Latest / The Matt Walsh Show / Everything You Need To Know About The Cornell 7 Allegations

Transcript

Everything You Need To Know About The Cornell 7 Allegations · The Matt Walsh Show

0:00
Speaker 1: Now that the prosecution of Lindsay Clancy is on hiatus,
0:03
Speaker 1: pending a retrial, assuming that there is one, hordes of
0:07
Speaker 1: slack-jawed leftist women who spend every waking hour on Instagram
0:11
Speaker 1: or TikTok have rushed headlong into their next psychotic obsession,
0:16
Speaker 1: just like zombies, you know, in the movies where the
0:19
Speaker 1: zombies move fast. This brain-dead biomass has transitioned, without missing
0:25
Speaker 1: a beat, from defending a woman who systematically murdered her
0:28
Speaker 1: three children to to launching a relentless, vicious smear campaign
0:32
Speaker 1: against seven young men who, while they were students at
0:35
Speaker 1: Cornell University, did not murder any children or anyone else
0:40
Speaker 1: for that matter. In fact, these seven young men have
0:43
Speaker 1: never been charged with any crime whatsoever. But in the
0:47
Speaker 1: eyes of the mob, these young men, unlike Lindsay Clancy,
0:50
Speaker 1: deserve to have their lives destroyed based on very dubious
0:54
Speaker 1: and unproven accusations that we'll get into in a moment. Now,
0:58
Speaker 1: once again, the Clancy Hoard wants to help a woman
1:01
Speaker 1: avoid all accountability for her actions. That's kind of the
1:04
Speaker 1: headline here. But before we run through the facts of
1:07
Speaker 1: the Cornell case and the psychology of the women who
1:10
Speaker 1: are rushing into the next Duke Lacrosse, UVA-style hoax with
1:15
Speaker 1: reckless abandon, I want to begin with a story that
1:19
Speaker 1: you may not be familiar with, you may not remember,
1:20
Speaker 1: or maybe never heard about. It involves a former Columbia
1:24
Speaker 1: University student named Emma Sulkowicz. So in 2012, she claimed
1:28
Speaker 1: that she was sexually assaulted by another student who was
1:31
Speaker 1: publicly named. The allegation triggered a wave of outrage on
1:34
Speaker 1: campus with students protesting the supposedly misogynistic culture in American universities.
1:43
Speaker 1: This is when we really started hearing terms like rape
1:45
Speaker 1: culture became came in vogue around this time. But after
1:51
Speaker 1: investigating the claim for seven months, Columbia found no wrongdoing.
1:55
Speaker 1: Part of the problem was that long after the alleged
1:58
Speaker 1: assault occurred, Emma texted the man who supposedly had assaulted her, writing, quote,
2:05
Speaker 1: I love you, Paul.
2:06
Speaker 2: Where are you?
2:08
Speaker 1: So this was not a compelling allegation, and the school
2:11
Speaker 1: appropriately dismissed it. You'll find this is a common theme,
2:15
Speaker 1: by the way, with many of these kinds of rape accusations.
2:17
Speaker 1: The supposed victim carries on a friendly and even sometimes
2:21
Speaker 1: romantic relationship with the man who supposedly abused her. And
2:25
Speaker 1: we're not supposed to view that as evidence that the
2:28
Speaker 1: claim is false. But no one can really ever explain
2:30
Speaker 1: why we shouldn't view it as evidence that the claim
2:32
Speaker 1: is false. Clearly, it is evidence in that direction. So
2:36
Speaker 1: in the case of Emma Salkowitz, student activists wouldn't let.
2:40
Speaker 2: The claim go.
2:41
Speaker 1: The accuser began carrying a mattress everywhere she went during
2:44
Speaker 1: the academic year as a kind of protest. And her
2:48
Speaker 1: supporters often joined her. Really, this was obviously just an
2:53
Speaker 1: elaborate ploy to get attention, and it worked. They said
2:56
Speaker 1: they wouldn't stop until the alleged attacker was expelled from campus.
2:59
Speaker 2: Columbia even gave Emma school.
3:01
Speaker 1: Credit for doing this by characterizing her behavior as performance art.
3:07
Speaker 1: This was coordinated harassment that was endorsed by Columbia University,
3:10
Speaker 1: and eventually the man that she was accusing, Paul, sued
3:14
Speaker 1: the university over it.
3:15
Speaker 2: The case later settled.
3:18
Speaker 1: So to reiterate, at no point was there any evidence
3:21
Speaker 1: that Paul was guilty of this allegedly this alleged crime
3:26
Speaker 1: or any other crime. In fact, there was clear evidence
3:29
Speaker 1: that Paul was innocent, but the mob didn't care. Their goal,
3:33
Speaker 1: which is the goal of feminists everywhere, is to reject
3:36
Speaker 1: the idea that women can be accountable for anything they do.
3:40
Speaker 1: If a woman makes a mistake and does something she regrets,
3:43
Speaker 1: these people believe that she should be able to destroy
3:46
Speaker 1: a man's life to save face. They believe essentially that
3:48
Speaker 1: a woman has a grace period of several years or
3:52
Speaker 1: several decades to decide whether any given sexual encounter was
3:57
Speaker 1: actually rape.
3:59
Speaker 2: That's actually what they believed.
4:01
Speaker 1: After the mattress performance art died down, a journalist walked
4:04
Speaker 1: around the campus of Columbia University to get a sense
4:07
Speaker 1: for what students thought about the whole episode. Now, the
4:10
Speaker 1: appropriate response, of course, would be to condemn this woman
4:13
Speaker 1: for lying and to advocate for the return of due
4:16
Speaker 1: process to American universities and culture, American culture generally. But
4:22
Speaker 1: that's not what we heard.
4:24
Speaker 2: Instead, Here's what the students said.
4:29
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I just think it's really ridiculous at
4:31
Speaker 1: the school to just decide to push it to the
4:33
Speaker 1: side and not really take her story for granted.
4:36
Speaker 3: It just seems like a really cool art project that
4:39
Speaker 3: she did carry the matches around for so long and...
4:42
Speaker 3: I think that's great, I love performance art. And also
4:45
Speaker 3: that she, I heard that she worked together with people
4:47
Speaker 3: at graduation to clear that she couldn't carry the mattress
4:50
Speaker 3: on stage or that that was like really great and
4:53
Speaker 3: just like that partnership.
4:55
Speaker 2: I think it was bold. I think it was a
4:57
Speaker 2: challenge to the administration.
5:00
Speaker 4: I think that Regardless of whether the allegation is true
5:03
Speaker 4: or not, and I can't comment because I don't, I
5:05
Speaker 4: really know the facts of the case, I would say that.
5:08
Speaker 2: Serious reform with regard to how the way rapes.
5:10
Speaker 4: Are handled is needed on college campuses across the country,
5:12
Speaker 4: not just at Columbia.
5:14
Speaker 2: It's a very, very, very difficult situation for that person
5:17
Speaker 2: as well, because.
5:18
Speaker 5: As you can imagine, his life is.
5:22
Speaker 2: Pretty much ruined.
5:23
Speaker 6: I remember that at one point, students were, other students
5:27
Speaker 6: were carrying around mattresses, and In addition to Emma, clearly
5:32
Speaker 6: many students are angry with the administration for not handling
5:36
Speaker 6: it very well. And the fact that Emma had to
5:38
Speaker 6: carry the mattress the whole year instead of, you know,
5:43
Speaker 6: like shows, you know, that the university did not take action.
5:48
Speaker 1: So this is the cowardice and ignorance that gives false
5:52
Speaker 1: allegations so much power. This woman sent a message saying,
5:55
Speaker 1: I love you after this alleged attack, but In the
6:00
Speaker 1: eyes of the average university student, somehow she's still a victim.
6:04
Speaker 2: She can't possibly be lying.
6:07
Speaker 1: The one guy with the glasses who admitted that he
6:09
Speaker 1: didn't know anything about the facts of the case still
6:11
Speaker 1: concluded that serious reform is needed. Of course, by serious reform,
6:16
Speaker 1: he didn't mean that women who make false allegations should
6:19
Speaker 1: be expelled, arrested and bankrupted. He didn't mean that if
6:24
Speaker 1: you make a false allegation and it's proven that the
6:27
Speaker 1: allegation was false and you lied, that you should get
6:30
Speaker 1: the same prison sentence that the man would have gotten
6:34
Speaker 1: had he been convicted of the crime. He wasn't talking
6:37
Speaker 1: about that kind of reform. That's reform we do need,
6:39
Speaker 1: but he didn't mean that. Instead, he was saying that
6:42
Speaker 1: when a woman makes an allegation, whether it's true or not,
6:47
Speaker 1: we should just reflexively believe it. We should just do
6:50
Speaker 1: whatever she wants.
6:52
Speaker 2: Truth is relative, after all. It's her truth. That's what
6:56
Speaker 2: they think.
6:57
Speaker 1: We've seen this attitude at play in many other cases,
6:59
Speaker 1: perhaps most notably in the Duke lacrosse saga of 2006
7:03
Speaker 1: when the DA insisted that three white lacrosse players who
7:07
Speaker 1: were publicly named again had sexually assaulted a black stripper.
7:11
Speaker 2: The DA lied.
7:12
Speaker 1: About the evidence in the case, which was nonexistent, and
7:14
Speaker 1: eventually the DA was disbarred and went to prison. And
7:17
Speaker 1: the black woman admitted that she made everything up. This
7:20
Speaker 1: was a media firestorm. These white students had their lives
7:24
Speaker 1: destroyed and the accuser suffered no legal consequences for it
7:27
Speaker 1: at all. Now, she did murder her boyfriend, so she
7:29
Speaker 1: had to serve some prison time for that. But as
7:31
Speaker 1: for the false accusation, she was never punished for it.
7:35
Speaker 1: In the intervening years, there was the defamatory and now
7:37
Speaker 1: retracted Rolling Stone article about an alleged gang sexual assault
7:42
Speaker 1: on UVA's campus. Again, this triggered mass outrage from campus
7:46
Speaker 1: activists when the story broke back in 2014. What happened
7:50
Speaker 1: is that a female UVA student had a crush on
7:52
Speaker 1: a male student named Ryan. So to win his affection,
7:55
Speaker 1: she created a male alter ego named Haven Monaghan. And
8:00
Speaker 1: using the name Haven Monaghan, she pretended to be someone
8:02
Speaker 1: who was involved with Jackie as a way of making
8:05
Speaker 1: Ryan jealous. And when that didn't work, the female student
8:10
Speaker 1: concocted even more bizarre situations using this alias, making it
8:13
Speaker 1: seem like she was in danger and that Ryan needed
8:15
Speaker 1: to rescue her. These lies culminated in the fake UVA
8:18
Speaker 1: gang assault story. which Rolling Stone published. Now, they didn't
8:22
Speaker 1: even bother to investigate and figure out that Haven Monaghan
8:25
Speaker 1: wasn't a real person. He was one of their main
8:28
Speaker 1: sources and he didn't even exist. And in the end,
8:30
Speaker 1: Rolling Stone had to pay a lot of money for
8:31
Speaker 1: publishing that article. But to this day, we don't know
8:33
Speaker 1: the identity of the female accuser who made the whole
8:35
Speaker 1: thing up. Even after she was exposed as a fraudster
8:39
Speaker 1: who defamed several students and administrators at UVA, her identity
8:43
Speaker 1: was still concealed by the legal system and by every
8:45
Speaker 1: media outlet. The judge even ruled that the female student's
8:48
Speaker 1: mental health needed to be protected during a deposition. And
8:52
Speaker 1: news outlets, including Rolling Stone, maintain that even when the
8:55
Speaker 1: accuser is a liar, her identity needs to be confidential.
8:58
Speaker 1: So if you're a man and you're accused of something
9:01
Speaker 1: horrific like this, you don't get to confront your accuser.
9:05
Speaker 1: You don't get the benefit of anonymity. You don't get
9:08
Speaker 1: to investigate her background or even know who she is. Meanwhile,
9:12
Speaker 1: every detail of your life, your job, your home address, everything,
9:17
Speaker 1: will be exposed online and you'll be hounded for the
9:19
Speaker 1: rest of your life. Because there were never any grave
9:22
Speaker 1: consequences for this woman at UVA, because she wasn't punished
9:25
Speaker 1: in a public and humiliating fashion or in any fashion
9:27
Speaker 1: at all, many more women have decided to anonymously destroy
9:31
Speaker 1: the lives of innocent men. In some cases, the motivation
9:34
Speaker 1: is to win the affections of someone they're attracted to.
9:36
Speaker 1: In other cases, the motivation is to excuse some degenerate,
9:39
Speaker 1: embarrassing behavior that they voluntarily engaged in. In other cases,
9:43
Speaker 1: it's to save face or to settle a score or
9:45
Speaker 1: to get revenge or just a sadistic joy out of
9:49
Speaker 1: watching other people suffer. Sometimes all of these motivations apply,
9:52
Speaker 1: but simply put, there's a gigantic incentive for immoral, manipulative,
9:57
Speaker 1: sadistic women to fabricate allegations because they have nothing to lose.
10:04
Speaker 1: If everything goes according to their plan, they'll gain a
10:06
Speaker 1: lot of sympathy and social capital, potentially a very large
10:10
Speaker 1: payout in a lawsuit. And if they're exposed as liars,
10:13
Speaker 1: then every media outlet will protect their anonymity. So it's
10:16
Speaker 1: basically a no-risk strategy. The only thing you stand to
10:20
Speaker 1: lose is your soul. But if you don't have a
10:23
Speaker 1: soul to begin with, or if you don't care about
10:24
Speaker 1: your soul, then there's no reason not to go for it.
10:29
Speaker 1: And that appears to be exactly what's apparently happening right
10:32
Speaker 1: now at Cornell University. Once again, there's a moral panic
10:36
Speaker 1: on campus about a very dubious, if not totally ridiculous,
10:40
Speaker 1: account of sexual assault. And to give you an idea
10:43
Speaker 1: of how students are responding to the allegation, the editorial
10:46
Speaker 1: board of the Cornell Student Newspaper just published the names
10:50
Speaker 1: of all of the male students who are allegedly involved
10:53
Speaker 1: in this alleged assault, along with an explicit threat. They wrote, quote,
10:57
Speaker 1: We know who you are, and we refuse to let
10:59
Speaker 1: you benefit from this university's concealment. So basically, these student
11:04
Speaker 1: activists have determined that the other students are guilty. And
11:08
Speaker 1: for what it's worth, here's how the New York Times
11:10
Speaker 1: reports on the decision of these student journalists, both women,
11:14
Speaker 1: of course, to publicly shame their former classmates. It's, quote,
11:17
Speaker 1: Over cake, she turned to her fellow editors and asked,
11:20
Speaker 1: can we just put the names on the front page
11:22
Speaker 1: of the paper? We called up our lawyer and we
11:24
Speaker 1: were like, can we do this? And she recalled, he
11:27
Speaker 1: was like, I mean, it's kind of a risk. And
11:28
Speaker 1: we were like, okay, I guess that's how we're going
11:30
Speaker 1: to start the editorial. Our main obligation is accountability. Whether
11:35
Speaker 1: that looks like something that many people do not want
11:37
Speaker 1: to hear or something that many people do want to hear,
11:40
Speaker 1: it's our obligation to report on it.
11:44
Speaker 2: Accountability.
11:45
Speaker 1: Actually, as a journalist, your obligation is the truth. It's
11:49
Speaker 1: not to hold someone who you feel is a bad
11:53
Speaker 1: person accountable as a journalist.
11:55
Speaker 2: It's the truth. It's to get to the truth of
11:58
Speaker 2: what actually happened.
12:01
Speaker 1: And speaking of accountability, accountability would mean that these women,
12:06
Speaker 1: student journalists or not, are sued into oblivion. They publish
12:10
Speaker 1: an editorial threatening people who have not been charged with
12:13
Speaker 1: a crime, much less convicted of one, implying that they're
12:18
Speaker 1: guilty of a heinous gang rape, despite there being no
12:21
Speaker 1: evidence of that at all. And several other media outlets
12:25
Speaker 1: have done the same thing. So here's the substance of
12:28
Speaker 1: the allegations to the extent that there is any substance.
12:30
Speaker 1: An alleged assault took place at a frat house in 2024.
12:35
Speaker 1: And now two years later, the anonymous accuser has filed
12:38
Speaker 1: a lawsuit.
12:39
Speaker 6: Watch.
12:40
Speaker 4: Watch.
12:42
Speaker 7: A prosecutor in New York has reopened a criminal investigation
12:46
Speaker 7: into claims of a fraternity gang rape at Cornell University.
12:49
Speaker 7: A former student says she was drugged and sexually assaulted
12:53
Speaker 7: in 2024 and is suing the Ivy League school, saying
12:56
Speaker 7: that it failed to protect her. CNN's Gloria Pasmino joins us. So, Gloria,
13:01
Speaker 7: this civil lawsuit is getting a lot of attention despite
13:04
Speaker 7: this investigation two years ago.
13:05
Speaker 2: Tell us more. That's right.
13:07
Speaker 8: Not only is it getting a lot of attention, but
13:09
Speaker 8: it's once again putting a spotlight on how universities and
13:13
Speaker 8: colleges address sexual assault allegations on their campuses. This case, Pamela,
13:19
Speaker 8: is disturbing. The details are graphic. And honestly, it is
13:24
Speaker 8: a complicated case.
13:25
Speaker 2: And I want to.
13:26
Speaker 8: Start right at the beginning, right? The alleged assault took
13:29
Speaker 8: place in October of 2024. According to the lawsuit, two
13:34
Speaker 8: of the seven members of Chi Phi fraternity were expelled
13:39
Speaker 8: and others received lesser punishment, including suspensions and written assignments
13:44
Speaker 8: after Cornell University conducted an investigation. The fraternity was also
13:49
Speaker 8: barred from campus. Now, the initial investigation back in 2024
13:55
Speaker 8: resulted in no charges and no arrests. Jane Doe, the
13:58
Speaker 8: accuser in this case, has since left the university, and
14:02
Speaker 8: now she has brought this civil lawsuit against the school,
14:06
Speaker 8: against the fraternity, her own sorority, seeking damages. The Tompkins
14:11
Speaker 8: County District Attorney is also saying that he is reopening
14:15
Speaker 8: the investigation. He plans to present new evidence in the case.
14:21
Speaker 1: So already some alarm bells, if you're a reasonable person,
14:25
Speaker 1: should be going off here. For one thing, just as a,
14:29
Speaker 1: you know, just at first blush, the story sounds absurd.
14:34
Speaker 1: You know, woman who's drugged and gang raped, allegedly, on
14:39
Speaker 1: a college campus. This is the kind of thing that
14:42
Speaker 1: happens in the world, the kind of thing that happens
14:45
Speaker 1: often in Pakistan, maybe. But it's extremely rare in the
14:50
Speaker 1: United States, especially among college students. And that's why in
14:53
Speaker 1: almost every case that you can think of, when you
14:56
Speaker 1: hear about an attack like this, especially in these high
14:59
Speaker 1: profile cases, it ends up being fictional. You'll recall, we
15:03
Speaker 1: already mentioned a few of the gang rape allegations ended
15:06
Speaker 1: up being false. You recall the ludicrous gang rape claims
15:10
Speaker 1: against Brett Kavanaugh, for example. He was another one who
15:13
Speaker 1: suffered these false allegations. Now, I was able to find
15:18
Speaker 1: one notable exception in the past 20 years, which was
15:20
Speaker 1: a gang sexual assault that took place at Vanderbilt in 2013,
15:24
Speaker 1: resulting in the conviction of four Vanderbilt football players. You
15:27
Speaker 1: probably haven't heard of this story, and I'll tell you why.
15:31
Speaker 1: One of the lead attackers, who was black, told the victim,
15:34
Speaker 1: who was white, that she deserved the attack because of
15:37
Speaker 1: the color of her skin, saying, quote, that's for 400
15:39
Speaker 1: years of slavery. So it was a racially motivated anti-white attack.
15:46
Speaker 2: That's why you haven't heard about it.
15:48
Speaker 1: Other than that, these kinds of cases are very rare.
15:52
Speaker 1: So when allegations like this surface, you should ask some
15:56
Speaker 1: obvious questions. Doesn't mean just because something's red doesn't mean
15:58
Speaker 1: it didn't happen.
15:59
Speaker 2: But automatically.
16:01
Speaker 1: Red flags go up, especially when it follows a pattern
16:04
Speaker 1: of other hoaxes on college campuses, very similar in.
16:07
Speaker 2: A lot of ways.
16:08
Speaker 1: If you're a reasonable person, you immediately think, oh, this
16:11
Speaker 1: fits a pattern.
16:13
Speaker 2: Is it part of that pattern?
16:17
Speaker 1: Well, all that means is that you should carefully scrutinize
16:19
Speaker 1: the evidence, especially since in the intro to that segment,
16:23
Speaker 1: we're only getting one side of the story. We're told
16:25
Speaker 1: that this woman was drugged. Very important how that was phrased.
16:30
Speaker 1: and didn't consent to anything. And if that was true,
16:34
Speaker 1: then obviously it'd be a very serious crime. But then
16:37
Speaker 1: in the same breath, we're told that no criminal charges
16:39
Speaker 1: were filed when this incident allegedly occurred, and this lawsuit
16:43
Speaker 1: wasn't filed for another two years.
16:45
Speaker 2: So why is that?
16:47
Speaker 1: I mean, are we supposed to believe that in, what, 2024,
16:49
Speaker 1: there's an old boys club in the DA's office in Ithaca,
16:53
Speaker 1: New York? Or is there potentially a serious problem with
16:58
Speaker 1: the evidence in the case? C-list celebrities certainly aren't waiting
17:02
Speaker 1: around to find out. According to Variety, someone named Jamila
17:05
Speaker 1: Jamil just stated, quote, I think the likes of the
17:08
Speaker 1: Cornell Seven shouldn't be allowed penises anymore. They use them
17:12
Speaker 1: as weapons, so now they have to be confiscated. I
17:14
Speaker 1: think jail time, legal castration, and removal of the shaft
17:18
Speaker 1: seems like the bare minimum. Then there's this from somebody
17:22
Speaker 1: named Josh Gad, quote, When we start setting a precedent
17:26
Speaker 1: that our girls and women can be brutally raped... And
17:29
Speaker 1: the resulting disciplinary action is to hand out checks notes, essays,
17:34
Speaker 1: like it's Bart Simpson being a little rascal about why
17:38
Speaker 1: it was wrong to brutally violate an innocent girl.
17:40
Speaker 2: We have lost our effing minds. Okay. Checks notes. Was
17:46
Speaker 2: that actually in the statement? I think it was. Whatever these.
17:54
Speaker 1: People are worth, which probably isn't much, they should be
17:58
Speaker 1: bankrupted by defamation lawsuits. And then once they're destroyed, something
18:04
Speaker 1: similar needs to happen to the Democrat leaders of the
18:06
Speaker 1: state of New York. And here's the governor of Kathy Hochul.
18:10
Speaker 1: This one is far more egregious than those dumb celebrities
18:13
Speaker 1: because this is the governor of the state.
18:16
Speaker 2: Again, here's what she says.
18:19
Speaker 1: Quote, the allegations in the Cornell University sexual assault case
18:22
Speaker 1: are nothing short of horrifying. For any student to come
18:25
Speaker 1: forward after an experience like this takes extraordinary courage. No
18:30
Speaker 1: student should ever be left wondering whether the institution meant
18:32
Speaker 1: to protect them will listen and act. I'm calling for
18:35
Speaker 1: outside counsel to conduct a transparent, independent review of the
18:39
Speaker 1: university's response to determine whether Cornell met every obligation to
18:43
Speaker 1: protect its students and pursue justice.
18:47
Speaker 2: Now, never mind the.
18:48
Speaker 1: Fact that it's wildly inappropriate for the governor of the
18:51
Speaker 1: state to weigh in on a case like this when
18:53
Speaker 1: no charges have been filed and None of the allegations
18:56
Speaker 1: have been proven at all. Merely by making these allegations
19:01
Speaker 1: in the eyes of the Democrat Party, the woman in
19:03
Speaker 1: this case has become untouchable.
19:04
Speaker 2: You know, she's not a degenerate anymore.
19:09
Speaker 1: Instead, by filing a lawsuit in which she's presumably seeking
19:12
Speaker 1: millions of dollars, she has extraordinary courage. Even if Hochul
19:17
Speaker 1: is using the word allegations, she's still essentially stating that
19:22
Speaker 1: the claims are factual. Because if it takes extraordinary courage
19:27
Speaker 1: to make the claim, then the claim must be factual.
19:32
Speaker 1: Unless Hochul believes that it also takes extraordinary courage to
19:35
Speaker 1: make false claims. I mean, if you care at all
19:39
Speaker 1: about the evidence, then shouldn't you hold off on calling
19:43
Speaker 1: it extraordinarily courageous until we know whether it's true? Doesn't
19:48
Speaker 1: the courage in saying whether or not it involves courage,
19:53
Speaker 1: doesn't that depend entirely on whether she's telling the truth
19:56
Speaker 1: or not? Well, no, we have the governor of New
20:00
Speaker 1: York implicitly declaring without a conviction or even any charges
20:04
Speaker 1: filed that the accused men are guilty. It's totally unconscionable.
20:10
Speaker 2: And predictable. You know, I tell my kids to finish
20:13
Speaker 2: what they start constantly, all the time. This is the message.
20:15
Speaker 1: It's basically my entire parenting philosophy, and I repeat it
20:18
Speaker 1: until they're sick of hearing it. So I should probably mention,
20:21
Speaker 1: if there's a degree you started and never finished, or
20:23
Speaker 1: one you always meant to start, Grand Canyon University gives
20:27
Speaker 1: you a flexible way to pursue it online without reorganizing
20:30
Speaker 1: your entire life around a campus schedule. GCU builds its
20:33
Speaker 1: program around the free market a Christian worldview, and actual
20:37
Speaker 1: open discourse into more than 325 online academic programs, in
20:42
Speaker 1: case you're wondering whether that includes yours. And they back
20:45
Speaker 1: it up with real scholarship and financial aid so a
20:47
Speaker 1: private education doesn't have to be out of reach. Whether
20:49
Speaker 1: you're returning to school or finally taking that first step,
20:53
Speaker 1: GCU can help you pursue your educational goals and your
20:56
Speaker 1: God-given purpose. They say higher education is outdated, irrelevant, but
21:00
Speaker 1: at Grand Canyon University, they don't settle for the status quo.
21:03
Speaker 2: They shatter it.
21:03
Speaker 1: GCU is accredited MBA program is 100% online and is
21:07
Speaker 1: designed to shape leaders through servant leadership. Finish what you start.
21:12
Speaker 1: Even the boring version of that advice is still true.
21:15
Speaker 1: GCU can help you take your passion and scale your
21:17
Speaker 1: business to serve your community.
21:19
Speaker 2: This is purpose-driven education. Take action. Find your purpose. Grand
21:23
Speaker 2: Canyon University. Visit gcu.edu.
21:27
Speaker 1: AOC, of course, is on board with all this. She's
21:31
Speaker 1: already convicted the Cornell students as well.
21:34
Speaker 2: Watch.
21:36
Speaker 9: I want to be clear that the culture of rape,
21:42
Speaker 9: sexual assault and pedophilia is protected in elite institutions across
21:49
Speaker 9: the United States and including Cornell University in this instance.
21:53
Speaker 4: AOC told the crowd about being touched inappropriately within 10
21:57
Speaker 4: seconds of arriving at a party during her freshman year
21:59
Speaker 4: at Boston University. Less than a week later, she was
22:02
Speaker 4: disturbed by what she witnessed at another party at the
22:05
Speaker 4: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
22:07
Speaker 9: And I was horrified at what I saw. I was
22:12
Speaker 9: 17 years old. I had been, you know, really kept
22:16
Speaker 9: from a lot of things like that when I was
22:18
Speaker 9: in high school. And I walked in and I saw just,
22:25
Speaker 9: you know, incapacitated women, men taking advantage of them. People
22:32
Speaker 9: making decisions and it, I mean, it was just horrible.
22:37
Speaker 9: When I read about what happened at Cornell, those men
22:40
Speaker 9: posted in a group chat. That means it was normal
22:45
Speaker 9: to them.
22:46
Speaker 4: She then directed a message of support to the woman
22:48
Speaker 4: identified only as Jane Doe who filed the lawsuit.
22:52
Speaker 9: Jane Doe, if you are listening or a survivor of
22:55
Speaker 9: any gender, mind you, because so many men and young
22:58
Speaker 9: boys are subject to this as well. That if you
23:02
Speaker 9: have been subject to this, I want you to know
23:05
Speaker 9: that you are not defined by the things that have
23:08
Speaker 9: happened to you. You are bigger than that. You are
23:12
Speaker 9: stronger than them and they will never define you for
23:15
Speaker 9: your entire life. And that you can achieve anything that
23:19
Speaker 9: you want to achieve from one survivor to another.
23:25
Speaker 1: Okay, so she tells the harrowing tale of going to
23:27
Speaker 1: a party and there were incapacitated women being taken advantage
23:32
Speaker 1: of by men all over the place.
23:33
Speaker 2: She says.
23:35
Speaker 1: And we'll get back to this, but of course you
23:38
Speaker 1: hear this harrowing tale and you ask, well, were the
23:42
Speaker 1: men also incapacitated?
23:43
Speaker 2: What kind of party was it?
23:44
Speaker 1: Typically at a party of the sort you're describing, everyone
23:48
Speaker 1: is incapacitated.
23:49
Speaker 2: So all the men were sober and all the women
23:51
Speaker 2: were drunk. Is that what you're saying?
23:54
Speaker 1: And if they were all drunk, involved in this kind
23:58
Speaker 1: of activity, then who's taking advantage of who? Well, this
24:04
Speaker 1: gets at something you're really not supposed to say, by
24:06
Speaker 1: the way, but it's true. And we hear stories like this,
24:10
Speaker 1: like liberal women, especially in the public eye, love to
24:14
Speaker 1: claim that they're survivors. You know, you often hear this
24:17
Speaker 1: claim as a way of gaining sympathy and sort of
24:21
Speaker 1: claiming the moral high ground. And we get these claims
24:26
Speaker 1: often with no evidence. We're just supposed to sort of
24:27
Speaker 1: take their word for it. They just sort of say, well,
24:30
Speaker 1: I'm a survivor.
24:31
Speaker 2: This thing happened. Okay, we're not, no one's allowed to
24:33
Speaker 2: ask any other questions. There's no way you're lying. There's
24:37
Speaker 2: no way. You must be telling the truth.
24:41
Speaker 1: Well, the problem is that in certain circles, you have
24:43
Speaker 1: to make claims like this in order to establish your
24:45
Speaker 1: credibility and ward off any criticism.
24:47
Speaker 2: But in most cases, we have no evidence or any
24:50
Speaker 2: reason to.
24:50
Speaker 1: Believe that they survived anything. But they prefer to use
24:55
Speaker 1: this kind of dramatic language because it works. It shuts
24:57
Speaker 1: down debate. It gives them moral authority in their minds
25:01
Speaker 1: to say whatever they want. We should reject that premise
25:06
Speaker 1: every single time we have the opportunity to do so.
25:08
Speaker 1: Your unverified sob story does not grant you any additional
25:11
Speaker 1: credibility or authority in this conversation or any other.
25:17
Speaker 2: All that matters are the facts on the ground. The
25:20
Speaker 2: actual evidence. That's all that matters.
25:23
Speaker 1: And that's the message we should be hearing from our
25:25
Speaker 1: political leaders if they even remotely respected the rule of
25:29
Speaker 1: law and the concept of due process, but they don't.
25:34
Speaker 1: The mayor of Ithaca, to give another example, has just
25:36
Speaker 1: told everyone that he's horrified by the, quote, heinous and
25:39
Speaker 1: sickening allegations. He says he's appalled by Cornell for failing
25:43
Speaker 1: to hold the perpetrators to account. So he's already decided
25:47
Speaker 1: that they're perpetrators. They're perpetrators, not even alleged perpetrators.
25:51
Speaker 2: They're the perpetrators.
25:52
Speaker 1: OK, so it happened, is what you're saying. No evidence
25:55
Speaker 1: of that, but that's what he's saying. And he's furious
25:57
Speaker 1: that the police didn't coordinate, quote unquote, an effective response.
26:00
Speaker 1: So basically, like every other Democrat, he's already convinced that
26:03
Speaker 1: the students are guilty. He's already convicted them very clearly
26:06
Speaker 1: in his statement. Once again, he calls them allegations, but
26:10
Speaker 1: then in the very next breath calls them perpetrators who
26:12
Speaker 1: must be held to account. Not to mention, what makes
26:15
Speaker 1: the allegations heinous and sickening exactly? If the claims are true,
26:21
Speaker 1: then yes, the alleged crime would be heinous and sickening.
26:25
Speaker 1: But if the claims are not true, and there's very
26:28
Speaker 1: good reason to believe that they aren't true, as we'll discuss,
26:31
Speaker 1: then in that case, what would be heinous and sickening
26:33
Speaker 1: is the allegation itself. It's heinous and sickening to claim
26:38
Speaker 1: that something heinous and sickening happened to you if it didn't.
26:43
Speaker 2: So then you, as the.
26:44
Speaker 1: Person making the claim, are the heinous and sickening person.
26:48
Speaker 1: So in that sense, sure, the allegations could be heinous
26:51
Speaker 1: and sickening, but that's not how the mayor meant it,
26:54
Speaker 1: we can be pretty sure. So let's get to the
26:57
Speaker 1: facts of the case as we currently know them, and
26:58
Speaker 1: we'll start with the rather significant problem that in 2024,
27:02
Speaker 1: according to the authorities, the accuser had a very different
27:04
Speaker 1: version of events.
27:06
Speaker 8: Watch. the tompkins county district attorney is also saying that
27:12
Speaker 8: he is reopening the investigation he plans to present new
27:15
Speaker 8: evidence in the case but this district attorney is now
27:18
Speaker 8: under a lot of pressure facing calls to reopen the
27:21
Speaker 8: case which he's doing now but also criticism about how
27:25
Speaker 8: he initially handled the investigation back in twenty four We
27:30
Speaker 8: should mention that he has said that the reason for
27:34
Speaker 8: why there was no charges back in 2024 is because
27:38
Speaker 8: Jane Doe did not allege at the time that she
27:41
Speaker 8: had been drugged or sexually assaulted. That's a key part.
27:45
Speaker 8: I want to read a statement from the district attorney,
27:48
Speaker 8: which says that Jane Doe's sworn statement in November 2024
27:53
Speaker 8: did not allege that she was drugged against her will
27:55
Speaker 8: or gang raped. On the contrary, Jane Doe's statement described
27:59
Speaker 8: her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious,
28:04
Speaker 8: and consensual.
28:09
Speaker 2: Okay.
28:10
Speaker 1: Well, so that should be it. I mean, that just
28:13
Speaker 1: should be it. End of story. Pretty big difference here.
28:16
Speaker 1: Two years ago, she was not making the same allegations
28:19
Speaker 1: at all when she spoke to the police and provided
28:21
Speaker 1: a written statement. She apparently said everything was consensual. That's
28:26
Speaker 1: what she said after it happened.
28:28
Speaker 2: End of story. Or at least it should be.
28:32
Speaker 1: According to the DA, she didn't allege in her final
28:34
Speaker 1: written statement that she was drugged or sexually assaulted in
28:38
Speaker 1: any way. And now two years later, she's talked to
28:41
Speaker 1: a lawyer who wants millions of dollars from the school
28:43
Speaker 1: and everything changes. This is reason enough to dismiss the
28:47
Speaker 1: allegations out of hand. Okay, if years after the fact,
28:51
Speaker 1: you've decided that an act you previously considered illegal consensual
28:55
Speaker 1: actually was not consensual, your claims should be disregarded as
29:00
Speaker 1: a matter of course, period. If you were actually raped,
29:04
Speaker 1: go to the police immediately and tell them. If you
29:07
Speaker 1: wait years to tell them, we already have significant reason
29:11
Speaker 1: to be skeptical. If you tell them it was consensual
29:14
Speaker 1: and then wait years to decide that actually it wasn't,
29:17
Speaker 1: our skepticism at that point verges very strongly towards definitive
29:21
Speaker 1: certainty that you're a liar. So let's pull up the
29:25
Speaker 1: full statement from the DA because this is truly extraordinary stuff. First,
29:29
Speaker 1: the woman says that she was texting with a male
29:31
Speaker 1: at the fraternity and arranged to meet him there. She
29:33
Speaker 1: was intoxicated at a level of 5 out of 10
29:35
Speaker 1: at this point. Intoxicated of her own accord, she chose
29:39
Speaker 1: to drink, and this was not something that was done
29:42
Speaker 1: to her against her will. And then when she arrived,
29:44
Speaker 1: the male who she was texting with invited her to
29:47
Speaker 1: join a threesome. Quote, Doe agreed due to how attracted
29:51
Speaker 1: she was to male number one on top of her
29:53
Speaker 1: drunken curiousness. When she learned that male number two would
29:56
Speaker 1: be the third participant, Jane Doe remembered being excited because
29:59
Speaker 1: she thought that male number one and male number two
30:01
Speaker 1: wanted to have a threesome. And that meant that they
30:04
Speaker 1: were gay. Well, she might well have been correct about that.
30:08
Speaker 1: But as far as proving that an assault occurred, this
30:11
Speaker 1: obviously doesn't help her case.
30:14
Speaker 2: Let's continue.
30:14
Speaker 1: Quote, the sexual conduct ended when Jane Doe noticed that
30:18
Speaker 1: male number one appeared really sleepy. She told male number
30:21
Speaker 1: two that they needed to stop having sex in order
30:23
Speaker 1: to make sure that male number one was okay. Male
30:25
Speaker 1: number two then stopped with Jane Doe. Male number one
30:28
Speaker 1: said he was going to take a nap and refresh
30:30
Speaker 1: himself and would eventually stumble his way from the couch
30:33
Speaker 1: to the bed. While male number one slept, male number
30:36
Speaker 1: two began to dry heave as if he was going
30:39
Speaker 1: to vomit. Jane Doe began to take care of male
30:41
Speaker 1: number two by patting his back while also waking male
30:44
Speaker 1: number one every few minutes to make sure he was okay. Now,
30:46
Speaker 1: at this point, If we use the logic of the
30:49
Speaker 1: Instagram horde for a second, it sounds a lot like
30:53
Speaker 1: maybe these men are actually the victims. After all, if
30:56
Speaker 1: you can't possibly consent to sexual activity when you're intoxicated,
31:01
Speaker 1: then these men were being taken advantage of.
31:04
Speaker 2: So where's their Me Too moment? Why aren't they filing
31:07
Speaker 2: a lawsuit?
31:08
Speaker 1: You know, this has always been the glaring inconsistency in
31:10
Speaker 1: the claim popular on the left that drunk sex is
31:14
Speaker 1: inherently rape. We kind of heard that from AOC, a
31:18
Speaker 1: version of this claim. Any woman who engages in sexual
31:22
Speaker 1: activity while drunk was by definition raped because she could
31:26
Speaker 1: not have consented.
31:27
Speaker 2: That's the idea. Now, the problem with this idea, aside
31:31
Speaker 2: from the.
31:31
Speaker 1: Fact that actually drunk people do make choices and are
31:34
Speaker 1: responsible for those choices, that's the whole reason why you
31:37
Speaker 1: go to prison if you get drunk and hit somebody
31:40
Speaker 1: with your car. In fact, if you kill someone with
31:43
Speaker 1: your car... you'll go to prison longer if you were drunk.
31:48
Speaker 1: But aside from that, in almost any case where a
31:50
Speaker 1: drunk woman is having sex on a college campus or
31:52
Speaker 1: anywhere else, the man is very often also drunk. So
31:56
Speaker 1: by this logic, he has a rape claim just as
31:58
Speaker 1: valid as hers. And yet nobody would take him seriously
32:02
Speaker 1: if he went public with a claim of that sort.
32:06
Speaker 1: And men basically never do. Meanwhile, back in reality under
32:10
Speaker 1: New York law and under the law of common sense,
32:12
Speaker 1: being intoxicated does not mean that you cannot consent as
32:16
Speaker 1: long as you got yourself intoxicated, meaning you weren't drugged
32:19
Speaker 1: against your will, you chose to put yourself in this state,
32:22
Speaker 1: and you remain conscious and able to verbalize your thoughts,
32:25
Speaker 1: then you remain fully responsible for what happens.
32:28
Speaker 2: That's the standard, and it should be.
32:32
Speaker 1: And according to this woman's statement, every single time she
32:35
Speaker 1: verbalized that she didn't want to engage in sexual activity,
32:37
Speaker 1: her request was respected.
32:38
Speaker 2: She actually pushed several people away.
32:40
Speaker 1: It's also clear from her statements that she voluntarily drank
32:43
Speaker 1: alcohol and took ketamine, At no point was she drugged,
32:48
Speaker 1: at least not by anyone else. She drugged herself, just
32:52
Speaker 1: like a lot of these guys apparently drugged themselves. At most,
32:56
Speaker 1: what's clear from her statement is that this orgy was
32:59
Speaker 1: bizarre and gross and disgusting. And eventually the other members
33:04
Speaker 1: of the fraternity put an end to it. Quote, mail
33:07
Speaker 1: number four asked Jane Doe if they could all do
33:09
Speaker 1: drugs off her perfect body, quote unquote. Jane Doe responded, sure.
33:15
Speaker 1: while the men were doing drugs off of her body,
33:17
Speaker 1: male number three and another, entered the room and said
33:20
Speaker 1: something like, okay, we're shutting down whatever.
33:22
Speaker 2: The F this is.
33:25
Speaker 1: So based on this statement, the DA decided not to
33:27
Speaker 1: bring charges. And that's because even if you pretend that
33:30
Speaker 1: everything she said was true, it still would not constitute
33:32
Speaker 1: a crime under New York law.
33:35
Speaker 2: That's obviously the correct decision.
33:38
Speaker 1: Everything that was happening that we just described is immoral
33:40
Speaker 1: and gross. And you shouldn't be doing any of that
33:44
Speaker 1: if you're a man or a woman. But everybody involved,
33:48
Speaker 1: if it's morally repugnant behavior, everyone involved, including the woman,
33:54
Speaker 1: is guilty of engaging in that morally repugnant behavior. But now,
33:59
Speaker 1: two years later, this woman has found a lawyer and
34:01
Speaker 1: completely changed her story. Instead of shutting her down, the
34:04
Speaker 1: DA is caving to the mob. Here's part of the
34:06
Speaker 1: statement from the DA. Quote, Multiple prosecutors and criminal investigators
34:10
Speaker 1: reviewed Jane Doe's statement and correctly determined that the alleged
34:13
Speaker 1: facts as set forth in the statement do not constitute
34:15
Speaker 1: a crime.
34:15
Speaker 2: To be clear, the.
34:16
Speaker 1: Credibility of the woman who described the facts in detail
34:19
Speaker 1: was never in question. I recognize the reality that it
34:21
Speaker 1: could take years of therapy and healing for victims of
34:23
Speaker 1: sexual assault to fully process and understand what happened to them.
34:29
Speaker 2: Well, this is complete and utter BS. There's no other
34:31
Speaker 2: way to describe it.
34:33
Speaker 1: Yes, the credibility of the woman is in question. She's
34:35
Speaker 1: contradicted herself. If contradicting yourself does not undermine your credibility,
34:39
Speaker 1: then nothing does. This woman described very specific details contemporaneously
34:45
Speaker 1: when she spoke to the prosecutors to report what happened.
34:47
Speaker 1: She clearly was not incapacitated. Otherwise, she wouldn't have remembered anything.
34:51
Speaker 1: She told investigators everything that occurred. And after reviewing her statements,
34:54
Speaker 1: they could not identify a crime. She obviously felt like
34:57
Speaker 1: something strange had happened.
34:59
Speaker 2: And it did.
35:00
Speaker 1: The whole thing, again, was disgusting. She participated in a
35:03
Speaker 1: drug-fueled orgy.
35:05
Speaker 2: If she felt ashamed of that and gross about it,
35:08
Speaker 2: she should have. It is shameful. It is gross, but
35:10
Speaker 2: it's not a crime.
35:12
Speaker 1: And by all available evidence, she was an active and
35:15
Speaker 1: enthusiastic participant in this gross thing that happened. Now, two
35:21
Speaker 1: years later, after therapy and consultations with her lawyer, she
35:27
Speaker 1: has a different version of events.
35:28
Speaker 2: By definition, this means she's not credible.
35:31
Speaker 1: The idea that so-called survivors need to take two years
35:34
Speaker 1: to figure out what happened to them on its face
35:36
Speaker 1: is insulting and idiotic. What's happening here is that the
35:40
Speaker 1: prosecutor is conflating the idea of delayed disclosure with delayed memory.
35:45
Speaker 1: It's very possible that somebody after suffering abuse, particularly if
35:49
Speaker 1: they suffered abuse when they were a child, let's say,
35:51
Speaker 1: might not want to talk about it for a while,
35:53
Speaker 1: might be afraid to talk about it, might be ashamed,
35:56
Speaker 1: might have all kinds of anxieties about it. But there's
36:00
Speaker 1: no support for the idea that victims of abuse are
36:04
Speaker 1: going to lie to the police at great length about
36:07
Speaker 1: what happened to them, only to change their story two
36:10
Speaker 1: years later because they remember it better suddenly, years after
36:14
Speaker 1: the fact.
36:16
Speaker 2: That's just pseudoscience. It doesn't make any sense.
36:21
Speaker 1: By the way, your memory of events gets less clear
36:25
Speaker 1: as time goes on, not more clear. If you feel
36:30
Speaker 1: like you're remembering something.
36:31
Speaker 2: Better, like if it's two.
36:33
Speaker 1: Years later and you feel like you remember an event
36:35
Speaker 1: better than you did after it happened, that is.
36:38
Speaker 2: Not your memory.
36:40
Speaker 1: That is your mind constructing a vivid story about what happened,
36:45
Speaker 1: which may or may not bear any resemblance to the
36:48
Speaker 1: thing that actually happened.
36:50
Speaker 2: Memories fade over time. They don't suddenly get better over time.
36:56
Speaker 1: But with this attitude, it gives a license to psychopaths
36:59
Speaker 1: to lie about what actually happened to them. And speaking
37:03
Speaker 1: of psychopaths, it also gives a license to therapists to
37:05
Speaker 1: plant these ideas in the minds of their female clients.
37:10
Speaker 2: See, this is how it often works.
37:12
Speaker 1: A woman does something disgusting, like participating willfully in a
37:16
Speaker 1: drug-fueled orgy, as was apparently the case at Cornell, and
37:20
Speaker 1: feels guilty about it. And since her real problem is guilt,
37:24
Speaker 1: not trauma, The real solution is to repent of her sins.
37:30
Speaker 1: She should be going to church, not a therapist's office.
37:34
Speaker 1: But in the modern world, therapists are the new spiritual advisors,
37:37
Speaker 1: the new clergy, the high priests of the left-wing therapeutic religion.
37:43
Speaker 1: And so that's where women like this one take their sins.
37:46
Speaker 1: This is where they go to find absolution. But in therapy,
37:48
Speaker 1: in the age of affirmation, no one can be guilty
37:52
Speaker 1: of any sins. A woman especially can't be guilty of sins.
37:55
Speaker 1: The only person who can really be guilty of anything
37:57
Speaker 1: is a white man. So the therapist helps her to
38:02
Speaker 1: see that her feelings of guilt are really trauma. You know,
38:06
Speaker 1: she actually isn't responsible for anything that happened.
38:09
Speaker 2: She's a victim. She was raped.
38:11
Speaker 1: Even if she didn't know she was raped. Even if
38:14
Speaker 1: she specifically remembered not being raped, she was raped. And
38:19
Speaker 1: the woman latches on to that new theory of the
38:21
Speaker 1: case for obvious reasons. Not only does it mean a
38:23
Speaker 1: potential payout, not only will it bring her attention and
38:27
Speaker 1: all the other things that shallow women and shallow men
38:29
Speaker 1: desire most of all, but it also frees her of guilt.
38:34
Speaker 1: It releases her from the burden of her own agency.
38:38
Speaker 1: And you will never really understand modern society or the
38:42
Speaker 1: rise of therapy culture or the popularity of socialism among
38:46
Speaker 1: young people or why big pharma is a trillion dollar industry,
38:51
Speaker 1: until you understand that the number one thing driving many
38:56
Speaker 1: people these days is a desire to be freed from
39:00
Speaker 1: the crushing weight of their own.
39:02
Speaker 2: Volition, their agency. They do not want to have free will.
39:09
Speaker 1: Freedom itself is not, it turns out, much to the
39:12
Speaker 1: chagrin of our founding fathers, an innate desire common among
39:16
Speaker 1: all people.
39:18
Speaker 2: It's not.
39:19
Speaker 1: Not everybody wants to be free. Some people want to
39:21
Speaker 1: be slaves. They want to be told they have no control.
39:24
Speaker 1: They have no capacity to make decisions. Nothing that they
39:28
Speaker 1: do is their fault. They can't be held accountable for anything.
39:34
Speaker 1: That's why they go to therapy. They sit down in
39:36
Speaker 1: the therapist's office and they say to the therapist, usually indirectly,
39:40
Speaker 1: but sometimes directly, here's the stuff I feel bad about.
39:43
Speaker 1: Now tell me why it isn't my fault. And the
39:47
Speaker 1: therapist indulges them. just like the drugs indulge them, just
39:51
Speaker 1: like the politicians indulge them. So you as a healthy person,
39:55
Speaker 1: as a well-adjusted person, you may feel a deep desire
39:59
Speaker 1: for freedom and the open road. But a lot of people,
40:02
Speaker 1: especially leftist women, most of all, have no such desire.
40:06
Speaker 1: They want to be puppets on a string. They want
40:08
Speaker 1: to be marionettes on a stage. Nothing is their fault.
40:14
Speaker 1: Nothing was their choice. That's what they want. Now, that's
40:19
Speaker 1: all deeper philosophical stuff. Closer to the surface, we still
40:21
Speaker 1: have practical questions. Questions like, why aren't we allowed to
40:25
Speaker 1: know the identity of this Jane Doe? She's allowed to
40:28
Speaker 1: publicly name all these Cornell students and file lawsuits that
40:30
Speaker 1: dox their home addresses, destroy their reputations for the rest
40:34
Speaker 1: of their lives, but we're not allowed to know anything
40:36
Speaker 1: about her? No judge should be able to shield this
40:40
Speaker 1: information from the public. We still have a First Amendment
40:42
Speaker 1: in this country, last time I checked, and if a
40:43
Speaker 1: woman is going to make bizarre claims that attract national
40:46
Speaker 1: attention like this, and contradict herself in the process, we
40:49
Speaker 1: have a right to know who she is, period.
40:51
Speaker 2: Now, it's not witness intimidation. It's not stalking.
40:54
Speaker 1: It's our constitutional right. This is not the Soviet Union.
40:56
Speaker 1: People have a right to confront their accusers in this country.
40:59
Speaker 1: They have the right to information that's clearly in the
41:01
Speaker 1: public interest. One of these Cornell students that this woman
41:05
Speaker 1: is accused, by the way, it was just fired by
41:07
Speaker 1: Wells Fargo after the lawsuit was filed. And the mob
41:11
Speaker 1: of Instagram harpies is trying to get the other students
41:13
Speaker 1: fired from their jobs as well. These young men are
41:16
Speaker 1: haven't even been charged with a crime, but they're being
41:18
Speaker 1: relentlessly harassed by the same women who defended Lindsay Clancy
41:21
Speaker 1: for the triple murder of her own children. And these
41:25
Speaker 1: students have no recourse whatsoever. Meanwhile, this woman, like the
41:29
Speaker 1: UVA accuser, has total immunity, apparently.
41:32
Speaker 2: No one's allowed to even know who she is. I mean,
41:35
Speaker 2: it's absurd.
41:36
Speaker 1: That's especially true when you look at the accuser's text messages,
41:39
Speaker 1: which were just obtained by CBS New York. And CBS
41:42
Speaker 1: deserves a lot of credit for this. It seems like
41:45
Speaker 1: the more we learn about this anonymous woman, the worse
41:47
Speaker 1: it gets. Quote, the messages were sent just two days
41:51
Speaker 1: after the alleged assault. The man started by apologizing for
41:54
Speaker 1: how things went down. He said his memory is kind
41:57
Speaker 1: of fuzzy and that he and another man feel bad
41:59
Speaker 1: for being too intoxicated to shut it down and kick
42:01
Speaker 1: people out before it got way out of hand. The
42:04
Speaker 1: woman in the text chain replied that her memory is
42:06
Speaker 1: super clouded, too, and said they had all been heavily intoxicated.
42:09
Speaker 1: She also wrote none of the sexual stuff was illegal.
42:13
Speaker 1: She said she liked being with him and another man. Later,
42:15
Speaker 1: she suggested they smoke together again, but leave out the
42:19
Speaker 1: extra 5 billion men and ketamine.
42:22
Speaker 2: Okay, well, again, this should just be the end of
42:24
Speaker 2: the story.
42:25
Speaker 1: The Cornell students, like the UVA students and the Duke
42:28
Speaker 1: Lacrosse students before them, should file defamation lawsuits against everyone
42:31
Speaker 1: who has lied about this case.
42:33
Speaker 2: That's a very long list of people.
42:35
Speaker 1: If she had been violently assaulted in the frat house,
42:37
Speaker 1: she would not text the participants in the assault after
42:40
Speaker 1: the fact, and explicitly say that nothing illegal transpired. I mean,
42:47
Speaker 1: this is about as definitive as a case like this
42:49
Speaker 1: can possibly get. You have the accuser on record, in writing,
42:54
Speaker 1: stating to one of the alleged rapists that no crime
42:58
Speaker 1: was committed.
43:02
Speaker 2: End of story. Nothing to see here.
43:05
Speaker 1: Nothing but a bunch of college kids, including this woman,
43:08
Speaker 1: doing something gross. They're not the first and won't be
43:12
Speaker 1: the last, but there was no crime, as she herself states.
43:18
Speaker 1: Unless we want to make just behavior like this a
43:22
Speaker 1: crime in general, which I don't think very many people do.
43:28
Speaker 1: But if we did, then everybody, herself included, would be arrested.
43:36
Speaker 1: And then she goes further. She attempts to schedule another
43:38
Speaker 1: encounter with some of the men involved. who were supposedly
43:41
Speaker 1: involved in this alleged heinous attack. There's one more piece
43:47
Speaker 1: of CBS's report we need to talk about because it
43:49
Speaker 1: establishes the timeline of when this woman's story began to change.
43:54
Speaker 1: According to a transcript of the alleged victim's interview with
43:56
Speaker 1: campus police obtained by CBS New York, Jane Doe distinguished
43:59
Speaker 1: the initial sexual activity from what she says happened later
44:02
Speaker 1: in the night. When asked whether she was okay with
44:04
Speaker 1: the initial encounter, she said, yeah, as much as I
44:06
Speaker 1: can be because I was super drunk when I got there,
44:08
Speaker 1: but I was pretty okay with all of this. When
44:10
Speaker 1: describing what happened later in the night, the transcript says
44:13
Speaker 1: Jane Doe said, I can say with 100% confidence I
44:15
Speaker 1: was raped. The interview began on November 14th, 2024, more
44:19
Speaker 1: than three weeks after the alleged gang rape, and continued
44:21
Speaker 1: the next day. So three weeks later, she declares that
44:25
Speaker 1: she was raped. But after reviewing her actual claims and
44:28
Speaker 1: the final written statement she subsequently reviewed and signed, prosecutors
44:32
Speaker 1: concluded that the facts she described did not constitute a crime.
44:36
Speaker 1: And according to the D.A., That signed statement did not
44:39
Speaker 1: allege that she had been drugged against her will or
44:42
Speaker 1: gang raped. This is a written statement that according to TMZ,
44:47
Speaker 1: the woman changed 20 times with handwritten corrections. And to
44:52
Speaker 1: put it mildly, that's extremely difficult to reconcile with the
44:55
Speaker 1: allegations she's making today. But, you know, it's it's very
45:00
Speaker 1: few people want to point that out. Actually, there is
45:03
Speaker 1: one person, at least, who's being honest about what's happening here.
45:06
Speaker 1: Of all people, Sonny Hostin on The View just came
45:09
Speaker 1: out to defend, kind of, the Cornell students whose lives
45:13
Speaker 1: are being destroyed.
45:14
Speaker 2: At the moment. Watch.
45:17
Speaker 5: I actually have the statement that Jane Doe wrote at
45:22
Speaker 5: that time.
45:24
Speaker 2: Just give it to us in a sentence. We don't
45:25
Speaker 2: have a lot of time.
45:27
Speaker 5: It's several pages long.
45:29
Speaker 8: I know, but.
45:29
Speaker 5: It's nine pages long. And I will say that under
45:32
Speaker 5: current New York state law, voluntary intoxication or drug use,
45:36
Speaker 5: and she voluntarily drank a lot, she voluntarily snorted ketamine
45:42
Speaker 5: off of one of the boys' body parts.
45:45
Speaker 9: Even though she was highly intoxicated when she arrived at
45:48
Speaker 9: the frat house.
45:49
Speaker 5: She was highly intoxicated, but had made plans to meet
45:52
Speaker 5: one of the young men. She allowed other boys and
45:58
Speaker 5: consented to other boys' snorting ketamine off of her body.
46:03
Speaker 5: And under New York law, voluntary intoxication or drug use
46:07
Speaker 5: that merely impairs judgment does not legally constitute an inability
46:11
Speaker 5: to consent to sexual activity, right? So that means if
46:14
Speaker 5: you voluntarily ingest drugs, you voluntarily take alcohol, you can
46:20
Speaker 5: agree to have threesomes, which in her statement, she agreed
46:24
Speaker 5: to have two separate threesomes. One boy did walk in.
46:29
Speaker 5: One young man did walk in and say, everybody out.
46:32
Speaker 5: So there was one person that did that. And according
46:36
Speaker 5: to her statement, three of the young men did not
46:38
Speaker 5: touch her.
46:40
Speaker 2: And so I say all that. But I say all.
46:43
Speaker 5: That to say the pictures of these young men who
46:48
Speaker 5: have not been charged, not been adjudicated, are being plastered
46:52
Speaker 5: all over the internet. I think people are reporting this
46:55
Speaker 5: story inaccurately. I think they're reporting it unfairly. And while
47:00
Speaker 5: this is something that we have to take very seriously,
47:02
Speaker 5: there is no way, according to her statement in 2024,
47:06
Speaker 5: that any prosecutor would have brought.
47:08
Speaker 2: Forth the case. Yeah, but she was intoxicated. Under New
47:11
Speaker 2: York law.
47:15
Speaker 1: Now, what's frustrating about this clip is the realization that
47:18
Speaker 1: Sunny Hostin, one of the dumbest women on The View,
47:20
Speaker 1: which is really saying something, Has more integrity and honesty
47:24
Speaker 1: on this issue than many prominent conservative politicians. Has a
47:31
Speaker 1: single Republican come out to defend these Cornell students? Has
47:33
Speaker 1: a single Republican said a word about this case? Which
47:37
Speaker 1: is an obvious miscarriage of justice that implicates the constitutional
47:40
Speaker 1: rights of these students and by extension, any student. If
47:46
Speaker 1: you care about civil rights at all, then this should
47:48
Speaker 1: be one of the most important issues you're talking about
47:50
Speaker 1: right now. Title IX has not been reformed in any
47:53
Speaker 1: meaningful way. It's still extremely easy for a woman to
47:57
Speaker 1: make up some false accusation and destroy the lives of
47:59
Speaker 1: anyone she wants, especially on a college campus.
48:03
Speaker 2: So it's a big deal.
48:05
Speaker 1: But a lot of Republicans who claim they care about
48:07
Speaker 1: the civil rights of everyone, including white men on college campuses,
48:11
Speaker 1: are totally silent. They're allowing this fake narrative to to
48:15
Speaker 1: take hold, just like they're remaining silent as Democrats spread
48:19
Speaker 1: lies about lynchings all.
48:20
Speaker 2: Over the country and so many other things.
48:22
Speaker 1: And the only conclusion you can draw from this is
48:24
Speaker 1: that at the moment, we're led by politicians who are
48:28
Speaker 1: somehow more pathetic than Sonny Hostin. And their weakness will
48:32
Speaker 1: lead to many more fake accusations. It will lead to
48:35
Speaker 1: the destruction of many more young men. And unless things
48:39
Speaker 1: change very quickly, their cowardice will empower another generation of
48:44
Speaker 1: leftist women to believe that they're never accountable for their
48:47
Speaker 1: own actions. A feminist tenant that, in every possible respect,
48:52
Speaker 1: has done more damage to this country over the past
48:54
Speaker 1: 50 years than the nuclear bomb did to Hiroshima. That
48:57
Speaker 1: is not an overstatement. It's not a metaphor. These people
49:01
Speaker 1: are destroying civilization. And with this Cornell case, they've made
49:06
Speaker 1: it very clear that they're just getting started.
49:08
Speaker 2: That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching.
49:11
Speaker 2: Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.
49:20
Speaker 8: Every significant movement in history has started with protesting.
49:23
Speaker 9: You're a traitor.
49:24
Speaker 2: Uncle Tom.
49:24
Speaker 8: This is our generation's civil rights.
49:26
Speaker 4: I have no idea what the protest is about.
49:28
Speaker 3: Bingo.
49:29
Speaker 1: Given the current climate, should a figure as polarizing as
49:32
Speaker 1: Clay Saunders even be allowed on campus?
49:34
Speaker 2: Can you hear me okay? Saunders is a close personal
49:37
Speaker 2: friend of Chancellor Freeman. This is a decision I cannot fight.
49:39
Speaker 2: Islam will conquer the West.
49:43
Speaker 7: As-salamu alaykum.
49:46
Speaker 2: Are we paying attention? They've taken over the building. They're
49:49
Speaker 2: downstairs and they've blocked the doors. I seek forgiveness from
49:54
Speaker 2: Allah the Almighty. You cannot run and hide. Muhammad is
49:59
Speaker 2: the messenger of God.
50:02
Speaker 9: There is no God but Allah.
50:05
Speaker 2: What do you say we turn those SOBs into a
50:09
Speaker 2: fine red mist?
50:11
Speaker 9: As we move, one man will cover while the other
50:14
Speaker 9: guys go.
50:14
Speaker 2: They call that leapfrogging. Stretch your mouth and listen. You
50:19
Speaker 2: need a course in safe weapons handling.