Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 091926 - Breaking the Simulation: Freedom, Power, and the Language of Control

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 091926 - Breaking the Simulation: Freedom, Power, and the Language of Control · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:00
  Unknown: Tax
• 0:30
  Unknown: Well, we'll kick off the show with our familiar theme song there from Alvin Lee, ten years after, forty years ago. So prophetic lyrics.
• 0:38
  Obviously, the guy could see what was happening back then. We kinda comment on those sort of things. And,
• 0:44
  oh, we
• 0:45
  try and pontificate
• 0:47
  around the word freedom,
• 0:49
  and you could put the word liberty in too. They're somewhat synonymous.
• 0:53
  Roger Sales,
• 0:55
  Radio Ranch, People's Patriot Network show dated
• 1:00
  April eleventh, four eleven nineteen.
• 1:03
  I don't see any
• 1:04
  ominous
• 1:06
  combinations
• 1:06
  there.
• 1:09
  So we'll get off and kick off the Thursday show. Let me just stay here at the start if you wanna call in and you're new. And I know we're getting some new listeners, not as many as we'd like, but we're getting some new people that are paying attention to what we do here and the things we've written and the things we've learned and the things we've been able to put together.
• 1:26
  Two plus two still does equal four. It doesn't matter what the hell they tell you.
• 1:32
  I got a confirmation. If you wanna call in, me get back to that in case the new folks didn't see the number on the website or whatever. But if you got a question, and I know this stuff is confusing.
• 1:43
  Why do I know? Because hell, it confused me for a lot of years.
• 1:47
  But with dogged determination,
• 1:49
  I just kept going and kept going and kept going. And then my my
• 1:54
  thirst was never satisfied if you get the analogy there. And until
• 2:00
  one day and I got boom in this piece of paper called a passport
• 2:05
  application form.
• 2:07
  Had to go get it because I was leaving the country come hell or high water
• 2:12
  because I'd been told to
• 2:14
  by the little voice.
• 2:17
  You know? Yeah.
• 2:19
  Ding dong. Ding dong. Ding dong. Ding It's always the first call that we have to get those irritating tones with. After that, we can merge people in like I'm about to merge Chris in with our ongoing call with Bob.
• 2:32
  So we got Bob and Chris on here this morning. Good morning, guys.
• 2:35
  Bob was first. Good morning. Good morning. You're a little late. Good morning. Good morning. How are you doing, Bob, Robert?
• 2:43
  Unknown: Doing well. Doing well.
• 2:46
  I had a comment because I'm gonna be needing to mute out, and I just wanted to get it out of my chest. I was reading I
• 2:53
  was reading this article on Zero Heads talking about the big five.
• 2:59
  I know you're gonna concentrate on some of the other basics today, but the big five had been caught with their
• 3:06
  collusion. You know? Audi,
• 3:09
  Daimler,
• 3:11
  Volkswagen,
• 3:12
  Unknown: blah blah blah. Audi. On and on. Audi Audi and Porsche. Yep.
• 3:19
  Unknown: Yeah. And so
• 3:20
  I just found that whole thing ironic
• 3:23
  as the Dickens when they come out and say that the reason
• 3:28
  that they're so upset this is the EU, the European Commission, whomever, it doesn't matter, the powers that be.
• 3:36
  The reason they're so upset
• 3:38
  is because
• 3:40
  this collusion
• 3:42
  has
• 3:43
  let's see. How did they term it? I've got the article right here. It has deprived
• 3:48
  the public
• 3:50
  of
• 3:51
  the most
• 3:54
  efficient,
• 3:56
  cutting edge,
• 3:57
  whatever
• 3:59
  product, you know, because these guys have glued it to keep it dumbed down to where they don't have to test each other. They can just say this is as good as we can do. Right? Yep.
• 4:10
  You read the article, I presume. I looked over
• 4:13
  irony?
• 4:14
  I
• 4:14
  Do do you see the irony in a socialist government telling industry that?
• 4:20
  Unknown: Yes.
• 4:22
  Unknown: Oh my god. I read that, and it's like, do they not understand what they're saying?
• 4:27
  No. They don't. Industry that you you can't collude
• 4:31
  because, you know, you might deprive the public of something good. But we're the only form of government. We know what's best for you. Don't question our authority. And I'm just thinking,
• 4:41
  wow. The hypocrisy is so ripe
• 4:44
  so rife
• 4:46
  either way on that one. Just it just made me wanna
• 4:51
  I laughed out loud when I read it. Well, that's driving the public
• 4:55
  Unknown: of the best. You think? Yeah. I know. It it's like with the trade treaties when they could go in if they would have gotten all those things passed
• 5:05
  and this country's sovereignty was stripped,
• 5:08
  they could go into the country to a corporation and and fine them on the deprivation
• 5:14
  of the of what they did to the public in the future. I don't know how the hell you can figure that out, but it gives you a real keen insight into these bastards, doesn't it?
• 5:24
  Unknown: A lot of legal mumbo jumbo, and it's all about heads I win,
• 5:29
  Unknown: tails you lose. You lose. You got it, man. So, yeah, that was on there. There's a couple of real interesting stories out. Of course,
• 5:37
  I'm I'm a little bit dismayed this morning because
• 5:41
  because of what they did in London a couple hours ago of of going into the Ecuadorian embassy and forcibly arresting Julian Assange,
• 5:52
  and
• 5:53
  it it
• 5:54
  aggravates me at Ecuador at this
• 5:57
  creep that's in there now. Lennon is his name. His name is Lennon.
• 6:02
  Okay?
• 6:03
  How ironic. Yeah. Well, that you know, I was somebody down here was telling me about they know some Ecuadorian,
• 6:09
  and he named he had two sons, and he named one of them Lenin and the other one Stalin,
• 6:14
  for god's sakes.
• 6:17
  But it's that Is his middle name Eliot? I have no idea, man. I just wanna get away from these people. You know? But as I wrote Jack when I saw the the article when I first got up this morning,
• 6:30
  well, I guess they've assured the $10,000,000,000
• 6:33
  loan from the IMF now. You know?
• 6:38
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 6:39
  I guess Joe Biden didn't have anything to do with that, did he? No. But Mike Pence sure as hell did.
• 6:46
  Unknown: So
• 6:47
  Pence Pence has been down here several times
• 6:50
  cooking this thing up, I'm sure. But
• 6:53
  and this came up at lunch the other day. One of our guys at lunch is a retired Fed guy. He's police powers fed. He was a instructor
• 7:02
  at Glencoe down there in Georgia for a year, biggest federal training base in the in the country and all that stuff. And Julian Assaj came up, and, of course, he was pre premeditatedly
• 7:13
  leaning the other way. He said, well, he's a traitor. I said, what about the Pentagon Papers? Aren't they a precedent? See,
• 7:21
  that's the problem. They've got the Pentagon Papers as the precedent here.
• 7:29
  K? Nobody from the New York Times went to damn jail.
• 7:33
  Alright?
• 7:35
  Unknown: Yes. No. They didn't. So,
• 7:37
  Unknown: anyway, there's a lot of interesting things happening, and I saw that article, Bob.
• 7:42
  I wanted to see if any of our listeners, newer listeners wanted to call in, comment, ask a question, any of that stuff as I was saying. All of us know.
• 7:50
  Chris knows. Bob knows. The two guys that are on with us right now, they know how confusing this is. And they know that the first time you hear it, you don't snap your fingers and go, that's it. Okay? You gotta hear it. You gotta think about it. You gotta exercise your synopsis,
• 8:07
  and you gotta exercise your brain a little bit because that's how our enemies work.
• 8:13
  And if you're not willing to do that, go ahead and be a damn voluntary serve the rest of your life.
• 8:19
  Okay? But if you don't wanna be a voluntary serve the rest of your life, we can give you some answers and some guidance and some direction that's proven. And I can say that right now. It's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that we're correct.
• 8:34
  Beyond a shadow of a shadow of a doubt, we're correct on this. So if you wanna learn how to get free and get empowered and all that stuff, you can so anytime,
• 8:45
  you can communicate with us, and we'll do the best we can to answer those very complex questions for you. Some of them on how they've turned your brain upside down because that's what they've done.
• 8:55
  Okay? They didn't go in. You know Roger? Yeah, Chris. Go ahead.
• 9:00
  Unknown: I was gonna say that 10,000,000,000 IMF
• 9:03
  so called loan is a pretty big bounty to pay on Julian Assange's head. Although, I'm fairly sure there's a pretty big bounty on my head in particular because of things that I'm involved in and then drug into kicking and screaming.
• 9:18
  But
• 9:20
  this is really, really
• 9:22
  the fail safe these days is any major event of supposed lone wolf mass shooters, Muslim
• 9:30
  shooters, white shooters, Christian shooters,
• 9:33
  whatever the meme is they wanna put out there, kinda like your former friend the Fed was buying, the meme that Julian Saunders is a terrorist,
• 9:42
  when he really was a patriot because he was exposing
• 9:46
  criminal
• 9:47
  acts by government and
• 9:49
  Unknown: elites inside the government. You know, Chris, I said when I first came down here, and even a lot of people here never thought about it because there are a lot of people were surprised.
• 9:58
  And I said, you know, if it wasn't first of all, if it wasn't for Julian Assange,
• 10:03
  I don't know that Trump would have gotten elected.
• 10:06
  Okay? Don't know. We'll never know. But, certainly, Trump was favorable to him through the election, mentioned him over a 100 times in different campaign stops. I've seen the damn videotape of them. Okay?
• 10:18
  And
• 10:19
  but I talked to people down here and say, little old Ecuador.
• 10:22
  If it wasn't for little old Ecuador
• 10:25
  and a guy named Correo,
• 10:27
  who may have been corrupt, I don't know, and I don't care. Okay? What I care about is he was the only damn guy in the world that would give this guy asylum when they were hunting him with packs of dogs.
• 10:38
  Okay?
• 10:39
  And he's the only guy in the whole damn world that would give this guy asylum.
• 10:46
  And because of that asylum, he was able to get this information out. And because he was able to get this information out, we put the new world order back
• 10:56
  decades.
• 10:59
  Unknown: Hoorah.
• 11:00
  Unknown: That one guy. And the one guy did it because another guy, the only one in the world that stood up for him. Okay? And if it wouldn't have been for little old Ecuador and Correo,
• 11:12
  all most of this stuff wouldn't be known today,
• 11:18
  period.
• 11:19
  Well, hats off to Correio. I'll guarantee you. At least he had the Cahones to do something stand up. I don't care if he's corrupt. Alright? And you know what? I look at Ecuador down here, and all the corruption
• 11:31
  was revolving around three incidents,
• 11:34
  Chris. I'm sure there was others, but three main incidents.
• 11:38
  One, the new airport that's twenty minutes down the road. Two, all the new infrastructure all over this area with with modern highways, four way highways, and super
• 11:48
  interstates that lead up and out to it and drill in a hole through a mountain so that the congestion to get up there to Quito
• 11:56
  isn't anywhere near like it used to be. Okay? You're gonna get building projects like that. Name me one damn country in the world where it's not gonna be corrupt.
• 12:06
  Name me one.
• 12:09
  Name me one where some political leader isn't gonna dish off some favors to some of his buddies that have helped him get where he at he's at. I don't hold a grudge against Correio about that. And I what I mentioned is always trying to look at a half full glass of telling people, look. You got a new airport. Enter you got all this new infrastructure,
• 12:29
  and you got that tunnel up there, and you got things that none of these other countries in South America have as an infrastructure,
• 12:36
  and it's gonna serve you well for decades in the future.
• 12:43
  It's gonna give Ecuador advantages that Peru and Colombia and these other countries around here don't have.
• 12:52
  Look what's going on in The US. The damn infrastructure is crumbling. Bridges are collapsing for god's sakes with cars on them.
• 13:03
  So, anyway, that one is kinda like somebody wee weeed in my Cheerios a little bit this morning. And, of course, we've known it's been coming. No. But that I'm sure that that IMF loan was part of this, that they had to had to get Assaj out of there as a as a requirement. Oh, that's just I gosh. Shit. I just guarantee you.
• 13:23
  Unknown: You know, Roger, you mentioned something about the bridges collapsing. This is a fatal error that we make when we describe these events.
• 13:31
  When things are imploded or not maintained
• 13:34
  as they've been paid for multiple times overdue.
• 13:37
  It's not a natural occurrence. It's not a collapse.
• 13:41
  It is an implosion. It is allowing
• 13:43
  it to degrade to the point of
• 13:47
  imploding or collapsing. This is a tactic. This is not a con consequence
• 13:51
  of time and natural forces whatsoever.
• 13:55
  This is a devious plot by governments when they siphon off the monies under these accounts,
• 14:00
  this double booking system,
• 14:02
  and root the people's money and put it in their own private pockets so they can cry poor mouth and ask for more tax money to maintain the infrastructure
• 14:10
  ad infinitum,
• 14:12
  Unknown: it's really, really quite devious. Yeah. Or else they wanna go float a bond issue so they can make it a toll bridge
• 14:18
  so that once the toll is the bridge tolls pay off the bridge in twenty years, they never take it off the books.
• 14:27
  Oh, no. They keep making that money for themselves. Let me tell you what. Really pocket. Let me tell you what.
• 14:34
  We mentioned it yesterday with Paul. Hilar Balak,
• 14:37
  a hundred years ago, very famous Catholic writer. I didn't know he lived in England down there where Paul is, but I remembered the statement out of his book, The Jews. And he said the worst problem, the biggest problem in the world today is the Jewish problem. A hundred years later, it's 10 times or a 100 times bigger than it was a hundred years ago.
• 14:59
  Unknown: Maurice Samuel's confession that we are the destroyer. We will forever be the destroyers. That's what we do. There you go. This pretty much puts it in a nutshell. Well, they're just the scourge of the earth, man, And everywhere they touch, it it it turns to Sabbatean crap.
• 15:18
  Unknown: Okay?
• 15:20
  So, anyway,
• 15:22
  k, you can tell somebody kinda wee weeed my Cheerios this morning.
• 15:28
  Shane, welcome along, buddy. I I watched your tape. Hey. I watched your video
• 15:33
  yesterday after the show. John was kind enough to send it to me. What was that gal's name? Candace Owens?
• 15:41
  Unknown: Yes.
• 15:41
  Unknown: Candace Owens. I've seen some I've seen some videos of her and her black blacks it. I think that's what she calls it.
• 15:49
  Her blacks it organization
• 15:52
  and thrust and what for the audience that might not know what miss Owens is doing, and she had her father, her grandfather behind her in that clip. It was pretty
• 16:02
  pretty cool, I thought,
• 16:04
  who was who used to pick and dry cotton at five years old because he was a slave.
• 16:10
  K?
• 16:11
  Mhmm. And here's his granddaughter
• 16:14
  two generations later sitting in front of congress.
• 16:17
  Now tell me how deprived the black community is.
• 16:25
  She had her great grandfather behind her, her grandfather.
• 16:28
  He was a slave.
• 16:30
  She's sitting up there addressing congress.
• 16:33
  Tell me how deprived
• 16:35
  and underwritten the black community is. Will you please?
• 16:41
  Unknown: That's
• 16:42
  Unknown: pretty first class. Blacks on black, you know? And and in that hearing,
• 16:47
  one of the new evidently, of the new legislators up there of
• 16:52
  oriental
• 16:53
  persuasion
• 16:55
  starts playing a clip taken totally out of context that didn't reference the question that precipitated the answer that she gave concerning Hitler. And they tried to barbecue her in front of the congress, and, buddy, she just stood right up to him and said
• 17:11
  told him what what what was what.
• 17:13
  I was I was real impressed with her as I have been every time I've seen her, Shane. So thanks for tipping us to that.
• 17:20
  It's it was a pretty interesting confrontation,
• 17:23
  especially
• 17:24
  with the chairman
• 17:26
  of that committee who is none other than this Edomite piece of Sabbatean
• 17:31
  crap,
• 17:32
  Nadler.
• 17:33
  Okay? And she put him in his place. Alright?
• 17:39
  So I would thanks for tipping us to that, Shane. Was an article on Zero Hedge last night. I wonder if any of you saw it. I've got it brought up here. I sent it out to a few folks
• 17:50
  simply because it just confirms everything we've been saying.
• 17:54
  MIT
• 17:55
  professor, that's the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for those of you who might know that, quoting,
• 18:01
  more likely,
• 18:02
  we are in a simulation
• 18:03
  than not. Did you guys see this story?
• 18:08
  Unknown: No.
• 18:09
  Unknown: But that sounds relevant. Well, it's very relevant. Oh, yeah. Know? It's very relevant. I'm gonna give you the background. I've been using that word to describe this for over five years now. Everybody that's a regular listener of the show has heard me say it. And and because I use the exact example, and I know Daryl
• 18:26
  probably his ears perks up every time he hears it because I use the the
• 18:31
  comparison of a flight simulator.
• 18:33
  Okay? When when these guys are going to learn to and get retrained on these planes, probably the Boeing Max Maxi.
• 18:42
  When they're getting retrained on these planes, they don't go stick them in a plane and go say, go go off for an hour and learn how this thing works.
• 18:52
  They go stick them in a flight simulator,
• 18:55
  and it simulates everything.
• 18:56
  And they step out of the flight simulator, and they never left the ground. But yet they got trained and they got updated because it was a simulation.
• 19:06
  It wasn't an illusion
• 19:08
  that they went into. It was a simulation.
• 19:13
  Okay? So now here, the MIT professor let me it's a short little story, Chris. Let me read it. We can discuss it because I think this is cool from a couple of different angles.
• 19:22
  Alright? We're likely
• 19:24
  more likely, we're living in a simulation than not. It's the reason it struck me is because I've used that term for so many years because it's very accurate.
• 19:33
  Okay? And I would say it's not my idea. The idea came from my shaman buddy in Argentina.
• 19:39
  He's the one that first turned me on to this. A
• 19:42
  Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor
• 19:45
  has declared that it is more likely that we are living in a simulation
• 19:50
  than not.
• 19:52
  In a recent interview with Digital Trends,
• 19:55
  MIT researcher, I don't know if I can say his name, Rizwan
• 19:59
  Virk.
• 20:00
  Rizwan Virk. Obviously, he's not too much of an American. Let me call clue Daryl in here. With this Rizwan
• 20:08
  Unknown: Good morning, Daryl. Sirk stated
• 20:10
  Unknown: that in his own personal estimation,
• 20:13
  we're probably
• 20:15
  living in a simulation.
• 20:17
  Well, Rizwan,
• 20:19
  read my book.
• 20:20
  Okay?
• 20:21
  Vic's hypothesis
• 20:23
  is far from new. The topic was famously probed
• 20:26
  in the 1999
• 20:28
  film, The Matrix. So I thought I got Darryl. Let's see. Let's see if we can okay. I bet we brought him in there. Was
• 20:34
  in the 1999
• 20:35
  film, The Matrix,
• 20:37
  and is the subject of a new book
• 20:40
  by Virk,
• 20:42
  a computer
• 20:43
  as a computer scientist
• 20:45
  and a video game developer
• 20:47
  who leads
• 20:48
  Playlabs
• 20:49
  at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They got a whole special special thing up there called Play Labs and he's the head of it. And Virk endeavors to unpack the heavy arguments
• 21:00
  that call our physical work into question in his book, The Simulation
• 21:06
  Hypothesis.
• 21:07
  That's the name of it. Okay? The book. Although
• 21:10
  this idea seems unlikely to the average person, does anybody agree with that? Does this idea that you're in voluntary slavery and a simulation of freedom, does that strike people as not believable?
• 21:23
  I've asked three guys. I got Chris,
• 21:25
  Daryl, and Shane, and Bob's in the background here. When you've been out talking to people, does this concept seem unbelievable
• 21:32
  to people as a that are receiving it the first time? Hell, yes. It does.
• 21:37
  They blow you off. They think you're nuts. They call you ugly names. You don't know what you're talking about. Okay?
• 21:45
  So
• 21:46
  although behind your back. The the idea seems unlikely to the average person.
• 21:52
  It has been entertained by the likes of technology
• 21:55
  gurus such as
• 21:57
  Elon Musk.
• 22:00
  During his infamous podcast with Joe Reagan,
• 22:03
  Musk declared
• 22:04
  that we are, quote, probably living in a simulation,
• 22:08
  which
• 22:09
  means that he believes we are all programmed to live in what is essentially
• 22:14
  a video game.
• 22:17
  Musk claimed
• 22:18
  that we have a one in a billion chance,
• 22:22
  one in a billion chance of living
• 22:26
  in quote unquote base reality.
• 22:29
  Well, guess what listeners?
• 22:31
  You're one in a billion.
• 22:33
  Does that make you feel better today? Does that put a smile on your face?
• 22:38
  Okay.
• 22:40
  You're that's how far everybody that listens to this program is ahead of the damn dumb general population out there.
• 22:48
  Okay? One in a billion according to mister Musk.
• 22:52
  Alright?
• 22:53
  Musk claimed
• 22:54
  that we have a one in a billion chance of living in base reality.
• 22:58
  Virk puts our chances
• 23:00
  at a little lower than Musk,
• 23:03
  though. I would say, quoting Virk here, I would say it's somewhere between 50 and a 100%.
• 23:09
  I think it's more likely that we're in a simulation
• 23:12
  than not. Again, mister Virk, please read my book. When Digital Trends asked Virk how he came to the conclusion
• 23:20
  that we are likely stuck in some sort of a mental trap simulation.
• 23:25
  That's what it is. It's a mental
• 23:28
  trap
• 23:28
  simulation.
• 23:29
  He hit it right on the head. Okay? And this is his quote right here. I had
• 23:34
  I had an experience playing virtual reality ping pong,
• 23:38
  and the responsiveness
• 23:40
  was very real
• 23:42
  to the point where I forgot that I was in a room with VR glasses on, virtual reality glasses on. When the game ended, I put the paddle on the table, but of course, there was no paddle and there was no table.
• 23:57
  So the controller fell on the floor.
• 24:00
  I had even leaned over onto the table and almost fell over. That experience got me thinking about how video game technology
• 24:09
  is evolving and how it could end up being so fully immersive
• 24:14
  that we would be unable to distinguish it from reality.
• 24:18
  Two more paragraphs here, and I'll be finished. Scientists are actually starting to take this idea seriously.
• 24:25
  Well, hell, I'm about glad.
• 24:27
  Cause a bunch of us have been taking it seriously for a lot of damn years. Okay? One of those is Oxford professor Nick Bostrom
• 24:35
  who wrote in an article in 2003
• 24:37
  called, are you living in a simulation? And there's a link. It's linked here. I haven't read it. He came up with a mathematically
• 24:44
  sound statistical
• 24:46
  argument for the simulation hypothesis.
• 24:49
  He says,
• 24:50
  suppose some civilization
• 24:52
  somewhere
• 24:53
  gets to the simulation point and creates and can create a highly realistic
• 24:59
  ancestor
• 24:59
  simulation
• 25:00
  quote ancestor
• 25:02
  simulation
• 25:03
  where more computing power with more computing power they can spin off new servers and new civilizations real quickly. Well, let me tell mister whatever the hell Nick Bolstrom, we need a new damn civilization
• 25:17
  and we need it quick.
• 25:19
  Okay? It's an interesting mind path to entertain this idea. Of course,
• 25:24
  the real question then becomes
• 25:27
  what if?
• 25:28
  What if we are in a simulation?
• 25:32
  Can
• 25:32
  we break free as they do in the matrix? Yes, you can.
• 25:38
  Or are you doomed to wander aimlessly
• 25:41
  never really living or experiencing
• 25:43
  anything?
• 25:44
  That's up to you.
• 25:47
  That's your choice,
• 25:49
  not theirs.
• 25:50
  Okay? So that's the end of the article. Did that I sent that to you, Darrell. Did that ring some bells last night?
• 26:00
  Unknown: Yeah. I've
• 26:02
  this is a topic I've thought a lot about and been provided with some information and haven't spoke about it before. I'll be glad to share it.
• 26:13
  So
• 26:14
  here's the first thing they kind of have right but don't
• 26:20
  it's not a simulation
• 26:23
  because
• 26:25
  simulations don't have consequences.
• 26:29
  Okay.
• 26:30
  And so if you go back to your your aircraft
• 26:34
  simulator analogy,
• 26:35
  which I've spent hundreds of hours in
• 26:38
  operating
• 26:39
  and
• 26:40
  and
• 26:41
  flying,
• 26:43
  Unknown: yeah, you can crash, but you don't die. There isn't a consequence. But if you crash if you crash, you might you lose your job. Not
• 26:53
  Unknown: not necessarily.
• 26:55
  Sometimes sometimes the point of the simulation is to crash,
• 27:00
  to to make a point.
• 27:01
  So
• 27:02
  but there's a learning experience that goes along with that. So
• 27:07
  so, anyway, here's here's here's the thing, and I'm gonna use scripture.
• 27:13
  Alright? Okay. So
• 27:18
  this this physical reality that we call a physical reality,
• 27:22
  it's it's all about energy. Okay? So everything has an energy and a frequency. So base base reality
• 27:30
  in the physical is all energy.
• 27:32
  Okay.
• 27:33
  That's fine. Well, in Genesis chapter one, the Lord
• 27:38
  God Almighty
• 27:40
  spoke it into existence
• 27:42
  in one verse, in the universe, the one verse.
• 27:45
  Okay.
• 27:46
  So there's your base reality.
• 27:48
  Now later on, he says,
• 27:52
  I knew you before you were born.
• 27:55
  Born into what? The base reality.
• 27:58
  Okay.
• 28:00
  The energy field, the universe that he spoke into existence.
• 28:04
  Alright.
• 28:05
  So if he knew me and he knew you before you were born,
• 28:11
  then
• 28:12
  your
• 28:15
  spirit and soul is separate
• 28:17
  from the base reality.
• 28:20
  And at conception,
• 28:23
  it's imported into the
• 28:25
  base reality.
• 28:26
  So
• 28:27
  I
• 28:28
  appreciate what these people are trying to say,
• 28:31
  kind of, but they very much disrespect
• 28:34
  scripture and the word and the understanding.
• 28:37
  And so I would use this analogy for people.
• 28:42
  Are we in reality? Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
• 28:46
  Has it been hacked?
• 28:47
  Yeah. It has.
• 28:50
  Who are you?
• 28:52
  Well, you're
• 28:53
  you are living in your avatar.
• 28:56
  If you don't understand what an avatar is,
• 28:59
  go watch the movie.
• 29:02
  An avatar
• 29:03
  is animated
• 29:05
  by a
• 29:06
  a different spirit,
• 29:08
  which is transported
• 29:10
  or moved into that body, that physical reality.
• 29:14
  Hence, you have an avatar. So is it a simulation?
• 29:18
  No.
• 29:19
  I think I think it's more that,
• 29:22
  our physical bodies
• 29:24
  in this in this realm
• 29:26
  are avatars
• 29:28
  of the spirit
• 29:29
  that God Almighty
• 29:31
  knew before we were brought here. Okay. Well, I Can we occupy it?
• 29:36
  Unknown: Yeah. Okay. Let me let me just say I don't disagree with you. Okay?
• 29:41
  From my standpoint on this side, you start dumping what you just put in front of us on people that don't know this stuff, and you're gonna lose a great deal of them.
• 29:52
  I use the word simulation. But they're already lost. Well, no. They're not. They're lost. No. There's some of them are looking, man. Some of them are looking. Okay? But
• 30:02
  but the reason I use that word is because it's easy for people to understand. Understand it. It's It's easier, easier, I I think, for people to understand it. Yeah. And that's better than an illusion because you're not living in an illusion.
• 30:15
  No.
• 30:17
  Unknown: No. You're not. No. You're not. This is this is how when people die
• 30:22
  when people die,
• 30:24
  near death experiences or death experiences, and they they leave their body, their spirit leaves their body,
• 30:30
  and they look down and they see the the the avatar laying there below them Yeah. As they're separated from it.
• 30:38
  And and so,
• 30:41
  I I mean, this
• 30:43
  I I science wants to explain this from the scientific point of view,
• 30:47
  and and they all worship Saturn.
• 30:50
  Okay?
• 30:52
  And
• 30:53
  and
• 30:54
  so I I think that I think this realm has been hacked,
• 31:00
  and
• 31:01
  and I think the guy that hacked it
• 31:03
  is
• 31:05
  Lucifer
• 31:06
  and Satan.
• 31:07
  They hacked it.
• 31:09
  And and
• 31:10
  so
• 31:12
  if you look around, all the symbology
• 31:15
  all over the world in this
• 31:17
  in this country,
• 31:19
  of this government,
• 31:20
  of this
• 31:21
  of these rulers,
• 31:23
  it's all Saturn
• 31:24
  based.
• 31:25
  And
• 31:29
  Saturn is the old dark sun.
• 31:32
  It's the symbology of it is everywhere,
• 31:35
  and I mean everywhere.
• 31:37
  It doesn't matter where you go, what government, it's all Saturn based,
• 31:42
  which is is Satan.
• 31:44
  And and so,
• 31:47
  I I mean,
• 31:49
  this has a this has I I have to take this out of the strictly scientific point of view. I I have to bring it into the the spiritual.
• 31:59
  And,
• 32:01
  course, this doesn't sound like good doctrine to a lot of Zayo Christians, but
• 32:07
  this is my understanding of it. And so
• 32:10
  Unknown: thanks for letting me share. Yeah, man. Well, you're welcome, and we always appreciate as the audience does what you have to say and how you phrase things.
• 32:20
  But if you one of the things that that article brought to me was that now this is being,
• 32:27
  as I've said, this is being more openly discussed.
• 32:31
  Okay?
• 32:32
  You're hearing people talk about Zionism. You're hearing now this comes up. Are we living in a simulation?
• 32:38
  And it's been discussed by people like Elon Musk, for god's sakes. Okay?
• 32:43
  So
• 32:44
  my point being is that we're on the right path here. All we have to do is continue to improve on what we do. And when the big guy's timetable
• 32:56
  fits,
• 32:58
  we're gonna be in a position to expose it to more people.
• 33:05
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I mean, you know, he
• 33:09
  our our Lord said to the apostles, he says, fear not. This this all has to come to pass,
• 33:14
  and and and it does have to come to pass.
• 33:17
  And
• 33:19
  I was I was watching some stuff earlier this morning that goes back into the twenty twelves and earlier 20007
• 33:28
  and what some people were saying back then.
• 33:30
  And
• 33:32
  listen.
• 33:34
  The Ziokans are still in control. Yes. They are.
• 33:39
  And and,
• 33:41
  you know,
• 33:43
  I I think people need to come to terms with your understanding
• 33:46
  that
• 33:47
  understanding that
• 33:50
  the
• 33:51
  the geopolitical
• 33:52
  agenda has not changed.
• 33:55
  They're still going after Iran,
• 33:58
  and, there's there's still they're they're still going after the Palestinians,
• 34:03
  and
• 34:04
  and that agenda has not changed. So the
• 34:08
  you know, if we wanna use this new term, the zio con,
• 34:12
  that is the neocon
• 34:14
  has been revealed
• 34:15
  as a zio con. Yep.
• 34:18
  And
• 34:21
  and
• 34:22
  you could
• 34:23
  you could actually come up with even a more compounded term. It gets kinda messy, but Christian ziocons.
• 34:30
  And
• 34:32
  they
• 34:34
  you know, as the Lord said,
• 34:35
  you know, I will send them a a great delusion. They I will allow them to be reprobating their own minds. So Well, you know, Darryl, as you go back let's go back to this doctrine
• 34:47
  Unknown: and you start realizing about Christian Zionism
• 34:50
  and you start doing a little research
• 34:52
  and remember that they started subsidizing
• 34:55
  Schofield
• 34:56
  back in the middle of the eighteen
• 34:59
  hundreds.
• 35:01
  They subsidized
• 35:02
  Schofield in the middle of the eighteen hundreds.
• 35:05
  Zionism
• 35:06
  and reformed
• 35:08
  Zion Judaism
• 35:09
  wasn't even started until 1837,
• 35:12
  and that early in this hundred and year plan
• 35:16
  is when they learned and understood that they had to coop the Christians.
• 35:21
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 35:24
  Unknown: Absolutely. If you go back,
• 35:26
  I sent you a link. I sent out to a number of people,
• 35:30
  Paul included, last week or the week before,
• 35:35
  the Irish Holocaust.
• 35:38
  And if anybody here wants to, you know, spend, you know, a half an hour and read an in-depth
• 35:45
  presentation
• 35:47
  on the origins
• 35:49
  or the the the modern origins of Zionism,
• 35:53
  go back and read about the Irish holocaust Yeah. And the so called potato famine.
• 35:59
  Alright? And you will find out that there was a a lord in parliament,
• 36:03
  a lord Palmgrin,
• 36:05
  Palmgrin,
• 36:06
  palm something like that.
• 36:09
  And and he stated the the very first principles
• 36:13
  of
• 36:14
  and talked about Zionism
• 36:16
  in the early eighteen thirties during the
• 36:19
  so called potato famine, which wasn't a potato famine.
• 36:23
  That was an Irish holocaust. Yeah.
• 36:25
  And it was done by by Zionists.
• 36:29
  Alright. So
• 36:30
  the facts are there. Just go to Irish holocaust, read it, and then go and then pick your jaw up off the floor.
• 36:37
  So
• 36:38
  Unknown: Yep. I I saw that. Pick up that article?
• 36:41
  Unknown: Did you pick up that article that talked about the idea that the same people that promoted the
• 36:47
  Iran war or the the war against
• 36:50
  Iraq
• 36:51
  are the same people that are, you know, pushing the Russian collusion. It's your
• 36:55
  zion.
• 36:56
  It's the same neocon,
• 36:57
  Zionist
• 36:59
  crowd that,
• 37:00
  you know, that's basically
• 37:02
  Unknown: misleading us on most everything. It's the same bunch that's been doing the same thing for at least a hundred and fifty years documenting.
• 37:14
  Unknown: Yeah. Yep. Yeah. Oh, unquestionably,
• 37:18
  there's you don't even have to have an opinion anymore. You can just put the facts, speak for themselves.
• 37:24
  And
• 37:26
  so,
• 37:28
  I mean, you know, pick a lane. You know?
• 37:31
  You you need to do some deep reflection. What are you willing to
• 37:35
  what what are the terms you're willing to live under? Make
• 37:38
  that choice. That's your free will right there. It's gonna get it's gonna get personal.
• 37:44
  Unknown: Sorry. Well, you know, the nice thing is is we've got a remedy to all of this, and you don't have to fight her. We ain't gonna win.
• 37:52
  And you don't wanna fight her. That's what it says, and it tells us. It says, come out of her. Come out of her and make yourself strong and get yourself empowered, and we can do that now. Okay?
• 38:03
  And
• 38:04
  in in in in in that growth of that
• 38:09
  concept spread to other people is our strength, folks.
• 38:17
  Unknown: Hey, Roger? Yes. Shane.
• 38:20
  Unknown: As it says in your book on page 37,
• 38:25
  it says we
• 38:26
  are fighting a
• 38:28
  horizontal
• 38:34
  skewed horizontal
• 38:40
  Unknown: You know you know where that came from? Strung out. Strung out. From your friend and Horizontally strung out. Let me tell you where that came from.
• 38:50
  Deceased my deceased patriot friend my deceased. I've lost two of of my dearest friends.
• 38:58
  My dearest friends. And Ron Brown was one of them. And Ron Brown
• 39:04
  used to say, he said, you know, we get into this stuff and you start studying law. And you get in here and you study law for a little bit and you see something that references medicine.
• 39:14
  And you go, wow. Well, they're messing with us in the medical field. So you drop your legal study, which is a lifetime study.
• 39:22
  Okay? You drop your legal study, and you move over to study medicine,
• 39:26
  which is another lifetime study.
• 39:28
  And you come into that, and you start reading. You go, well, they're messing with us some other way. And you drop medical study, which is a lifetime study, and you come over here and you study something else because it's all intertwined and it's all horizontal.
• 39:46
  And that's what he meant. That's what
• 39:49
  Ron meant when he said that term, we're horizontal,
• 39:52
  he strung out and he was really accurate with that.
• 39:58
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 39:59
  Well, another example of that would be you could you can go into just history
• 40:05
  and and anthropology,
• 40:07
  which are both lifetime studies.
• 40:09
  And
• 40:12
  so
• 40:14
  particular it's skill set where you can triage
• 40:18
  the different relevant points on these different disciplines
• 40:21
  and
• 40:22
  bring together a coherent
• 40:25
  picture.
• 40:26
  Well, then there's also theology.
• 40:29
  It's a lifetime study.
• 40:32
  So,
• 40:34
  you can't just bore down in one spot and strike
• 40:38
  reality.
• 40:41
  You have to triage all these different areas to get a
• 40:45
  a functioning a functioning picture.
• 40:48
  Unknown: And and for the newer people? So that's why it takes many of us. And let me add this. For the newer people, it does not happen overnight,
• 40:55
  does it, Darryl?
• 41:00
  Unknown: No. It's
• 41:02
  it's a it's a process.
• 41:04
  I I know everybody's looking for an event.
• 41:07
  Everybody's
• 41:08
  minds over since the time they were little were have always been trained to think in events,
• 41:13
  birthday events,
• 41:14
  election day events,
• 41:17
  Christmas
• 41:18
  events.
• 41:19
  Everybody
• 41:19
  is event driven,
• 41:22
  and you have to step away from that and understand,
• 41:24
  you know, internalize that this is all a process. Yep. You know? And the sooner you start, the the sooner you'll, you know, make progress,
• 41:33
  Unknown: real progress. Well, I'm glad to see that our ranks are growing, and I get that in dribbles and emails and new people looking for questions or
• 41:43
  trying to solve some problem on getting the book or something like that, and I keep seeing it. It's not overwhelming,
• 41:51
  but we're seeing dribbles of it. Okay? And I know that we're growing, and I know we got people like Thomas out there with his Facebook group and some of the new people that are coming into this. And the word's starting to spread,
• 42:03
  and, obviously, people are starting to ask questions from that article that I read earlier.
• 42:07
  Okay? People in high places. A guy at MIT
• 42:11
  that's a big professor starting to write a book about do we live in a simulation,
• 42:15
  that's progress.
• 42:16
  Okay?
• 42:19
  Now that is gonna reach more of the intellectual
• 42:22
  people than the unintellectual
• 42:24
  people, and the intellectuals,
• 42:26
  unfortunately, are who we want.
• 42:32
  Unknown: Mhmm.
• 42:34
  Unknown: Well, they're a force multiplier,
• 42:37
  and
• 42:40
  but you have to you have to come back to what's in their
• 42:43
  in their heart. I know I know I know a lot of really, really intelligent people that have some really stupid ideas.
• 42:51
  Boy, isn't that true? You know, they have to they have to overcome they have to come overcome their own lusts and their own obsessions and addictions
• 43:01
  even though they're intelligent.
• 43:04
  And,
• 43:05
  so,
• 43:06
  you know, there therein lies a challenge.
• 43:09
  Unknown: Daryl, let me bring up a specific example that's in your Ballywick because I know this is one of your issues.
• 43:15
  K? And that's abortion.
• 43:17
  Now
• 43:19
  I wanted to ask you the other day, there's a new film out called Unplanned,
• 43:25
  which is causing a lot of ruckus. They won't they won't
• 43:28
  Facebook's
• 43:29
  got it pulled.
• 43:31
  Google's got it suppressed.
• 43:33
  Everybody's going after and trying to suppress this,
• 43:36
  and I saw an article on it the other day at one of the places it was being shown.
• 43:41
  It's amazing how many people that were pro abortion,
• 43:44
  the percentage that walk out there that have been turned turned
• 43:48
  and had their opinion totally turned by that movie. Hey. You haven't had a chance to see that yet, have you?
• 43:56
  Unknown: No.
• 43:57
  It it hasn't it hasn't played around here yet
• 44:01
  that I'm aware of. But
• 44:03
  yeah.
• 44:05
  Unknown: Yeah. Okay. Well, that they've been confronted. Pretty graphic. Yeah. Yeah. And they've been confronted in a very graphic and medical way on something they've been in favor of, and they walk out in less than two hours with their opinion totally changed. A great percentage of these people, evidently.
• 44:25
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 44:26
  Well, I mean, there's a reason why
• 44:30
  they
• 44:31
  censor
• 44:32
  and
• 44:33
  control the narrative on
• 44:37
  the physical realities of
• 44:40
  that murder,
• 44:41
  that murdering of babies
• 44:43
  is the same reason,
• 44:45
  the very same reason why you don't see pictures,
• 44:49
  Vietnam
• 44:50
  era pictures of body bags and people and body counts
• 44:54
  front and center in the news of
• 44:57
  all these wars of aggression,
• 44:58
  the Ziokan wars of aggression all over the world and the condition of the Palestinian
• 45:04
  Christians and the genocide being perpetrated on them.
• 45:08
  That's why you don't you don't see any of that because
• 45:12
  people have a visceral reaction
• 45:14
  when you show actually show them the truth,
• 45:17
  and you have to
• 45:19
  you have to give them plausible deniability.
• 45:21
  So
• 45:22
  once you take that away, then
• 45:25
  Unknown: yeah. Well, what they do
• 45:27
  to get that result is go in and fake all these videos with that inferred in them. All
• 45:34
  the head choppings and all the stuff with no blood,
• 45:37
  but you get the simulation
• 45:39
  and it has an effect on the people and it sways them politically.
• 45:47
  Unknown: Yeah. So those are simulations.
• 45:50
  Most of those films of the hedge hoppers
• 45:53
  were done in in Britain.
• 45:57
  And
• 45:58
  so
• 46:01
  yeah. I I mean, they're very sophisticated.
• 46:04
  Unknown: It's very sophisticated. Yep. Yep. No. They're slick, man. They're very, very slick.
• 46:09
  Was there anything else on anybody's mind that you wanted to discuss today? It's
• 46:15
  legal murder. It's yes. Legal murder. Well, you know, my question on this abortion thing, if a woman's got a right to choose,
• 46:23
  what can she just walk down the street and kill anybody she wants?
• 46:29
  Why don't they just say women can go down the street and kill anybody they want? Why don't they say that?
• 46:38
  Unknown: Well, they get they'll get around to it. I I I know if you wanna be giving them ideas, but, yeah, they'll get around to it. Yeah. I mean
• 46:48
  Unknown: And of course might relate to that. You may, but I wanna interject something while it's on my mind on that point. Hold it, Chris. So hold yours. The only reason that Roe versus Wade was passed is because of the fourteenth amendment
• 47:01
  and because when you're in your mother's womb,
• 47:03
  you're not a person.
• 47:06
  You're not a person till you're born into their damn slave system. So
• 47:11
  you're fair game. Go ahead, Chris.
• 47:15
  Unknown: Well, I'm not wanting to deflect from this very sensitive and salient topic
• 47:21
  because it appalls
• 47:22
  everybody that has any moral scruples or conscience whatsoever.
• 47:26
  However, I just wanna go back to the initial part of Daryl's
• 47:30
  comments
• 47:31
  when he was talking about the conditioning, the mind control, the mosh pits we
• 47:36
  are alleged to live live in and point out that that MIT
• 47:40
  where
• 47:41
  this particular
• 47:43
  professor
• 47:44
  put out this paper is the same one where I I think it was Jonathan Gruber
• 47:49
  who was one of the writers of the sick Emmanuel of the so called
• 47:53
  not affordable health care act
• 47:56
  Yeah. That said we were too stupid to to read it and understand it, and so we were just a bunch of stupid goys anyway. Well, that's the way they think that's the way they think totally across the board. Go ahead.
• 48:08
  Yes. I agree. But I was gonna point out that we essentially do the same thing as the
• 48:15
  simulators that
• 48:17
  Daryl was speaking about, flight simulators,
• 48:21
  with our children because we're continually giving them
• 48:26
  pedal cars,
• 48:27
  tricycles,
• 48:28
  bicycles,
• 48:29
  go karts,
• 48:31
  electric go karts, electric jeeps and stuff. There were two little ones of three to four years old, two, three, four years old. One little brother has his sister. And of course, dad was out there watching him very closely.
• 48:43
  We live in a little, we're in a little cul de sac here where I'm at and they were going around and they were looking over me and waving in back of my truck.
• 48:54
  Of course he ran over there to look to see if there's an asset, no harm, no foul. We were laughing about it and stuff, but we are conditioning our children for these things through this travel function
• 49:05
  and for traversing around the planet. These
• 49:08
  are all constructs
• 49:10
  that are deeply
• 49:12
  embedded in our psyches
• 49:14
  at a very young age, our roles that we play, the clothes we're dressed in. And of course you got this deviant
• 49:21
  group of demoniacs
• 49:22
  who leave this reprobate,
• 49:25
  shadow Mike lifestyle,
• 49:27
  and they want to drag everybody down the cesspool sewer
• 49:31
  with them. And so they want to get into the schools and get them while they're young. That's their favorite saying. And that's Nambler saying also,
• 49:38
  North American man, boy love association for those who don't know what Nambler is.
• 49:43
  And they want everybody to be drugged down into the dregs of society with these reprobates
• 49:49
  so they can serve their pedophilic interest and let everybody prey upon them. And, of course, this body parts, this human sacrifices,
• 49:57
  sacrificing
• 49:58
  babies
• 49:58
  through the fires of Moloch and Maul
• 50:01
  is absolutely
• 50:03
  total insanity, and then you might as well include Shamiranus
• 50:06
  and or Samiranus, whatever you wanna call it, whatever name was, Isis.
• 50:11
  All these different demonic deities, gods and goddesses
• 50:16
  are just a bunch of tripe that have been made up by men so they can usurp the powers and get control of their fellow man. I mean It is absolutely.
• 50:24
  Unknown: Ask yourself this question. How can any society or culture survive when you're murdering your unborn?
• 50:31
  I I mean, just that question right there. Samuel, one of our newer students here. Samuel, welcome. You got a comment or a question, buddy?
• 50:40
  Unknown: I got a question, Roger.
• 50:43
  I
• 50:44
  I'm sort of stuck on the address to send to when I'm not using passport.
• 50:49
  Did what you suggested,
• 50:51
  but
• 50:52
  Unknown: really not coming up with a fuzzy feeling that I'm gonna be sending it to the right place. Well, let me tell you. Let's let's do this. Let's try this way because they're pretty nice folks there at the state department,
• 51:02
  the ones that are not 7th floor communists.
• 51:05
  And if you call the 800 number,
• 51:08
  just I would I would call them. Too. You did that. What'd they tell you?
• 51:13
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 51:13
  I
• 51:15
  Unknown: didn't know what I was talking about, basically. And then on questions and answers in their website there, I
• 51:21
  I typed in where to send citizen evidence, and they said
• 51:25
  no match found.
• 51:27
  Unknown: Well, Tricitizenship
• 51:29
  Unknown: evidence. What I call it? Tricitizenship
• 51:32
  Unknown: evidence. That's what they use. That's the exact term.
• 51:37
  Unknown: Yeah. That's what I do. Okay.
• 51:41
  Unknown: Well I
• 51:42
  Unknown: would call them and ask them mean I got
• 51:45
  Unknown: I would call them and ask them this.
• 51:47
  Where where do I sit what address do I send this to to something that I want submitted to my administrative file?
• 51:57
  Unknown: I used administrative file with one guy, and he says, you have one? Well, I don't know what that is.
• 52:04
  Unknown: Well, just get the state department address and send it to the main address.
• 52:09
  I have that. Okay. Well, that's what I do and do a return receipt requested
• 52:14
  because the same rules that apply to IRS apply to us, and once they receive it, it's considered received.
• 52:23
  Unknown: Okay.
• 52:25
  Unknown: Do return receipt Now
• 52:27
  I had a question on that very issue this morning from Chuck,
• 52:31
  and he was saying, should I send it certified or certified return receipt requested?
• 52:36
  Return receipt
• 52:37
  requested is what you always want because then you got proof that they received it because somebody had to sign for it.
• 52:45
  Unknown: Oh, okay.
• 52:48
  Alright.
• 52:50
  Let me see if I had anything else. Oh, I did wanna pass on. I haven't the times I have listened to your show, I've I've never had anybody
• 52:59
  mention
• 53:00
  Bruce Ray Riggs. Are you familiar with him? Never heard of him.
• 53:05
  Unknown: I know him very well with Tom Lochevera.
• 53:08
  Unknown: Yeah. He's got a a website called dirty uncle Sam, and he is heavy on the fourteenth amendment, and he has awesome
• 53:16
  YouTube on
• 53:17
  it, how illegal it was, how it was ratified, how illegal it was, etcetera.
• 53:23
  And the one you wanna look for when you go to YouTube, he's got I think the first one he does, he's got sort of a bright yellowish red t shirt on, and it's raining.
• 53:34
  Unknown: Anyways, that that one is pretty awesome. You send me a link to that if you would? Because I'm not familiar with that guy.
• 53:40
  And there again it buttresses what I was saying in referencing with this article.
• 53:45
  There's a lot of people out there talking about this.
• 53:48
  Okay? Now Bob brought yesterday,
• 53:50
  Bob called in and he made a really important statement,
• 53:54
  and he said, If you don't understand that the basis of this is the feudal system,
• 53:59
  you will not understand it easily.
• 54:02
  Now I've been saying that for years,
• 54:06
  because I know that if you don't understand the basics of it being the feudal system, you're shadow boxing.
• 54:14
  Unknown: Right.
• 54:16
  I can say Go
• 54:19
  Unknown: ahead. Samuel, and then we'll defer to Chris. I'll just go ahead. Say it. Whatever.
• 54:23
  One of you talk, Chris.
• 54:26
  Unknown: Well, the caller is absolutely correct. Tom Lochevera and Bruce Ray Riggs. Bruce Ray Riggs just ran for
• 54:34
  a high office of state down, I think it was in Florida.
• 54:38
  And they had broadcast
• 54:40
  together over on republicbroadcastingnetwork.org
• 54:43
  for a while. I was a contributor,
• 54:45
  a free range content contributor on that show for a couple of years, so I know them very well. And he was one of
• 54:52
  his friend, Tom Lochavira, was one of the ones that were locked up
• 54:56
  for
• 54:58
  press work up in the Malahir Wildlife Refuge
• 55:01
  who was meeting with LeBoy Finnecombe, I think, the night before he was murdered.
• 55:05
  And so
• 55:07
  this is and he spent quite a bit of time locked up there with,
• 55:11
  oh, the other fellow. I'm almost came up with his name, Deborah Johnson and
• 55:16
  Pete Santilli.
• 55:18
  Unknown: Yes.
• 55:19
  Unknown: And part of the Bundy situation,
• 55:21
  Lavoie Finnecombe,
• 55:23
  very deeply entrenched in that, and
• 55:26
  they
• 55:27
  in fact,
• 55:28
  Tom Lochevera
• 55:30
  went to the truckers ride for the constitution and spoke, I think it was, with Larry Clayman
• 55:35
  on the stage there or had Larry Klayman speak.
• 55:38
  And so he's been a political he's the son of a judge, and Bruce Ray Riggs has similar
• 55:43
  background, and they have been intrepid researchers,
• 55:47
  journalistic
• 55:48
  investigator, forensic investigators for a long time, and they have hacked. They've gone into they've gone to the state houses,
• 55:54
  and they have the original documents on their websites
• 55:58
  that support the original thirteenth title of nobility act
• 56:02
  that
• 56:03
  puts criminal penalties in there for bar attorneys holding public office
• 56:07
  and men multiple different states and lots of really relevant data for researchers that really wanna know the underlying
• 56:15
  deviosity
• 56:16
  of the
• 56:18
  Unknown: deemed past fourteenth amendment. Yep. And I tell you what, that thirteenth amendment is a real key. If you wanna know the power these guys had to get a past amendment
• 56:28
  to the constitution
• 56:29
  stripped and thrown into the dustbins of history,
• 56:34
  How much power does that take? That was a hundred and seventy years ago, folks.
• 56:42
  Unknown: Oh, Roger,
• 56:43
  when
• 56:44
  Unknown: John Glenn sent their paperwork in, what address did they send to? Well, that's a good question because we didn't know about the Secretary of State connection,
• 56:54
  and the reason for that is because John
• 56:57
  was totally obsessed with the taxation issue,
• 57:00
  And
• 57:02
  so what we did initially, and we were taught we didn't know of the Secretary of State,
• 57:08
  we understood it was the feudal era, and the feudal system was infused in all that, but we just didn't make that final connection,
• 57:15
  and so John and Glenn had us send all of them to the IRS first.
• 57:22
  Just for the audience, let just give you some background so you'll understand it is tax time. John was so adept at law and so adept at reading all those confusing regulations,
• 57:33
  and he had found in title 26,
• 57:36
  whereas you had misfiled
• 57:37
  under incorrect
• 57:39
  status
• 57:40
  that you could correct your filings for three years back
• 57:45
  and they would send you all the money that you paid in that you didn't know.
• 57:50
  That was what they built the business on because this was a business, and
• 57:54
  that's what they built the business on, and they'd get a piece of what you got back and you had to pay to go through the seminars.
• 58:01
  Okay? And so the first few people that submitted it to the IRS, and you gotta do it to a specific
• 58:07
  center, and that's the Philadelphia Service Center, because they're the service center that handles
• 58:13
  nonresident
• 58:14
  alien returns.
• 58:15
  They're called NRs.
• 58:17
  Alright? And so with all that in the regulations,
• 58:20
  John and Glenn instructed all of us to send them to the IRS,
• 58:24
  the first in Philadelphia.
• 58:26
  The first few people that did that got those huge returns back. And so they're waving around all these copies of these pretty large checks, gave us all inspiration.
• 58:37
  And so when the IRS figured out what was going on,
• 58:42
  they shut the gate and instead of getting the big check back, we all got a $500
• 58:48
  frivolous filing penalty.
• 58:51
  And that's when the gate came down. Now hold on. Let me ask Samuel a question here.
• 58:56
  If you send it to the IRS today first without sending it to the secretary of state,
• 59:03
  what do you think that frivolous filing penalty is now?
• 59:08
  Unknown: You told us 5,000.
• 59:10
  Unknown: It's 5,000.
• 59:14
  Now I had a guy Here are some Just as the book was coming out hold on a second, Chris, if you would, please. Just as the book was coming out because I make a point here. I had one of my students in Atlanta, female, call me and said, I got this friend. He's got all this IRS problems. They're doing this and doing that. He's got a couple of kids. He's scared to death, and he wants to send this affidavit to the IRS.
• 59:35
  I said, do tell him do not send it to the IRS.
• 59:39
  Tell him not to do it. Send it to the secretary of state. The dumb shit, send it to the IRS, and on top of all the problems he had, now he's got a $5,000
• 59:49
  frivolous filing penalty that's accruing penalties and interest, by the way.
• 59:55
  Unknown: Probably probably why he was in trouble to begin with. Yeah. No kidding.
• 1:00:00
  Unknown: So,
• 1:00:01
  Unknown: Chris, you were gonna say something a second ago. I interrupted you. What was it? Well, since Samuel was asking these salient questions that are not easy to find, and I've done an awful lot of investigative
• 1:00:12
  research, data mining,
• 1:00:14
  and polling government websites to locate this information,
• 1:00:18
  This might be a location that he can at least call to get some actual answers.
• 1:00:24
  And this physical address
• 1:00:27
  is the Office of Authentication's
• 1:00:30
  US Department of State.
• 1:00:32
  619th
• 1:00:35
  Street Northwest,
• 1:00:37
  Washington DC.
• 1:00:38
  Yes. I saw that on the main site. You know, some answers.
• 1:00:42
  Alright.
• 1:00:43
  But the mailing
• 1:00:45
  here's another one. The mailing address that you mail to
• 1:00:50
  for the Office of Authentications
• 1:00:53
  is the US Department of State
• 1:00:55
  at capital c a slash
• 1:00:58
  capital p p t slash
• 1:01:02
  s
• 1:01:02
  slash
• 1:01:04
  Unknown: t o slash No. Don't go over all that. Send it to me
• 1:01:09
  in an email,
• 1:01:10
  and I'll send it to Samuel
• 1:01:11
  and maybe post it on a because it's too hard for people to write down all that crap. It's too hard for people to write down all that crap. I agree. It's not easy. And it wasn't easy to find that, I'm curious.
• 1:01:23
  Unknown: I think I found that in questions and answers, Chris.
• 1:01:27
  Uh-huh.
• 1:01:31
  And that's where I typed in some of after I talked to these guys,
• 1:01:34
  which I you guys told me to do, then I went back and I I
• 1:01:39
  looked at the website again, and I found this questions and answer area.
• 1:01:43
  Unknown: And
• 1:01:45
  Unknown: Mhmm. I don't even know how I got there, though. It's not on the front banner of their site that I see.
• 1:01:51
  Unknown: Samuel,
• 1:01:52
  I'm for weird. Hold hold on. Hold on just a second. Daryl,
• 1:01:57
  are you in are you in the door,
• 1:01:59
  or can I get you to put the mute on? Because I think it's given us that echo.
• 1:02:04
  Okay. You got the mute on. Thank you. Go ahead, Samuel.
• 1:02:09
  Unknown: Yeah. I
• 1:02:11
  it's funny.
• 1:02:12
  I also found that Makour
• 1:02:15
  address before, and now I can't again. I mean, it's weird. I
• 1:02:20
  it's I'm I'm worried about this place. It's so damn big. It's just gonna end up in the round file, you know?
• 1:02:27
  Unknown: Why And don't you put, just send it to
• 1:02:30
  the main address and you know where you put on an envelope attention?
• 1:02:36
  Why don't you put citizenship
• 1:02:38
  evidence department?
• 1:02:42
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:02:46
  I think what I should do is is also copy maybe that
• 1:02:50
  have a copy of that letter so I, you know, the address and everything that I put on and
• 1:02:59
  Unknown: Chris, where were where did you find that what you were reading to us?
• 1:03:04
  Unknown: Well, that can't yeah. I did an awful lot of research at the secretary of state, the passport locations,
• 1:03:10
  and
• 1:03:11
  Unknown: these are not meant for the common people to find, I assure you. You know, like Hey. Let me hey, Chris. It ain't it ain't it ain't meant for the uncommon people to find it either.
• 1:03:23
  Unknown: Well, that's true. There's a very, very small portion of people who have the intrepid
• 1:03:30
  investigative
• 1:03:31
  diligence and the driven
• 1:03:33
  heartfelt
• 1:03:34
  desire
• 1:03:34
  and concerns
• 1:03:36
  about this country and what's happening here who will go to the lengths that it takes to search this stuff out. So whenever we're working together to enlighten others,
• 1:03:47
  they don't like it, and they start hiding the football like Charlie Brown.
• 1:03:54
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:03:55
  I promise you they're aware of us up there at state that this information's out because from one of these organizations,
• 1:04:01
  Anna Von Reich or these other guys you're talking about or other people, we don't even know we're out there. And there's others that none of us know are out there that are talking about this stuff right now.
• 1:04:11
  Unknown: We're going to I become I think I figured it Go ahead. I think I figured it out, guys.
• 1:04:17
  I what I did is I went into into the main
• 1:04:21
  website, US State Department. Right? Department of State.
• 1:04:25
  And I scroll down to the bottom where they've got all it's like one page, and they have all the,
• 1:04:32
  you know, different areas you can punch into. And I punched into contact us and that comes up with questions,
• 1:04:40
  frequently asked questions. And if you scroll down through that, you're gonna get
• 1:04:45
  all the different locations and addresses.
• 1:04:47
  Unknown: And the often
• 1:04:48
  Unknown: station one is there as well as the main one.
• 1:04:55
  You know what It's under contact. You might
• 1:04:58
  Unknown: send it It's pretty cheap to send
• 1:05:00
  a stamp, a letter still, you might send it to two or three of them.
• 1:05:10
  Pick the ones that look the most viable,
• 1:05:13
  but once they receive it at the secretary of state, it is considered received.
• 1:05:19
  Now, Samuel, should you be one of the doubting Thomases, and there are people out there that I am. That say, I don't trust these sabotean,
• 1:05:28
  lying, slave, and steal, and murdering bastards.
• 1:05:31
  I don't know that they're gonna put that piece of paper in this administrative
• 1:05:35
  file of mine.
• 1:05:37
  How do I know?
• 1:05:40
  Right?
• 1:05:42
  You
• 1:05:43
  wait about sixty days, and you send them a FOIA and FOIA your administrative file that those people up there that work there say you don't have
• 1:05:51
  and see if it's in there.
• 1:05:55
  I don't know how to do that. It's real simple. FOIA is very simple. It's one of the simplest remedies
• 1:06:00
  that any of us can take.
• 1:06:03
  You You go on FOIA. It's very simple, and all you do is send to the FOIA officer, Department of State, stipulate
• 1:06:11
  what you want, and they've got to send it back to you. And if they do not and they drag their feet, you can take them to jail. And that's the way
• 1:06:20
  who who are the claimant and and who's the other guy? Fittin. That's how they're Beautiful walk. They're bringing Hillary Clinton
• 1:06:29
  into depositions
• 1:06:30
  through FOIAs.
• 1:06:37
  Unknown: Nice.
• 1:06:38
  Unknown: Okay. Tom Fitton and Chris Farrell over at Judicial Watch and Larry Klayman.
• 1:06:42
  I think Joe G. Genova and Victoria Tonsing are doing some,
• 1:06:47
  Unknown: and maybe some of the other president's other entourage. You know where all this came from, Samuel? Remember Watergate?
• 1:06:55
  After Watergate and those scandals in the sixties, they were forced to do this Freedom of Information Act request.
• 1:07:02
  And it's a pain in their side, and they hate it. Okay? But they they're stuck with it,
• 1:07:08
  and it's an advantage to us, and it's a tremendous weapon. So should anybody wanna make sure that's in your administrative file,
• 1:07:15
  then you just FOIA up there.
• 1:07:17
  Now see, when I was Argentina and got my first original passport stolen,
• 1:07:23
  and I had to go to the embassy in Buenos Aires, contact them because you gotta do it through the embassy to get the replacement,
• 1:07:29
  and they're going, well, do you have an original
• 1:07:31
  copy of your birth certificate? Like, you carry your birth original copy of your birth certificate around when you live around the world. Right? Well, no. I didn't have a copy of it, of course. But the passport was only two years old.
• 1:07:44
  And when I was having the discussion with the gal at the passport office there in Buenos Aires, she said, oh, we get rid of that stuff.
• 1:07:51
  Later on, I thought, hell, you can't get rid of it. You gotta keep it.
• 1:07:56
  Okay?
• 1:08:00
  Okay. They gotta keep it. Do you understand why? Do you understand why, Samuel? They gotta keep it? Because these administrative
• 1:08:07
  agencies
• 1:08:08
  are courts of record.
• 1:08:10
  If
• 1:08:11
  you try and go and file a suit at your district court there wherever you are in California or wherever and you go in and many times, and Chris can echo this, many times they're gonna tell you, well, you haven't exhausted your administrative remedies. You can't file this
• 1:08:28
  because administrative
• 1:08:29
  agencies are courts of record. Courts of record means that all communications
• 1:08:34
  has to be kept.
• 1:08:37
  And once it's in and you communicate with them, because it's in their folder that designates you, it's admissible into any court of law.
• 1:08:48
  So,
• 1:08:51
  you know, that we've had good patriots. I mentioned it on here one day. Daryl bird dogged it up. Al Addis was
• 1:08:58
  said he got something from the IRS,
• 1:09:00
  and he wrote him a letter with 66 questions.
• 1:09:04
  He said, hell, I've never heard from them again.
• 1:09:10
  Why? Because those questions in that file that they've got to keep are admissible in court. And if they wanted to go after him for failure to file criminally and they got him in court, here's these I asked you these 66
• 1:09:23
  questions, and nobody answered me. What am I supposed to do?
• 1:09:29
  Unknown: K.
• 1:09:31
  Unknown: Okay? So that's a big thing that our people don't understand is you got parallel court systems here. One of them we recognize as the black rogue bandits.
• 1:09:41
  The other one is the administrative court that is a court of record that leads up because if you've got a problem with an administrative agency,
• 1:09:49
  you've got to go through the administrative process
• 1:09:52
  before you can take them to court so that those things are remedied ahead of time in great numbers.
• 1:10:02
  Unknown: Here's something that could be helpful, sir Samuel.
• 1:10:06
  At the
• 1:10:08
  US Department of State website,
• 1:10:12
  they have a site called htdvsfoya.state.gov
• 1:10:19
  that has to do with the Freedom of Information Act
• 1:10:22
  and has lots of info like this frequently searched questions that you found on the other location that you were at that will guide you. There's if you can also search out Freedom of Information Act,
• 1:10:33
  look at some of Tom Pitten at Judicial Watch and stuff and Larry Klayman's stuff, they've been really successful
• 1:10:39
  in getting
• 1:10:41
  disclosures to the FOIA act of the secret documents from the FBI. They've been stonewalling and obstructing justice. The Hillary
• 1:10:49
  Clinton entourage to the state department, her hidden emails,
• 1:10:52
  a lot of different things can be accessed by the FOIA. In fact, I'm getting ready to do a FOIA myself.
• 1:10:58
  I'm going to fax it to them,
• 1:11:01
  to the FBI and Department of Homeland Security to find out what fact centric basis they placed me on the terrorist watch list
• 1:11:09
  founded upon supposedly.
• 1:11:10
  And so there are a lot of different purpose
• 1:11:13
  Unknown: Here's what happened, Samuel, in that. If Chris sends that in, they got thirty days to respond to that. Now they can redact stuff. Okay? That that's power is with them, and they use that a lot very detrimentally
• 1:11:27
  because we don't we gotta take them to court to get the redactions checked. Okay?
• 1:11:33
  Unknown: I
• 1:11:34
  Unknown: mean, I had to cough there. Chris. But you can go on the web. You can go on the web and in in in go,
• 1:11:41
  go over there and put in how to do a FOIA,
• 1:11:45
  and there's a number of cookie cutter FOIA
• 1:11:49
  processes out there.
• 1:11:51
  Yes. Shane, you were gonna say something?
• 1:11:54
  Unknown: Oh,
• 1:11:55
  thanks.
• 1:11:56
  Unknown: Chris, how are you doing within your
• 1:11:59
  your
• 1:12:00
  passport application?
• 1:12:02
  Let's say I'm waiting anxiously for a phone call from the supervisors from the LA office to explain what the giddy up and the hit is out there and why they haven't complied with my
• 1:12:15
  exigent passport supplication
• 1:12:17
  they contracted to provide me and took my money in good faith, but are acting in bad faith and not providing it.
• 1:12:24
  What you an IG complaint
• 1:12:27
  Unknown: Is there a time limit limit for that? Or
• 1:12:30
  Unknown: Well, they told me it could take about yeah. They told me about ten days it could take to get a callback.
• 1:12:36
  I was before you asked the question, I was musing about getting them a follow-up call today to find out what their reticence is and hesitation
• 1:12:45
  and not complying with their duty to answer my calls and questions and inquiries.
• 1:12:51
  Unknown: It's very unusual for them to be that unresponsive,
• 1:12:54
  Chris. But, Les, I've told you and everybody when we discussed this, you're not the average case here.
• 1:13:02
  Unknown: I'm special. I know.
• 1:13:07
  Unknown: Not sure I'm happy about it.
• 1:13:09
  Unique. What? Chris, I have I have one more question. When when you were in that State Department
• 1:13:15
  office and certification
• 1:13:18
  area,
• 1:13:19
  did you see anything that you thought was applicable to this file,
• 1:13:23
  the affidavit?
• 1:13:25
  Unknown: I did not see anything,
• 1:13:27
  but the passport
• 1:13:29
  agent that I was working with at the office,
• 1:13:33
  I critically informed him
• 1:13:35
  that these documents
• 1:13:38
  must be Alonj,
• 1:13:40
  that means physically attached,
• 1:13:42
  to my passport
• 1:13:43
  application form
• 1:13:45
  as other evidences
• 1:13:47
  of my
• 1:13:49
  so called citizenship
• 1:13:51
  slash noncitizenship
• 1:13:52
  Unknown: status. You could, and you should be speaking with them. If you wanted to go this far, you don't ever wanna deface a government document,
• 1:14:01
  so you can't put an asterisk on there on the side and write exhibit A
• 1:14:07
  attached by reference,
• 1:14:09
  But you can put that on the top of the affidavit.
• 1:14:12
  Submitted with passport application
• 1:14:15
  and attached
• 1:14:16
  by reference. What's the reference?
• 1:14:21
  What's the reference, Chris? AUFC
• 1:14:23
  Unknown: 11 o one parenthetical
• 1:14:26
  a, small a, parenthetical
• 1:14:29
  22
• 1:14:30
  parenthetical
• 1:14:30
  capital b exclusively,
• 1:14:32
  not capital a.
• 1:14:34
  A helpful hint
• 1:14:36
  that I think might help some people that I found to be useful is I make a copy of their form,
• 1:14:43
  and then I put copy in red letters at the bottom of it, and then I highlight the appropriate part. Put arrows on it, stickers pointing at it, whatever else you wanna do, red flashing neon LED lights. I they might think it's something else if you do that. I know it's probably not. I was being funny when I said that. But you can actually include a copy. Don't deface their document for clarification
• 1:15:05
  purposes. You're filing it with your passport form to help the
• 1:15:10
  passport agents properly
• 1:15:13
  record your documents.
• 1:15:14
  Unknown: Well, my point on the by reference thing, what's the by reference in the passport application that you can attach that because of?
• 1:15:24
  Unknown: Oh, that comes in the page
• 1:15:27
  three at the bottom in the warning block. Warning box. It says you're either
• 1:15:32
  yeah.
• 1:15:33
  Unknown: And it tells you in the application,
• 1:15:36
  you can attach documentation,
• 1:15:39
  comma, including
• 1:15:41
  affidavits,
• 1:15:42
  comma.
• 1:15:43
  But you better not lie or we're gonna hit with these seven sections of the code. Now that is, once again, back to Bob's statement, if you don't understand this is the feudal era, you read right past that and don't know what it is.
• 1:15:56
  But that's your hey, you can volunteer out. How do you do it? You attach documentation
• 1:16:02
  comma including affidavits. There's your by reference.
• 1:16:07
  Unknown: Here's a rather intriguing
• 1:16:11
  suggestion that I found on the same FOIA request,
• 1:16:14
  foia.state.gov,
• 1:16:16
  number one, and I'm on the learn about page. And it says,
• 1:16:22
  in general, government rec 25 years and older, pre 1925
• 1:16:27
  passport and pre 1940
• 1:16:29
  visa record are
• 1:16:31
  property of the National Archives
• 1:16:33
  and Records Administration,
• 1:16:36
  the NARA.
• 1:16:37
  I think that might be the location where they keep this stuff. I'm just guessing, but it seems
• 1:16:43
  potentially
• 1:16:44
  viable.
• 1:16:45
  Unknown: Well, I know this, Samuel. If if they receive it and somebody's hold on. Hold on. If they receive it at the state department and somebody signs for it and you get that return receipt request back,
• 1:16:59
  it is considered received.
• 1:17:02
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:17:04
  I hear that.
• 1:17:05
  I missed what Chris said last.
• 1:17:08
  Unknown: What
• 1:17:09
  I said, it's the
• 1:17:12
  National
• 1:17:12
  Archives
• 1:17:13
  and Records Administration,
• 1:17:16
  n a r a.
• 1:17:18
  And that is
• 1:17:20
  Department of State and the US
• 1:17:22
  Consular Missions Abroad, US citizens abroad, and noncitizen national.
• 1:17:28
  Basically, the National Archives and Records Administration
• 1:17:32
  may be the repository
• 1:17:35
  where these records are maintained
• 1:17:38
  ad infinitum.
• 1:17:39
  And I don't think it's
• 1:17:42
  I don't think it's worthy of not paying close attention to that the red communist
• 1:17:48
  Chinese
• 1:17:50
  Dangan or the
• 1:17:52
  Dangan file that I think it was Charlotte Izerby who outed
• 1:17:57
  that they are keeping a cradle to grave record of all employment,
• 1:18:02
  contact,
• 1:18:03
  public activity,
• 1:18:05
  everything you do. How many times your wife can go to the bathroom a day from cradle to grave for their slaves in communist China so they know what skills, abilities, and proclivities their subject slaves have in case they need to call them up or hunt them down for something in particular. And I think they're doing the same thing here in America under their so called terrorist watch system and predators.
• 1:18:28
  Unknown: Well, they are. And and what's the important thing to me that you said there is its records before 1925
• 1:18:35
  on passports and nineteen forty something on visas that's kept at that place, Chris?
• 1:18:41
  Unknown: That
• 1:18:43
  is in the online posting. It says pre 1955,
• 1:18:48
  03/1940
• 1:18:49
  Unknown: visa. Okay. Now now how do you think somebody at the state department says you don't have an administrative
• 1:18:55
  file? How the hell do they keep that stuff?
• 1:18:59
  Unknown: Well, remember, it's important to know that government agents are incompetent,
• 1:19:04
  and you cannot rely on the information they give you because it
• 1:19:08
  would be you have to that's called a reliance stance, and they tell you you can't rely on the employees because they may not know the truth.
• 1:19:17
  Unknown: Right. Well, that goes back to a federal there's this case, Supreme Court case. We we used it a lot with John and Glenn. It's called Federal Crop Insurance v Merrill.
• 1:19:27
  I know Chris is familiar with that case. Are you familiar with it, Samuel?
• 1:19:35
  Unknown: I don't think so. Okay. Federal crop insurance
• 1:19:39
  Unknown: versus Merrill.
• 1:19:40
  You can go look it up on the Internet. And what it said, this guy had a beef with the federal agents, and they came out to over some insurance policy over agriculture,
• 1:19:50
  I think, if I remember right, and they came out to his house and, anyway, it went all the way to the Supreme Court. And what they said is, you, you, Samuel, Samuel, you've got a duty
• 1:20:01
  anytime you're interacting with a federal agent
• 1:20:05
  to make sure they're who the hell they say they are.
• 1:20:10
  Unknown: Wow.
• 1:20:12
  Unknown: Federal crop insurance
• 1:20:14
  v Merrill, m e r r I l l r I l, I believe. Go ahead, Chris.
• 1:20:20
  Unknown: I
• 1:20:21
  was gonna say you can also look at US versus Minker
• 1:20:24
  Yes. And k e r,
• 1:20:26
  and it tells you that many times people are deceived and to unconsciously
• 1:20:32
  giving up their rights
• 1:20:34
  under the mere color of law by agents or actors acting outside scope, sphere, and color of law Yep. Affectionately. I'm kinda paraphrasing.
• 1:20:41
  But, basically, it says that you have a duty to qualify and to demand that they proof up their authority.
• 1:20:48
  And when they don't, they're impostors acting as under
• 1:20:51
  Unknown: scope of color of law and don't have the true force, effect, or power of true law. Yeah. Now when you get contacted by some IRS people, why don't you brag that out and start confronting them with that and see how they react?
• 1:21:11
  Unknown: You know, they they they say that high IQ is just really pattern recognition or the lack thereof a pattern. Right? And something I noticed on the
• 1:21:21
  the application for the passport
• 1:21:24
  is for routine services. It says it's to send
• 1:21:28
  for California, Florida,
• 1:21:30
  Illinois,
• 1:21:31
  Minnesota, New York, and Texas.
• 1:21:34
  Right?
• 1:21:35
  Those
• 1:21:35
  states
• 1:21:36
  the one that doesn't fit is Minnesota. It's it's a it's a it's a low population state. All the other ones are the biggest in the union.
• 1:21:44
  I don't get that. The
• 1:21:46
  Unknown: definition of state is a little different than our common perceived meaning there.
• 1:21:52
  Unknown: What what was that in reference to?
• 1:21:56
  Unknown: Well, it's it's it's just when I was looking for addresses, right, on the passport here, they're they're they're saying to send this to Irving, Texas. Right? If you're in these states
• 1:22:07
  and Minnesota didn't fit in there and it's not in it like a
• 1:22:12
  geological
• 1:22:13
  zone either. It's just
• 1:22:15
  I don't know. It doesn't make any sense to me why Minnesota would be with California,
• 1:22:19
  Florida,
• 1:22:20
  Unknown: New York, Illinois, and Texas, which are the big states in the union? I have no idea. And I do know that around the country in certain cities,
• 1:22:29
  like Chris's, I know there's one in Atlanta,
• 1:22:32
  I know there's one in Washington DC,
• 1:22:35
  and I believe there's one that I know of in Dallas
• 1:22:38
  where you can go and actually go to a passport office and deal with
• 1:22:44
  state department people there on passport applications.
• 1:22:48
  I don't know if that's got anything to do with what you're talking about, but I do know there's satellite offices
• 1:22:53
  all around the country.
• 1:22:56
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:22:58
  I might look into that. Maybe there's something else I hear. You gotta remember,
• 1:23:03
  Unknown: go back to the 1835
• 1:23:05
  case. We talk about passport, passport, passport, and everybody puts the emphasis on the passport.
• 1:23:10
  The passport's an ex parte document. It don't mean crap except it identifies you.
• 1:23:16
  When it's as it says in the Supreme case,
• 1:23:20
  the information
• 1:23:21
  that the secretary has in his possession
• 1:23:25
  as to the citizenship,
• 1:23:28
  if admittable
• 1:23:29
  admissible in a court of evident in a court of law, should be brought forth as the higher and and and better evidence, not the passport.
• 1:23:37
  It's the affidavit in possession of the secretary.
• 1:23:41
  That's why you can send it in without a passport application, Samuel.
• 1:23:46
  It is is that in your book, Roger? No. This is all no. All this stuff is new since the first book that we learned.
• 1:23:54
  Okay?
• 1:23:55
  Unknown: I mean, listen. Oh, where do I find it?
• 1:23:59
  Unknown: That that This court used to be on a website. I have to go it's d r b c. It's an 1835
• 1:24:06
  Supreme Court case. I didn't find it. A listener sent it to me when we first started doing these programs seven years ago. I've got it somewhere in my files. Are CBERS. Yeah.
• 1:24:17
  I need to get it back on the web. It was on one of those websites that got that got taken down, and we just didn't put back up.
• 1:24:24
  And it it was The US passport for ed.com
• 1:24:28
  that had that done very well. Glenn laid that real simply out in one page, and I just need to sit down and replicate it. But that is an 1835
• 1:24:38
  case
• 1:24:39
  on citizenship
• 1:24:42
  and especially the passport.
• 1:24:46
  Unknown: I've got something too that's rather intriguing, I must say.
• 1:24:51
  And from the Department of State
• 1:24:53
  website that I was just on with the general information and searching out those things that I had led you to before,
• 1:24:59
  it comes up with a search engine called
• 1:25:02
  fam/
• 1:25:03
  f ah search, frequently asked questions or whatever else searches.
• 1:25:08
  And I typed in noncitizen US nationals,
• 1:25:12
  and what I got up here is pretty interesting. It says nonimmigrant
• 1:25:16
  visa class and arrest of US citizens on so forth. And it's talking about
• 1:25:23
  eight FAM
• 1:25:24
  three zero two point eight dash two chart and
• 1:25:28
  children born out of wedlock to a US noncitizen national mother who had US
• 1:25:34
  noncitizen nationality at the time. And there's some really intriguing
• 1:25:38
  things here. I just copied and downloaded it all here in my
• 1:25:42
  WordPad so I can data mine this
• 1:25:45
  intrinsically.
• 1:25:46
  But
• 1:25:47
  I think it's really reveals that some of these people who ask questions, if you like the quest ask the right question, you might be surprised at the answers you get.
• 1:25:59
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:26:01
  Well, you know, look at let's look at what we were talking about a minute ago. They
• 1:26:05
  had to put that warning box in the passport application.
• 1:26:10
  I promise you, Samuel,
• 1:26:12
  Chris, Shane,
• 1:26:14
  Bob, Daryl, anybody else that's out there, I promise you they did not wanna put that in there.
• 1:26:22
  No.
• 1:26:23
  They had to put it in there because they adhere to a system,
• 1:26:29
  even though when it's inimicable to their interests such as here.
• 1:26:33
  So they put that in the app application.
• 1:26:36
  What about all the people that read an application, and I don't know when they changed it, probably at least back in the forties.
• 1:26:43
  Okay? Thirties or the forties. How many people have applied for a passport since then?
• 1:26:48
  How
• 1:26:49
  many people have applied for a passport since then in that how many is that? Seventy years that that had that application with that information in front of them and may have even read it. Okay? May have even actually read it, which I'm sure most of our people don't do.
• 1:27:05
  May have actually read it, and they came across that warning box.
• 1:27:10
  Hey,
• 1:27:11
  man. I don't know. They're gonna hit me with all these code sections. I sure don't wanna do anything like submit documentation.
• 1:27:19
  Unknown: I read it. Yeah. Okay.
• 1:27:22
  Unknown: So before
• 1:27:23
  the passport and we stumbled onto this, which is the nexus where they had to put the key out there. They had to.
• 1:27:31
  Okay?
• 1:27:32
  How many people would have known you can just get out of this damn shoot and match slavery rodeo
• 1:27:38
  by just submitting a simple
• 1:27:41
  declaration?
• 1:27:49
  That's all you gotta do. Why? Because it's the feudal system. And if you were in voluntary servitude,
• 1:27:56
  all you had to do is go to the lord of the manor and say, I'm out of here, pal. See you later. Adios.
• 1:28:03
  What can you do with the federal government today? You can send them a simple declaration.
• 1:28:08
  You could probably write it in crayon on toilet paper and send it to them that says I'm not related to black slaves after the civil war, and I guarantee you that it'd work. Okay.
• 1:28:22
  Unknown: So
• 1:28:23
  Darryl here. Yeah. When
• 1:28:25
  you get out of the feudal system, you have to do it to the lord of the manor Yep. Or in this case, your king. You have to do it to the king.
• 1:28:34
  And so,
• 1:28:36
  you know, who is your king?
• 1:28:39
  And,
• 1:28:40
  you know,
• 1:28:42
  well, who is who is collecting the tithes for the king?
• 1:28:47
  And, you know, that's the IRS,
• 1:28:49
  and
• 1:28:50
  that's that's who you're that's who you're pledged to. There's your statute staple.
• 1:28:55
  There's your shit your shitar shitar.
• 1:29:00
  And
• 1:29:02
  who are you who are you getting out of the feudal system to? The bankers.
• 1:29:06
  You know, we I I just I just wanna pinpoint that. I'm glad you did, Daryl. Your lord your
• 1:29:13
  your lord your lord, your king on earth,
• 1:29:17
  okay, that you're in bondage to is the bank.
• 1:29:21
  You're you're you're you're
• 1:29:23
  you're telling the IMF that you don't wanna be their their vassal serf
• 1:29:28
  plebe anymore. That's that's that's who you're addressing
• 1:29:31
  Unknown: ultimately. So You know, Daryl, I was watching another, and I shouldn't even have stayed up. I stayed up too late watching it last night. One of these Robert Seffer
• 1:29:41
  episodes,
• 1:29:43
  and I'm gonna this is pretty good. This is really fascinating information. Go in and on YouTube, and the title of the video is The Saxons. Have you watched that one yet, Daryl?
• 1:29:56
  Unknown: No. I I saw some of his other stuff, and he is he's doing what an anthropologist
• 1:30:01
  should do. He's an anthropologist,
• 1:30:04
  and
• 1:30:05
  Unknown: he's he's doing excellent work. Excellent work. Well, there's a wonderful it's about forty five minutes long. It's called the Saxons, and I guarantee you, there's a lot of stuff in there that none of us knew about. At least maybe peripherally,
• 1:30:18
  but not anywhere near like he covers it in this video. And he goes over the way the Saxons were brought in as mercenaries.
• 1:30:28
  Okay? And so they come in and they say, well, these people are disorganized and easy picking, so they take over almost the whole country.
• 1:30:36
  And then it goes through all of this forty five minutes of who it is and the Saxon king and all that stuff. Well, the one Brit
• 1:30:43
  that came back out and emerged that fought him and defeated him was a guy named Alfred,
• 1:30:48
  and he's considered the first king of England. Alfred the great, they call him. The only monarch in the history of England that's been named the great, Alfred. He was the fifth son
• 1:31:00
  of and his four older brothers died or got killed,
• 1:31:04
  and he was a sickly intellectual young kid, and he got put into the kingship,
• 1:31:08
  and he's the one that went back and defeated
• 1:31:12
  Saxons. But in that whole thing, there's a part when the Saxons revolted
• 1:31:16
  against him. You
• 1:31:18
  know what the cause was? Because
• 1:31:21
  in the feuds, they couldn't produce enough food to give to the Saxons, Saxons, and so they rebelled and overran the whole thing
• 1:31:30
  because they the serfs
• 1:31:33
  couldn't produce enough food to pay for the agreement that they'd made with them.
• 1:31:41
  K? Very interesting.
• 1:31:42
  Unknown: The food. The Saxons.
• 1:31:44
  Unknown: The Saxons. And the guy is Robert Sepher, s s p h e r, and he is really excellent, and there's some good information in those videos.
• 1:31:54
  But I didn't They don't Did you know the
• 1:31:57
  Saxons were total did you know they were totally barbaric pagans?
• 1:32:03
  You know, we keep referring to ourselves as Anglo Saxons. Boy, there's some stuff in here that's gonna really surprise you. So go ahead, Daryl.
• 1:32:11
  Unknown: Well, I you you used the term mercenary, which is I'll have to watch it to put that in context. But it it it appears,
• 1:32:21
  and I'm I'm sure Paul could go on at some length about it, the the mercenary aspects of our history and and anthropologically
• 1:32:31
  around the world. It's like in in this country,
• 1:32:35
  when
• 1:32:36
  I refer to this country, I mean the,
• 1:32:39
  you know, the land and the soil.
• 1:32:41
  And,
• 1:32:42
  you know, during the revolutionary
• 1:32:44
  periods,
• 1:32:45
  we had the
• 1:32:47
  the Hessians. Okay? Well, that was a mercenary mercenary group
• 1:32:52
  that was was fighting here
• 1:32:55
  in the run up to the civil war
• 1:32:58
  to bring in the civil law.
• 1:33:01
  We had
• 1:33:03
  more Hessians.
• 1:33:05
  Yeah. We did. More more Germans, the the the the 48 ers. Was it the 48 or the 50 I think they were called the 48 Woah. Okay. Now here's what's really interesting is that those 48
• 1:33:18
  were actually
• 1:33:20
  successful
• 1:33:21
  in 1871
• 1:33:23
  in Germany
• 1:33:24
  under Bismarck, which was when he he took Prussia
• 1:33:28
  and he consolidated all the different city
• 1:33:31
  the all the different fiefdoms into Germany.
• 1:33:35
  And, you know, what was going on what was going on here during 1871?
• 1:33:40
  Well, you know, that's where they were consolidating their civil power
• 1:33:45
  here in
• 1:33:46
  in this country. So, you know, when I look at history
• 1:33:50
  and I look at I I look at history and we start talking about the civil war period or we start talking about World War one or anything,
• 1:33:59
  I don't focus on this country. I I I have to it takes me you know, I have to hit four more data points about what was going on in all the other different countries, and they're connected. Yep. They all are. And and what you're talking about the Hessians now. You know, we when fought the revolutionary war, we did most of the people we fought were Hessians.
• 1:34:19
  Unknown: They weren't the red coat British. They were the blue coat Hessians who were mercenaries.
• 1:34:25
  By the way, they used the term in the video,
• 1:34:28
  Darryl,
• 1:34:29
  is the reason I used it. And they were given paid to come over and fight. And one of the reasons that we beat them is because they'd march along in a very British way with their bright colored coats on down roads,
• 1:34:42
  and the Americans Americans were were fighting fighting a a guerrilla guerrilla war. War. Okay? And so what happened is they went to the Hessians who came from the Bismarck
• 1:34:51
  era of Germany where they could not own land. It was all in the feudal system. Only the lords owned land. The king delegated it to them. So they came to the Hessian soldiers and said, come over and fight on our side, and we'll give you free land.
• 1:35:08
  And they did.
• 1:35:09
  And they turned their blue coats inside out,
• 1:35:13
  and they could fight the guerrilla war in the forest,
• 1:35:16
  and they called them turncoats,
• 1:35:19
  and it's still with us today.
• 1:35:24
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:35:26
  I mean, that's an excellent point.
• 1:35:28
  You know, I would
• 1:35:31
  make the comment that
• 1:35:33
  people who consider themselves American have a very childish and naive interpretation
• 1:35:38
  of of their own history, very childish.
• 1:35:43
  And
• 1:35:44
  so it it's
• 1:35:49
  you know, take another look at it because
• 1:35:52
  there's some fascinating sources out there, and and mister Seffer is one of them. I
• 1:35:58
  Unknown: had Chuck Chuck shot me a couple IMs here on our discussion on my other account.
• 1:36:05
  The name of the video Chuck,
• 1:36:07
  and anybody in the audience that wants to go get this background,
• 1:36:11
  go to YouTube
• 1:36:12
  and put up in the search engine
• 1:36:14
  The Saxons.
• 1:36:16
  Two words, the
• 1:36:18
  Saxons,
• 1:36:19
  and I guarantee you it'll come up.
• 1:36:21
  That's
• 1:36:25
  Yeah. Forty five minutes well spent. I'll tell you there's some information in there that we that I've never been privy to.
• 1:36:35
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, here's some here's some more
• 1:36:39
  since since we're we're doing a little doing a little bit of this, here's some more mind bending information.
• 1:36:46
  So
• 1:36:47
  there's a lot of discussion
• 1:36:49
  here in different places about Sabbatian Frankish,
• 1:36:53
  the Ashkenazi,
• 1:36:55
  and
• 1:36:59
  Zionism
• 1:37:01
  and
• 1:37:03
  World War one, World War two. Okay. So that sort of lays out the the
• 1:37:08
  space.
• 1:37:09
  Now
• 1:37:11
  when we talk about some I I very seldom ever mention his name or even talk about this, but in in relationship to mister
• 1:37:20
  mister Hitler
• 1:37:22
  and the and the Nazi party.
• 1:37:26
  Okay? Now a major component
• 1:37:29
  of that
• 1:37:30
  construct
• 1:37:32
  was the
• 1:37:34
  swastika.
• 1:37:36
  And the swastika
• 1:37:39
  comes out of of
• 1:37:44
  Arian Arian mythology,
• 1:37:46
  and and
• 1:37:49
  one of the leading proponents of this was a
• 1:37:54
  in this time period during the creation of Zionism was Lewaski.
• 1:37:59
  This Yes. The woman who was a Madam Hall. Was very much
• 1:38:04
  yes. Who was very much
• 1:38:06
  I mean, she's she's got the scariest eyes I've ever seen. You know? She's she's got some scary eyes.
• 1:38:12
  And
• 1:38:14
  she was a a gatekeeper
• 1:38:17
  and a and a a minder of secret society information
• 1:38:22
  and
• 1:38:24
  madam Lebowski.
• 1:38:25
  And
• 1:38:27
  she
• 1:38:28
  was deeply involved in an
• 1:38:32
  organization called the The Thule,
• 1:38:34
  if I'm pronouncing this correctly. Thule.
• 1:38:38
  The Thule Society,
• 1:38:39
  which was a major
• 1:38:41
  component
• 1:38:42
  major component
• 1:38:44
  at the very heart
• 1:38:46
  the very heart of the Nazi party.
• 1:38:49
  Okay?
• 1:38:51
  Madame Lavowsky
• 1:38:54
  was a Sabbatean
• 1:38:56
  and a Zionist.
• 1:38:59
  And yet,
• 1:39:00
  she is part and parcel, and this dual society
• 1:39:05
  is part and parcel to the creation
• 1:39:08
  of the the mythology
• 1:39:10
  of the Nazi party.
• 1:39:13
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. By the way, she was a Jew. Oh, yeah. Big. Her famous her famous So now
• 1:39:19
  one of her writings let me just interrupt for a second, Darrell,
• 1:39:22
  that I picked up from somewhere listening to somebody else in one of her books. She's the world's foremost Satanist, Samuel.
• 1:39:29
  And her statement was, and this is very instructive,
• 1:39:33
  Satanism
• 1:39:34
  is love
• 1:39:35
  of
• 1:39:36
  self.
• 1:39:39
  Let me repeat that again. Satanism
• 1:39:42
  is love of
• 1:39:44
  Unknown: self. I'm just
• 1:39:46
  gonna come right out and say this because I don't often
• 1:39:51
  hear very many people that they get kinda close to this, but they don't really follow through. It's like a golf swing, and they don't really swing the whole club the whole way. They kinda pull back. Well, I'm not going to.
• 1:40:03
  And And I have substantial
• 1:40:06
  found enough evidence and enough documentation to make this statement.
• 1:40:11
  The Zionists
• 1:40:14
  through the eighteen hundreds
• 1:40:16
  and through World War one
• 1:40:18
  working with the banking system
• 1:40:21
  and
• 1:40:23
  the
• 1:40:24
  British
• 1:40:25
  secret societies and the masonry
• 1:40:31
  created
• 1:40:32
  the Nazi party. Okay?
• 1:40:35
  And they are the Nazis.
• 1:40:37
  Okay? Mhmm. They they said I'm just gonna flat out say it as explicitly as I can
• 1:40:42
  is that the Zionists created the Nazi party for a purpose.
• 1:40:47
  And
• 1:40:48
  what whatever whatever
• 1:40:51
  motives or
• 1:40:54
  Adolf Hitler had or any of those other people, they were they were a creation
• 1:40:59
  of the Zionists
• 1:41:01
  and and facilitated in order to create the events that took place.
• 1:41:06
  Unknown: And and these are the very same people that are in charge now. And and they were taking control of Hitler when when he was a when he was a young fledgling political party,
• 1:41:16
  they either out of initiation or recognized it, and they were part of it. And that's the word Nazi.
• 1:41:23
  National socialism
• 1:41:25
  in German
• 1:41:26
  is NA.
• 1:41:28
  NA was national socialism,
• 1:41:31
  and ZI
• 1:41:32
  was Zionism.
• 1:41:34
  And the ZI in Nazi
• 1:41:37
  is the Zionist influence.
• 1:41:39
  And at some point, Hitler recognized
• 1:41:42
  what was happening and kicked him out and took over the banking system, and that's when all hell broke loose on him.
• 1:41:53
  Unknown: And
• 1:41:55
  they
• 1:41:56
  they
• 1:41:59
  so so, actually, the Zionists have have actually
• 1:42:04
  perpetuated,
• 1:42:05
  created
• 1:42:06
  the the circumstances
• 1:42:09
  and exploited
• 1:42:11
  those of
• 1:42:12
  the Jewish faith
• 1:42:14
  such as it is,
• 1:42:16
  and
• 1:42:17
  then continued to exploit it.
• 1:42:19
  And
• 1:42:21
  so,
• 1:42:22
  I mean,
• 1:42:24
  I I don't know how to make that any simpler or clearer, but it's taken me a long time to get to the point where I would actually just come out and say that as a matter of fact, and
• 1:42:34
  and it's it's taken a lot of reference material for me to come to that point. But I I'm saying it now. So Well, you know, this is what the statement I'd make, Darrell, is Hitler's the most demonized
• 1:42:45
  Unknown: man in the history of the planet.
• 1:42:52
  Unknown: Well, yeah. And and for and to and to good effect.
• 1:42:56
  Unknown: To good effect. Good effect. But I would And for good reason. And for good reason too. Not that he's guilty of what he's accused of, but that they can use it to further their agenda so effectively.
• 1:43:10
  Unknown: Well, look at the modern day look at the modern
• 1:43:15
  propagandists
• 1:43:16
  and and SIOP experts. There's this this young fellow
• 1:43:21
  that is all over conservative radios
• 1:43:24
  and TV broadcast. I actually listened to this cat over the weekend when I was driving through Chicago. His name's Ben Shapiro,
• 1:43:32
  35 year old
• 1:43:35
  Zionist
• 1:43:37
  beanie wearer,
• 1:43:38
  and
• 1:43:39
  he
• 1:43:40
  he's talking about the Final Solution for the Palestinians,
• 1:43:44
  and and he's promoting a transfer. He wants them to be transferred out. A transfer. Is it is that does that word ring a bell with anybody? It sure does. So we have the
• 1:43:55
  we have a yeah.
• 1:43:57
  We have a Zionist Ashkenazi
• 1:44:00
  that they they want to
• 1:44:02
  they they want to accomplish their final solution on the Palestinians.
• 1:44:07
  And,
• 1:44:08
  of course, I I fully believe that mister mister Pence, who is one scary dude,
• 1:44:16
  and this administration
• 1:44:17
  will completely facilitate
• 1:44:19
  Unknown: the the final solution for the Palestinianians. There's no doubt about Yeah. I mean, look. They're the Trump is dropping his pants for these creeps every time he turns around.
• 1:44:31
  Unknown: Mhmm. Yeah.
• 1:44:33
  Well,
• 1:44:35
  it it just you know, I'm I'm not even I'm not even I'm not trying to be I'm just saying what is. You know? It is what it is. You know? And
• 1:44:43
  so
• 1:44:47
  Unknown: anyway, all all very interesting. Well, you know, as as it pertains to some of these people that Trump has brought in and the ones that really offend the one that offends me more than any of them is John Bolton.
• 1:45:02
  How we got that creep in the administration,
• 1:45:07
  in that key position with his pal, Pompeo,
• 1:45:10
  can only be attributed
• 1:45:12
  to your fellow Clark County and out there, Chris, mister Sheldon Adelson.
• 1:45:18
  Unknown: Yes, sir. And his brother Yeah. Is it the
• 1:45:21
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:45:23
  Unknown: Who can tell Yeah. The Ziokans are still in charge. Now listen. Look. This is interesting. We can tail this off a little bit because I I've seen this a couple of times and thought about it a little bit. It makes a lot of sense. Why are they doing all this stuff to Venezuela
• 1:45:36
  to go in and keep them from pumping oil
• 1:45:40
  so Trump can keep the price of oil up because we're discovering all this stuff up there like this this East West Texas field that's supposed to have more oil in it than Saudi Arabia.
• 1:45:52
  The Balkans up in they're producing all the shale oil. They wanna keep the price up. Venezuela's
• 1:45:58
  pumping oil out to try and pull themselves out of the hole, and it just drops the price on the market.
• 1:46:05
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, Iran and Iran and Russia are are gonna probably try to do a a stop gap on the Venezuela
• 1:46:14
  overthrow
• 1:46:15
  like they did in the Syrian
• 1:46:17
  overthrow.
• 1:46:19
  But I I just wanna leave I wanna I wanna put a phrase out there
• 1:46:24
  in everybody's mind that's listening to the point where they can repeat it. Okay? So I'm I'm actually talking about memorizing something.
• 1:46:33
  And and when you look around
• 1:46:35
  The Middle East or actually all over the world,
• 1:46:39
  okay, but particularly in Syria
• 1:46:41
  and Venezuela,
• 1:46:44
  understand
• 1:46:44
  this,
• 1:46:46
  that peace
• 1:46:48
  is a lack of war and commerce.
• 1:46:52
  And
• 1:46:53
  or
• 1:46:54
  yeah. And and war
• 1:46:57
  is a lack of peace in commerce, and it all comes back just to what actually, what Roger just said
• 1:47:04
  is is commerce.
• 1:47:05
  And so you either have peace in commerce or war in commerce,
• 1:47:10
  And all you have to do to connect that, the the veracity
• 1:47:14
  and and the cogency of that
• 1:47:17
  is just go back and study the Dutch East India Company and the British East India Company,
• 1:47:23
  and all of your wars come out of commerce.
• 1:47:27
  The World War I was a war of commerce because the
• 1:47:31
  as Paul said yesterday, the British the British in charge didn't wanna compete fairly
• 1:47:36
  and buckle down,
• 1:47:38
  they decided that it was just gonna be more to their benefit
• 1:47:42
  to, instead of build things, to destroy things. Yep. They wanted to compete through war, not commerce,
• 1:47:48
  in order to achieve commerce.
• 1:47:50
  And and so I I just keep hammering this commerce thing over and over and over again. If you're looking for a
• 1:47:58
  a genesis
• 1:47:59
  of all this conflict, it's always commerce. You have to think commerce. Let me bring something.
• 1:48:04
  Unknown: I might point out You may, but let me interject this first, Chris. When the world's first markets where people came together in Babylon to exchange goods,
• 1:48:14
  who set the prices?
• 1:48:19
  Priests.
• 1:48:20
  The priests of the temple
• 1:48:22
  set the prices
• 1:48:24
  at the first markets.
• 1:48:26
  Who became the bankers?
• 1:48:28
  The priests.
• 1:48:34
  Unknown: When you when you when you go to court and you play the clerk, what are you paying? You're paying the clerk.
• 1:48:40
  Unknown: Yep. There you go. Chris, what were you gonna say? Clerk the court with the clerics.
• 1:48:45
  Unknown: Was going to point out for Daryl's consideration that the word term com
• 1:48:50
  merc,
• 1:48:52
  merc as the case may be,
• 1:48:54
  with
• 1:48:55
  the gods of war,
• 1:48:57
  the mercenaries of war.
• 1:48:59
  Economics is a form of war by economic means. Sure.
• 1:49:04
  And so for these people,
• 1:49:07
  when they talk about peace, like State Department bulletin pamphlet number
• 1:49:12
  seven two seven seven,
• 1:49:14
  freedom from war in a peaceful society.
• 1:49:17
  When they say peace,
• 1:49:19
  their word peace for them means an eternal
• 1:49:23
  state of war by all forms
• 1:49:27
  of technocracy.
• 1:49:28
  Unknown: Well, don't forget what their definition of peace is.
• 1:49:32
  That's absence of opposition to communism.
• 1:49:36
  Unknown: Yeah. Shalom. Mono Shalom.
• 1:49:40
  Unknown: Is Shalom. A lost child that said that competition
• 1:49:43
  is
• 1:49:45
  a sin?
• 1:49:46
  Unknown: No. It wasn't. It was mister Rockefeller that said that, I believe. No. It's Rockefeller. Yeah.
• 1:49:53
  Unknown: Rockefeller.
• 1:49:54
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. Well, when you when you when when when the
• 1:49:59
  when they say when they use the word shalom,
• 1:50:02
  they mean peace. They say peace. You understand it as peace, but it means peace under their terms. Yep.
• 1:50:08
  Unknown: More of this More equivocation
• 1:50:12
  crap.
• 1:50:13
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:50:15
  Alright.
• 1:50:17
  So, I I mean, you know Samuel
• 1:50:20
  Unknown: What is Samuel's our new student here. If you wanna go back to the to the what this really is, go to the dictionaries.
• 1:50:27
  If you can even go back to one of the older ones, the Webster's in the eighteen hundreds,
• 1:50:31
  and look under the word equivocation.
• 1:50:34
  That's exactly what they're hanging their hat on, this whole thing. And in the Webster's dictionary in the eighteen hundreds,
• 1:50:42
  at the end of the definition,
• 1:50:44
  it says,
• 1:50:45
  this technique is sometimes
• 1:50:47
  used by non Christians
• 1:50:50
  against
• 1:50:51
  Christians.
• 1:50:53
  That's in
• 1:50:54
  the Webster's dictionary.
• 1:50:56
  Equivocation.
• 1:50:59
  Unknown: I do have an 1834
• 1:51:02
  or 1934
• 1:51:03
  Bovier.
• 1:51:04
  Unknown: No. Okay. They're probably '17. I don't think it's been published since 1917.
• 1:51:09
  That's the dictionary, by the way, that Congress uses, the Boviers. Oh, 1825
• 1:51:14
  Unknown: Webster's.
• 1:51:15
  Unknown: Well, eighteen twenty five is a Webster's dictionary. You're you're bringing in a law dictionary.
• 1:51:20
  I'm just talking about a general dictionary.
• 1:51:23
  I think you can find it online. I found it online.
• 1:51:26
  It's eighteen thirty five or something like that.
• 1:51:30
  Unknown: Eighteen
• 1:51:31
  thirty five Webster's?
• 1:51:32
  Unknown: I think.
• 1:51:33
  Eighteen twenty five Webster's, I think. I'm probably wrong on the date. So
• 1:51:39
  Unknown: says illegal is the removal of God from the law.
• 1:51:42
  Yeah. Or illegal is removal of God from the law. What was that date again? I
• 1:51:48
  Unknown: got scrambled.
• 1:51:50
  Unknown: It's in the early eighteen
• 1:51:53
  hundreds.
• 1:51:55
  It'll designate it on the Internet
• 1:51:59
  on a search. That's what they're doing, and the equivocation
• 1:52:04
  is basically what it goes back to James one:eight, A double minded man is uncertain in all of his ways. So they take these words and they assign a different definition to them, generally opposite,
• 1:52:16
  and they gotcha.
• 1:52:18
  They gotcha.
• 1:52:24
  You think it means one thing, they know it doesn't mean that, and it means something else, and they got you.
• 1:52:33
  Unknown: Right.
• 1:52:34
  So a a general learning technique here for all of us to keep in mind, I mean, this is what I do myself all the time,
• 1:52:41
  is I I operate on the premise until I've reeducated myself and deprogrammed
• 1:52:47
  that I'm illiterate.
• 1:52:49
  I pretty much have come to the conclusion that everything I thought I knew was incorrect
• 1:52:54
  and or out of context. And so
• 1:52:57
  I just I just, you know, embrace my the understanding
• 1:53:01
  that I'm an illiterate until I've deprogrammed.
• 1:53:05
  So there there's no shortcut to this. You have well, when you we we encounter words that you think you know what they mean, and then you you you you're feeling a contradiction, it means because you don't really actually understand how it's being applied.
• 1:53:17
  And so in 1828
• 1:53:19
  and these these reference books,
• 1:53:22
  and you need to spend a little time and go back and and revise your your understanding and and interpretation in context of these words. I had a a I heard a gal It's like sophisticated. Yeah. I heard a gal that was a medical doctor on a show one time, and she was the third
• 1:53:38
  Unknown: medical doctor in her family generationally.
• 1:53:42
  And her
• 1:53:43
  grandfather
• 1:53:44
  had kept all of his original medical books,
• 1:53:47
  and she went back and started looking in the the books of her grandfather,
• 1:53:51
  and it says, life begins at conception.
• 1:54:03
  Right. Okay.
• 1:54:04
  How did they change it, Samuel? How did they change that? From where a woman can murder a child,
• 1:54:10
  the fourteenth amendment,
• 1:54:12
  because all persons born,
• 1:54:14
  you're not a person in their system until you're born. So when you're in your mother's womb,
• 1:54:20
  you're fair game, buddy.
• 1:54:22
  Do you know that Roe versus Wade I didn't know this. Yeah. I didn't know this until Brent brought it up one day. Brent's on tomorrow, by the way, of course. The Roe versus Wade is the only Supreme Court case that's ever been written
• 1:54:35
  that didn't contain
• 1:54:37
  one single
• 1:54:39
  court reference in the decision.
• 1:54:45
  Unknown: Wow.
• 1:54:49
  Unknown: Wrote an entire decision
• 1:54:51
  on something this important,
• 1:54:53
  and there was not one site
• 1:54:56
  in the entire
• 1:54:58
  decision.
• 1:55:02
  Unknown: And and and so
• 1:55:04
  what's really important about the civil law is that it only applies to persons. That's right.
• 1:55:11
  It only you're you're in the law of the city.
• 1:55:15
  Okay?
• 1:55:16
  So you you you're living under the law of the city.
• 1:55:19
  And
• 1:55:20
  Unknown: welcome to Rome. You know, when when in Rome, do his Roman study. Yeah. I told you, my optometrist from Argentina came up to The States years when I was down there with his family.
• 1:55:30
  And he came back. I said, well, how'd you like the police state? And he said, I turned to my wife at the airport in LaGuardia in New York, and I said, are the new Romans.
• 1:55:40
  It's exactly what he told me. Thank you, guys. There's our Whistler. We'll be back tomorrow with Brent. Good stimulating show today. I appreciate everybody that participated,
• 1:55:49
  and I appreciate everybody that didn't participate too that was listening. So we'll see you tomorrow. Brent will cover no telling what all, and it'll I guarantee you, it will be entertaining and educational.
• 1:56:01
  So we'll see you guys tomorrow. Thanks, Samuel. Glad to have you on board, buddy.
• 1:56:06
  Unknown: You're welcome. Thank you.
• 1:56:09
  Unknown: Welcome aboard.
• 1:56:12
  Unknown: Amigos.
• 1:56:45
  Unknown: Will swallow
• 1:56:48
  you
• 1:56:50
  lay
• 1:56:51
  your
• 1:56:52
  body
• 1:56:54
  down.