Latest / The Morning Edition / Anna Wintour's biographer Amy Odell on John Galliano's Met cancellation
Transcript
- 0:06S1: When fashion designer John Galliano announced yesterday that he would
- 0:10S1: step away from being honored with a retrospective at next
- 0:13S1: year's illustrious Met Gala, the so-called Oscars of the fashion world.
- 0:18S1: It exposed an uncomfortable truth about the industry because many
- 0:23S1: Hail John Galliano as one of modern history's most important
- 0:27S1: fashion designers.
- 0:29S2: The first time I met John Galliano, I thought, I
- 0:35S2: can't allow this moment to pass.
- 0:39S3: Brilliant, exuberant, joyful, fun.
- 0:42S4: I thought that the way he mixes the the imagination
- 0:46S4: and at the same time have the clothes is really fantastic.
- 0:49S1: But he is also, as fashion insider Amy Odell puts it,
- 0:53S1: the industry's most famous anti-Semite. I'm Samantha Selinger Morris. And
- 0:59S1: you're listening to The Morning Edition from The Age and
- 1:02S1: the Sydney Morning Herald. Today, Amy Odell, author of Anna,
- 1:06S1: a biography of former Vogue editor in chief Anna Wintour
- 1:10S1: and host of the Back Row podcast, on whether John
- 1:13S1: Galliano's cancelation was fair and if it operates as a
- 1:17S1: wider rebuke to an industry known for tolerating bad behavior.
- 1:26S5: Amy, welcome to the podcast.
- 1:28S6: Thank you for having me.
- 1:30S5: Okay. Walk us through this. Why was this John Galliano
- 1:33S5: retrospective canceled? And what has the reaction been to it,
- 1:36S5: both in New York, where it was meant to be
- 1:38S5: taking place next year and also more broadly in the
- 1:42S5: global fashion community?
- 1:44S6: The way the met is framing it is that John
- 1:46S6: Galliano decided not to go forward with it, saying that
- 1:50S6: he didn't want his past, you know, really, his anti-Semitic
- 1:55S6: tirades and racist tirades that got him convicted of a
- 1:59S6: hate crime in France more than a decade ago, that
- 2:02S6: he didn't want his past to be a distraction for
- 2:05S6: the Costume Institute or the Metropolitan Museum of Art. That
- 2:09S6: is how it's being positioned.
- 2:12S7: It's fashion's biggest night the Met Gala, the Splashiest flashiest,
- 2:16S7: most exclusive party of the season.
- 2:19S8: Night in fashion is here it is the Met Gala.
- 2:22S8: The top names in music, entertainment, sports and beyond, all
- 2:25S8: descending on the iconic steps of the Metropolitan Museum of
- 2:28S8: Art in New York City.
- 2:32S6: But who knows really what went down. Because over the weekend,
- 2:36S6: on Friday, actually, The New York Times published a story
- 2:39S6: about all of the backlash growing against the exhibition. They
- 2:44S6: spoke to donors and Jewish leaders who were deeply, deeply
- 2:48S6: against it, which I think really reflected the public sentiment,
- 2:52S6: which I think is different from the fashion world sentiment.
- 2:56S6: I think a lot of people in the fashion world
- 2:57S6: were okay with this happening. Anna Wintour is thought to
- 3:02S6: have kind of muscled it through. She's wanted this for years. Uh,
- 3:07S6: and she seemed to have gotten her way. So I
- 3:09S6: think it's a really, really big deal. And I'm frankly surprised, actually,
- 3:13S6: that the met canceled it this quickly.
- 3:16S5: Okay. Well, there's a lot to unpack there. Just firstly,
- 3:19S5: can you just remind listeners of what John Galliano actually did?
- 3:22S5: It's about 15 years ago now, 15 or 16 years ago,
- 3:25S5: because you have called Galliano previously, quote, the industry's most
- 3:28S5: famous anti-Semite, not without good reason. So just briefly remind
- 3:32S5: us what it was that he said and did and
- 3:35S5: what it says about the fashion industry. I guess that
- 3:37S5: he was chosen then for this in the first place.
- 3:40S5: But first, what did he do all those years ago?
- 3:42S6: Yeah, there were two incidents, one of which was filmed
- 3:46S6: and released by The Sun newspaper.
- 3:49S9: I love Hitler, people like you would be dead today.
- 3:55S9: Your mothers, your forefathers would be gassed.
- 4:00S10: Oh my God. Do we have a problem with you?
- 4:04S9: You're ugly.
- 4:06S6: And there was another incident at a cafe in Paris
- 4:09S6: where he was drinking, and he was saying racist and
- 4:12S6: anti-Semitic things to another couple. One of the people involved
- 4:16S6: in that incident is named Philippe Virgile, and he appears
- 4:19S6: in the John Galliano documentary John Galliano High and Low,
- 4:24S6: which Anna Wintour had a hand in pulling together Conde
- 4:27S6: Nast as a producer on that. And she sat for
- 4:30S6: an interview for that. But that also seemed like a
- 4:32S6: way for her to kind of rehabilitate John Galliano's career
- 4:36S6: following these horrific incidents. Anyway, Virginie spoke to Kevin MacDonald,
- 4:41S6: who did that documentary, and he said he didn't think
- 4:44S6: John Galliano was sorry. He never apologized to him. And
- 4:48S6: he testified at the hate crime trial in Paris. And
- 4:52S6: he said at that trial that he didn't think Galliano
- 4:56S6: was racist. And he said in the documentary that he
- 4:59S6: regretted saying that basically, and that he does believe that
- 5:02S6: Galliano was racist because he never apologized to him.
- 5:06S5: Wow. And so I wanted to ask you because you
- 5:09S5: did mention a couple times there, you know, Anna Wintour,
- 5:11S5: famously a longtime Vogue editor in chief of American Vogue.
- 5:16S5: She only recently stepped down from that position. Is this
- 5:19S5: cancellation of John Galliano, I guess, a rebuke of her
- 5:22S5: in particular? She's always been her champion. And and, uh,
- 5:27S5: it has to be said, I think that it was
- 5:29S5: a very unusual choice to have him, because it's only,
- 5:32S5: I think, two times before in the history of the
- 5:34S5: Met Gala that a living designer has been chosen to
- 5:37S5: be the focus of a retrospective that was Yves Saint
- 5:40S5: Laurent in 1983. Rei Kubo in 2017. So is this
- 5:45S5: something of a. Yeah, a public recognition, perhaps, that her taste.
- 5:50S5: I don't know. Maybe it doesn't matter or it's off.
- 5:53S6: I think she's made some extremely tone deaf moves, particularly
- 5:56S6: around the Met Gala. And this may be the biggest.
- 5:59S6: And the met could not risk the donors pulling funding
- 6:05S6: and pulling donations. And also, I don't think it could
- 6:09S6: risk that round of backlash. And I don't you know,
- 6:13S6: I don't know at this at this time. The story
- 6:15S6: just broke really hours ago. But you know, what was
- 6:19S6: Vogue hearing, aside from the stuff that we've been reading
- 6:22S6: in the in the press, like, were they hearing from
- 6:24S6: celebrity publicists who are saying, we can't have our clients go,
- 6:29S6: you know, how do you attend the event if it
- 6:30S6: becomes the anti-Semitic Pro-hitler Met Gala? How do you attend
- 6:34S6: as a as a celebrity? What good does that do you.
- 6:38S6: And who would have sponsored it? It seemed like Vogue
- 6:40S6: was trying to get Zara to sponsor it because they
- 6:42S6: did a puff piece of Marta Ortega. Perez, who is
- 6:48S6: the chair of the Inditex, the Zara parent company's board
- 6:52S6: and the daughter of its billionaire founder. But yeah, I mean,
- 6:55S6: I think there's a lot behind the scenes that, you know,
- 6:58S6: may may come out in the coming weeks and months.
- 7:00S6: But yeah, I think there are a lot of questions.
- 7:02S6: Who is gonna who was gonna go out on a
- 7:05S6: limb and sponsor this? Who was gonna go, who would
- 7:08S6: have chaired it?
- 7:09S5: Right. And can you just tell the listeners, I guess,
- 7:11S5: a bit about how much backlash there was? Because there
- 7:13S5: was certainly controversy and backlash from when it was first
- 7:16S5: announced in early August, but it really built up steam.
- 7:21S5: And in particular, over the last few days, you know,
- 7:23S5: politicians started weighing in. Uh, the only living child of
- 7:27S5: Elie Wiesel, a very famous Holocaust survivor, weighed in. Just
- 7:31S5: tell us, I guess, a bit about how great the
- 7:33S5: backlash became.
- 7:35S6: Yeah. So Julie Menin, the speaker of the city council
- 7:39S6: and one of the most senior Jewish officials in city government,
- 7:42S6: called the museum's decision to do this a serious mistake.
- 7:46S6: In a letter that she sent to Max Hollein, the
- 7:48S6: Met's CEO and leader. Basically, this is according to New
- 7:52S6: York Times reporting. Arne Glimcher, an art world titan the times,
- 7:57S6: called him. He told the met in an email that
- 8:01S6: the Times reviewed that he and his wife were reconsidering
- 8:05S6: donating works from their collection to the met. Jill Kargman,
- 8:09S6: who was a member of friends of the Costume Institute,
- 8:13S6: said she would step down. Dave Ingber, senior director for
- 8:17S6: Jewish life and senior director of the Bronfman Center at
- 8:19S6: the 92nd Street Y and founding, which is a very
- 8:22S6: important cultural institution in New York City, not just a
- 8:25S6: Jewish institution, but also the founding rabbi of the synagogue. Uh,
- 8:32S6: he came out against it. And, you know, when they
- 8:37S6: announced this exhibition, Anna Wintour and the museum said, well,
- 8:43S6: we've we've gone and met with Jewish leaders, and they
- 8:46S6: forgive Galliano and they think this is okay. But, you know,
- 8:50S6: in the last four weeks since that was announced, many
- 8:54S6: more prominent Jewish people have come forward and said, we
- 8:59S6: don't think this is a good idea.
- 9:02S5: What are your reflections? Like, what do you think this
- 9:04S5: says most broadly about whether it's the political moment we're
- 9:07S5: in or fashion's place in the culture? You know, there
- 9:11S5: does seem to be, certainly with Anna Wintour alone, a
- 9:15S5: bit of a history of, say, overlooking people's bad behavior, uh,
- 9:19S5: and just, uh, looking at the glamour instead. I mean,
- 9:22S5: I know that you, I think, have spoken on your
- 9:24S5: own podcast, uh, about the decision that she made to
- 9:28S5: feature a hugely controversial profile of Asma al-Assad. Uh, she
- 9:33S5: was the first lady of the Syrian dictator. This was
- 9:37S5: in 2011. And, you know, the profile was titled A
- 9:40S5: Rose in the desert. and it portrayed the Syrian first
- 9:44S5: lady as glamorous, modernizing, and something of a democratic reformer.
- 9:48S5: Just as I believe a brutal government crackdown was beginning.
- 9:51S5: So I guess, what are your reflections on on this,
- 9:54S5: that historical yeah. Overlooking of horrific behavior for for glamour.
- 10:01S6: Yeah. The Arab Spring began, I believe, the day the
- 10:06S6: writer of that story left Damascus from her reporting trip.
- 10:12S6: But yeah, I think Anna Wintour has a long history
- 10:15S6: of just seeing the image and not be on that.
- 10:21S6: And she's had a lot of blind spots over the years.
- 10:24S6: I think Karl Lagerfeld, who got the 2023 Met Gala
- 10:28S6: and was the subject of a retrospective at the Costume Institute.
- 10:31S6: That's another example. People were really upset that the met
- 10:35S6: was honoring him because he was known for making Anti-fat remarks. He.
- 10:42S6: He commented repeatedly in his career about basically how he
- 10:47S6: didn't like fat women. Um, how he didn't think they
- 10:49S6: were attractive. And he also denigrated sexual assault victims that
- 10:53S6: came out during the MeToo movement. So I think Anna
- 10:57S6: Winter wants to have it both ways. Uh, it wasn't
- 11:00S6: that long ago that The Washington Post called her an
- 11:02S6: unlikely activist. And I think that it's really hard to
- 11:07S6: say that you're an activist and promote people like this.
- 11:16S1: After the break.
- 11:18S6: But yes, I think the fashion industry exists in a bubble.
- 11:21S6: It's very small, it's myopic, it's solipsistic. And I think
- 11:26S6: it is disconnected from reality. And I think in a way,
- 11:29S6: it kind of has to be.
- 11:36S5: And so is this something of an inflection point, perhaps
- 11:39S5: for the fashion culture more broadly, perhaps even a pointed
- 11:42S5: lesson that they absolutely just have to stop excusing horrific behavior.
- 11:47S5: Because I was just looking back at when Galliano was
- 11:50S5: first found guilty in a French court of public insults
- 11:53S5: based on origin and religion, and at the time, many
- 11:57S5: fashion greats rushed to his defense. Giorgio Armani said he
- 12:01S5: felt sorry for Galliano in a pit in particular, sorry
- 12:03S5: that he was filmed without his permission. I mean, that
- 12:06S5: seems a bit galling in retrospect. And Franca Sozzani. She
- 12:09S5: was the editor in chief of Italian Vogue. She raised
- 12:11S5: questions about the video itself, wondering if behind it were, quote,
- 12:15S5: some parvenu of journalistic scandal who, in our opinion, were
- 12:18S5: waiting to have three minutes of video to sell to
- 12:21S5: someone for a good deal more than 30 pieces of silver.
- 12:25S5: So yeah, is there a feeling perhaps that fashion really
- 12:30S5: needs a lesson and a hard one at that?
- 12:33S6: Yeah. I mean, those tirades did not really happen in
- 12:37S6: a vacuum. Those are two that we know about. But
- 12:40S6: as Dana Thomas reported in her book Gods and Kings
- 12:44S6: about John Galliano and Alexander McQueen, he had John Galliano
- 12:50S6: had a history of being a bully, kind of within
- 12:54S6: the offices of Dior. And, uh, you know, I guess
- 12:58S6: it was like a the classic toxic boss toxic workplace story.
- 13:03S6: And Dior knew it and knew that it might be
- 13:06S6: a problem. So then these reports that surfaced and that
- 13:10S6: video gave Dior reason to finally part ways with him.
- 13:15S6: But yes, I think the fashion industry exists in a bubble.
- 13:18S6: It's very small, it's myopic, it's solipsistic. And I think
- 13:22S6: it is disconnected from reality. And I think in a
- 13:25S6: way it kind of has to be because how are you,
- 13:27S6: the industry that's selling, uh, $100,000 jacket or, you know,
- 13:34S6: a $200,000 bag. I think you have to be disconnected
- 13:40S6: from reality a bit, because it's not like these prices
- 13:43S6: and that clientele that they're now courting, like the billionaire clientele,
- 13:48S6: you know, it's not like that is available to everybody.
- 13:53S5: Absolutely. But do you think it does damage to, to us,
- 13:56S5: to individuals, to us more broadly? Um, that, that it
- 14:00S5: has been so out of touch, I guess, and in
- 14:02S5: particular in ways like this when it celebrates people who have,
- 14:06S5: you know, committed heinous crimes or behaved in reprehensible ways.
- 14:10S6: That's a really good question. I do I do think
- 14:13S6: so because, you know, I'm, I'm Jewish and the people
- 14:19S6: I love most in this world are Jewish. And I
- 14:22S6: didn't want to see this happen, particularly at this moment
- 14:26S6: in time. And, you know, I've been talking about this
- 14:30S6: publicly and I feel like I would state my position
- 14:33S6: in a pretty rational way. And the comments that that
- 14:37S6: you get on social media, they seem to me just
- 14:41S6: kind of unhinged. You know, it's like, you know, I
- 14:45S6: can state it just the way I stated it to you.
- 14:47S6: And then it's like, what is the matter with you?
- 14:50S6: You're terrible. He deserves this.
- 14:54S5: And you mentioned that that it was particularly particularly galling
- 14:57S5: that this would be happening now at this time. So
- 14:59S5: what is it about this time that you find it, uh,
- 15:02S5: you know, a particularly, I guess, challenging time for something
- 15:05S5: like this to have been celebrated.
- 15:08S6: Well, anti-Semitism is on the rise. Um, you know, there
- 15:11S6: have been so many reports about that just recently in
- 15:14S6: New York. I think around the time that they announced
- 15:17S6: this exhibition, uh, a man was stabbed, I believe it
- 15:21S6: was leaving a synagogue with a screwdriver. So I think
- 15:25S6: these incidents are really, really troubling.
- 15:29S5: And what do you make, though, of those who argue
- 15:33S5: that his cancellation is unfair? You know that they say, okay,
- 15:36S5: Galliano paid his due. He was in the fashion wilderness
- 15:39S5: for many years. He lost his incredibly influential job at Dior. Um,
- 15:44S5: you know, he said he underwent rehab and discussed Judaism
- 15:48S5: and its history with rabbis and the former head of
- 15:50S5: the Anti-Defamation League. Like, what do you say to those people?
- 15:52S5: Because there's been so many who have come out. I've
- 15:54S5: seen them on your Instagram stories in response. I've seen them,
- 15:58S5: you know, across social media who say, well, he's a
- 16:00S5: genius and he's paid his dues.
- 16:02S6: I think those people are misinformed quite often. And, you know,
- 16:06S6: it's hard to remember all of the things that happened
- 16:09S6: in 2011. And I believe the trial was 2014. You know,
- 16:13S6: even for me, and I was covering this stuff very
- 16:16S6: in a very detailed way, like minute by minute when
- 16:19S6: it was all breaking. So I think a lot of
- 16:21S6: people have forgotten, maybe a lot of people never really
- 16:24S6: knew how I think damaging some of his, statements were and,
- 16:31S6: you know, not everyone has revisited all these stories again
- 16:35S6: and watch the documentary recently. Like, not everyone has that
- 16:38S6: knowledge at hand. And I think that if you're seeing
- 16:42S6: like the fashion world narrative where, you know, people say, oh,
- 16:46S6: he's paid his dues and like, this isn't fair. Like
- 16:48S6: I can understand like why you might come around to
- 16:51S6: that perspective. I also think he wasn't canceled. He wasn't canceled.
- 16:55S6: I mean, he left Dior. He went to treatment. He
- 17:00S6: did the trial. Uh, he paid a fine. He did
- 17:05S6: all of that. And then right away, you know, Anna
- 17:08S6: gets him a position. I forget the exact title, but
- 17:11S6: he worked at Oscar de la Renta for a period
- 17:14S6: of time. Then she gets him this job running Margiela.
- 17:18S6: And he did that for ten years, and he did
- 17:20S6: it to critical acclaim. And then he got a Zara deal.
- 17:23S6: So he has a Zara collaboration coming out in September,
- 17:27S6: So I don't think he ever really was put out
- 17:30S6: to pasture or canceled. You know, I think if you
- 17:33S6: think he's a genius designer, that's fine, but I don't
- 17:36S6: think that anybody is owed this honor. I think he's
- 17:40S6: still really beloved. But I also think like, you know, like,
- 17:46S6: who did it really benefit at the end of the
- 17:48S6: day to do this exhibition? And I think you could argue,
- 17:50S6: and I wrote this in my background newsletter, that this
- 17:52S6: wasn't even good for John Galliano, because if you care
- 17:55S6: about him, all this does is invite a relitigation of
- 17:58S6: his behavior and also for people to sniff around to
- 18:01S6: see what he's been doing in the last 12 years,
- 18:05S6: because there was a story that came out about a
- 18:08S6: month ago from fashion publicist Lauren London, who shared on
- 18:12S6: social media that she had witnessed Galliano in another anti-Semitic
- 18:16S6: incident in 2019.
- 18:19S5: Wow. And Amy, just to wrap up, you know, for
- 18:21S5: those listeners who, um, aren't avid fashion watchers, you know.
- 18:26S5: Why does this matter? The fact that he was chosen
- 18:28S5: for it in the first place, and the fact that
- 18:30S5: it's now been cancelled, why does it matter? More broadly,
- 18:33S5: I guess.
- 18:34S6: You know, I think people have been interested to see
- 18:38S6: who can bounce back from scandal and why and where
- 18:41S6: are the guardrails in our society surrounding scandal and morality.
- 18:46S6: Because I think this was a question of morality. And, uh,
- 18:51S6: I think that, you know, surprisingly, I'm surprised that this
- 18:56S6: was canceled 12 hours ago. But, um, surprisingly, we, we
- 19:01S6: kind of have a guardrail in place, at least in this,
- 19:04S6: in this instance, which is probably small in, in this
- 19:07S6: great big wide world of many scandals and many extremely
- 19:11S6: problematic people.
- 19:12S5: And perhaps it's something of a new guardrail. I mean,
- 19:14S5: it seems like this is a putting a foot down
- 19:17S5: moment against behavior that perhaps was more accepted in the past.
- 19:20S6: I don't think anti-Semitism, I want to say I don't
- 19:24S6: think anti-Semitism has been accepted. Uh, maybe in some parts
- 19:28S6: of society it has been accepted. But I think that
- 19:31S6: you need to yes, you need to draw a line
- 19:33S6: in the sand. If we can't draw a line around
- 19:34S6: someone who says, I love Hitler, your forefathers would be
- 19:38S6: gassed and dead, you know, in a celebratory way. Like,
- 19:41S6: what are we doing? I think this is an example
- 19:43S6: of an institution taking a stand against a powerful person,
- 19:47S6: and that person being Anna Wintour, who is understood to
- 19:50S6: have pushed this through because she wanted it, because she
- 19:53S6: likes his designs. And, um, I think that's a very
- 19:57S6: big deal. And she's been very influential at that institution
- 20:01S6: and in the fashion industry for a long time. And
- 20:03S6: I think the fact that the met said no to
- 20:06S6: one of their biggest and most famous fundraisers is a
- 20:09S6: really big deal. So I think it I think it
- 20:12S6: shows you that like an institution can say no to
- 20:15S6: a powerful person. It can happen.
- 20:18S5: Is this the beginning of the end of perhaps a
- 20:19S5: slide into irrelevance for Anna Wintour if it hasn't already begun?
- 20:23S6: I think so. I think this is it. It was
- 20:26S6: just such a tone deaf move to try to push
- 20:30S6: this through. I don't think anyone would have had an issue.
- 20:34S6: You know, if she wants to say I think he's
- 20:36S6: one of the greatest designers, he's made some mistakes. If
- 20:39S6: you just want that to be your line. But to
- 20:41S6: elevate him to getting his industry's highest honor, um, you know,
- 20:48S6: I think that was very, very out of touch.
- 20:51S5: Well, thank you so much, Amy, for your time.
- 20:54S6: Thank you for having me.
- 21:02S1: In other news today, Star Entertainment chief executive Bruce Mathieson
- 21:06S1: Jr has blamed previous management for the struggling casino giant's
- 21:10S1: compliance problems, promising he will deliver a clean slate and
- 21:14S1: cultural overhaul for the long suffering business. Foreign Minister Penny
- 21:19S1: Wong has said she is realistic about the challenges of
- 21:22S1: establishing the status of around 40 Australians missing in flash
- 21:27S1: flooding along the Tibet border and Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane
- 21:31S1: have all experienced a record warm 2026 winter higher than usual.
- 21:36S1: Temperatures are set to continue for the East Coast, with
- 21:39S1: Weatherzone predicting the warmest start to spring in more than
- 21:42S1: 50 years. You can read more at the age.com.au or smh.com.au.
- 21:52S1: Today's episode was produced by Kai Wong. Our executive producer
- 21:56S1: is Tammy Mills, and our podcasts are overseen by Lisa
- 21:59S1: Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If you like our show, follow
- 22:03S1: The Morning Edition and leave a review for us on
- 22:05S1: Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.