Latest / The Paul Barron Crypto Show / Banks Using PROPAGANDA to Kill Crypto Freedom! 🚨CLARITY Act Panic Mode!

Transcript

Banks Using PROPAGANDA to Kill Crypto Freedom! 🚨CLARITY Act Panic Mode! · The Paul Barron Crypto Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Freedom is about to be lost in the next three
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: days when it comes to crypto. Let's break it down.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: I do want to thank our sponsor and that is Tangent,
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: because this gives you freedom in self custody. You guys
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: need to take part in self custody right now. This
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: is one of the best things in crypto that you
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: can do, and that is getting your tokens off of
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: centralized exchanges. Put them in your own managed wallet. Very
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: easy to set up and super simple, three minutes to
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: get going here. It works like a credit card with
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: your phone and this is by far one of the
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: best platforms out there for self custody. Use it, guys.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Use our link down below to get a little bit
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: of a discount. Let's get into everything that's going on
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: with the Clarity Act because this is a huge, huge weekend.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: If you look at what the current Senate Baking Committee
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: is doing right now, is we have a few more days,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: three days to be exact, before Thursday at ten am
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: when the write ups and the markups will go into play.
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: And this is one of the most important times that
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: we have seen in crypto, and there's for many reasons,
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: and I'll break down a lot of things that are happening,
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: and there was a lot of drama over the weekend
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: right now. What's interesting, though, is a poly market is
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: now holding the possibility of a Clarity Act at around
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: seventy nine percent. I don't know if polymarket would go
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: stay there. I think it would go down after what
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: I'm about to show you here on today's episode, because
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: this is a critical thing when you look at this
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: new advocacy group, and this is the interesting point I'm
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: getting at Investors for Transparency. They're running primetime ads on
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: Fox News primarily urging viewers to oppose DeFi provisions in
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: the upcoming crypto market. So it's basically saying, don't let
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: DeFi get in the way of passing this, when in reality,
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: DeFi is one of the cornerstones of what this market
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: clarity bill is all about. And this going into the
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: primetime cycle to a Republican platform like Fox News tells
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: me they're trying to reach other Republicans out there that
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: haven't made their decision up on how they're going to
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: go on Clarity going forward. Here. Of course, with some
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: other things that happened, this of course was Heyen Adams
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: hitting on the same thing group DA Group named Investors
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: for Transparency running public ads. This divert deserves a Prometheum
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: style deep dive on crypto industry. And remember the last
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: time that we saw Clarity in the early stages, Prometheum
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: was one of the companies. And if you guys go
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: back and look at just search Prometheum on our channel
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: and you'll find out these guys were an actor, definitely
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: an op that was trying to thwart the movement of
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: what we would see in Clarity and furthermore even into
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: the Genius Acts. So this may be the kind of
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: thing that we're dealing with right here with this Avacy group,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: because what we have not been able to do is
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: find out who these guys are, who's funding them, who's
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: behind them. It's almost like a black box. And they
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: popped up on Twitter last fall twenty twenty five, so
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: it's a brand new organization and a brand new thing forward.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: So I don't know, guys, this is a very peculiar
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: at a peculiar time. For sure. It boils down to
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: basically three elements, What if any in terms of ethic
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: rules will apply to public officials dabbling in crypto? This
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: is going to be a big deal, including the president,
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: which means if the President were to give up his
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: stable coin in a way of you know, kind of
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: as a sacrificial lump lamb, that may be enough for
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: this to pull over the finish line. Who wins the
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: great stable coin yield debate? This, of course, is either
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: going to be crypto or banks, or whether our compromise emergence,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: which I think is kind of what's brewing right now.
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: I'll show you what I wrote about this weekend that's
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: specific to that point. And then also where Democrats and
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: Republicans land on DeFi, especially around securities trading and illicit finance.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: So this whole issue with DeFi, which is the one
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: area that is trying to be protected, is pretty significant.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: A couple of points that came out over the weekend
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: was Senator also Brooks put out a proposal to restrict
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: restrict yield transactions, one of the areas I have a
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: compromise that was aligned for this. This was a part
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: of a two part tweet that I put out out
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: around Senator also Brooks, if you guys aren't following or she,
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: of course, is a Senator from Maryland, and the idea
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: was really boiling around two frameworks, and this is in
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: reference to yields. One was the passive yield band, which
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: is kind of the bank shield. This would basically restrict
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: third party intermediaries such as exchanges to give not give
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: you yield, so that would be a no go. The
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: idea was is that it would go to an active
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: yield pathway, which means that you'd have to do something
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: with your with your asset, so staking lockups, doing things
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: like that, committing the fund for a fixed set of
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: terms like a seven to thirty or ninety. Those are
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: the kind of variations based on everybody that we've talked
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: to so far. And we had Senator Warren Davidson on
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: last week, we had the DeFi Education Fund. This is
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: something that both senators and congressmen are getting behind from
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: both sides of the aisle. So this would get a
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: little bit interesting as we start to see this go forward.
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: But again, and this is still very new, and it's
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: very possible that we're going to deal with something that
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: maybe is even more nefarious here when it comes to
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: the Clarity Act. One note that you can kind of
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: look at, and that is if they can ban stable
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: corn rewards The next up is going to be staking, rewards, lending, etc.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Pretty much whatever they want. It's about who sets the boundaries.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: To the point I'm getting at. The one thing you
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: can do, and remember this is one of the things
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: that Coinbase did to help get Genius Act through. Is
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: this right here? Go overstand with Crypto You guys can
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: of course reach out to your senators. You join the fight.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: It gives you some things to put into that. We're
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: going to actually show you the three things that you
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: need to have addressing all of your senators and congressman
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: out there in being able to get them aware of
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: where you stand. And I'll show you that at the
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: end of the video. Another thing I want to go
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: to is a clip.
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: Now.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: This clip is Charles Hoskinson talking about David Sachs. He
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: is the cryptosar and aisar and whether or not he
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: is successful or not successful all based on Clarity take
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: a look.
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: But here's the reality of the situation. I don't think
• 6:04
  Speaker 3: Clarity Act is going to pass in this quarter, and
• 6:06
  Speaker 3: because it's an election year, if it doesn't pass this quarter,
• 6:09
  Speaker 3: I think Sachs should resign. He's utterly failed US as
• 6:12
  Speaker 3: an industry. How could he control what Trump did before
• 6:16
  Speaker 3: he was even in office. He was selected before Trump
• 6:20
  Speaker 3: launched trump Coin, And what he should have done is say,
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: if you do this, I'm going to resign. That's the
• 6:25
  Speaker 3: part of all this is that he's so poorly advised
• 6:27
  Speaker 3: by the people around him. If his goal is just extractive,
• 6:32
  Speaker 3: he could have made so much more money doing it
• 6:34
  Speaker 3: after the framework, because the new framework would have supercharged
• 6:37
  Speaker 3: the markets and brought a lot of money into the markets.
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: And you're launching a coin into a bull market. And
• 6:42
  Speaker 3: also the Democrats can't complain. Here's another thing that David
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: up on. It is so bad, it's so bad. What
• 6:48
  Speaker 3: are the standards we're going to be writing RFPs at
• 6:50
  Speaker 3: the State Department? So how do we distinguish Solana from ethereum,
• 6:53
  Speaker 3: from bitcoin, from Cardino from anything else?
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: You can't.
• 6:57
  Speaker 3: So it's just bribery. It's just one oh one stuff.
• 7:00
  Speaker 3: And I guess he's doing that and he's the AI
• 7:02
  Speaker 3: guy at the same time, And what are the KPIs?
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: But most people would say passing the Genius Act and
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: passing clarity from an outside perspective, right, And what do
• 7:11
  Speaker 3: we get with genius? We got fan service for banks,
• 7:13
  Speaker 3: but by no means it is that a retail bill,
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: and you know it does is centralizes the industry around
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: black Rock and canter and you know Goldman Sachs and
• 7:22
  Speaker 3: huzzah great.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: I agree with almost everything he's saying there. The big key, though,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: to me, would be the position of Sacks. Sachs is
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: in David Sacks, the cryptos are he is in control
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: of the White House or at least the administration when
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: it comes to educating Congress and the Senate. Now I
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: get it, there's a lot of mistakes that happened, but
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: at one point he is going to have to be
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: called to the floor to either win it or lose it.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: If he loses it and we get a bad Clarity Act,
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: that's the worst thing that can happen for crypto. It
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: may be good for banks, or it may be good
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: for enterprises, but it's not going to be good for freedom.
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: And I think that's the biggest issue. You probably could
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: have seen things starting to showcase a little bit when
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: Bohines left. Not saying Bohines was an answer to it,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: but the fact that we started to see a weakness
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: in the administration that started probably should have given us
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: some indication that something was brewing there in DC. Another
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: thing that you got to concern yourself with. And this
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: is where it gets a little dicey, and this is
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: the Trump administration going to Davos. This concerns because it's
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: likely that he's probably going to bring up crypto as
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: a key point at the Davos event. How he does,
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: it will be interesting to see what he announces beyond
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: the Lookout, because that's coming up just here in a
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: few weeks. That also may have something to do with
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: what's going on in DC around the Clarity Act. And
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: I would rather see a good bill that gets denied
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: and US kind of work through that than a bad
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: bill that makes it through. So the compromises are an
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: absolute no. Many of these things are all about freedom
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: when it comes to crypto. Speaking of freedom, you have
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: to consider one of the things that X has brought us,
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: and I feel like it has been an era for freedom.
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: And the problem is is that X themselves said, well,
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: while all of this is going on, which is first
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: next two few months is going to be critical for
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: crypto narratives to be able to get out in the open.
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: And if they're doing this, which is the statement right
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: there from one of the developers. Truth be told, Yes,
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: we had X are heavily focused on removing bubbles such
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: as crypto Twitter from our app. Now, I don't know
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: if this is a conspiracy, if there's something going on,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: but what you have is you have a shadow organization
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: in DC marketing to Republicans who knows where that money
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: is coming from. Then you have pretty much the guy
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: who is behind most of the proliferation of crypto information,
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: which has done and been through X pretty much for
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: the most part over these last few bull runs. All right,
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: so let's go to one other point here. This, of course,
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: with Salana jumping out there and saying, all right, EX
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: to launch smart cash tags. This is kind of something
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: that has been out there, but you guys probably saw this.
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: It does start to accelerate more information, but I don't know,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: I think this was just kind of a you know,
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: a false giving from X to say, hey, you know,
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: crypto crew, settle down a little bit. So one of
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: the things that was concerning was the actual developer of
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: this was where he says, hey, my bags are literally
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: in my bio if you look at his bio, well, yeah,
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: his bags are in he's an advisor with Solana. So
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: this is a concern again because it gets into kind
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: of that corporate issue and enterprise slop that kind of
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: see seems to be moving around. And I think the
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: point behind all of this so when you look at
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: what the potential has been for ACTS in terms of innovation,
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: they basically lined up these things here and that is
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: new user spend forty three percent more time in the app,
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: so that's more money. Existing users spend twenty percent all
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: time high downloads are up sixty percent, so they're selling
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: more because you're paying to get the app itself. Well,
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: subscriptions cost one cross one billion. Again, these are great
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: money making, but it doesn't necessarily solve the real problem,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: which is being able to get a true platform out
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: there for freedom of speech but also freedom of engagement
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: and being able to own and hold your own and
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: I don't know whatever get there for social media. I
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: think that's going to be the next era of legislation
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: battle that we will see. So it is a big
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: issue right now as we start to move to the
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: next level. And this clip is about an enterprise company
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: that happened to be Israeli that wants to actually take
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: away free speech. Take a look, and I.
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: Know it's difficult to heal, but it's time to limit
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: the First Amendment in order to protect it. What do
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: you mean, I mean that we need to control the
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: platforms and take control over what they're saying based on
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: that ranking government the government, Now I should do that,
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: and I assume you have some of those ways. So
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: and that drives the next generation of companies such as
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: wiz crowds like Keto networks on the network that our platforms.
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: China, which obviously already is using AI to control the population,
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: and so we're not as interested in regulation right now,
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: certainly not at the state level, for example.
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: And that's a big mistake because if China has a
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: single narrative that protects its inner stability and the US
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: has multiple allows for multiple narratives, it puts them in
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: an unfair advantage that long term is going to cause
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: the stability of the nation.
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: Man, I am so glad nobody's listening to that guy,
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: because he's basically saying, no, we don't want to hear
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: from any of you guys. Just shut up and listen.
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: Is pretty much the case. And it's more from a
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: side of the enterprise kind of going in this direction.
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: And remember this has all been about being open, and
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: one of the things that Elon was supposed to do
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: was get us a very open look into our government.
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: You guys, remember Doje We failed at that. He's the
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: guy that could pull this off unless he's actually in
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: there trying to figure out how to angle in and
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: benefit what's going on at Tesla and SpaceX and all
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: those places. So it is a problem for sure. All right,
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: if you kind of consider openness and freedom, you have
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: to kind of look at what's going on in Iran.
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: And of course this was all about the fact that
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: they had their internet cutoff. And if you look at
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: this of what's going on now, granted, Starlink was the
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: one area that was going to be the advantage for
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: the Iranian people, But the real question is is what
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: is available out there in terms of an open social
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: media platform. There really isn't any available right now. When
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: you think about it. Elon owns X, You've got the
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: Ellisons owning other outlets out there, including TikTok. We know
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: what Meta is doing, we know what Google is doing.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: We understand that. I think the real question here is
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: when at one point will we ever get an open
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: social media platform? Now, Elon made this statement, We'll make
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: a new x algorithm, including all the code used to
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: determine what organic advertising posts are recommended to users. We're
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: going to make that open source in seven days or
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: so on. We'll repeat every four weeks. Comprehensive developer notes.
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: This will be interesting. I want to see this happen.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: That might be a step in the right direction. But again,
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: this is such a mess right now in terms of
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: how we are starting to see the clamps coming down,
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: not only for crypto, but I think crypto is exposing
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: a lot of this stuff. Right here. Here was Vitallic
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: hitting on this. If done properly, it's a good move.
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: I think he's responding to that. I hope it would
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: be verifiable and replicable, meaning let's just do it all.
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: This would not solve problems, but it would definitely very
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: effectively address concerns about algorithmic transparency. But it's all about executing,
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: and I think he is right dead on. Batallic also
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: goes in here and he talks about these kind of
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: things that this was the term I think should be used,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: and that is corporal slop includes things like this. So
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: if you're seeing this, guys out there, you already know
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: you're part of the corporal situation, which is social media
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: that maximizes dopamine outrage. You know you've seen that all right,
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: needless mass data collection. You know seen that wall gardens.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: We know we're there. Hollywood released in seven sequels, some
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: tired franchise, yes, and then every corporation that rallied around
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: slogans of diversity inequity. We all know all this stuff
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: was corporo slop. So if we get clarity through with
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: a clean bill, the real question is what wins. I
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: think when you consider sovereignty, meaning the flexibility, Ethereum is
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: the one that is suited to win. I would agree
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: with vitallic on that there will be others that will win,
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: but I do agree that Ethereum is one of the
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: best out there in terms of an open, true sovereign
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: blockchain going forward. If all of that does not happen, though,
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: this is what is at risk in three days, and
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: that is the wealth gap widening considerably because remember all banks,
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: credit cards, they've paved the way for the greatest redistribution
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: of wealth. You look at this in comparison to subsidize
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: what you're doing. In terms of just the credit card interest,
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: this would be enough to do a redistribution of enough
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: to do universal basic income for about one point three
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: million people. That's the kind of gap that is being
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: created right now. And really Crypto was supposed to solve this.
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: It was supposed to give the everyday person the ability
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: to bring themselves up and move to the next level.
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: But again, this is enterprise banking system, et cetera putting
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: so many barriers in front of us that we can't
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: get that done three days. Guys, that's what you have.
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: I want you to go over and stand with Crypto,
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: and this is the way you're going to put They're
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: doing it as protector rewards, because that's kind of the
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: sticking point right now. Put your name in there, and
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: then what you want to do is put in the statement.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: And what I've got is a link to just a
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: perplexity run on the three things we think are most
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: important right here, full self, custom, interoperability, and freedom. This
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: is the thing kind of if you don't know what
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: that is, it'll teach you a little bit about it.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: No kyc AML data collection. That's a privacy statement. And
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: then of course, the last is no unfair advantages for
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: trad fi incumbents versus what's happening in the crypto companies,
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: which is really innovation and creating free markets. If we
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: had put all these stipulations on the internet, we would
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: not be here today with what we have in e commerce,
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: with the United States being one of the world leaders.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: This is the kind of thing that we are facing
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: right now. This is a line in the sand. Hopefully
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: you guys get out there and do something about it.
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: It's going to be a fun week to watch for sure.
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: We'll see you soon. If you like this video, like
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: and subscribe, drop a comment down below, and also join
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: our free private member group. The link is in the description.