Latest / Tax Break: South African tax for professionals / When will SARS respond?
Transcript
- 0:11Welcome and thank you for joining me for Tax Break.
- 0:13This is a podcast about South African tax for South African
- 0:16tax professionals and practitioners.
- 0:19My name is Peter Frenchwoman, and in each episode I discuss a
- 0:23topic or a recent development in South African tax.
- 0:26And I tried to keep the episode short enough that you can listen
- 0:29to them whenever you've got a few minutes in your calendar.
- 0:33I would like you to like to ask you if you like the podcast or
- 0:38if you enjoyed the specific episode to forward that to one
- 0:41other person in your network. This chair the link on on your
- 0:46podcast platform with him and do help me grow the the listener
- 0:51base in this way. I would very much appreciate
- 0:54that. I'm also tasting a bit of a new
- 0:57setup with the microphone today, so if you if the sound sounds
- 1:03the same better, please let me know.
- 1:06I would appreciate feedback on that as well.
- 1:09So then to jump into our topic. So at the moment, I've, I've got
- 1:14about 11 instances where of of, of, of objections.
- 1:19We have assisted clients to draft the grounds of objection.
- 1:22So the objection is in the process.
- 1:25It's been submitted to Saginaw and all of the clients are
- 1:28asking the same question. So I decided, let me make a
- 1:31podcast episode on that. And that question is when are we
- 1:35going to get, so when is going to come back to us?
- 1:38So when are we going to get something from Sash?
- 1:41So I guess it comes down to the the human psyche of not wanting
- 1:45to, not wanting to wait, but also especially something like a
- 1:50dispute, not wanting it to be hanging and pending for too
- 1:54long. I think the other reality is
- 1:57that with these tax disputes is often cash on the line.
- 2:00So it is quite important to, to, to know when you can or when,
- 2:06when you can expect this, this dispute to be resolved or at
- 2:10least progress in some way. So if we look at objections or
- 2:17maybe the, the broader dispute process for that, for that
- 2:20matter, it's governed by Chapter 9 of the Tax Administration Act
- 2:25and then also by rules promulgated under Section 103 of
- 2:29the Tax Administration Act. Now, these rules and, and
- 2:33provisions of the law prescribed periods and these periods are
- 2:37mostly prescribed by reference to business days.
- 2:41So let's maybe start at that point.
- 2:43What exactly is a business day? So if you look at the definition
- 2:46of a business day, it's a day that is not a Saturday, not a
- 2:50Sunday or a public holiday. Then the definition goes on to
- 2:55say there are also some other days that are excluded for
- 2:59purposes of complying with the provisions of Chapter 9, which,
- 3:03as I've already mentioned, that's where we find the, the,
- 3:07the dispute process. So if we look at this specific
- 3:11exclusions for, for, for Chapter 9 purposes, and this typically
- 3:15affects disputes around year end.
- 3:17So when you start submitting information, do such by October,
- 3:23November, then these spirits may welcome into play.
- 3:27Or on the other side, if you need to take the next step in
- 3:31the, in the dispute, then it could also afford you a bit of
- 3:35time. So the specific additional
- 3:37periods that are excluded are the days between 16 December of
- 3:42each year and 15 January of the following year.
- 3:45And both days are included. So there's an additional period
- 3:49of time that doesn't count as business days for dispute
- 3:52purposes. So if we then go on to look at
- 3:57what are the timelines that you can expect the response from
- 4:00such it depends on where in the dispute process you are.
- 4:04And it's a combination of the, the law and the rules that would
- 4:09give you this, this, this, the these periods.
- 4:13So if the place in the process where you are, you've you've
- 4:17requested reasons, Dane, if Zach believes that you've got
- 4:23sufficient reasons, they've got 30 business days to tell you
- 4:27that. If Sash believes that you don't
- 4:30have sufficient reasons and they're going to provide you
- 4:32with reasons, they've got 45 business days to do that.
- 4:37This period can be extended by a further 45 business days.
- 4:43If you've now you've, you've received your reasons, you've
- 4:47submitted the the objection. So if the outcome of an
- 4:52objection is that Sarge requires more documentation from the tax
- 4:56payer, then we are looking at they need to ask that within 30
- 5:00business days from the objection if there is an outcome to the
- 5:05objection. So are there and allowed to
- 5:07disallow to partially allowed Sasha's got 60 business days
- 5:12from the date of the objection to to provide that outcome or if
- 5:17they've asked for information for for documentation, 45 days
- 5:21from the business days from the date when the documentation was
- 5:25submitted to them. So just to put that in, in, into
- 5:28perspective, if we're looking at 60 business days, you are
- 5:32looking at, in, in terms of months, at more or less three
- 5:38month period that scientists got to respond to objections as a,
- 5:42as a rule when it comes to appeals and other words, now
- 5:47your objection has been disallowed and the tax payer
- 5:52wants to appeal that outcome. There's a few more permutations
- 5:57there. So the, the, the, the, the, the
- 6:00next step in the process could be to, to follow the ADR
- 6:03process. It could be to go to the tax
- 6:05board, the Tax Court, and each step has got its own rules and
- 6:10its own process with its own timelines.
- 6:12So I'm not going to go into all the different permutations
- 6:15there. Important perhaps to know at
- 6:17this point is that these things are all governed by the dispute
- 6:20rules. So that's where you would go to
- 6:22find the the relevant periods. The last aspect I would like to
- 6:28conclude with today is what if it happens that you've now
- 6:33waited out this period and Zach hasn't responded yet.
- 6:37So I would like to leave you with the idea the the detail of
- 6:41it. I think we need to do a another
- 6:43episode on, but there is a process to deal with non
- 6:46compliance with the dispute rules, which includes not
- 6:50sticking to the prescribed periods.
- 6:53So that's the rule 56 process. So if Sash doesn't comply with
- 7:00the rules and I, I guess it could go the other way around as
- 7:03well to say that the tax payer doesn't comply.
- 7:06Just be aware that there is a mechanism in Rule 56 to to deal
- 7:11with this. So in summary, I think they do
- 7:15take away points. The first one is that the rules
- 7:18describe certain periods not only for taxpayers, because I
- 7:21think we are all quite well aware of the the periods within
- 7:25which we need to do something, but also for sash.
- 7:29And important here is these spirits are not just a week or
- 7:32two, they are longer periods of time.
- 7:36Second point is if Sarge does not keep to the periods then
- 7:40there are mechanisms and steps in the rules to, to, to to, to
- 7:45take if there is non compliance. So it's not that you that the
- 7:50tax payer would be without remedies if such doesn't comply
- 7:55with the periods. That's that for today's episode.
- 8:00If you've got any questions or comments, you're more than
- 8:02welcome to send me an e-mail. My e-mail address, as always, is
- 8:05in the show notes. Just a reminder again, nothing
- 8:10in this episode was intended to be tax advice or replacement for
- 8:14tax advice. The purpose of this podcast is
- 8:16for information purposes only. Until next time, goodbye.