Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Detective's Secret Affair Exposes Wife's Staged Murder

Transcript

Detective's Secret Affair Exposes Wife's Staged Murder · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Imagine standing in a dining room. I mean, it's an
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: ordinary suburban dining room, except your colleague's wife is lying
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: dead on the floor.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: Right. It's a horrific scene.
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And there's blood in her hair, blood on the hardwood.
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: And your colleague, a guy you've known for years, a
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: guy who wears the same badge you do, he just
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: looks up at you.
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: And he's suspiciously quiet, you know.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Exactly. He's quiet. And then he asks, can I wash
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: my hands? Now, you're a cop. You know the rules
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: of a crime scene. You know exactly what happens to
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: physical evidence when it goes down a drain.
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: It's gone.
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: Forever. But because he's wearing the same uniform you do, because,
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: you know, you know his kids, because you see him
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: at the precinct every morning, you just nod and say yes.
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: And in that single terrible second, you have just washed
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: away the truth.
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: It really is the ultimate collision between professional duty and
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: just human familiarity. Right. Because when we talk about crime scenes,
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: we usually assume this rigid... almost clinical objectivity from law enforcement, right?
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: Sure. We expect them to follow the book.
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: Exactly. But what happens when the person controlling the scene,
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: the person who actually made the 911 call, is someone
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: the community implicitly trusts?
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: It changes everything.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: It does.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: I mean, what.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Happens when the primary suspect is the one who literally
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: wrote the playbook on how to investigate a murder?
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: That is exactly the terrifying question we are tackling today.
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: So welcome to this deep dive.
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. I'm excited to get into this one.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: Me too. We have this massive stack of source material
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: today from the Law and Crime Network series, Killer Cases.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: And our mission for you today is to tear into
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: two entirely separate murder investigations.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: And on the surface, I mean, these cases could not
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: be more different.
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: Not at all. We've got a 30-year veteran police detective
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: in Massachusetts on one hand.
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: Right. And on the other, we've got a beloved interior
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: designer living in this wealthy California beach town.
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: Totally different worlds. But the thematic tissue connecting them is
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: just undeniable. We are looking at trusted figures, unimaginable betrayals,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: frantically staged crime scenes. And this is the kicker killers
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: who believe they were smart enough to execute the perfect crime.
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: And both of these killers were completely undone by the
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: exact same thing, which is their digital footprint.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: So we are going to explore the psychology of arrogance today.
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: We're going to look at how confirmation bias blinds investigators.
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: You know, how the physical reality of a dead body
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: absolutely refuses to cooperate with a fictional narrative.
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: The body never lies.
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: It really doesn't. And we'll see how in the modern era,
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: the data you leave behind is just a far more
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: stubborn witness than anything you can physically clean up.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack this.
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: I want you, the listener, to put yourself in a
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: very specific headspace right now. Imagine thinking you know exactly
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: who the people closest to you are.
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: Down to their core.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: Right. Your spouse of 30 years. Or the parent figure
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: who practically raised you. You have this foundational understanding of
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: your reality. And then in a single afternoon, you uncover
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: a secret so incredibly dark.
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: So fundamentally reality altering.
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: Yes. That the story basically has to end in murder.
• 3:12
  Speaker 2: Because it completely rewrites your past. I mean, when that
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: foundational trust shatters, it sends shockwaves not just through the family,
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: but through the entire community.
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: And the investigative process itself has to somehow, like, navigate
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: that blast radius. Right.
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: It's messy.
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: So let's start in the blast radius of Westfield, Massachusetts.
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: It's May 8th, 2018. The incident is at 9 North Road.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: A 911 call comes in, and the dispatcher actually knows
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: the voice on the other end of the line.
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: Which is already a huge red flag for the investigation's integrity.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: Exactly. It's Detective Brian Fannion, a 30-year veteran of the
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: Westfield Police Department. He tells the dispatcher, quote, My wife
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: just shot herself.
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: Now, notice the immediacy of the narrative there.
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: What do you mean?
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: Well, he isn't panicked, saying, send an ambulance, my wife
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: is bleeding. He is diagnosing the scene for them.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow. I didn't think of that.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: Yeah, he is planting a very specific flag in the
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: ground before the paramedics have even grabbed their keys.
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: Right out of the gate, he's setting the scene. He's
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: directing the play.
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: Exactly.
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: So, Engine 3 and Med 30 are dispatched to the house.
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: The responding officers walk into the dining room. And they
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: find Amy Fannion on the floor on her back. There's
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: blood on the right and left sides of her face and,
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: you know, in her hair.
• 4:28
  Speaker 2: And the dining room table has notably been moved.
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: Right. And Brian's demeanor is described by the responding officers,
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: who are his own colleagues, by the way, as very quiet.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: He looks like he had been crying. And he's just
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: sitting there holding and rubbing Amy's hands.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: And this is where you have to put yourself in
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: the boots of those responding officers.
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: You walk in and you aren't seeing a potential crime scene.
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: You are seeing the tragic, catastrophic collapse of a mentor's life.
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: Because they know him. Yeah.
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: You've worked cases with Brian. You've probably, I don't know,
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: complained about the brass over coffee with him. You know
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: his reputation as this solid family man.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: Which brings us back to that staggering detail from the intro.
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: The hand washing.
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: The hand washing is just, it's unbelievable.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: Brian asks if he can go wash his hands and
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: they let him. Wait. I have to push back on
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: this a little bit. I mean, I get being sympathetic
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: to a colleague, but this is a fatal gunshot wound.
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: If you're a cop responding to a fellow cop's house,
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: isn't there a glaringly obvious conflict of interest? This is
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: like a classic locked room mystery where the primary suspect
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: is holding the keys. Yep. Is allowing him to wash
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: his hands just cognitive bias? Or is that, flat-out systemic incompetence.
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: It's really a toxic cocktail of both, driven heavily by
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: confirmation bias.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Tell me more about that.
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: Well, confirmation bias isn't just about interpreting blurry evidence in
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: a way that favors your theory, right? It is about
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: what you completely filter out of your reality.
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Oh, interesting.
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: These officers categorized Brian Fannion as one of us. He's
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: a good guy, a grieving husband. Because he reported it
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: as a suicide right off the bat, their brains instantly
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: processed the scene as an unattended death.
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: So they just didn't see him as a suspect at all. Right.
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: The rigorous procedural skepticism that usually kicks in at a
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: scene with a dead body, it was completely turned off.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: So they just suspended the rules of investigation because he
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: wore the same uniform. But by letting him wash his hands,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: they destroyed the gunshot residue evidence, didn't they? Absolutely. Walk
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: us through the mechanics of that. I mean, why is
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: that specific act so devastating to the case?
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: So gunshot residue or GSR isn't just soot. When a
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: firearm is discharged, the primer explodes, and it forcefully expels
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: this vapor of heavy metals.
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: Like what kind of metals?
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: Typically lead, barium, and antimony. That vapor cools instantly in
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: the air and condenses into these microscopic particles that land
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: on the shooter's hands, their clothes, their arms.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: Okay, so it coats whatever is nearby.
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: Right, but it is incredibly delicate evidence. It can wipe
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: off on your pockets or just blow away in a
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: strong wind.
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: Let alone what soap and warm water would do to it.
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: Exactly. Washing your hands introduces surfactants that lift those microscopic
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: heavy metals right off the skin and send them straight
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: down the drain.
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: So by letting him go to the sink, the officers
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: allowed Brian to effectively erase the physical connection between his
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: hands and the firing of that weapon.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: That's wild.
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: It's an unforgivable breach of protocol, but it really underscores
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: the dangerous assumption of innocence afforded to law enforcement by
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: their own peers.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: And his shield was really thick. I mean, the community
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: perception of Brian and Amy Fannion was basically untouchable.
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: They were the golden couple.
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: They really were. They were seen as this incredibly loving couple.
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: They had two adult children, Victoria and Travis, deeply active
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: in their local church. Right. Brian volunteered his time feeding teenagers.
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: He had literally just returned from a church mission to Mexico.
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: Which becomes very relevant later.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: Yes, it does. And Amy volunteered at the Cancer House
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: of Hope. The sources universally described her as a beautiful,
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: kind soul who just poured her energy into helping others.
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: See, he had spent 30 years fortifying that facade. He
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: was banking on the fact that when he finally needed
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: to cash in that social capital, it would pay out
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: in full. He fully expected his colleagues to see the
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: church-going volunteer, not a cold-blooded killer.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: And for a brief, terrifying window, it actually worked. But
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: then the state police take over and the facade starts cracking.
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: And this is where the digital breadcrumbs begin to form
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: a trail.
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: The data never lies.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: It doesn't. But before we even get to the phone data,
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: there's this absolutely wild moment of family intervention. Early in
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: the investigation, the family, meaning Amy's family and Brian's kids,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: actually drafts a letter to the district attorney's office.
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: This part is just mind-blowing.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: They demand that the authorities, quote, cease and desist the
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: investigation into Brian. They explicitly call him a God-fearing family man.
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: That document is a stunning psychological artifact.
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: Why do you call it that?
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: Because it is weaponized denial. The family is so desperate
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: to maintain their internal paradigm that Brian is the protector,
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: the patriarch, that they are willing to legally threaten the
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: very people trying to investigate their mother's death.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: It's like they're protecting the predator.
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: Yes. It shows you how thoroughly Brian had manipulated his environment.
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: But the state police, thankfully, aren't blinded by his local reputation.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: So the morning after Amy dies, investigators perform a cellular
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: data extraction on Brian's phone. And boom, instant motive. They
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: uncover a string of highly provocative texts between Brian and
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: a woman named Corrine Hasty, who also goes by Cora Knowles.
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: And guess where he met her? On that church mission
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: to Mexico.
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: Of course.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: The sources show that by March, this relationship had escalated
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: into a full-blown romantic affair.
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: The irony there is incredibly thick. I mean, the very
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: church mission trick that he used to prop up his
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: image as a moral pillar is where he met the
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: catalyst for his wife's murder.
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: It's disgusting. It is.
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: But what's truly astounding here is the sheer digital ignorance
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: from a seasoned detective. There is this pervasive myth among criminals,
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: even those in law enforcement, about digital permanence.
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: Right, they think they can just delete it.
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They think if they delete a text thread or
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: lock their phone... The data just vanishes into thin air.
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: Well, let's talk about the timeline of that data, because
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: this is the moment where this story goes from tragic
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: to just duckly sinister.
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: The timeline is everything.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: The data extraction reveals that while Amy is bleeding out
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: on the dining room floor, Brian is actively texting Corrine.
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: While she is dying.
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: Yes. He sends her a message saying, don't call or
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: text for a while. Please pray very bad for family.
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: He prioritizes sending a text to his mistress over calling
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: his own son to tell him his mother is dead.
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: That timeline is the prosecution's dream and a defense attorney's
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: absolute nightmare.
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: I can't even imagine trying to defend that.
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: You can't. It completely obliterates the narrative of a panicked,
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: grieving husband. I mean, in the most critical moment of
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: his life, his hyper fixation is on managing his secret affair.
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: Not on the fact that the woman he built a
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: whole life with is dying feet away from him.
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: It's so cold.
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: It displays a sociopathic level of emotional detachment.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: And that detachment carries right over into the mourning period.
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: So there is a family gathering at his father's home,
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: specifically organized to mourn Amy. The family is upstairs weeping.
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: And where is Brian?
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: Exactly. Where is the grieving widower? He is found out
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: in the basement, completely tear-free. kissing Corrine passionately.
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: It's compartmentalization on a staggering scale. He has successfully removed
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: the obstacle in his life, and he is eagerly moving on.
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: To the reward. It's like Amy never even existed.
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: Right. He's so consumed by his narcissism and his new
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: reality with Corrine that he cannot even bring himself to
• 11:51
  Speaker 2: perform the social requirements of grief for the benefit of
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: his own children.
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: But his personal phone wasn't his only mistake. Investigators also
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: pull the search history on his actual police computer.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: This is where the arrogance really shines.
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: Oh, it's unbelievable. They find that right around the time
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: the affair with Corrine was heating up, Brian Fannion, a
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: 30-year veteran detective, is sitting at his precinct desk Googling
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: divorce pension rights and how divorce affects pensions.
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: On a government computer.
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: Okay. You have to explain this to me. Yeah. If
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: he is a guy who literally arrests people for a living,
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: a guy who knows exactly how digital forensics work, how
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: does he justify doing highly incriminating searches online? about a
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: financial motive for murder on a monitored IP address.
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: We have to unpack the psychology of institutional arrogance here.
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: Please do.
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: When someone spends three decades inside the criminal justice system,
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: especially in an investigative role, they can develop this catastrophic
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: superiority complex.
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: Like they're above the law.
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They internalize the belief that because they catch the
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: bad guys, they are inherently separate from the bad guys. Therefore,
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: the rules that apply to the people they arrest just
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: do not apply to them.
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: So it's not stupidity. It's just pure uncut ego.
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: It's the illusion of invulnerability. He felt untouchable. But beyond
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: the hubris, those specific search terms, divorce pension rights, they
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: crystallized the motive in a way the affair alone doesn't.
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: How so?
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: Well, the texts prove he was unfaithful, but the pension
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: searches prove he was financially trapped. Brian did the math.
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: If he divorced Amy to marry Corrine, he would lose
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: half his pension.
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: He'd likely have to sell his house. His entire comfortable
• 13:33
  Speaker 2: retirement would just evaporate. He simply couldn't afford a divorce.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: No, murder was cheaper.
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: In his deeply warped, calculating mind, a staged suicide became
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: the more financially prudent option.
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: He literally weighed the value of his wife's life against
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: the payout of his retirement fund. It's chilling. It really is.
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: But he didn't just passively hope the police would believe him.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: He actively tried to build a forensic and psychological narrative
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: to sell the suicide. Right.
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: He tried to direct the investigation.
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: On May 17th, he sits down for a recorded interview
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: with the state police. And the story he weaves is
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: just bizarre.
• 14:07
  Speaker 2: Suspects who are lying often over-explain. They populate their fictional
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: narratives with these mundane, highly specific details, hoping that the
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: specificity will somehow... lend the story an air of authenticity.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: Right, so the detectives ask him, what were you fighting
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: about right before she shot herself? And Brian claims Amy
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: was enraged about his upcoming retirement. He says she was
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: furious that their old house needed maintenance, angry that he
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: wanted to get a new dog, and this is the
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: wildest part. He claims she was furious about a local
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: play she had committed them to attend that he didn't
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: want to go to.
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: A play?
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: Yes. He paints this picture of a woman who just
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: snapped and ended her own life over a play and
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: a puppy. And he claims that while she was in
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: the middle of making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich,
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: she just picked up a service weapon and pulled the trigger.
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: The psychological continuity there is completely broken.
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: What do you mean?
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: Well, people in the throes of a sudden, violent, suicidal
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: crisis do not typically pause mid-sandwich making to do it.
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: The juxtaposition of a mundane domestic task like making a
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: PB & J and a sudden violent self-execution is incredibly jarring.
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: It just doesn't make sense.
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: It doesn't. And more importantly, it contradicts all the behavioral
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: evidence leading up to that day.
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: Because the police actually looked at Amy's digital footprint. They
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: didn't just take his word for it. They looked at
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: her texts, her emails, her search history.
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: And what did they find?
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: They found a woman who was actively planning for the future.
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: Her phone was full of positivity. She was texting friends
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: about how excited she was for the spring weather. She
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: was thrilled about a new grandchild on the way. Her
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: brother testified that she was happily polyurethaning a wooden stepstool
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: as a gift that very morning. There were zero markers
• 15:49
  Speaker 2: of a woman in crisis.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: Suicidal ideation almost always leaves a behavioral footprint. It might
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: be subtle, but it's there.
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: Like giving away possessions, withdrawing from social circles, changes in communication.
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: But she had none of that. None. None.
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: Amy's footprint was one of active, forward-looking engagement. The defense
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: tried to paint a picture of a woman on the
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: edge of a cliff. But the empirical data of her
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: life proved she was nowhere near the edge. And Brian
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: knew the police would look for that footprint. So he
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: actively tried to manufacture one.
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: This part is so manipulative.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: He started calling the medical examiner's office directly. He sent
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: them a curated list of Amy's old medications, heavily focusing
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: on her irritable bowel syndrome prescriptions. trying to draw this
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: tenuous link between IBS and severe depression. Wow. He even
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: dug up an old journal of hers, highlighted specific passages
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: that he interpreted as sad, and sent them to the
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: MEE to suggest she was unstable.
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: That is profound consciousness of guilt. Yeah. I mean, an innocent,
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: grieving husband is entirely focused on his loss. He is
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: not meticulously curating medical records and annotating diaries to convince
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: the medical examiner of a cause of death.
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: He's playing detective.
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: Exactly. He is attempting to manage the investigation from the outside,
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: using his insider knowledge of how death investigations work. He
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: knew the ME would look at medical history, so he
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: tried to artificially supply a narrative of mental illness.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: But all of his narrative manipulation slams headfirst into the
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: wall of ballistic science.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: Science always wins.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: It does here. The prosecution brings in a ballistics expert,
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: John S. Shrine, to testify about what they call the
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: blue gun testing. And the forensic reality of Amy's wound
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: is absolutely critical.
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: Right, the trajectory.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: Yes. The bullet trajectory was at a downward angle, and
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: it entered from slightly behind her head.
• 17:39
  Speaker 2: This is where the physical evidence categorically refuses to corroborate
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: Brian's fiction. The trajectory of a self-inflicted gunshot wound is
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: dictated by human biomechanics. Your arm only bends in certain ways.
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: The prosecution literally demonstrated this in court. They had females
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: of a similar size and Bill to Amy take a
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: plastic dummy gun, a blue gun, and attempt to replicate
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: the angle of that gunshot.
• 18:04
  Speaker 2: And they couldn't do it, right? No.
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: The expert testified that these women were physically incapable of
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: reproducing the angle without external intervention. I mean, think about it.
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: If you try to act it out right now, take
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: your right hand, reach it all the way around to
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: the back of your head, point the barrel downwards, and
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: somehow pull the trigger down. while maintaining that awkward, agonizing contortion.
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: The human shoulder and wrist just do not naturally operate
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: that way, especially not impulsively.
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: It is biomechanically absurd. Now, Brian tried to preempt this
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: in his interview.
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: Oh, he did?
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah, he told the detectives that Amy wasn't a gun person,
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: so she held the weapon awkwardly, maybe even turning it
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: around and using her thumb to pull the trigger.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: So he's making up excuses in advance.
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: He is retroactively trying to invent a scenario that explains
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: the awkward angle he knows the autopsy will reveal, but
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: his verbal gymnastics cannot overcome the laws of physics.
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: And the physics get worse for him. During that same interview,
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: the detectives push back. They say, Brian, the ME is
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: saying there's no indication this was a close-range shot.
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: And how does he react?
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: His entire demeanor shifts. He gets incredibly defensive. Yeah. He
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: snaps back, you're wrong because she did, because I saw it.
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: It was right freaking there. How does a forensic expert
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: know a gun wasn't held directly against a head? Explain
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: the science of a contact wound for us.
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: Well, when a firearm discharges, the bullet isn't the only
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: thing that exits the barrel. You have expanding, superheated gases,
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: unburned gunpowder, and soot.
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: Right, all the explosive material.
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: If a gun is pressed firmly against the skin, which
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: is a contact wound, all of that gas, powder, and
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: soot is forced directly into the wound track under the skin.
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: Ouch.
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah. The edges of the wound will often be seared
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: and the skin might even tear in a star shape
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: from the expanding gas trapped beneath Ouch. But Amy didn't
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: have that. So she didn't have that either. No. If
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: you have no soot and no stippling, it means the
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: muzzle of the gun was far enough away that those
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: elements dissipated before reaching the target. Typically, that means the
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: gun was held beyond arm's length.
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: Which makes a suicide impossible.
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: Exactly. When confronted with the lack of stippling and soot,
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: Brian doesn't react with the confusion of an innocent person
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: trying to make sense of a tragedy. He reacts with
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: the combativeness of a liar whose script has just been challenged.
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: He's mad they caught him in a lie.
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: The impossible trajectory, the distance of the muzzle... and the
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: lack of gunshot residue on her hands due to the handwashing,
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: it all paints an undeniable, scientifically verified picture of homicide.
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: So all of this leads to the Fannion trial. Yeah.
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: And this is where we see the horrifying collateral damage
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: of this crime. The defense strategy, led by attorney Jeffrey Brown,
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: was singularly focused on destroying Amy's character.
• 20:59
  Speaker 2: They put the victim on trial.
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: They literally put the victim on trial. They argued she
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: was volatile, short-tempered, suffered from severe anxiety. And in a
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: sudden fit of rage over a dog and a play,
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: she grabbed the gun.
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: Over a play?
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: And they argued the gun went off accidentally as Brian
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: heroically lunged across the room to save her.
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: They needed the jury to believe Amy was a powder keg,
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: capable of an erratic, violent act over something incredibly trivial.
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: But to sell that narrative, they needed witnesses to corroborate
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: her alleged volatility.
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: And this is the part that is so hard to swallow.
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: The defense's star witnesses were Amy's own family, her daughter, Victoria.
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: her son Travis, and, incredibly, Amy's own mother, Patricia Tarrant.
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: They all took the stand for the defense.
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: That is heartbreaking.
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: They testified on behalf of the man accused of murdering
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: their mother and daughter. They told the jury Amy had
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: a short fuse that she was snippy. And they painted
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: Brian as a gentle, peaceful, nonviolent saint. I mean, how
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: do you sit in the courtroom and watch the prosecution
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: lay out the affair, the pension motive, the impossible physics
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: of the gunshot, and still take the stand for the killer.
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: It speaks to the terrifying power of cognitive dissonance and
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: family denial. You have to look at the psychological alternative.
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: What do you mean?
• 22:14
  Speaker 2: For these children and for Amy's mother, accepting the prosecution's
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: theory meant accepting a reality that was fundamentally apocalyptic to
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: their worldview. It meant accepting that their trusted patriarch, their
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: community leader, was a calculating sociopath who executed their mother
• 22:31
  Speaker 2: to protect his retirement fund.
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: It's just too dark to process.
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: It destroys their entire support system. Psychologically, it was vastly
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: easier to blame the victim. It was less world shattering
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: to accept the narrative that Amy was unstable and simply snapped.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: It preserves the family unit somewhat.
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: Clinging to that illusion allows the children to keep their
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: father and the mother to keep her son-in-law. It is
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: a profound trauma response. They chose the lie because the
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: truth was unsurvivable.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: But not everyone in the family chose the lie. The
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: prosecution's key witness was Amy's sister, Anna Hansen. And her
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: testimony is absolutely heartbreaking.
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: She was the truth teller.
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: She was. She told the jury that prior to the murder,
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: she thought Brian and Amy had a dream marriage. She
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: adored Brian. But I think she describes a conversation she
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: had with Brian just two weeks after Amy's death.
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: Well, this part is awful.
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: Brian sits her down, takes her hand, and confesses that
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: he is madly in love with Corrine. He tells Anna
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: he didn't even really love Amy in the beginning. And
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: then he leans in. and forcibly kisses his dead wife's
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: sister on the lips.
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: That anecdote is chilling. It demonstrates a complete absence of
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: empathy and a total collapse of personal boundaries.
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: It's sickening.
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: He is so intoxicated by his own perceived cleverness, so
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: unburdened by guilt, that he inappropriately forces his elation onto
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: the grieving sister of the woman he just murdered. It
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: shatters the facade of the grieving widower instantly.
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: Anna was also the one who exposed that cease and
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: desist letter we talked about. She testified that she was
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: heavily pressured by the family to sign it just to
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: keep the peace because Brian was sitting right there in
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: the room when they were discussing it.
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: So she was intimidated.
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: Yes. And the cost of her truth was absolute because
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: Anna chose to testify for the prosecution. She testified that
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: she lost her entire family. Her sister's children and her
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: own mother stopped speaking to her.
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: She paid the ultimate social tax for telling the truth.
• 24:24
  Speaker 2: The family closed ranks around the abuser and completely expelled
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: the truth teller. It's a tragic dynamic we see constantly
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: in cases of familial abuse. The system demands a scapegoat
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: to maintain the illusion, and in this case, Anna sacrificed
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: her relationship with her family to ensure her sister's killer
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: faced justice.
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: And justice was served. The jury saw right through the
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: defense's character assassination of Amy. They returned a verdict of
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: guilty of first-degree murder.
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: Good.
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: Brian Fannion was sentenced to life in prison without the
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: possibility of parole. the judge did not hold back at sentencing,
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: explicitly noted that Brian murdered his wife in cold blood
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: while she was simply trying to eat a sandwich, calling
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: his actions heinous, callous, and sociopathic.
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: The 30-year veteran who thought his badge and his knowledge
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: of forensics would make him untouchable was ultimately undone by
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: his own monumental arrogance.
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: The digital trail he left.
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The digital trail he left, combined with the stubborn
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: physics of the crime scene, completely dismantled his hubris.
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: Now, you might think, The kind of arrogance is strictly
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: a hazard of wearing a badge for three decades. You
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: might think that only a cop would believe they could
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: manipulate a crime scene and script a perfect death.
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: But that's not true.
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: It's not. Because that same dangerous illusion, the beliefs that
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: you can outsmart reality, shows up in people who have
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: never set foot in a police academy. And that brings
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: us to Solana Beach, California.
• 25:47
  Speaker 2: This transition is fascinating. Because we are shifting from the cold,
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: calculated hubris of a professional investigator to the frantic, improvised
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: panic of a civilian. Right.
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: Completely different energy.
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: The environments are polar opposites, but the fundamental flaw, the
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: belief that one can completely erase the physical reality of
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: a murder, remains exactly the same.
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: Let's set the scene for case number two. It is
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: New Year's Day 2021. The horror show that was 2020
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: has finally ended. And right around 1.0 p.m., a panicked
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: 911 call drops into the San Diego Sheriff's dispatch. The
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: caller is a man named Adam Siplyak. And he is terrified.
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: He tells the dispatcher that his friend, a woman named
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: Jade Jinks, who is also known as Jade Jensen, asked
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: him to come over the night before.
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: And what did she want?
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: She casually asked him to help move the body of
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: her stepfather, whom she claimed to have just murdered.
• 26:42
  Speaker 2: Think about what the police are dealing with here. In
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: the Fannion case, they had a body but assumed there
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: was no crime.
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: Here, the police are on high alert immediately because they
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: have a third-party confession, but they face a bizarre logistical problem.
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: They have no body and they have no crime scene.
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: Right. Adam just called it in, but where is the proof?
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They are operating in the dark. Is this a homicide,
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: a missing person, or just a friend telling a fabricated story?
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: They have to work completely backward.
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: So let's establish the characters in this tragedy in the
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: inciting incident that set off the powder keg. The victim
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: is Tom Merriman, 64 years old. He's a well-known figure
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: in the Solana Beach area, the founder of a non-profit
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: butterfly farm.
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: Okay, sounds like a gentle guy.
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: Colleagues describe him as an environmentalist, a conservationist, a very smart,
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: gentle soul. But he struggled deeply with alcohol. In fact,
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: he'd recently taken a very bad fall while highly intoxicated.
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: and had to be placed in a rehab facility.
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: Though he was a complex figure, beloved by his community
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: for his environmental work, but battling severe personal demons. He
• 27:48
  Speaker 2: was vulnerable and required significant care, which brings us to
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: the suspect.
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: The suspect is Jade Jensen, who often goes by Jade Jinx.
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: She is a highly successful interior designer, 18 years in
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: the business, with a vibrant, dynamic personality.
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: A local professional.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: Yes. The sources repeatedly describe her as having a very
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: relatable girl-next-door vibe. Her relationship with Tom is the crux
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: of this entire case. She was his stepdaughter.
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: Her mother and Tom had divorced over a decade prior,
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: and Jade's biological mother was entirely out of the picture.
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: Jade herself described her mother as nuts. But despite the divorce,
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: Jade and Tom remained incredibly close.
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: That's interesting.
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: They actually lived in adjacent units. She was, for all
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: intents and purposes, his primary caretaker. She took him to
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: the hospital. She managed his affairs when he drank too much.
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: That is a relationship built on profound trust and mutual reliance.
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: I mean, she stepped in to care for the man
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: who helped raise her long after any legal or marital
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: obligation to her mother was gone. That continued devotion speaks
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: to an incredibly strong emotional bond.
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: Which is exactly why the betrayal is so catastrophic. Here
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: is the inciting incident.
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's hear it.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: Jade is doing a good deed. She had just helped
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: admit Tom into the AVR rehab center to detox after
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: his fall. She goes into his apartment, which is a mess,
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: to clean it up and organize it before he gets discharged.
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: Just being a good daughter.
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: While she's in his office wiping things down, she accidentally
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: bumps his computer mouse. The monitor wakes up, and the
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: screensaver pops on.
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: And in a fraction of a second, her entire reality
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: is rewritten.
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: The screensaver is a picture of nude female breasts. Jade
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: looks closer, and she recognizes a very distinct beauty mark
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: above the left breast. With a sickening drop in her stomach,
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: she realizes they are her breasts. oh my god she
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: hits the space bar to exit the screensaver and she
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: opens a folder containing hundreds of photos explicit scantily clad
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: and fully nude photos of herself in various stages of
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: undress taken across different years.
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: How did he get those.
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: These were photos she had taken consensually with a past
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: romantic partner years ago And somehow, the trusted stepfather she
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: was currently cleaning up after had stolen them, hoarded them,
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: and was actively using them as his screensaver.
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: The psychological earthquake of that moment cannot be overstated.
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: Let me use an analogy here, because it's hard to
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: wrap your head around. Imagine looking into a mirror in
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: your own bathroom. You feel safe. But then you realize
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: that mirror is actually a two-way glass. And it's installed
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: in the house of the person you trust most in
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: the world.
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: That's terrifying.
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: You realize they haven't been looking out for you. They've
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: been secretly watching you, preying on you the entire time.
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: That is precisely the cognitive dissonance she experienced. The brain
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: simply cannot reconcile the concept of the gentle, beloved stepfather
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: with the reality of the voyeuristic sexual predator.
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: It just shorts out.
• 30:41
  Speaker 2: It instantly shatters every memory she has of him. She
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: stated later that she felt physically sick. that she couldn't
• 30:47
  Speaker 2: even stand the touch of her own skin. It is
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: a profound, life-altering violation.
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: Absolutely.
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: And this sets up the absolute core of the legal battle.
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: Was the murder that followed an act of sudden, uncontrollable
• 30:59
  Speaker 2: panic driven by this unimaginable trauma, or was it cold, calculated,
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: premeditated execution?
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: The prosecution argued heavily for premeditation, focusing on what they
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: called the murder kit and Jade's massive digital footprint.
• 31:13
  Speaker 2: Right, the data again.
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: Let's trace her actions leading up to New Year's Eve.
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: Jade is living in acute terror. She feels so unsafe
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: that she can't even shower in her own home without
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: someone standing guard. She actually hires a private security fixer
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: named Alan Roach to watch her door.
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: That shows real fear.
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: She starts sleeping with a plastic tarp and a large
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: knife by her bed. Terrified Tom might come into her unit.
• 31:35
  Speaker 2: Her fear is entirely genuine, but her actions show a
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: pivot from fear to strategy.
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: The tarp.
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: The tarp by the bed is a particularly alarming detail.
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: It indicates she is no longer just preparing to defend herself.
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: She is preparing to manage a violent aftermath.
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: The plan really crystallizes on New Year's Eve day. Tom
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: is scheduled to be released from the AVR rehab center
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: at 1119 a.m. He is discharged with a bag full
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: of his own prescription medications, heavily featuring the sleep aid Ambien.
• 32:06
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: Around this time, Jade sends a text message to her
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: security fixer, Alan Roach. She texts, I just do the
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: hell out of him. She is explicitly referencing dosing Tom
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: heavily with his pills.
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: That single text message is the civilian equivalent of Brian
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: Fannion googling divorce pension rights.
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: Boom. The digital trail.
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: It is the undeniable time-stamped digital footprint of premeditation. It
• 32:29
  Speaker 2: proves that she did not just snap in the heat
• 32:31
  Speaker 2: of the moment. She had formulated an intent to harm
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: him and was actively communicating the exclusion of that intent
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: to an accomplice.
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: And her subsequent errands completely support that intent. Surveillance cameras
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: track her driving around town with a heavily dosed, largely
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: incapacitated Tom waiting in the car.
• 32:48
  Speaker 2: Where does she go?
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: First stop. A liquor store. Now, put yourself in the
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: jury box. If you are terrified of this alcoholic man
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: who has deeply violated you, why are you buying him
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: his favorite brand of whiskey?
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: It doesn't track.
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: And not just whiskey. She buys his favorite chocolates. Then
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: she drives to a lumber store and buys rope, towels,
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: and two sets of nitrile gloves. Prosecutors labeled this The
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: murder kit. But seriously, why the chocolates? Is she trying
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: to soften the blow like offering a final meal or
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: is she strictly gathering props for a stage play?
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: It is absolutely staging. She is trying to manufacture a
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: specific narrative. Her goal is to make his death look
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: like a tragic accidental overdose by an alcoholic who relapsed
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: immediately upon leaving rehab.
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: I see.
• 33:31
  Speaker 2: What props do you need to sell that scene to
• 33:33
  Speaker 2: the police? You need the pills. You need the empty
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: whiskey bottle. And the chocolates add a touch of mundane,
• 33:39
  Speaker 2: innocent reality. It makes it look like he was just
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: having a quiet, self-indulgent night in.
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: That makes sense.
• 33:44
  Speaker 2: But the props for her overdose narrative clash violently with
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: the tools she bought at the lumber store. Rope and
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: nitrile gloves betray the true, violent reality of her plan.
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: And she didn't want to execute that violent reality alone.
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: She texts Alan Roche, the fixer, asking for help. Roche
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: doesn't show up, but he sends a friend, a guy
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: named Brian Solomon. to meet her.
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: Okay, so she has a new accomplice.
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: Solomon arrives, and Jade doesn't mince words. She tells him explicitly,
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: he's drugged, I want you to strangle him, bring him
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: into the apartment, and I'll take care of the rest.
• 34:18
  Speaker 2: Oh my god.
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: Solomon, suddenly realizing he's being solicited to commit a homicide,
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: flees the scene immediately.
• 34:25
  Speaker 2: This is the critical juncture. She actively solicited an accomplice
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: to commit murder. Her plan was rigid. He is drugged,
• 34:32
  Speaker 2: you strangle him, we carry him inside, and I stage
• 34:34
  Speaker 2: the overdose scene in his bed.
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: But the guy runs.
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: When Solomon runs away, she is left alone in a
• 34:39
  Speaker 2: car with a heavily drugged man, and she makes the
• 34:41
  Speaker 2: conscious decision to proceed with the murder anyway.
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: Which leads to a completely botched, frantic cover-up in her
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: own driveway. Her perfect plan unravels the second physical reality intrudes.
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: Reality is messy.
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: Tom is too drugged to walk. He falls out of
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: the car onto the driveway. Jade, despite her plan to
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: stage him in his bed, cannot physically carry him. She
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: manages to heave him into the back of her Toyota 4Runner.
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: Just into the trunk area.
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: Yes. And it is there, in the back of the SUV,
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: not in his bed, that prosecutors allege she put on
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: the nitrile gloves and strangled him to death.
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: This is where the theoretical perfect crime violently collides with
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: the messy, unpredictable logistics of reality. She planned for a
• 35:23
  Speaker 2: neat overdose in a bedroom, and she ends up committing
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: a brutal strangulation in the back of a hatchback.
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: And the second he is dead, she starts attempting to
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: establish her alibi. At 5.23 p.m., knowing full well that
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: Tom's dead body is in her car, she sends a
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: text message to his phone, checking in on you, how
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: you doing?
• 35:39
  Speaker 2: That 5.23 p.m. text is incredibly chilling. It is a deliberate,
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: calculated act of data manipulation to manufacture a false timeline.
• 35:49
  Speaker 2: She is creating a digital record that suggests to future
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: investigators that she believed he was alive, well, and separate
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: from her.
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: Just like Brian Fanyan.
• 35:58
  Speaker 2: It's the exact same tactic Brian Fannion used when texting
• 36:01
  Speaker 2: his mistress. She is trying to use the digital record
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: to override the physical truth.
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: But the physical truth is heavy. Literally. At 7.00 p.m.,
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: she is desperate. She calls her friend Adam Siplyak, the
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: guy who eventually called 911 and begs for help.
• 36:16
  Speaker 2: She confesses to him.
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: She confesses to him that she drugged and strangled Tom,
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: and she needs him to help carry the body to
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: Tom's bed so she can finalize the overdose staging. Adam
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: flat out refuses and leaves. Yes, Mark. Now, Jade is
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: in a full-blown panic. She is entirely unable to move
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: the body, which she later described as feeling like a
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: bag of rocks.
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: Dead weight.
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: She manages to drag Tom out of the car, and
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: in an act of sheer, frantic desperation, she just covers
• 36:40
  Speaker 1: him with blankets and a pile of broken-down cardboard boxes
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: right there in the driveway and abandons him.
• 36:45
  Speaker 2: It highlights how incredibly heavy and unwieldy a deceased human
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: body actually is. It's a physical reality that often shocks
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: killers who haven't planned for the brute logistics of disposal.
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: She had no idea what she was doing.
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: She goes from planning a sophisticated staged overdose to hiding
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: a body under trash in her own driveway. It is
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: the absolute total collapse of her carefully constructed plan.
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: And the absurdity of it is staggering. Hiding a human
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: body under a pile of cardboard boxes in an affluent
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: California beachfront neighborhood. It is doomed to fail.
• 37:20
  Speaker 2: Obviously.
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: The police, acting on Adam's 911 call, bring Jade in
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: for an interrogation at 9.01 p.m. on New Year's Day.
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: Detective Rosa Patron conducts the interview. Jade plays completely dumb.
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: Of course she does.
• 37:32
  Speaker 1: She admits she picked Tom up from the hospital, but
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: she claims she dropped him off and has no idea
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: where he went. Eventually, she asks for a lawyer.
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: During that entire interrogation, as she is playing the concerned stepdaughter,
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: she knows exactly where he is.
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: Under the boxes.
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: She knows he is under a pile of boxes in
• 37:47
  Speaker 2: the driveway. She is gambling everything on the fading hope
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: that the police won't search the property thoroughly or that
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: she can somehow move him later in the night. It
• 37:55
  Speaker 2: is a massive risk.
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: But the next morning at 7 a.m., The gamble fails spectacularly.
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: Detective Patrion is back at the house, looking around the
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: driveway in the daylight.
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: And she finds him.
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: She spots the pile of trash they had previously walked past.
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: She moves a few cardboard boxes and spots the silhouette
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: of a man under a blanket. Tom is found dead,
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: still wearing his hospital admission bracelet, buried like garbage.
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: The physical evidence, the stubborn reality of the body, finally
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: brings the truth to light. completely shattering the false narrative
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: Jade tried to build in the interrogation room.
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: So Jade is arrested and the case goes to trial.
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: And this trial is a fascinating, complex clash between overwhelming
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: sympathy for the defendant's trauma and the hard, undeniable evidence
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: of her premeditated actions.
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: It's a tough balance for the jury.
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: The defense strategy, led by high-profile attorney Mark Carlos, leaned
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: entirely into the trauma. He framed Jade not as a killer,
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: but as a relatable traumatized woman who simply panicked.
• 38:57
  Speaker 2: When you are facing charges of first-degree premeditated murder and
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: the prosecution has your text messages soliciting a hitman, your
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: options are severely limited.
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: True.
• 39:07
  Speaker 2: He couldn't argue she wasn't involved, so he had to
• 39:09
  Speaker 2: create an emotional override. He had to make the jury
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: feel the visceral horror of her betrayal.
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: And he didn't hold back. In a highly dramatic courtroom moment,
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: Carlos took a packet of those stolen explicit photos of Jade,
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: And he handed them directly to the jury box.
• 39:24
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: He forced them to look at what she saw. You
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: could literally see jurors shaking their heads in disgust. he
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: wanted them to feel the sickening shock jade felt when
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: she bumped that mouse.
• 39:34
  Speaker 2: He is essentially arguing for mitigation based on extreme psychological
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: provocation he wants the jury's disgust at tom's voyeurism to
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: completely overshadow jade's subsequent.
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: Violence he wants them to excuse the murder Right.
• 39:46
  Speaker 2: He's asking the jury to view her not as a murderer,
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: but as a victim who reacted to an unbearable violation.
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: But the defense also had a very real medical dispute
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: to leverage. The official autopsy listed the cause of death
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: as an overdose of zolpidem, which is Ambien.
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: OK, so not strangulation.
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: But here is the catch. The toxicology report showed only
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: 39 milligrams per liter in his system, which the defense
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: vehemently argued is the equivalent of only about four to
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: five pills.
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: Which is a lot, but.
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: That is a heavy dose, but not typically a massive,
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: instantly fatal overdose. Furthermore, the defense hammered on the fact
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: that there were zero forensic signs of strangulation on Tom's neck.
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: No external bruising. No trauma to the windpipe.
• 40:31
  Speaker 2: This is a crucial evidentiary gap for the prosecution. Let's
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: explain the mechanics here. The defense argued that if she
• 40:36
  Speaker 2: strangled him, there should be petechiae.
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: What are petechiae?
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: Patechiae are tiny pinpoint hemorrhages usually seen in the eyes
• 40:43
  Speaker 2: or face.
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: How exactly does strangulation cause that?
• 40:46
  Speaker 2: It's about blood flow. The jugular vein, which carries blood
• 40:50
  Speaker 2: away from the head back to the heart, is very
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: close to the surface of the neck. It takes very
• 40:55
  Speaker 2: little pressure, only about four and a half pounds to
• 40:57
  Speaker 2: compress it.
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: That's barely anything.
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: Right. The carotid artery, which carries blood to the brain,
• 41:02
  Speaker 2: is deeper and takes more pressure, about 11 pounds. If
• 41:06
  Speaker 2: a killer applies just enough pressure to block the jugular
• 41:09
  Speaker 2: vein but not the carotid artery, blood continues to pump
• 41:13
  Speaker 2: into the head, but it can't drain out.
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: What builds up?
• 41:16
  Speaker 2: The pressure builds rapidly, and the tiny capillaries burst, causing
• 41:20
  Speaker 2: those petechiae.
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: So if Tom didn't have petechiae or bruising, does that
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: mean he wasn't strangled?
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: Not necessarily, and this is what the medical examiner had
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: to admit on the stand. Fatal strangulation can occur without
• 41:32
  Speaker 2: leaving visible marks. If a broad surface is used, like
• 41:36
  Speaker 2: a forearm in a chokehold or a soft ligature, or
• 41:39
  Speaker 2: if the pressure is applied in a way that compresses
• 41:41
  Speaker 2: both the arteries and veins simultaneously, or simply induces a
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: rapid cardiac arrest, you might not see classic bruising or petechiae.
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: So it's still possible? Yes.
• 41:51
  Speaker 2: The ME testified that while he believed strangulation was possible,
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: he could not prove it to a medical certainty in
• 41:59
  Speaker 2: this specific case.
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: This creates a sliver of reasonable doubt about the exact
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: method of death. The defense aggressively exploited this. They argued
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: Tom didn't die of strangulation. He died of a mild
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: overdose combined with his poor health and alcoholism. And Jade
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: simply panicked when she found him dead in the car.
• 42:17
  Speaker 2: That's their narrative.
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: To sell this panic narrative, the defense made a massive,
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: desperate gamble. They put Jade on the stand.
• 42:24
  Speaker 2: In the legal world, we talk about bad facts.
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: Bad facts. Yes.
• 42:28
  Speaker 2: The defense had to put Jade on the stand because
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: they were buried in bad facts. The text messages, I
• 42:33
  Speaker 2: just do the hell out of him, the receipts for
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: the rope, and the 911 call from Adam detailing her
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: confession were insurmountable hurdles.
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: They needed her to explain them.
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: The jury was guaranteed to convict her based on those
• 42:44
  Speaker 2: digital and audio records alone, unless Jade herself provided a
• 42:48
  Speaker 2: believable alternative context for them.
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: So the prosecutor, Jorge Deport, gets her on cross-examination. And
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: he zeroes right in on that smoking gun text to
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: her fixer. He asks her, point blank in front of
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: the jury, what I just do the hell out of
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: him means.
• 43:04
  Speaker 2: And what did she say?
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: Her response was astonishingly weak. She looked at the jury
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: and claimed it was just poor phrasing. Oh, wow.
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: That is the exact moment her entire defense crumbles to dust. Yeah.
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: Poor phrasing does not explain away a text message sent
• 43:18
  Speaker 2: while you are actively driving a heavily medicated man to
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: a lumber store to buy rope and nitrile gloves. It
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: does not explain asking a man to strangle your stepfather
• 43:27
  Speaker 2: in a parking lot.
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: It's just a lie.
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: When a defendant takes the stand and cannot provide a logical,
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: credible explanation for their own highly incriminating words, the jury
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: almost universally sides with the prosecution's interpretation. Her inability to
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: explain her own digital footprint doomed her.
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: The prosecutor methodically walked through every lie she told the detectives,
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: every person she failed to call for help when she
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: allegedly found them cold. He painted a picture not of
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: a traumatized, panicked victim, but of a calculating, angry executioner
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: who's just sloppy.
• 43:58
  Speaker 2: And the jury had to weigh all that.
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: Imagine being on that jury. You are holding the horrifying
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: reality of those photos, but you are also staring at
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: a receipt for a murder kit in a text soliciting
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: a hitman. How do you weigh those?
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: Ultimately, the jury had to separate their genuine human sympathy
• 44:15
  Speaker 2: for her trauma from the cold, undeniable reality of her
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: premeditated actions.
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 44:21
  Speaker 2: The betrayal was real. The trauma was real. But the response,
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: the shopping trip, the texts, the attempted accomplices was a
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: calculated premeditated crime that the law simply cannot excuse.
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: And the jury agreed. They deliberated briefly and returned a
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: verdict of guilty for first degree murder. Jade looked to
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: be an absolute total shock in the courtroom.
• 44:40
  Speaker 2: I'm sure she was.
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: She was sentenced to 25 years to life. And I
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: found the judge's comments at sentencing fascinating. He explicitly acknowledged
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: the horrific, devastating violation of the photos. He didn't minimize it.
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: That's important.
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: But he ruled that discovering those photos did not legally
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: or morally justify a cold-blooded execution.
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: It was a tragic end to a profoundly tragic situation.
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: She allowed the trauma inflicted by her stepfather to turn
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: her into the very thing she feared.
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: So as we synthesize these two incredible stories, we see
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: two individuals who are worlds apart. Brian Fannion, a seasoned
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: police detective in a Massachusetts suburb deeply embedded in the
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: criminal justice system. and Jade Jinks, an interior designer in
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: a sunny California beach town dealing with an unimaginable personal violation.
• 45:29
  Speaker 2: Completely different backgrounds.
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: Yet both of them arrived at the exact same arrogant conclusion.
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: They believed they could script the perfect death.
• 45:36
  Speaker 2: They both believed they could completely control the narrative. Brian
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: thought his 30 years of service and his reputation as
• 45:42
  Speaker 2: a church-going family man would blind his colleagues, allowing his
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: poorly staged suicide to pass without forensic scrutiny.
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: Right. Jade thought she could manufacture a neat overdose scene
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: that would neatly explain away the death of an alcoholic,
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: shielding her from the consequences of her revenge.
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: But both cases underscore a modern, terrifying investigative reality. A
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: staged physical crime scene, whether it's moving a dining room
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: table and washing your hands or hiding a body under
• 46:09
  Speaker 2: a pile of cardboard boxes, will almost always be betrayed
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: by the digital crime scene you leave behind.
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: Exactly. Brian's texts to Corrine and his pension searches on
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: his government computer. Jade's texts to her fixer and her
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: manufactured alibi check-in texts.
• 46:26
  Speaker 2: Think of digital footprints like footprints in wet cement, not sand.
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: Brian and Jade both thought they were just sweeping away
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: sand by deleting texts or lying in interrogations, but the
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: cement had already dried on the server.
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: That's a great analogy.
• 46:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: And this raises a final provocative thought for us to
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: consider today.
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: Let's hear it.
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: In an era where every keystroke is logged, where every
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: text is stored on a cloud server, where our phones
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: track our exact physical movements down to the minute, the
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: entire concept of the perfect crime has fundamentally changed. It
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: doesn't exist anymore.
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: It is no longer a matter of simply cleaning up blood,
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: hiding a weapon, or washing gunpowder residue off your hands.
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: Right. It's about cleaning up the data.
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: And data, unlike physical evidence, is nearly impossible to watch away.
• 47:08
  Speaker 2: It lives in the cloud. It lives on the recipient's phone.
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: It lives in the metadata of our daily lives.
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: It's everywhere.
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: So the question we are left with is this. In
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: a world where your digital footprint tells the unvarnished truth
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: of your intentions, how well does that footprint align with
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: the reality you project to the world? Because if those
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: two realities ever diverge violently, as they did for Brian
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: and Jade, the data will always have the final word.
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: That is a terrifying and necessary thought to mull over.
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: Thank you all so much for joining us on this
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: deep dive. Keep questioning the narratives you see on the surface.
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: And we will catch you next time.