Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / What's Wrong With Canada Why Poilievre Lost

Transcript

What's Wrong With Canada Why Poilievre Lost · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Why Carneie won. So Kat Canada posted this When this
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: dude was answering my questions, I could hardly believe it.
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: So this is somebody she was interviewing. They vote liberal
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: and don't even know why. Why could have told you that?
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: Vote?
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah Carney one?
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: So is that a good thing?
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, it's a good thing.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: Why did you vote for Carney?
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: Because he makes most sense out of people?
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: So what makes the most sense to you from his policies?
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: I don't know, is there one specific policy that you
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: were really interested in of his?
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: No?
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: Okay, thanks for your time, all right bye.
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: I know that's just one person, but I think it's
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: instructive because the election was fought over two issues. One
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: just Trump Trump, who can take on Trump? The other
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: was on the conservative side, you know, cost of living essentially,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: cost of living, housing prices, inflation, cost of food, opportunity taxes,
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: all of that. So if you were concerned about those things,
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: you would have voted conservative because McCartney was offering nothing
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: on that front, right, His sell thing was just I'm
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: anti Trump, I'm the Trump slayer. Yeah, not so much,
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: it turns out. But if you're somebody who's you know,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: fairly comfortable. You're not really feeling feeling the you know,
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: the pressures, the way that somebody who's less comfortable is
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: still trying to, you know, build up their life to
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: the point of retirement and build up their finances to
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: the point of having a comfortable retirement. If you're not,
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: if you're already there and you're not really feeling the
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: effects as much as somebody who's not in the same
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: place as you, Well, you've got you can be a
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: luxury voter, right, you can. You have the luxury to
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: just go Well, he just sounds like he makes sense,
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: and I'm not paying any attention. I always just vote liberal.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: But there's much more to it than just that about
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: from this government is corrupt. A new poll says nearly
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: half the Canadian population favors socialism, but are against higher
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: texas to fund debt. Just perfect, So let's go, let's go.
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: Let's take a look at some past elections. Now, Canada
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: is a left more than a left leaning country. It
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: is a left country, right, so you could roughly say
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: sixty to forty left. Let's go to the twenty twenty
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: one election here, So Justin Trudeau was already kind of
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: slumping by this point, thirty two point six percent of
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: the popular vote. Desertives thirty three point seven won the
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: popular vote, but the way that's it's laid out in
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: the parliamentary system, they have a more efficient a more
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: efficient vote, so they ended up with the most seats,
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: ended up winning. You see New Democrat Party your seventeen
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: point eight percent, Green two point three. So there's twenty
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: percent there Liberal. So now you're getting up to fifty
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: three percent. In twenty nineteen, you had thirty three percent
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: for the liberals, New Democrat Party sixteen percent, Green Party
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: six point five. You've got the Block, which is really
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: a left wing party. It's kind of unique though in
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: that it's nationalist. It's a nationalist party, separatist party, but
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: it's actually quite left wing as well, especially economically, it's
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: very left wing. So you can see, I mean, it's
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: it's a left wing country. It just is. And let's
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: take a look at the final vote here. So the
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: Conservatives got forty one point three percent of the vote,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: which is the most percentage of the vote they had
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: gotten in forty years. Last election they got with thirty
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: three percent, Right Liberals forty three percent. Here you can
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: see the NDP six point three percent, so they're down
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: about ten points the New Democratic Party, so what did
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: they have in the last election They had seventeen point
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: eight percent, this time six point three, so over that,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: so about twelve twelve points down. So what happened here?
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: What happened? Well, the NDP vote base, aside from their
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: like super base, left and went and voted for the
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: Liberals because they'd rather have a liberal than just any conservative,
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: any conservative at all. And one is left to wonder
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: at this point why the NDP is even necessary in Canada.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: And I think this is I think a lot of
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: NDP voters decided, well, they're not really because we've got
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: the illiberal party now. So New Democratic Party was always
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: the furthest left party, the most socialistic, and over time
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: they've become, or at least been trying to become the
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: wokest party, the most irrational illiberal party in Canada. But
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: the Liberal Party under Justin Trudeau was transformed from a
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: centrist left leaning party to a straight up radical progressive
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: party and illiberal party. It's a totally different party now, philosophically, politically,
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: every way. It is not the party of John Kretschian.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: So when you have that, why do you need the
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: New Democrat Party anymore? Obviously a lot of NDP voters decided, well,
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: we don't need them, We'll just go We'll just go
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: for the liberal, We'll go for Kearnie. I mean, are
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: you concerned about global warming? Are you? Are you obsessed
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: with the with the environment. Obviously, Mark Kearney is more
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: obsessed than anybody. So if you want the craziest, most destructive,
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: dysfunctional policies around climate, Mark Kearney is your guy. Why
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: do you need the NDP. If that's your main issue,
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: you don't need it anymore. Wokeness. Mark Carney is all
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: for woke. He wants to preserve it. He wants to
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: preserve that woke dysfunction, that total denial of reality. He
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: wants to preserve two plus two equals five in Canada
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: and call it diversity. So you don't need the NDP
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: for that. Like sex changes for children, Mark Carney's your man.
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: He's already said that. You know, he wants to do
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: something about Alberta banning puberty blockers and cross six hormones
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: for children. So if you're into if you if you
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: are really into sex changes for children. Mark Carney's your man.
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: And there, I mean, what is more radical far left
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: than that. That's about as radical far left insane as
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: you can get. Mark Carney is your man. Land acknowledgment
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: woke Land acknowledgements. Mark Carne is your man. Di. Mark
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: Carney's your man. I mean he set up I ESG funds,
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: ESG funds for Brookfield d I is a big part
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: of that of the So he's your man. Censorship, he's
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: talking about, he wants, he wants, he's he's gonna resurrect
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: Bill C sixty three with the pre crime and the
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: life sentence for doing a hate whatever that's going to be,
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: probably not too much, probably just anything that's conservative, life
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: in prison for doing a hate online. So you like censorship,
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: Mark Kearney's your man. You like or Wellianism, Mark Carney's
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: your man. So why do you need the NDP. You
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: don't need the NDP, And a lot of their former
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: voters made that calculation. Any crazy, fucking, lunatic bullshit that's
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: going to ruin your country, you can get it from
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: Mark Curny, So vote for him. So in the past,
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: or you had vote splitting between a liberal the Liberal
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: Party and the New Democratic Party, which would allow a
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: conservative party to form a government. Well that's done now,
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: that might be done permanently. Again, why do you need
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: the NDP? Now? Will they come back? They've been around
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: for a while. Will they come back? Maybe? But does
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: anybody have confidence that any Liberal leader would not just
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: outwoke the NDP or give enough woke, enough lunacy that
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: would make it very difficult for the NDP to rebuild again.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: This is a problem. This is what's blackpilling me about
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: Canada is that it You know, when you have the Conservatives,
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: we have peer polyev getting forty one point three percent
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: of the vote, the most in forty years. The last
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: election it was thirty three percent. That's a major improvement.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: And it's not enough because if the lefties combine, if
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: they unite under one banner, we're screwed. You just can't win.
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: It's like California. California is a one party state and
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: it's going to remain that. I'm very worried. That's what's
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: happening with Canada and out Canada has just become a
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: one party state and it doesn't matter what happens. People
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: could be people could be having to dig holes or
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: in the ground to let it, or look for caves
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: to live in, and they'll still vote Liberal. Like San
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: Francisco is a dystopia, right, it's ay woke dystopia, with
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: human feces all over the ground, crazy drug addicts, needles everywhere,
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: it's incredibly expensive to live amongst all of that, and
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: yet there is zero chance that they are going to
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: do anything but continue to vote for more of the
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: same lunacy. I worry that Canada has become that. That's
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: that's my blackpill on that, you know. And if non
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: Liberal Party leftists would rather have the Liberal Party than
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: the Conservatives, well again we're just kind of screwed. And
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: why wouldn't they every fucking crazy thing they could want.
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: Mark Kearney's giving them all. Right, I want to show
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: you something else. So here's the polls in this going
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: back to here on October twenty twenty two, really kind
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: of took the lead. And here you can see where
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: they really big leads were coming in. Right, this is
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: just as Justin Trudeau became more and more unpopular. And
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: let's go all the way to here. What day is that?
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: That's January sixth, twenty twenty five. That's the day that
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: Justin Trudeau announced he was go just step down, he
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: was going to resign as prime minister once a new
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: prime minister was picked. And what happens Immediately Liberals go
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: up in the polls and completely take over. This wasn't
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: because this here, this just steep rise. That's not because
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: Mark Kearney was this transformational character, this charismatic new leader
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: that mesmerized the masses with his charm and wit. No,
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: Mark Kearney is a globalist hobgoblin, right, He's a gargoyle. No,
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: there is no reason that should have happened other than
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: the fact that Justin Trudeau would just simply very unpopular.
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: A lot of Liberals were just so kind of apathetic
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: at that point, and as soon as a new guy,
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: as soon as they knew there, as soon as Trudeau
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: was gone, it shot up. January sixth, you had a
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: twenty four percent advantage for the Conservatives. But where were
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: the Conservatives. They were forty four point two. That's only
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: three percent more than what they ended up with in
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: the final polls. In the final count for the election
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: only three percent. Liberals were at twenty percent that's because
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: just a lot of Liberal voters weren't interested in voting
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: as long as Justin Trudeau was Prime minister. As soon
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: as they got somebody new, they shot back up. Those
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: were people who were never going to vote for the Conservatives.
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: So this whole Pierre blew a twenty five point lead
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: is a bullshit because he didn't end up far off.
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: That's at the very peak. By the way, his support
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: was actually pretty stable. He didn't blow this big lead.
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: It's just that a new face was put on the
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: Liberal Party. The media immediately immediately got behind the new
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: sugar daddy, the new savior. They put him on a throne,
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: They put a crown on his head and a sword
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: in his hand and said this is the guy who's
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: got to save you from that meet and Donald Trump,
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: and that was enough, and all the Liberals said, Okay,
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: I'll vote again. So I reject the notion that Pierre
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: Pauliev blew a twenty five point lead. No, all that
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: happened was his report remained actually remarkably high for Canadian
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: federal elections. It's just that a new face was put
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: on the same pig, the same Liberal Party pig, and
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: that was enough. That was enough. It's like, oh, I
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: can vote liberal again now, and I don't want those
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: mean Conservatives to win because Poliv's mean. I know because
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: Rosemary Barton said that he's mean. And the most important thing,
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: apparently in a leader of a country is that they're
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: not mean, I guess, even though Mark Carney was plenty
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: mean during the campaign. But the TV didn't say that though,
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: So that's an important distinction. Donald Trump brags that he
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: cost Pierre Polly of the federal election. It was not
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Let me tell you something. The Liberals and
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: the NDP and the Greens had been using Donald Trump
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: as a weapon for years, okay, in parliament calling Pierre
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: Pouliff map o' maga. They've been using this for years,
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: and they were going to use it, and they were
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: going to use it successfully. Regardless of whether or not
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: Trump said anything. Trump could have said absolutely nothing during
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: the election campaign and it still would have worked. They
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: would have continued with that line of attack. The media
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: would have supported them in it. They would have kept
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: pushing it. Oh, they would have made something out of nothing,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: and it would have worked. Because I'm telling you right now,
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: when you see this, when you see this the red
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: line is the liberals, and you see it go down
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: like this, and then the day after Justin Trudeau steps down,
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: all all of a sudden, you see this dramatic rise.
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: That's not rationality at work, all right, that's not that's
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: not a bunch of sophisticated, discerning voters being persuaded by
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: great arguments. No, that's tribalism. That's team sports. That's all
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: it is. That's CBC said, TV said, that's all it is.
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: And Trump didn't have to say a word. They would
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: have continued using the same Trump attack that they'd already
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: been using four years and that would have worked too.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: I mean, this won't phase any of the liberal voters
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: you have to unseat. They didn't know anything, right, they
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: were just it was TV said, that's why they voted.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: TV said, the TV's not going to tell them about
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: how Trump bragged that he cost Pierre Paul of the
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: federal election, and that, you know, maybe you should reac
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: maybe maybe that there might be some buyer's remorse on
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: this thing. Maybe the whole thing was based on a lie.
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: It will be none of that. The people, the ignorant
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: people who voted for Mark Kearney because they knew literally
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: nothing about anything happening in the election, or the or
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: the the featured players. Right, they remain ignorant, and they
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: will continue to remain ignorant, so they'll have nothing. They'll
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: have nothing to have any cognitive dissonance about, because they
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: will remain as ignorant now after the election as they
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: were before. Anyway, that's all I'm going to say about that.
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: Please like, share, and subscribe. Subscribing really helps me out.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: I thank you for that. I will see you next time.