Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3958 Trump Just OUTPLAYED Xi and Secures SHOCKING Deal!!!

Transcript

Ep. 3958 Trump Just OUTPLAYED Xi and Secures SHOCKING Deal!!! · Turley Talks

• 0:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
• 0:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
• 0:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is Turley Talks.
• 0:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you.
• 1:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: You are watching the single most consequential geopolitical chess match of the 21st century playout in real time.
• 1:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: Donald Trump's high stake summit in Beijing was absolutely epic.
• 1:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: the first sitting American president to visit China in nearly a decade.
• 1:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what he just extracted from Xi Jinping and the great whole of the people is nothing short of absolutely jaw-dropping.
• 1:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: Stick them in the very end of this video because I'm going to show you the shocking deal Trump just secured with President Xi.
• 1:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're going to see how China just flipped on Iran and changed the
• 2:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: And we're going to see exactly how Trump just changed the global order in a way no president ever has this is 40 chess in its most spectacular form and you're about to get a front row seat you're not.
• 2:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: get to want to miss this greetings everyone it is live stream friday i am your host doctor steve your page professor celebrating yet another glorious day in the trumpian golden age that you made possible back in november twenty twenty four so if you want to front row seat on how you continue to change the nation and the world in ways you never even imagine you know what to do make sure
• 2:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: live stream Fridays are so cool as always we got a jam pack show for you today our super chats are up
• 2:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: So please feel free to send in your comments or questions.
• 2:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: It will be my honor.
• 2:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: My privilege to read and answer them during our livestream.
• 3:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: Also, before we dive in here, what have I told you?
• 3:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's actually a little known arbitrage play hiding inside a $30 billion market.
• 3:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's right, you heard it billion with a B.
• 3:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: And regular people with zero background and finance or tech are quietly generating, I don't know, 5,000, 10,000, even 20,000 dollars a month from that.
• 3:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: Using nothing but a laptop.
• 3:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know that sounds almost too good to be true, but here's what's actually going on.
• 3:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's a significant and very real pricing gap in the use book market.
• 3:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: The same book can be worth dramatically different amounts depending on where it's listed on what website.
• 3:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the people who've learned how to spot and exploit that price gap are building serious, sustainable income.
• 3:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what makes us unlike anything else I've come across, you actually never handle a single physical book.
• 4:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: no inventory, piling up in your garage, no trips to the post office, no physical logistics, whatsoever.
• 4:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: The whole thing runs from your browser.
• 4:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: You identify the opportunity, you make a few clicks, and the fulfillment side is handled entirely.
• 4:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: by someone else.
• 4:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: And I want to be clear, this is not a side hustle that just pads your grocery budget gang.
• 4:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is a real business model where people are running full time right now.
• 4:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Many of them have been walked away from jobs.
• 4:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: They frankly couldn't stand.
• 4:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's why I'm personally hosting a free training where I'm going to walk you through exactly how
• 4:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: this system works.
• 4:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: Start to finish.
• 4:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: No filler, no theory, just the actual mechanics of how to find the opportunities and what to do with them.
• 4:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: I've gone deep on this.
• 4:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, I'm generally excited to show you what I found.
• 5:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: So click on that link below or type bk profit dot com slash thoroughly in your browser.
• 5:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: You can scan the QR code on your screen to reserve your free spot right now.
• 5:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: You do not want to miss this one.
• 5:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's awesome.
• 5:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: I love it.
• 5:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's a combination of the two things that I love.
• 5:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: Books and making money, right?
• 5:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: So it's wonderful.
• 5:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: All right.
• 5:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's dive right in here.
• 5:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: So this week was without question.
• 5:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: The most consequential presidential visit to the middle kingdom as it's called in the modern era.
• 5:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: This wasn't just any state visit.
• 5:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: It was the first one in nearly 10 years by US president
• 5:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: that came after months of Trump squeezing China from every direction simultaneously.
• 5:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: We've been talking a lot about this for weeks now.
• 5:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump has applied trade pressure, tariff pressure, a rare earth standoff, the Iran pressure campaign, the Strait of Hormuz crisis from which China gets 40% to 50% of its oil.
• 6:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: The straight of Malacca deal that just gave US forces full access to that choke point that crucial narrow waterway in southeast Asia through which 80% of China's imports travel and bottom line China was hurting.
• 6:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: Xi Jinping needed this meeting far more than Donald Trump did.
• 6:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump came into this meeting with more leverage than any American president in modern political history.
• 6:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that gang, that as they say, that's the entire ballgame right there.
• 6:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: This summit was decided before it even began.
• 6:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's what the legacy media will never tell you.
• 6:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: because they're too busy projecting their incestant TDS to their dwindling audience.
• 7:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump walked into this summit literally holding all the cards.
• 7:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: China's entire business model.
• 7:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Think about it.
• 7:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're actually talking about this last night at a, and the Pharaohsat.
• 7:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: China's entire business model has been built on two planks, cheap oil and cheap exports.
• 7:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: cheap oil and cheap exports.
• 7:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's it.
• 7:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: You can do a lot with just like a couple of things.
• 7:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: Google is a mass trillions of dollars on a business model built on two planks, aggregate and advertise.
• 7:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Aggregate through giving all this free stuff and assemble billions and billions of people into your network and then advertise to them and they've made trones of dollars.
• 7:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: China has made trillions through cheap oil and cheap exports.
• 7:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: Without cheap oil, bought on the black market at a massive discount and without cheap goods that chips out to 80% of countries across the globe, China's business model collapses.
• 8:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: Think about what Trump has done in these last several months.
• 8:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's cut them off.
• 8:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, actually starting in January, he cut them off from the cheap oil
• 8:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: and then he cut them off from the cheap oil from cutting them off from Iran.
• 8:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's actually holding, as we speak, 40 to 50% of China's oil imports hostage by shutting down the straight-of-horse moves.
• 8:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: And at the same time, Trump is hit China with the highest tariff rate of any major trading partner peaking at 145%.
• 8:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: which causes their goods, the price of their goods to rise.
• 8:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: So Trump is basically eviscerated, the very heart of China's global business model.
• 8:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so that's what made this summit.
• 8:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: So fundamentally different from every other presidential summit.
• 9:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: When Obama went to Beijing, he was hat in hand.
• 9:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: It was embarrassing.
• 9:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: When Biden met G in San Francisco, was essentially a damage control summit.
• 9:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: But when Donald Trump stepped off Air Force 1 in Beijing this week, he wasn't alone.
• 9:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: He brought the entire economic Avengers team with him, right?
• 9:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're talking Elon Musk of Tesla and SpaceX.
• 9:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're talking Tim Cook of Apple, Jensen Wong of Nvidia.
• 9:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: That was huge.
• 9:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: Larry Think of BlackRock.
• 9:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: Kelli Ortberg of Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Mehta, Qualcomm, the list goes on and on, gang Trump didn't show up with a brief case.
• 9:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: He showed up literally with the Fortune 500.
• 9:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, can you imagine sitting in Xi Jinping's chair watching that delegation walk off the tarmac?
• 10:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, you expected one cowboy who's basically decimated your entire business model.
• 10:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: And instead, he gets off the plane with the entire cavalry.
• 10:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: And here's the message that Calvary sent in unmistakable diplomatic terms.
• 10:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: America is open for business, but we're doing business on America's terms in a way we don't get ripped off anymore.
• 10:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: But it gets better.
• 10:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: Because look at the pre-summit positioning here.
• 10:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is where the 40 chess really begins to come into focus.
• 10:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: According to Politico,
• 10:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: China did not officially even confirm Trump's visit until just a couple of days before he landed.
• 10:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's unprecedented.
• 10:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: All right.
• 10:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: China in diplomatic ease, China would have confirmed to their nation that there is going to be a major summit months ago.
• 11:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: What that means is that China was still haggling over what was even going to be discussed right up to the final hour.
• 11:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: The Treasury Secretary Scott Basin actually held an emergency meeting with Chinese officials in South Korea literally just hours before the summit.
• 11:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Reportedly still negotiating the terms on the ground.
• 11:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: The translation of that is rather simple.
• 11:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: He needed this meeting badly enough to keep negotiating into the final hour, which means Trump showed up calm, cool, smiling, holding all the cards, while Beijing was frantically looking for its poker chips under the table.
• 11:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: That, my friends, is what 4D chess looks like, not weakness, not flattery, leverage, pure leverage.
• 11:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: So with this 40 chess motif as our model here, what I want to do in our live stream today is I want to show you Trump's four major moves that he made here.
• 12:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: What I'm calling the four fronts at the summit so that you have a full understanding of exactly the four-digect mate involved in all of this.
• 12:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there's four fronts involved here.
• 12:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's go through them one by one.
• 12:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: The first front.
• 12:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: is what we might call the front of flattery.
• 12:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's right, the front of this is the art of the deal after all, right?
• 12:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: The front of flattery and what a lot of people simply don't understand is the importance of the strategic use of flattery in high stakes negotiations.
• 12:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: For example, strategic flattery explains exactly why
• 12:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: I wish you all the best of your best wishes.
• 13:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is a historic visit.
• 13:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: This year marks the start of China's 15th-5-year plan for economic and social development.
• 13:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: The over 1.4 billion people of China joined on the rich heritage of our over 5,000-year civilization at Voncing Chinese modernization and all fronts through high-quality development.
• 13:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: This year is also the 250th anniversary of American independence.
• 13:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: The over 300,000,000 American people are reinvigorating the spirit of patriotism, innovation, and enterprise, and assuringing a new journey for the development of the United States.
• 13:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: The people of China and the United States are both great peoples, achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, and making America great again can go hand in hand.
• 13:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: We can help each other succeed and advance the well-being of the whole world.
• 14:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: So she's gone, MAGA!
• 14:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: She's gone, Magga.
• 14:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Make America great.
• 14:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: She framed the summit as making both China and America great again.
• 14:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: He overtly and publicly endorsed the Trump project of making America great again.
• 14:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: And in so doing, he believes Trump is helping to make the world great again.
• 14:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: She is flattering Trump.
• 14:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: because Trump has so much leverage over him and leverage involves having what others want.
• 14:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: But, and this is absolutely key, it also works the other way around from a different dynamic.
• 14:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's a very, very important observation, because a lot is being made right now, Trump's comments to G when he said this
• 15:05
  [SPEAKER_03]: President Xi, I want to thank you very much, first of all, that was an honor, like few have ever seen before.
• 15:14
  [SPEAKER_03]: And I think I was particularly impressed by those children, they were happy, they were beautiful.
• 15:21
  [SPEAKER_03]: The military is obvious, it couldn't be better, but those children were amazing, and they represent so much, and I know they represent so much to you.
• 15:34
  [SPEAKER_03]: The longest relationship of our two countries that any president and president has had.
• 15:41
  [SPEAKER_03]: And to me and honor, we've had a fantastic relationship.
• 15:46
  [SPEAKER_03]: We've gotten along when there were difficulties we worked it out.
• 15:49
  [SPEAKER_03]: I would call you and you would call me.
• 15:51
  [SPEAKER_03]: And whenever we had a problem, people don't know.
• 15:54
  [SPEAKER_03]: Whenever we had a problem, we worked it out very quickly.
• 15:58
  [SPEAKER_03]: And we're going to have a fantastic future together.
• 16:02
  [SPEAKER_03]: A such respect for China, the job you've done.
• 16:06
  [SPEAKER_03]: You're a great leader, I say it to everybody.
• 16:08
  [SPEAKER_03]: You're a great leader.
• 16:09
  [SPEAKER_03]: Sometimes people don't like me saying it, but I say it anyway, because it's true.
• 16:13
  [SPEAKER_03]: I only say the truth.
• 16:15
  [SPEAKER_03]: And I just want to say, we have for all of the great delegation that we have.
• 16:20
  [SPEAKER_03]: We have the greatest business, men, the biggest.
• 16:22
  [SPEAKER_03]: I guess the best in the world.
• 16:24
  [SPEAKER_03]: We have amazing people.
• 16:26
  [SPEAKER_03]: And they're all with me.
• 16:27
  [SPEAKER_03]: They every single one of them.
• 16:29
  [SPEAKER_03]: We ask the top.
• 16:30
  [SPEAKER_03]: 30 in the world every single one of them said yes and I didn't want the second or the third in the company.
• 16:36
  [SPEAKER_03]: I wanted only the top and they're here today to pay respects to you and to China and they look forward to trade and doing business and it's going to be totally reciprocal on our behalf.
• 16:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now the borderline illiterates in the legacy media want you to think that that's
• 16:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: that that was a U.S. president literally groveling at the feet of Beijing.
• 17:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: I kid you not the legacy media is pushing.
• 17:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, look at this headline, the legacy media is pushing literal Chinese propaganda because that's what Xi Jinping said over a decade ago.
• 17:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: The China was ascending in the U.S. was declining.
• 17:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: and the world order would inevitably reflect that.
• 17:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so the legacy media is deliberately pushing Chinese propaganda, just as they've been pushing Iranian propaganda, in claiming in this case that Trump was bowing to Beijing there.
• 17:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: What that pathetic excuse for analysis misses.
• 17:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know what, it's not even, it's not even,
• 17:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's not even political illiteracy.
• 17:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: The legacy media knows what's really going on here.
• 17:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: They just decided to lie to you, or I should say to their dwindling audience.
• 17:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: The legacy media knows what Trump is doing there.
• 17:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: Instead, though, they're lying.
• 18:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: And their audience loves to be lied to.
• 18:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is a post-truth era, and they are deliberately lying so as to try to infect more people
• 18:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: What every great behavioral psychologist knows, what every student of Machiavelli, what every reader of the arch of the deal already knows, flattery in the right hands in its right use is not weakness.
• 18:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: It is, in fact, the opposite.
• 18:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: It is the most powerful negotiating weapon ever invented.
• 18:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, if you don't know, in Chinese political culture, there is a concept known as Mayanja, which literally means face as in saving face.
• 18:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's the actual social currency that determines how much power a leader has inside an authoritarian hierarchy.
• 19:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: So in the system where there are no elections, there's no ballot box, there's no democratic legitimacy, a leader's prestige is his power.
• 19:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: Or you can think of it the other way around, a leader's power is his prestige.
• 19:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: And when you take face away from an authoritarian leader publicly, meaning when you take their dignity, their prestige, the perception of their integrity and their respect away from them, you don't just embarrass them, you actually destabilize the regime.
• 19:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: You destabilize in his entire ability to govern.
• 19:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Precisely because face is the social currency by which he governs.
• 19:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is why authoritarian leaders who lose face in a negotiation, what will they always do?
• 19:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Always without exception.
• 20:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: They will have no choice, but to dig in, to retaliate, to refuse to concede on anything visible.
• 20:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're not negotiating anymore.
• 20:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're fighting for survival.
• 20:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Trump, who's been studying at a deal with people for decades who grew up reading Dale Carnegie wrote the art of the deal, Trump has a deep understanding of this.
• 20:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: When Trump calls G, a great leader inside the great hole of the people on Chinese state TV in front of G's own party officials, he knows what he's doing.
• 20:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's not being sycophantic.
• 20:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's certainly not groveling for heaven's sakes.
• 20:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's handing G, a domestic political asset worth more than almost anything Trump could have offered financially.
• 20:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: He was giving G the ability to walk out of that meeting, having saved face in front of his own party.
• 21:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: He could look at them and say, the most powerful man in the world just flew across the Pacific Ocean to call me publicly a great leader and appear.
• 21:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: That is the currency authoritarian systems run off.
• 21:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: and Trump gave it to him for the price of one sentence, and then he proceeded to extract absolutely breathtaking concessions in return.
• 21:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: And we've, this isn't the first time we've seen that we have the same exact same playbook over and over again, Trump wrote,
• 21:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: Remember he wrote Kim Jong-un beautiful letters.
• 21:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: He called him smart.
• 21:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: He walked across the DMZ.
• 21:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: He actually asked him permission if he could come in.
• 21:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: It would be my honor if I could step over this line and step into your beautiful country.
• 21:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: And he did this meat while keeping every sanction in place.
• 22:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: He wasn't groveling to Kim Jong-un and he's done the same with Putin and press conferences while the United States was crushing Russian oil revenue and selling weapons to Ukraine.
• 22:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: The optics look like surrender only to the willfully ignorant, to the politically illiterate,
• 22:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: the lying legacy media when all said and done.
• 22:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: The substance is the exact opposite.
• 22:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's the means by which Trump gets literally everything he wants.
• 22:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so then that leads us to the second chess move, to the second front of the summit.
• 22:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: Front two is the Iran master stroke.
• 22:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: China just affected on Tehran.
• 22:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: and has changed the straight-of-form moves forever.
• 22:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: So what happened with China and Iran at the Beijing Summit may be the single most consequential development in the ongoing Iran war.
• 23:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: And I want to make sure you understand the full magnitude of what just took place here because the numbers really are staggering.
• 23:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: So here's the baseline, okay?
• 23:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: China used to import, let's say, throughout China imports, 11 million barrels of crude oil per day.
• 23:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's a record high, okay?
• 23:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Of those, nearly two million came from Iran.
• 23:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: And again, this is per day.
• 23:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: And they were often disguised through ship-to-ship transfers off Malaysian Indonesia to dodge US sanctions.
• 23:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: These are these phantom shipping so far.
• 23:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: So bottom line, they were getting one out of every seven barrels from Iran.
• 23:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: delivered at a deep discount because Iran is nowhere else to send it.
• 23:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: China has been the Iranian regime's single greatest economic lifeline, 90% of every barrel of oil Iran exports goes to China.
• 24:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: The entire hard currency revenue stream that keeps the IRGC funded, that keeps the missiles flying, it all runs through Chinese refineries.
• 24:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: But this week changed all of that.
• 24:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: check this out.
• 24:23
  [SPEAKER_03]: Out of there are 40% of there are well from that location.
• 24:27
  [SPEAKER_03]: So what has happened and one thing I think that we are going to make a deal on is they have agreed they want to buy well from the United States.
• 24:34
  [SPEAKER_03]: They're going to go to Texas.
• 24:35
  [SPEAKER_03]: We're going to start sending Chinese ships to Texas and to Louisiana and to Alaska.
• 24:41
  [SPEAKER_03]: And I think that was another thing that was agreed to.
• 24:43
  [SPEAKER_03]: That's a big thing.
• 24:44
  [SPEAKER_03]: What about Lecofine?
• 24:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not that much longer.
• 24:46
  [SPEAKER_03]: Yes, too.
• 24:47
  [SPEAKER_03]: Yeah, everything.
• 24:49
  [SPEAKER_03]: Energy.
• 24:49
  [SPEAKER_03]: Energy.
• 24:50
  [SPEAKER_03]: That's the one thing they really need energy.
• 24:52
  [SPEAKER_03]: That's the one thing they have an insatiable appetite for energy.
• 24:56
  [SPEAKER_03]: And we have unlimited energy.
• 24:59
  [SPEAKER_03]: You know, we've now under me, but we now produce more than a view combined Saudi Arabia and before the war,
• 25:08
  [SPEAKER_03]: If you took Saudi Arabia, Russia put them together, we're doing twice as much oil and gas as they are.
• 25:14
  [SPEAKER_03]: Think of that.
• 25:15
  [SPEAKER_03]: It's amazing.
• 25:16
  [SPEAKER_03]: And I'll tell you what that was.
• 25:17
  [SPEAKER_03]: We're too cold drill.
• 25:19
  [SPEAKER_03]: Maybe drill, right?
• 25:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's amazing.
• 25:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there you have it.
• 25:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm at huge.
• 25:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: That alone.
• 25:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: That China wants to reduce its dependence on the straight of Hormuz changes the geopolitical chess board in literally permanent ways.
• 25:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: That phrase is doing enormous diplomatic work, because reducing dependence on the straight poor moves is the polite diplomatic way of saying we want to reduce dependence on Iran.
• 25:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then Trump went on to say on Fox News, that Xi Jinping would like to see a deal with Iran.
• 26:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: The G, literally said, if I could be of any help at all, I would like to be of help.
• 26:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Which again, is diplomatic speak for Yoran, Yorazim.
• 26:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's time to go full Venezuela.
• 26:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's time to take whatever carrots, Trump is offering you and make the deal and move on.
• 26:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: Go retire on some island and Indonesia or something like that.
• 26:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: in the very nation that spent decades financing and propping up the Iranian regime just offered to basically pressure it to fold to concede to all of Trump's demands and the proof who is China now buying crude oil from to the tune of 600,000 barrels per day worth close to ten billion dollars per month.
• 26:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: Beijing is simultaneously paying Washington for more oil while publicly stating opposition to Iran's attempt to militarize and toll the straight-of-war moves.
• 26:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's not neutrality anymore.
• 26:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's a slow motion defection.
• 27:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: China is quietly exiting stage left on the Iranian relationship, and now they have no one.
• 27:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: And this is exactly what Trump's three front pressure campaign
• 27:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: was designed to produce.
• 27:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: So first you squeeze Iran militarily and economically with the block aid.
• 27:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you're draining the IRGC of $500 million per day.
• 27:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Word on the street, by the way, IRGC isn't getting paid anymore.
• 27:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: Which means the regime again is going to collapse because the regime is based on patronage.
• 27:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: The regime buys loyalty and the moment the money dries up so does the loyalty.
• 27:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: Second, you weaken China's backup options by getting rid of Venezuela.
• 27:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're no longer in the table for China.
• 27:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then third, you give China an all-framp in the form of American oil.
• 27:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: Forget going to Venezuela, come to Texas.
• 27:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you get American oil, get America's soybeans, get American Boeing jets, and China's staring at a slowing economy,
• 28:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: a property crisis, youth unemployment, they take the offer amp, why wouldn't it they?
• 28:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: Iran just lost its finance here.
• 28:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: They just lost its biggest customer and it's most important diplomatic backer in the same summit.
• 28:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: That is 4D chess at the highest level.
• 28:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: So front one is the strategic art of flattery.
• 28:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Front two is getting China to defect on Iran, which is absolutely huge.
• 28:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: But then front three is what I'm calling the jackpot, the economic avalanche.
• 28:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump came away with a massive economic haul from this summit, and the numbers really are absolutely breathtaking.
• 28:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're talking 200 Boeing 737 Max Jets.
• 28:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: Okay, China, again, you have to put this in perspective.
• 29:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: China has not placed a major Boeing order in years.
• 29:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: They've been routing their business straight to Airbus in Europe.
• 29:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: 200 planes coming back to Boeing means American manufacturing jobs, American supply chains, and the direct hit to European aerospace.
• 29:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: It signals to the entire global market that the U.S. trying to trade lane is back open for the big ticket American goods that move the trade deficit.
• 29:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're also talking 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans per year for the next three years.
• 29:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's American farmers in Iowa and Illinois in Nebraska.
• 29:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: The people are getting crushed by the trade war.
• 29:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now they're getting their largest customer back.
• 29:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: And we already talked about the 600,000 barrels of American crude oil per day that's already
• 30:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: at current prices.
• 30:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: Again, that's close to $10 billion per month flowing from China into American energy producers.
• 30:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: You've got the extension of the rare earth minerals agreements.
• 30:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: So China's suspending its export controls on rare earth like gallium and germanium and
• 30:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: Intinamy and graphite for the benefit of U.S. and users.
• 30:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: This was the economic weapon Beijing was hoping.
• 30:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: They were counting on to strangle American ship manufacturing.
• 30:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: American battery production, American solar panels, American defense systems, right?
• 30:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: We need rare earth minerals to create all of these things.
• 30:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Trump has Beijing with its hand off that weapon.
• 30:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: for another year minimum.
• 30:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's largely because of the chip deal.
• 30:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: Again, it's just amazing how we use as the leverage here.
• 30:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: China for all of their minerals monopoly, they are still radically dependent on American chip and silicon manufacturing via Nvidia.
• 31:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: And this is it's subtle, but it's absolutely masterful.
• 31:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump approved the sale of Nvidia's H200 chip to about 10 major Chinese tech companies prior to that.
• 31:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: And video was banned from trading with China.
• 31:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: They still were able to get some of those chips in, but nevertheless they were banned that band's been lifted.
• 31:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, once again, the borderline illiterate headlines made this sound like a concession, but let me tell you what was not approved.
• 31:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: And again, this is so fascinating.
• 31:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: What was not approved was the Nvidia, what's known as their black wellline.
• 31:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: So this is the B-100, the B-200, the B-300, the chips that train America's frontier AI models.
• 31:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: The chips, the major American labs are stockpiling right now.
• 31:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Those have stayed banned.
• 32:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump gave G yesterday's flagship chip.
• 32:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: China gets the previous generation and video gets billions of restored China revenue and American AI labs keep their structural lead on the frontier.
• 32:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then now would Trump and G sit down in their next meeting in September when G comes to the United States when he's at the
• 32:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: The blackwell band, now itself, becomes new leverage.
• 32:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Something she badly wants, something Trump can hold over the table for the next round.
• 32:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is not giving away the crown jewel.
• 32:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: That is giving away last year's model while keeping the crown jewel locked in the vault for round two.
• 32:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's called the art of the deal.
• 32:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then that finally brings us to the fourth front in this four-D chess.
• 33:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: And it's this front that many believe to be the most consequential.
• 33:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: of them all.
• 33:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: But first gang, if you aren't just joining us, our super chats are up.
• 33:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: So feel free to send in your comments and your questions.
• 33:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'll be happy to answer them.
• 33:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: Be my honor to answer them on this live stream here.
• 33:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: Also, you know, when the left talks about affordability, they never seem to mention how costly excessive Biden era regulations have been to American
• 33:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: new rules were for I can't even swallow that, right?
• 33:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're forced on the hardworking Americans each year.
• 33:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: All these excessive rules and laws placed a heavy 1.8 trillion dollar burden on the back of hardworking Americans.
• 33:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now thankfully Trump is changing all that last year his administration cut more than six
• 33:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: 600 rules and regulation and the result was hundreds of billions of dollars in net savings about $600 per American and he's not done.
• 34:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Next month, the SEC is officially axing something called the Pattern Day Trader Rule.
• 34:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's a relic of the establishment era that's long served as a barrier to entry for building wealth.
• 34:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: in the stock market.
• 34:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now this rule forced people to keep 25,000 dollars in their account if they wanted to day trade.
• 34:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: But by removing this arbitrary threshold, the Trump administration is effectively democratizing the stock market, allowing everyday Americans to manage their own capital without being sideline by wealthy elites.
• 34:43
  [UNKNOWN]: So
• 34:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: if you've ever wanted to build wealth using the stock market now's the time to get started, which is why I'm so excited that Mark Wilburne of Neo's Capital will be hosting a free six day online training called the Zero to Trading Bootcamp.
• 35:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: It starts May 18th.
• 35:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: It goes all the way to the 23rd.
• 35:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Mark is a good friend of this channel, and he's been training for nearly 20 years.
• 35:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: His stock picks and trainings have helped our listeners not only beat the market, but in some cases even two X or three X, their market returns.
• 35:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, the last time Mark hosted one of these events, we had so much positive feedback from our listeners that we asked if you would do another.
• 35:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: People like Randy.
• 35:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: who said quote the zero to trading boot camp is an amazing program your financial life can be forever changed that's one of us gang so if you're wondering what you should do to position yourself to prosper in these turbulent times that click the link below right now or go to freeturlyticket.com
• 35:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: to reserve your spot.
• 35:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's online and everything.
• 35:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's one of you can enjoy it from the comfort of your own couch.
• 35:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: Actually, tickets are normally $97 for marks trainings, but marks agree to open up registration for free for all of our listeners because he wants to support patriots like you.
• 36:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Go to freeturlyticket.com right now to reserve your spot.
• 36:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: It begins May 18th.
• 36:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: You're going to absolutely love it.
• 36:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: All right.
• 36:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: So this brings us finally to front for.
• 36:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's the body language throughout the summit.
• 36:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, these are the details that tell the full story of who was actually in control of this meeting.
• 36:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: First, the reception itself.
• 36:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: Vice President Han Jun was waiting at the airport to greet Trump, a higher ranking official than even during Trump's last 2017 visit.
• 36:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: Hundreds of young people uniforms waving ribbons and shouting welcome slogans, large crowds gathering outside the four seasons hotel where Trump was staying.
• 36:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: Chinese social media absolutely lighting up with enthusiasm for Trump's arrival, something that's not happened for any foreign dignitarity this year despite years of anti-American propaganda from the CCP, Donald Trump still generates a level of curiosity and enthusiasm and excitement inside China.
• 37:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: that the CCP simply cannot manufacture replicate.
• 37:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Chinese observers, insiders who know how to decode CCP symbolism, notice something extraordinary.
• 37:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: The children at the welcoming ceremony, they weren't wearing red scarves.
• 37:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now gang, the red scarf is the signature symbol of what's called the young pioneers, one of the CCP's most important youth indoctrination organizations, representing communist ideology and the communist cause.
• 37:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: Beijing deliberately soft-pedaled, it's most visible, communist symbolism for Donald Trump in his delegation.
• 38:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's not a small thing.
• 38:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's Beijing, quietly signaling, we need this man's goodwill more than we need ideological posturing.
• 38:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then there was G himself,
• 38:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: Chinese observers noted that compared to previous summits, G appeared noticeably more restrained and less animated.
• 38:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: Some described him almost as looking tired.
• 38:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Others said he appeared unusually cautious.
• 38:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: And in a moment that went viral on Chinese social media when the PLA officer saluted during the troop inspection, Trump returned the salute.
• 38:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: G did not.
• 38:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: He bowed.
• 38:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: Who's the chief commander here?
• 38:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: The answer symbolically speaking was devastating for she's domestic prestige image by his own fault.
• 38:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: And let's not forget the music, right?
• 39:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: Did you hear, would Trump?
• 39:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: Because we got to watch out for copyrights here, but when Trump walked into the great hall of the people, what song was the Chinese military ban playing?
• 39:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: Did you see it?
• 39:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: Check it out on X.
• 39:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: They were playing YMCA.
• 39:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
• 39:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: In Beijing with the Chinese military marching band.
• 39:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, I don't know what stage of the simulation we're in gag, but this is not a picture of a leader who's negotiating from strength when it comes to G. This is a picture of a leader who's trying everything in his power to make his
• 39:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: Xi Jinping was literally playing Trump's campaign song at Trump's own state visit to China.
• 39:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: If that doesn't tell you who had the leverage in that room, nothing will.
• 39:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: Chinese state media cut its CCTV coverage of the summit to just about 17 minutes or so is compared to 27 minutes back in 2017 Trump's last visit the people's daily front page actually didn't even mention the summit at all in the day of the meeting.
• 40:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: These are all signs of a leader managing a delicate domestic political situation a leader who needed to demonstrate strength to his own party.
• 40:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: while simultaneously making major concessions to the American president.
• 40:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's exactly the box that Trump's pressure campaign that we've talked so much about of last couple of weeks had put President G in.
• 40:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: So now, when you step all the way back and look at the full panorama of this four-d chess, the flattery that cost Trump nothing, the Iran
• 40:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: the economic avalanche, the paedert, and then the symbolic boxing in of G. What are we actually watching here?
• 41:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're watching the full expression of what I've been calling civilization power being exercised at the highest level of global politics.
• 41:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: What the globalist establishment has never understood about Donald Trump is that he doesn't operate from the same rule book as the Kissinger's or the Biden's or the Obama's of the world.
• 41:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: The entire framework, their entire framework, I should say, was built around managing decline, managing multiplicity, managing the inevitable rise of China's appear competitor while we inevitably decline.
• 41:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump's framework.
• 41:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: And by the way, it looked like that was exactly what was happening in the four years of Biden.
• 41:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: And even in Trump's first term, he was constantly frustrated, especially with Russia-Hokes' nonsense.
• 42:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump's framework for Trump to point out is completely different.
• 42:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: His framework is America has leverage.
• 42:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: In fact, America has all the leverage in the world.
• 42:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: America has the oil.
• 42:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: America has the chips.
• 42:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: America has the japs.
• 42:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: America has the most innovative companies on the planet.
• 42:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: America controls the waterways.
• 42:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: America controls the choke points.
• 42:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: Use it.
• 42:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: What we saw in Beijing this week is the full application of that framework.
• 42:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: before Trump ever sat down with G. He had already moved the geopolitical pieces.
• 42:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: He had already squeezed Iran to the point where the IRGC is losing $500 million per day to this US-led blockade.
• 42:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: He had already pressured Venezuela undermining China's strategic backup in the Western Hemisphere.
• 43:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: to the negotiating table in South Korea last October.
• 43:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then he arrived in Beijing with the economic Avengers offered G the face he needed to survive politically at home and walked away with Boeing contracts, soybean deals, oil commitments, rare earth assurances, and China pivoting away from Tehran.
• 43:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, I know the skeptics are going to say something like, yeah, but Dr. Steve, can we trust China to follow through with all of this?
• 43:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's a very fair question.
• 43:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: But here's the thing, Trump built in the verification architecture.
• 43:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: That black well-chipped ban stays in place.
• 43:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: You better behave with the last year's model if you want the cutting edge model when we meet in the fall.
• 44:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: The rare earth deal, it's a one year suspension, not a permanent waiver.
• 44:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: G's coming to the United States in September 24th, which means that the next round of pressure leverage is already baked in.
• 44:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Trump himself told us exactly what to watch for.
• 44:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: Watch whether Chinese refiner's actually start cutting their Iranian crude purchases, because that is the proof that the oil pivot is real.
• 44:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's the receipt that shows whether G's commitment actually hold.
• 44:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump's not trusting China on faith.
• 44:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's built in a trust but verify a literal verification architecture deal by deal.
• 44:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: Summit by summit, leverage by leverage.
• 44:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: And here's the civilizational bottom line China's global influence network is under enormous strain right now Iran's being squeezed militarily and economically then as well of course has been taken off the table for them the BRI the Belt and Road Initiative is running and to push back across Africa and Southeast Asia.
• 45:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: The Chinese property crisis is gutting domestic consumer confidence, youth unemployment is at historic highs, and Xi Jinping who's consolidated personal power in a way that leaves him with no factional buffer if things go wrong.
• 45:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: Xi is managing all of this simultaneously while trying to project power for his own party.
• 45:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's the China that Donald Trump walked into
• 45:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: not arising hedge-mong operating from strength, but a system under enormous pressure operating from fear.
• 45:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Trump knew it, and he used it masterfully.
• 45:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: The legacy media will spend the next week telling you Trump got played.
• 46:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's the Rachel Mattel media at this point.
• 46:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: They'll focus on the flattery.
• 46:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: They'll focus on each 200 chips last year's model.
• 46:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: They'll focus on, you know, gee, got whatever you wanted, Trump got nothing.
• 46:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: All this nonsense.
• 46:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's right, your audiences are depleting, but as we speak.
• 46:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: But the receipts tell a completely different story.
• 46:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: 200 Boeing jets, 600,000 barrels of American oil per day, 25 million tons of American soybeans per year, rare earth controls suspended, trying to pivoting off Iran, G agreeing to broker a peace deal on the straight and the blackwell chip fans still firmly in Trump's back pocket for September.
• 46:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: That my friends is not a president who got played, that is a president who just outplayed the most sophisticated authoritarian state on the planet in their own palace with their own brass band playing YMCA that is perhaps the greatest concession of them all.
• 47:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: Over to you gang, over to you our super chats our live our moderator Josh is putting together your questions it will be my privilege to honor and honor I should say to answer them also let's face it you had a number in your head right.
• 47:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: The number you thought you could retire on and then the price of life went up and then it went up again and then it went up and up and now the question is whether you save it's whether what you save can still buy the retirement you plan for I mean think about what's happening right now.
• 47:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: Wars, flaring up, oil spikes, and then everything gets higher.
• 47:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Gas, groceries, insurance bills.
• 47:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: We've seen this before.
• 47:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're watching a structural shift in the global economy.
• 47:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're inflation isn't temporary, it's embedded.
• 47:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: And historically, when that happens, purchasing power doesn't recover.
• 48:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: It erodes.
• 48:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Your dollar buys less.
• 48:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Your savings carry less.
• 48:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: And people were counting down to retirement.
• 48:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: if they have enough to push it back, if they actually have to push it back all because the cost of living move the finish line.
• 48:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: That was my wake up goal.
• 48:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: I knew there had to be something else that I could do to protect what I built.
• 48:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I researched and that's when I found Augusta precious metals and gang, they taught me things I'd even know were possible.
• 48:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: I had no idea
• 48:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: tax-free and penalty-free, a real asset that held its value through war, oil spikes, and market chaos, that changed everything for me.
• 48:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: I've spoken with Augusta's education team.
• 48:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: These guys, I mean, gang, they know they're stuff and they explain it so clearly.
• 48:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: So here's what I recommend you do right now.
• 48:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Go to turlybyesgold.com or texturly to 35052 to get a ghost's free gold IRA guide.
• 49:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's turlybyesgold.com or texturly to 35052 because the retirement you dreamed of is still possible, but only if you protected.
• 49:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: All right, what have we got Josh?
• 49:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: What have we got?
• 49:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's go on over to what everyone else got to say.
• 49:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let me get my computer fired up here.
• 49:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Hey, don't tell me my pin is incorrect.
• 49:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yes, it was, of course.
• 49:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: Hey, Dr. Steve, from Stephanie, what is your insight on CIA rating, Tulsi Gabbards Office the other day?
• 49:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what do you think it means?
• 49:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: That is,
• 49:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, that was wild, wasn't it?
• 49:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's a couple of different theories that's to what's going on there.
• 49:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's one theory is that the CIA basically rating Tulsi Gabbard's office was set up by Tulsi.
• 50:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: Um, uh, another theory is that it's basically, uh, it's, it's a coup by the, let me, let me give you the full picture here because I think this story is, I do think this story is part deep state drama.
• 50:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think it's part media chaos and I think it's part deliberate political warfare.
• 50:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: let me try to break that all down.
• 50:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's let's go with what we know.
• 50:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: So it goes back to the CIA with the Blower James Urban.
• 50:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: He testified before the Senate Homeland Security Committee this week and he alleged
• 50:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: that the CIA quietly removed approximately 40 boxes of JFK assassination files and the MK-altrad documents from Gabbards, ODI, DNI, so the Office of Director of National Intelligence Office.
• 51:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: So documents that were being actively processed for declassification, Trump's own executive order.
• 51:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: Florida Congresswoman Anna Polina Luna.
• 51:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: She just let's just say she went ballistic over it.
• 51:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: She issued a preservation subpoena to the CIA, demanding the documents be returned to the ODI and I. Gabbard's own office officially denied it was a raid.
• 51:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the CIA calls the whistleblower testimony bad faith and political theater.
• 51:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they're in effect denying it.
• 52:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: So here's my read on this from what we seem to know from old the facts of what we seem to know.
• 52:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: I do not think this was a set up by Tulsi.
• 52:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think Laura Loomer was saying that I like Laura.
• 52:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: Don't get me wrong.
• 52:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: But I think that was Laura Loomer's argument here that this was Tulsi making
• 52:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: She sees Tulsi and Joe can is basically the same.
• 52:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so she thinks this is Tulsi making hay while Trump is gone.
• 52:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't think that.
• 52:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: At least I just don't have any evidence that that's the case.
• 52:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: Instead, I think what we're watching is the deep state, what's left of it, bureaucracy inside the CIA, doing what it's always done.
• 52:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: Just it just seems to me this is the most obvious explanation.
• 52:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's trying to protect its darkest secrets by removing them before they can be declassified and exposed to the American public.
• 53:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, the MK Ultra.
• 53:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: files here.
• 53:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: I have an interesting article on all this.
• 53:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know if you know it's a covert CIA mine control program that ran from 1953 to 1973 officially authorized by the CIA director at the time and it used all these illegal human experiments designed to develop techniques for interrogation and psychological manipulation mine control they were using LSD and
• 53:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: hypnosis and sensory deprivation, torture, the MK Ultra files alone are catastrophically embarrassing to the CIA, the GA of K files potentially implicate CIA operatives directly.
• 53:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the CIA, which technically operates under ODNI,
• 53:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: the Office of Director of National Intelligence.
• 54:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: Apparently decided it would rather defy its own chain of command and face a congressional subpoena than let Tulsi Gabbard declassify those documents.
• 54:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: I just think that's the most obvious explanation here that whatever residual remainder of the deep state got nervous and tried to take those documents back and they were willing
• 54:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: They continue to believe they can hide behind the layers of bureaucracy, so as to avoid consequence.
• 54:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I don't think this is a setup from Tulsi.
• 54:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think it's an institution that believes it's still, or there's still, there are still players within that institution who believe they're above the law.
• 54:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the institution always has believed it's above the law.
• 54:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's why people join the deep state.
• 54:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: They join the deep state in order to make money and in order to be above accountability.
• 55:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: So now I think the real story here is what is daddy do when he gets back?
• 55:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: The real story here is whether Trump will force rack-cliff, director CIA, and the CIA to comply with his orders and return those boxes.
• 55:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's going to tell us, I think, everything about whether this administration can finally completely break the deep state's iron grip on its own most classified secrets as it were.
• 55:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that, again, we have limited knowledge of what's going on and we can make some assessments based on that limited knowledge and there's assessments, I try to always go with the most likely explanation of what's going on here.
• 55:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there you go, Stephanie, that's that's what I see going on.
• 56:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: for the super chat there, max a million.
• 56:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you say that scientific rationalism fails its own test.
• 56:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: What are the scientific rationales' arguments that it does pass?
• 56:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: What are their rebuttals?
• 56:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what arguments do we have to disprove
• 56:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: that it passes.
• 56:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: After all, unless I'm much mistaken, isn't this the Achilles heel, we should be focusing our intellectual attacks on the enemy.
• 56:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 56:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, it seems to me from the scientific materialist conception of the world,
• 56:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: The self-negating starting point is probably the best place to hit them because it's being widely admitted now.
• 57:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's being widely admitted that the notion that science is the only way of truly knowing the world is an inherently contradictory system.
• 57:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: There is no evidence for empiricism, right?
• 57:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: If you say I only believe on the basis of evidence, there is no evidence for that assertion.
• 57:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: There is no evidence for evidence.
• 57:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: you're assuming a starting point that doesn't exist, which validates all evidence, but it's not itself evidential, right?
• 57:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: Or better you're assuming a starting point that validates all evidence, that is not itself evidential, and therefore negates itself, it's better way of looking at it.
• 57:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then, then you reason,
• 57:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: by itself suffers, again, this is widely, right?
• 58:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's been recognized for ages.
• 58:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: The suffers from the fallacy of the infinite regress.
• 58:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Reason never is able to ground itself.
• 58:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: Reason is inference.
• 58:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: So reason begins with a major premise, then has a minor premise, and then your rational if your conclusion is a legitimate inference from the two premises, all men are mortal, socrates is a man, therefore socrates is mortal.
• 58:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: If all men are mortal,
• 58:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: And if Socrates is a man, therefore, the inference from that, the conclusion is rational if it's implied in the major premise in the minor premise, namely, Socrates is therefore mortal.
• 58:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: But how do we know the first premise is true?
• 58:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: How do we know that?
• 58:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: And how do we even know the second premise?
• 58:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, then it has to be from rationality's own rules,
• 59:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: The major premise has to have been a legitimate inference from two previous premises.
• 59:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: But we only know their valid, if they are the legitimate inference from two previous premises, and that's the infinite regress that never ends.
• 59:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: So rationalism is never able to ground itself, and empiricism's ground is contradictory, self-contradictories, since empiricism is grounded on an assertion of foundational belief on the validity of evidence that is not itself evidential.
• 59:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's no evidence for it.
• 59:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's begging the question of it.
• 59:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's where you go, generally speaking, if you're dealing with scientism.
• 59:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: But then I'm not sure where you're going with the rest.
• 59:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: What are their re- their re-bottles?
• 59:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's see, what are the scientific ration that it does pass?
• 1:00:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I've, I've, I've come to be honest with you, Maximine, maybe I'm not the best person to ask here.
• 1:00:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: I haven't heard them.
• 1:00:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, the only re-bottles I've heard are questioned begging.
• 1:00:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, it's like, well, how can you know if there's no evidence for something?
• 1:00:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they just put the shoe on the other foot, and I always play agnostic at that moment.
• 1:00:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: I said, well, I don't, you know, I don't know if I can articulate it.
• 1:00:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: But I know that however we do know it's not evidentialism.
• 1:00:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know that because it's self-contradictory.
• 1:00:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know it's not rationalism because it suffers from the infinite regress.
• 1:00:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know that.
• 1:00:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: So, so whether I could give you an alternative form of knowledge is not going to help your case for evidentialism or rationalism, right?
• 1:00:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I, but I just noticed that they tend to put the shoe on the other foot.
• 1:00:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: They, they do tend to deflect having to defend their self-contradictory belief system by asking you to defend yours.
• 1:01:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: Other than that, they just constantly go back and say things like, you know, well, mathematics doesn't need any, any grounding.
• 1:01:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's just self-evidential and things like that, but again, that's it still doesn't work because no, it's not self-evidential.
• 1:01:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: What if I don't believe in that when I if I disagree with that, it's rooted in a worldview.
• 1:01:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Mathematics makes sense in an ontology, an ontological worldview that opens up for the infinite, but then that's when you start getting into theistic belief.
• 1:01:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there you go, I'm not, I think it is the Achilles heel to hit.
• 1:01:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: focus on the contradiction and be very sensitive to the attempt at deflecting and having you account for your own epistemology apart from, or as a way of getting away from having to admit defeat of their own, that's where I'd probably go with that.
• 1:02:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: Ben Den, recently Barbara Boyd of the Permitian reported Senator Alyssa Slotkin, Obama and the Center of Economic Progress, and Alex Soros joined Mark Carney in Toronto to encourage the American working class to join the Globalist Progress Socialist Movement.
• 1:02:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: They did not have the Hutsbud to have the program in the USA.
• 1:02:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: As I understand Obama may have violated, oh, the Loganac, yeah, to appreciate your clarity on the map.
• 1:02:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know about it, Benton.
• 1:02:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: I love the ladies who have a Prometheus rising, the Promethian channel that focuses on how the British world order is being overturned by Maga.
• 1:03:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: and this new civilizationalist order.
• 1:03:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: But I don't know, I wouldn't be able to comment on it, unfortunately, it.
• 1:03:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: I haven't caught up.
• 1:03:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: I would be, I'm a list of slackeners.
• 1:03:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: She's a Republican, isn't she?
• 1:03:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let me see.
• 1:03:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: No, sorry, I'm getting her wrong.
• 1:03:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: No, she's from Michigan.
• 1:03:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yes, she's like, fuck, fuck, she's very obnoxious Democrat for giving me for even suggesting for tarnishing Republican image like that.
• 1:03:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I don't know, I don't know.
• 1:03:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: They are under pressure enormous pressure to try to win the working class back.
• 1:03:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: That is their Achilles heel.
• 1:03:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: They lost the working class.
• 1:03:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're seeing it in the UK, speaking of.
• 1:03:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're seeing it with the local elections last week, last Thursday, where reform crushed it.
• 1:04:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: And reform crushed it in both, this was Brilliant's beautiful.
• 1:04:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: In both blue collar traditionally labor regions, as well as traditionally a white collar traditionally Tory regions.
• 1:04:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: They crushed it in both because they were able to bridge
• 1:04:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: the pivoted left on economics to bring in the working class, and they pivoted right on culture to keep the traditional Tory vote satisfied as well, because the Tories have been so disappointing on culture.
• 1:04:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they've been able to bring both the left and right together in a populist way, because Pockett will see the divide not as left versus right, but the people
• 1:04:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: and as long as the working class have abandoned the left, either Democrats or Labor, Democrats or Labor are shot.
• 1:05:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're absolutely shot.
• 1:05:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: They could try to build their coalition on third-world identity politics all they want and LGBT and all that sort of stuff.
• 1:05:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's only going to be limited.
• 1:05:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's not going to be more than 20-30% of the population.
• 1:05:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: And they're going to get crushed.
• 1:05:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's what I think is happening here.
• 1:05:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what are the poll sources you rely on showing for Arizona governor elections, et cetera, as well as California governor and L.A. Mayer races.
• 1:05:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Good question.
• 1:05:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: I do not have specific polling sources for those specific regions.
• 1:05:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I tend to I like corroboration.
• 1:05:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: So what I'll do is I'll see one poll.
• 1:05:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: And for for a race or what's going on in in California and then I want to look at another pole and then I want to look at another pole and then I also look I really defer to voter registration trends because Seth Cashle was made I think the very persuasive argument.
• 1:06:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: that the most predictive accurate predictive indicator for how an elections could turn out is how people registering ahead of the election.
• 1:06:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: Very few people register Republican and then just weeks later vote Democrat.
• 1:06:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: Very, very few.
• 1:06:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: So if we're seeing a clear voter registration trends,
• 1:06:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: in one direction, that's the party that you will want to favor for the outcome of the election.
• 1:06:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: And you gave me California, and Arizona, both, as I understand both California and Arizona, Republicans have been crushing it.
• 1:06:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: I forget if California though,
• 1:06:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: I thought they I know Arizona registers according to party.
• 1:06:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: They have a partisan breakdown not everybody does like Wisconsin or Georgia.
• 1:06:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: They don't.
• 1:06:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you have to look at bellwethers to see what they're doing.
• 1:07:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know Arizona is and Republicans are crushing it there.
• 1:07:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're they're good.
• 1:07:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's going to be a 10 point advantage at some and the not so distant future over Democrats.
• 1:07:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: Again, though, how that translates at local levels is also harder because local elections or statewide elections can often not be the turnout that you need saying a presidential election.
• 1:07:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: So SESS model is perfect for a presidential election.
• 1:07:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's working on the model for midterm elections.
• 1:07:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, I have to see how it plays itself out.
• 1:07:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: But I do not have specific pollsters, polling sources for those specific places.
• 1:07:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: I just go with what's out there.
• 1:07:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then I try to see if there's a pattern when I corroborate it with other polling.
• 1:07:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you don't just go with one pollster.
• 1:07:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's the bottom line.
• 1:08:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: Try to combine polling with voter registration.
• 1:08:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: William, Dr. Terlia, be Friday.
• 1:08:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm seeing reports on Mike Pence.
• 1:08:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: His allegedly deep state allegiances to Indiana, Job, a GOP about redistricting.
• 1:08:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: His being allegedly the leak in the White House, et cetera.
• 1:08:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: How credible do you believe that these allegations may be a not fantasy?
• 1:08:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, definitely, I don't know about the leaking.
• 1:08:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: It may be there, but definitely he is he was one of the major forces behind trying to embarrass Trump in not redistricting after Trump specifically said we want those two seats.
• 1:08:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: By the way, depending on how you break it down
• 1:08:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: In redistricting, we'd be at 218 right now.
• 1:08:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: Again, it's to I think that's the inside elections for casting cook not cook has us down the cook political report has us right now to 11.
• 1:09:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Crystal Ball, I think, has us around two, 14, if I recall, safe seats.
• 1:09:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: So if, but inside election, I think, has us at two, 17.
• 1:09:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: So we'd be at two, 19 right now.
• 1:09:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that was a deliberate attempt to embarrass Trump and to try to lose the midterms, I think.
• 1:09:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: tenure as leader of the Republican Party eliminated.
• 1:09:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: They want it over.
• 1:09:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: And this sooner they can do that, the better.
• 1:09:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: The more wins he racks up, the least likely that will be.
• 1:09:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: they're going to fail in the end obviously as we saw where what was at seven of the eight and up getting voted out of office in the in the primaries so they're going to fail but it doesn't mean they can again it's always a matter of how much damage they do in in the interim.
• 1:10:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: But no, Mike Pence is behind it every bit as much as I think Nikki Haley was behind the South Carolina collapse of redistricting, getting picking up that one seat in the Senate with the five Republicans voting against, by the way, the governor's already calling a special session, they just need a simple majority to do that.
• 1:10:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: So South Carolina looks like it's going to be fine, but
• 1:10:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, you know, you just have to understand we this is this is the uniparty.
• 1:10:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is the Republican party.
• 1:10:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is Republican wing of the uniparty and they do not like upsetting Democrats because half their stock picks come from Democrats.
• 1:10:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm just going to be blunt to you.
• 1:10:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: These guys are scum.
• 1:10:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: They will hide behind their principles, suppose it Republican principles, so that they can make money and they make money half their stock tips come from Democrats.
• 1:11:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they don't like upsetting Democrats.
• 1:11:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's what's going on.
• 1:11:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're scum and sooner we get rid of them the better.
• 1:11:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Peacefully, we always have to say that, right?
• 1:11:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: Carter Benton, in other words, Trump just pulled the rug,
• 1:11:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: from right under G, but he didn't do it publicly.
• 1:11:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: It was so, it was done so G wouldn't be in bear.
• 1:11:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: Absolutely, you cannot exactly.
• 1:11:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: You can embarrass G, you can embarrass Putin.
• 1:11:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: embarrassing them only has them dig deeper.
• 1:11:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: It only has them acting more recalcitrant towards you because they have to to save face within their power struggles.
• 1:11:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: So absolutely you've got this and Trump knows this and again for for Trump it's always at the end of the day
• 1:11:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: how much money is pouring into the United States, how much power are we exercising throughout the world?
• 1:11:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's all he cares about.
• 1:11:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: And by the way, that's all they care about, too, is not the money coming into the United States, but how much power can they project to their challengers from inside their regimes and also outside with the civilizational sort of gravity that draws their own individual spheres, the Chinese sphere,
• 1:12:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: orthodox fear, brasha, the induced fear, India, the Sunis fear, the Ottoman sphere of Turkey or the Sunis fear, Saudi Arabia, how much can you project power?
• 1:12:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: in that, in your own hegemon, in your own region, and Trump is very sensitive to that.
• 1:12:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: The only way he's going to rip you apart in that is if there's a full-out war like what he's doing with the regime right now and Iran.
• 1:12:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, he made play around a little bit to get you to the board like he did with rocket man, right?
• 1:12:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: And his first term.
• 1:12:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: Richard, Dr. Steve, early poll for Democrat 2028 candidates.
• 1:13:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: AOC, that mayor Pete knew some Kamala.
• 1:13:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: These are clowns of their pension thoughts.
• 1:13:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: You said it pretty well.
• 1:13:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, these are, it's, it's just at this point from what I understand.
• 1:13:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: Just not a serious, it's not a serious bench.
• 1:13:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, JD, Marco, whoever it is, or it's a combo of JD and Marco, they're going to, they're going to crush them.
• 1:13:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, I just, at this point, Americans tend to like two terms for a presidency.
• 1:13:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: You have to be, you have to, either have to cheat or you have to be a disaster.
• 1:13:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: You have to be a Carter, you have to be a Bush senior, where it just, well, no, I wouldn't Bush senior was actually Trump's, I'm sorry, Reagan's third term.
• 1:13:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's very hard to only one term of president and right now with Trump technically speaking because of the cheating back in 2020, this is this is Trump's I would argue this is his first term.
• 1:14:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: in many respects, because this Trump 2.0 is completely unlike anything we saw in his first term.
• 1:14:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: So people are going to want to continue it.
• 1:14:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're going to want to keep the border closed, they're going to want manufacturing in the industry staying, they're going to want the economic prosperity that it's bringing, they're going to want the relative piece and the
• 1:14:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: in the world.
• 1:14:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're going to want that.
• 1:14:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're going to want wokeness staying out of their their locker rooms and their lives and so forth.
• 1:14:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they'll bring in JD, they'll bring in Marko definitely.
• 1:14:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: AOC.
• 1:14:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: I do think in the end, it's Kamala's to lose.
• 1:14:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: just because of just the demographics of the primaries, you know, the, I just Kamala inevitably is going to get the black vote and the black vote has a Norden influence in, um, in national Democrat politics.
• 1:14:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's why we thought Jasmine Crockett will probably
• 1:14:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: overtake Tolerico just because of just the the inordinate influence that black and minority votes have in the Democrat party just because of the they're doubling down on identity politics.
• 1:15:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: it was able to pull it out in the Democrat primaries and Texas.
• 1:15:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: But nationally, it's going to be very hard.
• 1:15:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think it's Kamala's to lose.
• 1:15:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think she's going to run and I think it's going to be you.
• 1:15:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: Like we've seen historically, it's going to be an object disaster.
• 1:15:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: No one has been able
• 1:15:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: to run after losing in the next election after losing in the kind of landslide that she did and when you would have to wait at least one more election cycle like Nixon did and he didn't lose in a landslide.
• 1:15:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: He barely lost by only a hundred thousand votes and that was questionable to begin with.
• 1:15:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: I like both of them.
• 1:15:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think Reagan and
• 1:15:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: or Nixon and Kennedy were, I would both be solid Republicans today.
• 1:15:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: But there's just no way, right now they're just, it's not a serious bench.
• 1:16:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: Joan, off topic, I know, I know NATO is a Japanese dish.
• 1:16:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: Does your wife actually like it?
• 1:16:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: I ate it for a while, even cultured, but couldn't stomach the smell taste in stringy texture.
• 1:16:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's really interesting.
• 1:16:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: You bring that up, Joan.
• 1:16:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, so it is, um, it's not so much a Japanese dish as it is a Tokyo dish.
• 1:16:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: As I understand it, it is a very Tokyo-specific dish within Japan.
• 1:16:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: So even there are even Japanese who really don't care for Nato.
• 1:16:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: But yes, my wife does love Nato.
• 1:16:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: She always has it.
• 1:16:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: She's a, she's a Tokyo girl and believe it or not, I'm not told Dyski as I tell people in Japan because they've often asked me that if I eat
• 1:16:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: And if no one knows that it is, it's a, I guess it's a soybean, a fermented soybean, and it is.
• 1:17:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's very sticky and slimy and stringy, but you often eat it with raw egg, stirred into it, and on a bed of rice.
• 1:17:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so yes, I do.
• 1:17:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: I do enjoy not to apparently it's supposed to be very good for your cholesterol.
• 1:17:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: But and so sometimes doctors will actually prescribe it.
• 1:17:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: for others.
• 1:17:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: But you're not alone.
• 1:17:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: If you don't like that smell taste or stringy texture, you're not alone plenty of Japanese don't like it either.
• 1:17:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: Kevin A. Dr. Steve, what do you think about the rhinos undermining the redistricting?
• 1:17:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
• 1:17:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
• 1:17:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, they're, that's the in a party.
• 1:17:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's what got Trump, and this is what they don't understand.
• 1:17:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's what got Trump elected back in 2016.
• 1:17:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: And I would argue 2020 and 2024.
• 1:17:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, they're, they're the in a party.
• 1:17:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's the wing of the Republican party that does not want to upset the Democrat side of their stock fix.
• 1:18:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's bottom line.
• 1:18:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: What it is?
• 1:18:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: All right.
• 1:18:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's all about money.
• 1:18:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's all about power.
• 1:18:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's not about ideology.
• 1:18:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't care about ideology.
• 1:18:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: They don't like the fact that Trump has interrupted their gravy train.
• 1:18:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: So yeah, we'll see how it all plays out.
• 1:18:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't think it.
• 1:18:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think at the end, it looks like we're going to hit 2018.
• 1:18:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: 20.
• 1:18:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: I do that every time I do 22, 20.
• 1:18:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: I guess I'm always talking years or elections.
• 1:18:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: It looks like we're going to hit two 18.
• 1:18:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: It does.
• 1:18:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: We'll know in the next few weeks, probably next month.
• 1:18:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: Again, it depends which projection model you're looking at.
• 1:18:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I'm just looking for at least one projection model to get us 2018.
• 1:18:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: It looks like inside elections is going to give us.
• 1:18:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: a safe seat or leaning seat of 220 by the time all said and done.
• 1:18:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's at 217 now and we've got four seats to come.
• 1:19:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: And with Louisiana South Carolina, Alabama, I think Mississippi is counted in that
• 1:19:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: But cook will fall short, cook I think will at most give us to 15 and I think crystal ball might get us to 18.
• 1:19:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: Right now, as I understand, the projections are 217, 2111, and I think 214, I think, might be 209, something like that.
• 1:19:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then that's it.
• 1:19:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: We just, I mean, in the end, we just need a few seats, the toss up seats.
• 1:19:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: And,
• 1:19:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: the Democrats would need to run around with the the tall subsets and need to win every single one a feat they didn't even accomplish back in 2018 and 20 there hard go into 2018 when they won 40 seats we still won some toss ups so we just need to win a few toss ups and we when we keep control of the the house but ask yourself what
• 1:20:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: political party in their right minds has the opportunity to bake in and secure their majority in the house in perpetuity and doesn't take that.
• 1:20:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: What party is that?
• 1:20:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: A unit party that makes at least half their money from the other side.
• 1:20:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's the only explanation.
• 1:20:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: From Dr. Steve, if underwriting sanctioned cargo is illegal, how would sanction ships port without their liability being covered?
• 1:20:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: And will their penalties for those?
• 1:20:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: And will their penalties for those that cover it?
• 1:20:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: And will there be penalties for those?
• 1:21:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: Okay, let me see if I understand.
• 1:21:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: If underwriting sanctioned cargo is illegal, okay, so right, there is no,
• 1:21:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, I wonder, I bet there are, I don't know, but I bet there are sort of black market.
• 1:21:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: Um, you know, um, underriding organizations, probably via the government, luck will pay you know, uh, if you lose the shipment, we'll pay for it.
• 1:21:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: Don't worry about it kind of thing.
• 1:21:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so it's a, I wouldn't be surprised if there was under the table, um, underriding going on.
• 1:21:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: But if underriding sanctioned car is illegal, how would sanction ships, port without their liability being covered?
• 1:21:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: be penalties for those that cover they're okay.
• 1:21:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I get it.
• 1:21:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's a good question.
• 1:21:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know the answer to that.
• 1:21:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know the insurance economy well enough.
• 1:21:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: The Lloyds of London world.
• 1:22:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: So my initial sense, and but you bring a great question, how do they get to ports?
• 1:22:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: How are they allowed to dock and take realist port real estate up if they're not legitimately, legitimately underwritten with insurance.
• 1:22:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: Good question, I don't know the answer.
• 1:22:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: Don't know logistics, very good question.
• 1:22:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: I should find out how, hold me accountable to that prompt.
• 1:22:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: Or maybe some people now, put it in the chat if you guys know.
• 1:22:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: Uh, is it, do you, didn't, do you, didn't was there any news on Jimmy lie release?
• 1:22:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know that either.
• 1:22:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's a very good question.
• 1:22:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let me check that out.
• 1:22:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Actually, that wouldn't take me more than a minute here.
• 1:22:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: Although my, I've got a super cool computer, but it's slow in terms of like coming out of hibernation was Jimmy lie released I will ask my super awesome AI if Jimmy lie was released.
• 1:23:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, no Jimmy lie has not been released.
• 1:23:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: In fact, the situation is deeply grim.
• 1:23:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: Oh, that's interesting.
• 1:23:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: In December 2025, Hong Kong's high court found the guilty of conspiracy to publish seditious material and two counts of colluding with foreign forces under their
• 1:23:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: In February, he was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
• 1:23:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's effectively a lie sentence because he's 78.
• 1:23:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: Secretary of State Rubio called an unjust, an tragic conclusion.
• 1:23:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: The UN Human Rights Chief called for his immediate release, given his age and health.
• 1:24:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Um, but there has been no, uh, oh, and Trump did say, uh, that he would bring it up with because remember, um, G and Trump had a private meeting with G's own daughter who's Harvard, Harvard educated doing the translation.
• 1:24:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: Trump has not told us what he's talked about on that.
• 1:24:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: That is in the temple of the heavens.
• 1:24:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: Very interesting stuff.
• 1:24:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: It also indicates G is a little paranoid about his own inner circle.
• 1:24:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's why there's been no public confirmation that Trump secured lies release or that even brought it up with G. So we'll have to say keep an eye on it.
• 1:24:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you for doing that.
• 1:24:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you for not letting the most vulnerable among us being forgotten.
• 1:24:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you for that.
• 1:24:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: John, it seems apparent that woke Democrats and European liberals prefer Islam to Christianity.
• 1:25:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Why do you suppose why this is?
• 1:25:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: You're right.
• 1:25:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: The way I understand it is through the prism of third worldism.
• 1:25:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: Okay, so you can look this up.
• 1:25:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's a really interesting kind of rabbit hold, just, and it's very fruitful, because I think, you know, connect a lot of things for you.
• 1:25:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Third worldists believe that Western civilization is evil.
• 1:25:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's the absolute evil in the world.
• 1:25:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: And they blame it on whites and whites by definition, the worst racist in the world and everything, and the oppressors and so forth.
• 1:25:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: The third world uprising is not only justifiable, but it's actually morally necessary.
• 1:26:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: You are morally obligated if you recognize that the world is made up of oppressor and oppressed victimizer and victim, and that the oppressor is the western world.
• 1:26:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the oppressed and the those who want to revolt against that oppression are the third world.
• 1:26:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: The moment you recognize that, then you are morally obligated to support them in every way imaginable.
• 1:26:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: The first world Western civilization is always wrong because they're the oppressor.
• 1:26:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the third world,
• 1:26:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: oppressed is always right because they're the victims.
• 1:26:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: So whatever they're doing, however they're acting out, it is a response to the first blood drawn by the oppressor of Western civilization.
• 1:26:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is why the Somali community that's been involved in billions of
• 1:27:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: fraud in Minneapolis.
• 1:27:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're only doing it because they were first depressed by the very people that set up Minneapolis.
• 1:27:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you can't blame them.
• 1:27:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: that you would do it too, if you were in that kind of mentality.
• 1:27:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the number one religion of course Western civilization is Christianity.
• 1:27:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: The number one most popular religion among third world is Islam.
• 1:27:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: So Islam is the sacred.
• 1:27:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's the sanctified resistance.
• 1:27:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so, that's why they always side with Islamists.
• 1:27:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: And this is why the Democratic Party is becoming increasingly Islamo-socialist.
• 1:27:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: Because it provides the religion and the values that every civilization needs.
• 1:28:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: You've got to have a religion, there's no way around it.
• 1:28:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: And you can't make it up like wokeness.
• 1:28:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Wokeness is just stupid.
• 1:28:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: So it doesn't go very far.
• 1:28:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: Remember, it splits half the left, half the the Bill Marlub can't stand woe.
• 1:28:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: So, but Islam is, you can't stand against that because standing against that is standing against the primary sanctification of the revolt of the revolution of the oppressed.
• 1:28:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: So, that's why they tend to favor Islam and they denounce Christianity.
• 1:28:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's all based on this Marxist binary of
• 1:28:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: Politically incorrect forever.
• 1:28:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: Love that tag.
• 1:28:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's Steve.
• 1:28:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: Here's an ideal pork barrel project.
• 1:28:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: Relocate 10,000 plus wild boars to little Mogadishu in Minneapolis.
• 1:28:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yes, I mean, I can't believe you're making me read this.
• 1:28:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: Then study the Environmental Impact of wild boars on Little Mogadishu.
• 1:29:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: Oh, you're terrible.
• 1:29:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Boo.
• 1:29:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: Boo.
• 1:29:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: I have to say that.
• 1:29:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Is that my political correctness coming up?
• 1:29:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: my little you are politically incorrect forever for sure that'd be that'd be hilarious.
• 1:29:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: What is it kind of reminds me of that south park episode when when where where are they in spring field or where I forget or is that the Simpsons and whatever their town is it got inundated with hippies.
• 1:29:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: all these hippies and it became this mass infestation of hippies so they would people would find hippies like inside their walls and so forth and they can stand the smell and the weed and all that sort of stuff.
• 1:29:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: So the way they got rid of the hippies is they had a heavy metal concert
• 1:29:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: on their town green is starting playing metal and they start leaving in mass like a a pide pipe or with a rat or whatever the mice.
• 1:29:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's just very funny.
• 1:29:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there you go.
• 1:29:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Find some cultural symbol that all of them despise and they run away.
• 1:30:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: France, Dr. Zeev, was our military presence in the Malacostrate use as leverage to set up negotiations in China.
• 1:30:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: So part of the analysis that I've read is it was part of it.
• 1:30:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: Of course, China would never admit to it, but it was part of it.
• 1:30:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: 80% of China's imports come through the straight in Malak and Malak as I understand it, and it's in most narrow point, it's only two miles wide.
• 1:30:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: It makes Hormuz look like the Pacific Ocean.
• 1:30:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: It is very, very small.
• 1:30:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so this latest, um,
• 1:30:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: treaty that we just signed with Indonesia.
• 1:30:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: And Malaysia has already been on our side in Singapore, of course, as a long time ally for especially for security.
• 1:30:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I mean, in many ways, that was the ball game.
• 1:30:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, with the,
• 1:30:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Morocco, Treaty as well, that we signed to have full rights over Gibraltar in terms of our military, our own Panama Canal, and then Hormuz.
• 1:31:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, those four choke points.
• 1:31:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: from Atlantic to Pacific, we're just, I mean, that's a game changer.
• 1:31:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: He controls choke points, you know, controls energy, traffic, food, you name it, you know, weapon shipments, you name it.
• 1:31:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: So it's, that was a huge, huge part of it.
• 1:31:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: As when I mean, when the legacy media talks about who Trump went to Beijing,
• 1:31:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: uh, Moronic TDS, um, narrative that only a Rachel Maddow mentality and an increasingly unfortunately, like a kind of Tucker mentality actually believe.
• 1:31:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: And it's just stupid.
• 1:32:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's just dumb.
• 1:32:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: It just, it doesn't even understand the world as it actually is right now.
• 1:32:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: So yeah, so they won't say it explicitly, but I have seen it in the analysis that Malaka was was part of G's recognition, all right, we better negotiate here.
• 1:32:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: And it was really, you know, the meeting had already been set up before we got the Malaka straight access, but it certainly
• 1:32:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: Thrawn, love that.
• 1:32:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: Look at that.
• 1:32:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Good good good image there thumbnail.
• 1:32:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: Why has anyone talked about how the Democrat party is trying to destroy the electoral college by pushing its certain states, electoral votes can only go to the person who in the popular vote.
• 1:32:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm with you.
• 1:32:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, no, people are talking about that.
• 1:32:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: I appreciate that.
• 1:32:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's been brought up several times on our channel.
• 1:32:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: And it's so the the the the
• 1:33:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: The bottom line is it's backfiring on them.
• 1:33:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they believed based on the 2000 election, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, they believed that the popular vote was forever.
• 1:33:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: moving in their direction because they had all of the population in the cosmopolitan areas, the metro areas, L.A. San Francisco, Chicago, New York City, Filly, Seattle, Portland, Boston.
• 1:33:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: popular vote locked up.
• 1:33:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: What 2024 showed is that if you can turn out the load and no prop voters, voters that have voted only once in the last four elections or it didn't vote at all in the last four elections.
• 1:34:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: then you can actually negate that popular vote, that more cosmopolitan popular vote, with these low to no props, so that Trump ended up getting what two million more votes than come on.
• 1:34:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so now ironically, as long as the Republican,
• 1:34:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: ground game get out the vote.
• 1:34:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Ground game that what we call go TV right get out the vote ground game is locked in like we saw with Cliff Meloney who I just interviewed will have an interview tomorrow on his latest project he has a new book out.
• 1:34:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: and implementing the get out the vote efforts like along with Scott Prussler.
• 1:34:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: As long as we've got that locked in, we'll be getting those low to no prop voters activated in every election, and we should be able to win.
• 1:35:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: the popular vote from the foreseeable future.
• 1:35:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: We can outweigh the Democrats every single time with it, just because low to no prop are the ones that vote populists.
• 1:35:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're the ones who voted for Brexit.
• 1:35:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're the ones who voted overwhelmingly.
• 1:35:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: And
• 1:35:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: the last local elections in Britain that gave reform over 1400 seats in their local elections.
• 1:35:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: So we can do that.
• 1:35:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: So this is blowing up in their face.
• 1:35:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's the irony.
• 1:35:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: But yes, now they hate the electoral college because it works in our favor.
• 1:35:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's why they hate redistricting.
• 1:35:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, Louisiana could have a map, if I recall, it's 70, I think they have seven, seven, uh, uh, uh, congress seats of districts, they can have a 70 map where every single district is at least Trump plus 20.
• 1:35:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: They every single district is a plus Trump, uh, plus 20 Trump district.
• 1:36:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Everyone.
• 1:36:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: You don't have to, and not in a single one, they could all be contiguous.
• 1:36:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: Exactly like our founding fathers envisioned in the constitution.
• 1:36:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: They don't have to do the salamander districts or anything like that or the, what's it the, you know, crab districts and these insane weird looking districts that like the Democrats do, because the Democrats have to, have to steer them around this location specific, you know, urban population.
• 1:36:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: their demographic, their voting demographic, their constituencies are so geographically specific.
• 1:36:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is why in the end, if there were ever God forbid a civil war, you know, red states and or just the the rural population would be able to more or less blockade every single Democrat population center, which is they couldn't do the same to us.
• 1:37:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Carter and Steve the USA also has the rare earth metals, but we're using China's metals first.
• 1:37:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, yeah, we have our real rare earth metals are the cash of rare earth metals is coming from Greenland.
• 1:37:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's the big one there.
• 1:37:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then ironically, the moon, that's another reason why we're trying to push that there.
• 1:37:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know if China's metals as I understand it are already mined, but yeah, you have to be a little, I don't quite know how to take your comment.
• 1:37:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're using, is that a betrayal?
• 1:37:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't, there's no betrayal here.
• 1:37:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: I wouldn't go there.
• 1:37:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's no betrayal.
• 1:37:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: There may be a carrot
• 1:38:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: monopoly of China has every intention of breaking.
• 1:38:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: They need, and so he may be in the meantime, getting Chinese minerals from the next year at least, because they need our silicon.
• 1:38:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: They need our chips, and that's where that's what Wong's visit would China represent at the CEO of NVIDIA.
• 1:38:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: They need our chips because they just don't have the tech for it.
• 1:38:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there's a reciprocity going on there that's not, I wouldn't read it as a betrayal.
• 1:38:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's how I'm interpreting your exclamation mark.
• 1:38:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: is going to come to an end.
• 1:38:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's definitely part of America first.
• 1:38:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: Franco, Dr. Charlie, can you remind me that group used to lose weight?
• 1:39:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you.
• 1:39:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, PhD weight loss.
• 1:39:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're wonderful.
• 1:39:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: You'll love them.
• 1:39:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: Dr. Ashley Lucas, PhD weight loss.
• 1:39:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Tell them I sent you.
• 1:39:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: Harald Dyrin, I'm not sure how to pronounce that.
• 1:39:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: The left aren't hypocrites when you understand their ideology, anything but the West.
• 1:39:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yep, that's the third worldism.
• 1:39:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's why they support anything that didn't spawn from Roman governance, Greek philosophy, and Christian values.
• 1:39:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, you're absolutely right.
• 1:39:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: They believe they start with the Marxist,
• 1:39:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: dichotomy, the Marxist binary of a press or versus a press, everything can be understood through that.
• 1:39:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then they decontextualize, meaning there's no historical context, right?
• 1:39:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
• 1:39:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: uh, uh, whites could have been racist sur at one point in time in history, but so were other groups at one point in time in history.
• 1:40:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yes, there was slavery at one point in time in history.
• 1:40:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: As there was slavery, every else everywhere else at one point in time in history.
• 1:40:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they take all that historical context out and they just say whites racist,
• 1:40:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: racism, evil, western civilization, evil, period, end of discussion.
• 1:40:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they have, they have basically, they have calcified white.
• 1:40:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Western civilization as the epitome of evil now forever into the ages of ages.
• 1:40:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then they've calcified non-whites, non-westerners, third-worlders as the epitome of struggle against depression and victimization and that God is always on the side of the victim and that we
• 1:41:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, and that's why they always begin with moral denunciation.
• 1:41:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: They always begin with, yeah, but that's because you're racist.
• 1:41:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: Or yeah, that's because you're, that's your, that's your patriarchy.
• 1:41:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: Oh, that's your privilege.
• 1:41:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: They always begin with accusation and denunciation.
• 1:41:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: When in Western rhetoric, in the Western rhetorical tradition, rooted in Athens, and then developed, of course, through the great homilies of the Christian tradition,
• 1:41:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: denunciate moral denunciation and accusation is always at the end of an argument.
• 1:41:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you make your argument, you show all your cards.
• 1:41:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then you say, and therefore now we all must rise up and stand up against this.
• 1:41:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: And if I want to argue with that, you have given to me plenty of evidence that I can either contest or I can agree with summer, disagree with others.
• 1:41:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: But the moment I just come around and say,
• 1:42:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: well, there's no contestation.
• 1:42:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: The moment I contest, it's only because you're too to blind to see it, right?
• 1:42:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you got it.
• 1:42:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know it.
• 1:42:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know how the game is played.
• 1:42:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: MDE, we're entering back into a system of market toism while we're just talking about this last night, actually.
• 1:42:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Seems advantageous versus globalism.
• 1:42:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: also what's your top three issues trump is overlooking possibly oh that's a good question that's actually a good question i don't know if i've got three but because he's pretty global thinker in that sense yeah so we are going back to the days of trade as being a form of national security everyone's an economic nationalist at this point
• 1:42:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: And economic nationalism is not necessarily protectionism.
• 1:42:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: It could be, but it could also be libertarianism, like what we're seeing with Havira Malay.
• 1:43:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: It could be a combination of the two.
• 1:43:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Economic nationalism simply argues that the economy is subservient to culture.
• 1:43:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: whereas globalists, like you're talking about here with globalism, the globalists in the international order subverted culture to multilateral.
• 1:43:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: economic trade structures, WTO, W, World Bank, IMF, to a certain extent, the WF and so on.
• 1:43:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what we're seeing now is the return of 18th, 19th century, mercantilism that saw trade as a form of national security, and it is an extension of culture, custom tradition and the like.
• 1:43:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you're absolutely right.
• 1:43:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: we are in the age of a neo-mercantillism, and in terms of, and again, I like to point out to people it's not whether we should be or shouldn't be, it's not whether it's writer, it's wrong, it's not necessarily being prescribed.
• 1:44:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's being described.
• 1:44:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is just where the world is going.
• 1:44:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's no way around it.
• 1:44:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's what this channel is all about.
• 1:44:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: Description, not necessarily prescription.
• 1:44:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, obviously, we're all for civilizationalism, nationalism, populism, traditionalism, all that good stuff.
• 1:44:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're all for it.
• 1:44:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: We root for it.
• 1:44:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: No question.
• 1:44:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: But what I try to do for you is not necessarily make arguments
• 1:44:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: per se of why it should be.
• 1:44:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's I'm trying to give you a descriptive panorama of how it is.
• 1:44:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is what's happening, whether we like it or not.
• 1:44:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: What Trump is not doing, what he's overlooking.
• 1:44:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: I am very concerned about the state of the universities today as being hotbeds of cultural Marxism and radical activism.
• 1:44:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: Somebody once said, I think it was Michael Millerman who said that our universities are the real sleeper cells and they will be activated.
• 1:45:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: So if we don't,
• 1:45:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: If we don't nip the radicalism, the radical Marxist insanity that's being taught, even in Christian universities, we're going to be wonus is going to re-rear its ugly head again in a matter of a generation.
• 1:45:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I think he's got to take care of that.
• 1:45:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: And I think he can, you know, you can just cut off the money, get rid of this idiot faculty or you don't get a dime or
• 1:45:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Harvard will rate your $40 billion in dominant.
• 1:45:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: We'll rate it.
• 1:45:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: So play hardball with that.
• 1:45:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that definitely that one.
• 1:45:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: Because I lived it for 20 years.
• 1:45:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: I saw it.
• 1:45:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: I saw the Marxism.
• 1:45:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're insane.
• 1:45:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're nuts.
• 1:45:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's no talking to them, they're literal useful idiots, they're real believers in this insanity.
• 1:46:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I think he's got to do something more with that, which he hasn't.
• 1:46:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm very appreciative what he's done with.
• 1:46:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: The transgender issue and female sports, but it's bigger than that, steeper than that.
• 1:46:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's a root cause.
• 1:46:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, you know, it's funny.
• 1:46:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: You're saying, because I think I was thinking about this.
• 1:46:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: The other not too long ago about where I thought he was overlooking a couple of things here.
• 1:46:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's good.
• 1:46:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know if I could come up with three on the spot that that first one, the mill is the university one is is.
• 1:46:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: is huge.
• 1:46:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: I would like him.
• 1:46:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'd like to see him take down the Democrat party.
• 1:46:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think he was using the term, you know, the radical leftist radical terrorist left or something like that.
• 1:47:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: I would have liked to, especially after Charlie's assassination, I would have liked to have seen him.
• 1:47:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: in a full-blown crackdown on the left in our country, the political left, in terms of its funding.
• 1:47:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know we got rid of USAID, but I think we could go deeper.
• 1:47:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: I've been waiting to see someone like Soros brought up on Rico charges.
• 1:47:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: I haven't seen anything like that.
• 1:47:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't think he's been harsh enough on the political left.
• 1:47:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: So there he goes.
• 1:47:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: So it would be related.
• 1:47:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: there.
• 1:47:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: Those would be two, and I'm sure I could figure out a third as well.
• 1:47:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: But those, those two, I'd like to see him do more.
• 1:47:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: You're taking out the regime in Iran.
• 1:47:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: Take out the regime here.
• 1:47:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, that's what I'd like to see.
• 1:47:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Shura, Maga, Maga, let's go.
• 1:47:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then Illus, what is Illus?
• 1:47:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know that.
• 1:47:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: But yes, so prayers for Jerusalem.
• 1:48:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: So make America great again, is it make Iran great again?
• 1:48:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then prayers for Jerusalem.
• 1:48:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: Absolutely.
• 1:48:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: And there are.
• 1:48:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, Israel is doing wonderfully.
• 1:48:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Israel is demographically.
• 1:48:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: They have about three children.
• 1:48:14
  [SPEAKER_02]: As I understand it per couple.
• 1:48:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: They have one of the highest demographics rates in all of among all OECD nations.
• 1:48:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: And they are crushing it.
• 1:48:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: The technologically,
• 1:48:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, economically, culturally, they're getting more and more conservative with her ready Jews having the majority of children.
• 1:48:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: So, no, they're, yeah, prayers for Jerusalem.
• 1:48:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: It looks like they're being answered.
• 1:48:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: Mary, how would you compare or contrast the political military objectives outcomes of USA's overwhelming force and Iran versus Russia's Coldering Ukraine, Russia rescuing Russians and done mass versus USA's rescue of Persian Iranians.
• 1:49:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: Wow, great great question.
• 1:49:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: Uh, it's a very good question.
• 1:49:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: I, well, so let me, let me go, let me go the reverse there for you.
• 1:49:16
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I do see.
• 1:49:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: the same great power politics operative in both theators.
• 1:49:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's why I've taken the views I have.
• 1:49:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I see Russia responding to the encroachment of the great power NATO IE US into their civilizational sphere that Putin has been talking about for over a decade
• 1:49:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: great powers never allow a great power like mere shimmers talked about it at nauseam, but great powers never allow for a pure competitor within their hegemon they'll have no problem with a pure competitor somewhere else in their own hegemon i.e.
• 1:50:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Russian china and their relationship together.
• 1:50:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: But Russia doesn't encroach on china china doesn't encroach on Russia.
• 1:50:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's by definition or else you're not a great power.
• 1:50:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: And when we started to make inroads with Ukraine, by arming them to the teeth to deal with the done baths, break away the separatists.
• 1:50:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: In the dumbass region, Putin said, you're basically becoming, you're turning Ukraine into a de facto NATO power and we've said that you can't do that.
• 1:50:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: You're not allowed to do it.
• 1:50:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's a red line, and you cross it and we're going to act.
• 1:50:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: In a similar manner, I think Trump made it very clear with the Abraham Accords architecture in place that was broken by the United States that brought Israel together with Sune Arabs.
• 1:51:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: not all to be sure but many where there was a rapprochement going on between Saudi Arabia and Israel.
• 1:51:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: And in effect what the Abraham Accord did is it effectively took the Palestinian equation off the map and it was bringing together Israeli mit with Arab money.
• 1:51:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you know you've got buttering and you've got
• 1:51:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Morocco, and you've got Sudan, you have the UAE, so they're all joining together.
• 1:51:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's what this is why it's just, it's patently, it's patently lunacy to argue that this is Trump doing BB Netanyahu's bidding.
• 1:51:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: When BB Netanyahu is on the same side as Sunirus, it's patently lunacy.
• 1:52:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: Mohammed bin Salman was was was was lobbying Trump every bit as much as baby.
• 1:52:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: So it's just but where's that would not have been thinkable before 2020 when the Abraham Accords were formally signed.
• 1:52:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: Not that Saudi Arabia is technically a part of Abraham Accords, but that
• 1:52:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: They are very much a part of is rarely might combine with Arab money and the encroachment into that architecture via China was a no-no and Trump had made that very clear.
• 1:52:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: Whenever he says that Iran is not allowed to have a nuclear weapon, that is him saying, we are not going to allow China to permanently control the straight-of-war moves.
• 1:52:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's not going to any more than it would be allowed to happen.
• 1:52:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: in the Panama Canal.
• 1:53:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's not going to happen or at the straighted Gibraltar, just simply not going to happen.
• 1:53:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so, but China was encroaching more and more and more and finally said that's it.
• 1:53:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're done.
• 1:53:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're going in.
• 1:53:11
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I think it's the same great power politics playing our similar power politics, great power politics playing out where great powers do not and for Trump the great power in that region was the US brokered Abrahamic Accords.
• 1:53:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: They were
• 1:53:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: Iran and its proxies and being financed by China so that China could have a tacit control over the straight-of-war moves from which it gets 40 to 50 percent of its oil.
• 1:53:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: So that's where they're similar.
• 1:53:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: Where they're very different is I doesn't seem that Russia has the 5G
• 1:53:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: military capability that we have.
• 1:53:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: So 3G is land-cinear.
• 1:53:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: 5G is the cloud, it's cyberspace, and then it's the astropolitics, the astrosphere, the satellites, and so forth.
• 1:54:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: We have 75% of all satellites
• 1:54:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then we have tremendous control over what's called the NOIS fear, which is the cyber world, the cloud that covers with the globe with our dominance in AI and quantum computing.
• 1:54:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: And so this war that we've seen in how we've been able to render Iran in basically 30 days in a way
• 1:54:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: to accomplish with Ukraine, I think demonstrates the power of 5G warfare over and against 3G.
• 1:55:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think Russia is still very much 3G warfare, very powerful with 3G warfare and no question.
• 1:55:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: But so it was Iran and look what 5G can do to 3G.
• 1:55:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: as long as the, and so that's where you get into the, the whole idea of the cold raining and so on.
• 1:55:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: As long as the longer this war drags on, I think the harder it's going to be
• 1:55:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Increasingly, Ukraine is turning into a 5G theater and not just a 3G theater in terms of warfare.
• 1:55:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: Increasingly, they're getting access to the cyber technologies, the AI technologies and so forth.
• 1:55:54
  [SPEAKER_02]: And increasingly, we're going to start allowing them to tap into the satellite technologies and the space force technologies.
• 1:56:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's just going to be harder and harder and harder for Russia.
• 1:56:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: And again, case and point from if the data is right over the last several months, it's been the first time that Ukraine has been able to actually gain back more land than it's losing.
• 1:56:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: we just hadn't seen that throughout the entire theater.
• 1:56:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Russia always had the upper hand and that and Ukraine seems to be reversing that.
• 1:56:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't think they're everywhere yet at the 20% back that they've lost.
• 1:56:36
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're not certainly not going to get Crimea back and so I just think and then Russia, and then Trump is trying to decouple Russia, trying to do a reverse kiss
• 1:56:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: And I think that's just going to be the carrot.
• 1:56:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's going to give him look.
• 1:56:51
  [SPEAKER_02]: You can have the Russian speaking like you have here rescuing the Russians in the in the Donbass.
• 1:56:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, he's just going to allow Russia to have it.
• 1:57:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is great power politics here.
• 1:57:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yes, the United States is going to allow way it works because we're the ones supplying all the weapons so far.
• 1:57:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: or at least the means of five G means it's going to allow Putin to have the 20% if Putin then will decouple itself from China and move more in the direction of the United States.
• 1:57:23
  [SPEAKER_02]: Putin himself has said that the big snag to that right now is European globalists, European bullies and Brussels leaders who are
• 1:57:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: who are the ones who are basically the flying the ointment and all that.
• 1:57:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: So we'll have to see how that plays out.
• 1:57:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: In terms of rescuing and so forth, again, it's civilizational.
• 1:57:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: This could be a little difference since it's Russians in the Donbass, whereas, you know, Persians, we don't have necessarily a stake in that directly.
• 1:57:56
  [SPEAKER_02]: But I mean, it's similar to what we're seeing with the Venezuelans
• 1:58:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: You know, expat Persians here.
• 1:58:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: There's huge expat Persian populations.
• 1:58:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: I understand primarily in LA or just concentrating LA.
• 1:58:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: It'll be the same thing.
• 1:58:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's it's America as a civilizational gravity civilizational center where expats can come enjoy our freedoms and then root to see those freedoms eventually extended because of the
• 1:58:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: civilizational core that the United States has, the gravity that it pulls into itself for other sovereign nations to enjoy what we have.
• 1:58:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: I think they're going to be very, very excited about that, but it's different.
• 1:58:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's very different than Putin defending his own
• 1:58:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: you know, ortho ethno sphere with with with with Eastern Ukraine.
• 1:58:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: I just see those is very different there.
• 1:58:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: But yep, there's a lot of similarity and then there's the 3G 5G difference.
• 1:59:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: ROTO, Great and Lairon, if you have Professor, have you been following the crypto
• 1:59:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: and latest on crypto clarity act.
• 1:59:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's see, let's see, let's say, where it is, uh, to do do do do do do do do do, I see that that it just cleared the Senate Banking Committee yesterday along mostly party lines, but still faces the steeper climb, of course, with our
• 1:59:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's going to need at least seven Democrats with key Democrats like Elizabeth Warren opposing in over money laundering and political profiteering just give clarity for everyone here.
• 2:00:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't see how it passes the Senate to be honest with you.
• 2:00:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's so the whole point of it's to establish this clear legal framework for determining whether a digital asset is a commodity regulated by the CFTC or a security regulated by the SEC, ending years of regulatory and big ambiguity that has hampered the American crypto industry.
• 2:00:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, Trump wants crypto flourishing.
• 2:00:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's going to be there.
• 2:00:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: Somebody's going to make it flourish.
• 2:00:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: and a Trump wants us to have a clear advantage dominance over cyber civilization, and this is the finance of cyber civilization.
• 2:00:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: So we'll see again, it is this ambiguity of whether it's under the CFTC or whether it's under the SEC, and we'll just have to see how it flashes out and plays out.
• 2:01:04
  [SPEAKER_02]: Texas and Lashak, what do you think John Thun is resisting the save act so much?
• 2:01:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm just not seeing how it would benefit him.
• 2:01:12
  [SPEAKER_02]: Amnesty would not be acceptable, but it would be understandable at least.
• 2:01:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: This I don't get.
• 2:01:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm with you.
• 2:01:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm with you on this.
• 2:01:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: I, I see Thun as an establishment guy.
• 2:01:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's an old rhino dinosaur.
• 2:01:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: And as is the Senate in general, most of the Republicans in the Senate in general, this is why I think John Cornan is good to go down in Texas as he ought, at least Lindsey Graham votes the way that Trump always wants him to vote so that that's good, but you know, I just think John Thun is just trying to wait out Trump in the end and hopefully things have just go back to normal.
• 2:01:57
  [SPEAKER_02]: with the Romney Ryan Rove wing of the party.
• 2:02:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's wrong, but he's not willing.
• 2:02:06
  [SPEAKER_02]: He apparently is not willing to do what he needs to do to play a hardball to get this past, even though 80% of the country wants it.
• 2:02:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: So if ever there were an ability to pass, an act to pass via finegling the filibuster,
• 2:02:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: or putting it in reconciliation like John Kennedy wants.
• 2:02:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: This is the one.
• 2:02:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I'm with you.
• 2:02:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm I kind of scratched my head at a sub-sertity.
• 2:02:40
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, move.
• 2:02:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: Veroctic.
• 2:02:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: Why isn't gas going down if we're producing so much?
• 2:02:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: Now, it doesn't work that way.
• 2:02:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know.
• 2:02:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: I know.
• 2:02:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: It doesn't work that way.
• 2:02:50
  [SPEAKER_02]: We may be producing so much, but we have in order amount of the world buying from us right now.
• 2:02:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: And with limited, limited global amounts,
• 2:03:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: with hormones being, it's about 20% of the world's oil comes through hormones.
• 2:03:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: So with, say, 15% taken off the table, the supply can't keep up with the demand.
• 2:03:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're selling twice the amount we normally do, but it's priced globally.
• 2:03:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: And it's even priced locally at the point where, okay, we're supplying twice the amount that doesn't mean we have the infrastructure to the full infrastructure to accommodate that demand so just the bottom line with oil is the supply has not has yet to catch up to the demand and therefore the price is going to be inflated until we have equilibrium.
• 2:04:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: and the supply catches up with the demand.
• 2:04:07
  [SPEAKER_02]: And then you'll see the price is going down exponentially.
• 2:04:15
  [SPEAKER_02]: Mitchell really concerned with data centers, taking too much power, leaving people without electricity.
• 2:04:20
  [SPEAKER_02]: Didn't Trump sign an executive order so that these centers have to provide their own power.
• 2:04:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: Good question.
• 2:04:25
  [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know about that.
• 2:04:27
  [SPEAKER_02]: I wouldn't worry too much about that because again this is this is part of what all of our expeditions to the moon is going to be about it's all about water ice and helium three
• 2:04:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: that's going to create fusion-based energy that can fuel anything and everything we possibly need all over the planet at a literally micro fraction of the cost and it's all clean.
• 2:05:02
  [SPEAKER_02]: and the moon has literally infinite supply of it in the way it gets synthesized so it's not you don't you don't have to worry about it too much it's a long term it's not going to be an issue there might be a short term pain here or there but long term it's not going to be an issue.
• 2:05:19
  [SPEAKER_02]: Our end, this is why Elon is so freaked out about solar energy and electric energy and the light, but he's freaked out about that because he's obsessed with it, I should say not freaked out.
• 2:05:32
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's obsessed with it because he knows, you're not going to have fossil fuels on the moon, you're not going to have fossil fuels on Mars.
• 2:05:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you're going to have to find your energy somewhere else.
• 2:05:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: And through fusion,
• 2:05:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: We can get from like helium 3 and so forth.
• 2:05:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: We can start getting the compounds that we need for genuine energy that is far cleaner and far more abundant than fossil fuels.
• 2:05:58
  [SPEAKER_02]: So I wouldn't worry about it in that sense.
• 2:06:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: And that's the way Trump is thinking.
• 2:06:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's thinking down the line there.
• 2:06:09
  [SPEAKER_02]: You worried polls, say we could lose Texas Senate race.
• 2:06:13
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, the same polls that told us that Kamala Harris was going to win in a landslide.
• 2:06:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: Don't, as I understand it, it is a very, very rare thing in politics, incredibly rare.
• 2:06:29
  [SPEAKER_02]: for the party whose presidential candidate won by double digits to turn around and lose that state the following election.
• 2:06:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: That's a very, very rare thing indeed.
• 2:06:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: So you don't have to worry about Texas is not voting.
• 2:06:45
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's not voting for Gallup Belize that God is binary.
• 2:06:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: So don't, I mean, you gotta learn that polls are manipulated all the time.
• 2:06:55
  [SPEAKER_02]: For, and they always are manipulated in one direction.
• 2:07:03
  [SPEAKER_02]: Memobas how many more do we got here Josh let me get it give me a sense of we're over two hours here.
• 2:07:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: FYI, China and Russia are building huge port cities and airports in Greenland for oil and minerals to bypass the unstable.
• 2:07:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, Middle East Trump wants to do the same thing and keep the oil flowing.
• 2:07:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: We are seeing that big time.
• 2:07:24
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're seeing the UAE just announced that they're bypassing and going straight into the straight of Oman.
• 2:07:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: Saudi Arabia has its east west pipeline that goes straight into the red sea.
• 2:07:37
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're bypassing Hormuz.
• 2:07:39
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's two unstable regardless of what happens.
• 2:07:43
  [SPEAKER_02]: And the great bypass of these choke points.
• 2:07:46
  [SPEAKER_02]: And in terms of the
• 2:07:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: the the railways shall we say or the the rivers of oil movement is happening and so that it's exactly again this is a disruption of oil prices and so forth it's it's not a correction.
• 2:08:08
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's just an intemporary disruption until a new oil infrastructure, global oil infrastructure is created.
• 2:08:17
  [SPEAKER_02]: And what Trump wants to make sure is that the United States is at the center of that.
• 2:08:21
  [SPEAKER_02]: And he's doing it.
• 2:08:22
  [SPEAKER_02]: We're about, we'll have at the end of it all, at least, tacit either direct or tacit control of 50 to 60% of the world's oil production.
• 2:08:31
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's astonishing.
• 2:08:33
  [SPEAKER_02]: And with that gang!
• 2:08:34
  [SPEAKER_02]: I want you to all have a wonderful weekend, check out my interview with Cliff Maloney tomorrow from Pennsylvania Chase and doors when wars.
• 2:08:44
  [SPEAKER_02]: He's going to show you exactly how he plans to help with the midterms and 2028 and also keep an eye on the channel because I'm going to be your back porch professor for any breaking news and analysis you're not going to get anywhere else.
• 2:08:59
  [SPEAKER_02]: Love you guys.
• 2:09:00
  [SPEAKER_02]: God bless.
• 2:09:01
  [SPEAKER_02]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of The Turley Talks Podcast.
• 2:09:05
  [SPEAKER_02]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with your friends.
• 2:09:10
  [SPEAKER_02]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
• 2:09:18
  [SPEAKER_02]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.