Latest / Beyond The Horizon / Murder In Moscow: Murder In Moscow: The Experts Behind The case Against Bryan Kohberger (Part 4) (8/24/26)

Transcript

Murder In Moscow: Murder In Moscow: The Experts Behind The case Against Bryan Kohberger (Part 4) (8/24/26) · Beyond The Horizon

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to the program. In
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: this episode, we're getting right back to the experts behind
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: the case against Brian Coberger. Amended supplemental Expert Disclosure Number
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: five Jade Miller. The State has previously disclosed that Jade
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: Miller Forensic Scientists three as an expert witness in the
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: field of forensic biology and DNA, which includes, but in
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: no way is limited to, DNA extraction, quantification, amplification analysis,
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: and interpretation analysis, including but not limited to STR data
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: an STR mixed probabilistic genotyping. The State hereby incorporates its
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: previous response and attachments fueled on December eighteenth, twenty twenty four,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: and is hereby supplementing those responses. As follows, Miller will
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: provide an explanation of what DNA is. DNA is genetic
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: material contained in cells that may be utilized for human identification.
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: DNA may be present on an item in the form
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: of biological mis materials such as blood, semen, and saliva,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: or may be left on an item when it's handled.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: Biological evidence and possible potential DNA evidence is collected for
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: preservation and may be sent for further testing by qualified analysts.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: DNA can be collected by swabbing an item or by
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: taking or cutting directly from an item. Reference DNA samples
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: can be collected directly from individuals. DNA can be used
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: to identify individuals, link individuals to crime scenes, link crime scenes,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: as well as exclude individuals from DNA profiles. Miller will
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: explain the four steps of DNA analysis. One the extraction
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: of DNA from cells by adding chemicals to break open
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: all the cells to release DNA. Two the quantification of
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: DNA to determine how much DNA is present in a sample.
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: Three the amplification of DNA by generating copies of the DNA.
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: This requires copying the specific location of DNA using chain
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: reaction for the generation of DNA profile for comparison. This
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: includes visualizing the DNA profile, which looks like peaks onograph.
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: Once a DNA profile is created, the data can be
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: interpreted and comparisons can be made. Miller can be expected
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: to testify a length about her conclusions and interpretations made
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: in Report twenty six, which is that DNA profile obtained
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: from item one point one from Report four bates, pages
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: five point thirty four through five ninety four matches that
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: obtained from the known reference sample by Brian Colberger Item
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: one a weight. Miller's conclusion, as set fourth in Report
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: twenty six is that DNA profile is at least five
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: point three octillion times more likely to be seen if
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: Brian Colberger is the source than if an unrelated individual
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: randomly selected from the general population is the source. Miller
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: will also testify about CODIS. COTIS is a database managed
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: by the FBI that allows state and local crime laboratories
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: to upload and compare DNA profiles from crime scene evidence
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: and convicted offenders. Use of this database can help to
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: provide links between evidence and crimes and evidence and known offenders.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: The coda's database requires that DNA profiles meet specific eligibility
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: requirements prior to being uploaded. These requirements include that a
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: crime must have been committed, the profile was developed from
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: an item related to the crime, and the profile must
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: be attributable to the perpetrator. DNA profiles from victims, nonprobative individuals,
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: and items that are not linked to the crime scene
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: are not allowed to enter The laboratory must justify entry
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: of every profile put into CODIS, and many factors can
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: influence eligibility. In regard to mel B, this profile was
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: not entered into CODIS based on the location of the
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: profile within the residence and proximity of the profile to
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: the victims. This was a large redad occupied by several
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: college students, as well as heavily trafficked by other students
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: who may not have lived there. This profile was located
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: on the underside of a hand rail within a stairwell,
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: which is frequently touched area that cannot be directly linked
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: to the crime. It would not be uncommon to find
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: unknown DNA on a hand rail within the residence that
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: got there in a manner that was not related to
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: the crime. Also, the proximity of this profile to the
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: victims makes it difficult to ensure it's attributable to the perpetrator.
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: Though probative value this profile mel B is not as
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: high as that of the unknown mal profile MALA obtained
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: from the knife sheath, as the victims were believed to
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: have been stabbed to death and the knife sheath was
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: located next to one of the victims. In regard to
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: mel D, this profile was developed from a gardening style
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: glove located outside the residence in a publicly accessible area.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: No DNA from the victim was located on this item,
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: and a direct link to the crime could not be established.
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: HANA from one or more of the victims been located
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: on the item, it likely would have been CODIS eligible. Also,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: perhaps if this DNA profile had matched mel B from
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: the handrail inside the residence, there's a possibility it could
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: have been uploaded because there would have been a link
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: to a profile found within the crime scene. At the
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: time CODIS eligibility was determined, mal DNA profiles A, B,
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: and D were unidentified and it was not possible for
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: lab staff to know who would ultimately be linked to
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: any one item. CODIS eligibility determination was strictly made based
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: on our evaluation of the probitive value of each item.
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: Exhibits six Amended Supplemental Expert Disclosure and NORD the state
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: is previously disclosed and NORD forensic scientist and laboratory manager
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: as an expert witness in the field of controlled substances
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: and toxicology. The State hereby incorporates its previous responses and
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: attachments filed on December eighteenth, twenty twenty four, and is
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: hereby subse lamenting those responses as follows. Nord may testify
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: to the laboratory process and procedure for receiving, storing, handling,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: and returning evidence and what was done in this case
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: with regards to LAB item number seventy one. The analyst
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: may testify to the laboratory method for testing controlled substances,
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: which may include identification of drugs detected in the sample
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: and sample waging. The analyst may testify to the result
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: of testing in this case and the process for approving
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: and reporting results. Nord may testify regarding her involvement in
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: the case in which Nord tested LAB item seventy one
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: ziplockbag with trace of blue powder. Nord's conclusion was the
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: item was anphetamine. Nord will explain how she came to
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: the conclusion and what method she used to test item
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: seventy one. Nord tested Item seventy one using Idaho State
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Police Controlled Substance Analytical Method Revision thirteen, specifically three and
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: AM six. A copy of that method is available online.
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: Item seventy one was analyzed by preparing two separate samples
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: by diluting the blue powder and methanol and running each
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: of those on a gas chrometograph mass spectrometer GCMs consists
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: of two analytical techniques run in tandem. The gas chromatograph
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: is used in separate compounds and provides selectively based on
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: physical and chemical characterizations. The mass spectrometer provides selectively based
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: on the compounds chemical structure. The results from those run
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: were compared to a non standard of amphetamine that was
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: run under the same conditions. Nord will testify that the
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: comparison of the extracts to the non standard. She concluded
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: that the sample contained amphetamine. Due to the limited sample amount,
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: more than half of the sample was consumed in analysis.
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: Due to this, the extras were packaged and returned in
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: the evidence envelope with the original item Exhibit seven amended
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: supplemental expert disclosure Rilean NOWLN. The state is previously disclosed
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratory Manager Riylean NOWLN, as
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: an expert witness. The state hereby incorporates its previous responses
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: and attachments filed on December eighteenth, twenty twenty four and
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: February sixteenth, twenty twenty five, and is hereby supplementing those
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: responses as follows as previously disclosed. Now then will testify
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: about the day to day operation of the forensic lab
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: specifically one accreditation, two ensuring quality control, three evidence receipt
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: into the laboratory, and four evidence handling and storage at
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: the laboratory and adhering to appropriate standards in the field.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: One Accreditation the process of creating compliant methods and a
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: quality system. Accreditations applicable and forensic science specifically ISO seventeen
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: twenty five and the Forensic Supplemental Document Are twenty two
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: one A two LA document and the FBI Quality Assurance
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: Standards for forensic casework Labs and Forensic database Lab accreditation assessments,
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: including frequency, the process of external assessors reviewing all documents
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: and observing casework being performed, as well as the process
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: and frequency of FBI Quality Assurance audits. Two Ensuring quality
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: control annual training, annual manual reviews, and quality control activities
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: including quality control tests and controls for reagents, instrumentation, and methods,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: and required certification for all scientists in their specific discipline.
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: Three Evidence receipt into the laboratory. Pre log of evidence
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: by customers into the Idaho Laboratory Information Management System, evidence
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: review of information on the item compar to the pre
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: logged information, assignment of the case, an item number in
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: ILM S for a storage of evidence in the laboratory,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: transfer of evidence in the laboratory, proper storage conditions of evidence,
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: and storage of evidence while at the laboratory. In addition,
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: now Lyn will testify regarding the general structure of the
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratory. This includes three laboratories Meridian, Cordelaine,
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: and Pocatello within the system, with a fourth drome plan
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: for twenty twenty five. Now Lynn discusses the discipline offered
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: in each lab. Now Lynn will discuss the DNA casework,
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: analysis and DNA database exclusively performed at the laboratory in Meridian, Idaho,
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: and the types of evidence submitted for each discipline will
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: also be discussed. Now Lynn will also testify to touch
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: DNA and transfer of DNA Specifically, now Lynn will testify
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: to the characteristics and nature of touch DNA, including house
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: deposited and transferred to an item of evidence, and methods
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: used to collect and preserve touch DNA samples from items
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: of evidence, the procedures and protocols used by forensic scientists
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: to extract and analyze touch DNA, the manner in which
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: results from touch DNA samples are interpreted, and the reliability
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: of touch DNA analysis and its acceptability in the field
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: of forensic science. Now, then, will also testify to the
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: potential for DNA to transfer between an individual and an object,
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: including the distinction between primary and secondary transfer and the
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: factors influencing the likelihood of transfer. All right, folks, that's
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: going to do it for this one. In the next episode,
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: dealing with the topic, we're going to pick up with
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: our exceed All the information that goes with this episode
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: can be found in the description box.