Latest / GNN Daily Breaking News / Trump Opposes Letting E. Jean Carroll Collect $5 Million Award, Cites Supreme Court Bid

Transcript

Trump Opposes Letting E. Jean Carroll Collect $5 Million Award, Cites Supreme Court Bid · GNN Daily Breaking News

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump attempted to block author E Jean Carroll
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: from collecting the five million dollars in damages awarded to
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: her in twenty twenty three, arguing that enforcement should be
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: delayed while he pursued an appeal to the U. S.
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court. The award was the result of a New
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: York jury's finding that Trump sexually abused Carroll in the
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: nineteen nineties and defamed her by publicly denying the allegations.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: Trump's legal team filed motions insisting Carroll should not be
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: allowed to collect until the Supreme Court ruled, citing fairness
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: and the risk that repayment would be impossible if the
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: verdict were overturned. Carroll's attorneys countered that Trump was deliberately
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: stalling accountability, emphasizing that the jury's verdict was clear and enforcible.
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: On June twenty ninth, twenty twenty six, the Supreme Court
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: denied Trump's appeal, ending his effort to block Carroll from
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: collecting the damages with interest. The award now totals new
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: nearly five point eight million dollars. Carroll's lawyers hailed the
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: ruling as a decisive victory for accountability and women's rights,
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: while Trump's team criticized the decision as politically motivated. This
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: case is only one of several legal battles Trump faces
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: involving Carroll. In addition to the five million dollar award,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: he was ordered in a separate defamation case to pay
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: Carroll eighty three million dollars, which he continues to appeal. Together,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: the judgments highlight the scale of Trump's legal challenges, intertwining
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: personal allegations with political implications as he navigates his presidency
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: and prepares for the midterm elections. For Carol, the Supreme
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: Court's rejection represents closure after years of litigation and a
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: reaffirmation of her claims. For Trump, it is another setback
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: in a string of courtroom defeats that continue to shadow
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: his political career, and for the broader public, the case
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: underscores the tension between personal accountability, political power, and the
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: justice system's roll in enforcing verdicts against sitting presidents. The
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: ruling also raises broader questions about how courts handle appeals
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: in high profile cases. Legal experts note that while defendants
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: often seek to delay enforcement, courts typically require bonds or
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: guarantees to protect plaintiffs in Trump's case. The Supreme Court's
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: refusal to hear the appeal effectively removed any remaining obstacles,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: clearing the way for Carol to collect. As Carroll moves
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: forward with enforcement, the case will remain a touchstone in
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: debates about sexual assault accountability, presidential immunity, and the limits
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: of political influence over the judiciary.