Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News - 3rd September 2025

Transcript

UK Column News - 3rd September 2025 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. It's Wednesday, the third of September twenty twenty five,
0:12
Speaker 1: just after one o'clock. Welcome to the UK Colin News.
0:14
Speaker 1: I'm your host Mike problemson My co host today is
0:16
Speaker 1: Brian Gerrish. Welcome to the program, Brian Pleasure, Pleasure Mike,
0:19
Speaker 1: and joining us via livelink our researcher and activist Sandy Adamson,
0:23
Speaker 1: journalist and peace campaigner Vanessa Bailey. And later in the program,
0:27
Speaker 1: Bran's going to be reporting on the duplicity of Nick Legg, censorship, politics,
0:30
Speaker 1: big business, these types of topics. Vanessa is going to
0:33
Speaker 1: be covering the Zionist shadow state here in the UK,
0:36
Speaker 1: and Sandy's going to be taking a look at the
0:38
Speaker 1: impact investing and how that's changing the way that we're governed.
0:42
Speaker 1: But we're going to start off with going to China
0:45
Speaker 1: and Shishin Ping was looking at a huge parade and
0:51
Speaker 1: so on, a major military parade held in Tianaman Square
0:56
Speaker 1: in Beijing, of course, to mark the idiot anniversary of
0:59
Speaker 1: the World War Two. I have to say he said
1:01
Speaker 1: some pretty unpleasant things about Japan in the course of
1:05
Speaker 1: the speech that he gave, perhaps on surprising in a
1:08
Speaker 1: certain sense, but it is eighty years later. The BBC
1:12
Speaker 1: and other media took the opportunity to present this as
1:15
Speaker 1: a major provocation as China was showing off some of
1:18
Speaker 1: its new weaponry, which, well, does the West have any
1:22
Speaker 1: defense against any of this?
1:23
Speaker 2: Brian quite a lot of it. They don't like the
1:26
Speaker 2: moment he goes into hypersonic missiles. The West in trouble
1:29
Speaker 2: at the moment.
1:30
Speaker 1: Yeah. Indeed. So the event, as I say, was to
1:33
Speaker 1: mark eighty years since Japan's defeat at the end of
1:35
Speaker 1: World War Two. Western leaders didn't attend. Vladimir Putin and
1:40
Speaker 1: Kim Jong un were the guests of honor, and as
1:43
Speaker 1: you can see on screen, lots of new hardware, including
1:46
Speaker 1: the J fifteen, which is China's new carrier based electronic
1:50
Speaker 1: warfare jet which you'll see in a second submarine lodged
1:54
Speaker 1: intercontinental ballistic missile was there as well, a new one,
1:58
Speaker 1: along with drones of various perhaps some of them were autonomous.
2:03
Speaker 1: She's message was simple. Today, mankind, he said, is faced
2:09
Speaker 1: with the choice of peace or war, dialogue or con confrontation,
2:13
Speaker 1: win win or zero sun. And he went on to
2:16
Speaker 1: say that the Chinese people firmly stand on the right
2:20
Speaker 1: side of history. I'm sure they'd probably stand on the
2:24
Speaker 1: left side of history if we consider their politics. But anyway,
2:26
Speaker 1: that's another thing. So you know, he's sending a message
2:31
Speaker 1: not to mess with China, apparently by showing off all
2:34
Speaker 1: his hardware. But he's also, apparently, at least on the surface,
2:38
Speaker 1: offering the option of dialogue, unlike the West, which is
2:41
Speaker 1: clearly on a non negotiable path toward despite the demonstrations
2:46
Speaker 1: from China and Russia of what they have in their arsenals,
2:49
Speaker 1: for example, functioning armies, navies and air forces. The way
2:52
Speaker 1: of functioning armies, navies and air forces not entirely. We
2:56
Speaker 1: certainly haven't got a functioning navy min because we've talked
3:00
Speaker 1: about that in a really bad situation, and of course
3:04
Speaker 1: the army is not big enough to fight, and the
3:07
Speaker 1: RAF at the moment is just something on the sideline.
3:10
Speaker 1: So UK in a pitiful state. Well as the war
3:14
Speaker 1: drums keep beating. Let's bring the BBC back, because, with
3:17
Speaker 1: no skepticism whatsoever, they were reporting on Monday that a
3:20
Speaker 1: flight with Ursula vonder Lean on board was disrupted due
3:24
Speaker 1: to suspected Russian interference. The BBC reports that this was
3:29
Speaker 1: according to the European Commission, and they just believed them
3:32
Speaker 1: without any particular challenge at all. They quote an unnamed
3:36
Speaker 1: spokesperson who allegedly said the GPS jamming happened while vonder
3:40
Speaker 1: lenn was about to arrive in Southern Bulgaria on Sunday.
3:44
Speaker 1: The plane landed safely, and the spokesperson is allegedly said
3:49
Speaker 1: to have said, we have received information from the Bulgarian
3:52
Speaker 1: authorities that they suspect that this was due to blatant
3:55
Speaker 1: interference by Russia. The Financial Times also got in on this,
4:01
Speaker 1: again with no skepticism and also citing unnamed officials, and
4:05
Speaker 1: they reported that vonder Lyon's plane had to land at
4:09
Speaker 1: the airport with pilots using paper maps.
4:12
Speaker 2: Apparently, yeah, I saw that common levels have been shot
4:15
Speaker 2: for the pilots that they actually had to do some work.
4:17
Speaker 1: Yes. The problem is though that Flight Radar twenty four
4:21
Speaker 1: disagrees with all this. They tweeted out on Monday that
4:24
Speaker 1: they were seeing media reports of GPS interference affecting the
4:27
Speaker 1: plane carrying wonder Lion. They said that some reports claimed
4:32
Speaker 1: the aircraft was in a holding pattern for one hour.
4:35
Speaker 1: This is what we can reduce from our data. Flight
4:37
Speaker 1: Radar twenty four said the flight was scheduled to take
4:40
Speaker 1: one R and for forty eight minutes. It took one
4:43
Speaker 1: R and fifty seven minutes. The aircraft transponder reported good
4:47
Speaker 1: GPS signal quality from takeoff to landing. So I think
4:51
Speaker 1: we're going to have to say that this report from
4:53
Speaker 1: the BBC and all the other legacy media is nonsense.
4:57
Speaker 1: And the question is why are they doing this. I
5:00
Speaker 1: suspect that this is all about security guarantees, that the
5:05
Speaker 1: demand that even though Ukraine is not going to join
5:09
Speaker 1: NATO anytime soon, that the Starmar regime and the EU
5:13
Speaker 1: want an Article five style guarantee for Ukraine, so that
5:16
Speaker 1: should our countries put boots on the ground, that any
5:20
Speaker 1: attack in them would mean war. And this is why
5:23
Speaker 1: there was all the frauor over the claimed attack on
5:25
Speaker 1: the British Council building and the EU building in Kiev
5:28
Speaker 1: last week, And of course our illustrious Secretary State for
5:33
Speaker 1: War was giving a statement in the House yesterday. I
5:35
Speaker 1: believe when he reiterated high disgraceful, it was that the
5:39
Speaker 1: Russians had attacked the British Council in this way, which
5:42
Speaker 1: of course they didn't, not directly anyway. So this fake
5:46
Speaker 1: GPS story, I think is a continuation of that.
5:49
Speaker 2: Yeah, I wonder, Mike whether what's actually gone on is
5:53
Speaker 2: aircraft coming close to the conflict zone or getting some
5:57
Speaker 2: interference from whatever electronic warfare systems the Russian Russians are using.
6:03
Speaker 2: But I think there's a big difference between picking up
6:06
Speaker 2: interference and actually somebody talgeting you with a dedicated electronic
6:12
Speaker 2: warfare system. So my view on this is this is
6:16
Speaker 2: a manipulated story, absolutely.
6:19
Speaker 1: So with all that in mind, and the war drums
6:22
Speaker 1: beating as hard as they are, it should come as
6:24
Speaker 1: no surprise then that Leacanard in France is claiming to
6:30
Speaker 1: have seen leaked French government documents which show that French
6:35
Speaker 1: hospitals have been told to prepare for French casualties by
6:39
Speaker 1: March twenty twenty six because of a major war. In fact,
6:42
Speaker 1: not just French casualties but NATO casualties and so on
6:45
Speaker 1: from other countries. Now, we have to make it clear
6:48
Speaker 1: that Leacannard is considered a satirical magazine, but it also
6:51
Speaker 1: covers serious stuff as well, So you've got to make
6:55
Speaker 1: up your own mind, whether this was intended to be satire,
6:57
Speaker 1: whether it's real. It certainly is real as far as
7:00
Speaker 1: the mainstream media is concerned. But I suppose we could.
7:03
Speaker 1: The closest thing in the UK that we can compare
7:05
Speaker 1: this publication to is private Eye. So the question is
7:09
Speaker 1: was the satire was it real? The article says that
7:13
Speaker 1: on the orders of Catherine voultra hospitals must stand ready
7:17
Speaker 1: to receive thousands of soldiers wounded in the event of
7:20
Speaker 1: a generalized armed conflict in Europe. They had received internal
7:24
Speaker 1: documents asking regional health agencies to prepare caregivers for a
7:27
Speaker 1: possible major commitment under the mandate of the General Secretariat
7:32
Speaker 1: for Defense and National Security, Catherine voutra As plans to
7:37
Speaker 1: establish medical centers to accommodate patients returning from the camp
7:41
Speaker 1: combat zones. These centers will have to be located close
7:44
Speaker 1: to bus or railway stations, ports or airports to quote
7:47
Speaker 1: enable the rerouting to their home nation of foreign soldiers.
7:51
Speaker 1: And they're suggesting perhaps one hundred casualties per day for
7:55
Speaker 1: two consecutive months, or two hundred and fifty patients daily
7:59
Speaker 1: for three days of activities. But it's not clear whether
8:02
Speaker 1: that's per facility or as a whole, as a whole
8:06
Speaker 1: brand for a general conflict. That seems like quite low numbers.
8:10
Speaker 2: I would have said, so what are what are they
8:14
Speaker 2: talking about here, Mike. This is the key thing until
8:16
Speaker 2: there's some actual meat on the bones as to what
8:19
Speaker 2: they think is going to happen. But this isn't war
8:21
Speaker 2: against the Russians. This is some sort of game again.
8:25
Speaker 2: It's stipulation here.
8:27
Speaker 1: Yes, Now, it should come as no surprise that Arsha
8:30
Speaker 1: LeVander Lean speaking to the FT, claims that Europe is Sorry.
8:36
Speaker 1: Europe is Sorry, has a pretty precise plan for sending
8:40
Speaker 1: troops to Ukraine. There's a clear roadmap, she said for
8:44
Speaker 1: possible deployments. Security guarantees are paramoid and absolutely crucial. So
8:49
Speaker 1: there we have this reiteration of these security guarantees. This
8:53
Speaker 1: is this Article five scenario Article five type scenario. As
8:57
Speaker 1: she said, we have clear roadmap and we had an
9:00
Speaker 1: agreement in the White House and this work is going
9:02
Speaker 1: forward very well. So let's just bring her on screen
9:05
Speaker 1: so you can see these words. Security guarantees are paramount.
9:10
Speaker 1: And President Trump reassured us that there will be an
9:14
Speaker 1: American presence as part of the backstop. That's very clear
9:17
Speaker 1: and repeatedly affirmed. Well, they're desperate to get that commitment.
9:22
Speaker 1: Might because without the Americans there is no substance there
9:27
Speaker 1: well amongst European troops and day too. Yes, she said
9:31
Speaker 1: that various European capitals working on plans for a multi
9:35
Speaker 1: national troop deployment and the backstop of Americans. So, you know,
9:40
Speaker 1: I don't quite know what to make of it, But Vanessa,
9:42
Speaker 1: I don't know if you've got any thoughts on that.
9:45
Speaker 1: I know you're certainly not necessarily optimistic about what Russia
9:52
Speaker 1: and China are doing, but the language from them, despite
9:55
Speaker 1: the military period, does seem to be suggesting that they
9:59
Speaker 1: would prefer to be talking than fighting.
10:03
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I mean I agree, I think no. No,
10:06
Speaker 3: My reservations come from how little support they're giving to
10:11
Speaker 3: Palestine currently and the region. But I think as regards
10:16
Speaker 3: negotiations with the US, EU and u K, I think
10:19
Speaker 3: Russia and China are both perfectly sensible in their approach
10:23
Speaker 3: that negotiations should be first, and negotiations can continue even
10:28
Speaker 3: through military activity, which we've seen from Russia of course,
10:32
Speaker 3: but not from Ukraine.
10:35
Speaker 1: Yes, thank you for that. Now you made a comment
10:37
Speaker 1: before the news program about these types of periods. We'll
10:40
Speaker 1: keep that for extra and so if anybody's interested in
10:45
Speaker 1: listening to that discussion, you better and you're not yet
10:47
Speaker 1: a member, you better joined fairly quickly. But anyway, Vanessa,
10:50
Speaker 1: let's move on to back to the UK. And I mean,
10:55
Speaker 1: we're looking at the role of the Zionist lobby in
10:58
Speaker 1: this country. And we obviously had David Miller on the
11:01
Speaker 1: program last week, but that's not just him that is
11:04
Speaker 1: under attack at the moment.
11:07
Speaker 3: No, definitely not. And you talk about the Zionis lobby,
11:10
Speaker 3: this is more about Israel and the Zionist movement. So
11:13
Speaker 3: it's a much bigger complex than only a lobbying industrial
11:19
Speaker 3: complex that Israel deploys against the world basically, And of
11:24
Speaker 3: course this comes in the context of ongoing unthinkable genocide
11:28
Speaker 3: in Gaza. We've seen some of the most and I
11:31
Speaker 3: don't even know how we can keep saying, there's some
11:34
Speaker 3: of the most hideous massacres in the last seven days
11:36
Speaker 3: of children of aid camps, of refugee tents just being
11:41
Speaker 3: burned to the ground with people still in them, etc.
11:44
Speaker 3: So you know, the horror, the absolute horror that is
11:48
Speaker 3: being perpetrated by the Zionis regime against the Palestinians in
11:53
Speaker 3: Gaza in the West Bank is something that we should
11:56
Speaker 3: all keep in mind whenever we discuss any of this.
12:00
Speaker 3: It's my belief now watching what is going on in
12:03
Speaker 3: the UK, that it's not only a case of potential
12:06
Speaker 3: state capture, but I think what we're now actually saying
12:09
Speaker 3: is the expansion of a shadow state, which of course
12:12
Speaker 3: is what the British has always deployed against countries like Syria.
12:16
Speaker 3: For example, we talked many times Mike about the creation
12:20
Speaker 3: of a shadow state inside Syria to infiltrate and destroy
12:25
Speaker 3: infrastructure and structure institutions within Syria during the regime change war.
12:30
Speaker 3: But effectively, in my opinion, that is now exactly what
12:33
Speaker 3: Israel is doing within the UK. So I want to
12:37
Speaker 3: take the case a relatively recent case, although it's been
12:40
Speaker 3: ongoing for two years. It's now being ramped up against
12:44
Speaker 3: an NHS doctor. I understand. She's a trainee orthopedic surgeon
12:49
Speaker 3: also Doc do Rama Aladwan, who you can go to
12:54
Speaker 3: her ex account to follow all of the details on
12:57
Speaker 3: her case. And this is just one section from her
13:01
Speaker 3: pinned post. If my British government, she's a British citizen.
13:05
Speaker 3: Wants to let you, meaning designers, do this to their
13:08
Speaker 3: NHS doctor who has zero patient complaints or disciplinary actions,
13:13
Speaker 3: and let you dictate who gets to practice medicine in Britain,
13:16
Speaker 3: depriving the British public of my care. Then so be it.
13:19
Speaker 3: We will never abandon Graza. So let's dig down into
13:22
Speaker 3: what is actually happening. This is a video. She originally
13:27
Speaker 3: came under investigation by the Medical Council the GMC under
13:33
Speaker 3: the Terrorist Act. Of course, that case after nine months
13:38
Speaker 3: was dismissed, there were no charges against her, etc. And
13:41
Speaker 3: this is just her little explanation on that.
13:46
Speaker 4: The GMC found no basis for any of the allegations
13:49
Speaker 4: under the Terrorism Act and asked me to comment on
13:51
Speaker 4: the anti Semitism allegations. Pose examiners found no realistic evidence
13:55
Speaker 4: that my fitness to practice is impaired and closed the case,
13:58
Speaker 4: no action, no warning. Case closed rightfully. So this smear
14:03
Speaker 4: piece is a retaliation. What are they saying, who exactly
14:06
Speaker 4: is saying it, who is this mystery colleague and what
14:09
Speaker 4: is their true intention?
14:13
Speaker 3: So basically, once she was cleared by the GMC and
14:16
Speaker 3: back at work, this happened. So in February twenty twenty five,
14:19
Speaker 3: The Daily Mail ran a horrendous smear piece against Rama,
14:24
Speaker 3: the shocking full extent of anti Semitism at the heart
14:27
Speaker 3: of our health service from the doctor terrifying colleagues with
14:30
Speaker 3: her views to the neurologist idolizing Hamas. And this is
14:35
Speaker 3: written by junior news reporters Sabrina Miller. People might recognize
14:40
Speaker 3: her from the former Bristol University student who waged a
14:45
Speaker 3: campus war for Israel against David Miller. Of course, David
14:48
Speaker 3: Miller eventually won his case against Bristol University and is
14:54
Speaker 3: now facing an appeal case by the Zionist lobby based
15:00
Speaker 3: the Zionist movement. So then Rama basically looked into or
15:04
Speaker 3: discovered those who were attacking her through the Daily Mail article.
15:10
Speaker 3: She again put all this information out on x So.
15:13
Speaker 3: She says, here leaked confirmed the doctor who had lied
15:17
Speaker 3: about me in the Daily Mail's inflamatory article, Dtor Miriam
15:20
Speaker 3: Green as the same colleague who complained to Whittington Hospital
15:24
Speaker 3: our workplace about my online Palestine activism and had me fired.
15:29
Speaker 3: Now in one video, Rama actually explains what really happened
15:32
Speaker 3: is that she was in tears because of something that
15:34
Speaker 3: had just happened in Gaza that had deeply traumatized her.
15:38
Speaker 3: She'd entered the staff room and she had spoken to
15:43
Speaker 3: Miriam Green about it, who had turned out and said
15:46
Speaker 3: basically shrugged her shoulders and walked out, and as a
15:49
Speaker 3: result of that, she led this case against Rama. So
15:54
Speaker 3: she then goes on to explain what happened once she'd
15:57
Speaker 3: been docked by doctor Miriam Green, who was her junior
16:01
Speaker 3: on the medical staff. Her private information was shared a
16:04
Speaker 3: friend and fellow doctor was doxed. The same night their
16:07
Speaker 3: private information was shared. I received rape and death threat.
16:11
Speaker 3: We both had to call the police. The police came
16:13
Speaker 3: to her home, they sent me panic alarms and followed
16:16
Speaker 3: up with me for weeks. They transferred me to a
16:19
Speaker 3: hate crime support group and it goes on from there.
16:23
Speaker 3: So she basically says, in what is happening in Britain,
16:28
Speaker 3: She alerts us all to what is going on.
16:32
Speaker 4: We have done the same to me. Difference here is
16:34
Speaker 4: they're targeting a British citizen on British soil, all while
16:37
Speaker 4: rallying for a foreign state by leveraging their ties to
16:41
Speaker 4: the media and the government. Many UK LFI lawyers are lords.
16:44
Speaker 4: They're acting as foreign agents preaching UK democracy, security and interest.
16:50
Speaker 4: The GMC reiterated that my posts are within the limits
16:54
Speaker 4: of political speech, which attracts the highest level of protection
16:58
Speaker 4: under Article ten. Pical debate is basically their opinion versus mine.
17:02
Speaker 4: There's being in support of the state committing genocide and
17:05
Speaker 4: mine which opposes genocide, leading to nine months of regulatory action.
17:10
Speaker 4: This is what creates an issue in modern day Britain.
17:15
Speaker 3: I think she's absolutely right there and we can continue
17:17
Speaker 3: to discuss that in extra But she went on to
17:20
Speaker 3: say that another doctor was revealed to have been responsible
17:23
Speaker 3: for the reporter against her, which is Dr Justin Stabbing,
17:28
Speaker 3: previously suspended for mistreating cancer patients and for inappropriate conduct
17:33
Speaker 3: with a female patient. Stabbing is a British Jewish oncologist
17:37
Speaker 3: and cancer expert. Oh sorry, cancer and COVID nineteen treatment researcher.
17:42
Speaker 3: Again the COVID nineteen connection at Imperial College London with
17:46
Speaker 3: a Harley Street private practice. She goes on to point
17:50
Speaker 3: out that the Medical Practitioner Board, the chair of the Board,
17:58
Speaker 3: Miss Margaret Obi for his erasure from the medical Register,
18:02
Speaker 3: stating that he showed persistent dishonesty and no remorse. Sharon
18:06
Speaker 3: BTQC for the GMC agreed and expressed concerns about an
18:10
Speaker 3: ongoing risk to patient safety due to his persistent dishonesty,
18:14
Speaker 3: which he had attempted to cover up, yet he avoided
18:17
Speaker 3: being struck off. Why and as one person responded on
18:21
Speaker 3: the post from Rama Leila Hammad, who's a Spanish Moroccan journalist,
18:25
Speaker 3: she said, basically because he is protected by governments, shielded
18:29
Speaker 3: by lobbies, excused by media and weaponizing anti Semitism to
18:33
Speaker 3: silence critics. This is why they are immune everywhere. Again,
18:38
Speaker 3: I agree with this. And then basically what she then
18:44
Speaker 3: went on to explain is regarding Miriam Green, who docked
18:48
Speaker 3: her in another colleague basically last year. Sorry, I'm getting
18:53
Speaker 3: mixed up with the dates. This is what she has
18:56
Speaker 3: now said about Miriam Green. So part of my now
18:59
Speaker 3: second GMC investigations, so she's now facing a second investigation
19:03
Speaker 3: and first referral to a tribunal hearing which could potentially
19:07
Speaker 3: suspend me and revoke my license, is that I doxed
19:11
Speaker 3: Miriam Green, the same Miriam who made sure that in
19:14
Speaker 3: less than one month of working with me, I was fired.
19:17
Speaker 3: This is Jewish supremacy, which is Zionism, this is Jewish privilege,
19:22
Speaker 3: this is the double standard, this is Britain. We are
19:25
Speaker 3: occupied very strong words, but I second them entirely. And
19:31
Speaker 3: then let's have a look at one another organization quickly
19:34
Speaker 3: that is going after RAMA. So this is the campaign
19:38
Speaker 3: against Semitism organization in the UK. I was speaking to
19:42
Speaker 3: David Miller about this this morning because they've also now
19:45
Speaker 3: joined in on the attack against David Miller for the
19:48
Speaker 3: second appeal case. They're trying to take a private case
19:52
Speaker 3: against David Miller to add to his burden of SIONUS
19:55
Speaker 3: Movement persecution. Basically. Now, the odd thing is, Mike and
19:59
Speaker 3: I were talk about this morning. On the website, the
20:02
Speaker 3: only two representatives that you see are Gideon Falter on
20:06
Speaker 3: the left and Steven Silverman on the right. There are
20:09
Speaker 3: no other employees listed on the Charities Commission. Also, there
20:14
Speaker 3: are no trustees, no directors listed, and David told me
20:18
Speaker 3: through his research that he's discovered that they've been given
20:21
Speaker 3: special dispensation. Do not expose their directors on the Charities
20:28
Speaker 3: Commission website. Extraordinary, So David back in I think this
20:33
Speaker 3: was twenty twenty four, he wrote an article about Gideon
20:36
Speaker 3: Falter campaign against anti Semitism instruments of the Zionist entity.
20:41
Speaker 3: So the CAAA is a covert instrument of the foreign
20:44
Speaker 3: policy objectives of the illegitimate and genocidal Zionist regime working
20:49
Speaker 3: in the UK. Of course it should be shut down.
20:52
Speaker 3: They're receiving massive funding from basically organizations within the zion
21:00
Speaker 3: movement in the UK and all this while, of course,
21:03
Speaker 3: the Palestine Action Group is being prescribed as a terrorist
21:07
Speaker 3: organization and we still have now twenty four Palestine Action
21:13
Speaker 3: young people in jail facing trial. But they're in jail
21:17
Speaker 3: and undergoing sort of Abi Grabe style detention. An anti
21:22
Speaker 3: genocide protester in British jail, and if we look at
21:25
Speaker 3: what she actually says in the article. In August twenty
21:30
Speaker 3: twenty four, heavily armed police arrested me in one other person.
21:34
Speaker 3: She says basically, they came in the first time with guns,
21:37
Speaker 3: flying a drone above our heads while we were completely
21:40
Speaker 3: unarmed and in our pajamas. She was let go and
21:43
Speaker 3: arrested again. Four months later. Police surrounded me in my
21:47
Speaker 3: bed while I was sleeping and naked, breaking down my
21:50
Speaker 3: front door and destroying my bathroom. In another brutal example,
21:54
Speaker 3: thirty police officers entered a family home to arrest one person.
21:58
Speaker 3: We were all detained in specialist counter terrorism units around
22:02
Speaker 3: the country, although the terrorism charge has been dropped. Sorry,
22:06
Speaker 3: can I just go back to that for a second.
22:10
Speaker 3: They're interrogated multiple times a day and experience sleep deprivation
22:14
Speaker 3: with lights kept on twenty four hours a day with
22:16
Speaker 3: no windows. They initially had no contact with loved ones
22:19
Speaker 3: and were kept in isolation for up to a week
22:22
Speaker 3: before being remanded in prison. I mean me personally, I
22:26
Speaker 3: just find this absolutely horrifying, the contrast between how real
22:33
Speaker 3: criminals who happen to be protected by the Zionist movement
22:36
Speaker 3: are being let off scot free, while those that are
22:39
Speaker 3: protesting genocide defending the Palestinians are held in conditions that
22:44
Speaker 3: can be compared to our grave. And finally, I just
22:47
Speaker 3: want to end with what is an emotional part of
22:51
Speaker 3: her statement from Dr Rama Aladuan and ask you all
22:56
Speaker 3: to support her as much as you can on her
23:00
Speaker 3: social media and wherever you can.
23:02
Speaker 4: Basically, I have persevered, but I am also a human.
23:08
Speaker 4: It has not been easy, and every time I cry
23:12
Speaker 4: remember one martyr child or a mother of a martyr,
23:18
Speaker 4: and it fills me with determination and resistance. So please
23:23
Speaker 4: don't let them scare you into silence because of me,
23:27
Speaker 4: because they haven't managed to scare me into it. Please
23:30
Speaker 4: let this empower you. If you're speaking out, continue If
23:34
Speaker 4: you haven't, you decide what choice of yours history you
23:37
Speaker 4: will remember, whether it's silence in the face of the
23:40
Speaker 4: most documented genocide in history or your clear stance for humanity.
23:47
Speaker 2: Thoughts well, I think it's appalling, Mike, and we the
23:52
Speaker 2: UK column have been warning for many years that we
23:56
Speaker 2: have a foreign power which is taking more and more
23:59
Speaker 2: control within UK. We talked about David Cameron saying that
24:04
Speaker 2: his belief in Israel was unshakable, and of course if
24:07
Speaker 2: you say that and believe it, that means that UK
24:11
Speaker 2: come second. So we pointed that out. We had France's
24:16
Speaker 2: more announcing effectively a partnership of all the security and
24:21
Speaker 2: intelligence services and the universities with Israel, and all of
24:26
Speaker 2: this was done with absolutely no discussion with the public,
24:30
Speaker 2: so there's no accountability and it's clear that this partnership
24:35
Speaker 2: in inverted commas has just got more and more complex
24:38
Speaker 2: and buried itself deeper and deeper into British society, and
24:42
Speaker 2: there's a lot of questions to be asked. And I
24:45
Speaker 2: think the good thing which is starting to happen is
24:48
Speaker 2: more and more Jewish people are expressing concerns about what's
24:53
Speaker 2: happening here because they realize how dangerous this is to them.
24:58
Speaker 2: And as you say, Vanessa, we can talk about this
25:01
Speaker 2: more in UK column extra at the end of the.
25:03
Speaker 1: News Sandy, let me welcome you to the program and
25:07
Speaker 1: you're going to tell us a little bit about impact investing.
25:11
Speaker 5: Thank you, Thank you very much. Mike.
25:15
Speaker 6: Yeah.
25:15
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't know if many people understand what
25:18
Speaker 5: impact investing is, but it is really the currency of
25:24
Speaker 5: data mining and data gathering, the gathering of data and
25:30
Speaker 5: selling that onto to third parties through things like outcomes,
25:34
Speaker 5: futures markets, whatever. But it's a new currency that that
25:39
Speaker 5: he's being traded on our on our on us humans basically.
25:45
Speaker 5: So the man and that's sometimes called the father of
25:48
Speaker 5: impact investment is Sir Ronald Cohen, and he is a
25:52
Speaker 5: businessman both UK and US, notorious for bankrolling the new
25:57
Speaker 5: Labor governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, being dubbed
26:01
Speaker 5: Brown's bankers. So Coen reveals in his book Impact, Yeah,
26:08
Speaker 5: he's also really in with the Rothschild Foundation and they're
26:14
Speaker 5: all in this together. The Edmund de Rothschild Foundation is
26:19
Speaker 5: all part of that now. In Coen reveals in his
26:22
Speaker 5: book Impact, reshaping capitalism to drive real change. And it
26:27
Speaker 5: was in that book that he reveals that in two
26:30
Speaker 5: thousand and seven a meeting was hosted by the Rockefeller
26:33
Speaker 5: Foundation at their Bellagio Center in Italy, and impact investing
26:39
Speaker 5: was coined as a term to replace social investment. The
26:42
Speaker 5: Rockefeller's private estate in Belago, we mustn't forget, is the
26:45
Speaker 5: same place that gave birth to the Club of Rome
26:48
Speaker 5: in nineteen sixty eight, which was again behind the Earth
26:51
Speaker 5: Summit and everything that comes with the SGGS. Brown himself
26:56
Speaker 5: is now a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation. And let's
26:59
Speaker 5: not forget that in ninety nine he sold he sold
27:03
Speaker 5: three hundred and ninety five tons of UK gold reserves
27:07
Speaker 5: for a song, and that's not to be forgotten now.
27:11
Speaker 5: Tony Blair is his partner in crime, crime obviously, and
27:16
Speaker 5: he shortly after resigning for British politics in January two
27:19
Speaker 5: thousand and eight, Blair joined Rothchild associated business JP Morgan
27:23
Speaker 5: Chase in a senior advisory capacity, earning two point fifty
27:27
Speaker 5: two million a year. So he was on the Business
27:31
Speaker 5: Council of the World Economic Forum, was a board member
27:34
Speaker 5: of the United States China Business Council, and in nineteen
27:37
Speaker 5: ninety seven received the American Jewish Committee's National Human Relations Award.
27:43
Speaker 5: Now Cohen is also involved in the World Economic Forum,
27:47
Speaker 5: the West's Global Shapers project, led by Schwab and his
27:52
Speaker 5: colleague David M. Rubinstein of the Carlisle Group. They're all
27:56
Speaker 5: heavily into impact investing, as is obviously Tony Blair's Institute
28:02
Speaker 5: for Global Change, which is his main vector for pushing this. This, this,
28:08
Speaker 5: you know this. It's like a financial investment company. Now,
28:13
Speaker 5: the godfathers of the great research, the Rothchild, are openly
28:16
Speaker 5: involved in impact investment, both through the asset management division
28:19
Speaker 5: of Rothchild and co with its Social Impact Investment Fund
28:24
Speaker 5: in Israel. Impact investing has enjoyed rapid growth in recent years,
28:28
Speaker 5: doubling from an estimated one hundred and thirty million in
28:31
Speaker 5: twenty sixteen to two hundred and sixty million in twenty eighteen,
28:35
Speaker 5: Aiming to build the Israeli impact investment ecosystem, the Edmund
28:40
Speaker 5: de Rothschild Foundation in partnership with the Jewish Funders Network,
28:44
Speaker 5: and I think we've got a slide on that launched
28:47
Speaker 5: last year the Matching Grant, a one million dollar matching
28:50
Speaker 5: grant initiative. The Israeli Edmund de Rothschild Foundation's Impact Entrepreneurship
28:56
Speaker 5: Program officer Alnachel Andinkov said the promotion of the impact
29:02
Speaker 5: industry has to happen through philanthropy. I think we've got
29:05
Speaker 5: a picture a side there of the global shaper, the
29:08
Speaker 5: global shapers. That's also all part of this impact investment
29:14
Speaker 5: push to get you know, to get it you know,
29:17
Speaker 5: even more kind of accepted and well it's already accepted,
29:23
Speaker 5: but you know, more impactful. The impact investment is totally
29:27
Speaker 5: reliant on the yeah, we've got on the sustainable development goals,
29:33
Speaker 5: whose acceleration has you know, has been officially pushed by
29:36
Speaker 5: the WEF, which is a kind of Zionus propsy really
29:40
Speaker 5: since twenty nineteen. The real power lies not in the
29:44
Speaker 5: goals themselves, but in the technical indicators and algorithms that
29:48
Speaker 5: measure progress towards these goals. Now they a lot of
29:54
Speaker 5: it is done through philanthropy, and we've got we've got
29:57
Speaker 5: these engeos, you know, creating change through family philanthropy, and
30:02
Speaker 5: I'll be going into that a little bit later with
30:04
Speaker 5: the Gorilla Foundation, which I'll be covering after this. So,
30:11
Speaker 5: you know, the seventeen goals are really the driver for
30:16
Speaker 5: impact investing. They act as a covert legislation. These laws,
30:22
Speaker 5: you know, these are the ways this legislation didn't really
30:26
Speaker 5: go through any democratic process. We're witnessing the most sophisticated
30:30
Speaker 5: control system in human history, and it is its debt slavery.
30:35
Speaker 5: I mean, no matter how you look at it, it
30:37
Speaker 5: is a way. It is far worse than capitalism. The
30:40
Speaker 5: SDG values act as a hidden control panel of global governance.
30:45
Speaker 5: Whoever sets these parameters and algorithms effectively programs the automated
30:49
Speaker 5: responses that shape billions of lives. Now, looking at the
30:54
Speaker 5: seventeen goals sixteen peace, justice, strong institutions and goals set
31:00
Speaker 5: seventeen partnerships for the goals reflect the purpose of impact investing.
31:04
Speaker 5: So let's have a look at those two because actually
31:09
Speaker 5: what they say is now Goal sixteen is the official
31:14
Speaker 5: description of Goal sixteen is promote peaceful and inclusive societies,
31:19
Speaker 5: provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable
31:24
Speaker 5: and inclusive institutions at all levels. The real meaning, though,
31:28
Speaker 5: is promote peace through supernational policing, erode local legal systems
31:34
Speaker 5: in favor of international law, and redefine justice to mean
31:38
Speaker 5: ideological conformity. And Goal seventeen is really really gets it.
31:45
Speaker 5: I mean, all of these goals kind of interlink with
31:47
Speaker 5: each other, so I'll be covering some other ones in
31:49
Speaker 5: the next few weeks. Goal seventeen is the partnership for
31:53
Speaker 5: the goals, which is the final one, and the official
31:57
Speaker 5: description is strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the
32:02
Speaker 5: goal partnerships for sustainable development. But the real meaning is
32:06
Speaker 5: cement the public private partnership model where unelected corporations, banks,
32:11
Speaker 5: and NGOs dictate policy globally bypassing democratic accountability under the
32:17
Speaker 5: banner of banner of cooperation and safeguarding. So that's a
32:23
Speaker 5: quick sort of resume of what how these goals link
32:27
Speaker 5: up really with impact investing and what it really means
32:31
Speaker 5: to us as human beings, because it is a whole
32:34
Speaker 5: slavery system built on these financial instruments such to you, Thank.
32:41
Speaker 1: You, Thank you for that, and as you say later on,
32:45
Speaker 1: we'll be looking at the Gorilla Foundation as just one
32:48
Speaker 1: example of impacting impact investing and action. But Brian, let's
32:54
Speaker 1: move on then and have a look at Nick Clegg.
32:57
Speaker 1: Has he been speaking out again recently?
33:00
Speaker 2: Unfortunately he has, and I've got to say, Sandy lovely
33:02
Speaker 2: segue talking about public private partnerships. We're not too sure
33:07
Speaker 2: what is political, what is big business? And up pops
33:11
Speaker 2: Nick Clegg. And of course he gets massive coverage in
33:15
Speaker 2: the BBC article. Let's pull this apart. This is the
33:19
Speaker 2: headline Clegg accuses Vance of hypocrisy over free speech criticism.
33:26
Speaker 2: So when we see Clegg here, what are we dealing with?
33:30
Speaker 2: Because yes he was a politician deputy Prime minister, but
33:34
Speaker 2: then he disappears off to work in America. Why has
33:37
Speaker 2: he been given all this street cred by the BBC.
33:40
Speaker 2: Let's have a listen to what he actually says. And
33:43
Speaker 2: it's quite amazing. I cannot stand the rank hypocrisy of
33:47
Speaker 2: senior right wing American politicians flying first class of by
33:51
Speaker 2: private jed over the United Kingdom and declaring that somehow
33:55
Speaker 2: there's excessive censorship in the UK and then flying back
33:59
Speaker 2: to the US to basically intimidate and bully and cow
34:04
Speaker 2: their own opponents. So pretty strong language. She would think
34:08
Speaker 2: that he's on a squeaky clean slate here, but not quite.
34:14
Speaker 2: He goes on to say that the behavior of many
34:17
Speaker 2: in the Trump administration is flagrantly contrary to American principles
34:22
Speaker 2: of free expression. So this is the britt He's worked
34:25
Speaker 2: in America for a few years, and he's now going
34:29
Speaker 2: to stick his or into the pond in order to
34:31
Speaker 2: tell the Americans how to conduct their business. The clegg
34:35
Speaker 2: arrogance is clearly still there. He went on to say
34:39
Speaker 2: that the UK is over censorious online, and he cited
34:46
Speaker 2: the police making thirty arrests a day for offensive posts.
34:52
Speaker 2: But it goes on still part of the definition of
34:54
Speaker 2: living in a free society is that you can say
34:57
Speaker 2: things that are offensive and other people violent, which other
35:01
Speaker 2: people violently disagree with. He says that over censoring offensive
35:09
Speaker 2: but legal speech actually empowers figures like Nigel Frage, who
35:15
Speaker 2: will get more of a hearing the more imprecise the
35:18
Speaker 2: boundaries are. So he's deep into politics. He's come back
35:22
Speaker 2: in from nowhere. Then he sticks the knife in with
35:26
Speaker 2: this one, which I'm sure you'll enjoy my age verification.
35:31
Speaker 2: Rules in the Online Safety Act preventing young people from
35:35
Speaker 2: encountering harmful content did not do not go far enough.
35:41
Speaker 2: So this man absolutely jumping in to ensure that this
35:45
Speaker 2: pernicious act is going to be used or even further
35:49
Speaker 2: clamped down on free speech. Let's look at a little
35:51
Speaker 2: video clip now of Clegg in action from two thousand
35:55
Speaker 2: and fourteen. At see how this man performed.
36:02
Speaker 3: Okay, can't clicking.
36:12
Speaker 5: Here, just cup of things for on the other side.
36:24
Speaker 1: Let's get the.
36:25
Speaker 7: Dog in the photo.
36:27
Speaker 5: There was a dog already in the photo.
36:34
Speaker 2: He smiles.
36:38
Speaker 8: Four years ago I asked you, what were you going
36:41
Speaker 8: to do that institutional operating in this country? Now your
36:46
Speaker 8: reply to me, Nick was I don't know what you
36:49
Speaker 8: mean by institutional pedophile rings. Do you understand why I
36:52
Speaker 8: was talking about four years ago? Now, Nick can stay
36:54
Speaker 8: in my eyes.
36:57
Speaker 9: Okay, Britain, when don't we going to Yeah, Miss Randy Clandon,
37:05
Speaker 9: you've just been a part of You're based on lie.
37:07
Speaker 9: Why is it the treasury we've produced.
37:09
Speaker 5: Encouragive currency appear in trust?
37:12
Speaker 10: Why did you right?
37:14
Speaker 4: Are you not going passively?
37:15
Speaker 9: It's very simple. Last week, have none so we can
37:19
Speaker 9: put our own currency, and so that means austerity. He's
37:23
Speaker 9: based on absolute high and you have posed to that, Hi,
37:26
Speaker 9: and you're not done expectually has an absolute pots clip
37:30
Speaker 9: of your measures, and you were a handsome roumi crats.
37:37
Speaker 10: I'm happy I'm not actually with a dempty prime minister
37:39
Speaker 10: because he's had to abort our interview because we were
37:42
Speaker 10: here for a little photo of which the lib Dems
37:45
Speaker 10: have organized to flag up there what they say is
37:48
Speaker 10: their key tax measure, which is raising the lower threshold. However,
37:51
Speaker 10: so mister Clig was there and all his Libdem people
37:53
Speaker 10: were there, but the whole thing had to be aborted
37:55
Speaker 10: because well, a few protesters came along and spoiled the occasion.
37:58
Speaker 10: So mister Cleig has gone over. I don't know whether
38:00
Speaker 10: they we'll be coming back in the near future, but
38:02
Speaker 10: that was one photo op which seemed to hit the buffers,
38:06
Speaker 10: shall we say.
38:08
Speaker 1: Yeah, those nasty protesters they got in the way of
38:11
Speaker 1: stuff and he had to run away. I mean he
38:12
Speaker 1: just had to run away.
38:13
Speaker 2: He had well, he did have to run away because
38:15
Speaker 2: actually he knew that what Bill Maloney was saying to
38:18
Speaker 2: him was absolutely true. So Nick Clegg didn't want to
38:21
Speaker 2: protect the children. He didn't want to talk about it.
38:24
Speaker 2: Free speech wasn't his thing. And of course eventually he
38:28
Speaker 2: disappears off to America and let's finish his words from
38:32
Speaker 2: the BBC, the BBC that doesn't want to protect children.
38:36
Speaker 2: So Clegg said that seeing tech bosses like Elon Musk,
38:39
Speaker 2: Jeff Bezov and mister Zuckerberg line up behind Donald Trump
38:43
Speaker 2: at this and his inauguration January was one of the
38:46
Speaker 2: reasons where I thought, probably it's time to move on
38:49
Speaker 2: from Silicon Valley. And then this is the real masterpiece.
38:53
Speaker 2: There's only one thing worse than having politicians and business
38:57
Speaker 2: people at each other's throats. It's having them in each
38:59
Speaker 2: other's pockets. But that is exactly what he did by
39:03
Speaker 2: jumping out of a political or senior political role in
39:08
Speaker 2: order to go to America, straight into not only big business,
39:12
Speaker 2: but big business which was censoring people's right to free speech.
39:16
Speaker 2: And sorry, and now the BBC brings this man back
39:22
Speaker 2: and puts him in front of the public as if
39:25
Speaker 2: we should pay attention to a word he says. This
39:27
Speaker 2: is obscene.
39:28
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what's even more obscene than that. It's
39:31
Speaker 1: the Rony and the fact that he refused to answer
39:33
Speaker 1: any questions about institutional child abuse and yet protecting children
39:38
Speaker 1: as a justification for this entire censorious regime that we
39:41
Speaker 1: have at the moment. These people are disgusting.
39:43
Speaker 2: They are disgusting, and of course the BBC is even
39:46
Speaker 2: more disgusting because they've chosen this man to put in
39:50
Speaker 2: front of the British public so that the public should
39:53
Speaker 2: pay attention to what he thinks and says. We should
39:57
Speaker 2: not pay attention anything. Nick Klegg says, be put on
40:00
Speaker 2: a flight back to America for Trump to deal with.
40:04
Speaker 2: But on the subject of child protection and the safety
40:07
Speaker 2: of children, let's get onto a more positive note. And
40:11
Speaker 2: actually the theme is ultimately America. But I was delighted
40:15
Speaker 2: to be told a month or so ago that there
40:18
Speaker 2: was going to be an event at the end of
40:20
Speaker 2: this September in Washington where a number of people were
40:24
Speaker 2: coming together to protect the future of children. And this
40:28
Speaker 2: is an international coalition for children, a lot of extremely
40:33
Speaker 2: outspoken and very good people. And I haven't got the
40:37
Speaker 2: exact date, twenty ninth, thirtieth of September, but we are
40:41
Speaker 2: going to be reporting on this event because Kim Ischelwood
40:46
Speaker 2: that the UK Column has interviewed several times from Public
40:49
Speaker 2: Child Protection Wales. She will be attending. But let's get
40:53
Speaker 2: our minds in the right frame as to what the
40:56
Speaker 2: problem is. Who is trying to sexualize children worldwide? This
41:00
Speaker 2: is a really excellent film clip which Coalition for Children
41:06
Speaker 2: has on their website together with a lot of other material.
41:09
Speaker 2: Let's have a look at this quick clip.
41:18
Speaker 11: In this film. The term comprehensive sexuality education or CS
41:23
Speaker 11: does not refer to sex education programs in general, but
41:27
Speaker 11: rather to a specific form of graphic sexuality education. CS
41:32
Speaker 11: is designed to change the sexual and gender norms of society,
41:36
Speaker 11: promotes high risk sexual behaviors, and encourages even the youngest
41:40
Speaker 11: of children to experiment sexually.
42:04
Speaker 6: This is definitely an attack on healthy family life. It
42:09
Speaker 6: will affect your economy, it will affect your child rearing,
42:12
Speaker 6: it will affect your education system.
42:15
Speaker 1: This has horrified a lot of people in South Africa
42:18
Speaker 1: and the.
42:18
Speaker 12: Tool that has been used, the weapons that been used
42:21
Speaker 12: is comprehensive sexuality education.
42:23
Speaker 13: As President of the American College of Pediatricians, I am
42:27
Speaker 13: deeply concerned about comprehensive sexuality education for four reasons. First,
42:33
Speaker 13: it sexualizes children. Second, it threatens children's health, Third, it
42:38
Speaker 13: promotes a dangerous gender ideology, and fourth it undermines the
42:43
Speaker 13: parent child relationship, which violates parental rights.
42:47
Speaker 12: My life's work has been to protect children by exposing
42:52
Speaker 12: the roots of the sexual revolution, the sexual rights movement
42:57
Speaker 12: that's led to sex education worldwide.
42:59
Speaker 4: Go not to.
43:01
Speaker 9: Sec say not to suses not to see.
43:06
Speaker 7: There is a worldwide war raging across the globe. Not
43:10
Speaker 7: a war of guns and weapons, but a war of ideas, ideologies,
43:14
Speaker 7: and world views regarding sex.
43:19
Speaker 14: This is just part of the lesson plan for what's
43:24
Speaker 14: called making a Difference curriculum, and it is in Oregon
43:27
Speaker 14: schools and probably schools around the nation. This is instructions
43:32
Speaker 14: for the teacher in the classroom to ask her or
43:36
Speaker 14: his students how do people express their sexual feelings? What
43:39
Speaker 14: is abstinence? And here are some answers that they try
43:43
Speaker 14: to elicit from the children. Oral sex, masturbation, anal sex massage,
43:49
Speaker 14: holding hands, touching each other's genitals, saying I like you,
43:54
Speaker 14: and what they're doing is equating all these things. Saying
43:57
Speaker 14: I like you is equal to anal We have.
44:01
Speaker 15: Had several high level visits to Jamaica and the Caribbean,
44:05
Speaker 15: from Prime Minister David Cameron of the UK, from the
44:08
Speaker 15: Secretary General of the UN, Ban Ki Moon, and from
44:11
Speaker 15: President of Barack Obama. This is about pressure in the
44:14
Speaker 15: Caribbean to accept the sexual rights campaign.
44:20
Speaker 2: So there it is easy to see what's going on
44:22
Speaker 2: and note the people peddling this filth attacking children. So
44:27
Speaker 2: if we've got any worries about what's happening in UK,
44:30
Speaker 2: we shouldn't have any worries because we can see clearly
44:34
Speaker 2: where this is coming from. Just to stay on the positive.
44:38
Speaker 2: Public Child Protection Wales one of a number of organizations
44:43
Speaker 2: that will be attending this event at the end of September.
44:46
Speaker 2: And the important thing is these organizations are worldwide organizations
44:51
Speaker 2: coming together to challenge what's going on. I'll just end
44:55
Speaker 2: by a couple of quotes from Kim Isherwood, a self
44:58
Speaker 2: chairman of Public Child Protection.
45:00
Speaker 1: Well.
45:00
Speaker 2: She says that she's delighted with the move and she
45:04
Speaker 2: feels privileged to work alongside some of the biggest names
45:08
Speaker 2: known to be opposed to the Kinsey deceits, that's the
45:11
Speaker 2: Kinsey Report and the betrayal of childhood. And she ends
45:16
Speaker 2: by saying this unified Front is crucial for the future
45:20
Speaker 2: of our children, ensuring a collective voice against influences that
45:24
Speaker 2: seek to undermine their natural growth and purity. And I'll
45:28
Speaker 2: remind our audience that if you have a look for
45:30
Speaker 2: Kim Isherwood on the UK Column website, you'll see that
45:34
Speaker 2: we've done a number of interviews with this amazing and
45:38
Speaker 2: very gutsy woman, so Mike some positive things. They're clear
45:43
Speaker 2: that a big pushback on this filth against children is happening,
45:47
Speaker 2: and it's a worldwide movement, so a lot more support needed,
45:52
Speaker 2: but it's happening.
45:54
Speaker 1: Okay, Thank you, Brian, Thank you to anybody as well
45:57
Speaker 1: who is supporting the UK Colin. We do need your
45:59
Speaker 1: continuing support, so if you can support us, please consider
46:03
Speaker 1: joining us are making a donation. There's a big blue
46:05
Speaker 1: button on the front page of the website which will
46:08
Speaker 1: take you to information on that. Another reminder of the
46:12
Speaker 1: UK Column on location event featuring doctor Andrew Wakefield and
46:17
Speaker 1: of course access to what I called seven his film,
46:21
Speaker 1: also Tess Lourie and a number of other speakers. We'll
46:24
Speaker 1: be mentioning more of those on Friday's program. Did you
46:28
Speaker 1: want to say anything.
46:29
Speaker 2: Well, I've got to say Mike that we are just
46:31
Speaker 2: over fifty tickets left. So if you want to come
46:34
Speaker 2: to this event and you've been hanging on, do IO
46:37
Speaker 2: don't I? I you need to get onto the UK column
46:40
Speaker 2: shop and buy a ticket because it's clear that we
46:43
Speaker 2: are going to sell this event out well before the
46:47
Speaker 2: day to the actual conference. This is absolutely amazing. Thank
46:51
Speaker 2: you to all of our supporters worldwide for the confidence
46:55
Speaker 2: of coming in and getting on board this event. If
46:59
Speaker 2: you can't make it all, she can still pay for
47:02
Speaker 2: the live stream, So we will be talking to you
47:07
Speaker 2: wherever you are in the world, but if you can
47:08
Speaker 2: be there with us, it will be fantastic.
47:11
Speaker 1: Okay. Tonight at seven pm, John Warfare is why is
47:16
Speaker 1: gender and Version Everywhere? With mister e and tomorrow at
47:21
Speaker 1: one pm the Charles is speaking to Jig Fern about
47:26
Speaker 1: a picture hint. It's effectively about the Post Word podcast
47:31
Speaker 1: and news about that, So do join us at one
47:34
Speaker 1: pm for that. Ni Brian, Let's move on and what's
47:39
Speaker 1: the Daily Mail been up to?
47:42
Speaker 11: Well?
47:43
Speaker 2: The Daily Mail has produced an article which in my
47:46
Speaker 2: mind is absolutely designed to ramp up the angst and
47:50
Speaker 2: the unhappiness that's in people's minds at the moment, particularly
47:54
Speaker 2: as we see the police arresting people for making comments
48:00
Speaker 2: on social media. So here's the incredible headline page of
48:05
Speaker 2: the Daily Mail another day in Starmer's socialist utopia. Then
48:10
Speaker 2: it's talking about the bond markets, but then it quickly
48:13
Speaker 2: it gets on the police arrest of the father Ted
48:17
Speaker 2: writer Grant Linahan, and it then asks when did Britain
48:21
Speaker 2: become North Korea. Now, the amazing thing about this article
48:26
Speaker 2: is that Martin Beckford, the Daily Mail policy editor, apparently
48:30
Speaker 2: has no idea where all the mad policies have come from,
48:33
Speaker 2: and yet the UK column has been tracking all of
48:36
Speaker 2: this over years. So this is a little video of
48:40
Speaker 2: the article. It's the only way I can get the
48:42
Speaker 2: actual scale of it. But as you're scrolling through all
48:46
Speaker 2: these people who've been effectively attacked by the police and
48:49
Speaker 2: imprisoned or questioned or rested as a result of social posts,
48:55
Speaker 2: this is all presented to the public in a very glossy,
49:00
Speaker 2: childish way, in my opinion, designed to ramp up the
49:06
Speaker 2: anks that the public or were already fear. And to
49:10
Speaker 2: the right of the page as it scrolled down, of course,
49:14
Speaker 2: is a column of utter dross articles by the Daily Mail.
49:18
Speaker 2: So in my opinion, this article has been put together
49:23
Speaker 2: in order to ramp up the stress and anxiety in
49:27
Speaker 2: people when they see the police arresting people from making
49:31
Speaker 2: some casual social media comment that twenty years ago, nobody
49:37
Speaker 2: would have batted an eyelid. So this is priming the
49:41
Speaker 2: population for something to happen. And if I can just
49:44
Speaker 2: quote Graham Lenham himself, because he was interviewed surely before
49:49
Speaker 2: we went live with the News and he was talking
49:52
Speaker 2: about London and he said, basically, I don't recognize this place.
49:56
Speaker 2: It's different from the friendly place I used to rememb
50:00
Speaker 2: and he said the cultural life is disappearing, it's been
50:03
Speaker 2: taken apart. And he said the tensions that he feels
50:08
Speaker 2: that he knows that other people feel, are growing. And
50:12
Speaker 2: he then says something is going to blow and that
50:15
Speaker 2: is going to happen next year now. And I'm not
50:17
Speaker 2: sure why he says next year, Mike, but what I
50:21
Speaker 2: do think is significant is he is also realizing that
50:25
Speaker 2: public emotions are being played and the Daily Mail has
50:30
Speaker 2: not got a leg to stand on because we told
50:32
Speaker 2: them years ago. But I'll come on to that in
50:35
Speaker 2: a minute. Yep, you going sorry, Well, just to show
50:38
Speaker 2: these two bits. Essentially, there were comments. So this was
50:42
Speaker 2: JK Rowling that the paper printed. She used some bad
50:47
Speaker 2: language but basically said, what the f has the UK become?
50:52
Speaker 2: This is totalitarianism, utterly deplorable and this is the really
50:57
Speaker 2: sad stuff. We got Neil O'Brien, Piers Moore and Robert
51:00
Speaker 2: Jenrick commenting. But essentially this is all. It's sort of
51:05
Speaker 2: making a joke. They're puzzled. Its laughter, it's ridicule. Know
51:10
Speaker 2: what we are looking at is calculated, vicious policy to
51:15
Speaker 2: destroy the UK and the next objective is breakdown, which
51:20
Speaker 2: is why these articles are phrased in such a frivolous way.
51:25
Speaker 2: It's playing with the emotions of the population.
51:28
Speaker 1: Yeah, so if you haven't seen grimlin AND's substack, this
51:33
Speaker 1: is it. I just got arrested again, and he says
51:35
Speaker 1: something odd happened before I had even bordered the flight
51:39
Speaker 1: in Arizona. When I handed over on my passport at
51:41
Speaker 1: the gate, the official told me I didn't have a
51:43
Speaker 1: seat and had to be re ticketed. At the time,
51:46
Speaker 1: I thought it was just the sort of innocent snafu
51:48
Speaker 1: that makes air travel such a joy, and hindsight it
51:51
Speaker 1: was clear that I'd been flagged. Someone somewhere, probably wearing
51:54
Speaker 1: unconvincing makeup and his sister wife mom's underwear, had made
51:59
Speaker 1: a phone call. The moment I stepped off the planet.
52:02
Speaker 1: He throwed. Five armed police officers were waiting, not one,
52:06
Speaker 1: not to five. They escorted me to a private area
52:09
Speaker 1: and told me it was under arrest for three tweets.
52:11
Speaker 1: In a country where pedophiles escape sentencing, where knife crime
52:15
Speaker 1: is out of control, where women are assaulted and harassed
52:17
Speaker 1: every time they gathered to speak, the state had mobilized
52:20
Speaker 1: five armed officers to arrest a comedy writer for this tweet.
52:24
Speaker 1: And no, I promise you I'm not making this up,
52:27
Speaker 1: is what he said. So this was the first of
52:29
Speaker 1: the three tweets. The other two tweets, by the way,
52:32
Speaker 1: were not as quite as sort of graphic as this.
52:35
Speaker 1: But he said here, if a trans identified male is
52:38
Speaker 1: in a female only space, he's committing a violent, abusive act,
52:42
Speaker 1: make a scene, call the cops, and of all else,
52:44
Speaker 1: fields hunch him in the balls. So that's what he said,
52:48
Speaker 1: And for that the five officers with guns picked him
52:52
Speaker 1: up at the when he got off the plane. Now
52:54
Speaker 1: for their part, the met Police claimed that this is
52:59
Speaker 1: that it's normal all the police in airports are armed.
53:03
Speaker 1: He didn't seem to say very much about the fact
53:05
Speaker 1: that the need for five of them to be there.
53:07
Speaker 1: But I mean Leninan got the usual treatment. Built bag
53:11
Speaker 1: and other devices were confiscated. Lenihan was sorry and electronic
53:16
Speaker 1: devices were confiscated. He was seen by a nurse while
53:19
Speaker 1: at the police station and then he was taken the
53:22
Speaker 1: hospital because of high blood pressure. He was then released
53:25
Speaker 1: on bill with a single condition. So that single condition,
53:28
Speaker 1: he's not allowed to use Twitter or x as it
53:31
Speaker 1: likes to be called these days, So that's the only
53:33
Speaker 1: bill condition now. He went on then to say I'll
53:37
Speaker 1: just bring this on screen. He went on to say
53:40
Speaker 1: the civility of individual officers doesn't alter the fundamental reality
53:44
Speaker 1: of what happened. I was arrested in an airport like a terrorist,
53:47
Speaker 1: locked in a cell like a criminal, take in the
53:49
Speaker 1: hospital because stress nearly killed me, and banned from speaking online,
53:53
Speaker 1: all because I made jokes and upset some psychotic cross dressers.
53:59
Speaker 1: Now wezating. The Health Secretary has weighed in with the
54:02
Speaker 1: BBC this morning on this and basically said, well, what
54:07
Speaker 1: did he say, ministers need to look at laws concerning
54:10
Speaker 1: online speech. He was concerned that there was a bit
54:15
Speaker 1: of overreach of something more expectation on the police and
54:18
Speaker 1: because of that they're under pressure and maybe doing the
54:20
Speaker 1: wrong things. And he was also talking diluting, but diluted
54:25
Speaker 1: the focus and priorities of the public. That's obviously something
54:29
Speaker 1: we need to look at, and he said it's very
54:31
Speaker 1: easy for people to criticize police who are only being
54:36
Speaker 1: enforcing the laws that have been passed them by MPs. Well,
54:40
Speaker 1: part of the problem here, perhaps is that those laws
54:42
Speaker 1: are so vaguely defined that the police are basically left
54:46
Speaker 1: to make things up as they go along, and they're
54:48
Speaker 1: clearly making the wrong decisions. If that's what they're doing,
54:52
Speaker 1: perhaps it's much more likely that they're making the right decisions,
54:55
Speaker 1: or at least the decisions that they're being told to
54:57
Speaker 1: make in the first place, because there's clearly a lot
55:00
Speaker 1: going on behind the scenes here.
55:01
Speaker 2: Bryan, I think that is the way round, like the
55:04
Speaker 2: loose definitions are to allow abuse of powers. In my opinion,
55:09
Speaker 2: that's what it is. But let's come back to the
55:11
Speaker 2: Daily Mail and we'll pot this image up on screen.
55:16
Speaker 1: Where are we here we are.
55:18
Speaker 2: Now, this's got a little bit of a reflection on this.
55:23
Speaker 1: Letter.
55:23
Speaker 2: It's a letter dated the fourteenth of February twenty twelve.
55:28
Speaker 2: It's to me as body of the UK column team,
55:32
Speaker 2: and it's from Paul Daker, who was then the editor
55:36
Speaker 2: in chief of the Daily Mail, and he says, thank
55:39
Speaker 2: you so much for sending me a copy of your
55:41
Speaker 2: paper containing the article on the Media Standards Trust. I
55:46
Speaker 2: read the article with great interest. Now this is a
55:49
Speaker 2: thank you letter from Paul Daker because we explain to
55:52
Speaker 2: him why he was being attacked by the Media Standards Trust.
55:57
Speaker 2: We also gave him a lot of information about the
56:02
Speaker 2: pernicious political work of the charity Common Purpose, and as
56:06
Speaker 2: a result of that, about two months later, the Daily
56:09
Speaker 2: Mail on a Saturday morning, printed nine and a half
56:14
Speaker 2: full pages of information around Common Purpose and that was
56:20
Speaker 2: what my ninety percent of our research in the background.
56:25
Speaker 2: The point we're making is that we told the Daily
56:28
Speaker 2: Mail in twenty twelve exactly what was happening under the surface.
56:34
Speaker 2: The country was being taken apart from the inside, and
56:38
Speaker 2: perhaps on top of that, very importantly, the woke agender
56:42
Speaker 2: diversity and all the rest of it was being used
56:46
Speaker 2: as the weapon to destroy and cause friction in the
56:53
Speaker 2: UK public. But despite giving it to The Mail, they
56:57
Speaker 2: did the one big splash on the Saturday, and then,
57:00
Speaker 2: of course none of their investigation team continued to dig
57:04
Speaker 2: in order to find the policy, which their own policy
57:08
Speaker 2: editor in this latest article just doesn't seem to understand
57:13
Speaker 2: what's happening. I'm going to use the word pathetic, Mike.
57:16
Speaker 2: I find this utterly pathetic, and I wonder whether it's
57:20
Speaker 2: because the policy editor has brought in some standards, the
57:25
Speaker 2: newspaper standards to the Daily Mail that we are seeing
57:29
Speaker 2: this crass situation with reporting.
57:33
Speaker 1: We'll talk more about that an extra as well. Certainly, Well, Sally,
57:36
Speaker 1: let's welcome you back and tell us about the Gorilla Foundation.
57:41
Speaker 11: Well.
57:41
Speaker 5: I stumbled across this when I was looking into impact investing,
57:45
Speaker 5: and it's an interesting website, the Gorilla Foundation, because they're
57:50
Speaker 5: talking about a new form of philanthropy. It's a different
57:54
Speaker 5: it's generation X. A lot of the people who are
57:57
Speaker 5: involved in this website have never worked. Immensely rich. A
58:02
Speaker 5: lot of their funders are and are going to I'll
58:05
Speaker 5: go into some of the A lot of them are
58:09
Speaker 5: are literally rich, rich, kind of I think they just
58:14
Speaker 5: they live, they've they've inherited a lot of money from
58:17
Speaker 5: their grandparents, their parents and so on, and they're they're, they're,
58:22
Speaker 5: they're pushing away the whole idea of old philanthropy. So
58:26
Speaker 5: I just thought that the mission statement that they had
58:29
Speaker 5: the language they use is hilarious. Well, it's woke, but
58:33
Speaker 5: it says the dinosaurs that cling to power Whitosaurus, Plutosaurus, Mattosaurus,
58:40
Speaker 5: and Straightosaurus. Time for meteoric extinction and cultivation of new
58:45
Speaker 5: forms of democratized giving. Let's not confuse plutocracy with philanthropy,
58:50
Speaker 5: and philanthropy with real love of mankind. The world, life
58:55
Speaker 5: and consciousness itself is unfathomably queer, steeped in paradox and uncertainty,
59:01
Speaker 5: and there are too many things to name ideas, quests, journeys,
59:04
Speaker 5: and pursuits. Perhaps these words give you a taste of
59:06
Speaker 5: who we are and where our hearts beat. Let no
59:09
Speaker 5: amount of words substitute a real relationship. So let's meet.
59:14
Speaker 5: These are simply some of our emergent visions, ever unfolding
59:17
Speaker 5: and interacting with the dreams of the little earthlings who
59:21
Speaker 5: have not yet been taught what to dream. So I'm
59:25
Speaker 5: assuming we are the little earthlings that they are saving
59:29
Speaker 5: in their you know, in their philanthropic quest. So anyway, basically,
59:35
Speaker 5: I mean, I will just read you the what the
59:40
Speaker 5: The guy in charge of this is Anthonis Schwartz. He's
59:44
Speaker 5: an activist, philanthropist and impact investor of Greek German descent
59:48
Speaker 5: and driven by the ideas laid out in the Gorilla
59:52
Speaker 5: Foundation's mission, he has used his inherited wealth that originated
59:56
Speaker 5: from the selling of pharmaceutical company Schwartz Farmer, to support
59:59
Speaker 5: of variety of social causes since twenty eleven. In twenty thirteen,
1:00:04
Speaker 5: Antonis co founded ruley Watch, a Greek parliamentary monitoring organization
1:00:09
Speaker 5: that claims to increase political accountability. He also co funded
1:00:14
Speaker 5: the Center for Sustainable Finance at the University of Zurich,
1:00:17
Speaker 5: and in his free time he enjoys skateboarding and playing
1:00:21
Speaker 5: magic in the gathering. I don't know what that is for.
1:00:24
Speaker 5: You can find out more about his work on the
1:00:26
Speaker 5: website Good Move Initiatives. Well interestingly, you know, I looked
1:00:31
Speaker 5: at it and that he also is involved in something
1:00:34
Speaker 5: called Resource Generation and again it organizes young people eighteen
1:00:41
Speaker 5: to twenty five with access to wealth in class privilege
1:00:45
Speaker 5: in the US to become transformative leaders working towards the
1:00:49
Speaker 5: equator distribution of wealth, land and power. And is interesting
1:00:55
Speaker 5: because there's another one that's called sign the distribution pledge.
1:01:01
Speaker 5: Wealth inequity stops with our generation. So these are idealistic
1:01:05
Speaker 5: people who've never worked in their lives, and they have
1:01:09
Speaker 5: become quite woke in their thinking and how they really
1:01:14
Speaker 5: seem to believe that this is really happening. The Gorilla
1:01:18
Speaker 5: Foundation presents itself as a departure from traditional philanthropy. It
1:01:21
Speaker 5: claims to reject the charitable industrial complex with the paternalistic
1:01:26
Speaker 5: model of billionaire giving, quoting Peter Buffett's sharp critique that
1:01:30
Speaker 5: as more lives and communities are destroyed by the system,
1:01:33
Speaker 5: it creates vast amounts of wealth for the few. The
1:01:36
Speaker 5: more heroic it sounds to give back, but this just
1:01:40
Speaker 5: keeps the existing structure of inequality in place, and I
1:01:44
Speaker 5: tend to agree with that. On the surface, the foundation's
1:01:47
Speaker 5: approach appears radical. Donors are told to give us money
1:01:50
Speaker 5: while giving up power, while decisions about grants are handed
1:01:54
Speaker 5: to act the activist Counsel, made up of grassroots actors.
1:01:58
Speaker 5: The foundation champions of vision of great transition, much like
1:02:02
Speaker 5: the great research and move away from traditional capitalism towards
1:02:05
Speaker 5: the so called solidarity economy, ecological balance, and participatory governance.
1:02:11
Speaker 5: Yet beneath this language lies the uncompitable paradox. The Foundation
1:02:15
Speaker 5: is largely bankrolled by new generation of Europe's wealthy elite.
1:02:19
Speaker 5: Generation X and millennial heirs to fortunes are massed by
1:02:23
Speaker 5: their parents, grandparents, and great grandparents. These individuals who, by
1:02:27
Speaker 5: their own emission, have never worked in the traditional sense,
1:02:31
Speaker 5: yet now position themselves as the vanguard of reinvented commute
1:02:34
Speaker 5: commutarian capitalism.
1:02:37
Speaker 4: So this is you know.
1:02:39
Speaker 5: Obviously this model is branded as impact investing or stakeholder capitalism,
1:02:43
Speaker 5: but it's sold as a moral alternative to the market economy.
1:02:47
Speaker 5: It accelerates digitalization and circular economy frameworks that consolidates data
1:02:52
Speaker 5: and resources in the hands of the very same one
1:02:55
Speaker 5: percent who dominate global finance. So isn't the real Foundation
1:03:01
Speaker 5: aware of these contradictions. It calls for transparency about the
1:03:04
Speaker 5: origin of wealth and openly critiques philanthropy as conscience laundering.
1:03:10
Speaker 5: But here lies the central problem. It's all wrapped up
1:03:12
Speaker 5: in the language of gorilla activism. Or sustainability, and it
1:03:16
Speaker 5: continues to insulate the wealthy from deeper accountability. It's just,
1:03:20
Speaker 5: you know, wealth is not being dismantled, it's being re themed.
1:03:23
Speaker 5: The system is not overturned, but is being rebranded. It
1:03:27
Speaker 5: dream dreams of a world in which philanthropy itself becomes obsolete.
1:03:33
Speaker 5: So you know, it's it's really a kind of a
1:03:36
Speaker 5: camouflage of this elite, uh, you know system that we have. Anyway, now,
1:03:44
Speaker 5: I've just flagged up a few of the the the
1:03:49
Speaker 5: people who actually are helping this this uh, the you know,
1:03:54
Speaker 5: the the Gorilla Foundation, and of course you've got Millionaires
1:03:59
Speaker 5: for Humanity, and I've got another slight there's the edge funders,
1:04:04
Speaker 5: Alliance Impact Investing, all of these, there's leap do look
1:04:10
Speaker 5: at these up. I don't think we've got too much
1:04:13
Speaker 5: time to go into it in general. But then you've
1:04:15
Speaker 5: got the Millionaires for Humanity who also are saying, you know,
1:04:21
Speaker 5: we want a new rebranding of this philanthropy. So I
1:04:26
Speaker 5: just want to tie this in with the with the
1:04:30
Speaker 5: goals again, and they talk a lot about climate action
1:04:34
Speaker 5: in this, So the real meaning Goal thirteen is climate action.
1:04:39
Speaker 5: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
1:04:42
Speaker 5: The real meaning is use the climate crisis narrative to
1:04:45
Speaker 5: justify extreme restrictions on energy, travel, diet, and personalized freedom,
1:04:50
Speaker 5: while diverting trillions to climate finance schemes benefiting corporations, impact investors, banks,
1:04:57
Speaker 5: and billionaires who created the problem. And that's that's the
1:05:01
Speaker 5: way it is.
1:05:02
Speaker 2: Absolutely Okay, Well, I'm just going to say, Sandy, thank
1:05:06
Speaker 2: you very much for that. And it's amazing research from
1:05:10
Speaker 2: yourself and Ben now focusing in on this idea of
1:05:14
Speaker 2: a revision of philanthropy in order that these immensely wealthy
1:05:20
Speaker 2: people make even more money. But a lot, a lot
1:05:23
Speaker 2: to talk about this.
1:05:24
Speaker 1: Yeah, but we are absolutely out of time for an eye,
1:05:27
Speaker 1: so we're going to finish there. I'm going to say
1:05:29
Speaker 1: we'll be back in a few minutes of the UK
1:05:30
Speaker 1: column member for UK col News Extra. If you're not
1:05:34
Speaker 1: a UK column member, please consider joining us. As said earlier,
1:05:37
Speaker 1: we do need your support and you can then join
1:05:40
Speaker 1: us for Extra as well. But enjoy Jeram tonight, the
1:05:44
Speaker 1: interview tomorrow, and we'll be back at one pm on
1:05:47
Speaker 1: Friday with more news. See you then,