Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / House Democrats Eye Prince Andrew Testimony in Epstein Investigation (10/20/26)
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
- 0:03Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. Now, I know most of you who live
- 0:07Speaker 1: in the United States are watching closely what goes on
- 0:11Speaker 1: when it comes to the midterms. Well, you're not the
- 0:14Speaker 1: only ones. Because across the pond, there's another person who
- 0:18Speaker 1: has a whole lot riding on those results. And that
- 0:21Speaker 1: person is none other than the Joe Exotic of the
- 0:24Speaker 1: Windsor family himself. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Because if the Democrats take
- 0:31Speaker 1: the House, they're going to subpoena him. Now, does that
- 0:36Speaker 1: mean he's going to end up coming before Congress? Of
- 0:38Speaker 1: course not. He is not a citizen of the United States,
- 0:41Speaker 1: so they have no power over him to compel him
- 0:44Speaker 1: to do so. And while for all intents and purposes,
- 0:47Speaker 1: it would be a symbolic gesture, I think it would
- 0:50Speaker 1: be a good one. And it sends a message, right? Look,
- 0:54Speaker 1: we know what you are. We want to talk to
- 0:56Speaker 1: you more about it. We want you under oath. To
- 0:59Speaker 1: explain it, and the reason you won't do that, is
- 1:02Speaker 1: because you're scared. You don't want the world to know
- 1:05Speaker 1: the kind of scumbag you really are. And when it
- 1:08Speaker 1: comes to Andrew, well, that's certainly the case. Today we
- 1:12Speaker 1: have an article from the Irish Sun and the headline,
- 1:15Speaker 1: By the Ballots. Andrew facing new order to reveal Epstein
- 1:18Speaker 1: links as he sweats over US elections, which could trigger
- 1:21Speaker 1: a fresh probe. Sweats? I thought he didn't sweat. Oh wait,
- 1:27Speaker 1: that was only back in the day, right? He's better now.
- 1:30Speaker 1: He can sweat again. The author of this article is
- 1:33Speaker 1: Daniel Bates. Andrew Mountbatten wins awards facing new heat in
- 1:37Speaker 1: the U.S. over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, if, as expected,
- 1:40Speaker 1: the Democrats take control of Congress next month. Now, looking
- 1:45Speaker 1: at the current races, it seems likely that the House flips.
- 1:50Speaker 1: The Senate? That's more of a question that's up in
- 1:53Speaker 1: the air, but it certainly looks like, for all intents
- 1:56Speaker 1: and purposes... that the House is going to flip to
- 1:58Speaker 1: the Democrats. And if that happens, they've promised an even
- 2:03Speaker 1: deeper look. And you better believe I'll be here holding
- 2:06Speaker 1: them accountable. So if they do win the House, then
- 2:10Speaker 1: Prince Andrew is certainly going to be on the menu.
- 2:13Speaker 1: How far that goes, that's the real question, right? Will
- 2:17Speaker 1: they have help from the UK? Maybe. What if the
- 2:20Speaker 1: new Congress decides they want to play ball? and turn
- 2:24Speaker 1: over whatever documentation that the British government's looking for. So
- 2:28Speaker 1: there's just a lot of variables we don't know yet,
- 2:30Speaker 1: and there's a lot of things that can happen from
- 2:33Speaker 1: here to now that could change the trajectory of the
- 2:36Speaker 1: whole conversation. But as it stands right now, if the
- 2:40Speaker 1: Democrats flip the House, they've made a lot of promises,
- 2:44Speaker 1: and they damn well better follow through with them. Democrat
- 2:47Speaker 1: Suhas Submaranium says, vowed to help British police gain access
- 2:51Speaker 1: to the unredacted Epstein files, a critical current barrier in
- 2:55Speaker 1: their inquiry into the former royal, which is just crazy
- 2:58Speaker 1: to me. You would think the UK of all people,
- 3:02Speaker 1: the one country that you'd want to share this information with,
- 3:05Speaker 1: but I guess not. I guess that relationship's out the
- 3:08Speaker 1: window too, huh? So what happens after Trump? That's the
- 3:11Speaker 1: real question. When he's gone, what happens with these relationships?
- 3:15Speaker 1: Do they just pick back up? Or have they been
- 3:17Speaker 1: damaged to a point where it's going to take a
- 3:20Speaker 1: lot of work to build that respect and trust back.
- 3:24Speaker 1: And in 2028, if the Democrats take the White House back,
- 3:28Speaker 1: you know there's going to be a reset. But what
- 3:30Speaker 1: kind of reset is that going to be, right? So
- 3:33Speaker 1: there's just a lot going on. And there's a lot
- 3:35Speaker 1: of relationships that have been fractured and frayed that are
- 3:38Speaker 1: going to be very hard to repair. He said that
- 3:42Speaker 1: he would issue a legal demand for the former Duke
- 3:44Speaker 1: of York, to testify about his friendship with pedophile Epstein
- 3:48Speaker 1: if Democrats take control of Congress in next month's midterm elections.
- 3:52Speaker 1: Andrew was riding high after police accepted that search warrants
- 3:56Speaker 1: used in the raids on his homes in Sandringham and
- 3:59Speaker 1: Royal Lodge in Windsor were unlawful. Yeah, technicalities. The investigation
- 4:05Speaker 1: wasn't unlawful. It was the way that they got those warrants. Now,
- 4:10Speaker 1: with that said, the state has so much power, that
- 4:13Speaker 1: they have to do things the right way. And even
- 4:16Speaker 1: when it comes to Prince Andrew, I'm never going to
- 4:18Speaker 1: be on board with somebody getting steamrolled by the government, ever.
- 4:22Speaker 1: If you have the goods, you have the evidence, build
- 4:25Speaker 1: your case and bring it. If you don't, then shut
- 4:28Speaker 1: the fuck up. The former prince, who denies any wrongdoing,
- 4:33Speaker 1: launched a legal challenge against their legality after he was
- 4:36Speaker 1: arrested on February 19th, his 66th birthday, on suspicion of
- 4:40Speaker 1: misconduct in public office. Police argue that delaying access risks
- 4:45Speaker 1: the loss of evidence. And I think there's some truth
- 4:48Speaker 1: to that. Again, you're dealing with the Queen's son. And
- 4:51Speaker 1: there's people out there that are supportive of him that
- 4:55Speaker 1: are only doing it in the background. They're not going
- 4:57Speaker 1: to come forward and do it because they don't want
- 4:59Speaker 1: to deal with you. But in the background, hell yeah.
- 5:02Speaker 1: How can I support you, Mr. Queen's son? Whole bunch
- 5:06Speaker 1: of weird people on this planet, folks. A whole bunch
- 5:08Speaker 1: of people that are grooving to a whole ass different tune.
- 5:13Speaker 1: The probe continues, but Andrew's spirit is said to have
- 5:16Speaker 1: been rekindled after being stripped of his royal titles by
- 5:19Speaker 1: King Charles over his links to Epstein. Well, that's going
- 5:22Speaker 1: to be a short-lived victory, isn't it? Because if and
- 5:26Speaker 1: when the Democrats take Congress, they say they're going after him.
- 5:31Speaker 1: Now look, I'm certainly not naive, and I understand how
- 5:34Speaker 1: political season goes. So if the Democrats think it's a
- 5:37Speaker 1: trust-us-bro type of situation, they're crazy. It's not. We're not
- 5:42Speaker 1: trusting any of you. The time for talk is over.
- 5:46Speaker 1: Now's the time for action. It would give them the
- 5:50Speaker 1: power to subpoena people, including Andrew, who previously ignored a
- 5:53Speaker 1: Democrat request to testify before the House. Mr. Samaranian, who
- 5:58Speaker 1: sits on the Oversight Committee, said Democrats will continue to
- 6:01Speaker 1: investigate Epstein's crimes and demand answers from Andrew and anyone
- 6:05Speaker 1: else involved. Well, how about we start with Stacey Plaskett?
- 6:09Speaker 1: You know, somebody in your own party who's holding office.
- 6:12Speaker 1: Let's start with her. Can we ask Reid Hoffman some questions?
- 6:16Speaker 1: Any kind of internal housekeeping that's going to occur? Are
- 6:19Speaker 1: we going to talk about George Mitchell or Bill Richardson
- 6:22Speaker 1: or Sandy Berger or any of these other people that
- 6:25Speaker 1: helped Epstein along the way? Because all of that matters. Now,
- 6:29Speaker 1: of course, we have to deal with current history as well.
- 6:33Speaker 1: And I think that should be on the front burner.
- 6:35Speaker 1: But if you think for a minute I've forgotten about
- 6:37Speaker 1: those people or the fact that everybody, including the Democratic establishment,
- 6:42Speaker 1: look the other way, You are sorely mistaken. The problem
- 6:46Speaker 1: right now is the man in charge is engaging in
- 6:50Speaker 1: a cover-up. So that's the five alarm fire that needs
- 6:53Speaker 1: to be dealt with right now. But all the other
- 6:56Speaker 1: people that were involved, all these other movers and shakers
- 6:59Speaker 1: that were embedded in power on the left who were
- 7:02Speaker 1: eating off this man's plate, they caused a lot of
- 7:06Speaker 1: this problem. They enabled it. They facilitated it. And they
- 7:10Speaker 1: let it go on for years. So there's plenty of
- 7:13Speaker 1: blame to go around. But you can't fall into the whataboutism, right?
- 7:19Speaker 1: We have to talk about what's current. Sure, that should
- 7:21Speaker 1: have happened previously, but it didn't. The real question is,
- 7:25Speaker 1: what are we going to do now? Because the past
- 7:29Speaker 1: is the past. So in my opinion, if you want
- 7:31Speaker 1: to expose that past, then you have to go after
- 7:33Speaker 1: what's going on currently. You have to expose what we
- 7:37Speaker 1: have right in front of us. And then it'll all
- 7:39Speaker 1: tie together. But when it comes to people that were
- 7:43Speaker 1: locked in, people that had a lot of power, this
- 7:46Speaker 1: certainly goes much deeper than just one side of the aisle.
- 7:51Speaker 1: But even with all of that said, I think the
- 7:53Speaker 1: focus has to be on the now and the people
- 7:57Speaker 1: that are in power now that are covering it up
- 7:59Speaker 1: because they're the ones that have the power at this
- 8:01Speaker 1: moment to make a real change. And if they won't
- 8:04Speaker 1: do it, then we have to hold them accountable. We
- 8:07Speaker 1: will use the full subpoena power of the Congress to
- 8:09Speaker 1: get justice for the survivors and transparency for the American people.
- 8:14Speaker 1: I called on the former Prince Andrew to testify and
- 8:16Speaker 1: will continue to do so in the next Congress. I
- 8:20Speaker 1: also fully support giving British law enforcement the Epstein files
- 8:24Speaker 1: and assisting with any other criminal investigation. You know what's
- 8:27Speaker 1: crazy about that? They won't even give the files to
- 8:30Speaker 1: New Mexico, never mind a foreign country, where they have
- 8:33Speaker 1: no power to do anything once they give those documents up, right?
- 8:39Speaker 1: And we know the Trump administration has no desire to
- 8:41Speaker 1: do that. They want to control the blast radius. They
- 8:44Speaker 1: don't want to make it nuclear fallout. So if anyone
- 8:49Speaker 1: thinks they're going to turn this shit over to the
- 8:51Speaker 1: UK without being forced to do so, they are crazy.
- 8:56Speaker 1: I mean, just look at the fight they're giving New Mexico.
- 8:58Speaker 1: We're going through the lawsuit. You saw it for yourself.
- 9:01Speaker 1: An absolute joke. And this DOJ is probably, in my opinion,
- 9:06Speaker 1: the most out of control DOJ in my lifetime. And
- 9:09Speaker 1: that's saying a lot because your boy has been here
- 9:12Speaker 1: for 46 years. And there have been some doozies. Epstein
- 9:16Speaker 1: survivor Laura Bloom-McGee said if a Democratic House uses its
- 9:21Speaker 1: subpoena power to finally expose the whole truth, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
- 9:25Speaker 1: should be uncomfortable. Well, look, there is no doubt, okay?
- 9:29Speaker 1: The big problem here is that Virginia's not with us anymore.
- 9:33Speaker 1: Because if she was, Andrew would be finished. That's a guarantee.
- 9:38Speaker 1: With the way the momentum's going, with how things are breaking,
- 9:41Speaker 1: I can promise you, it would be on. and Andrew
- 9:45Speaker 1: would be running for cover. But with Virginia gone, it's
- 9:49Speaker 1: going to be a lot more difficult to pin that
- 9:51Speaker 1: portion of this on Andrew. So, like I told you
- 9:54Speaker 1: with Al Capone, if you want to get Andrew, my opinion,
- 9:58Speaker 1: follow those financials, and they'll lead you to a whole
- 10:01Speaker 1: grip of corruption. And I know that's not the same
- 10:04Speaker 1: as a headline capturing headline of Prince Andrew being found
- 10:09Speaker 1: guilty of human trafficking and sex crimes, blah, blah, blah.
- 10:13Speaker 1: But accountability is accountability. And as far as I'm concerned,
- 10:16Speaker 1: Prince Andrew doing 10 or 15 years or 20 years
- 10:20Speaker 1: for exposing confidential information to outside sources, that would be
- 10:24Speaker 1: a win. Now, do I think that's going to happen?
- 10:27Speaker 1: I do not. But boy, it would certainly be a win,
- 10:30Speaker 1: and it would send a message. Spencer Coven, a lawyer
- 10:34Speaker 1: who represents several of the pedophile's victims, said, I don't
- 10:37Speaker 1: think this will ever be over for Andrew. Andrew denies
- 10:40Speaker 1: the claims against him. In 2022, he settled a civil
- 10:44Speaker 1: battery lawsuit filed in the U.S. by Virginia Roberts, an
- 10:48Speaker 1: Epstein survivor, who claimed she was sent to Andrew for
- 10:51Speaker 1: sex when she was age 17. Well, what do you
- 10:54Speaker 1: folks think? Do you think that Andrew is going to
- 10:57Speaker 1: worm his way out of this again? Or do you
- 10:59Speaker 1: think that Andrew is finally going to be held accountable?
- 11:03Speaker 1: Shoot me some emails and let me know. All the
- 11:07Speaker 1: information that goes with this episode can be found in
- 11:10Speaker 1: the description box.