Latest / Mechanical Engineering Made Simple / (#95) Bearing Failure Tolerance GD&T Vibration

Transcript

(#95) Bearing Failure Tolerance GD&T Vibration · Mechanical Engineering Made Simple

• 0:00
  Welcome back, design junkies, to mechanical engineering made
• 0:03
  simple. Hello again.
• 0:04
  Today we are doing a deep dive that connects the absolute
• 0:08
  smallest imperfections in a part to, well, catastrophic failure.
• 0:12
  We're talking fire and brimstone.
• 0:14
  That's a good way to put it. We're looking at the microscopic
• 0:17
  battle happening inside basically every spinning machine
• 0:20
  you can think of. Specifically, why critical parts
• 0:23
  like bearings fail. And it comes down to the twin
• 0:26
  demons of heat and vibration. Always.
• 0:29
  And we've got a whole stack of sources.
• 0:31
  Here we do everything from hydraulic installation manuals
• 0:34
  to the the deep dark arts of geometric dimensioning and
• 0:38
  tolerancing, or GD and T. And our mission really is to
• 0:41
  connect those two worlds, to show how the physics of failure,
• 0:45
  you know, fluid dynamics, torsional shake is directly
• 0:48
  prevented by the language engineers use.
• 0:50
  Tolerance isn't fit. Exactly.
• 0:52
  It's the language of precision. You can't solve the problem if
• 0:55
  you can't speak the language. So let's start where the failure
• 0:57
  so often begins the installation.
• 1:00
  I was stunned to see how often it goes wrong right at the start
• 1:03
  with dry mounting. It's so counterintuitive, isn't
• 1:06
  it? You'd think less lubrication
• 1:08
  means a better grip, but that is precisely the wrong way to think
• 1:12
  about it. So what actually happens?
• 1:14
  Well, the sources are very clear.
• 1:16
  Avoid dry mating surfaces. If you try to mount that bearing
• 1:20
  dry, the friction is just immense.
• 1:24
  And it damages the surface instantly.
• 1:26
  You get what's called micro smearing on the shaft in the
• 1:29
  inner ring. But the real kicker is what that
• 1:31
  friction does to your setup readings.
• 1:33
  Oh absolutely. That insane friction means your
• 1:36
  hydraulic pump shows the required pressure way, way
• 1:40
  before the bearing is actually in its correct starting
• 1:42
  position. So the operator thinks they're
• 1:43
  there, they've hit their number. They think the job's done, but
• 1:47
  all they've done is fight dry friction.
• 1:48
  It's a completely false sense of security.
• 1:51
  OK, so then what about this? This idea said that a bearing
• 1:54
  might actually move down the tapered seat after you've
• 1:57
  released the hydraulic pressure. That seems backward.
• 2:00
  It does, but it makes perfect sense when you think about what
• 2:02
  failed. The whole point of the drive up
• 2:04
  is to secure the bearing and reduce that internal clearance.
• 2:08
  If the bearing slips back down after you release the pressure,
• 2:12
  it means the oil film, the very thing that should be holding it,
• 2:16
  has squeezed out. So the initial dry mounting
• 2:19
  damaged the surfaces so badly that they can't maintain that
• 2:23
  final secure oil layer. You've got it.
• 2:25
  The initial damage compromises the final grip.
• 2:28
  The bearing is essentially trying to reseed itself later,
• 2:31
  probably during operation, which is a disaster waiting to happen.
• 2:34
  And Speaking of the procedure, that hydraulic nut seems to have
• 2:37
  its own failure modes. Why is it so important to
• 2:40
  tighten it against the bearing before you even start?
• 2:43
  It's a pure safety measure. It's there to prevent blowing
• 2:46
  out the piston seals. How so?
• 2:48
  If you don't snug it up first, the piston inside the nut can
• 2:51
  move too far axially before it even starts pushing the bearing.
• 2:55
  And if it moves too far during that final high pressure push,
• 2:58
  the seals can literally be forced right out of the nut.
• 3:00
  And then you've got a catastrophic loss of pressure.
• 3:02
  You lose the tool, you could have an injury.
• 3:05
  It's a tiny procedural detail with just massive consequences.
• 3:09
  It really is. And for really big bearings, the
• 3:12
  setup tools themselves can be a problem.
• 3:14
  Yeah, that's. Something people overlook, the
• 3:15
  drive up distance can be huge. You as the engineer have to
• 3:19
  check if your dial indicator can even measure that far.
• 3:22
  So if the drive up is say 13mm, but your indicator only goes to
• 3:26
  10. You're in trouble.
• 3:27
  You have to plan for that. Maybe add extension rods.
• 3:30
  If you hit the indicator's limit halfway through, you've lost
• 3:33
  your measurement data. You have to start over.
• 3:35
  So assuming we get past the installation, the next fight is
• 3:38
  against the dynamic forces, vibration and shock.
• 3:42
  Exactly. We're moving from the static
• 3:43
  world into the much more violent world of continuous motion and
• 3:48
  resonance. This is where things can really
• 3:50
  tear themselves apart. Oh yeah, for any complex
• 3:53
  rotating machine, an engine, a turbine, torsional vibration is
• 3:57
  just a killer, and managing it is incredibly technical.
• 4:00
  The sources get into this fixed point method for tuning A
• 4:04
  damper. What are those points?
• 4:05
  A&B on a resonance curve actually telling us.
• 4:09
  Right, so this is all about tuning out dangerous harmonic
• 4:12
  energy before the machine shakes itself to bits.
• 4:16
  The fixed point method is how you do it reliably.
• 4:19
  Those points A&B are two frequencies on the curve where
• 4:24
  the amplitude doesn't change no matter how much damping you have
• 4:27
  in the system. So they're like stable anchors
• 4:29
  in the data, even if the damper itself is changing.
• 4:32
  Precisely. They're mathematically stable.
• 4:35
  So the procedure is you adjust the damper spring constant until
• 4:39
  the vibration spikes. The amplitudes at points A&B are
• 4:44
  the same height and. When they're equal, you're
• 4:46
  optimized. You're optimized, but if that
• 4:48
  resulting amplitude is still too high, well, that tells you
• 4:51
  something fundamental. The damper is just too small for
• 4:53
  the job. Exactly.
• 4:54
  You can't tune your way out of it, you have to go back and
• 4:56
  calculate for a bigger damper. It proves this isn't guesswork,
• 4:59
  it's a very precise science. And that kind of precision is
• 5:02
  critical because engineers are always making trade-offs.
• 5:05
  It's not just about performance. Not at all.
• 5:08
  This is where theory crashes into reality.
• 5:11
  You know you might prefer a low cost, weaker material over a
• 5:14
  super expensive strong one, but only if you can prove your
• 5:18
  design keeps the stresses low. You're balancing cost, schedule,
• 5:22
  safety. All of it, and you can't ever
• 5:24
  compromise on safety, but that cost pressure is always, always
• 5:27
  there. Those choices really matter in a
• 5:29
  high vibration environment. One of the biggest warnings in
• 5:32
  the material was about using rivets.
• 5:33
  Yes, specifically cold driven rivets.
• 5:37
  The sources say they are completely unsuitable for any
• 5:40
  structure that's going to see shock and vibration.
• 5:42
  Why is that? Because when you drive a rivet
• 5:44
  cold, you lock in a huge amount of residual stress.
• 5:47
  Creating a weak point a. Perfect focal point for a crack
• 5:50
  to start the second that assembly begins to shake.
• 5:53
  If it's going to vibrate, the rule is simple.
• 5:56
  The rivets have to be driven hot.
• 5:57
  It's all about the installation technique, not just the part
• 6:00
  itself. Which brings us to the real
• 6:02
  power tool for fighting these rhythmic forces, damping.
• 6:05
  Applied damping treatments. A powerful design tool.
• 6:09
  It's how you directly reduce the maximum stress from those
• 6:12
  periodic repeating vibrations. And the math behind it is
• 6:15
  surprisingly simple, isn't it? It really is.
• 6:18
  The maximum stress in the structure is just inversely
• 6:21
  proportional to its damping ratio.
• 6:23
  So double the damping you have the stress.
• 6:25
  Simple as that. It's a direct intervention.
• 6:28
  That's why you see all those complex pads and special
• 6:30
  materials in high end equipment. OK, so we've seen how things
• 6:34
  fail. Bad mounting, lone seals,
• 6:37
  constant vibration. Now let's get into how we
• 6:39
  prevent it from the start, using the formal language of GD and T.
• 6:43
  Right, this is how design intent actually makes it onto a
• 6:46
  physical part, and it all starts with the system of standard
• 6:49
  tolerance grades. Which is what makes everything
• 6:51
  interchangeable. Exactly.
• 6:52
  It's a brilliant system because it ensures that a certain grade
• 6:55
  represents about the same level of manufacturing difficulty no
• 6:58
  matter the size of the part. A designer in one country can
• 7:02
  specify a fit, and a machine shop on the other side of the
• 7:05
  world does exactly what that means.
• 7:06
  And that lets us define different fits.
• 7:09
  Everything from a loose running fit for a piston rod to a super
• 7:14
  tight interference fit. A force fit where you literally
• 7:18
  have to heat one part and freeze the other to get them to
• 7:20
  assemble. The choice dictates the entire
• 7:23
  function. OK, so let's get into the heart
• 7:25
  of GD and T The foundational concept is the feature.
• 7:29
  Which is really just any physical portion of a part.
• 7:31
  A whole, a pin, a flat surface, a slot.
• 7:34
  And from that we get the feature axis.
• 7:36
  Which is the axis of the and this is key, the unrelated
• 7:39
  actual mating envelope. Why that specific, very
• 7:43
  technical definition? Why not just the center of the
• 7:45
  hole as you made it? Because the AS build hole might
• 7:48
  be a little bit out of round or WAVY, the mating envelope is the
• 7:52
  theoretically perfect cylinder that would just touch the
• 7:55
  highest points of that real feature.
• 7:57
  So it creates a stable perfect reference axis, no matter the
• 8:00
  small flaws in the part itself. Exactly.
• 8:02
  It's repeatable. That's the key to making
• 8:04
  millions of interchangeable parts that all fit together
• 8:07
  perfectly. OK, let's tackle a big one.
• 8:09
  Lease material condition or LMC? When and why would a designer
• 8:14
  use that? LMC is your tool when the most
• 8:17
  important thing is guaranteeing a minimum distance between
• 8:20
  features. So like minimum wall thickness,
• 8:23
  you're protecting the part from breaking.
• 8:25
  You are protecting its structural integrity.
• 8:27
  And here's the clever part, the part that machinists love as the
• 8:31
  feature departs from its LMC size, which means you're adding
• 8:35
  more material, making the wall thicker.
• 8:37
  You get a bonus. You get an equal increase, a
• 8:39
  tolerance bonus in its positional tolerance.
• 8:43
  The part becomes easier to make, but you've still guaranteed that
• 8:46
  minimum strength. It's an elegant trade off.
• 8:48
  That's fascinating. What about a fundamental shape
• 8:51
  like flatness? There's a tricky relationship
• 8:54
  there with the size tolerance. Right, The flatness tolerance is
• 8:57
  basically 2 parallel planes. The surface has to live between
• 9:02
  and normally. The rule is your flatness
• 9:03
  tolerance. It has to be less than your size
• 9:05
  tolerance. You can't be flatter than the
• 9:07
  box you're allowed to be in. Pretty much, but there is one
• 9:10
  symbol that changes everything. The independency symbol, the
• 9:14
  free pass. I like that the free pass if a
• 9:17
  designer applies that symbol to the size dimension, it breaks
• 9:21
  the link. The requirement for perfect
• 9:23
  format maximum material conditioner is gone.
• 9:25
  And the flatness tolerance can actually be larger than the size
• 9:28
  tolerance. It can, it gives the shop floor
• 9:31
  a lot more freedom, but it completely changes the tolerance
• 9:34
  analysis for the designer. It's a big risk reward
• 9:37
  calculation. So let's bring this all back to
• 9:39
  our bearings, to rotating parts. To stop that heat and vibration,
• 9:43
  we need perfect alignment or coaxiality.
• 9:46
  It is absolutely essential for durability.
• 9:49
  If you have a shaft with multiple diameters.
• 9:51
  They all had to be perfectly on the same center line, and we
• 9:53
  control that with positional tolerance.
• 9:56
  At MMCLMC or RFS? Depending on what you need and
• 10:00
  the data modifier you choose is critical, especially the maximum
• 10:03
  material boundary or MMB. What does MMB do for the
• 10:07
  Machinist? It gives them a bonus if the
• 10:09
  datum feature itself departs from its MMB size, it creates
• 10:13
  extra allowable wiggle room or displacement between its axis
• 10:17
  and the axis of the feature you're controlling.
• 10:18
  So it loosens the alignment requirement just a little,
• 10:20
  making it easier to machine. Without compromising the
• 10:23
  function when the parts are at their worst case material size.
• 10:26
  OK. So to check the actual
• 10:28
  rotational quality, we move to run out tolerance.
• 10:31
  Yes, run out is the master control for anything that spins.
• 10:34
  It's critical for killing vibration before it starts.
• 10:37
  So how does it work? You take circular run out, for
• 10:40
  example. You rotate the part around its
• 10:42
  datum axis, and you measure at different points along the
• 10:45
  surface, and that one measurement controls the
• 10:48
  combined cumulative variations of both circularity and
• 10:51
  coaxiality. So it's super efficient.
• 10:54
  It catches multiple potential errors in one go.
• 10:56
  Incredibly efficient. It's how you guarantee that
• 10:59
  component will spin smoothly and keep those dangerous vibrations
• 11:02
  from ever getting a foothold. And on a complex modern part,
• 11:05
  you might not have just one reference frame.
• 11:07
  Not at all. It's common to have multiple
• 11:09
  datum reference frames on a single part.
• 11:12
  One side might need to align with a housing, another needs to
• 11:15
  be coaxial with a completely different shaft.
• 11:17
  And the key is you have to define the relationship between
• 11:20
  those frames. You absolutely must.
• 11:22
  If you don't explicitly dimension the relationship
• 11:24
  between your reference frames, the design intent breaks down,
• 11:28
  the communication fails, and the whole assembly fails.
• 11:30
  So we started this deep dive with the triggers for failure,
• 11:33
  dry mounting, blown seals, vibration, stress, and we've
• 11:36
  ended up with the language of prevention, GDNTLMC run out.
• 11:40
  The connection is so direct, you know, solving a huge system
• 11:44
  level problem like tuning A torsional damper with that fixed
• 11:47
  point method we talked about. It all comes back to being able
• 11:50
  to communicate and enforce these geometric specs with just
• 11:54
  unwavering precision on the drawing.
• 11:56
  Precision is the foundation. It's.
• 11:58
  Everything in mechanical reliability.
• 12:00
  And that brings us to our final provocative thought.
• 12:02
  It connects geometry, materials, and scale.
• 12:05
  Our sources point out that the rupture factor for brittle
• 12:08
  materials varies inversely with the absolute scale.
• 12:11
  Which is a fascinating and slightly scary concept.
• 12:14
  It means as you drink a part down, its ability to handle
• 12:17
  stress concentrations doesn't shrink with it.
• 12:19
  In fact, the problem gets worse. So if you're designing a very
• 12:23
  small part with sharp corners or holes, you need to pay
• 12:26
  disproportionately more attention to the material
• 12:28
  strength than you would for a larger version of the same part.
• 12:32
  That's exactly it. The smaller the component, the
• 12:35
  more unforgiving the material demands become.
• 12:37
  Something for you to all Mull over until our next deep dive.