Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Taxpayers(men) are funding discrimination against men! (Taxpayers) | Rantzerker 235

Transcript

Taxpayers(men) are funding discrimination against men! (Taxpayers) | Rantzerker 235 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Coming to you live from deep within a very icy,
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: radioactive wasteline, like the most icy it has been all year,
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: actually even last year too. We are not mine, not me.
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: We We are the survivors of the alright, kick apocalypse,
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: the few, the brave, the bitchy, once more wading into
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: battle against the feminist fetti fetti fetti, I'll just call
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: them fetti feminist Freddi hordes, fetimist hordes with tax pays
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: men are funding discrimination against men tax payers. And this
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: is ran Zerker number two three five. I got it
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: this time. And I'm your host, Alison, and I'm with
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: Brian and the estiemable Hannah and Jojo. Oh we do
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: have a jojo.
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: All right, So today we're going to be talking about
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: all of the US AID that's being funneled into feminist
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: initiatives around the world, old that, incidentally, most of these
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: these companies, these countries do not want in the first place.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure most of it's just going to bureaucratics, bureaucrats, pockets,
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: and maybe a few people on the ground. But for
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: the most part, this is this is this is a
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: do not want situation. I've actually talked to people from
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: countries like Nigeria and there they don't want this stuff
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: in their in their country they would prefer well, no,
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: they shouldn't, they don't want it. But anyway, USA, it
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: is exporting it around the world and it is feminist.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: So we're all paying, or at least you Americans, probably
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: Canadians as well, because we have our own silly initiatives
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: and uh yeah, so we're all paying for this, folks,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: this frodden underdog ideology that can't get a break. We're
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: all paying for it.
• 2:00
  Speaker 3: Money that every Western country and probably most Eastern countries
• 2:05
  Speaker 3: are invested in the same kinds of initiatives. They just
• 2:08
  Speaker 3: haven't been discovered in those countries yet.
• 2:10
  Speaker 4: I've just learned they're all doing it.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: I've just learned that the Ottawa our masters, our dear
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: masters and mistresses in Ottawa, have decreed the Canadian banks
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: need to disclose their diversity, equality and inclusion statistics about
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: their the people running the banks, because that's what's important
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: here when it comes to banks.
• 2:33
  Speaker 4: Yeah, not whether they know what they're doing, but you know,
• 2:38
  Speaker 4: and and we hear all the time about THEI and
• 2:42
  Speaker 4: race and DEI and religion and DEI and general identity
• 2:48
  Speaker 4: status and all that. It's all really about women. Yep,
• 2:53
  Speaker 4: it's all really about women, and it's all really about
• 2:56
  Speaker 4: using Guyno centrism to gain power over institutions and the
• 3:01
  Speaker 4: people who run them, the people who use them and
• 3:05
  Speaker 4: rely on them to be able to exercise their power.
• 3:09
  Speaker 4: If you run a business, any kind of institution, you
• 3:13
  Speaker 4: have to rely on banks. You can't just you can't
• 3:17
  Speaker 4: just pay cash for everything, right, and so especially if
• 3:21
  Speaker 4: you do international business, it's not like you can just
• 3:24
  Speaker 4: go to your consumers or the people that work for
• 3:27
  Speaker 4: you if it's international. Alison knows this. We've had that
• 3:30
  Speaker 4: issue of I'm not happy with PayPal, but if I
• 3:33
  Speaker 4: don't want to use PayPal, she's got to send me
• 3:35
  Speaker 4: checks and that takes longer. And you know, these are
• 3:39
  Speaker 4: things that every business that does anything internationally, which is
• 3:44
  Speaker 4: more and more now, you have to go through banks
• 3:48
  Speaker 4: and there's no getting around it. So if you control
• 3:53
  Speaker 4: the banks, you control everybody. I want to point out
• 3:58
  Speaker 4: something too, about the thing in the United States USA.
• 4:03
  Speaker 4: It is one funding initiative. We have thousands and with
• 4:11
  Speaker 4: dozens of departments. If you go to there's a Wikipedia
• 4:14
  Speaker 4: page for this, it's fairly accurate has the number of
• 4:17
  Speaker 4: departments and agencies. And it's not just this one long
• 4:21
  Speaker 4: list of departments and agencies. It's you have to click
• 4:26
  Speaker 4: on the letter of the alphabet to get a list
• 4:28
  Speaker 4: of the departments and agencies for that letter of the alphabet.
• 4:32
  Speaker 4: I think there might be one or two letters, you know,
• 4:34
  Speaker 4: that are obscure. Don't usually start words that you would
• 4:37
  Speaker 4: use for a department name that maybe don't have some
• 4:40
  Speaker 4: but then there are others that there are dozens on
• 4:43
  Speaker 4: the list, and pretty much all of them are funding
• 4:47
  Speaker 4: feminist initiatives. So this isn't just USA. It is very widespread.
• 4:54
  Speaker 4: This isn't just a rabbit hole. It's a whole rabbit
• 4:57
  Speaker 4: warren of rabbit holes.
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: There you go.
• 5:02
  Speaker 3: It's like cockroaches. If you see one, there are thousands
• 5:04
  Speaker 3: in the walls. Yeah, it is good that we are
• 5:09
  Speaker 3: seeing this one. Now we know we have an infestation,
• 5:12
  Speaker 3: or at least people who were not paying attention before
• 5:14
  Speaker 3: and are paying attention now.
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: We'll see that.
• 5:17
  Speaker 3: So should we uh, because it's a lot to cover.
• 5:21
  Speaker 3: So should we like start like dive in what are
• 5:24
  Speaker 3: we doing?
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: Well, maybe we should give a little bit of context
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: to some of the language that's used because I know
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: that people have question it. So when these reports say
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: something like gender sensitive, they mean feminist. They mean to
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: look at a situation through a feminist lens. So, for example,
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: gender sensitive when it comes to domestic violence is things
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: like the primary aggressor law, which usually results and arrest
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: them in and also all of the feminist initiatives, for
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: example in the US, that make it so that a
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: police department is investigated if there are arrests of women
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: get too high. And they instituted this as a result
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: of a while back, and Hannah can probably correct me
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: because she's got like the dates and everything. I'm sure
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: they started a feminist demanded that a domestic violence result
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: in arrest, so if cops were called out to a
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: domestic violence instant, somebody had to be arrested. But this policy,
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: while it did increase the arrests of men, it increased
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: the arrests of men by about maybe like from one
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: hundred to one hundred and sixty, but arrests of women
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: went from like one hundred percent like before to something
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: like two three thousand times higher.
• 6:48
  Speaker 4: It was so I wrote I wrote about this for
• 6:51
  Speaker 4: that video we made during the Johnny Depp hearing where
• 6:55
  Speaker 4: he talked about the history of domestic violence response basically
• 7:01
  Speaker 4: the legal and social response. So the government and the
• 7:05
  Speaker 4: people in a community, how did they respond to domestic
• 7:08
  Speaker 4: violence throughout history and throughout history. We'll we'll just real
• 7:13
  Speaker 4: quick cover the fact that throughout history, when the abuser
• 7:17
  Speaker 4: was male and it was one way, not only was
• 7:22
  Speaker 4: there a legal response, going back to before the United
• 7:25
  Speaker 4: States existed, In fact, before voting in Western culture existed,
• 7:33
  Speaker 4: there was there was a legal response even in the
• 7:36
  Speaker 4: thirteenth century. So we're this whole thing that it used
• 7:42
  Speaker 4: to be legal for men to abuse their wives and
• 7:45
  Speaker 4: then all of a sudden feminists came along. That's bullshit,
• 7:48
  Speaker 4: so we'll start there. But in the eighties, feminists started
• 7:53
  Speaker 4: pushing for automatic arrest policies every time the police were
• 7:58
  Speaker 4: called to somebody's home for domestic violence, because domestic violence,
• 8:03
  Speaker 4: because of feminism, domestic violence is the label for everything
• 8:08
  Speaker 4: from if you get yelled at by your partner, you're
• 8:13
  Speaker 4: a victim of domestic violence to if your partner tries
• 8:16
  Speaker 4: to kill you, and that label really covers a lot
• 8:20
  Speaker 4: of ground in between. You know, if you do something
• 8:25
  Speaker 4: wrong to your partner and your partner yells at you, hey,
• 8:28
  Speaker 4: stop it. It's considered domestic violence that's just gone both ways,
• 8:33
  Speaker 4: you know, and so it's you know, domestic abuse that's
• 8:37
  Speaker 4: gone both ways. So they want people to get arrested
• 8:39
  Speaker 4: who have had a loud argument and then resolved it
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: themselves without hitting each other or doing anything otherwise illegal stuff.
• 8:47
  Speaker 4: That if two men in a bar did it for
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: five minutes and then said, okay, we're gonna cool it down.
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: Let's just settle this over a beer, Nobody would call
• 8:57
  Speaker 4: the cops. Nobody would want them arrest did some people
• 9:02
  Speaker 4: might not want to sit with them, but you know,
• 9:04
  Speaker 4: aside from that, it'd be settled, no problem.
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 9:07
  Speaker 4: But if it's a couple in their home and they
• 9:10
  Speaker 4: do it, suddenly it's it's now an arrestable offense. Right.
• 9:19
  Speaker 4: So researchers that looked into this discovered that, let's see,
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: in California, the enhanced arrest policies, and I wrote this
• 9:30
  Speaker 4: is what I wrote. Enhanced arrest policies, designed to increase
• 9:36
  Speaker 4: law enforcement response to intimate partner violence, caused a number
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: of arrests of men to increase by thirty seven percent,
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: but the number of women arrested increased by four hundred
• 9:44
  Speaker 4: and forty six percent, and that was just arrests. Convictions
• 9:48
  Speaker 4: for an offense following a domestic violence related arrest grew
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: by one hundred and thirty one percent for males but
• 9:55
  Speaker 4: one two hundred and seventy percent for females. And post
• 9:58
  Speaker 4: DV arrest and carson ration rates were up one hundred
• 10:02
  Speaker 4: and fifty six percent for males but one six hundred
• 10:06
  Speaker 4: and eighty three percent for females. And what the researchers,
• 10:10
  Speaker 4: because it was feminist researchers that discovered this, they concluded
• 10:14
  Speaker 4: that it was a backlash against women. It didn't occur
• 10:17
  Speaker 4: to them that when you look at domestic I'm sure
• 10:22
  Speaker 4: that certain behaviors heard them. They they look through things
• 10:28
  Speaker 4: through such an ideological lens that I think they really
• 10:30
  Speaker 4: believe this shit. I think they really believe that. Well,
• 10:35
  Speaker 4: there's an extra some mental exercise I do with people
• 10:38
  Speaker 4: when I try to get them to understand the social
• 10:41
  Speaker 4: attitudes toward violence. Right, So you're at a bus stop
• 10:45
  Speaker 4: and you see a man there and you see a
• 10:47
  Speaker 4: woman there, and one of them says something just absolutely reprehensible,
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: sexually explicit and abusive to the other one, and the
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: other one hauls off and slaps the speaker across the face,
• 11:01
  Speaker 4: just absolutely, you know, bitch slaps across the face? How
• 11:04
  Speaker 4: dare you say that to me?
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 11:06
  Speaker 4: If the speaker is a man, people think that the
• 11:11
  Speaker 4: woman is justified because it's an assault to say something
• 11:16
  Speaker 4: sexually aggressive and offensive to a woman, Right. But if
• 11:20
  Speaker 4: it's the other way around, and the speaker is a
• 11:23
  Speaker 4: woman and a man hits her, people will have all
• 11:26
  Speaker 4: sorts of excuses for why what she said wasn't that bad?
• 11:30
  Speaker 4: And a man should never hit a woman under any circumstances.
• 11:34
  Speaker 4: And if you change the thing to one person pulls
• 11:38
  Speaker 4: out a knife and the other person hits the knife
• 11:41
  Speaker 4: wielder so hard that the knife wielder falls to the
• 11:45
  Speaker 4: ground unconscious. Right, If it's a woman that does the
• 11:49
  Speaker 4: hitting and a man who was the knife wielder, people
• 11:52
  Speaker 4: would cheer. But if it's a man who does the
• 11:57
  Speaker 4: hitting and the woman was the knife wielder, will question,
• 12:00
  Speaker 4: how do you know she was going to stab that guy?
• 12:02
  Speaker 4: You know, people if she's even coming at him, and
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: you can say she raises the knife up and comes
• 12:08
  Speaker 4: right at him, like you know, movie style, not how
• 12:11
  Speaker 4: you would actually attack somebody with a knife, but they
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: would still, well, she's in infector, she doesn't know what
• 12:17
  Speaker 4: she's doing, she's not strong enough. He should have restrained her.
• 12:21
  Speaker 4: Everything in the world. But okay, he was just defending himself.
• 12:26
  Speaker 4: And that attitude that's not just feminist, that's kind of centric,
• 12:32
  Speaker 4: and it's throughout society's It permeates most people's households, most
• 12:38
  Speaker 4: people's subcultures, that they live in, whatever church they go to,
• 12:43
  Speaker 4: whatever school they go to, whatever workplace environment they're in,
• 12:46
  Speaker 4: their family. The idea that when a woman is violent,
• 12:50
  Speaker 4: she's less dangerous automatically because she's a woman, and when
• 12:54
  Speaker 4: a man is violent, he's more dangerous automatically because he's
• 12:57
  Speaker 4: a man. That a woman's violence can be justify by
• 13:00
  Speaker 4: what the target of that violence does, and that a
• 13:03
  Speaker 4: man's violence is never justified if the target is a woman,
• 13:07
  Speaker 4: no matter what she has done. That creates a situation
• 13:13
  Speaker 4: where when these researchers look at this information, they just
• 13:18
  Speaker 4: assume that these situations are men who assaulted women, and
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: then the women fought back, and when they fought back,
• 13:27
  Speaker 4: they caused injury, and then the cops arrested them because
• 13:31
  Speaker 4: they fought back. But in reality, there's a lot of
• 13:34
  Speaker 4: evidence that not only is domestic violence primarily perpetrated by
• 13:40
  Speaker 4: women when it's only one direction, but that when it's
• 13:44
  Speaker 4: two direction, so both sexes are perpetrating, it's more frequently
• 13:49
  Speaker 4: perpetrated by women, which means that sometimes within those two
• 13:53
  Speaker 4: way settings, it's still one way from the women.
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: And all of that relates to the what the language
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: is in regards to feminist bureaucracy or aid. So when
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: they say gender sensitive, they mean arrest the men, or
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: they mean focus on women, or they mean look at
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: how women are victims of the thing. So it's always
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: comes back to the feminist lens, which is men are perpetrators,
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: women are victims, And so that language is sort of
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: a red flag.
• 14:24
  Speaker 4: Essentially women are victims, but it's also men are dangerous,
• 14:29
  Speaker 4: women are vulnerable.
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: Go ahead.
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: While I was just saying, they're just there.
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: The reason why you have to pay attention to the
• 14:36
  Speaker 3: language is because we know that the term feminist comes
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: with baggage and there's like some negative connotations associated with it,
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: and that sentiment is growing all the time, so they
• 14:48
  Speaker 3: have to rebrand. But it's the same crap. They're just
• 14:52
  Speaker 3: calling it something new. It's kind of like how you
• 14:54
  Speaker 3: know DEI was fell out of popularity and so it
• 14:59
  Speaker 3: got rebranded and changed to something called Bridge or some
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: you know, there was a Jedi like. They've done this
• 15:06
  Speaker 3: multiple times, but ultimately it's the same ideology. They're just
• 15:10
  Speaker 3: trying to rebrand it because ultimately, what we're dealing with
• 15:13
  Speaker 3: is people who are very good at marketing very bad ideas,
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: so and we have to just maneuver around the marketing.
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: So yeah, they it's a rebrand.
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: It's important to focus on the feminism because the feminism
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: is basically the root system from which all everything else
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: comes everything else. And the reason why I say that
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: is because when they construct their network, their supply lines,
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: they start with feminism because of what Hannah said, it
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: it segues into an already existing bias that we have
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: to benefiting men to or sorry, benefiting women, to protecting
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: women from men, to providing for women, to ensuring women
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: are safe, and so they build that kind of resource
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: base on that, and then after they've built the resource base,
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: they construct additional initiatives to acquire more resources based on
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: advocacy for all of these other groups that in some
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: ways are a symptom of the breakdown I think in
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: the relationship between men and women more than anything caused
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: by feminist initiatives and feminist beliefs about the relationship between
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: men and women being characterized as oppressive. So all of
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: the attitude that men oppress women causes a breakdown in
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: the relationship between men and women. From that comes everything else.
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: And then feminists turnaround advocate for these issues because they're
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: sources of additional funding, and when they're found out, they
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: disavow and they almost jettison them like a lizard jettisons
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: its tail. So everybody goes after that and the body
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: is protected, and when it's safe, out pops another tail.
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: So we are never going to get rid of this
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: corruption and this graft and this grift without addressing feminism
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: and the the the roots system from which it springs.
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: And that's what we're here. That is what we're doing today.
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: So I got a super chap, But do you want
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: to do the things before we get into it?
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: Oh? Yeah, yeah, that's right. I haven't done the things
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: for a while. I didn't do it with our steam
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: or am I don't want to use the same word
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: are incredibly productive conversation that we had yesterday. I'll put
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: it that way, all right. So if you would like
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: to send us a tip and a comment, please go
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: you can do so. I feedbadger dot com slash just
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: the tip. Once again, that's feed the Badger dot com
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: slash just the tip, the very best way for you
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: to send us some funds and also send us a
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: comment to read on air. And you could do that
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: at any time. You can send us a message at
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: any time. We will receive it, we will ponder it,
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: and we will read it out at the next show
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: if it's if it's related, if it's completely unrelated, maybe not,
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: but we will read it out at some point. So
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip. And
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: if you would like to support the show outright, you
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: just want to say, hey, keep this going, go to
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash support. It's very very
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: much appreciated because we continued continue to be able to
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: do this content despite being in the crosshairs of an
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: entire alphabet of agencies and the algorithm. We continue to
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: do this content because you continue to support its construction.
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: So feed the Badger dot com slash support to do that,
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: all right, show, we just get into the Yeah.
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: What do we what do we want to start with?
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: We're looking at a website called USA spending dot gov.
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: Oh I thought we were doing super chows and super chat.
• 18:50
  Speaker 3: Oh I got a super chat. I didn't get any
• 18:52
  Speaker 3: super chows did I.
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: Not get yet?
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: But super chows they're the best.
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: Zaix gave us five five dollars super chat and says, hilarious,
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: considering many react as though violence is justified. Hannah, and
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: you see this when they try to talk to talk
• 19:08
  Speaker 3: a man down or push slash restrain a woman.
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: Okay, so.
• 19:15
  Speaker 3: Okay, let us get into yeah, so the topic. Thank
• 19:19
  Speaker 3: you for that zaryingx so, Hannah said. And I thought
• 19:23
  Speaker 3: I would do this. Maybe we'll start with just so
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: we can see how deep the rabbit hole begins. We
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: went to this website called USA spending dot gov and
• 19:32
  Speaker 3: I just searched a key role feminist and.
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: Came up with all of these results. And there's like
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: various tabs.
• 19:40
  Speaker 3: Right, so there's nine contracts, one hundred and one grants,
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: five direct payments, twenty one loans, and nine other And
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: these are the lists of various recipients and the obligations
• 19:54
  Speaker 3: that they are receiving, and look at how many millions
• 19:57
  Speaker 3: of dollars. I think it's actually sort of by amount,
• 20:00
  Speaker 3: so at the top you have the highest amount.
• 20:02
  Speaker 4: So that when you see the contracts are specifically to
• 20:10
  Speaker 4: do something the government hired them to do. The grants,
• 20:13
  Speaker 4: people make these proposals and somebody has to read the
• 20:16
  Speaker 4: proposal and approve of the research or whatever else. They're
• 20:21
  Speaker 4: getting a grant. We're going to build something. Okay, you
• 20:25
  Speaker 4: know what are you going to build? This is this
• 20:27
  Speaker 4: is the parameters, this is what it's for, this is
• 20:29
  Speaker 4: who it's going to serve, and so on, and they
• 20:32
  Speaker 4: decide yes or no on that. Loans are a different story.
• 20:37
  Speaker 4: What I discovered was a lot of the loans were
• 20:41
  Speaker 4: there were companies that had something feminist on their website
• 20:45
  Speaker 4: or feminist in their name or whatever, but they were
• 20:47
  Speaker 4: COVID loans. So the government anybody that said they needed
• 20:51
  Speaker 4: a COVID loan to keep their business running, be able
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: to pay their employees, and uh not go out of
• 20:58
  Speaker 4: business during the COVID crisis, got an amount of money.
• 21:01
  Speaker 4: They got basically whatever they asked for, and so there
• 21:04
  Speaker 4: were not.
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: Just Feminist Women's Health Center.
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: Just organizations that you know. And there were a lot
• 21:14
  Speaker 4: of these organizations that got their their employees were paid
• 21:19
  Speaker 4: to stay home through these loans, or they weren't bringing
• 21:23
  Speaker 4: in money because people couldn't patronize their business, or people
• 21:27
  Speaker 4: weren't donating.
• 21:29
  Speaker 5: But like.
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: When you look at names like Feminist Women's Health Center,
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: so most in at least in Ohio, most places you
• 21:39
  Speaker 4: could go for medical attention were not closed. So a
• 21:43
  Speaker 4: lot of these places said, we don't have people coming in,
• 21:46
  Speaker 4: we don't have money coming in, we're not getting insurance payments,
• 21:49
  Speaker 4: we can't pay our employees. We need this loan. And
• 21:52
  Speaker 4: they don't the loans guarantee they don't have to pay
• 21:54
  Speaker 4: it back, so it's basically a grant, but they didn't
• 21:55
  Speaker 4: call it that. And even though it says women's health center,
• 22:01
  Speaker 4: which means probably female, things like you know, going into
• 22:09
  Speaker 4: to check if you have cervical cancer or things like that,
• 22:13
  Speaker 4: which again I was able to do all of those
• 22:16
  Speaker 4: things during the COVID crisis. There wasn't a shortage of
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: places to go to be able to do that. I
• 22:22
  Speaker 4: know that in some states that there were people having
• 22:24
  Speaker 4: trouble getting their cancer treated. So it may be different
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: in different states, but I don't think those places all
• 22:34
  Speaker 4: shut down. So I think some of those loans are
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: probably fraud, but we don't know, and we wouldn't be
• 22:44
  Speaker 4: able to prove it, so I wouldn't necessarily specify, you know,
• 22:47
  Speaker 4: this one or that one. But it was interesting because
• 22:50
  Speaker 4: I learned about an organization in New York from from
• 22:53
  Speaker 4: seeing these loans. I don't think it was high on
• 22:56
  Speaker 4: the list. I don't think it be this list. Huh,
• 23:01
  Speaker 4: what am I looking for the Yeah, I'm looking at
• 23:04
  Speaker 4: the list, and I don't think it's on the list.
• 23:06
  Speaker 4: Of of it might be direct underdirect payments, which.
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: Let's see, I'm under direct payments.
• 23:12
  Speaker 3: There's feminist Women's Health center, a little feminists, feminist book club, I.
• 23:17
  Speaker 2: Can't remember the name of it, a thousand feminist sticker
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: club cats. I can't make this up. Guys.
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: By the way, I just want to point out they're
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: the underdogs.
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there are the underdogs.
• 23:32
  Speaker 4: You know what.
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: You won't see any freaking payments to any men's Yeah,
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: none of us money any men's initiatives that aren't feminists.
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: In fact, I just recently got into an altercation with
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: our friend Michael Flood, and he pointed out that he
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: started up a men's helpline or something, and but it
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: was feminist.
• 23:56
  Speaker 4: And I'm like, why does why not really for men?
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they're not really for men?
• 24:01
  Speaker 4: Then are they?
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: Like? Why is it?
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: Why is it necessary for services to men? Why is
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: it necessary for a phone line taking men's calls for
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: being abused or for being suicidal? Why does it have
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: to have a feminist framework?
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: Guys?
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: Why Anyway?
• 24:20
  Speaker 4: Because they made nothing feminist framework, then men might actually
• 24:26
  Speaker 4: get the help they need when they're abused, and that
• 24:28
  Speaker 4: means that their female abusers would be jailed. It would
• 24:32
  Speaker 4: ruin the statistics that feminists use to gather money from
• 24:37
  Speaker 4: the federal government and persuade organizations, departments, agencies, and so
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: on to to to hire them to tell them how
• 24:49
  Speaker 4: to do their jobs, and their money would dry up.
• 24:54
  Speaker 4: If men get the help they need and women are
• 24:57
  Speaker 4: held accountable for abusing men, then feminists run out of
• 25:02
  Speaker 4: money because their story stops being persuasive.
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and if it isn't say it's feminists, they don't
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: get the money. And I've seen how these feminists organizations
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: are run. They do the minimum amount to get maximal return,
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: and their board members do almost no work and they
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: get huge well not huge, I mean it's piecemeal. But
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: you find out that there are people who are board
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: members multiple organizations getting forty thousand a year from each
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: one for an hour a month's work. You know, it's
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: it's insane. And they probably don't even do it in
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: the office. They just do like a zoom session for
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: an hour a month, forty thousand a year and I'm
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: not even exaggerating. And this is so it has to
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: be feminists because not only does it have to push
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: the ideology, but they're the ones who have to make
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: the money. Okay, because I think ultimately that's what it's about.
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: But let's keep Yeah, so yeah, we were just looking
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: at that.
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: But well, let's get into the main, the meat of this,
• 26:10
  Speaker 3: because it's already been like almost half hour since we
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: went live. And so what you found was on the
• 26:17
  Speaker 3: US spending all of the various like state funded feminist
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: curriculums and shit like that. Where do you want me
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: to start? I have departments, United Nations Office on Drugs
• 26:29
  Speaker 3: and Crime. I don't know, that's like a.
• 26:34
  Speaker 4: Two weeks ago we went through packed incorporated already see
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: the regions of the University of Minnesota. I believe that
• 26:42
  Speaker 4: was a research grant Tyler Salute was when. I don't
• 26:48
  Speaker 4: think that we went through so that one we might
• 26:51
  Speaker 4: want to look at. We didn't. I don't think we
• 26:53
  Speaker 4: looked at that one. Okay, where is the third one
• 26:58
  Speaker 4: down on the list you have opened right now?
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: Unless that's yeah, Taller Salute incorporated.
• 27:03
  Speaker 4: So click on the number, right click on the number
• 27:07
  Speaker 4: and open it in a new tab, and then look
• 27:08
  Speaker 4: at that tab and see it.
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, has it's loading right now?
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 27:14
  Speaker 4: It takes a minute. Yeah, it's really slow. And after
• 27:18
  Speaker 4: people started looking at it, it got all glitchy because well,
• 27:21
  Speaker 4: I guess we figured out what it takes to d
• 27:24
  Speaker 4: the US government that everybody was looking into this once
• 27:28
  Speaker 4: those actually exposed it. But I'm going to go back
• 27:32
  Speaker 4: to the.
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: Page incorporated total worded amount two hundred and fourteen thousan five.
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: Now, if you scroll down slightly here, like should a
• 27:42
  Speaker 4: little more like there, it'll come up. Keep going you're
• 27:49
  Speaker 4: looking for it'll say something about the purpose. Maybe it's
• 27:52
  Speaker 4: back up at the top and it just hadn't loaded
• 27:55
  Speaker 4: because it doesn't load evenly very it's very weird.
• 28:00
  Speaker 2: Okay. Oh yeah, I'm trying to see here. So well,
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: here's business types.
• 28:07
  Speaker 4: No, no, it's you'll want to go down below that.
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: It's below the graph. I'm sure.
• 28:15
  Speaker 2: I see the awarding agencies countries USA. That's all it's says.
• 28:21
  Speaker 4: But comes up on the page. Is there something to
• 28:24
  Speaker 4: the right on the page. It's not showing.
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: I don't see like an ability to scroll to the right,
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: but it does say woman owned business right here.
• 28:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, but that's not that's not why they got that money.
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: All right, let's let's try Let's try this another way,
• 28:43
  Speaker 3: see if I can reload it and see if it
• 28:46
  Speaker 3: shows more this time.
• 28:49
  Speaker 2: So let's just give that a moment. But uh, let's see,
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: I'm looking at the chat.
• 28:55
  Speaker 3: Remember, send us a super child if you want to
• 28:57
  Speaker 3: like anything to the conversation will definitely take we will
• 29:02
  Speaker 3: read it be the badge of concourse, that's just the tip, okay.
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: So description Taller Salute is a feminist, culturally specific nonprofit
• 29:12
  Speaker 3: organization founded in nineteen seventy nine with a forty two
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: year old forty two year trajectory of violence prevention and
• 29:19
  Speaker 3: health promotion, community work and we.
• 29:22
  Speaker 4: Did talk about this when this one is the Puerto
• 29:24
  Speaker 4: Rican thing they they paid to teach the police in
• 29:32
  Speaker 4: Puerto Rico, if I remember, it was the cops in
• 29:35
  Speaker 4: Puerto Rico, uh to to basically teach that violence is
• 29:40
  Speaker 4: a gendered, gendered thing. And when I read this, it's
• 29:45
  Speaker 4: hard not to yell it because it's all in caps
• 29:47
  Speaker 4: and I'm a gen xer.
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's but I feel like it's shouting at us.
• 29:53
  Speaker 4: Yeah, a large prendiction on our edition on my screen.
• 29:57
  Speaker 4: The program minimum, so that what they're doing here is,
• 30:01
  Speaker 4: let's see.
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: I could actually I could read.
• 30:06
  Speaker 4: It implementing the island's only community violence intervention program, Aquero Depas,
• 30:13
  Speaker 4: which is Peace Accords. Peace Accords uses highly trained violence
• 30:18
  Speaker 4: interrupters and street outreach workers. So what they are doing
• 30:21
  Speaker 4: is they are training young men in the community to
• 30:25
  Speaker 4: confront people who are violent, and they specifically picked men
• 30:31
  Speaker 4: public education campaigns such as those addressing structural racism and
• 30:35
  Speaker 4: toxic masculinities. There it is behavioral and funding the program
• 30:39
  Speaker 4: will serve a minimum of forty young males ages fifteen
• 30:42
  Speaker 4: to thirty, so they may have kids as young as
• 30:44
  Speaker 4: fifteen years old doing this. Residents of the region every
• 30:47
  Speaker 4: year with violence, violence interruption, conflict mediation, behavior education, employment,
• 30:54
  Speaker 4: and community outreach activities, which could be anything from hosting,
• 30:59
  Speaker 4: you know, sports activities to walking up to people who
• 31:03
  Speaker 4: are engaged in a fight and trying to stop the fight,
• 31:06
  Speaker 4: to having community meetings and trying to lecture people about it.
• 31:11
  Speaker 4: And and it's from.
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: Two million dollars for forty men or boys. That's uh,
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: you know, as much as we can talk about how
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: you know, it's ideologically problematic because well, first of all,
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: there's places where the cops are basically telling feminist informed
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: domestic violence people to just turn around and go away
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: because you're making things.
• 31:33
  Speaker 4: Worse, and.
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: So they're they're there when when feminists say that they're reduced,
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: they're not. They're not reducing violence, they're harvesting it. But
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: the other thing is that this sounds like it's so
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: minimal impact, Like forty men and boys two million dollars
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: to teach forty men and boys and do like picnics
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: and sports things two million dollars. That's like, ultimately, what
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: is that even going to do if all they're doing
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: is talking to forty men a minimum? They say minimum,
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: But that just means that that's probably where they're at.
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: They're probably doing like thirty nine.
• 32:12
  Speaker 4: Well, the really strange part of this is, right, they
• 32:16
  Speaker 4: have in Puerto Rico, they have their own police forces.
• 32:19
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 32:20
  Speaker 4: They also there are churches there, right, there are community
• 32:23
  Speaker 4: leaders already in these places. But they are going to
• 32:26
  Speaker 4: take young men who have no expertise whatsoever. Who are
• 32:31
  Speaker 4: They're going to pull them out of schools, going to
• 32:33
  Speaker 4: pull them out of their jobs whatever, and they're going
• 32:36
  Speaker 4: to give them training in conflict management, and they're going
• 32:42
  Speaker 4: to teach them to look at conflict between men or
• 32:46
  Speaker 4: between men and women through a feminist lens that considers
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: the causes of violence to be toxic masculinity. And then
• 32:58
  Speaker 4: they are going to fund those men's activities, whether like
• 33:03
  Speaker 4: I said, it's from anything from from hosting a sports
• 33:06
  Speaker 4: activity like a basketball game or a football game or
• 33:11
  Speaker 4: a soccer match or whatever regularly at a local park
• 33:14
  Speaker 4: where they interact with young men and everything, to lecturing
• 33:18
  Speaker 4: people in a in a community event, to going up
• 33:23
  Speaker 4: to people in the street and saying stop fighting. And
• 33:27
  Speaker 4: if they're teaching young men to teach other young men
• 33:31
  Speaker 4: that the causes of their violence are things like feeling
• 33:35
  Speaker 4: like it makes them more manly when they're they're confronting
• 33:40
  Speaker 4: men in gang neighborhoods, they're confronting gang activity, right, because
• 33:46
  Speaker 4: it's it does specify that here as well, and it
• 33:50
  Speaker 4: specifies knowledge of crime trends and gang related activities is
• 33:55
  Speaker 4: one of the things that they're training them in because
• 33:58
  Speaker 4: it's going to be necessary. Gang members don't engage in
• 34:02
  Speaker 4: violence because they think it makes them feel manly, all right.
• 34:06
  Speaker 4: Gang members engage in violence because somebody is trying to
• 34:08
  Speaker 4: kill them, or because they want something and they don't
• 34:11
  Speaker 4: want to pay for it, or because they want to
• 34:13
  Speaker 4: sell drugs in a neighborhood and they don't want somebody
• 34:15
  Speaker 4: to compete with them, and they don't want the cops
• 34:17
  Speaker 4: to catch them, and they don't want people to tell
• 34:19
  Speaker 4: on them, and they want some people to sell their
• 34:22
  Speaker 4: drugs for them that don't want to sell their drugs
• 34:24
  Speaker 4: for them. They engage in violence for those reasons. It's
• 34:27
  Speaker 4: completely mercenary. It has nothing to do with whether it
• 34:29
  Speaker 4: makes them feel like men or not. And a lot
• 34:32
  Speaker 4: of the gang members that do it are women, right.
• 34:36
  Speaker 4: A lot of heads of gangs are women, and so
• 34:39
  Speaker 4: what kind of toxic masculinity are they suffering from.
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: Well, they're they're under the thrall of the men that
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: they are under.
• 34:51
  Speaker 2: So they're still under patriarchy.
• 34:53
  Speaker 4: See, so yeah, it's just anxious rhetoric.
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: I want you to point something out though, this is
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: not two million dollars a year, I believe. No, it's
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: two million over three years, over three years, so that's
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: you know, it's a little bit less. Is almost the
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: six six sixty six hundred and fifty one thousand a year?
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: One hundred thousand a year. That's not too bad, is
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: it for to do some skills work building sessions with
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: forty men.
• 35:21
  Speaker 4: But it's not even all of Puerto Rico. It's the
• 35:25
  Speaker 4: community at the community level seeking crime reduction, improving criminal
• 35:29
  Speaker 4: justice responses to crimes, and denormalizing crime in the community
• 35:34
  Speaker 4: of Loiza and the northeastern region of Puerto Rico.
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: But this is continual, guys like you'll see these initiatives
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: like again, skill sessions for forty forty men and boys. Yes,
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: the part of the problem is they're doing things like
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: teaching them to intervene with gang violence, which you'll get
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: them killed.
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: But the other problem is.
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: Why does that cost six hundred and fifty thousand a year.
• 36:04
  Speaker 4: Puerto Rico is smaller than Connecticut.
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: How much possibly how much could they possibly be doing? Yeah,
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: and like doing some workshops, some skill building. I actually
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: looked a lot of the financials for these feminist NGOs,
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: and if Honey Badger Radio was operated as a feminist NGO,
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: we would probably have a budget of five to six
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: and a half million dollars a year, ninety five percent
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: of which would go to board members each take or
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: not ninety five, but a good portion of it would
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: go to board members, each taking about forty thousand dollars
• 36:40
  Speaker 1: in terms of salary a year for a one hour
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: zoom call a month. So we'd probably have like sixteen
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: twenty board members doing that, and it'd just be like,
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: it's unbelievable. And then there'd be like five percent towards
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: creating any kind of content, doing any kind of investigation work,
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: doing any kind of research, anything else, Like just five
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: percent towards that. It'd be it would be I can't
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: even imagine operating like that. Can you imagine it? Like
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: every one of you, like you know, each one of
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: you would probably be making like one hundred and sixty
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: thousand a year because you're you're directly involved in the
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: production of the of the I'm sorry, I'm probably making
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: people feel bad, but you know, and and we'd all be.
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: It.
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: And this is why they do it. This is why
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: they use this ideology because it's a gigantic meal ticket. Anyway,
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: I'll move away from that because it's it's it's depressing it.
• 37:44
  Speaker 3: It is, but but I mean, like if but now
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: we see it's also very fake. Like it's obviously all
• 37:51
  Speaker 3: like you know, astroturfed most of this stuff. So that's
• 37:55
  Speaker 3: a that's kind of a good sign in my opinion.
• 37:58
  Speaker 2: But what's the other thing?
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: Says in the vertical Chack? What about violent women? Does
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: this organization address that? Do you mean our organization?
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 38:08
  Speaker 5: No, no no.
• 38:12
  Speaker 3: Anthony Huber, permanently retired skateboarder, has been watching us for
• 38:16
  Speaker 3: a while.
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: So he knows what we're about. Yeah, okay, all right,
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: all right.
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: So what's another organization we can look at now? Or
• 38:24
  Speaker 3: do you want to go onto something else?
• 38:26
  Speaker 4: Hannah, Well, it just I've been just been on the
• 38:32
  Speaker 4: per Capiti is spending there because when you think about it,
• 38:36
  Speaker 4: all right, just looking at numbers for for size comparisons,
• 38:43
  Speaker 4: population of Puerto Rico is about three point two million.
• 38:47
  Speaker 4: There are over one point one million Puerto Ricans living
• 38:52
  Speaker 4: in the New York metropolitan area. So New York City
• 38:56
  Speaker 4: has a third as many Puerto Ricans as Puerto Rico does.
• 39:00
  Speaker 4: Mm hmm, and we are exporting toxic masculinity to Puerto Rico.
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Puerto Rico's population is the same as Chicago's population.
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: Chicago's population is three million.
• 39:14
  Speaker 4: I have a feeling that the men of Puerto Rico
• 39:16
  Speaker 4: are going to call bullshit on this anyway.
• 39:20
  Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe I would hope. So I think that Puerto
• 39:24
  Speaker 3: Ricans are pretty old school, to put it that way.
• 39:29
  Speaker 3: They're not much different from uh, Southern hillbilly types. They
• 39:34
  Speaker 3: just speak Spanish. That's what we call them hivaos because
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: that just means hillbilly in Spanish. Puerto Rico, the island
• 39:42
  Speaker 3: is a lot of hills and rainforests and stuff. My
• 39:44
  Speaker 3: my family's from the south central part of Puerto Rico,
• 39:47
  Speaker 3: so not where this is going on. That's like the
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: northeastern tip near San Juan, which is the capital, so
• 39:53
  Speaker 3: definitely more urban over there.
• 39:55
  Speaker 4: But yeah, I just I just have a feeling like
• 39:57
  Speaker 4: if you took this to the to the hat Field
• 39:59
  Speaker 4: and McCoy for instance, which that was kind of similar
• 40:03
  Speaker 4: to gang violence, except it for silly reasons in the beginning.
• 40:08
  Speaker 4: But they killed each other for decades after the initial
• 40:12
  Speaker 4: killing in revenge. All the all the killings were revenge killings,
• 40:16
  Speaker 4: and it didn't have anything to do with it makes
• 40:20
  Speaker 4: me a man if I do this, It was these
• 40:23
  Speaker 4: other people did us wrong, and we have to do
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: something about it. And this is our territory and that's
• 40:29
  Speaker 4: their territory. And if they come here, then we're going
• 40:31
  Speaker 4: to kill them. And if we go there, we're going
• 40:33
  Speaker 4: there to get revenge because you know, they did something
• 40:36
  Speaker 4: wrong to us. And both sides were like that. But
• 40:38
  Speaker 4: if somebody came along and said, now you men, you know,
• 40:42
  Speaker 4: started in with the whole. You know, this doesn't make
• 40:44
  Speaker 4: you manly, and you know, being being violent doesn't make
• 40:49
  Speaker 4: you tough and strong like they'd have been shot that.
• 40:53
  Speaker 4: They wouldn't have gotten the full lecture out, they'd have
• 40:56
  Speaker 4: gotten three or four sentences out and they'd have been shot.
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm. All we can hope for is that these
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: initiatives are as pointless basically just exercises in creating money
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: streams rather than But we can only hope they're just
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: so incompetent. They haven't talked to a single Puerto Rican kid.
• 41:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, Porto Ricans are prettych Puerto Rican kids are.
• 41:24
  Speaker 2: They have a modern sensibilities. And I'm sorry, go ahead,
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: but if you're.
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: An American, that's probably not the best outcome because you paid, yeah,
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: six hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year for these
• 41:39
  Speaker 1: people to screw around, making things more dangerous for Puerto
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: Rican boys, potentially getting people killed. And the only hope
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: is that they didn't actually do anything. This was just
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: an account and see fiction, you know what I mean.
• 41:56
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 41:57
  Speaker 4: Well, now some of these organizations you can actually scroll
• 42:00
  Speaker 4: down on their page and it will tell you what
• 42:03
  Speaker 4: they paid their executives. But I noticed that a lot
• 42:07
  Speaker 4: of them that's left blank. It doesn't stay what they
• 42:10
  Speaker 4: got paid, which is interesting.
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: Don't look at the executives, look at the board members.
• 42:16
  Speaker 4: Well, they don't that listed, no, because they don't have to.
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: If board members make under something like fifty thousand a year,
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: I probably, since I looked in twenty twenty two, if
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: they make under a certain houth, they don't have to
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: declare it to the regulatory agency, so they keep So
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: what happens is they are on the board of Feminist NGOA,
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: they're on the board of Feminist ngob cdef However, many
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: each getting forty thousand from that NGO, which they don't
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: have to declare for an hour's work a zoom meeting
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: a month, and then they just collect a whole bunch
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: of them and suddenly you're making a quarter half a
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: million dollars a year for fucking nothing. And that's how it's.
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: That's and they don't declare that stuff like they might
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: have an executive officer, one executive officer, a couple executive
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: officers doing a little bit of office work. For example,
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: the one I looked at, I think was the National
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: Violence Against Coalition of Violence Against National Coalition Against Domestic
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: Violence in the US. And what she does is she
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: has at pamphlet, she has a mailing list, she arranges
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: for a workshop once a month, and she makes referrals
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: to plastic surgeons. And she makes one hundred and sixty
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: thousand a month, I know a year, one hundred and
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: sixty thousand American a year between perks and her actual salary.
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: I mean, and I'm like, looking at that, I'm like,
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: how much time would that actually take? Like maybe five
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: hours a week.
• 43:55
  Speaker 2: M hm.
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: And she probably has an assistant who does the actual work,
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: and that's like that. There a lot of them are operated.
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: Just like that.
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: The money just goes down and your suary is considered
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: expenses because she's directly related to the production of that workshop,
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: even though probably the only thing she does is maybe
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: make a phone call and then go for a coffee
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: to arrange it, and then that's it.
• 44:23
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and there's there's a bunch of that, and then
• 44:27
  Speaker 4: we lost Brian lost Brian.
• 44:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah, just jump there.
• 44:32
  Speaker 4: There's a there's a thing I put in I sent
• 44:35
  Speaker 4: you on discord directly that you should open if you can.
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: Ye, hold on a second.
• 44:42
  Speaker 4: It's the link right below our thing.
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: You're just gonna share this, okay, So what what's the link?
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: Where is it?
• 44:50
  Speaker 4: It's right below the the studio link that you sent me.
• 44:55
  Speaker 4: So it's the very last thing in your.
• 44:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I see, I got it.
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: I got it.
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: Let me just open it up. Yeah. For some reason,
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: video Ninja like aid itself for a second. But I'm back.
• 45:08
  Speaker 2: So where we're going?
• 45:09
  Speaker 4: There, we go that's good, all right, So.
• 45:10
  Speaker 3: It's opening up. Now, let me just share this tab internationally.
• 45:14
  Speaker 3: Agency for International Development USAID.
• 45:17
  Speaker 4: This is USA. This one you might find interesting specifically,
• 45:21
  Speaker 4: and and our listeners that are from UH from the
• 45:26
  Speaker 4: East will find this interesting specifically as well. The purpose
• 45:30
  Speaker 4: of the proposed activities to conduct feminist informed formative research
• 45:36
  Speaker 4: on integrated gb V s r H. So what that
• 45:41
  Speaker 4: is is gender based violence dash SR is something like
• 45:46
  Speaker 4: sexually related something, but it's they now are calling it
• 45:50
  Speaker 4: gender based. They've stopped calling it domestic, they've stopped calling
• 45:53
  Speaker 4: it intimate partner violence. It is now gender based violence rebranding. No,
• 45:57
  Speaker 4: it's not even that is that is absolute evil right now.
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: But it also proves what I've been trying to, Like
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: I've been in these arguments, sorry of pan, I've been
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: in these arguments on Twitter.
• 46:08
  Speaker 4: The location that they're doing this is Bangladesh, but go on.
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but well they're probably they're probably testing it out
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: on the specimens, you know, those cultures that are lesser.
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: So well, they've been doing it to us forever.
• 46:24
  Speaker 3: Then now they're just exporting it and they're just saying
• 46:27
  Speaker 3: because men's issues advocacy in places like Bangladesh, I think
• 46:32
  Speaker 3: are more mainstream.
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: Isn't that in India? Am I wrong about that?
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: We have to I'd have to look into it. But
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: my overall point is that I've been arguing with people
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: that said that about how feminists use domestic violence and
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: sexual assault to push their idea that that men use
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: these things to oppress women in patriarchy, and people push
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: back on that, and I show them receipts, But this
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: is a huge receipt. They're literally calling the violence gender
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: based violence. They have how much more of an evidence
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: that that's what they're that they're pushing this narrative. And again,
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: if we don't address this stuff, we are just going
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: to continuously have this cropping up over and over and
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: over again, because this is the root of the problem.
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: People are looking at the lgbt Q plus l rn
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: N element op crap right, and they're saying, well, this
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: is no, that's not it. That's a symptom, and it's
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: growing out of the root, which is this, which is
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: the destruction of the relationship between men and women, and
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: this insistence that we denied biology in order to maintain
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: this idea of men's oppression that historically men oppressed women.
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: So women's position wasn't a result of biology, but of
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: men oppressing women. You see, women would be seafarers if
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: they hadn't been oppressed by they'd be able to tie
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: those knots in a squall, No, but in haul up
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: three hundred pounds nobody's business, right, They'd be able to
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: do anything a man could do if men hadn't oppressed them.
• 48:07
  Speaker 4: Secly, men men totally stopped me from buying and using
• 48:11
  Speaker 4: this book. I don't have it in my hands right
• 48:13
  Speaker 4: now because patriarchy. We didn't arrange that, by the way. Yeah,
• 48:18
  Speaker 4: but my point is that interesting book.
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: Women were not oppressed throughout history. They were capable of
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: the jobs that were available outside of the home, and
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: the jobs in the home were not nothing to sneeze
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: at either, because there were critical importance to maintenance of society.
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: And yet we frame all of that instead of in
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: terms of biology men women were restricted by their biology.
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: We frame it in terms of oppression. Men oppressed women
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: because it's a useful narrative to make money. Let's put
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: it down a brass tacks. That's what it comes down to.
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: You spout that off and people give you money. Right,
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: But it is a lie, and it is a lie
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: that is down upstream of all of the crap we're
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: seeing with the rainbow or the DG, the LGBTQ. Plus
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: it's downstream of that. That stuff is downstream of it.
• 49:12
  Speaker 4: Okay, so there's more. There's more, all right, So we
• 49:16
  Speaker 4: see this. The purpose of the proposed activity is to
• 49:19
  Speaker 4: conduct feminist inform so it's being funded by the government.
• 49:22
  Speaker 4: It specifically says feminist informed formative research on integrated GBV
• 49:29
  Speaker 4: SRH approaches using a quantity or qualitative human centered design
• 49:34
  Speaker 4: over eighteen months in order to inform best or promising
• 49:40
  Speaker 4: practices for GBV SRH integration by practitioners and humanitarian contexts.
• 49:48
  Speaker 4: So what that means is they're using this research, this
• 49:52
  Speaker 4: feminist informed research then to inform the creation of law
• 49:56
  Speaker 4: and policy in how AID is being distributed in other countries.
• 50:01
  Speaker 4: So the reason it's significant that this is in Bangladesh
• 50:04
  Speaker 4: is there's Bangladesh, is that there's a policy in India
• 50:10
  Speaker 4: with organizations like USAID that distribute food to people who
• 50:15
  Speaker 4: are in living in abject poverty situations that the head
• 50:22
  Speaker 4: female of the household is the only one who is
• 50:25
  Speaker 4: allowed to go get the food. So if she is
• 50:27
  Speaker 4: abusing the men in her family, they will starve. They
• 50:32
  Speaker 4: do not have any recourse. They cannot go get the
• 50:35
  Speaker 4: food on their own, and they can't appeal to anyone
• 50:37
  Speaker 4: to give it to them. She is in control, so
• 50:40
  Speaker 4: they have to obey her. And this design is literally
• 50:44
  Speaker 4: intended to force men to depend on women in ways
• 50:48
  Speaker 4: that will cause them physical harm if they don't obey. Right,
• 50:54
  Speaker 4: that's one thing this organization is doing. If you click
• 50:57
  Speaker 4: on the name where it'sa recipient, and the name is
• 51:01
  Speaker 4: International Rescue Committee, which I find ironic given that information,
• 51:06
  Speaker 4: and you right click on that and open it, or
• 51:09
  Speaker 4: if you click on it and just go from this page,
• 51:11
  Speaker 4: because I think we've got everything. We're not from this
• 51:13
  Speaker 4: page International Rescue Click on International Rescue Committee. All right,
• 51:19
  Speaker 4: you will see this is not the only thing they've
• 51:21
  Speaker 4: been funded. It's going to take a minute here to load.
• 51:24
  Speaker 4: But wait till this number pops up, because it's it's
• 51:28
  Speaker 4: not six hundred thousand.
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: That was one thing half a billion almost.
• 51:33
  Speaker 3: Uh yeah, yeah, seventy one point four million dollars from
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: two hundred and thirteen transactions, yep.
• 51:41
  Speaker 4: And so I googled them, and I started. I found
• 51:44
  Speaker 4: their website and I started looking at their website. I
• 51:49
  Speaker 4: have sent you a link on discord Brian, and I
• 51:51
  Speaker 4: found this.
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: Where are we focused?
• 51:57
  Speaker 3: Women in the world yep, but particularly in places affected
• 52:01
  Speaker 3: by crisis face discrimination, violence, and a lack of equal
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: opportunities that threaten their lives and rob them of their potential.
• 52:08
  Speaker 3: But with the right support and investment, they can change
• 52:10
  Speaker 3: their own future and uplift entire communities. They can change
• 52:14
  Speaker 3: the world. This is this reminds me of when, of course,
• 52:19
  Speaker 3: but that's just the impetus to essentially like bring in
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: these external you know, apparatuses like NGOs, which are supposed
• 52:28
  Speaker 3: to help, but they actually usually do more damage than
• 52:33
  Speaker 3: anything else.
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: So where else do you want me to go from there?
• 52:37
  Speaker 4: So what I found here, and I hadn't gone too
• 52:41
  Speaker 4: far into this, but a lot of it. They they
• 52:45
  Speaker 4: do things like they'll fund medical centers that are female specific,
• 52:51
  Speaker 4: so only women can go there and it's for specifically
• 52:55
  Speaker 4: female problems. Or they'll do like they're doing in India
• 52:59
  Speaker 4: where they're handing out food or they're handing out vouchers
• 53:03
  Speaker 4: for food or the equivalent of food stamps, but only
• 53:06
  Speaker 4: women can get them. But if you click on let
• 53:14
  Speaker 4: me go back to the page. If you click on
• 53:16
  Speaker 4: see our work in action, so you scroll down to
• 53:18
  Speaker 4: how the first thing our goals, and it has these
• 53:22
  Speaker 4: three goals.
• 53:24
  Speaker 3: The first one is women and girls see real improvements
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: to their safety, health, education, economic well being, and their
• 53:30
  Speaker 3: ability to make decisions that affect their lives. How we
• 53:33
  Speaker 3: get their women's rights and human rights. The IRC is
• 53:36
  Speaker 3: working to break down barriers for women and girls and
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: ensure gender equality is a cornerstone of all of our programs. Wow,
• 53:43
  Speaker 3: that sounds oddly familiar. It sounds you want me to
• 53:47
  Speaker 3: go to number two or.
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: So do this?
• 53:49
  Speaker 4: You think about this all right? So, in a country
• 53:52
  Speaker 4: like the United States, where we've had a history of
• 53:56
  Speaker 4: women stepping into roles that may have been that started
• 54:00
  Speaker 4: out as traditionally male roles, such as during the Industrial Revolution,
• 54:07
  Speaker 4: men's manufacturing activities and women's manufacturing activities were pretty segregated, right.
• 54:13
  Speaker 4: Men men built things where running the machines took a
• 54:17
  Speaker 4: lot more muscle and was a lot more that the
• 54:21
  Speaker 4: risks were different. Women ran machines where it took a
• 54:25
  Speaker 4: lot more agility. So you saw more women in textiles
• 54:30
  Speaker 4: like my great aunts worked in a textile factory. But
• 54:35
  Speaker 4: so there were They both went into manufacturing, but in
• 54:40
  Speaker 4: areas where there was you know, extreme heat, you know,
• 54:45
  Speaker 4: and and I don't mean like the kind of hot
• 54:47
  Speaker 4: heat that you get in a laundry press. I mean
• 54:49
  Speaker 4: the kind of heat where you're melting aluminum and steel,
• 54:53
  Speaker 4: you know, like that kind of heat, which is entirely
• 54:56
  Speaker 4: different if you haven't experienced it. Those were men. Men
• 55:02
  Speaker 4: did that, not women. And of course when the United
• 55:06
  Speaker 4: States got involved in wars and started sending men overseas,
• 55:11
  Speaker 4: pulling them out of the factories, then they needed the
• 55:14
  Speaker 4: women to step in. So you had this change that
• 55:17
  Speaker 4: took place, and you had laws that changed sort of
• 55:21
  Speaker 4: behind the cultural changes that were taking place. But it
• 55:25
  Speaker 4: was organic, not something that another country didn't come in
• 55:29
  Speaker 4: and say, we don't like your culture and we're coming
• 55:32
  Speaker 4: in here to change it. Right, So what these people
• 55:35
  Speaker 4: do is they go into countries where that's not the culture,
• 55:38
  Speaker 4: and that's not how their industrial revolution happened, and it's
• 55:43
  Speaker 4: not how their culture responded when there were wars or
• 55:46
  Speaker 4: famine or other outbreak. Women have been protected from a
• 55:50
  Speaker 4: lot of dangers. Men are the ones that took those risks,
• 55:54
  Speaker 4: and now that safety measures are more common in those workplaces,
• 55:59
  Speaker 4: they're saying, you have to let women in now, and
• 56:02
  Speaker 4: you have to let women be out of their homes
• 56:05
  Speaker 4: and go and do things that are not specifically for
• 56:09
  Speaker 4: their families and earn money and so on in countries
• 56:12
  Speaker 4: where like, if I earn a living in the United States,
• 56:16
  Speaker 4: all right, and I'm living separately from my husband or something,
• 56:21
  Speaker 4: and I just buy a bunch of stuff for myself
• 56:25
  Speaker 4: and my kids are starving, I can be convicted of
• 56:28
  Speaker 4: child neglect. Even if my husband and I are living
• 56:31
  Speaker 4: together and we're married, and we both are trying to
• 56:35
  Speaker 4: contribute to the household, and I live in luxury and
• 56:39
  Speaker 4: the rest of the family is starving, I still can
• 56:42
  Speaker 4: be convicted of child neglect because we've had that evolution
• 56:48
  Speaker 4: of culture here in the United States. If a woman
• 56:52
  Speaker 4: in say Middle Eastern country earns a bunch of money
• 56:56
  Speaker 4: and her family isn't making that money, she just keeps it,
• 57:01
  Speaker 4: can she be convicted a child neglect for not spending
• 57:05
  Speaker 4: that money on her children, because from what I understand,
• 57:09
  Speaker 4: only the men are considered responsible for that. Only the
• 57:12
  Speaker 4: men can be convicted. And in fact, if she earns
• 57:17
  Speaker 4: that money and he doesn't pay her taxes, he can
• 57:20
  Speaker 4: be convicted. So these women, these this isn't all women,
• 57:24
  Speaker 4: but this organization is going into countries where women may
• 57:28
  Speaker 4: not be accountable if they earn a bunch of money
• 57:31
  Speaker 4: and then don't spend any of it on their families.
• 57:33
  Speaker 4: And they may not be accountable if they go places
• 57:37
  Speaker 4: and do things and it happens to be illegal. They
• 57:40
  Speaker 4: may be able to get their husbands in trouble without
• 57:42
  Speaker 4: intending it. They may cause all kinds of problems for
• 57:46
  Speaker 4: their families, and they are disrupting the culture there and
• 57:50
  Speaker 4: simply imposing their ideas. So that's when they say we
• 57:55
  Speaker 4: stand with women and girls, what they're actually saying is
• 57:59
  Speaker 4: we have an idea idea of how women and girls
• 58:01
  Speaker 4: should live, and we are going into under other countries
• 58:04
  Speaker 4: and imposing those ideas on those other countries. It's not
• 58:09
  Speaker 4: that women and girls and those other countries have begged
• 58:11
  Speaker 4: them to come in and change everything. It's that they
• 58:14
  Speaker 4: are coming in and selling it to them. And then
• 58:18
  Speaker 4: they pretend that the men of those countries are at
• 58:22
  Speaker 4: fault when there are problems from the cultural changes that
• 58:27
  Speaker 4: are taking place. When what they have brought in doesn't
• 58:33
  Speaker 4: mesh with everything else that's already there, So if that
• 58:37
  Speaker 4: makes sense. So if you look at if you click
• 58:41
  Speaker 4: on Stand with Women and Girls, it goes right back
• 58:44
  Speaker 4: to the top of the page. It doesn't actually go
• 58:49
  Speaker 4: to any initiatives or anything.
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: It just goes to the top of the page.
• 58:55
  Speaker 4: Well stand with that was with you Stand with Women
• 58:58
  Speaker 4: and Girls. But yeah, breaking down barriers here they're talking
• 59:02
  Speaker 4: about you know that there there are things that could change,
• 59:09
  Speaker 4: like women not being able to go see doctors.
• 59:11
  Speaker 5: And so on.
• 59:13
  Speaker 4: But they're not going in and you know, doing they're
• 59:20
  Speaker 4: not going in and talking to people and working with
• 59:25
  Speaker 4: legislators slators to try to get things changed in everything.
• 59:29
  Speaker 4: They're going in and shaming people and uh suing and
• 59:34
  Speaker 4: you know, building things that that only women can access
• 59:38
  Speaker 4: and so on.
• 59:39
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well I I don't I think that because there's
• 59:43
  Speaker 3: like so much more that we have to go through. Ultimately,
• 59:46
  Speaker 3: what we're looking at is they're exporting you know, feminism
• 59:51
  Speaker 3: and and they're making Yeah, and they're painting a really
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: nice picture. Like there's so much propaganda. It's really annoys
• 59:57
  Speaker 3: me to see like these little girls playing the war.
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it looks really cute.
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 4: And this story that it's on the next page, it
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 4: sounds really compelling too, right, Yeah, I know that's when
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 4: you read the first paragraph. Meet fourteen year old Mariama.
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 4: She's been forced to flee her home in the Central
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 4: African Republic because armed forces are threatening her village. And
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 4: then it goes on and it talks about her hardships,
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 4: and they're real hardships, but they're talking about this, they're
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 4: talking about this like women in the circumstances have hardships
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 4: that are unique to women, and men do not also
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 4: have hardships. Men do not also face violence. Men do
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 4: not also face a loss of medical care. Men do
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 4: not also face and inability to find a safe place
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 4: to the topbody.
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, this this one right here, you're right on it.
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: You notice how the girls are in the front and
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: the boys are in the back.
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: Isn't that say a picture is worth a thousand words?
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 3: Let's say, for I'm so, they're exporting essentially, like, uh,
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: feminism in the let's say, the gift wrap of liberalism
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 3: to other countries and the purpose of that, and I
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 3: think the consequence of that is going to be creating
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: instability and uh, instilling in girls and women and the
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: men who support them, which is gonna be a lot
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 3: of men, because men generally support women a revolutionary attitude,
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 3: and it's actually gonna destabilize those countries, just like any
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 3: time we get involved with some third world country, we
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 3: make things worse. Like any any like you know, large
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: Western liberal democracy that goes into another country says, oh,
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 3: you guys, you guys are having trouble growing rights, but
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 3: we're gonna send you ship tons of rice. And so
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: instead of like, you know, what is this saying, like
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: give a man of fish for a day, and you know,
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 3: And so what they do is they make it worse.
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 3: I've seen documentaries about it. And another thing too, is
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 3: that most NGOs are not non government NGOs, Like that's
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 3: it's a lie. Like there they actually get money from
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 3: you know, three letter agencies and various others, so they're
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 3: not even non government. They just say they're non government.
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 3: It's like, so in the best way to destabilize the country,
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 3: and I think the most effective way to do it
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 3: is to turn the men and the women against each other,
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: because not in every you know, you can't necessarily do
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 3: it in other ways, Like let's say, you know, creating
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 3: like an LGBT class or bring it along the lines
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 3: of race, because a lot of the countries are homogeneous
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: and they all have the same religion or whatever, and
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: their culture is very you know, like it's all the same.
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 3: But every country has men and women.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: So this is like where you do it.
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 3: And the first thing you do is you start you
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 3: look at a country and you say, the women there
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: are not served and they're not liberal enough, and we're
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 3: going to make them more liberal, and that sounds good
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 3: and everybody's like, oh yeah, why not and and but
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 3: it doesn't do that at all. It just makes the
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 3: women fear and resent the men, and then the that
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 3: the purpose of that is obviously to make the men overreact,
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 3: and it just destabilizes and it creates, you know, like conflict.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 4: So yeah, so where they've done that, how they've done that,
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 4: You'll you'll have to click on let's see you are
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 4: at that page, all right, is it on this page? Yeah,
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 4: you'll want to go down differently. They preventing violence against
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 4: women and girls, so that the well, it click on that, okay, okay,
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 4: and it takes you to where we focus safety and
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 4: then it goes down to their goals and and it
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 4: the first goal ensure that people are safe in their
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 4: homes and receive support blah blah blah, supporting women and
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 4: girls and having healthy and safe a relationships and working
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 4: with men to change violent behavior and stop in mint
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 4: partner violence. So they're promoting the gendered model that sendment
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 4: partner violence is something that men do to women, not
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 4: something that happens among both sexes and almost and you
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 4: know it's tight.
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 3: And then yeah, masculinity is conditioned, so we need to
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 3: make them less masculine so that they're less violent, because
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 3: masculinity is violence.
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: That's what they believe. I'm obviously not what I believe.
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 4: And if I can go back and find it somewhere
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 4: on this page, it might be the previous page. It
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 4: says they've been doing this since nineteen ninety six.
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: Yeap.
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 4: So on the page that you go, click your back
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 4: button where it says what is the IRC doing differently?
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 4: Now that you've seen that that they promote a specific
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 4: gender model of what domestic violence is, then you see
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 4: at the IRC every time I read this, I'm thinking
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 4: of IRC chats. I'm sorry, guys, that's why keep smiling
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 4: I'm like, give me IRC chat. We discuss we help
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 4: people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 4: disaster to survive. So they're going to war torn areas,
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 4: They're going to areas that have had famine, floods, unstable. Yeah,
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 4: we prioritize help for the most vulnerable. And in nineteen
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 4: ninety six, we were the first humanitarian aid group to
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 4: develop an international aid team dedicated to preventing violence against
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 4: women and girls. So they have since nineteen ninety six,
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 4: with government funding from the US government, been imposing this
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 4: gendered model of responding to intimate partner violence, intimate partner
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 4: and sexual violence in all over the world, actually in
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 4: areas that are torn by natural disasters and war. So
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 4: these people are probably operating in the Democratic Republic of
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 4: the Congo where yes, during war times, sometimes women get raped,
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 4: men get raped to death. Mm hmmm, right, women get
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 4: attacked by the equivalent of criminals in the United States, UH,
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 4: men get attacked by the equivalent of shoot. What were
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 4: they called hands? Will know what I'm talking about? Reverse? Reverse?
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 4: They were called reverse. But these these uh aliens that
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 4: are they weren't really aliens. If I remember right, but
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 4: they had completely lost their minds, and the statement was
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 4: that they would they would beat you to death, they
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 4: would rape you to death, and they would eat you
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 4: and hopefully in that order.
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 4: Yeah sure sure, but in any case.
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 3: But it's other men that makes it okay, So you know,
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 3: well yeah, and I mean it's not necessarily other men,
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 3: but you.
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 4: Yeah, there were parts of Africa a while back that
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 4: had a massive problem of female rape gangs going around
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 4: because they wanted to have babies and they couldn't find
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 4: men that wanted to have babies with them. So it's
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 4: not exactly unknown that it's not a gendered crime, right,
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 4: But yeah, this this they've been doing this since nineteen
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 4: ninety six. Nineteen ninety six was before my son was born, right,
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 4: I graduated high school in nineteen ninety one.
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like almost twenty years ago. Yeah, no, no,
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: it is more than twenty years ago, almost thirty.
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's almost thirty.
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: It's like twenty nine years ago, yeah, twenty yeah.
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 4: So yeah, anybody that was born that year is having
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 4: an age related crisis because they're hitting the thirty something
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 4: next year. And this, this program has spent that many
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 4: years and I want you to go back to the
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 4: page with.
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 2: BA the.
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 4: USA spending, the USA spending.
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: Let me see, is this the right page? Yeah?
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: It is, okay, okay, because I got into a brief
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: argument with somebody and the and the vertical chat. This
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: is discrimination against minority men around the world.
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: I mean they're trying to say, oh, while we're helping
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: the women, blah blah blah. But this is literally they're
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: making the lives of poor black and brown men worse
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: around the world. They're removing their roles in their families
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 1: and communities and replacing them with well, I would honestly
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: say predatorial, exploitative, colonialist policies. And but literally they are
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: harming boys and men of ethnicities and cultures that they
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: consider to be lesser because of this framework. And I
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 1: mean I could actually it would be fun.
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 3: It's a liberal world order, that's the that's kind of
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 3: like how it's framed, because it's like.
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: The liberal world order will result in worse outcomes, Yes.
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 3: Yes it will, But that I'm saying is because, yeah,
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 3: because it is built on the framework that liberalism knows
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 3: what's best for everybody, so it's going to export it
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 3: everywhere and baked into that is feminism, so that that
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 3: like there's no escaping it, and it is just as
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 3: you said, there's an idea that those people are inferior.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 3: I remember you and I were on wig TV, Allison.
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 3: I don't know if you remember wig TV.
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: He invited it on some for a debate, and we
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: were talking about, you know, the population collapse or whatever,
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: the impending population collapse, and we were talking about like,
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: you know, Islamic men and women, so people from Islamic countries,
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: and the people who were most of them were just
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: libs too. In the conversation.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: They immediately were like, well, those people are inferior, and
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 3: I was like, what like that? But they're human beings still,
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 3: and they and so like, we can't even have a
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 3: conversation about right and wrong if you don't see them
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 3: as agents of their own destiny doing things in the world.
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 2: And so you know, I'm just pointing out that this
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 2: is the outcome of the liberal world order seeing itself
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: as the arbor of morality spreading everywhere and baked into
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: that as part of the recipe, you know, of the
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: cake is feminism, which is inherently misinterest.
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: Okay, I will add to that I would say this,
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: I think there is. Somebody pointed out that there's usually
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: more foot and I think there is. First of all,
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: they're destroying. They're doing what all colonialists do throughout all
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: of humanustry. They are destroying the ability to fight back,
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: to innovate, to present themselves as threat of the military,
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: and like age men of a culture. This is right
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: out of a colonialist playbook. Destroy the men and the
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: culture becomes less of a threat. You basically punch its
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: teeth out. But here's the other thing. If they just
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: stabilize these economies, if they tear apart the relationship between
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: men and women in these communities and thus reduce their productivity,
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: which means that they're less effective, less resilient, they're more
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: reliant on usaid. They can then harvest these people as
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: resources for our economies. If we look at this in
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: terms of right now, in a situation of population collapse,
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: one of the most important resources on the planet is
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: now people. Because people keep your economy afloat, people keep
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: the engine running. They're doing this, creating this social chaos
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: allows them to harvest peace people from these communities. And
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that this is this is necessarily good
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 1: for the native people that they're But this isn't about
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: what's good for people who already exist in country. It's
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: what what's about what's good for these colonialist powers, and
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 1: they it allows them because in order to succeed anybody
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: who's innovative, any men usually it's men who are innovative
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: who want to build something, have to move out of
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: their native country and go and immigrate to another country
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 1: to do so. Right, so they are taking all of
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 1: that away from the people of that country, ensuring their impoverishment,
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: ensuring their continuous reliance, and ensuring whatever is good that
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: rises to the top and these cultures goes to the
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: colonialist countries. I know that people might be upset with
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: what I'm saying, but I think that I don't think
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: it's good for anybody. I don't think that this drain
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: from these these countries is good for them either, because
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: they don't talk to people who are productive where they
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: can do good for their own communities and cultures.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 2: You know, most people are against that in those countries.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: Like I've interviewed Indians and Indonesians and Filipino guys that
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: are in tech and they want to build their own
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: industries in their home countries and not get exported to
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 2: like the United States. So yeah, I think that the
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 2: best thing we can do is get the fuck out
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 2: of the way. That's what I think. I mean.
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 3: Some people might say, well, that's not nuance enough. We've
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 3: been throwing money in the trash for decades.
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's our money, like we like, you can't
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: money from me by force and then give it to
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 2: some other country. And when I have an issue with it,
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 2: you're like, dude, that's not enough nuance.
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 4: Though my money is worse than throwing money in the trash, right, Yeah.
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 4: This is this is taking your money and ironing it
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 4: so that it's really razor's edge straight, and then taking
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 4: a shipload of it to another country and giving them
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 4: death by a thousand paper cuts. Okay, and that's not
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 4: the page I was thinking of. Go back to the
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 4: page that had the recipient profile for International Rescue Committee.
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 4: It'll it'll if you hover over the tab, it'll come
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 4: up International Rescue Committee Incorporated Federal Award.
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: That we're looking at.
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 4: No, that's that's a different page back on the list.
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 2: So I'll just put this list up. Okay, So which.
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 4: One is called International Rescue. Did you close your other tabs? No? No, okay,
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 4: it should still be.
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 2: In one of Oh, okay, this one right here.
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 4: Yes, and that's that's okay. Now, if you scroll down,
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 4: there's a graph that shows like how how it goes
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 4: all the way to to thousand and eight and how
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 4: the spending pattern was, and right below that and right
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 4: below that it gives the top five ord rewarding agencies.
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 2: Yes, Department of State.
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 4: Yeah, so what we saw there was USAID before. The
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 4: Department of State is actually the biggest. The State Department
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 4: gave them fifty percent of the funding that they've had
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 4: over you know. And then USAID, which is the Agency
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 4: for International Development. So when they say USA, we know,
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 4: we know.
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 3: Yeah, people in the chat are spurging out about US
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 3: saying USA instead of USAID. We are completely one hundred
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 3: percent aware that us AID is itself a syop as a.
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 2: Term, and then it actually doesn't mean AID. We are
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 2: aware of that, but it's just easier for us.
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 4: To just say the USA put an at the end
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 4: of it. USAID's everybody's everybody in the world USA. We
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 4: all have USAID, and then we have the Department of
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 4: Health and human services. All right, So the US Department
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 4: of Health and Human Services was ostensibly created to help
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 4: people in America with poverty situations and other social services needs.
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 4: It runs Medicaid, it runs Medicare, I think it runs Medicare.
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 4: It runs the Welfare Department, it runs child protective Services,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 4: actually family services. In general. It is supposed to be
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 4: about managing the social systems created to serve the needs
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 4: of actual citizens in the United States. And they sent
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 4: ninety one point three million to this International Rescue Committee
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 4: to export feminist ideology to other countries through various programs
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 4: that limit assistance to only women or work with local
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 4: governments and organizations to change policy so that their assistance
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 4: benefits only women.
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: We were fucking up against this entire time. M hm,
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: this is what we were fucking up against, folks, all
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: of the people who came at us and said, what
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: are you doing? Really, we're surviving like like this is
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: like do you see the amount of fucking slash flowing
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 1: through this?
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 2: Oh man, it's insane.
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: We were up against the behemoth that we didn't even
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: was so ensconced in the actual like the establishment, that
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: you couldn't even see it. All you could see is
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: it's toes. Yeah, I just can't believe. Like, looking back,
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: I remember how bad I felt about Oh yeah, well,
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: it's really hard to get the stuff started, and it's
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: really hard to keep going forward all the shit that
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: we're doing, and I feel bad about how much progress
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: we've made. I haven't. And then it's this, look at
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: how much we've been up against all this time. We
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: haven't been fighting a lizard. We've been fighting like a
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 1: three hundred hydra.
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 4: You don't say that your organization is feminist and then
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 4: you're going at it from a feminist perspective or through
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 4: a feminist lens. Do you think they'd give you money
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 4: to start a domestic violence victims advocacy shelter where you know,
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 4: you have people who are are victims of domestic violence
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 4: can stay there with their families, and you get an
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 4: advocate to go to court with you.
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: Not when the literally the US government is exporting feminism
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: throughout the world. Not when not, when the entire, the
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: entire structure, the entire institution is feminist.
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 4: No, you're not going to get that now. I wanted
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 4: to start a five oh one C three I think
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 4: is what they're called, and build a shelter or buy
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 4: a building and create a men's shelter in Dayton, Ohio,
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 4: which at one point I was hoping to be able
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 4: to someday do. If I wanted to do that, I
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 4: would literally have to put down how we're doing it
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 4: through a feminist lens, how we're doing it with a
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 4: feminist perspective, what feminist organizations will endorse me, and how
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 4: I am going to use feminist ideology to cure those
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 4: men of their objections to being battered by their wives.
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is tearing the mask off and all
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: along what feminists were calling the patriarchy was them.
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 4: This is probably also the same in Canada. In fact,
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 4: we know if the same in Canada because this is
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 4: the kind of thing that Cafe came up against. Right,
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 4: this is why Earl Silverman killed himself. Yes, this is
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 4: what killed Earl Silverman.
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 2: This is the rope. Mm hmm yep. Can I just
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 2: I wanted to digress a little bit of There's someone
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: in the vertical chat named outlaw Josie Wales who says
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 2: he's a federal marshal. He well, I don't know, maybe
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 2: maybe he's telling the truth about the martial part. That's
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: a cool name. I know.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 3: So, Hey, Josie Wales, if you want to and you're
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 3: like you're serious about like being a marshal, I would
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 3: like to have you on our show as a guest
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 3: so you can talk. We can talk about what's going on,
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 3: because you said that you see the spending yourself and
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 3: the waste, so I'm curious about that.
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: I don't know if you'd be interested.
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 3: Maybe you're camera shy, but let me know what you
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 3: think and if you want to, you know, seriously consider
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 3: guests on our show, then uh, send us an email Allison.
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 3: What's the email address? Or join our discord server at
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 3: abagination dot online.
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 4: Yeah, if you really are a federal marshall, Marshall, I
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 4: would love to have you on HBr talk just to
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 4: talk about the gender based violence training that you get,
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 4: because I know that that's something that I've been talking
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 4: about for a long time. It's funded by the Violence
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 4: Against Women Act, but there's other funding. Uh. There there
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 4: were grants. Every president has made grants for this, uh,
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 4: And so I'd be interested in talking about that specifically
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 4: because again, you know, we know the statistics and we
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 4: know the reality, and then we know the government is
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 4: telling people who actually work in law enforcement to treat
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 4: female violence like it's men's fault or like it's not
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 4: that bad and it doesn't exist. So yeah, that definitely
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 4: something that I would like to see.
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 3: And if you want to come on our stream and
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 3: like throw spaghetti into the chat into a conversation, you
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 3: also can call us.
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 2: We'll talk to whoever.
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: I think it'd probably be hilarious because he'll come on
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: stream and he'll be like in a suit with an
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 1: ear piece and like.
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 2: Yeah right, yeah, like some men in black glasses and ship.
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 4: And again.
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 3: Uh okay, So anyway we're looking at yeah agency, you
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 3: were talking about the Department of Health and Human Services.
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 4: So yeah, Department of Health. Well, and you see like
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 4: every but below that, it's not as much one point
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 4: seven Department of Commerce and Department apart Agriculture. Right now
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 4: when on my pay or on mine when it came up,
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 4: let me see where I was here. Yeah, it has
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 4: it's a lower Okay, I see what it is. It's
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 4: the the thirty zero point three seven percent from the
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 4: Department of ACA Agriculture. That does not mean that these
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 4: are the only agencies that money is coming from and
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 4: means that smaller percentages just aren't showing up on this
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 4: list because it does say the top five. To see
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 4: more than the top five, you can visit our advanced
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 4: search page, which we don't need to do. But every
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 4: organization that I've looked at like this, from Packed to
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 4: this one, there's been several they've all had this where
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 4: they're not just getting money from US AIDS. They're getting
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 4: money from these other departments and agencies. They're funding things like, well,
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 4: we're going to Timbuk two and we're training the local
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 4: police forces in Timbuk two that when domestic violence is
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 4: two way, that if somebody's more injured than the other person,
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 4: it's they must have been the primary aggressor, which isn't
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 4: necessarily always true. Women actually often hurt themselves trying to
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 4: engage in violence.
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 2: And I.
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 4: Think my favorite story about that was from one of
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 4: the sources that I used in that video that I
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 4: was talking about earlier, where women in California broke her
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 4: wrist trying to stab her husband because he put his
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 4: arm up and she brought her wrist down like on
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 4: his wrist. And there's a thing about biology, Oh my god,
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 4: men's bones are thicker and heavier than women's bones. So
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 4: if you bring your bones down on a man's bones
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 4: with a lot of force and one of those bones breaks,
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 4: it's going to be yours if you're female. That's common sense, right,
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 4: But under primary aggressor policies, guess who gets arrested even
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 4: though you were trying to kill him and you hurt
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 4: your self trying to kill him, because you're injured and
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 4: he's bigger and stronger, it looks like he did something
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 4: to you, and the cops will haul him off in cuffs,
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 4: even if you both tell the same story, because the
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 4: primary aggressor policy says he gets hauled off in cuffs.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 4: So when you get something like that where there some
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 4: of these are funded by the Department of Justice. That's
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 4: where I got that particular type of we're going to
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 4: go train police forces.
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 2: They do that.
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 4: They go to countries all over the world, and it's
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 4: not always third world countries. There's an initiative that this
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 4: country had in Italy that actually was similar to that,
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 4: and it's on Oh, it doesn't have quite a bit
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 4: of description. The description is a bunch of letters and numbers,
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 4: and and so it did it. It went to Italy
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 4: and it went to Afghanistan. So they're they're training Afghanistani
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 4: police to view domestic violence is something men do to women.
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 4: So of course, then when you see domestic violence statistics
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 4: come out of Afghanistan, what are they going to be
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 4: based on that training and how the police responded to
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 4: that training and not necessarily right funded research and development,
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 4: So they're they're actually going through this was d D grant.
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 2: Uh for.
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 4: I see if it says the amount three hundred and
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 4: seventy eight dollars, the two dollars is obviously very important
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 4: for the paper boy. But can I just point a.
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 1: Point something out? All right? So actually statistics coming out
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 1: of the Middle East shows high rates of female domestic violence,
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: but nobody wants to talk about that.
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 4: But see that change, you know why?
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 2: Now?
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: I just wanted to say that fak Mare has responded
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 1: to your invitation to come on and has said, rather,
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: I would bring twenty two years of overseas development expertise
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: and experience. No spaghetti.
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 4: Sorry, So you wait? Does he work for US AIDS? Yeah,
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 4: funded by US AIDS, but.
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 2: I play one on TV.
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: He came in and said, what have I stumbled in on?
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: And you just so happened to be have twenty two
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: years in overseas.
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 4: Aid, Yeah, we totally believe that.
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 2: You wonder, no wonder you dude.
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you might have an invested interest in all of
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: this fact Mark, Yeah, a little bit, and in the
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 1: narrative itself. That makes you money.
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 3: I like how he I like how he's trying to
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 3: whoever this is is trying to insult Americans. I remember
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 3: when Americans were brave and had integrity. Okay, dude, yeah
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 3: that sty'll not getting our money. I don't kill a
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 3: ship like you can say whatever you want. You're just
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 3: coping at this point, not getting our money. Fuck you
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 3: find it someplace else, Go to Canada. I hear Trudeau
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 3: likes giving.
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: Away people that is mine.
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 2: Okay, we would you do that to? I mean, it's okay, Alison.
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 2: The Chinese have already like taken everything.
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 3: They're they're they're taking your money. Yeah, so you just
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 3: have to you have to change it, you know, change it.
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 3: That's all I can say is change it.
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 4: Maybe the Beavis and butt Head approach to politics. If
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 4: you think it sucks, change it.
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well yeah, well we'll see what happens.
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 4: You just pick up the remote.
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: You know, the voting slots are actually making the liberals
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: more popular, so we'll see if we're able to get
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: rid of them. But anyway, let's uh, let's keep going.
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: All right, So what are we what are we looking
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: at next?
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 4: Okay, gosh, if we go back to this is there's
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 4: so much stuff here.
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, if we go back to well, if we go
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 2: to the first thing that.
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 4: Was actually, if we go back to packed incorporate, now
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 4: we we went over this kind of pact incorporated. Is
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 4: that it's at the very top. It's the very first
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 4: thing on the list of grants for the keyword feminism.
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 2: Okay, so let's go back to this share this tab instead.
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 2: So AI, wait, is it is this?
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 1: It?
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 2: This is feminist? Yeah. When I searched feminists and the
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 2: key words granted.
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 4: That should be at the top there agency Okay, click
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 4: on grants.
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: It's on grants. It's direct payments, it's on grants.
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 4: It's on grants.
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: That's okay. Just shoot shoot me the link and I'll
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 2: open it. Maybe maybe the numbers have moved.
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: Do you have a minute ago that's your part? Yeah,
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: let me know what can I make it a suggest?
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 3: Oh you're talking about Packed, I see it, Yeah, co Incorporated. Okay,
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 3: to Packed Incorporated.
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 5: Then go to that.
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: We go through this before we go through this to
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: make a suggestion, let's not we can do this again,
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: all right.
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 4: Yeah, we don't need to go through all of them
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 4: to go through.
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: Every well, we don't. We can go through all individually.
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: I'm just suggesting that we might want to have additional
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: shows just looking at Oh.
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 4: Yeah, believe me, we what I'm saying. But for HBr talk,
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 4: I'm going to be doing this for a while. I
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 4: was going to go down the war path and start
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 4: looking at the history of United States military interference in
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 4: other countries and our use of men's blood as means
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 4: for laundry money. But I think we need to talk
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 4: about the money first so people understand just how much
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 4: is being washed and what is actually being done here.
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 4: So if you look at Packed Incorporated, I'm not going
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 4: to go through the whole thing of Yeah, you got
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 4: the profile up okay, so eighty one point one million, uh,
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 4: and that is it has fifteen other names if you
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 4: look at there, so there are different agencies.
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 2: Up here, yep.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 4: So if you go to the topah, go to the
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 4: and it says Packing Corporate also known by fifteen other names.
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 4: So it has all these different ah okay, so there's
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 4: and it's private agencies collaborating together. So this agency has
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 4: been around for like fifty years, more than fifty years,
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 4: and it has been drawing from the US government for
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 4: that long since the seventies, nineteen seventies, And we talked
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 4: about this on HBr talk. So now if you scroll down,
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 4: you'll see it'll it only shows on the chart down
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 4: to back to two thousand and eight. But if you
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 4: scroll down, uh huh, and you'll see there will be
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 4: the there you go there, you go go back up, yeah,
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 4: to the chart. Yeah, like there were there were a
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 4: few years there that they didn't get a whole bunch
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 4: of money, and then it came back and it started
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 4: to come back again. But if you look as you
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 4: go back, they got a lot more money historically, and
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 4: you can sort of see, uh, in earlier years two
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 4: thousand and eight, two thousand and nine, it got a
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 4: great deal of funding, and it looks like it just
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 4: sort of bounces around like that, and it this chart
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 4: only shows goes back so far. But if you look
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 4: at their history, it's like that they ask for a
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 4: large amount some years, they ask for small amounts some years.
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 4: And then if you continue to scroll down to the
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 4: awarding agencies there and it's only going to show the
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 4: top five again, but they actually get awards from way
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 4: more agencies. Let me see if i can.
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: Where do you want me to click?
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 4: Go? Scroll down? Scroll down? There we go to warding agencies.
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 4: There you'll see lament and this this is another issue,
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 4: all right. So you see here under awarding agencies like
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 4: it only only uh notes a few, but then the
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 4: accounts actually come from other agencies, so some of this funding.
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 4: In order to actually trace how where it comes from
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 4: and and how it's been achieved and how permeated the
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 4: government is by this this organization's funding and so on,
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 4: you'd actually have to go to their advanced search and
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 4: you would find that this organization, similar to the one
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 4: we just looked at, is getting is getting money from
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 4: a buttload of agencies. So and they're similar also in
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 4: what they do. Now, the other fun thing about this
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 4: is that eighty one point one million is for one
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 4: iteration of packed incorporated. So when you click on it
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 4: says child recipient recipient, it's a child. Does it say
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 4: child recipient there too, where Okay, no, it doesn't on
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 4: your page, so you might actually have the the greater
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 4: packed incorporated page.
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 2: So if I click on a different it won't it
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 2: won't open on anything.
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 4: It won't open up anything.
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 5: But I have.
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 4: Packed incorporated from that page open on my page. This
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 4: is a this is a child recipient of what you have,
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 4: and it says one hundred and eighteen point eight million,
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 4: So there's eighty one million to the parent organization. Each
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 4: of those organizations have that kind of money, and each
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 4: of them has had huge amounts of money, and this
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 4: was just for a particular set of years or for
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 4: a particular initiative or so on. Because when I look
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 4: back at two thousand and eight, for this child recipient,
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 4: they have one hundred and eighty one point eight million
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 4: in two thousand and eight from that pact incorporated. If
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 4: you go to let's see it just I accidentally clicked
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 4: on something, but it'll if you go to any of
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 4: the child recipients, each of them have different Right.
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 2: How do I look up the child recipients?
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 3: Is there?
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 2: I don't because all I see is the main one
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 2: unless I go to maybe the list, go back to
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 2: the list.
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna see if I can get there from yeah,
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 4: but so.
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 5: It should have.
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna send you this link copy.
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 2: All right, there we go.
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna get to your page. There. This is the
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 4: parent recipient with all the child recipients, and it's showing
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 4: just thirty point seven million from seven transactions. But we
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 4: know that's not actually the case because that's just one
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 4: packed in corporate incorporate. And you can see places where
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 4: you saw holes in spending on other years in that
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 4: same chart. If you scroll down, we looked at.
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 2: Oh here it is child recipients.
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 4: This is what I want to that has But you
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 4: don't want to do that, Oh I don't, Okay, No,
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 4: all right, so scroll back down to that chart where
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 4: there were holes before. That's where all this now. So
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 4: and if you do go through the child recipients and
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 4: look at every single one of them. Now, this one's
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 4: primarily funded by us AIDS, but other child recipients, which
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 4: are all the same organization by the way, they're all
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 4: little branches of the same organization, they are all getting
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 4: different amounts of funding. So we don't actually know unless
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 4: we were to go through and write down all the
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 4: numbers from each of these and add it all up together.
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 4: How much this organization is actually getting?
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 3: Wait, yeah, so basically take the parent organization and the
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 3: child organizations and yeah, you add them up, so it
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 3: packed ink thirty million.
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 4: And it doesn't necessarily this this website really not.
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 2: It's a little JANKI yeah, can I.
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: Of these? And how is PACT related to feminism?
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 2: Again?
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 4: So let's go back to.
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 2: This page.
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 4: I'm just gonna put this link when you're go back
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 4: to this page. All right, that might be it. That
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 4: might be what I'm looking for.
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 2: It.
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 4: It would be what would open if you clicked on
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 4: the number at the top of the page that I
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 4: just sent you. So I think it might be the
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 4: right page. Transform the digital pages space. Okay, so this
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 4: one's a little different. That's the correct number. That's the
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 4: correct number, I think.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 2: Okay, waiting for that page you sent me to load up?
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: So oh give them packed in page.
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 4: Yeah, that's great that you sent me.
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: So this is it's this right here, it's that numb
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 2: and yeah, that's the one that we're looking at.
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 4: Right, And if you look at this, this one's this
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 4: one's interesting, right, The transform digital spaces to reflect feminist
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 4: democratic principles. Right, transform, I want to say that more
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 4: slowly because what I've been experiencing over the last few
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 4: years in terms of censorship.
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: Can I read the whole paragraph and then you guys,
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 2: can that part?
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 4: That part people need to hear? Very very transform digital spaces.
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 4: Think about what that means, transgend digital spaces.
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 2: Right, all right, Let's let me read it because in
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 2: the vertical people can't see this, so I'm want to
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 2: picture they can hear. I'm going to read it because
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 2: even if I displayed it, it's too small.
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 1: You need to control the horizontal and the vertical.
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 3: So the descript of this award profile for the Agency
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 3: for International Development us AIDS, what is the description? The
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 3: Transform Digital Spaces to reflect feminist democratic principles activity is
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 3: designed to implement a global approach to addressing technology facilitated
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 3: gender based violence TFGBV. This activity will look at a
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 3: variety of subsets impacted by this form of violence, including
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 3: towards women in politics and public life. The activity will
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 3: pilot practical approaches to preventing, mitigating, and responding to t TFGBV,
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 3: which is technology facilitated gender based violence, technology facilitated len Okay,
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 3: I'm just yeah, I know in a set of countries
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 3: with diverse development contexts including inner penetration, language, religion, regional
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 3: and language diversity, and will then analyze, synthesize, and share
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 3: learning from the pilot activities with a broader community of
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 3: practice working to address TFGBV technological technological based gender violence.
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 3: The pilot initiatives will aim to increase resourcing and capacity
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 3: for programs and organizations implementing digital democracy and or TFGBV activities.
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 2: And will serve to two mutually reinforcing goals. One mitigation,
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 2: prevention and response. Two technology facilitated gender based violence, including
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 2: towards women in politics and public life at the country level,
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 2: and two gaining practical comparative knowledge into what types of
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 2: programming are effective to inform global efforts to combat this problem.
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 4: So what this means? All right? Technology facilitated gender based violence?
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 4: All right? Hello gam of Gate.
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 2: Yep, this no more tea bagging for you guys.
• 1:42:08
  Speaker 4: Sorry, this is not even really coded language for claiming
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 4: that if somebody upsets you online, if somebody says something
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 4: to you online that you don't like, if you feel harassed,
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 4: if you feel stalked, if you feel mistreated. Right, that's violence. Now,
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 4: that's that's violence. Is not physical anymore. Feminists have been
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 4: moving the goalposts on what constitutes violence for decades. They
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 4: started with the idea that yelling is violence. They started
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 4: with the idea that withholding affection is violence. So not
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 4: touching someone or not letting someone touch you when you
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 4: want to is violence, but only if you're female. Right,
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 4: Not giving someone money that they want from you is violence.
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 4: That's another form of domestic violence, economic violence. And they
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 4: have this pretty much established in law and policy in
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 4: a number of countries. So now they're wanting to establish
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 4: that you can shut someone up online by accusing them
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 4: of violence for saying something that you disapprove. And they've
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 4: specified women, and they've specified women in politics. All right,
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 4: So if feminist Susie Smith is running to become a
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 4: leader in your country, a legislator, a judge, a prosecutor
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 4: in your local area, president and says a bunch of
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 4: things about how she's going to take fathers out of
• 1:43:51
  Speaker 4: the home. Fathers are unnecessary, and we're going to make
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 4: it impossible for fathers to get custody to their children
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 4: because fathers having custody of their children's abuse, and you
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 4: respond by posting information showing how important it is to
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 4: have fathers in the home, that children raised without involved
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 4: fathers or fifty percent more likely to have criminal outcomes.
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 4: For instance, she can consider that to be gender based violence,
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 4: and it is technology facilitated right under laws that this
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 4: organization is promoting in various countries. Your government could put
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 4: you in jail for saying that, oh, fathers are important.
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 4: You can't do that. We won't vote for you if
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 4: you're going to do that. Oh okay, go directly to jail.
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 4: You just said something anti woman. Now for those of
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 4: us listening in the UK, going yes, yes, these people
• 1:44:46
  Speaker 4: operate in your country, and this is not the only
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 4: thing that they're doing. This is, by far not the
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 4: only thing that they're doing. Their funding is in the billions.
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 4: They have been operating for longer than I've been alive, okay,
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 4: and their funding is in the billions, and they're doing
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 4: things like this.
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 1: It is actually, when I see this, it is incredible
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: that we have managed to remain on air and still
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: doing talking about this stuff and still like I mean,
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 1: people talk. I mean I've had so many people say, oh,
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 1: you're so small, you need you don't make. But we've
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 1: managed to stick with it and be a thorn in
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 1: the side of a goliath for ten years, well twelve
• 1:45:43
  Speaker 1: years now, I mean that's actually, now that I think
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 1: about it, that's incredible. Yeah, with almost nothing like in
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 1: terms of actual resources. I mean, I really appreciate the
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: people who do support us. But let's face it. I mean,
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: it's it's been, and you know a bit of a
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 1: it's it's not been.
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 2: We haven't been.
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 1: We haven't been seeing like, uh, feminist funds, and if
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 1: we had, could you imagine what we would have been
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 1: capable of, Like if if if they saw feminist funds,
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 1: if kat they saw feminist funds, they probably have solved
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 1: the problem of domestic violence by now. And it's just
• 1:46:26
  Speaker 1: it's like this, I've always felt so bad for how
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 1: hard it is to seem to build an audience and
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 1: keep keep them engaged and build and and now I
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 1: realize what we were up against, what we were up against,
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 1: and the fact that we even survived this long to
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 1: see what we're up against is is an incredible feat
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 1: of endurance. So you know, everybody give themselves a pat
• 1:46:50
  Speaker 1: on their back, you know, Hannah Brian Karen's probably not listening.
• 1:46:54
  Speaker 1: But everybody who helped fund us and and and keep
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 1: kept watching like shit, damn, even the people who are
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 1: watching us had to make an effort because of the
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 1: algorithmic deep boosting. In fact, I saw it happen today,
• 1:47:10
  Speaker 1: just in real time. We went from going from like
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: seventy five viewers on the on the vertical two now
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 1: we're at twenty five. Must have said something that somebody
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 1: didn't like and they decided to just throttle us again.
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 2: Put it down, shut it down, shut it down.
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: And yet they can't I don't think they can do
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: it completely because streisend effect, you know, they just have
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 1: to just have to try to put no energy into it,
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 1: to pretend we don't exist, because if they do, then
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 1: they blow us up bigger, you know, And it's like,
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 1: this is incredible. This just the sheer scope of this.
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 1: We had a organization going up against our speech on
• 1:47:55
  Speaker 1: the internet, against this kind of digital like the Digital
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 1: Community Cations of what this is that was making Okay,
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 1: eighty million, I saw eighty million, I saw four hundred
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: and fifty four hundred and fifty million.
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 4: Each of those was one initiative for a few years
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 4: one or a few years. And that's like I said,
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 4: this agency has been around for a long time, yep.
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 2: And this is just one agency in one country yep.
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 4: Well, and this is one agency that is centered in
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 4: the United States. It's actually it's its main office is
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 4: in d C. Of course, it's a DC company, but
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 4: they operate all over the world. They're global, and they.
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 1: Have more functionally, they have more power in other countries. Yeah,
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 1: because the US still has the Constitution. So yeah, you
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 1: probably wouldn't be arrested for Christian criticizing feminism in the US,
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: but it is now you would potentially in the UK,
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 1: and it's going into to effect potentially in Canada if
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 1: the liberals managed to.
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 4: Get their way.
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 1: So no, in the US you have still have the
• 1:49:13
  Speaker 1: protections of the Constitution in terms of free speech. But
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: in other countries where we don't have that, this us
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 1: ai D or us AIDS is.
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's called the usaid system, us AIDS, us AIDS system, you.
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: Know, USAIDS. They're actually able to enact their will much
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 1: more in these other countries where they don't have as
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 1: much of a protection by law. All right, So, and
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 1: believe me, the rest of the world would like this
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 1: to stop.
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I think if most Americans would like it
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 2: to stop.
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: Too, well, yeah, why should you have to pay to
• 1:49:54
  Speaker 1: make us?
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 3: Why we don't want feminism here? Why would we want
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 3: to anywhere else? I don't want that for other countries.
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 3: Sounds like this.
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 1: Is this sounds like this is the worst arrangement for everyone.
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 1: USA players have to pay to make the rest of
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: the world miserable, for for for elitists in in your government.
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 1: Like no, I think nobody wants this, absolutely nobody except
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: who make money off of it, of course, all right,
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 1: but you know, I think I think I think we should,
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 1: like we're pushing on two hours here, guys, And as
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 1: much as much as fascinating this is, as this is
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 1: a bunch of accountants documents, tends to be a little
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 1: bit tiring to the mind. I think, like a bunch
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: of figures and and all of this stuff what we're seeing,
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 1: you know, year end reports and investigative like data, that
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: that tends to get a little bit exhausting. So I
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 1: think that maybe we should revisit this. We should we
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: should get Hannah, you should come back on as long
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 1: as you have time, because I know that you're.
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's it's kind of a challenge. But we'll have
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 4: to find time for me to come back on or
• 1:51:09
  Speaker 4: I mean, you're always welcome to hop on with us
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 4: on HBr talk too.
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just that when we do it this way,
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 1: we're actually hitting the shorts audience too, because we got
• 1:51:18
  Speaker 1: faces and stuff.
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 4: Yeah yeah, yeah, but we'll just figure out a time.
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 4: But I wanted to the one last last thing I
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 4: wanted to say about this because I like people are
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 4: kind of marveling about the time.
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 2: So on their.
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 4: They're about page, there are history page. It's that since
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 4: our founding in nineteen seventy one, So they were founded
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 4: in nineteen seventy one, and you have to scroll down
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 4: to find it. But then it on their timeline it
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 4: says with a five thousand dollars grant from USAID, Packed
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 4: was born. Packed is born with a mission to help
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 4: organizations serving the most disadvantage. So they started out as
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 4: an organization and to direct funding to other organizations, and
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 4: they do still do that. They actually they get money
• 1:52:07
  Speaker 4: from the US government and then they hand out grants
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 4: to other organizations as well. And this is something else
• 1:52:15
  Speaker 4: that everybody should know about. This is something you'll see
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 4: in school systems. It's something that you'll see in medicine,
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 4: it's something that you'll see in everything feminist ideology, touches,
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 4: police departments, whatever. You won't always be able to do
• 1:52:30
  Speaker 4: what we did today, where you go find the organization
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 4: using the word feminist and it says what it's doing,
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 4: and you read the coded language and you realize, oh,
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 4: this is about gendering the idea of domestic violence, or
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 4: this is about gendering the concept of food service, and
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 4: so on. It's can they You'll see the first step
• 1:52:52
  Speaker 4: and it looks innocuous, but they give grants to another
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 4: step where they get materials from another step, and you
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 4: go to that second step and it's a little less
• 1:53:02
  Speaker 4: innocuous and it's very incomplete. And then you find that, oh,
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 4: they have a lot of sources for what they're doing.
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 4: So you go to their sources and maybe the sources
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 4: for their sources, and so on till you get to
• 1:53:15
  Speaker 4: something that has several layers of stuff that looks innocent
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 4: in between the outcome and the origin actually is you know,
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 4: the Deluthe model for gender based.
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 1: For those of you who don't know the Deluthe model
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 1: is basically what I was talking about, that men use
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 1: rape and domestic violence to to oppress women and aphold
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 1: the pressure. So not just that men engage in rape
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 1: and domestic violence more, but they specifically use it as
• 1:53:48
  Speaker 1: a social tool to organize society and.
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 4: And to dominate and control women. And so it's a
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 4: for gender based oppression, is what they would all it,
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 4: and and that that will be hidden behind all those
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 4: layers where you'll see terms like gender based violence, and
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 4: you'll see terms like women's rights or uh, female disadvantage
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 4: and all that, and they stem from that origin source.
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 4: So this is pretty front, out front and open. But
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 4: even this has those layers. So what we've seen is
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 4: the most innocent part of it, and it was pretty nefarious.
• 1:54:40
  Speaker 4: That terrifies me personally, just based on the fact that
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 4: the innocent part is so bad, you know, yeah, oh.
• 1:54:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah, because it's discriminating against men overtly.
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 4: Yeah, what are they what are they doing that they
• 1:54:59
  Speaker 4: that that's high hidden behind their layers?
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 2: Good night.
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 1: Maybe they're sex trafficking boys, who knows. I mean, that's
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 1: just that's just a possibility. I'm not saying that they do,
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 1: all right, I mean, I mean there have been a
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: lot of aid scandals regarding that kind of stuff.
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 4: Right, all right, So for our listeners just to just
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 4: to understand, like, yeah, I wasn't kidding when I said
• 1:55:23
  Speaker 4: this organization was old, and uh and yeah, this is
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 4: this is the tip of this is the glint on
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 4: the edge of the tip of the iceberg.
• 1:55:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 1: I just wanted to say something like, why does the
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 1: U has to have to export this? Why couldn't you
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: export your constitution?
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 4: It would have been nice.
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 2: And it's I don't know.
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 4: I think that their government that that's what they were
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 4: doing for the last eighty years, when in fact they
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 4: were exporting this ship.
• 1:55:52
  Speaker 3: I mean, I think that they they have they want
• 1:55:55
  Speaker 3: to tear down our constitution to Allison, So I tell
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 3: you why. The last thing they want is for other
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 3: countries to figure out the Constitution is a good idea.
• 1:56:04
  Speaker 3: So they're not only subverting other countries by essentially, you know,
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 3: doing all this shit, turning their men and women against
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 3: each other and dividing them in whatever way they can,
• 1:56:14
  Speaker 3: but they're also dividing them against us because, like you know,
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 3: all the other Western countries look down on the United
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 3: States despite the fact that we have a constitution and
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 3: they're also working to undo that as well. How many
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 3: times have we seen, you know, women who have been
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 3: propagandazed to say, like, the Constitution is.
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 2: An old, dead, you know, piece of paper and we
• 1:56:36
  Speaker 2: should just burn it. Yeah, red and written by old,
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 2: racist white guys. So I mean, it's it's not just
• 1:56:44
  Speaker 2: that we're not exporting it, we're also attacking it. A
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 2: freedom of speech and the Second Amendment are constantly getting
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 2: attacked in this country. You want to know why by weirdos,
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 2: because because they know that they can control us, and
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 2: they take away our guns right and our freedom to be.
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 4: At the top of the food chain. And you don't
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 4: want anybody to be able to take you off the
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 4: top of the food chain. But you don't want to
• 1:57:09
  Speaker 4: be the best server of other people in the world,
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 4: the best helper of other people in the world. The
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 4: thing that you have to do is find a magic
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 4: bullet that controls people. And that magic bullet is gynocentrism. Right,
• 1:57:25
  Speaker 4: So if you can control guinocentrism, which is what feminism
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 4: is about. Feminism is seizing the means of ginocentric production
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 4: and guyinocentric manifestation in the world. It is the communist
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 4: version of using ginocentrism. Right, there's other ways that people
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 4: use guinocentrism. Traditionalism tries to find functional ways to use guinocentrism.
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 4: I don't think it does very well. I think a
• 1:57:58
  Speaker 4: lot of people do. I would disagree. I don't think
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 4: there is a functional way to exploit guinocentrism. But in
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 4: any case, that is why. And in order to exploit
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 4: guyinocentrism as effectively as humanly possible, you have to make
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 4: it illegal to criticize kinescentrism. You have to present people
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 4: who want genuine open equality and genuine humanitarian equality as
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 4: monsters who hate women and anti guynessentrists. Which, hello, I
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 4: am an anti guinessentrist, all right, I'm also a woman.
• 1:58:40
  Speaker 4: I don't hate women. I think that women are really
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 4: being held back by guynocentrism. But yeah, if you want
• 1:58:49
  Speaker 4: to be the wealthiest and the most powerful, and the
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 4: most feared and the most in control of eurity in
• 1:58:56
  Speaker 4: the world, you have to do this shit. You have
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 4: to export feminism, you export the constitution. You will help
• 1:59:01
  Speaker 4: the most people to not need you anymore and they
• 1:59:06
  Speaker 4: will forget about you, which is kind of what I want.
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 4: To happen in my life, to help the most people,
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 4: to independently not need me anymore, to to fix their
• 1:59:16
  Speaker 4: problems so that I can go back to playing video games.
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I want to. I want to help people. Then
• 1:59:24
  Speaker 1: then become a famous writer.
• 1:59:26
  Speaker 4: Yeah I don't. I don't really want to be famous.
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 4: I don't hate it, but I don't really like it either.
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 1: When you become like a really popular writer, that means
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 1: that you've it made a lot of people happy.
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, that's true, or it made a lot of
• 1:59:40
  Speaker 4: people think. I would like to make a lot of
• 1:59:42
  Speaker 4: people think. I just don't want I want them to
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 4: think about something other than me.
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but they want to. That's sort of true. Like
• 1:59:50
  Speaker 1: I think all of us are, like, we do this
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 1: because it's something that needs to get done, at least
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 1: I do. But you know, we have other things we
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 1: would probably rather be doing. Yeah, Like I would rather
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 1: be writing and drawing. I'm sure Brian would rather be
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 1: doing his his comic book. And it's not that this
• 2:00:06
  Speaker 1: isn't important and it isn't good to help people.
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 4: But no, it's just what we wish that feminism had
• 2:00:12
  Speaker 4: not dumped this big pile of shit in the middle
• 2:00:14
  Speaker 4: of the street of our culture so that we wouldn't
• 2:00:17
  Speaker 4: have to be showing up with shovels to clean it up. Yeah,
• 2:00:20
  Speaker 4: we're happy to do the job because it needs done.
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 4: We're not happy that it needs done.
• 2:00:26
  Speaker 1: No, And just for those of you who don't know
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 1: what ginocentrism is, it basically means that we care about
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 1: women more than men. And it's patently obvious that we do.
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 1: If you want to, if you want, just do an experiment.
• 2:00:38
  Speaker 1: Just imagine you can punch a man or you can
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 1: punch a woman. Which would you prefer to do Which
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 1: would you prefer to harm? And I know trolls will
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 1: say the women because they admit the same thing. All right,
• 2:00:49
  Speaker 1: So we can continue with further going down the rabbit hole.
• 2:00:53
  Speaker 1: I assume that there's even more organizations beyond packed and
• 2:00:58
  Speaker 1: the other.
• 2:00:58
  Speaker 2: Word, Yeah, we can go, we won't.
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 4: We don't need to do that today. But I would
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 4: like to suggest anybody that doesn't really understand guyes centrism
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 4: if you want a good working definition for it. Peter
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 4: Wright actually has had quite a bit to say on
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 4: the subject at gescentrism dot com, and he's been really
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 4: good in terms of researching the history of when it
• 2:01:20
  Speaker 4: went from being our society went from being family oriented
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 4: to being women oriented. And so I think that knowing
• 2:01:27
  Speaker 4: that history is very useful if you want to understand
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 4: these issues.
• 2:01:32
  Speaker 1: Shunan King says, Alison hates women. She said as much
• 2:01:35
  Speaker 1: herself because people tell me not to, like that's just
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: sort of my nature. Uh But but aside from that,
• 2:01:44
  Speaker 1: I just I well, you know, I see the ship.
• 2:01:46
  Speaker 1: That's but I have to remember that these aren't women.
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 1: These are women in the grips of a cultural like this,
• 2:01:56
  Speaker 1: like this, all of this when you victims, When you
• 2:02:01
  Speaker 1: present women as victims, it's a money spinner. So what
• 2:02:04
  Speaker 1: is our culture done. It's grabbed that idea and ran
• 2:02:07
  Speaker 1: with it. So now we have generations of women whose
• 2:02:11
  Speaker 1: only functional cope in life is to present themselves as
• 2:02:14
  Speaker 1: a victim or to see themselves as a victim. That's
• 2:02:17
  Speaker 1: how they see that they're empowered, and it's turning them
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 1: into horrific people.
• 2:02:24
  Speaker 4: Let's a good illustration of what's wrong how guinocentrism also
• 2:02:28
  Speaker 4: hurts women. Is this all right? Let's imagine you have
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 4: two athletes on the same track team and for the
• 2:02:35
  Speaker 4: sake of something that I actually know about. They both
• 2:02:37
  Speaker 4: run the short hurdle race, the hundred meter hurdles. Right,
• 2:02:42
  Speaker 4: so you have the male and the female. The female
• 2:02:47
  Speaker 4: is already running the intermediate height hurdles instead of the
• 2:02:50
  Speaker 4: high hurdles because biological differences, women are shorter than men
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 4: on average. All right, but you say, all right, I
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 4: want you to practice these hurdles by running this race
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 4: forty times during practice, and when you're done running it
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 4: forty times, then you can go home. And so the
• 2:03:11
  Speaker 4: guy runs the hurdles forty times, and maybe just for
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 4: good measure, he runs an extra ten times.
• 2:03:18
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 4: The woman, she makes phone calls to her mom, she
• 2:03:24
  Speaker 4: takes care of an animal that's off to the side
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 4: of the track, She goes home to cook dinner and
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 4: comes back and she runs eight times, and so she
• 2:03:37
  Speaker 4: doesn't do anywhere near forty. And you're like, well, you
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 4: had to do all those other things, so we're going
• 2:03:42
  Speaker 4: to give you the same credit. You can still go home.
• 2:03:46
  Speaker 4: You're done practicing. When you get to the end of
• 2:03:51
  Speaker 4: the practice before the next race, and you discover that
• 2:03:57
  Speaker 4: actually they're not running this as gendered race. They're running
• 2:04:01
  Speaker 4: in the same race against each other, which one of
• 2:04:04
  Speaker 4: them do you think is going to win. Do you
• 2:04:06
  Speaker 4: think it's going to be the one who ran the
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 4: hurdles forty times every practice or the one who only
• 2:04:12
  Speaker 4: ran eight times. And the answer to that is now
• 2:04:16
  Speaker 4: you know why only twenty percent of CEOs are women, right,
• 2:04:20
  Speaker 4: And guynescentrism is why the woman is getting away with that, Oh,
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 4: she had to do all those other things. If a
• 2:04:26
  Speaker 4: guy went off and did a bunch of other things
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 4: instead of what the coach told him to, he'd get
• 2:04:30
  Speaker 4: kicked off the team. But feminists use that excuse all
• 2:04:35
  Speaker 4: the time. Well, women have all these other things, they
• 2:04:37
  Speaker 4: should get paid the same as men for the same work.
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 4: And we've had this for fifty years of this argument
• 2:04:45
  Speaker 4: of women should be able to do a lot of
• 2:04:47
  Speaker 4: things that are not work, that have nothing to do
• 2:04:49
  Speaker 4: with work, as a substitute for their work, and still
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 4: get paid the same. Women are held back by guynescentrism
• 2:04:57
  Speaker 4: because they're not allowed to be held account in a
• 2:05:00
  Speaker 4: bowl by society in the same way that men are.
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 4: They're not allowed to be pushed by society in the
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 4: same way that men are, and so they do not
• 2:05:08
  Speaker 4: develop the hardness, they do not develop the strength, they
• 2:05:11
  Speaker 4: don't develop the discipline, they don't develop the the knowledge.
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: And consideration of others.
• 2:05:17
  Speaker 4: Consideration, right, and so you end up in a situation
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 4: where then women feel like they're getting the short end
• 2:05:23
  Speaker 4: of the stick, when in fact they broke their stick,
• 2:05:27
  Speaker 4: and then nobody said get another stick, you know, perhaps
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 4: nothing better. So that's why I do recommend going and
• 2:05:35
  Speaker 4: reading the introductory page of guynocentrism dot com though, to
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 4: understand a little better.
• 2:05:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and I actually do appreciate the more looking at
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 1: the more socialized aspects of a gynocentrism, because I feel
• 2:05:53
  Speaker 1: like saying that it's purely biological, it doesn't have a
• 2:05:57
  Speaker 1: socialized component that can be moved, is giving up. Yeah,
• 2:06:02
  Speaker 1: and I prefer not to give up, as you might
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 1: have noticed over the years. Anyway, So we do have
• 2:06:07
  Speaker 1: some superchows, Brian.
• 2:06:09
  Speaker 2: Yes, I know, I have them up and I want
• 2:06:11
  Speaker 2: to read them so you are prepared.
• 2:06:13
  Speaker 3: I got some superchows, yes, one from Great Indoors who
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 3: gives us ten dollars and says please play the thirty
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 3: second video. The Cure for Poverty has a name Christopher Hitchins,
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 3: and you will hear how deep and far the termites
• 2:06:28
  Speaker 3: have dined, and okay, I believe I have it. Well,
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 3: it's called the Solution of Poverty. I couldn't find it
• 2:06:34
  Speaker 3: by that name, but I will share this tab. It's
• 2:06:37
  Speaker 3: thirty seconds, so I hope this is the right one.
• 2:06:41
  Speaker 2: But I'm just gonna go ahead and play it.
• 2:06:42
  Speaker 3: And let's let me let me just display it for
• 2:06:46
  Speaker 3: the people in the vertical. It's going to be really small,
• 2:06:49
  Speaker 3: but let's let listen to the whole thirty seconds.
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 2: There is only one kill. Oh well, I'm sorry.
• 2:06:55
  Speaker 3: I muted the tab because I was opening it and
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 3: I didn't want it to play while guys were talking.
• 2:07:00
  Speaker 5: There is only one cure for world pote. It's ever
• 2:07:03
  Speaker 5: been found or ever will be. And it's very simple,
• 2:07:05
  Speaker 5: and it can be phrased very simply too. It's called
• 2:07:08
  Speaker 5: the empowerment of women. Go to Bangladesh or Bolivia. I
• 2:07:13
  Speaker 5: have to ask you to hold your applause, though I
• 2:07:15
  Speaker 5: love you. Go to Bangladesh or Bolivia. Give women control
• 2:07:18
  Speaker 5: over their reproductive cycle. Give them a thrown a handful
• 2:07:22
  Speaker 5: of corn. If you can make them not just the
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 5: beasts of burden and the beasts of childbearing.
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 2: That they become and the floor will rise. It just
• 2:07:30
  Speaker 2: will it never fails anyone. Is that the video you
• 2:07:35
  Speaker 2: meant for us to share.
• 2:07:37
  Speaker 4: There's something that for some reason men seem to have
• 2:07:47
  Speaker 4: a very difficult time considering, at least outside the men's
• 2:07:50
  Speaker 4: rights movement. Women have always had control over their reproductive cycle.
• 2:07:56
  Speaker 4: There's never been a time when women have not had
• 2:08:01
  Speaker 4: one thing that they could use to control their reproductive cycle. Right,
• 2:08:06
  Speaker 4: who has the keys to the uterus? It's not in
• 2:08:10
  Speaker 4: someone else's body, it's in your body. So if you're
• 2:08:15
  Speaker 4: in a family where poverty is an issue or could
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 4: be an issue, and having a baby makes a difference,
• 2:08:23
  Speaker 4: you also have a hole at the other end and
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 4: it talks and you can have conversations with your husband out.
• 2:08:29
  Speaker 4: We need to be more careful with this, and this
• 2:08:32
  Speaker 4: is a bad time to do this. Even if there's
• 2:08:34
  Speaker 4: no birth control. Well, let's not do this this week.
• 2:08:38
  Speaker 4: Let's hold off until and that greatly reduces the chances
• 2:08:43
  Speaker 4: of getting pregnant. And that alone. Women have been able
• 2:08:48
  Speaker 4: to do for as long as we've known we had
• 2:08:51
  Speaker 4: a menstrual cycle, and over the years, for centuries actually,
• 2:08:58
  Speaker 4: there's been the development of ways to prevent semen from
• 2:09:03
  Speaker 4: getting in and women have always had the capacity to say,
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 4: if we don't want another mouth to feed, wear that,
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 4: or I'm not going to do this if you don't
• 2:09:16
  Speaker 4: wear that. All right, So there's there's never been this
• 2:09:21
  Speaker 4: idea that women have no control. It's so whether or
• 2:09:24
  Speaker 4: not women have discipline and whether or not women have diplomacy.
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 4: The hardest part for women. Diplomacy takes discipline.
• 2:09:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, So that super.
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 1: Okay, So I was muted when I was talking. The
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 1: presumption at the heart of that is that women don't
• 2:09:49
  Speaker 1: because men just just engage in sexual abuse or sexual violence,
• 2:09:54
  Speaker 1: and that's.
• 2:09:54
  Speaker 4: Not true, not a sustainable model for family.
• 2:09:58
  Speaker 1: No, it isn't because if you do that to like,
• 2:10:02
  Speaker 1: I don't know, a Nordic if you're judging from the
• 2:10:04
  Speaker 1: Nordic sagas, if you did that in Scandinavia, you might
• 2:10:09
  Speaker 1: just get a woman who kills your babies just and
• 2:10:11
  Speaker 1: feeds them to you. It's pretty horrific.
• 2:10:15
  Speaker 4: But yeah, that's just it. If men treated women throughout
• 2:10:18
  Speaker 4: history the way feminists claim that men treated women throughout history,
• 2:10:22
  Speaker 4: women would have revolted and killed men in their sleep
• 2:10:25
  Speaker 4: and that would have been the end of it.
• 2:10:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, pretty much. And then then that would have been
• 2:10:28
  Speaker 1: the end of the human race. But okay, let's keep going,
• 2:10:30
  Speaker 1: all right.
• 2:10:31
  Speaker 3: I got another super child from Meredith g h and
• 2:10:35
  Speaker 3: she gives us five dollars. Thank you, Meredith, and says
• 2:10:40
  Speaker 3: Ranzicker number two thirty five. I believe the hypothesis of
• 2:10:43
  Speaker 3: the book The Lords of Poverty, the Power, prestige and
• 2:10:46
  Speaker 3: corruption of the international aid business is that aid is
• 2:10:50
  Speaker 3: used as a means of oppressing of people to control
• 2:10:53
  Speaker 3: them in foreign nations, to control the resources of a country.
• 2:10:57
  Speaker 4: Yes, yep, that's why they use distribution to women instead
• 2:11:02
  Speaker 4: of distribution to men, because men are oriented towards solving
• 2:11:07
  Speaker 4: problems for everybody. Women are oriented toward hoarding and only
• 2:11:12
  Speaker 4: solving problems for themselves. And if their families are lucky,
• 2:11:16
  Speaker 4: their families.
• 2:11:17
  Speaker 2: Mhm mm hmmm mmm hmm.
• 2:11:22
  Speaker 3: Yes, right, all right, So that's all the super chides
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 3: I think, and there are no super chats or anything.
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 2: So should we wrap it up?
• 2:11:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Actually, Hannah's completely right. I was just walking that
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 1: through my mind because I've heard feminists complain that studies
• 2:11:42
  Speaker 1: show that male leaders consider everybody in the community, not
• 2:11:46
  Speaker 1: just women.
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and female leaders just just for.
• 2:11:50
  Speaker 1: The most part consider women which you know what, that's
• 2:11:53
  Speaker 1: a problem, all right, yes, let's absolutely okay. So you
• 2:11:59
  Speaker 1: to support this analysis and support us continuing to be
• 2:12:03
  Speaker 1: a thorn in the side of the goliath, which has
• 2:12:06
  Speaker 1: now been revealed to be a goliath. Please go to
• 2:12:09
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash support and help us
• 2:12:12
  Speaker 1: out because we continue to exist almost solely because well
• 2:12:16
  Speaker 1: solely because you guys help make sure that we can
• 2:12:19
  Speaker 1: continue to create this content. And I mean I'm sure
• 2:12:22
  Speaker 1: we would have done it one way or another some
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 1: way else it would just be at a much smaller
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 1: scale and a lot less often. But anyway, feed the
• 2:12:31
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com slash support to help to help out
• 2:12:34
  Speaker 1: the show, to make sure we can continue to do this,
• 2:12:36
  Speaker 1: and feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip
• 2:12:38
  Speaker 1: if you want to send us a tip and a
• 2:12:39
  Speaker 1: message with that tip. So yeah, back to you, Brian.
• 2:12:44
  Speaker 3: Okay, Well, if you guys liked this video, please hit like,
• 2:12:47
  Speaker 3: subscribe if you're not already subscribe, hit the bellop for notifications,
• 2:12:50
  Speaker 3: leave us a comment, let us know what you guys
• 2:12:52
  Speaker 3: think about what we discussed on the show today.
• 2:12:54
  Speaker 2: And please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 2:12:58
  Speaker 2: Thank you.
• 2:12:58
  Speaker 3: Guys so much for coming on today episode of The
• 2:13:01
  Speaker 3: ram Zerker with Hannah and we'll talk to you guys
• 2:13:03
  Speaker 3: in the next video.