Latest / Yaron Brook Show / National Security Strategy; Pipe Bombs; Eurovision--Why Care About Israel? : Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

National Security Strategy; Pipe Bombs; Eurovision--Why Care About Israel? : Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: A lot of them of rattle cells. And as this
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: is the show. All right, everybody, welcome here on books
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: show on this Uh, I don't know, Friday, December fifth.
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: I hope everybody's having a great week and uh yeah,
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: looking forward to the weekend. Hure in Puerto Rico, it's Friday,
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: is almost over three thirty pm.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: And being an hour ahead of.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: The East coast is kind of weird, but it is
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: what it is. And all right, let's let's jump in.
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: I'll remind you you can ask questions. That way we
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: can shape part of the show. If you have complaints, comments, disagreements,
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: you can use the super chat to express yourself.
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: Uh so uh.
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: And support the show at the same time, make make
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: this possible, make yourself a trader so that it's a
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: trade win.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: Win so uh.
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: The Trump administration today this morning released its National Security
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: Strategy document. Uh, no big fanfare, no big press confidence.
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: Trump didn't make a big deal out of this. Really interesting,
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: you know that that it kind of snuck in like.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: That without without a lot of fanfare.
• 1:33
  Speaker 2: But this is kind of the guiding the guiding principles
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: for American farm policy moving forward. And as we'll see
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: it's more than just American phone policy. It even touches
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: on domestic policy. It is a strategic document. It's supposed
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: to be big picture, uh strategy. This is something every
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: administration typically puts out. You know, famous George Bush had one.
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: It was called Forward Strategy for Freedom, which I did
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: a whole talk.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: I did a whole.
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: Talk on criticizing and actually an essay with Elon Jono
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: which made it into Elon Juno's book, Winning the Unwinnable War,
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: where I was critical of George Bush's a Forward Strategy
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: for Freedom. This document, this strategic plan, is relatively short.
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: It's thirty three pages, and it's thin, undetails, and there's
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: quite a few glaring things that are absent from it,
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: which we will discuss. So we're gonna spend most of
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: our time going over this document. Actually for your benefit,
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: have it up.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: On screen so you can you can actually look at it.
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: You know, it starts, it starts way over here. National
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: Security Strategy of the United States twenty twenty five. It
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: has a forward by Donald Trump which is not worth
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: really reading. Introduction and introduction, What is American strategy? Defined strategy?
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: Which is all all good stuff and then you know, we'll.
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: Jump into what should the strategy be, what are the goals,
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: what should America want?
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: Is the way to present it?
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: And let me just say this is a heavily, heavily
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: heavily mixed document. It's got some passages that are great.
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: It's actually got one line that I think they stole
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: from me at some point. I'll point that out when we.
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: Get to it.
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: It's got some some basically good stuff in it, and
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: it's got a lot of bad stuff in it, and
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: most of it is just blah. Mostly it's just not
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: neither here nor there, and it's got a lot missing.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: It's got a lot missing, and I think i'll just
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: say this, the thing missing most from it is any
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: sense and I know which actually just Ush's document did have,
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: and this one does not have any sense of good
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: and evil, any sense of good countries, bad countries, just
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: unjust anything like that. It has none of that. It
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: is really here American interests, and this is what we're
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: going to pursue. And all countries have interests, and all
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: countries will pursue their interests.
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: And that's okay.
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: And that's the tone of it. The tone of it
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: is values free at least universal value free and in
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: that sense, it is very much reasoned like a document,
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: and let's be clear, not written by Donald Trump. This
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: is not a trumpest document, although it has element of
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: it to appease him.
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: This is a document really written by elements within the
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: Department of Defense, Deparliament of War that I influenced clearly
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: by the national conservative movement.
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: So this is a document that will please the national conservatives.
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: It's got strong national conservative elements in it. It's supportive of,
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: kind of in a nuanced way, the national conservative agenda
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: and then generally a nationalist agenda, but a national conservative
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: agenda in particular.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: So we will go over this. So you know, we'll
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: start with what do we want? What does America want?
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: Well, first and foremost, it says, we want to continue
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: to survival and safety of the United States as an independent,
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: sovereign republic whose government secures that God given natural rights
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: of its citizens and privatize their well being an interest. Okay,
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: that is good, right, except for the God given part
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: and God given natural rights. Every time they talk about rights,
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: which is two or three times, it's always God given
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: natural rights. It's always God given natural rights. Again, consistent
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: with kind of national conservatives considered consistent with Christian conservatives.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: The emphasis is on.
• 6:07
  Speaker 2: God given I guess to differentiate from the government given
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: rights that the left.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Would argue for. So here they have to make the
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: case that's our rights a god given as compared to whatever.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: So that's good.
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we want to protect the independence, we want to
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: protect their soeignty, and we want to certainly want to
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: protect rights. Rights should be the integrating part of this.
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: It's just one of the many things. So they don't
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: quite understand rights. But that's okay, that's not the worst
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: thing here. We want to protect this country, it's people,
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: it's territory, it's economy, and it's way of life from
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: military attack and hostile for un influenced. Yes, we're they espionage,
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: predatory trade practices. Huh, So we want to protect the country,
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: it's people, it's territory's economy from predatory trade practices. Interesting,
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: this is a found policy agenda, drug and human trafficking,
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: destructive propaganda. Who gets to decide which propaganda is destructive
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: in which propaganda is not destructive? And influence operations? Cultural subversion.
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: We don't want cultural subversion, so we're gonna use a
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: fund policy to stop preedatory trade practices, whatever the hell
• 7:23
  Speaker 2: those are. I mean, the easiest thing to stop predatory
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: trade practices is just not to do them.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: If it's predatory, just don't trade. It's easy.
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: I don't engage in predatory trade practices because I won't
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: trade with people trying to take advantage of me.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: Just leave it to Americans. They're pretty good at that. Drugs.
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: You know, we talked about it in other context about
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: why drugs is not an appropriate goal of their American government.
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: And propaganda, influence and cultural subversion is very dangerous territory
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: for the government to get involved in identifying it and
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: defining what it is. The best thing is to light
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: ideas rip. We want full control of our voters over
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: our immigation system and over transportation networks through which people.
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: Come into the country.
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: Not surprising you'll see in this document, immigration plays a
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: huge role. Immigration is the source of our problems, and
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: immigration is a key feature of what our found policy
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: should be. We want resilient national infrastructure. Yeah, I'm all
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: for resilient national infrastructure, although the best way to make
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: it resilient is to sell it to the private sector
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: and courage competition.
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: We want to trude, train, equipp and field the world's
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: most powerful, lethal, and technologically advanced military.
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: And now listen to this and tell me if this
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: isn't stolen from something I said written in the.
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: Past to protect our interests. The two wars, and here's
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: where it gets.
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: If necessary, win them quickly and decisively with the lowest
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: positive possible casualty star forces.
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's like a direct quote for me, quickly
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: and decisively with the lowest possible casualty star forces.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: You know I couldn't agree more. I agree with that
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: statement one hundred percent.
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: Uh. You know that's perfect.
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: And if only I believed that they would live up
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: to it, I would embrace it completely. And of course
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: I don't believe that they will go with the war
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: when it's appropriate and not go to war where it's
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: not appropriated. I don't believe anything they can do. But
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: was that's exactly how they should be for it, And
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: I said so first.
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: So who knows who had some hand in writing this
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: that might have I've read something that I've written or
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: listen to me in the past. I've been doing this
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: for a long time.
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: A lot of people have heard my stuff, particularly in
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: fun policy. We want the world's most robust, credible, and
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: modern nuclear discernans. Yeah, and including Golden Dome for American homeland. Yes,
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: no question. We want the world's strongest, most dynamic, most innovative,
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: most advanced economy.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: How do you get that?
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is a big question, right, how do
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: we get the most dynamic, most innovative, most robust economy,
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: advanced economy? What what does that come Where does that
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: come from? How does that happen? I mean, I'll tell
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: you right now. The document does not say we know
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: people listening to this show know what I think at least,
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: and that is capitalist and freedom, free markets. Get the
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: government the hell out of markets. Stop trying to central
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: the plan, stop trying to to to manage the economy,
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: Stop trying to tell us who to trade with and
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: who not, Stop trying to tell us what we should
• 11:02
  Speaker 2: and shouldn't make, Stop trying to manipulate the economy. That's
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: how you get the world's strongest and most dynamic, most
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: the innovative, and most advanced economy. Indeed, we innovate, and
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: we're advanced, and we're dynamic in direct proportion to the
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: lack of regulation and control, but that they're not going
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: to say. They're not going to say because that would
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: upset too many people within the administration. We want the
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: world's most robust industrial base. Really, I'm not sure that's true.
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: We want the most robust economy and most dynamic, most innovative.
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: Whether that leads the industrial base, that might retard American
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: growth because it will misallocate capital. We want the most robust,
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: productive and innovative energy sector. Yeah, probably, it probably happens anyway.
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: All you need to do is get out of the way.
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: It goes back to what I said before. We want
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: the world's most scientifically and technology advanced and innovative country.
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, freedom achieves that. And maybe.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: You know, not stopping all the funding to the things
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: to science would be helpful here at least until you
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: create a kind of a private alternative to it.
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: I don't know.
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: It doesn't seem like the Trumpet denverstation is taking that
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: one very seriously. We want to maintain the United States
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: unrivaled seft power, through which we exercise positive influence soft powers.
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: When you don't have to go to war, you don't
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: have to use weapons.
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: People listen to you because they respect you. They like
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: you because they know you represent important values, and it
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: really it's worth it. How do you achieve soft power
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: but getting respect from other countries? Do you think Trump
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: has done that over the last nine months ten months?
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: Tariffs undermine soft power. His wishwashingess, his corruption, his groveling
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: before dictators does not encourage soft power. It actually weakens
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: soft power.
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: You know, it writes it. Doing so, we will.
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: Unapologetic, unapologic about the country's past and present, while respectful
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: of other countries, deferring religions, cultures, and governing systems. Why
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: should you be respectful of other countries religions, cultures, and
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: governing systems. This sounds like a leftist subjectivist document. Like
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: this sounds like you want to be friends with the
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: Qataris and you don't want to criticize their religion, culture,
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: and governing It sounds like this means you want to
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: be friendly with Putin and not challenge his governing system.
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: This sounds like you want to be friends with she
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: and but doing all that, are you really going to
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: enhance soft power? So here they want to differentiate themselves
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: on new coons who supposedly I wish you know, actually
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: took the position that you know, we have the right
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: political system and we should encourage other people to adopt
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: it as well.
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: And we shouldn't. We should take into account differing religion, culture,
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: and governing systems.
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: Finally, we want the restoration and reinvigoration of Americans spiritual
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: and cultural health, so do I without which long term
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: security is impossible. We want people who are proud, happy,
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: and optimistic that they will leave their country to the
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: next generation better than they founded.
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: You know, I want that too, although the stuff about
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: the next generation is less important to me, but I
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: want that too. This is great. How do we do that?
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: How do we do that?
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: Capitalism, freedom, respect to the constitution, respect for individualism, respect
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: for individual rights, or a new respect for what made
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: this country great, not through their tribalism and their mindlessness
• 15:18
  Speaker 2: and emotionalism.
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: Freedom.
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: What do we want in and from the world. Oh,
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: now we're getting the frump Possey in and from the world.
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: This is great. We want to ensure that the Western
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: hemisphere remains reasonably stable. So here's a strategic shift that
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: is happening from previous documents like this, And you know,
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: there's a real shift from George Bush's document from twenty seventeen,
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: The last time we got a Bush, last time we
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: got a Trump strategy. There's a real shift.
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: In the twenty seventeen document, Western Hemisphere gets a brief
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: mention one page, general corporation something. Now, Western Hemisphere is
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: the heart of it. We're establishing a new Monroe doctrine.
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: We want to other the Western Hemisphere and remain reasonably stable.
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: We're governed enough to prevent a discourage mass migration, because
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: that's the.
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: Real threat to America.
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: If only you can get rid of those brown looking migrants,
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: everything would be so much better, so much better. We
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: want a hemispheres governments cooperate with US against narco terrorists, cartels,
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: and other transnational criminal organizations. Yeah, that's the problem in America.
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: It's the other I told you that it's immigrants and
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: narco terrorists.
• 16:49
  Speaker 2: We want a hemisphere that remains free of hostile foreign
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: incursions or ownership of key assets, and that supports critical
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: supply chains. We want to ensure a continue access to
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: key strategic locations. In other words, a Monroe doctrine. Now
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: we can talk about whether a Monroe doctrine is appropriate
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: in the twenty first century, whether the American Navy basically
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: has global reach, whether the Western Hemisphere is any different
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: than any other hemisphere. It is true that the one
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: thing that the Western Hemisphere has that other countries do
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: not have is direct access to the American homeland. That is,
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: direct access to immigrants they can just walk in, and
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: direct access to drug cutaels they can smuggle the drugs in.
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: So yes, the Western Hemisphere, you know, given their priorities,
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: which are immigration and drugs more than anything else, should
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: be a big deal.
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: But given that borders are with Mexico and Canada, in
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: terms of national security, let me emphasize security.
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: The Western hemisphere is pretty secure. Yeah.
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: I mean we have peaceful voters both in the South
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: and in the north and no risk of invasion. And
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: whatever problems we have with immigration and with drugs, those
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: problems one hundred percent self inflicted. If we had a
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: rational immigration system, there would be no mass migration of
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: people flowing in illegally.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: If we had a.
• 18:30
  Speaker 2: Rational policy of guarding drugs, there would be no narco terrorists.
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: We have created the problems that this.
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: Administration thinks of the number one problems that we face
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: and need to be addressed.
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: We created them. The document goes on, we want to
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: hold and reverse ongoing damage that foreign actors inflict on
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: American economy while keeping the Indo Pacific free and open.
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: Foreign actors inflict damage on the American economy. How how
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: do they do that? Oh?
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: I know, I know how they do that? By trading
• 19:06
  Speaker 2: with us? How frigging dare they? They trade with us
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: and by doing so they inflict damage on us. I'm
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: worse off for trading with somebody. This is zero was
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: some thinking of the worst kind, perceptual level, mentality of
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: the worst kind. We want to support our allies in
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: preserving the freedom and security of Europe. Europe as a
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: real role here will see the strategy around Europe is
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: really important. So notice support our allies and preserving the
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: freedom of security of Europe.
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: That sounds fantastic, yes, While restoring restoring America is going
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: to restore Europe's civilizational self confidence and Western identity. Now,
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: I am all four.
• 19:58
  Speaker 2: Restoring Europe's civilizational self confidence in Western identity, and I'm
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: all for doing that because I think it's really really crucial.
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: But what is Trump?
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: People?
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: Because Trump doesn't think what is Trump's people think you
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: have civilizational self confidence in Western identity means what do
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: they think that means. I'll tell you what they think
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: that means. They think that means Christianity. They won't write
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: it here, but that's what they.
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: Think it means. Not reason and individualism.
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: They think it means Christianity with closed borders, right wing Christianity,
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: not not left wing Christianity like in Europe. They want
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: to bring civilizational self commedies in Western identity.
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: What was the thing that Matt Walsh wrote.
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: Yesterday about how things are worse off in every dimension
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: in the world right now?
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: That's what they want to bring back.
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: And we want to ensure that US technology and US standards,
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: particularly in AI, biotech and quantum computing, drive the world forward.
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: We won't ensure that juice technology and your standards, particularly
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: AI biotech and quantum computing, driver doors forward. Yeah, me too,
• 21:20
  Speaker 2: me too, yep. Freedom, capitalism all right?
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: What America is available means to get what we want.
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: What we have that makes it possible, and this is fascinating.
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: What are advantages? We have a nimble political system, nimble,
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: that's what they call it.
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: Nimble.
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: We have the world's largest and most innovative economy, leading
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: financial system, advanced and most innovative, powerful and capable military,
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: broad network of alliances enview, not so much with Trump
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: enviable geography, unmatched soft power, courage, will power on patriots
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: of the American people. Anybody notice anything here missing from
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: the things that make it make it?
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: Was it again?
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: What makes us special? What makes it possible for us
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: to have this position? What makes all this possible? You
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: notice anything that's missing? What's missing is what America is.
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: Freedom.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: What's missing is individual rights. What's missing is capital c capitalism.
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: What's missing is freedom.
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: Freedom.
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: But remember, people in Trump universe don't understand why America
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: is rich. They have no conception of what America is.
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: Jennifers's the idea of America. Absolutely. What they're missing is
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: the idea of America, which is what makes all this possible.
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: But they don't know what that is. They have no idea. Indeed,
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: when underminded and undercutted said to them, these are just
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: creeds that are oh, we're rich, cool.
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: How did we get rich? We're Americans. That's how we
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: got rich. We're just Americans. We have the right genes.
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: Something I don't know.
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: So the whole idea of what America is. It's it's nature.
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: It goes back to this year about Europe. They want
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: to civilization of confidence in Western identity.
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: What the hell is that? Do they know? Enlightenment? Again,
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: to them, it's Christianity. We're rich because we're Christian. Other
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: people Christian not rich.
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: Well, they don't, they don't, they don't the right Christianity.
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: In addition, through President Trump's robust domestic agenda, the United
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: States is reinstalling a culture of competence. How is it
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: doing that?
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: By rooting out DII? That's how we get back to competence.
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: Not rooting our DII is good? But is that enough?
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: At leasting on enormous energy production?
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: Good?
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: Reindustrializing our economy hmm interesting given that manufacturing has declined
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: every month since Trump took office, literally every month, and
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: it's not getting better.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: It's getting worse.
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: Less industrial jobs, less industrial capacity, less stuff being made
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: every month since Trump became presidents. He's not reindustrializing, he's deindustrializing, unindustrializing.
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: Whatever the hell the world is.
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: Returning economic freedom The only time freedom appears anyway to
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: our citizens, really, the economic freedom to.
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: Trade with whoever we want.
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: We have lowered taxes, true, but we've also increased taxes
• 24:44
  Speaker 2: called tariffs. We've deregulated, but not in any big significant way.
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: And then finally investing in emergence technologies and basic science.
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: I thought Trump was cutting back on investment in basic
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: science quite dramatically.
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: Actually they lie. What's new? Okay, what's the strategy? This?
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: I love the sentence. This is great.
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: Right, We're going to be pragmatic without being pragmatists. We're
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: going to being realistic without being realists. We're going to
• 25:15
  Speaker 2: be principled without being idealistic. We're going to be muscular
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: without being hawkish, and restrained without being dubbish. It is
• 25:27
  Speaker 2: not grounded in traditional political ideology because we are America first. Now,
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: if you understand what the hell that means, good for you,
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: because I have no clue, and I guarantee you the
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: people who wrote it have no clue either. They have
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: no idea what they just wrote.
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: So what are we going to do? So far?
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: President Trump has proven an American fall policy. Defense and
• 25:51
  Speaker 2: intelligence policies whoops, Right, there must be driven by the
• 25:55
  Speaker 2: falling basic principles focused definition of national interest. That is
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: absolutely true. But I don't see that happening. The national
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: interest is some schmogusborg of.
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: Anti immigration, anti trade, anti drugs, strong military combination and
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: don't touch a Western hemisphere. Peace through strength. I support
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: peace through strength. I wish they took seriously Peter's position
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: to non intervention. This is interesting. Well Peter sposed not
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: ten TV unless we want to right. Uh? This is
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: this is this is this is really interesting.
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: This one sentence of this document, which I think on
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: the minds a lot of what they write in the
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: rest of the documentary. It says, in the Declaration Independence,
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: America's founders laid down a clear preference for non interventionism
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: in the affears of other nations and made it clear
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: that the basis.
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: Here, and this is the sentence, just as.
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: All human beings possess God given equal natural rights. What
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: all human beings possess God given equal natural rights?
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: Let me read that again, All human beings possess God
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: given equal natural rights? You mean immigrants? Do you mean
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: even illegal immigrants possess God given equal natural rights equal
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: to everybody else, including to citizens. Wow.
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: I guess if you're a drug dealer, you don't possess.
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: But it says all human. It doesn't say unless you're
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: doing something Trump doesn't like. It's not in parentheses. All
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: human beings. That means, including non Americans, they all possess
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: God given equal natural rights. And then it says all
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: nations are entitled by the laws of nature, God, and
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: Nature's God to ac separate an equal station with suspect
• 28:02
  Speaker 2: another one another.
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: Really is that what the founders really meant?
• 28:11
  Speaker 2: And how is that consistent with all human beings possessing
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: God given equal natural rights. When some nations violate those rights,
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: are they then equal?
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: And should they have equal station?
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: Should Nazi Germany had equalstation with America because because the
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: laws of nature and Nature's God require it.
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is bizarre, bizarre.
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: The first statement is true, all human beings do possess
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: natural rights, equal natural rights. That is the cornerstone of
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: them of America. It's the cornerstone of what makes America America.
• 28:52
  Speaker 2: And this administration violates that principle in almost everything that
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: it does. But this idea that all countries should be
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: treated equally is absurd, And here continues for country whose
• 29:11
  Speaker 2: interests are as numerous and diverse as ours. Rigid adherence
• 29:15
  Speaker 2: to non interventionism is not possible, so we might intervene sometimes.
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: We're just not going to tell you when, and we're
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: not going to lay out a cliff strategy of when
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: we're gett intervene and when we're not. Like Venezuela, we
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: don't like them there, and they supply drugs primarily to Europe,
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: by the way, not to the US.
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: Most of the drugs from Venezuela go to Europe, but.
• 29:39
  Speaker 2: Doesn't matter, and therefore we maintain the right to intervene.
• 29:46
  Speaker 2: And then the Western hemisphere because on flexible realism, we
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: seek good relations and peaceful commercial relations with the nations
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: of the world without imposing them democratic or other social
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: changes that differ widely from the traditions and histories. In
• 30:01
  Speaker 2: other words, we accept all nations, no matter how much
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: they violate their own people's God given equal natural rates.
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: Everybody's the same, All these countries are the same. And
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: by the way, I don't understand this. We want good
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: relations and peaceful commercial relations. How to tell us fit
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: into that, I don't know, Even as we push like
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: minded friends to uphold our share values. So notice, we
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: are not going to tell Russia or China or Vietnam
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: or Venezuela or any country.
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: How they should run their business. We're not going to
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: tell them what's right and what's wrong. We're not going
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: to tell them that they should become more freedom over
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: in it.
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: We're not going to tell them any of that, except
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: except for Western countries. There we're going to lecture them.
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: We're going to help them bring back civilization, words Christianity.
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: The primacy of nations. This is straight out of national conservatism.
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: It is natural and just that all nations put their
• 31:08
  Speaker 2: interests first in God their sovereignty. But not all nations
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: have sovereignty, at least not according to Rand. If they're
• 31:15
  Speaker 2: violating the natural rights of their citizens, they don't have sovereignty.
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: Sovereignty is from the people, and if the people opposed
• 31:26
  Speaker 2: to the regime, they have no sovereignty. If the people
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: are being oppressed by the regime, the regime has no sovereignty.
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: Sovereignty I mean, this is the primacy of nations. Whereas
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: we we some of us online, we believe in the
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: primacy of the individual.
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: We believe in the primacy of individual rights, you know,
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: those God given whatever they stated, but they're they right.
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: We stand for the sovereign rights of nations.
• 31:59
  Speaker 2: Nations do not have rights, They do not have sovereign
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: rights against the sovereignty sapping incursions of the most intrusive
• 32:07
  Speaker 2: transnational organizations.
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: What if those transnational.
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: Organizations are seeking liberty and freedom sovereignty in respect, the
• 32:16
  Speaker 2: United States will unapologetically project our own sovereignty. Attempt so
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: I found powers of entities to sense our disclosure or
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: could tell our citizens free speech rights, lobbying and influence
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: operations and seek to steer our policies or involve us
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: in foreign conflicts, and cynically manipulation of our immigration system,
• 32:35
  Speaker 2: always immigration to build up voting blocks loyal to foreign
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: interests within our country.
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: The conspiracy theories, balance of power.
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: The United States cannot allow any nation to become so
• 32:48
  Speaker 2: pre dominant that it could threaten our interests.
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: But other than that, we're going to allow.
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: China to dominate Asia and Russia to dominate whatever it
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: can dominate.
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: Pro American worker, what happened to the equal rights? There's
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: something about equal rights?
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: But now American workers are going to get proferential treatment.
• 33:11
  Speaker 2: American positively, we be pro worker? Do I count as
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: a worker? Do you guys count as workers?
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: What about the rights of capitalists, business owners, entrepreneurs, innovators, students, children,
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: I don't know, non workers. This is stupid and contradict fairness.
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: From military alliances to trade relations and beyond, the United
• 33:49
  Speaker 2: States will insist them being treated fairly.
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: By other countries. That's right.
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: We should be treated fairlies by the countries. We just
• 33:55
  Speaker 2: don't trade with other countries. We trade with individuals in
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: those countries.
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: And we only trade with them.
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: The only reason Americans trade with foreigners is when it
• 34:03
  Speaker 2: benefits Americans. If Americans thought that the foreigners were being unfair,
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: they wouldn't trade with them.
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: If my grocery store, local grocery shur. If I think
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: they're unfair, I walk away. Competence and merit.
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: American prosperity and security depend on the development and promotion
• 34:21
  Speaker 2: of competence.
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: I'm awful competence competence is.
• 34:23
  Speaker 2: Could they continue the success of radical ideologies that seek
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: to replace competence and merit with favorite group status would
• 34:34
  Speaker 2: render American America unrecognizable and unable to defend itself.
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: So this is anti DII. Here we go.
• 34:42
  Speaker 2: We can however, right this is However, this is unbelievable statement. Right,
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: we want merit we want competence. However, now you get
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: the reveal of what they really, really, really really care about. However,
• 34:59
  Speaker 2: or at the same time, we cannot allow meritocracy to
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: be used as a justification to open America's labor markets
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: to the world in the name of finding global talent
• 35:12
  Speaker 2: that undercuts American workers. Now that is ludicrous on so
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: many different levels, but on the basic level, it doesn't
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: undercut American workers.
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: It elevates American workers.
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: If we can bring in global talents in all realms,
• 35:33
  Speaker 2: then that creates more opportunities, more businesses.
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: It increases productivity.
• 35:39
  Speaker 2: We get more innovators, we got more brains, we get
• 35:42
  Speaker 2: more engineers, we get more people starting gardening companies, we
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: get more products, products get cheaper, better, wages go up
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: because productivity goes up. And we get a much better
• 35:58
  Speaker 2: culture because we're getting the best form all the cultures
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: who are coming here and reinvigorating American culture. So in
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: every regard, this is just an unbelievable statement, and it.
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: Shows how this is what they care about. And it
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: tells you that the in priorities. This is the next
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: section priorities, the number one priority, the first priority they
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: list is an end of mass immigration.
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: Who a country admits into its borders, in what numbers
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: and from where will inevitably define the future of that country. Yeah,
• 36:41
  Speaker 2: if you don't admit the right people, if you don't
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: admit enough people, if you don't admit the right people,
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: if you don't allow for freedom, your country is screwed.
• 36:51
  Speaker 2: Thought history, sovereign nations prohibited uncontrolled migration. Da da, This
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: is what they really care about in countries, thought history,
• 36:57
  Speaker 2: mass migration are strained domestic domestic resources, really increased violence
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: and other crimes, No evidence of that. Weaken social creation,
• 37:06
  Speaker 2: no evidence of that, distorted labor markets and under my
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: national security. Isn't an amazing amazing that the largest immigration
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: in human history, the largest immigration in human industry as
• 37:18
  Speaker 2: a percentage of the population.
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: The largest immigration.
• 37:22
  Speaker 2: In human history was immigration to the United States during
• 37:26
  Speaker 2: the nineteenth century, which was by every definition mass migration,
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: and that basically built defined what America is. What would
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: America be without the mass migration of the nineteenth century.
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: It didn't strain domestic g resources, it enhanced them and
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: expanded them. It didn't increase violence in other crime, well
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: maybe for a short time when the Italians came in
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: with the mafia, it decreased it over time. It didn't
• 38:00
  Speaker 2: weaken social creation. It actually made America America. It didn't
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: distort labor markets. It allowed labor markets to expand dramatically,
• 38:10
  Speaker 2: increased productivity and increased wages. And it certainly didn't under
• 38:14
  Speaker 2: my national security. It made the American country big and
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: strong enough to be able to take over, to take
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: on anybody in the world. From the founding until nineteen fourteen,
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: actually into nineteen twenty four America basically had an open
• 38:30
  Speaker 2: immigration system.
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: Open immigration anybody could come. Read your history, and that, not.
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: Accidentally, is the era in which America went from a
• 38:41
  Speaker 2: third grade colony to the strongest economy and strongest military
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: in the world. It is during the era of open
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: immigration that America became the strongest, that America became.
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: The most powerful economic power.
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: It is during this period where America became America.
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: So don't give me this throughout history. Throughout history, God, the.
• 39:15
  Speaker 2: American history contradicts everything they stand for and.
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: Everything many of you stand for. Without immigration, America would
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: be in a small, insignificant, struggling country. It would have had,
• 39:34
  Speaker 1: I mean, almost all the great entrepreneurs who built this
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: country were immigrants. Rockefeller, Carnegie, Melon, JP Morgan, all immigrants.
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: So the idea that this country would become what it
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: became without immigration is historically ignorant, economic, stupid, and motivated
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: by a xenophobic, racist ideology that wants to recast the past.
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: In order to justify eliminating freedom in this country today.
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: Second priority, after the first, protection of core rights and liberties.
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: Shouldn't that be first? You'd think that would be first,
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: You'd think, and.
• 40:36
  Speaker 2: Then listen to this. Regarding countries that share or say
• 40:40
  Speaker 2: they share these principles, principles of rights and everything, these
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: are the countries we're going to be mad at. The
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: United States will advocate strongly that they be upheld in
• 40:51
  Speaker 2: letter and spirit. We will oppose elite driven anti democratic
• 40:56
  Speaker 2: restrictions on core liberties in Europe, the Anglosphere, and the
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: rest of the democratic world, especially among our allies.
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: I mean, we don't care what the Russians is to Russia.
• 41:05
  Speaker 2: We don't care what what what Putin does, we don't
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: care what she does, we don't care what any brutal
• 41:09
  Speaker 2: dictator does.
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: Anyway, as long as Europe stays.
• 41:14
  Speaker 2: Consistent with these principles as understood by the crazy people
• 41:18
  Speaker 2: who work for Trump. We believe in burden sharing and
• 41:22
  Speaker 2: burden shifting. We want other countries to pay their fish
• 41:24
  Speaker 2: shire fine.
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: I have no problem with that, although again it has
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: a bunch of bs about trade in here. Realignment through peace. Uh,
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: you know, we want to seek peace. We want to
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: seek peace.
• 41:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, even if we have to compromise and sell out
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: to our enemies, even if we have to sell Israel
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: out to Qatar, even if Takata, even if we have
• 41:49
  Speaker 2: to sell out Ukraine to Russia.
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: The main thing is peace. Economic security.
• 41:57
  Speaker 2: This is the This is the complete ignorance about economics, trade,
• 42:00
  Speaker 2: balance trade, which is meaningless. I've talked about it many, many,
• 42:05
  Speaker 2: many times why balance trade is not something to strife
• 42:09
  Speaker 2: for and not very meaningful. Securing access to critical supply
• 42:13
  Speaker 2: chains and materials. You can do that by deregulating environmentalism
• 42:17
  Speaker 2: here in the United States. Reindustrialization not exactly what the
• 42:21
  Speaker 2: United States is actually doing.
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: You don't do it by strategic use of tariffs.
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: Tariffs do the exact opposite. You don't do it, you know,
• 42:32
  Speaker 2: you don't do it by central planning.
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: You do it through capitalism.
• 42:37
  Speaker 2: You do it through freedom reviving on defense industrial base. Yeah,
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: I mean this is all good.
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: Again.
• 42:45
  Speaker 2: To do that, you need more freedom, more capitalism, and
• 42:48
  Speaker 2: you need to encourage entrepreneurship, and you need to encourage
• 42:52
  Speaker 2: the Defense Department to respect entrepreneurs Energy dominance again, solution
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: to energy dominance is unsupport freedom, preserving and growing America's
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: financial sector dominance.
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: Answer to that is freedom.
• 43:08
  Speaker 2: This is the only place where they say something like
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: preserving and growing out dominance entails leveraging our dynamic femalket system.
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: Now it means establishing a femalekeet system because our fem
• 43:18
  Speaker 2: markets we don't have free markets in finance.
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: We need more free markets. That's what we need, all right.
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is a section.
• 43:31
  Speaker 2: We're running out of time, but this is a section
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: where he talks about reasserting the Monroe doctrine and you know,
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: emphasizing emphasizing Europe. We want to enlist their help in
• 43:47
  Speaker 2: for migration and for cartels and for near showing manufacturing.
• 43:55
  Speaker 2: United States must consider our military presence in the Western hemisphere.
• 43:58
  Speaker 2: This is all those all those ships in the Caribbean Sea.
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: Blowing boats out of the water.
• 44:06
  Speaker 2: That's you know, American toughness on display around the world,
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: blowing people out of the water, killing them, killing them
• 44:14
  Speaker 2: with no trial, no declaration of war, nothing, just the
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: president's whim. We must look to expand our network in
• 44:23
  Speaker 2: the region, identify street each points and resources. We must
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: prevent others within the hemisphere other powers.
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: Being president of the Hemisphere, the.
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: United States should make clear that American goods, services, and
• 44:37
  Speaker 2: technologies are far better better buying a long run because
• 44:41
  Speaker 2: they are higher quality and do not come with the
• 44:43
  Speaker 2: same kind of strings as other countries' assistance. Yeah, you
• 44:46
  Speaker 2: make that clear by basically having free trade and letting countries,
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: letting companies and individuals in those countries decide who they.
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: Want to trade with.
• 44:57
  Speaker 2: Anyway, at that Asia, China got rich and powerful and
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: used its wealth and power to its considerable advantage.
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: So China, China is problematic.
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: But you know, the Indo Pacific is already the source
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: of almost half the world's GDP, but it's not a
• 45:19
  Speaker 2: focus right. This is second to Latin America, So which
• 45:25
  Speaker 2: means the Indo Pacific is already and will continue to
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: be among the next centuries key economic and geopolitical backgrounds,
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: and we need to be able to successfully compete here.
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: I agree completely, It's just I'm not sure these are
• 45:37
  Speaker 2: the strategies to do it.
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: Since the Chinese economy reopened in the world in nineteen
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: seventy nine, commercial relationships between now two countries have been
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: and remained fundamentally unbalanced. That's right.
• 45:48
  Speaker 2: We get huge benefits from China and they get just some.
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is such crap.
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: The reality is America benefit and has benefited enormously from
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: trade with China. Now, maybe one can argue we should
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: stop trading with them because they're hostile, okay, But the
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: idea that they benefited and we have not, or that
• 46:15
  Speaker 2: they've benefited a lot and we benefited a little, is.
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: Just economic ignorant and wrong. It's wrong anyway, tariff stuff.
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: Going forward, we will rebalance America's economic relations with China,
• 46:33
  Speaker 2: prioritizing re siprecocity and fairness to a stall American economic independence.
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: Trade with China should be balanced and focused on nonsensitive factors.
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: Good luck with that and balances balance and trade is
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: not a good thing, particularly not with any particular country,
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: and it cannot be achieved.
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: Since Trump's tariffs have come into play, we are not
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: more balanced we are indeed less balanced. Trade deficit is larger,
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: not smaller, a robust and I'm going focus on deterents
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: to prevent war in the Indo Pacific.
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: That's a good thing, and there's not enough about that
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: rather than this, the United States rights to protecting, defending
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: economy and our people from harm from other countries. There
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: is no there is no harm that other countries inflict
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: on our economy. There is no you know, they if
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: they subsidize industries in their own country and we can
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: buy the cheap stuff that benefits us, it doesn't harm us.
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: There are no unfair trading practices. You know, they're not
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: job destroying in the industrialization quite the country.
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: I've talked a lot about this. I'm skipping I'm skipping
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: all of that. You know. This is about.
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: Treaties and bringing India in and yeah, mostly good stuff.
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: And the US government critical relations with American private sector. Yeah,
• 48:04
  Speaker 2: the best thing the US government can do with the
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: private sector is leave it alone. America first, diplomacy needs
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: to rebalance global trade relations. No, it shouldn't. It doesn't
• 48:14
  Speaker 2: know how to. This is central planning, park salons. It's
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: exactly the opposite of what it made America successful and rich.
• 48:22
  Speaker 2: So stay away, don't try to guide, don't try to
• 48:25
  Speaker 2: shape economic issues. This is fascinating. There's a whole section
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: here in the Middle East. What has never mentioned Islamism?
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: Terrorism not a.
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: Wood, not a wood, Nothing about supporting terrorism, nothing about terrorism,
• 48:41
  Speaker 2: nothing about the risk of terrorism.
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: Nothing.
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: Indeed, a huge, you know, huge pat on the back
• 48:50
  Speaker 2: to golf Persian Gulf countries. They demonstrate the power appeal
• 48:56
  Speaker 2: of American technology. We needed, we need needed reassurance from
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: the Qataris and the Saudis and UEE that our.
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: Technology is good.
• 49:06
  Speaker 2: We should film coalitions that use a comparative advantage in
• 49:09
  Speaker 2: finance and technology to build export markets with corporating countries.
• 49:14
  Speaker 1: Just trade with them. What do you need to form
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: coalitions for? What a waste?
• 49:19
  Speaker 2: And again, do these countries fund Islamism? Are we giving
• 49:24
  Speaker 2: them weapons and technology that then they will use against us?
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: Here here's the one statement.
• 49:36
  Speaker 2: They say, the greatest advantage remains our free our system
• 49:39
  Speaker 2: of government and dynamic free market economy.
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: All true.
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: Yet we cannot assume that our system's advantages will prevailed
• 49:46
  Speaker 2: by default, and national security strategy is therefore essential. National
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: security strategy is essential not a national economic strategy, not
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: a national economic policy other than to keep our system free.
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: That's all you need. So nothing about Islamic terrorism, not
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: a word, doesn't exist anymore. It's not a threat to
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: the United States. The only threat is immigration and predatory trade. Trade.
• 50:13
  Speaker 1: Trade and immigration are threats.
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: Terrorism is not almost no mention of Russia, a little
• 50:19
  Speaker 2: bit of China, but not really as a threat. Something
• 50:25
  Speaker 2: about global shipping is important, and we need to detour
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: conflict in Taiwan.
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: Which is good. Let's see.
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we want Japan and South Korea to spend more
• 50:42
  Speaker 2: money on defense.
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: I agree with that.
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: Promoting European greatness whole section and now from policy strategy
• 50:51
  Speaker 2: is to.
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: Promote European greatness.
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: So we want to help them prevent their economic decline,
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: and we want to prevent them from undermining political liberty
• 51:07
  Speaker 2: and sovereignty. We definitely want to stop the mass migration
• 51:11
  Speaker 2: into Europe. We America, this is American farm policy. We
• 51:17
  Speaker 2: want to, you know, stop creating strife, and we want
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: to stop them from censuring free speech, which is rich
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: coming from Trump, one of the most censorious presidents in
• 51:28
  Speaker 2: American history. We're going to prevent them from suppressing political opposition.
• 51:34
  Speaker 2: Again rich coming from Trump who tried to overthrow an election,
• 51:41
  Speaker 2: creating birth rates. I hate to tell you, but the
• 51:44
  Speaker 2: creating in America as well, and loss of national identity
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: and self confidence.
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: It's true. You know that you know nothing about Islamia,
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: nothing about the Islamist threat. It's mass migration, as if
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: all mass migration is the same, nothing about Muslims, nothing
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: about Sharia, because there's nothing in the old document portraying
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: Islam as a problem.
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: Because the Kataris might greet it, and they might not
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: like it, and they might want they gift back, or
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: they might not invest in Trump towers quite as much,
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: or they might they might not just be happy with Trump.
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: You wouldn't want to upset the Kataris.
• 52:28
  Speaker 2: We want Europe to remain Europe, to regain a civilization
• 52:31
  Speaker 2: and self conference and to banits failed.
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: Focused and regulator sufifocation. That's good. I want them to
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: regain all that and to stop regulating to death. But
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: I don't think that's what you mean here.
• 52:44
  Speaker 2: It is a core interest in the United States negotiate
• 52:46
  Speaker 2: an expeditious cessation of hostilities in Ukraine. In other words,
• 52:50
  Speaker 2: it's in a core interest in the United States for
• 52:52
  Speaker 2: Ukraine to surrender to Russia.
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: We want to re establish strategic stability with Russia. Why
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: their trump a deeministration fight.
• 53:05
  Speaker 2: It suffers odds with European officials who hold unrealistic expectations
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: of the war, pushed in unstable minority governments, many of
• 53:12
  Speaker 2: which trample and basic principles of democracy to suppress opposition.
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: They're talking about Europe really, as compared to Russia.
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: A large European majority wants peace, not true. A large
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: European majority wants Russia to leave Ukraine. A large European
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: majority wants Europe to stand in America, to stand behind
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: Ukraine in its opposition to Russia.
• 53:40
  Speaker 2: Yet that desire is not translated into policy. Yeah, putsin
• 53:43
  Speaker 2: what's up with that? In large measures, because these governments
• 53:46
  Speaker 2: subverse subversion of democratic processes. This is so hostile to
• 53:53
  Speaker 2: Europe and so friendly to everybody else, it's unbelievable. Yet
• 54:02
  Speaker 2: Europe remains strategically and culturally vital to the United States.
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Not only can we not afford to write Europe off.
• 54:09
  Speaker 2: Doing so would be self defeating for what the strategy
• 54:12
  Speaker 2: aims to achieve. American diplomacy should continue to stand up
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: for genuine democracy.
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: Freedom of expression.
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: Oh God, I wish we had freedom of expression in
• 54:20
  Speaker 2: America under Trump. An unapologetic celebration of America, of European nations,
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: individual character and history. Again the collectivism, Ah, nothing about
• 54:31
  Speaker 2: individual God given rights. Here, promote and revive the spirit
• 54:35
  Speaker 2: and growing influence of patriotic European parties. Indeed, gives cause
• 54:40
  Speaker 2: of great optimism here they talk about the right wing
• 54:45
  Speaker 2: political parties in Europe. That's what they're excited about. That's
• 54:47
  Speaker 2: what gives them optimism about Europe. This is about what
• 54:55
  Speaker 2: they're going to do to Europe and enabling them to
• 54:58
  Speaker 2: do this and to do that, encouraging them to do
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: this and that. Again Middle East Middle East partners are
• 55:03
  Speaker 2: demonstrating the commitment to combating radicalism, a trend line. American
• 55:07
  Speaker 2: policy should continued to encourage. Which kind of radicalism Islamic
• 55:12
  Speaker 2: something others? And by the way, is that true? Is
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: Kataru Kato a big friend in ally? Are they spending
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: less money on radicalism? Are they spending less money in
• 55:22
  Speaker 2: the Muslim brotherhood? Are they promoting terrorism less?
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: If so, I don't know that that's true.
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: Dropping America's misguided experiment with hectoring, hectoring these nations, especially
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: the Gulf monarchies, into abandoning their traditions and historic form
• 55:37
  Speaker 2: of government.
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: I don't know, I'm speechless, and how awful.
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, let them let them oppress their people, let
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: them subvert their god given, god given natural rights, equal
• 55:53
  Speaker 2: natural rights, you know, let them promote Islamism, let them
• 55:59
  Speaker 2: certa rorists.
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: What the hell?
• 56:03
  Speaker 2: Accepting the region, its leaders, and its nations as they
• 56:07
  Speaker 2: are while working together on areas of common interest. That
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: is their new Middle East strategy. Now, if you think
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: this is Israel friendly, then you're nuts. Israel makes no
• 56:18
  Speaker 2: mention here except, you know, right at the beginning, something
• 56:22
  Speaker 2: about American Arab Israeli and took his support something like
• 56:25
  Speaker 2: that to stabilize and is Tho's actions in Iran. But
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: this is basically all about appeasing the Muslim world, all
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: about appeasing the monarchies, all about appeasing.
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: The people who.
• 56:41
  Speaker 2: Funded terrorism against America. And in the long run, the
• 56:48
  Speaker 2: days in which Middle East dominated American fault policy is
• 56:51
  Speaker 2: both long term planning and day to day execution execution
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: are thankfully over. So all right, Well, that is the
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: strategic plan. It's a lot of a lot of really
• 57:13
  Speaker 2: really mixed ideas. A few sentences here in there, they're good,
• 57:17
  Speaker 2: a lot of garbage. What you'd expect out of a
• 57:22
  Speaker 2: national conservative kind of led administration, what you'd expect from
• 57:27
  Speaker 2: an administration to use everything from a collectivistic framework, what
• 57:32
  Speaker 2: you'd expect from people who view the biggest threats to
• 57:36
  Speaker 2: America being immigration and drug imputation and trade imbalance.
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: One day, one day.
• 57:48
  Speaker 2: I'm looking forward to the day where I will read
• 57:49
  Speaker 2: a document like this and agree with one of it.
• 57:56
  Speaker 2: By the way, in twenty seventeen, immigration was treated as
• 57:59
  Speaker 2: a security issue voted protection. In this documentary, it's being
• 58:03
  Speaker 2: treated as an existential threat. Generally, a big difference between
• 58:16
  Speaker 2: the twenty seventeen document and this one.
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: Laura Luma is really upset.
• 58:23
  Speaker 2: According she got the document, she read the whole thing,
• 58:25
  Speaker 2: She did keyword search, and she says, according to the
• 58:28
  Speaker 2: keywords search I conducted, there was zero mention of the
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: woods he had.
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: There was zero mention of the wood Islamic.
• 58:33
  Speaker 2: There is zero mention of the wood islam There's only
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: one mention of Islamic terry activity. Not here in the
• 58:40
  Speaker 2: homeland of the United States sol but in Africa there
• 58:43
  Speaker 2: is zero mention of the CCP, the Communist Chinese Communist Party.
• 58:48
  Speaker 2: There was zero mention of the Wood Communist or communism.
• 58:52
  Speaker 2: How is this possible, Well, it's possible because Trump is
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: the end and there's an anti ideology, completely anti ideology,
• 59:05
  Speaker 2: and he's not going to identify communism as a problem
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: because that would identify in antiology and is against identifying
• 59:11
  Speaker 2: ideologies as bad. More than anything, this is a document
• 59:18
  Speaker 2: that basically said America is going to expend a lot
• 59:20
  Speaker 2: of energy on trying to reshape Europe and trying to
• 59:24
  Speaker 2: make Europe like American conservatives would like America to be,
• 59:27
  Speaker 2: or like Europe to be.
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: This is a continuation of the JD.
• 59:31
  Speaker 2: Van's speech at the Munich was a security conference from
• 59:35
  Speaker 2: earlier this year where he berated the Europeans about issues
• 59:39
  Speaker 2: like free speech.
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: Now, I'm all for.
• 59:44
  Speaker 2: Berating Europeans and moving them towards greater freedom, but that's
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: not what they're doing. They're moving them to grow to
• 59:50
  Speaker 2: greater nationalism, towards more Christianity, towards more of this reactionary
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 2: ideology that the modern conservatives adhere to.
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: All Right, let's quickly on the pipe bomb. I don't
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: have a lot to say about this, but they arrested
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: the guy who put out the pipe bombs the day
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: before January sixth, pipe bombs that are ultimately disarmed. And
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: for years, the writer has.
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 2: Been full on conspiracy theory about this, you know, conspiracies
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 2: that it was an inside job, that the pipe bombs
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: were done by the Metro Police or by the FBI,
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 2: that it's part of the big inside job that is
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: January sixth. I mean, full of conspiracy theories around the
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 2: pipe bombs that you know, and around January sixth, that's
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: all inside jobs. So Hannity had deputy fi Deputy Director
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: Dan Bungino on, and Dan Bungeno, of course when he
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: was a talk show host from talk show hosts, a
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 2: deputy FBI director, that's quite that's quite a promotion. Anyway,
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 2: he was one of the biggest promoters of these conspiracy
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 2: theories that it was all basically inside.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: Job, the pipe bumps. Well, now, when asked about this,
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: this is what Bengino responded, This is your deputy FBI director.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 1: I was paid in the past, Sean for my opinions.
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 2: That's clear. One day I will be back in that space.
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 2: But that's not what I'm paid for now. I'm paid
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: to be your deputy director and we base investigations on facts.
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: That is just a perfect statement.
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: In other words, when I was a pundit and had
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 2: my own TV show or podcast or whatever, I didn't
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 2: have to base what I said on facts.
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: I just spouted opinions that were facts that had nothing
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: to do with facts, a truth or anything like that,
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 1: just whatever came to my mind. What the hell?
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 2: Now then I have to be a FBI. I have
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 2: to base everything on facts. Now I have to be serious.
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 2: Now I seek the truth.
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, that just made me laugh.
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 2: I think that's one of the most hysterical things I've
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: seen in a while. But yeah, all right, all right,
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 2: let's get back to serious stuff. Let's talk about the Eurovision.
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: And I was also going to talk about Israel, but
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 2: really out of time, so I'll do a separate segment
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: another time about why America is to support as well.
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: I want to do a self contained video on that.
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: There seems to be a lot of interest in this
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: and I will talk about that. But anyway, the Eurovision
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 2: is a singing competition in Europe and countries compete.
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: Each country sends a singer to represent their country and
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: they sing, and then there used to be just a
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: panel of judges, a judge from each country, and they
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 1: would vote on who the winner was.
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 2: And now they have simultaneous judging where people in each country, not.
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: Just judges, people in each country can also vote on
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 1: which song wins.
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: And this is a competition and it's big in Europe.
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: I mean, European countries take this seriously and they all
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: watch and it's a big deal. Israel has participated in
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 2: the Eurovision at least since the early seventies. I remember
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: as a kid watching the Eurovision. I remember when Abba Abba,
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: Well maybe in the mid seventies Israel joined, but I
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 2: remember when Aba one, you know, the group Abba from
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: Sweden won the Eurovision.
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: And as well as one.
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 2: The competition a couple of times, maybe more, but at
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: least a couple of times. Well, this year the Eurovision
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 2: is being hosted in I believe, Austria, and there has
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: been an upproll about whether Israel should be allowed to
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 2: participate because Israel, of course is a para state. It is,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: you know, it is a genocidal state that has just
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: committed war crimes in Gaza and if we should not
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 2: be allowed to participate.
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: In this competition.
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 2: And the consequence, So there's a big crisis, you know. Basically,
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: basically Austria said, oh, no, Israel's participating. We're a host
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 2: and Israel's definitely invited and they will participate. However, four
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: countries have decided they will guess they are going to
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 2: skip the Eurovision this year, and this is a big
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 2: deal in these countries because Israel is there. They will
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: not be one of these countries. Is surprising to me
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 2: that others maybe not Ireland, that's not surprising. Very anti Israel,
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: very very anti Israel in Ireland, Spain, this government is
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: very anti Israel. I don't think the Spanish people are,
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 2: but this goverment is Slovenia, don't know exactly.
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: And the Netherlands.
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 2: I thought the Netherlands had a relatively right wing government,
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: but this is maybe decided by not the government itself.
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: Those countries.
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: Are not going to be in the Eurovision because of
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 2: because of Israel, right, I mean, this is a disgrace,
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 2: It is absurd. The idea that Israel committed genocide is
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 2: science fiction and bad science. Fiction at that it is
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 2: a negation of facts and reality. Idea that Israel is
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 2: somehow the bad guys in the conflict in Gaza is
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 2: again bizarre and factually completely incorrect.
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: The bad guys in Gaza.
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 2: Are Ramas and all those Palestinians, sadly a large number
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 2: of them, maybe even a majority of them, who support Ramas.
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: They are the bad guys. They're the ones who made
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: this war inevitable. They're the ones who started to one
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: October seventh. They're the ones that use children as human shields.
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: They're the ones who dug tunnels and use hospitals as headquarters.
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 1: They're the ones who refused to.
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: Surrender even though it was clear that they lost and
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 2: the only thing that they were doing was getting civilians killed.
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: They're the ones who refused to release hostages until a
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: bunch of people had to die. They're the ones who
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 1: slaughtered hostages, little children, babies. The Hamas and their supporters,
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: a big chunk of the Palestinian people are monsters, and
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: Israel somehow is to blame here. Israel.
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 2: Somebody says, the Knackba made this way inevitable. Yeah, and
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 2: the Knakba is the Palestinian's fault. Absolutely. They shouldn't have
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 2: started a war with Israel. They should have accepted the
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: Palestinian state. They should have tried to kill Jews wherever
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 2: they could. They shouldn't have, you know, run away thinking
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 2: they were going to win the war and come back.
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, when you lose the war, you lose the war.
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: Their consequences.
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: The Knackba was a consequence of Palestinian actions, and if
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: you don't know that.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 1: History, then you shouldn't spout opinions about it. So the
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: bad guys share the Palestinians, not these Raeliers share these
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: other good guys.
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 2: Israel is a free country, as free as any European country.
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: Israel treats it's citizens equally, including the two million Arabs
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: who live in Israel equal rights. Israel is a country
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: that should be a model for Europe and the rest
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: of the world of governance.
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: Oh, I mean.
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 2: Not perfect, fall and perfect, far far from perfect, but
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: as compared to these other countries, pretty good. But the
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: lies about Israel, I mean, what these countries are doing
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 2: is basically embracing another blood libel among the many blood
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 2: libels of the last two thousand years. The Jews kill Jesus,
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 2: they drink babies blood, you know, they kill Christians, they
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: poison Christian wells to infect them with the plague. They
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: kill Palestinian babies just for fun. Same blood libel. It's
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 2: the same hatred of Jews. It's the same anti Semitism,
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 2: motivated maybe by different different fears and different aspects, but
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 2: it's the same thing. It's disgusting, it's despicable. These European
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: countries and the people that represent them should be ashamed
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: of themselves, all right. What's funny, by the way, is
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: while these countries are accusing Israel of all this stuff,
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: and while the European countries are not going are not
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 2: allowing Israel to come and compete with the in the Eurovision,
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: and even some countries like Germany stopped selling weapons to
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: Israel guesses buying Israeli weapons systems.
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: Europeans.
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 2: There was just like a fair in Israel weapons affair,
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 2: and European countries sent delegations, including countries that hate Israel
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: like Norway, in Germany and the UK, and half of
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 2: NATO members came there to inspect Israeli systems. The Germans
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: have just announced that they are the first country in
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: the world to deploy outside of Israel, to deploy the
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 2: AR three anti aircraft missiles in Germany. It's a three
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 2: billion dollar export deal. So it's his four billion dollar
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: export deal. So yeah, Israel is out is selling its
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: anti missile technology to Europeans who hate on it. It's something, Yes,
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: Europe needs to be reformed, not by Trump though.
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: All right, let's.
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: See that is the news for this December fifth, Friday,
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 2: December fifth, all right, don't have a huge amount of time,
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: so let's see what we're gonna do. We've got how
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: many questions do we have? We've got We've got a few,
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 2: not a huge amount, We've got a few.
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: We're doing okay on the money, one.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: Hundred and forty two dollars short for that second hour,
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: which we are now definitely into, so that'd be great. Wes,
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: thank you for the fifty dollars sticker. That is a
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: huge help to getting us to our goal. Thank you, Wes.
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 2: And let's see do we have any other stickers? Yes, Michael,
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 2: Mike Dial and Stephen Harper, thank you for your stickers.
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: Really really appreciate it.
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: And all right, what else, Yes, we have of some sponsors,
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: The Ironman Institute. Ironman Institute is wants to remind you
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: that a life courses are back. You can get the
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 2: rigor of Ironman Institute's top notch educational programs at a
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 2: commitment level that.
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: Works for you.
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: Courses open to everybody, no application needed, There is no
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: long term commitment.
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: Take the courses that interest you. They work with your schedule.
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 2: Take them whenever you want. You can be their live
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 2: in class, or you can watch your codings. Homework is optional.
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 2: You couldn't control how much you want to invest in
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 2: these courses. Courses run eight to ten weeks, include access
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 2: to a personal success coach.
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: Help you set goals, stay motivated.
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 2: And make the most of what you're learning. We've got
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: three courses starting January. In January, Objectives and Objectivism through
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 2: Ironman's fiction, Reactionary authoritarianism from Mussolini to the New Right.
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 2: I think that's being taught by Nicos an introduction to
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: objectivist ethics. Wherever you are in your intellectual journey, there
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: is something here to take your understanding and your life
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: to the next level. As listeners to this show, you
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: get a ten percent discount with the code twenty six
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: YBS ten. You can find that all the information you
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 2: need about this at einrand dot og slash dot here,
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 2: So check about become take one of these courses. Alex
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 2: Epstein alex Epstein is a sponsor of the show and
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: is the leading thinker on all things fossil fuels, energy, electricity,
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: power generally and is a great thinker and us all
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 2: should subscribe to alex Epstein dot substec dot com. Alex
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: Epstein does substect dot com. His talking points are amazing.
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 2: They will make you so much better communicator about these
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 2: issues that are often contentious, and particularly the holidays, when
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 2: you get family and everybody and you know, the bunch
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 2: of climate change people and stuff like that.
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: It's you know, you'll have the talking point. You'll be
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: able to combat them to the extent that you want.
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 2: Michael Williams from Defenders of Capitalism dot com a friend
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 2: and a colleague of mine. I've i worked for Defenders
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: of Capitalism regular basis. Go check out his website. He's
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 2: a sponsor of the show. Definders of Capitalism a sponsor
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 2: of the show. Check out the website Defenders of Capitalism
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 2: dot com. All right, Lincoln, thank you for the sticker.
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 2: Remind you of our Patreon. I only need four people
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 2: now this month to join you guys. Keep at every
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 2: day I get one that's great by the end of
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: the month.
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: Four forty would be good too, But we'll start with four.
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 2: All right, let's start with fifty dollars. Questions Andrew, The
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: Judo Christian premise of focusing on the meek over the
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 2: wrong is a highly irrational premise. Rand once says something
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 2: to the fact of, I'd like to hear less about
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 2: the incompetent, disabled, and poor, and more about the strong.
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: Successful, and able.
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know that I would call it a
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 2: Judo Christian premise, And Judaism doesn't have much about focusing
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: on the meek.
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: It really is a Christian thing.
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 2: Judaism is much more disworldly and less altruistic, less explicitly
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 2: altruistic than Christianity is.
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: But yes, why is the focus on that.
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 2: The people who move civilization forward, the people who make
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 2: our lives better, the people who push us.
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: To greater wealth and greater spiritual.
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 2: You know, progress, are the achievers, the competents, the strong,
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 2: the able, strong, intellectual.
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: They're the ones who move us forward. So why are
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: we so obsessed with the meek. Why is every time
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: the question is, but what about the poor? And why?
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: If I say why do you care? People get offended?
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: Why do you care? I mean people should answer that question.
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: People should think about it. What is it about the
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: poor makes you care? It's disabilities that are elevated? What
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: about superior abilities? Extraordinary abilities? Shouldn't they be what we
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: really focus on?
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean that's a difference between alturistic culture and
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 2: an egoistic culture. An egoistic culture, I would focus on
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: what's important to me. What's important to me is the
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 2: people who benefit my life the most, the able, the successful,
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 2: the wealth creators, the knowledge creators. Rational IP says excited
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 2: about Netflix acquiring Warner Brothers, including its film or television
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 2: studios HBO, Max and HBO. Let's wait and see if
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 2: the regulators like this mega deal as well as a
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 2: film and IP enthusiast, I'm very happy. The portfolio is massive.
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean it is really interesting. I thought, wasn't
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: this in play where.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 2: What's his name Ellison's company was going to buy this
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 2: and one and and I guess Netflix has stepped in
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 2: and made a big, a higher offer. I think this
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 2: is the same thing Ellison is very connected within.
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: The Trumpet administration.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 2: So let's hope somebody doesn't kill this for political reasons.
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 2: But yeah, I mean I think I'm out for it.
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: I mean a lot of these mergers fail usually. Usually
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 2: generally mergers are big companies are now usually don't succeed.
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: Usually the over ambitious and.
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 2: The Sydney seas are not really there, and the corporate
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 2: cultures clash and and both companies deteriorates. I'm not a
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 2: huge fan of mergers, not because of anti trust reasons,
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 2: but because it's very hard to make emerges succeed. But
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: maybe this one will work. Maybe this one I should,
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 2: you know, should be excited about. Maybe it'll enhance the
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 2: good stuff on Netflix. Netflix has some good stuff, but
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 2: it could it could use more good contact. I mean,
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 2: if everything HBO has would be on Netflix, that would
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 2: be a huge advantage for Netflix, a huge up. Now,
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 2: what the business model is exactly how they want to
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: make that happen? Can they make new good original content
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 2: owned by Netflix?
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: I don't know. We will have to see, Michael.
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 2: What Trump is doing with these drug boats is extra
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: judicial extra judicial chillings i e.
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: Murder killings, i E. Murder.
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 2: He ordered the US military kill the survivors in the water.
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 2: This is the kind of war crime that we rightly
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 2: tried German officers for. Yeah, I mean, I think it's
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 2: just terrific. But it's not even I mean, I think
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 2: the whole thing is a war crime. The second bombing,
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 2: why is that worse than the first bombing?
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 1: Right? The first bombing.
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 2: I mean, if they really wanted to stop the vote,
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 2: they could have sent a US Coast Guard ship to
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 2: stop the boat, search it if there was drugs, arrest
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 2: the people and.
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: Put them on trial.
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 2: The idea that the only way to stop these votes
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 2: and the only way to deal with this is to
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 2: kill them without trial, without evidence, without anything, is just insane.
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 2: It's truly it's truly murdered, and Congress has not authorized us.
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 2: It's unconstitutional, it's illegal, it's horrific, and again nobody cares.
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: Ron.
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 2: I've always wondered why so called conservatives that are about
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 2: freedom on money, etc. Are so anti freedom on personal rights,
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 2: being so often against gay rights, right or abortion.
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 1: It's only consistent and irrational.
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I ran commented in this years and
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 2: years ago, and she basically said, look, the left Marxists
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 2: on materialists. So materialists care about the physical world, and
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 2: they don't care about the spiritual world. They don't care
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 2: about the personal world, they don't care about social issues.
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 2: So they want to control and regulate the material world
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 2: because that's what they care about, and they leave it
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 2: up to people to do whatever the hell they want
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: in their personal and in their social lives because they
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: don't care about that. Conservatives, she said, they think they're religious,
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: so they fundamentally think the material world is unimportant, insignificant,
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 2: who cares, so they leave that to be free. But
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 2: the spiritual world, the personal world, that is the most
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 2: important thing that day fore must be controlled. So each
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: side controls that which they think is most important.
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: Now the way the left and the right, though have evolved,
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: is now now.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 2: Both sides view both the material and the spiritual world
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: is important. Both sides left and right want to regulate both.
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 2: And that's where we are now. So the right has
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 2: given up also on the economic freedom Stephen, today, I
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: was able to do my first supersticker and chat in
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 2: a month on this site on any side. The previous
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: month I was only able to do them intermittently. That's weird.
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 2: So I've missed a lot of income from Stephen. That's
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: weird that YouTube would do that. I have no idea
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 2: what's going on. Charlsbad says, thank you for the show.
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 2: I wish to express to you my most enthusiastic congratch
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 2: contra fibulatarities. Whatever that means. I have no idea. I'll
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 2: take it as congrat whatever. Thank you, chus really appreciated.
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 1: Andrew.
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 2: What do you think about the five hour meeting between Whitcoff,
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 2: Krishna and Putin in his age? They trapsed around Moscow
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 2: again doey eyed, and then at the end the Russians said,
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 2: there was no agreement in Ukraine.
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: Please analyze.
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I did analyze that the day of the day
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 2: after that was happening, and yeah, and I talked about
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 2: the fact Putin gave them a long speech, a long
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 2: history lesson about you know, battles in the past, all
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: with an effort to delegitimize the very idea of a
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: Ukrainian state. You know, basically, all Putin is doing is
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 2: playing with Trump. He's playing with him, He's basically making
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 2: fun of him. He dangles this idea, Oh maybe there's
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 2: time compromising He doesn't, and puts In has no interesting compromise.
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 2: Here's no interest in ending the war unless it's full
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: surrender of Ukraine. And he knows that the more he
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 2: plays Trump, the less Trump will support Ukraine, the less
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: Trump will supply weapons to Ukraine, and the stronger Russia
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 2: is on the battlefield because Ukraine doesn't have the best
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: weapons systems that it could have to actually defeat the Russians.
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 2: So it's it's completely it completely makes sense. And again
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: it's it was a long meeting because because Putin kept lecturing.
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 1: Them on Russian history and about.
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 2: How, by the way, the same things supposed he happened
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 2: in Alaska that Putin brought up big thick folder with
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 2: all of his historical claims and all of his historical
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: stories to share with Trump, and Trump lost patience with it.
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 1: Trump doesn't have a fight, doesn't can't be, you know.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 2: Patient for five hours, and he lost patience with Putin
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 2: trying to give him a history lesson. It's what Putin
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 2: did to Tucker Carlson in that famous interview, Catherine, do
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 2: you think the current US administration will ever fully stop
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 2: Europeans from buying US weapons for Ukraine?
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: I don't know.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 2: It's possible that they would, but I don't know, not yet,
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 2: but it is possible at some point Trump could just
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 2: get fit up and walk away and not sell weapons.
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 2: They is all hopefully will step in and start selling weapons.
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: That would be cool, Thomas, Now is the golden age
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: of air travel. Yes, it is.
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 2: In spite of all the complaints about terrible service. Airlines
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 2: offer product low cost flights, no fills that Americans have
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: chosen with their spending habits over and over. Absolutely, absolutely,
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 2: I mean, air travel is the best that it's ever been.
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 1: You can fly anyway.
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 2: You can fly cheaply, or if you don't want those
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 2: cramp seats.
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: If you don't want those.
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 2: Cheap you can buy business class and it's quite comfortable,
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 2: and you can fly anywhere in business class, and you
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 2: fly across the pond to Europe, you know, with life
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 2: flat seats, you can fly to Asia, you can fly
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 2: anywhere in the world.
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 1: It's just it's the golden age of flight.
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 2: Absolutely, in spite of Matt Walsh's I don't know what
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 2: to call it, stupidity is too generous seventeen seventy six,
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 2: Yesterday said race is not a social construct you're anti science.
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 2: You can have a DNA test to get your race.
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 2: Different races have different average IQs and so on.
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: Bullshit. You can do a DNA test that will give.
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 2: You your ancestry. It will not give you your quote race.
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 2: I don't know what that is. No DNA test will
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 2: tell you you're white. There's no whiteness in a test.
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 2: I'll tell you what your pig is based on their DNA,
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 2: but it won't tell you belong.
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: To white race. Who cares what different races do.
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 2: What matters is your IQ And the fact is that
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 2: there lots and lots and lots of white people with very,
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 2: very very low IQ, and most of those are what
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 2: you call race realists. So no, what matters is individual
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 2: like Q, individual ability, individual traits, individual free will, individual ambition,
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 2: individual success. Race matters nothing. There is no science to race,
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 2: and indeed most of us are MutS. Ginghis Khan. Ginghis Khan,
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 2: who is Mongolian like, has his genes in like what, I.
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: Don't know, ten percent of the world's population. He rapes
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: so many women. When he took Hans, the Hans again,
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: another Asian.
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 2: Nomad tribe, conquered vast parts of Europe and raped many
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 2: women there and haunted Genes from Asia all over Europe.
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: Gens from Africa are all over Spain. Arab Jans from
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: North Africa all over Europe, not because of recent migration,
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 2: because of the past.
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: And Northern Africans are actually German, have lots of German Jens.
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 2: Because there was Barbaric tribes conquered North Africa in something
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 2: like for something ad and settled there and stayed there.
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 2: And nomadic tribes have moved and changed, and immigration is constant, constant,
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 2: And there's no such thing as genetic purity. And how
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: many hundred thousands, how many thousands of years do you
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 2: want to go back? There are a few isolated tribes
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 2: here and there in the world that have some genetic purity.
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: The rest of you, almost all of you are mutts.
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 2: So no race is a completely social construct. It is
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 2: created in order to make some races some individuals based
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: on insignificant characteristic side They call their skin.
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: Subservient to others. And by the way, it's only low.
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: IQ people who evaluate other people zy Q based on
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: their race. I've never asked anybody what their IQ is.
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 2: I don't care about anybody's IQ. The ignorance and just
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 2: you know, it's unbelievable. Then in the twenty first century,
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: we have gone backwards, backwards, away from science, away from reason,
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 2: away from rationality. In our analysis, I've done many DNA tests.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 2: I do a DNA test every single year, including twenty
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 2: three and meters which I've done. DNA tests are wonderful.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 2: They tell you what diseases you're susceptible to. They tell
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: you what you're inclined you know, certain sensitivities to drugs
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 2: and certain sensitivities to particular medical treatments.
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, Jewish is a social construct. It's a social construct
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 1: created by some Jews and by many anti Semites. Am
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 1: I Jewish? No, I'm not. Why because I've chosen to
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: be me, I'm not Jewish.
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: I'm only Jewish when creeps anti Semitic bastards like you
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 2: express anti Semitic of ideas. But I would consider myself Jewish.
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 1: I'm Iron Brook. Yeah.
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 2: Your ancestry came back ninety nine percent Kanazi Jews. Yeah,
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: you have a long line of people who call themselves
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 2: Jews going back generations.
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 1: Is that a race? It's meaningless? And those are Kanazi Jews.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: Where did they come from Middle East, are not Europeans me.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: I'm an American, I was born in Israel. I'm an atheist.
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 1: I'm not Jewish, I'm not.
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 2: Of any ethnic group. I don't believe in ethnicity. I
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 2: don't believe in race. Am I white? Can I be
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 2: white and Jewish and an atheist? You know, and reject
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 2: my judaism? You know, how does that all that work?
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 2: You guys are medievalists. You know this is this is,
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 2: this mentality of collectivism and tribalism and racism is so
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 2: primitive and barbaric.
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: It makes me angry because.
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 2: It should have disappeared from the face of the earth
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 2: decades ago. And you people are bringing up one of
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 2: the most horrific primitive ideologies of all of human existence.
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: Jacob.
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 2: If a vaccine could say forty thousand lives, would it
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 2: not be made mandatory? If weymos could, if weimos could
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 2: say forty thousand lives, would human driving not be outlawed restricted? No,
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: because the vaccine wouldn't be made mandatory. Vaccine should not
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 2: be made mandatory. No vaccine should be mandatory. Now you
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 2: can a school could say you can't come to the
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 2: school unless you're vaccinated, but that's private property. A park
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 2: can say you can play in this park if it's
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 2: a private punk unless you're vaccinated. There are a lot
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 2: of places where you can do that. But the government
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 2: has no role in telling people. They in forcing people
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 2: to be vaccinated, and they have no role in telling
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 2: people they have to drive in Weymos. Andrew, this isn't
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 2: an essential value of YBS to me. But if I
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 2: ever feel like getting pissed off, I listen to a
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 2: YBS show. There's nothing wrong with getting pissed off sometimes.
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but I'm glad it's not the essential value. Thank you,
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 1: Andrew Jacob.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 2: How much of this is Trump's actual opinions versus jade
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 2: Van's part of the party. If the right gets smoked
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 2: at the midterms, any chances for change, No, I don't
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 2: think you'll see a change.
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: I think it's a mixture of the JD events. I
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: think is mainly JD events.
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 2: It's mainly the national Christian Conservatives waded down a little bit,
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 2: so less Christianity, more nationalism, and with a lot of
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: kind of I don't know if they agree with Trump
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 2: on trade really, but so a lot of Trump stuff
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 2: Trump red meat, like immigration and trade.
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 1: Now JD.
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 2: Events might agree with all that, I'm just not sure
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 2: he does. Andrew strikes me as a good and properly
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 2: selfish modern generalization when people, including many entrepreneurs, say how
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 2: they allocate their time is the essential value to them. Yeah,
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 2: I mean how you allocate your time, what you choose
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: to do with your time, what values you choose to pursue.
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 2: That's a big part of what it means to allocate
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 2: your time is an essential characteristic, essential part of being
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 2: self interested, being an egoist. All right, we are fifty
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 2: five dollars short of our targets.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: If anybody wants to help out, stickers welcome Ron.
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 2: Do you know of any objectivist organization in France where
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 2: I live?
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: I do love it here, though of.
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 2: Course not a fan of the economic policies. I've been
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 2: able to find everything in anything in my searches.
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: No, there really isn't.
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 2: I mean, there's some libertarians, and there's the guy who
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 2: translated I ran into French, who I've met a couple
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 2: of times. But no, there really has never been significant
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 2: interest in France for objectivism. Sadly, Lincoln, thank you, Lincoln, Lincoln.
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 2: I hope You're not overstretching yourself. You're doing a lot
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 2: of super chests lately and stickers, and I know you're
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: getting you know you got a go friend, and you're
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 2: a student. Don't overstretch yourself. As much as I want
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 2: your money, don't overstretch Andrew is the connection of rationality
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 2: to goodness primarily a discovery of Rands or Aristotle? Do
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 2: you consider the one of the key integrations made in
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 2: intellectual history. Yes, it's one of the key integrations. It's
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 2: really iran. Aristotle views rationality is important, and he identifies
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 2: it as the identifying feature of man, which is crucially important.
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 2: But then integrating that with morality, integrating that with values
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 2: and virtues, that I think is an ironmand accomplishment. So
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 2: I don't think there's anyone in Aristotle where he sees
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 2: being rational is a virtual though he doesn't believe study
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 2: and learning is a huge virtue, the primary virtue, but
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 2: not rationality in terms of using reason to live your
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 2: life in every aspect of it, as being the primary virtue,
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 2: the integrating virtue. I think that's Einman's great achievement. And yes,
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 2: it's one of the great integrations made in intellectual history,
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 2: and it builds an Aristotle, so it's a two person achievement. Lincoln,
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 2: just send my application to a Rise Intellectual Incubator program,
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 2: looking forward to improving my.
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: Skills and objectivism. Excellent. That's really good. I look forward
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: to seeing you there. Fend Harper shout out to a friend.
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 2: Of mine who just got married to someone they met
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 2: at okon twenty twenty four. Another reason to come to
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 2: okon two great objectivists pursuing their happiness. Excellent and one
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 2: of the best ways to pursue happiness marriage. Lincoln talked,
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 2: I guess this is a two part question. Talk to
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 2: the school's PP and E department about having you speak
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: on campus anytime after five works, and we should schedule
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 2: it for before after a Peterson Academy course taping, as
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 2: the university is about a two hour drive from Phoenix
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 2: and not quite big enough for a separate trip.
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that sounds great. I don't know if Peterson is
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: going to have me back this coming. Yeah, I haven't
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: heard from them. As soon as I hear from them
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: and schedule anything with them, I will let you know
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 1: and we'll schedule that. Really appreciate you doing that and
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 1: I'm happy that they're willing to host me like numbers.
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 2: Is the more benevolent nature as society is more benevolence
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 2: natural as society gets richer, No, I don't think so.
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: I mean you're seeing the opposite today in America, we're
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 2: getting richer.
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: And we're less benevolent.
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: We're getting more pessimistic and more angry and more unfriendly.
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: Towards other people.
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 2: I think as a society gets freer, more free, it
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: begets more benevolent. Benevolence is a feature of freedom, not
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 2: of wealth in and of itself. Andrew, are the ethics
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 2: Are the ethics underlying Marxism Christian Yes? Essentially the ethics
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 2: of Marxism is sacrifice. It's the idea of sacrificing the
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 2: individual to the collective, to the group. That is an idea,
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 2: this idea of sacrifice that is inherent in Christianity, where
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 2: the whole idea is you sacrifice the individual to God,
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 2: or to the group, or to the poor. But it's
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 2: essentially about sacrificing.
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: The individual, and that is the essential part of the morality.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: You also get you get your moral virtues, you get
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 1: your commandments.
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 2: An authority, the authority is the dictators of the politarian,
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: or the authority is God or spokesman on earth. But
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 2: it's an authority, so many many similarities between and that'll
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 2: be a part of the book we write, is to
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 2: show how Marxism was a secularization of Christianity, even the
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 2: sense in which you'll get your awards in and afterlife
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 2: in Christianity. In Marxism you'll get your rewards in some
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 2: fictitious utopia that comes sometime in the future that you
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: might not might not live to see, probably not, But
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 2: it's in another dimension in sense, and otherworldly in that sense.
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 2: Jacob Thoughts on call sheet and polymarket monetizing almost everything,
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 2: thoughts on the culture that spends billions on betting markets
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 2: like slot machines.
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: Look.
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 2: I think overall it's it provides a valuable information.
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: People like to bet on stuff.
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 2: I don't think there's an anything necessarily bad about that.
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 2: It's a way to express your opinion. And here when
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 2: it's it's not random, right, so the outcomes in our
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 2: random knowledge actually pays off. If you know more about politics,
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 2: then you can predict elections, you'll do better.
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: Than somebody who doesn't know anything. So rewards knowledge I'm
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: all for betting markets or any kind of markets that
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: reward knowledge, so I'm not against this. I think it's
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: a positive move.
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 2: And Mel taking this opportunity to support the show and
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 2: say that as a Spaniard living in Ireland, I find
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 2: the Eurovision thing pathetic but sadly not surprising.
• 1:40:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, pretty sad. Thank you and Mel, I appreciate it.
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: What is going on here?
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 2: Anyway? I have to get you a little hot water.
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 2: This is Andrew in a little hot worded. Do you
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 2: think anyone who thinks IQ is an important element of
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 2: life understands objectivism?
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 1: I mean it depends what people mean by IQ.
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 2: I mean, if you mean by IQ inherited intelligence, that
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 2: is a certain level of intelligence that is inherited. There's
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 2: no question that we do inherent different levels of firepower,
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 2: right potential, and that you know that matters. I don't
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 2: think it's an important element, but it's there. How you
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 2: use it, what you do with it, how you initiated,
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 2: how you deploy this potential, that's what matters. That's the
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 2: important element.
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: So to say it's an important element of life, I
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 1: think you don't understand objectivism why it could be an
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 1: element of life?
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 2: But to give it importance. That is taking the potential
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 2: and giving it way too.
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: Much importance than it should.
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 2: Lincoln, there is a company called Nucleus Bioscience focused on
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 2: advancing IVF treatment to identify genetic diseases before having kids,
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 2: which is great. Yeah, I mean it's already being done,
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 2: and I think it's fantastic.
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 1: I think it really is fantastic. Lincoln says, last big
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 1: super Chat for a.
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: While, cutting back in the coming months. Got to save
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 2: up for that engagement ring. Don't tell my girlfriend. I
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 2: promise I'm not going to say anything. Hopefully she doesn't
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 2: listen to the show. Andrew fifteen dollars short of our goal, guys,
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 2: fifteen one five. Somebody trade be nice to end on
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 2: a bang. Right, Andrew says, what do you think of
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 2: this formulation? Aristotle central principles of epistemology led to the
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 2: first time to the premise of the primacy of reality
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 2: over consciousness.
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know, it might be the other way round. Right,
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 1: Andrew did do his Andrew did do his part today,
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 1: So I'm you know, hmm.
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 2: Lincoln is all tapped out and the racists are not
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 2: going to put anything in. They just want to harass
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 2: me on just want to continue with their pseudo science harassment.
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 2: All right, we got five dollars from Jacob, so we've
• 1:43:45
  Speaker 2: chipped a waste and I was only ten dollars.
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 1: What do I think?
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure that formulation is right right, So it's
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 2: not clear what comes first. In a sense, the metaphysics
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 2: might come first. It might be that the principle of
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 2: reality of consciousness is what leads Aristotle to an epistemology,
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 2: to pistemology, to a reason based a pistemology. They probably
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 2: go together and certainly reinforce each other hierodically. Metaphysics come first.
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 2: Doesn't mean it's the way it's lunched, but it's it's
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 2: it's higher key comes first. All right, guys, there it
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 2: is Thomas. Youbottom just did ten dollars. And he says,
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 2: but what about the poor?
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 1: Why do you care? Thomas? Why do you care? Yes?
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 1: What about the poor?
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 2: The poor do well if they're egoistic. Linn Corda says, goal.
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 2: By the way, Adultry three by Quinn is now available
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 2: on Amy.
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 1: I think I down loaded it on my kindle.
• 1:45:04
  Speaker 2: I think I downloaded on a kindle because that's how
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 2: I probably read it right. I'll probably read all three
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 2: on the kindle, even though I've got hot copies of
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 2: the first two, so you don't actually is it an
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 2: available on audio, because if it's available on audio, I'll
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 2: probably just listened to them all.
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 1: Ron came in with ten dollars. Thank you guys. Okay,
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 1: now we've exceeded I'll target, so thank you everybody.
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 2: All right, tomorrow there will be a show. I don't
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 2: know the topic. It will either be something on something
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 2: on the crisis of meaning or something on capitalism, to
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 2: be determined tomorrow. See all tomorrow.
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 1: By everybody, have a great, great, great weekend. By