Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Americans giving away their freedom

Transcript

Americans giving away their freedom · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to
• 0:13
  ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America
• 0:18
  Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:30
  Benjamin Franklin famously said, they who would give
• 0:33
  up an essential liberty for temporary security deserve
• 0:36
  neither liberty or security.
• 0:40
  What does that say about the American people
• 0:42
  who are giving up their rights just because
• 0:44
  someone said so?
• 0:47
  Hello there, everyday Americans, Paul Engle here with
• 0:49
  a constitution study where we read and study
• 0:51
  the Constitution, teacherizing generation be free.
• 0:53
  Glad you could join me today.
• 0:55
  You know, this has become uh a recurring
• 0:57
  thing.
• 0:58
  I don't know if it's because I've got
• 1:00
  a speech on this coming up shortly, or
• 1:02
  just the day.
• 1:04
  But the number of times I see people
• 1:05
  that are just willing to give up their
• 1:07
  rights because someone said so, and then claim,
• 1:09
  well, they were taken from me.
• 1:11
  No, no, way too often we simply give
• 1:13
  up our rights because we're unwilling to fight
• 1:15
  for them.
• 1:17
  We're willing to stand for them.
• 1:19
  We're unwilling to be uncomfortable to protect our
• 1:22
  rights.
• 1:25
  We are willing to trade our rights for
• 1:28
  a promise of some temporary safety nowadays, not
• 1:31
  even of life and limb, just of heckling.
• 1:35
  And it really shows it makes you wonder
• 1:36
  do the American people deserve liberty or safety
• 1:38
  anymore.
• 1:41
  Take for example, there's a a protest outside
• 1:44
  of the Yorbelinda, California High School.
• 1:47
  It was done by the California Family Council,
• 1:51
  and they were protesting a dude participating in
• 1:55
  the girls' long jump, high jump, and triple
• 1:58
  jump events at the school.
• 2:03
  Now, listen, if you're a dude that wants
• 2:05
  to dress up like a girl, well, hey,
• 2:07
  I think that that's a mental disorder.
• 2:09
  If you uh, but legally, I think you're
• 2:12
  crazy, but okay, but we're not talking about
• 2:14
  dressing up.
• 2:16
  We're talking about pretending you're a girl to
• 2:18
  participate in sports.
• 2:21
  Now, this came about because the California Interscholactic
• 2:25
  Federation, their bylaws state that students may participate
• 2:29
  in school athletics consistent with their gender identity.
• 2:34
  In other words, girl sports are no longer
• 2:36
  girls' sports.
• 2:39
  Yeah, um that's what the rules they said.
• 2:43
  Now, I have a question.
• 2:45
  Uh who picks who's on the California Interscholastic
• 2:47
  Federation?
• 2:51
  Who's in control of that?
• 2:53
  And they said, well, you know, we're we
• 2:55
  don't believe in in women's rights.
• 2:57
  We don't believe that women have a chance
• 2:59
  to, should have a chance to fairly compete.
• 3:02
  No, no, no, no, no, no.
• 3:03
  We we believe that someone with a mental
• 3:06
  disorder has the right to dominate female sports.
• 3:10
  So they had their their press event and
• 3:12
  they got the word out.
• 3:14
  But of course, you know, this is Camifora.
• 3:16
  Um, you know, they don't believe in individual
• 3:17
  rights.
• 3:18
  No, no, no, group is all that really
• 3:20
  matters.
• 3:22
  So the event went ahead, and who here
• 3:24
  was surprised that the dude won all three
• 3:27
  things he jumped in.
• 3:30
  Not one, not two, all three.
• 3:34
  He won the long jump, the high jump,
• 3:37
  and the triple jump.
• 3:39
  Um, actually, he tied for first in the
• 3:42
  high jump, uh, but he won by a
• 3:44
  pretty substantial margin, both the long jump and
• 3:47
  the triple jump.
• 3:50
  Now, I'm sure someone out there is saying,
• 3:51
  but Paul, the transgender, they have a right
• 3:53
  to be, you have a right to walk
• 3:54
  around whatever you want.
• 3:56
  Your rights stop when they infringe on the
• 3:59
  rights of another.
• 4:02
  You want to walk around dressed up as
• 4:03
  a girl?
• 4:04
  Okay.
• 4:06
  But when you take away people's rights, the
• 4:08
  the ability, the ability to compete.
• 4:10
  We the federal government, illegally, by the way,
• 4:13
  created Title IX in order to protect school
• 4:15
  sports, female sports in schools, so that the
• 4:18
  females will have a chance to participate in
• 4:21
  schools on a fair basis, which is exactly
• 4:23
  what this guy wants to take away.
• 4:26
  Now, again, I don't know if he truly
• 4:28
  thinks he's a girl, or if he just
• 4:31
  wants the easier competition.
• 4:33
  I don't know, and I don't care.
• 4:36
  But when the parents and the women in
• 4:39
  these competitions are willing to give up their
• 4:42
  rights because someone has a mental disorder, or
• 4:44
  even worse, when they when they were when
• 4:47
  they capitulate because they're afraid someone will call
• 4:50
  them bad names.
• 4:53
  You're transphobic.
• 4:54
  No, I'm not.
• 4:55
  I'm an indie, I'm an intelligent individual that
• 4:57
  recognizes a mental disorder is not a physical
• 4:59
  disorder.
• 5:02
  Simply because you can't look between your legs
• 5:04
  and tell the difference between boys and girls
• 5:06
  doesn't mean you have the same physical characteristics
• 5:08
  of a girl.
• 5:11
  And the fact that you wish to dominate
• 5:14
  a sport where you have a biological advantage,
• 5:17
  not based on training, right?
• 5:20
  It's not because boys train better or train
• 5:22
  harder or have more skills.
• 5:25
  No, it's simply because the male body has
• 5:28
  different physical characteristics than the female body.
• 5:31
  It's biology, it's science.
• 5:35
  But if you're willing to give that up,
• 5:37
  so we're not going to protect our girls
• 5:40
  because we're afraid we'll be called transphobic, then
• 5:43
  you don't deserve either the liberty or the
• 5:45
  security of not being called transphobic, because I
• 5:48
  think you're a blithering idiot.
• 5:51
  My opinion.
• 5:59
  Remember, okay, yes, in these events, harm to
• 6:02
  the females is not likely.
• 6:05
  But what about the volleyball uh player who
• 6:07
  was so seriously concussed she can't concuss she
• 6:10
  can't play anymore?
• 6:13
  What about the the wrestler that was injured?
• 6:17
  How many more?
• 6:19
  How many rights will we give up just
• 6:21
  so we don't get called names?
• 6:22
  And that's the part that really pisses me
• 6:23
  off.
• 6:24
  It was bad enough when people threatened to
• 6:26
  throw you in jail for like, you know,
• 6:28
  not wearing a mask or something stupid like
• 6:30
  that.
• 6:32
  You're talking about getting called names.
• 6:35
  Names.
• 6:37
  And people are willing to throw away their
• 6:39
  rights just so they don't get called names.
• 6:41
  And again, transgender is just the latest of
• 6:43
  this whole political correct nonsense.
• 6:47
  This communist idea of, well, we got to
• 6:48
  be politically correct.
• 6:50
  Yeah, that's the way the communists work.
• 6:52
  They get to tell you what you can
• 6:54
  and cannot say.
• 6:56
  That's what political correctness is.
• 6:59
  In the United States, it's supposed to be
• 7:00
  States are supposed to be free.
• 7:00
  free.
• 7:01
  We have freedom of speech.
• 7:01
  We have freedom of speech.
• 7:02
  I can say whatever I want.
• 7:02
  I can say whatever I want.
• 7:04
  I may be held accountable for what I
• 7:04
  I may be held accountable for what I
• 7:06
  say, but I decide.
• 7:06
  say, but I decide.
• 7:09
  I decide what words to use and not
• 7:09
  I decide what words to use and not
• 7:10
  use.
• 7:10
  use.
• 7:12
  I decide what language I use.
• 7:12
  I decide what language I use.
• 7:15
  And unless that language directly harms another, then
• 7:15
  And unless that language directly harms another, then
• 7:18
  you have no right to tell me not
• 7:18
  you have no right to tell me not
• 7:20
  to.
• 7:20
  to.
• 7:23
  But what happens?
• 7:23
  But what happens?
• 7:24
  Americans capitulate.
• 7:24
  Americans capitulate.
• 7:27
  They uh okay, I won't.
• 7:27
  Okay, I won't.
• 7:29
  They used to be called.
• 7:29
  They used to be called stewardesses, now they
• 7:30
  were flight attendants.
• 7:32
  Why?
• 7:32
  Who determined that that was a proper term
• 7:33
  for them?
• 7:36
  They're not garbage men.
• 7:37
  They're they're trash specialists.
• 7:41
  You know, comedians used to make fun of
• 7:42
  this nonsense.
• 7:44
  Now here we are 20 years later, and
• 7:46
  30 years later, actually.
• 7:48
  And it's it's now so common that, well,
• 7:50
  someone says you can't call a uh uh
• 7:53
  a you can't say that uh a transgender
• 7:55
  girl is not a girl.
• 7:57
  Sure, I can, because it's the truth, and
• 7:59
  nobody has a legal authority to tell me
• 8:00
  otherwise.
• 8:02
  The question is will we capitulate?
• 8:05
  Will we bow to the pressure?
• 8:09
  Will we trade our essential liberty for the
• 8:11
  promise of a temporary safety that ladies and
• 8:14
  gentlemen never lasts?
• 8:17
  That's the question we need to be asking
• 8:19
  ourselves.
• 8:21
  Because there's there are consequences for our lack
• 8:23
  of moral fiber.
• 8:27
  There's a study came out that um these
• 8:31
  so-called transgender kids, uh adolescents who underwent some
• 8:35
  sort of medical gender manipulation.
• 8:39
  They have a markedly increased issue of psychiatric
• 8:42
  problems.
• 8:46
  There was a study published on April 4th
• 8:49
  in a Nordic medical journal, Act Pediatrica.
• 8:52
  Uh the taper's name is psychiatric morbidity among
• 8:56
  adolescents and young adults who contacted specialist gender
• 9:00
  identity services, uh, who contracted uh specialist general
• 9:04
  identity services in Finland between 196 and 2019.
• 9:09
  Now, the results of this paper found that
• 9:14
  among adolescents who underwent medical gender reassignment, psychiatric
• 9:19
  morbidity increased markedly during the follow-up, rising from
• 9:24
  9.8% to 60.7% in feminizing gender reassignment, and
• 9:29
  from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinizing gender reassignment.
• 9:34
  In summary, the so-called sex change procedure in
• 9:38
  mantle adolescents are much more likely to experience
• 9:42
  psychological crisis so severe they require professional intervention.
• 9:47
  As I said at the beginning, transgenderism is
• 9:50
  not a physical disorder, it is a mental
• 9:52
  disorder.
• 9:55
  And this study shows something very interesting.
• 9:59
  Not only does it show that there's a
• 10:03
  there are there's a an increased risk of
• 10:06
  what they call psychiatric morbidity or uh some
• 10:09
  psychological crisis that requires a significant professional treatment.
• 10:12
  Not only is it higher for those who
• 10:14
  claim to be transgender, but those who transition,
• 10:16
  these are medical treatments, it's not even getting
• 10:18
  to the surgical transition.
• 10:20
  Medical, what they call gender reassignment, which is
• 10:24
  a lie, goes from if you're going from
• 10:27
  uh uh uh female from male to female,
• 10:31
  you go from just under 10 to just
• 10:35
  over 60 percent, a six times increase.
• 10:40
  Interesting, girls going to boys is only uh
• 10:42
  two and a half times two, yeah, about
• 10:45
  two and a half times from just over
• 10:48
  21% to 54 and a half percent.
• 10:51
  So girls becoming boys apparently is less psychologically
• 10:54
  traumatizing than boys becoming girls, but it shows
• 10:57
  this is a mental disorder, and when we
• 11:00
  treat it as if it is real, as
• 11:02
  if it is a physical disorder, we do
• 11:05
  more harm to those children psychologically, because we're
• 11:08
  not dealing with the problem, we're dealing with
• 11:11
  a symptom.
• 11:15
  The symptom is I don't think I'm in
• 11:16
  the right body.
• 11:18
  The problem is I've got a mental issue
• 11:20
  with how I distinguishing between how I feel
• 11:22
  and who I am.
• 11:25
  Now, I wonder, I'd love to see a
• 11:27
  similar thing where uh this the so-called transgender
• 11:30
  children are dealt with not by reassignment, but
• 11:33
  by psychological treatment.
• 11:35
  I wonder, I'd love to see that study
• 11:38
  done and see what the long-term outcomes are.
• 11:41
  Now, I wonder how many parents have been
• 11:44
  so convinced by others that they that they
• 11:47
  have to uh uh uh treat their kids
• 11:49
  physically.
• 11:52
  Uh the the young lady who just won
• 11:55
  a two million dollar malpractice suit because her
• 11:57
  doctor convinced her parents that the proper treatment
• 12:00
  for a mental disorder was surgery, uh it
• 12:02
  was it was malpractice that he he literally
• 12:04
  told the parents that if they didn't give
• 12:07
  her this treatment that they had a choice,
• 12:09
  they could have a live son or a
• 12:11
  dead daughter.
• 12:14
  Yeah.
• 12:16
  And this type of, you know, the the
• 12:18
  idea of I'm gonna let society tell me
• 12:20
  what my children are doing.
• 12:23
  I'm going to let a sports entity say
• 12:26
  that my my child has to compete against
• 12:28
  against girls.
• 12:30
  How many people are simply they had a
• 12:32
  demonstration?
• 12:35
  Okay.
• 12:36
  Is that all?
• 12:38
  What percentage of the people in your belinda
• 12:40
  believe this nonsense?
• 12:43
  And how many of them are simply keeping
• 12:46
  silent because they're afraid of being called names?
• 12:50
  How many people are keeping silent about these
• 12:53
  so-called gender reassignment treatments because they're afraid of
• 12:57
  being called names?
• 13:01
  What cowards we are?
• 13:04
  What absolute cowards to allow our young people
• 13:07
  to be mentally tortured, in some cases physically
• 13:11
  tortured, because we're afraid of being called names,
• 13:14
  of saying what the truth is because some
• 13:18
  Yahoo said so.
• 13:22
  But the government's forcing us, no, they're not.
• 13:25
  They're they're pressuring you and they're asking you
• 13:26
  to capitulate.
• 13:28
  And by and large, seems that many, many
• 13:30
  Americans are doing just that.
• 13:33
  They are capitulating to the lie.
• 13:36
  And it makes me wonder what other lives
• 13:38
  are they capitulating to?
• 13:41
  What else is going on that they're capitulating
• 13:45
  to, and how bad will things get?
• 13:49
  How can we be the land of the
• 13:51
  free if we're not brave enough to stand
• 13:53
  up for a biological fact?
• 13:57
  Forget disagreements about policy.
• 14:00
  A biological fact.
• 14:00
  A biological fact.
• 14:04
  Where are we?
• 14:04
  Where are we?
• 14:07
  We're just giving away our freedom.
• 14:11
  We're trading our freedom for safety, often for
• 14:11
  We're trading our freedom for safety, often for
• 14:15
  the most insubstantial of things, being called names.
• 14:16
  the most insubstantial of things, being called names.
• 14:21
  People tried to get me to stop talking
• 14:21
  People tried to get me to stop talking
• 14:24
  about the the uh um the constitutional issues,
• 14:24
  about the the uh um the constitutional issues,
• 14:26
  illegal issues with with COVID policy.
• 14:26
  illegal issues with with COVID policy.
• 14:29
  I
• 14:29
  I got called all sorts of names.
• 14:31
  I was told called grandma killer, I was
• 14:32
  told I hate my kids.
• 14:34
  I was called all sorts of names.
• 14:35
  I don't care.
• 14:37
  I'm old enough to remember sticks and stones
• 14:39
  may break my bones, but words will never
• 14:40
  hurt me because I know those people are
• 14:42
  idiots.
• 14:44
  Not because they disagree with me, but because
• 14:47
  they have no evidence to support their position.
• 14:49
  Well, I had evidence to support mine.
• 14:52
  Are we really willing to give away our
• 14:55
  rights because we're afraid of being called names?
• 15:00
  It's a sad, sad day for this country.
• 15:03
  And the effects of our unwillingness to stand
• 15:05
  up and exercise our rights, whether they be
• 15:08
  in the face of government or just well,
• 15:10
  people like to call them Karen's, people who
• 15:12
  just think they know better and like to
• 15:14
  dictate our lives.
• 15:17
  We will be dealing with the consequences for
• 15:18
  decades.
• 15:19
  Just look at the COVID.
• 15:21
  Long COVID is real.
• 15:23
  I I again I'm on the board of
• 15:25
  a nonprofit where one of our employees had
• 15:27
  to quit because of long COVID.
• 15:29
  Vaccine injuries are real.
• 15:32
  Shedding is real.
• 15:33
  We are dealing with the consequences of allowing
• 15:34
  the government to turn us into medical guinea
• 15:36
  pigs.
• 15:38
  So what do we do?
• 15:40
  Well, our friends at the wellness company came
• 15:42
  up with a very interesting product.
• 15:45
  It's called daily spike support because this is
• 15:47
  the spike protein that's the problem.
• 15:50
  That's the inflammatory and toxic part of COVID-19.
• 15:53
  And that's exactly what the so-called COVID-19 vaccine
• 15:56
  taught your body to make.
• 16:00
  So they came up with a product designed
• 16:02
  to block and dissolve the spike protein.
• 16:05
  They call it daily spike support.
• 16:07
  It can be taken to prevent in uh
• 16:10
  getting the spike protein or to protect against
• 16:12
  the effects of vaccine shedding or COVID itself.
• 16:16
  Now I I'm not a virologist.
• 16:18
  I don't understand how all of this stuff
• 16:19
  works.
• 16:20
  People I know have explained it to me
• 16:22
  in ways I can kind of understand, but
• 16:24
  I'm not the expert.
• 16:26
  But it is backed by documented research.
• 16:28
  It's been vetted by the chief medical board
• 16:30
  of the wellness company.
• 16:33
  And if you go to AmericaOut Loud.shop and
• 16:35
  you click on the Daily Spike Support panel,
• 16:37
  you can do your own research.
• 16:39
  I want you to be an informed consumer.
• 16:42
  Even more, use the code Out Loud at
• 16:43
  checkout, and you'll get 20% off of your
• 16:45
  order.
• 16:46
  So again, head to AmericaOut Loud.shop, click on
• 16:49
  the spike support panel and do your research.
• 16:53
  Whether it's you, a family member or a
• 16:54
  friend.
• 16:56
  Let us protect ourselves from the craziness of
• 16:59
  government actors who think they they can turn
• 17:02
  us into medical guinea pigs.
• 17:05
  Use the daily spike support to protect yourself
• 17:07
  and your family.
• 17:09
  And don't forget to use that code out
• 17:10
  loud at checkout to get 20% off of
• 17:12
  your order.
• 17:22
  During COVID, we got educated on the power
• 17:25
  of natural virus protection and immune boosting using
• 17:28
  vitamins A, C, D, Zinc, and Quircetin.
• 17:32
  The problem?
• 17:32
  Getting them at the right dosage from truly
• 17:34
  natural sources that doesn't cost an arm and
• 17:36
  a leg.
• 17:38
  Enter the Daily V stack.
• 17:40
  Using breakthrough cellular absorption technology, we put those
• 17:42
  vitamins together and supercharge them with a complete
• 17:45
  multi-mineral complex.
• 17:48
  The Daily V Stack is basically an oral
• 17:50
  IV of six products all in one at
• 17:52
  an affordable price.
• 17:55
  Go to chemicalfree body.com forward slash out loud
• 17:57
  today.
• 17:59
  Get the daily V stack, protect yourself, boost
• 18:01
  your immune system, and save 20% on your
• 18:03
  first order.
• 18:06
  Oral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years, but
• 18:08
  our diet and the way we eat has
• 18:11
  creating an environment in your mouth for bacteria
• 18:13
  to wreck havoc on your teeth and gums
• 18:15
  for better oral health.
• 18:18
  Get spray, dental defense, and oral care line
• 18:21
  designed to combat acid-creating bacteria.
• 18:24
  The toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and gum all contain
• 18:27
  xylitol, and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve
• 18:29
  oral health.
• 18:32
  Sprite can be found online and at all
• 18:34
  fine natural retailers.
• 18:36
  Feeling off lately, bloated brain fog, low energy.
• 18:39
  It could be parasites.
• 18:41
  These cell invaders that weaken your gut immune
• 18:43
  system and mental clarity.
• 18:44
  That's why Dr.
• 18:45
  Peter McCullough and the doctors at the wellness
• 18:47
  company formulated ivermectin and mabendazol cleanse, a medical
• 18:49
  great solution designed to help eliminate parasites and
• 18:52
  restore balance.
• 18:54
  No gimmicks, just real medicine trusted by top
• 18:56
  doctors.
• 18:57
  Go to TWC.health forward slash outloud and use
• 18:59
  code out loud for 20% off your first
• 19:02
  order.
• 19:04
  Take control of your health today.
• 19:21
  From those carrying the banners of socialism, communism,
• 19:24
  and Marxism.
• 19:26
  America.
• 19:33
  America outloud.news is that place to awaken your
• 19:37
  heart, soul, and mind to the outloud truth.
• 19:49
  Welcome back, everyday Americans to rejoin the Constitution
• 19:51
  study.
• 19:52
  Dave's been talking about the Americans giving away
• 19:54
  their freedom.
• 19:56
  And I can see no better example of
• 19:59
  this than our willingness to give up our
• 20:01
  freedom of speech.
• 20:05
  I came across this article which uh uh
• 20:08
  pointed out that uh according to well, at
• 20:11
  least one professor who there's this there's this
• 20:14
  professor who uh um he he encourages his
• 20:17
  class to not just read but discuss the
• 20:20
  great books of of history in his class,
• 20:24
  and he found out that that there were
• 20:27
  students that were afraid to speak.
• 20:30
  Uh not because uh they were afraid of
• 20:33
  their professor, they're afraid of the other students,
• 20:36
  they're afraid of their classmates recording them uh
• 20:39
  talking about things like politics or philosophy and
• 20:42
  um well then using that uh uh against
• 20:45
  them.
• 20:49
  Now I find this interesting because to me
• 20:51
  this is the the logical conclusion of something
• 20:54
  that started way back in the 1990s with
• 20:56
  political correctness.
• 20:59
  Now, I must admit that I didn't learn
• 21:00
  Admit that I didn't learn this until a
• 21:01
  this until a few years ago, but political
• 21:02
  few years ago, but political correctness was not
• 21:03
  correctness was not created here, not in the
• 21:04
  created here, not in the United States.
• 21:05
  United States.
• 21:07
  It was created in the Soviet Union.
• 21:07
  It was created in the Soviet Union.
• 21:10
  You were expected to act in a politically
• 21:10
  You were expected to act in a politically
• 21:12
  correct great way to show that you had
• 21:12
  correct great way to show that you had
• 21:14
  fidelity to the the the party and could
• 21:14
  fidelity to the party and could be trusted
• 21:16
  be trusted to make decisions.
• 21:16
  to make decisions.
• 21:19
  It was political correctness.
• 21:19
  It was political correctness.
• 21:22
  Now it appeared in the United States again,
• 21:22
  Now it appeared in the United States again.
• 21:23
  I think it was like early late 80s,
• 21:24
  I think it was like early late 80s,
• 21:25
  early 90s.
• 21:25
  early 90s.
• 21:27
  This whole idea of you can't say.
• 21:27
  This whole idea of you can't say that.
• 21:31
  We had to change the names.
• 21:33
  I think we may have gone back even
• 21:34
  to the 70s.
• 21:35
  We talk about you had to change the
• 21:36
  names.
• 21:37
  They were no longer stewardesses, they were flight
• 21:39
  attendants.
• 21:43
  Why?
• 21:44
  What's wrong with the name steward or stewardess?
• 21:47
  It perfectly describes their job.
• 21:49
  No, no, no, we have to call them
• 21:51
  flight attendants.
• 21:52
  They're no longer garbage men.
• 21:54
  No, no, no, no.
• 21:55
  They're they're trash uh uh uh uh uh
• 21:58
  trash specialists, and they're no longer manhole covers,
• 22:02
  they're people hold covers.
• 22:06
  And it was this whole idea that others
• 22:08
  got to tell you how to speak.
• 22:12
  And to avoid the embarrassment of being called
• 22:15
  not politically correct, people changed how they spoke.
• 22:19
  They self-censored.
• 22:22
  And uh we I remember comedians used to
• 22:25
  make fun of this nonsense, but now we're
• 22:28
  seeing that self-censorship has grown into what you
• 22:31
  want from self-censorship to a a um because
• 22:34
  of political correctness to what we're seeing here,
• 22:37
  and at least in this professor's experience of
• 22:41
  students that are self-censoring because they're afraid of
• 22:44
  what their fellow students will say.
• 22:47
  In other words, they're afraid that um they'll
• 22:51
  be turned into the thought police, just like
• 22:56
  in Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia.
• 23:00
  The very ideas in Orwell's 1984, the very
• 23:04
  ideas behind China's social credit system are being
• 23:08
  implemented not by government, but by the acceptance
• 23:12
  of this political correct speech and the idea
• 23:16
  that that the students get to um to
• 23:20
  to uh tell you what you can say.
• 23:25
  Now, I of course I'm in a lot
• 23:26
  of these discussions and a lot of groups,
• 23:28
  and all of someone will say, Well, you
• 23:30
  can't say that, to which I say, baloney,
• 23:32
  I can say anything I want.
• 23:34
  Now, I may be held accountable for what
• 23:36
  I say.
• 23:38
  People say, well, the Supreme Court said you
• 23:39
  can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
• 23:41
  No, it did not.
• 23:43
  It said you could not use freedom of
• 23:45
  speech as a protection for falsely yelling fire
• 23:47
  in a crowded theater.
• 23:50
  A much different statement.
• 23:52
  But this goes to show, you know, we
• 23:54
  we we same thing with we saw with
• 23:55
  COVID.
• 23:56
  You know, you can't say that COVID came
• 23:58
  from China.
• 23:59
  Why?
• 24:00
  It was first called the it was a
• 24:01
  Wuhan flu.
• 24:02
  Oh, you can't say that.
• 24:03
  Why?
• 24:03
  Well, it's racist.
• 24:04
  Why?
• 24:06
  What is racist about pointing out the actual
• 24:08
  uh uh history of where this virus came
• 24:10
  from?
• 24:14
  You you can't call people black.
• 24:16
  Why?
• 24:16
  Are they not black in in skin tone?
• 24:19
  No, they're African American.
• 24:20
  Well, most of them didn't actually come from
• 24:22
  Africa.
• 24:24
  Well, you can't say that.
• 24:25
  Why?
• 24:26
  You're telling me I have to lie and
• 24:27
  call someone who's not from Africa an African
• 24:29
  American.
• 24:32
  Doesn't that sound stupid to you?
• 24:35
  But what happened is again, the American people
• 24:38
  gave up.
• 24:41
  See, I'm not surprised that are people that
• 24:43
  tried to force their will on others.
• 24:45
  There always have been, there always will be.
• 24:47
  It's the fact that the American people stop
• 24:50
  fighting for their own free speech.
• 24:54
  They willingly impose the opinions of others on
• 24:58
  their own speech.
• 25:03
  So not only did people willingly impose political
• 25:06
  correctness on their peers, those peers accepted it.
• 25:10
  They did what they were told.
• 25:12
  They sat down, shut up and did what
• 25:13
  they were told.
• 25:15
  Exactly what they were taught in government-run schools.
• 25:20
  And of course, I hope we all remember
• 25:22
  the uh the Ministry of Truth that the
• 25:24
  Biden administration tried to create where the government
• 25:26
  would determine what is and is not true.
• 25:28
  Well, that's misinformation.
• 25:30
  Why?
• 25:31
  Because we said so.
• 25:32
  Oh, that's not how truth works.
• 25:35
  Now that died.
• 25:36
  Thank God that died because of the uproar.
• 25:39
  But the idea hasn't gone away.
• 25:44
  The the California legislature is looking at a
• 25:47
  uh at a bill that uh I think
• 25:49
  it was uh um Mia Bonta, I think
• 25:52
  brought this letter.
• 25:56
  It's been nicknamed the Stop Nick Shirley Act.
• 25:59
  And this all became this apparently came about
• 26:02
  because a uh an independent journalist by the
• 26:05
  name of Nick Shirley has a habit of,
• 26:08
  as I understand it, um keeping an eye
• 26:11
  on what the politicians are doing and then
• 26:14
  publishing that information generally on YouTube.
• 26:17
  He publishes videos.
• 26:20
  And in fact, of December of last year,
• 26:22
  he became fairly well known for making videos
• 26:25
  and posting them on social media about these
• 26:27
  alleged Somali daycare fraud in Minnesota.
• 26:30
  You remember uh the daycare that uh even
• 26:32
  the name is misspelled, and there are no
• 26:35
  kids in the daycare.
• 26:38
  And um, you know, he got he made
• 26:40
  kind of quite a name for and he
• 26:42
  drew a lot of attention to the fraud
• 26:44
  that was going on in Minnesota.
• 26:47
  So why are California legislators concerned about this?
• 26:53
  Well, interesting, under according to the bill, under
• 26:56
  existing California law, um, people are not allowed
• 26:59
  to knowingly publicly post or display uh what
• 27:02
  they call uh uh um uh personal information
• 27:06
  or image of a designated health care service
• 27:09
  provider.
• 27:12
  In other words, they focus on health care.
• 27:14
  Gee, I wonder what kind of health care
• 27:16
  they tend to focus on.
• 27:18
  This would add uh what they call immigration
• 27:21
  service providers to this list.
• 27:26
  Now, what I find interesting to me is
• 27:27
  is twofold.
• 27:29
  One is it violates the 14th Amendment because
• 27:32
  you don't have equal protection under the law,
• 27:34
  either make it criminal to publicly post or
• 27:37
  display uh uh certain in public personal information
• 27:40
  uh uh uh either in physically or on
• 27:43
  the internet, or don't.
• 27:46
  But don't pick and choose who gets protection
• 27:48
  and who doesn't.
• 27:50
  And of course, they're talking about what they
• 27:51
  call immigration support service.
• 27:53
  Now, this all I think falls under California's
• 27:56
  sanctuary state policies and the the idea that
• 27:58
  um certain information should be hidden from the
• 28:00
  Certain information should be hidden from the public.
• 28:00
  public.
• 28:03
  Now, again, I agree that maybe certain personal
• 28:03
  Now, again, I agree that maybe certain personal
• 28:05
  information should be hidden from the public.
• 28:06
  information should be hidden from the public, but
• 28:08
  But again, if you're talking about government actors,
• 28:09
  again, if you're talking about government actors, government
• 28:11
  government employees, well, should they their actions be
• 28:12
  employees, well, should they their actions be hidden
• 28:15
  hidden from the very public they work for?
• 28:15
  from the very public they work for?
• 28:18
  And again, I don't think anybody should be
• 28:18
  And again, I don't think anybody should be
• 28:22
  subject to doxing, to harassment, to threats.
• 28:22
  subject to to doxing, to harassment, to threats.
• 28:25
  But why does California only wish to protect
• 28:25
  But why does California only wish to protect
• 28:27
  a couple of different types of uh organizations?
• 28:27
  a couple of different types of organizations, not
• 28:30
  um everybody?
• 28:32
  I find this extremely interesting.
• 28:36
  Because remember, uh a perfect example, you understand
• 28:38
  you have the right to remain silent.
• 28:40
  You do not have to answer questions from
• 28:41
  law enforcement.
• 28:43
  However, law enforcement has to identify themselves to
• 28:45
  you.
• 28:47
  Even if they show up in uniform, they're
• 28:49
  supposed to in most locales, I believe they're
• 28:51
  supposed to give their name and badge number
• 28:53
  or some other identifying number.
• 28:55
  Whereas you're only required to provide that information
• 28:57
  if they can provide a reasonable article of
• 29:00
  suspicion that you have been or about to
• 29:02
  participate in a crime.
• 29:04
  It's recognizing that a public servant in uniform
• 29:06
  in the performance of their duties, or at
• 29:08
  least even uniform or not, and performance of
• 29:11
  the duties owes it to the public they
• 29:13
  work for to identify themselves.
• 29:15
  Well, the public doesn't have the same responsibility
• 29:16
  to government.
• 29:18
  I just find this one interesting because as
• 29:20
  I understand it, and I haven't done a
• 29:23
  deep dive into the legislation, but as I
• 29:26
  understand it, uh it's more than just doxing.
• 29:29
  And there's uh at least an allegation that
• 29:32
  this is meant to target uh what they
• 29:34
  would have freelance publishers, no other or freelance
• 29:37
  press.
• 29:40
  People who uh, you know, again, maybe not
• 29:43
  a part of an organized corporate media, but
• 29:46
  still are exercising their freedom of the press.
• 29:49
  By the way, freedom of the press is
• 29:51
  not the freedom of the media, it's the
• 29:53
  freedom to publish information.
• 29:55
  So again, uh uh just because of California's
• 29:57
  history.
• 29:59
  I have to wonder is there something going
• 30:01
  on with this?
• 30:02
  And it makes me concerned.
• 30:05
  Um, and of course, again, it's not even
• 30:07
  just California.
• 30:09
  The U.S.
• 30:10
  Senate is trying very hard to regulate AI
• 30:12
  chatbots.
• 30:16
  SB 3062, known as the Guard Act, um,
• 30:19
  attempts to regulate these chatbots, or what they
• 30:23
  also refer to as AI companion systems through
• 30:26
  limiting access, uh, design mandates and disclosure requirements.
• 30:29
  And they want to provide not just civil
• 30:32
  but criminal penalties for these violations.
• 30:35
  Now, first of all, the federal government has
• 30:37
  no legal authority to regulate these AI chatbots.
• 30:40
  They're not participating in commerce.
• 30:42
  Now, if you buy the chatbot, that that
• 30:44
  might be interstate commerce if you buy access
• 30:47
  to the cap chat bot, but the chatbot
• 30:49
  themselves, no, that's not interstate commerce.
• 30:51
  So there's no legal authority for them to
• 30:52
  do so.
• 30:54
  Oh, but we're trying to protect the children.
• 30:56
  That's nice.
• 30:58
  Now, again, if they're participating in actual interstate
• 31:01
  commerce, you could say, you know what?
• 31:04
  Well, there needs to be disclosure rules as
• 31:05
  part of this commerce.
• 31:07
  And then it's up to the parents to
• 31:08
  decide.
• 31:09
  Now, are parents going to make the right
• 31:10
  decision all the time?
• 31:12
  No.
• 31:13
  But I have to wonder, are you willing
• 31:15
  to give up your right to uh uh
• 31:18
  to access a chatbot that maybe agrees with
• 31:21
  you because someone claims it's to save the
• 31:23
  children?
• 31:27
  Now, the the one thing in the bill
• 31:28
  that so far it again, it's the federal
• 31:30
  government can't do this, they don't have the
• 31:32
  legal authority to do that.
• 31:33
  They do have an age verification requirement.
• 31:36
  Again, this is back to parents are not
• 31:38
  being parents, so the government's trying to be
• 31:40
  parents for them.
• 31:42
  And uh that to me is the biggest
• 31:44
  problem.
• 31:45
  You know, parents they want to be friends
• 31:47
  to their kids, they don't want to be
• 31:49
  parents anymore.
• 31:50
  They don't want to tell them no, you're
• 31:52
  not allowed to have a cell phone.
• 31:54
  And no, he he don't want you on
• 31:56
  those systems because they're dangerous.
• 31:59
  Yeah, I I remember my daughter.
• 32:01
  Oh, she must have been about maybe five,
• 32:03
  six years old.
• 32:05
  And uh we were at a at a
• 32:06
  well, it wasn't really a funeral, it was
• 32:08
  it was a it was a remembrance for
• 32:10
  a family member in in New York City.
• 32:12
  We're in an apartment in New York City.
• 32:14
  40, 50 people, a place is packed.
• 32:17
  Kids went off to the bedroom to play
• 32:19
  and whatever to not disturb the the adults.
• 32:22
  And at one point, my daughter comes toddling
• 32:24
  out and uh comes up to us, and
• 32:26
  of course, she doesn't know anybody there except
• 32:27
  myself, my wife, my dad, my stepmom, my
• 32:29
  sister.
• 32:32
  She comes out and she's very polite.
• 32:34
  Excuse me, please, thank you.
• 32:36
  And when she comes over, I said, honey,
• 32:38
  um what do you why are you here?
• 32:40
  She goes, Well, they were gonna go watch
• 32:41
  a video that I know you didn't want
• 32:43
  to meet to watch, so I came out
• 32:44
  here.
• 32:46
  That's parenting.
• 32:48
  In other words, I didn't have to have
• 32:50
  some sort of system to protect her from
• 32:53
  inappropriate content.
• 32:55
  I had instilled in her the need to
• 32:57
  protect herself.
• 32:59
  My wife and I had instilled in her
• 33:00
  the need to protect herself from certain content
• 33:02
  that we decided was not she's not ready
• 33:03
  for yet.
• 33:05
  And she did it.
• 33:08
  Now, it's one thing to make sure parents
• 33:10
  have access to information to make the decision.
• 33:13
  I get very concerned when government gets to
• 33:16
  decide what can and cannot be on chat,
• 33:18
  who can and cannot be on chatbots, what
• 33:21
  they're used for, because that is just another
• 33:24
  example of Americans giving up their freedoms, in
• 33:27
  this case freedom of speech, but giving up
• 33:30
  their freedoms, their liberty to let government decide
• 33:32
  what is and isn't appropriate for their child.
• 33:36
  That is the problem.
• 33:39
  Again, uh, you know, AI chatbots, I uh
• 33:41
  again, then I have an advantage, right?
• 33:44
  Because I spent 30 years in IT.
• 33:45
  It's easier for me to regulate what's on
• 33:46
  my network.
• 33:48
  It was easier when my daughter was young
• 33:49
  to regulate what she saw.
• 33:51
  Guess what?
• 33:52
  My daughter didn't get a cell phone, I
• 33:54
  think till she was 16 years old.
• 33:56
  Oh my god, she didn't have a cell
• 33:56
  phone.
• 33:57
  No, and it was a flip phone.
• 33:59
  She didn't get a smartphone until she was
• 34:01
  an adult.
• 34:04
  That's because my parent, my wife and I
• 34:06
  took responsibility for uh raising our child and
• 34:09
  limiting what you know, making sure she didn't
• 34:11
  have access to stuff that we thought was
• 34:14
  inappropriate, at least as best as we could.
• 34:16
  It was our responsibility.
• 34:19
  So every time we turn around to government,
• 34:21
  say, we need you to do this for
• 34:23
  us, we give up our freedom.
• 34:25
  We give up our right to make decisions,
• 34:28
  and we let somebody else decide what is
• 34:31
  and isn't appropriate for our children, for our
• 34:33
  families, for our bathrooms, for our washing machines,
• 34:36
  for our cars, for everything in our life.
• 34:39
  It isn't just the this uh censorship of
• 34:41
  speech, it's the controlling of our lives that
• 34:43
  we give up.
• 34:46
  And many Americans give it up without even
• 34:47
  thinking about it.
• 34:49
  They give it their freedom away because they
• 34:52
  show no value in it.
• 34:55
  Now, there are a lot of organizations that
• 34:58
  are pushing hard to infringe on our rights,
• 35:00
  Infringe on our rights.
• 35:00
  and they get a lot of their funding
• 35:01
  And they get a lot of their funding
• 35:03
  from companies you and I do business with.
• 35:03
  from companies you and I do business with.
• 35:05
  That's why I stopped doing business with certain
• 35:05
  That's why I stopped doing business with certain
• 35:07
  corporations.
• 35:07
  corporations.
• 35:08
  And I think you should too.
• 35:09
  I think you should too.
• 35:10
  I want to buy from companies that believe
• 35:10
  I want to buy from companies that believe
• 35:11
  what I believe.
• 35:11
  what I believe.
• 35:13
  Now you have another opportunity.
• 35:13
  Now you have another opportunity.
• 35:15
  Patriomobile's America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
• 35:15
  PatriMobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
• 35:19
  Not why I joined them, but they are.
• 35:19
  Not why I joined them, but they are.
• 35:22
  They offer great 4G and 5G coverage all
• 35:24
  across the nation.
• 35:26
  Not why I joined them, but they do.
• 35:28
  They're U.S.
• 35:28
  They're U.S.
• 35:29
  customer sports.
• 35:29
  customer sports, 100% U.S.
• 35:31
  based.
• 35:32
  I love it.
• 35:33
  It's not why I joined them.
• 35:35
  I joined them because they support organizations fighting
• 35:37
  for our rights and our freedom.
• 35:40
  Freedom of religion, speech, press, to be secure
• 35:43
  from unreasonable searches and seizures, to not be
• 35:45
  deprived of liberty, life under property without due
• 35:47
  process of law.
• 35:50
  They also support sanctity of life, our veterans,
• 35:52
  and our first responders.
• 35:54
  Guess what?
• 35:55
  That group now includes the Constitution study.
• 35:58
  Yep, I became affiliated to them about a
• 35:59
  year or two ago.
• 36:01
  And uh because I love the work, I
• 36:02
  became I was a customer, I love the
• 36:04
  way it worked.
• 36:06
  I was very happy with it.
• 36:07
  I was more than willing to associate with
• 36:08
  them as an affiliate.
• 36:10
  That means if you switch to patron mode
• 36:12
  a day, use the code constitution, and you
• 36:14
  will get free activation.
• 36:16
  Just go to patriotmobile.comslash constitution, find a plan
• 36:18
  that works for you, see if you're eligible
• 36:21
  for a discount.
• 36:23
  First responders, veterans, even just families with multiple
• 36:26
  lines, are eligible for a discount.
• 36:29
  And don't forget, you got that code constitution
• 36:31
  to get your activation absolutely free.
• 36:34
  So join me on America's only Christian conservative
• 36:37
  wildness provider, and the only company I know
• 36:39
  that takes a portion of every dollar and
• 36:42
  supports organizations defending your rights.
• 36:44
  Go to PatriotMobile.comslash constitution, find a plan and
• 36:46
  discount that works for you, and don't forget
• 36:48
  that code constitution to check out to get
• 36:51
  free activation.
• 36:53
  I also hope you'll join me at AmericaOut
• 36:54
  Loud.news.
• 36:56
  We live in the information age.
• 36:58
  All of human knowledge is available at our
• 37:00
  fingertips.
• 37:01
  But who do we trust?
• 37:03
  Who can we verify?
• 37:05
  For me, one of those is AmericaOut Loud.news.
• 37:08
  I go there every day for news and
• 37:09
  information.
• 37:10
  I want you to do the same, but
• 37:11
  I want you to do a bit more.
• 37:13
  Do like I do.
• 37:14
  Read the stories and articles, but then share
• 37:15
  them.
• 37:17
  Listen to the podcast, watch the videos, share
• 37:18
  them.
• 37:20
  You'd be surprised how often people say, I
• 37:22
  didn't know that.
• 37:24
  Yeah, because they're getting their news from corporate
• 37:26
  news.
• 37:28
  That is, well, let's just say propagandizing them.
• 37:31
  It's the act of sharing this information, sharing
• 37:33
  content people didn't know was out there that
• 37:35
  helps secure the blessings of liberty for all
• 37:37
  of us.
• 37:43
  Are you looking for a healthy snacks?
• 37:46
  But you've had enough of all the sweet
• 37:49
  sugary energy bars.
• 37:52
  Good news.
• 37:53
  There's new bars to try.
• 37:55
  That's savory, crunchy, and packed with goodness.
• 37:58
  Bear bars are based just on six simple
• 38:02
  natural ingredients, a certified organic veggie, nut and
• 38:05
  seed bar.
• 38:08
  That's low temp dried, never baked or fried.
• 38:12
  Bear bars are plant-based, gluten-free and loaded with
• 38:15
  nutrients and protein.
• 38:18
  Head over to barebar.com/slash out loud and get
• 38:21
  the exclusive discount just for America out loud
• 38:24
  listeners.
• 38:28
  That's B E A R B A Rout
• 38:32
  Loud.
• 38:35
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the Sprout Book.
• 38:38
  And I've devoted my life to helping people
• 38:41
  reconnect with food at its most alive stage.
• 38:45
  The sprout.
• 38:46
  When you germinate a seed, you're not just
• 38:49
  growing food, you're activating potential.
• 38:52
  Sprouts grow without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer right
• 38:54
  on your kitchen countertop.
• 38:57
  They're organic, fresh, and cost less than a
• 38:59
  dollar a serving.
• 39:02
  It's nature's fastest form of farming, accessible to
• 39:04
  anyone anywhere.
• 39:07
  Discover the joy of growing your own food
• 39:09
  and the power of living nutrition.
• 39:12
  Visit thespoutingcompany.com and use the code out loud
• 39:14
  for an exclusive offer.
• 39:18
  Are you struggling with thinning hair?
• 39:19
  Try roots from the wellness company.
• 39:20
  This doctor formulated non-oily hydrogel uses seven powerful
• 39:24
  peptides and key nutrients to nourish your scalp
• 39:27
  and support visibly thicker, healthier hair.
• 39:30
  Visit TWC.health forward slash out loud and use
• 39:32
  code out loud for 20% off your first
• 39:34
  order.
• 39:37
  That is TWC.
• 39:46
  Welcome back, everyday American to rejoin the Constitution
• 39:47
  study.
• 39:49
  Today we're talking about, well, we're talking about
• 39:51
  Americans giving away their their rights, their freedom.
• 39:54
  I'm actually going to talk about a Canadian
• 39:55
  that's fighting for his rights.
• 39:57
  Now, why Canadian?
• 39:59
  Well, because this Canadian, a a who's remained
• 40:02
  anonymous, a Mr.
• 40:05
  Doe, is suing DHS Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen
• 40:08
  to stop the U.S.
• 40:11
  government from compelling Google to disclose his private
• 40:15
  information, his real name, his physical location, his
• 40:19
  movement history, his private communications, and his browsing
• 40:23
  records.
• 40:27
  Now, what's happened is DHS, firstly, I have
• 40:29
  to understand.
• 40:31
  All right, this man is a Canadian citizen,
• 40:33
  but he is still suing the United States
• 40:34
  government.
• 40:37
  And yes, he lives in Canada, but he
• 40:39
  hasn't entered the United States since 2015, and
• 40:41
  he does not do business with anyone in
• 40:43
  the United States.
• 40:45
  Yet on February 14th, 2026, quite a Valentine,
• 40:48
  DHS issued a summons to Google for all
• 40:52
  records and other information tied to this Gmail
• 40:55
  account linked to this Mr.
• 40:58
  Doe's account covering September 2025 through February 2026.
• 41:05
  What jurisdiction does uh DHS have over any
• 41:07
  of this?
• 41:10
  Well, here's what apparently happened.
• 41:12
  See, this was included the time frame when
• 41:16
  um uh uh ICE uh ice agents killed
• 41:19
  Renee Good and Alex Paretti in Minneapolis.
• 41:23
  Something which prompted Mr.
• 41:24
  Doe to create some very sharp and targeted
• 41:26
  posts.
• 41:28
  In other words, he exercised his freedom of
• 41:31
  press to publish his opinion on the actions
• 41:33
  of those federal uh uh of those federal
• 41:36
  agents.
• 41:39
  So now DHS is seeking it has sent
• 41:42
  a a summons, quote unquote summons, not even
• 41:45
  a subpoena, a summons to Google, something that's
• 41:48
  never been reviewed by a judge, no court
• 41:51
  order, nothing.
• 41:55
  Just the just the federal government acting as
• 41:57
  a tyrant saying, give me this data.
• 42:01
  Give me the the this foreign citizens digital
• 42:01
  Give me the the this foreign citizens digital
• 42:04
  footprint because he tagged a government official in
• 42:04
  footprint because he tagged a government official in
• 42:08
  a post that they found embarrassing.
• 42:08
  a post that they found embarrassing.
• 42:12
  Now, so far, Google has not complied, but
• 42:12
  Now, so far, Google has not complied, but
• 42:15
  they have made clear that they cannot promise
• 42:15
  they have made clear that they cannot promise
• 42:18
  to hold out forever.
• 42:18
  to hold out forever.
• 42:21
  This is what is why I'm always talking
• 42:21
  This is what is why I'm always talking
• 42:23
  about the the problems with subpoenas, and in
• 42:24
  about the problems with subpoenas, and this case
• 42:25
  this case, just a summons, not even a
• 42:26
  just a summons, not even subpoena, is that
• 42:27
  subpoena, is that there's
• 42:29
  there's no probable cause supported by oath or
• 42:32
  affirmation.
• 42:34
  There's no limit to the search.
• 42:36
  They can just say, hey, demand this data.
• 42:39
  And that completely violates the Fourth Amendment, right?
• 42:42
  I have a similar problem with administrative warrants,
• 42:45
  because again, this is a government agency giving
• 42:48
  itself permission to issue a warrant without any
• 42:50
  other review.
• 42:54
  Now the lawsuit is being handled by the
• 42:57
  ACLU's DC and Northern California branches, and they've
• 43:00
  asked a federal court to invalidate this summons.
• 43:03
  Um, again, for blatant violation of the Fourth
• 43:05
  Amendment.
• 43:07
  Um here's the interesting thing.
• 43:10
  Uh this lawsuit is separate from three other
• 43:13
  attempts that the ACLU has used to challenge
• 43:15
  DHS summonses.
• 43:19
  Each time that the parent when ACL got
• 43:22
  involved, DHS review, review withdrew the summons or
• 43:25
  the subpoena before a judge could decide.
• 43:28
  In other words, they're trying to intimidate people
• 43:30
  to provide data, and then once the the
• 43:33
  the it's actually challenges illegal, they pull it
• 43:35
  back.
• 43:38
  It's why we need to know our rights.
• 43:41
  It's why we need to deal with this,
• 43:42
  and we need to be willing to fight
• 43:44
  for our rights and our freedom.
• 43:46
  Because, as Mr.
• 43:47
  Doe said, I have long admired the United
• 43:49
  States for its commitment to free speech.
• 43:52
  Never in a million years did I think
• 43:53
  that after criticizing the U.S.
• 43:55
  government, I would be targeted with a summons
• 43:57
  seeking to find out who I am, where
• 43:58
  I live, where I go, and what I
• 44:00
  read online.
• 44:02
  You don't have to be from America to
• 44:04
  know that this is un-American.
• 44:06
  Absolutely, this is true.
• 44:08
  So I'm curious.
• 44:10
  I'm curious if the judge, even if the
• 44:12
  DHS, you know, if the DHS withdraws it,
• 44:14
  I think the judge should not mute this
• 44:17
  and say you have a pattern of action,
• 44:19
  and we're gonna issue the order anyway.
• 44:21
  Uh, I really hope DHS gets slapped really,
• 44:24
  really, really badly.
• 44:26
  Because this is, again, they are attempting to
• 44:29
  deprive people of their rights.
• 44:32
  But this Canadian, I love this.
• 44:35
  This Canadian is now trying to protect the
• 44:39
  rights of other American citizens.
• 44:44
  And there's more because I I just saw
• 44:46
  this pop up.
• 44:48
  ICE, immigration and customer inform uh enforcement is
• 44:51
  uh the reports are they're planning to use
• 44:54
  facial recognition glasses to collect data on all
• 44:57
  Americans in real time.
• 45:01
  This is according to a an independent journalist,
• 45:03
  uh a Ken Klipperstein.
• 45:07
  These are financial statements he found point to
• 45:09
  the development of a facial recognition platform modeled
• 45:12
  after commercially available AI smart glasses, and will
• 45:14
  basically be used to well identify anybody they
• 45:17
  come in contact, bystanders.
• 45:20
  Imagine, you know, you not stopped at an
• 45:23
  immigration checkpoint, you're just wandering through.
• 45:26
  You haven't be going to Home Depot, and
• 45:28
  ICE is there keeping an eye on what
• 45:31
  they suspect may be illegal aliens, and now
• 45:33
  ICE is going to collect your your your
• 45:35
  facial recognition, your biometric data for some future
• 45:38
  purpose.
• 45:41
  A blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment.
• 45:43
  This is a completely unreasonable search.
• 45:46
  Yes, it's being enabled by technology, but the
• 45:49
  search itself is unreasonable.
• 45:52
  And what are the American people doing about
• 45:53
  it?
• 45:55
  Mostly nothing.
• 45:57
  Oh, they may whine and complain.
• 45:59
  It's the same thing with with now cars.
• 46:01
  Do you realize that if you buy a
• 46:03
  model 2027 car or later, the federal government
• 46:06
  has illegally now going to commit a Fourth
• 46:08
  Amendment violation for every 2027 model vehicle and
• 46:11
  later sold?
• 46:14
  Because in order to start the car, you
• 46:17
  must submit to a search, a scanning of
• 46:20
  your of your biology of your of some
• 46:22
  sort of to determine whether or not the
• 46:25
  computer thinks it's safe for you to drive.
• 46:28
  Because Congress once again has violated your rights
• 46:31
  under the Fourth Amendment, protected by the Fourth
• 46:34
  Amendment, to be free from an unreasonable search.
• 46:38
  Whether it's spyware, license plate readers, um, the
• 46:41
  and now vehicles.
• 46:44
  I mean, licensed plate readers, you're out and
• 46:46
  about in public.
• 46:48
  These uh glasses, they may argue, well, you're
• 46:50
  in a public, you have no right to
• 46:52
  to to privacy.
• 46:55
  No, but I do have a right to
• 46:56
  not be searched.
• 46:58
  And that to me is where things are
• 46:59
  getting really ugly.
• 47:02
  The license plate readers, first of the license
• 47:05
  readers, now it's by by the uh the
• 47:08
  ice, you know, search glasses.
• 47:10
  Now you've got Congress saying that your car
• 47:12
  must search you before it'll be allowed to
• 47:14
  start.
• 47:16
  These are all blatantly illegal.
• 47:18
  They're all blatant violations of the Fourth Amendment.
• 47:20
  But yet the American people, maybe they complain,
• 47:23
  but they really don't do anything about it,
• 47:25
  do they?
• 47:29
  See, it was Franklin who said those who
• 47:32
  would give up essential liberties for the promise
• 47:36
  of temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
• 47:41
  If you are not willing, if you're willing
• 47:43
  to give up your rights because someone says
• 47:46
  it'll keep you safe, you don't deserve safety,
• 47:49
  you don't deserve liberty.
• 47:53
  Perfect example was 9-11, right?
• 47:54
  We were all scared because the bomb uh
• 47:56
  the planes flew in, and oh my god,
• 47:58
  terrorist attacks, and what are we gonna do?
• 48:00
  Here, here's our rights, here's our rights to
• 48:02
  be free from unreasonable searches.
• 48:03
  In order to get an airplane, you gotta
• 48:05
  have a porno scanner and all that.
• 48:07
  We give them all up to keep us
• 48:09
  safe, and then we find out, oh yeah,
• 48:11
  not only did we give up our rights,
• 48:13
  they don't keep us safe.
• 48:16
  Based on the last study I saw, something
• 48:19
  like 90% of the stress tests against TSA
• 48:22
  checkpoints allow the test weapons through.
• 48:25
  90%, nine out of 10 get through.
• 48:29
  Is that keeping us safe?
• 48:30
  No.
• 48:31
  All it's doing is making us late and
• 48:32
  pissing us off.
• 48:34
  But we've given up our rights already to
• 48:36
  the point where most Americans don't even think
• 48:38
  about it.
• 48:41
  You know, Ronald Reagan warned us way back
• 48:43
  in 1961, that freedom is never more than
• 48:46
  one generation away from extinction.
• 48:49
  Ladies and gentlemen, freedom is an endangered species.
• 48:52
  If Congress can simply illegally make up a
• 48:55
  law to search you before you're allowed to
• 48:58
  operate your own vehicle, regardless of where you
• 49:00
  Then your freedom is dying.
• 49:00
  are, that then your freedom is dying.
• 49:04
  If the Department of Homeland Security can simply
• 49:04
  If the Department of Homeland Security can simply
• 49:06
  demand a person's private information simply because they
• 49:07
  demand a person's private information simply because they
• 49:09
  said something the government doesn't like, by the
• 49:10
  said something the government doesn't like.
• 49:11
  way, this is a DHS run by a
• 49:13
  By the way, this is a DHS run
• 49:14
  Republican president.
• 49:14
  by a Republican president.
• 49:16
  This is Donald Trump's DHS.
• 49:16
  This is Donald Trump's DHS.
• 49:18
  This is not Biden.
• 49:18
  This is not Biden.
• 49:19
  This is not Obama.
• 49:19
  This is not Obama, this is not Kamala
• 49:20
  This is not Kamala Harris.
• 49:21
  Harris.
• 49:22
  This is Trump.
• 49:22
  This is Trump.
• 49:23
  Now do you know why I don't support
• 49:23
  Now do you know why I don't support
• 49:25
  people?
• 49:25
  people?
• 49:26
  I support policies.
• 49:26
  I support policies.
• 49:28
  We've given up our rights and we continue
• 49:28
  We've given up our rights.
• 49:30
  to do so.
• 49:32
  And what are we doing about it?
• 49:33
  We're fighting over donkeys and elephants.
• 49:36
  Where the question really is not who's going
• 49:38
  to protect our rights.
• 49:39
  It's how quickly each group is going to
• 49:40
  take away our rights.
• 49:42
  What rights are they focusing on to take
• 49:43
  away?
• 49:44
  Now it may be government actors that are
• 49:46
  trying to take away our rights, but it's
• 49:48
  still the American people that are capitulating.
• 49:51
  We're the ones that do nothing.
• 49:54
  They stand by while this atrocity happens.
• 49:58
  And then wonder, well, gee, I wonder what
• 50:00
  happened to our rights.
• 50:02
  I tell the story years ago.
• 50:04
  I was uh speaking to a conservative student
• 50:06
  group at Vanderbilt University.
• 50:09
  We were doing it over Zoom because the
• 50:11
  school would not let us meet in person
• 50:12
  because they were afraid we might, oh, I
• 50:14
  don't know, catch a cold.
• 50:16
  And during that speech, I had one young
• 50:18
  man ask me, says Paul, you've been talking
• 50:20
  about rights and rights and rights.
• 50:22
  What does it matter?
• 50:24
  Imagine that.
• 50:26
  A 20-something that one wonders, do rights even
• 50:28
  matter.
• 50:30
  What do they even matter anymore?
• 50:32
  I spent the best part of the next
• 50:34
  20 minutes listing for him the rights I
• 50:36
  exercised at his age that he has no
• 50:38
  clue of.
• 50:41
  That's why I say it's freedom is an
• 50:43
  endangered species in America.
• 50:45
  And if America falls, where do you go?
• 50:48
  England?
• 50:49
  Kenla?
• 50:50
  They're worse off than we are.
• 50:53
  They throw people in jail for, oh, I
• 50:54
  don't know, preaching.
• 50:56
  For praying.
• 50:58
  Maybe head to Germany.
• 51:00
  No, they so they said they send you
• 51:02
  to jail for your uh homeschooling your children.
• 51:05
  This is the last best hope of freedom,
• 51:08
  and we are actively stomping out the sacred
• 51:10
  fires of liberty in this country.
• 51:14
  When are we going to stop?
• 51:16
  When are you going to recognize the damage
• 51:18
  we have done and stop it from getting
• 51:20
  worse?
• 51:23
  The first thing you do, if you find
• 51:24
  yourself dug in a hole, the first thing
• 51:26
  you do is stop digging.
• 51:28
  Ladies and gentlemen, we need to stop digging
• 51:30
  this hole.
• 51:32
  If we want freedom survive, stop digging the
• 51:34
  hole that will bury it.
• 51:37
  Let's start working our way out.
• 51:40
  And it starts by, in my opinion, reading
• 51:42
  and studying the Constitution, doing it diligently, like
• 51:44
  John Jay said.
• 51:47
  Why?
• 51:48
  So we can recognize when our rights are
• 51:49
  being violated.
• 51:51
  But more importantly, so we are prepared to
• 51:53
  defend and assert them.
• 51:55
  Prepared to look at a government actor in
• 51:57
  the eye and say, no.
• 51:59
  Prepared to file lawsuits, prepared to not comply
• 52:02
  with illegal orders and illegal laws to stand
• 52:04
  up for the truth, justice in the American
• 52:07
  way.
• 52:10
  You don't have to be from Krypton to
• 52:12
  stand up for truth, justice in the American
• 52:14
  way.
• 52:17
  But if we're going to be the land
• 52:18
  of the free, we need men and women
• 52:20
  that are a home of the brave enough.
• 52:22
  Men and women brave enough to stand up
• 52:24
  for freedom.
• 52:27
  We have to do this.
• 52:29
  And we're not.
• 52:32
  And that to me is the biggest problem.
• 52:35
  It's not Washington, D.C.
• 52:36
  or your state capitalists the problem.
• 52:38
  The problem is the American people won't stand
• 52:40
  up and say no.
• 52:44
  They won't stand up against these illegal laws
• 52:47
  and these illegal actions and say no.
• 52:51
  They're more worried about being called names or
• 52:54
  or threatened and oh my God, you someone
• 52:56
  might put you in jail.
• 52:59
  Oh my God.
• 53:00
  Yeah, that's a hard thing.
• 53:03
  Our founding fathers pledge their lives, fortunes, and
• 53:06
  sacred honor to our independence.
• 53:10
  Are we unwilling to pledge our comfort?
• 53:15
  Our coffee money.
• 53:17
  Our honest concern to defend our own rights,
• 53:21
  our own freedom.
• 53:25
  Do we value our freedom so little that
• 53:27
  we won't stand up to protect it?
• 53:29
  Now, I'm sure somebody out there has some
• 53:31
  questions.
• 53:32
  They're questioning what I've said, they're questioning what
• 53:34
  fine.
• 53:36
  I love questions.
• 53:38
  In fact, I have a whole section of
• 53:40
  my website dedicated to questions.
• 53:42
  Just go to Constitution Study.com slash questions and
• 53:44
  ask your question there.
• 53:47
  Now I do ask for your name and
• 53:48
  email address because I'm going to personally email
• 53:50
  you a response.
• 53:52
  If you'd like me to answer the question
• 53:53
  on the radio, well, there's a checkbox.
• 53:55
  Answer on America Loud Talk Radio.
• 53:56
  I'll be happy to do that as well.
• 53:59
  But please ask your questions.
• 54:01
  They do a couple of things.
• 54:03
  One is if you're not sure, asking a
• 54:04
  question is a great way to learn.
• 54:07
  It also helps me to make sure that
• 54:08
  I'm my position is based on good facts
• 54:10
  and data because I have to be able
• 54:12
  to answer your question.
• 54:14
  And of course, it also, yes, it creates
• 54:16
  content for the radio, which may prompt more
• 54:17
  questions.
• 54:18
  And trust me, never worry about not having
• 54:20
  the answer.
• 54:22
  Just worry about running out of cut out
• 54:23
  of questions.
• 54:25
  Again, go to constitutionstudy.com/slash questions, ask your question.
• 54:28
  The only thing I ask, well, is that
• 54:31
  you're you be polite about it, right?
• 54:33
  I don't be a jerk.
• 54:35
  Don't be foul mouth.
• 54:36
  Don't be, and that it'd be something related
• 54:38
  to the constitution or constitutional study, or something
• 54:40
  I've covered here.
• 54:42
  It's relevant.
• 54:43
  But do me your ask your questions.
• 54:45
  When you ask your questions, I will give
• 54:47
  you an answer.
• 54:48
  And I generally try to be just as
• 54:50
  polite as people are to me.
• 54:51
  You know, treat people the way you want
• 54:53
  to be treated.
• 54:54
  The golden rule.
• 54:56
  Ask your questions.
• 54:57
  I'll give you the best answers I have.
• 54:59
  And what if you don't like them?
• 55:00
  Well, that's between you and God, not me.
• 55:04
  So again, please go to Constitution Study.com/slash questions,
• 55:06
  ask your question.
• 55:09
  And I'd love it if you'd allow me
• 55:10
  to answer it here on the radio.
• 55:12
  Because I think that, again, it prompts other
• 55:14
  questions from other people, which again is the
• 55:16
  best way we can learn.
• 55:18
  And that's really what the Constitution study is
• 55:19
  all about.
• 55:20
  Reading and study of the Constitution so we
• 55:22
  can learn.
• 55:23
  Learn what our rights are, learn to recognize
• 55:24
  when they're violated, learn to defend and assert
• 55:26
  them.
• 55:28
  That's what this is all about.
• 55:30
  One last time, constitutionstudy.com/slash questions to ask your
• 55:32
  question, and I will email you a direct
• 55:34
  response.
• 55:36
  You can also see a list of other
• 55:38
  questions that people have asked and the answers
• 55:39
  that I've sent them.
• 55:41
  Now, I also hope you come back and
• 55:43
  will join us here for the Constitution Study
• 55:46
  on America Out Loud Talk Radio heard in
• 55:48
  the iHeartRadio Network every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 55:50
  Eastern time.
• 55:51
  And you can listen on our media player.
• 55:53
  We have after Apple, Android, and Alexa, and
• 55:55
  of course, every episode goes to podcasts.
• 55:58
  It does take a day or two to
• 56:00
  To get to podcast from Talk Radio, but
• 56:01
  get to podcast from Talk Radio, but you
• 56:02
  you get to listen in your favorite podcast
• 56:03
  get to listen in your favorite podcast ad.
• 56:03
  ad.
• 56:06
  But do me a favor, subscribe to the
• 56:06
  But do me a favor, subscribe to the
• 56:07
  show.
• 56:07
  show.
• 56:09
  Leave us a rating, especially on Apple Podcasts.
• 56:09
  Leave us a rating, especially on Apple Podcasts.
• 56:12
  It helps the algorithm show us to more
• 56:12
  It helps the algorithm show us to more
• 56:13
  people so they're more likely to click the
• 56:14
  people so they're more likely to click the
• 56:15
  link and join us here.
• 56:16
  link and join us here, become a member
• 56:17
  Become a member of the Constitution Study.
• 56:18
  of the Constitution study.
• 56:20
  Speaking of links, you can find all the
• 56:20
  Speaking of links, you can find all the
• 56:22
  links you need on the home page at
• 56:22
  links you need on the homepage at America
• 56:24
  AmericaOut Loud.news.
• 56:24
  Outloud.news.
• 56:26
  But please share those links.
• 56:26
  But please share those links.
• 56:28
  Share this program.
• 56:28
  Share this program.
• 56:30
  Share the work that we're doing here.
• 56:31
  It is the sharing of this information that
• 56:34
  doesn't just share the Constitution Study or America.
• 56:37
  It helps to share the blessings of liberty
• 56:41
  to everyone who calls this great nation home.