Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Primaries, “Tic Tac Tech”, and COVID-19 cover-ups

Transcript

Primaries, “Tic Tac Tech”, and COVID-19 cover-ups · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

0:04
In this political Coliseum, we slay the rising
0:08
beast with the fateful sword of truth that
0:11
transcends hypocrisy and censorship.
0:16
It's time to unleash yourself from the tyrants
0:18
of media propaganda on the America Out Loud
0:21
Talk Radio Network.
0:26
This is unleashed the political news hour.
0:32
We've got a lot to get into, so
0:34
I'm going to jump right in.
0:36
Look, today is uh voting day in many
0:38
states for their primaries, and particularly some important
0:41
ones.
0:47
Look, folks, it's really it's one of those
0:50
things where in if you are in a
0:53
red state, uh, where you know it's not
0:56
a you know 50-50 chance.
1:00
This really is election day for you because
1:03
uh whoever you vote in in the primary
1:05
in states that are solid one way or
1:08
the other, uh, that is your chance to
1:11
really pick who's gonna be your uh your
1:13
leadership.
1:16
Uh, because essentially the generals are given.
1:20
Uh that's the way it is in my
1:22
state of West Virginia, and that is certainly
1:25
the way it is going to be in
1:27
many of the southern red states.
1:29
And so I want to start with Kentucky.
1:33
Uh right, just so you know, we we've
1:36
got made main elections that are happening basically
1:40
in uh Georgia, Kentucky, Alabama, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and
1:44
Idaho, uh, you know, that are held today.
1:48
And um, by the time you guys are
1:50
hearing this, uh, it'll probably be only a
1:52
couple of hours left on the um uh
1:54
with the polls open.
1:56
Uh but you know, these slate of uh
2:00
primary elections, they really are going to shape
2:03
key uh gubernatorial Senate, House, and statewide contests
2:07
ahead of November.
2:10
So let's start with Kentucky.
2:13
Uh there are few you know really uh
2:17
competitive uh races in these primaries that probably
2:21
have had uh as much attention as Kentucky,
2:25
uh mainly because uh Thomas Massey uh has
2:29
basically faced an onslaught of attack from Donald
2:34
Trump.
2:38
Now, I honestly I can't remember anyone that
2:41
has received so much attack from Trump uh
2:43
in terms of you know uh you know
2:46
being primaried, and it it seems to be
2:49
working.
2:52
Uh it is interesting when I was looking
2:55
at the uh the real clear politics polls,
2:59
and it was showing uh earlier in the
3:02
I guess last week, it was showing that
3:06
uh there were some polls that were showing
3:09
Massey ahead, but then all of a sudden
3:13
in the last week, all of the polls
3:16
are now showing uh with his opponent ahead.
3:20
And you know, this is uh this is
3:22
important because you know, look for for there's
3:24
a lot of people who probably follow me
3:26
on here that love Massey, and I get
3:28
it.
3:31
Uh he is a principled dude, no doubt
3:32
about it.
3:34
And you know, I gotta hand it to
3:35
him.
3:36
You know, he sticks to his principles.
3:38
However, he is not by any stretch of
3:40
the you know, of the means a true
3:43
and tried Republican.
3:47
He is more of a libertarian.
3:49
Uh there was a time in my life
3:52
where uh after the I think it was
3:55
the uh the Bush years and just all
3:58
of the disgust that I had with the
4:01
um the you know the change of course
4:04
from you know what the Republicans stood for,
4:07
and and in my case, it was primarily
4:09
all of the spending on uh prescription expanding
4:12
the prescription drug plans and and all of
4:15
that that uh Bush did.
4:18
Uh I started kind of siding with the
4:21
libertarians and uh for a while there I
4:24
was even a card-carrying libertarian, but my views
4:27
have completely shifted and come full circle as
4:30
I've seen what happens when we take a
4:33
step back in the world when I see
4:36
us become more isolationist, in the end, it
4:39
it hurts everybody.
4:43
Uh, and and ultimately it hurts us.
4:46
And I see Representative uh Thomas Massey is
4:49
one of those guys who basically is uh
4:52
he he pushes back, he votes against the
4:55
Republican Party.
4:59
When by the way, the Democrats never break
5:01
from each other.
5:04
Uh, you know, the the they have a
5:07
very strong uh control over their party, and
5:09
because of it, it gives them a lot
5:12
of power when they are in power.
5:15
Uh however, you know, Trump is right, I
5:17
think in this case, and that we need
5:18
somebody that is going to be a team
5:20
player.
5:22
We got a lot of things to get
5:24
done, and the margins are too slim to
5:26
have somebody who is going to essentially exert
5:28
their own will over the will of the
5:30
people.
5:33
The people voted for Trump.
5:35
They wanted what Trump was going to do.
5:37
And I think while certain things that Trump
5:39
is doing, the jury may still be out
5:41
with you know regards to how people feel
5:43
about it.
5:45
The reality is is that the majority of
5:48
Republicans support Trump in everything that he's doing.
5:52
Even if maybe they're not so sure, and
5:54
they're kind of a wait and see.
5:56
Let's see how this thing works out.
5:57
And I'm thinking about, you know, of course,
5:59
Iran uh right now is what I'm talking
6:01
about primarily.
6:03
But the reality is is that uh Galleryan
6:06
who's uh running against him.
6:10
Uh this this guy's a former Navy SEAL,
6:12
Ed Gowrin.
6:14
Uh, he's been endorsed by President Trump.
6:17
Uh, you know, and he is this guy
6:19
has a I think he's gonna be, I
6:22
think it's gonna beat Massey, and I think
6:24
it's gonna change and shift things in the
6:26
Republican Party, and we're going to need every
6:29
Republican vote we can to get Trump's agenda
6:31
through.
6:34
Um, some other notables that are happening.
6:37
Uh, you know, we've got uh in Georgia,
6:39
uh, Georgia voters are gonna cast their ballot
6:41
in um you know, high profile primaries for
6:43
governor, uh U.S.
6:45
Senate, U.S.
6:46
House, and uh several statewide offices.
6:49
Um Alabama voters are deciding on key primaries
6:52
uh for governor U.S.
6:55
Senate and Congress.
6:57
And uh and there you've got uh Senator
6:59
Tommy Tuberville who's running for uh uh governor,
7:00
Tommy Tuberville, who's running for uh uh governor,
7:01
and of course, has received uh you know
7:02
and of course, has received uh you know
7:04
Trump's endorsement.
7:04
Trump's endorsement.
7:06
Uh there's a lot going on.
7:06
Uh there's a lot going on.
7:08
Um, you know, there's a a uh it'll
7:08
Um, there's a a uh it'll be interesting
7:11
be interesting to see what happens in Oregon.
7:11
to see what happens in Oregon.
7:14
Uh obviously, Oregon's likely gonna go, you know,
7:14
Uh obviously Oregon's likely gonna go, you know,
7:17
uh it's gonna stay blue, but but it'll
7:17
uh it's gonna stay blue, but but it'll
7:19
be interesting to see if the people go
7:20
be interesting to see if the people go
7:22
even further, uh, you know, left or if
7:23
even further uh, you know, left or if
7:24
they if they decide to pull back to
7:26
they if they decide to pull back to
7:27
more of a moderate uh Pennsylvania.
7:29
more of a moderate Pennsylvania, Idaho.
7:32
Like I said, uh they're important races that
7:34
are happening in all those places.
7:35
But uh that's all we got time for,
7:37
folks, in this first segment.
7:39
Stick around because we got two really great
7:40
guests for the second and third segments, and
7:42
you guys are gonna definitely want to hear
7:44
um what we're gonna talk about.
7:46
Be right back after this.
7:48
Struggling with your health, energy, and constantly feeling
7:51
hungry, want to save money on the rising
7:53
cost of groceries and dramatically improve your health.
7:56
Go to ChemicalfreeBody.com forward slash out loud today,
7:59
get nature's super multivitamin, doctor formulated green 85
8:02
juice formula, empower your immune system, cut your
8:04
grocery bill, and save 20% on your first
8:07
order.
8:10
Feeling off since COVID, try the wellness company
8:12
spike detox trio, packed with natok kinase, bromaline,
8:15
and turmeric to help boost your immune system
8:17
and fight off harmful spike proteins.
8:20
Bounce back with energy and clarity.
8:22
Go to TWC.health forward slash out loud and
8:24
use promo code out loud for 20% off
8:26
your first order.
8:30
And I quote you and I have a
8:32
rendezvous with destiny.
8:34
We will preserve for our children this the
8:37
last best hope of man on Earth.
8:39
Or we will sentence them to take the
8:42
first step into a thousand years of darkness.
8:45
Those are the words of number 40.
8:47
Ronald Reagan shine bright as America approaches 250
8:50
years.
8:56
America out loud news is that place to
8:59
awaken your heart, soul, and mind to the
9:01
all-block trouble.
9:09
Welcome back to Unleash the Political News Hour.
9:12
I'm your host, Nate Kane for this week,
9:14
and we've got something new that I want
9:15
to talk about.
9:17
Um it's a it's kind of a a
9:19
tag along to what I was talking about
9:21
last week in regards to the UAPs and
9:23
all of that.
9:25
And to help me kind of break this
9:27
down and get into some other ideas of
9:29
what this stuff might be.
9:31
Uh, joining me is Brandon J.
9:33
Wyckart, uh national security analyst, author, and commentator
9:36
and fellow host of another show on America
9:40
Out Loud, the National Security Hour.
9:43
And he specializes in a lot of these
9:45
emerging military technologies.
9:48
And so uh Brandon, I want to thank
9:49
you for joining the show.
9:51
I think I think this is going to
9:52
be a great discussion.
9:53
Well, thanks for having me.
9:54
It's always good to be back.
9:55
So, you know, there was this release of
9:57
all of this information uh by our our
9:59
government.
10:00
And and in all fairness, I mean, this
10:03
stuff was basically all previously released.
10:05
Uh there were new unredacted, you know, information
10:08
that was put out there.
10:11
Um it kind of reminded me a little
10:13
bit of like the initial release of the
10:16
quote unquote Epstein files where they made a
10:18
big, you know, uh ado about nothing, yeah,
10:20
and then they released a bunch of stuff
10:22
that had already been released.
10:25
And that kind of seemed like this.
10:27
Now, I'm not at all um of the
10:30
opinion that that this stuff's not real.
10:34
And in fact, one of the things that
10:36
was unredacted was kind of interesting was that
10:37
most of the stuff was not visible to
10:39
the naked eye, but seemed to have some
10:41
sort of cloaking device, but sensors were picking
10:43
it up, therm, you know, FLIR and stuff
10:44
like that.
10:47
And my um just based on things that
10:49
that I'm aware of uh that I can't
10:52
get it too much into.
10:55
I do know that there are things that
10:57
our government has seen, uh, and and I
10:58
can speak with some level of authority that
11:00
there are things that our government's seen and
11:02
couldn't figure out what it was.
11:04
Um that said, you know, unless I see
11:06
some hard evidence of like aliens or something
11:08
like that, um, you know, I'm gonna be
11:10
a bit skeptical about this.
11:12
And um, you know, it because it is
11:14
technological in nature, clearly.
11:17
And uh, and so I I want to
11:18
know what your thoughts are on this, and
11:20
you know, where do you see this uh
11:22
is is all falling.
11:24
Well, I think this is one of those
11:25
sub well, this is great question, and thanks
11:26
for having me.
11:28
This is one of those those sort of
11:30
areas where there's a lot of a lot
11:33
of smoke, and I think there's fire, but
11:35
it's not as the conflagration is not what
11:38
they're saying.
11:40
It is I I try to separate you
11:43
know, aliens or now they're saying they're spiritual
11:45
things or whatever.
11:47
I look at the technology, what's the tangible
11:49
element here?
11:51
What are the the real material aspects of
11:53
the story?
11:55
And I think there is being demonstrated across
11:58
multiple instances.
12:01
Um something tangible.
12:03
There's something going on, and as you know,
12:05
we now have hard data, uh, not just
12:07
any data.
12:09
I mean, we're talking about the USS You
12:11
know, Nimitz incident in 2004.
12:14
This uh the with the so-called tic-tacks, this
12:17
was something that was detected initially because we
12:20
had upgraded uh the year before the uh
12:23
the AN spy one uh phased array array
12:26
radar systems on the ships, and so we
12:29
were finally able to do that.
12:32
Those things they said might have been there
12:34
before uh in that area, but we never
12:35
detected it because we so we have we
12:37
have data.
12:39
Um my personal view though is uh to
12:41
me, especially in the I bring up the
12:44
Tic Tac because it's very key.
12:46
Lockheed Martin, if you go to the patent
12:48
and trademark office, you can find it's been
12:50
dubbed in the media as the the UFO
12:52
patents.
12:54
The Navy many years ago put patents, Lockheed
12:57
Martin in the Navy did, uh, for what
13:01
they referred to as tic-tac-shaped uh exotic um
13:04
aircraft.
13:07
Um and these look like the white tic-tacks
13:11
that Commander Fraver and his team, uh, his
13:14
F-16 or F-18 pilots uh saw on that
13:17
fateful day, and those types of vehicles have
13:21
been seen repeatedly in usually restricted U.S.
13:24
military airspace.
13:26
Um not just off the coast of San
13:28
Diego, where the carriers conduct a lot of
13:31
their readiness uh before deployment, but also off
13:33
of the coast of Virginia Beach in uh,
13:35
you know, exclusive air zones.
13:38
All of that to me indicates not aliens,
13:41
it indicates that it's some special access program
13:44
with new exotic technology that they are testing
13:47
in those areas, and they might even want
13:50
to test them against our best equipment, conventional
13:53
equipment and our best trained people to see
13:56
how a rival might respond to the presence
13:59
of these exotic ships or aircraft, what do
14:00
might respond to the presence of these exotic
14:01
ships or aircraft, what do you want to
14:02
you want to call them?
14:03
call them?
14:05
Um, but it do I think it's aliens?
14:05
Um but it do I think it's aliens?
14:08
No.
14:08
No.
14:08
Uh, do I think something is there?
14:08
Uh do I think something is there?
14:10
Yes.
14:10
Yes.
14:10
I think that's been proven beyond a shadow
14:10
I think that's been proven beyond a shadow
14:11
of a doubt.
14:12
of a doubt is there's something happening.
14:12
Is there something happening?
14:14
I just think this is advanced military science
14:14
I just think this is advanced military science
14:16
that's being tested in real time.
14:16
that's being tested in real time.
14:19
Well, speaking of which, you know, it is
14:19
Well speaking of which, you know, it is
14:21
interesting that you have all of these missing
14:22
interesting that you have all of these missing
14:24
scientists, and they were all apparently working on
14:25
scientists and they were all apparently working on
14:27
uh, you know, some sort of
14:27
uh you know some sort of energy projects
14:30
or you know material projects or you know
14:33
any kind of thing that seems that it
14:36
would have some sort of relationship to this
14:39
guys have disappeared or been found dead and
14:42
I find that interesting uh it's not like
14:44
we don't have a history of things like
14:47
this happening before um one of the things
14:50
in particular I think about is Tesla and
14:53
about uh you know the FBI coming and
14:56
you know taking all of his you know
14:59
documents and and uh you know information and
15:01
basically the guy was left you know penniless
15:04
and and broke and uh a lot of
15:07
his inventions and a lot of his discoveries
15:10
were never made public right and you know
15:13
there were rumors about things but uh a
15:16
lot of his patents taken by the federal
15:18
government yep this wouldn't surprise me there's also
15:21
stories about guys who have uh you know
15:24
developed uh you know water based uh you
15:27
know high I'm assuming hydrogen uh based uh
15:30
you know cars uh in fuels and yet
15:33
you know the same thing you hear these
15:35
stories of the government come and taking the
15:38
patents on them and and basically removing these
15:41
things and not compensating people and making people
15:44
disappear.
15:47
Well and Amy Eskridge who's the late uh
15:50
kind of she was just real innovative young
15:53
woman scientists uh her father was uh very
15:56
famous rocket uh or nuclear propulsion engineer at
15:59
NASA he's still alive but Amy Eskridge uh
16:01
worked at um uh redstone uh arsenal if
16:04
I'm not mistaken out in uh Alabama and
16:07
she was a physicist and and she before
16:10
she died said that she knew of at
16:13
least four instances where uh scientists working for
16:16
the government or affiliated with the government created
16:19
anti-gravity propulsion systems and they were all mysteriously
16:22
killed and their um you know their their
16:24
their technology was disappeared and their research was
16:27
disappeared um and she of course ended up
16:30
in death she ended up being killed or
16:33
dying in 2022 under mysterious circumstances and she
16:36
herself was working on anti-gravity propulsion and in
16:39
fact it electromagnetic propulsion is something that is
16:42
has been around for a long time like
16:44
since the 60s they've they've yes they've been
16:47
working on I can't remember his name uh
16:50
something brown um well the EM drive is
16:53
is currently so I wrote about this in
16:56
my first book uh winning space how America
16:59
remains a superpower um the EM drive is
17:02
actively under development it at uh NASA Eagleworks
17:05
um they had to fight to get it
17:07
because nobody believed in the American establishment nobody
17:10
thought it could work because it's basically it's
17:13
they're saying it violates Newtonian physics it creates
17:16
thrust from nothing but the Chinese were the
17:19
ones leading the experimentation in this technology um
17:22
and uh this was what prompted uh in
17:25
2016 the research to get reactivated uh at
17:28
NASA because there was concern that the Chinese
17:30
were going to crack this code with the
17:33
EM drive uh for their satellites ion thrusters
17:36
have been ion thrusters and and and proven
17:39
and you know they're being used right now
17:42
I actually talked to General Shaw formerly uh
17:45
of Space Force I actually talked to him
17:48
I was gonna say it's being used right
17:51
now for uh the the uh Starlink uh
17:53
that's exactly right the heat this is exactly
17:56
right yes and so and now that's sort
17:59
of still rudimentary compared to the kind of
18:02
systems I'm talking about but yes it is
18:05
next level um no it's it's absolutely true
18:08
um that they're I think in the desert
18:11
uh at US military facilities I think there
18:14
are certain facilities like uh uh you know
18:16
up in the Edwards Air Force base you
18:19
know plant uh 42 uh which I'm very
18:22
very familiar with because I've been there many
18:25
times uh not to the well no I've
18:28
been there many times um but ultimately um
18:31
I'm not saying I saw anything but it
18:34
has been heavily implied by people I know
18:37
there that they they are they are experimenting
18:39
with really amazing technologies and uh the question
18:42
is can they scale it?
18:45
And when I was speaking to a gentleman
18:47
at Edwards Air Force Base after one of
18:49
my talks um he he and I were
18:51
talking and I I asked him I go
18:53
okay you I go let's just say you
18:55
guys are playing with really radical technology out
18:57
here I said what's the scalability of it
18:59
and then he kind of shrugged and went
19:01
well that's always the problem with new technology
19:03
isn't it and I said well let's put
19:05
it this way if we can do it
19:07
the Chinese can probably do it at this
19:09
point and I said and we know they
19:11
don't have problems with scale and he kind
19:13
of smiled and he said yeah it's a
19:14
real problem.
19:17
So you know I don't know what that
19:18
meant.
19:19
I don't know what they were talking about
19:20
with technologies.
19:21
But you know I can assume that that
19:23
and and we know Nick Cook wrote about
19:26
this in his 2002 book and Nick Cook
19:28
was the Jane's defense weekly aerospace editor.
19:31
So this guy is a legit serious person.
19:33
He's not some gonzo conspiracy theorist he wrote
19:36
a book in 2002 and he talked to
19:39
a lot of very top notch people in
19:41
the military science sector including how put off
19:44
who's now become famous for working with Lou
19:47
Elizondo and all these people involved in disclosure
19:49
um but but Nick Cook in 2002 wrote
19:52
a book called the Hunt for Zero Point
19:54
Energy and he detailed how Time magazine Life
19:57
magazine in the 50s Lockheed and Boeing would
20:00
take out full page ads depict um uh
20:02
what looked to me like and I because
20:05
I've you can find them online these ads
20:08
they look to me like the Tic Tac
20:10
uh machine floating over a runway and someone
20:13
climbing up and it says in another decade
20:15
Lockheed will provide um uh anti-gravity uh technology
20:18
to replace the jet engine and that was
20:21
back in the 50s and then as Nick
20:23
Cook explains in his book by the 1970s
20:26
all talk of that was was gone and
20:29
and and his question that he was trying
20:31
to answer was did they stop talking about
20:34
it because they found the technology was not
20:37
viable or did they stop talking about it
20:39
because they in fact crack the technology and
20:42
they don't want it getting out and he
20:44
leans heavily in the latter and that's where
20:47
I am right now is I think that
20:50
we have I don't think that it's aliens
20:52
though I think it's from like you said
20:55
Tesla I mean there's a lot of discoveries
20:58
still we don't know that needs to and
21:00
in all things there there could very well
21:01
There could very well have been some uh
21:03
have been some uh you know craft recovery
21:03
you know craft recovery, you know, type of
21:05
thing and and reverse engineering.
21:05
you know type of thing and and reverse
21:08
I'm not saying that that's completely out, but
21:08
engineering I'm not saying that that's completely out
21:10
uh until I see evidence of that's by
21:11
but I until I see evidence right of
21:11
V.
21:13
that's why but but I will say this
21:14
But but I will say this though, it's
21:15
interesting.
21:16
My own it's just a personal anecdote.
21:16
though it it's interesting that my own it's
21:18
Um I was in college at Devry University
21:19
just a personal anecdote um I was in
21:21
in uh Pomona, California back in I think
21:21
college at Devry University in uh Pomona California
21:24
back in I think this was uh 90
21:24
this was uh 90 when was it 96
21:27
gosh when was it 96 and I
21:28
and I had a professor who was like
21:31
you know, he basically part-time professor, but worked
21:34
at uh JPL.
21:37
Yeah.
21:38
And we had a lot of conversations.
21:40
I was definitely one of one of his
21:42
more um curious students.
21:44
And I would go to him with ideas
21:46
about you know electrostatic propulsion and all this
21:49
other stuff, and uh, you know, it was
21:51
uh the telecommunications um you know class, and
21:54
I I remember talking to him about like
21:56
ionization and um you know collecting ions and
21:59
so he shared some things with me, and
22:01
it was interesting.
22:04
Excuse me.
22:05
One of the things that he shared, and
22:06
I don't know if this is something he
22:08
should have shared or was allowed to or
22:09
not, but nonetheless he did.
22:11
He shared with me that at that time
22:14
in '97 that he had seen and worked
22:17
on projects where they had um they had
22:20
fiber optics that were nine atoms wide.
22:23
Now we know that stuff exists now, but
22:26
in 97 it existed, which means that what
22:28
we have now is probably way better than
22:30
that.
22:32
Yeah, and that's the kind of thing you
22:35
would need for like, say, you know, a
22:37
cloaking device or something like that.
22:39
Well, remember, remember originally, because I've tracked the
22:43
F-35 program for 20 years.
22:46
Originally, the F-35 was supposed to have, and
22:49
the F-22 they were supposed to put this
22:51
on, was supposed to be like a fiber
22:54
optic shield on the bottom of the plane
22:57
that was supposed to reflect the environment so
23:00
that you could not visit see the plane
23:02
in flight.
23:05
Yeah, that never happened, and I was told
23:08
it's because they couldn't they couldn't make the
23:10
tech right, they couldn't make the tech work,
23:12
but this was a key selling point when
23:14
Air Force and Lockheed and Boeing and whoever
23:16
would go trundling up to the hill asking
23:18
for money, they would say, Oh, we're developing
23:21
a call invisibility club.
23:23
And there is a guy in China I've
23:24
written about.
23:26
Um he's called China's Elon Musk, he's a
23:30
Duke University grad.
23:34
Uh, it's believed that he actually ripped the
23:36
the initial design off of his professor who
23:39
was a DARPA employee.
23:42
Which brings up a whole nother point.
23:43
Why do we allow the Chinese to go
23:44
to our universities?
23:46
Well, ask the president because he's allowing half
23:48
a million new Chinese students into the uh
23:49
into the United States over the next 10
23:51
years.
23:53
Um, you know, it's funny you mentioned that
23:55
because uh I tell the story when I
23:57
talked to the military.
23:58
My wife did her PhD genetics PhD at
24:01
Yale when we met, and I did not
24:03
go to Yale.
24:06
I was but my wife's from DC and
24:07
I was working in on Capitol Hill and
24:09
we met um in DC.
24:12
And um, but when we were dating, she
24:14
told me that she was getting all of
24:16
these emails.
24:18
Her whole cohort at Yale, the PhD genetics
24:21
people were getting emails through their dot EDU
24:25
email, which means the university gave it uh
24:28
from uh Chinese enterprises in places like Wuhan.
24:32
Now, this was before anybody knew Wuhan and
24:35
its association with biotechnology development for China, and
24:38
they were encouraging the Yale cohort of genetics
24:41
PhD students to go work in China when
24:44
they graduate, and as a signing bonus, basically,
24:47
they were offering to pay all of the
24:50
student loan debt that these students had accrued
24:53
over their years.
24:56
Now that's pretty tempting.
24:58
Well, uh well, and a lot of her
25:00
cohort did this, and so they, in exchange
25:03
for not having any student loan debt, and
25:05
then also they were given base I called
25:08
it a gilded cage, but they were basically
25:11
given state-of-the-art laboratories in Bio Lake, which is
25:13
the area um where they have all of
25:16
the cluster of biotechnology firms in China, which
25:18
a lot of them are Western backed uh
25:21
financially.
25:23
Um, and a lot of her cohort ended
25:26
up graduating and going to China, uh being
25:29
given rock star status in the scientific community,
25:31
which is not normal for new PhD students.
25:34
Normally they're treated like garbage.
25:36
Um, and then they were given you know
25:38
all this money to pay off their student
25:41
loan debt on top of excellent, you know,
25:43
you know, payment in general for their work.
25:46
That it's and that to me is a
25:47
no-brainer.
25:48
If I'm a if I'm a Chinese, you
25:51
know, you know, intelligence operative, MSS operative, whose
25:54
job it is to identify America's next top-tier
25:57
talent scientifically, technologically.
26:00
I'm just gonna go to them and say,
26:02
hey, I'll pay off all of your I
26:03
have the ability to pay off all of
26:04
your student loans.
26:06
You just give me your amazing ideas, give
26:07
it to me instead of the US government
26:09
or instead of an American firm.
26:11
And uh and that to me is probably
26:14
probably playing out throughout the entire scientific world.
26:17
Um, and so it's interesting.
26:19
China seemed to definitely know something because uh
26:22
they refused to allow any of the mRNA
26:26
vaccines to be used on their absolutely knew.
26:29
And I'll just say this also back about
26:31
UAPs.
26:32
There was a report in 2023 or 2024
26:35
in the South China Morning Post Um SCMP,
26:39
uh, in which the reporter went to the
26:42
Chinese general in charge of basically defending China's
26:45
interests in the South China Sea, and they
26:48
said, you know, there are a lot of
26:51
reports from from boats in the South China
26:55
Sea of all these unidentified lights at night.
26:58
Uh, and and nobody can figure out what
26:59
they are.
27:00
What does the Chinese military know what they
27:01
are?
27:02
And the Chinese general was very dismissive.
27:04
He goes, Yes, he goes, we know what
27:05
they are.
27:06
They're all American advanced uh prototypes.
27:08
They're they're testing them against our systems in
27:10
the South China Sea.
27:12
Which is probably what we had in New
27:13
Jersey a couple years ago was them testing
27:15
their stuff on Hearthcase.
27:17
And Langley Air Force Base where the F-22s
27:18
are.
27:20
That's right.
27:20
That's right.
27:21
No, I definitely and also Barksdale.
27:23
This just happened like last month.
27:24
Did you hear about this?
27:25
The I did not.
27:26
There was a drone surge, a swarm of
27:29
drones appeared in the skies over Barksdale, where
27:32
the B-52s are housed, which are of course
27:35
carry nuclear bombs, and they buzzed the airfield
27:38
for like 48 hours, and we couldn't get
27:41
rid of them.
27:44
And I don't know how they ultimately got
27:46
rid of them, but I know that this
27:47
was a huge and they were saying at
27:49
the time that it was speculating that it
27:50
was Iran because it happened right around the
27:52
start of the Iran War, but I don't
27:54
think it was Iran, I think it was
27:55
China.
27:57
They were probably you know sending us some,
27:59
or it could have been our own people
28:00
Or it could have been our own people
28:00
just trying to test security.
28:01
just trying to test security.
28:02
But that's possible too.
28:02
But that's possible too.
28:04
The point is is that I think the
28:04
The point is is that I think the
28:06
most of the stuff you're seeing in the
28:06
most of the stuff you're seeing in the
28:08
sky unexplained is actually quite explainable.
28:08
sky on explained is actually quite explainable.
28:10
I think it is either our advanced military
28:10
I think it is either our advanced military
28:13
gear or Russian or Chinese, because I think
28:13
gear or Russian or Chinese, because I think
28:16
a lot of the technology we're seeing in
28:16
a lot of the technology we're seeing in
28:18
the sky is derived from captured Nazi equipment.
28:18
the sky is derived from captured Nazi equipment.
28:21
We know at Pinamunda, which was basically Hitler's
28:21
We know at Pinamunda, which was basically Hitler's
28:23
Area 51.
28:24
Area 51, they were experimenting with a bunch
28:26
They were experimenting with a bunch of different
28:27
of different uh high end technology.
28:28
uh high-end technologies.
28:31
We got most of them.
28:33
The Soviets got some of them.
28:34
We it was we called it Operation Paper
28:35
Clip.
28:36
The Soviets had their own version.
28:38
And ever since then, I think we and
28:40
the Russians have been spinning off technology.
28:43
Yeah.
28:44
Wow.
28:44
Well, you know, there's so much that uh
28:46
so much that they're definitely not gonna tell
28:48
us.
28:50
And uh I know that.
28:52
Um, there are things today that that you
28:55
know I've had to sign non-disclosures for the
28:57
rest of my life that I'll probably never
28:59
be able to talk about.
29:01
And there are plenty of things that I
29:04
think that should get disclosed, uh, that they're
29:06
not talking about.
29:09
For example, uh, when are we gonna see
29:12
the release of the redacted portions of the
29:14
9 11 commission?
29:17
Uh, you know, that's something I'd like to
29:18
see.
29:20
Uh, and why are they still withholding some
29:22
things from the JFK files?
29:24
That makes no sense at all.
29:25
It's been over 50 years.
29:27
So clearly while this does seem to be
29:29
the age of disclosure, I don't feel like
29:32
it is a hundred percent uh you know
29:34
truthful disclosure.
29:37
Oh, it's yeah, it's well, I think with
29:39
the JFK thing, I think it's uh I
29:41
think it's very clear why that's not getting
29:43
out there.
29:45
CIA doesn't want there to be well, I
29:47
don't think it's CIA, you know, it's funny.
29:49
I actually think the CIA was ancillary to
29:50
that.
29:51
I actually think it was the the Pentagon.
29:53
I think it was General Lonzo.
29:54
No, without a doubt.
29:55
100% staff they wanted a war with Russia,
29:58
and uh JFK wasn't gonna allow it.
30:02
You know, it's funny.
30:02
I talked to somebody who I think is
30:05
the one of the experts on the JFK
30:07
truth, uh, and he was former intelligence, he's
30:09
an old, he's one of my dinosaurs.
30:12
And he explained to me the other night
30:13
on the phone.
30:14
He said, You have to put yourself back
30:16
in the context of the time.
30:17
He goes, he said, the the military guys,
30:20
these are the men who in many cases
30:23
had won the second world war.
30:26
They lived through the atomic bomb.
30:27
He goes, and they really believe that JFK
30:30
was a threat to the national security of
30:32
the country because he was screwing anything that
30:35
moved.
30:37
He had he had all kinds of vulnerabilities
30:40
that the Soviet intelligence they feared could exploit.
30:43
And that basically he was a walking, you
30:45
know, counterintelligence disaster.
30:47
And he said, and back then, those guys,
30:49
because it wasn't like today, where they're all
30:51
a bunch of libs.
30:52
He goes, back then those guys were real
30:53
serious.
30:55
And he said, I he goes, I really
30:57
think our own guys took him out because
30:59
they thought he was going to get America
31:01
defeated uh by the Soviets.
31:03
And uh he wasn't justifying it because he's
31:05
but but anyway, um that and then with
31:07
the 9-11 thing.
31:09
But it is important to understand the context
31:10
behind the decisions that some of these guys
31:12
make.
31:13
And even if they're wrong, you know, in
31:16
principle in what they do, uh, you you
31:18
can't understand history without looking back at that
31:21
time and seeing what was right of people.
31:24
It's very interesting too, because when you actually
31:25
think about it and you see a guy
31:27
like General Lonsdale, uh, you know, you think
31:29
about these guys and what they what their
31:31
careers were like and what was going on
31:33
in the world, you think, wow, I mean,
31:35
it's it's a totally different paradigm than what
31:37
we're used to.
31:39
And then with with 9 11, you know,
31:41
I'm very good friends with our co-host, Monday
31:43
co-host of the National Security Hour, Dr.
31:45
Michael Scheuer, a former Bin Laden unit head.
31:48
I did a for my other show, NATSEC
31:50
talk on Rumble.
31:52
I did a three-hour interview of him in
31:54
February of this year, and he said that
31:57
he came to the conclusion not long ago
32:00
that CIA, his agency, was as he was
32:02
running the bin Laden unit to hunt down
32:05
bin Laden, he became convinced that CIA was
32:07
secretly running a counter bin Laden unit, which
32:10
basically was going behind him and negating what
32:13
he was doing because some element of the
32:15
government wanted Al Qaeda to get be successful
32:18
in hitting America.
32:21
Well, we we definitely gotta you and I
32:22
need to have a conversation about that because
32:24
there's some things there that uh I could
32:25
put it.
32:27
This was confirmed to me, by the way,
32:29
this theory independently by a former United States
32:31
Congressman, not Weldon, who was on Tucker, another
32:33
another one who I'm very close with who's
32:35
retired.
32:38
Um we were having drinks uh uh in
32:41
DC about six months ago, and he started
32:44
saying things that almost lined up perfectly with
32:47
what Shoryer had independently told me.
32:50
Um, and the Saudi role and the the
32:52
Israeli role.
32:54
I mean, there there's there is so much
32:55
more to 9-11, and it and it it's
32:57
anyway, yeah.
32:59
Well, Cash had said that that he believed
33:01
that the American people needed to see it
33:03
and that they would be pissed.
33:05
So cash can't be dependent on because I'm
33:07
convinced cash has been compromised.
33:10
We think so.
33:10
I'm convinced.
33:12
I I am convinced he is he he's
33:14
uh he's completely different guy.
33:16
I knew Cash a little bit back on
33:18
the hill.
33:19
Um he's something's happened to him.
33:21
I don't know if it's just he finally
33:22
got what he wanted and he doesn't want
33:23
to rock the boat.
33:24
Maybe that's that might be or I I
33:26
you know I did find it interesting that
33:28
the first thing he, you know, him and
33:29
uh Dan Bon Gino get in there and
33:31
they say uh, you know, Jeff Jeffrey Epstein
33:33
killed himself.
33:35
And I was like, what?
33:36
And Bongino with the hostage video, you know,
33:38
where he's talking to Maria and he's glazed,
33:41
gleaning with sweat and his eyes are bulging,
33:43
and it's like blink once if you're if
33:45
you're in just if you're under duress, Dan.
33:47
I mean, yeah, Dan built a whole career
33:49
on uh in the media on the Epstein
33:51
files, and then he gets in there and
33:53
it's like nope, there's nothing to see here.
33:56
Uh well, I I've got to wrap things
33:57
up here, uh, but uh get to go
33:58
to a break.
33:59
But I I really appreciate your insights on
34:01
this, and uh Brandon definitely got to have
34:03
you on again because yeah, I think I
34:06
want to get into some of these other
34:08
topics and um yeah, and we definitely have
34:10
a conversation because uh there's some other stuff
34:12
too that I'm aware of on that uh
34:14
some documents that I've seen uh not as
34:16
a not in my capacity with my clearance,
34:18
but things that were shared with me by
34:20
other whistleblowers that were very, very interesting related
34:22
to uh the Bin Laden story.
34:24
Yeah, well, yeah.
34:25
Yeah.
34:26
With with that, folks, uh, make sure you
34:27
check out his show.
34:29
What when are you on?
34:30
Uh every Wednesday night, 8 p.m.
34:33
Eastern, and then I usually post uh episodes
34:35
twice a week on Rumble under the name
34:38
NatSec Talk.
34:41
Fantastic.
34:41
Well, folks, you're gonna have to check that
34:43
out and uh and hear more of what
34:45
Brand has to say about a lot of
34:46
these topics, which he's uh he's got a
34:48
lot of very um a lot of very
34:50
interesting views on it and uh and a
34:52
lot of knowledge and background in this type
34:53
of uh type of thing, especially in the
34:55
area of technology.
34:57
So, folks, uh make sure and check him
34:58
out and uh stick with us.
35:00
Us.
35:00
We'll be right back after the break.
35:00
We'll be right back after the break.
35:01
We got another guest coming on, and we're
35:01
We got another guest coming on, and we're
35:04
gonna be covering uh getting into more about
35:04
going to be covering uh getting into more
35:06
some of the corruption related to uh the
35:06
about some of the corruption related to uh
35:09
COVID uh scam that went on.
35:09
the COVID uh scam that went on.
35:12
Folks, uh, we will be right back after
35:12
Folks, uh, we will be right back after
35:13
a short break.
35:13
a short break.
35:14
You wouldn't go a day without brushing your
35:14
You wouldn't go a day without brushing your
35:16
teeth or washing your hands.
35:16
teeth or washing your hands.
35:18
What about washing your nose?
35:18
What about washing your nose?
35:20
I mean, your nose does filter the air
35:20
I mean, your nose does filter the air
35:22
you breathe, air loaded with bacteria, viruses, and
35:22
you breathe, air loaded with bacteria, viruses, and
35:24
irritants, make nasal hygiene part of your routine
35:24
irritants make nasal hygiene part of your routine
35:27
with clear, no messy bottles to fill, no
35:27
with clear, no messy bottles to
35:29
drowning sensation.
35:31
Clear is a natural drug-free saline with the
35:34
added benefit of xylitol, which blocks bacterial and
35:36
viral adhesion available in stores and online at
35:39
clear.com.
35:41
That is xLEAR.com.
35:44
In a world of rising prices, you can
35:46
still grow abundance.
35:48
I'm Doug Evans, author of the national bestseller,
35:50
the Sprout Book.
35:52
Sprouts grow in three to five days without
35:55
soil, sunshine, or fertilizer on your kitchen countertop
35:58
for under a dollar serving.
36:01
Take control of your food and your future.
36:04
Visit the sprouting company.com/slash out loud and use
36:07
the code out loud for an exclusive offer.
36:11
Grow food, not fear.
36:14
Welcome back to Unleash the Political News Hour.
36:17
We now enter into our third and final
36:20
segment with a courageous public servant and whistleblower
36:22
who refused to remain silent.
36:25
Look, folks, you know, the COVID crisis that
36:29
uh we all went through.
36:32
Uh, there was a lot of things that
36:35
were completely corrupt about it.
36:37
And with me today is Ronald F.
36:40
Owens Jr., who served as an information officer
36:44
at the California Department of Public Health from
36:47
March 2009 until December 2023.
36:52
And like many, he saw things going on
36:55
firsthand uh where basically the warning signs uh
36:58
were ignored.
37:02
The evidence that was coming out from government
37:06
websites was completely ignored for political reasons.
37:11
And uh, so we're gonna get into that
37:12
and talk about that, especially right now.
37:14
I think this is critical.
37:16
We still have not seen justice for the
37:18
wrongs that were done against the American people
37:20
during COVID.
37:22
The fact is a lot of people were
37:23
harmed.
37:25
And while there may have been mistakes made
37:26
early on in this thing, maybe people were
37:27
afraid.
37:29
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
37:31
The fact is that when evidence started coming
37:33
out in VERES and people were ignoring it
37:35
at the, you know, these public officers were
37:37
ignoring it.
37:40
And when people like Ronald came forward and
37:42
said, Hey, you guys need to take a
37:45
look at this evidence, and they flat out
37:47
ignored it and retaliated.
37:50
I think uh it's something that needs to
37:52
be talked about because these people who were
37:54
ignoring these warning signs need to be held
37:57
accountable.
37:59
Ronald, thank you so much for joining us.
38:02
Well, thank you, Nathan King, for inviting me.
38:05
And I just want you to note that
38:09
when we hear about corruption in government, whether
38:13
it be federal, state, local, oh, we think
38:16
about um somebody stole public funds, misappropriation of
38:20
money, um, setting up an NGO, but using
38:24
it for other purposes like to enrich yourself.
38:27
But in my interesting corruption issue, and had
38:32
to do with California state public health officials
38:37
withheld injury sparing, life-saving information from the public
38:42
because it was contrary to the COVID-19 vaccine
38:47
mantra that they're safe and they're effective.
38:53
When, for example, in my situation, the assistant
38:57
director of the California Department of Public Health,
39:01
the deputy director for the Office of Communications,
39:05
the media team supervisor, the assistant deputy director
39:09
for the Office of Communications.
39:13
I name out what four people who knew
39:17
the information that I brought to them that
39:21
these vaccines are not safe and unaffective.
39:26
So I've informed them three times between 2022
39:29
and 2023.
39:33
And they can look at that information and
39:35
say, look, you know what?
39:38
Maybe there's something to this Ron Owens guy.
39:40
I've known Ron Owens.
39:41
He's worked here since 2009.
39:43
He's just not making this up.
39:47
Maybe I may not take the booster.
39:50
Okay.
39:51
So they had privy to the information that
39:53
I brought to them, Nathan.
39:55
But the corruption is that they deprived.
40:01
They deprived 40 million other Californians from learning
40:06
this information so they too could make decisions
40:10
for themselves and for their family.
40:14
So that's the corruption that my whistleblower narrative
40:18
dealt with.
40:23
See, this is the problem that I see
40:26
right now with what happened during that time
40:30
and the lack of justice, if you will.
40:35
Essentially, what you had was malfeasance in government.
40:38
And this is this is uh, I would
40:40
say the least of the crimes that were
40:42
committed.
40:43
Uh, because I do think that there was
40:46
probably uh there probably are other things, but
40:49
at a minimum, there was malfeasance, which basically
40:52
refers to the intentional performance of a wrongful
40:54
or unlawful act by a public official while
40:57
acting in their official capacity.
41:00
And it typically under the law, it involves
41:03
deliberate misconduct that violates the law or ethical
41:06
standards, which I would say this definitely falls
41:09
under that, uh, or the duties of the
41:12
office, which it also falls under.
41:15
So this is a clear case of malfeasance
41:18
in government at the federal level.
41:20
Everybody knows about that, but it wasn't just
41:23
the feds, it was the state because they
41:25
had access, they were informed, and in this
41:27
case, there's no doubt they were informed because
41:30
you're the one that informed them about the
41:32
VERS database and what you were seeing and
41:35
about reports that were going on.
41:37
Tell us a little bit about that.
41:39
Okay, and there's more.
41:41
Okay, I've just described about the four people
41:44
that I dealt with between 2022 and the
41:48
time that I retired, December 31st, 2023.
41:51
Okay, since then, I have provided written notification
41:55
to 296 county boards of supervisors in the
41:58
state.
42:00
Of supervisors in the state.
42:02
There are 58 counties in California.
42:02
There are 58 counties in California.
42:06
And each county has a board of supervisor.
42:06
And each county has a board of supervisor.
42:08
It's sort of like a small legislative governmental
42:08
It's sort of like a small legislative governmental
42:13
political entity per county.
42:13
political entity per county.
42:17
Well, I provided written notification in July of
42:17
Well, I provided written notification in July of
42:22
2024 to 296 county elected officials.
42:22
2024 to 296 county elected officials.
42:26
I provided another written notification, Nathan.
42:26
I provided another written notification, Nathan, in December
42:31
of 2024 to those 296 uh officials.
42:37
Now they were some were re-elected, some decided
42:40
not to run for office, but they were
42:43
still notified in 2024.
42:47
And between July of 2024 and the present,
42:51
I followed up those two written notifications by
42:55
appearing in person.
42:59
And after my in-person appearance per county, and
43:03
I've done 53 out of 58 thus far,
43:07
I've also provided another round of notification.
43:12
So each board of supervisor in California, and
43:15
I've got five more counties left, and those
43:19
counties are Imperial, San Diego, Orange, San Bernardino,
43:22
and Los Angeles.
43:26
Each county in California would have been provided
43:30
by me three written notifications and one in
43:34
person appearance per county.
43:39
So again in 2022 to 2023, these state
43:42
public officials were informed by yours truly since
43:46
2024 to the present, there were three or
43:49
two notifications and one in person appearance for
43:53
296.
43:56
And still, still the ban is playing on.
44:02
Matter of fact, Dr.
44:03
Mary Tally Bowden, I don't know if you
44:06
know about her whistleblower story, but she has
44:09
been really um persecuted by Texas health officials
44:13
for having the temerity to try to cure
44:16
one of her patients with properly dosed ivermectin.
44:20
She said recently that seven million children have
44:24
been treated or not treated, injected with the
44:29
COVID-19 vaccine.
44:33
And that's one of the many reasons what
44:37
fuels me to do what I'm doing, that
44:40
children are still being exposed to poison.
44:44
Absolutely.
44:46
You know, um it's interesting.
44:48
So I I did just a little bit
44:49
of searching through uh, you know, the California
44:51
state laws.
44:52
I grew up in California and uh spent
44:55
you know the the formative years of my
44:57
life uh up until I was uh uh
45:00
till I was about 2022, and then I
45:02
joined the army and and moved all over.
45:04
But I I lived there a little bit
45:06
longer uh back in 2004, I lived there
45:08
for about four years, four to five years
45:10
um as well.
45:13
And here's the thing that uh to me
45:17
is is so just it's such a a
45:21
problem in the state.
45:25
Now, under California law, uh the the California
45:30
government, uh a California government official, okay.
45:35
Uh I I mentioned malfeasance uh in, but
45:38
there's also misconduct in office in California.
45:42
Um, you know, it's not a standalone uh
45:44
penal code crime, but it can support removal
45:47
from office or serve as grounds for other
45:49
charges.
45:52
And you know, and and the bottom line
45:55
is is that the courts, uh, you know,
45:58
they they have to obviously look into these
46:01
things and and determine uh whether it was
46:05
willful uh malfeasance or misfeasance or nonfeasance in
46:08
performing official duties.
46:11
But the fact is that there are laws
46:15
on the books in California that state that
46:18
you cannot uh you cannot basically not give
46:22
people informed consent, and that's not just state
46:25
law, that's federal law uh under the official
46:29
duties and immunities.
46:32
Uh California government code uh 855.4, it provides
46:36
immunity for discretionary decisions on uh preventing disease
46:39
spread.
46:43
Uh, and and I think that's a personally,
46:45
I think that's a problem there because again,
46:48
uh it may give somebody the idea that
46:50
they they don't have to give informed consent.
46:52
Uh and you know, obviously uh broader uh
46:56
you know discretionary act immunity, uh, which often
47:00
you know protects policy choices like endorsements or
47:04
mandates, but the bottom line is is that
47:08
you had concealment and and in some cases
47:11
false statements, which is a federal crime, uh,
47:15
which basically criminalizes knowingly and willfully falsifying concealing
47:19
or covering up a material fact in a
47:23
matter within federal jurisdiction um communications with federal
47:27
agencies like CDC, FDA.
47:31
I mean, there's so many people that committed
47:34
crimes in this and related uh healthcare false
47:37
statements have their own uh their own law,
47:40
18 USC uh 1035, and uh if it's
47:43
tied to federal programs, and I think that's
47:47
important here, but at the state level, there's
47:50
also official misconduct and uh withholding or endorsing
47:53
um you know something like hey, you need
47:56
to take this vaccine and it's safe and
47:59
effective.
48:03
Uh if you know that that is not
48:06
the case, even if you suspect that that's
48:08
not the case, you're violating specific statutory duties
48:11
under the health and safety code public health
48:14
reporting requirements.
48:16
So in your case, you actually did what
48:19
you were required to do by law by
48:21
informing them of what you were seeing in
48:24
the the Verse Health data, and not just
48:26
the first health data, but also what was
48:28
being reported to you uh you know by
48:31
some in your own government.
48:34
Well, you raise a good point because I
48:37
have up to this point, Nathan just zeroing
48:40
in the moral ethical the right thing to
48:42
do because I'm I'm a man of faith,
48:45
I'm a Christian and I'm I'm guided by
48:48
scripture to do the right thing.
48:52
And one of the things that was a
48:55
driving force was for me to tell the
48:58
truth and not to lie.
49:00
The truth and not to lie.
49:01
I know the truth.
49:01
I know the truth.
49:02
And if I had to just sat there
49:02
And if I had to just sat there
49:04
and just muzzled myself because they muzzled me,
49:04
and just muzzled myself because they muzzled me,
49:07
I would have been lying.
49:07
I would have been lying.
49:09
But to your point, I would have gone
49:09
But to your point, I would have gone
49:12
against, I would have basically gone against the
49:12
against, I would have basically gone against the
49:15
law of this government code 855.4 that you
49:15
law of this government code 855.4 that you
49:17
cited.
49:17
cited.
49:20
One of the laws that I cite to
49:20
One of the laws that I cite to
49:23
the Board of Supervisors, I cited in the
49:24
the Board of Supervisors, I cited in the
49:26
written notification and my follow up comments.
49:27
written notification and my follow-up comments, is health
49:31
and safety code 101025.
49:35
I told the Riverside County Board of Supervisors
49:39
just over a month ago and other board
49:42
of supervisors prior to them that even though
49:45
they think that these vaccines are safe and
49:49
effective, according to Health and Safety Code here
49:52
in California, 101025, they have a statutory responsibility
49:55
to preserve and protect the public health.
49:59
And they haven't done so.
50:00
And then there's the government code that you
50:02
just cited.
50:03
I appreciate you citing that because heretofore I
50:08
had not seen that particular government citation.
50:13
Here's the problem that I have with all
50:16
of this is that as you mentioned, you
50:18
know, you're a man of faith.
50:21
I'm a man of faith as well.
50:23
And you know, to me, this is not
50:26
about politics.
50:28
It's not about Democrat versus Republican.
50:32
The fact is, this happened everywhere.
50:34
It happened in Republican states.
50:35
It happened in Democrat states.
50:37
You had government officials who, like I said,
50:41
I can forgive somebody making a mistake.
50:46
But when they knew the information, when they
50:48
had the information presented to them, and they
50:51
continued to lack courage to stand up and
50:54
say, you know what?
50:57
I think we need to pause.
50:59
And at a minimum, we need to provide
51:01
informed consent.
51:03
Uh, you know, I'm okay with somebody saying,
51:06
hey, there's a risk if you take this,
51:08
but there's also a risk if you don't.
51:11
And so it's up to you.
51:13
But when they coerce people into taking vaccines
51:16
by telling them you're going to lose your
51:18
job if you don't, that's coercion.
51:21
And then when they tell people uh that
51:25
you know they don't care what a government-funded
51:28
website, their uh, which was basically you know
51:31
managed by healthcare professionals, providing data that there
51:35
were 20,000 people dead from taking this vaccine
51:38
and hundreds of thousands that were injured.
51:42
And they are and that's conservative.
51:44
That's very conservative because the fact is the
51:46
studies have shown that they're they're only reports
51:47
one percent.
51:49
Exactly.
51:50
Thank you for making that point.
51:52
So the thing, think about this.
51:54
The fact that you had people who continued
51:57
to do these things who lacked courage, who
51:59
were cowards, and that's really what it boils
52:01
down to.
52:03
It was cowardice.
52:05
Because I I don't think that many of
52:07
these people intentionally wanted to harm others, but
52:09
I think many of them were cowards and
52:11
chose not to stand up and say, Whoa,
52:13
hold on a minute.
52:15
They chose not to buck the system because
52:18
they wanted to continue to collect a paycheck,
52:20
continue to get promoted, and they knew that
52:23
if they went against the system, went against
52:25
the narrative, that the likelihood was that they
52:28
would pay because that's what happened to you.
52:31
And you know, if somebody spoke out, then
52:35
they they were pro they were persecuted.
52:39
And when you think about that, it happened
52:42
on both sides.
52:45
And and and I and I I I
52:47
love our president, but I this is an
52:49
issue that I think we still need to
52:51
see justice.
52:53
And while I run I recognize that, yeah,
52:55
sure.
52:57
Uh, you know, under Trump, uh, you know,
52:59
they they started the process of of you
53:02
know creating these vaccines rapidly.
53:05
Again, I can forgive uh mistakes that may
53:07
have been made in in the desire to
53:09
protect people.
53:11
But once information got out there that these
53:13
things were harming people, it should have stopped.
53:16
It should have been pulled from the market,
53:18
and the government should have said something.
53:20
And that that falls on the Biden administration,
53:23
but it also falls on every state government,
53:26
including my own of West Virginia, which basically
53:29
pushed this on people in my state, they
53:32
were having gun raffles.
53:35
Uh, because it's a very conservative state.
53:37
They were they were giving gun raffles and
53:40
offering, like, you know, uh, get a you
53:42
know, uh uh get a a uh a
53:44
Big Mac or something like that if you
53:46
go get your shot.
53:48
I was so ridiculous.
53:49
They bribed people, and uh I want to
53:52
see these people held accountable because we cannot
53:55
ever have this happen again, ever in our
53:58
country.
54:01
What say you?
54:03
Well, I agree with you emphatically.
54:10
Um, something you said that brought something to
54:12
my mind that I had blood clots in
54:15
both of my lungs in February of 2019,
54:18
diagnosed with with having deep vingt thrombosis, that's
54:21
why I stay active and walk five miles
54:24
a day trying to stay healthy.
54:26
I represent Nathan, a demographic of people that
54:30
if I take the vaccine, it could injure
54:33
me or even kill me.
54:36
And so you mean you're gonna tell me
54:38
that I have to take it in order
54:40
to keep my job or walk into store
54:42
and shop or conduct business.
54:45
That's just plain evil.
54:47
So back to my issue, again, 40 million
54:51
Californians were deprived in 2022, uh uh April,
54:55
and October of 2022, in August of 2023,
54:59
and September of 2023, they were deprived with
55:03
having that information.
55:07
How many people were injured and died?
55:10
Because the management of the California Department of
55:15
Public Health deprived um or prevented that information
55:20
from being uh uh told to them.
55:25
Exactly.
55:26
Well, Ronald, I'm I'm just about out of
55:27
time, but um, I want to give you
55:29
an opportunity.
55:30
You're folks, for those of you that have
55:32
not heard his story, uh, he's got a
55:33
book out.
55:35
And uh Ronald, tell us where people can
55:37
find your book and where they can find
55:38
out more about you, and then you're working
55:40
on a project.
55:41
Uh, tell us about that as well before
55:43
we uh end this segment.
55:45
Muzzle truth.com is my website.
55:48
My whistleblower stories there were the documents on
55:51
that particular website.
55:53
My book, muzzle truth.com is in paperback ebook
55:56
and audiobook read by yours truly, and to
56:00
further document what's going on in California, I'm
56:00
Truly.
56:00
And to further document what's going on in
56:03
crowdfunding a documentary.
56:03
California, I'm crowdfunding a documentary.
56:06
And when you go to muzzle truth.com, there
56:06
And when you go to muzzle truth.com, there
56:09
is information there to click to donate if
56:10
is information there to click to donate if
56:13
you want to help produce this documentary to
56:13
you want to help produce this documentary to
56:16
hold these public officials accountable, hopefully in a
56:16
hold these public officials accountable, hopefully in a
56:19
court of law, but definitely in the court
56:19
court of law, but definitely in the court
56:22
of public opinion.
56:23
of public opinion.
56:26
Absolutely, absolutely.
56:26
Absolutely.
56:27
Absolutely.
56:28
Well, folks, that concludes.
56:28
Well, folks, that concludes today's edition of Unleash
56:31
the Political News Hour.
56:33
I want to extend a sincere thanks to
56:35
our guests, Brandon J.
56:37
Wakehart, for his expert insights on national security
56:40
and technology, and Ronald F.
56:44
Owens Jr.
56:45
for your courageous testimony and unwavering commitment to
56:48
public transparency.
56:51
Thank you, folks, for tuning in.
56:52
We encourage our viewers to seek truth, ask
56:54
hard questions, and to hold those in power
56:56
accountable.
56:59
Join us next week for another powerful hour
57:01
of unfiltered political news and analysis.
57:04
Until then, stay informed, stay engaged, and stay
57:06
unleashed.
57:08
I'm Nate Kane.
57:09
Good night.