Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Ashley St. Clair Accuses Musk, Germany Comes for Misogyny | HBR News 490

Transcript

Ashley St. Clair Accuses Musk, Germany Comes for Misogyny | HBR News 490 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four ninety Ashley Saint Clair
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: accuses Musk Germany comes for misogyny, where we discuss the
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. I hope
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: you guys are doing well this week and that you're
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: laughing at all of the absurdity so that you are
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: not consumed by it. I am your host, Brian. I'm
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts, doctor randam
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: Mercam and Hannah Wallen. On today's HBr News show, We're
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: gonna be talking about, excuse me, We're gonna be talking
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: about a sixty minutes interview with some German officials that
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: are planning to fight against online misogyny. We're gonna be
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: talking about Ashley Saint Clair, who has made an allegation
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: against Elon Musk on Valentine's Day. No less a woman
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: in castrates her husband and more so, stick around. It's
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: gonna be a time. It's gonna be the the time
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: of all times. I don't want to say a good
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: time after that last story, but uh, and be sure
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: to join us afterwards for the patron Only show. So
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: I figured in light of the fact that apparently TDS
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: has evolved into edes EDS, which is Elon derangement syndrome.
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk brought one of his children to the Oval
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: Office to discuss the findings of his team over at Doge,
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: which of course I support because I was Doge before
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: there was Doge. I'm like the Doge hipster and wanted
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: to pronounce it you were. You pronounced it dog.
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: Yeah, because I'm not French, But yeah, we lost the
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: war over that. Just like a gift won the war
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: of a gift, Doge won the war of a dog. Yeah.
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: I think dog actually makes sense because because it's and
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: then you put an e on the end of it
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: and yeah yeah. But then again, there's the Doge of Venice,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: so maybe you know, it kind of works a couple
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: different ways.
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: It sounds like a cute mispronunciation of dog.
• 2:14
  Speaker 3: It's like, yeah, yeah, Dollan the Donald duck Cuttons. We
• 2:20
  Speaker 3: can if it was Dolan or Dolan, and I wanted
• 2:24
  Speaker 3: to say Dolan because it sounds like a yeah yeah,
• 2:27
  Speaker 3: which became all the more funny when Donald became the president.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: Coland please now I now I just picture Donald Trump
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: talking like Donald Duck instead of talking like Trump. It's
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: just you know, if you can do that voice. But anyway,
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: I digress, I digress. So, uh, we have an article
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: from our Sometimes I can't find something to talk about,
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: and whenever I'm like struggling to find an after show topic,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: I just go and see what our woman Dowie is doing.
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: Because Arawa Madawi of The Guardian is always good for
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: a cringe article. I mean she I don't know if
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: she gets paid to do this, but she has to
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: come up with something every week. I guess it's called
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: the Week in Patriarchy, her little segment. Though maybe she's
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: not doing it as often because of, like, you know,
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: all of the money that's been found in all the
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: various USAID programs that have been shut down. But she
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: has opined she has a take on Elon Musk bringing
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: his child to work, and she has this article called
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk He's bringing his kids to work and the
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: reasons aren't cute at all.
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: So well, miss Selini did the same thing, damn it,
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: did he? Yeah, there's a picture of Mussolini with his
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: kid on his shoulders, just in.
• 3:52
  Speaker 4: So are we getting canceled? Take your daughter's to work.
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: Day now only when it's suns only.
• 4:00
  Speaker 4: Oh okay, yeah, only problem people. I was just wondering
• 4:07
  Speaker 4: about that because she didn't say she said kids.
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, no, it's it's it's uh, that's true. But it
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: appears that he's mainly just talking about his son.
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: Why isn't he bringing all thirteen of his children to
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: the White House.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: Well, we'll get into that.
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: Why is X his favorite? Why is he called X?
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: That's not cute? He's gonna grow up weird?
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah, oh you're buzzing, Mike, Yeah, you got a mute.
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: I'll let you know if you buzz when you come back. Okay,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna be looking at that in the Patron Show.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: If you want to join us in the Patron Show
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: to talk about Rawa Madowie and her takes, you have
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: to become a Badger yourself. Are going to feed the
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com and setting up a monthly subscription five
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: bucks a month. We'll get you into our discord server
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: where you'll be able to watch all the additional content
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: as well as participate in all of the various activities.
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm a little burp because I'm drinking some
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: fizzy water while I'm talking to you guys, and I
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: won't be doing that in the Patron show, so you'll
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: be relieved of that experience. So anyway, yeah, please go
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: to feedbagel dot com force has subscribe to be a
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: part of that action. And also feel free to send
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: us a super chat by going to feed Thebadgler dot
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: com for slash just the tip, so that you can
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: send us a message. And the benefit of that is
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: that you can say whatever you want. You can make
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: it longer than normal because superchats have a limit on
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: the characters, and you will not give Google your money,
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: so there is all all of those things I think
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: are big pluses. If you want to help fight the
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: censorship machine, one of the things you can do is
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: not pay them, or you can just send a Rumble
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: rant because the Rumble Gang is there and they are
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: also on point. So anyway, so that is feedbagel dot
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: com for slash subscribe, feed Thebadgler dot com forard slash
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: just the tip. With all that said, we are going
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: to get into today's stories, starting with Germany. So let's
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: talk a little bit about Germany. So in Germany, where
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: hate speech laws are strictly enforced. Online misogyny appears to
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: be the serious topic, and specifically they're calling out anti
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: feminist content on the internet places like x. There was
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: a sixty minute segment that showcase how German prosecutors and
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: police conduct raids to curb hate speech, including misogynistic content online.
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: German law not only prohibits overt hate speech, but also
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: extends to actions like spreading malicious gossip and violent threats,
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: which can include misogynistic attacks. Now bear in mind how
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: they are describing attacks. We're talking about online harassment, online
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: words and this kind of like I know that was
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: going to say a lot about this because we did
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: a show yesterday where we looked at some of the
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: programs that are putting money into this. So anyway, reposting
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: false or harmful information about women can lead to prosecution.
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: So not just making content, but just like liking a
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: post that they deem to be misogynistic. Okay. State prosecutors
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: like doctor Matthias Fink Sevenia Maging howse, I'm sorry these
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: are very like weird moon language names to me and
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: Frank Michael Law have explained that these measures are crucial
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: to protect democracy, putting in quotes by preventing the spread
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: of harmful rhetoric, which includes misogynistic content. Their enforcement involves
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: actions like simultaneous raids across Germany targeting individuals for offenses
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: such as posting misogynistic cartoons or threats. Penalties might involve
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: fines or imprisonment for repeat offenders. While these actions have
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: sparked debates about freedom of speech, which Germany does not have,
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: German officials assert that's such enforcement is vital to safeguard
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: democratic values and societal peace. Okay, so Germany, you're at
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: it again, guys. It's like, look at your track record.
• 8:18
  Speaker 4: Apparently we have ways of making you shut up. Sorry, now,
• 8:26
  Speaker 4: this is this is something that you should be looking
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: at the US government and wondering if there they've contributed
• 8:35
  Speaker 4: to this. We found more than one source when in
• 8:41
  Speaker 4: the last few weeks on HBr talk and then yesterday
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: on was it arrangeing that?
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: I mean, if it's one other person like you or Karen,
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: we just call it a rantsircer.
• 8:55
  Speaker 4: So we were looking. We looked at the same thing
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: we looked at the first Thursday. We looked at one
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: of the same things we looked at the first Thursday,
• 9:02
  Speaker 4: and that particular organization was funding research into how to
• 9:08
  Speaker 4: make this happened, and they were talking about doing it
• 9:12
  Speaker 4: in other countries. They operate more in second and third
• 9:17
  Speaker 4: world countries. I don't know if Germany counts is a
• 9:20
  Speaker 4: first or second World country. I don't think it's considered
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: third world yet. I know they've they've had a lot
• 9:25
  Speaker 4: of changes in the last few years, but they've been
• 9:30
  Speaker 4: heading this way for quite a while. I've been kind
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: of watching because I have some people who follow me
• 9:34
  Speaker 4: on Twitter, and they've basically been using the history of
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: necessary Denazification as a means to fuel this this sort
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: of other nazification.
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: I don't know, well, they're over they're over correcting, like huge,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: it's probably a lot.
• 9:59
  Speaker 4: Worse sirtually doing what looks on the surface like over
• 10:03
  Speaker 4: correction very much. But the leadership, the people that are
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: behind it, they're not over correcting. They're just correcting. They
• 10:13
  Speaker 4: feel that they lost too much control, that they're they're
• 10:18
  Speaker 4: not being allowed to do the things that they need
• 10:22
  Speaker 4: to do in the country to make it compatible with
• 10:25
  Speaker 4: the One World government and those up any men are
• 10:29
  Speaker 4: criticizing the the FRAS and that you can't do that.
• 10:34
  Speaker 4: You can't criticize the old ladies. So you have to
• 10:40
  Speaker 4: deal with this by shutting people up. And this is
• 10:43
  Speaker 4: how they do it. They start by pretending that women
• 10:47
  Speaker 4: are victims of online violence, and they had to create
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: this concept of online violence in order to do this.
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: You literally could just get up and walk away from
• 10:59
  Speaker 4: your computer. So no harm, no physical harm, can be
• 11:04
  Speaker 4: done to you by something that somebody calls you or
• 11:06
  Speaker 4: says to you. And defamation is already an offense of
• 11:12
  Speaker 4: some sort in every first world country. You can sue
• 11:16
  Speaker 4: for it. In some countries it's criminal. In some countries
• 11:20
  Speaker 4: you can actually go to jail for defamation already. So
• 11:24
  Speaker 4: there didn't need to be a new law to specify
• 11:27
  Speaker 4: that defaming women specifically was a bad thing, because it's
• 11:32
  Speaker 4: already bad whether the person that you're defaming is female
• 11:35
  Speaker 4: or not. The thing that has to be proved, however,
• 11:39
  Speaker 4: in regard to those kind of laws, is that the
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: statement was a lie. And what they're doing now is
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: including in the concept of harm and defamation if you
• 11:54
  Speaker 4: tell something that's true, If you say something that's true
• 11:59
  Speaker 4: but it's politically incorrect or it's upsetting, right, then it's
• 12:07
  Speaker 4: suddenly defamation. Or harassment or hate speech. So now if
• 12:13
  Speaker 4: a public official creates a policy or promotes a policy
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: that gets created and imposed on you and it causes
• 12:21
  Speaker 4: problems for everybody, if that public official is female, you
• 12:26
  Speaker 4: can't complain about the policy or the problems that it's
• 12:29
  Speaker 4: causing because that's upsetting and it's politically incorrect, and therefore
• 12:36
  Speaker 4: you're a misogynist if you don't like it. Right, That
• 12:41
  Speaker 4: is really no different than how the Nazis started out.
• 12:47
  Speaker 4: You can't criticize what we're doing, or instead of being
• 12:51
  Speaker 4: a misogynist, it's your jew lover, right, So really it's
• 12:57
  Speaker 4: kind of the same attitude, very different means of getting
• 13:05
  Speaker 4: it across. One way is to make you subject to
• 13:10
  Speaker 4: a prejudice that everybody has against a group of people.
• 13:15
  Speaker 4: The other is to make you subject to a prejudice
• 13:18
  Speaker 4: that everybody has if you don't have a prejudice in
• 13:22
  Speaker 4: favor of a group of people. So there's kind of
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: a little layer there of added. It's a prejudice against
• 13:29
  Speaker 4: a form of thought, independent thought, and it makes it
• 13:34
  Speaker 4: more difficult I think for people to see and I
• 13:36
  Speaker 4: think people are that are that are getting subject to
• 13:39
  Speaker 4: this are going to have a harder time arguing against it.
• 13:42
  Speaker 4: And I don't know if taking the American funding out
• 13:46
  Speaker 4: of these projects is going to change it, because I
• 13:50
  Speaker 4: think the German and government, the German government's all in
• 13:52
  Speaker 4: for this, so they may fund it themselves.
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: Maybe Artful Artful Ours is German. I believe he lives
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: in Germany. It's one of our subscribers. Might.
• 14:07
  Speaker 4: Yeah. I only hope to help the German public with
• 14:12
  Speaker 4: this is to make it blatantly obvious how bad it
• 14:17
  Speaker 4: is by presenting the opposite example ourselves as a nation.
• 14:23
  Speaker 4: And that's going to require a lot of continued work
• 14:27
  Speaker 4: to maintain the direction that we're going right now. But
• 14:34
  Speaker 4: I can't even tell people to hang in there because
• 14:36
  Speaker 4: I don't I don't really know what's going to happen
• 14:38
  Speaker 4: in Germany.
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: Well, Germany is probably one of the most demoralized countries
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: in all of Europe, if not the most demoralized, after
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: so many decades of shame and guilt. So you know,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: as a result of World War Two that they've never
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: come back from that like they I don't think they've
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: ever come back from That's why they're probably one of
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: the most woke countries in all of Europe. But let's
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: I mean, another thing that I didn't mention the write
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: up is that they will confiscate your phone and they're
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: they the finds are like higher than other finds that
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: are more serious, like three grand or something for like
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: online activity is ridiculous. And we've covered censorship and social
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: media like authoritarianism in Europe for a long time. I
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: remember when they tried to ban memes like the Pepe
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: meme way back in the day, in the glory days.
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: So like this has never really changed and as long
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: as there is like in you know, the EUS calling
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: the shots and there's this kind of like woke like
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: we're better people than I don't know, you feel the
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: Americans kind of attitude when it comes to freedom, because
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: it like they kind of like like view American freedom
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: as disdainful because we are okay with people being mean
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: online at least like Americans citizens and maybe not parts
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: of our government. But yeah, so like that they have
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: to change culturally in order for that to change, and
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: that starts with them, like they have to stop apologizing
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: for shit that they're not responsible for.
• 16:15
  Speaker 4: And I want to point something else out about this too.
• 16:17
  Speaker 4: You notice in Germany you can make disparaging remarks about
• 16:23
  Speaker 4: the German people. You can't make disparaging remarks about any
• 16:28
  Speaker 4: immigrants or any group of people that are not German.
• 16:32
  Speaker 4: And you can make disparaging remarks about men, and men
• 16:38
  Speaker 4: are not allowed to complain because that's misogynistic.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: Well, that's the thing that was the primary thing.
• 16:45
  Speaker 4: It's that that Mike points this out all the time, acophobia.
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: Can you hear me, yes, yes, you sound good?
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: Sorry, yeah, carry on.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: Well, I was going to say that the thing I
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: wanted to highlight specifically was because there's a lot of
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: things that they're you know, calling hate speech, but that's
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: not what this channel is about. So I'm not going
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: to get into the other stuff that they are big unsensoring,
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: but specifically, it's interesting that they're calling out what they
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: call anti feminism as hatred, as anti woman. Obviously, this
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: is an old trope that we've heard a lot, but
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: this is a serious problem for them because there's a
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: lot more people getting the word out about all of
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: the dysfunction and all of the destruction that feminism leads
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: in it leads in its wake, and people all over
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: the West that are online are learning about it, especially
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: young men, and I think that's what they're worried about.
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: It's like they're losing the grip, right, the grip on
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: the culture that they had, because it starts when men
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: realize that, you know, like they have that the system
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: is against them. I guess you could say, or that
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: there are systems in place against them and that they
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: have to like be unafraid to speak out. And a
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: lot of this has to come down to criticizing the
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: narrative that is, you know, implicitly puts men in the
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: worst possible category. And they're doing that and they're calling
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: and of course that would be anti feminism, and they're
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: calling that the thing in particular that they're trying to target.
• 18:19
  Speaker 4: You know, there's a pretty solid population of men going
• 18:22
  Speaker 4: their own way in Germany, and like solid enough that
• 18:25
  Speaker 4: they have their own networks, they have their own forums
• 18:30
  Speaker 4: and everything. And I know this because my blog gives
• 18:35
  Speaker 4: me information on who clicks on and so on, and
• 18:40
  Speaker 4: who shares my links to my blog and where. You know,
• 18:45
  Speaker 4: if I get a lot of views from a particular share,
• 18:48
  Speaker 4: I'll find out, you know, where it was shared. And
• 18:53
  Speaker 4: that led me to a German magtau forum and because
• 18:58
  Speaker 4: I had. I had an article on their I think
• 19:02
  Speaker 4: I called it a question of Respect, where I explained
• 19:07
  Speaker 4: that women in general do not understand the concept of respect,
• 19:12
  Speaker 4: so when they demand it, they're not demanding respect, they're
• 19:16
  Speaker 4: demanding veneration. And they don't even understand that they're demanding
• 19:20
  Speaker 4: something different than the word they're using what it means.
• 19:26
  Speaker 4: And I gave an illustration based on an experience I
• 19:29
  Speaker 4: had that was just profoundly stupid, and that got shared
• 19:34
  Speaker 4: all over that actually got shared all over the world,
• 19:38
  Speaker 4: but that that told me something right there, Germany is
• 19:44
  Speaker 4: having the same problems that the United States is having,
• 19:47
  Speaker 4: that Canada is having, that the UK is having, every
• 19:51
  Speaker 4: nation in the world is having with regard to gynocentric
• 19:57
  Speaker 4: intimate partner and sexual violence laws and guyinocentric family court systems.
• 20:04
  Speaker 4: And you know, because there wouldn't be Migtao if there
• 20:07
  Speaker 4: were not those problems, not in the numbers that you
• 20:12
  Speaker 4: need to have a forum where people are sharing information
• 20:16
  Speaker 4: and stuff. And this is probably partly a response to
• 20:23
  Speaker 4: the fact that they have a growing men's rights movement
• 20:26
  Speaker 4: there and a growing manisphere there, and they're having to
• 20:31
  Speaker 4: deal with the fact that men are not obeying the
• 20:36
  Speaker 4: guynocentric I don't know, manifesto, the guynocentric obligations that the
• 20:45
  Speaker 4: government needs them to obey in order to be controllable.
• 20:49
  Speaker 4: So yeah, this I hope that we can see this
• 20:58
  Speaker 4: turned around. But if you're in Germany right now, just
• 21:04
  Speaker 4: be very careful, keep your head down.
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah you can hear me, right, Yes, we can hear you.
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: While I was busy sorting my microphone out, you'll said
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: most of the things that I was going to say. Tempting, though,
• 21:20
  Speaker 2: it is to insinuate that this is all Germany's fault,
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: that Germany is ground zero for the anti nationalists sentiment
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: that's spread all across the world. It would be more
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: accurate to say it started with that false proclamation that
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: it's all Germany's fault, and by extension, that it's all
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: the fault of nationalism, especially of the Western persuasion. And
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: it does seem like ever since World War Two, the
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: West has been hell bent on doing the exact opposite
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: of what the national socialists did, and that means no
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: more nationalism, nothing even resembling nationalism. Even if it's patriotism,
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: that's just a euphemism for it's for the mustache man or.
• 22:09
  Speaker 5: Like.
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: Does that not also mean no more socialism?
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: No?
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: No, No, the national socialists were nationalists. I mean, it's
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: in the name, you can't argue with it. But they
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: were not socialists. They only called themselves that because socialism
• 22:28
  Speaker 2: was so popular at the time. They were riding a bandwagon.
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: Does that not indicate that socialism was part of the
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: contagion at the time. No, we need we need more
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: socialism and no nationalism. We need to transcend. We need
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: to transcend nations. Yet to proceed with socialism to the
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: nth degree, in fact, we need global socialism. Is that
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: not just national socialism but with extra goose steps.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: No.
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: And it's disheartening to me that so many people who
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: used to criticize gender socialism i e. Feminism have since
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: then almost entirely fallen away from that arena and are
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: now laser focused on the immigration problem. They've flipped right
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: back to we need to save the women from the
• 23:25
  Speaker 2: bad men. Women are taking too much responsibility and men
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: need to be punched in the phases. And I'm like, bro,
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: you could get rid of every immigrant tomorrow. I mean,
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: you won't because you've left a bunch of feminists in charge.
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: But even if you did get rid of every immigrant tomorrow,
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: they would all come back the day after tomorrow because
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: you left a bunch of fucking feminists in charge. Feminists
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: hate men, but especially their own men. They blame all
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: the world's problems on whichever men they can get away
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: with blaming, and so they import men from other countries
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: in order to punish and replace their own men. They
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: don't care how many of their own women get abused
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: on mass it's a small price to pay for the
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: sake of ridding the world of those dastardly European men.
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: So it needs to be said, if you're gonna go
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: ahead and ignore the gender socialists in your own country,
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: the feminists in your own country, dare I say, the
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: women in your own country while you relentlessly blame everything
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: on whichever men you can get away with blaming, then
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: you are the feminists. That's exactly what feminists do. You
• 24:44
  Speaker 2: might be a more xenophobic flavor of feminism, but that
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: will inevitably land you right back to the eikophobic kind.
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: That's how we got here. It started with quote unquote
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: white feminism, where they're all help on aborting black children,
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: but it inexorably evolved, like an evil pokemon, into intersectional
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: feminism where they're all hell bent on aborting everyone. Chaos
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: breeds chaos. It will always circle back to the origin
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: of the chaos. A lot of you are out here
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: going German politicians are only creating these draconian anti male
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: laws because they're so overrun with these immigrant men. That's
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: what it's for. They wouldn't be doing this if it
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: wasn't for the immigrants. They wouldn't be doing this if
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: they had a homogeneous population of native men. Yes, they would,
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: you stupid bastards. They've been doing it for decades, since
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: long before this explosion of immigrants. They are not doing
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: this to punish the immigrant men. If they wanted to
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: do that, they would just fucking deport them. Why are
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: they not just departing them? Because how the fuck does
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: deporting immigrants help us punish our own men, That's the
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: bottom line. It's like when someone invented that color changing
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: nail polish that can identify when a drink has been spiked.
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: I don't think that was even real by that. I
• 26:16
  Speaker 2: think it turned out to me a hoax. But the
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: point is the feminist reaction at the time was was
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: not this is great, this will help keep women safe. No,
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: it was this doesn't punish men, so it's an outrage.
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: We're not interested in solutions that keep women safe. We're
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: only interested in putting more restrictions on men. We want
• 26:42
  Speaker 2: curfews on men, we want discrimination against men. We want
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: to create legal mind fields around every men, around all men,
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: in every direction, as far as the eye can see,
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: not just criminal men, all men. And if you don't
• 26:58
  Speaker 2: think this is something that Nazis would have done if
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: they had won the war, in exactly the same way
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: all the other socialists are currently doing, then I have
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: a bridge to sell you, and you would buy that
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: bridge for one hundred billion dollars rather than spending one
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: red scent on a fucking wall, because it's build bridges,
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: not walls, even if those bridges collapse because you insisted
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: they'd be built by women. Get with it, people, solve
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: the feminism problem, and the immigrant problem will solve itself.
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: Address the problem, not just the symptoms of the problem.
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: Deaf ears, I know, but I'd rather shout into deaf
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: ears than silently press my own ear against a deaf cunt.
• 27:46
  Speaker 2: Message in.
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: All right, well, thank you for your feedback and thoughts
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: on this. What do you guys think about what Germany
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: is doing? Does I don't know? Does this mean that
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: the that the messages are getting strong enough that they
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: have to respond and make it a vocal thing. I
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: know that our free speech in the United States can
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: be contagious in other countries that have never experienced it before,
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: and that scares people in power. But maybe I don't
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: know what I'm talking about. Let me know what you
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: guys think in the comments. We're gonna move on to
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: the next story. All right, this may seem like gossip
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: or drama at first, but there are a couple things
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: about this that I think is worth putting a spotlight on.
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: So let's talk a little bit about this Ashley Saint
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: Clair versus Elon Musk situation. So there is a woman
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: who is a I guess a somewhat well known online
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: conservative in quotes influencer named Ashley Saint Clair, and she
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: has recently come forward with claims that she gave birth
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: to Elon Musk's thirteen shot thirteenth five months ago. She
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: announced it on x on February fourteenth, twenty twenty five,
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: that's Valentine's Day, after reportedly learning that tabloid media was
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: about to report on it. According to her, Saint Clair,
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: who has kept the pregnancy secret for supposedly private and
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: safety reasons, stated that she and Musk were negotiating an
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: agreement on raising their child. Musk's response to these allegations
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: was a cryptic woe on X, without directly confirming or
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: denying the claim. Saint Clair's representative this her lawyer has
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: mentioned awaiting Musk's acknowledgment to end speculation and finalize private agreements.
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: The reaction on social media has been mixed, with some
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: users questioning Saint Clair's timing and motives, which is fair
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: because it was on Valentine's Day given her conservative background
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: and her history of making statements criticized as misogynistic or transphobic,
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: but also oh, she has been known to fight a
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: lot with what she calls the misogynist parts of the right,
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: So the you know, the male I guess you could
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: say just the anti feminist right or the red pill
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: right or whatever. I mean. It's like the language is
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: all over the place, regardless. But she was on an
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: episode of Triggernometry which I'm going to talk about in
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: a second. That's what I know her from, because she
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: was on there saying that we should do something about
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: these male anti feminist influencers right that are like shitting
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: on women online. Meanwhile, she's a single mom if that's true.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: She was a single mom before this, so she's double
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: single mom right now. But anyway, the public reaction has
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: been mixed, with some users questioning Saint Claire's timing and
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: motives given her conservative background and history of making statements
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: criticize the misogynistic or transphobic. Saint Clair is known for
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: her book Elephants Are Not Birds and her association with
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: MAGA and conservative media like The Babblebe which she used
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: to work for her or does maybe still. Her decision
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: to go public has led to discussions about Musk's personal life,
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: his public image, and the implications for both their careers.
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: Omitst ongoing media and public scrutiny. Now, a couple of
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: things I want to say before we get into it. Okay,
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: it is already it should already be known to everyone
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: that what Elon Musk does with his personal time should
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: not have any impact on the stuff that he's doing
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: in terms of like working with Doge. Okay, but there
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: are a lot of people who want to see him fail,
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: and they want to see by extension, our country to fail.
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: They want to see us fail, so they're going to
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: indulge in all of this nonsense, this noise. But I
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: will say this, So Musk has a lot of kids
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: with a lot of different mommies. Okay, well, at least
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: a few. Let me look at the notes I have here,
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: which I'll be able to tell you guys a little
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: bit more so. Musk has twelve living children, and he
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: has three different mothers that we know of. Justine Wilson
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: they have six kids together, Grimes they have three children together.
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: And Chevn Zillis they have three children together. I'm not
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: sure which one of these bo when he's married to.
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: I think it's Chevn. I think that's his wife right now.
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: So Elon Musk is by no means a trad con
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: at all. So that's right right off the bat. People
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: are claiming that because he's working with Trump that makes
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: him conservative or something that's obviously not true. These are
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: all just individual people doing their their thing to help out.
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: I mean, like you know, Robert F. Kennedy Junior and
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: Tulsi Gabbard were Democrats and they came over to work
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: with Trump. Elon Musk obviously.
• 32:39
  Speaker 4: Like gard was a libertarian, Well.
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: She was, No, she was a Democrat, and then she
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: moved towards libertarianism. She was a Democrat for most of
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: her political career actually, but you know, she moved towards
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: I don't know, like she's probably still her views are
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: probably still mostly the same.
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: But libertarian like a contradiction in terms.
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: Probably I think it is, yes, But but the thing
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: is is that what I'm saying is that Trump's cabinet
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: is not what the left makes it out to be.
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: It is not a bunch of like hard right christianationalists. No,
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: they're They're all different. But that's not the most interesting
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: thing it is. Again. Ashley Saint Clair is is an
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: interesting example because she's kind of an engagement farmer and
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: an attention seeker online. She timed her statement for you know,
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: Valentine's Day, and also this stuff going on in the
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: Oval office with Elon Musk going there to talk to
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: Trump about DOJE and all the stuff that they were doing.
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: So you have like this really meaningful stuff that the
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: American people are paying attention to that they want to
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: get answers for. And then she comes out of nowhere
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: and says, you're pregnant with my baby, and we got
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: to talk about that, and she makes it very public.
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: So there, you know, there's a few things to look
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: at that. And then you have the fact that Ashley
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: Saint Clair and this is why I think she's kind
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: of I don't want to overuse the word drifter, but
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: there's definitely some shady shit going on with her. So
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: she was on triggerednometry, and when she was on triggernometry,
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: she was there one of the things that they talked
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: about with the guys that triggernometry, it is like Constantine
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: Kissin and the other guy whose name I can't remember.
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: She was basically trying to address what she's calling the
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: misogynistic parts of the right, or the misogynist right, or
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: the male centered right, or the masculiness right, whatever. And
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: this is the same stuff, by the way that people
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: like Sidney Watson and Shoe on Nutshoe, although maybe a
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: little bit, but Sidney Watson and Lauren Southern were also
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: talking about like this is a problem we have to
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: address it. Why is there so much misogyny in this thing?
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: And she was a part of that thing, even though
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: she kind of came out of nowhere. And the thing
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: that I think is interesting about that is that, first
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: of all, we don't know if it's true. I've tried
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: to find out if any of this is really confirmed.
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: Everyone's operating under the presumption that it is that she's
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: got Elon's baby. Okay, we don't know yet. Unless there's
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: some news that I did not see, I don't see
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: it right now. But what is interesting is that if
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: it was true, it wouldn't make the MAGA movement look bad.
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: It would only make her look bad. And it would
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: also make a point that I think is interesting because
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: she is concerned about like the Andrew Tates and the
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: Freshes and Fits and the whatever podcast people, because those
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: are the people she brings up by name on trigonometry.
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: But she is but why is that, Well, those guys
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: they're they're kind of like an example of the Harem effect.
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: Like you have this thing where these guys that are
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: they're operating at the top levels, they're getting like multiple women,
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: and that's the that's what we're having now, Like hypergamy
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: is at a point where, you know, very a very
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: small percentage of men have access to the most women,
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: and like it or not, Elon Musk is one of
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: those men. Hence he's got you know, thirteen kids from
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: like several different women, and god knows how many others plus.
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: And I thought this was really funny. Elon Musk himself
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: said that he was a big fan of Genghis Khan,
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: who fathered hundreds of kids. Amast the amainst these claims
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: made by Ashley Saint Clair, what kind of man would like.
• 36:29
  Speaker 4: One in two hundred men in Asia throughout all of
• 36:34
  Speaker 4: Asia is a direct descendant of Genghis Khan, right.
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: And but like, what I'm getting at is, though, what
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: are the conditions? What kind of society would we live
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: in where one man could father or sire several children
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: from different women if those women weren't a part of that? Like,
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: how can any one of those women also complain about
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: men complaining about the state of dating and relationships and
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: marriage and family when they're a part of the harem,
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: like they're participating in this, so it doesn't matter. Like
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: that's the thing about it that I found interesting. I
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: don't care about the drama. I don't care about actually
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: saying Claire as a person I know that she's just
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: another like you know, attention like seeking, you know, kind
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: of like supposed influencer personality. But she's not saying anything groundbreaking.
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: She's not that interesting, but she does sort of highlight,
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: you know, a nature that we're seeing and the effort
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: to or the desire to own Elon Musk by saying, oh,
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: you you have a kid with me and you're not
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: taking care of your kid. Well, so what like Elon
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: Musk is not he's not a traccon obviously, he's just
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: he's just whatever he is, and you are opening your
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: legs for him, if that's true, and you're just number thirteen.
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: And what's what's funniest is is that when he was
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: at the White House, he took pictures with Zella or
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: whatever the other the most recent woman is like they
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: have pictures together and they're like setting each other heart
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: emojis online and stuff, and actually Saint Clair is just
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: like not in the picture. So she's not just if
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: it's true, she's she's got a baby with a guy
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: who has no interest in her, and she's not getting
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: like any of the attentions she's trying to seek out.
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: So but what I wanted to highlight was a the
• 38:30
  Speaker 1: fact that Elon Musk is not politically in line with
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: people that he's working with, and that this whole coalition
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: is just a bunch of people with disparaging views trying
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: to accomplish a similar goal. But two that Ashley Saint
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: Clair is an example of the harem effect that we
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: are seeing in our modern society today, where the you know,
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: women are all looking for the small group of men
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: and Elon Musk is one of those men. As weird
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: as he is, he's the richest guy in the world,
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: so guess what you know. So anyway, that's that. Those
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: are my thoughts on.
• 39:03
  Speaker 2: That, And to state what seems kind of obvious, if
• 39:09
  Speaker 2: you don't want a certain matter to be public, then
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: surely the best course of action would be to not
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: make it public. But the logic with which we're being
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: presented is from Ashley Sickly, is the media is definitely
• 39:27
  Speaker 2: going to publicize this information, and I know this for
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: a fact, so I'm gonna get out ahead of it
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: and publicize it first. And then the thing I don't
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: want to happen, will definitely happen, and then at least
• 39:43
  Speaker 2: I'm in charge of my own destiny, in charge of
• 39:47
  Speaker 2: the narrative. And I guess this is to deny the
• 39:53
  Speaker 2: media the opportunity to run with this story. Well they are.
• 39:59
  Speaker 2: They're all all talking about this now, whether they think
• 40:04
  Speaker 2: actually as a hero and Elon is a chad or
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: if they think you're both degenerates and they just want
• 40:10
  Speaker 2: to smear you from the left perspective or the right perspective.
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: The whole world knows about it now and is talking
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: about it. If this bombshell was indeed dropped in some
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: tabloid rag or extra extra deadbeat Elon Musk fathers an
• 40:27
  Speaker 2: illegitimate child with some far right online thought, I for
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: one would read that and I'd be like, yeah, all right,
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: good one, And Prince Harry was abducted by aliens and
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: someone found the shroud of Chirin at the bottom of
• 40:42
  Speaker 2: a milkshake or whatever. I don't believe you. You're all
• 40:46
  Speaker 2: congenital liars who lie all the time. Why wouldn't you
• 40:49
  Speaker 2: be lying now? And maybe the story would cause a
• 40:54
  Speaker 2: mob of smear merchant reporters to turn up at Ashley
• 40:57
  Speaker 2: start going, is this true? Do you have any comment?
• 41:01
  Speaker 2: And she could just say nothing. She wouldn't even have
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: to deny it. She could just be like, I'm not
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: even going to entertain this report, leave me alone, and
• 41:10
  Speaker 2: I would be like, yeah, I wouldn't entertain these fucking
• 41:13
  Speaker 2: cockroaches either, Good for you, and we'd go. Remember when
• 41:18
  Speaker 2: the Gutter Press accused Actually Sinclair of carrying Elon Musk's child. No, no,
• 41:23
  Speaker 2: I don't remember that. It went in and out of
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: the New cycle in a day. At the time, I
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: was reasonably sure it was all bollocks, and it immediately
• 41:32
  Speaker 2: fell out of my memory in favor of a million
• 41:35
  Speaker 2: things that are far more important. But since she dropped
• 41:39
  Speaker 2: the story herself, I mean, I'm still not sure it's true.
• 41:43
  Speaker 2: I'm more inclined to believe it when it comes straight
• 41:46
  Speaker 2: from the horse's mouth. I'm more inclined to remember it
• 41:50
  Speaker 2: when it comes in the horse's mouth. From the horse's mouth,
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: sorry Freudian slip intended. So and so now I'm left
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: pondering two possibilities. Either actually Sinclair is a degenerate single
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: mother double single mother by two different baby daddies by choice,
• 42:09
  Speaker 2: or she's simply a liar. Neither of these possibilities reflects
• 42:15
  Speaker 2: particularly well on her, So I don't quite understand what
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: she could be achieving other than shooting herself in the foot,
• 42:24
  Speaker 2: or shooting herself in the other foot, or shooting yourself
• 42:26
  Speaker 2: at both feet. I'm reminded of a quote by the
• 42:31
  Speaker 2: late David Hume, later made famous by the late Christopher
• 42:34
  Speaker 2: Hitchins ahem, which is more likely that the whole natural
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: order is to be suspended or that a Jewish minx
• 42:45
  Speaker 2: should tell a lie end quote.
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: Now, obviously Hume.
• 42:51
  Speaker 2: Was talking about someone else. You could probably get who.
• 42:55
  Speaker 2: But it's a quote that becomes more and more apposite
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: as history unfolds before us. And I'm not just being
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: anti Semitic there, I'm also being quite anti Christian. So oh,
• 43:09
  Speaker 2: it all balances out quite nicely, and it's technically politically correct.
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: I think I'll leave it there.
• 43:16
  Speaker 4: Oh, there you go. I think one of the most
• 43:21
  Speaker 4: obvious things in this situation is that Elon Musk has
• 43:24
  Speaker 4: trusted far too many women.
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, for sure, he really needs to He needs
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: to watch some of our videos. I just put it
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: that way.
• 43:35
  Speaker 4: Yeah, we don't know if she's telling the truth, you know,
• 43:38
  Speaker 4: we don't have any way, And his response really doesn't
• 43:44
  Speaker 4: give any answer one way or another, and it wouldn't
• 43:47
  Speaker 4: really matter it does. It's not our business, and it's
• 43:51
  Speaker 4: offensive that she made it everybody's business. I resent having
• 43:55
  Speaker 4: to think about this at all, actually, but that's really
• 44:00
  Speaker 4: the thing that's stuck out for me the most in
• 44:02
  Speaker 4: this is that even one of the smartest men in
• 44:08
  Speaker 4: the world isn't too wise to be beyond trusting women
• 44:16
  Speaker 4: when maybe he should not.
• 44:20
  Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, but yeah, nonetheless revealing an interesting but ultimately
• 44:28
  Speaker 5: I thought it was an interesting case study on the whole.
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: Well, what do when women generalize negatively about men? They
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: are drawing from personal experience, and that's why it doesn't
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: ring true. So if she is even saying something that's
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: based on something she's actually experienced and not simply farming
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: for attention her examples, well you know, they sort of
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: demonstrate her her bias. So you know, when you see
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: these women, for example, these three or four is on
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: the whatever podcast whining about men, they're whinnying about a
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: certain kind of man, not the common man, not the
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: man that they don't see.
• 45:10
  Speaker 4: They're whining about men they can't control.
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know.
• 45:14
  Speaker 4: That's that's the bottom line, and honestly, this woman had
• 45:21
  Speaker 4: better hope that she. I wouldn't say that Elon Musk
• 45:25
  Speaker 4: is necessarily a simple some some people are saying that
• 45:30
  Speaker 4: other people are saying is the Antichrist. So there's a
• 45:32
  Speaker 4: whole range of things there. But he's definitely simp adjacent.
• 45:38
  Speaker 4: If this is true. She may desimplify him.
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: Well, she's probably trying to get some money out of it.
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: Let's let's be real.
• 45:47
  Speaker 4: Yeah, probably, yeah, But he better hope she doesn't desimplify
• 45:53
  Speaker 4: him too much, because every woman on welfare in the
• 45:58
  Speaker 4: country is going to be gun her throat after that.
• 46:03
  Speaker 4: M because where where do you think dose is going
• 46:05
  Speaker 4: to go looking next?
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: Well, they've already exposed a bunch of a Social Security
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: scam that's like crazy.
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: But as long as he doesn't get divorced, he gets
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: he gets to keep most of his money. I don't
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: think he's married exactly. He's smart enough not to get married,
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: never to get divorced. He's not going to make the
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: same mistake as Bill Gates or.
• 46:27
  Speaker 4: Jeff in California.
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: Well, I don't know, but if he if she wants
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: a difference calimony, if she wants money. If she wants
• 46:35
  Speaker 2: a million dollars a year, that's pocket changed to wheel
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: and he's like, yeah, I hand over a million dollars,
• 46:41
  Speaker 2: he gets at all thirteen of my children, and I'm
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: still the richest man in the world. So he's he's
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: he is as long as he doesn't get him broiled
• 46:50
  Speaker 2: in in in the in the marriage courts and all that,
• 46:53
  Speaker 2: he's sort of playing it right. If his aim is
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: to father as many children as possible, and that does
• 46:59
  Speaker 2: seem to be he's he's he's doing the game his
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: cam thing because he he thinks he's in a simulation.
• 47:05
  Speaker 2: He's trying to win the game. And and in case
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: the objective of the game is to pass on your
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: genes to as many people as possible, then he's doing
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: it right. And that's what lots of people think. It's
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: not necessarily a right or left thing. A lot of
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: people have concluded that the meaning of life is to
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: pass on your genes to as many lives as possible.
• 47:27
  Speaker 2: And if that's what he's trying to do, then on
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: those grounds, he's he's winning. And I disagree. I think
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: there's more to life than that. But he's he's also
• 47:40
  Speaker 2: doing that. He's also heading up five companies.
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: Know who else? You know who else was like that
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: that believe the same thing about passing your genes and
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: all that. Jeff Jeffrey Epstein. There you go, Yes he did.
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not saying these guys are the same.
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that. I'm saying that there are people.
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: It takes all kinds. So but yeah, yeah, yeah, I
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: mean that's I will, Well, he was, but I don't
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: think he plans on getting married. So but nonetheless, you know,
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: you make your bed, you lay in it. I don't
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: know what else to tell you, but that's not going
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: to deter anybody. But anyway, Hannah, were you finished with your.
• 48:22
  Speaker 4: This is I will say, this is possible, This is
• 48:26
  Speaker 4: not beyond. This is the man. This is a man
• 48:29
  Speaker 4: who dated Amber heard said he's trusted far too many women.
• 48:34
  Speaker 4: So we don't know what parts of this story are fact.
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: He definitely he definitely needs a change of taste in women.
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: Examine that for sure.
• 48:46
  Speaker 4: But I will say this, it's it's kind of proving
• 48:51
  Speaker 4: the in cells, right, you gotta have you gotta have
• 48:56
  Speaker 4: the U the sixes, I guess, and and if you
• 49:00
  Speaker 4: don't have all of them. Well, there's always IVF. We
• 49:03
  Speaker 4: don't know, you know, maybe he's not interested in being
• 49:08
  Speaker 4: in romantic relationships with the women that he fathers children with,
• 49:11
  Speaker 4: and maybe he's keeping his romantic relationships in a different direction.
• 49:15
  Speaker 4: We don't know.
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but.
• 49:19
  Speaker 4: This woman didn't go for the DNA of some nobody
• 49:25
  Speaker 4: with no money and no looks. Mm hm, all right,
• 49:29
  Speaker 4: some short guy that nobody ever heard of. So when
• 49:34
  Speaker 4: people accuse in cells of making that shit up just
• 49:39
  Speaker 4: to have something to feel bad about, remember this story.
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah there you go. All right, Well, let us know
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this one. In the comments.
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: I got to catch up on some super chats and
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: super childs and whatnot. So first I got a rumble
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: rant from earlier from Nova fan twenty one for a dollar,
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: and he says, Eli takes his child to the White
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: House Greta Thumberg, and I took that personally, and then
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: Blade Kaiser gave us five dollars rumbull rant and says,
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: when I heard the Ashley story, I thought, why would
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: a conservative woman be willing willing to be a single mother?
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: Then I thought, well, I guess women are gonna be
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: two women which I don't like thinking. But hey, I
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: don't think she's conservative, blade, but thank you.
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: Conservative doesn't mean that you don't do the fucking hypergamy thing,
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: as we've discovered.
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but she was. She was very critical of women
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: for becoming single mothers. So I mean that I think
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: that that if there's like one conservative value that makes sense,
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: it's to not like have kids out of wedlock. It's
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: like the I don't know if that's like step one.
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: I think she's not following that. But you know, she's
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: like I I think that there are people who are
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: disingenuous about their beliefs and they don't live according to
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: what they preach, and they are all over the place,
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: you know, politically, and I think she is one of
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: these people. And plus yeah, a lot of them are women,
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: not all of them. But the fact that she she
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: she went she went from no somebody I never heard
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: of to suddenly like you know, doing all over the
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: rounds everywhere, And I was like, who is this? Like
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: whenever people come out of nowhere and they become super
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: like internet famous overnight, I become very suspicious. So anyway,
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying she's a fat I'm just saying there's
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: something artificial going on there, and then like to you know,
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: get the attention of somebody like Musk. I mean, come on,
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: okay anyway, Oh I see, you get.
• 51:45
  Speaker 4: A lot of money behind that, and we were looking
• 51:48
  Speaker 4: this week into where that money comes from.
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: So yeah, we will continue to Yeah, you.
• 51:54
  Speaker 4: Will find that when you're reading the news, pretty much
• 52:00
  Speaker 4: much everything you're reading about is a syop. If you
• 52:03
  Speaker 4: watch the news on television, pretty much everything you're watching
• 52:07
  Speaker 4: is a sy up. If you're seeing people link to
• 52:10
  Speaker 4: news articles and discuss the news on social media, pretty
• 52:14
  Speaker 4: much everything you're seeing them talk about is a syopy.
• 52:18
  Speaker 4: It's the sooner you get we aren't living in a simulation.
• 52:24
  Speaker 4: We're living in a syop. And the sooner you guys
• 52:28
  Speaker 4: know that, the sooner you guys understand that, you know,
• 52:31
  Speaker 4: the sooner we can start shutting it down.
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah all right, So one more rumble rant from OIC
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: who says elon Nis needs to make anime cat girls
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: all real already for a dollar, thank you? O see,
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: And that's it for the rumble rants. Now I'll read
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: the super Child. So there was one from yesterday that
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: came in right after we stopped so I'm gonna read
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: it because you know it's where we're here now. Zara
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: AANX yesterday gave us five dollars and said, has anyone
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: ever asked feminists how men utilize the power and control?
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: Alleged at the same time said use of such tactics
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: are being complained about by feminists and has there ever
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: been any attempt at a satisfactory answer how men utilize
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: their power control? Alleged at the time said use of
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: such taxes are being complained about, and yeah, go ahead.
• 53:27
  Speaker 4: When you ask a feminist a question like that, her
• 53:31
  Speaker 4: response is very similar to what happens when you catch
• 53:34
  Speaker 4: a cat falling down the stairs by accident. Right as
• 53:38
  Speaker 4: soon as soon as she realizes you noticed, the cat
• 53:42
  Speaker 4: will turn around and bathe her tail, and women similarly
• 53:47
  Speaker 4: will cover their ass when they make a mistake and
• 53:50
  Speaker 4: you pointed out the subject will get changed, right, the
• 53:56
  Speaker 4: allegations will come out, the darvo attacks will start. You
• 54:00
  Speaker 4: will never get an explanation, You will never get the
• 54:03
  Speaker 4: answer that you're looking for.
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm, all right, and then I got a super
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: child from Meredith g gives us five dollars and says
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: HBr news for ninety honey for the Badgers, and thanks
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: for reminding me why I need to not eat my
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: dinner while listening to the show. I got beef stews. Good.
• 54:24
  Speaker 2: Just wait till the next story. Yeah, finish before you
• 54:28
  Speaker 2: get to the next story. Yeah, please.
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: And then Richard Bierre gave us five and says, I
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: would say something about not sticking it in crazy, but
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: the baby was conceived by IVF, so Elon didn't actually
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: stick it in the crazy. However, this technically might not
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: be applicable though. Well, I don't know if we know
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: that again, that there is a baby. Maybe there is, but.
• 54:51
  Speaker 4: We don't know that there is his baby. Yeah, we
• 54:55
  Speaker 4: don't know anything about the situation.
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: That's true. If you were a woman and you were
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: like kind of loose and you banged like different dudes,
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: but one of them happened to be Elon Musk and
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: you got pregnant, I would probably go for the you
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: did it thing, because that's where the bank is at.
• 55:13
  Speaker 4: James, IVF doesn't involve any banging.
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: Well, yeah, but that's we don't know that.
• 55:18
  Speaker 4: That's her story, Is that it was IVF?
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: Is that her story?
• 55:23
  Speaker 4: Yes, okay, that there was an agreement he was asking
• 55:26
  Speaker 4: her to keep it quiet, and she blabbed because the
• 55:31
  Speaker 4: media was gonna blab. I'll be honest if she did
• 55:36
  Speaker 4: blab about if this was all true, and she blabbed
• 55:39
  Speaker 4: because he really should be angry with her, because if
• 55:43
  Speaker 4: the media blabbed when the couple non couple, couple was
• 55:49
  Speaker 4: not talking about it, if it was true, there could
• 55:53
  Speaker 4: have been lawsuits because that was their private life that
• 55:57
  Speaker 4: was dug into, and that's that's you know, stalking, harassment,
• 56:04
  Speaker 4: slander or libel. If it's printed defamation, they would have
• 56:09
  Speaker 4: to prove that they had that information and they knew
• 56:14
  Speaker 4: for a fact. And the thing about IVF is it's
• 56:17
  Speaker 4: a medical procedure, right, It's not just a random service.
• 56:23
  Speaker 4: It's not like going for coffee and having somebody make
• 56:26
  Speaker 4: you a coffee. It's done in a medical office and
• 56:31
  Speaker 4: it's covered by HIPPA. So a random reporter should not
• 56:36
  Speaker 4: be able to just find out who has had IVF,
• 56:41
  Speaker 4: much less who the sperm donor was. Like, their first
• 56:48
  Speaker 4: layer of information is that it happened, the second layer
• 56:52
  Speaker 4: of information is at what facility, and the third layer
• 56:57
  Speaker 4: of information is who else was involved? So that's there's
• 57:02
  Speaker 4: no way somebody should have been able to get that
• 57:04
  Speaker 4: far into the story, unless you know, she told people
• 57:08
  Speaker 4: in her life and they told reporters, in which case, again,
• 57:14
  Speaker 4: the reporters wouldn't be able to prove that the information
• 57:18
  Speaker 4: they had was factual. They would be printing gossip. But
• 57:25
  Speaker 4: so it wasn't just a stupid mistake that got people
• 57:29
  Speaker 4: talking about her and all that. She prevented herself and
• 57:35
  Speaker 4: possibly him from being able to sue the media for
• 57:39
  Speaker 4: defamation for this story coming out.
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, well, let us know what you guys
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: think about this one in the comments. I'd be curious
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: about your thoughts regarding, well, this whole thing and some
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: of the ways that we discussed it tried to spot
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: trying a different light on it and not make it
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: about the drama. All right, well, I look forward to
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: seeing your thoughts on that. Let us move on to
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: the last story. This is the face of Evil. So
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: in Pataz Peru, a shocking crime of passion unfolded when
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: Catherine Milagros Juarez Bermudez, Yeah that's her full name. This
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: is the woman pictured here. Catherine Milagros Juarez Bermudez allegedly
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: murdered her boyfriend. Well she she was arrested, so Jose
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: Antonio Pisan Penya in a gruesome manner. According to reports,
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: Juarez Bermudez discovered that Penya had been unfaithful, leading her
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: to take extreme measures of revenge while he was asleep.
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: This is always the problem, sleeping around women that hate you.
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: She reportedly used a kitchen knife to sever his testicles
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: and act driven by rage over his infidelity. The attack
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: was so severe that Penya, despite being rushed to the
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: nearest hospital, which has which was a significant distance away,
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: did not survive his injuries. The aftermath of.
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: It, and again, a band kitchen knives in Peru, Now, yeah,
• 59:06
  Speaker 2: that's that's the only way to prevent these cars. Then
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: she'll have to use a cheese grater or something, and
• 59:11
  Speaker 2: that's a lot more difficult.
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: Oh. The aftermath of this brutal act show saw local
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: authorities quickly arresting Juarez Bermudez. The case has since drawn
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: widespread attention due to the nature of the crime, highlighting
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: issues of jealousy and violence in relationships. Police described the
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: incident as a clear case of a crime of passion,
• 59:30
  Speaker 1: noting that such acts are not uncommon, but rarely reached
• 59:33
  Speaker 1: this level of brutality. The community of Pataz has been
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: left in shock, prompting discussions of the societal pressures and
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: the handling of emotions in relationships. The legal proceedings against
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: Wuarez Bermudez are expected to delve into a psychological aspects
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: of her actions alongside the straightforward criminal charges. So he
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: may they may be making the case for temporary insanity
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: or something like that.
• 59:57
  Speaker 2: Crime of passion might ass By the way, Yeah, that's
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: usually a factor that separates first degree from second degree.
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 2: If you're having a heated argument with someone and during
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: that argument you strike out with your fist or with
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: whatever weapon you happen to be holding at the time,
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 2: and by chance that causes the person to die, that's
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: like either manslaughter or second degree murder. Maybe I am
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: ignorant of the law here, but surely if you stab
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 2: someone in their sleep while they pose no threat to
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 2: you whatsoever, and there is no heat of the moment,
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: that is first degree. You planned what you were going
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: to do, you planned when you were going to do it,
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: and you made sure it wasn't a fair fight, wasn't
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: even a fight. And make no mistake, if Stabbing someone
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 2: to death counts as murder, regardless of the degree. Then
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 2: it is worse, much worse to saw through someone's body
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: with the express purpose of leaving them in two pieces.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: Stabbing someone once can be a crime of passion in
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 2: some circumstances. Stabbing someone two or three times I mean
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 2: at a stretch, that could be a crime of passion
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 2: if you genuinely think it's the only way to save
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 2: your own life. But taking the time to actively butcher
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 2: your victim, even if they're awake at the time, is
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: a first degree crime, even if you don't intend to
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: kill them. And if you claim you didn't know that
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 2: sawing off a body part can kill someone, then you
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: are too stupid to exist. If you cut off someone's ear,
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: they can blete to death. If you cut off the
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: tip of someone's pinky finger, they can bleed to death.
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 2: If you happen to nick someone in an artery with
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 2: a razor blade, they can bleed to death. Whether you
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 2: know this or not, you clearly don't care if this
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: person dies, and that's the point. Displaying a reckless disregard
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 2: for someone's life is the point. I don't care. If
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 2: you're a seventy IQ imbecile who has no idea how
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 2: the human circulatory system works, or if you're a cold
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 2: blooded psychopath who is determined to end a life. Either way,
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 2: you are extremely dangerous and you should not be allowed
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 2: to walk the streets. The only reason this case is
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 2: considered in any way controversial is because the body part
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 2: in question is not an ear or a pinky finger.
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 2: It's a body part with which women cannot empathize. Certain
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 2: women cannot empathize. Oh she cut off his toe. Oh
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 2: that's awful. I can imagine my toe being cut off.
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 2: She cut off his nipple. Oh that's horrendous. I can
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: imagine my nipple being cut off. He cut off her labia.
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: Oh death row. I want him in the electric chair
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 2: with a dry sponge and no blindfold, and I want
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: it yesterday, No trial, no nothing, Kill him where he
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: stands and make it as painful as possible. But she
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: cut off his testicles?
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 4: Lol?
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 2: What did she do with the testicles? Did she put
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 2: them in the garbage disposal?
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: Ah?
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 2: I could just imagine them go round and around. It's
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: like putting meatballs and a blender. What's the problem. Do
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: testicles even have blood in them, Well, who cares. He
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: must have done something to deserve it. She's obviously a
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: very proud and passionate individual who don't need no man.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: You go girl. Furthermore, if a man stabs a woman
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: in the womb via the vaginal canal, well, it depends
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: is he trying to kill her or is he trying
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: to kill someone else, perhaps a diminutive male specimen, a parasite,
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 2: if you will, who would otherwise, in the event of
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: his birth, in all likelihood grow up to be some
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 2: raging misogynist who goes around stabbing women in the womb,
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 2: and we can't have that. I think I've said enough.
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 2: I should stopped before I continue this trajectory any further.
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: Let's keep it family friendly. A nothing to see here, people, Remember,
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: we need to save the women from those hastardly men
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: who we don't like. There is nothing else worth addressing.
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: The only thing the government is doing wrong is neglecting
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: to protect women. Shut up, go away, la, la, shut
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: up not listening. Ah, leave a li like in a comment,
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 2: and don't forget to share because sharing's characters.
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: Let me go. I just want to tell you. I
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: just want to say, Passport Bros. Don't go to Peru. Okay, yeah, Magnus.
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 4: Years ago, when I was discussing intimate partner violence on
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 4: Reddit and talking about one of the things that we've
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 4: had to talk about quite a bit for a long time,
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 4: really because feminists keep harping on numbers, is that domestic violence,
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 4: intimate partner violence is more frequently perpetrated by women than
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 4: by men. The research has been out for a long
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 4: time showing that.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: Mike, you're buzzing, Mike, you're buzzing. I'm gonna view.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 4: Them all right, showing that that seventy percent of one
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 4: way innimate partner violence is female perpetrated, and that two
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 4: way intimate partner violence is associated with more frequent perpetration
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 4: among women but not among men, which means that even
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 4: among two way violent relationships, women are perpetrating sometimes and
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 4: the men are not hitting back. So the women are
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 4: hitting first most of the time. And this is this
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 4: is something that feminists would like to deny. And so
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 4: since that type that that information came out, they wrote
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 4: papers and did research where they asked women what their
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 4: reasons were for hitting. And it's interesting way they tried
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 4: to deal with this, like they have the power and
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 4: control wheel in their Deluthe model where they try to
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 4: make it out that men are using violence to control women.
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 4: So if a man feels that a woman isn't obeying him,
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 4: or if he thinks that she's too free with her
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 4: attention to other people and stuff like that, his violence
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 4: in that moment is an attempt at controlling her behavior. Right,
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 4: you can't hit a woman for saying the wrong thing,
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 4: you can't hit a woman for cheating on you, you
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 4: can't hit a woman for disrespecting you. But when they
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 4: talked about female violence, those were justifying factors. A woman
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 4: was acting in self defense if she felt disrespected in
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 4: the moment. A woman was acting in self defense if
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 4: she thought a man was cheating on her. And a
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 4: woman was acting in self defense if she thought that
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 4: a man was rude or verbally aggress toward her. And
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 4: this tolerance for women engaging in violence as a means
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 4: of controlling male behavior and calling it self defense. When
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 4: a woman is using violence to control male behavior, even
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 4: when it's nothing to do with aggression. The man isn't
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 4: doing anything to her. He's not hitting her, he's not
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 4: trying to rape her, he's not engaging in any kind
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 4: of aggression. He's not trying to steal her money or anything,
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 4: all right, just doing things that she disapproves, right, the
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 4: things that make her angry. That's treated to self defense.
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 4: That convinces women that they can get away with things,
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 4: and they expect to get away with things. And when
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 4: the media reports on stuff like this as a crime
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 4: of passion rather than a woman using intimate partner vie
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 4: violence to control a man's behavior, Right, how dare you
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 4: be with someone else instead of me? Right? That is
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 4: why women like this feel entitled to act like that.
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 4: It's exactly what feminists would tell you about a man
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 4: who does this kind of thing. Right. If a man
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 4: kills his girlfriend because she's cheating or he thinks she's cheating,
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 4: we get told that society approves of that kind of
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 4: behavior and treats that kind of behavior like it's normal.
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 4: And that's why this guy felt like he could do that. Right,
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 4: But who is doing that with women? Feminists? Feminists treat
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 4: this kind of behavior like it's normal. Feminists invented a
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 4: defense in court for when a woman who is in
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 4: a relationship where she feels that she's being abused and
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 4: she might be being abused. She might even be in danger. Right,
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 4: but she chooses not to use the vast network of
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 4: domestic violence shelters and domestic violence advocacy that is paid
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 4: for by the national government of every first world country
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 4: in the world, and kills the guy instead in his sleep. Right.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 4: They have a whole defense for that. They call it
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 4: batter woman syndrome. It doesn't work for men either. This
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 4: has to stop. This woman didn't commit a crime of passion.
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 4: She engaged in an attempt at using power to control
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 4: this man's behavior, and she killed him. She acted on ray.
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 4: That was that stemmed from entitlement to control his behavior. Right,
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 4: she felt entitled to his loyalty. We don't know that
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 4: he had a reason to be loyal to this woman.
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 4: We know that she got so out of control when
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 4: she was angry that she killed him. That usually isn't
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 4: a one off. What kind of relationship was that, What
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 4: kind of household was he living in? What kind of
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 4: environment did she subject him to? Maybe he cheated because
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 4: she was a fucking bitch. Yeah, Maybe he cheated because
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 4: he didn't have affection at home. Maybe he cheated because
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 4: he didn't feel loved. We don't know, But I know
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 4: one thing, regardless of why he did it, why he cheated,
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 4: it's not justification for murder. And we would we would
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 4: never see this this excuse. Oh, it is a crime
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 4: of passion if it was a man who did this killing,
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 4: who killed his girlfriend or his wife for cheating on him,
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 4: for not being loyal, for seeking affection elsewhere.
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 2: M h.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 4: This is something that only gets said when a woman
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 4: does something violent and horrible. And stop stop accepting that.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 4: Don't accept that, don't use that language. Don't let other
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 4: people use that language. Don't let him get away with it.
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 4: When somebody says, uh, sexual relationship instead of rape, when
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 4: they're talking about a story where a teacher raped one
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 4: of her students because the student's a boy, No, no,
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 4: it's not a sexual relationship. He's underage. That's rape, that's
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 4: statutory rape. And when someone says crime of passion for
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 4: something like this, No, it's not a crime of passion.
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 4: He was asleep, that's murder. It's just straight up murder.
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep. Well, we'll follow up if we if we
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 1: like learn like what you know, what actually happens, will
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: follow up with the follow up story. I don't know
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: the news show. So hopefully she just gets thrown in jail.
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: But I have no idea what they're gonna do, like
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: what the Peru laws are around two Mexic bollands. I
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: don't know how much USAID money was poured into, you know,
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: anti toxic masculinity programs or the Deluthe model or whatever
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: that they're because they're exporting it everywhere for millions and
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: millions of dollars. I wouldn't be surprised. I mean that
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: America was.
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 4: Heavily targeted too when we did see that.
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, Latin America was heavily targeted, and that it
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: probably includes South America a lot of countries. So maybe
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: she'll become a celebrity like Lauren Yeah wait, Lorena Bobbitt,
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: Lorena bob Bobbit, Yeah yeah, yeah.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: I try not to remember her name because I don't
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: want to make her a celebrity like she became.
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: Well yeah, I mean, let's hope not. But anyway, that's
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: it for the story. So we're gonna go into the
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: Patron show, probably chit chat or maybe look at this
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: article from our woman Dowie Elon Musk. He's bringing his
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: kids to work and the reasons aren't cute at all,
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: while of course she secretly wants to be IVF herself.
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: I'm sure. But anyway, if you guys want to join
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: us in the Patron show, become a Badger yourself by
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: going to feed the Badger dot com and setting up
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: a monthly subscription. Five bucks a month will get you
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: into the Discord server, where you'll be able to watch
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: all the bonus content and as well as enjoy a
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: lot of the additional sort of like you know, community
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: oriented things like today. I assume it's game night and
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: they're gonna be playing Cards against Humanity or something like that,
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: so please consider joining us for that. Feedbbatgel dot com
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: for slash subscribe. If you're gonna try out the Discord,
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: you can go to badgination dot online. If you want
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: to send us a message anytime after the show is over,
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: we'll be sure to read it out on the next
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: relevant show. Go to feedbbadgel dot com, forward slash just
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: the tip and send us a message. All right, thanks
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: guys for so much for coming on the show. If
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: you guys like this video, please hit like subscribe If
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: you're not already subscribe to the BELF notifications leave as
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: a comment, let us know what you guys think about
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: what we discussed on the show today, and please please
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: guys so much for coming on today's episode of HBr
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: News and we will see you next Tuesday.