all plus free shipping click on that link below and cleanse your body today.
- 26:55[SPEAKER_01]: All right.
- 26:57[SPEAKER_01]: So, bottom line, this is no longer just a historical scandal.
- 27:01[SPEAKER_01]: There are active criminal investigations happening right now, as we speak, as you heard earlier, CIA director John Rackleiff announced that he has made criminal referrals to the Justice Department regarding Hillary Clinton, James Komi, and John Brennan.
- 27:17[SPEAKER_01]: At the exact same time, director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has also made criminal referrals to the Justice Department, releasing evidence showing that Obama administration officials intentionally manufactured intelligence to push the Trump Russian narrative in the deliberate attempt at sabotaging a duly elected president and thereby thwarting the Democratic integrity of a presidential election.
- 27:44[SPEAKER_01]: Attorney General Pam Bondi has just established what she is calling an official strike force to assess this evidence and investigate potential prosecutions.
- 27:55[SPEAKER_01]: Now, no, this is not just congressional oversight hearings.
- 27:59[SPEAKER_01]: Can't stand those anymore.
- 28:00[SPEAKER_01]: There's so worthless.
- 28:02[SPEAKER_01]: Now, this is the Justice Department actively investigating criminal conduct.
- 28:09[SPEAKER_01]: I should say, potential or alleged criminal conduct.
- 28:12[SPEAKER_01]: We've got to be
- 28:13[SPEAKER_01]: We gotta be specific here, right?
- 28:15[SPEAKER_01]: In addition, FBI Director Cash Patel has opened up official criminal investigations into both Brennan and Colby.
- 28:23[SPEAKER_01]: So things are indeed moving.
- 28:26[SPEAKER_01]: The walls are closing in on Clinton, on Brennan, on Colby, on Clapper.
- 28:30[SPEAKER_01]: This is really happening.
- 28:33[SPEAKER_01]: Now I know it's slow.
- 28:35[SPEAKER_01]: Justice does turn slowly.
- 28:38[SPEAKER_01]: I know it can get frustrating, but heck, we've been waiting eight years.
- 28:41[SPEAKER_01]: What's another couple of months here?
- 28:44[SPEAKER_01]: Now.
- 28:45[SPEAKER_01]: Let's talk about the charges that they are most likely looking at here.
- 28:49[SPEAKER_01]: We're talking obviously federal felonies of the highest order.
- 28:54[SPEAKER_01]: So one is there's the charge of the conspiracy to defraud the United States.
- 28:58[SPEAKER_01]: So this would involve the coordinated effort between Hillary and her campaign, the DNC, George Sorris' organization, the Open Society's foundations, and FBI affiliated companies to create and spread false intelligence
- 29:15[SPEAKER_01]: That, indeed, could constitute a conspiracy to defraud the United States government.
- 29:19[SPEAKER_01]: That's being talked about.
- 29:21[SPEAKER_01]: You heard earlier the allegations of false statements to federal investigators.
- 29:26[SPEAKER_01]: So this involves both Hillary Clinton and people like Jake Sullivan, who testified under oath in Durham's investigation, Clinton testified in twenty-twenty-two, Sullivan testified in earlier proceedings.
- 29:39[SPEAKER_01]: And their testimonies now directly contradicted by these declassified documents.
- 29:43[SPEAKER_01]: showing that they certainly knew about and approved the plan to tie Trump to Russia.
- 29:49[SPEAKER_01]: Third, there's a perjury before Congress.
- 29:52[SPEAKER_01]: So House Republicans have already referred Hillary Clinton for perjury charges related to her congressional testimony about her emails.
- 30:01[SPEAKER_01]: So these new documents provided additional evidence that her testimony was false that she was deliberately trying to cover up the scandal of her emails with this Russian collusion hoax.
- 30:13[SPEAKER_01]: And then finally, there was, of course, the violation of Pfizer protocols.
- 30:16[SPEAKER_01]: So the, the intentional and deliberate use of what they knew to be fabricated evidence with the Clinton funded steel dossier to obtain Pfizer warrants while knowing it was all part of a political operation that it was all fabricated could constitute abuse.
- 30:31[SPEAKER_01]: Certainly, it seems to me, it obviously constitutes abuse of the surveillance system.
- 30:37[SPEAKER_01]: And finally, election interference.
- 30:41[SPEAKER_01]: And to me, you know, this is all, all of this is crazy and insane, but in the end, this was a coordinated effort to spread false information about a presidential candidate using government resources and FBI-affiliated companies to thwart the Democratic integrity of a presidential election.
- 31:00[SPEAKER_01]: It was blatant election interference, blatant.
- 31:07[SPEAKER_01]: And that to me is the irony.
- 31:11[SPEAKER_01]: Because if you think it through, that was the very thing they accused Trump up.
- 31:18[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, you literally cannot make this stuff up.
- 31:22[SPEAKER_01]: They accused Trump and Putin of interfering with the Democratic integrity of presidential election all the while they were the ones who were actually
- 31:34[SPEAKER_01]: conspiring with foreign powers to interfere in the democratic integrity of the election.
- 31:39[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, reality is strange than fiction, at least the fiction that Democrats have attempted to fabricate.
- 31:47[SPEAKER_01]: And then, of course, we need to talk about how the legacy media is handling this story because their response really tells you everything you need to know about their complicity, complicity in this scandal.
- 32:02[SPEAKER_01]: And the irony is that this scandal probably more than anything else destroyed the legacy media.
- 32:07[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, they killed themselves in this process.
- 32:10[SPEAKER_01]: CNN, MSNBC, MSNBC, Rachel Madden.
- 32:16[SPEAKER_01]: New York Times, Washington Post, they've all either completely ignored these declassified documents, or they just dismissed them as old news.
- 32:26[SPEAKER_01]: There's nothing new here, nothing new.
- 32:29[SPEAKER_01]: We can all move on now, but think about that response.
- 32:31[SPEAKER_01]: If any of this evidence existed against Trump, how do you think they would have reacted?
- 32:38[SPEAKER_01]: Take everything that I just laid out for you, step by step by step, but instead of the Obama administration, make it the Trump administration, make it Trump doing this to Hillary.
- 32:48[SPEAKER_01]: How would the legacy media be acting right now?
- 32:53[SPEAKER_01]: It would be front page news for weeks.
- 32:55[SPEAKER_01]: The New York Times actually would so far as to publish a story claiming that these emails that I just showed you earlier were likely fabricated by Russian operatives.
- 33:08[SPEAKER_01]: It doesn't end!
- 33:11[SPEAKER_01]: It doesn't, yeah, they were likely fabricated.
- 33:13[SPEAKER_01]: Yep, by Russian operatives.
- 33:15[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, Russia, Russia, Russia.
- 33:16[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it never ends.
- 33:19[SPEAKER_01]: But here's what they don't tell you in this report.
- 33:22[SPEAKER_01]: The CIA assessed that these intelligence reports were not Russian fabrications.
- 33:30[SPEAKER_01]: The US intelligence community considered them authentic.
- 33:33[SPEAKER_01]: That's what they told Obama.
- 33:35[SPEAKER_01]: That's what all of our intelligence agencies told them that these emails, everything are all authentic.
- 33:44[SPEAKER_01]: This is Hillary trying to bring down a presidential campaign in the most dishonest way imaginable.
- 33:51[SPEAKER_01]: And isn't it neat?
- 33:53[SPEAKER_01]: Isn't it cool?
- 33:56[SPEAKER_01]: That's what happened.
- 33:57[SPEAKER_01]: And the reason why the New York Times is in telling you that is because they were one of the one celebrating.
- 34:03[SPEAKER_01]: They loved it.
- 34:04[SPEAKER_01]: They ate it up.
- 34:05[SPEAKER_01]: They gave out Pulitzer Prize prizes.
- 34:09[SPEAKER_01]: They got Pulitzer prizes for reporting on lies as as if they were true.
- 34:16[SPEAKER_01]: Meanwhile, these same legacy media outlets, if you think it through, while they're just dismissing all of this
- 34:26[SPEAKER_01]: Totally legit evidence.
- 34:29[SPEAKER_01]: These same media outlets, what do they do these last four years?
- 34:33[SPEAKER_01]: Or what do they do the three and a half years of Trump's presidency?
- 34:38[SPEAKER_01]: They promoted every aspect of the Russian hoax.
- 34:40[SPEAKER_01]: They promoted the steel dossier.
- 34:42[SPEAKER_01]: They promoted the Alpha Bank allegations.
- 34:44[SPEAKER_01]: They promoted the Carter Page Fines Awards.
- 34:48[SPEAKER_01]: All of which have now been proven to be part of Hillary's political operation.
- 34:52[SPEAKER_01]: Where was their comparable skepticism then?
- 34:55[SPEAKER_01]: They could have found this.
- 34:56[SPEAKER_01]: They could have easily found out this was a fraud.
- 34:58[SPEAKER_01]: They didn't care.
- 34:59[SPEAKER_01]: Why?
- 34:59[SPEAKER_01]: Because the legacy media is the fraud.
- 35:05[SPEAKER_01]: That's why the legacy media could ultimately be counted on as we saw in that email to amplify these lies because they are the fraud.
- 35:18[SPEAKER_01]: They are the single greatest fraud perpetrated upon the American people every single day in our nation.
- 35:24[SPEAKER_01]: That's why their ratings are in the tank.
- 35:27[SPEAKER_01]: That's why according to Gallup polling, the legacy media is seeing its lowest levels of trust and credibility ever in the history of Gallup polling.
- 35:39[SPEAKER_01]: The selective reporting here is beyond stunning.
- 35:43[SPEAKER_01]: When the Mueller investigation was ongoing every single minor development was treated as earth-shattering news.
- 35:50[SPEAKER_01]: Now we've got declassified intelligence proving the entire thing was a political operation and it gets buried on page forty seven or completely ignored or dismissed.
- 36:00[SPEAKER_01]: The reason why the legacy media could be counted on to perpetuate a fraud is because they are the fraud.
- 36:09[SPEAKER_01]: So what comes next?
- 36:12[SPEAKER_01]: Where does this leave us?
- 36:16[SPEAKER_01]: Clearly we're looking at the biggest political scandal in American history, being actively investigated by the current justice department.
- 36:26[SPEAKER_01]: Attorney General Pam Bondi has made it crystal clear that transparency and accountability priorities for this justice department.
- 36:35[SPEAKER_01]: The strike force you just established isn't just a PR move, they are actively assessing evidence from potential prosecutions.
- 36:43[SPEAKER_01]: FBI Director Cash Patel's open criminal investigations and has stated explicitly that the American people deserved the full unfiltered truth about the Russian collusion hoax and the political abuse of our justice system that it exposed and for all the major actors to be brought to accountability.
- 37:02[SPEAKER_01]: Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard continues to declassify documents as we speak, suggesting that there is much more evidence to come.
- 37:12[SPEAKER_01]: The legal processes are going to take time, but the framework for prosecutions is clearly being established.
- 37:21[SPEAKER_01]: We're not just talking about political accountability here, like trade gaudy ones.
- 37:25[SPEAKER_01]: There's all kinds of way.
- 37:26[SPEAKER_01]: Did you see that loser that neocon rhino loser on fund it?
- 37:31[SPEAKER_01]: They're, they're new Carl Robe.
- 37:33[SPEAKER_01]: Well, they're all kind of ways of holding them, holding them accountable, like, you know, political or there's, you could socially ostracize them and so forth.
- 37:41[SPEAKER_01]: You don't have to send a jail.
- 37:45[SPEAKER_01]: That's I'm so glad Trump destroyed the rhino neocon wing of the Republic of part, at least at the executive level because they're all they are just the shills for the uniparty establishment.
- 37:59[SPEAKER_01]: It's just so disgusting.
- 38:02[SPEAKER_01]: We're not just talking political accountability here.
- 38:05[SPEAKER_01]: We are talking about the absolute necessity of criminal accountability for what Center Chuck Grassley called one of the biggest political scandals and coverups in American history.
- 38:20[SPEAKER_01]: But let's zoom out for a moment and talk about what this really means for our country and our nation because this scandal goes far beyond Hillary Clinton or even the twenty sixteen election.
- 38:32[SPEAKER_01]: What these documents reveal
- 38:35[SPEAKER_01]: is the weaponization of our intelligence agencies against a political opponent.
- 38:42[SPEAKER_01]: The FBI, CIA, and other agencies were used to intentionally sabotage an undermine a presidential candidate based on fabricated intelligence created by his political opponent.
- 38:57[SPEAKER_01]: This represents a fundamental threat
- 39:01[SPEAKER_01]: to our democratic system.
- 39:03[SPEAKER_01]: If political campaigns can coordinate with foreign billionaires like Soros and government-affiliated companies to create false intelligence operations against the opponents, then elections frankly are meaningless.
- 39:18[SPEAKER_01]: The fact that this operation continued after Trump was elected and was used to undermine his presidency.
- 39:24[SPEAKER_01]: And for the entirety of his first term shows this wasn't just campaign dirty tricks.
- 39:31[SPEAKER_01]: This wasn't attempted coup using the machinery of government.
- 39:36[SPEAKER_01]: The government has supposed to be of buying for the people.
- 39:44[SPEAKER_01]: And let's be completely honest about something the media will never admit.
- 39:50[SPEAKER_01]: Here's the glorious irony in it all.
- 39:54[SPEAKER_01]: Donald J. Trump was right all along.
- 40:00[SPEAKER_01]: For eight years, Trump called the Russia investigation of hoax and a witch hunt.
- 40:09[SPEAKER_01]: He called it a political operation designed to undermine a duly elected president.
- 40:16[SPEAKER_01]: how did the legacy media respond, how did Democrats have had even some Republicans, Rino Neocons?
- 40:21[SPEAKER_01]: I try to go to respond, they called them a conspiracy theorist.
- 40:26[SPEAKER_01]: They called them a conspiracy theorist.
- 40:28[SPEAKER_01]: They called all of this things like the big lie and so forth.
- 40:32[SPEAKER_01]: Now we've got declassified US intelligence proving that is exactly what it was.
- 40:39[SPEAKER_01]: It is exactly what President Trump said it was, and therefore Trump is absolutely right in designating legacy media as fake news.
- 40:51[SPEAKER_01]: The ironies absolutely staggering.
- 40:53[SPEAKER_01]: They accused Trump of colluding with Russia while literally colluding with foreign billionaires and government affiliated companies to create false intelligence against it.
- 41:02[SPEAKER_01]: It's the very definition of projection.
- 41:06[SPEAKER_01]: So, as we wait for justice,
- 41:10[SPEAKER_01]: What can you do with this information in the meantime?
- 41:15[SPEAKER_01]: Well, first and foremost, I humbly ask, share it.
- 41:20[SPEAKER_01]: The complicit legacy media is, of course, desperately trying to bury this story, which means it's up to us to make sure the American people know the truth.
- 41:30[SPEAKER_01]: I hope you reckon that these aren't partisan talking points.
- 41:34[SPEAKER_01]: These are declassified government documents.
- 41:36[SPEAKER_01]: This is US intelligence that's been verified by multiple agencies.
- 41:41[SPEAKER_01]: The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable.
- 41:46[SPEAKER_01]: So share it with friends, family, and foreign wine.
- 41:49[SPEAKER_01]: Secondly, contact your representatives to man they support the ongoing investigations.
- 41:54[SPEAKER_01]: This cannot be allowed to just fade away like so many other scandals.
- 41:59[SPEAKER_01]: And then for yourself, thirdly, stay informed.
- 42:01[SPEAKER_01]: Follow the officials who are actually working to expose this corruption.
- 42:05[SPEAKER_01]: So we got Senator Chuck Grassley, we got Attorney General Pam Bonny, we got FBI Director Cash Patel, we got Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, there are the ones
- 42:14[SPEAKER_01]: who are doing the real work to restore accountability to our government.
- 42:21[SPEAKER_01]: Fifty years from now, when historians write about this period in American history, they are going to identify this as the moment when the truth finally came out about the biggest political scandal of our time.
- 42:39[SPEAKER_01]: The Russia hoax wasn't just about one election or one presidency.
- 42:44[SPEAKER_01]: It was about whether our intelligence agencies could be weaponized for political purposes.
- 42:51[SPEAKER_01]: It was about whether foreign billionaires could coordinate with American political campaigns to influence our elections.
- 42:59[SPEAKER_01]: It was about whether the rule of law applies equally to everyone.
- 43:07[SPEAKER_01]: What we're seeing now with these declassifications is the beginning of real accountability.
- 43:14[SPEAKER_01]: For the first time, we have hard evidence of what actually happened, not theories, not speculation, but declassified intelligence that proves the conspiracy.
- 43:29[SPEAKER_01]: This is so much bigger than watergate.
- 43:34[SPEAKER_01]: Watergate involved a break in and a cover up.
- 43:38[SPEAKER_01]: This involved the entire intelligence apparatus of the United States government being used to spy on an undermine a political opponent based on fabricated evidence as coordinated by the president of the United States himself and then amplified by a compliant lying legacy media.
- 43:56[SPEAKER_01]: It was the entire establishment swamp system weaponized against Trump and they freaking lost.
- 44:08[SPEAKER_01]: They lost because of what you did on November the fifth.
- 44:17[SPEAKER_01]: Here's the bottom line.
- 44:18[SPEAKER_01]: And there's really no way around this bottom line.
- 44:22[SPEAKER_01]: Hillary Clinton is in serious legal jeopardy.
- 44:25[SPEAKER_01]: More and more legal analysts are admitting that.
- 44:28[SPEAKER_01]: The evidence of her role in creating coordinating the Russian hoax is now overwhelming.
- 44:34[SPEAKER_01]: While Obama and Colmy and Clapper and Brennan are certainly all involved as well, all these tweedledies and tweedledums because they're not very smart people.
- 44:46[SPEAKER_01]: While they were all certainly involved and while they certainly did their part, if anything, made things worse, nevertheless, the buck stops with Hillary.
- 44:59[SPEAKER_01]: It was Clinton who was and who is and who will always be at the center of the whole Russian collusion, treasonous conspiracy.
- 45:09[SPEAKER_01]: For eight years, eight years, they told us Trump was a Russian asset.
- 45:18[SPEAKER_01]: For eight years, they said anyone questioning the Russian investigation was spreading conspiracy theories.
- 45:24[SPEAKER_01]: For eight years, they use this hoax to undermine Trump's presidency damage our country.
- 45:32[SPEAKER_01]: Now we know we have incontrovertible evidence that it was all, all of it, a total bald face lie.
- 45:44[SPEAKER_01]: Not just wrong, not just factually inaccurate.
- 45:51[SPEAKER_01]: but a deliberate, coordinated lie involving some of the most powerful people in our government.
- 45:59[SPEAKER_01]: And one of the world's richest men, as well as the complicity of the legacy media.
- 46:08[SPEAKER_01]: Here's the good news, the wonderful news.
- 46:13[SPEAKER_01]: The truth is finally coming out.
- 46:16[SPEAKER_01]: The documents have declassified.
- 46:18[SPEAKER_01]: The investigations are active.
- 46:19[SPEAKER_01]: The evidence is overwhelming.
- 46:23[SPEAKER_01]: Justice is coming.
- 46:25[SPEAKER_01]: This is the beginning, not the end.
- 46:29[SPEAKER_01]: And it is my commitment to you as your patriot professor that we're going to cover every development of this historic scandal as it continues to unfold in the days ahead.
- 46:41[SPEAKER_01]: It does indeed look as if the swamp is about
- 46:45[SPEAKER_01]: to be drained, finally, and it's all because of what you did on November fifth.
- 46:56[SPEAKER_01]: Over to you guys, over to you as our producer, Mike, as someone's your questions and super chats.
- 47:01[SPEAKER_01]: I do want to talk a little bit about Medicare, right?
- 47:04[SPEAKER_01]: Medicare touches the lives of millions of Americans, just like about everything the government touches.
- 47:10[SPEAKER_01]: It's a mess.
- 47:11[SPEAKER_01]: And mistakes could cost you thousands of dollars between confusing rules and penalties and thousands of different plans.
- 47:18[SPEAKER_01]: It's no wonder so many people are spending more than they need.
- 47:22[SPEAKER_01]: because they're just stuck on the wrong plan.
- 47:24[SPEAKER_01]: So that's why I want to introduce you to a genuinely helpful company called chapter.
- 47:30[SPEAKER_01]: Chapter gives you personalized Medicare advice and they actually work for you, not the government, not big insurance.
- 47:37[SPEAKER_01]: They search every plan available even those that other agencies they skip.
- 47:42[SPEAKER_01]: And by doing this, they can actually save people in average of eleven hundred dollars a year.
- 47:46[SPEAKER_01]: Sometimes more.
- 47:47[SPEAKER_01]: In fact, Chapter was able to save one couple Joe and his wife three thousand dollars every year.
- 47:52[SPEAKER_01]: Chapter's advice is completely free to my audience.
- 47:55[SPEAKER_01]: No fees, no pressure, just honest help.
- 47:59[SPEAKER_01]: So if you're already on Medicare or about to be
- 48:01[SPEAKER_01]: I can't recommend chapter enough.
- 48:03[SPEAKER_01]: Give them a call at nine one nine seven two seven one nine zero three to make sure your Medicare works for you most people wish they'd called them a lot sooner again that's nine one nine seven two seven one nine zero three also remember I announced at the beginning of our show but we got an awesome event coming up here on this channel you all know I wrote my book
- 48:24[SPEAKER_01]: My brand new book, America Awaken the Collapse of Globalism, and the rise of faith, family, and freedom.
- 48:31[SPEAKER_01]: We are doing a live America Awaken Masterclass.
- 48:36[SPEAKER_01]: And it's now open for registrations.
- 48:37[SPEAKER_01]: It's normally three hundred dollars to register, but you can, as of today, get an early bird discount of just seventy five dollars.
- 48:44[SPEAKER_01]: So if you're part of the courageous Patriot Club, you're going to get an even sweeter deal.
- 48:47[SPEAKER_01]: So just click on that link below or take advantage of this early bird discount.
- 48:52[SPEAKER_01]: Today.
- 48:53[SPEAKER_01]: All right, what do we got?
- 48:54[SPEAKER_01]: What do we got?
- 48:55[SPEAKER_01]: Let's hear what you have to say.
- 48:56[SPEAKER_01]: Questions, comments, you name it.
- 48:59[SPEAKER_01]: Our T-Corp, doctor, truly got my bodybuilding competition men's physique debut tomorrow.
- 49:05[SPEAKER_01]: We'll be one thousand four hundred eighty-six days post chemo God bless your ROT court.
- 49:10[SPEAKER_01]: Not planning a winning but still planning to do the best I can wish me luck.
- 49:14[SPEAKER_01]: You bet ROT God be with you and you deserve it.
- 49:17[SPEAKER_01]: You deserve it more than anyone my friend.
- 49:20[SPEAKER_01]: Enjoy just being healthy and and and and maha.
- 49:26[SPEAKER_01]: Domino stock to show the biggest question of our age.
- 49:29[SPEAKER_01]: The golden age dies.
- 49:30[SPEAKER_01]: If the dominion retakes Congress in twenty twenty six, you point out at Quinnipiac, Polish to seventy two percent to prove Democrats, but do seventy two percent to prove because they hate Democrat ideas or because they're foolish Dems looked terrible Dem ideas and disapproved Democrats because Dems aren't shackling us with Democrat policies.
- 49:50[SPEAKER_01]: It's the latter than seventy two percent Democrat disapproval writing could actually mean Democrats are more fired up than ever.
- 49:57[SPEAKER_01]: to vote in twenty twenty six, possibly doubtful us possibly to me the big um indicator, the key indicator for how a particularly midterm but any election is going to turn out.
- 50:10[SPEAKER_01]: The key predictive indicator is voter registration trends.
- 50:13[SPEAKER_01]: We saw that in twenty twenty four.
- 50:15[SPEAKER_01]: We talked a lot about it, especially with Seth Keschel, the election analyst.
- 50:19[SPEAKER_01]: That's what he uses to get like almost like a hundred percent, you know, ninety nine percent accuracy in his election predictions.
- 50:27[SPEAKER_01]: It is not so much polling.
- 50:29[SPEAKER_01]: It's much more voter registration trends.
- 50:34[SPEAKER_01]: And in twenty one different states that put up their voter registration by party, not all states do so for example, like Georgia does not have voter registration by party as I'm just going to whisk on send us a voter registration by party.
- 50:49[SPEAKER_01]: Let's just tell you people voting are registering to vote, but they're not going to tell you which party of the twenty one twenty three states that
- 50:59[SPEAKER_01]: publish party affiliated voter registration.
- 51:05[SPEAKER_01]: Republicans are killing it and crushing it in literally every single one.
- 51:09[SPEAKER_01]: Literally most particularly in my backyard here in the Keystone State in Pennsylvania.
- 51:15[SPEAKER_01]: They're crushing it.
- 51:17[SPEAKER_01]: They're absolutely crushing it.
- 51:19[SPEAKER_01]: And that trend is so important because it tends to predict how and who is going to vote in the upcoming election.
- 51:30[SPEAKER_01]: So obviously, people who just register vote are more likely to vote, right?
- 51:34[SPEAKER_01]: They're more their intentional about it.
- 51:36[SPEAKER_01]: And then how they registered will influence in order not lay how they vote.
- 51:42[SPEAKER_01]: It's very rare that someone registers Democrat and then turns around votes for public.
- 51:47[SPEAKER_01]: Very rare for someone who registers Republican, then turns around and votes.
- 51:51[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats.
- 51:52[SPEAKER_01]: So Republicans are crushing it.
- 51:54[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, everyone's admitting that.
- 51:55[SPEAKER_01]: Harry Anton, as admitting that, of CNN, their data analysts, and Republicans are crushing it with voter registration.
- 52:03[SPEAKER_01]: That tells me, in the end, when you combine that with the purging of voter rules.
- 52:09[SPEAKER_01]: So California's already seen three.
- 52:10[SPEAKER_01]: Over three, California saw three point one million voters purged from their voters.
- 52:16[SPEAKER_01]: They are legally required to do that in order to receive federal funds.
- 52:21[SPEAKER_01]: They are legally required to purge the rules and turn them over for auditing by federal officials, which they have.
- 52:30[SPEAKER_01]: They purged three.
- 52:31[SPEAKER_01]: One million voters from their voter rules.
- 52:35[SPEAKER_01]: So these are obviously not people who are unqualified to vote and get so they moved away or whatever.
- 52:45[SPEAKER_01]: They're not living at the actual location or whatever it is.
- 52:50[SPEAKER_01]: Three point one million perched, Kamala Harris, one California by three point two million.
- 52:59[SPEAKER_01]: Let that hit you.
- 53:01[SPEAKER_01]: Now, I don't do we have evidence that they're all Republicans we don't.
- 53:05[SPEAKER_01]: It's not it's not broken down partisanly.
- 53:08[SPEAKER_01]: Do we have evidence that they're all, or are they all Democrats know?
- 53:12[SPEAKER_01]: Of course we don't.
- 53:12[SPEAKER_01]: Do we have evidence that most redemocrats?
- 53:15[SPEAKER_01]: No, it's anecdotal, though, because Democrats overwhelmingly
- 53:19[SPEAKER_01]: They overwhelmingly outnumber Republicans in California.
- 53:25[SPEAKER_01]: And here's the key that the disqualified voters, voters are not supposed to be voting, illegitimate voters are not supposed to be voting election.
- 53:36[SPEAKER_01]: If there are millions of Democrat illegitimate voters, they all vote.
- 53:42[SPEAKER_01]: They all find the way of voting.
- 53:44[SPEAKER_01]: They all show up at the polls.
- 53:46[SPEAKER_01]: Well, better at the
- 53:49[SPEAKER_01]: at the ballot harvesting box.
- 53:52[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas Republicans don't, if you're an eligible voter and you're a Republican, generally, you don't show up.
- 53:59[SPEAKER_01]: You don't end up there because Republicans generally play by the rules because we like law and order.
- 54:04[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas Democrats, if you're an eligible Democrat voter, you'll vote, they'll make sure you vote some way shape or form.
- 54:11[SPEAKER_01]: So these are indicators to suggest that people really want nothing to do with the Democrats.
- 54:19[SPEAKER_01]: And if anything, the nation is shifting towards MAGA and the Republicans.
- 54:27[SPEAKER_01]: Trump will make our October back to see, did you, do you believe we will see any arrest for the Russian gate treaty?
- 54:32[SPEAKER_01]: How many, if any, will actually be prosecuted?
- 54:34[SPEAKER_01]: So they're going to have, I do, I do think we're going to see arrest.
- 54:38[SPEAKER_01]: I think that it's inevitable.
- 54:39[SPEAKER_01]: And again, I'm just looking at legal analysts and they're saying there's no way around this for the, for maintaining the integrity of the system, they have to be arrested.
- 54:48[SPEAKER_01]: Now, the question is, what happens if they're indicted inside the DC Beltway?
- 54:55[SPEAKER_01]: Well, there's not a court inside that corrupt swamp of a legal system.
- 55:03[SPEAKER_01]: The jury system there is absolutely radically left-wing.
- 55:07[SPEAKER_01]: They're not going to
- 55:09[SPEAKER_01]: They're not going to indict anybody from the Obama administration.
- 55:13[SPEAKER_01]: So if you have certain charges against them, there are certain charges that allow you to try them anywhere in the country, because like like illegal money wiring or something like that.
- 55:29[SPEAKER_01]: If it is, if it is trends,
- 55:32[SPEAKER_01]: jurisdictional, then you can, you can have them tried in any court in the country.
- 55:38[SPEAKER_01]: And that hopefully is what they will do.
- 55:40[SPEAKER_01]: I'd love to have them tried in the heart of Texas.
- 55:43[SPEAKER_01]: That would be awesome.
- 55:44[SPEAKER_01]: So if they do it inside DC, they won't get, they won't get to convicted.
- 55:50[SPEAKER_01]: So that's what I, you know, that's what they're mulling around.
- 55:54[SPEAKER_01]: Why bring indictments when you know they're just going to be acquitted by a rabid left wing.
- 56:00[SPEAKER_01]: you know, compromise jury system in the DC circuit.
- 56:05[SPEAKER_01]: So they're, I know they're thinking that through and that's part of the process.
- 56:10[SPEAKER_01]: So, but I do, I think we're going to see indictments.
- 56:13[SPEAKER_01]: Maybe in a look, I do not understand how treason in this beyond any shadow of a doubt was treason.
- 56:19[SPEAKER_01]: Could be considered an official presidential act.
- 56:21[SPEAKER_01]: How can what Obama did possibly qualify under presidential immunity?
- 56:25[SPEAKER_01]: It's good question.
- 56:29[SPEAKER_01]: Now, bottom line, Dinesh Dissues and others are arguing, if Obama continued to be an actor in this treasonous conspiracy, after his presidency, all bets are off, all bets are off.
- 56:44[SPEAKER_01]: They can just nail him with that and they won't even have to deal with bringing this in front of the Supreme Court or anything like that.
- 56:54[SPEAKER_01]: But no, I'm with you.
- 56:57[SPEAKER_01]: They would have to argue that this was all happening within the confines of his presidential responsibilities.
- 57:07[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, and it wasn't treason.
- 57:11[SPEAKER_01]: He did have some other intelligence briefing from Johnny.
- 57:20[SPEAKER_01]: And he went with that that suggested that this was a real Russian collusion.
- 57:29[SPEAKER_01]: a real Russian collusion scare that could spell disaster for the country.
- 57:35[SPEAKER_01]: They'll find some way to flip it around the questions, whether there's any evidence for it, whether the evidence is valid, that kind of stuff.
- 57:42[SPEAKER_01]: So I'm with you.
- 57:43[SPEAKER_01]: I don't quite know, but again, we're assuming that our institutions still have some modicum of integrity.
- 57:50[SPEAKER_01]: And it's getting harder and harder to see that as this thing stretches out.
- 58:01[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you Raymond for the super chat very appreciate it.
- 58:06[SPEAKER_01]: Davaroos, what do people always demand trees in charge?
- 58:09[SPEAKER_01]: As Treason is a specific charge for specific offenses related to actively working with hostile foreign powers against America.
- 58:18[SPEAKER_01]: Just manufacturing, Russia, Gate, isn't treason, horrible countries arrest everyone for treason.
- 58:24[SPEAKER_01]: How do we move freedom people beyond the treason is?
- 58:26[SPEAKER_01]: Well, I mean, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so
- 58:32[SPEAKER_01]: Tulsa Gabber called it, treasonous collusion was a collusion I believe, or conspiracy.
- 58:39[SPEAKER_01]: And as I understand conspiracy collusion so forth, those are one of the ones that are trans jurisdictional in terms of who you can, where you can indict them and try them.
- 58:54[SPEAKER_01]: And that's in the constitution.
- 58:57[SPEAKER_01]: So bottom line, I wouldn't go with trees and I would go with collusion or could I forget which term it's used.
- 59:05[SPEAKER_01]: I did a video on it actually.
- 59:08[SPEAKER_01]: And because that will enable them to get out of the DC circuit court system and the district and try them in the heart of Texas or something.
- 59:18[SPEAKER_01]: And then which I think would be brilliant.
- 59:24[SPEAKER_01]: Allen is the megabase being too hard on Pam Bondi while I would love to see a bunch of arrest and trials already underway.
- 59:30[SPEAKER_01]: She's had a lot of excess stuff to deal with from rogue judges.
- 59:33[SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely to evaluating staff and files left from creepy paito joe retards pile of dung admin love it.
- 59:41[SPEAKER_01]: Figuring out what is fact in order deception and to that the breakneck pace is so much of the other things in this administration is done.
- 59:48[SPEAKER_01]: The DOJ seems slow.
- 59:50[SPEAKER_01]: It's only been six months that they get off if they get off bigger problems.
- 59:54[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I agree with you.
- 59:56[SPEAKER_01]: I'm still willing to give Pam the time of day, definitely.
- 59:59[SPEAKER_01]: I think she's come.
- 1:00:02[SPEAKER_01]: The thing is she's come through on all of the Supreme Court challenges with these rogue judges issuing those nationwide injunctions.
- 1:00:11[SPEAKER_01]: She's she's beat them all down to a pulp.
- 1:00:15[SPEAKER_01]: She's been brilliant on that.
- 1:00:16[SPEAKER_01]: That's taken up a lot of time.
- 1:00:18[SPEAKER_01]: And there's been a lot of I don't know if you notice there's been a lot of child sex ring.
- 1:00:23[SPEAKER_01]: Busts of light.
- 1:00:25[SPEAKER_01]: Where do you think they're getting that information from?
- 1:00:28[SPEAKER_01]: Right.
- 1:00:29[SPEAKER_01]: That's the real juice of Epstein right there.
- 1:00:32[SPEAKER_01]: There's been a lot of human trafficking child sex trafficking rings that have been busted by Pam and by Cash.
- 1:00:41[SPEAKER_01]: And they're doing God's work in that sense.
- 1:00:44[SPEAKER_01]: Now what Pam got hit with and rightly so because of the way she handled it was the Epstein files, particularly the original files with the notebooks, where all the influencers came and looked it up and was basically nothing.
- 1:00:58[SPEAKER_01]: There was nothing there just a few pages.
- 1:01:00[SPEAKER_01]: There I'm willing to give it that she was thwarted by the New York office, just as department office.
- 1:01:08[SPEAKER_01]: That's where Komi's daughter used to work since been fired.
- 1:01:11[SPEAKER_01]: And that's the other thing is Pam has been firing all these swamp rats left and right.
- 1:01:17[SPEAKER_01]: So I'm willing to give her the benefit of the out that she was sabotaged.
- 1:01:21[SPEAKER_01]: But then when they came out and said, when they said, OK, we're dropping the investigation.
- 1:01:28[SPEAKER_01]: Nothing to see here.
- 1:01:30[SPEAKER_01]: Epstein killed himself.
- 1:01:32[SPEAKER_01]: He, he, he, he did, he wasn't, he wasn't, he wasn't.
- 1:01:38[SPEAKER_01]: blackmailing people of influence and there was really no conspiracy or anything like that's when everyone just went like come on Pam what the heck are you doing so and they had to backtrack from that so i think there was some definite deliginization on on a lot of people's part towards her
- 1:01:57[SPEAKER_01]: And we'll see, I just think right now, it's a complicated thing.
- 1:02:02[SPEAKER_01]: I think it even looks like they sort of booby trap the Epstein files and put they planted a bunch of stuff that is on true.
- 1:02:13[SPEAKER_01]: That's why Trump keeps saying, make sure you
- 1:02:15[SPEAKER_01]: You publish whatever's true.
- 1:02:17[SPEAKER_01]: That's in there.
- 1:02:18[SPEAKER_01]: But I think they planted a bunch of stuff to try to humiliate the Trump administration.
- 1:02:24[SPEAKER_01]: And so they're just they're trying they look like they're just trying to navigate that the best they can in a way that continues to shatter the Democrats and they're obviously their their immoral impulses.
- 1:02:41[SPEAKER_01]: Magga, twenty-four average, Dr. Steve, I know there's a bill introduced in Congress to take a new census, not counting illegal aliens like they didn't win twenty, but where are the chances of bill passing?
- 1:02:49[SPEAKER_01]: And being done in time for twenty-six election, secondly, the census bureau have mega people in charge to perform census accurately.
- 1:02:56[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, so backwards, yes, I think that's
- 1:03:00[SPEAKER_01]: It would be that certainly the case.
- 1:03:01[SPEAKER_01]: And no, it would have to be Trump would have to issue an executive order.
- 1:03:05[SPEAKER_01]: It's not going to go through Congress.
- 1:03:06[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, outside of appropriation bills and just minor little budgetary issues funding issues and so forth.
- 1:03:16[SPEAKER_01]: And a Congress is broken.
- 1:03:17[SPEAKER_01]: Nothing that's politically polarizing will get through.
- 1:03:20[SPEAKER_01]: the Senate filibuster.
- 1:03:22[SPEAKER_01]: What the middle ground is that red states are not bound by redistricting councils, like blue states are.
- 1:03:31[SPEAKER_01]: Blue states redistricted to the, I mean, in in saying, Jerry Mander, you know, spaghetti drawn districts all over the place.
- 1:03:41[SPEAKER_01]: And a lot of their populations actually didn't like that.
- 1:03:44[SPEAKER_01]: And so they created
- 1:03:46[SPEAKER_01]: independent redistricting councils that are enshrined in their state constitutions.
- 1:03:52[SPEAKER_01]: And those councils generally stand against any kind of redistricting efforts.
- 1:03:59[SPEAKER_01]: And these are all primarily in blue states, just because they saw a lot of the abuse.
- 1:04:03[SPEAKER_01]: This is another way of how the red patches inside blue states were able to kind of push back a little bit by mobilizing these redistricting councils.
- 1:04:15[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas
- 1:04:16[SPEAKER_01]: Red states don't have them.
- 1:04:17[SPEAKER_01]: So red states can can redistrict all they want.
- 1:04:20[SPEAKER_01]: Ron DeSantis looks like he's going to pass an executive order redistrict.
- 1:04:26[SPEAKER_01]: Florida to reduce Democrats to basically two or three seats.
- 1:04:30[SPEAKER_01]: Texas is doing the same thing, two to three seats.
- 1:04:32[SPEAKER_01]: A number of red states are doing an Iowa is looking like it's going to do it North Carolina looks like they're going to do it.
- 1:04:39[SPEAKER_01]: State after state red state and that may net us the seats we need to be in perpetual power.
- 1:04:47[SPEAKER_01]: to be in power and perpetuity.
- 1:04:49[SPEAKER_01]: That, I mean, right now, a cook political report says if Texas redraws its map and gives a seven new seats, seven solid Republican seats, the Republican party is sitting easily pretty at two hundred and seventeen seats.
- 1:05:06[SPEAKER_01]: They only need what, two hundred and seventeen safe seats.
- 1:05:09[SPEAKER_01]: They only need one seat to win
- 1:05:11[SPEAKER_01]: back in the majority.
- 1:05:13[SPEAKER_01]: So that I mean, that goes and then that that aligns with the voter registration trends that shows that voters are moving in order to the Republican party as well.
- 1:05:23[SPEAKER_01]: So you put all that together.
- 1:05:25[SPEAKER_01]: You don't need a new census.
- 1:05:27[SPEAKER_01]: You can wait till the twenty thirty.
- 1:05:30[SPEAKER_01]: The only thing where I think it
- 1:05:33[SPEAKER_01]: the drawback is when we get a twenty thirty if Trump if we had the right census electoral appropriation that we should have gotten in twenty twenty blue states would have lost double digits of electors and red states would have gained double digits of electors somewhere like fourteen electors or something akin to that so Trump would have won
- 1:05:58[SPEAKER_01]: by what three hundred and twenty six electoral votes rather than three hundred and twelve, for example.
- 1:06:05[SPEAKER_01]: So.
- 1:06:08[SPEAKER_01]: In human condition, Dr. Steve, should we go back and take another look at Sydney Powell's evidence?
- 1:06:13[SPEAKER_01]: I think she was plowed under maybe so.
- 1:06:15[SPEAKER_01]: Maybe so.
- 1:06:16[SPEAKER_01]: So Sydney Powell.
- 1:06:18[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, she focused more on the espionage side of things.
- 1:06:21[SPEAKER_01]: She focused more on the electronic side of things.
- 1:06:26[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas what we found is the evidence came out from the twenty twenty it was actually more.
- 1:06:31[SPEAKER_01]: It really I mean at least just what we were able to prove it was actually.
- 1:06:36[SPEAKER_01]: More the ballot harvesting that's that's where that you know you had again you had millions upon millions of voters who suddenly disappeared in twenty twenty four.
- 1:06:46[SPEAKER_01]: showing up in basically five states.
- 1:06:49[SPEAKER_01]: It wasn't across the country.
- 1:06:53[SPEAKER_01]: Those five million voters showed up in five states and they're all the swing states, Arizona and Georgia and Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania.
- 1:07:00[SPEAKER_01]: So Biden underperformed in all four states, but super-performed in those five states clearly something wasn't right.
- 1:07:12[SPEAKER_01]: and attended to be centered on these ballot harvesting initiatives bought and paid for at the time by Zuckerberg.
- 1:07:19[SPEAKER_01]: But there was concern, of course, about voting software and voting machinery, and that's where Sydney Powell went with it.
- 1:07:29[SPEAKER_01]: And as well as with foreign
- 1:07:32[SPEAKER_01]: for involvement.
- 1:07:34[SPEAKER_01]: And yes, it looks like we've, it certainly looks like those, those two themes are coming back in space.
- 1:07:46[SPEAKER_01]: Richard, Dr. Steve, your thoughts about thirty-five percent tariffs on Canada.
- 1:07:49[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, Trump is hitting Carney hard.
- 1:07:54[SPEAKER_01]: Honestly, I'm thinking this has a lot more to do with Alberta and Sask, Manitoba and BC.
- 1:08:03[SPEAKER_01]: I think he wants to see a wax that I think he's trying to split Canada apart.
- 1:08:07[SPEAKER_01]: At one level, I think that's what's going on.
- 1:08:09[SPEAKER_01]: At another level, I think he's trying to force them more to the negotiation table.
- 1:08:14[SPEAKER_01]: But Carney is, you know,
- 1:08:16[SPEAKER_01]: Carnies still living in an old globalist world order that doesn't exist anymore.
- 1:08:23[SPEAKER_01]: And so he's being stubborn, but with Van der Leyen and the EU deal and the China deal and the Japan deal and South Korea deal and all these deals coming out, it's going to be harder and harder for Carnie to play the recalcitrant to card.
- 1:08:40[SPEAKER_01]: Rubber Guy, thank you so much for the super chat.
- 1:08:42[SPEAKER_01]: The internet is under attack payment processors, censoring anime and games.
- 1:08:46[SPEAKER_01]: You keep passing a law which is silencing speech, etc.
- 1:08:49[SPEAKER_01]: Similar things in the U and Australia and bills in the United States will do the same as the UK.
- 1:08:55[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, we have to be very, very
- 1:08:59[SPEAKER_01]: It's interesting though, I mean the technology is involving the network society and the internet and so forth.
- 1:09:08[SPEAKER_01]: The IP system, what is it, not the IP, what is it, you know what I'm trying, VPN systems.
- 1:09:15[SPEAKER_01]: You know, they have ways of getting around that.
- 1:09:19[SPEAKER_01]: And then they do this in China, you know, they do this to certain extent Russia, Belarus and so on, Iran.
- 1:09:26[SPEAKER_01]: They find ways of being able to get around.
- 1:09:28[SPEAKER_01]: It's very, very hard to
- 1:09:34[SPEAKER_01]: How do I put it?
- 1:09:35[SPEAKER_01]: It's very hard to fire wall the internet.
- 1:09:38[SPEAKER_01]: China's actually done a pretty good job.
- 1:09:40[SPEAKER_01]: And ironically, they're kind of using blockchain as a way of doing it.
- 1:09:46[SPEAKER_01]: The computers, the massive computer decentralized computer system that is nevertheless centralized around more or less for lack of better term.
- 1:09:55[SPEAKER_01]: They're national security boundaries.
- 1:09:59[SPEAKER_01]: But but I'm with you.
- 1:10:01[SPEAKER_01]: I do not like seeing any of that and are elite hate free speech because of course they can't control it.
- 1:10:12[SPEAKER_01]: Davoro's, if Obama told coming not to bug Hillary about our mishandling of classified info, then what was coming doing announcing it was investigating Hillary just a few days before the election?
- 1:10:24[SPEAKER_01]: Because Hillary was pissed about coming announcing it was investigating your further.
- 1:10:28[SPEAKER_01]: No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
- 1:10:30[SPEAKER_01]: Davoro, no, call me announced that they would not be investigating her any further.
- 1:10:35[SPEAKER_01]: They were closing the investigation just days before the election.
- 1:10:40[SPEAKER_01]: What made people very upset is that Komi basically detailed what she did, which was a felony, placing national security documents on her own private server.
- 1:10:53[SPEAKER_01]: If you and I did that, we'd be in prison right now.
- 1:10:56[SPEAKER_01]: But because she didn't intend it, because there was she didn't intend any harm or she didn't quite understand
- 1:11:03[SPEAKER_01]: the issues at hand, I'm not gonna, there was no malice and therefore I'm not gonna pursue charges.
- 1:11:10[SPEAKER_01]: So what people got upset about is he, the speech was in two parts.
- 1:11:15[SPEAKER_01]: He perfectly explained precisely why should be and should be indicted.
- 1:11:18[SPEAKER_01]: And then he made up a whole new standard to exonerator.
- 1:11:23[SPEAKER_01]: And that's what they were upset about.
- 1:11:25[SPEAKER_01]: But no, I mean, it was already out in the open.
- 1:11:27[SPEAKER_01]: Her email,
- 1:11:30[SPEAKER_01]: scandal was already there for everyone to see and it was just a matter of combi putting a lid on it.
- 1:11:37[SPEAKER_01]: That's what he did and did it faithfully.
- 1:11:42[SPEAKER_01]: Maga, twenty forever, Dr. Steve, if when charges are brought against Hillary Brennan at all, can they bring to a different, different, different, different court district, right, then DC, I heard one reason Durham didn't bring charges against Hillary's because he knew the futility of getting conviction in DC court.
- 1:11:57[SPEAKER_01]: I don't buy that.
- 1:11:58[SPEAKER_01]: He, Durham was hiding all this evidence from us.
- 1:12:02[SPEAKER_01]: He could have easily,
- 1:12:04[SPEAKER_01]: declassified it and showed it to the world and he didn't, he did everything he could more or less bury this thing.
- 1:12:10[SPEAKER_01]: No, so we talked about that.
- 1:12:12[SPEAKER_01]: I believe it is collusion and conspiracy are trans jurisdictional.
- 1:12:18[SPEAKER_01]: So those are charges where you could be tried anywhere.
- 1:12:23[SPEAKER_01]: ROT Corp, Dr. Turley, I didn't ask on Monday.
- 1:12:28[SPEAKER_01]: Should we go to see the new fantastic form movie?
- 1:12:31[SPEAKER_01]: I understand it leans away from wokeness.
- 1:12:33[SPEAKER_01]: I wish you reward good behavior in all.
- 1:12:35[SPEAKER_01]: But do we want to make Hollywood Hollywood Hollywood suffer a little bit more to really drive home the point just because a criminal does a good thing?
- 1:12:43[SPEAKER_01]: We don't end their sentence.
- 1:12:44[SPEAKER_01]: Well, let me answer that right now.
- 1:12:46[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I mean, that's up to you.
- 1:12:47[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, R to you.
- 1:12:48[SPEAKER_01]: That's up to you.
- 1:12:49[SPEAKER_01]: I went and saw it and I loved it.
- 1:12:51[SPEAKER_01]: I thought it was a beautiful film took my whole family.
- 1:12:53[SPEAKER_01]: Well, the boys who were here, my wife, my girls were away at school.
- 1:13:00[SPEAKER_01]: So yeah, I loved it.
- 1:13:02[SPEAKER_01]: It's very pro-life.
- 1:13:04[SPEAKER_01]: It's very pro-family.
- 1:13:05[SPEAKER_01]: Pro-traditional was family.
- 1:13:08[SPEAKER_01]: And it didn't have a woke bone in its body.
- 1:13:10[SPEAKER_01]: It was absolutely wonderful.
- 1:13:12[SPEAKER_01]: So, you know, I, for one thing, you know, I want to, look, you're stuck with, what is it?
- 1:13:18[SPEAKER_01]: Is it the Marvel movies?
- 1:13:19[SPEAKER_01]: Is it Disney?
- 1:13:20[SPEAKER_01]: Right?
- 1:13:21[SPEAKER_01]: You're stuck with the major production companies.
- 1:13:25[SPEAKER_01]: Um, so why not spend, you know, push them in directions we want to, uh, to go rather than, I mean, you could, you could, yeah, Disney, I'm Mike as tell you.
- 1:13:34[SPEAKER_01]: So yeah, uh, Disney has flopped and flopped and flopped.
- 1:13:38[SPEAKER_01]: They hopefully they've learned their lesson.
- 1:13:41[SPEAKER_01]: It's not twenty twenty anymore.
- 1:13:43[SPEAKER_01]: If anything, all the movies that have come out of from twenty twenty to twenty twenty three or so should probably just be erased from memory.
- 1:13:51[SPEAKER_01]: and they're recognizing now that we're in the age of normalcy returning and not certainly the movie underscored that.
- 1:14:03[SPEAKER_01]: Missed opportunity to call Alberta and the others, the Western Alliance of Canadians, I like that.
- 1:14:08[SPEAKER_01]: And we could also call it WAKWAC.
- 1:14:11[SPEAKER_01]: I call the supporters Wackies.
- 1:14:13[SPEAKER_01]: I love that.
- 1:14:13[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:14:14[SPEAKER_01]: The Western, I do like that.
- 1:14:16[SPEAKER_01]: I'm as part of the Wexit.
- 1:14:17[SPEAKER_01]: But the Western Alliance is wonderful.
- 1:14:20[SPEAKER_01]: I love Wackies.
- 1:14:23[SPEAKER_01]: Robo guy bills like the kids online safety ax screen acts or don't fall for it.
- 1:14:29[SPEAKER_01]: Okay.
- 1:14:29[SPEAKER_01]: Good.
- 1:14:29[SPEAKER_01]: Good.
- 1:14:29[SPEAKER_01]: I won't protect.
- 1:14:31[SPEAKER_01]: It won't protect kids.
- 1:14:32[SPEAKER_01]: It will destroy the free internet here.
- 1:14:33[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:14:34[SPEAKER_01]: That's the key, isn't it?
- 1:14:36[SPEAKER_01]: Robo guy.
- 1:14:36[SPEAKER_01]: They always use, you know, human frailty, human suffering as the veneer to hide their nefarious schemes behind.
- 1:14:46[SPEAKER_01]: We saw it with USAID.
- 1:14:48[SPEAKER_01]: They do it all the time.
- 1:14:49[SPEAKER_01]: They do it with sanctuary cities.
- 1:14:51[SPEAKER_01]: your sanctuary cities literally hide criminals and they're saying no no no no no we're just trying to make you know the you're you're made and the people pick your crops and the people go to church with feel you know feel feel safe so yeah trump sciences bills as presidency's cut people drop all support yeah no let's make sure they know that absolutely
- 1:15:16[SPEAKER_01]: Brian, my good friend, living with best life and Southwest Florida.
- 1:15:20[SPEAKER_01]: Certainly, there is enough in the document released to indict members of the Obama administration Clinton campaign.
- 1:15:25[SPEAKER_01]: I remember you mentioning there might be a mechanism for moving any trial side of DC.
- 1:15:29[SPEAKER_01]: Is that still the case?
- 1:15:30[SPEAKER_01]: And so what's the likelihood of having?
- 1:15:32[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, I mean, again, that's going to be part of it.
- 1:15:34[SPEAKER_01]: There's no way they're going to go through the whole craziness of inditing them, just like with Trump in Manhattan.
- 1:15:42[SPEAKER_01]: with Alvin, Bragg, Fat Alvin.
- 1:15:46[SPEAKER_01]: They're not going to go through the whole process of inditing them and the circus around it, only to have them acquitted by, you know, mentally lunatic asylum court system in DC, jury system in particular.
- 1:16:03[SPEAKER_01]: So as I understand collusion and conspiracy, they are in, and I've got in my notes, I did a video on it,
- 1:16:12[SPEAKER_01]: It's in the constitution that they are jurisdictional so you can you can try them literally anywhere like you know illegal money wiring so what that would be another one human trafficking is another one but I think that's why
- 1:16:31[SPEAKER_01]: Tulsi, if I recall, call that treasonous collusion, if I recall, or treasonous conspiracy, I forget which co-word she used.
- 1:16:41[SPEAKER_01]: But one of those is constitutionally allowed for to try them pretty much anywhere.
- 1:16:50[SPEAKER_01]: Robo guy, Trump and his administration needs to announce all the censorship going on in the world.
- 1:16:54[SPEAKER_01]: Make sure it doesn't happen here otherwise.
- 1:16:56[SPEAKER_01]: It's golden age is over.
- 1:16:57[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, Robo guy.
- 1:16:59[SPEAKER_01]: You have major point there.
- 1:17:00[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, we got you.
- 1:17:01[SPEAKER_01]: We got you.
- 1:17:03[SPEAKER_01]: We got you.
- 1:17:03[SPEAKER_01]: We do not want censorship.
- 1:17:04[SPEAKER_01]: Also at this point, Trump should just go full dictator movement.
- 1:17:08[SPEAKER_01]: Dude, he's a Democrat.
- 1:17:09[SPEAKER_01]: I'll keep sabotage.
- 1:17:10[SPEAKER_01]: I get rid of him.
- 1:17:11[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
- 1:17:11[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
- 1:17:12[SPEAKER_01]: Maybe you're right.
- 1:17:12[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, again, the
- 1:17:17[SPEAKER_01]: You know, I talked about this earlier before actually where was I was on another show was a Steve Gruber on on real America's voice, you know, bottom line unfortunately, this is the way our the framers should say unfortunately, but this is the way our framers design the system to work if you want fast
- 1:17:43[SPEAKER_01]: shock in all action.
- 1:17:45[SPEAKER_01]: It's the executive action because he's got the exact in the EO and he's got the pen and that pen truly is mightyer than the sword.
- 1:17:52[SPEAKER_01]: And your president Trump has restored true constitutional presidential power.
- 1:17:58[SPEAKER_01]: We haven't seen it in seventy years.
- 1:18:00[SPEAKER_01]: because Congress worked very hard to curb that after FDR, to curb presidential power, which they effectively more or less did.
- 1:18:08[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, Obama showed that.
- 1:18:10[SPEAKER_01]: Obama just walked around making speeches.
- 1:18:13[SPEAKER_01]: He hardly did anything, if you think it through.
- 1:18:15[SPEAKER_01]: It's just waiting for, you know, for his Obama carry, just waited for Congress to act, but it was easier than, too, because they had a sixty seats in the Senate, Democrats did.
- 1:18:24[SPEAKER_01]: But in the end, you want fast, rapid, shock and all action to the executive branch.
- 1:18:32[SPEAKER_01]: He can do that.
- 1:18:34[SPEAKER_01]: If you want that executive action enshrined in the permanent law, it's got to go through a long, molasses like laborious process that where you trudge through Congress, both the House and the Senate and it is slow and it's made to be slow.
- 1:18:55[SPEAKER_01]: That's what the Senate filibusters for.
- 1:18:58[SPEAKER_01]: So we're just watching how the sausage is made and it just don't put any hope
- 1:19:04[SPEAKER_01]: in Congress, which you want to keep a White House in our hands, which after twenty-thirty, it's going to be very hard for them to win again with the reappropriation of the electoral votes, reapportionment of the electoral votes.
- 1:19:24[SPEAKER_01]: It's going to be almost impossible.
- 1:19:25[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, we could lose.
- 1:19:27[SPEAKER_01]: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, in every presidential election going forward from twenty thirty and still win to seventy.
- 1:19:34[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it's just because my colleague Brian Edgett so, so many electoral votes are moving and following.
- 1:19:45[SPEAKER_01]: the population into deep red states like Florida and they're becoming red or in red or ruby red and right taxes and so forth.
- 1:19:52[SPEAKER_01]: They're both picking up four more electoral seats.
- 1:19:57[SPEAKER_01]: So, yeah, I just think in the end, we need to focus on keeping the White House in perpetuity.
- 1:20:06[SPEAKER_01]: And if we do that, we're going to have, there's really not much Congress can do.
- 1:20:11[SPEAKER_01]: will be appointing Supreme Court justices for the foreseeable future.
- 1:20:17[SPEAKER_01]: So we'll have nine Samalitos or nine Justice Thomases on the Supreme Court eventually.
- 1:20:25[SPEAKER_01]: And things will be good.
- 1:20:27[SPEAKER_01]: So don't worry so much.
- 1:20:29[SPEAKER_01]: Don't freak out too much about the Senate and the House of Representatives.
- 1:20:35[SPEAKER_01]: It's just, they're, they're just there to kind of touch along and come along for the ride and eventually hopefully enshrined the stuff.
- 1:20:45[SPEAKER_01]: Terry, Trevor Noah has suggested what I suspect that Trump has possessed these facts since the actual events and withheld them for this long, so they're released would have maximum effect.
- 1:20:57[SPEAKER_01]: But I point out something, everyone's missing the Russians were intervening against Trump, not for him.
- 1:21:03[SPEAKER_01]: Could Trump have been trying to convince citizen Putin one more chance to cooperate with them on Ukraine is around the Arctic.
- 1:21:10[SPEAKER_01]: And when Putin blew it, Trump said, OK, you asked for it.
- 1:21:13[SPEAKER_01]: Maybe that's a good question.
- 1:21:14[SPEAKER_01]: I haven't put this, I haven't put the collusion hoaxed together with Trump's current strategy towards Eurasia and Putinism.
- 1:21:31[SPEAKER_01]: I think your right, Trevor Noah, I think is right on.
- 1:21:35[SPEAKER_01]: I don't think this timing is coincidental.
- 1:21:39[SPEAKER_01]: I think Trump has said he said he had four years in the wilderness to plan this out.
- 1:21:47[SPEAKER_01]: And then after Jay Thirteen, after God spared his life, he believed he had a divine call to carry this out.
- 1:21:55[SPEAKER_01]: So they have been mapping out these four years to be the single greatest four years like ever.
- 1:22:01[SPEAKER_01]: It'll be a presidency we'll be talking about centuries from now.
- 1:22:10[SPEAKER_01]: And it seems to me he wanted to fundamentally reshape
- 1:22:14[SPEAKER_01]: Board of Security, economic security and cultural security over the first six months.
- 1:22:17[SPEAKER_01]: And then the next six months will be trade, international diplomacy, and remaking the world map in a civilizationalist world, and then exposing the deep state.
- 1:22:33[SPEAKER_01]: So I think that's where we are.
- 1:22:35[SPEAKER_01]: I think that's right.
- 1:22:36[SPEAKER_01]: Now how that fits together with the rising civilizations, what we'll have to say.
- 1:22:42[SPEAKER_01]: That's a very, hold me accountable to that, because I love that, the connection you're making there.
- 1:22:47[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:22:47[SPEAKER_01]: And it seems like the Russians did not want Trump and they didn't, they saw America as weak and as,
- 1:22:57[SPEAKER_01]: America could be controlled with these idiots in charge.
- 1:23:03[SPEAKER_01]: And they do see them as idiots.
- 1:23:04[SPEAKER_01]: They're all from the north
- 1:23:09[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, the Northeast families, private school families, Kent Connecticut families, New England families, even the Bushes, the Bushes were New England family that moved down to Texas and brought all of George Herbert Walker Bush, brought all of his CIA connections, military industrial, complex connections, and then married them.
- 1:23:30[SPEAKER_01]: together with Texas oil and that's how the bushes became associated with Texas and Texas politics, but they're from freaking, they've got a house up in Maine, they're from freaking New England, you know.
- 1:23:43[SPEAKER_01]: So I think yeah, Putin
- 1:23:46[SPEAKER_01]: Saul America has incredibly weak with these globalist leaders.
- 1:23:50[SPEAKER_01]: And he was freaked out with Trump.
- 1:23:52[SPEAKER_01]: He was like, oh, crap.
- 1:23:53[SPEAKER_01]: Trump coming in that.
- 1:23:55[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:23:57[SPEAKER_01]: We're not going to be able to get away with stuff with Trump.
- 1:23:59[SPEAKER_01]: So anyway, but I'm by the same token.
- 1:24:01[SPEAKER_01]: They, I think they admire each other as well, because they both see the world civilization.
- 1:24:10[SPEAKER_01]: The federal is Dr. Turley.
- 1:24:11[SPEAKER_01]: Will you be reading hundreds of them today?
- 1:24:16[SPEAKER_01]: I think what's the zombie movie?
- 1:24:18[SPEAKER_01]: Isn't it like, twenty nine days?
- 1:24:19[SPEAKER_01]: It's a hundred and seven days.
- 1:24:20[SPEAKER_01]: The book that come on Dale Harris wrote, I think I might read it just just for the heck of it, right?
- 1:24:26[SPEAKER_01]: I love to read the inside store.
- 1:24:27[SPEAKER_01]: They're failures and defeats.
- 1:24:28[SPEAKER_01]: How about you?
- 1:24:29[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, Davos, you have more patients than I do.
- 1:24:32[SPEAKER_01]: That's for sure.
- 1:24:33[SPEAKER_01]: Oh gosh.
- 1:24:34[SPEAKER_01]: Now, seriously, when I saw that, hundred and seventy seven days, I thought of that.
- 1:24:38[SPEAKER_01]: There's a zombie movie, right?
- 1:24:39[SPEAKER_01]: There's like, twenty eight days later or something like that.
- 1:24:43[SPEAKER_01]: Now I think there it's twenty-eight years later, so that's what I thought of, just the zombie, the comma, comma, apocalypse or something like this.
- 1:24:55[SPEAKER_01]: Our producer Mike has said, this has been suggested as a fantasy football punishment for the loser of the lake.
- 1:25:00[SPEAKER_01]: I've heard that.
- 1:25:01[SPEAKER_01]: People are actually now
- 1:25:04[SPEAKER_01]: They are threatening to use a hundred and seven days as punishment for something.
- 1:25:09[SPEAKER_01]: So if you lose whatever it is, or if you get a bad grade, it's going, you have to actually sit there and read a hundred and seven days as punishment.
- 1:25:18[SPEAKER_01]: That's hilarious.
- 1:25:19[SPEAKER_01]: She's such a clown.
- 1:25:21[SPEAKER_01]: Maximilian, the future belongs to those with new and better ideas.
- 1:25:24[SPEAKER_01]: How do new ideas come about?
- 1:25:27[SPEAKER_01]: And how can we systematize, generating them?
- 1:25:30[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, my, oh, my.
- 1:25:33[SPEAKER_01]: I think the new ideas, I'm a firm believer that new ideas and I've actually read a very interesting article on Elon Musk with this.
- 1:25:43[SPEAKER_01]: I'm a firm believer that new ideas come from something called the moral imagination.
- 1:25:46[SPEAKER_01]: And the moral imagination is a mental map of reality that's able to interpret the world in light of the great
- 1:26:00[SPEAKER_01]: the great myths of old like the heroes journey and so forth.
- 1:26:04[SPEAKER_01]: So so
- 1:26:07[SPEAKER_01]: Jordan Peterson would argue that we cannot think apart from myths.
- 1:26:12[SPEAKER_01]: We all have myths and myths of just meta narratives, like the story that defines all the other stories.
- 1:26:19[SPEAKER_01]: And it's a foundational story, so in the Western civilization that would be the Bible, for example, the biblical stories are the stories by which all the other stories
- 1:26:30[SPEAKER_01]: make sense in it and it's structure.
- 1:26:32[SPEAKER_01]: We hate slavery because of the Exodus, right?
- 1:26:34[SPEAKER_01]: Exodus slavery is something we're supposed to be liberated out of, for example.
- 1:26:39[SPEAKER_01]: If we had a different story about that, we would have had a different value system that came out of it.
- 1:26:48[SPEAKER_01]: Peterson argues is that we're able to organize all the myriad gazillions of gazillions of bits of data that are always surrounding us at every minute.
- 1:27:00[SPEAKER_01]: We organize them in accordance with a value hierarchy.
- 1:27:04[SPEAKER_01]: In accordance with rules, understandings and goals that are considered sacred and absolute.
- 1:27:10[SPEAKER_01]: We've talked a lot about that.
- 1:27:11[SPEAKER_01]: Maximilian.
- 1:27:13[SPEAKER_01]: And so
- 1:27:14[SPEAKER_01]: Like the example I like to give is if I'm driving, my eyes could be looking quite literally anywhere because everywhere around me, there is data.
- 1:27:25[SPEAKER_01]: that can take my attention.
- 1:27:27[SPEAKER_01]: But unless I have the value of safety and the value of arriving at a destination, it's that which ends up shutting out what is peripheral to my eyes as less important to what's in front of my eyes, what's in front of me.
- 1:27:45[SPEAKER_01]: That becomes more important.
- 1:27:47[SPEAKER_01]: So meta narratives create a value hierarchy and then the data gets organized
- 1:27:53[SPEAKER_01]: around that value hierarchy.
- 1:27:55[SPEAKER_01]: And what we're just, we find is that the most ingenious ideas tend to come from, they tend to come from literally geniuses who have extraordinary imaginative capacities.
- 1:28:13[SPEAKER_01]: Their map of the world organizes the data in such a way where they can solve extraordinary problems.
- 1:28:21[SPEAKER_01]: But again, there's got to be a value system that prioritizes certain data over others to see that.
- 1:28:29[SPEAKER_01]: And so there have been articles, look it up.
- 1:28:32[SPEAKER_01]: Elon Musk and the moral imagination of the moral imagination of Elon Musk, things like that were the moral imagination of Einstein or the moral imagination of Mozart, then Bach, that the moral imagination seems to be key.
- 1:28:48[SPEAKER_01]: Now, how do you systematize generating that?
- 1:28:51[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, you have to feed your moral imagination.
- 1:28:53[SPEAKER_01]: That's one, obviously.
- 1:28:55[SPEAKER_01]: So that's what is that?
- 1:28:57[SPEAKER_01]: That's good literature.
- 1:28:58[SPEAKER_01]: This is why it's so important.
- 1:29:00[SPEAKER_01]: This is why, by the way, won't listen.
- 1:29:03[SPEAKER_01]: Postmodernism can be so horrible in its sense by relativizing everything is just, you know, all just cultural constructs with no superior superiority over the other.
- 1:29:14[SPEAKER_01]: This is why good literature and art and architecture and music and poetry and drama are so important.
- 1:29:22[SPEAKER_01]: They're so important because they shape the moral imagination.
- 1:29:25[SPEAKER_01]: So reading good literature, listening to good music,
- 1:29:29[SPEAKER_01]: And again, what do we mean by good, timeless?
- 1:29:32[SPEAKER_01]: That's the key.
- 1:29:33[SPEAKER_01]: The moral imagination gets connected to values and meta narratives that are eternal by nature.
- 1:29:42[SPEAKER_01]: So this is the difference between, this is where I get into a little trouble with my Christian friends where they worship to contemporary music.
- 1:29:57[SPEAKER_01]: that will be quote old in a matter of five years.
- 1:30:01[SPEAKER_01]: And my problem is the sense of eternity.
- 1:30:06[SPEAKER_01]: is not embedded in the music.
- 1:30:09[SPEAKER_01]: The music is not conveying eternity.
- 1:30:11[SPEAKER_01]: You would know it's conveying eternity if it was always fresh, always new, always renewed, like classical music tends to do, or classical liturgy tends to be.
- 1:30:23[SPEAKER_01]: A cathedral is a symbol to eternity.
- 1:30:27[SPEAKER_01]: Cathedral stands forever.
- 1:30:29[SPEAKER_01]: A storefront congregation doesn't.
- 1:30:33[SPEAKER_01]: It's temporary.
- 1:30:34[SPEAKER_01]: It's practical.
- 1:30:35[SPEAKER_01]: It's pragmatic.
- 1:30:37[SPEAKER_01]: Now this is not to totally dismiss storefront.
- 1:30:45[SPEAKER_01]: congregations, right?
- 1:30:46[SPEAKER_01]: Or mall, accommodations and malls or movie theaters.
- 1:30:49[SPEAKER_01]: It's not to dismiss them.
- 1:30:51[SPEAKER_01]: Great and wonderful things can happen.
- 1:30:53[SPEAKER_01]: God is everywhere working amazing things in amazing ways.
- 1:30:56[SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely.
- 1:30:57[SPEAKER_01]: But when we're thinking about culture and civilization, that's when
- 1:31:02[SPEAKER_01]: Things like, how do you instantiate and embody eternity comes in?
- 1:31:06[SPEAKER_01]: And you do it to music, art, architecture, literature, poetry, drama, and so forth.
- 1:31:12[SPEAKER_01]: Liturgy.
- 1:31:13[SPEAKER_01]: That by its nature never dies and never loses its relevance.
- 1:31:18[SPEAKER_01]: So you shape the moral imagination by coming in contact with the literature art, architecture music, poetry that lasts forever because it's just as valid today as it was a thousand years ago.
- 1:31:32[SPEAKER_01]: And then what that does is that shapes a value system in your imagination that is able to order data when we find just in the most precise and ingenious ways and then that's able to give you these amazing ideas and solutions and so on.
- 1:31:55[SPEAKER_01]: So there you go.
- 1:31:57[SPEAKER_01]: the trouble maker or rock dog or Steve if it's not obola or the hill to be tried for trees and then who were they put on trial the head of the snake must be cut off.
- 1:32:07[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, no, I'm with him with it.
- 1:32:08[SPEAKER_01]: Well, again, we'll have to see what they try them with.
- 1:32:10[SPEAKER_01]: But yes, they're going to have to be that's why I do believe we're going to see.
- 1:32:14[SPEAKER_01]: Well, we're going to see Hillary and died it.
- 1:32:17[SPEAKER_01]: I don't we'll have to see with Obama just because of just the ambiguity surrounding presidential immunity.
- 1:32:26[SPEAKER_01]: Brian, what charges a client will face are within the statute of limitations?
- 1:32:30[SPEAKER_01]: It's a good question, I don't know that.
- 1:32:35[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know that.
- 1:32:35[SPEAKER_01]: I'll have to look that up.
- 1:32:36[SPEAKER_01]: That's very good.
- 1:32:37[SPEAKER_01]: It's a very good question, actually.
- 1:32:39[SPEAKER_01]: It's not your limitations.
- 1:32:48[SPEAKER_01]: Well, I am, too, to encourage religion and education.
- 1:32:50[SPEAKER_01]: Do you see President Trump providing tax credits for parents to send their kids to religious schools?
- 1:32:53[SPEAKER_01]: Well, he's talked about that.
- 1:32:55[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, he wants to see overall the school choice as the federal, the default federal position of education.
- 1:33:05[SPEAKER_01]: So make it a big competition.
- 1:33:06[SPEAKER_01]: So you get a public schools, you're a private schools, you're broke, you're schools, you have
- 1:33:10[SPEAKER_01]: You have it all.
- 1:33:11[SPEAKER_01]: And obviously, I think the classical schools, the home schooling, all that sort of stuff will probably win that competition, certainly in a sort of a K to eight structure.
- 1:33:21[SPEAKER_01]: So, but yeah, no, I think he has talked about that.
- 1:33:24[SPEAKER_01]: And Pete Higgseth as well, the Secretary of Defense is a huge, huge proponent for precisely that.
- 1:33:33[SPEAKER_01]: Mitchell, do you honestly believe anyone at Khan's going to be arrested, let alone stand trial yet?
- 1:33:38[SPEAKER_01]: No, I'm just going, I'm going, well, again, watch out for that little cynicism there.
- 1:33:43[SPEAKER_01]: I'm saying, I'm getting, I'm, I'm detecting a little, a little sarcasm there from your Mitchell.
- 1:33:48[SPEAKER_01]: It's the goal in age.
- 1:33:49[SPEAKER_01]: You got to throw that out, man.
- 1:33:51[SPEAKER_01]: amazing things are happening here.
- 1:33:54[SPEAKER_01]: No, I'm just I'm literally going by what the what the people in charge are talking about in terms, you know, Pam Bonnie and Tulsi and cash and so on.
- 1:34:06[SPEAKER_01]: I'm going by what legal analysts are saying is happening here behind the scenes, particularly.
- 1:34:12[SPEAKER_01]: We're getting word that Hillary and and oh, come in.
- 1:34:16[SPEAKER_01]: Clapper and Brennan are all loyering up as we speak.
- 1:34:20[SPEAKER_01]: So the trends seem to be, and then of course you look at the evidence that I laid out for you.
- 1:34:26[SPEAKER_01]: It's it's pretty cotton dry.
- 1:34:28[SPEAKER_01]: This was this was this was treasonous conspiracy when all seven done at at the highest level.
- 1:34:35[SPEAKER_01]: So it's it seems like it is moving in that direction.
- 1:34:40[SPEAKER_01]: And keep in mind Mitchell, who did they indict four times?
- 1:34:45[SPEAKER_01]: Do you think that guy's going to just sit around?
- 1:34:47[SPEAKER_01]: Go ahead and don't worry about it.
- 1:34:48[SPEAKER_01]: That's why I played that original clip at the beginning of the livestream.
- 1:34:52[SPEAKER_01]: The original clip was Trump saying, yeah, in twenty seventeen, I'm like, I'll leave her alone.
- 1:34:56[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, we could lock up Hillary, but, you know, just for the sake of the piece of, you know, the unity of the country, leave her alone.
- 1:35:03[SPEAKER_01]: He's like, now they indicted me.
- 1:35:05[SPEAKER_01]: And now I don't feel that way anymore.
- 1:35:07[SPEAKER_01]: I ain't going to leave her alone no more.
- 1:35:13[SPEAKER_01]: Moving dog, didn't Hillary say if she went down, everyone was going down or did someone just make that up?
- 1:35:17[SPEAKER_01]: I thought I heard that.
- 1:35:18[SPEAKER_01]: So even before we went online today, I was looking for the origin of that comment and I couldn't find it.
- 1:35:23[SPEAKER_01]: So yes, that is out there.
- 1:35:25[SPEAKER_01]: If I go down, I'm taking everyone down with me, but I haven't found where I haven't found the origin, I couldn't verify it, so I didn't use it.
- 1:35:34[SPEAKER_01]: Cody, curious about what you really think about Bill Mar.
- 1:35:36[SPEAKER_01]: To me, he's always seemed like a better miserable and, oh, bitter, bitter, miserable and hateful person.
- 1:35:43[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, I don't know.
- 1:35:49[SPEAKER_01]: My thing with Bill Mar, I hear where you're coming from.
- 1:35:55[SPEAKER_01]: I hear where you're coming from.
- 1:35:57[SPEAKER_01]: And you certainly are not unreasonable in those conclusions.
- 1:36:03[SPEAKER_01]: My thing with Bill Mars, he's a progressive realist.
- 1:36:07[SPEAKER_01]: And he's just, Chris Cuomo looks like he's coming out of his progressive realism.
- 1:36:13[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know if you've noticed that of late.
- 1:36:15[SPEAKER_01]: That's fascinating.
- 1:36:16[SPEAKER_01]: I'd love to talk with Chris some time.
- 1:36:18[SPEAKER_01]: Just curious just where he is and all that coming from.
- 1:36:22[SPEAKER_01]: Literally, a Democrat dynasty up in my neck of the old neck of the woods in New York.
- 1:36:27[SPEAKER_01]: I grew up in Connecticut.
- 1:36:30[SPEAKER_01]: And you know, I grew up with Cuomo right next to us.
- 1:36:33[SPEAKER_01]: And just to connect this tiny little state compared to New York City, we're in the greater New York area.
- 1:36:40[SPEAKER_01]: So Cuomo was always a huge name for me growing up.
- 1:36:46[SPEAKER_01]: And even he now is saying, I've been so wrong in so many ways about politics, about ideology, about
- 1:36:52[SPEAKER_01]: all kinds of things.
- 1:36:54[SPEAKER_01]: So he seems to have broken through this thing called progressive realism, whereas I don't see Mar having done that yet.
- 1:37:02[SPEAKER_01]: Mar is still progressive realism.
- 1:37:04[SPEAKER_01]: But progressive realism believes is that the arch of history inevitably bends towards liberalism.
- 1:37:11[SPEAKER_01]: I've read
- 1:37:13[SPEAKER_01]: Brian, Brian Edgett, my colleague from Eastern University.
- 1:37:19[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, he could, he could share this with you, you know, talking to our colleagues there.
- 1:37:22[SPEAKER_01]: There is, there's sort of an unspoken rule that life is liberal.
- 1:37:31[SPEAKER_01]: And I've actually read an article once.
- 1:37:34[SPEAKER_01]: I'll never forget it by history professor or forget from where.
- 1:37:39[SPEAKER_01]: And he was answering the question, why are academics particularly history professors?
- 1:37:47[SPEAKER_01]: Why are we always so liberal?
- 1:37:48[SPEAKER_01]: Why are often so liberal?
- 1:37:51[SPEAKER_01]: And his answer was very simple because reality is liberal.
- 1:37:55[SPEAKER_01]: And he said, as a historian when I look at history, I see a movement, an apical movement from century to century, of more and more liberation.
- 1:38:09[SPEAKER_01]: More and more populations are liberated from traditions and religions and customs and cultural obstructions and political obstructions and economic obstructions and racial obstructions and on and on and on.
- 1:38:25[SPEAKER_01]: And there's this liberationist theme that connects all of history.
- 1:38:32[SPEAKER_01]: So all of history is moving towards
- 1:38:36[SPEAKER_01]: the liberal goals, which, of course, have become absurd.
- 1:38:39[SPEAKER_01]: They've become insane, you know, like trans athletes and women's sports and the like and transitions of kids and, you know, they've just become, they've become free and what is a woman and they've become knots.
- 1:38:51[SPEAKER_01]: But regardless, there is this notion that history naturally bends, the archivist or naturally bends towards the liberal and the liberal sentiment and the liberal understanding of reality.
- 1:39:05[SPEAKER_01]: And that's Bill Mark.
- 1:39:06[SPEAKER_01]: That's bill more.
- 1:39:08[SPEAKER_01]: So in the meantime, you can admit the Democrats have been wrong, Democrats have screwed up this, Democrats have screwed up that, and so forth.
- 1:39:15[SPEAKER_01]: But in the end,
- 1:39:17[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats and the liberal left are innocent until proven guilty because they are they represent reality.
- 1:39:25[SPEAKER_01]: They represent where the world is going.
- 1:39:27[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas Republicans are the obstructionists of reality and therefore they are guilty until proven innocent.
- 1:39:35[SPEAKER_01]: And that's an effect what a progressive realist is.
- 1:39:38[SPEAKER_01]: That's what has taken over our legacy media industry entirely entirely.
- 1:39:45[SPEAKER_01]: They are all progressive realists.
- 1:39:47[SPEAKER_01]: And up until recently, it was the faith of Washington, D.C.
- 1:39:55[SPEAKER_01]: and now it's being replaced increasingly with MAGA, make America great again in civilizationalism.
- 1:40:00[SPEAKER_01]: The world is a moving towards liberalism.
- 1:40:04[SPEAKER_01]: The world is returning to more of an archio future, archio modernist concept of world tradition and technology work together.
- 1:40:12[SPEAKER_01]: Because liberalism is
- 1:40:15[SPEAKER_01]: rooted in the notion that technology is opposed to tradition, that science is opposed to religion.
- 1:40:23[SPEAKER_01]: And to the extent, like if you're in the Episcopal Church, if you're going to, if you are religious, you're going to bring religion up in alignment with liberal goals and scientific norms.
- 1:40:36[SPEAKER_01]: Tradition and collusionism.
- 1:40:38[SPEAKER_01]: I love it.
- 1:40:38[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you.
- 1:40:39[SPEAKER_01]: Are he.
- 1:40:39[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you for the gift.
- 1:40:40[SPEAKER_01]: Cody several weeks ago you mentioned a Republican party is inherently dysfunctional.
- 1:40:44[SPEAKER_01]: I was wondering if you could expand on that a little bit more.
- 1:40:46[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, so it's easy.
- 1:40:51[SPEAKER_01]: contrast it with the Democratic Party.
- 1:40:53[SPEAKER_01]: Democratic Party is absolutely cohesive in terms of their ultimate goals.
- 1:40:57[SPEAKER_01]: What are their ultimate goals?
- 1:40:58[SPEAKER_01]: They want to expand the government.
- 1:41:01[SPEAKER_01]: They want to increase your taxes.
- 1:41:03[SPEAKER_01]: They want to increase government control and regulation.
- 1:41:06[SPEAKER_01]: The old
- 1:41:07[SPEAKER_01]: near it.
- 1:41:07[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, the old quick is liberal stone care what you did Democrats don't care what you do as long as it's mandatory right now that you you have different factions you got the progressive wing you've got the more traditional is kind of you know liberal establishment wing you've got you've got you know your pro Palestinians or pro Israelis you've got different they'll clash here or there you got your shumers your AOCs but in the end they all want bigger government
- 1:41:31[SPEAKER_01]: You know, want more regulations.
- 1:41:33[SPEAKER_01]: They all love Mam Donnie in one way shape or form where they wanted, minute or not.
- 1:41:37[SPEAKER_01]: He's just saying, he's just saying explicitly what they all kind of implicitly want.
- 1:41:43[SPEAKER_01]: When it comes to the Republicans, you actually have different goals.
- 1:41:47[SPEAKER_01]: You have diverging goals.
- 1:41:49[SPEAKER_01]: You have a wing that wants to decrease government.
- 1:41:54[SPEAKER_01]: You have a wing that actually wants to increase it.
- 1:41:57[SPEAKER_01]: Not necessarily everywhere, but definitely in their pet projects.
- 1:42:01[SPEAKER_01]: You have a wing that wants to cut taxes across the board.
- 1:42:05[SPEAKER_01]: You have another wing that says, yeah, we could cut taxes here there, but not across the board.
- 1:42:09[SPEAKER_01]: No, I don't want it here.
- 1:42:10[SPEAKER_01]: I don't want it there.
- 1:42:11[SPEAKER_01]: You have one wing that wants to cut spending dramatically.
- 1:42:15[SPEAKER_01]: You have another wing that actually wants to increase spending.
- 1:42:20[SPEAKER_01]: One wants to cut rollback on the other one wants to grow.
- 1:42:22[SPEAKER_01]: So what my Johnson and
- 1:42:28[SPEAKER_01]: John Thun have almost the impossible task of doing is trying to bring together, you know, the likes of Rand Paul with Lisa Murkowski or Ted Cruz with Susan Collins and it's just it's very hard.
- 1:42:45[SPEAKER_01]: It's not easy.
- 1:42:47[SPEAKER_01]: The Republican Party has conflicting goals.
- 1:42:50[SPEAKER_01]: There are some that just really want to roll back government, but there are others who like government and kind of want to keep it the same.
- 1:42:55[SPEAKER_01]: They just want it to manage a little better.
- 1:42:58[SPEAKER_01]: And where's the Democrats?
- 1:42:59[SPEAKER_01]: They're all in on growing government.
- 1:43:01[SPEAKER_01]: So that's the dysfunctionality that I was talking about.
- 1:43:08[SPEAKER_01]: Uh, Renata will Magistop blaming Trump for Epstein.
- 1:43:11[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, eventually.
- 1:43:12[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, they'll move on.
- 1:43:13[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I don't think this is going to be an issue for the midterms.
- 1:43:17[SPEAKER_01]: I know there are a lot of doomers and glimmers, but I don't think so.
- 1:43:22[SPEAKER_01]: And B.W.I.
- 1:43:23[SPEAKER_01]: five, fifty-three shoot.
- 1:43:24[SPEAKER_01]: How to come back?
- 1:43:25[SPEAKER_01]: Do you think Texas News Seats work?
- 1:43:27[SPEAKER_01]: It could backfire of Latino voters, mad reports.
- 1:43:30[SPEAKER_01]: Also, News Scum is also trying to do two to six seats in California.
- 1:43:34[SPEAKER_01]: News Scum is is hampered by a committee for redistricting, redistricting committee.
- 1:43:43[SPEAKER_01]: That's enshrined in their constitution.
- 1:43:45[SPEAKER_01]: So he can't do anything.
- 1:43:46[SPEAKER_01]: The redistricting committee isn't moving on it.
- 1:43:49[SPEAKER_01]: We'll not be done by the midterms.
- 1:43:51[SPEAKER_01]: Now, Texas will do it.
- 1:43:53[SPEAKER_01]: Latino vote has been moving right, and it looks pretty pretty secure.
- 1:43:59[SPEAKER_01]: So yeah, it'll be huge.
- 1:44:01[SPEAKER_01]: Again, according to the Cook County, the Cook County, some of my daughters in Chicago, and the Cook political report, if they put in those seven new seats, the Republicans are sitting at pretty safe, two hundred and seventeen seats.
- 1:44:16[SPEAKER_01]: They just need one more and they're good to go needs more cello What is that?
- 1:44:23[SPEAKER_01]: Pranacasha productions needs more cello needs more cello needs more cello.
- 1:44:28[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know is that is that I don't know whether that's wrong?
- 1:44:32[SPEAKER_01]: Rubber God, is it weird I tolerate Russia more than China, not a fan of some things that they do, but I swear they seem less authoritarian than China, in my opinion.
- 1:44:39[SPEAKER_01]: Wish you were an ally and said, yeah, no, Russia's Christian.
- 1:44:41[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, at least we have, we have that Russia is an ancient thousand year Christian civilization.
- 1:44:47[SPEAKER_01]: It's the largest Orthodox civilization in the world.
- 1:44:50[SPEAKER_01]: And it's the third largest Christian nation in the world, the United States Brazil, Russia.
- 1:44:55[SPEAKER_01]: So no, absolutely.
- 1:44:58[SPEAKER_01]: I think Russia should definitely be an ally.
- 1:45:00[SPEAKER_01]: No question about a China's different China's China's Confucian society.
- 1:45:04[SPEAKER_01]: It uses the system, the ancient system Tianxia, which is the mandate of heaven and the harmony of the cosmos is centered in China, centered in Beijing.
- 1:45:14[SPEAKER_01]: And so they will naturally see themselves as superior to to every other civilization as I understand it.
- 1:45:23[SPEAKER_01]: I should, congrats on the great deal with the EU.
- 1:45:26[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, thank you for the Europe.
- 1:45:29[SPEAKER_01]: I wonder how it will affect the German economy and the rest of Europe as well.
- 1:45:32[SPEAKER_01]: God bless President Trump.
- 1:45:33[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:45:34[SPEAKER_01]: Well, I mean, as long as, as long as you've got the likes of a mayor or a Schultzer or those, those clowns, it's, I agree with the, along only the ADF, AFD can save Germany.
- 1:45:53[SPEAKER_01]: And we'll have to see how that works.
- 1:45:55[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it just doesn't look like the E really did much to benefit you got and to benefit their citizens.
- 1:46:05[SPEAKER_01]: It really seemed to be more some were calling it what were they calling it a tribute.
- 1:46:12[SPEAKER_01]: to the king to make sure he didn't abandon them in their attempt to try to draw the United States further into the Ukrainian conflict.
- 1:46:21[SPEAKER_01]: We'll have to see how it plays out for sure.
- 1:46:24[SPEAKER_01]: But I would love to see, you know, as you know, up shoot or you piece shoot, I try to stay abreast as much as possible on the rise of AFD after.
- 1:46:44[SPEAKER_01]: Because I do believe they can restore sense of civilization normalcy to Germany.
- 1:46:49[SPEAKER_01]: Tucker, you probably saw had a very good, I thought a very good interview with German journalist, just basically excoriating him for his globalism and saying, what is your problem?
- 1:47:02[SPEAKER_01]: embracing and celebrating this unique, amazing glorious German culture that's given us some of the greatest literature, art, architecture, music, science, and economics, imaginable, and innovation, and industry, and so forth.
- 1:47:19[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, Germany is Europe in terms of the economy.
- 1:47:23[SPEAKER_01]: If Germany falls, Europe falls.
- 1:47:24[SPEAKER_01]: So, yeah, we're keeping an eye on that.
- 1:47:28[SPEAKER_01]: I really, really want to see Germany rise again, that's for sure.
- 1:47:35[SPEAKER_01]: Feed the creativity by bringing back art shop home economics in the schools.
- 1:47:39[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, absolutely.
- 1:47:40[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:47:42[SPEAKER_01]: So that's, so you have what's called the liberal arts, but then you have what's also called the survival arts.
- 1:47:48[SPEAKER_01]: And that's one of the things we do at the World View Academy is that we want students not only to be
- 1:47:54[SPEAKER_01]: cultivating moral imagination, but we also want them being able to cultivate a sense of culture and building things and being industrious in the light.
- 1:48:03[SPEAKER_01]: And so that's why the survival arts are complemented.
- 1:48:06[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, that's why the liberal arts are complemented by the survival arts.
- 1:48:10[SPEAKER_01]: Classically speaking, it's blacksmithing and the like.
- 1:48:17[SPEAKER_01]: And that's it.
- 1:48:17[SPEAKER_01]: All right, guys.
- 1:48:18[SPEAKER_01]: You have a wonderful weekend.
- 1:48:19[SPEAKER_01]: I will be your back porch professor.
- 1:48:21[SPEAKER_01]: So make sure you have your whatever you want, your lemonade, your Bruce ski, your beer and nice glass of wine.
- 1:48:28[SPEAKER_01]: We'll be hanging out on my back porch weather permitting later on today.
- 1:48:32[SPEAKER_01]: I'll probably have a couple of videos for you up today, but definitely over the weekend tomorrow night and Sunday.
- 1:48:39[SPEAKER_01]: Again, weather permitting has been pretty rainy out here in the
- 1:48:42[SPEAKER_01]: in the Northeast, Mid and Lannick.
- 1:48:45[SPEAKER_01]: So whether permitting, I will see you out, my back porch.
- 1:48:47[SPEAKER_01]: We're going to have some more wonderful, riching, enriching conversations.
- 1:48:51[SPEAKER_01]: Love you guys.
- 1:48:52[SPEAKER_01]: God bless.
- 1:48:54[SPEAKER_01]: Thanks so much for listening this episode of the Turley Talks podcast.
- 1:48:58[SPEAKER_01]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 1:49:03[SPEAKER_01]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 1:49:10[SPEAKER_01]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.