Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / A Quantum Computer in Space? The First Results Are In
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: Welcome to the QuarkSide Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration of
- 0:05Speaker 1: the fundamental structure of reality, where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
- 0:11Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
- 0:16Speaker 1: and understanding begins at the smallest scales.
- 0:27Speaker 2: Right now, literally as you are listening to this, There
- 0:31Speaker 2: is a quantum computer just hurtling around the Earth at
- 0:36Speaker 2: something like 17,000 miles per hour.
- 0:39Speaker 3: Yeah, it's wild.
- 0:40Speaker 2: Which, it's up there in low Earth orbit, actively operating.
- 0:44Speaker 3: Which, I mean, that defies pretty much everything we know
- 0:46Speaker 3: about how incredibly fragile and, you know, delicate these machines
- 0:50Speaker 3: are supposed to be.
- 0:50Speaker 2: Oh, I should say. I'm your host, and sitting across
- 0:53Speaker 2: from me is our resident expert on all things quantum
- 0:56Speaker 2: and orbital.
- 0:57Speaker 3: Glad to be here. And yeah, you are totally right.
- 1:00Speaker 3: It's a massive historical first. I mean, we are talking
- 1:03Speaker 3: about taking technology that normally demands these completely pristine, vibration-free,
- 1:10Speaker 3: temperature-controlled laboratory conditions down here on Earth.
- 1:13Speaker 2: The golden chandeliers in basements.
- 1:15Speaker 3: Exactly. And just strapping it to a rocket bound for
- 1:18Speaker 3: literally one of the most hostile environments imaginable.
- 1:21Speaker 2: The idea that this didn't just instantly shatter into a
- 1:24Speaker 2: million pieces is just wild to me. But before we
- 1:27Speaker 2: even get into the physical survival of this machine, we
- 1:32Speaker 2: have to look at the motive, right?
- 1:33Speaker 3: The why, yeah.
- 1:34Speaker 2: Like satellites have been doing fine for decades. Why go
- 1:37Speaker 2: through the monumental headache of putting a highly sensitive quantum
- 1:40Speaker 2: machine in orbit to begin with?
- 1:42Speaker 3: Well, it really comes down to a colossal data bottleneck.
- 1:45Speaker 3: You have to realize we have thousands of satellites dedicated
- 1:48Speaker 3: to Earth observation right now.
- 1:50Speaker 2: Right, taking pictures and stuff.
- 1:52Speaker 3: Yeah, but way more than just pictures. They are tracking
- 1:55Speaker 3: shifting weather patterns, measuring crop health, monitoring environmental disasters, gathering intelligence.
- 2:01Speaker 3: The sheer volume of raw data they collect every single
- 2:04Speaker 3: second is staggering.
- 2:05Speaker 2: Because they aren't just snapping like simple JPEGs, right? They're
- 2:09Speaker 2: capturing massive amounts of multidimensional data.
- 2:12Speaker 3: Hyperspectral imaging is a really great example of this. A
- 2:15Speaker 3: satellite isn't just looking at the visible light spectrum like
- 2:18Speaker 3: our eyes do. It's actually measuring thousands of specific wavelengths
- 2:22Speaker 3: of light across millions of pixels. So it can detect
- 2:25Speaker 3: things like subtle methane leaks or ocean temperature variances.
- 2:29Speaker 1: Wow.
- 2:29Speaker 2: Okay.
- 2:30Speaker 3: But the problem is, the satellite itself is essentially just
- 2:33Speaker 3: a giant floating eyeball. It collects all this raw, really
- 2:37Speaker 3: heavy data, but to actually make any sense of it,
- 2:40Speaker 3: it has to beam it all the way back down
- 2:42Speaker 3: to ground stations on Earth for processing.
- 2:45Speaker 2: I was actually trying to picture the scale of this.
- 2:47Speaker 2: And it feels a bit like, you know, being at
- 2:49Speaker 2: a concert, recording a massive, uncompressed, hour-long 4K video on
- 2:53Speaker 2: your phone.
- 2:54Speaker 3: Oh, that's a good analogy.
- 2:55Speaker 2: And then trying to text that raw file to a
- 2:57Speaker 2: friend using an old spotty 3G cell connection. Like you
- 3:01Speaker 2: are just going to clog up the entire network.
- 3:03Speaker 3: Exactly. It would take days and your phone would probably crash.
- 3:08Speaker 3: That captures the frustration perfectly. Our global communication networks are
- 3:12Speaker 3: literally choking on this orbital data.
- 3:15Speaker 2: Because there's just too much of it.
- 3:17Speaker 3: Way too much. You can only beam so much down
- 3:20Speaker 3: at a time because transmission speeds are limited. Plus, the
- 3:23Speaker 3: window for a satellite to communicate with a specific ground
- 3:26Speaker 3: station as it flies overhead is incredibly short.
- 3:29Speaker 2: It's just zooming past.
- 3:31Speaker 1: Right.
- 3:31Speaker 3: So what you really want is to edit that 4K
- 3:33Speaker 3: video down on your phone first. You know, crop it,
- 3:36Speaker 3: pull out the most important five seconds, and only send
- 3:39Speaker 3: that tiny finished clip.
- 3:41Speaker 2: That makes total sense.
- 3:43Speaker 3: So we need satellites to process their own data in
- 3:45Speaker 3: situ right there on the device and only beam down
- 3:48Speaker 3: the specific insight we are actually looking for.
- 3:50Speaker 2: Wait, hold on though. If that's the goal, why do
- 3:54Speaker 2: we need quantum technology? Why couldn't we just take the
- 3:57Speaker 2: kind of wildly powerful microchip you find in a high-end
- 3:59Speaker 2: laptop or, I don't know, a server farm, shield it
- 4:02Speaker 2: really well, and put that on the satellite?
- 4:05Speaker 3: It comes down to power constraints and, honestly, the nature
- 4:08Speaker 3: of the math. A traditional microchip, no matter how powerful
- 4:11Speaker 3: it is, processes information linearly.
- 4:14Speaker 1: Right.
- 4:15Speaker 2: One calculation at a time. Exactly.
- 4:17Speaker 3: It reads ones and zeros in sequence. So to process
- 4:20Speaker 3: the massive multidimensional arrays of data these sensors capture, a
- 4:25Speaker 3: classical chip would have to run millions of calculations, one
- 4:28Speaker 3: after the other.
- 4:29Speaker 2: Which takes a lot of juice.
- 4:31Speaker 3: An immense amount of electricity, which a solar-powered satellite just
- 4:34Speaker 3: does not have. And worse, it generates a tremendous amount
- 4:37Speaker 3: of heat.
- 4:38Speaker 2: Oh, right, and there's no air in space to fan
- 4:40Speaker 2: it away.
- 4:41Speaker 3: Precisely. Venting heat in the vacuum of space is incredibly difficult.
- 4:46Speaker 2: So a traditional supercomputer would basically just melt itself or
- 4:50Speaker 2: drain the satellite's battery instantly?
- 4:52Speaker 3: Yeah, pretty much. But quantum computers, on the other hand,
- 4:55Speaker 3: process probabilities simultaneously rather than sequentially.
- 4:59Speaker 2: Okay.
- 5:00Speaker 3: They can sift through vast, complex datasets and isolate specific
- 5:04Speaker 3: variables incredibly fast and with far less energy per calculation.
- 5:08Speaker 3: They just don't have to brute force the math the
- 5:11Speaker 3: way classical chips do.
- 5:12Speaker 2: Okay, so that makes sense. We need a machine that
- 5:15Speaker 2: can do the heavy lifting without the huge power draw. But,
- 5:19Speaker 2: and this is where I get stuck, every quantum computer
- 5:21Speaker 2: I have ever seen is, like I said earlier, a
- 5:23Speaker 2: giant freezing cold golden chandelier hanging in some university basement.
- 5:28Speaker 3: Yeah, the classic superconducting systems.
- 5:30Speaker 2: Right. They require temperatures colder than deep space just to
- 5:34Speaker 2: function on Earth, just to keep their wires from losing
- 5:37Speaker 2: the quantum state. So how do you shrink a fragile,
- 5:40Speaker 2: freezing chandelier down... and make it sturdy enough to survive
- 5:43Speaker 2: a rocket launch?
- 5:45Speaker 3: Well, you abandon the superconducting wires entirely.
- 5:48Speaker 2: Oh.
- 5:48Speaker 3: Yeah. The team behind this milestone, led by Philip Walther
- 5:52Speaker 3: over at the University of Vienna, they took a completely
- 5:55Speaker 3: different route. They built a quantum photonic processor.
- 5:59Speaker 2: Photonic. Meaning it runs on light.
- 6:02Speaker 3: Exactly. Individual particles of light, or photons, act as the
- 6:06Speaker 3: quantum bits, the qubits. By using light instead of electrons
- 6:10Speaker 3: and electrical currents, the entire system can be built out
- 6:13Speaker 3: of really compact optical hardware. You completely bypass the need
- 6:17Speaker 3: for those massive absolute zero cooling systems.
- 6:20Speaker 2: I really want to make sure I am visualizing this
- 6:23Speaker 2: correctly for you listening, because building a computer out of
- 6:27Speaker 2: light just sounds like sci-fi magic. The physical mechanism here,
- 6:32Speaker 2: it starts with a laser, right?
- 6:34Speaker 3: It starts with a laser shining through a specialized nonlinear crystal.
- 6:38Speaker 2: A crystal?
- 6:39Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 6:39Speaker 3: And when the laser hits this crystal, the physical interaction
- 6:42Speaker 3: generates pairs of entangled photons. These individual light particles are
- 6:47Speaker 3: essentially our raw computational material.
- 6:49Speaker 2: Got it.
- 6:50Speaker 3: And once they are generated, they get fed into a
- 6:52Speaker 3: microscopic integrated glass circuit.
- 6:55Speaker 2: A glass circuit? Like a tiny fiber optic maze?
- 6:59Speaker 3: Very similar, yeah. It is a microscopic maze of pathways
- 7:02Speaker 3: etched right into the glass. So the photons zip through
- 7:05Speaker 3: these pathways. But to actually perform a calculation, you have
- 7:09Speaker 3: to control how the light moves.
- 7:11Speaker 2: Right. You can't just let them run wild.
- 7:12Speaker 3: Exactly. And this is where the engineering gets incredibly clever.
- 7:16Speaker 3: Integrated directly into this glass chip are microscopic thermal heaters.
- 7:21Speaker 2: Wait, tiny heaters? How does changing the temperature of glass
- 7:25Speaker 2: do math?
- 7:26Speaker 3: It's all about the speed of light. When you apply
- 7:28Speaker 3: a tiny, highly precise amount of heat to a specific
- 7:31Speaker 3: pathway in the glass, the glass expands infinitesimally, and its
- 7:35Speaker 3: refractive index actually changes.
- 7:38Speaker 2: Okay, so it alters the glass itself.
- 7:40Speaker 3: Right, which means light traveling through that specific heated path
- 7:44Speaker 3: slows down by a fraction of a fraction of a percent.
- 7:47Speaker 2: Okay, I'm following.
- 7:48Speaker 3: So that tiny delay shifts the phase of the light wave.
- 7:52Speaker 3: So when that photon reaches an intersection in the maze
- 7:55Speaker 3: and meets another photon, their phases determine how they interact.
- 7:58Speaker 2: Oh, like how waves in a pool crash into each other. Exactly.
- 8:02Speaker 3: If the peaks of their waves align, they amplify each other.
- 8:05Speaker 3: If a peak meets a trough, they cancel each other out.
- 8:08Speaker 3: This is called quantum interference. Wow. By carefully controlling those
- 8:12Speaker 3: microscopic heaters, you control the phase shifts, which dictates the
- 8:15Speaker 3: interference patterns. Mathematically, that interference acts exactly like a logic
- 8:20Speaker 3: gate in a standard computer. You are literally performing complex
- 8:24Speaker 3: algebra by bouncing light waves together.
- 8:26Speaker 2: So the heaters are essentially acting as microscopic traffic lights. Yes.
- 8:31Speaker 2: You have these individual particles zipping through the glass, and
- 8:34Speaker 2: this thermal traffic system is dynamically shifting, slowing particles down
- 8:39Speaker 2: just enough so they crash into each other in highly specific,
- 8:42Speaker 2: controlled ways to give us an answer.
- 8:44Speaker 3: That is a phenomenal way to visualize it. And because
- 8:48Speaker 3: the final step is just catching the light that emerges
- 8:51Speaker 3: at the end of the maze using highly sensitive detectors,
- 8:54Speaker 3: the entire apparatus is remarkably compact and elegant.
- 8:58Speaker 2: Elegant on a lab table in Vienna is one thing, though.
- 9:01Speaker 2: Fair point. Getting it to orbit is a whole different reality.
- 9:05Speaker 2: Space does not care how elegant your traffic control system is.
- 9:09Speaker 2: June 23rd, 2025. This delicate glass maze and its microscopic
- 9:13Speaker 2: heaters get loaded aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.
- 9:17Speaker 3: And the violence of a rocket launch cannot be overstated.
- 9:20Speaker 2: It's basically controlled explosion.
- 9:22Speaker 3: Exactly. You are taking nanometer-precise optical pathways and subjecting them
- 9:27Speaker 3: to extreme acoustic shockwaves, sustained crushing g-forces, and violent vibrations
- 9:33Speaker 3: as you just hurl the payload out of the atmosphere.
- 9:35Speaker 2: And even if you survive the ride up, the destination
- 9:38Speaker 2: is brutal. We are talking about a vacuum that can
- 9:41Speaker 2: cause materials to warp, plus high levels of radiation that
- 9:44Speaker 2: can just scramble sensitive electronics. But the biggest threat to
- 9:48Speaker 2: this specific machine has to be the temperature, right?
- 9:51Speaker 3: Oh, absolutely. Thermal cycling is the silent killer in low
- 9:54Speaker 3: Earth orbit. A satellite orbiting the Earth moves from the blinding,
- 9:58Speaker 3: unfiltered heat of direct sunlight sunlight into the freezing, pitch
- 10:02Speaker 3: black shadow of the Earth every 90 minutes or so.
- 10:04Speaker 2: 90 minutes? That's so fast.
- 10:07Speaker 3: Yeah, and the external temperature can swing hundreds of degrees
- 10:10Speaker 3: in that time.
- 10:11Speaker 2: And if your entire computer relies on applying hyperspecific, microscopic
- 10:15Speaker 2: amounts of heat to glass to shift the speed of light,
- 10:19Speaker 2: Massive external temperature swings would just wreck the math. The
- 10:23Speaker 2: whole chip would be expanding and contracting chaotically.
- 10:26Speaker 3: It is an absolute nightmare for optical stability. So when
- 10:29Speaker 3: the satellite finally reached orbit and the team booted up
- 10:32Speaker 3: the system, it was honestly no surprise that they had
- 10:35Speaker 3: taken a massive hit. Oh, no.
- 10:37Speaker 2: What happened?
- 10:38Speaker 3: Well, the system relied on six single-photon detectors. Those are
- 10:41Speaker 3: the ultra-sensitive sensors at the end of the maze that
- 10:44Speaker 3: catch the light to read the final calculation.
- 10:46Speaker 1: Right.
- 10:47Speaker 2: And they turned it on to find out three of
- 10:49Speaker 2: them were completely dead.
- 10:50Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 10:51Speaker 3: Half of their detection capability was wiped out instantly, likely
- 10:54Speaker 3: from the mechanical stress at the launch or just the
- 10:56Speaker 3: sudden harsh realities of the orbital environment.
- 10:59Speaker 2: I have to ask, if 50% of your sensors are
- 11:03Speaker 2: dead on arrival, how is this not classified as an
- 11:05Speaker 2: immediate catastrophic failure? Like, how do you even perform complex
- 11:10Speaker 2: quantum algorithms when half the cameras meant to read the
- 11:13Speaker 2: results are smashed?
- 11:14Speaker 3: Well, the short answer is you can't perform the complex algorithms.
- 11:18Speaker 1: Oh.
- 11:18Speaker 3: The loss of those detectors meant multi-qubit entanglement protocols, which
- 11:22Speaker 3: require reading the output across all the different exit paths simultaneously.
- 11:26Speaker 3: Those were completely off the table.
- 11:28Speaker 2: So they were stuck.
- 11:30Speaker 3: But the mission was not a failure because engineering for
- 11:33Speaker 3: space is all about adaptability. The fundamental core of the
- 11:37Speaker 3: machine was intact. The laser still worked. The crystal was
- 11:40Speaker 3: still generating photon pairs. And the glass maze hadn't shattered.
- 11:44Speaker 2: So they basically had to rewrite the playbook on the fly. Exactly.
- 11:49Speaker 2: They have this incredibly advanced machine, but they're suddenly forced
- 11:52Speaker 2: to figure out what they can accomplish with one hand
- 11:55Speaker 2: tied behind their back.
- 11:56Speaker 3: And they pivoted brilliantly. Over the next eight months, they
- 11:59Speaker 3: focused entirely on using the three working detectors to prove
- 12:02Speaker 3: that the foundational physics of their machine held up in space.
- 12:05Speaker 2: Okay, so back to basics.
- 12:07Speaker 3: Right. They reprogrammed the thermal heaters to run fundamental benchmark tests.
- 12:11Speaker 3: And the most critical of these was proving they could
- 12:13Speaker 3: still achieve what is known as two-photon interference.
- 12:17Speaker 2: Break that down for me. What is two-photon interference, and
- 12:20Speaker 2: why is it so important?
- 12:22Speaker 3: So it's also known as the Hong-O-Mandel effect, and it
- 12:25Speaker 3: is the ultimate proof of quantum coherence. If you send
- 12:29Speaker 3: two identical photons into a beam splitter, an intersection in
- 12:32Speaker 3: our glass maze, from two different input paths, classical physics
- 12:36Speaker 3: says they should bounce randomly. They might. Both go left,
- 12:39Speaker 3: both go right, or split up.
- 12:41Speaker 2: Just a coin toss.
- 12:42Speaker 3: Exactly. But in the quantum world, because of their wave nature,
- 12:46Speaker 3: they interfere. If they are perfectly identical and perfectly timed,
- 12:50Speaker 3: the probability of them splitting up drops to zero.
- 12:53Speaker 2: Wait, really zero?
- 12:55Speaker 3: Zero. They will always bunch together and exit the same
- 12:58Speaker 3: path as a single quantum state.
- 13:00Speaker 2: So they essentially merge and just refuse to leave each
- 13:03Speaker 2: other's side.
- 13:04Speaker 3: Yeah, that's exactly it. And it is the bedrock of
- 13:07Speaker 3: optical quantum computing. Generating this effect requires the environment to
- 13:10Speaker 3: be incredibly stable.
- 13:12Speaker 2: Which space is not.
- 13:13Speaker 3: Right. Any vibration, any temperature variance that alters the path
- 13:17Speaker 3: by even a fraction of a nanometer destroys the interference.
- 13:21Speaker 3: The photons lose their quantum link and act like normal
- 13:23Speaker 3: random particles again.
- 13:25Speaker 2: And they managed to pull this off up there. They
- 13:27Speaker 2: maintained that perfect microscopic stability while the entire spacecraft was vibrating,
- 13:32Speaker 2: getting blasted by radiation, and dealing with wild thermal swings
- 13:36Speaker 2: in orbit?
- 13:37Speaker 3: Yes. Doing it in low Earth orbit with the three
- 13:40Speaker 3: detectors they had left is a staggering achievement. It definitively
- 13:44Speaker 3: proves that the fundamental physics of photonic quantum processing can
- 13:48Speaker 3: be harnessed in space.
- 13:50Speaker 2: It really is an incredible testament to the engineering. But
- 13:54Speaker 2: I am going to challenge the timeline here a bit.
- 13:56Speaker 3: Go for it.
- 13:57Speaker 2: If they lost half their sensors on day one and
- 14:00Speaker 2: they had to pivot to running what are essentially fundamental
- 14:02Speaker 2: benchmark tests, like the quantum version of a Hello World program,
- 14:07Speaker 2: Aren't we still decades away from my GPS or my
- 14:10Speaker 2: weather app actually using quantum process satellite data? It kind
- 14:15Speaker 2: of sounds like they are fighting a losing battle against
- 14:18Speaker 2: the physics of outer space.
- 14:20Speaker 3: It is undoubtedly a steep hill to climb.
- 14:22Speaker 2: You're not wrong.
- 14:24Speaker 3: What they achieved over those eight months is just step one.
- 14:27Speaker 3: And you are totally right to point out the harsh
- 14:29Speaker 3: reality because over those eight months, the team actually documented
- 14:33Speaker 3: a gradual degradation of the surviving components.
- 14:36Speaker 2: So the environment is just slowly eating the machine.
- 14:40Speaker 3: Pretty much. Ionizing radiation in low Earth orbit tends to
- 14:44Speaker 3: darken optical glass over time.
- 14:46Speaker 2: Oh, interesting.
- 14:47Speaker 3: Yeah, and as the glass darkens, it absorbs more light
- 14:50Speaker 3: instead of letting it pass through. This reduces the coincidence rate,
- 14:53Speaker 3: which is essentially a measure of how efficiently the system
- 14:56Speaker 3: can detect those paired photons.
- 14:58Speaker 2: So the signal gets weaker.
- 15:00Speaker 3: The signal-to-noise ratio drops. If you are trying to run
- 15:03Speaker 3: a real-world sustained data processing task, The computer needs to
- 15:07Speaker 3: hold up without the signal dropping so low that the
- 15:09Speaker 3: calculation just fails entirely.
- 15:11Speaker 2: So the machine is literally going blind the longer it
- 15:14Speaker 2: stays up there.
- 15:15Speaker 3: Yes. Better shielding, more robust components, and highly reliable photon
- 15:20Speaker 3: detectors that can survive a rocket launch, those are absolute
- 15:23Speaker 3: necessities before this becomes a standard tool.
- 15:25Speaker 2: Right.
- 15:26Speaker 3: But we cannot underestimate what breaking the seal actually means.
- 15:30Speaker 3: The ultimate goal here, the next major frontier the researchers
- 15:34Speaker 3: are pushing toward, is what they call closing the loop.
- 15:37Speaker 2: Closing the loop. Meaning what exactly? Connecting it to the
- 15:41Speaker 2: rest of the satellite? Exactly.
- 15:43Speaker 3: Right now, the quantum processor is isolated. It generates its
- 15:46Speaker 3: own photons, runs them through the maze, and reads them.
- 15:49Speaker 3: It is essentially talking to itself.
- 15:51Speaker 2: Like a closed experiment.
- 15:52Speaker 3: Right. Closing the loop means coupling the satellite's actual observation
- 15:57Speaker 3: sensors directly to the quantum chip. Oh, wow.
- 16:00Speaker 2: So instead of taking a massive hyperspectral image of a hurricane,
- 16:04Speaker 2: saving it as a giant data file and trying to
- 16:06Speaker 2: process it, the satellite takes the literal light from the
- 16:10Speaker 2: hurricane and feeds it straight into the optical glass maze.
- 16:14Speaker 3: The sensor data is encoded directly into the quantum circuit.
- 16:17Speaker 2: That's insane!
- 16:19Speaker 3: The computation happens instantly as the light passes through the processor.
- 16:22Speaker 3: When we achieve that, we are looking at a complete
- 16:25Speaker 3: paradigm shift in orbital architecture. We move away from satellites
- 16:29Speaker 3: being passive eyes in the sky that rely on Earth
- 16:31Speaker 3: to do all the thinking.
- 16:33Speaker 2: They become autonomous brains in the sky. Exactly. They could
- 16:37Speaker 2: monitor global weather patterns in real time, instantly filter out
- 16:40Speaker 2: the terabytes of useless background noise, and only send an
- 16:44Speaker 2: alert to a ground station when a highly specific anomaly,
- 16:47Speaker 2: like the exact signature of a methane leak, is detected.
- 16:50Speaker 3: And the data bottleneck completely vanishes.
- 16:52Speaker 2: That is huge.
- 16:54Speaker 3: They will be able to autonomously coordinate with a constellation
- 16:57Speaker 3: of other satellites to track environmental disasters, you know, without
- 17:01Speaker 3: ever waiting for instructions from ground control. This mission laid
- 17:05Speaker 3: the foundation for that future.
- 17:06Speaker 2: It is a phenomenal journey. I mean, we started with
- 17:08Speaker 2: this massive problem on Earth. Our communication networks choking on
- 17:12Speaker 2: the sheer weight of raw satellite data. And the solution
- 17:16Speaker 2: was to build a computer out of light. bypassing the
- 17:19Speaker 2: freezing temperatures of traditional quantum machines.
- 17:22Speaker 3: A very elegant solution.
- 17:23Speaker 2: A delicate, microscopic glass maze that survived the violent acoustic
- 17:29Speaker 2: shock waves of a rocket launch, adapted when half of
- 17:32Speaker 2: its sensors were destroyed, and successfully proved that quantum wave
- 17:36Speaker 2: mechanics can be harnessed in the harsh vacuum of low
- 17:39Speaker 2: Earth orbit.
- 17:40Speaker 3: It proved the physics work. The engineering just has to
- 17:44Speaker 3: catch up now.
- 17:45Speaker 2: But I want to leave you with a final thought
- 17:47Speaker 2: to mull over. Because the implications here go way beyond Earth.
- 17:52Speaker 2: We have been talking entirely about satellites looking down at us.
- 17:55Speaker 2: But if we can successfully build and shield quantum brains
- 17:59Speaker 2: that operate and survive in the radiation and vacuum of space,
- 18:03Speaker 2: what happens when we turn them around and point them outward?
- 18:07Speaker 3: Oh, the applications for deep space exploration are where this
- 18:10Speaker 3: technology truly becomes revolutionary.
- 18:13Speaker 1: Right.
- 18:14Speaker 2: Think about our current deep space probes. If we send
- 18:16Speaker 2: a probe out to the edge of the solar system,
- 18:19Speaker 2: it takes hours, sometimes almost a full day just for
- 18:22Speaker 2: a single radio signal to travel back to Earth.
- 18:24Speaker 3: And another full day for our instructions to reach the probe.
- 18:28Speaker 2: It is practically flying blind.
- 18:30Speaker 3: And if we ever send a probe to another solar system,
- 18:33Speaker 3: the communication delay would be measured in years. We absolutely
- 18:36Speaker 3: cannot micromanage an interstellar mission.
- 18:38Speaker 2: But what if that probe was equipped with a fully
- 18:41Speaker 2: stable photonic quantum computer? It wouldn't need to call home
- 18:45Speaker 2: and ask us what to do when it encounters an
- 18:47Speaker 2: unexpected atmospheric anomaly on a distant exoplanet.
- 18:50Speaker 3: It could process those massive unprecedented data sets autonomously.
- 18:54Speaker 2: Instantly sifting through the noise to make incredibly high level
- 18:57Speaker 2: complex decisions light years away in the dark.
- 19:01Speaker 3: It transitions our spacecraft from being just remote controlled extensions
- 19:04Speaker 3: of our senses into truly independent, intelligent explorers.
- 19:09Speaker 2: And the groundwork for that autonomous future was just laid
- 19:11Speaker 2: by a few microscopic heaters. and some particles of light
- 19:15Speaker 2: orbiting just a few hundred miles above our heads. Thank
- 19:18Speaker 2: you so much for joining us for this conversation. Keep
- 19:21Speaker 2: your eyes on the stars, and we will catch you
- 19:23Speaker 2: next time.