Latest / Kvetch & Release / Ontario considers revising housing start counts after cities raise concerns
Transcript
- 0:00Welcome back to AM eight hundred CKLW hope you're all doing well today. Housing
- 0:06Housing, Housing, housing, it's the pretty well one of the number one
- 0:09topics that we talk about, or I talk about whenever I'm here on the
- 0:12station, and it is on the top of minds for renters and first time
- 0:17buyers and sellers and policymakers and elected officials. And we have found out that
- 0:22the government of Ontario is considering revising its tallies of how many homes are built
- 0:26in cities and towns after some complained that undercounting has cost them millions of dollars
- 0:32in provincial funding. As the Ford government attempts to get one and a half
- 0:37million homes built by twenty thirty one, it's assigned annual housing targets to fifty
- 0:42cities and promised extra funding to those who accede or get close to it.
- 0:46But to qualify under the Building Faster Fund, which can be spent on infrastructure
- 0:50related to housing enabling projects, cities need to have hit at least eighty percent
- 0:55of their targets, of which is of housing starts, as calculated by the
- 0:59Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation. But the big city mayors group says there's discrepancies between
- 1:04the CMHC data and their own internal counts, and for four municipalities that we're
- 1:11close to qualifying for funding, it meant losing out on a collective twenty three
- 1:15point three million dollars. Joining me right now to talk about this potential change
- 1:23is Ward nine Councilor Kieren Mackenzie Kieran. Good to have you on the show.
- 1:27This is a really interesting announcement that we're seeing here from the provincial government.
- 1:34What do you think about it? Well, I'm happy to hear that
- 1:36they're entertaining the idea of potentially looking at the metrics that would lead to qualifying
- 1:42for the infrastructure required to support housing housing development in our community. To be
- 1:48honest, that this conversation should have been happening before but or much earlier than
- 1:53this, But here we are today, so let's look look forward. I
- 1:57think it's a it's critical to understand the difference between the way the CMHC determines
- 2:02what a housing start is and what if the municipal or if the provincial government
- 2:07is going to create a program to incentivize municipalities to do everything that they can
- 2:13that's within their span of control to facilitate housing moving forward and housing development moving
- 2:19forward in their communities. Using the CMHC metric isn't fair, and I think
- 2:23that that's becoming increasingly clear in the City of Windsor from a building department perspective
- 2:29and a building permitting perspective, as well as through our planning and our planning
- 2:32and Zoning Planning committee, we have done. We haven't turned down any development.
- 2:38First of all, that's number one. We've everything that's come through for
- 2:40rezoning has proceeded, even sometimes when there's been pretty significant challenges and pushback.
- 2:46The second piece to it, we've invested millions of dollars to improve our capacities
- 2:50in the building department itself, to improve the permit to accelerate the permitting processes.
- 2:55Not easy, These aren't easy decisions, but we've done that work,
- 2:59and unfortunately the program, the way the province has set it up, it's
- 3:02not We're not getting the benefit that other communities are getting for doing that work.
- 3:08So I'm glad the conversation is happening. I hope it proceeds as quickly
- 3:13as possible and we can get some revisions to how we do the counts because
- 3:16I think that we've more than exceeded what we should and need what we need
- 3:21to do to be a good partner in this to the province. So I
- 3:24just want to highlight how confusing these counts could actually be. Our Municipal Affairs
- 3:31and Housing minister acknowledged that a legislative committee earlier this month that at the same
- 3:38time the province was in a dispute with the FEDS over how the FEDS counted
- 3:42affordable homes built in Ontario, he was hearing concerns from cities about how the
- 3:46province was tracking the city's housing starts. Every level of government is sort of
- 3:53pointing at each other here over this situation, and I suppose that that's not
- 3:57surprising considering how big of a problem housing crisis has become and how quickly it
- 4:00happened. It's it's a good point, John. There is some complexity there.
- 4:04But here's where I think it actually is simple. If the if the
- 4:09province is coming it wants municipalities to do everything in their power to address housing
- 4:15stock in their community, then create a metric and a measurement tool that reflects
- 4:23the things that fall within the municipality's span of control. That's building permits,
- 4:28that's zoning changes. Once you get beyond that, it becomes a decision of
- 4:32the private sector. So and they're making decisions on when they're going to build
- 4:38their proceed with their development based on the larger macroeconomic financial environment that we have
- 4:45no control over. So it's it's frankly, it's not fair. It's not
- 4:49a good tool to use as a metric to count whether or not a municipality
- 4:56is going to be eligible or not eligible for for funding to support the goals
- 5:01that the provinces articulated it wants us all to support. So concern that I've
- 5:05raised from the beginning of this discussion or in terms of the targets that the
- 5:11province was setting as to whether or not they're going to provide the appropriate levels
- 5:15of support to help us achieve our goals as well as their goals which are
- 5:19aligned. So this is again there's I get the complexity of it, but
- 5:25it doesn't need to be that complex when the objectives of the province are what
- 5:31they want municipalities to do more to get more and better housing. We're doing
- 5:35that and if you count it fairly, you'll see that. See I wonder
- 5:41if when they announced the one point five million, if they thought it was
- 5:44achievable, if situations changed from when they came up with the figure two when
- 5:49they rolled it out. I only bring this up because we know that they
- 5:54had to include well, they started counting long term care beds as part of
- 5:59homes, and that brought them closer to an annual target towards their goal of
- 6:02the one point five million homes over the ten years. But our housing minister
- 6:06has also previously said he's considering counting student residences and retirement homes, and now
- 6:12the big city mayors are waiting to find out if that's going to happen,
- 6:15if transitional housing is going to count as well. I guess my question would
- 6:19be, if the government keeps trying to find ways to count things that already
- 6:24exist as towards getting to a goal of one point five million homes being built,
- 6:30we're not really adding any new stock. If we're just going to start
- 6:33counting things that are already here, They're already being used. It's not like
- 6:38student residences are empty, or long term or or other places are empty,
- 6:43like retirement homes. It's a fair point. But if we're going to get
- 6:47into this business of trying to establish how much housing is in the community,
- 6:50because the things that you just highlighted, John do represent housing need and pressure
- 6:56that's in the housing universe that communities are being forced to deal with. So
- 7:00if we're looking to create a baseline in terms of how we how we determine
- 7:05what is how much housing capacity do we actually have across the province and are
- 7:10going to develop programs and support programs municipalities based on those numbers, we need
- 7:15a baseline number. So I think it's your point's well taken. But I
- 7:17think if we're starting on this journey, which we kind of are, then
- 7:23let's let's figure out how much capacity is in the system and in the municipalities
- 7:27currently, and then you know, if we want to you know, tweak
- 7:30the program and start looking at different measures that we can do to further incentivize
- 7:34new builds, then I think we also have to have an understanding of what
- 7:39actually what is the real number in terms of what actually exists currently. Well,
- 7:44listen, I'm not against having an accurate account. You can't have a
- 7:46conversation to identify a problem without knowing what the actual facts on the grounds are.
- 7:50I guess my only point was that they're looking to count these as additional
- 7:56new units towards that goal of one point five million. I just I'm having
- 7:59a hard time wrapping my head around that. One. Still, last question
- 8:03that I want to ask you comes down to, of course, one of
- 8:05the most important things, and that is cash, cold hard cash. Do
- 8:11we have enough of it to meet our goals of clearing our affordable housing weight
- 8:16list? How much do we need? What partnerships could there be out there?
- 8:20I mean, what what? What are some of the realities like,
- 8:22I mean, it's not cheap to build. Those are the big fundamental questions.
- 8:26The answer is no. And how much do we need? That's a
- 8:30really good question. Uh, there's a you know, we have a list
- 8:33that's that's that's into the several thousands, and it's grown appreciably since I even
- 8:39started on council. Uh just uh, just over six years ago. So
- 8:43we're not making we're not making progress. We're going in the wrong direction.
- 8:46Obviously, there needs to be new funding and new models and new new new
- 8:50ways of interpreting or or figuring out how to how to bring bring new units
- 8:54in, particularly in the affordable space. Online. Here's what I do know
- 8:58and what I believe firmly we cannot and in terms of what like the strict
- 9:03definition of affordable housing, which includes people who are you know, need brant
- 9:07supports and whatnot to be in to be to be housed, the private sector
- 9:13cannot and cannot be relied upon, will not participate. There's no path in
- 9:18my view, for the private sector to be uh involved in affordable housing.
- 9:24And uh so this is the pressure is entirely on the public sector to address
- 9:30those needs. The other the only way to knock down that that list,
- 9:35the people who are on those waiting lists is for the economy to generally improve
- 9:39unless people have the need to be in affordable housing, that's you know,
- 9:43and then they could they could start looking into the private sector. But when
- 9:46you hear private developers saying I'm going to build affordable units, they're not doing
- 9:50that. They're going to build they're looking to build a unit that at a
- 9:54in the sort of the private marketplace, would be affordable to some in the
- 10:00middle of the income spectrum, or maybe on the middle to a low end
- 10:03of it, but people who are in high need and in poverty. The
- 10:07idea of a private developer building affordable housing that fills that need not happening won't
- 10:13happen, needs to be incentivized. That of course means more money. It's
- 10:18a complex issue though sometimes looking at it from the fifty thousand point view or
- 10:24on the ground level, you can get different perspectives that always appreciate your perspectives.
- 10:30Ward nine councilor Kieren McKenzie, appreciate you having me on, John,
- 10:33and you're dre and you're consistent addressing this really important topic. Thank you,
- 10:37Thank you very much. We'll be back right after this