Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / HUNTER Claims He Paid $50K a month to Daddy - Only 2 Possibilities: A Lie, or Criminal Corruption By Joe Biden

Transcript

HUNTER Claims He Paid $50K a month to Daddy - Only 2 Possibilities: A Lie, or Criminal Corruption By Joe Biden · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Welcome to his verdict with Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: with you is well, nice to have you with us,
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: and Senator I just want to know, have you ever
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: paid your dad forty nine thousand, nine hundred and ten
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: dollars in rent to live in his house at any
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: point in your life? I just think we should make
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: sure we get a good answer on this. I'd look
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: to be honest. I don't think I paid my dad
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: back the twenty bucks he lent me when I went
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: out as a fifteen year old, much less paying a
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: dollar of rent to either of my parents at any
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: point in my life. This story of Hunter Biden paying
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: this rent, and for people that don't know the story,
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: there is a document that apparently Hunter Biden filled out.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: Marina Divine the Post she's also the author of Laptop
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: from Hell, put this out there. And now we're hearing
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: that the House Oversight Committee is going to probe investigating
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: these suspicious bank records concerning Hunter Biden's recorded forty nine
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: ten dollars in rent. The other thing that could be
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: a big problem for the president now is if you
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: look back his tax returns from the time when Hunter
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: Biden put this on official background check form for another
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: place and put the residence and put down his license number,
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: and everything was accurate on this piece of paper. Doesn't
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: match up with the President's tax returns of anybody paying
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: him forty nine thousand dollars a month for rent. That
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: could be a problem in so many different ways than
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: the president. Well, and let's explain this story because it
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: can be confusing and it's important to understand what happened. Look,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: the punchline of this is that, based on what we
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: know now, there are two and I think only two possibilities.
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: One this is corruption or two this is dishonesty. Or
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: I suppose there's option three. It could be both, but
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: let's walk through what it is. So Hunter Biden filled
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: out a background screening request in California. He was applying
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: to get into a Sheshy residential area that he had
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: to fill out this background screening request. And I am
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: looking at it. I'm reading the background screening requests right now.
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: It's handwritten the name Robert Hunter Biden. It gives the
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: address it is his father's home in Wilmington, Delaware, and
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: it includes also his social Security number. It's blocked out,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: but I'm told the last four digits that are not
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: blocked out are Hunter biden SoC security numbers. It also
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: includes his driver's license. Part of it's blocked out, but
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: I'm told the last three digits that are visible are
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's driver's license. All of this is handwritten, and
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: it says is current residence, and he indicates Number one,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: it asks do you own lease or family friend? Now,
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden indicates that he owns it. He does not
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: I believe in fact own the house that mom and
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: dad live in, but he claims he does. And by
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: the way, there's a box that says family friend. So
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: if he's saying I live with my dad, the obvious
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: box to check his family friend that it's my dad's house.
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: But he also puts there's a box that says monthly
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: rent and Hunter Biden handwrights forty nine thousand, nine hundred
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: and ten dollars. Now, this raises a gazillion questions all
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: at once. Number One, I think there is no reason
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: to doubt the accuracy of this document. If it were not,
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: in fact a real document handwritten by Hunter Biden, we
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: would expect the White House to be screaming that from
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: the Mountaintops. It has all the indisso on the face
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: of being something Hunter Biden filled out if it is
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: in fact accurate, and I don't believe they're going to
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: come back with an argument as a forgery. They're not
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: going to dispute that. Then he presumably was being dishonest
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: and lying when he said that Hunter Biden owns his
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: father's house, but he claimed that he was paying his
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: father forty nine, nine hundred and ten dollars a month.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: Now let's stop for a second. I want to ask
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: folks listening to this pod, have you ever paid fifty
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars a month in rent for anything? I certainly haven't. Yeah,
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: I've played a few, paid a few thousand, but fifty
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: grand a month, and and the thing says monthly rent.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: It doesn't say annual rent. It says monthly rent. And
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: that is an astonishing figure. And then I want I
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: want you to wratch it up a little more. Have
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: you ever paid it to your father? If it is
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: the case that Joe Biden was extracting fifty grand a
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: month from his son, if that is true, as you noted,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: that has apparently not indicated on Joe Biden's tax return,
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: so it raises real issues of criminality potentially on Joe
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: Biden's side. But number two, we know that RSMA, the
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: Ukrainian natural gas company that had Hunter Biden on the board,
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: at one period, it appears that paid him fifty thousand
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: a month. At another period it appears it paid him
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: eighty three thousand a month when it was paying him
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: fifty thousand a month. You know what, forty nine thousand,
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: nine hundred and ten dollars is really really close to,
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: really close to exactly what he was making from the
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: board of Barisma monthly. You know, it really is striking
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: If it is the case that Barisma, the Ukrainian natural
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: gas company, cut a check to Hunter Biden for fifty
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: grand a month, and then Hunter turned around and cut
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: a check for forty nine thousand, nine hundred and ten
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: dollars to daddy. You gotta ask what kind of dad
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: lets his poor drug addict son keep ninety dollars of it? Yeah,
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: Like it's one thing, we all know the phrase ten
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: percent for the big guy. This is a lot more
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: than ten percent, but it's a great way if you're
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: wanting to funnel money, launder money. Uh, this is how
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: you would pull this off. And look, you and I
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: have both probably done this a lot in our careers
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: when you see something that you think is to be
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: clear funneled money, laundered money. No, no, I wouldn't say
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: a lot, a lot, right there you go. But we
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: when we hear stories like this that you want to go,
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: there's no way you. I always look, and you're a
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: lawyer first and foremost in your career, you probably said,
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: all right, we'll hold on a second. If it maybe
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: it was an accent and he meant to put annual
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: rent of forty nine thousand, Is that the number that
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: matches up with Joe Biden's tax return, and it was
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: an accident, right, because you could technically do that, it
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: could be an accident. That number still doesn't match up.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: And that's where it gets very interesting for me. Center
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: is the fact that, look, it's not like he accidentally
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: put in the annual rent, because I could have believe
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: a forty nine ten for the year to Daddy for
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: delivering his thousand dell where and say, now I gotta
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: pay something. But so you go to you go to
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden's sector return and they were public and again,
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: so we have them when he was the vice president.
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: That number still doesn't match up and doesn't even come
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: close to the number they reported on his taxes, which
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: goes back to the issue of funneling money. If you
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: want to funnel money to your dad and you got
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: to give him some cash or your business dealings, this
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: would be a brilliant way of pulling this off well.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: And this is where we just need more facts. I
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: don't want to jump to conclusions. The document, on its
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: face says this was the monthly rent, but there's a
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: weird coincidence, and that the number is exactly the same
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: as another document indicates was the deposit for an office
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: at a place called Swedenhouse forty nine, nine hundred and
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: ten dollars. That's a weird number. And the fact that
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: a one time deposit is the exact same number as
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: what Hunter Biden indicated was his monthly rent. It is possible.
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: So I'm going to give the most benign explanation this.
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: If the White House spendmeisters are looking for a store
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: to go with, this is probably the best one, which
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: is Hunter screwed up. He didn't know what he was doing.
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: The guy has serious substance abuse issues, So he filled
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: out a bunch of stuff and it's all nonsense and false.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: And that might be true. I don't know if it
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: is or not. That's the most innocuous explanation because if
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: assuming this is a real document, and as I said,
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: the White House has not disputed that. If it is
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: the case that Hunter was paying mom and dad fifty
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: grand a month or just short of that to stay
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: in their house, that is corruption through and through. There's
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: no other explanation. Let's be clear. If fifty grand a
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: month went from Hunter to Joe Biden, in any operating
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: justice system, Joe Biden should be indicted. Well, right, And
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: why don't you say that again, because that's something I
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: don't believe that you've ever said before. And I want
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: to make sure that everybody understands why you're saying what
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: you just said. Okay, When Hunter Biden was on the
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: board of Barissma, Joe Biden was the sitting Vice President
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: of the United States. We've talked at great length on
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: this podcast about how Barissma took a drug using ne'er
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: do well, son of the Vice President, who spoke no
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: Ukrainian and knew nothing about natural gas, and put him
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: on the board and paid him at one point fifty
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: thousand a month, at another point eighty three thousand a month,
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: despite the fact that he had no useful skills other
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: than Daddy was vice president, didn't speak the language, and
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: didn't work in the industry. That screamed corruption on the
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: face of it. But this is the other piece that
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: makes it not just corrupt in the colloquial sense, but felonious. Look,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: a bribe is when you pay a government official for
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: an official act. You know, you look at the old
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: old school style of putting fifty grand in a paper bag,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: walking up to a government official and saying, here's fifty grand,
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: vote yes or no on the following thing. That's a bribe.
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: Remember abscam, Yeah, where they showed up with the briefcases
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: full of cash. In this case, you have a Ukrainian
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: company owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch paying Hunter Biden
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: fifty grand a year. If he was turning around and
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: giving that directly to Daddy while Daddy was the sitting
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: vice president leading Obama's Ukraine policy. That is bribery, and
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: that is bribery that should come with real jail time.
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: Now we don't have all of those pieces, but we
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: have Hunter claiming he was giving his dad just under
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: fifty grand a year. If that is true, this the
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: evidence of Biden family corruption has jumped an order of
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: magnitude higher. All right, I want to get your take
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: on this center, but before we get to that, I
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: want to tell you about our good friends over at
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile. If you've got a cell phone, you need
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: to check out Patriot Mobile because every time you use
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: your phone, every time you send a text, and every
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: time you pay your bill, you will be supporting conservative
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: causes that we believe in. We're talking about defending the
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: First and Second Amendment rights, the rights of the unborn,
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: helping with adoptions, funding of those adoptions. That's why we
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: love Patriot Mobile. Patriot Mobile is a conservative Christian cell
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: phone company, the only one. And instead of giving your
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: money to Big Mobile, where they're fighting against your traditional
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: family values, Patriot Mobile was started so that you could
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: work with a company that actually made a difference with
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: every phone call you make. Patriot Mobile also gives you
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: nationwide coverage. They give you unlimited talk and text. They
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: give you the exact same coverage you have right now.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Because you'll be using the exact same cell phone towers,
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: except when you pay your bill, you'll be standing up
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: for the values you believe in. So check them out.
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict. That's Patriot Mobile dot
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: com slash verdict, use the promo code verdict. You can
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: also call them nine seven to Patriot. That's nine seven
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: to Patriot or Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict. Well, you
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: look at the cash here, and I just want to
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: throw the numbers out there so people understand the basic
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: math here. If Hunter Biden's telling the truth, this would
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: a mean that he paid or as I would describe it,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: funneled five hundred ninety four one hundred twenty dollars in
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: rent in the months after Biden departed his role as
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: the vice president and January of twenty seventeen. Also, when
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: it comes to these boxes in this document indicating he
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: owned the Delaware home where classified documents are being stored
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: at the time, that brings up center the other part
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: of the story here, and that creates a lot of
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: questions as that why was he paying rent at the
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: residence that he allegedly owned and he had access to
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: Apparently these classified documents based on what we know may
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: very well have dealt with Ukraine. That brings up the
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: special prosecutor aspect of this. And again to put it
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: back into perspective, President Joe Biden Center only listed nineteen thousand,
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: eight hundred dollars in rents rents plural received in twenty seventeen.
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: That is, according to his tax returns that year. The
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: president then listed no rents received in twenty eighteen, So
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: these are his tax returns. That's what he had out there,
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: Only that he got nineteen thousand, eight hundred rents received
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: in seventeen. His son claims he owns the house that
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: he's paying rent at and he would have had access
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: to the classified documents in the garage while he was
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: living there, while he was paying rent on the house.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: He claims he owns. If there's anything that seems screwed
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: up but totally makes sense, it would be in the
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: Biden family based on now what we know, Well, you're right,
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: and you made an important clarification there that is worth noting.
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: On the face of this document it says current residence
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: and it gives a move in date and to move
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: out date, and the move in date it looks like
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: initially he wrote one twenty seventeen, and then it looks
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: like it's crossed out and turned to three twenty seventeen.
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: So let's assume it's March of twenty seventeen, and it
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: puts the move out date as February of twenty eighteen.
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: So on the face of this, these payments of monthly
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: rent started two months after Joe Biden stepped down as
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: vice president, so he wasn't technically being bribed as a
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: sitting vice president. But if it was the case that
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: he was being paid fifty grand a month, if this
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: was effectively money laundering from Ukrainian sources or elsewhere, then
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: it still raises a serious prospect. You can't bribe someone
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: after the fact, particularly if they had an expectation of
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: receiving that bribe. Now, what's confusing about this is that
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: this document has at the top it says current address,
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: and that's where he lists Joe Biden's home address, and
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: then it has below it it says current residence. Now
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: it's a strange document. I'm not sure what the difference
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: is between current address and current residence. And here Hunter
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: Biden has filled out something that says Owasco PC and
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: that's where he says it's forty nine, nine hundred and ten.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: So it is possible there's some business address and that
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: money is not being paid to mom and dad. But
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: at the very minimum, a DOJ that gave a damn
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: and cared about the law would be investigating that and
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: figure out the answer to it. And even if the
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: Biden Department of Justice won't, I have every confidence that
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: the House of Representatives is going to investigate this thorough
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: how complicated? Senator, does this get from a standpoint off?
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: You have this investigation into Hunter Biden right in Delaware.
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: You don't have a special prosecutor involved, But now it's
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: clear that Hunter Biden is claiming that he had access
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: and was living at the residence where these classified documents,
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: where we do have a special prosecutor involved, was that
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: he would have access to this. That would also mean
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: that there would probably be a lot of the people
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: that he was around, based on his laptop, shady individuals
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: who we know from his own pictures and his own
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: laptop and his own book, that he was meeting with
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: the worst people in the world in the United States
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: of America. They were coming here there were Russianoagarks that
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: were coming to America. There were people and people that
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: worked with the Chinese Communist Party and people that worked
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: with the intelligence community within the Chinese Communist Party that
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: we're coming and meeting with him in America. We also
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: know that he was meeting with people from Ukraine and
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: leaders in Ukraine that we're meeting with him here in America.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: Imagine having these top secret documents where you're hanging out
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: and dealing with substance abuse issues. How do you not
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: look at that if you're a special prosecutor And does
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: the Delaware investigation into Hunter Biden have the ability to
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: start asking and connecting some of these dots? Are they're
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: just going to stay separate the entire time? So look,
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: they certainly have the ability. And this is where the
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: Special Counsel investigation into Joe Biden potentially could expand as well.
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: And we talked talked about previously on this podcast, how
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: I'm concerned that the special Counsel was Rob Rosenstein's right
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: hand was a protege of Chris Ray and Merritt Garland
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: put him in because he wanted a special counsel who
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: would protect the White House. I hope that's not the case,
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: but that given the behavior of the Biden DOJ, there
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: is reason to be deeply suspicious. I will say, when
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: it comes to the Hunter Biden issues, what we've discussed
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: at great length, it's not an issue of concern public
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: concern that Hunter Biden is a troubled soul with substance
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: abuse issues. There are a great many people in the
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: United States and on planet Earth that struggle with those.
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: What makes this a public concern is the connection that
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, by all appearances, had a business of selling
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: access to Daddy as a high government official, and not
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: just access to Daddy to say some run of the
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: mill corporate lobbyists in Washington. That happens a lot in Washington,
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: but selling access to Daddy to foreign nations, corrupt foreign oligarchs,
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: whether in Ukraine or Communist China, and cashing out in
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: the seven figures, cashing out in massive amounts. And you know, Ben,
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: early on when we started Verdict, one of the things
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: we talked about was the payments from Barisma. And actually
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: I got a call from someone who was previously a
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: very very senior official in the federal government. I'm going
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: to keep him anonymous, but he had an insight, and
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: he's someone who's known Joe Biden forty plus years. He said, look,
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: even if not a penny of this money made it
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: to Joe Biden, when a parent has a ne'er do
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: well child who's an adult child who's had enormous challenges,
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: that can be enormously expensive to that parent having to
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: deal with all of the challenges that adult child has.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: And so this this former senior government official said, it's
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: a massive benefit to Joe Biden to just take the
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: burden of Hunter Biden off his hands, say hey, we'll
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: give him an income stream so you, Joe don't have
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: to cover that. So that's an indirect way those millions
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: of dollars benefited Joe Biden. But if this application is accurate,
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: then we're not just dealing with an indirect benefit. We're
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: dealing with Hunter Biden basically becomes the bagman taking effectively
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: foreign money and delivering it to dad. This needs serious investigation.
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: And if we had a functioning press corps, every question
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: at the White House Press briefing tomorrow should be about this,
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: would be about it. It It wouldn't even be up for debate.
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: But they're deliberately protecting this White House at all costs.
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: They are the Praetorian Guard. They are the defenders and
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: the propagandists. And in fact, some of the early stories
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: on this are already you know, they begin with, you know,
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: Republicans pounce, that's their favorite thing. Look his own sons,
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: he's paying him fifty grand a month, or he was
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: paying him fifty grand a month like that. There are
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: two and only two options. That was a lie. And
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: we'll see if the White House goes there and says, oh,
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: that's our story. Hunter Biden was just lying, or if
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: he wasn't lying, that is corrupt. I believe there is
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: zero innocent explanation for Hunter Biden paying his father fifty
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: grand a month in quote unquote rent. So if those
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: payments happen, we're talking serious criminal activity. If they didn't,
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: if Hunter lied, we need to demonstrate that with clear
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: and real evidence. Well, it's exactly like you said earlier,
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: and James Comers said this on the House side quote.
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: Many questions must be answered about the Biden's family influence
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: peddling and President Biden's mishandling and classified documents for his
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: time as Vice president. And I think Comer said those
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: two things together on purpose, saying these two are interconnected.
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: Now you can't take them apart because the family members
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: were at the residence during the time these classified documents there.
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: And if you can connect these two, then Matt, we
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: might actually start to get some real answers here. Thank
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: goodness that we, as you've said many times, that the
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: Republicans got back control the House, because finally somebody's gonna
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: look at this. Lord knows, it's not going to be
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: the media. Which brings me, Senator to another amazing story
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: that's getting barely any attention, and that is that the
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: US has been overcounting COVID deaths. Before I play this
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: audio from CNN with doctor Wynn, who used to be
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: over at planned parenthood, that you know, the US been
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: overcounting COVID deaths and hospitalizations. Shocker there, I say it, sarcasticley,
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: Are you surprised at all by this? Because I was not.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: It was like to me, I'm like, yep, of course
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: that's what they were doing. Yeah. No, look, I think
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: it's clearly right. But go ahead and play the audio
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: because the shocker is seeing CNN say this out loud. Yeah,
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: and and I'll set this up for everybody listening. This
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: is doctor Wynn admitting to Don Lemon and Poppy Harlowe
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: and whoever the other host is on their new new
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: morning show that no one watches. And I you got
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: to say, Ben, the fact that you worked at CNN
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: for years was just demonstrated by that, because I certainly
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: couldn't name who the people were she were talking to.
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: And I'm betting you're one of six people on planet
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: Earth that could. Yeah, I know, I got two three.
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: That's like, that's I mean, that's that's MVP all Star
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: status if you're if you're counting in sports books. But
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: but you listen to these this conversation, and you can
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: tell it's cringeworthy for all of them. Listen to Don
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: Lemon set up, and then listen to Doctor Wind's response
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: talk about her op ed. Doctor, thank you so much. Listen,
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: And I know that you don't want to and we
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: don't want to underplay the risk of COVID. After three years,
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: it is still a leading cause of death in this country.
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: The story I just read about the number of deaths increasing.
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: Can you explain end infections? Can you explain why you
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: believe COVID deaths are being overcounted. I think it's important
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: for us to be intellectually honest in this case, and
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: that includes recognizing that circumstances have changed. At the beginning
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: of the pandemic, we had a situation where there were
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: many people dying from COVID pneumonia, including healthy young people
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: were dying because of severe shortness of breath, difficulty breathing,
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: they were hospitalized because of it. Then, as a result
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: of vaccines and as a result of a lot of
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: people getting COVID and having some level of immunity to it,
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: we're seeing far fewer cases of that kind of severe
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: COVID and severe COVID pneumonias specifically, and yet hospitals are
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: still routinely testing everyone who's getting admitted for COVID, and
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: so we're seeing many people who are hospitalized with COVID,
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: and I think it's important to separate out who is
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: being hospitalized because of it, because there are a lot
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: of people who are still very concerned about their risk
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: from COVID, and we need to give them the most
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: accurate data possible so that they could better gauge their
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: There are people who are still not resuming enjoy dining
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: or going to the gym or socializing, and I think
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: we have to give them the most accurate reporting possible.
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's one hell of an answer. We're fearmongering
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: still yet then we're telling you that we're overcounting COVID
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: desks and overcounting hospitalizations, which means the death tracker before
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: the presidential election was all propaganda, so you wouldn't vote
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: for Donald Trump. Look that there are a number of
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: things that that scream out from that. Number one, what
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: she's saying is obviously and indisputably correct. Number two, it
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: was obviously and indisputably correct two years ago at the
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: height of the pandemic, when CNN was engaged in their
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: pandemic porn every minute of the day, screaming that we're
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: all going to die from this. It was true then,
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: and by the way, lots of people, including you, including me,
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: were making that point then. As I said on this podcast,
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: there was a meme I saw online that I thought
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: was particularly funny, which is woman eaten by great white
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: shark dies of COVID. It showed just how absurd it
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: was that every death you're at a car wreck COVID
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: killed you. You stub your toe and get an infected
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: ingrown toenail. COVID killed you. Whatever it was, they wanted
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: to blame it on COVID. You're ninety eight years old
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: and dying of old age and you've got COVID. COVID
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: killed you. Mind you that you presumably weren't going to
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: live forever. Otherwise it was COVID. Well, we had, I mean,
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: we had whistleblowers. We had I'll give you a great example.
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: In my hometown of Memphis is Saint you Children's Research
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: Hospital and Laban are two great children's hospitals, and they
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: categorized some kids that passed away as COVID deaths. When
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: the parents came out and said to the media, this
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: was too several years ago. Now, my child died of cancer,
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: did not die of COVID. We knew they were terminal,
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: and they died of the cancer that weakened their body.
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: And then they categorize their deaths COVID. And people are
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: asking questions, why are they doing this? Why are they
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: acting like even when a child's dying of cancer, which
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: is horrific enough, are you politicizing the reason for death
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: on their deaths, it is yep, We're gonna chalk that
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: one up to COVID as well. Well. One element of
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: it was that there were significant financial incentives to category
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: huge hospitalizations or deaths as coming from COVID, And so
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: I got to ask you the question I have to
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: ask you because everybody else listening right now is asking
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: the same thing. The financial incentive center. Was that money
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: being paid by the insurance companies or was that coming
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: through the government or both? Because was this a money
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: grab from for tax dollars by categorizing it as COVID
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: it was tax dollars. And to blame is both the
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: administration and Congress who in response to COVID. Look, when
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: the COVID pandemic began, it was reasonable to be concerned
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: and if you were very elderly, if you were very vulnerable,
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: if you had cancer, if your immune system was compromised,
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: that could be very dangerous. But what happened is the
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: media and the Democrats took what was a reasonable concern
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: for people that were very vulnerable and from the beginning,
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: we should have focused on protecting the very vulnerable, and
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: they used it as an excuse to restrict everybody else
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: to restrict young healthy people to go after kids. It
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: never made sense. If you were ninety eight years old
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: and had cancer immune issues, yes you should have been protected,
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: but they deliberately cooked the books. And the thing that
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: is so remarkable about CNN saying this is doctor Leanna Wynn.
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: She knew that then. It's not that these people are stupid.
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: They knew it then. But if you said it there
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: and she was just seen in medical analysts back then
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: making a killing, going on TV five times a day
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: telling you that you're going to kill grandma and die
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: if you don't get the vaccine which will protect you
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: from ever getting COVID, when they knew that was a lie.
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: And if you don't over saying what she just said
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: right now, CNN treated you as a crazy tinfoil hat
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: wearing COVID denier. If you made the obvious point that
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: someone killed it a car wreck that has COVID didn't
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: die from COVID, that that was treated as, oh, you
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: crazy people, you know, you know. And by the way,
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: that's the kind of thing Twitter was suppressing. Twitter was
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: deep platforming at the request of the federal government. This
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: is where the Twitter files comes into it. This is
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: all it was a propaganda effort from big tech, from
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: big government, from the Democrats, from the corrupt corporate media,
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: and the consequences have been utterly devastating for the country.
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: And I don't know how CNN can get up and say, hey,
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: you know, we've been lying to you for three years,
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: but now we're not. Hey, all's good. No one remembers
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: that it's easy because Don Lemon said, quote, let's bring
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: in doctor Wyn to talk about her op ed doctor,
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: thank you so much. I don't want to, you know, again,
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: we don't want to underplay the risk of COVID. After
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: three years, it's still a leading cause of death in
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: this country. We just got rid of the death counters
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: on TV because we like the guy who's the president now.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: And then she says in her very first sentence, look,
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: I think it's important for us to be intellectually honest
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: in this case. And she says it was different before.
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: And you know what the difference was Donald Trump was president. There. Yes,
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: no matter how you died, it was because of COVID.
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: Even if you're still alive, you're probably gonna die because
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: of COVID. And the only answer there's elect Democrats, all right,
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: I wasn't going to play the center, but I have
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: to let you hear Don Lemon's follow up question, right
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: because you just said she just kind of said, you know,
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: everybody calmed down, but they still leading caused death is COVID.
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: Listen to the follow up question from Don Lemon carefully.
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: You're gonna love it. It's a quick follow You're not
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: suggesting that hospital stop checking people testing people for COVID
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: if they come in, that's right. I think that there's
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: a better way to do this. And actually one of
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: the people that I interviewed, Shira Duran, who is an
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: infectious disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center.
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: She and her colleagues came up with a different measure room,
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: which is using dexamethasone. So dexamethasone is a steroid that's
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: used to treat cases of severe COVID, and she and
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: her colleagues found them in cases of hospitalizations that do
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: not involve dexamethasone, it's very unlikely that the primary cause
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: is COVID, and so the state of I mean, I
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: just have just out there. So she's actually saying the
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: COVID test at this point in the hospital should not
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: be used and it's pretty much worthless, and we should
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: actually use a drug if it is administered to people
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: as a way to count who actually died of COVID
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: or had severeness with COVID or with I see you
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: for COVID. Why didn't somebody say this a couple of
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: years ago, because CNN would have taken you off air,
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: they would have branded you a denier, they would have
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: treated you like a heretic. Social media would have banned you,
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: and it would be one thing if CNN is saying, Okay,
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: we were mistaken, we apologized, we thought we were right,
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: we were operating under limited information. But now we've learned
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: they don't admit any of that. There is no error.
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: There is no rear view mirror at CNN or MSNBC
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: or any of the other corrupt corporate media. They've been
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: lying to you forever and ever and ever, and now
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: they'll just shift and hope nobody remembers. And it's there
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: is a reason the American people have so much distrust
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: and institutions, and it's because today's institutions that used to
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: have some modicum of integrity are utterly broken, and they
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: are willing to lie, and they bear no responsibility. The
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: Washington Post and The New York Times one Pulitzer prizes
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: for reporting stories that were based on a fraud about
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: the alleged Trump Russia collusion, and they never took the
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: awards back by They never took the awards back, they
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: never apologized for it. There is no shame. CNN doesn't
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: feel a moment of shame airing this story, saying we
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: lie to you for two years. But this is CNN. Well, hey,
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: I will say this. I listen to this crap so
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: other people don't have to. And that's why I saved
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: some of the best for last, because there's many of
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: you that may be asked the same question I was asking,
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: which is okay when it deals with these hospitalizations for COVID,
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: My question is, right, how much have they been overstating COVID?
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: You're ready because she's going to give you a glimpse
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: into just how overstated COVID may be actually being counted
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: in hospitals. Here is her definition of it, and then
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: I want to get your reaction. That's a shoes. It's
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: actually turned to use this measure. So they're reporting both
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: the total hospitalizations with COVID as well as the total
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: hospitalizations with decks and methasone, which are the hospitalizations for
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: which COVID is the primary cause. And they found that
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: about thirty percent of the current hospitalizations are actually for
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: COVID as opposed to seventy percent with COVID. Can we
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: just stop there, Senator, She just told America obviously at
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: the very end of the interview, which should have been
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: the lead. Right, if you're being intellectually honest to quote her,
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: you would have come on TV and said, in a
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: shocking Massachusetts COVID tracking patients primarily hospitalized for COVID is
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: completely different than what the number of hospital pa with
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: coronavirus actually is in America. How big of a difference.
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: We're talking about seventy all the way down to thirty percent.
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: That's how wrong We've been getting it for three years.
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: And they waited till the very end to just slide
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: that in there for you, the real info in the
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: number you needed to hear. Yeah, Look, what she's admitting
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: is that for three years, the deaths have been wildly exaggerated.
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: For three years, the hospitalizations have been wildly exaggerated. It's
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: been deliberate. It's been done by government. It's been done
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: by doctor Fauci, It's been done by the corrupt corporate media.
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: It's been done by big Tech. It's been done to
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: the enormous profit of big Pharma, who is in bed
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: with everyone here. And it has been done with everyone
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: knowing they were lying to you. And part of the
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: way they get away lying to you. You may wonder
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: why is the Democrat Party and the corrupt corporate media
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: is so invested in censorship. Why do they hate Elon
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: Musk so much? Because if you are going to make
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: it a business model to lie to the American people,
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: the biggest threat to you is that someone will shine
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: sunlight and tell the truth. They knew they were lying,
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: and they know it today. It wasn't accidental, it was deliberate. Yeah.
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: And if you think, by the way that this is
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: just going to end, I'll end very quickly with this story.
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: The Eleventh Circuit of Appeals heard arguments over a federal
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: mass mandate on Tuesday. After a Florida federal judge struck
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: down a mass mandate for planes and other transportation last April,
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: the CDC quickly countered by requesting an appeal through the
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: Justice Department. That appealed your criticism from the US Travel Association,
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: which along with other industry groups have been pressuring the
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: Biden administration for months to end the mass mandate for travel.
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: We don't have the mass mandate for travel right now.
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: There's not a bunch of people that are dying because
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: of this. If we had got it wrong, it would
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: have clearly played out by now. Yet this administration is
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: still refusing to just say, okay, fine, let's walk away
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: from this. They still want to fight and still have
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: the power to tell you to put a mask on
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: while you're traveling. Look, no rational or sane person following
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: the evidence in science supports a mask mandate for airplanes
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: for everyone. Remember, these are the people that want forced
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: you to put your two year old children in masks
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: or threw families off planes because their two year old
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: was crying rather than be masked. It is indefensible. And
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: by the way, let me be clear, Number one, I'm
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: on planes every week. I spend a lot of time
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: on a lot of airplanes. Right now today, there are
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: fewer than twenty percent of the passengers wearing masks in
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: many instances it's ten percent or less. It varies on
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: if you're flying too some bright blue city, it may
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: get as high as twenty percent, but it's usually much
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: lower than that number. Two Democrats don't wear masks in
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: the Senate. Democrats don't wear masks. They don't wear masks
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: in big groups. They don't wear masks in small groups
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: only the most sort of Actually, when I walk through
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: airports that I see the people wearing masks unless someone
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: is is frail and ill. I understand someone if you're
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: taking your grandmother and she's you know, really frail and
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: you want a protector, that's reasonable. Or maybe someone has
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: a disease that makes them vulnerable that I'm all for.
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: Take steps protect yourself if you have a medical condition
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: that makes you vulnerable to all sorts of things, including
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: the colder flute. But when you see young, healthy people
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: wearing masks, when you see and you do sometimes see
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: now parents that put little kids in a mask, you
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: just wonder, Okay, what is it going through your head
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: that makes you want to do this to your children,
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: to your family? Are you Are you that scared? Do
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: you believe what the propaganda to so much? Are you
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: just so addicted to virtue signaling that it is your
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: It is like your gay pride flag. You got to
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: show that your virtue. But the amazing thing is, look,
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: when the federal court struck down the mask mandate on planes,
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: you and I both saw the videos that were taken
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: spontaneously in all sorts of people's phones, of passengers just
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: cheering aloud and pulling their masks off. And yet yesterday
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: the Biden administration was in the Federal Court of Appeals arguing,
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: we want the power to reimpose the mask mandate, we
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: want that, we don't want to give it up. At
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: the same time, Biden's trying to victory lap COVID is over.
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: So they want power. They want power to arbitrarily infringe
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: your life. And yet they want to claim to have
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: also solved the crisis. And it's part of why you're
• 40:01
  Speaker 1: seeing CNN acknowledge the deaths are exaggerated. Why because they
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: want the Democrats to get credit for it. Yeah. See,
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: yet you know the start and charge, and they want
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: to believe that they're the ones that somehow fixed all
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: your problems. And this is the biggest problem they're fixing
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: right now. And by the way. It's the same way
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: to get into a different topic. They cook the numbers
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: on global warming. So if you look at the numbers
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: on global warming, they adjust the temperatures from long ago down.
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: They adjust the temperatures from today up, and then they say, gosh,
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: look the temperatures we've adjusted up are higher than the
• 40:34
  Speaker 1: temperatures we adjusted down. Look at what's going on. When
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: you cook the books, you can get the results you want.
• 40:41
  Speaker 1: In this case, now they want to show that Biden,
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: the Democrats have cured COVID, and one of the best
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: ways to do it is, well, if we can magically
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: reduce hospitalizations by seventy percent by suddenly acknowledging what was
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: true three years ago, then voila through the power yep,
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: crooked book keeping. The Democrats have solved everything well. And
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: that scary part is one day when the government's going
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: to really ask a favor of the American people, that's
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: based in fact, no one's gonna want to listen to
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: them Center. As always, it's been a pleasure. If you're listening,
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: don't forget hit that subscribe or auto download button. We'll
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: have an audio and video podcast coming out on Friday,
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: so you can watch it on YouTube on Facebook as well.
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: Make sure you write a five star review and hit
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: that subscribe button. Share this podcast with your family and friends,
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: or if you just want to make a global friend
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: go crazy. It's a nice thing to send them and
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: we will see you all back here on Friday morning.