Latest / Reformed Thinking / No Other Gospel (Galatians 1) | John MacArthur

Transcript

No Other Gospel (Galatians 1) | John MacArthur · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Welcome to Reformed Thinking. Our mission in today's Deep dive
• 0:03
  is to reconstruct an absolute theological battlefield for you.
• 0:07
  We are taking a massive stack of source material, specifically
• 0:11
  John MacArthur's extensive commentary on Galatians Chapter
• 0:14
  1, and we are extracting the most crucial theological and
• 0:17
  historical insights just for you.
• 0:19
  And it is quite a battlefield. The stakes in this ancient text
• 0:24
  are astronomical. They really are.
• 0:26
  The Apostle Paul is writing to the churches in the region of
• 0:29
  southern Galatia. We are talking about specific
• 0:32
  rough and tumble for century cities, places like Antioch of
• 0:35
  Pasidia, Iconium, Lystra and Derby.
• 0:39
  And if you read the opening lines of this letter, you notice
• 0:42
  something missing right away. It is actually shocking.
• 0:44
  It is a stark departure from his normal style.
• 0:46
  Yeah, Paul skips all the usual pleasantries.
• 0:48
  There are no worn commendations. There are no friendly greetings
• 0:51
  thanking God for their faith, which is his standard practice
• 0:54
  in almost every other letter. Why the sudden, aggressive shift
• 0:57
  in tone? Because the very gospel of grace
• 0:59
  is under a vicious, coordinated attack by a group known as the
• 1:02
  Judaizers. These are false teachers who
• 1:05
  have crept into the assemblies. They are claiming that faith in
• 1:07
  Jesus Christ is fine, but it requires the addition of human
• 1:10
  works, specifically Old Covenant ceremonies like circumcision, to
• 1:15
  achieve full salvation. Our goal here is to break down
• 1:19
  Paul's ferocious defense of the truth.
• 1:21
  And while the historical context centers on 1st century Galatia,
• 1:24
  the human instinct to try and earn salvation is a universal
• 1:28
  issue you and I face constantly today.
• 1:30
  From a Westminster Confession standpoint, this text is the
• 1:33
  absolute structural Center for the doctrine of justification by
• 1:36
  faith alone. The Reformed perspective insists
• 1:39
  that salvation is a sovereign work of God from beginning to
• 1:42
  end. When you add human effort to
• 1:43
  God's sovereign grace, you completely nullify grace.
• 1:46
  The two systems cannot coexist. They're mutually exclusive.
• 1:50
  The Judaizers were attempting to mingle human merit with Divine
• 1:53
  Mercy, and Paul recognized that this mixture creates a lethal
• 1:57
  theological poison. Throughout this discussion, we
• 2:00
  will apply the lens of Reformed theology, examining concepts
• 2:03
  like sovereign election, total depravity, irresistible grace,
• 2:07
  and Christ's substitutionary atonement.
• 2:08
  Because these doctrines are not simply abstract ideas, they're
• 2:12
  the very lifeblood of Paul's argument in Galatians.
• 2:14
  He knows what is at stake. Absolutely.
• 2:17
  The apostle understands that if man contributes anything to his
• 2:19
  justification, God is robbed of his total glory.
• 2:22
  The entire system of grace collapses if human works are
• 2:25
  introduced. OK, let's unpack this, starting
• 2:27
  with the opening verses. In Galatians 1 verses one
• 2:30
  through 5, Paul opens with a fiercely defensive stance.
• 2:34
  He immediately declares his authority, explicitly stating
• 2:37
  that he is an apostle. And crucially, he states that
• 2:39
  his Commission is not sent from men, nor through the agency of
• 2:42
  men. He wants you to know right out
• 2:44
  of the gate that his right to speak does not originate from
• 2:48
  any human committee. It does not come from any
• 2:50
  earthly institution or any denominational headquarters.
• 2:54
  He is completely bypassing human channels.
• 2:57
  To grasp the weight of that opening defense, we have to
• 2:59
  define the term apostle accurately, right?
• 3:02
  In the Greek, the word is apostolos, which refers to an
• 3:06
  envoy or a commissioned ambassador.
• 3:08
  However, in the primary technical usage within the New
• 3:11
  Testament, an apostle was a man who met exceedingly strict
• 3:14
  criteria. This was not a loose title
• 3:16
  handed out to the successful preachers.
• 3:18
  It was very exclusive group. Highly exclusive, he had to be
• 3:21
  personally chosen by Jesus Christ, directly trained by him,
• 3:24
  and be a literal eyewitness to the resurrected Christ.
• 3:27
  The original 12 fit this description.
• 3:29
  Having been chosen during Christ's earthly ministry, Paul
• 3:32
  met these precise criteria through his entirely unique
• 3:35
  encounter on the Damascus Rd. That is where the resurrected
• 3:38
  Lord appeared to him in blinding glory, shattered his rebellion,
• 3:41
  trained him, and personally commissioned him to go to the
• 3:44
  Gentiles. We must also distinguish between
• 3:47
  these primary apostles and secondary messengers, right?
• 3:50
  Guys like Barnabas or Silas. Spied on Those secondary men are
• 3:55
  sometimes referred to with the same Greek term, but they did
• 3:57
  not hold the same unique absolute authority to write
• 4:01
  Scripture. A critical point for Reformed
• 4:03
  theology is that this primary Apostolic office was never
• 4:07
  perpetuated after the original men died.
• 4:09
  So no passing the baton in that sense.
• 4:11
  None at all. Once the base of the Church was
• 4:14
  laid and the Canon of Scripture was completed, the office ceased
• 4:17
  to exist. There is no Apostolic
• 4:19
  succession. Play devil's advocate for a
• 4:21
  second. If I am a Judaizer sitting in
• 4:23
  the church at Antioch of Pasidia, I could just look at
• 4:26
  Paul and say you weren't even one of the original 12.
• 4:28
  You weren't walking the shores of Galilee with Peter, James and
• 4:31
  John. Why should anyone listen to you
• 4:33
  over the guys down in Jerusalem? How does Paul legally defend
• 4:37
  himself against that specific accusation?
• 4:39
  That is the precise accusation he is fighting, and he defends
• 4:42
  himself by pointing directly to the source of his calling.
• 4:46
  He goes further in that very first verse by highlighting the
• 4:49
  specific divine origin of his Commission.
• 4:51
  He writes that it came through Jesus Christ and God the Father
• 4:55
  who raised him from the dead. That phrasing is very
• 4:57
  deliberate. It is entirely deliberate.
• 4:59
  He pairs the first and second members of the Trinity together
• 5:02
  in this commissioning by linking God the Father and Jesus Christ.
• 5:06
  In his single unified action of sending an ambassador, Paul
• 5:10
  asserts the absolute equality of deity between the two.
• 5:13
  They share the exact same divine essence.
• 5:16
  He's telling the Judaizers that his authority outranks any human
• 5:19
  endorsement because the Triune God directly appointed him.
• 5:22
  The implications for the inspiration of Scripture here
• 5:25
  are massive, because if his story comes directly from God,
• 5:28
  then what he writes is not just good advice.
• 5:31
  Precisely because Paul's authority comes directly from
• 5:33
  the Triune God, his writings are literally God breathed, as
• 5:38
  detailed in Second Timothy 316. This provides a stark contrast
• 5:41
  to two massive errors we see in history.
• 5:43
  What would this be? First, it completely destroys
• 5:46
  liberal theology, that is, the view that treats the biblical
• 5:50
  text as simple human insight or a collection of evolving
• 5:53
  religious thoughts from ancient men trying to figure out the
• 5:56
  divine. Second, it counters Roman
• 5:58
  Catholic dogma, which elevates Church tradition, papal decrees,
• 6:03
  and ecclesiastical pronouncements to the same level
• 6:05
  of authority as Scripture. So the Church does not create
• 6:09
  the truth. That is right.
• 6:11
  The Church is entirely subject to the truth delivered by God
• 6:14
  through his appointed apostles. We see that divine truth
• 6:17
  immediately expressed in his greeting in verse three.
• 6:19
  He writes grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord
• 6:23
  Jesus Christ. If you look at the typical Greek
• 6:26
  culture of Paul's day, the standard greeting in a letter
• 6:29
  was the word Cara, meaning joy. It was the ancient equivalent of
• 6:32
  saying hello or good health. But Paul alters it specifically.
• 6:36
  He does. He changes the secular greeting
• 6:38
  of Cara to the theological reality of Cara's grace, and he
• 6:41
  pairs it with the Hebrew concept of Shalom or peace.
• 6:44
  What's fascinating here is the theological sequence of those
• 6:47
  two words. It is brilliant and deliberate.
• 6:50
  Grace is the positional source and peace is the practical
• 6:53
  result. You cannot possibly have true
• 6:56
  peace with God without first receiving His sovereign grace.
• 6:59
  Because humanity and its fallen state is at enmity with God.
• 7:03
  Yes, the natural man is hostile to his Creator.
• 7:06
  It requires God's unmerited unilateral favor, His grace, to
• 7:10
  reconcile that hostility. Once that grace is applied to
• 7:13
  the Sinner, the resulting condition is peace.
• 7:16
  You are no longer at war with the Almighty.
• 7:18
  And the Judaizers were offering a system of law and works.
• 7:21
  Which inherently provides 0 grace and guarantees 0 peace.
• 7:24
  Under a system of works, a person can never rest.
• 7:27
  They can never know if they have done enough to satisfy a
• 7:29
  perfectly holy God. The checklist is never complete.
• 7:32
  After establishing that greeting, Paul moves right into
• 7:35
  the mechanics of how this grace and peace were actually secured
• 7:37
  for us. In verses four and five, he lays
• 7:40
  out the gospel in a highly condensed, intensely
• 7:43
  concentrated summary. He writes that Christ gave
• 7:47
  himself for our sins so that he might rescue us from this
• 7:50
  present evil age according to the will of our God and Father.
• 7:54
  We can observe 4 distinct stages of salvation laid out in those
• 7:57
  verses. First, you have the sovereign
• 8:00
  decree of God. Second, the atoning death of
• 8:02
  Christ. Third, the appointment of
• 8:04
  messengers to deliver the news. And 4th The actual granting of
• 8:08
  grace and peace to the believer. The language he uses for the
• 8:11
  rescue is pretty intense. Let us examine that language.
• 8:15
  The Greek word for deliver or rescue is exario.
• 8:18
  This is not a casual assistance. It portrays a desperate, violent
• 8:22
  rescue operation. It was used historically to
• 8:24
  describe snatching someone from severe physical danger, like
• 8:28
  pulling a drowning man out of raging Rapids just before he
• 8:31
  goes over a waterfall. So it implies the person being
• 8:33
  rescued cannot save themselves. Absolutely.
• 8:36
  Paul uses it metaphorically to describe our rescue from the
• 8:39
  doomed satanic roll system, what he calls this present evil age.
• 8:43
  And tying that back to the Reformed view, this completely
• 8:46
  highlights the absolute necessity of Christ's
• 8:48
  substitutionary atonement. Human works, going to church,
• 8:52
  observing rituals, or trying to be a good neighbor, none of that
• 8:55
  can eliminate a single sin. That is correct.
• 8:57
  Sin incurs a debt of divine wrath that must be paid in full.
• 9:02
  God is perfectly just, meaning He cannot simply sweep cosmic
• 9:06
  treason under the rug. Therefore, salvation requires a
• 9:09
  willing divine substitute to absorb that wrath Christ gave
• 9:13
  Himself for our sins. He stepped into the courtroom,
• 9:16
  took the penalty we deserved, and imputed His perfect
• 9:19
  righteousness to our account. And the source of this entire
• 9:21
  rescue operation, Paul tells us at the end of verse 4.
• 9:24
  It is according to the will of our God and Father.
• 9:26
  The rescue of totally depraved sinners originates exclusively
• 9:30
  in the sovereign gracious will of God.
• 9:31
  We did not initiate the rescue. We were the ones drowning.
• 9:34
  God executed the rescue plan solely for His own glory.
• 9:38
  It is wild how fast Paul pivots here.
• 9:40
  Usually you'd expect a warm thanks for your faith after that
• 9:43
  greeting, but he just skips it entirely.
• 9:46
  By verse 6, he drops the hammer. We are moving into Segment 2 of
• 9:51
  our discussion, covering verses 6 through 9.
• 9:54
  The tone shifts dramatically. It really does.
• 9:57
  Paul transitions from his greeting to an expression of
• 9:59
  sheer shock. He uses the strong Greek word
• 10:02
  thomazo, meaning astounded or bewildered.
• 10:05
  He cannot fathom that the Galatians are deserting God with
• 10:07
  such terrifying speed, he writes.
• 10:10
  I am amazed that you were so quickly deserting him who called
• 10:12
  you by the grace of Christ for a different gospel.
• 10:15
  The verb Paul uses for deserting is metatatheme, and its
• 10:19
  historical background is incredibly revealing.
• 10:21
  It is a term with military origins.
• 10:23
  Specifically, it describes a soldiers desertion during a time
• 10:26
  of war, abandoning his post and switching loyalties to the
• 10:29
  enemy. In the Roman army, this was a
• 10:31
  crime punishable by death. That paints A vivid picture of
• 10:34
  the severity of their actions. Furthermore, Paul uses the word
• 10:38
  in a reflexive sense in the Greek, indicating that the
• 10:41
  Galatians were voluntarily removing themselves from the
• 10:44
  sphere of grace. They were not passive victims
• 10:46
  kidnapped by the Judaizers. They were active participants in
• 10:50
  their own spiritual defection. Which speaks volumes about human
• 10:53
  nature. From a theological standpoint,
• 10:56
  this perfectly illustrates the ongoing vulnerability of the
• 10:59
  human flesh. Even believers can be swayed by
• 11:02
  the remnants of their old nature, which continually
• 11:05
  desires to earn favor and boast in its own accomplishments
• 11:09
  rather than resting solely in the finished work of Christ.
• 11:12
  We like to feel like we contributed to our own rescue.
• 11:15
  Here's where it gets really interesting.
• 11:17
  The Judaizers who were infiltrating these churches did
• 11:19
  not operate with obvious, glaring heresy.
• 11:22
  They didn't show up with a completely bizarre cult and deny
• 11:25
  that Jesus was the Messiah. They didn't deny his crucifixion
• 11:28
  or his resurrection. They acknowledged Christ, but
• 11:31
  they insisted on adding the requirements of the Old Covenant
• 11:33
  laws like physical circumcision and dietary restrictions to
• 11:37
  faith in Him. It was a subtle corruption.
• 11:39
  It is like placing a single drop of deadly poison into a large
• 11:43
  container of pure water. That one drop doesn't just
• 11:47
  change the flavor, it makes the entire container lethal.
• 11:51
  The subtlety of their false gospel requires careful
• 11:54
  linguistic analysis. Paul points out that they're
• 11:57
  promoting a different gospel and he uses 2 distinct Greek words
• 12:01
  to explain this deception. In verse 7 he says it is really
• 12:04
  not another utilizing the word allos, which means another of
• 12:07
  the exact same kind. See, the Judaizers were trying
• 12:09
  to blend in. The Judaizers likely claimed
• 12:12
  they were just preaching another version of the exact same
• 12:14
  message Paul taught, simply adding some necessary cultural
• 12:17
  and traditional elements to complete the package.
• 12:20
  But Paul utterly rejects that claim.
• 12:22
  He says they actually want to metastropho the gospel, meaning
• 12:25
  to distort it or literally to turn it into its opposite.
• 12:28
  So it is not an expansion, it is a destruction.
• 12:31
  A gospel that requires human works is not a slight variation
• 12:35
  of the gospel of grace, it is a total reversal of it.
• 12:38
  Law and grace as methods of salvation are diametrically
• 12:42
  opposed. If you attempt to sustain your
• 12:45
  justification by observing the law, you completely sever
• 12:48
  yourself from the benefits of Christ.
• 12:50
  I want to focus on verses 8:00 and 9:00 because the language
• 12:53
  here is incredibly intense. Paul issues an absolutely
• 12:57
  terrifying condemnation against anyone who preaches this
• 13:00
  distorted message. He presents a hypothetical
• 13:03
  scenario warning that even if he himself or a literal Angel from
• 13:06
  heaven should show up preaching A workspace gospel, they should
• 13:10
  be considered a cursed. This raises an important
• 13:13
  question. What precisely does Paul mean by
• 13:15
  the word accursed? The Greek term is anathema, and
• 13:18
  it translates to being devoted to destruction.
• 13:20
  That brings to mind some heavy Old Testament narratives.
• 13:23
  To grasp the gravity of this, we have to look back at the Old
• 13:26
  Testament parallel of a can in the battle of Jericho in the
• 13:29
  book of Joshua, God had placed Jericho under the ban.
• 13:32
  Everything in the city was devoted to destruction.
• 13:34
  It was Anathema. Acan disobeyed and took items
• 13:37
  that God had condemned. A beautiful mantle, some silver
• 13:41
  and gold, Trying to salvage something for himself.
• 13:44
  And the fallout was catastrophic for the whole nation.
• 13:47
  As a result, he brought massive tragedy upon the entire camp of
• 13:50
  Israel, causing them to be defeated in battle.
• 13:53
  Eventually, his hidden sin was exposed, and he and his family
• 13:57
  faced total destruction in the Valley of Acor.
• 14:00
  Taking what God has condemned brings severe, unmitigated
• 14:03
  judgement. The Judaizers were taking a
• 14:05
  works righteousness system that God had already condemned and
• 14:08
  bringing it directly into the church.
• 14:10
  That is a staggering analogy. It shows that false teaching
• 14:13
  isn't just a minor academic disagreement, it brings a curse
• 14:16
  upon the entire assembly. And Paul specifically mentions
• 14:19
  an Angel from heaven. Why bring angels into this?
• 14:22
  We must realize that Satan operates primarily through
• 14:25
  deception. Second Corinthians tells us that
• 14:28
  Satan masquerades as an Angel of light.
• 14:30
  He very often utilizes religious leaders, charismatic speakers,
• 14:34
  and seemingly holy visions to lie people astray.
• 14:37
  It is a deliberate strategy of sabotage.
• 14:39
  By subtly adjusting the doctrine of salvation, the enemy
• 14:42
  effectively cuts people off from the only legitimate means of
• 14:45
  reconciliation with God. An Angel of light might look
• 14:48
  glorious, sound pious and command massive respect, but if
• 14:52
  the message as human effort to the finished work of Christ is
• 14:55
  demonic. This highlights a crucial
• 14:58
  principle for you to remember as you listen today.
• 15:00
  Truth completely outranks credentials.
• 15:03
  We must evaluate every single teacher, author, and speaker by
• 15:06
  the standard of God's revealed word, no matter how charismatic,
• 15:09
  popular, or seemingly authoritative they appear.
• 15:12
  Even if a literal glowing being showed up in your bedroom
• 15:14
  tonight with a new revelation, if it contradicts grace, we are
• 15:18
  commanded to reject it as anathema.
• 15:20
  That is the absolute essence of spiritual discernment.
• 15:22
  Notice that Paul repeats the curse a second time in verse 9.
• 15:26
  He says, as we said before, so I say again now, if any man is
• 15:30
  preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received,
• 15:33
  he is to be accursed. He wants to make sure no one
• 15:36
  thinks he just misspoke. He repeats it just to ensure the
• 15:39
  Galatians understand he is not speaking in a moment of
• 15:41
  reckless, heated emotion. This is a settled Apostolic
• 15:45
  verdict. Any teaching that adds human
• 15:48
  requirements to the grace of God is under divine wrath.
• 15:52
  Moving on to verse 10, the Judaizers accused Paul of being
• 15:55
  a people pleaser, which is almost laughable when you look
• 15:58
  at his life. Their argument went something
• 16:00
  like this. They said Paul is deliberately
• 16:02
  watering down the difficult, demanding requirements of the
• 16:05
  law just to make his message more appealing to the Gentiles.
• 16:09
  He doesn't want to tell them they have to get circumcised
• 16:11
  because that's painful and unpopular.
• 16:13
  He is simply trying to build a massive following by making
• 16:16
  salvation easy. That argument collapses under
• 16:19
  the weight of basic history. Right.
• 16:21
  If he is trying to win a popularity contest, getting
• 16:24
  repeatedly beaten and thrown in prison seems like a terrible
• 16:27
  strategy. It is entirely absurd.
• 16:29
  Paul systematically dismantles that slanderous logic in verse
• 16:32
  10. He asks for Am I now seeking the
• 16:35
  favor of men or of God, or am I striving to please men?
• 16:39
  If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond
• 16:42
  servant of Christ. His past life proves that point
• 16:44
  perfectly. The historical reality is that
• 16:47
  if Paul were seeking human approval, he would have remained
• 16:49
  a highly respected Pharisee in Jerusalem.
• 16:52
  He would have enjoyed the immense prestige, the social
• 16:54
  status, and the physical comfort of traditional Judaism.
• 16:58
  Instead, he surrendered to Christ and became a bondservant.
• 17:01
  The Greek word is doulos, a slave entirely devoted to his
• 17:05
  master's will. And that devotion came with a
• 17:07
  heavy physical price. As a result of this devotion, he
• 17:10
  bore the physical brand marks of extreme suffering.
• 17:14
  You have to recall what happened to Paul in these very Galatian
• 17:16
  cities. On his first missionary trip in
• 17:18
  Leystra, he was dragged out of the city, stoned by a furious
• 17:22
  mob and left for dead. A man who simply wants to please
• 17:25
  crowds and win popularity contest does not continuously
• 17:28
  subject himself to riots, beatings and literal martyrdom.
• 17:32
  The message Paul Priest actually guaranteed he would be hated by
• 17:36
  many because the gospel of grace is intensely offensive to human
• 17:39
  pride. Applying Reformed theology here,
• 17:41
  we understand the human nature absolutely despises sovereign
• 17:45
  grace. Why?
• 17:46
  Because grace completely strips away all grounds for human
• 17:49
  boasting. The natural fallen mind wants a
• 17:52
  checklist. We want to be able to point to
• 17:54
  our attendance, record our moral superiority or our rituals, and
• 17:57
  demand that God recognize our effort.
• 17:59
  We want a resume to hand to the judge.
• 18:01
  Every humanly devised religion on earth is fundamentally based
• 18:05
  on works on man doing something to climb up to God.
• 18:09
  The Judaizers were deeply offended because Paul's gospel
• 18:12
  relies totally and exclusively on the merit of Jesus Christ,
• 18:16
  leaving the center with absolutely nothing to claim as
• 18:19
  his own achievement. The very fact that Paul preached
• 18:22
  a message requiring 0 human works is proof itself that his
• 18:26
  message was not invented by men. No human would invent a religion
• 18:30
  where humanity gets zero credit. So if Paul didn't invent this
• 18:33
  message and he wasn't adjusting it to please crowds, where did
• 18:36
  he get it? He says in verse 12.
• 18:38
  For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but I
• 18:41
  received it through revelation of Jesus Christ.
• 18:44
  This brings us to a huge cultural clash.
• 18:47
  How did a Jewish rabbi normally learn theology?
• 18:50
  Paul is directly attacking the rabbinic method of learning
• 18:52
  here. In 1st century Judaism,
• 18:54
  religious instruction was built heavily on the Halaka.
• 18:57
  This is the massive body of ancestral traditions, oral
• 19:00
  interpretations, and precise legal rulings that the Rabbi's
• 19:03
  had built as a protective fence around God's law.
• 19:06
  It was a very complex, humanly constructed system.
• 19:08
  To give a modern analogy, imagine a simple one page
• 19:11
  contract representing God's law. The Halaka would be like a 400
• 19:16
  page terms of service agreement attached to it by corporate
• 19:19
  lawyers detailing every conceivable hypothetical
• 19:22
  violation. A Pharisee learned by memorizing
• 19:25
  these human interpretations from older scholars.
• 19:28
  You sat at the feet of a master like Gamaliel, and you absorb
• 19:31
  generations of human tradition. But.
• 19:33
  Paul says his gospel did not come through that pipeline.
• 19:36
  Paul completely rejects all of that.
• 19:38
  Regarding his gospel, he states that his theology came through a
• 19:41
  direct divine unveiling. The Greek word is apocalypsis,
• 19:45
  which means taking the cover off something that was previously
• 19:47
  hidden on the road to Damascus. The veil of spiritual ignorance
• 19:51
  was sovereignly removed from his mind, and the pure truth of the
• 19:54
  gospel was downloaded directly from heaven by Jesus Christ
• 19:57
  Himself. Which brings us to verses 13
• 20:00
  through 24, where Paul lays out his autobiographical proofs to
• 20:04
  back up this massive claim. This section is the absolute
• 20:07
  zenith of sovereign grace. Paul begins by describing his
• 20:11
  pre conversion life as Saul the Pharisee.
• 20:14
  He points out that he wasn't just casually opposed to the
• 20:16
  Christian Church, he was ravaging it.
• 20:19
  The grammar he uses there is quite striking.
• 20:21
  The Greek text uses the imperfect tense, which indicates
• 20:24
  A continuous, persistent, unrelenting intent to harm.
• 20:28
  He wasn't just having bad days, His entire career was built on
• 20:31
  destroying Christians. Paul used the word procopto to
• 20:35
  describe his former life and advancement.
• 20:37
  In Judaism, the word literally means chopping ahead.
• 20:40
  Think of a man furiously blazing a trail through a dense,
• 20:43
  impenetrable forest with a machete.
• 20:45
  Saul was an unstoppable freight train of legalistic zeal.
• 20:48
  He was a terror to the early believers.
• 20:50
  He was actively arresting believers, dragging men and
• 20:53
  women from their homes, and voting for their execution.
• 20:56
  As we see in the book of Acts with the Stony of Stephen, this
• 20:58
  historical reality provides A flawless textbook demonstration
• 21:02
  of the Reformed doctrine of total depravity.
• 21:05
  There was absolutely nothing within Saul's human nature,
• 21:08
  intellect, or background that prepared him or inclined him to
• 21:11
  accept the gospel of grace. His hatred for Christ was total.
• 21:15
  His mind was violently hostile to Christ.
• 21:17
  He was spiritually dead, wholly consumed by his own self
• 21:20
  righteousness and hatred for the truth.
• 21:22
  Left to his own free will, Saul of Tarsus would have continued
• 21:26
  murdering Christians until the day he died.
• 21:28
  He had no capacity to choose Christ on his own.
• 21:31
  But his trajectory was completely shattered by a
• 21:33
  sovereign call. In verse 15, Paul writes the
• 21:36
  turning point of his entire existence.
• 21:38
  He says. But when God, who had set me
• 21:40
  apart even from my mother's womb and called me through His grace,
• 21:43
  was pleased to reveal His Son in me.
• 21:45
  If we connect this to the bigger picture, that phrase is a pure,
• 21:49
  unadulterated declaration of unconditional election.
• 21:53
  God's choice of Paul was made long before Paul had done
• 21:56
  anything good or bad. It was determined even from his
• 22:00
  mother's womb. It echoes the calling of the
• 22:02
  prophets. This aligns perfectly with the
• 22:04
  accounts of the Old Testament prophets and patriarchs.
• 22:07
  Consider Jacob and Esau in Romans 9, where God chose Jacob
• 22:11
  before they were born, before they've done anything right or
• 22:13
  wrong, so that God's purpose according to his choice would
• 22:16
  stand. Consider the prophet Isaiah, who
• 22:19
  said the Lord called him from the womb.
• 22:21
  Consider Jeremiah, to whom God said, Before I formed you in the
• 22:25
  womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.
• 22:28
  So human effort plays absolutely no role in the choosing.
• 22:31
  God's election is based on absolutely nothing but His own
• 22:34
  holy pleasure and purpose, entirely apart from foreseen
• 22:37
  human merit or faith. And we also see the concept of
• 22:40
  irresistible grace right there in the same sentence.
• 22:43
  Yes, at the precise moment appointed by God in eternity
• 22:47
  past, the Lord effectually called Paul.
• 22:50
  In time, Christ confronted him in blinding resurrection glory
• 22:54
  on that dusty Rd. shattering his violent rebellion.
• 22:57
  Notice the phrasing. God was pleased to reveal his
• 23:00
  Son in me. He broke right through the
• 23:01
  darkness. God broke through the utter
• 23:03
  darkness of a totally depraved mind to grant spiritual life
• 23:07
  specifically so that Paul might preach Christ among the
• 23:10
  Gentiles. The grace was irresistible.
• 23:12
  Paul was forcefully conquered by the love and authority of
• 23:15
  Christ. So what does this all mean for
• 23:17
  his timeline? Because his movements
• 23:19
  immediately following his conversion are vital to his
• 23:22
  defense against the Judaizers. He explicitly notes in verse 16
• 23:26
  that he did not consult with flesh and blood.
• 23:28
  He didn't rush off to Jerusalem to enroll in a seminary run by
• 23:32
  the original apostles to figure out what he was supposed to
• 23:34
  preach. Instead, he says, he went away
• 23:36
  to Arabia. That specific geographical
• 23:39
  detail is crucial. He went to Nabati in Arabia.
• 23:42
  This was a vast desert Kingdom stretching east and South of
• 23:46
  Damascus, famously containing the rock city of Petra.
• 23:49
  This three-year period in Arabia is a time of intense, direct,
• 23:54
  divine tutoring from Jesus Christ.
• 23:56
  It was a massive theological reset for him.
• 23:59
  Imagine the psychological weight Paul carried.
• 24:02
  He had to unlearn decades of rabbinic tradition, scrap
• 24:06
  everything he thought he knew about the law, and receive the
• 24:08
  pure doctrines of the New Covenant in total isolation.
• 24:11
  And he wasn't just sitting in a cave meditating peacefully.
• 24:14
  There was intense geopolitical danger surrounding him during
• 24:17
  this time. We have to consider the intense
• 24:19
  geopolitical tension of this era.
• 24:21
  Paul was actively preaching in the region and his message
• 24:24
  eventually aroused the severe anger of the ethnic a regional
• 24:28
  governor under King Aridas the 4th, who ruled the Nabatean
• 24:31
  Kingdom. He became a wanted man.
• 24:33
  This governor guarded the city of Damascus with a Garrison
• 24:36
  specifically to capture and kill Paul.
• 24:39
  This led to the famous, deeply humiliating incident where
• 24:42
  Paul's disciples had to lower him out of a window over the
• 24:45
  city wall in a Wicker basket in the dead of night to escape
• 24:48
  execution. The proud, terrifying Pharisee
• 24:52
  who used to larch into cities with warrants to kill Christians
• 24:55
  was now fleeing for his life in a laundry basket.
• 24:57
  God was completely breaking his pride.
• 24:59
  It is incredibly cinematic. So it was only after three full
• 25:03
  years of this independent preparation, persecution and
• 25:06
  ministry that Paul finally makes a very brief 15 day visit to
• 25:10
  Jerusalem to become acquainted with Cephas, who is Peter and
• 25:13
  James, the Lord's half brother. And we must note the brevity of
• 25:16
  that visit. 15 days is hardly enough time to be discipled from
• 25:19
  scratch. It was certainly not enough time
• 25:21
  to absorb a complex workspace theology.
• 25:23
  It was simply a meeting to establish fellowship and share
• 25:25
  what God had done. And Barnabas was crucial.
• 25:28
  Furthermore, it was Barnabas who functioned as the essential
• 25:31
  bridge during this visit. The believers in Jerusalem were
• 25:34
  understandably terrified of Paul.
• 25:37
  They remembered him as the inquisitor who orchestrated the
• 25:40
  murders of their friends and family members.
• 25:42
  They didn't believe he was actually a disciple.
• 25:45
  Barnabas had to vouch for him. Paul's contact with the original
• 25:49
  apostles was minimal, proving again that his gospel did not
• 25:53
  come from them. Following that brief 2 week
• 25:55
  visit, Paul heads far away into the regions of Syria and
• 25:59
  Seleucia. Back near his hometown of Tarsus
• 26:01
  and the church in Antioch. He continues his ministry
• 26:05
  entirely independent of the primary apostles in Judea.
• 26:08
  He is hundreds of miles away, preaching to Gentiles.
• 26:11
  The immense theological victory of this historical timeline is
• 26:14
  found in the final verses of the chapter, specifically verse 24.
• 26:18
  Paul writes that the Judean churches did not even know him
• 26:20
  by sight. If he was taking his orders from
• 26:23
  Jerusalem, they would have known him, but they kept hearing the
• 26:25
  reports they heard. He who once persecuted us is now
• 26:28
  preaching the faith which he once tried to destroy.
• 26:31
  And their reaction is a final nail in the coffin for the
• 26:34
  Judaizers argument. And what was their reaction?
• 26:36
  Did they send investigators to shut him down for preaching a
• 26:39
  different message? No, Paul writes.
• 26:42
  And they were glorifying God because of me.
• 26:45
  They recognized that the message Paul was preaching independently
• 26:47
  in Syria and Cilicia was the exact same gospel of grace that
• 26:51
  they believed in Judea. It was perfect theological
• 26:53
  harmony. The fact that His completely
• 26:56
  independent ministry produced the identical doctrine proves
• 26:59
  unequivocally that His message was not a human invention, but
• 27:02
  was given directly by the sovereign God.
• 27:05
  The Spirit of God does not contradict Himself.
• 27:08
  As we wrap up this massive discussion, we need to summarize
• 27:11
  the sheer magnitude of the theological paradigm shift we
• 27:13
  have discussed today. We have traced Paul's ferocious
• 27:17
  defense of his apostleship and his gospel.
• 27:19
  We have seen the absolute, non negotiable necessity of a gospel
• 27:23
  completely untainted by human effort.
• 27:25
  The salvation is secured solely by Christ's substitutionary
• 27:28
  death, taking the wrath we deserved, and it is applied
• 27:31
  effectively through God's sovereign election and
• 27:33
  irresistible grace breaking through our total depravity.
• 27:36
  The definitive conclusion from Galatians chapter 1 is that
• 27:39
  anything added to grace destroys grace.
• 27:42
  If you introduce a single human requirement into the basis of
• 27:46
  justification, whether it is a ritual, A moral performance, or
• 27:49
  a traditional observance, you construct a false gospel that
• 27:52
  leaves men under the wrath of God.
• 27:55
  The true gospel rests entirely and exclusively in the hands of
• 27:59
  a sovereign God who rescues dead sinners for his own glory.
• 28:02
  I want to leave you with a specific, highly provocative
• 28:05
  thought to Mull over as you go about your wheat.
• 28:07
  In our own modern lives, what are the subtle, seemingly
• 28:10
  orthodox human traditions or personal checklist we try to add
• 28:13
  to our faith today? We might not be arguing about
• 28:16
  1st century circumcision, but do we subconsciously rely on our
• 28:19
  church attendance, our specific vocabulary, or our moral track
• 28:22
  record to make us feel acceptable to God?
• 28:25
  How often do we accidentally construct our own different
• 28:27
  gospel by trying to help God out with our own works, forgetting
• 28:30
  that Christ has already paid the massive debt in full?
• 28:33
  Keep examining the text with a critical theology focused eye.
• 28:36
  Thanks for diving deep with us today.