Latest / Cold War History Uncovered / The Cuban Missile Crisis: Thirteen Days the World Held Its Breath

Transcript

The Cuban Missile Crisis: Thirteen Days the World Held Its Breath · Cold War History Uncovered

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: On October 27, 1962, an American U-2 reconnaissance aircraft was
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: shot down over Cuba. Its pilot, Major Rudolph Anderson Jr.,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: was killed. In Washington, President John F. Kennedy's administration was
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: already confronting Soviet missile sites under construction on the island.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: American forces had moved to DEFCON 2, the highest alert
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: level reached by the United States during the Cold War.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: The immediate question was whether the United States would strike Cuba.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: The larger question was whether a crisis between Washington, Moscow,
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: and Havana could still end without nuclear war. The Cuban
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: Missile Crisis did not begin with the loss of the U-2.
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: It had been building for months through decisions taken in
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: the Soviet Union, Cuba, and the United States. But October
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: 27 concentrated its dangers into a single day. An aircraft destroyed,
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: military pressure mounting, messages crossing between leaders, and officials trying
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: to distinguish a possible opening for settlement from the approach
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: of war. For 13 days, from October 16th to October 28th,
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Kennedy and his advisors met in Washington to decide how
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: to respond to evidence from Cuba. The group became known
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: as the Executive Committee of the National Security Council, or EXCOMM.
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: Its members considered options that included airstrikes, an invasion of Cuba,
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: diplomatic action, and a naval blockade. Kennedy chose a measure
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: the administration called a quarantine. The language mattered. A blockade
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: could be understood as an act of war. A quarantine
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: was presented as a limited effort to stop further Soviet
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: deliveries of offensive military equipment to Cuba. In practical terms,
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: it used American naval power to intercept or turn back
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: ships carrying specified cargoes. It was designed to apply pressure
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: while leaving time for negotiation. That choice is often remembered
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: as an example of calm, controlled crisis management. The surviving
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: record supports part of that image. Kennedy rejected immediate military
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: action and gave diplomacy a chance. But later declassified records
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: and Soviet material show that control was never complete. Each
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: government had incomplete information. Military organizations operated under alert conditions.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: Cuba was not merely a location on a superpower map.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Fidel Castro's government faced a direct American threat and had
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: its own interests, fears, and judgments. The crisis grew from
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: the wider struggle that followed the Cuban Revolution. Castro's government
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: had become aligned with the Soviet Union after its break
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: with the United States. The failed Bay of Pigs invasion
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: in 1961 remained a central fact in Cuba's security calculations.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: American records also document Operation Mongoose, a United States program
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: intended to destabilize Castro's government. That history did not prove
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: any particular American invasion plan in October 1962. It did, however,
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: provide the setting in which Soviet and Cuban leaders judged
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: American intentions. From Moscow's perspective, the deployment offered several possible advantages.
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: Soviet medium-range and intermediate-range missiles in Cuba could threaten much
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: of the continental United States. The deployment could strengthen Cuba's
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: defense and alter the strategic balance. Public explanations later stressed
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: the protection of a Cuban ally and the unequal location
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: of American nuclear weapons near Soviet territory, including missiles based
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: in Turkey. The Soviet operation was conducted in secret and
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: was known by the codename Anadyr. Later Russian military documents
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: have added detail to the picture of its planning and execution.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: More than half a century after the crisis, in May 2022,
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: the Russian Ministry of Defense declassified more than 30 formerly
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: top-secret documents concerning Soviet preparations and forces connected to the
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: Cuban deployment. They joined hundreds of documents already available from American, Soviet, Cuban,
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: and other collections. These later records have complicated any picture
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: of the deployment as a flawlessly executed strategic masterstroke. Scholars
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: Sergei Radchenko and Vladislav Zubok, using newly available Soviet material,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: described it as a poorly conceived gamble that depended heavily
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: on good luck. That interpretation does not erase Soviet strategic objectives.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: It does underline a basic feature of the crisis. The
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: operation depended on secrecy, speed, and assumptions about what the
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: United States would see, when it would see it, and
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: how it would react. By mid-October, American U-2 reconnaissance flights
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: had confirmed missile sites under construction in Cuba. The photographs
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: became physical evidence at the center of the crisis. Not rumor,
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: not a public accusation, but images that American analysts and
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: policymakers treated as proof of a major Soviet deployment. On
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: October 16th, Kennedy began meeting with EXCOMM. The central difficulty
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: was immediate. The United States had evidence of Soviet missiles,
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: but it did not yet have a settled answer to
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: the most important policy question. How could it force their
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: removal without beginning the war it was trying to prevent?
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: An airstrike promised speed. It might destroy missile sites before
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: they became fully operational. But it also carried grave uncertainties.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: Intelligence could be incomplete. A strike could fail to eliminate
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: every missile or every weapon system. It could kill Soviet personnel.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: It could lead Moscow to respond against American interests elsewhere,
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: including Berlin. An invasion of Cuba would be still larger,
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: more destructive, and more difficult to control. A quarantine was slower.
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: It did not remove missiles already on the island. It
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: could be portrayed as indecision. And it carried its own risk.
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: an encounter between American naval forces and Soviet ships could
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: become the first military clash of the crisis. The EXCOMM
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: debates were not a simple contest between advocates of peace
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: and advocates of war. They were arguments over timing, credibility, intelligence,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: alliance obligations, and the danger that restraint could be read
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: as weakness. Kennedy had to weigh advice from civilian and
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: military officials while keeping the decision process secret. At this stage,
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: the American public had not been told that Soviet missile
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: installations had been identified in Cuba. That secrecy was temporary.
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: On the evening of October 22, Kennedy addressed the United
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: States on television and radio. He announced the discovery of
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: Soviet missile sites in Cuba and the naval quarantine. He
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: warned that the United States would regard a nuclear missile
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States,
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: requiring a full retaliatory response. The speech made the confrontation
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: public and international. It also narrowed the room for retreat.
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: Kennedy had committed the United States before its allies, its adversary,
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: and a global audience. Khrushchev now faced an American demand
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: that the missiles be removed, backed by visible military power.
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: For people in Cuba, the broadcast confirmed that their island
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: had become the focal point of a confrontation between nuclear powers.
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: Cuba's government was not simply a passive recipient of Soviet weapons.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: Castro had his own revolutionary government, his own assessment of
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: American hostility, and his own political stakes. Yet the final
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: bargaining channel would largely run between Washington and Moscow. That
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: imbalance would leave a lasting mark on Cuban-Soviet relations. The
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: quarantine went into effect on October 24. Soviet vessels bound
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: toward Cuba became a test of whether the two governments
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: could avoid a direct encounter. Some ships altered course away
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: from the quarantined zone. This did not settle the crisis.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: Existing missile sites remained in Cuba, and the United States
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: continued to demand their removal. But the change in ship
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: movements suggested that Moscow was not seeking an immediate naval confrontation.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: The crisis now had two tracks. At sea, the quarantine
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: tried to prevent further deliveries. In Cuba, the missile installations
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: remained the decisive issue. In diplomatic channels, both governments searched
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: for terms that could be accepted without appearing to surrender
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: under pressure. The record of these days is unusually rich,
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: but it must be handled carefully. For years, many accounts
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: relied heavily on memoirs by Kennedy administration officials, especially Robert
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: Kennedy's Thirteen Days. The memoir provided a powerful, intimate narrative
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: of the crisis. It also helped establish the popular image
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: of a tightly unified White House, firmly controlling events and
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: skillfully outmaneuvering Moscow. Later releases made that picture less complete.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: By the middle of 1989, the State Department had declassified
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: roughly 2,000 documents in full or in part. The National
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Security Archive and other researchers obtained hundreds more through Freedom
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: of Information requests and from presidential and military libraries. Since then,
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: additional American, Soviet, and Cuban sources have given historians a
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: wider record against which to test memoirs. The result has
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: not been the discovery that diplomacy played no role. It
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: has been a more demanding account of diplomacy. Participants remembered
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: events selectively. Officials defended their decisions. Institutions had incentives to
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: emphasize their own prudence and minimize their own errors. Documents
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: can also mislead if treated as complete. A memorandum may
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: show what one official recommended, not what another leader privately decided.
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: A military order may show readiness, not intent to use force.
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: In the late 1980s and early 1990s, former American, Soviet
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: and Cuban participants met with scholars in a series of
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: retrospective conferences. These meetings, supported by documents, exposed differences between
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: official memories and the wider evidence. They also demonstrated how
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: much participants had not known at the time. That gap
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: between what leaders knew then and what historians know now
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: is central to the crisis. Kennedy knew Soviet missile sites
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: had been discovered. He knew Soviet weapons in Cuba could
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: alter the military and political situation. He did not possess
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: a complete, certain map of Soviet capabilities, command arrangements, or
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: the risks embedded in every possible military action. Khrushchev knew
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: the United States had exposed the deployment and imposed a quarantine.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: He could not know precisely how far Kennedy would go
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: or whether the United States might launch an attack without
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: further warning. By October 26, Khrushchev sent a message to
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: Kennedy that offered one possible basis for settlement. The Soviet
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: Union would remove the missiles if the United States pledged
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: not to invade Cuba. The message appeared to provide an opening.
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: It linked the missiles to Cuba's security, the same issue
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: Soviet leaders had emphasized when defending the deployment. Then, on
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: October 27, another message arrived from Moscow. This one added
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: a new condition, removal of American Jupiter missiles from Turkey.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: Those missiles were nuclear-armed and stationed on the territory of
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: a North Atlantic Treaty Organization ally near the Soviet Union.
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: Their existence made the Soviet demand comprehensible as a matter
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: of strategic reciprocity. But accepting the demand publicly could damage
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: American alliance politics and make Kennedy appear to have traded
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: under coercion. The two messages created an immediate problem. Were
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: they competing Soviet positions? Was the second an escalation? Did
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: Moscow intend both as non-negotiable demands? The record does not
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: allow a simple reading of every motive behind the messages.
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: It does show an American administration trying to choose a
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: reply that could preserve an opening while limiting the risk
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: of a public bargaining spiral. On that same day, the
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: U-2 was shot down over Cuba. Major Anderson's death gave
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: military advocates of stronger action a new argument. A United
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: States aircraft had been destroyed in the middle of an
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: armed confrontation. Kennedy and his advisers had to consider whether
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: the shoot-down was a deliberate Soviet decision, a Cuban action,
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: an unauthorized escalation, or part of a larger move toward war.
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: The available record supports caution about claims of total central control.
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: In a crisis of this kind, decisions in Havana, Soviet
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: field commands, Washington, and Moscow could have different sources and
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: different tempos. A leader's public statement did not automatically determine
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: every action on the ground. The danger came partly from
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: this fragmentation. Governments were trying to manage a confrontation while
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: military systems were already mobilized. The U-2 shoot-down did not
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: produce an immediate American airstrike. That restraint was consequential. It
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: was not proof that the danger had passed. American forces
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: remained at DEFCON 2. The possibility of escalation still ran
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: through every military and diplomatic decision. But Kennedy continued to
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: pursue a settlement. The administration chose to respond publicly to
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: the earlier Khrushchev message, the one linking missile removal to
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: a no-invasion pledge. At the same time, a separate and
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: confidential understanding addressed the missiles in Turkey. The United States
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: would remove its Jupiter missiles from Turkey, but this was
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: not presented as a public concession under Soviet pressure. The
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: arrangement was kept separate from the announced settlement and was
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: to be carried out later. This distinction is crucial. The
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: familiar public story of October 1962 emphasized an American quarantine
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: forcing an unconditional Soviet retreat. That story contained an important truth.
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: Khrushchev did agree to remove the Soviet missiles from Cuba,
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: and Kennedy's pressure was a major part of the context.
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: But it omitted the full structure of the settlement. The
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: United States also gave an assurance against invading Cuba, and
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: it privately committed to remove the Jupiter missiles from Turkey.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: The secrecy surrounding the Turkish element was not accidental. Kennedy
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: needed to manage the expectations of allies and domestic critics.
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: Khrushchev needed a result he could present as protecting Soviet
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: and Cuban interests. Both leaders sought a way to step
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: back without publicly accepting the language of defeat. On October 28,
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: Khrushchev announced that the Soviet Union would halt work on
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: the missile installations and return the missiles to the Soviet
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: Union under United Nations supervision. The announcement ended the most
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: acute phase of the crisis. It did not erase suspicion
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: between the superpowers. It did not resolve Cuba's anger over
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: being exposed to invasion threats and excluded from the final terms.
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: It did not make verification simple. In the following weeks,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: the agreement had to be implemented. The United States sought
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: evidence that the missile installations were being dismantled and that
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: the weapons were leaving Cuba. The crisis did not fully
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: conclude on the day of Khrushchev's broadcast. Negotiations and verification
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: continued into late November. The human cost of the 13
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: days cannot be measured only by the fact that nuclear
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: war did not occur. Major Anderson was killed when his
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: aircraft was shot down. Cuban people lived under the threat
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: of an American invasion and of being caught in a
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: superpower conflict. Soviet personnel in Cuba faced the possibility of attack.
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: American and Soviet service members were placed on heightened alert,
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: operating amid uncertainty about whether their governments were approaching a
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: military decision. The crisis also had a political human cost.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: Cuba's government had accepted a Soviet deployment partly in the
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: context of perceived American danger. Yet the decisive bargain was
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: made between Washington and Moscow. Castro was angered by the
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: Soviet decision to withdraw the missiles under American pressure. The
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: episode revealed the limits of Cuban influence, even when Cuba
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: itself was the place where the confrontation could become catastrophic.
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: The settlement did not establish friendship. It established a temporary
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: structure for avoiding disaster. The United States maintained its commitment
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: not to invade Cuba. The Soviet Union removed the missiles.
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: The Jupiter missiles in Turkey were later withdrawn under the
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: private arrangement. Each side could claim that it had protected
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: vital interests. Each side also learned how rapidly a nuclear
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: confrontation could outrun the intentions of political leaders. The historical
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: question is therefore not whether one side simply won. The
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: Soviet deployment failed in its most visible military form. The
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: United States achieved removal of the missiles from Cuba. But
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: the settlement also recognized Soviet concerns about Cuba's survival and, privately,
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: the strategic issue raised by American missiles in Turkey. The
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: deeper lesson lies in the record of contingency. Kennedy did
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: not choose immediate invasion. Khrushchev did not force a naval clash.
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: Soviet ships changed course. Messages arrived that could be interpreted
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: as an opening rather than an ultimatum. The U-2 shoot-down
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: did not automatically trigger retaliation. Private diplomacy made it possible
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: for both governments to move away from public positions that
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: had become increasingly rigid. None of this means that the
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: outcome was predetermined by wisdom. Later Soviet military records, American
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: meeting records, and retrospective testimony show planning failures, intelligence limits,
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: bureaucratic pressure, and serious disagreement. The crisis ended peacefully, but
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: not because anyone possessed complete control over it. The archival
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: record has changed the way the 13 days are understood.
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: Early memoirs placed Kennedy's inner circle at the center of
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: a story of measured resolve. Declassified documents preserve that resolve,
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: but they also show the pressures surrounding it. Later Soviet
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: material shows the risks and weaknesses of the secret deployment.
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: Cuban perspectives show that the island was not merely a
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: square on a strategic board. It was a country whose
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: people faced the prospect of invasion and nuclear attack while
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: larger powers negotiated over its future. On October 27th, the
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: destroyed U-2 made the crisis look as if it might
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: be moving beyond diplomacy. Less than 24 hours later, Khrushchev
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: publicly accepted missile withdrawal. Between those moments stood no single
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: miraculous decision and no simple victory. There was pressure, restraint, secrecy, fear, calculation,
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: and an agreement that allowed both nuclear powers to step back.
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: This has been Cold War history uncovered.