Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Sober-Minded Shepherd: Vigilance in the House of God

Transcript

The Sober-Minded Shepherd: Vigilance in the House of God · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. We're shifting gears a little
0:03
bit today, moving into a space that we're calling Reformed
0:07
thinking. We've taken a stack of
0:09
theological papers, some articles and commentaries, and
0:12
we're going to see if we can get to the bottom of them.
0:14
The goal is the same as always. We want to extract the Nuggets
0:18
of gold so you don't have to read, you know, 50 pages of
0:21
footnotes. But today, the subject matter is
0:23
a bit more specific. We're looking at leadership,
0:26
specifically, what makes a biblical leader actually fit for
0:30
the job. It is good to be here, and you
0:33
know you're right to frame it that way.
0:35
We are looking at a topic that sounds, well, pretty simple on
0:39
the surface. It does.
0:40
But according to the materials we have in front of us, it's
0:43
actually a structural necessity for the church.
0:46
We're talking about the biblical qualification for elders known
0:49
as sober mindedness. Sober mindedness, I have to be
0:52
honest with you when I saw that title.
0:54
In our folder we've got the Sober Minded Shepherd and Clear
0:57
Minds for holy Oversight. My brain immediately went to the
1:00
obvious place. I thought we were going to spend
1:02
the next 45 minutes talking about alcohol.
1:04
I really did. I just assumed this was a
1:06
checklist item for a search committee.
1:08
You know, sure. Does the pastor drink too much?
1:10
If the answer is no, you check the box and we'll move on to
1:13
whether he can preach. And that's the assumption most
1:16
of us make. It seems like a pretty low bar,
1:19
doesn't? It very low.
1:20
I mean, if that were all the Bible meant by the term, we can
1:22
just wrap this up right now and go get coffee.
1:25
Right, episode over. But the sources we're analyzing
1:29
today are arguing for something much, much heavier.
1:34
They argue that this isn't just about blood alcohol levels.
1:37
It's about a specific state of mind.
1:40
So we're not just talking about a dietary restriction here.
1:42
No, not even close. We're talking about mental
1:44
clarity. The argument in these texts is
1:47
that sober mindedness is a functional requirement for the
1:51
office of an elder. A functional requirement.
1:53
Yes. It's not just a moral badge of
1:56
honor, it's a tool. The claim is that if a man lacks
1:59
this specific kind of mental alertness, he is functionally
2:03
unfit to protect the church. It doesn't matter how
2:05
charismatic he is, it doesn't matter how many books he has
2:08
read or how organized his calendar is.
2:11
If he isn't sober minded in the biblical sense, he is dangerous.
2:16
Dangerous is a strong word, but it hooks me.
2:21
So if we aren't talking about staying away from the wine
2:24
bottle, what exactly are we talking about?
2:26
Well, to get there we have to do a little bit of work on the
2:28
language first. The New Testament was written in
2:30
Greek, of course, and the word Paul uses for sober minded in
2:34
the qualification lists is no folios.
2:36
No folios. OK, break that down for me.
2:38
It's a compound word, so you have the negative particle no,
2:41
which just means not or without, pretty simple.
2:45
And then you have the root P which means to drink.
2:49
So if you want to be incredibly literal about it, the etymology
2:52
is wine less. OK, hold on, you just told me
2:55
this wasn't about wine, but the word literally means wine less.
2:58
That feels a little contradictory.
3:00
It does seem that way at first glance, but this is where
3:03
linguistics gets fun. You know?
3:05
Etymology is the history of a word, not necessarily its
3:07
current definition. By the time we get to the New
3:09
Testament era, the usage of nefalios had evolved.
3:13
It had taken on this massive metaphorical weight.
3:16
It wasn't just describing a man who didn't have a cup in his
3:18
hand. It was describing a man whose
3:20
mind was in a certain state. OK, It came to mean something
3:24
like siritually alert or wakeful or pamper it.
3:29
It describes A cognitive posture.
3:31
A man who is Novolios is calm, he's collected, and he's
3:35
intellectually poised. So it moved from not drunk on
3:38
wine to something more like not drunk on anything.
3:41
That is a great way to put it. Implies a freedom from any kind
3:44
of mental intoxication. But how do we know that for
3:47
sure? I mean, I, I want to trust these
3:49
sources, but is there actual evidence in the text that Paul
3:52
meant this metaphorically? Or are we just, you know,
3:55
spiritualizing a simple command not to drink?
3:57
That's the crucial question to ask.
3:59
We shouldn't just take the experts word for it.
4:01
The sources provide what they call the redundancy argument,
4:04
and I think it's the strongest piece of evidence they.
4:05
Present the redundancy argument. So if you open your Bible to
4:08
first Timothy chapter 3, verse 2, Paul requires an elder to be
4:13
nofolios. That's our word.
4:15
Right verse 2 Nofolios. Got it.
4:16
But then just look at the very next verse, verse 3.
4:20
Paul forbids the elder from being Perinos.
4:23
And what does perinos mean? Perinos literally means beside
4:26
wine. It refers to a drunkard as
4:29
someone who sits long at the bottle.
4:31
It is the specific word for addiction to alcohol.
4:34
So think about the logic here. If no folios in verse 2 only
4:39
meant not drunk. Then verse 3 would be a complete
4:42
waste of ink. It would be redundant.
4:44
I see it now. Paul would be saying he must not
4:46
be drunk and then immediately saying and also he must not be
4:50
drunk. Right.
4:51
And scripture is concise. It generally doesn't waste
4:53
breath like that. The sources argue that this
4:55
distinction is very intentional. Verse 3 prionos covers the
4:58
behavior, the actual addiction to the substance.
5:01
But verse 2 Natholios is covering the state of the mind.
5:04
So the distinction is between the bottle and the brain.
5:06
You've got it. And the frightening implication
5:10
here is that you can have a man who is physically sober.
5:14
I mean, maybe he's been a teetotaler his entire life,
5:16
never touched a drop. Yeah, but he can still be
5:19
spiritually drunk. He can be intoxicated by anger,
5:22
he can be intoxicated by fear. He can be drunk on his own ego
5:26
or just staggering under the influence of the praise of man.
5:29
That is a haunting image. You could have a guy who is
5:32
technically qualified because he passes the breathalyzer, but
5:35
he's just stumbling around spiritually crashing into
5:37
things. The sources use an analogy here
5:39
that I found really helpful. They call him the Watchman.
5:42
And that's really the central image of the pastorate.
5:44
In this view, the elder is a Sentinel.
5:47
He's standing on the wall of the city.
5:48
OK, now imagine a Sentinel who falls asleep.
5:51
Or, you know, imagine a Sentinel is hallucinating because he took
5:54
something. He's a liability.
5:55
A. Huge one.
5:56
The safety of the entire city depends on his ability to see
6:00
reality clearly. The elder has to be able to spot
6:03
a wolf, which is the biblical metaphor for heresy or spiritual
6:07
danger from a long distance. And if he's drunk on distraction
6:11
or his own emotions? Then he won't see the wolf until
6:14
it's already inside the gate, devouring the sheep.
6:18
A foggy mind just cannot spot a subtle error.
6:22
I want to try to visualize this Nofalios man.
6:25
If we met a leader with this quality, what does he look like
6:29
in a room? What does he feel like?
6:31
He's clear headed. He isn't foggy, but he also was
6:34
in frantic. That's a big one, the sources
6:37
highlight. He's not easily provoked.
6:39
He's not easily seduced by the latest fad or the newest thing.
6:43
He's able to weigh a matter rather than just be swept away
6:47
by it. Think of a surgeon in the
6:49
emergency room. You know, chaos is everywhere.
6:51
Alarms are beeping, people are screaming.
6:53
The surgeon can't join in the panic.
6:55
No, you definitely don't want him to.
6:56
He has to be the calmest person in the room.
6:59
He has to be sober in the gravest sense or the patient
7:02
dies. That makes a lot of sense.
7:04
He's governed by something other than the immediate atmosphere.
7:07
Now I want to dig into the history of this though.
7:09
You mentioned that this concept isn't just a New Testament
7:11
invention. It has roots that go all the way
7:14
back to the Levitical priesthood.
7:15
It does, and to really grasp why this matters so much, we have to
7:20
go back to a very disturbing story in Leviticus chapter 10.
7:24
This is the incident with Nadab and Abihu.
7:26
The sons of Aaron. This is the unauthorized fire
7:29
story. It is, and the scene is just
7:30
terrifying. These two priests, they take
7:32
their sensors, they put fire in them and lay incense on it, and
7:36
they offer unauthorized fire before the Lord.
7:39
Which the text says he had not commanded.
7:41
Them exactly. And the result is immediate fire
7:46
comes out from the presence of the Lord and consumes them.
7:48
They die right there in the sanctuary.
7:50
It's one of those passages that just makes you sit up straight.
7:52
It emphasizes the holiness of God in a way that's hard to
7:55
ignore. It does, but what's fascinating
7:57
is what happens immediately after.
7:59
So the bodies are carried out, the camp is in shock.
8:02
And then the Lord speaks directly to Aaron, and the very
8:05
first command he gives Aaron after his sons have just died is
8:08
this drink no wine or strong drink, you or your sons with you
8:13
when you go into the tent of meeting, lest you die.
8:15
That is interesting timing. So the implication is that the
8:19
alcohol ban was directly tied to the disaster.
8:22
Were Natab and Abihu drunk? Well, the text doesn't
8:25
explicitly say they were drunk, but the placement of the command
8:29
strongly implies it. The Rabbi's certainly believe
8:32
so, and a lot of Christian commentators agree.
8:35
It seems their judgement was impaired.
8:37
They got sloppy. They got sloppy with holy
8:39
things, but look at the reason God gives for the ban.
8:43
This is the key, he says. They must be sober to
8:46
distinguish. To distinguish what?
8:48
To distinguish between the holy and the common, and between the
8:50
unclean and the clean, and to teach the people of Israel all
8:54
the statutes. So the whole purpose of sobriety
8:56
is the ability to make distinctions.
8:58
That is the definition of the job.
9:00
You cannot teach if you cannot distinguish.
9:02
You can't shepherd if you can't tell the difference between a
9:04
wolf and a sheepdog. You need a sharp, surgical
9:07
faculty of judgement to handle holy things.
9:09
OK, now here's where the sources connect this to the New
9:12
Testament elder in a way that really raises the stakes even
9:16
higher. Well, in the Old Testament, the
9:19
priests had shifts, right? They didn't live in the holy
9:21
place. They went into the attendant
9:22
meeting, did their service, and then they went home.
9:24
Right when they were off duty, the restriction was lifted.
9:27
They could have wine with their dinner.
9:28
But the New Testament elder. The New Testament elder doesn't
9:31
have shifts. The Church is the living temple
9:34
of God. It's made of people.
9:36
It is always active. So the elder is an overseer of a
9:40
living, breathing temple that never closes.
9:43
He is, in a sense, perpetually on duty.
9:46
So he never clocks out. He cannot clock out of his
9:50
spiritual alertness. He must always be ready to
9:53
distinguish truth from error. He must always be ready to
9:57
teach. You know, I can hear a question
9:59
forming in the minds of some of our listeners right now.
10:02
We're talking about being perpetually on duty and avoiding
10:06
the impairment of judgement. Does this mean a pastor can
10:09
never have a glass of wine? Are the sources arguing for
10:12
total abstinence based on this? That's a very important
10:16
distinction to make, especially since we're looking at this
10:18
through the lens of the Reformed tradition.
10:20
The sources here rely heavily on the Westminster Confession of
10:23
Faith, and we have to distinguish between legalism and
10:26
Christian liberty. And the Westminster Confession
10:29
is pretty robust about protecting liberty.
10:31
Right it is. Chapter 20 specifically protects
10:33
the conscience from man made rules.
10:36
The argument these articles make is not for teetotalism.
10:39
They were not saying the substance itself is evil.
10:43
I mean scripture says God created wine to gladden the
10:45
heart of man. Psalm one O 4.
10:48
The sin is not the liquid. The sin is intoxication.
10:51
The sin is the loss of control. So the issue isn't the glass of
10:54
wine at dinner, it's the surrender of your mental
10:57
governance. Precisely the Puritan view, and
11:00
they were very big on this concept of nepholios, was that
11:03
sobriety equals gravity. Gravity as in like weightiness?
11:07
Yes. They argued that the pulpit is
11:09
no place for a gesture. Elders deal with eternal
11:12
realities. They are handling the souls of
11:15
men and women. They're talking about heaven and
11:16
hell. They're handling the blood of
11:17
Christ and the sacrament. These are weighty things.
11:21
They require a serious mind. The argument is that a man can
11:25
be a teetotaler. He can drink only water and
11:28
still be flippant. He can be silly.
11:30
He can be structurally unsound in his thinking.
11:33
That man is not sober minded even if he is physically sober.
11:37
That distinction helps a lot. It really takes the focus off
11:40
the dye and puts it back on the demeanor on the character.
11:43
Sobriety is about gravity right now.
11:46
I want to pivot back to something you touched on at the
11:48
beginning. You listed a few things that act
11:51
as intoxicants besides alcohol. The drunks of the soul.
11:55
Yes, this is where the rubber really needs the road.
11:58
If a leader can be spiritually intoxicated without a drop of
12:02
alcohol, we need to know what the symptoms are and, as the
12:04
sources identify, several specific opposites of sobriety.
12:08
Let's run through these because they think this is where we
12:10
start to see ourselves or maybe our leaders in the mirror.
12:13
The first one you mentioned is quarrelsomeness.
12:15
This is a big one in our current cultural moment.
12:18
The man who is addicted to conflict.
12:20
We've all seen this type of leader.
12:22
He isn't happy unless he's fighting someone.
12:24
He hunts for opponents rather than caring for sheep.
12:27
He treats every board meeting, every theological discussion,
12:30
like it's a cage match. And the source argues this is a
12:33
form of intoxication. Yes, because it alters his
12:36
judgement. He's intoxicated with winning.
12:39
He gets a rush from the blood sport.
12:41
When you're looking for a fight, you will find one, even if you
12:44
have to invent it. That man cannot distinguish
12:47
between a minor disagreement and a major heresy because his brain
12:51
is just clouded by the desire for combat.
12:54
That is dangerous. He's creating enemies just to
12:57
satisfy his own need for a rush. What about the second one?
13:00
Impulsiveness. This is what the source calls
13:03
the tyranny of the immediate. This is the leader who just
13:05
reacts. He vents.
13:07
He sends the e-mail before he cools down.
13:09
He posts on social media before he prays.
13:12
That posting before praying line that is going to step on some
13:16
toes. It should.
13:18
The impulsive leader confuses confidence with recklessness.
13:21
He thinks he's being decisive, but really he's just being rash.
13:24
He can't bear the slow plotting work of careful shepherding, so
13:29
he rushes to judgement. He is, in a very real sense,
13:32
drunk on adrenaline. The third opposite was novelty
13:36
addiction. This one was interesting to me
13:38
because, you know, in the business world, we usually
13:40
celebrate innovation. We want the guy who disrupts
13:43
things. And innovation can be good, but
13:45
novelty addiction is a spiritual sickness.
13:48
It describes a leader who is bored.
13:50
He is bored with the ordinary means of grace.
13:53
And when we say ordinary means, we're talking about the basics,
13:56
like preaching, prayer, the sacraments.
13:58
The very things God actually gave the church to do.
14:01
The novelty addict thinks those are too slow, too boring.
14:04
So he's constantly chasing the new.
14:06
New methods, new controversies, new visions, new branding.
14:09
There's a great line and one of the sources it says novelty
14:12
rarely announces itself as rebellion.
14:14
It announces itself is progress. His leader is intoxicated by the
14:18
thrill of the new and he drags the church along with him.
14:22
He exhausts everyone because he changes direction every six
14:24
months to get that next hit of excitement.
14:27
That leads right into the final one they mentioned.
14:29
Pride or ego? And Paul warns about this
14:31
explicitly in First Timothy 3 verse six.
14:34
He says not to appoint a recent convert or he may become puffed
14:38
up. The Greece word there suggests
14:40
being inflated with smoke. It's an intoxication with self
14:44
importance. A leader drunk on ego interprets
14:47
every disagreement as a personal attack.
14:50
He interprets every decision as a referendum on his own
14:53
greatness. He can't see reality because he
14:56
is the center of his own universe.
14:57
He's hallucinating his own importance.
14:59
These are such subtle intoxications.
15:01
You don't smell them on a man's breath, but they destroy
15:04
churches just as effectively, maybe even more effectively than
15:08
alcohol. I would argue they destroy more
15:10
churches because often we celebrate these traits, don't
15:13
we? We do.
15:13
We celebrate the fighter. We celebrate the innovator.
15:16
We don't realize we're celebrating a lacks of sobriety.
15:18
So we've established the ancient roots in Leviticus and these
15:22
internal character flaws, but we're living in the mid twenty
15:25
20's. The world has changed so much.
15:27
The sources spend a significant amount of time discussing the
15:30
modern enemies of the sober mind.
15:32
These are external pressures that make it harder than ever to
15:35
stay in a folios. And the argument here is that
15:38
the modern world is essentially an engine designed to disciple
15:41
us into intoxication is a machine built to distract us and
15:45
to fog up our minds. And the biggest part of that
15:47
machine has to be the digital world, social media, the 24 hour
15:51
news cycle, what they call outrage culture.
15:54
Oh, without a doubt. Just think about how the digital
15:57
world works. It rewards speed.
15:59
It rewards volume. It runs on these little
16:01
adrenaline loops. If a controversy breaks out at
16:04
9:00 AM and you haven't issued a statement by noon, the Internet
16:08
says you are irrelevant or worse, complicit.
16:12
There's a pressure to have a hot take instantly.
16:14
Exactly. But the sober elder refuses to
16:17
be hurried. That is a deeply countercultural
16:20
stance. He refuses to let the algorithm
16:23
dictate the pace of his ministry.
16:24
He prays more than he posts. He understands that the anger of
16:28
man does not produce the righteousness of God.
16:31
If a leader is constantly reacting to every global
16:34
controversy, he's not shepherding his local flock.
16:38
He's performing for an audience that doesn't even know him.
16:40
That's a loss of sobriety. He's drunk on the noise.
16:44
Another modern pressure point mentioned is pragmatism and
16:47
metrics, the intoxication of numbers.
16:50
This is the business model applied to the church.
16:52
We look at the attendance, we look at the giving units, we
16:55
look at the growth charts. A Sunday morning dashboard.
16:57
That's it, and the source offers a sharp critique here.
17:01
It suggests that the Seeker sensitive movement or the Church
17:04
growth movement can act like a stimulant.
17:06
A stimulant like a drug. Yes, because it creates A
17:09
temptation to trade reverent worship for entertainment just
17:13
to get a quick result. It's the sugar high.
17:15
If the numbers are up this week, the pastor feels high.
17:18
If the numbers are down next week, he crashes into
17:20
depression. A sober minded elder looks at
17:24
faithfulness, not just spreadsheets.
17:26
He trusts that God's Word does the work, even if it's slow.
17:30
He doesn't need the constant dopamine hit of a packed room to
17:33
know that God is working. You know, the sources also bring
17:36
up a more sensitive topic, ideological intoxication.
17:40
Specifically, they mentioned critical theory and some of the
17:42
modern social justice frameworks, and I want to handle
17:46
this carefully because I know this is a flashpoint for a lot
17:48
of people. How do the sources frame this as
17:51
an intoxication? They frame it as a distortion of
17:54
perception. This goes right back to the lens
17:56
we talked about. The argument being made is that
17:59
ideologies, and this could apply to extreme right wing
18:01
nationalism just as much as left wing critical theory.
18:04
They function like strong drink because they alter how you see
18:07
reality. They give you a whole new set of
18:10
categories. Categories like what?
18:11
Well, in the case of critical theory, the source argues it can
18:15
replace biblical categories like sin, redemption, and individual
18:19
moral agency with sociological categories like power dynamics,
18:24
oppressor and oppressed. So the concern isn't discussing
18:27
justice, the concern is the framework that's being used to
18:31
discuss it. Correct.
18:33
And again, this is what the sources are arguing, that the
18:35
sober elder is supposed to stick to the external, unchanging
18:39
revelation of God if he starts interpreting his flock primarily
18:44
through the lens of power groups.
18:46
You are in this group, so you are guilty.
18:48
You are in this group, so you are innocent.
18:50
Rather than his individual sinners all needing the same
18:53
Savior, the source argues, he's become intoxicated by a foreign
18:56
philosophy. He swapped his glasses.
18:58
He has. He's no longer distinguishing
19:00
holy from common based on scripture, he's distinguishing
19:02
based on modern cultural category.
19:04
It's about keeping the biblical categories primary.
19:07
I get that there was one more modern enemy mentioned, and this
19:09
one touches on theology itself, mysticism and experience.
19:14
And this really reflects the Reformed cessationist viewpoint
19:16
of the sources we're looking at. The danger here is the
19:20
temptation to bypass the mind, to seek an ecstatic experience.
19:24
Trying to feel something rather than know something.
19:26
We're trying to get a Direct Line to God that, you know,
19:29
bypasses Scripture. The source warns that this is a
19:32
drunkenness of the mind. It is a surrender of cognitive
19:35
control in the hopes of some kind of spiritual high.
19:39
But true. Filling with the Spirit, they
19:41
argue, is letting the word of Christ dwell richly in you.
19:44
That's Colossians 3.16. It isn't losing mental control,
19:48
it's having your mind saturated with truth.
19:51
A sober leader does not rely on private whispers or visions, he
19:54
relies on the closed Canon of scripture.
19:57
He doesn't need to feel God to know God is there because he has
20:00
the book. It seems like the common thread
20:02
and all these modern enemies, whether it's the outrage
20:04
machine, the obsession with metrics, the ideological or the
20:07
mystical experiences, is that they all offer a shortcut.
20:10
They do. They all offer a high, and they
20:12
all dull the watchman's ability to see reality clearly.
20:16
They fog the glass. I want to take a turn now.
20:19
We have talked about the failures, the dangers, the
20:22
pressures. It can feel a bit heavy, but the
20:25
sources point us to the ultimate example of this virtue.
20:29
They point us to Christ. And this is the most beautiful
20:32
part of the study, and honestly the most convicting.
20:36
If you want to see Nepholios in action, you don't just look at a
20:39
list of rules, you look at Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane.
20:42
The contrast in that scene is just incredible.
20:45
When you view it through this lens, you have the disciples on
20:47
one side. And what are they doing?
20:49
They're asleep. They're asleep, the text says.
20:52
They were sleeping for sorrow. That is a fascinating phrase.
20:55
They were, in a sense, drunk on their own grief.
20:58
They were overwhelmed by their fleshly weakness.
21:01
Jesus asked them to watch, to be no folios for one hour and they
21:06
couldn't do it. They were not sober minded in
21:09
that moment. They just checked out.
21:11
And then you have Jesus. The only one who was truly no
21:13
folios. He was awake, he was alert, he
21:16
was praying. He saw the cup of wrath coming,
21:18
the ultimate wolf, if you will. And he did not look away.
21:22
He faced the horror of what was coming with perfect, terrifying
21:27
clarity. Yeah.
21:28
He didn't try to distract himself.
21:29
He didn't try to numb the pain. There's a specific detail from
21:32
the crucifixion that the sources highlighted and I had never
21:35
connected it to this concept set before.
21:36
It's in Mark chapter 15, verse 23.
21:38
Yes, this is right before the crucifixion really begins.
21:42
They bring Jesus to the place of the skull, and the soldiers
21:46
offer him wine mixed with more. And myrrh was a sedative, right?
21:50
A painkiller. It was a narcotic.
21:52
It was a primitive painkiller. It was actually an act of mercy
21:56
in a strange sense, to dull the senses of the victim before the
22:00
agony of the nails began. It would have taken the edge off
22:03
the screaming nerves. But the text says he would not
22:06
take. It he refused the sedative.
22:09
Think about that. Why?
22:10
Why refuse the one small comfort in the midst of that kind of
22:13
torture? The sources argue he refused it
22:16
because he had a job to do. He was the high priest offering
22:19
the ultimate sacrifice himself. He needed to distinguish the
22:23
holy from the common in the ultimate sense.
22:26
He was taking our sin and giving us His righteousness.
22:29
He was drinking the cup of God's wrath.
22:31
And he didn't want to be drugged for that transaction.
22:34
He chose to face the wrath of God with a clear, undiluted
22:38
mind. He wanted to know exactly what
22:39
he was doing. He drank the cup of judgement so
22:42
that we wouldn't have to. And he did it with his eyes wide
22:45
open. He was the ultimate watchman.
22:47
That is, that changes how you view that moment.
22:51
It wasn't just toughness, it was theological clarity.
22:53
He stayed sober so he could save us.
22:55
And that implies that for us, Christian sobriety is a
22:59
derivative virtue. We aren't sober just by gritting
23:02
our teeth and trying harder. We're sober because we are
23:05
united to Christ. It's his spirit, the spirit of a
23:08
sound mind that empowers an elder to stay awake.
23:12
We watch because he watched. That brings it from an abstract
23:15
requirement down to a gospel reality.
23:17
But I do want to land the plane on the ground level.
23:19
We have listeners who might be elders or aspiring leaders or
23:22
just members of a church. The sources breakdown the
23:25
application into three areas, head, heart and hands.
23:29
Let's start with the elder. What does sobriety look like for
23:32
his head? For the head, it looks like
23:34
intellectual stamina. It's the willingness to do the
23:37
grueling work of exegesis. OK, that means studying syntax,
23:41
grammar, context. It's the refusal to be lazy in
23:45
the study. A sober mind doesn't just want
23:47
to be entertaining on Sunday. It wants to be accurate.
23:50
It respects the text enough to work hard at it.
23:53
It resists the urge to just, you know, download a sermon from the
23:56
Internet because you're too busy or too tired.
23:58
Emotional regulation. This goes right back to not
24:01
being a drunk of the soul. It means not panicking during a
24:05
crisis when the budget crashes or a scandal hits or the culture
24:09
turns against the church. The sober elder is anchored in
24:12
the doctrinal Providence. He knows God is in control, so
24:16
he doesn't have to spiral into anxiety or rage.
24:19
He's the thermostat, not the thermometer.
24:21
And the hands. This is where it gets really
24:23
practical for everyone. Digital sobriety.
24:26
The sources are very specific here.
24:28
Put down the phone. You cannot have a sober mind if
24:31
you're addicted to the dopamine loops of social media or
24:34
entertainment. An elder needs to limit the
24:37
things that dull his spiritual senses.
24:40
If you are binge watching garbage on Saturday night until
24:43
2:00 in the morning, you will not be a sharp watchman on
24:45
Sunday morning. You will be foggy.
24:47
You will be useless to the sheep.
24:49
That is a challenge for all of us, honestly.
24:52
But what about the person in the Pew, the listener who isn't an
24:55
elder but helps select them or praise for them?
24:58
How does this change how they vote in a congregational
25:01
meeting? The advice here is really
25:03
countercultural. Do not look for the most
25:05
charismatic guy. Do not look for the successful
25:08
CEO type who can get things done.
25:10
Do not look for the guy who is flashy or funny.
25:12
What are we looking for then? Look for gravity.
25:14
Look for the man who is steady. The source calls it being
25:17
unexcitingly faithful. I love that phrase.
25:19
Unexcitingly faithful. Yes, you want the man who is
25:23
boringly consistent because a foggy mind produces a foggy
25:29
ministry. You want a leader who, when the
25:31
world is on fire, standing there with a bucket of water, not a
25:35
can of gasoline. You want the man who is awake.
25:38
That really flips the script on what we usually celebrate in
25:40
leadership conferences, doesn't it?
25:42
We usually want the rock star. The Bible wants the Watchmen.
25:45
The Bible wants the man who is sober enough to keep the sheep
25:48
alive. We have covered a massive amount
25:50
of ground today. We've gone from the Greek
25:52
etymology to the tragedy of Nadab and Abaahu to the cross
25:55
and right into our pockets with our smartphones as we wrap up.
25:59
If you had to boil this down to one thing for the listener to
26:01
walk away with, what is it? The core take away is that sober
26:05
mindedness is spiritual wakefulness.
26:08
It is the quality that protects the church from wolves, from
26:11
fads, and from the leaders own sin.
26:13
It's about being a watchman who is actually watching.
26:16
And the sources leave us with the final thought that I think
26:18
is worth chewing on. They mentioned that we live in
26:20
an age that is actively discipling us into intoxication,
26:23
into distraction. Outrage metrics.
26:26
The challenge they pose is simply this Who governs your
26:30
mind? Is it the algorithm or is that
26:33
the word? Because you cannot be governed
26:36
by both. You are either sobered by
26:38
scripture or you are intoxicated by the world.
26:42
A question worth sitting with. Who governs your mind?
26:44
I want to thank you for guiding us through these texts today.
26:47
It has been a very clarifying conversation.
26:50
It's been a. Pleasure to look at these things
26:51
with you. And to our listener, thank you
26:53
for joining us on this deep dive.
26:55
Remember, reformed thinking isn't just about learning old
26:58
doctrines. It is about going back to the
27:00
sources to find the life and stability we need for today.
27:04
We will catch you on the next one.