Latest / INSIGHT TODAY / The US wants to livestream a firing squad execution. Is that legal
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: The Pentagon says the execution of a 2009 Fort Hood
- 0:03Speaker 1: shooter will be publicly live streamed. Gonna get a firing
- 0:06Speaker 1: squad of soldiers. as it should be. And we'll make
- 0:09Speaker 1: sure that people are able to watch it, that it's public.
- 0:11Speaker 2: That method has not been used by the military since
- 0:14Speaker 2: the 1940s.
- 0:15Speaker 1: Hassan was convicted of killing 13 people. The shooter's attorney
- 0:19Speaker 1: tonight saying Hegseth's pledge for a public execution is political theater.
- 0:23Speaker 3: I think firing squad is the least inhumane method.
- 0:27Speaker 4: What are the concerns of the legality of live streaming this?
- 0:30Speaker 5: There are a number of concerns.
- 0:32Speaker 1: What's next, pay-per-view?
- 0:33Speaker 6: I mean, this is just ridiculous what's going on.
- 0:35Speaker 1: It shouldn't be anything the public sees.
- 0:42Speaker 2: The United Nations says the plan by the US to
- 0:44Speaker 2: live stream the firing squad execution of a former army
- 0:48Speaker 2: major amounts to torture. Nidal Hassan shot dead 13 unarmed
- 0:53Speaker 2: soldiers at the Fort Hood base in Texas in 2009.
- 0:57Speaker 2: Over the next 10 minutes or so, we'll get reaction
- 0:59Speaker 2: to the plan, hear from a soldier who survived the
- 1:02Speaker 2: shooting and ask, is it legal? It was the U.S.
- 1:06Speaker 2: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth who made the announcement that the
- 1:09Speaker 2: public would be able to watch the execution live. Here's
- 1:12Speaker 2: what he said.
- 1:13Speaker 1: No-brainer. Execution by firing squad. Army major betrays his country.
- 1:18Speaker 1: Radical Islamist kills a bunch of Americans at Fort Hood.
- 1:21Speaker 1: Of course we're going to do it at Fort Hood.
- 1:22Speaker 1: We're going to do it on a Thursday. We're going
- 1:24Speaker 1: to do it at 1 o'clock, which is when he
- 1:25Speaker 1: did it. And it's going to be soldiers with rifles
- 1:28Speaker 1: executing the firing squad.
- 1:30Speaker 5: We know what it is.
- 1:31Speaker 1: It was a radical Islamist attack in uniform inside the ranks.
- 1:34Speaker 1: And so he's going to get a firing squad of soldiers,
- 1:37Speaker 1: as it should be. And we'll make sure that people
- 1:39Speaker 1: are able to watch it, that it's public, because people
- 1:42Speaker 1: need to understand that there's serious consequences for these types
- 1:46Speaker 1: of things. Has Major Hassan made any final requests, reached
- 1:50Speaker 1: out to the president, anything like that, to your knowledge?
- 1:52Speaker 3: Don't care.
- 1:54Speaker 1: We'll see him on December 3rd.
- 1:56Speaker 2: So who is Nidal Hassan, the man set to be executed,
- 1:59Speaker 2: and what did he do? Here's our White House reporter,
- 2:02Speaker 2: Bernd de Busseman.
- 2:03Speaker 6: Well, Nidal Hassan, at the time of the incident in 2009,
- 2:06Speaker 6: he was a major in the U.S.
- 2:08Speaker 5: Army.
- 2:08Speaker 6: He was a mental health professional, a psychologist. And at
- 2:13Speaker 6: Fort Hood in Texas, at something called the Military Readiness Center,
- 2:18Speaker 6: he carried out a mass shooting that killed 13 unarmed soldiers,
- 2:22Speaker 6: including one pregnant soldier who had just returned from Iraq
- 2:26Speaker 6: and wounded several dozen more. It later was determined that
- 2:31Speaker 6: that he had been in contact with Awar al-Awlaki, an
- 2:35Speaker 6: American who at the time had joined al-Qaeda in Yemen.
- 2:40Speaker 6: And this was kind of inspired by al-Qaeda's militant version
- 2:44Speaker 6: of jihadism. But at the time, of course, nobody knew
- 2:49Speaker 6: that when the incident took place. He was shot during
- 2:52Speaker 6: the incident and was left paraplegic and in a wheelchair
- 2:55Speaker 6: when he was taken into custody. And he's been in
- 2:57Speaker 6: custody ever since.
- 2:59Speaker 2: So what's been the reaction to the plan to live
- 3:01Speaker 2: stream the execution? One Democratic senator, Chris Murphy, called the
- 3:05Speaker 2: idea disgusting. Here's Shabia Mantou, a spokesperson for the UN
- 3:10Speaker 2: High Commissioner for Human Rights.
- 3:12Speaker 3: Public executions constitute a form of cruel, inhuman or degrading
- 3:16Speaker 3: treatment or punishment. The live streaming of an execution is
- 3:19Speaker 3: tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute
- 3:23Speaker 3: prohibition of torture. Failure to respect this prohibition would inevitably
- 3:27Speaker 3: render the execution arbitrary in nature and result in a
- 3:31Speaker 3: violation of the right to life. And the absolute prohibition
- 3:34Speaker 3: of torture prohibits public executions.
- 3:37Speaker 2: A former US Army sergeant who survived the mass shooting
- 3:41Speaker 2: at the Fort Hood base has been speaking to us.
- 3:44Speaker 2: Alonzo Lunsford, seen here in 2013, was shot seven times
- 3:48Speaker 2: by Hassan. Speaking to BBC Radio 4, he gave his
- 3:51Speaker 2: reaction to the news that the execution would be live-streamed.
- 3:55Speaker 5: It's not something that you should view for entertainment purposes.
- 4:00Speaker 5: To show the whole thing without it being censored for
- 4:04Speaker 5: the general public, I really don't, me personally, I don't
- 4:07Speaker 5: agree with that. And as far as the families of
- 4:11Speaker 5: the fallen and the families of the survivors and the
- 4:16Speaker 5: survivors themselves, yes, I think we should be able to
- 4:19Speaker 5: look at it uncensored because I'm going to be there.
- 4:23Speaker 5: And before they pull the trigger, I want him to
- 4:25Speaker 5: look at me in my eyes and I look at
- 4:28Speaker 5: him in his eyes and I want him to know, dude,
- 4:30Speaker 5: you failed. I'm still here.
- 4:34Speaker 2: So do we know how the live stream will work?
- 4:36Speaker 2: Back to Berndt in Washington.
- 4:38Speaker 6: We don't. And I think that's one of the main
- 4:40Speaker 6: questions that many people here in the United States have,
- 4:43Speaker 6: even those who are supportive of the death penalty and
- 4:46Speaker 6: supportive of of the death penalty being applied in this
- 4:50Speaker 6: instance by firing squad. There's a lot of questions about,
- 4:53Speaker 6: for example, what guardrails would be put in place. For example,
- 4:57Speaker 6: many parents I've spoken to in the last 24 hours
- 5:00Speaker 6: or so, they wonder what would prevent a young child
- 5:03Speaker 6: from logging on to the Internet and watching this firing
- 5:08Speaker 6: squad actually be carried out.
- 5:12Speaker 2: It could be that the U.S. Defense Department decides to
- 5:14Speaker 2: stream it themselves. Certainly the main social media companies have
- 5:18Speaker 2: strict policies, as our senior technology reporter Shona McCallum explains.
- 5:23Speaker 4: Most major social media platforms have rules that prohibit or
- 5:27Speaker 4: restrict live streaming explicit content. Meta, YouTube, TikTok and X,
- 5:33Speaker 4: the most widely used online platforms capable of streaming live video...
- 5:37Speaker 4: have prohibitions in place, not only on violent images and videos,
- 5:41Speaker 4: but also on those that show death. Meta, the owner
- 5:45Speaker 4: of Instagram and Facebook, explicitly bans any live stream of
- 5:49Speaker 4: capital punishment. TikTok has a similar blanket ban. Its policy
- 5:54Speaker 4: says we don't allow extremely graphic, violent or disturbing content,
- 5:59Speaker 4: especially when it could cause viewers emotional distress. The policy
- 6:04Speaker 4: at X, which has loosened content moderation since Elon Musk
- 6:07Speaker 4: took over the platform, says any content depicting when a
- 6:11Speaker 4: person dies will be removed if we receive a request
- 6:15Speaker 4: from their family or authorised representative. Truth Social, the social
- 6:19Speaker 4: media platform owned by Trump, does not have a live
- 6:23Speaker 4: stream video feature for users.
- 6:26Speaker 2: One of the big questions a lot of people are
- 6:28Speaker 2: asking about live streaming and execution is, is it legal?
- 6:32Speaker 2: So what legal hurdles could there be? Dr Casey McCall-Smith
- 6:35Speaker 2: is a lecturer in public international law at the University
- 6:38Speaker 2: of Edinburgh and chair of the Association of Human Rights Institutes.
- 6:43Speaker 7: It's more spectacle and show because there are many legal
- 6:49Speaker 7: hurdles to get to that actual execution and questions about
- 6:53Speaker 7: whether it should be live streamed. There are a variety
- 6:57Speaker 7: of appeals still available to Mr.
- 7:00Speaker 2: Hassan.
- 7:02Speaker 7: And one that springs to mind in my capacity as
- 7:06Speaker 7: professor of human rights law is that based on human
- 7:10Speaker 7: dignity and the US Constitution requirement to protect that, it
- 7:16Speaker 7: seems that live streaming a public execution hasn't been done
- 7:21Speaker 7: in a long time, and that's.
- 7:22Speaker 1: For good reason.
- 7:23Speaker 7: It aligns more with U.S. enemies that have publicly executed
- 7:28Speaker 7: individuals in more recent years.
- 7:31Speaker 2: So can Nidal Hassan appeal the decision and would he
- 7:34Speaker 2: want to? Here's Berndt again.
- 7:36Speaker 6: There's been some suggestions since the live streaming concept was
- 7:40Speaker 6: announced that in theory, Hassan could appeal the decision and
- 7:46Speaker 6: make the argument that this is in some way cruel
- 7:48Speaker 6: and unusual punishment beyond the execution itself. It's not clear, however,
- 7:52Speaker 6: that Hassan would want to appeal this decision. He very
- 7:55Speaker 6: much had made it clear when he was first brought
- 7:57Speaker 6: before a court-martial following the incident that he didn't necessarily
- 8:01Speaker 6: expect to live in the first place. He didn't really
- 8:04Speaker 6: put up much of a defense, and he's put up
- 8:06Speaker 6: very kind of little defense kind of to try stave
- 8:10Speaker 6: off the death penalty. He very much saw this as
- 8:13Speaker 6: kind of a suicide operation of sorts, and it's really
- 8:17Speaker 6: not clear whether he would really want to appeal in
- 8:20Speaker 6: the first place. Ultimately, he is getting what he wanted
- 8:23Speaker 6: to achieve in 2009 when he carried out this mass
- 8:27Speaker 6: shooting in Fort Hood.
- 8:28Speaker 2: So this public execution could face legal hurdles in the US,
- 8:32Speaker 2: but other countries do carry them out, although not live streamed.
- 8:36Speaker 2: Our global population correspondent, Stephanie Hegarty, has more details.
- 8:41Speaker 8: So according to data that's been compiled by Amnesty International
- 8:44Speaker 8: last year, we know that there were at least 17
- 8:46Speaker 8: public executions carried out, but only in two countries, and
- 8:49Speaker 8: those are Afghanistan and Iran. 11 public executions happened in
- 8:53Speaker 8: Iran last year and six in Afghanistan.
- 8:58Speaker 2: And a few more countries do use a firing squad
- 9:00Speaker 2: to execute people. Here's Stephanie again.
- 9:03Speaker 8: There are quite a few countries, 28 altogether, that authorise
- 9:06Speaker 8: shooting by firing squad, according to the Cornell Centre and
- 9:09Speaker 8: the death penalty worldwide. That's where a group of people
- 9:13Speaker 8: are shooting, usually at the heart. One may have blanks
- 9:17Speaker 8: but there is also another method shooting which is one
- 9:20Speaker 8: bullet to the back of the head and there are
- 9:22Speaker 8: another 22 countries that carry that out um that those
- 9:25Speaker 8: are usually countries in africa and the middle east in
- 9:28Speaker 8: asia there are a few china taiwan indonesia south korea
- 9:32Speaker 8: also and vietnam and then there's the united states the
- 9:35Speaker 8: united states is the only country in the americas that
- 9:39Speaker 8: allows executions to happen in this way and only in
- 9:41Speaker 8: four states and at the federal level.
- 9:44Speaker 2: So finally, let's put this into a little bit of
- 9:46Speaker 2: historical context. When were the last public and firing squad
- 9:50Speaker 2: executions in the U.S.? Back to Bernd de Busseman in Washington.
- 9:54Speaker 6: Well, the last public execution in the United States took
- 9:57Speaker 6: place in 1936 in Kentucky.
- 9:58Speaker 1: It was.
- 10:00Speaker 6: A young man who at the time confessed to raping
- 10:02Speaker 6: and killing a 70-year-old woman. Thousands of people actually turned
- 10:07Speaker 6: out in person to watch that execution in Kentucky. But
- 10:10Speaker 6: Of course, the difference was that it wasn't broadcast to
- 10:12Speaker 6: the rest of the country. And the last military execution
- 10:16Speaker 6: by firing squad took place in January 1945. It was
- 10:20Speaker 6: a young U.S. Army soldier named Eddie Slovik who had
- 10:23Speaker 6: deserted from his unit at the tail end of the
- 10:26Speaker 6: Second World War. It was controversial at the time. He
- 10:30Speaker 6: made very clear he was quite simply terrified of the
- 10:33Speaker 6: prospect of dying in combat against the Germans. And after
- 10:37Speaker 6: the war, there was quite a lot of attention and
- 10:40Speaker 6: even films and books written about his case because, of course,
- 10:44Speaker 6: there was many thousands of deserters at that time, but
- 10:46Speaker 6: he was the only one to be executed by a
- 10:48Speaker 6: firing squad. But both those instances are very, very long ago,
- 10:53Speaker 6: and it's not something that many Americans are familiar with.
- 10:57Speaker 6: So I think this is really uncharted territory for many
- 11:00Speaker 6: Americans in contemporary United States today.
- 11:04Speaker 2: And that's the U.S. plan to live stream an execution explained.