Latest / Elon Musk Podcast / Elon Musk Weekly News Update: Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and More

Transcript

Elon Musk Weekly News Update: Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and More · Elon Musk Podcast

• 0:01
  Hey everybody, welcome back to the Elon Musk Podcast.
• 0:05
  This is a show where we discuss the critical Crossroads, The
• 0:08
  Shape, SpaceX, Tesla X, The Boring Company, and Neuralink,
• 0:13
  and I'm your host, Will Walden. One more thing before we start.
• 0:17
  Google Podcasts is being discontinued by Google.
• 0:22
  So if you want to continue getting episodes of the Elon
• 0:25
  Musk podcast, please check us out over at YouTube Music.
• 0:31
  Search us out over there and that's where you'll be able to
• 0:34
  find our podcast through Google products.
• 0:38
  Thank you so much for understanding.
• 0:39
  I had no control over this. Google pulled the Google Podcast
• 0:43
  app off of Android. And I want to let you know where
• 0:47
  to continue finding the show. Over at YouTube Music Search for
• 0:51
  Elon Musk podcast. Thank you so much.
• 0:55
  Formerly, Twitter is financially backing Chloe Happ in a legal
• 0:58
  action against her previous employer, Block, founded by Jack
• 1:01
  Dorsey, who also established Twitter, now known as X.
• 1:06
  HAP asserts she was unfairly dismissed from expressing her
• 1:09
  opinions on X through a pseudonym satirical account
• 1:14
  outside of work hours. Elon Musk on X expressed his
• 1:17
  support for the lawsuit emphasizing supporting your
• 1:20
  right to freedom of speech. Now the lawsuit arises from 2
• 1:24
  specific posts made by Hap on her anonymous account.
• 1:27
  The first post referenced the movement of refugees from Gaza
• 1:32
  to Kurdistan following attacks on October 7th, while the second
• 1:36
  included derogatory language aimed at transgender individuals
• 1:40
  in the context of discussing a gender neutral restroom.
• 1:43
  A HAP maintains these posts were satirical and did not directly
• 1:47
  mention her employer. Block Block's acquisition of
• 1:50
  these posts in the company's decision to terminate Hap's
• 1:53
  employment formed the crux of this dispute.
• 1:56
  Hap alleges that despite Block's policy seemingly supporting free
• 1:59
  speech, she was dismissed without severance for sharing
• 2:02
  views contrary to the company's stance, a move she argues was
• 2:06
  against the company's own guidelines now seeking redress,
• 2:10
  Hap's lawsuit demands her reinstatement at Block and
• 2:13
  financial compensation for damages, including lost wages.
• 2:16
  This case is not X's first foray into legal battles championing
• 2:19
  free speech. Previously, the company
• 2:21
  supported Gina Carano in her lawsuit against Disney and
• 2:25
  Lucasfilm, alleging her removal from The Mandalorian was due to
• 2:28
  her controversial viewpoints. Now, the intertwining of
• 2:32
  significant tech figures like Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey and the
• 2:36
  companies they founded shows that there's a complex web here,
• 2:45
  there's ideologies, relationships, different ways of
• 2:49
  thinking, and it's all in the tech industry right now.
• 2:53
  X in Block They're in a legal battle.
• 2:56
  Musk's X, by funding Hap's lawsuit, is taking a definitive
• 2:59
  stance on issues of speech and expression in the workplace, and
• 3:04
  this shows that there's a bigger debate here.
• 3:06
  Freedom's in the digital age. Can you speak your mind wherever
• 3:10
  you are without being let go from your job?
• 3:14
  Do you have freedom of speech, or is there language in your
• 3:17
  contract that doesn't allow you to do this?
• 3:20
  It's really up to the company and up to the person who signs
• 3:23
  that contract when they start employment with that company.
• 3:29
  Now, Hap's assertion that her posts were meant as satire and
• 3:32
  her subsequent actions, including deleting the content,
• 3:37
  Now it's nuanced, it's online expression, and now she has
• 3:41
  potential consequences when personal and professional
• 3:44
  boundaries intersect. Her insistence on her right to
• 3:47
  express political satire without workplace repercussion is an
• 3:51
  important question that we have to ask ourselves.
• 3:53
  And does it limit expression and employer responses?
• 3:57
  We're going to find out with this lawsuit, and this lawsuit
• 4:00
  also alleges that Block violated its own speech policies by
• 4:04
  dismissing HAPS suggest a possible discrepancy between
• 4:09
  company guidelines and their applications.
• 4:12
  Now this raises broader concerns about how companies interpret
• 4:15
  inter force policies related to employee conduct and expression,
• 4:18
  particularly in cases involving social media and in this case, a
• 4:23
  quote satirical account. Now, Block's refusal to disclose
• 4:28
  whether complaints from other employees prompted their
• 4:31
  investigation into HAPS posts adds another layer of complexity
• 4:35
  to this case. Corporate transparency and the
• 4:38
  rights of employees to understand the basis of
• 4:41
  disciplinary action taken against them.
• 4:44
  If they post quote satirical content on another website,
• 4:49
  well, we're gonna have to find out what's going to happen in
• 4:52
  this lawsuit. Will keep you up to date as
• 4:53
  well. Now, Hap initially denied these
• 4:57
  posts, though they said that they feared repercussions if
• 5:02
  they were attributed to this and her later admission.
• 5:05
  Spotlighting the challenges that individuals face when confronted
• 5:10
  with their online activities impacts their professional life
• 5:14
  and their personal life. It raises questions about
• 5:17
  privacy, identity and also accountability In the age of
• 5:22
  digital personas. Now, the support of high profile
• 5:25
  figures like Elon Musk for legal actions rooted in free speech
• 5:28
  concerns signifies a notable intersection of tech leadership
• 5:32
  and socio political issues. Musk's public backing of Hap's
• 5:36
  lawsuit through X positions him and the platform within ongoing
• 5:40
  debates about freedom of expression, freedom of speech
• 5:43
  both online and at the workplace, and the legal
• 5:46
  precedent set by cases like this in the involvement of platforms
• 5:50
  like X in such disputes could influence future employer
• 5:54
  implied dynamics concerning free speech.
• 5:57
  The outcome of this lawsuit may offer insights into how
• 5:59
  companies craft and enforce policies regarding employees
• 6:02
  online expressions in the future, especially when done
• 6:05
  anonymously or through a pseudonym.
• 6:08
  Now, the reference to previous cases, such as Gina Carano's
• 6:11
  lawsuit against Disney, where X also provided support, shows
• 6:16
  that they're willing to take the step forward and take A big
• 6:19
  stance on certain free speech issues.
• 6:22
  This pattern of backing individuals challenging
• 6:24
  corporate actions perceived as limiting expressions suggests a
• 6:27
  broader strategy by X to align itself with particular values in
• 6:31
  the public sphere. Now, the complexity is this
• 6:34
  case, though, involving pseudonyms and online activity,
• 6:39
  satirical expression, and corporate policy shows that
• 6:43
  there's challenges out there for companies and for individuals
• 6:47
  when they're signing that contract.
• 6:50
  Is this free speech? Do you have to manage your
• 6:52
  speech to keep your job? That's another question we have
• 6:56
  to ask ourselves, and the boundaries between personal
• 6:59
  expression and professional responsibilities continue to
• 7:02
  blur, raising important questions about the rights and
• 7:05
  obligations of employees and employers alike.
• 7:09
  The legal and ethical considerations at play in Hap's
• 7:12
  lawsuit against Bloc supported by X reflect broader societal
• 7:15
  debates about the nature of free speech, responsibilities of
• 7:19
  digital platforms, and the impact of personal expression on
• 7:22
  professional engagements. These issues are increasingly
• 7:25
  relevant in a world where digital and real life personas
• 7:28
  intersect, and where the actions taken in one realm can have
• 7:31
  significant consequences in the other.
• 7:35
  Now, the outcome of this case could have important
• 7:37
  implications on how companies navigate the balance between
• 7:41
  fostering an inclusive workplace and respecting individual rights
• 7:46
  to free expression and free speech.
• 7:48
  It also highlights the potential role social media platforms and
• 7:51
  supporting users rights in legal challenges that arise from
• 7:55
  digital expressions. Now this lawsuit, brought by
• 7:58
  Chloe Hap against Block with the support of X, shows that there's
• 8:03
  an intricate relationship between free speech, employee
• 8:06
  rights, and corporate policies. It's a reminder of the ongoing
• 8:10
  challenges and debates surrounding expressions in their
• 8:13
  digital age and who's watching your accounts, especially as it
• 8:18
  intersects with professional life and corporate expectations.
• 8:22
  The outcome may offer valuable insights into the evolving
• 8:26
  landscape of digital expression and the implications for both
• 8:30
  individuals and organizations. SpaceX has announced its
• 8:35
  intentions to carry out as many as 9 Starship missions in the
• 8:39
  next year, with spacecrafts expected to land all the way in
• 8:43
  the Indian Ocean. Now these operations, which are
• 8:45
  set to be launched from the Boca Chica Starbase, Texas site, are
• 8:49
  detailed in an extensive environmental assessment by the
• 8:52
  Federal Aviation Administration or the FAA.
• 8:55
  Now the FA AS report, which is 119 pages long, indicates the
• 9:00
  possibility of up to five total losses of the starships which
• 9:03
  would occur as they crash into the ocean at the highest speed
• 9:07
  possible after re entering from orbit while still intact.
• 9:12
  Of course, now these incidents termed over pressure events in
• 9:15
  the document would be caused by the impact with water leading
• 9:19
  the structural compromise and subsequent combustion of the
• 9:22
  liquid methane and oxygen on board.
• 9:25
  In addition to these potential explosive landings, SpaceX is
• 9:29
  also looking into the viability of controlled water landings
• 9:32
  wherein the spacecraft would softly approach the water
• 9:35
  surface before tipping over as described by the FAA document.
• 9:40
  Now the FAA report points out that the starships propellants,
• 9:43
  liquid methane and oxygen are not toxic unlike some other
• 9:47
  rocket fuels, which is an important consideration for
• 9:50
  environmental safety. Now the document also
• 9:52
  acknowledges the chance the starships might break apart
• 9:55
  during the RE entry process, adding another potential outcome
• 9:58
  to these planned missions. Now SpaceX moves forward with
• 10:01
  these plans and continues to receive the necessary
• 10:03
  authorizations from the FAA. A large number of starships,
• 10:06
  either whole or in pieces, will likely end up on the ocean floor
• 10:11
  in a region between Australia and Madagascar.
• 10:14
  Now the FA as environmental assessment details what could be
• 10:17
  expected if Starship landings in the Indian Ocean do not go as
• 10:21
  planned, predicting a field of debris primarily made-up of
• 10:25
  heavy metals and some composite materials.
• 10:29
  Now, the majority of this debris, especially the stainless
• 10:32
  steel components, is expected to sink quickly due to its heavy
• 10:35
  nature and material composition. However, some lighter pieces
• 10:39
  might float or remain suspended before eventually sinking.
• 10:43
  Now, in case of explosion upon impact, the resulting debris is
• 10:47
  expected to be contained within a radius of about .5 nautical
• 10:52
  miles from the point of impact, and the FAA has stated there
• 10:55
  will be no attempts to retrieve or clean up the Starship
• 10:58
  remains, whatever their condition after landing in
• 11:01
  pieces or not, and the report also considers the potential
• 11:04
  impact. Are these operations on marine
• 11:07
  life such as sea turtles, fish, sharks, whales and others in the
• 11:12
  intended landing zones? Now the FA as assessment
• 11:15
  suggests that the direct impact on marine life from either
• 11:19
  impact or breaking apart starships is highly unlikely,
• 11:22
  thanks to the Ocean's vastness and a relatively small size of
• 11:26
  the spacecraft components compared to, well, millions of
• 11:29
  tons of water, and also they have to hit tiny fish, so it's
• 11:35
  very unlikely. Now it's reason that although
• 11:38
  debris hitting an animal underwater could cause harm or
• 11:41
  death, the low frequency of Starship operations and the
• 11:44
  natural underwater behavior of marine life makes such
• 11:48
  occurrences highly unlikely. And on March 14th, 2024, a large
• 11:53
  crowd gathered to watch a Starship launch from Spacex's
• 11:57
  Boca CHIC facility. Marking an important moment for
• 11:59
  this company, this launch was particularly notable.
• 12:03
  As well known to be the most powerful rocket in existence, it
• 12:07
  successfully reached orbit, a significant achievement for
• 12:10
  SpaceX and everybody in the spaceflight community.
• 12:15
  Now these developments and the planned future missions show
• 12:18
  that SpaceX is working towards fully operational and fully
• 12:24
  reusable large scale massive rockets that can take massive,
• 12:29
  massive payloads the low Earth orbit to the moon, Mars and
• 12:34
  beyond. One more thing before we start
• 12:37
  the show, Google Podcasts is being discontinued by Google at
• 12:44
  the end of this month. So if you want to continue
• 12:47
  getting episodes of the Elon Musk podcast, please check us
• 12:51
  out over at YouTube Music. Search us out over there and
• 12:56
  that's where you'll be able to find our podcast through Google
• 13:00
  products. Thank you so much for
• 13:02
  understanding. I had no control over this.
• 13:05
  Google just pulled the Google Podcast app off of Android.
• 13:09
  And I just want to let you know where to continue finding the
• 13:12
  show. Over at YouTube Music Search for
• 13:15
  Elon Musk podcast. Thank you so much.
• 13:19
  Tesla has once again reduced its vehicle prices and introduced
• 13:22
  special offers aimed at enticing buyers following a report of
• 13:26
  disappointing vehicle deliveries in the first quarter of 2024.
• 13:30
  This news comes alongside adjustments by analysts to
• 13:32
  Tesla's full year earnings forecast leading to a rise in
• 13:36
  Tesla shares. Now, in a notable move, the
• 13:40
  electric vehicle behemoth known as Tesla slashed the prices of
• 13:43
  its Model Y vehicles in Australia by over 9%, setting
• 13:47
  the starting price of approximately $42,240.
• 13:52
  This decision coincides with a surge in electric vehicle sales
• 13:55
  in Australia, where Tesla ranks as the sixth most popular
• 13:58
  automotive brand. Now.
• 14:00
  The price reduction in Australia is part of Tesla's broader
• 14:02
  strategy to remain competitive, evidenced by the introduction of
• 14:06
  a 0% financing offer on the Model 3 and Model Y models in
• 14:10
  China till the end of April. Now this marks Tesla's first
• 14:14
  foray into interest free promotions in China and the
• 14:17
  electric vehicle market globally.
• 14:20
  Now contrarily, Tesla has raised the prices of all Model Y
• 14:23
  variants in the United States and Europe and also in China,
• 14:27
  despite some existing incentives coming to an end.
• 14:29
  Nevertheless, significant discounts on the Model Y
• 14:32
  inventory remained available in the US and other markets.
• 14:37
  Tesla stock experienced a 1.6% increase reaching 171.5 and
• 14:44
  these pricing adjustments. During these pricing adjustments
• 14:48
  and this follows A rebound where the stock went up by 1% to 100
• 14:52
  and 6838. Now the company's stock
• 14:55
  purchased activities by Kathy Wood which involved acquiring
• 14:58
  319,000 shares over 2 days also contributing to the stock
• 15:03
  movement. Now to keep its sales momentum
• 15:06
  going, Tesla has aggressively reduced prices and offered
• 15:10
  discounts throughout 2023 and also 2024, causing a significant
• 15:14
  dip in auto gross margins from a high of 30% and quarter 4/20/21
• 15:20
  to below 20%. And following Tesla's
• 15:23
  announcements of lower than expected global deliveries of
• 15:26
  386,810 vehicles in quarter one, HSBC revises Tesla price target
• 15:33
  downward, maintaining a reduced rating on the shares.
• 15:36
  Now this report has sparked a wave of criticism for both
• 15:39
  supporters and also skeptics, attributing the poor performance
• 15:43
  to challenges in the production ramp up and factory shutdowns.
• 15:47
  Now analysts have adjusted their 2024 earnings projections for
• 15:50
  Tesla downwards, indicating a potential second conservative
• 15:54
  year of profit declines for the company.
• 15:56
  The revised forecast reflect a more than 26% reduction in EPS
• 16:00
  consensus estimates since the end of 2023.
• 16:03
  And despite A disappointing first quarter, expectations for
• 16:07
  Tesla's business are higher for quarter 2.
• 16:10
  With anticipated improvements in Model 3 and Cyber truck sales in
• 16:14
  the US and a potential uptick in Chinese sounds now, Tesla's
• 16:19
  stock performance has seen fluctuations.
• 16:22
  The 2.9% increase last week but trading below the 50 day moving
• 16:27
  average. Leaked emails from Elon Musk
• 16:29
  suggested push for the latest full self driving update in
• 16:32
  North America along with a one month free trial offer for FSD.
• 16:38
  Now Tesla faced A notable decline in stock value on March
• 16:41
  15th, reaching a new low for 2024 stocks.
• 16:45
  Performance ranks in eighth among auto manufacturers with
• 16:49
  relatively low composite and relative strength ratings.
• 16:54
  Now hedge fund manager Pearl Lekender has expressed A bleak
• 16:59
  outlook for Tesla, though predicting the company could
• 17:03
  face bankruptcy and its stock could plummet to $14.00.
• 17:08
  A very pessimistic view following Tesla's quarter one
• 17:11
  delivery report, which fell short of market expectations and
• 17:15
  pair is a bull. Lekender attributes Tesla's
• 17:19
  challenges not to supply chain disruptions but to a demand
• 17:23
  problem, particularly with the Model 3 and Model Y vehicles.
• 17:27
  He does not anticipate any significant recovery for Tesla
• 17:30
  in the near term due to the aging model lineup and economic
• 17:34
  conditions. Now, Tesla's first quarter
• 17:36
  delivery shortfall has led to a chorus of negative opinions,
• 17:39
  with analysts pointing to the harsh realities of scaling
• 17:42
  electric vehicle production despite Tesla's valuation.
• 17:45
  Increased competition and market pressures are contributing to
• 17:48
  skepticism about the company's future.
• 17:52
  Now Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives described Tesla's first
• 17:56
  quarter performance as a disaster, calling it a crucial
• 18:00
  moment for the company to recover or face potential long
• 18:04
  term challenges. But amongst the criticism, Tesla
• 18:07
  continues to receive support, notably from Kathy Woods Arc
• 18:12
  Invest, which purchased Tesla stock ahead of the delivery
• 18:15
  report. Some analysts remain optimistic
• 18:18
  about Tesla's long term prospects, citing potential
• 18:21
  catalysts like the promotion of the FSD feature and also the
• 18:25
  free trial of full self driving. Now.
• 18:28
  RBC Capital Markets analyst Tom Menerian highlighted Tesla's
• 18:32
  energy storage and autonomy as key factors in his positive
• 18:36
  rating on the company's stock. Despite the first quarter
• 18:38
  setbacks, there remains a belief in Tesla's potential to leverage
• 18:42
  this technology for future growth.
• 18:45
  Now, Tesla's recent price adjustments and promotional
• 18:48
  offers show that it's going to work to stimulate sales amidst A
• 18:53
  challenging period marked by lower than expected delivery
• 18:56
  figures and a downward revision in earnings forecasts.
• 19:00
  The company's stock has experienced volatility with its
• 19:03
  future prospects contingent on its ability to navigate the
• 19:06
  competitive electric veal market and capitalize on its
• 19:09
  technological innovation. Tesla Motors has reintroduced
• 19:13
  its full self driving transfer program as a buying incentive
• 19:17
  this quarter. Now this is counter to CEO Elon
• 19:20
  Musk's previous assertion that such an offer would be a
• 19:24
  singular event. The program permits existing
• 19:26
  Tesla owners to transfer their FSD package to a new vehicle
• 19:30
  upon purchase, which a feature that has been highly requested
• 19:35
  due to Tesla's unfulfilled promise of complete self driving
• 19:39
  capabilities. They've been promising this for
• 19:41
  years and have not delivered on FSD, and people bought into
• 19:46
  this. They paid about $15,000 for full
• 19:50
  self driving. It's never come to fruition.
• 19:53
  So people think that they should be able to transfer their full
• 19:56
  self driving license from one vehicle to another.
• 19:59
  Considering that Tesla never gave them what they bought,
• 20:03
  customers have long argued for the ability to transfer the FSD
• 20:05
  package price it up to $15,000, especially since the promised
• 20:10
  autonomous driving features. Have yet to be fully realized by
• 20:13
  Tesla. The rationale is that if Tesla
• 20:15
  can eventually provide these features via in software update,
• 20:19
  owners should not lose their investment when upgrading their
• 20:22
  vehicle. Now, despite the logical appeal
• 20:26
  of allowing FSD transfers to support customer investment in
• 20:31
  the technology, Tesla has historically been resistant to
• 20:34
  the idea. Companies eventual concession to
• 20:37
  allow transfers, but only for purchases made in the third
• 20:41
  quarter of 2023 was met with a Lunt of skepticism.
• 20:46
  Now Elon Musk said that the temporary nature of this
• 20:49
  opportunity. He said that he framed it as a
• 20:51
  one time amnesty for buyers to take advantage of during the
• 20:55
  specific quarter. This move was not seen as a
• 20:59
  customer friendly initiative, but as a strategic attempt to
• 21:02
  just boost sales for Tesla within a limited time frame by
• 21:05
  leveraging the company's failure to deliver on its FST promises.
• 21:09
  And let me ask you a question. If you invested $15,000 for full
• 21:15
  self driving and they didn't deliver, would you be upset?
• 21:20
  It's kind of like buying a house and you put an investment of a
• 21:25
  couple $100,000 into this house and the real estate agent never
• 21:31
  shows up and give you the keys. You don't have a house, you
• 21:35
  don't have full self driving, so you spent a lot of money.
• 21:37
  I know it's a little bit different, but you spent a lot
• 21:40
  of money and you never got what was promised to you.
• 21:43
  Now, critics have accused Tesla of using the FSD transfer offer
• 21:46
  as a sales tactic rather than a genuine effort to do right by
• 21:49
  its customers. The skepticism was further
• 21:52
  fueled by the belief that, despite Musk's statements, the
• 21:54
  offer would likely reappear in the future.
• 21:56
  Sometime and in line with these suspicions, Tesla announced the
• 21:59
  future of the FSD transfer option in February 2024,
• 22:03
  available until the end of this quarter to encourage new vehicle
• 22:07
  purchases. This decision contradicts Musk's
• 22:10
  earlier claims of the offer being a one off.
• 22:14
  Recently, Tesla expanded the FSD transfer offer to include all
• 22:17
  new Tesla vehicles, excluding the Cybertruck.
• 22:20
  This move is part of a broader strategy to stack incentives and
• 22:23
  boost sales, indicating a more flexible approach to FSD
• 22:27
  transferability than previously communicated.
• 22:30
  Tesla has also provided updates to long standing FSD adopters
• 22:34
  with older Model S and Model X vehicles, shedding light on the
• 22:37
  company's efforts to extend the latest FSD capabilities to these
• 22:40
  legacy models. The rapid pace of Tesla's tech
• 22:45
  advancements means that newer vehicle models often receive the
• 22:48
  latest updates first, leaving older models waiting for
• 22:52
  enhancements. This has been particularly true
• 22:55
  for FSD and Autopilot features, which are primarily developed
• 22:58
  for the more recent additions to test this fleet.
• 23:01
  New computers, new architecture. They're going to get the latest
• 23:04
  software because of it. Think of your iPhone.
• 23:07
  The latest iPhone gets the latest update before all the
• 23:11
  other phones do. Now Musk acknowledge this issue,
• 23:14
  noting that while the upcoming Hardware 4 will offer
• 23:16
  improvements, the company's current focus remains on
• 23:19
  vehicles equipped with Hardware 3.
• 23:21
  This left some early adopters of FSD, particularly those with
• 23:24
  older Model S and also Model X vehicles, feeling overlooked.
• 23:28
  They spent a lot of money on these cars and they should be
• 23:30
  getting what they paid for. This frustration among these
• 23:34
  legacy vehicle owners stems from unmet promises regarding the
• 23:38
  vehicles potential for autonomy. Although Tesla has introduced
• 23:42
  hardware upgrade programs, they come at additional cost.
• 23:45
  With some owners are unwilling to pay.
• 23:47
  They should have full self driving.
• 23:49
  That's what they think with the current software that they were
• 23:52
  promised and the current hardware that they're using now.
• 23:55
  The sense of exclusion among these early FSD supporters was
• 23:58
  highlighted in a post by Tesla owner Anthony Spina, who
• 24:01
  expressed concerns over the lack of updates and communication
• 24:04
  regarding the deployment of the latest FSD versions to older
• 24:08
  models. Responding to these concerns,
• 24:10
  though, Tesla Vice President Rohan Patel conveyed the
• 24:13
  company's efforts to bring full self driving capabilities to
• 24:16
  older models. It might take a little bit of
• 24:17
  time though Explain the challenges in validating the
• 24:20
  software for different hardware configurations reassured
• 24:23
  customers of the company's commitment to resolving all of
• 24:26
  these issues. Now, Patel's communication show
• 24:29
  that there's a lot of challenges here.
• 24:32
  Software with hardware. You don't just put a new version
• 24:35
  of software with older hardware. Or you could do the Apple root
• 24:40
  and make sure that it works with a bunch of versions before it.
• 24:44
  Now there's a small segment of Tesla's customer base that faces
• 24:48
  these challenges, and they possess different hardware from
• 24:51
  the majority of the users. He said that there's rigorous
• 24:55
  safety validation processes that each software update undergoes
• 24:59
  and they aimed to manage the expectations regarding the
• 25:01
  timelines for these updates at Tesla.
• 25:05
  Now, the follow up communication from Tesla's executive team
• 25:08
  acknowledged the patients required from legacy vehicle
• 25:10
  owners. It showed that the company's
• 25:12
  understanding of these frustrations and also Tesla
• 25:16
  reiterated the intense efforts made to extend the latest FSD
• 25:20
  features to all eligible vehicles regardless of their
• 25:23
  hardware versions. They have to build different
• 25:26
  software for a different hardware.
• 25:27
  It's a big process. I know it is.
• 25:29
  I'm a software developer myself. If you have to develop for one
• 25:33
  sort of code base on a certain sort of hardware, and then you
• 25:37
  switch the hardware, you might have to reroute, rewrite
• 25:40
  thousands of lines of code. Now the situation illustrates
• 25:44
  the complexities that test the faces.
• 25:46
  As a tech driven company in the auto industry, they want to
• 25:51
  rapidly innovate, but it could lead to disparities in customer
• 25:55
  experience based on vehicle age and hardware capabilities of
• 25:59
  older vehicles. And the reintroduction of the
• 26:02
  FSD transfer program along with the ongoing efforts to update
• 26:05
  legacy vehicles shows that Tesla's actually in this.
• 26:08
  They want to help and they have their efforts towards the older
• 26:13
  vehicles straight in line with the newer vehicles, but it's
• 26:17
  going to take them a little bit longer.
• 26:19
  They aim to balance the company's forward-looking
• 26:21
  technological advancements with the needs and expectations of
• 26:25
  its diverse customer base. Hey, thank you so much for
• 26:29
  listening today. I really do appreciate your
• 26:31
  support. If you could take a second and
• 26:33
  hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast
• 26:35
  platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly
• 26:38
  appreciate it. It helps out the show
• 26:40
  tremendously and you'll never miss an episode.
• 26:43
  And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you
• 26:46
  caught up quickly. And please, if you want to
• 26:49
  support the show even more, go to Atreoncom, Stage Zero, and
• 26:55
  please take care of yourselves and each other and I'll see you
• 26:58
  tomorrow.