Latest / Honey Badger Radio / They smile in your face | HBR Talk 382

Transcript

They smile in your face | HBR Talk 382 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three eighty two. They
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: smile in your face, uh and all the while, all
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: the time they want to take your place, the backstabbers,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: And we are unfortunately back to that because I couldn't
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: find anything light and cute that I thought we we
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: could discuss instead of this tonight. This is kind of
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: important anyway. It's it's a coup attempt, and it, you know,
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: might still be They might still be trying to do this.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: They probably are. Even even after they get they get caught,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: they usually will try to you know, ah, well we're
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: not doing that.
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: Now, we've stopped.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: We're sorry, you know, we apologize. But then in the
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: background and all right, well let's let's pivot to uh,
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: this and we'll call it something else, we'll relabel it
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: and and everything, but we're still going to do the
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: same thing. So that's where we we are tonight. Sorry, Yes,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: I'm your host, Tanna Wallen here with nonsense annihilator Lauren
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: Brooks and the personification of perceptivity Mike Stevenson a while
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: with the doge in charge Brian Martinez the background, making
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: sure the cargoes room broom room, and tonight we have
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: to fall back to the treacherous ground under the Humanitarian
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: Initiative VEIL to deal with our raging USAIDS infection. But
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: before we do that, we gotta do what we gotta do,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: and so it is time to shill the shills. As always,
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Honeybadgery Radio dishes out Ace morgas board of thought provoking discussions,
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: and as experiences both recent and long past have demonstrated,
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: the provoked thoughts are fighting back, They've made it clear
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: that for people like us, relying on third party payment
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: platforms like Patreon to fund our work is treading on
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: thin ice or building our house in the path of
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: a rapidly growing wildfire. Light of this, we strongly encourage
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: our supporters to switch at least their support for us
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot Com the most stable way
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: to help us out. And if you want to tip
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: us directly instead of relying on any social media platform's
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: tip jar, the link for that is feed the Badger
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: dot Com slash just the tip. So that's feed the
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: Badger dot Com slash just the tip, because you don't
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: want to slash the whole thing. That kind of leads
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: to gender ideology. Actually, and as always, the same risk
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: applies to our social media platforms, both both the the
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: wildfire risk and having the whole thing slashed, which is
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: why you should further provoke the thought police by tracking
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: our thought provoking discussions on Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: you can find your way to all of our content,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: as well as a link to feed the Badger dot
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: com in the drop down menu at the top of
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: the page. And uh, oh my gosh, Murder of Crows
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: is on it tonight. Yes, herpes Ghanas Syphilides, yep, yep.
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: The these agencies that fund these NGOs that try to
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: enact coup attempts against the nation that is feeding them. Yeah,
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: they're every every STI. The book just kind of like
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: morphed all into one big ball of STI and then
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: now they've shoved it down our throats. So what you're
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: looking at is a Twitter thread we've been going through
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: and we will start there. But there's a rabbit hole,
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: because there's always a rabbit hole. There's always a fucking
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: rabbit hole, guys. There is never just a simple discussion
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: about shit. So so tonight we're gonna dig into that hole.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: And yes, then you and no it's strong with this one.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: But they asked for it. They were they've been asking
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: for it and capital lungs, you know, screaming for it,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: begging please please dig into our hole. And so we will.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: But with that, I want to remind you before we
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: do anything else, the last thing that we looked at
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: was this gobbledegook of a sentence that they they left
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: us with trying to explain briefly. Okay, guys, here's what
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: we're doing. So we're gonna we're gonna listen to that again,
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: because holy fuck.
• 4:45
  Speaker 3: The foment of the current constitutional crisis is our opportunity
• 4:50
  Speaker 3: to catalyze and synergize a dynamic change making, a dynamic
• 4:56
  Speaker 3: change making fractal ecosystems capable of co generation, the emergence
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: of the new thriving together based socio political economic governance systems.
• 5:07
  Speaker 3: That is a long sentence.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: Even they admit, even they have to admit that the
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: the buzzword soup is a little to it, right, So
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: what what did they what did they basically say, there,
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: let's let's go over it again.
• 5:29
  Speaker 3: The foment of the current constitutional crisis is.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: In other words, we are upset at the outcome of
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: the recent election and and uh the policies of the
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: new administration, not that there's actually a constitutional crisis, not
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: that it's actually being supported you know, as a constitutional crisis,
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: and and not that there is actually uh a a
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: cou going on from the side they oppose. This is
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: called a air and free election in which the people
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: had their say and the administration came in and began
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: doing what the people said we want. Like that's that's
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: what has them so upset. But yeah, the the foement
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: of the current constitutional crisis.
• 6:27
  Speaker 3: Is our opportunity to catalyze and synergize a dynamic change making.
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: In other words, this is our opportunity. This this new administration.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: They know they don't have the experience that the uh,
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: you know, existing establishment has with working with the bureaucracy
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: uh to uh to maintain a stronghold over the people.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: And so we can sneak in under their radar and
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: do things behind their back. That's what she's saying.
• 6:59
  Speaker 3: There a dynamic change making fractal ecosystems capable of co
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: generating the emergence of the new thriving together, meaning.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: We could take all the tiny little organizations and departments
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: and agencies and sub agencies and offices and so on,
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: and conspire to overthrow them from the inside and from
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: behind their backs.
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: Based socio political economic governance systems.
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: Meaning that what they're going to use isn't a military overthrow, right,
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: It's not an information war that gets the people on
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: their side. It's going to be control over the economy
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: and control over the conversation, ways of preventing people from
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: dissentic and ways of punishing people if they try.
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: Long sentence, and that.
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: Is a long sentence, and it is a means of
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: disguising the fact that what she just said was that
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: all of these various organizations that use the US AIDS
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: infection USAID system infection to reach through your federal government
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: into your pocket and take your money and pay their
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: grifters to do jackshit for the people they say they're
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: doing things for all those people they're they're going to
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: try to conspire to get a clamp on the economy
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: through various means of controlling how money flows, so that
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: if you dissent, they can punish you. And they want
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: to get a clamp on social media so that they
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: have total control over all of the different ways that
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: money flows, and in doing so, that will give them
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: control over your ability to dissent to that ideas to
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: you know, attempt to participate in the civic process as
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: a decision makers. As what you are. The nation that
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: you live in is a corporation. Every nation is a corporation, right.
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: The shareholders in the corporation are the people in the nation.
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: So you, the shareholders in this corporation known as the
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: United States, are basically being told, no, fuck you, We're
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: gonna run it, and you don't get to decide. You
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: don't your vote's not going to count. We're going to
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: make sure that you can't make informed choices, and we're
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: going to control you so that you have no choice
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: when you vote, and you just basically are going in
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: and ticking off a box so that it looks like
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: you approve of what we're doing. And we're going to
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: prevent you from stopping us from stealing your money, which
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: is what we're doing, and that is essentially the entirety
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: of us as Outlook, they're entitled to your money. They're
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: coming for your dollars and your kids, by the way,
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: and that's where we are. So how are they going
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: to do this? Well, here we go. This is a
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: hell of a thing. Right, they have this organize system.
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: There's always an organized system, right, There's always a method,
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: there's always a how are you going to do this? Guys,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: Well here's how and here we go.
• 11:12
  Speaker 4: This is the our Common Purpose initiative and it ties
• 11:17
  Speaker 4: into an implementation initiative called more Perfect, and it ties
• 11:23
  Speaker 4: completely into the panel you just heard from Prea Shanker.
• 11:28
  Speaker 4: You know, this whole notion that that civil society is
• 11:31
  Speaker 4: clearly part of the sustainability requirements that we have. So
• 11:36
  Speaker 4: with that, and again I.
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: Apologize now when they say sustainability, they're not talking about
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: you being able to maintain a solid economy, being able
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: to grow food or anything, you know, keeping the environment
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: from tanking so that you know, we don't end up
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: in some some sort of weird industrial pollution laid and
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: cancer cluster or something. No, it's it's about sustaining their
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: way of government. Right. So this thing he mentioned are
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: the art common Purpose thing. We'll get into that in
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: a minute, but I'll let I'll let it go here
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: for a minute, all guys.
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: As the Steve, I mean, he literally did this for
• 12:20
  Speaker 4: me because once he knew he couldn't get here, so
• 12:24
  Speaker 4: hit it.
• 12:24
  Speaker 5: Thank you, hello, and thanks for including me in your
• 12:29
  Speaker 5: conversation today. I'm very grateful to my friend Bob Bernstein
• 12:33
  Speaker 5: for this invitation.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: By the way, this guy really sounds like he should
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: be going bueller bueller. He's very, very exciting speaker.
• 12:44
  Speaker 5: I'm Stephen Hinz. I'm the co chair of a national
• 12:47
  Speaker 5: commission that was organized by the American Academy of Arts
• 12:51
  Speaker 5: and Sciences to.
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: Study just just a point here, all right, I want
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: you to want you to think about the name of this.
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: This This is not the American Academy of protecting the
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: civil and human rights of the citizens, protecting the shareholders
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: of the corporation that our nation is now the arts
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: and sciences the people who think they're better than you.
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: So he is what did he say he is? Let's see,
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: let's listen to this again.
• 13:22
  Speaker 5: The I'm very grateful to my friend Bob Bernstein for
• 13:28
  Speaker 5: this invitation. I'm Stephen Heinz. I'm the co chair of
• 13:32
  Speaker 5: a national commission.
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: Of people who think they're better than you.
• 13:36
  Speaker 5: That was organized by the American Academy of Arts and
• 13:39
  Speaker 5: Sciences to study the health of American democracy.
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: There it is there are democracy, So what do they
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: mean when they say democracy? They mean their ability to
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: manipulate votes and other processes in within the democratic republic,
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: that we are the representative republic, that we are to
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: to to override the public. That's that's what they mean
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: by democracy and a very short.
• 14:19
  Speaker 6: And they will always have a stranglehold over this situation
• 14:25
  Speaker 6: as long as everyone's convinced that democracy is the best
• 14:31
  Speaker 6: or indeed only way to proceed with things. And that's
• 14:35
  Speaker 6: why there are so many of us pushing back against
• 14:37
  Speaker 6: this and saying it's it's not just to do with
• 14:41
  Speaker 6: the adage that democracy is the worst possible system apart
• 14:45
  Speaker 6: from all the others.
• 14:47
  Speaker 5: No, it's.
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: It's there.
• 14:50
  Speaker 6: There are other systems better than this. There are other
• 14:53
  Speaker 6: systems who with better track records for sustaining a country
• 14:58
  Speaker 6: for millennia. As a posed to centuries, democracy has only
• 15:04
  Speaker 6: lasted for centuries. You could consider ancient Greece, but even
• 15:12
  Speaker 6: that only lasted for centuries. That too eventually shrank into nothingness,
• 15:18
  Speaker 6: and so did the Roman Empire. But monarchies have kept
• 15:25
  Speaker 6: on going. They've weaved in between the democracies, and they
• 15:29
  Speaker 6: will continue to do so. It's but it's it's a
• 15:34
  Speaker 6: tricky questions as to what degree we can ever get
• 15:38
  Speaker 6: back to that or if we can get beyond that
• 15:40
  Speaker 6: into and into something that's neither monarchy nor democracy, like
• 15:45
  Speaker 6: anarcho capitalism. Oh no ah, he said it, Yeah, I
• 15:49
  Speaker 6: said it. It's it sounds like pie in the sky.
• 15:54
  Speaker 6: But you know, we do live in different times, in
• 15:58
  Speaker 6: very different times, and maybe there's such a thing as
• 16:03
  Speaker 6: a narco monarchy, what would it I'm trying to think
• 16:08
  Speaker 6: as flexibly as I can, you know, or a narco
• 16:15
  Speaker 6: capitalist monarchy or whatever it is, whatever combination of things
• 16:20
  Speaker 6: will work. But this constant insistence that the only thing
• 16:25
  Speaker 6: that can work is democracy is it seems to be
• 16:31
  Speaker 6: finally having having its legs like shoved out from under
• 16:35
  Speaker 6: it because like, especially given that it's conducted by people
• 16:45
  Speaker 6: who call it our democracy, and we're trying to translate
• 16:50
  Speaker 6: what they mean by our democracy. They don't call it
• 16:55
  Speaker 6: the democracy. They don't even call it democracy with out
• 17:00
  Speaker 6: the definite article or without an indefinite article like a democracy.
• 17:07
  Speaker 6: It is our democracy, Like, why why do you insist
• 17:10
  Speaker 6: on calling it that? It's it's for the same reason
• 17:14
  Speaker 6: communists kept calling everything of the people's whatever it was.
• 17:20
  Speaker 6: That's what democracy means, rule by the people, and it's
• 17:23
  Speaker 6: it's obviously a euphemism, like the way the Soviet Union
• 17:32
  Speaker 6: called everything the people's thing, but it was never the
• 17:34
  Speaker 6: people's thing. It was the ruling classes thing. And that's
• 17:39
  Speaker 6: that's what they mean by our democracy. It's not it's
• 17:42
  Speaker 6: not the people's thing. It's because it's it's something that
• 17:49
  Speaker 6: the ruling class speak of. It's if anything is our oligarchy.
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, pretty much. When they say that, what they are
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: saying is we are the owners of this so called democracy.
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: And they're not enamored of democracy because they think it
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: gives everyone an equal say, they're enamoredi democracy because they
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: think it gives them a better opportunity to manipulate the
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: system by stacking the deck against individuals. And it does.
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: It does. It gives them a perfect opportunity for it.
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: In Ohio, when my parents were teaching, the school systems
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: had a debate going on when my parents were young teachers,
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: do we become a closed state for union schools? In
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: other words, the state and national teachers associations, the state
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: and national teachers unions. They wanted to set it up
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: so that in the public school system, all of the schools,
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: all of the teachers had to be union members, as
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: in clothes shop, and the most of the schools didn't
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: want that. The overwhelming majority of actual school systems, the
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: teachers in those school systems did not want that. But
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: in the urban areas the teachers did want that, and
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: there were more classroom teachers in bigger school systems in
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: those areas. So the way that they were voting, each
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: school system would vote on their own and they decided
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: to make it an individual democratic vote, and they pushed
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: and pushed and pushed until they got that changed so
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: that the school systems could not decide for themselves each
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: system how they wanted to go. What they had instead
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: in the school systems prior to the unions was professional associations,
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: which were more similar to the old fashioned guild where
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: they did they did create standards and practices as the
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: the the unions do, but the teachers themselves, the individual
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: teachers in the local school system systems, had a lot
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: more input into that, and it wasn't top down, it
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: was bottom up, and so the people that worked with
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: and observed the behaviors and needs of the students were
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: the ones who were most active in deciding what they
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: should be doing for the students, what the students needed,
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: and how to best serve them. And then along comes
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: this change. We're going to change the way we vote
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: so that instead of giving the school systems, the different
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: school systems their own say on whether to make it
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: so that the entire state has to do the same
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: thing or not. And and you know, they could have
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: gone through and said, well, our school system is going
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: to be a union school system even if other school
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: systems are not. Or our system is going to be
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: a professional association school system even if other school systems
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: are not. They they created this, this this manner of
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: voting in which the number of teachers in the urban
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: areas were able to overwhelm the vote and force the
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: country schools, the rural schools basically, and the small town
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: schools that did not need to have a national association
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: controlling their curriculum into accepting and joining the National Education Association.
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: And they did this in every state. Once they had
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: a strong grip on the entire country, they began inserting,
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: by the way, the world is going to end in
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: ten years if we don't stop fishing into the curriculum.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: And it wasn't just in science class, where you know,
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: parents might actually read what the kid is learning and say, no,
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: wait a minute, I'm going to push back on that
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: a little bit, just like it wasn't just in health
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: class when they introduced, by the way, you might be
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: you might have been born in the wrong body, and
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: you get special treatment in the classroom if you were.
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: In fact, you're nobody. If you are, are you know,
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: content with your your gender and content with your sexuality.
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: Oh and by the way, five year old kid sexuality
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: is blah.
• 23:25
  Speaker 7: Blah blah blah blah like that, that's where we ended
• 23:28
  Speaker 7: up as a result of that, right, and they basically
• 23:33
  Speaker 7: stiff armed the entire country into that by changing the
• 23:38
  Speaker 7: way the system for voting it into place worked to
• 23:43
  Speaker 7: overwhelm the majority of schools, the majority of communities, with
• 23:52
  Speaker 7: the populace of the minority of communities that were urban areas.
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: They could have done this without forcing it on everybody else.
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: So to just keep that in mind when we'll see
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: a little bit more what this guy has to say, We've.
• 24:12
  Speaker 5: Worked together for more than two years, a very diverse
• 24:14
  Speaker 5: group of Americans from all parts of the country, from
• 24:17
  Speaker 5: different sectors of our society and with different political perspectives and.
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: We so this has been a long standing conspiracy. They've
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: been working on this individual project. They organized this project
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: and have been working on it for two years, which
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: means they've been This is part of the along March
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: through the institutions. Yes, Murder of Crows, I remember that.
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: So Murder of Crow seventy five to twelve. We've been
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: We're supposed weren't we supposed to be under two miles
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: of ice since the late seventies, And yeah, my area
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: kind of had a panic about that in nineteen seventy
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: eight when we had a blizard uh, and the snow
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: drifts in various areas got as tall as Canadian snow drifts.
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: So we were we were driving in between walls of
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: snow for a few weeks after that. It's it's happening,
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: It's happening, you know. Well, no, it wasn't happening. It's
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: just that, you know, Ohio is flat up up north,
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: Southern Ohio is slightly less flat, and as you get
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: to southeastern Ohio, which it's even much more less flat,
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: if that makes sense. There's hills in that part of Ohio,
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: the actual real like bumps in the ground and stuff.
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: But but where I grew up, like, it's flat, it's
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: flat flat, and uh because you know it's the where
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: the glaciers scraped everything off and just rubbed it smooth.
• 25:51
  Speaker 6: And this point, at this point, we're being told about
• 25:56
  Speaker 6: rising sea levels and that means most of the Netherlands
• 25:59
  Speaker 6: is going to be underwater. Well, they've been told that
• 26:01
  Speaker 6: they're going to be underwater any year now for the
• 26:05
  Speaker 6: last few decades. Are like, no, we should to be
• 26:09
  Speaker 6: done just fine, thank you very much, just busiest man
• 26:13
  Speaker 6: made structures to make sure that they don't become underwater.
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: That's a fucking that. That's what they've done. They've pretty
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: much conquered it.
• 26:26
  Speaker 6: What what is it, the Maldives or whatever it is,
• 26:28
  Speaker 6: this series of islands of the Indian Ocean that's it's
• 26:31
  Speaker 6: got the lowest elevation of any of any country, Like
• 26:34
  Speaker 6: the highest elevation at any point in the series of
• 26:37
  Speaker 6: islands is like twenty five meters or something. And they've
• 26:42
  Speaker 6: been warned for decades now that they're going to be
• 26:45
  Speaker 6: the first to go underwater, and they're still there just
• 26:47
  Speaker 6: like no, it hasn't happened yet we're bracing for the worst.
• 26:53
  Speaker 6: But the shoreline doesn't seem to have budged a smagging
• 26:58
  Speaker 6: inch so far. But yeah, we believe you. Yeah, give it,
• 27:04
  Speaker 6: give it, Give us all the money you have to
• 27:06
  Speaker 6: make sure that we can prevent this from happening.
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: Like I believe it. I believe it. When wealthy politicians
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: quit buying shoreline properties.
• 27:19
  Speaker 8: Yes, that ship is just like, I mean, how more
• 27:26
  Speaker 8: in your face can you be?
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah, talking out one side of your mouth.
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: Oh my god, the willion it is.
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: Well, the glads are nothing, but let me buy this
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: nine point five million dollars sprawling estate. Get them the.
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: Beaches of California.
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: Yes, to be.
• 27:48
  Speaker 6: Fair, they have enough money to just abandon those particular
• 27:51
  Speaker 6: properties because they have a dozen other properties elsewhere in
• 27:54
  Speaker 6: the world. But you can examine what's actually happening to
• 27:59
  Speaker 6: the sea levels and shawlline and that's what's important. Like
• 28:03
  Speaker 6: they're never gonna leave those house houses because the sea
• 28:06
  Speaker 6: isn't fucking moving at all. That's what's important.
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: There's another thing that that you gotta you gotta pay
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: attention to as well, Right, the ice that is floating
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: in the ocean. If it melts, that doesn't matter at all.
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: It's it's like sitting on something if it's on top
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: of the ice that's on land, or the ice that
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: is propped on the bottom of the ocean and and
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: goes all the way from the bottom of the ocean
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: to the to the surface where it stands up out
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: of the ocean because it can't sink any further. If
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: that ice melts, that might make a difference. It's very
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: I want you to take a clear plastic cup and
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: fill it with water about halfway and then put ice
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: in it that doesn't touch the bottom. Just put any
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: ice in it at all. It doesn't touch the bottom,
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: and uh, I want I want you to to see
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: what happens to the water level, Like mark it with
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: a marker, uh, and see what happens to the water
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: level as that ice melts.
• 29:20
  Speaker 6: It does not overflow over the sides of the container.
• 29:24
  Speaker 6: This is a simple physics experiment that they should teach
• 29:26
  Speaker 6: you when you're fucking twelve.
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but they're they're busy scaring the shit out of
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: small children because they can't convince adults that ice will
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: behave differently in in the ocean than it does in
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: other water. So again, unless they then come through and say, well,
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: all the all the land mass ice is is going
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: to melt and that much ice will actually raise the
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: sea level somehow, then then there's their fear mongering isn't
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: going to work, right, So, yeah, it's it's kind of
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: it's kind of pathetic, but yeah, this has been going
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: on for a long time. Guys. When my parents first
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: heard from me that, you know, I came home from
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: school all upset because of some of the environmental stuff
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: I was being taught, and my dad was like, you know,
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: when I was in school, they told us we were
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: severely overpopulated and that by the time you were born,
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: there wouldn't be room for two people to stand together there.
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: We would all have just a just a standing room
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: only left on earth at the rate of birth in
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: the world, because they weren't considering the rate of death
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: in the world, or the rate of scientific advancement that
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: allowed buildings to be made, that that lots of people
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: can live in a small amount on a small amount
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: of land, and so on. But in the meantime, none
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: of that has ever happened. Like every prediction they've made,
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: none of it has happened. We haven't run out of
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: fish every ten years for the last seventy years or so,
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: none of that. So all of these dire predictions are bullshit.
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: It's just ways of manipulating you. Now, does that mean
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: that it's okay to dump toxic chemicals into the groundwater. No,
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: we still have to be not environmentally stupid. Right, don't
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: set your lakes and rivers on fire, people. We had
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: a fire at one point in the Ohio River. Actually,
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: it's been on fire multiple times, and the EPA was
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: kind of invented because of things that happened in Ohio.
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: But there's a balance. There's got to be a balance
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: between the ffforts to not do stupid things environmentally and
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: the efforts to use environmental science as a scare tactic
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: to control people economically, which is what these people are doing.
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: And this, by the way, is why they want control
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: over social media because this discussion isn't something that they
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: want us to be allowed to have. They don't want
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: us to be allowed to have this discussion where you
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: point out that ice and water do not behave the
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: way that they are threatening us that they will behave.
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: That's something that is just not acceptable to the elites.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: So going on here.
• 32:47
  Speaker 5: You looked at the research, the data, the literature, the.
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: Most important propaganda, and we.
• 32:53
  Speaker 5: Listen to Americans in fifty communities across this country in
• 32:56
  Speaker 5: very diverse settings.
• 32:58
  Speaker 8: Oh, fifty whole community, the whole com Oh my god,
• 33:04
  Speaker 8: what did that take you?
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: Like an afternoon?
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: There's there are are fifty communities on one side, one
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: quarter one corner of Ohio. Sorry, guys, maybe there's fifty.
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: Maybe there's only fifty community. No, there's probably more than
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: fifty communities in Connecticut as tiny as ye. Oh yeah,
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: there's probably fifty communities in a part of Ohio the
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: size of Connecticut.
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 33:36
  Speaker 8: And it was probably like a fucking zoom call, right,
• 33:39
  Speaker 8: like a zoom mean yeah, people so fullish shit?
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: They went to fifty nursing homes in Florida. What kind
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: of communities are we talking about? Oh, you know the
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: ones where like you ask people questions about their political
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: views and they tell you what their grandchildren are doing
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: this week because they've seen pictures on the Facebook. Uh
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: uh yeah, no, I hate to make fun of this,
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: but I'm sorry. This is this is that's pathetic. Fifty communities.
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: That's it. That's all they talk to. That's that's him
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: telling you.
• 34:22
  Speaker 9: We we we very carefully cultivated the set of people
• 34:28
  Speaker 9: we were talking to, curated the set of people we
• 34:32
  Speaker 9: were talking to to get the answers we wanted so
• 34:35
  Speaker 9: that we could then come and tell you we.
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: Talked to representatives of the people, and this is what
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: the people had to say, when in fact it's just
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: their cronies, and with.
• 34:49
  Speaker 5: Very divergent points of view. And we came away from
• 34:52
  Speaker 5: that convinced that are.
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: The very divergent points of view are well? The Titanic
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: is thinking, we think that the chairs should be placed
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: in a star pattern, and the divergent point is no, no, no, no.
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: The chairs have always been in rows. We need to
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: put them in rows. But nobody has considered the possibility
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: of not running into the iceberg.
• 35:19
  Speaker 5: Democracy needs not only to be reformed, but really in
• 35:22
  Speaker 5: a way, reinvented, reimagined.
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: Oh there's another one. What do you just say?
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: There?
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: And this let's go back.
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: Not that far in very.
• 35:33
  Speaker 5: Diverse settings and with very divergent points of view, And
• 35:37
  Speaker 5: we came away from that convinced that our democracy needs
• 35:40
  Speaker 5: not only to be reformed, but really in a way reinvented.
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: Real They need to reinvent democracy, imagined, reimagine democracy. And
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: what does that mean when they say they want to
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: reinvent and reimagine things, It means, well, we didn't We're
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: not getting the results we want. Therefore you're doing it
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: wrong and we want to change it. Yeah, very simple, right,
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: what we have right now, If Ohio and the other
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: states had done this with regard to the unions, we
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: would have had a better result, a result that was
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: more representative of what the teachers wanted. We have in
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: our parliamentary system. We have one set of representatives that
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: gets voted for that each state gets the same number
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: of votes regardless of population, and then we have one
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: set that is specifically representative of the populace. The population,
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: so if your state has a larger population, you get
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: more of this type of representative, and if your state
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: has a smaller population, you less of this type of representative.
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: And they have districts rather than representing the entire state,
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: although to a degree they represent the entire state, and
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: so it allows an equal say for states with smaller populations.
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: And it also allows individuals to have their sway on
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: the system by sending representatives that handle both, and this
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: is important. Both the populous representatives and the representatives of
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: the actual states have to agree enough that a majority
• 37:45
  Speaker 1: of both of them pass a law before it actually
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: goes to be signed by our executive leader. And then
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: the executive leader has to have been voted in by
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: the largest number of voters out of everybody that voted
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: in his election. So you have a popular leader leader
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: that the populace decided on right, and that also goes
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: through a system that gives the states their say, and
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: that does allow states with larger populations a little more sway.
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: So you have sort of two pins in already for
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: a democratic popular vote system, but you have a check
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: on it for a nationwide every state gets their say system,
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: and then if it turns out to be unconstitutional, then
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: the Supreme Court can throw it out. So it's pretty
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: good system because it allows several little checks and balances
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: that prevent a group of people from coming along and saying, well,
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: if we can get fifty point zero zero zero one
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: percent of the population to agree that X is better
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: than Y, then they can just trample over the forty
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: nine point nine nine nine percent that you know that
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: that allows a little bit of contention between them, and
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: the possibility of back and forth, and the possibility that
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: actually it takes more of a majority than that to
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: to override a minority of voters, and something has to
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: be much more popular to to make that big of
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: a change. And if that had been the case with
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: the unionization of our schools, for instance, they would have
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: had to engage in a significant level of salesmanship to
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: get the smaller schools to agree to it, because they
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: wouldn't have been able to just trample them in the process.
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: Richard Pierre just sent us five dollars and said, there's
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: a book by Tom Kratman called A Desert called Peace,
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: which is a science fiction book about a society five
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: hundred years in our future. The elites have said that
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: they have a desire to see the rest of the
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: world outside their gated communities, only to be lit by fire.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: So that's the entire thing, I think, And I'm not
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: sure the way that sentence is written, and there's no
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: period at the end of it. If that's the entire sentence,
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: it's not a book I've read, so I don't know
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: what the story is. So Richard, you might need to
• 40:56
  Speaker 1: clarify that one a little bit, because I'm not sure
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: what you're saying there, whether it's if they want if
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: they want to leave their gated communities but they catch
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: on fire when they leave, or if they only want
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: that area to be lit by fire in no place
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: else or what. I'm not sure there. But in any case,
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: just as that little lesson, it's going to be important
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: as we go through this a little bit for the.
• 41:32
  Speaker 5: Kinds of challenges we face in the twenty first century.
• 41:36
  Speaker 5: In June of twenty twenty, we issued this report, Our
• 41:39
  Speaker 5: Common Purpose, Reinventing American Democracy for the twenty first Century.
• 41:44
  Speaker 5: It includes thirty one very concrete recommendations for changes to
• 41:49
  Speaker 5: our institutions, our processes, but also ways to revive a
• 41:54
  Speaker 5: healthier civic culture.
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: So what did he just say there, let's go back
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: and uh, I'm gonna I'm gonna rewind again here tuitions
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: are pros a little more than that.
• 42:09
  Speaker 5: On very concrete recommendations for changes to our institutions, our processes,
• 42:16
  Speaker 5: but also ways to revive a healthier civic culture.
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: So they're so mad, all right, They're so mad that
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: men put their foot down and said no, stop stealing
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: from us. Stop paying women to make stupid choices. Stop
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: sending us to war when there's nothing for us to
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: fight for. There's not a cause that we support. There's
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: not a threat to our homes and our families right.
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: Stop trampling our property rights, stop trampling our civil rights,
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: Stop railroading us in the court systems and taking our
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: chill in a way. They're so mad that men said
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: no to these things that they want to change the
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: entire government system, the entire election system, the way that
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: our leadership of this corporation is decided. This is a
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: coup is essentially the hostile takeover of a corporation by outsiders,
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: by minority shareholders and people who are parts of other
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: corporations other countries. Richard Beierre says, the gated communities would
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: have all of the modern technology, and those outside would
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: be living stone age lifestyles. To protect the environment, Oh
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: I see how that is? Okay, yep, So that the
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: wealthy people have earned the right to use electric lights
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: and so on. But you plubs, you plubs that destroy
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: the environment. It's your fault. We're in this situation. So
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: you you have to use candles and you have to
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: heat your home with a fireplace. Well, we have a
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: furnace that runs on gas or electricity or something. Yeah,
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: that's how I can see that. I could totally see that.
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: But yeah, so this is what he's saying. Here is again,
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: we want to rig the game because we lost in
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: a fair fight and we don't like it. They're not
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: protecting your right to vote. They're not protecting the system
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: that you use to determine the leadership of your corporation.
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: They are trying to take it over. They are engaging
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: in a hostile takeover.
• 45:00
  Speaker 5: We are now embarked on a campaign with partners all
• 45:03
  Speaker 5: across the country to help advance these reforms to our
• 45:07
  Speaker 5: democracy in order to our restore it, to save it, to.
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: Have to save our democracy from the voters. Guys, those
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: evil voters aren't doing what we want them to do.
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: So how are they going to save our democracy? Oh no, wait, no,
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: it's their democrats. How are they going to save their
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: democracy that we, the plubs, are not part of. So
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: let's take a look at this strategy one. Well, we'll
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: just look at it. They had this type table of contents, right,
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: and and let's see if I'm I don't know if
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: I'm going to go through and read all of this part.
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: I want to get straight to the strategies just because
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: the first couple things here are really egregious. Achieve equality
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: of voice and representation sounds good, right, sounds like they're
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: trying to make sure that you have your say, But
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: what does it actually mean? What are they actually trying
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: to do? Expand both the House of Representatives and the
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: ways that people can vote for their representatives. Change how
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: districts are drawn. This is called gerrymandering, by the way,
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: First to eliminate partisan jerrymandering. So they're going to use
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: jererymandering to eliminate jerrymandering. Guys that that totally is effective.
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: And then to make them larger, allowing several representatives per district.
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: Amend this basically creates contention in Congress between representatives for
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: the same district. That that's helpful. Amend the Constitution to
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: allow for congressional regulation of campaign expenditures. So what's wrong
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: with allowing the government to decide what people can contribute to,
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: how how people can financially back a candidate that they like.
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: Can you know what do you think might be the
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: problem with allowing incumbents to place limitations on your ability
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: to fund the campaigns of their competition when you disagree
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: with them. You think that that I might actually be
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: an incumbent protection practice right there. Yeah, imagine if we
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: passed along Ohio that said Walmart gets to decide how
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: much its competitors are allowed to to spend on advertising
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: in the public media. You think you think CBS would
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: be able to do much advertising or Walgreens.
• 48:10
  Speaker 6: There's there's this disparity. When I saw I saw a
• 48:18
  Speaker 6: few tweets of people who were saying Donald Trump, Donald
• 48:22
  Speaker 6: Trump is telling us to uh, to be austere and
• 48:25
  Speaker 6: to save money. Meanwhile he has fucking golden toilets and everything.
• 48:30
  Speaker 6: Musk is telling us maybe we should save money because
• 48:33
  Speaker 6: that will help us, and all these all these all
• 48:36
  Speaker 6: these evil fucking billionaires are telling us, Yeah, a good
• 48:43
  Speaker 6: way to save money is to save energy and so
• 48:47
  Speaker 6: and they're all, well, you can't tell us this. You
• 48:50
  Speaker 6: don't save money, you're spending billions because because you have billions. Meanwhile,
• 48:56
  Speaker 6: the government is telling them we're going to loss you
• 49:00
  Speaker 6: to to useless energy because it's gonna save the planet.
• 49:07
  Speaker 8: And that's.
• 49:09
  Speaker 6: And that and that's the difference between giving someone good
• 49:14
  Speaker 6: advice for what it actually means and giving someone the
• 49:20
  Speaker 6: same advice based on lies, like using less energy isn't
• 49:25
  Speaker 6: going to save the planet.
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: It's not.
• 49:27
  Speaker 6: The fucking planet is going to be fine. I mean,
• 49:29
  Speaker 6: this is this is fucking if you're get If you
• 49:35
  Speaker 6: if you're gonna save energy, it should be for your
• 49:37
  Speaker 6: own good. It should be because it's going to save
• 49:41
  Speaker 6: you money. And frugality is is its own virtue aside
• 49:50
  Speaker 6: from anything else, like because it prevents you from being
• 49:57
  Speaker 6: accustomed to using too much energy of any kind, energy
• 50:02
  Speaker 6: of any kind really, and people should get on board
• 50:08
  Speaker 6: with that. They should be like, yeah, I should save
• 50:10
  Speaker 6: money regardless of the fact that people who can afford
• 50:14
  Speaker 6: to spend money are spending money. I should still save
• 50:16
  Speaker 6: money no matter how poor I am, because I mean,
• 50:19
  Speaker 6: that's how you get rich in the first place. That's how.
• 50:23
  Speaker 6: In the meantime, the other billionaires, the fucking grift of ones,
• 50:29
  Speaker 6: and especially the government, which is itself a trillionaire. There's
• 50:36
  Speaker 6: no such thing as a trillion are individually, but the
• 50:40
  Speaker 6: most world governments are trillionaires. And they're not individual humans,
• 50:45
  Speaker 6: but they are machines.
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: They're corporations. They're trillionair corporations.
• 50:52
  Speaker 6: Yeah, they're machine trillionaires. And then and they're here telling you, no,
• 50:58
  Speaker 6: you should you should be frugal because it's gonna save
• 51:01
  Speaker 6: the world. In fact, we're going to force you to
• 51:03
  Speaker 6: be frugal because it's gonna save the world. And that's like,
• 51:09
  Speaker 6: it's not gonna save the world, and yet they're forcing
• 51:13
  Speaker 6: you to do it. This is bullshit on two different levels.
• 51:19
  Speaker 6: Like they're not telling you to do it for your
• 51:22
  Speaker 6: own good. That telling telling it to you because if
• 51:26
  Speaker 6: some nonsense is going to convince you that that you're
• 51:30
  Speaker 6: some fucking environmental freedom fighter who's gonna save the planet,
• 51:37
  Speaker 6: even though the planet is gonna be fucking fine. And meanwhile,
• 51:40
  Speaker 6: they're not even asking you, they're not even advising you
• 51:44
  Speaker 6: to be frugal. They're going, yeah, no, we're gonna fucking
• 51:49
  Speaker 6: steal all your money to force you to be frugal.
• 51:53
  Speaker 6: And these fucking deckheads are like, yeah, yeah, no, that's fine, Yeah,
• 51:56
  Speaker 6: that's that's good. Everyone should be on board with this,
• 51:58
  Speaker 6: and everyone anyone who's not on board with it, it
• 52:00
  Speaker 6: is a fucking nazee. It a fascist. Oh that uh,
• 52:06
  Speaker 6: there are so many layers of this clown world that
• 52:10
  Speaker 6: it drives me to drink well.
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: The sad thing is they have successfully convinced people that
• 52:17
  Speaker 1: money is something that it is not right. Money is
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: all money is all currency is of any kind is
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: a placeholder. It doesn't represent anything else. You spend the
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: thing that everybody has the same amount of to get it.
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: Nobody has more minutes in their day. Everybody has a
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: twenty four hour day, and when that's up, it's the
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: next day. It's not the same day anymore. And everybody
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: needs pretty close to the same amount of sleep, the
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: same amount of food, and time to eat, time down,
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: time from working. The only difference between people is you
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: know how much of that placeholder they can command for
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: the labor that they do during their non downtime during
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: their uptime, And that depends on a whole set of factors.
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: How difficult your labor is, how dangerous it is, how
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: many people can do it, how badly people need it
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: to be done. More people are willing to give you
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: more placeholder for your labor if most people aren't smart
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: enough to do that labor, and they have to pay
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: you because there isn't somebody else to do it. Or
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: most people aren't tough enough to do your labor, so
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: they have to pay you because there isn't somebody else
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: to do it, or it's too gary or too dirty
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: and they just don't want it. They'd really rather you
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: do that, or if it took you a long time
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: to learn how to do it, and things like that,
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: And of course, how much other people's labor you have
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: to invest in to get the materials you need to
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: do your labor factors and things like that. Right, how
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: much it costs other people and how much you end
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: up with at the end of the day depends on
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: the wisdom of your labor choices and your capacity for trade.
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: And that's it. It's that simple when it comes to
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: how much money people end up with. But the other
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: thing is, because that's all it is, it's a placeholder.
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: And when you when you spend that placeholder, what you
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: are doing is you are paying for other people's time
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: to do things that you don't want to spend your
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: time doing. I pay farmers to grow my food by
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: giving my money to the grocery store for that food,
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: knowing the grocery store is going to give it to
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: the distributors who are going to give it to the farmers, right,
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: And that's the way that works. And obviously that's a
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: little oversimplified. There's a lot more midtlemen than that. And
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: sure I could grow my own food, but I can
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: have more placeholder value from my labor if I pay
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: somebody else to do that and focus on the labor
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: I do, and then I can also spend that placeholder
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: money for other things that I don't want to spend
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: time on. I don't want to spend time sewing my
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: own clothes. I don't want to build. Well, I kind
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: of do want to build my own car, but that's
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: the whole whole different story. I really can't build my
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: own car and do the other things I want to do.
• 55:50
  Speaker 6: You have an ambulance, you don't need a call.
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: We did just purchase a decommissioned ambulance. But if you
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: want to learn more about that, you need to go
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: to Feed the Badger and find out how to join
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: in on the Patreon only after shows for HBr talk,
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: where I where I spend much more time talking about
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: the ambulance. But if you want to know a little
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: bit about the United States, that ambulance came from Kansas,
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: so the first thing we had to do is replace
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: the windshield. But in any case, yeah, I still it
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: would still be really fascinating to build my own car,
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: but I don't know that I would be that I
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: have the skill and the talent necessary to make it
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: street worthy. And the whole point would be to have
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: something that I built that I could drive. And if
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: that's not going to happen, then I would be wasting
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: my placeholder earning capacity doing that. So yeah, essentially, if
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: you don't want to be like, as David lot Boy
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: pointed out, a neolithic sub subsistence farmer, you used placeholder
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: or money to pay for other people's time and other
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: people's labor, other people's expertise, other people's intelligence and so on,
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: other people's wisdom. But your so called betters that want
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: you to become part of a communist system want you
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: to believe that that is a bad way of doing things,
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: that it's theft if you voluntarily trade your labor to
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: get placeholder money placeholder currency for your time, your labor,
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: your intelligence, your wisdom, and so on expertise, and then
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: spend some of it to get a variety of different
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: things that you wouldn't have time to do for yourself
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: in a given day, and your life is easier. That's theft.
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: You're being ripped off, and you're ripping other people off.
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: According to these folks, they hate that, but in the meantime, yeah,
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: they do it. And most of the time, the people
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: who are mad at you for that, for living that way,
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: not only do they live that way, but they live
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: that way so effectively that they have so optimized their
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: ability to obtain that placeholder that they have way way
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: more of it than is necessary to create sustainable, secure
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: living for them. They have disposable placeholder, and their disposable placeholder.
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: The way the economy works is if they hoard that
• 59:02
  Speaker 1: disposable placeholder, it takes away from every individual who is
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: trying to earn placeholder by selling things or services or
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: combination both. And so it isn't a bad thing when
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: one of them buys a gold toilet, because it gives
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: somebody else the opportunity to earn placeholder. By creating and
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: transporting and installing and maintaining a gold toilet, it gives
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: people the opportunity to earn placeholder. By mining gold gives
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: people the opportunity to earn placeholder by figuring out how
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: to make a toilet work even if it's made out
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: of a very very soft metal instead of porcelain, which
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: seems like it would be problematic to me, but to
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: each their own. Also, can you imagine sitting on that
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: in New York during a nor'easter?
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: That thing's got to be cold.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: They need to have like a heater a toilet keep
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: your ass from freezing to the toilet. I don't like
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: sitting on porcelain in Ohio in the autumn, so like,
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: come on, guys. But yeah, the idea that that there's
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: some immorality toward having that placeholder for for your your
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: labor and your time spent and your expertise, and and
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: how necessary what you're doing is, and how hard it
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: is to get somebody else to do it and so on,
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: so that you can diversify your ability to get things
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 1: and get services from other people, so that you don't
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 1: have to do everything yourself for yourself, and you actually
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: have downtime, which is something that you know, the Neolithic
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: subsistence farmers did not have downtime. Okay, they worked all
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 1: day and they slept all night, and they got up
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: the next day and they worked all day again, very
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: little downtime. You get to read a book. If books
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: had existed, they didn't, they wouldn't wouldn't have had to
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: You get to go. You could. You could be an
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: entertainer for a living if you're good at it. And
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: very very few people can say that. But fewer can
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: say that in an environment where people have to do
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: everything for themselves and nobody has time for entertainment.
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 6: We were starting to dread a certain future when people
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 6: rely on AI for their information. But once upon a time,
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 6: nobody had books and they relied entirely on oral information.
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 6: They just talked to each other like they didn't have
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 6: to remember all these graphic symbols on these pieces of
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 6: pulped wood, and they were really really good at talking
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 6: to each other because that was the only kind of
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 6: communication they had.
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: Had.
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 6: People often assumed that people in the past were really stupid,
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 6: but in all likelihood they were extremely orally efficient. Now
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 6: that sounds like an innuendo, but it's not. I mean,
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 6: they were, they were, They were. They were probably much
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 6: better at talking than we are.
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: Because besides begin in your endo, uh yeah, well, and
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: and then that is the point, like you would be
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 1: better at the things that you had to do. It's
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: just that you would only have time for the things
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: that you had to do. Now we have time for
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: things we want to do, right, Yeah, and and yeah,
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: Richard Bierre says, it's probably gilded porcelain. I hope so, okay,
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 1: because can you imagine how much that sucker would weigh.
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: Imagine being the being the guy that has to, uh,
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: you know, handle the transfer of that from from uh,
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: you know, the manufacturing system to the truck. You handle
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: the forklift like you got to hope that it doesn't
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: counterbalance the forklift. Gold is heavy, It's incredibly heavy. But
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: but yeah, so I mean, this is this is why
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: you should be suspicious of the elites, right they tell
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: you it's immoral and your being taken advantage of when
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: you engage in a system that actually creates luxury for you.
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: And in this country, in my country, and in Laurence country,
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: we can have simultaneous designation of poverty where we're we're
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: labeled poor by our government and by the rest of
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: society and have not only enough clothing to wear, enough
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: food to eat, a roof over your head, shoes. Where
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 1: there are places in the world where if your poor
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: shoes are not a thing in your home. You don't
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 1: have shoes if you don't make them yourself. Right, But
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 1: you can have a car and be considered poor. You
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: can have an entertainment system your house, a television, a
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 1: video game system, and be considered poor be eligible for
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: public assistance. You can have pets animals living with you
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: that you're not going to eat and that don't do
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: any work and be considered poor. You could pay for
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 1: their food and afford your own food and buy drugs
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: or cigarettes which are technically drugs. Coffee is a drug alcohol.
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: You can have money for those things and still be
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: considered poor. You can have a heat in your house
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: from a utility system, you don't have to burn stuff
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: to eat your house, and be still be considered poor.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: Right in our first world nation, our line for poverty
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: is so much higher because we have that placeholder and
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: a system designed around using that placeholder instead of straight
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 1: up trade or doing everything yourself. But yet you're being
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: told that the existence of that the fact that it
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: gets used to pay for your labor, and that an
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 1: investor can make money off of the money that they've
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: invested without adding labor to it because they have purchased
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 1: so much labor and so on that that's somehow immoral,
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: when it is that system that has raised the overall
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: economy by putting money back into the economy and creating
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: more ways that different people can use their labor, their expertise,
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: their skills, their talents, their intelligence, their wisdom, their creativity,
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: their their character to gain placeholder without being limited to
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: a small set of of of of methods for obtaining it.
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: And then they can they can choose from a broad
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: variety of ways to spend that placeholder to get conditions, services, items,
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: and so on that they want in their lives. It's
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: it's you're a victim of that, guys. You're a victim
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: of that luxury, that plentiful situation. You're a victim of
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: being part of a nation so wealthy that you can live,
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: you can have living conditions that would be considered wealthy
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: in poor countries and be considered poor in this country.
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: Just think about that. That's I mean to be told that,
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: and to be told that you would be better off
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: if the entire country were stripped of that system, so
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: that it was like the third world country where poverty
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: means not having enough to eat, not having shoes, not
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: having a roof over your head, not having heat, not
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: having a cool environment to go into in the summertime,
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: like air conditioning. First world problems. Really poor countries, yeah,
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: Richard be Air points out, really poor has no toilets
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: in a country, a third world country that doesn't have
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: indoor plumbing. People think you're poor now if you don't
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: have an internet connection in your home, or if the
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: internet connections in your area are not incredibly reliable, if
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: you don't have five g I remember when you used
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: to be poor, if you were still in a party line.
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 6: When you were poor, when you didn't have satellite television.
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep, yep. I remember when you were poor, if
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: you didn't have a second car. You can be now
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: poor people have multiple junk cars in their yard. But yeah,
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: so this is my point here is these people lie
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: to you about the most fundamental things. They tell you
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: that you are a victim of things that you benefit from,
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 1: and that they want to rescue you from those things
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: so that you can benefit from what real poverty is
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: like in third world countries, because that would be better
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 1: for you. Meredith g gave us five dollars, is said HBr
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: talk three eighty two. Honey for the Badgers, The BS
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: about democratic reform is like declaration of sentiment. Congressional leadership
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: already control campaign funding to the point where that when
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: a favor candidate loses a primary, the party will literally
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 1: demand the winner, fire all the people who help the
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: winner get through the primary, and hire the consultants that
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: will cause them to lose in general. The more you know, well,
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: or they do what the Democrats did when they wanted
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: Hillary run and or or was it Biden and Bernie
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: Sanders actually won the primary and they put their candidate
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: in instead. Anyway, they like, no, we don't want Bernie Sanders.
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 1: We want because Bernie is more openly socialistic, whereas Biden
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: and Hillary tried to at least be semi covert in
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: their socialism. They were the same. All three of those
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: candidates were the same. Kamala Harris was the same. They
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: all have the same goals. Bernie doesn't know how to
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: shut up about them, he says the quiet part out loud.
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: Last independent thinker says, I grew up in a town
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: or with no town water, only tank water, and what
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: was trucked in no hot water, and we still had
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: those wind up phones that went to the exchange. Yeah,
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: the ones you see in the old movies where they
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: have to crank it to make it work. My dad's
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: house when he was young, had something called a cistern.
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: Not to be confused with brethren, they are not the same.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: A cistern is a big tank like what last independent
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: was talking about, and it catches rain water and you
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: use it for gray water. So you wash dishes with it,
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: you wash your clothes with it. You might even shower
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: with it. They did, and you know it comes through
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: if you don't have a means of heating it. It's cold,
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: you get a cold shower, you get you wash your
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: clothes and cold water. You wash your dishes in cold water.
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: And your your cleaning method is your soap, which a
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: lot of times was lie soap, so it's a lot
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: more harsh than the soap that you're using today. And
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: I had friends growing up that they bought water for
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: drinking because they're on their farms. All they had was
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: well water. If something happens to your well, you're fucked.
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: If you want, you know, to do laundry, you haul
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: up some well water. If you, you know, and they
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: some of them had cisterns so that they could catch
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: rain water for stuff like that. And if it didn't
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: rain for a long time you didn't have water and sistern,
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: you couldn't use it. You know, you had to you
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: had to haul up water from the well or you
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: had to buy water. You had to have it trucked in.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: You know, there are places that didn't have Like in
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 1: the city and in towns, you have gas lines so
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 1: you can get natural gas pipe to your house if
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: you want to run your furnace and your your water
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: heater and stuff like that. But out in the country
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 1: that wasn't necessarily the case until those systems were built.
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: There's there's probably still people that that don't have gas lines.
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: The apartment I live in, we don't have gas. Everything's
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: electric and uh. On one side, if the power goes out,
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: that means you have no heat. But on the other side,
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: your house doesn't blow up because they haven't been reading
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: the meter for six months and they don't know there's
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: a leak. You can't get a basement full of carbon
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: monoxide and and and a spark goes off in the
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: whole place. There have been multiple house explosions in Ohio
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: from that, and almost every single time you find out
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: they have, the gas company hasn't been reading the meter,
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: and if they had been, they would have known there
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: was a leak. But in a couple of those instances,
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: the individual owner of the home had interfered with the
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: way that the the gas comes in to try to
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: bypass the meter. So it's not every single instance, right,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: And yeah, out in the country, there's a lot of
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: pro paine. People might have a great big tank on
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: their farm and truck comes by and they subscribe essentially
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: to it. So yeah, there's a lot of people that
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 1: grew up without some of the privileges that were used
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: to like. But you can choose to move to city,
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: you can choose to live on a farm, and we
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: have the luxury in this country of moving around and
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: nobody's going to stop us. They are parts of the
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: city that you don't want to live if you're the
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: wrong color. We do have that war going on, and
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: a lot of that is manufactured by these same people.
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: But there isn't some law that says that if you
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: grew up on a farm in Nebraska that you can't
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: move to Omaha and you live with all the luxuries
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: you want that are available in a city, and there's
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: no law that says that if you grew up in
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: the middle of the city and you had all those luxuries,
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: you can't give them up and go off grid out
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: the country either yet, but they're working on that part.
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: So what do they want to do. They want to
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: change your House of Representatives. So we just talked a
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: little bit about ago about how important it is that
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: they have that balance, that the individual voters. Representatives can't
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: just run roughshod over the states and the different local
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: cultures by imposing urban culture on the entire rural majority
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: of the country. And most of if you look at
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: the map of the United States and you look at
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: where the urban centers are versus where the rural population lives,
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: the overwhelming majority of the land is rural, not urban.
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: And there are a lot of things that can be
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: done at the local level in urban centers and can
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: be done the urban way without imposing the urban way
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: on farmers and small towns and villages and so on.
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: But what they want to do is increase the size
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: of the House of Representatives. And they look they claim
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: that it's because the population has grown, but the fact
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: is it's uh, it's grown, you know, slowly over time,
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: and they're wanting to make it sudden and they're not
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: going they're not wanting to balance that out with any
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: evolution to to ensure equal opportunity for the states. So
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: they're going to give a history of how the population
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: has expanded and the number of people per representative has grown.
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: But at the same time, what they're omitting is the
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: fact that the reason that the representatives haven't grown is
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: because they're trying to keep the debate possible. You can
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: have a debate in a room full of a few
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: dozen people, a couple hundred people even, but you know,
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: if you triple the size of the House of Representatives,
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: it becomes harder and harder to debate, harder and harder
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 1: for them to interact with each other and make decisions
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: and come to agreements and so on, and you do
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: end up in is such where the proportion ends up
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: being like it was during that teacher union fight. So
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: what they're essentially trying to do is give the urban
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: populations the ability to override the rural populations in the
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: House of Representatives. Then the other thing that I wanted
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: to make sure that we talked about tonight is ranked
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: choice voting, which they want to do this. They want
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: to make this how the president is elected, how how
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: the House and Senate are elected, how your governor and
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: your state House and your state Senate are elected. They
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: want all those positions to be elected by ranked choice votings. Right,
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: So for people who don't know what that is, let's
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: let's see. I actually looked this up. It looks like
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: I close the tab. Okay, So essentially rank choice voting.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: What they do is, let's say you have six candidates
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: running for a political office, and then they'll say, all right,
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: you have the Democrats, the Republicans, the Green Party, the
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: Communist Party, which those are two versions of the same party,
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: which is the same as the Democrat Party. Everybody, it's
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: not Republican, it's pretty much communists. But you have you
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: have six different parties, you know, in any election, and annually,
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: maybe forty some percent of the vote goes to the
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: favored party and thirty to forty percent of the vote
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: vote goes to the second choice, and the arrest is
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: divided by the other four candidates. And that happens almost
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: every year in the presidential elections, whereas in the smaller
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: elections you might see other parties. The Independent Party sometimes
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: get somebody in. Once in a blue moon you get
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: a communist or a Green Party person elected, and so on.
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 1: But imagine if you went to the poll and instead
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: of you voting for one person for president, you had
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: to state your top three choices, your first choice, your
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: second choice, your third choice, and the race is between
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: you know, somebody whose ideals fit yours perfectly, and five
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 1: people whose ideals have complete polar opposition to yours. Who's
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: your second choice? Who is your second choice in that situation?
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 1: And why is that important? Because in that election, then
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: when they go to count the votes, what they're going
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: to do is, if your first choice isn't the top choice,
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: it's the bottom choice, the bottom choice gets dumped. That
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: choice doesn't count. So now, maybe you voted for the
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: Green Party for whatever reason, right, your top choice just
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 1: got dumped. What's your second choice? Maybe you voted second
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 1: for the popular candidate, or maybe you voted second for
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: the candidate that got second place in a popular vote.
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: That candidate now gets your vote. They redistribute your vote
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: to that candidate because your candidate was guaranteed to lose.
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: That makes sense. And then so in that process, it's
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: possible for enough people, like if you have this top
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: six and maybe the bottom three all end up getting
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 1: getting eliminated because almost nobody voted for them. All those
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: votes get redistributed, and maybe that bottom three all liked
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 1: the second place candidate. If the race is close, that
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: can push the second place candidate to the first place,
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: and that person can win even though in the popular
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: vote the other person was the first choice of most people.
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 1: Then the other thing is if you know your ballot,
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: if you all you vote for is your favorite candidate
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: and you don't have a second choice, or your second
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: and your third choices all got eliminated, your ballot just
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 1: isn't counted. All nobody hears how many people voted for
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: your candidate. So there's been some criticisms of this, one
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 1: of which is that it can result in a lot
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: of people's votes just getting dumped. So for instance, that
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: like the spoiler effect happened. I want to say there
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 1: have been a couple of places where it's been a problem.
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: There you go, New York twenty twenty one Democratic mayoral primary,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: nearly fifteen percent of ballots, about one hundred and forty
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: thousand were eliminated, were exhausted, exhausted. In Mainz twenty eighteen
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: congressional race, eight thousand were discarded. One San Francisco race,
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: more ballots were discarded than counted. Literally, they threw out
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: more votes than they counted. So what does that do?
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: It gives the establishment control over who gets elected. Essentially,
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: it creates it.
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 2: As if they didn't already have it.
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it it opens a pathway for them to cheat.
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: In Alaska's twenty two twenty twenty two special election, Republican
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: candidates received sixty percent of first round votes, yet a
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: Democrat one after redistribution. So this isn't a more accurate
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 1: way of voting. It isn't a better way of letting
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: the people decide who is going to be their leader.
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: What it is is a way for the elite to
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 1: disguise vote manipulation. It provides cover for vote manipulation. The
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: complexity of the system makes audits damn near impossible, creates
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 1: the risk that they can hide vote manipulation undetected errors,
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: like in an Oklahoma school board election, a programming error
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: totally just a mistake guys led to the wrong candidate
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 1: being declared the winner. It doesn't eliminate the spoiler effect,
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 1: may even exacerbate it, right make it worse. Where voters
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: rank a less perverse preferred but more viable candidate hire
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: to avoid helping their least favored candidate win. So they
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: like you say, you you're looking at Trump versus Hillary
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 1: and five other candidates. You might make one of those
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: other candidates a higher rank because you think Trump or
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: Hillary is the most evil person in the world. Whichever
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: one you hate, you know, is the most evil person
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 1: in the world, and you just cannot abide the idea
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: that they might win Hillary.
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 8: Yeah, all right, just I'm chasting my vote now.
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I see, I vote no on this. I think
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 1: we shouldn't do this. Well no, yeah, But so five
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 1: states have made this type of system actually illegal out
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: of the fifty, ten percent of the states has already
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: outlawed this, citing multiple concerns that there's quite a bit
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 1: of leeway for error and manipulation in this. This is
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: one of the things that they want to do. They
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: want to make sure that you have the least possible
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 1: opportunity of evaluating whether or not the election was run fairly,
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 1: because you know, the last eight years, what we discovered
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: was when the election is run fairly, the people's choice
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: turns out to be different than the establishment's choice. And
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: when the establishment manipulates the election to cure that problem,
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 1: to heal the system so that they get their choice
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: in their minds, they're fixing democracy. People get upset because
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 1: they can tell that their say was overridden and and
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: they they act up, they protest, and you can't have that.
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 1: You can't have people getting mad that you told them
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: you were going to listen to them and then you didn't.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: So you have to hide the fact that you're not listening,
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: and you have to not listen more sneakily, Yes, this one.
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 1: This one's a little sneaky too. So essentially, if you're
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 1: in a more densely populated area, they want extra members,
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: whereas there are some districts that get a member even
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: though their population isn't big enough, which with the idea
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 1: being that there shouldn't be people who just aren't represented
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: at all, and there also shouldn't be population density shouldn't
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: give one small area a significant amount of control over
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 1: what happens in the rest of the country, because you
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: end up with a situation where the people of some
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: section of a city get to vote that the people
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 1: of some other state have to give up income from,
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 1: say the oil that's under their state to fund free
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: housing for the people of that city. We just want
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 1: a profiteer off of these people's labor. We're going to
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: vote for that, and they shouldn't be able to override
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: us because there's more of us than there are of them.
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: Amend or repeal and replace the nineteen sixties having the
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: law that mandates single member districts for the House, So yeah,
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 1: what they want multiple member districts. Yeah, support adoption through
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: state legislation of independent citizen redistricting commissions in all fifty states.
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: So essentially what they want there, And this is something
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: that's been talked about in Texas recently too. Right now
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: there's a process for gerrymandering that allows the parties their
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 1: say through a system that gives the government input. What
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 1: they want to do is take citizens claim to be
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 1: independent and put them in charge. So you know, we'll
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 1: take your word for it that you're not biased toward
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 1: Republican or Democrat, or perhaps we'll take five Republicans and
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 1: five Democrats and five people who are not affiliated with
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: either party. But notice there's like six different prominent political
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: parties in the country. Where's the other representation? So it's
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: just not really changing anything. It's just taking it from
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 1: the existing model to a new gerrymandering model that there's
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 1: less oversight and quite a bit more ability to hide
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 1: one's biases in this time, they're going to provide federal
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: funding for these processes. Instead of allowing, say you to
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: elect people to do it, They're just going to appoint people.
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 1: And guess who gets to appoint them? By the way,
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: do you think do you think maybe the public gets
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 1: to elect those people?
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 3: No?
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 2: Of course not, of course not my god.
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Amend the Constitution to authorize the regulation of election
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 1: contributions and spending, to eliminate undue influence of money in
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: our political system, and to protect the rights of all
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 1: Americans to free speech, political participation, and meaningful representation in government.
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: Sounds good again when they say it, right, but what
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 1: they're talking about. I believe the bill was McCain, feineld
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: or Einstein. I think it was Feinstein, Diane Feinstein and
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 1: John McCain introduced this bill that limited individual contributions and
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 1: limited group contributions. So it was intended, according to them,
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: to keep Bill Gates from buying an election by just
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 1: funneling a bunch of money into a candidate's It was fine,
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 1: gold I was wrong, okay, but to h to keep
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: you know, like somebody like Bill Gates from just funneling
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: a bunch of money into somebody's campaign, right.
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 2: Or George Soros?
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: Soros? Right?
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 2: They know, Actually this is just so fucking backwards.
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 8: What it does is give them or or allow them
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 8: to find different ways to actually do the thing that
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 8: they say that they're not supposed to do.
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: You know, yep, it's it's just unbelievable.
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 8: And nobody bats an eye when the people like George
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 8: Soros will do something like this.
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 2: But we sent Denish Dasuza went to jail for what
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 2: was it?
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 8: It was some stupid amount like like some not a
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 8: huge amount of money that he donated and he went
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 8: to jail, you know, and and listen, listen, If the
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 8: laws are the laws, I'm fine with that being the law.
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 2: However, when they just look.
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 8: The other way when the other side does it, it.
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 2: Just it drives me insane.
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: I like when Rosie O'donnald did it? Yes, yeah, because
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 1: every time she got nervous, she voted to or she
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: donated to the Democrat Party some like. But the reality
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 1: is that there are different ways that people do this. Right,
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: So you have rich guys like Bill Gates or George
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: Soros or any other rich guy. Donald Trump might donate
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: to a candidate. Okay, they're donating, but some farm co
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: op in Ohio can all get together as a group,
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: raise money and donate. You're if you're in a workplace
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: that has a union, your union donates. It takes In fact,
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: they donate from the money that you pay as dues,
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: and even if you opt out, you know they the
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: way they handle that is more of your money goes
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: to pay for operations, and they cut the amount of
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: money that other people are paying for operations, and they
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: still send the candidate the same amount of money. So
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: they just say which money is going where? And technically,
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: on paper, they haven't taken your money out of your
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: pocket and donated to a candidate that's going to vote
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 1: against your interests. But in reality they have right. And
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 1: so when they talk about campaign finance and they focus
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 1: on individual donors. What they are essentially doing is preventing
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: people who have the ability to increase their income and
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: work together as donors from counteracting union donations and other
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: big organizational donations. But if they focus on those big
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: organizational donations donations, then they also go after the farming
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 1: co ops and so on. If they stayed out of it,
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: and all they do is say, all right, you have
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: to disclose whose donations paid for what and how much
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: you accepted from whom, and and leave it at that,
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: and you have to make it public. So say, ninety
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: percent of Candidate a's campaign money has come from George Soros,
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 1: and ninety percent of Candidate b's campaign money came from
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 1: the a f L c IO. You know, ninety percent
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: of candidate ces money came from individual donors donating their
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: drops in a bucket until they filled the bucket. You know,
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 1: it gives you an idea as a voter what the
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: candidate's financially motivated biases are. Who's who are they beholden to?
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: And uh, you know, if you if you're going to
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 1: pick somebody and you feel like, you know, if your
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: only two choices are George Soros versus a FL Cio.
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: You know, like, all right, I'm voting for the Union
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: in that one, and I'm like Soros, I don't trust him.
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: I know what he's thinking, and I don't want that. Right,
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 1: the union's a lesser of two evils. But if you
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 1: have big organization like a union, rich guy, and the
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 1: general public, you know, then I'm thinking, you know, maybe
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 1: the guy who's going to be biased more toward the
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 1: general public is my guy, and so that that would
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 1: influence people's vote. But instead, what they want is to
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: control the candidate's ability to buy advertising by saying, well, well,
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: you know you can't donate. You can't. You can't give
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 1: this candidate money, even if everybody knows you did it,
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: even if even if it's going to be a public thing,
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: you still can't do it. You don't get to have
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: yours say you can't support putting signs in people's yards
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: and buying thirty second spaces on advertising platforms, so that
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: the candidate can say, this is what I'm going to
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: do when I get into office. So what happens Soros
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: doesn't suffer. What can he do? He can create a
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: website or a whole bunch of websites, whole bunch of
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: little sub organizations, and those organizations can then give money
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: to other organizations, and those organizations can arrange riots in
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 1: cities all over the country in protests of the candidate
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: he doesn't like.
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 2: Exactly how this pile of bricks get here? Oh my god. Yeah,
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 2: it's just unbelievable, you know.
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 1: And because there's no receipt tracing that pile of bricks
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: directly to George Sorows, he has plausible deniability. No, No,
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 1: this is the people expressing their opinion. Nobody paid these protesters.
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: It's what they really think. A lot of people hate
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 1: Trump and they're very angry that he won. Yeah, how
• 1:41:36
  Speaker 1: the fuck did he win? Then? Right, why didn't they
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 1: vote against him? No, we have to to make sure
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: that Americans cannot participate in the political system by putting
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 1: their money where their mouth is. Yep. George Torros can
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 1: also fund organizations that fund organizations that then pay people
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 1: to go all over Ohio and get signatures on petitions
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 1: to put abortion into our constitution and then hold an
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 1: election after getting it changed so that they barely need
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 1: a majority to make it a constitutional amendment that abortion
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 1: must always be legal in Ohio. Which he did, and
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: they did and they won, and it is now a
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 1: constitutional amendment in Ohio that abortion will always be legal here.
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 1: Ohio will not prosecute abortion clinics or their owners, or
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 1: their clinicians or anybody involved for providing abortion. Even if
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: there's in the future of fal law that outlaws it,
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 1: the Feds would have to go after those people because
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 1: Ohio can't. Even if there's something that happens in the
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 1: future where they conclusively prove find a way to communicate
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 1: with fetuses in gestation and conclusively prove that the abortion
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: advocates are lying about how the brain develops in gestation,
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 1: Ohio still can't do anything about it because it's in
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: our constitution. So yeah, we can. We have less power
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 1: under the laws that these people want to support candidates directly,
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 1: but rich people can still manipulate our political system. They
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 1: just do it without direct support. What else they want
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 1: to do? Campaign finance to disclosure laws? All right, So
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 1: that I am for campaign finance disclosure laws. The one thing,
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 1: the one caveat is that they should have it should
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 1: be a higher penalty if you're caught attacking someone for
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 1: donating to a campaign. Then if you just burglarize them
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: on the street. Because you're you're violating two things. You're
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: violating that individual's right, and you're also violating the American
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 1: principle of free elections. So you're engaging in election interference.
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 1: If you're caught trying to intimidate voters by using any
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 1: type type of like violence, threat to their employment status,
• 1:45:04
  Speaker 1: any type of public shaming. Oh, this person supported this candidate,
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 1: We're going to publish it in the local newspaper and
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 1: embarrass them. We're going to shame them for it. We're
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 1: going to pressure their employer to fire them, pressure their
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 1: school to kick them out, pressure whatever socially isolate them,
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: you know, any such thing. Any measures you take to
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 1: punish someone for supporting a candidate should be punishable under
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: the law. Like yep, yep. They can't hide the fact
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 1: that they did it. Nope, you can't punish them for
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 1: it because it's supposed to be a free and fair election.
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: You don't have to agree with them, but you're not
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 1: allowed to take away their right to do that.
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree with that.
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 1: We should all know that's but they won't do that.
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: They'll they'll pass those disclosure laws, but then they'll turn
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 1: around and say, well, you know, free speech has consequences.
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 1: If you donate to Donald Trump and somebody comes to
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 1: your house and burns it down, that's just a consequence. Yeah,
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 1: maybe you shouldn't have donated.
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 2: Upside down situation we are in right now.
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 1: There's another thing too. Fred's part of the retail union.
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 1: I can't remember what it's called. Fred works at, I
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 1: don't know CVS, And CVS is a unionized company. So
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: the union that that Fred has to pay membership dues to,
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 1: that union supports the Democrat candidate. And Fred's name gets
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 1: attacked to that. But Fred is a registered Republican, been
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: a registered Republican all his life, votes Republican, and personally
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: wants to donate money to a Republican candidate. Does he
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 1: face on the job discrimination when that comes out? Does
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 1: the state try to stop him because he's already donated
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: to a Democrat? You know, how does that work? So,
• 1:47:27
  Speaker 1: like these laws need to be they need to have
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: a level of complexity that prevents penalizing citizens who are
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 1: participating in the process, and that stops the state and
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 1: the unions and any other organizational donors like besides the unions,
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 1: because They're not the only ones. Any other authoritative controllers
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 1: of the lives of people, like whether or not you
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 1: have access to a job, whether or not you have
• 1:48:03
  Speaker 1: access to a school, whether or not you have access
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 1: to public services, and so on, from applying penalties because
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 1: you donated, or forcing you to donate against your will,
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: or any other such behavior, preventing you from donating to
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 1: who you want to donate to because the organization that
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 1: you're part of donated against your interests. Imagine that needs
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 1: to be part of it.
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 8: Imagine if they did anything like this with donating to
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 8: like churches, right, the people would be in an uproar,
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 8: an absolute fucking uproar.
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 1: You bet you.
• 1:48:45
  Speaker 8: It's just it's amazing that these people are even have
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 8: the audacity to.
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 2: Say that this is something that they want to implement.
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 8: I mean, I wish more people paid attention to politics,
• 1:49:03
  Speaker 8: because then they would realize this.
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 2: For what it is and shut it down. You know,
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 2: that is ridiculous.
• 1:49:13
  Speaker 8: You do not I go to work forty hours a week,
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 8: I earn my money. You do not get to tell
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 8: me where I can and cannot spend that money. You know,
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 8: and if I want to donate to a certain campaign.
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 8: Then number one, it's none of your business, you know.
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 8: Number two, it should have no bearing on my employment
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 8: or anything anything.
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 2: It shouldn't.
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 8: It shouldn't, you know, negate me from society because you
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 8: don't like where I put my money towards.
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 6: You know.
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 8: It's just it's mind blowing. It's mind blowing that more
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 8: people are not paying attention to this and it is
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 8: and saying something about it, you know, and and pushing
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 8: back against this because it's it's it's ridiculous. I say
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 8: ridiculous all the time. It's disgusting. I say disgusting all
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 8: the time. But it is all of those things.
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 1: It is, it really is. So what we what we've
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 1: seen here so far. They want to control the elected
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: bodies that decide the laws, right uh. They want to
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: make it so that they can they can stack the uh,
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 1: the House of Representatives in their favor and in the
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: favor of urban areas, places where they can more easily
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 1: control the school systems, more easily create a level of uh,
• 1:50:53
  Speaker 1: lack of information among the voters, and and so on.
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: Not that all urban voters are ignorant. You just have
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 1: to work harder to overcome what what government controlled information
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: systems are doing to you. It puts, it takes effort.
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 1: It takes more effort two not be ignorant in the
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 1: city than it does to not be ignorant in the country.
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 1: You would think the opposite would be true, right, Uh,
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 1: based just based on per capita access to local libraries
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 1: from walking distance from your home. But that's not the case,
• 1:51:36
  Speaker 1: you know. So they want to control that. They want
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: to control funding and which directly controls communications from from
• 1:51:50
  Speaker 1: your your representatives. They want to control how you vote,
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 1: like the method by which you vote and and therefore
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 1: make it more easily controllable what the outcome of the
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 1: election is. They want to insist on controlling how you
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: support your candidates. And now they're talking about passing clean
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 1: quote clean election laws for federal, state local elections through
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 1: mechanisms such as public matching donation systems and democracy vouchers,
• 1:52:28
  Speaker 1: which amplify the power of small donors. So if their
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 1: candidate isn't getting the money in support that they think
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 1: their candidate should have, they want to use the tax
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 1: dollars of people who donated to their opponents to give
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 1: them equal communication power. God, So let's.
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 2: Say, how is this democracy again?
• 1:52:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah? Let's say you have a candidate like Trump, with
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 1: the popularity of Elvis, but who isn't necessarily as polarizing
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 1: as as Trump. And it's it's not that Trump himself
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 1: is polarizing. It is that the media's attitude toward him
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 1: has been. But let's say, let's say that doesn't happen,
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: that that the media fails at polarizing the country in
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: regard to this candidate. This is this is the Elvis
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 1: of candidates, the Michael Jackson of candidates, right, and and
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 1: so this individual gets a huge amount of campaign donations
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 1: from individual voters, all donating the max that they can afford,
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 1: and within the law that they're allowed. Organizations that would
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 1: normally donate to the establishment candidate, they donate to this
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 1: can because the candidate speaks to their interests and so on.
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 1: And the candidate has a significant war chest as a result,
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 1: and the other candidate can't build a war chest because
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 1: nobody likes him and nobody wants to donate any money
• 1:54:17
  Speaker 1: to him. All the people who donated already, they've already
• 1:54:21
  Speaker 1: given money to the candidate they support. Along comes on
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 1: Uncle Sam and says, whoa WHOA, wait a minute, Well,
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 1: I've got money that you gave me, and I'm going
• 1:54:31
  Speaker 1: to counteract your donations by giving some of your money
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: that you gave me, you know, gave as in I
• 1:54:40
  Speaker 1: came to you and said, if you don't give me
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 1: this money, I'm going to pull out a gun and
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: shoot you with it gave me. I'm gonna give it
• 1:54:49
  Speaker 1: to the candidate you don't like and didn't donate to.
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: Is that in the interest of the voters.
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 2: Of course not, well, not.
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 8: The voters who would vote for their candidates.
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 3: Is just.
• 1:55:10
  Speaker 2: My god.
• 1:55:15
  Speaker 1: If we're going to override this candidate's popularity by taking
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 1: skimming off the top of what we have told people,
• 1:55:23
  Speaker 1: we're going to spend building roads for them, JESU pize
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: democracy vouchers. Citizens receive campaign donation vouchers that they can
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: give to their preferred candidate and be redeemed as cash.
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 1: So at least that one. You know, they're pretending that
• 1:55:44
  Speaker 1: they're putting control over it in the hands of the people, right,
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 1: except why can't you donate your own money?
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 1:55:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So again, it's it's giving people the ability to
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 1: override the donations of other people. We're gonna just take
• 1:56:06
  Speaker 1: their money, give it to you and then you can
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 1: donate it to who you want. Or they want the
• 1:56:14
  Speaker 1: government to just fully control financing of campaigns, so no
• 1:56:19
  Speaker 1: campaign donations from the public. Both candidates get an equal
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: war chest from the taxpayers, and it doesn't matter if
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 1: one of them is lying, because there's no truth in
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: advertising laws for campaigns, So if your candidate falsely advertises something,
• 1:56:41
  Speaker 1: there's no you don't have any recourse as a consumer,
• 1:56:44
  Speaker 1: as a voter.
• 1:56:51
  Speaker 2: So much democracy, it's wonderful. And this is why we
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 2: don't fucking live in a democracy. We live in a republic.
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, god, now.
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 8: Why can't they Well, it's not why they can't understand this.
• 1:57:06
  Speaker 2: They do understand this.
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 8: They just want to circumvent the rules to get their
• 1:57:15
  Speaker 8: people in.
• 1:57:18
  Speaker 1: Oh my god. Then we want what were they gonna
• 1:57:23
  Speaker 1: do term limits for Supreme Court justices? Why not because
• 1:57:30
  Speaker 1: they're doing a bad job in their old age, not
• 1:57:33
  Speaker 1: because they become outdated, right, the Constitution is not something
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 1: that gets outdated, but because they want they don't want
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 1: a situation where when president gets to appoint multiple judges,
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 1: even though there are checks and balances on how that
• 1:57:50
  Speaker 1: appointment takes place. They don't want a situation where a
• 1:57:55
  Speaker 1: judge they don't like is in there for a lifetime
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 1: they don't want. Uh. Essentially, the people's choices of who
• 1:58:10
  Speaker 1: you know, gets in there by based on who they
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 1: choose to potentially appoint. Like when we voted for Trump,
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 1: we all knew that there was this possibility that he
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 1: might be appointing multiple judges. That wasn't a mystery, Like,
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 1: it wasn't shocked and a surprise. In fact, many of
• 1:58:29
  Speaker 1: us were hoping for it.
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 8: I mean, but meanwhile, Joe Biden gets to sit in
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 8: Congress for.
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 2: Half a century. This has been but oh no, no, no, no.
• 1:58:43
  Speaker 8: It's the judges, the people who actually study the laws
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 8: of this country and know what the hell they're talking
• 1:58:50
  Speaker 8: about and have to pass convolution. Yeah, yeah, no, no, no,
• 1:58:55
  Speaker 8: they can't be around because some of them might, you know,
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 8: rule in a.
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 2: Way that I don't like it.
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 1: Come on on, you know, I think should have term limits.
• 1:59:08
  Speaker 1: Who bureaucrats in the government.
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 6: Does Mitch mccuttal still have a job? Miss much mcuttal
• 1:59:15
  Speaker 6: is still employed in the federal government?
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 2: Is he still alive?
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: There's two types of term limits I'd introduced. One of
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: them is if you are a bureaucrat in a government
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 1: department or agency or office. You get a limited number
• 1:59:34
  Speaker 1: of years and then you you have to go back
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 1: to the public sector, the private sector whatever. That's the
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 1: first one. The second one is if you've served out
• 1:59:45
  Speaker 1: your full term as a as a bureaucrat, you cannot then,
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 1: you know, become run for office and become congressman or
• 2:00:01
  Speaker 1: senator or president or anything like that until there's been
• 2:00:06
  Speaker 1: a period of time in between your government service and
• 2:00:11
  Speaker 1: your time in office, and you can't go from being
• 2:00:16
  Speaker 1: the CEO of Pfizer or some other high ranking official
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 1: at Pfizer and then become a bureaucrat at the Food
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 1: and Drug Administration.
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 8: Oh my god, this swap is unbelievable, the amount of
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 8: times these people just change positions from one company to
• 2:00:38
  Speaker 8: another and then into the government.
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 6: Yep, how long was that was Nazi wants a face
• 2:00:49
  Speaker 6: that's supplus in the government. It was something like fifty years,
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 6: wasn't it. Fucking John Kennedy days. Imagine if she had
• 2:00:58
  Speaker 6: term limits, if she to fuck off after eight years,
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 6: imagine how much bullshit you wouldn't have had to go
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 6: had to had to go through.
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 1: Although at least she had to run for office at least,
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 1: which like the head of the Food and Drug Administration doesn't. Yeah,
• 2:01:18
  Speaker 1: and it's not just that the people in various offices
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 1: within the Food and Drug Administration that control how your
• 2:01:27
  Speaker 1: business operates in relation to the government, what rules apply,
• 2:01:33
  Speaker 1: what rules are enforced, and so on, they don't have
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: to They don't have to run for office. Nobody votes
• 2:01:39
  Speaker 1: for them.
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 2: Mhm.
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: Right there. The public doesn't even get told how they're
• 2:01:44
  Speaker 1: doing their jobs. And it that goes all the way
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 1: down to local bureaucracy. By the way, there was a
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 1: company that I worked for that started having a kitchen
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 1: and uh so some food assembly service. Essentially I used
• 2:02:04
  Speaker 1: a turbo chef oven, which is a glorified microwave oven
• 2:02:08
  Speaker 1: that also has conventional oven heat. It's got a five
• 2:02:13
  Speaker 1: hundred gree temperature and it also has convection heat, which
• 2:02:16
  Speaker 1: means the heat is moved using air currents inside to
• 2:02:21
  Speaker 1: ensure that it'll be be balanced throughout the inside of
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 1: the and then microwaves are also used to speed up
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 1: the heating process. And all you do is you put
• 2:02:36
  Speaker 1: the filling of a sandwich, whatever type of meat you're
• 2:02:39
  Speaker 1: putting in, whether it's cheeseburgers, like the burger patties for cheeseburgers,
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: or the chicken patties for chicken sandwiches and stuff like that,
• 2:02:48
  Speaker 1: or pizzas or whatever you're cooking in there. You put
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 1: those in there for a short amount of time, and
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 1: you have pre programmed buttons to push, so it's not
• 2:02:57
  Speaker 1: real cooking. This button says pizza. You hit pizza, and
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 1: you hit how many are in there, and and it
• 2:03:05
  Speaker 1: does it automatically or as my husband likes to say, automagic,
• 2:03:11
  Speaker 1: and and then you pull them out and you have assembled.
• 2:03:14
  Speaker 1: You have to put the sandwich together, or you have
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 1: to put the pizza in the pizza box. It's really
• 2:03:21
  Speaker 1: you know, you a gas station employee can do this.
• 2:03:25
  Speaker 1: You don't have to be a chef. So it wasn't
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 1: anything fancy, right, but it still has to be clean
• 2:03:30
  Speaker 1: because even if you're irradiating the food, even if it's
• 2:03:35
  Speaker 1: being cooked in a five hundred degree environment, even if
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: it was already cooked once and you're cooking it a
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 1: second time, there is still ample opportunity for you to
• 2:03:45
  Speaker 1: introduce salmonella poisoning, listeria, botulism, all manner of nasty ass
• 2:03:50
  Speaker 1: things that you know nobody wants in their in their body,
• 2:03:54
  Speaker 1: and to avoid that, you have standards and practices that
• 2:04:00
  Speaker 1: that are known standards and practices to follow in order
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 1: to prevent bacteria from being introduced into the food and
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 1: bacteria from surviving on the food. It's the food poisoning
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: is kind of a numbers game. You just want to
• 2:04:17
  Speaker 1: make sure that there's not enough on there alive that
• 2:04:21
  Speaker 1: your body can't overcome it with your body's defenses. But
• 2:04:27
  Speaker 1: there's a lot that goes into They have figured out
• 2:04:32
  Speaker 1: a lot about how to prevent bacteria from getting into
• 2:04:35
  Speaker 1: your food. For instance, hand washing, just like in medicine,
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 1: and they have some very interesting stipulations like when you
• 2:04:46
  Speaker 1: wash your hands, you walk over to the sink, your
• 2:04:48
  Speaker 1: hands are dirty, and whatever is on your hands that
• 2:04:51
  Speaker 1: you don't want to get on things that you're going
• 2:04:53
  Speaker 1: to touch after you wash your hands is on there
• 2:04:56
  Speaker 1: when you turn on the faucet. So if you have
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 1: a faucet that you have to grab with your dirty
• 2:05:00
  Speaker 1: hands to turn it on, and then you wash your hands,
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 1: and then in order to turn off the water, you
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 1: have to grab that faucet that you just got dirty
• 2:05:08
  Speaker 1: with your dirty hands. You are now recontaminating your hands,
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: which kind of defeats the purpose of washing them, especially
• 2:05:17
  Speaker 1: if you just touched raw chicken, raw fish or something
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 1: like that, right, something that has salmonella, you know, or
• 2:05:25
  Speaker 1: lysteria or any other type of nasty germy death pitting
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 1: in it. And so the health department when they come
• 2:05:38
  Speaker 1: in and they look at your kitchen, they want to
• 2:05:40
  Speaker 1: see they want to see a hands free, a grip
• 2:05:45
  Speaker 1: free means of turning your faucets on. And it's nice
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 1: if you have something that just automatically turns on, but
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 1: if you have to have handles, you have to be
• 2:05:54
  Speaker 1: able to manipulate them with your arm, your wrist, your
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: elbow and not. You don't shouldn't have to have to
• 2:06:02
  Speaker 1: grab them with your hands to manipulate them. So usually
• 2:06:05
  Speaker 1: that means some the type that has a little wing
• 2:06:08
  Speaker 1: sticking off instead of a grip. And if you don't
• 2:06:13
  Speaker 1: have the right one, that's that's some points off of
• 2:06:16
  Speaker 1: your your score. They can suggest that, you know, you
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 1: really need to replace those, right, And there's a whole
• 2:06:25
  Speaker 1: bunch of little things like that. If you have a
• 2:06:27
  Speaker 1: freezer in there, it's gotta have wheels on the bottom,
• 2:06:29
  Speaker 1: because you've got to be able to move that freezer
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 1: so you can sweep and mop underneath and then put
• 2:06:33
  Speaker 1: it back, because otherwise you can get a build up
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 1: of of dust and dirt and that can get in
• 2:06:37
  Speaker 1: the food and all kinds of little things like that.
• 2:06:42
  Speaker 1: What types of gloves you have, how much hand sanitizer,
• 2:06:45
  Speaker 1: how available to hand sanitizer is, where it is in
• 2:06:49
  Speaker 1: relation to the food and the sink and so on,
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 1: all kinds of stuff. What your personal protective equipment is,
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 1: every single thing there's you go in there. When they
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 1: come in there, they come in with a clipboard that
• 2:07:03
  Speaker 1: practically has a book on it that they have to
• 2:07:05
  Speaker 1: check off little boxes. And so this organization, this company,
• 2:07:11
  Speaker 1: they had hundreds of stores in the area where they
• 2:07:18
  Speaker 1: were starting this food program. And we had gotten the
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 1: okay to start on a particular day at a particular time.
• 2:07:28
  Speaker 1: This is when you can start cooking and serving the food,
• 2:07:33
  Speaker 1: not a minute before everything will be ready. Then this
• 2:07:36
  Speaker 1: is what you have to accomplish prior to that. And
• 2:07:40
  Speaker 1: you know, the day before they come through and they
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: take off all their boxes, Okay, you've done everything you're
• 2:07:44
  Speaker 1: supposed to do, right, So everything was great day of
• 2:07:55
  Speaker 1: one store out of the hundreds started like eight hours early,
• 2:08:04
  Speaker 1: and they offended the gods at the health department. How
• 2:08:10
  Speaker 1: dare you? How dare you start eight hours early? We said,
• 2:08:14
  Speaker 1: ex o'clock? You said, why o'clock? We are the authority.
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 1: Guess what we're going to do. So they send them
• 2:08:20
  Speaker 1: back every every evaluator, and it comes comes back to
• 2:08:27
  Speaker 1: the stores that they had looked at before and went
• 2:08:30
  Speaker 1: through and every place where they had said, well, this
• 2:08:34
  Speaker 1: is good enough. It doesn't actually meet the standard, but
• 2:08:38
  Speaker 1: it's so close that we're not going to to dicker
• 2:08:41
  Speaker 1: over it. They dickered the fuck out of everything. And
• 2:08:47
  Speaker 1: at our store, where they had okayed a whole bunch
• 2:08:52
  Speaker 1: of things that were borderline and I didn't know this
• 2:08:58
  Speaker 1: until afterward, bunch of things that were like, well, you know,
• 2:09:03
  Speaker 1: you don't have a full six feet of open space
• 2:09:07
  Speaker 1: in front of your electrical panels, but somebody can get
• 2:09:12
  Speaker 1: to them with the fire extinguisher and it is close,
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 1: so we'll let that slide, right. Just little things like that.
• 2:09:23
  Speaker 1: They unchecked all of those boxes and gave us twenty
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: four hours to fix it. On our paperwork about our kitchen,
• 2:09:34
  Speaker 1: they wrote, clean this whole room like it was. It
• 2:09:42
  Speaker 1: was if it was that bad forty eight hours prior.
• 2:09:49
  Speaker 1: And they didn't write that on there, but they did
• 2:09:52
  Speaker 1: because they were offended. That tells you something, right, Yeah,
• 2:09:57
  Speaker 1: And I got I got eight hours of overtime out
• 2:10:01
  Speaker 1: of that because they basically said, Okay, who's the O
• 2:10:04
  Speaker 1: c D person. Oh, that's Hannah. All right, let's send
• 2:10:09
  Speaker 1: Hannah's sick Hannah on that room. And I did. I
• 2:10:13
  Speaker 1: cleaned that whole room. And this is this is the
• 2:10:16
  Speaker 1: worst part. Okay, I get done. I just get done.
• 2:10:21
  Speaker 1: I had initially they gave me like three or four hours,
• 2:10:25
  Speaker 1: and I had it sparkling it like that. The iron
• 2:10:29
  Speaker 1: chef would have been like, yeah, I can cook in here.
• 2:10:33
  Speaker 1: And and the soda guy came in, the pop guy
• 2:10:39
  Speaker 1: that brings the syrup in the bag of the boxes
• 2:10:43
  Speaker 1: for the and he he has to he does a
• 2:10:50
  Speaker 1: couple of different things. One of them has to do
• 2:10:53
  Speaker 1: with calibrating the the the R two unit, which is
• 2:10:58
  Speaker 1: where the OR two unit in Star Wars got its name.
• 2:11:03
  Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure which it's the it's the carbon dioxide
• 2:11:08
  Speaker 1: uh insertion that that that that makes the pop fizzy basically,
• 2:11:14
  Speaker 1: and he fucked us something up. I don't know what
• 2:11:17
  Speaker 1: he did, but it caused an explosion of coalis cert
• 2:11:23
  Speaker 1: my god, that reached from one end of the room
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 1: to the other, from head to toe. The man was
• 2:11:33
  Speaker 1: dripping like he looked like he had been tarred and
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 1: was about to be feathered.
• 2:11:40
  Speaker 2: It would have been so pissed.
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 1: It like splattered. The ceiling got all over like we
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 1: had a It got all over the electrical electrical panels,
• 2:11:50
  Speaker 1: got all over my freezer. And so I got another
• 2:11:55
  Speaker 1: six hours of overtime out of that, like I got
• 2:11:59
  Speaker 1: to clean my My total overtime that I received was eight.
• 2:12:04
  Speaker 1: But this poor guy and he looked at me and
• 2:12:08
  Speaker 1: he was like, I'm so sorry, And I didn't tell
• 2:12:11
  Speaker 1: him that I had the health department coming in. I
• 2:12:14
  Speaker 1: just looked at him because, like you look at this,
• 2:12:18
  Speaker 1: you can't imagine how sad and pitiful this poor guy looked,
• 2:12:23
  Speaker 1: just standing there coated and this stuff is sticky. If
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 1: you just spill your pop on the floor, it's sticky.
• 2:12:30
  Speaker 1: But the syrup, yeah is it? When when you get
• 2:12:35
  Speaker 1: your pop, a fifth of it is that syrup and
• 2:12:40
  Speaker 1: the other four fifths are the soda water. So he
• 2:12:45
  Speaker 1: got straight syrup. Fel like if somebody just opened up
• 2:12:51
  Speaker 1: a barrel of you know, any any kind of pancake
• 2:12:57
  Speaker 1: syrup and don't Oh my god, I couldn't. I couldn't
• 2:13:02
  Speaker 1: be mad like this. And he had to drive home
• 2:13:06
  Speaker 1: like that. Oh no. And we weren't anywhere near like
• 2:13:10
  Speaker 1: a truck stop or someplace where he could go get
• 2:13:12
  Speaker 1: a shower. You know, if I had have lived across
• 2:13:15
  Speaker 1: the street, I'd have been like, that's my house over there,
• 2:13:17
  Speaker 1: here's the key. You know, I'll let my husband know
• 2:13:21
  Speaker 1: what's going on. You need to go get it, get
• 2:13:24
  Speaker 1: cleaned up. You know, here's some extra clothes, like but yeah,
• 2:13:31
  Speaker 1: this poor guy. And but but the next day when
• 2:13:36
  Speaker 1: the health department came in, I still had that kitchen spotless,
• 2:13:40
  Speaker 1: like completely, but U and they still ding this on stuff.
• 2:13:46
  Speaker 1: Oh my god, like there was still stuff there, like
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 1: we want you to it's gonna be okay. You can
• 2:13:51
  Speaker 1: still do you for your start, but by that date
• 2:13:54
  Speaker 1: you have to end. One of the things they dinged
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 1: on was the fawcets, not the faucets, but the think handles.
• 2:14:02
  Speaker 1: And it was because we were supposed to do that,
• 2:14:06
  Speaker 1: and they had told us to do that, and the
• 2:14:08
  Speaker 1: company had told them that we did that, and they
• 2:14:11
  Speaker 1: hadn't checked and we hadn't done that. So, yeah, your
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 1: your officials in your government that are supposed to be
• 2:14:24
  Speaker 1: protecting you from from things like food poisoning and bad
• 2:14:32
  Speaker 1: ingredients in your food and poor construction on say, the
• 2:14:40
  Speaker 1: system that transports flammable gases into your house to keep
• 2:14:44
  Speaker 1: it from you know, being cold. Run your furnace, run
• 2:14:49
  Speaker 1: your stove, run your water, heat and stuff that that
• 2:14:55
  Speaker 1: their job is to make sure that those things don't
• 2:14:58
  Speaker 1: make your house explode, whether or not. The officials in
• 2:15:02
  Speaker 1: charge who are supposed to be making sure those people
• 2:15:06
  Speaker 1: do their job right so you don't suffer consequences of
• 2:15:09
  Speaker 1: them not doing their job right. They care more about
• 2:15:13
  Speaker 1: whether or not their authority is respected than they do
• 2:15:16
  Speaker 1: about whether or not they're doing their job.
• 2:15:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 2:15:24
  Speaker 1: Yes, David Loboy, I'm from Ohio. So we have sin
• 2:15:27
  Speaker 1: candles instead of sink handles, and we have a community
• 2:15:32
  Speaker 1: just north of Dayton named after a well known city
• 2:15:37
  Speaker 1: in France, Versailles, the city of Treaty Fame, but in
• 2:15:43
  Speaker 1: Ohio it's called Versales.
• 2:15:50
  Speaker 6: You're allowed to do that, and you're allowed to because
• 2:15:53
  Speaker 6: you're not a friends and you're not Portuguese.
• 2:15:56
  Speaker 1: That's true. And then we're also allowed to say kro
• 2:16:00
  Speaker 1: instead of Cairo because we're rednecks and you can't tell
• 2:16:05
  Speaker 1: us what the fuck to do. But but yeah, and
• 2:16:12
  Speaker 1: then half half the state says kro and the other
• 2:16:16
  Speaker 1: half says caro. Not very many people say Cairo. So
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 1: there you go. But but then again, if you're from
• 2:16:29
  Speaker 1: one part of the state, you're from Ohio, and if
• 2:16:32
  Speaker 1: you're from another part of the state, you're from Ohio.
• 2:16:36
  Speaker 2: Yeah Ohia.
• 2:16:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I grew up in Ohio, but I live
• 2:16:42
  Speaker 1: in Ohio, so a certain fandom will understand what I
• 2:16:46
  Speaker 1: just said and nobody else does. Yeah, oh, David, you know,
• 2:16:52
  Speaker 1: you know, yes, you should know, mister Youngstown.
• 2:17:00
  Speaker 6: Okay, I have good authority that it's all Ohio.
• 2:17:06
  Speaker 1: Nope, Nope, it's it's all Ohio because because that's where
• 2:17:10
  Speaker 1: I grew up. But David, so have you actually seen
• 2:17:14
  Speaker 1: the were wolves? I have to have to know, because
• 2:17:18
  Speaker 1: I heard about the werewolves in young Town. Youngstown has
• 2:17:23
  Speaker 1: were wolves, guys, and and yes, yes, according to other
• 2:17:28
  Speaker 1: people that I have met from Youngstown, wolfman does have nards.
• 2:17:33
  Speaker 1: But with that, and we'll get back to the point there. Yeah,
• 2:17:39
  Speaker 1: they they don't this idea of term limits like it's
• 2:17:42
  Speaker 1: such a cop out. It is such a cop out.
• 2:17:46
  Speaker 1: Judges can be impeached if they don't do their job right,
• 2:17:48
  Speaker 1: and they should, but the state should not impeach the
• 2:17:55
  Speaker 1: people's choices preemptively just because they don't like how they're
• 2:18:04
  Speaker 1: doing their job. Let's see, it is nine twenty one.
• 2:18:11
  Speaker 1: We better get well. We'll continue with this next week.
• 2:18:15
  Speaker 1: But you see what's going on here, and there is
• 2:18:17
  Speaker 1: more to this. I will continue this next week. It's
• 2:18:21
  Speaker 1: the full set of things. We may not go over
• 2:18:23
  Speaker 1: the full set of things because some of them are
• 2:18:25
  Speaker 1: worse than others, and some of them are easier to
• 2:18:27
  Speaker 1: understand than others. But they're closing off all the ways
• 2:18:32
  Speaker 1: that you can contribute to the process of putting people
• 2:18:39
  Speaker 1: in office who are going to determine what the bureaucracy
• 2:18:45
  Speaker 1: does and who is involved in it. But they've made
• 2:18:49
  Speaker 1: no mention whatsoever of placing any limitations on the power
• 2:18:54
  Speaker 1: of the bureaucracy. Notice that you should be concerned about
• 2:18:59
  Speaker 1: these people. So this coup that they're trying to do,
• 2:19:02
  Speaker 1: they're organizing with people from other countries, elites in the
• 2:19:09
  Speaker 1: United States and UH financiers from the World Economic Forum
• 2:19:20
  Speaker 1: to UH to be able to manipulate your elections, control
• 2:19:26
  Speaker 1: which candidates you can support, how much you can know
• 2:19:29
  Speaker 1: about those candidates, and UH how you vote, and how
• 2:19:36
  Speaker 1: how much recourse you have over you know, whether the
• 2:19:40
  Speaker 1: election outcome was valid or not. And they've been doing
• 2:19:47
  Speaker 1: this for two years. They've been working on this for
• 2:19:49
  Speaker 1: two years. So we'll we'll talk more about this next week.
• 2:19:58
  Speaker 1: Let's see. Yeah, I already read Meredith, jeez, super chow.
• 2:20:06
  Speaker 1: We do not have any rumbel rants or super chats.
• 2:20:08
  Speaker 1: So yeah, that's that's gonna be it. Thanks everybody for listening.
• 2:20:14
  Speaker 1: Thanks to my two co hosts for going with This
• 2:20:16
  Speaker 1: is some dry material again, I know, but at the
• 2:20:21
  Speaker 1: same time, if you really think about it, it's not
• 2:20:24
  Speaker 1: like this is this is rage material. This is just
• 2:20:26
  Speaker 1: as much rage material as last week. It's just not
• 2:20:29
  Speaker 1: as graphic. Yeah, this is the Tate State telling you
• 2:20:34
  Speaker 1: you can't tell me no. So thanks for going through
• 2:20:41
  Speaker 1: that with me. Good idol. Thanks very much Brian for
• 2:20:44
  Speaker 1: working in the background to make all of this happen.