Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Perfect Penitent | C. S. Lewis

Transcript

The Perfect Penitent | C. S. Lewis · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome back to Reformed Thinking.
0:01
This is the deep dive. And today you've sent us a real
0:05
classic, an excerpt from CS Lewis that gets right to the
0:08
heart of the matter. We're looking at Mere
0:10
Christianity, specifically the chapter called The Perfect
0:13
Penitent, and it's just, well, it's classic Louis.
0:16
It's this incredibly clear, logical case for why Christ had
0:20
to be both God and man. And our mission for this deep
0:24
dive is really twofold. 1st we want to unpack how Lewis
0:27
separates the central Christian fact, the Atonement, from all
0:31
the theological theories that try to explain it.
0:33
Right. And 2nd, we want to follow his
0:35
line of reasoning step by step to show why the incarnation
0:39
wasn't just, you know, a miracle, but a logical
0:42
necessity. It was the only way for perfect
0:45
human repentance to happen. It's such a helpful piece of
0:47
writing because it cuts through so much of the the
0:50
denominational arguments about the details.
0:52
It does. Louis just sidesteps all that.
0:53
He's not interested in the technical terms as much as he is
0:56
in the function of what Christ did.
0:58
He wants you to see the absolute need for the God man.
1:01
OK, so let's start where Lewis always tells us to start, which
1:04
is with the identity of Jesus Christ.
1:07
You can't really talk about what he did without first figuring
1:10
out who he is. Exactly.
1:12
He just clears the table of all the comfortable, easy options.
1:15
Right away. He gives you this stark choice
1:17
about Jesus of Nazareth. Which is that this man went
1:19
around making claims that are, well, they're staggering.
1:23
He didn't just say he was a prophet, he claimed to be God.
1:27
The one true God, the creator of everything.
1:29
And Lewis says, OK, if you hear that claim, you can't just brush
1:33
it aside. You have to take it seriously.
1:34
Yeah, you can't just say, oh, he's a great moral teacher, but
1:37
a bit confused on that one point.
1:39
No, that's the one position Lewis says is totally illogical
1:42
because a claim to be God is so massive.
1:44
It's either the absolute truth or it's a sign of a profound
1:48
problem. So he lays out the options.
1:50
He's either what he said he was God, or he's a lunatic.
1:55
A complete lunatic on the level of a man who thinks he's a
1:58
poached egg. Or, and this is the third
2:01
option, he's something far worse.
2:03
A fiend. A fiend, A demon, someone who is
2:07
deliberately and maliciously deceiving everyone, using these
2:10
beautiful moral teachings as a cover for the most monstrous lie
2:14
in history. And the reason he forces that
2:16
choice is to show that the good moral teacher idea just doesn't
2:20
hold up to scrutiny. A great moral teacher has to be,
2:24
at a minimum, sane and honest. And claiming to be God if you
2:28
aren't disqualifies you on both counts immediately.
2:31
It's either insane or dishonest. There's no middle ground.
2:34
So Lewis looks at the evidence, the life you live, the
2:37
teachings, the impact he had, and he concludes that the only
2:40
option left standing is the one Jesus himself claimed.
2:43
That he was and is God. And once you accept that, the
2:46
whole story changes. Lewis uses this amazing analogy.
2:49
He says it's like God has landed on this enemy.
2:52
Occupy world in human form. That phrase enemy occupied world
2:56
is so important if frames the entire situation.
2:59
The world isn't just a bit broken or in need of some
3:01
pointers, it's held captive. We're behind enemy lines and
3:04
that means his arrival isn't a diplomatic visit.
3:07
No, it's a rescue mission. It's an invasion.
3:09
It sets the stage for a conflict, not just a series of
3:12
lectures. So if we've established who he
3:15
is, the commander in chief landing on occupied soil, the
3:19
next question is obvious. What did he come here to do?
3:22
Right. And the first answer that comes
3:24
to mind for most people, the sort of surface level answer, is
3:27
that he came to teach. To give us a better moral code,
3:30
Fix our ethics. Show us how to be good people.
3:32
And he certainly did that. The Sermon on the Mount is
3:35
there, but Lewis makes this crucial observation.
3:38
If you actually read what the first Christians wrote, Paul's
3:41
letters, the book of Acts, all the foundational stuff, they
3:44
barely talk about the teachings in comparison to one other
3:47
thing. His death and resurrection.
3:48
His death and coming to life again, that's the obsessive
3:51
focus. It's the central point of every
3:54
sermon, every letter. The thing that changed
3:56
everything wasn't a new philosophy.
3:58
It was an event. That is such a key distinction.
4:02
They didn't see him as a new Plato or Socrates whose ideas
4:06
you follow. They saw him as a rescuer who
4:09
performed an action. And Lewis concludes from this
4:12
that Christians believe the main thing, the chief point of the
4:15
whole mission, was for him to suffer and be killed.
4:19
The teaching was the context, the preparation, but the ACT
4:22
itself was the mission. Yes.
4:24
It shifts the center of gravity of the faith away from just
4:28
being a moral system to being a response to a historical event
4:32
that Christ accomplished. And that gets us right into the
4:34
next part of his argument, which for me is maybe the most
4:38
liberating part of the whole chapter.
4:39
Oh, absolutely. This is where he draws that
4:41
razor sharp line between the core Christian belief and all
4:45
the theories people have built around it.
4:47
He basically gives you permission to not be a
4:49
theologian. He talks about his own
4:51
experience before he was a Christian, thinking he had to
4:54
believe this one specific kind of clunky theory.
4:57
The one you hear all the time. God is angry and wants to punish
5:00
just for our sins, but Jesus steps in and says punish me
5:03
instead. And God says, OK, you're all off
5:05
the hook. Right.
5:06
And when you put it that baldly, it can sound a bit, well, silly,
5:10
or even immoral. Why would a good God need to
5:13
punish anyone if he can just forgive?
5:16
And Lewis admits that. He says it sounded a bit crude
5:19
to him at first, too. But then he makes this
5:21
incredibly important move. He says that theory is not
5:26
Christianity itself. That's the key.
5:29
That is just one attempt to explain it.
5:31
It's a picture. The actual central belief, the
5:34
thing that all Christians everywhere agree on, is much
5:38
simpler. It's just that Christ's death
5:40
has somehow put us right with God and given us a fresh start.
5:44
That's the fact. That's the fact that the
5:46
mechanics of it, that's where the theories come in.
5:49
And Louis says those are secondary.
5:51
Christians are united by the belief that it works, not by a
5:54
single explanation of how it works.
5:56
Which is so helpful because people have been trying to
5:59
explain it for 2000 years with different models.
6:02
Ransom satisfaction substitution.
6:04
All of them trying to get at this central reality.
6:07
And Louis gives this brilliant analogy to make the distinction
6:09
clear. The meal analogy.
6:12
Yeah, this one is perfect. Anyone can understand this?
6:14
Right. If you're tired and hungry, you
6:16
know that eating a meal will do you good.
6:18
That's the reality. You eat, you feel better.
6:20
You don't need to know anything else.
6:22
You don't. But then there's the modern
6:24
theory of nourishment, the science of vitamins, proteins,
6:27
carbs, metabolic pathways. All the biochemistry.
6:30
Exactly, and people ate dinner and got strong for thousands of
6:34
years before anyone had ever heard of a vitamin.
6:37
And if tomorrow scientists announced that the whole vitamin
6:40
theory is wrong and they replace it with something new?
6:43
You're still going to eat your dinner because the reality of
6:46
nourishment doesn't depend on the theory that explains it.
6:48
So the atonement is the meal. The atonement is the meal.
6:52
It's the real event that puts you right with God.
6:55
The theological theories are the vitamin science.
6:58
They can be helpful, but you don't need to be a nutritionist
7:01
to be fed. He mentions his own church.
7:04
The Church of England doesn't even require you to believe one
7:07
specific theory. It's the event that's infinitely
7:10
more significant. And he double s down with
7:12
another, more abstract analogy, the one about the formula and
7:15
the mental picture which he gets from the scientists of his day.
7:19
Right, like trying to explain an atom.
7:21
Yeah, a scientist might show you that little picture of it.
7:24
You know the solar system model with electrons orbiting a
7:26
nucleus, But they'll immediately tell you no, don't think that's
7:30
what an atom actually looks like.
7:31
The picture is just a helpful crutch for our imagination.
7:34
The reality is the mathematical formula, the complex equations
7:38
that describe its behavior, that's what the scientist
7:40
actually believes. The picture is just an aid.
7:43
If it doesn't help you, you're told to drop it.
7:45
And he applies that directly to the death of Christ.
7:48
He says it's this point in history where something
7:51
absolutely unimaginable from the outside breaks through into our
7:54
world. Think about that.
7:55
We can't even properly picture an atom, which is a thing inside
7:59
our universe. How on earth could we expect to
8:02
have a perfect mental picture of an event where the eternal,
8:06
uncreated God intersects with time and space?
8:10
It's possible it's beyond us. And this is the paradox, he
8:13
points out, if we could fully understand it, if it fit neatly
8:16
into our little mental boxes. Then that would be proof that it
8:19
wasn't what it claimed to be. Exactly.
8:21
If it were totally comprehensible, it wouldn't be
8:24
this incredible transcendent thing from beyond nature
8:27
striking down into it like lightning.
8:29
It would just be another human level transaction.
8:31
So the formula, the thing we have to believe, is simple.
8:35
It is. Christ was killed for us.
8:37
His death washed out our sins, and by dying he disabled death
8:41
itself. That's the core claim.
8:43
Everything else is a picture, and you're free to use the
8:47
picture that helps you most, but never ever mistake it for the
8:50
real thing. You could accept the meal
8:52
without knowing the science. And he even suggests that you
8:55
probably can't know how it works until after you've accepted it.
8:57
It's an experience you enter into first and understanding
9:00
follows. OK, so he's established the
9:02
atonement as this central historical fact.
9:05
Now he has to go back and explain why it was necessary in
9:08
the 1st. Place Yes, he circles back to
9:10
that common theory of punishment and substitution, but he
9:13
completely reframes it by first defining man's actual problem.
9:16
Let's start with that objection again.
9:17
If God is forgiving, why not just forgive?
9:21
Why the need for a payment or a punishment at all?
9:24
It seems so arbitrary. It does if you're thinking of it
9:27
like a traffic court where a judge has the discretion to just
9:31
waive the fine, Lewis says. That's the wrong analogy.
9:34
We need a better picture. Me too, and he offers a couple
9:37
first. Think of it not as a criminal
9:39
fine, but as a financial debt. If someone is bankrupt
9:43
completely in the red, it makes perfect sense for a wealthy
9:46
friend to step in and pay the entire debt for them.
9:48
That's a substitution that we understand.
9:50
It's an act of grace. Or his other phrase, standing
9:53
the racket or footing the bill. Right.
9:55
We all know this from real life. When someone gets into a
9:58
terrible mess, a deep hole, the work and the cost and the
10:02
trouble of getting them out usually falls on a kind friend
10:04
or family member. The cost is real and someone has
10:08
to bear it. So to understand the cost Christ
10:10
paid, we have to understand the hole that mankind is in.
10:14
And Lewis is very clear, this is not just about us being
10:17
imperfect creatures who need a bit of improvement.
10:19
No, his diagnosis is much more severe, and it's very much in
10:23
line with a reformed view. The problem isn't bad behavior,
10:27
the problem is rebellion. We've tried to set up on our
10:30
own. To behave as if he belonged to
10:31
himself. That's the line.
10:34
We are created beings who have declared independence from our
10:37
Creator. It's an act of cosmic treason.
10:40
And if the problem is rebellion, the only way back is an
10:43
improvement. It's.
10:44
Surrender. Laying down your arms.
10:46
That's the only way you have to admit you've been on the
10:48
completely wrong track. Say you're sorry and get ready
10:51
to start over from scratch. This whole process is what we
10:54
call repentance, and Lewis is brutally honest about how hard
10:57
it. Is he says it's no fun at all.
10:59
It's not just about saying sorry and feeling a bit bad for a
11:02
while. It's way more than being humble
11:04
pie. It's a fundamental rewiring of
11:07
your entire being. It means unlearning all the self
11:10
conceit and the self will that we've been practicing our whole
11:13
lives, that our species has been practicing for thousands of
11:16
years. It means, in his words, killing
11:19
part of yourself. A kind of death.
11:22
And this description, this reality of what repentance truly
11:25
is, sets up what you call the devastating logical dilemma.
11:29
The Catch 22 of the human condition.
11:30
It's a perfect, inescapable trap.
11:32
The dilemma is this, only a bad person needs to repent.
11:36
But only a good person could possibly do it perfectly.
11:40
Wow. Say that again.
11:41
Think it through. The worse you are, the more
11:44
steeped you are in self will and pride, the more desperately you
11:47
need to repent. But that very self will and
11:50
pride is what makes a perfect selfless surrender impossible
11:54
for you. So the more you need it, the
11:55
less you're able to do it. Exactly the only one who could
11:58
perform that act of perfect surrender, A submission with
12:02
absolutely no ulterior motives, no shred of pride left, would
12:07
have to be a perfect person. Someone who had no self conceit
12:10
to begin with. Right.
12:12
And of course, a perfect person wouldn't need to repent in the
12:14
first place. So we are completely stuck
12:17
logically trapped human inability right there.
12:20
In a nutshell, our best attempts at repentance are always going
12:23
to be flawed, stained by the very sin we're trying to repent
12:27
of. And Lewis is quick to point out
12:29
that this isn't some arbitrary rule God made-up that he could
12:31
just get rid of. Repentance isn't a hoopie He
12:34
makes us jump through. He says it's simply a
12:37
description of what going back to him is like.
12:39
It is the act of returning. To ask God to take you back
12:43
without repentance is to ask Him to welcome you back while you're
12:46
still walking away. It's a contradiction in terms.
12:49
It just cannot happen. So the cost, this death of the
12:53
self has to be paid, and we've just established that we are
12:57
fundamentally incapable of paying it perfectly.
13:00
Which brings us to the only possible solution.
13:02
Right, We're in this trap. So what do we do?
13:04
We look for help. Can we do this impossible thing
13:07
if God helps us? And Lewis says yes.
13:10
But the kind of help we need is very, very specific.
13:13
He starts by explaining how God's help normally works.
13:15
Yeah, he says. When God helps us do something,
13:18
he puts a bit of himself into us.
13:20
When we think a rational thought, we're borrowing a tiny
13:23
drop from God's ocean of reason. When we love someone, we're
13:26
being lent a little of God's own love.
13:28
He uses that beautiful image of a parent teaching a child to
13:31
write. You're holding the child's hand,
13:34
guiding it as it forms the letters.
13:35
The child is forming the letters only because you, the teacher,
13:39
are forming them through the child's hand.
13:41
That's how grace ordinarily works.
13:43
We do things because God is doing them in US and with us.
13:46
And if we had never fallen, if we weren't rebels, this would
13:49
be, as he says, plain sailing. God would just help us get
13:52
better and better at being wise and loving and creative.
13:56
But fallen man doesn't just need help being good.
13:59
We need help doing something completely different.
14:02
We need help to surrender, to suffer, to submit, to die to
14:07
ourselves. And this is where Lewis finds
14:09
the critical gap. A gap in God's own nature, as it
14:12
were, he says. And this is a direct quote.
14:15
Nothing in God's nature corresponds to this process at
14:18
all. What does he mean by that?
14:20
Well, God by definition is perfect, sovereign, and
14:23
complete. He doesn't surrender.
14:24
There's nothing higher to surrender to.
14:25
He doesn't submit. He doesn't suffer, loss or die.
14:29
Those are experiences of creatures, of beings who are not
14:31
God. That makes sense.
14:32
It's tied to the classical understanding of God as being
14:34
impassable, that he doesn't suffer or change.
14:37
Exactly. So Lewis puts it very simply,
14:39
God can only share what he has. He has love so he can share
14:42
love. He has reason.
14:44
He can share reason. But this process of surrender,
14:47
of submission, of dying, he doesn't have that in his own
14:51
nature to share with us. So the one thing we desperately
14:54
need God's help with is the one thing He, as God, cannot
14:58
directly model for us or empower in us.
15:01
That is the absolute core of the problem.
15:03
We need a divine guide to lead us down a road that God Himself
15:07
and His divine nature has never walked.
15:10
The dilemma is complete. Perfect repentance is necessary,
15:13
but we can't do it. God's help is needed, but the
15:16
help required is for an act that is alien to God's nature.
15:20
And this is where the incarnation stops being just a
15:22
wonderful story and becomes the only logical key that fits the
15:25
lock, Lewis says. All right, suppose God became a
15:28
man. Suppose he takes on human
15:30
nature, a nature that can suffer and submit and die, and joins it
15:34
to his divine nature in one person.
15:36
Suddenly the problem is solved. You have a being the God Man who
15:39
is uniquely qualified to be the perfect penitent.
15:42
He could do it because he was man.
15:44
He had a human will to surrender, a human body to
15:46
suffer in. And he could do it perfectly
15:48
because he was God. The divine nature meant his
15:50
human act of submission was flawless, untainted by any
15:54
selfishness or pride. So our only hope hope of
15:57
succeeding in this act of dying to self is if God does it in us.
16:02
But God can only do that if he becomes one of us.
16:05
It comes right back to the child writing analogy.
16:07
Our successful attempts at repentance are just us sharing
16:10
in God's perfect repentance. Our dying is a drop out of His
16:13
dying. But we can't share in God's
16:15
dying unless God dies. And God can't die except by
16:19
becoming a man. The logic is a steel trap.
16:23
The Incarnation is the absolute prerequisite for the Atonement.
16:27
So that's the sense in which he pays our debt.
16:29
It's not a simple, almost crude legal transaction in a heavenly
16:33
courtroom. No, it's a deep structural
16:36
cosmic necessity. He performed the one act
16:39
necessary for reconciliation that we were incapable of
16:42
performing, and he was the only one in existence who was capable
16:44
of doing it. It's.
16:45
Just an incredibly powerful and satisfying explanation.
16:48
Because it's rude in the very nature of God and man, not just
16:51
in, you know, a set of rules. It is, but Lewis knows that even
16:54
after all this, there's one last objection that always seems to
16:57
pop up. Ah.
16:58
Yes, the unfair advantage argument.
16:59
The one that says, well if Jesus was God then his suffering and
17:03
death don't really count as much because it must have been so
17:06
easy for him. People feel like his divinity
17:09
somehow invalidates the sacrifice.
17:12
Right. And Lewis just cut straight
17:14
through that. He says that objection comes
17:16
from a really deep misunderstanding of what was
17:18
going on. He says the person making that
17:20
complaint is actually understating the case.
17:23
What do you mean? They're right that the perfect
17:25
submission and suffering were easier for Jesus because he was
17:29
God. But Lewis says they weren't just
17:32
easier, they were possible only because he was God.
17:36
The very thing they see as a disqualifier was actually the
17:40
prerequisite. Exactly.
17:41
Think back to the teacher and the child learning to write.
17:44
The reason the teacher can help is because it's easy for them.
17:47
They already have the strength and skill.
17:49
Their advantage is what makes the help possible.
17:52
If you insisted on being taught to write by another toddler who
17:56
also couldn't write, you'd never learn.
17:58
You'd both just be scribbling. The superiority of the helper is
18:01
the whole point, and that leads him to his final, absolutely
18:04
brilliant analogy. The Drowning Man.
18:06
The drowning man, it's unforgettable, he says.
18:10
Imagine you're in a raging river, being swept away, about
18:13
to go under for the last time. You're.
18:15
Completely helpless. And a man on the riverbank, with
18:18
one foot planted firmly on solid ground, reaches out his hand to
18:23
save you. Lewis says the last thing you
18:25
should do is shout. No, it's not fair.
18:27
You have an advantage. You're keeping 1 foot on the
18:29
bank. That advantage, that's ability,
18:33
that connection to something solid outside of the chaos
18:36
that's destroying you, that is the only reason he can help you
18:40
at all. If he jumped in the river with
18:42
you without his footing on the bank, you'd both just drown.
18:45
His strength, His otherness, is the very source of the salvation
18:48
he's offering. The divine nature of Christ
18:51
wasn't a cheat code that made the sacrifice easier.
18:53
It was the solid ground that made the rescue of humanity
18:57
possible. And he ends with that piercing
18:59
question to what will you look for help if you will not look to
19:03
that which is stronger than yourself?
19:05
It just leaves you nowhere to go.
19:06
If you reject the help because the helper is stronger than you,
19:09
you've chosen to drown. And after building this entire
19:13
airtight case, Lewis does something remarkable.
19:17
He adds a final caution. He does with total humility.
19:20
He reminds you that everything he has just laid out, this whole
19:23
logical structure about the perfect penitent, is just his
19:26
way of looking at it. He calls it only one more
19:28
picture. He never lets go of that
19:30
distinction between the formula and the picture.
19:32
He's saying I've just built a very detailed picture for you, a
19:35
map, but don't mistake it for the territory itself.
19:38
And he says if this picture his explanation doesn't help you
19:42
then you should just drop it. Which is just a sign of his
19:45
confidence in the central reality.
19:47
He knows His explanation isn't the thing itself.
19:50
The reality of what Christ did is what matters, and it will
19:52
always be bigger than any human attempt to fully explain it.
19:55
So to recap this team dive, we started by locking in Christ's
19:59
identity, then saw that crucial separation Lewis makes between
20:02
the fact of the Atonement and the theories about it, and then
20:06
we followed his logic to see why the Incarnation was an absolute
20:09
necessity. We saw the human condition as a
20:11
catch 22. We have to perform a perfect
20:14
repentance that our very nature makes us incapable of.
20:18
It's a problem that only a God man, the perfect penitent, could
20:22
solve by performing that act of perfect surrender for us.
20:26
And this framework Lewis gives you is just so valuable.
20:28
It frees you from getting stuck defending one particular
20:31
theological model. You can focus on the core
20:33
formula. Christ died for our sins and
20:36
defeated death. He gives you an intellectual
20:38
scaffold to stand on. And that brings us to our final
20:41
thought. Lewis insisted that the death of
20:43
Christ is something that we can't fully get our heads
20:46
around. If we could, it would mean it
20:48
was smaller than it claims to be.
20:50
So we'll leave you with this question to think about in your
20:53
own life. How often do you accept a
20:54
reality without fully understanding the mechanics
20:57
behind it? Do you demand to understand the
20:59
physics of digestion before you eat a meal?
21:01
Or do you insist on grasping quantum mechanics before you
21:04
enjoy the warmth of the sun? Lewis reminds us that the
21:07
deepest truths often require our acceptance first, with our
21:10
understanding following along behind.
21:12
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive into CS Lewis.
21:16
We'll see you next time on Reformed Thinking.