Latest / Beyond The Horizon / House Panel Votes 41-0 to Hold Leon Black in Contempt (9/17/26)

Transcript

House Panel Votes 41-0 to Hold Leon Black in Contempt (9/17/26) · Beyond The Horizon

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. So the House yesterday decided that they're going
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: to recommend that Leon Black be held in contempt over
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: the Epstein subpoenas. And while this certainly was an expected move,
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: now that it's on the books, the fight has been accelerated.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: And as expected, Leon Black's legal team, they responded right away.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: And according to that legal team, this is nothing more
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: than retaliation for Leon Black exercising his constitutional rights. And
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: from where I'm sitting, that seems like quite the stretch.
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: And when you go back in history and you look
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: at the people who have sued Congress over similar issues,
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: it really hasn't worked out well for them. And I
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: don't think it's going to work out so well here either.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: You have to show an extraordinary amount of bias by
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Congress to have a court side with you against Congress.
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: Because remember, Congress has vast authority to investigate pretty much
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: whatever they want. Now, that doesn't mean they don't have guardrails,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: and there's no rules, but the rules are certainly different
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: when it comes to Congress and their investigations. So, this
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: battle between Leon Black and Congress has only just begun.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: And today we have an article from The Guardian, and
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: the headline, House Panel Recommends Leon Black Be Held in
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: Contempt Over Epstein Inquiry Subpoenas. This article was authored by
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: Anna Betts. The House Oversight Committee voted unanimously on Tuesday.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: to recommend that House of Representatives hold Leon Black, the
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: billionaire financier, in contempt of Congress after he refused to
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: comply with subpoenas seeking his testimony and non-disclosure agreements sought
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: by the panel as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Black intends the subpoenas are invalid and he's suing to
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: block them. And if there are NDAs that don't have
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: to do with Epstein, they might end up not being
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: part of this. Right? When all's said and done, Those
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: might not be part of whatever we get from Leon Black.
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: But anything that Epstein was involved in, I mean, even
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: a whiff of Jeffrey Epstein, then those files should be
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: available for Congress to take a look at. So that's
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: where the fight's going to be. What has Epstein's fingerprints
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: on it and what doesn't? And you know that Leon
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Black and his team, they're going to really be particular
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: about what they say belongs and what doesn't belong. And
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: I think that it's going to end up being A
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: backyard brawl. Everything Leon Black's involved in turns into some
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: kind of brawl. And that's because he has that kind
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: of money. And when you have that kind of money, well,
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: the world is yours. Subpoenas are not suggestions. They carry
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: the full force of law and require full compliance. The representative,
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: James Comer, who chairs the committee, said in the chamber
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: on Tuesday afternoon before the voting began, Mr. Black's testimony
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: is crucial to our investigation and Because he maintained a
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: close personal relationship with Epstein for years. During the time
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: when Epstein was engaged in sex trafficking. And look, we're
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: not talking about, you know, a phone call here or there.
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: Coming over to watch the ball game. We're talking about
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: somebody that was deeply entrenched with Jeffrey Epstein. Whether financially
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: or otherwise. Now if it goes further than that, we'll
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: have to see. But there's been credible allegations made against
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: Leon Black. And I think that it's going to be
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: up to the court to figure out what's what. But
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: one thing I will point out is that Leon Black's
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: used to dealing with Epstein survivors and people that aren't
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: on an equal footing. When it comes to Congress, that's
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: a different story. Because if you think Congress is just
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: going to roll over for Leon Black, especially right now,
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: you're crazy. They're going to go to the mattresses. With
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: all the tough talk they've done, they have no other choice, right?
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: They can't back down now. He added that we made
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: it clear to Mr. Black and his attorneys that if
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: he did not comply, then the committee would initiate contempt proceedings.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: The bipartisan committee passed a resolution 41 to nothing. Comer
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: said that the committee now moves the report to the
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: full house. Well, I would love to say that we're
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: going to see some action here, but when we have Mr.
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: Mike Johnson running things, who knows? Remember, this is the
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: second time now that he sent people home early so
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: he didn't have to deal with the Epstein issue. One time,
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: you can say, alright, coincidence maybe. But a second time?
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: We all know what he's up to, and we all
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: know where the orders are coming from. The office of
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: the House of the Speaker, Mike Johnson, did not immediately
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: respond to a request for comment on Tuesday about whether
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: the lower chamber would consider the contempt measure. Well, why
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: wouldn't they? If it's referred to them by the committee
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: that's investigating this, and then the full body decides they
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: don't want to follow through with contempt, they damn well
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: better have a good explanation, right? Because every roadblock they
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: throw up, every impediment they put in the way, is
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: just another finger pointing at their cover-up. And as we
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: all know, they already have an optics problem, so the
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: last thing they need is more bad publicity, making it
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: look like they're trying to hide things, right? The decision
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: is the latest escalation in the dispute between the committee
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: and Black, whose name has come up repeatedly in the
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: Epstein files, and who, as reported by the New York Times,
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: paid Epstein a total of $ 170 million for what he
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: described as tax and estate planning services from 2013 to 2017. Ah,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: just a couple of bucks. Giving me a little bit
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: of advice, no big deal. What, who hasn't paid $ 170
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: million for some advice? Oh, word? You go to H
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: & R Block? Got it, understood. Like most people, $ 170
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: million for tax and estate planning services. What they really
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: mean It's $ 170 million for Jeffrey Epstein to show him
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: how to shelter his money in places where it's not
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: going to be taxed. That's what they really mean. And
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: the fact that nobody has been brought up on charges
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: when it comes to the financials of this is just
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: absolutely deplorable. There was so much financial malfeasance occurring and
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: so many people involved that it's literally shooting fish in
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: a barrel if you're a prosecutor. but instead we hear
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: more about a hoax and moving on. Comer announced last
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: week that the committee would consider the resolution to hold
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Black in contempt. It came after Black did not appear
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: for his deposition scheduled for September 3rd and did not
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: produce all the nondisclosure agreements sought by the committee. Instead,
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: Black sued to block the subpoenas arguing that they were
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: invalid to the extent they exceed the committee's delegated authority
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: in seeking private information To its legislative purpose. I would
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: say that anything Jeffrey Epstein's involved in, or was involved in,
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: would be covered by Congress's ability to investigate here. And
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: the fact that Leon Black is so willing to sue
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: Congress when the optics are so bad already. Can you
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: imagine what this guy is hiding? Can you imagine the
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: kind of skeletons this scumbag has in his closet? Now
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: what those skeletons are, I have no idea. But I'm
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: guessing they're not good. And I know it's breaking news
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: to people out there, but you don't get to the
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: level that Leon Black's at without shitting on a whole
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: lot of people on your way up that tree. Black's
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: lawsuit also argued that the subpoenas would expose women who
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: value their privacy, who have no known or public connection
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: to Epstein, who bargain for confidentiality and have refused to
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: release it, and who have no ability to protect themselves
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: and their privacy before the committee. Oh, look at that.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: Leon Black, champion of women. Fucking Sir Lancelot over here.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: Who does this dude think he's kidding? Oh yeah, I'm
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: so worried about the women, you know. That's why I
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: don't want to give this information up. I'd love to
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: see one of those women come out and say, hey,
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: you know what? Here's my confidential agreement. I waive my right.
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: I give it to Congress, and then they can take
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: a look at how disgusting this son of a bitch is.
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: The committee issued the subpoena in June, after Black appeared
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: voluntarily before the panel for a transcribed interview. The interview
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: ended abruptly after lawmakers from both parties said that Black
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: refused to answer questions about NDAs. Comer then issued the
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: two subpoenas, one demanding that Black produce all nondisclosure agreements
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: to which he is a party, and another requiring him
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: to appear before the committee again. In August, Comer threatened
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: to hold Black in contempt if he did not fully
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: cooperate with the committee subpoenas, and that's exactly what he
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: should be doing. And I don't think it's any big
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: surprise or shock to anybody that's been listening. I'm not
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: a fan of Comer or this committee. I think it's
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: a goddamn sham, and I think it's a joke. But
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: holding Leon Black in contempt is the right way to go.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Because this dude has spent years doing whatever he wants,
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: whenever he wants, to whoever he wants. And at some
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: point that party has to end, right? You would think,
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: you would hope, on Tuesday, during his remarks in the
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: chamber before the vote, Comer said that Black only produced
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: one NDA to the committee and noted that Black did
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: not appear for his September 3rd deposition. Yeah, rules for
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: me and you, but not him. Can you imagine Congress
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: calling you before them and you acting like you didn't
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: have to go? Ah, you know what? I think I'm
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: busy today. I'll have my lawyers deal with that. Your
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: ass would be dragged right in front of Congress and
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: sat in one of those chairs. But Mr. Big Shot
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: Leon Black, well, there's a different set of rules for him.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: Attorneys representing Black had asked for a postponement of the
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: committee's markup earlier on Tuesday and described it as a
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: complete abomination. The attorney said they sent two letters to
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: Comer and Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee,
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: saying that they would submit a complaint to the Office
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: of Congressional Conduct requesting an investigation into conduct by Chairman Comer,
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: alleging that ahead of Black's scheduled deposition, Comer engaged in
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: what should be viewed as a violation of the rules
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: of House of Representatives relating to the deposition. So let
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: me translate that for you. James Comer didn't want to
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: give our client a reach around, so we're going to sue.
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: And another thing I want to point out is look
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: at the way that they're treating Leon Black, and then
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: look at the way they treated Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton.
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: Completely unacceptable. And people like Robert Garcia, they were glazing
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: the Clintons. And in those depositions, the whole entire point
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: from the Democrats was to try and exonerate Clinton. It
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: wasn't testing out what people have said. It wasn't running
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: real evidence. It was a whitewash. and it was an embarrassment.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: Black's attorney said in a statement on Tuesday the committee
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: under the leadership of James Comer and ranking member Robert
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: Garcia has lost sight of its legislative purpose and is
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: abusing its power. The lawyer described the subpoenas as illegitimate, illegal,
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: and a textbook abuse of power designed to bully and
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: destroy legal protections of private citizens. Oh, well, how does
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: it feel to be on the other end of that
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: for once? Usually it's Leon Black, That's doing the dictating.
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: Now he's being dictated to, and he doesn't like it. Mr.
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: Black has repeatedly said that he feels terrible for Epstein's
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: victims and that he regrets ever doing business with them.
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: The statement added, he never abused a woman. He never
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: was with an underage woman. He never engaged in sex trafficking.
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: He never paid Epstein for access to women. He was
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: never blackmailed by Epstein. Mr. Black had no knowledge of
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: any of Epstein's heinous conduct. No, not at all. They
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: just stayed friends after Jeffrey Epstein was already a convicted
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: sex offender. But he had no idea. Come on. Stop
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: being a conspiracy theorist. What are you, Candace Owens? Before
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: Black's scheduled deposition earlier this month, more than a dozen
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: survivors of Epstein's abuse urged him to comply with congressional subpoenas.
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: They argued that his use of NDAs underscores why Congress
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: must scrutinize the agreement in his possession and determine whether
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: they shed light on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein or
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: and others in Epstein's orbit. Earlier this year, the committee
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: also moved the whole former President Bill Clinton and Hillary
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: Clinton contempt for initially refusing to testify about Epstein. The
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: Clintons ultimately testified before the House, if you want to
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: call it that. That shit was an abomination. Absolute joke.
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: They spent the whole entire time talking about Trump. Like,
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: I get it, but time and place, right? Save the whataboutism.
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: And instead, why don't you start producing some results? And
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: as far as I'm concerned, this is the perfect place
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: to start. If you're going to hold anybody accountable, then
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: Leon Black should definitely be near the top of the list.
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: So we'll see where this all goes. And when we
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: have some more information one way or the other, we'll
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: get that added to the catalog. All the information that
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: goes with this episode can be found in the description box.