Latest / Sleepy Facts About History / How Did Indigenous Nations Control the Early North American Fur Trade? - The Journey of the Beaver Pelt | Sleepy Facts About History

Transcript

How Did Indigenous Nations Control the Early North American Fur Trade? - The Journey of the Beaver Pelt | Sleepy Facts About History · Sleepy Facts About History

0:00
Welcome to Sleepy Facts About History. The familiar
0:13
image of the North American fur trade often involves
0:16
a solitary French trader paddling into an empty
0:20
wilderness to acquire furs. The reality of the
0:24
early 17th century was entirely different. Long
0:28
before European newcomers arrived, the Great
0:31
Lakes and St. Lawrence Watershed were governed
0:33
by sophisticated indigenous powers like the Wendat
0:36
Confederacy, and the Haudenosaunee, who maintained
0:39
dense networks of trade, diplomacy, and alliance.
0:43
When the French entered this world, they were
0:46
not conquerors setting terms, but supplicants
0:49
seeking admission into an existing indigenous
0:52
system. This episode examines how the beaver
0:55
pelt moved from an indigenous hunter to a European
0:58
hat maker, passing through a chain of sovereignties
1:02
rather than a simple commercial supply chain.
1:05
The narrative explores the diplomatic protocols
1:08
that made exchange possible, including the sharing
1:12
of tobacco, feasting, and gift -giving that established
1:15
mutual obligation. It also details the physical
1:20
and technological realities of the trade, from
1:23
the preparation of castor grass pelts to the
1:26
birchbark canoe journeys that required immense
1:29
indigenous labor and geographic knowledge. As
1:33
the system expanded, French survival depended
1:36
entirely on indigenous partnership, a reality
1:39
made clear by events like Samuel de Champlain's
1:43
integration into indigenous warfare and the Great
1:45
Peace of Montreal in 1701. I wanted to understand
1:50
why the standard historical narrative of New
1:52
France so often overlooks the actual mechanics
1:55
of its survival. While working on this episode,
1:59
I kept returning to one question. Who truly controlled
2:02
the terms of exchange? The evidence shows a fragile
2:06
colonial settlement that relied completely on
2:09
indigenous diplomats, traders and hunters who
2:13
pursued their own strategic interests. It is
2:16
a story that requires us to look past simple
2:19
colonial triumph and see the enduring reality
2:22
of indigenous power. The beaver pelt that became
2:28
a gentleman's hat in Paris did not begin with
2:31
European discovery. It began with indigenous
2:34
sovereignty. It began with protocols of tobacco
2:38
and kinship, with networks of alliance and obligation
2:42
that governed who could trade, what they could
2:45
exchange, and on what terms. The French who entered
2:50
this world were not conquerors bearing order
2:52
to wilderness. They were supplicants who had
2:56
to be taught its rules. Their survival depended
2:59
on their willingness to learn. Most of us carry
3:03
a picture in our minds of the North American
3:05
fur trade. A Frenchman in a canoe, perhaps, paddling
3:09
into silent forest, meeting an indigenous hunter,
3:13
exchanging a few metal tools for a stack of beaver
3:16
pelts. The wilderness yields its treasure. The
3:20
European returns rich. It is a simple story,
3:24
and almost entirely wrong. What actually existed,
3:29
long before any Frenchman dipped a paddle in
3:32
the St. Lawrence, was a world already dense with
3:34
politics. trade routes and diplomatic protocol.
3:38
The valleys and lakes of the northeast were not
3:41
empty. They were governed. The Wendat Confederacy
3:45
organized towns and trade across what we now
3:48
call southern Ontario. The Haudenosaunee, five
3:52
nations bound by the great law of peace, controlled
3:55
corridors south of Lake Ontario. Algonquin and
3:59
Innu peoples managed the St. Lawrence watershed
4:02
itself. These were not tribes and waiting. They
4:07
were powers with histories, rivalries, alliances,
4:10
and sophisticated economies. Trade moved between
4:14
them along river highways in birch bark canoes.
4:18
That trade was never merely commercial. To exchange
4:22
goods was to enter a relationship. Gifts created
4:26
obligation. Kinship, real or adopted, bound strangers
4:31
into reciprocity. Imagine the scene at Tadoussac,
4:36
where the Saguenay River meets the St. Lawrence,
4:39
or later at Montreal as the trade grew. A trading
4:43
encounter did not begin with goods displayed
4:45
and prices named. It began with tobacco. The
4:50
smell of it rose in the morning air as parties
4:52
gathered. The pipe passed from hand to hand in
4:56
a gesture of peaceful intent. Then came feasting.
5:00
the preparation and sharing of food that established
5:03
hospitality and mutual recognition. Then came
5:07
speeches often long, often in multiple languages
5:10
with interpreters working between them. These
5:13
speeches established who the parties were to
5:16
each other, what previous relationships connected
5:19
them, and what obligations existed from earlier
5:22
exchanges. Gifts moved first. Knives, perhaps,
5:27
or cloth. or wampum belts that carried messages
5:30
of alliance. Only after these protocols had been
5:34
observed, after relationships had been acknowledged
5:37
and renewed, did furs appear. The pelt was not
5:41
a commodity in a modern sense. It was an object
5:45
embedded in a social world, exchanged between
5:48
people who had agreed on who they were to each
5:51
other. The French who began arriving in the early
5:55
17th century stepped into this world as newcomers
5:58
who needed to be taught its rules. Their survival
6:01
depended on it. The beaver pelt itself explains
6:05
part of why they came. European hat makers had
6:10
discovered that the soft underfur of the beaver,
6:13
the dense layer beneath the coarser outer hair,
6:16
could be felted into a material of remarkable
6:18
quality. Felted beaver made hats that held their
6:22
shape. resisted water and signaled status. But
6:27
the best pelts for this purpose were not fresh
6:29
kills. They were what the French called castor
6:33
gras, greasy beaver, pelts that had been worn
6:37
by indigenous people as clothing, softened by
6:40
use, the outer hair worn away to expose the underfur.
6:45
Indigenous hunters and wearers were not merely
6:47
suppliers. They were participants in a manufacturing
6:51
process that began in North America and finished
6:54
in European workshops. The pelt that would become
6:58
a hat in Paris or London had already traveled
7:01
through indigenous hands, indigenous preparation,
7:04
and indigenous exchange networks before it ever
7:07
reached a French warehouse. This is where we
7:11
need to start. Not with European ambition, but
7:15
with indigenous control of the entire first half
7:17
of the journey. French entry into this system
7:21
began at Tadoussac, where Innu and Algonquin
7:24
peoples had long gathered for seasonal fishing
7:26
and trade. When French ships arrived, they found
7:30
not a blank coast, but a known meeting place
7:33
where they had to be incorporated into existing
7:35
protocols. The French brought goods, metal tools,
7:39
cloth, glass beads that interested indigenous
7:42
traders. But access to furs was not automatic.
7:48
It had to be negotiated, gift by gift, alliance
7:51
by alliance. The French learned quickly that
7:55
they were not setting terms. They were seeking
7:58
admission. Samuel de Champlain enters our story
8:03
here, but we must understand him as the sources
8:06
allow. A capable, observant man who understood
8:10
that French survival required indigenous partnership,
8:14
not a solitary founder imposing order on wilderness.
8:18
His writings, The Voyages of 1613 and 1619, record
8:23
his efforts to learn the diplomatic landscape.
8:27
In 1609, he joined a Wendat and Algonquin war
8:31
party against the Haudenosaunee near the lake
8:34
that now bears his name. This has often been
8:38
read as French military intervention. It was
8:41
nothing of the sort. Champlain carried a single
8:45
arquebus. His presence mattered because alliance
8:48
mattered. The Wendat and their Algonquin allies
8:52
were pursuing their own long -standing conflicts
8:55
with the Haudenosaunee. By joining them, Champlain
8:59
demonstrated French commitment to the relationship.
9:02
He was being incorporated into indigenous warfare
9:05
and indigenous alliance logic, not redirecting
9:09
it. The Haudenosaunee enmity that would shape
9:12
the next half -century of the region's history
9:16
was, in significant part, a consequence of this
9:20
choice. But it was a choice made within an indigenous
9:23
framework by indigenous allies who had their
9:26
own reasons for fighting. The alliance that formed
9:30
after 1609 became the central mechanism of the
9:33
fur trade's expansion. The Wendat Confederacy,
9:37
positioned between the St. Lawrence settlements
9:39
and the Great Lakes interior, became indispensable
9:42
intermediaries. Wendat traders travelled by canoe
9:47
to nations farther inland, the Odawa, the Ojibwe,
9:51
others, carrying French goods and bringing back
9:54
furs. They controlled access. They set terms.
10:00
They moved goods through networks they had managed
10:03
long before French arrival. The French at Quebec
10:07
and Montreal received what the Wendat chose to
10:10
bring when they chose to bring it. at prices
10:13
negotiated through gift exchange and alliance
10:16
obligation this was the system that moved the
10:20
beaver pelt toward european hat makers an indigenous
10:24
hunter in the western great lakes region perhaps
10:27
a dawa or a jibway trapped or traded for a pelt
10:31
he might wear it soften it prepare it as castra
10:36
gra it passed to wendat traders who had traveled
10:40
to his community with french goods axes Knives,
10:44
kettles, cloth, establishing the relationships
10:46
that made exchange possible. Then came the journey
10:50
east. The canoe itself was indigenous technology,
10:55
refined over centuries. Bark stretched over a
10:59
wooden frame, sealed with spruce gum, light enough
11:03
to be portaged by one or two people yet capable
11:06
of carrying hundreds of pounds of cargo. A loaded
11:10
canoe with pelts and trade goods might weigh
11:12
as much as a ton. Moving it across the geography
11:16
of the Great Lakes required not merely paddling,
11:19
but intimate knowledge of watersheds, currents
11:21
and portage routes around rapids and falls. The
11:25
Wendat traders paddled through lakes Huron and
11:27
Ontario, down the Oswa River, navigating by memory
11:31
and observation. They carried their vessels across
11:35
land where water failed, reloaded and pushed
11:38
on. The physical labor was immense. It involved
11:43
the ache of shoulders and backs, the coordination
11:46
required to lift a loaded canoe from water to
11:50
shore and back again, and the constant attention
11:52
to weather and water. This was not a route on
11:57
a map. It was a bodily achievement, repeated
12:00
season after season, made possible by indigenous
12:04
knowledge and indigenous endurance. The pelt
12:09
that would reach Europe had already traveled
12:11
through indigenous labor, indigenous technology,
12:13
and indigenous geographic expertise. At Montsouris
12:18
or Quebec, the canoe arrived at French settlements
12:21
built on indigenous ground. The pelt passed into
12:25
a different kind of space, a warehouse of timber
12:28
and stone where European commercial order prevailed.
12:32
Here the pelts were counted, sorted, and stored
12:36
in piles that rose toward rafters. Their greasy,
12:40
musky smell filled the enclosed air. Clerks recorded
12:44
quantities in ledgers. Merchants calculated values.
12:51
Administrators prepared reports for officials
12:53
and investors. The warehouse was a node of European
12:57
accounting, a place where the pelt began its
13:00
transformation into commodity. Yet even here,
13:04
the indigenous world was not absent the canoes
13:08
that arrived carried not just pelts but news
13:10
alliances grievances and requests the traders
13:15
who brought them expected not merely payment
13:17
but recognition gift and relationship the warehouse
13:22
stood in tension with the longhouses where these
13:24
same pelts had been warm prepared and exchanged
13:28
in ceremonies of tobacco and speech in the longhouse
13:33
european goods the very knives and kettles that
13:36
are traveled inland were being incorporated into
13:39
indigenous life just as indigenous pelts were
13:42
being incorporated into european commerce the
13:46
two spaces warehouse and longhouse were connected
13:50
by the same objects the same relationships and
13:53
the same ongoing negotiation from the warehouse
13:57
the pelts were loaded onto ships for the atlantic
14:00
crossing in european ports Merchants sold them
14:05
to feltmakers, and here the final transformation
14:08
occurred. The workshop smelled of animal fiber
14:11
and hot water. The pelts were soaked. The underfur
14:16
was scraped and separated from the coarser guard
14:19
hairs. Then it was pressed and rolled into felt
14:23
through a process of heat, moisture, and pressure
14:26
that matted the fine fibers together. The castor
14:30
grass softened by indigenous wearing. yielded
14:33
its underfur more readily than dry pelts ever
14:36
could. The felt was then shaped, blocked, and
14:40
finished into hats that held their shape against
14:42
rain and time. The finished hat might be worn
14:46
by a merchant in Amsterdam, a gentleman in London,
14:49
or a cleric in Paris. Each step of this journey,
14:53
from indigenous hunter to Wendat trader to French
14:57
warehouse to European workshop, required permission,
15:00
relationship, and negotiation the pelt moved
15:04
not through a supply chain but through a chain
15:07
of sovereignties the french understood at some
15:11
level their own dependence new france's settler
15:15
population remained tiny a few thousand by the
15:19
mid 17th century compared to tens of thousands
15:22
in the english colonies to the south the colony
15:25
could not feed itself reliably it could not defend
15:29
itself against hostile powers It could not even
15:33
reach the furs that sustained its commercial
15:35
rationale. Every peltry that left Quebec represented
15:39
indigenous labor, indigenous knowledge, indigenous
15:43
diplomacy, and indigenous choice to participate
15:46
in the alliance. French officials complained
15:49
frequently about the terms they had to accept,
15:52
about the gifts they had to give, about the traders
15:56
who failed to return. and about the unpredictability
15:59
of allies who made their own decisions. These
16:03
complaints are evidence not of French control,
16:06
but of its absence. The system worked after a
16:09
fashion, because it served indigenous purposes
16:12
as well. The Wendat and other nations gained
16:15
access to European goods that altered their material
16:18
lives. Metal tools changed woodworking and agriculture.
16:24
Firearms shifted military balances. Cloth supplemented
16:28
or replaced leather and fur clothing. More importantly,
16:33
they gained allies in their own regional struggles.
16:37
The French connection strengthened the Wendat
16:40
position against Haudenosaunee expansion. It
16:43
brought traders who reinforced Wendat networks.
16:46
It created, for a time, a powerful alignment
16:50
of interest. But the system that carried French
16:53
goods inland also carried destruction. European
16:57
contact brought epidemic disease. Smallpox was
17:02
most devastating, but measles, influenza and
17:05
other illnesses to which indigenous populations
17:08
had no immunity also spread. The Jesuit relations,
17:12
those remarkable annual reports compiled between
17:15
1632 and 1673, record with horrifying detail
17:20
the impact on Wendat communities. Villages emptied.
17:25
Social structures strained. The relations must
17:29
be read critically. They are missionary documents,
17:32
shaped by conversion goals and cultural assumptions,
17:36
often interpreting suffering as divine opportunity.
17:39
But their testimony to demographic catastrophe
17:42
is consistent with other evidence. Archaeological
17:46
work at Wendat sites show settlement disruption,
17:50
population movement, and the sudden appearance
17:52
of mass burials. The precise numbers are uncertain
17:56
and contested, as population estimates for pre
18:00
-contact indigenous societies always are. But
18:04
the scale of loss is not in doubt. The Wendat
18:08
Confederacy that had dominated the early fur
18:10
trade was weakened from within, even as external
18:14
pressures mounted. The Haudenosaunee, meanwhile,
18:18
pursued their own strategic interests with ruthless
18:21
clarity. Their conflicts with the Wendat and
18:25
their French allies predated European contact.
18:28
But access to Dutch and English firearms through
18:32
their own European connections, the Dutch at
18:35
Fort Orange, later Albany, gave them military
18:37
advantages that shifted the regional balance.
18:41
The Haudenosaunee were not mere aggressors. They
18:46
were a people also experiencing epidemic losses,
18:49
also seeking to replace population and maintain
18:52
power. also operating within their own political
18:55
and spiritual logics. The morning war tradition,
18:59
in which captives were taken to replace the dead
19:02
and sustain community vitality, was one framework
19:06
for understanding their expansion. Economic competition
19:10
for control of trade routes was another. The
19:13
Haudenosaunee destruction of Wendat settlements
19:15
in 1649 and the dispersal of Wendat survivors
19:19
in the years following was a catastrophe shaped
19:22
by all these factors indigenous and european
19:26
material and spiritual strategic and desperate
19:32
the wendat dispersal did not end the fur trade
19:36
it transformed it french traders now cut off
19:41
from their primary intermediaries had to adapt
19:43
they moved deeper into the interior into the
19:47
Pays d 'un Hort, the upper country of the Great
19:50
Lakes and beyond. They formed new alliances with
19:54
Ojibwe, Ottawa and other nations who became the
19:57
next generation of intermediaries. The French
20:00
crown tried to regulate this expansion, to license
20:04
traders and to maintain some control over who
20:07
went where and with what goods. The attempt largely
20:11
failed. Quereuse d 'Ibois. Unlicensed French
20:16
traders moved among indigenous nations. They
20:20
learned languages. They adopted customs. They
20:25
sometimes married into communities. They became
20:28
part of the kinship networks that made trade
20:31
possible. What did this adaptation look like?
20:35
A Cora de Bois might wear indigenous clothing,
20:39
moccasins, leggings, a blanket coat. more practical
20:43
for travel and more acceptable to indigenous
20:46
hosts than European dress. He learned to build
20:50
and navigate birchbark canoes, to hunt and fish
20:54
in indigenous ways, and to speak enough of local
20:57
languages to negotiate without interpreters.
21:00
He might spend months or years in the interior,
21:03
living in indigenous communities, participating
21:06
in their seasonal movements, their social life
21:09
and their diplomatic gatherings. Some married
21:13
indigenous women and were incorporated into kinship
21:16
systems through the same protocols of adoption
21:18
and alliance that had structured indigenous trade
21:21
for generations. They were celebrated by some
21:24
as adventurous frontiersmen, condemned by others
21:28
as renegades who abandoned civilization. Both
21:32
descriptions miss the point. They were participants
21:35
in an indigenous system that required their adaptation
21:38
to survive. Missionaries complicated the alliances
21:42
further. Jesuit and Recollet priests accompanied
21:45
French traders and officials. They established
21:49
missions in indigenous communities. They sought
21:53
conversions. They introduced new forms of social
21:57
and spiritual pressure. Their presence was not
22:01
neutral. Indigenous people who converted or were
22:05
suspected of converting. might be seen by their
22:07
own nations as threats to communal integrity.
22:11
Missionaries who condemned indigenous spiritual
22:13
practices created tensions that rippled through
22:16
alliance networks. Yet missionaries also learned
22:20
indigenous languages, recorded indigenous societies
22:23
with unprecedented detail and sometimes served
22:27
as interpreters and mediators in diplomatic encounters.
22:30
The Jesuit relations, for all their limitations,
22:34
remain essential sources precisely because their
22:36
authors lived among indigenous people and wrote
22:39
down what they saw. The missionaries were another
22:42
thread in the tangled fabric of the fur trade.
22:45
They were neither simply destructive nor simply
22:48
benevolent, but agents of profound and often
22:52
unintended change. By the late 17th century,
22:56
the fur trade had become something different
22:59
from what it had been in Champlain's time, yet
23:01
built on the same foundation. New French influence
23:05
reached far into the interior, to Michilimackinac,
23:09
to Green Bay, to the Mississippi watershed, not
23:12
because French power had grown, but because indigenous
23:15
nations continued to carry French goods and French
23:18
alliance along their own routes for their own
23:21
purposes. The Great Peace of Montreal in 1701
23:25
demonstrated this reality with remarkable clarity.
23:30
Representatives of dozens of indigenous nations
23:32
gathered at Montreal that summer. Haudenosaunee,
23:36
Odawa, Ojibwe, Potawatomi, and many others alongside
23:42
French officials. The event unfolded according
23:46
to indigenous diplomatic protocol. Speeches were
23:50
made. Gifts were exchanged in quantities that
23:53
demonstrated the wealth and commitment of the
23:56
givers. Alliances were renewed and new ones forged.
24:01
The French could not dictate terms. They participated
24:05
in a diplomatic world that remained fundamentally
24:08
indigenous. The scale of the gathering, the number
24:13
of nations involved, and the protocol observed
24:16
all testified to the enduring reality that New
24:19
France's survival depended on indigenous partnership,
24:23
not French power. We need to pause here. and
24:27
consider what this means for how we understand
24:30
New France itself. The colony that historians
24:33
have often described as a French imperial project
24:36
was, in its daily functioning, something quite
24:39
different. It was a fragile settlement, clinging
24:43
to the St. Lawrence, dependent on indigenous
24:46
allies for food, for military security, for geographic
24:50
knowledge, and for access to the resources that
24:53
justified its existence. French officials issued
24:57
decrees, built fortifications, and wrote reports
25:01
to Versailles. But the actual work of extending
25:04
French influence inland was done by indigenous
25:07
diplomats, traders, and travelers who chose,
25:11
for their own reasons, to incorporate French
25:14
goods and French allies into their networks.
25:17
The beaver pelt that reached a European hat maker
25:20
did so because indigenous sovereignty allowed
25:23
it too. This is not a comfortable story for any
25:27
simple narrative of colonial triumph or indigenous
25:30
victimhood. The fur trade involved exploitation,
25:35
violence, disease and displacement. Indigenous
25:38
nations were not uniformly powerful. Their choices
25:42
were constrained by circumstances they did not
25:45
control. Epidemics devastated their populations.
25:49
Warfare destroyed their communities. European
25:53
goods altered their economies in ways they could
25:56
not fully anticipate. Individual indigenous people
25:59
experienced coercion, enslavement, and death.
26:04
The system as a whole contributed to long -term
26:07
processes of dispossession that would accelerate
26:10
in later centuries. None of this can be sanitized
26:14
or minimized. But neither can the agency that
26:18
indigenous nations exercised within this system
26:20
be denied or diminished. They were not passive
26:24
recipients of European power. They were active
26:27
participants who shaped the terms of engagement,
26:30
who controlled access to resources, and who pursued
26:33
their own strategic interests through alliance
26:36
and trade. They adapted to changing circumstances
26:40
with creativity and determination. The Wendats
26:43
who mediated the early trade, the Haudenosaunee
26:47
who pursued their own expansion, the Ojibwe and
26:51
Odawa, who became the new intermediaries after
26:54
Wendat dispersal, and the countless individual
26:58
hunters, traders, diplomats, and families who
27:01
made choices within this system. All were historical
27:05
actors whose decisions mattered. The Beaver Pelt's
27:09
journey from indigenous hunter to European hatmaker
27:12
was, in the end, a journey through indigenous
27:15
sovereignty. It passed through hens that chose
27:18
to trade, through networks that indigenous people
27:22
maintained, through protocols that indigenous
27:25
people enforced, and through alliances that indigenous
27:28
people negotiated and renegotiated according
27:31
to their own interests. The French were there,
27:34
important, sometimes desperate, always dependent.
27:38
But they were participants in a system they had
27:41
not created and could not control. New France
27:44
survived for as long as it did, and reached as
27:47
far inland as it did. because indigenous nations
27:50
allowed it. The colony's thin population, its
27:54
limited agriculture, its vulnerable settlements,
27:58
and its uncertain supply lines would all have
28:01
been fatal without indigenous partnership. The
28:04
French knew this at some level, even when they
28:08
pretended otherwise in their reports to the King.
28:11
The real history of the fur trade is not a story
28:14
of European discovery and commercial expansion.
28:18
It is a story of indigenous diplomatic worlds
28:20
that incorporated newcomers on their own terms,
28:23
that used alliance to pursue their own power,
28:26
that transformed and were transformed by the
28:29
encounter, but that never simply surrendered
28:32
to it. When we picture the fur trade now, we
28:37
might imagine something different from that solitary
28:39
Frenchman in his canoe. We might picture a Wendat
28:43
trading party arriving in Montreal with canoes
28:46
loaded with pelts. The vessels heavy with the
28:49
weight of the journey. The traders weary from
28:52
weeks of paddling and portaging. They are greeted
28:56
with ceremony. Tobacco is offered. Speeches are
29:01
made in multiple languages, with interpreters
29:04
working between them. Gifts are exchanged before
29:07
any business is discussed. The pelts that emerge
29:10
from the canoes have been worn and prepared by
29:13
indigenous hands, carried through indigenous
29:16
waters by indigenous labor. and brought to this
29:19
place by indigenous choice. In the warehouse
29:22
nearby, clerks wait with their ledgers. In Europe,
29:26
feltmakers prepare their workshops. But the moment
29:30
that makes all of this possible is here, in the
29:33
greeting, in the recognition, in the renewal
29:36
of relationships that precede and enable every
29:39
exchange. The hat on the European gentleman's
29:43
head was connected. by this chain of diplomatic
29:46
encounters and political calculations to the
29:50
indigenous worlds of the North American interior.
29:53
That connection was not simple. It was not equal.
29:57
It was not benign. But it was real, and it was
30:01
shaped at every point by indigenous agency. The
30:05
fur trade was an indigenous system that the French
30:08
entered, adapted to, and depended upon. Understanding
30:12
this does not require us to celebrate or to condemn.
30:15
It requires us to see clearly what the evidence
30:18
shows, that New France was built in large measure
30:22
on indigenous foundations, and that the Beaver
30:26
Pelt's long journey was also a journey through
30:28
indigenous sovereignty, indigenous diplomacy,
30:31
and indigenous power.