Latest / The Rita Panahi Show / The Rita Panahi Show | 2 April

Transcript

The Rita Panahi Show | 2 April · The Rita Panahi Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: On Scorums Australia. This is the Winner Panalkey Show.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Panekey Show.
• 0:12
  Speaker 3: Coming up tonight, the Prime Minister addresses the nation and
• 0:15
  Speaker 3: the nation wonders why. Daniel Wilde will join me shortly
• 0:19
  Speaker 3: to discuss that and the day's other top headlines.
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: Is One Nation.
• 0:24
  Speaker 3: The official opposition party in South Australia, Cory Bernardi will
• 0:28
  Speaker 3: be here to discuss that. The Great John Heinderecher will
• 0:32
  Speaker 3: have the latest from the US, including President Trump's addressed
• 0:35
  Speaker 3: to the.
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: Nation, and later in the hour Dedie dun Levy.
• 0:39
  Speaker 3: Will cover royal and entertainment news, as well as the
• 0:43
  Speaker 3: ongoing fallout from Christy Nolmes's husband being exposed as a
• 0:48
  Speaker 3: cross dresser. Plus we never forget lefties losing it tonight
• 0:52
  Speaker 3: featuring this young man telling CNN What's what?
• 0:58
  Speaker 4: Why do you want to be here? Why do you
• 0:59
  Speaker 4: love speaks? Why do you love being a part of history?
• 1:03
  Speaker 5: We're going back.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: To the frecking moon, that's why.
• 1:06
  Speaker 3: But first, last night, Prime Minister Anthony Alberaneasi addressed the
• 1:10
  Speaker 3: nation as the war in the Middle East and its
• 1:13
  Speaker 3: economic fallout continues.
• 1:14
  Speaker 6: To grow, but I understand that right now, it's hard
• 1:18
  Speaker 6: to be positive. I know that you're seeing this at
• 1:21
  Speaker 6: the servo and at the supermarket, and I understand farmers
• 1:25
  Speaker 6: and truckies, small businesses and families are doing it tough
• 1:30
  Speaker 6: and overcoming weeks. If you can switch to catching the
• 1:32
  Speaker 6: train or bus or tram to work, do so. That
• 1:36
  Speaker 6: builds our reserves and it saves fuel for people who
• 1:39
  Speaker 6: have no choice but to drive.
• 1:43
  Speaker 3: Joining me now is Deputy Executive Director of the Institute
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: of Public Affairs, Daniel wild Dad. It was a pointless
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: exercise as far as I could work out, We've had
• 1:53
  Speaker 3: what just motherhood statements, nothing concrete, nothing consequential.
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: But what really me was the tone.
• 2:02
  Speaker 3: The way he was patronizing the nation, talking to us
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: like he's a prep teacher and where the little kidler's
• 2:10
  Speaker 3: sitting on the ground listening.
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: I just don't understand the.
• 2:14
  Speaker 3: Tone or what do you hope to achieve out of
• 2:16
  Speaker 3: that whole exercise.
• 2:18
  Speaker 7: Well, he's completely internally out of touch. This was a
• 2:22
  Speaker 7: pr exercise where he basically took all the media companies
• 2:26
  Speaker 7: for a ride. They believed, you know, if he's calling
• 2:29
  Speaker 7: the nation to have five or ten minutes of his time,
• 2:32
  Speaker 7: you better have something important to say instead. He basically
• 2:36
  Speaker 7: just said, how good am I for cutting the fuel
• 2:38
  Speaker 7: excise nothing of substance in terms of actually getting more
• 2:42
  Speaker 7: oil out of the ground. How are we going to
• 2:44
  Speaker 7: have our own supplies? How are we going to have
• 2:45
  Speaker 7: our own refinery? So we're not in this position again.
• 2:49
  Speaker 7: I thought it was a truly bizarre but revealing moment
• 2:52
  Speaker 7: that he really isn't a leader. He's someone who just
• 2:55
  Speaker 7: sort of exists in a ceremonial role and sort of
• 2:59
  Speaker 7: pats itself on the back every now and again.
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: That's an interesting description.
• 3:05
  Speaker 3: Perhaps the dream that the Republicans had of that ceremonial
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: leader that we all elect, maybe that was elbow. He's
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: before his time. There was nothing there concrete about. Okay,
• 3:20
  Speaker 3: this is a wake up corps for this country. Perhaps
• 3:22
  Speaker 3: we've been on the wrong track with energy policy, not
• 3:26
  Speaker 3: just my government, but coalition governments, and we need to
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: be energy independent, we need to stand on our own
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: two feet. If he even just broached that topic and
• 3:36
  Speaker 3: gave us some confidence that he gets the magnitude of this,
• 3:40
  Speaker 3: he gets the long term implications, and he's going to
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: do something about it, I think that would have changed everything.
• 3:45
  Speaker 3: I think he would have had people from all sides
• 3:48
  Speaker 3: of the political aisle going, well, thank god, there's going
• 3:52
  Speaker 3: to be something positive come out of this crisis.
• 3:56
  Speaker 7: Well that's what astroliers wanted to hear, but we're not
• 3:59
  Speaker 7: going to get that. And as a matter of fact,
• 4:01
  Speaker 7: Albanezi and a lot of people in this government like
• 4:04
  Speaker 7: high fuel prices because it encourages people to ditch internal
• 4:07
  Speaker 7: combustion engines and take up electric vehicles. So you know,
• 4:10
  Speaker 7: as far as they're concerned, so much the better. And
• 4:13
  Speaker 7: you're absolutely right, this is an off ramp for the
• 4:17
  Speaker 7: net zero climate change madness, but this government won't take it.
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: They won't take it.
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: And as Donald Trump has pointed out, the US is
• 4:26
  Speaker 3: energy independent. The European countries that are upset about this
• 4:32
  Speaker 3: conflict and Australia, which really isn't helping out much. We're
• 4:35
  Speaker 3: the ones who have dependent on this, and we were
• 4:37
  Speaker 3: acting like it's the other way around that we expect
• 4:40
  Speaker 3: the US to fix this issue as opposed to taking
• 4:44
  Speaker 3: some action ourselves. And unlike most European countries, we are
• 4:48
  Speaker 3: blessed with all the natural resources you need to be
• 4:51
  Speaker 3: energy independent.
• 4:52
  Speaker 7: Yeah, I mean, this is a self inflicted economic wound.
• 4:55
  Speaker 7: You're always going to have external circumstances, be it war,
• 4:58
  Speaker 7: be it supply chain disruption, and in your spot on
• 5:01
  Speaker 7: in a country like ours, the only reason we're in
• 5:04
  Speaker 7: this situation is because of short sighted damaging policy. That's
• 5:08
  Speaker 7: both sides of politics. It was the coalition that signed
• 5:10
  Speaker 7: us up to net zero, thanks to Scott Morrison. But
• 5:13
  Speaker 7: this is a self inflicted wound that's been accelerated by
• 5:16
  Speaker 7: the international event absolutely now.
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: Richard Miles.
• 5:20
  Speaker 3: Defense Minister Richard Miles has confirmed that Australia will participate
• 5:24
  Speaker 3: in a virtual meeting of thirty five nations discuss military
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: measures to secure the safe passage of vessels in the
• 5:31
  Speaker 3: Strait of Hormuse and we could contribute assets to the plan.
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: This is what he told ABC Radio today.
• 5:39
  Speaker 5: Yeah, we will be participating in that.
• 5:41
  Speaker 8: It'll be a virtual meeting as I understand the next
• 5:43
  Speaker 8: twenty four hours in the Foreign Minister will be representing
• 5:45
  Speaker 8: Australia at that meeting. And it follows on from Australia
• 5:50
  Speaker 8: signing up to the UK led statement more than a
• 5:54
  Speaker 8: week ago in respect of the Straits of Horn Moves.
• 5:57
  Speaker 5: I mean that statement gives a sense of where.
• 6:00
  Speaker 8: I mean, obviously all of those countries and very much
• 6:02
  Speaker 8: Australia have an interest in seeing straits of horn Moves
• 6:04
  Speaker 8: opened as soon as possible.
• 6:07
  Speaker 5: We will look to what Australia can do.
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: Again, does not fill one with confidence, just so weak,
• 6:16
  Speaker 3: wishy washy. We signed a statement of the UK penned.
• 6:19
  Speaker 7: Really yeah, look in principle this is a good thing.
• 6:22
  Speaker 7: If they're able to get the job done, and if
• 6:24
  Speaker 7: we can make a contribution, then so much the better.
• 6:27
  Speaker 7: But yeah, I mean, it doesn't fill me with confidence.
• 6:29
  Speaker 7: It sounds like he's sort of going through the motions.
• 6:32
  Speaker 7: I can sort of picture him sitting in his office
• 6:34
  Speaker 7: with the notes in front of him, reading them out
• 6:36
  Speaker 7: to get the lines out there. And it just goes
• 6:38
  Speaker 7: to this point that we have been as a nation
• 6:41
  Speaker 7: so far behind where we should be on our abilities
• 6:43
  Speaker 7: to defend ourselves and make meaningful contributions to international challenges
• 6:47
  Speaker 7: that we currently face. And this is a reason why
• 6:49
  Speaker 7: the US and others are not looking at Australia as
• 6:53
  Speaker 7: the reliable ally that we once were.
• 6:56
  Speaker 3: Now we spoke yesterday about the looming threasho of stag
• 7:00
  Speaker 3: due to this fuel crisis. That's when you have the
• 7:03
  Speaker 3: worst of both world's high unemployment, high inflation. Well more
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: economists are warning that we are headed in that direction.
• 7:10
  Speaker 3: Economists at Cities say there is a twenty five percent
• 7:14
  Speaker 3: chance that the country will enter a recession. They said
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: with growing slowing inflation and unemployment rising, this is the
• 7:22
  Speaker 3: greatest stagflation risk faced by the Australian economy in the
• 7:26
  Speaker 3: twenty first century. Dad is treasurer, gim charmers up to
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: the task. Can he prevent the country from falling into recession,
• 7:34
  Speaker 3: perhaps even stackflation?
• 7:36
  Speaker 7: Well it can, but he won't because what needs to
• 7:39
  Speaker 7: be done is beyond the capacity of the government. Now,
• 7:42
  Speaker 7: stackflation is a problem because usually if you have high inflation,
• 7:46
  Speaker 7: that's a sign that unemployment is low because you've got
• 7:49
  Speaker 7: people in jobs spending money. And usually if inflation is low,
• 7:52
  Speaker 7: that's because people are out of jobs and not spending money.
• 7:54
  Speaker 7: When you've got both that are high, that's a real
• 7:56
  Speaker 7: structural problem. The reason we are going to that place
• 7:59
  Speaker 7: in this is because we're not generating any wealth or growth.
• 8:03
  Speaker 7: We don't our supply side, our capacity to produce wealth
• 8:07
  Speaker 7: has collapsed at the same time as we have demand
• 8:10
  Speaker 7: increasing because of mass migration and massive government spending. So
• 8:14
  Speaker 7: that is what is causing these twin problems. You put
• 8:16
  Speaker 7: on top of that all of the regulation and red
• 8:18
  Speaker 7: tape that businesses face. That's why we've got the problem
• 8:21
  Speaker 7: that we have. So yes, the government can do things
• 8:24
  Speaker 7: to fix it. Cut immigration, reduce red tape, make sure
• 8:29
  Speaker 7: that we can have a resources sector that can generate
• 8:31
  Speaker 7: wealth rather than undermining them. Are they going to do
• 8:33
  Speaker 7: those things? Absolutely not.
• 8:36
  Speaker 3: Well no, it's not in their DNA to do any
• 8:38
  Speaker 3: of that, is it. It just goes against their ideological position.
• 8:43
  Speaker 3: And we're hearing all sorts of mixed reports. They're talking
• 8:46
  Speaker 3: about slashing the capital gains tax discount, they're talking about
• 8:50
  Speaker 3: increasing spending in certain areas when everyone's recommending they slash spending.
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: So it's going to be a surprise what we get
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: out of this budget.
• 8:59
  Speaker 7: Well, I think it'll be all the same. It'll be
• 9:00
  Speaker 7: higher taxes and more spending.
• 9:03
  Speaker 2: I just don't we was surprised possible.
• 9:05
  Speaker 7: I look, I don't. I mean what else are they
• 9:09
  Speaker 7: going to do? I mean, as I say, the big
• 9:10
  Speaker 7: ticket items, cut immigration, get rid of net zero, reduce
• 9:13
  Speaker 7: regulation on small business. I don't get any indication that
• 9:17
  Speaker 7: they're going to do any of that, So things are
• 9:19
  Speaker 7: just going to keep going on as they are now.
• 9:21
  Speaker 3: After the huge success of One Nation in the South
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: Australian election, leader Pauline Hanson has doubled down on her
• 9:27
  Speaker 3: quest to reshape Australian politics. This is what she had
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: to say on Sky News yesterday.
• 9:33
  Speaker 9: People want change. They're sick and tired of these political parties.
• 9:37
  Speaker 9: They don't have vision for the future, they don't have answers.
• 9:39
  Speaker 9: We're in the dire mess that we are in this
• 9:42
  Speaker 9: country because they're policies under both of them and people
• 9:45
  Speaker 9: want clear policies, directions, someone like One Nation, who has
• 9:49
  Speaker 9: this country and it's people at heart now.
• 9:52
  Speaker 3: Pauline Hanson also confirmed One Nation would go after Victoria
• 9:56
  Speaker 3: in the November state election and declared that the part
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: would win the hotly contested federal seat of Fara in
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: the upcoming by election that was Susan Lee's old seat.
• 10:10
  Speaker 3: I'm going to be speaking to Cory Bernardi shortly, Dan,
• 10:13
  Speaker 3: but the tide is slowly, well maybe not so slowly anymore.
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: We've got One.
• 10:20
  Speaker 3: Nation now, who are saying we are the official opposition
• 10:24
  Speaker 3: in South Australia.
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 10:26
  Speaker 7: Well, I think it has all sort of changed and
• 10:28
  Speaker 7: it's almost as if it's passed the Liberal Party by
• 10:32
  Speaker 7: you know, the results in South Australia can't be understated
• 10:36
  Speaker 7: that One Nation wiped out the Liberal Party in the
• 10:39
  Speaker 7: outer suburbs, but they also overtook the Liberal Party in
• 10:42
  Speaker 7: the urban fringe.
• 10:42
  Speaker 3: As well, with a number of seats where they came
• 10:45
  Speaker 3: in second ahead of the Liberal That's right, is something
• 10:49
  Speaker 3: that should be alarming the coalition across the country.
• 10:51
  Speaker 7: That's right. You might be able to understand the outer suburbs,
• 10:54
  Speaker 7: but certainly when you're eating into the middle suburbs and
• 10:57
  Speaker 7: the regions, there's not much left. And so One Nation
• 11:00
  Speaker 7: has also succeeded in taking the Labor Party's vote. You
• 11:03
  Speaker 7: look at the outer suburbs, some seats went from seventy
• 11:06
  Speaker 7: to thirty Labor Liberal to fifty five to forty five
• 11:09
  Speaker 7: Labor One Nation. So Labour's also eaten into One Nation
• 11:13
  Speaker 7: is also eating into Labour's working class vote as well.
• 11:17
  Speaker 7: Now can they maintain that. The challenge One Nation has
• 11:20
  Speaker 7: is they don't get many preferences, so it's hard for
• 11:23
  Speaker 7: them to win a lot of seats. So if they
• 11:25
  Speaker 7: don't get a primary of thirty plus, it's hard for
• 11:28
  Speaker 7: them to get seats. So the next phase is are
• 11:31
  Speaker 7: they going to convince people to put one nation second
• 11:33
  Speaker 7: for those who don't want to put it first. And
• 11:35
  Speaker 7: if they can do that, then they're off to the races.
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: Well, Liberals coalition need to decide what they want to
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: do as well, because they can't continue to treat one
• 11:47
  Speaker 3: nation like they're the minno in this relationship?
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: Are they?
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: They can be disregarded because if they don't have some
• 11:55
  Speaker 3: sort of a preference still, some sort of preference discipline
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: on the right, you're going to have Labor remaining power.
• 12:01
  Speaker 3: You're going to have Labor with a primary vote of
• 12:03
  Speaker 3: somewhere around the thirty percent mark winning comfortably.
• 12:08
  Speaker 7: Well, that's probably the most likely scenario is Labour's primary
• 12:11
  Speaker 7: goes backwards but they win more seats, Liberals lose seats,
• 12:15
  Speaker 7: One nation wins a few seats. Look one, preferences can
• 12:20
  Speaker 7: only be recommended. People will vote the way they want
• 12:22
  Speaker 7: to vote anyway, So preference deals are important, but I
• 12:25
  Speaker 7: don't think they're as big of a deal today as
• 12:27
  Speaker 7: they used to be because people basically make up their
• 12:30
  Speaker 7: own minds.
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: Now, they're not looking at the little slip of payper
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: that the party not as much.
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: Daniel Wilde, thank you so much for your time.
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: Thank you.
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: Now One Nation has unveiled their winning candidates from the
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: South Australian election, pending a recount in one seat. There
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: are now three One Nation MPs in the Upper House
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: and four in the Lower House. Police to say One
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: Nation South Australian leader Cory Bernardi joins me. Now, Corey,
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: this is a diverse group of individuals. Do you consider
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: One Nation the true opposition in South Australia?
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: Now, good a reader. Look, we are a diverse group
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: of individuals. We've got different skills and strengths and experiences,
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: but we're actually united by one single thing that we
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: want to put South Australia and South Australians first, as
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: part of our mission to give voice to those who
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: have been left behind by the uniparty. And realistically, even
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: though we don't have the same number of seats in
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: the lower houses say the Liberal Party, I'm absolutely confident
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: we will be the unofficial opposition because we actually are
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: prepared to speak up for things that matter. Whereas the
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: Liberal Party goes through focus groups and then decides to
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: have a leadership change, and they've demonstrated a complete lack
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: of capacity to actually hold the government to account over
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: the last four years. So yeah, we're going to give
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: it a very good crack and speak up for the
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: people that matter.
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: Now, there's been some criticism of your new MP's suggestions
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: from some that they're not equipped to be MPs and
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: their work history is not up to the standard required
• 14:11
  Speaker 3: of a member of Parliament.
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: What's your response to that.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: Well, you know, criticizing people who have just been elected
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: to parliament before they've actually been sworn in and are
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: empowered to do anything is kind of really weak and pathetic.
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: These are people who have put themselves forward, they've been
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: elected in a democratic process, and surely you wait until
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: they're sworn in, till they get their feet under the seats,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: and then they can actually start to do the job
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: that they've been elected to do. As I said, it's
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: easy to criticize from the cheap seats and not put
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: yourself into the ring, But you know, the proof will
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: be in the putting reader. We will be a strong voice.
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: We will make sure that we stick up for the
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: things that are important and for the forgotten people and
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: that's why we've had this record breaking result. Let's not
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: forget we're the first party in one hundred years to
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: actually have lower House MPs elected. We've got nearly twenty
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: five percent, nearly of the vote across the state in
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: the upper House, and we beat the Liberal Party at
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: their own game, even though they were preferenced by their
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: Uni Party colleagues the Labor government. That tells you all
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: you need to know. The Labor Government fears one Nation
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: because they know we're going to be a really strong voice.
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: I'd rather have the controlled opposition known as the Uniuni
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: Party Blue Team.
• 15:32
  Speaker 3: Now you've been outspoken about any state based voice in
• 15:38
  Speaker 3: South Australia. Tell me about the issue of racial politics
• 15:42
  Speaker 3: in that state.
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: It's just ridiculous. Three So there was a referendum, a
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: federal referendum which rejected an Aboriginal voice to the Parliament
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: in its totality. The Premier here didn't care about the
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: results of that, so he enacted one before and there
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: was actually a third election held, not just the Legative
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: councilor in the House of Assembly, a third election for
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: the Aboriginal Voice to Parliament. On the same day as
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: we had our state election. That means some people had
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: got three votes at this state election, less than ten
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: percent of the people eligible to vote in that election
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: decided to do it. We had two people that are
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: elected with just over a handful of votes for fifteen
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: votes each. And you actually had three people elected as
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: representatives with zero votes because they had the right gender
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: as well as the right ethnicity. This is nonsensical. The
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: people who are eligible to vote for it don't bother.
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: They don't know what it does. It's a make work scheme.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: It's some symbolic stuff that no one really knows what
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: benefits going to have in closing the gap or dealing
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: with some of the terrible things that are happening in
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: some Aboriginal communities. This is a farce. It's got to go.
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: And we want to get rid of all race based
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: legislation because we are a single country, a single people
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: diverse backgrounds, but we're all Australians and we're all South Australians.
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: We should be treated equally.
• 17:06
  Speaker 3: Why is South Australian labor pressing ahead with this because
• 17:10
  Speaker 3: South Australia was one of the strongest NO votes in
• 17:14
  Speaker 3: the country. I think from memory it was something like
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: two out of three voters that it was around sixty
• 17:20
  Speaker 3: five percent voted no in South Australia. Why they determined
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: to have a state based voice.
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: Now, this is the thing, reader, it's ideology. And they
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: were supported and cheered on in this by the Liberal Party.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: And it was only when one nation came into the
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: fray and looked like being an electoral threat that they
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: decided to change their policy in late last year. So
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: what we've got is the unipartis i call them, who
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: are blinded by ideology and thinking, oh, we've got to
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: cater to this specific group or placate this mob in
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: order to to look like we're doing something. We don't
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: care about real outcomes. Of course, right, that doesn't matter.
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: As long as we appear to be doing something symbolic,
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: it'll be fantastic. Well that's not serving the country well.
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: And that's why people's lifestyles, that's why the quality of
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: life in Australia is actually going backwards. People are finding
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: it harder because both the Liberal Party and the Labor
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: Party don't give usop about the outcomes. They actually only
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: care about looking to do something in order to get
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: to power. That's wrong and so we're going to call
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: this out every single time because the policies of today
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: are going to deliver the outcomes of tomorrow, just like
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: the negative outcomes today have been a product of twenty
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: or thirty years of uniparty rule and we need to
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: change it reata.
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: Now you're going to face a much better run National
• 18:49
  Speaker 3: Party under the leadership of Matt Canavan. It's been reported
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: here will be camping out in the New South Wales
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: seat of Fara ahead of the May nine by election. Corey,
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: what do you realistically expect to see at that by election?
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: This has been a Liberal coalition seat for decades. It's
• 19:10
  Speaker 3: been a coalition seat since it was created back in
• 19:13
  Speaker 3: nineteen forty nine.
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: All Ready, you can't fatten the pig on market day,
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: that's the farmer's parlance. And what you've got is a
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: refreshed National Party who are now the leader is now
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: disavowing the very things that actually made him popular in
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: the first place. There is something structurally broken in politics
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: in this country, and it is that we've got this
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: homogeneous cookie cut of stuff. And Matt Canaban might be
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: a decent bloke and he might go into his party room,
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: but he's got a whole bunch of left shops in
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: there that just say, oh, we need to placate the internationalists,
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: or we need to make labor feel good, or we
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: need to make the Greenies feel good. Hey, what about
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: making the Australian people feel good and proud of their country,
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: making them affordable, being able to afford a house in
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: this country, getting rid of net zero so we can
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: have a reliable electricity grid, and creating jobs and entrepreneurship. Right,
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: that's the guts of what needs to happen. But instead
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: we've got a bit more of the same. Oh maybe
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: we'll tink around the edges here and the labor and
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: liberal parties. What they're doing is they're saying, we'll manage
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: the decline of this great nation slightly less badly than
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: the other mob. Well, I say that's not good enough.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: We need to replace them. We need to make sure
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: that we've got practical, common sense policies going forward that
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: are actually going to get outcomes for people. So I
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: expect in the pharaoh by election, I expect one nation
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: to win because they deserve to win, and the people
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: know they've had a guts full of politics as usual
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: in this country.
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: Now before you go, the Victorian election is coming up
• 20:44
  Speaker 3: in November. I would argue the Labor Party in this
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: state is the worst government in the country by some margin.
• 20:53
  Speaker 3: What can we expect to see from One Nation in
• 20:55
  Speaker 3: this state.
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: I think you'll see a solid fight. You know, just
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: as we've done here in South Australia. We've broke records
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: in this state and we've broken convention and we sent
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: an earthquake through the two party duopoly. I think that's
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: going to happen in Victoria as well. I think One
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: Nation are going to be very very popular there because
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: the people know that, you know, we're fearless. We do
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: not care about the criticisms that come our way from
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: the people who are entrenched in this this entitlement mentality.
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: What we care about other people. And you're quite right
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: about the Victorian government, it's been the worst in the country.
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: But I suspect there's other Labour states around this country
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: that are on the same trajectory. And that's why One
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: Nation is absolutely important. We can't rely on the Liberal
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: Party or the National Party to stop the corruption, to
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: be a good voice in opposition, they're always talking about themselves.
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: We want to talk about the people of this country.
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: Corey Bernardi, thank you for your time.
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: You're welcome.
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: Right, it is still to come, the lefties lose.
• 22:00
  Speaker 3: The ed Past will have the latest from the US,
• 22:02
  Speaker 3: including President Trump's address to the nation. John Heinderaker is
• 22:07
  Speaker 3: up next, welcome back. It's time for lefties losing it.
• 22:16
  Speaker 3: And we have another entry from the view. This time
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: it's joy Behar making this incredible claim, and by incredible
• 22:23
  Speaker 3: I mean a straight out lie, hysterical misinformation. Here she claims,
• 22:29
  Speaker 3: if the Save Act is passed and voter ID becomes law,
• 22:33
  Speaker 3: well that means women will stop voting and there won't
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: even be an election.
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: The midterms won't happen.
• 22:41
  Speaker 10: We'll be lucky if we have those midterms, because what
• 22:44
  Speaker 10: they are trying to do is stop especially women from
• 22:47
  Speaker 10: voting with this Save Act, and the Supreme Court is
• 22:52
  Speaker 10: poised to let them do it. Watch the Supreme Court
• 22:56
  Speaker 10: right now.
• 22:56
  Speaker 11: They're playing such an important role, by the way in
• 22:58
  Speaker 11: our country saying that.
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: They passed that out.
• 23:02
  Speaker 10: We won't we won't.
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: See we will. I told you incredible.
• 23:08
  Speaker 3: ABC continue to air that program, knowing perfectly well it
• 23:13
  Speaker 3: is nothing but miserable misinformation.
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: Relentless leftist propaganda.
• 23:18
  Speaker 3: Let's see now from basketball great Charles Barkley, who clearly
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: doesn't understand the difference between immigrants and illegal immigrants.
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: Here's a clue, truck, it's the word illegal.
• 23:31
  Speaker 12: The wigh some of these other immigrants again treated in
• 23:35
  Speaker 12: our country right now, there's a travesty and a disgrace.
• 23:40
  Speaker 12: I think there's a difference between amazing immigrants and criminal immigrants.
• 23:46
  Speaker 12: And I think what's going on in our country, what
• 23:49
  Speaker 12: we're doing in some of these amazing immigrants, is really unfortunate,
• 23:55
  Speaker 12: and it's really sad. And that's a greatmmigrant story. And
• 24:00
  Speaker 12: we have a lot of great immigrant stories out there
• 24:03
  Speaker 12: who these stories need to be told.
• 24:06
  Speaker 3: Oh, Charles, the difference isn't between amazing immigrants and criminal immigrants.
• 24:12
  Speaker 3: It's between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. You either believe
• 24:16
  Speaker 3: in borders and in the right of countries to exist
• 24:20
  Speaker 3: and protect those borders, or you're an open borders leftys.
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: Up to you.
• 24:26
  Speaker 3: Now, Don Lemon's levels of delusion should be studied here
• 24:30
  Speaker 3: he speaks about how one.
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: Day he could be president. Seriously, could it happen?
• 24:37
  Speaker 11: Yeah, it could happen if the opportunity presented itself, the
• 24:41
  Speaker 11: right opportunity presented itself. Look if I wanted to and
• 24:45
  Speaker 11: people are going to think I'm crazy, this is going
• 24:46
  Speaker 11: to be the headline and people are going to laugh
• 24:48
  Speaker 11: about it. I think I could be president of the
• 24:50
  Speaker 11: United States. I could definitely run this country better than.
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump.
• 24:57
  Speaker 3: He's a rare, one rare combination of confidence and almost
• 25:02
  Speaker 3: zero ability. Let's look at some of Don's work. Firstly,
• 25:06
  Speaker 3: with folk who may one day vote for him.
• 25:09
  Speaker 11: If you could say anything to the President Donald Trump,
• 25:11
  Speaker 11: what would you say?
• 25:12
  Speaker 13: Oh?
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: I hate him. I think he's a horrible person. He's
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: ruined America.
• 25:17
  Speaker 13: That the whole kindcept of an American dream is just shot.
• 25:21
  Speaker 5: I would say to step down.
• 25:23
  Speaker 14: I think we hit a replacement.
• 25:24
  Speaker 5: Stop funding Israel, help America. Oh, make America better again.
• 25:29
  Speaker 5: That's not making America better again. Fund the Israel. That's bad.
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: Like, come on out. No objections there from Don. That
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: was all music to his ears.
• 25:38
  Speaker 3: But listen to what happens when a Persian American tries
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: to speak to him.
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: Don can't help objecting.
• 25:45
  Speaker 15: There's a lot of readream kills women. They killed fifty
• 25:49
  Speaker 15: thousand people in two days. A lot of them believe
• 25:52
  Speaker 15: death and all of Americans. So I'm for hundred percent
• 25:56
  Speaker 15: for Donald Trump.
• 25:57
  Speaker 11: So you said you're a Persian, but there's no imminent
• 26:00
  Speaker 11: threat to the United States.
• 26:02
  Speaker 15: My dad grew up in your aunt. You had to
• 26:03
  Speaker 15: fear the country when he was fourteen again and fully
• 26:05
  Speaker 15: support Donald Trump with the bombing of the Supreme Leader.
• 26:08
  Speaker 11: But do you understand how Americans feel that this had
• 26:10
  Speaker 11: nothing to do with us. We're not there's no eminent threat.
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: Poor kid does try to explain to dim Don there
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: that this regime kills women for not wearing a hey jab.
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: It doesn't care, it doesn't care.
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: Suddenly Don Lemon wants us to believe he's some sort
• 26:28
  Speaker 3: of America first non interventionist.
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: Give me a break. Now, let's go to Sea Pack.
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: That's just concluded, and.
• 26:36
  Speaker 3: Let's check in on this lass who showed up with
• 26:39
  Speaker 3: two distinct hair colors wearing a Deport Millennia cap and
• 26:44
  Speaker 3: leave your mega boyfriend top.
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: I'm here to smell on the corner here.
• 26:50
  Speaker 5: Why have you come to Seapack to day?
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: I'm not a sea pactice is what hart rolls look like?
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: Thanks for asking the way have you come to Sea
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: Pack to day. I mean, clearly there's going to be
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: some connection, right. Why are you would see Peck today?
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: Your accent tells me that you're not from this country.
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: You sound like an immigrant.
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: That's what a hot girl looks like. Good to know
• 27:07
  Speaker 3: she didn't nail the Aussie accent though, so good on
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: her for that. And let's look at a highlight from
• 27:13
  Speaker 3: the No King's protest.
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: This old dude.
• 27:15
  Speaker 3: Sums up the crowd, confused, angry, incapable of articulating.
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: Any argument wat chat.
• 27:22
  Speaker 3: He loses it when the interviewer points out that it
• 27:25
  Speaker 3: was Kamala Harris who was installed, not elected, as the
• 27:29
  Speaker 3: Democrat nominee.
• 27:31
  Speaker 2: No one voted for Kamala. We say no kings and
• 27:34
  Speaker 2: no authoritarianism. But Kamala Harris no one voted for her.
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: Oh yes they did. Half the country vote for her.
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: So no one was voted for her to be the nominee.
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: Yes they did.
• 27:44
  Speaker 5: Isn't that like authoritarian You're going on.
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: The wrong road right now with me. I wasn't go
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: any further.
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: What does that mean?
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to talk to anywhere that Now.
• 27:52
  Speaker 3: Let's end lefties on a high note with this. A
• 27:55
  Speaker 3: young man who gave CNN a piece of his mind.
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: They asked the dumb question and they got an awesome answer.
• 28:03
  Speaker 4: Why do you want to be here? Why do you
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: love space? Why do you love being a part of history?
• 28:08
  Speaker 5: We're going back.
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: To the frecking moon. That's why right now.
• 28:12
  Speaker 3: Donald Trump addressed the nation earlier today, and he gave
• 28:15
  Speaker 3: us this little preview of what to expect.
• 28:19
  Speaker 14: And to know.
• 28:19
  Speaker 16: I'm making a little speech at nine o'clock and basically
• 28:23
  Speaker 16: I'm going to I'm going to tell everybody how great
• 28:27
  Speaker 16: I am, What a great job after, what a phenomenal job,
• 28:30
  Speaker 16: What a phenomenal job I've done.
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: Let's bring in Center for the American Experiment, President and
• 28:36
  Speaker 3: co founder of the popular power Line blog, John Heindereger. John,
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: Let's break down the key points of this address to
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: the nation. Firstly, watching the whole thing, did it instill
• 28:49
  Speaker 3: confidence domestically?
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: Well?
• 28:53
  Speaker 17: Reader, The Democrats have been rooting for the Mullahs, hoping
• 28:56
  Speaker 17: that we'll fail at Iran, and nothing that Trump says
• 28:59
  Speaker 17: well please them. But most Americans support the action in
• 29:03
  Speaker 17: Iran and wanted to succeed, but they also wanted to end.
• 29:07
  Speaker 17: They don't want a ground war, and tonight Trump said
• 29:10
  Speaker 17: that the campaign will be over in two or three weeks,
• 29:13
  Speaker 17: which is what people want to hear, and he implied
• 29:16
  Speaker 17: at least that there will not be a ground offensive.
• 29:18
  Speaker 17: So Trump is doing what most Americans want, and I
• 29:21
  Speaker 17: think he's also doing the right thing.
• 29:25
  Speaker 3: And he did talk about the Iranian regime. Here explains
• 29:29
  Speaker 3: the forty seven year reign of terror.
• 29:33
  Speaker 13: This fannacular regime has been chanting death to America, death
• 29:38
  Speaker 13: to Israel for forty seven years. Their proxies were behind
• 29:43
  Speaker 13: the murder of two hundred and forty one Americans and
• 29:47
  Speaker 13: the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, the slaughter of hundreds
• 29:50
  Speaker 13: of our service members with roadside bombs. They were involved
• 29:55
  Speaker 13: in the attack on the USS coal and they're carried
• 29:59
  Speaker 13: out the the countless other heinous acts, including the blood
• 30:03
  Speaker 13: just horrible, bloody atrocities of October seventh in Israel, something
• 30:10
  Speaker 13: that most people have never seen anything like it. This
• 30:14
  Speaker 13: murder's regime also recently killed forty five thousand of their
• 30:18
  Speaker 13: own people who were protesting in Iran. Forty five thousand dead.
• 30:24
  Speaker 13: For these terrorists to have nuclear weapons would be an
• 30:27
  Speaker 13: intolerable threat. The most violent and thugish regime on Earth
• 30:32
  Speaker 13: would be free to carry out their campaigns of terror, coercion, conquest,
• 30:37
  Speaker 13: and mass murder from behind a nuclear shield.
• 30:41
  Speaker 14: I will never let that happen.
• 30:44
  Speaker 3: John, President Trump also pointed out that this situation should
• 30:48
  Speaker 3: have really been handled by previous president. This Uranian threat
• 30:53
  Speaker 3: is not new, It's existed for decades. But as you
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: pointed out there, you could not allow them to have
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: new clear weapons.
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: RITA.
• 31:02
  Speaker 17: The Iranian regime has been making war on the United
• 31:05
  Speaker 17: States since nineteen seventy nine, as well as other countries.
• 31:09
  Speaker 14: And Trump is absolutely right.
• 31:11
  Speaker 17: This is something that should have been done by prior administrations,
• 31:14
  Speaker 17: but they kicked the can down the road. The Obama
• 31:17
  Speaker 17: administration literally tried to bribe the Mullahs and that was
• 31:20
  Speaker 17: a very foolish policy. So Trump is finally doing something
• 31:24
  Speaker 17: that has needed to be done for a very long time.
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: Now.
• 31:28
  Speaker 3: During this space, you obviously addressed domestic concerns, as you said,
• 31:33
  Speaker 3: a lot of Americans want this conflict to end in
• 31:36
  Speaker 3: the short term as opposed to months and years. But
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: he also delivered a message to the Iranian regime.
• 31:43
  Speaker 13: We're going to hit them extremely hard over the next
• 31:46
  Speaker 13: two to three weeks. We're going to bring them back
• 31:50
  Speaker 13: to the stone ages where they belong. In the meantime,
• 31:54
  Speaker 13: discussions are ongoing. Regime change was not our goal. We
• 31:58
  Speaker 13: never said regime change, But regime change has occurred because
• 32:02
  Speaker 13: of all of their original leader's death.
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: They're all dead.
• 32:09
  Speaker 13: The new group is less radical and much more reasonable. Yet,
• 32:13
  Speaker 13: if during this period of time no deal is made,
• 32:15
  Speaker 13: we have our eyes or key targets. If there is
• 32:19
  Speaker 13: no deal, we are going to hit each and every
• 32:21
  Speaker 13: one of their electric generating plants very hard, and probably simultaneously.
• 32:27
  Speaker 13: We have not hit their oil, even though that's the
• 32:30
  Speaker 13: easiest target of all because it would not give them
• 32:33
  Speaker 13: even a small chance of survival or rebuilding. But we
• 32:38
  Speaker 13: could hit it and it would be gone, and is
• 32:41
  Speaker 13: not a thing they could do about it. They have
• 32:44
  Speaker 13: no anti aircraft equipment, their radar is one hundred percent annihilated.
• 32:50
  Speaker 13: We are unstoppable as a military force.
• 32:55
  Speaker 3: John, how likely is it that the US will hit
• 32:59
  Speaker 3: that infrastructure in Iran? They've refrained from doing it. They
• 33:03
  Speaker 3: know the impact it would have on the country, on
• 33:05
  Speaker 3: the population. But is that a threat he's willing to
• 33:09
  Speaker 3: carry out? If the Iranian regime continues to behave as
• 33:13
  Speaker 3: it has been.
• 33:15
  Speaker 17: Well, I think it could be Rita. Trump is talking
• 33:17
  Speaker 17: about making a deal with whoever's left. I don't know
• 33:20
  Speaker 17: who can speak for the regime at this point, but
• 33:22
  Speaker 17: Trump is talking about making a deal. I think the
• 33:25
  Speaker 17: only deal that makes any sense is in agreement by
• 33:29
  Speaker 17: whoever is in charge in Tehran to stop harassing shipping
• 33:33
  Speaker 17: in the Strait of Horror moves. I think that's the
• 33:35
  Speaker 17: only thing at this point that realistically we can get.
• 33:39
  Speaker 17: I mean, we all know that even if somebody could
• 33:42
  Speaker 17: speak for Iran and try to make a deal over
• 33:44
  Speaker 17: a period of time, they would never adhere to it,
• 33:45
  Speaker 17: they would never follow it. So I think that the
• 33:48
  Speaker 17: most likely endgame is that Trump agrees not to destroy
• 33:52
  Speaker 17: the power plants in exchange for Iran stopping their harassment
• 33:58
  Speaker 17: of shipping in the Strait of Horror Moved, and that
• 34:01
  Speaker 17: leads them to the conclusion of the hostilities.
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: Now John The Trump administration's criticism of NATO continues. Secretary
• 34:10
  Speaker 3: of State Marco Rubio said overnight that the US will
• 34:14
  Speaker 3: re examine its relationship with NATO America's European allies. Well,
• 34:19
  Speaker 3: there've been nowhere to be seen during this conflict, reluctant
• 34:22
  Speaker 3: to join the military operation in the Middle East. It
• 34:26
  Speaker 3: has been a bit of a one way street, hasn't
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: it NATO. They expect the US to be there to
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: defend them when they need it, But when the US
• 34:34
  Speaker 3: calls on them to live up to their end of
• 34:36
  Speaker 3: the bargain, well, we've seen what's happened in recent weeks.
• 34:41
  Speaker 14: Read.
• 34:41
  Speaker 17: I would say that the NATO allies have been not
• 34:44
  Speaker 17: just reluctant to join on the effort, but unable to
• 34:47
  Speaker 17: do much. You know, Britain has a base in Cyprus
• 34:50
  Speaker 17: that there was hit and damaged by an Iranian missile,
• 34:54
  Speaker 17: and Britain was going to try to get a ship
• 34:55
  Speaker 17: or an aircraft carrier to the eastern Mediterranean. They struggled
• 34:59
  Speaker 17: even to do that. You know, France has an aircraft
• 35:01
  Speaker 17: carrier that apparently they set off someone in the Mediterranean.
• 35:05
  Speaker 17: But I am skeptical how much ability these allies really
• 35:09
  Speaker 17: have if we need them to fight a war. And
• 35:12
  Speaker 17: so NANO is not a meaningful alliance if all it
• 35:16
  Speaker 17: means is that we protect the Europeans and they do nothing,
• 35:19
  Speaker 17: not even let us use our own bases. And so
• 35:22
  Speaker 17: when you hear this kind of talk. It's not Trump
• 35:24
  Speaker 17: or Rubio being anti europe. It's really just reality.
• 35:30
  Speaker 3: It is reality, and there's a lot of money that
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: goes into the NATO alliance. And yes, the Europeans have
• 35:36
  Speaker 3: increased their spending, but as you've described, they seeming capable
• 35:40
  Speaker 3: of defending themselves a lit alone helping their allies. Now,
• 35:44
  Speaker 3: let's go to matters at home. In the US, the
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case challenging Prisident
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: Donald Trump's executive order against birthright citizenship. That's when an
• 35:57
  Speaker 3: illegal immigrant gives birth in the US and that child
• 36:00
  Speaker 3: is granted citizenship.
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: John, I want to.
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: Play you comments here from Supreme Court Justice Katanji Brown Jackson,
• 36:08
  Speaker 3: who let's not forget President Joe Biden put on the
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: Supreme Court, listen to this absurd definition of the word allegiance.
• 36:17
  Speaker 2: And I have to be honest here.
• 36:18
  Speaker 3: When I first heard this, I thought it was some
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: April fool's joke. I thought it was a spoof.
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: It's real.
• 36:26
  Speaker 18: You obviously have permanent allegiance based on being born in
• 36:30
  Speaker 18: whatever country you're from. That's what everybody recognizes. But you
• 36:34
  Speaker 18: also have local allegiance when you are on the soil
• 36:39
  Speaker 18: of this other sovereign And I was thinking, you know,
• 36:43
  Speaker 18: I'm IAUS citizen and visiting Japan, And what it means
• 36:48
  Speaker 18: is that, you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan,
• 36:53
  Speaker 18: the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me. It's
• 36:59
  Speaker 18: allegiance to me. Can they control you? As a matter
• 37:03
  Speaker 18: of law? I can also rely on them if my
• 37:05
  Speaker 18: wallet is stolen to you under Japanese law, go and
• 37:09
  Speaker 18: prosecute the person who has stolen it. So there's this
• 37:13
  Speaker 18: relationship based on even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm
• 37:17
  Speaker 18: just on vacation in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance
• 37:23
  Speaker 18: in that sense.
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: John, That's incredible.
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: She seems to think that jurisdiction is the same as allegiance.
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: It's hard to fathom how she.
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: Got into law school, let alone becoming a Supreme Court justice.
• 37:39
  Speaker 17: Well, it's a very odd analogy. She shows allegiance to
• 37:42
  Speaker 17: the nation of Japan by stealing someone's wallet.
• 37:45
  Speaker 14: I mean she lost me along the way somewhere.
• 37:47
  Speaker 17: The issue here is whether the children of illegal aliens
• 37:51
  Speaker 17: are entitled under the Constitution to citizenship in the United States.
• 37:55
  Speaker 17: So Congress could pass a law granting them citizenship, but
• 37:59
  Speaker 17: Congress would never do that, and so the argument now
• 38:02
  Speaker 17: is over the scope of the fourteenth Amendment. I think
• 38:05
  Speaker 17: that the fourteenth Amendment should be read not to require
• 38:08
  Speaker 17: birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens. I think
• 38:13
  Speaker 17: the vote is going to be very close, and we'll
• 38:15
  Speaker 17: see how it turns out.
• 38:18
  Speaker 3: Now, Ron DeSantis is petitioning the state legislature that's sending
• 38:23
  Speaker 3: Florida to impeach Judge Tiffany Baker. This is after she
• 38:27
  Speaker 3: released a repeat offender who went on to kill a child.
• 38:31
  Speaker 19: You have the power, and you have sufficient numbers in
• 38:35
  Speaker 19: your chamber to impeach this judge, Tiffany Baker. Until you
• 38:41
  Speaker 19: start holding these judges accountable, they are going to continue
• 38:46
  Speaker 19: to find ways to benefit the criminal element. This was
• 38:51
  Speaker 19: an outrage. This was such an easy call to make
• 38:55
  Speaker 19: sure that this guy was put behind bars, and this
• 38:58
  Speaker 19: judge refused to do it, knowing the risks, and the
• 39:01
  Speaker 19: result is obviously been a tragedy.
• 39:05
  Speaker 3: John, The US does have a problem with activist judges.
• 39:09
  Speaker 3: Can they be held accountable or once they're appointed, is
• 39:12
  Speaker 3: it well bad luck? They learned position of power and
• 39:16
  Speaker 3: there's not much you can do to remove them.
• 39:20
  Speaker 17: Well, in general, it's hard. You know, federal judges are
• 39:23
  Speaker 17: appointed for life. They have to be impeached, just like
• 39:25
  Speaker 17: the president. State court judges that varies from state to state,
• 39:29
  Speaker 17: and Florida, as we saw there, they do have an
• 39:31
  Speaker 17: impeachment process. But there absolutely should be more of these
• 39:35
  Speaker 17: attempts going after activist judges and judges who let criminals
• 39:39
  Speaker 17: go and they go on to commit more heinous crimes.
• 39:43
  Speaker 17: There should be more accountability there. But I would add
• 39:46
  Speaker 17: this rita as well. These left wing activist judges are
• 39:50
  Speaker 17: being hailed as heroes by liberals and by the Democratic Party.
• 39:55
  Speaker 17: The judges who have done everything they can to prevent
• 39:58
  Speaker 17: the Trump administration from implementing the policies that the American
• 40:02
  Speaker 17: people voted for are being cheered on by the Democrats.
• 40:05
  Speaker 17: So I think we need some accountability in that sphere
• 40:08
  Speaker 17: as well. These judges aren't just randomly making bad decisions.
• 40:13
  Speaker 17: They are following Democratic Party dogma, and so I think
• 40:18
  Speaker 17: the Democratic Party needs to pay a price too.
• 40:22
  Speaker 3: Now so deeply ideological, and they don't try to hide
• 40:26
  Speaker 3: and do they Now, before you go, I want to
• 40:28
  Speaker 3: play you this clip from a Democrat. But this story
• 40:31
  Speaker 3: again seems unbelievable. You've got the mayor of Providence, Brett Smiley,
• 40:36
  Speaker 3: wanting a mural of Ukrainian refugee Irena Zarutzka to be
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: taken down. That's the young woman who was brutally murdered
• 40:44
  Speaker 3: late last year and her murder caused just an outpouring
• 40:49
  Speaker 3: of emotion across the country.
• 40:51
  Speaker 2: But he thinks a mural.
• 40:54
  Speaker 3: Honoring her is divisive, and the Democrats seem to be
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: on board with this sort of madness. This is representative,
• 41:02
  Speaker 3: David Morales.
• 41:04
  Speaker 20: Ultimately, we want to make sure that every community member
• 41:06
  Speaker 20: that calls Providence home feels safe, and we can both
• 41:10
  Speaker 20: agree that this mural behind us does not reflect Providence's values,
• 41:15
  Speaker 20: nor does it reflect the creativity that we want to
• 41:18
  Speaker 20: see in.
• 41:20
  Speaker 3: A young refugee murdered, but she can't be honored because
• 41:24
  Speaker 3: the Democrats think it's divisive.
• 41:26
  Speaker 17: John, Yeah, I'm not sure what the division is. There
• 41:30
  Speaker 17: Are there a bunch of people in Providence who are
• 41:33
  Speaker 17: in favor of murdering innocent young women.
• 41:36
  Speaker 14: I don't get it, Arena. I mean, it's just ridiculous.
• 41:40
  Speaker 3: It really is, and it just shows you how broken
• 41:42
  Speaker 3: segments of the Democrats are John Heinderracha.
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: Thank you so much for your time tonight, Thank you, Edter.
• 41:49
  Speaker 2: Still to come, we.
• 41:50
  Speaker 3: Look at the ongoing fallout from Christy Noomes's husband being
• 41:54
  Speaker 3: exposed as a cross stressor.
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: Dedie Dunlevy joins me next welcome back.
• 42:04
  Speaker 3: Security concerns have been raised after shocking pictures were released
• 42:08
  Speaker 3: of Christin Nome's husband, Brian Nome, revealing his bizarre passion
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: for wearing oversized fake breasts and other related activities. The
• 42:18
  Speaker 3: leaked photos of nar raised serious security concerns, with a
• 42:22
  Speaker 3: former CIA officer telling The New York Post that damaging
• 42:26
  Speaker 3: information like this can be a tantalizing lead for a
• 42:30
  Speaker 3: hostile intelligence service. They approach the person and say, if
• 42:34
  Speaker 3: you work with us, we won't expose you, and if
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: you don't, we will. That's espionage. One oh one joining
• 42:41
  Speaker 3: me now in the studio to discuss this further is
• 42:44
  Speaker 3: broadcast a leedy diddy. Christine Nome was demoted some weeks
• 42:49
  Speaker 3: ago unrelated to this business. But should she resign completely
• 42:54
  Speaker 3: from the administration because of her husband's activities or is
• 42:58
  Speaker 3: that punishing her for something.
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: Really that she had nothing to do with.
• 43:02
  Speaker 21: It is a very difficult position, and I don't think
• 43:05
  Speaker 21: it's fair that she'd be punished for his what I
• 43:08
  Speaker 21: consider to be bizarre behavior. Some people might find it acceptable,
• 43:11
  Speaker 21: but there's no question I think that she has or
• 43:15
  Speaker 21: she was compromised in that position. And there has actually
• 43:18
  Speaker 21: been a development today, so Axius reporter Mark Caputo has
• 43:22
  Speaker 21: posted on exit he was approached earlier this year by
• 43:25
  Speaker 21: somebody with apparently access to those photographs, and this person,
• 43:31
  Speaker 21: he believes was an illegal Chinese immigrant working in America
• 43:35
  Speaker 21: as a sex worker, and so therefore the idea that
• 43:40
  Speaker 21: they could have been leveraged as some sort of blackmail
• 43:42
  Speaker 21: against Christine, there could be some absolute.
• 43:45
  Speaker 2: As to that.
• 43:47
  Speaker 3: Well, that's a yeah, that's quite a development, and given
• 43:50
  Speaker 3: how senior she was in the administration, that would be
• 43:53
  Speaker 3: valuable information if he could give some sort of access.
• 43:57
  Speaker 3: Not that we are suggesting any sort of treat business work,
• 44:00
  Speaker 3: but it would obviously be a concern. Now let's talk
• 44:04
  Speaker 3: about Prince Harry. He has found himself in some hot water,
• 44:08
  Speaker 3: not that hot lukewol maybe after court documents reveal he
• 44:12
  Speaker 3: sent flirty messages to a reporter in which he even
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: joked about drinking her under the table.
• 44:17
  Speaker 2: The messages were sent.
• 44:18
  Speaker 3: To Daily Mail reporter Charlotte Griffiths and have emerged as
• 44:22
  Speaker 3: part of Harry's privacy case against the papers publisher Associated
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: Newspapers Limited. Here are some examples of the messages, sent
• 44:30
  Speaker 3: between December twenty eleven and January twenty twelve.
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: So we are talking some time ago. First one goes.
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: It's h In case you were confused by the name
• 44:41
  Speaker 3: and picture, the Duke wrote to Griffiths, Hello, mister mischief,
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: was indeed confused by both effing awesome pie, Griffiths replied,
• 44:50
  Speaker 3: and he followed up with or. She reminisced about a
• 44:55
  Speaker 3: weekend of naughtiness with the Duke. Can't we all get
• 44:59
  Speaker 3: up to no in the countryside every weekend?
• 45:02
  Speaker 2: Damn it smooches, she wrote.
• 45:05
  Speaker 3: Harry responded, saying it was, without doubt the best of
• 45:08
  Speaker 3: those weekends.
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: I've been to best of those weekends. I've been too interesting.
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: I don't know, diddie, I think these are pretty pedestrian.
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: That could be a lot worse.
• 45:16
  Speaker 3: I don't think Megan Markel's going to be too upset
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: by of this, but it does raise the question of
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: the well, how wise it was to take this Court action.
• 45:27
  Speaker 3: What is it in it for Harry when he says
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: he's so concerned about his privacy and yet he engages
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: in behavior where that privacy is breached.
• 45:37
  Speaker 21: Well, I think in the case of these messages, we're
• 45:40
  Speaker 21: assuming that they're genuine. This was a Facebook exchange. I
• 45:43
  Speaker 21: think it's exposed him as a terrible liar because he
• 45:47
  Speaker 21: said to the High Court in January that he didn't
• 45:50
  Speaker 21: know any journalists, and when the name of this particular
• 45:53
  Speaker 21: journalist who's still working at the same publication was raised,
• 45:56
  Speaker 21: he said, oh, I might have met her at a party,
• 45:58
  Speaker 21: and as soon as I found out she was, you know,
• 46:00
  Speaker 21: I cut off contact. And yet this string of messages
• 46:03
  Speaker 21: goes on for months, and it makes sense that she was.
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: Moving in his circles.
• 46:09
  Speaker 21: She went to UNI with Harry's ex Chelsea Davy, so
• 46:14
  Speaker 21: they absolutely were connected and had the same circle of friends.
• 46:17
  Speaker 21: This all happened before he met Meghan. But I disagree.
• 46:21
  Speaker 21: I would think she would beat Meghan, who's all about
• 46:23
  Speaker 21: pr and how she appears. I think she'd be pretty annoyed.
• 46:27
  Speaker 3: Well, I think she'd be annoyed that again he's grabbing
• 46:31
  Speaker 3: headlines for this. She is all about her and her
• 46:36
  Speaker 3: brand and her products. Yes, isn't helping with any of that.
• 46:39
  Speaker 21: No, did you notice they made an announcement in the
• 46:42
  Speaker 21: US about another Polo not the same as that terrible
• 46:45
  Speaker 21: Polo documentary he made on Netflix and nobody watched, but
• 46:48
  Speaker 21: another series to do with Polo that is being made
• 46:51
  Speaker 21: by them, but with the assistance some professional producers. That announcement,
• 46:56
  Speaker 21: strangely enough, came out at the exact same time of
• 46:58
  Speaker 21: this information coming forward, because in the court of public opinion,
• 47:01
  Speaker 21: everyone's going, Harry, You're a liar.
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: Yeah, because that's how it appears now.
• 47:05
  Speaker 3: Staying with the royals, and reports have circulated that Princess Beatrice,
• 47:11
  Speaker 3: daughter of the disgraced form of Prince Andrew and Fergie
• 47:14
  Speaker 3: Sarah Ferguson, is considering moving to America to save her marriage.
• 47:18
  Speaker 3: I don't know if the Americans are ready for another
• 47:21
  Speaker 3: lesser royal to be moving in. Maybe she can get
• 47:25
  Speaker 3: her own Netflix series as well. They're handing them out.
• 47:29
  Speaker 21: Well, they're making this sound as though she thinks this
• 47:32
  Speaker 21: is going to rescue her marriage, and it does seem,
• 47:35
  Speaker 21: according to some of the reporting, that there is a
• 47:38
  Speaker 21: bit of strain. Her husband has been to Palm Beach,
• 47:40
  Speaker 21: Florida several times on business. His business is going really well,
• 47:44
  Speaker 21: which has left her pretty much isolated. Like I don't
• 47:47
  Speaker 21: think she's having a lot to do with her mum
• 47:48
  Speaker 21: and dad at the moment. And she's thinking that if
• 47:51
  Speaker 21: she goes and moves in to Florida with him, that
• 47:55
  Speaker 21: somehow that will help their marriage. And look, I think
• 47:57
  Speaker 21: Donald Trump would welcome them with open arms.
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: He loves the Royals. I love the Queen. I don't
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: know how fond years of the rest of them.
• 48:05
  Speaker 21: Yarrow him next to Catherine. He he loves cat with
• 48:09
  Speaker 21: two tales.
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: He loved it. He loves the Royalist. Well, she's a
• 48:12
  Speaker 2: future queen and she's lovely. It's hard not to like Kate,
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: is it true? I adore her.
• 48:18
  Speaker 3: She's one of the favorites. Now, let's talk about matters
• 48:21
  Speaker 3: closer to home. I have a piece in today's Harold's
• 48:24
  Speaker 3: Son on what I've called the most absurd sporting scandal
• 48:29
  Speaker 3: this country has seen, centers around an official complaint and
• 48:33
  Speaker 3: accusations of fat shaming and cyber bloy bullying made by
• 48:37
  Speaker 3: the owner of the Adelaide thirty six is Grand Kelly
• 48:40
  Speaker 3: against basketball legend Andrew Bogert, who is also the King's
• 48:44
  Speaker 3: co owner and assistant coach. These teams are actually playing
• 48:48
  Speaker 3: off in the Grand Final series. It's tied two games
• 48:51
  Speaker 3: all the deciding fifth game is coming up.
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: But deitie. The headlines are all about this feud. I mean,
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: and it's so silly. You have a grown man crying
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: about fat shaming. Come on, I find it really hard
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: to talk about this.
• 49:08
  Speaker 21: Share and I read to your column and I had
• 49:11
  Speaker 21: to laugh. I just had to laugh all the way through. Look,
• 49:13
  Speaker 21: the point is that if I called you, I could
• 49:16
  Speaker 21: call you fat until I'm blue in the face, but
• 49:18
  Speaker 21: it wouldn't hurt your feelings because you're not fat.
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: The same with me.
• 49:21
  Speaker 21: So if it doesn't apply to you, how can it
• 49:25
  Speaker 21: hurt your feelings? And if it does apply to you,
• 49:27
  Speaker 21: if you are fat and it hurt, then there's.
• 49:30
  Speaker 2: Your truth defense defense.
• 49:33
  Speaker 21: I would think that Andrew Bogert, who has a very
• 49:36
  Speaker 21: unique physique, I would imagine he's come across a bit
• 49:39
  Speaker 21: of you know, people call it making it every.
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: Time, but every time he meets anybody, the first thing
• 49:45
  Speaker 3: they say to him is, bore your tall because he's
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: so freakishly tall. Is other thing seven foot or something. So,
• 49:51
  Speaker 3: I mean, he's had plenty of commentary about his body,
• 49:55
  Speaker 3: and you know what, I'm not embracing fat shame, but
• 50:00
  Speaker 3: being fat is not a good thing.
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: It's not healthy, it's not a positive thing.
• 50:03
  Speaker 3: I think we've got past that whole body positivity movement
• 50:07
  Speaker 3: and gone back to reality. Doing You Done, Levy always
• 50:10
  Speaker 3: a pleasure, and that's all the time we have.
• 50:13
  Speaker 2: Don't go anywhere, and Year's Night is up next