Latest / The Bill Handel Show / Supreme Court Decisions 2026 | NEW California Law Going into Effect

Transcript

Supreme Court Decisions 2026 | NEW California Law Going into Effect · The Bill Handel Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: six forty.
• 0:06
  Speaker 2: Bill Handle Here. It is a Wednesday morning, July first,
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: come Saturday. It is July fourth, the two hundred and
• 0:14
  Speaker 2: fiftieth anniversary or the celebration of the birthday of the
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: United States of America. And as I said earlier this
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: morning when we opened the show, interesting factoid that three presidents,
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: James Monroe, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson, all died on
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: July fourth, and Thomas Jefferson and John Adams died at
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: the same the same day, July fourth, at the same
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: time Monroe died obviously generations later. But all right, interesting
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: interesting stuff. Okay, a couple of big Supreme Court cases.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: As I said yesterday, and we all know that yesterday
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: was the last day of this year's term the Supreme Court.
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: It was the last day, which you what the Court
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: does is the last week of June, just before the
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: court recess happens that they are off for the summer.
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: Not a bad gig, by the way, they don't come
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: back until the first Monday in October. The big cases
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: are coming down. That's when they release the decisions. The
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: one that is I think the most interesting that people
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: are looking at the most and it really doesn't have
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: a lot to do with you or me. There are
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: a few things here that you know, Okay, which way
• 1:33
  Speaker 2: do you feel about them? You know, for example, transgender
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: athletes are not allowed to play in women's sports.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: Okay, that came down? Does that really how many people
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: is that affected? Does that really affect? Not much?
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: And the birthrights citizenship, I think is the most interesting one,
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: and I'll tell you why because of well, first of all,
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: the president's position with the Supreme Court said, I think
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: the most interesting part was at the Court, in a
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: six to three decision, upheld the fourteenth Amendment, in other words,
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: that the fourteenth Amendment holds that anybody born here in
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: the United States as a citizen. Thank you hardstop, We're done.
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: And the President argued that in fact, that's not true
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: if you look at the historical context of the fourteenth Amendment,
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: it had to do with enfranchising former slaves and it
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: was effectively anti slavery. That was the historical content context.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: And three of.
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: The justices bought that argument, particularly Clarence Thomas. But Claience
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: Thomas is big on historical context anyway, When he rules
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: in favor of Second Amendment rights across the board. I
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: don't think he's ever voted against it. What Clarence Thomas
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: said was, you have to look at the use of weapons,
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: guns held by the citizenry in the history historical context
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: the United States. This country was founded on citizen reowning weapons,
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: and therefore, if you look back now, I would think
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: that he would also argue, well, let's look at civil
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: rights in historical terms. Slavery wasn't that historical in this
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: country when blacks were owned by people, So why would
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: you push civil rights where African Americans or minorities would
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: have the same rights. I mean, that's the craziest stuff.
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: And this is the stuff that makes no sense to
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: be so it was a big deal for the president.
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: The birthrights citizenship made a huge deal and has been forever.
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: This is not new stuff. One thing about President Trump
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: is he doesn't come up with stuff that's new in
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: the sense of all of a sudden to be politically correct,
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: he's changing his tune. He does not reinvent himself just
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: for political consideration. I mean, he is who he is
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: and what he believes in is he's believed in for
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: a very very long time, particular early birthright citizenship, and
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: this has to do with being born in the United States. Now,
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: he says, well, let's talk about the fourteenth Amendment, where
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: six of the three justices, which I cannot believe if
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: not unanimous, the President has said and it's I love this.
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: He said, it's too bad for a country. Of course,
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: he said Congress could easily make it up, could change
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: it through legislation. Absolutely not true. The amendment is necessary.
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: Therefore the amendment of the amendment is necessary. That the
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: fourteenth Amendment is simply not appropriate. And so he said
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: that the intent was not of what we make of
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: what the court and what the laws have it mean.
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: And so he says, it's a little confusing. I said,
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: the fourteenth Amendment is confusing. It's too long. Okay, here's
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: the confusing part. I understand it. I can see his point.
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: The first clause of the fourteenth Amendment reads, all persons
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: born or naturalized in the United States, subject to the
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and the
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: state wherein they reside. A little confusing, don't you think
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: if you're born in a United States or a citizen hum, okay, okay.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: So that's confusing as hell.
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: And the point is that the Court of Horse upheld
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: the direct language of the fourteenth Amendment. It has never
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: been interpreted in any other way. Now, and the President
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: won't take That's one thing about Trump. He doesn't take
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: any of this stuff lying down. He says, Okay, this
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: is what you decide. Here's what we're gonna do. Congress
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: can change it. No, Congress cannot change it other than
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: a constitutional amendment, changing the constitution, getting rid of the
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: fourteenth Amendment, or at least that phrase in the fourteenth Amendment.
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: That's how it can change. That's it, and the rest
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: of it is just crapola. So and the other one
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: I want to share with you, and I've got so
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: many to talk about allowing the states to bar transgender
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: athletes from girls' sports. Now, this is not to say
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: that women are or trans are barred from engaging in
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: women's sports. It's men who have trans into women. And
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: the concept's unfair to treat these trands the same or
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: let them compete, because there have the advantages just having
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: a male physiology. And so we all it said was
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: is that the states are allowed to ban and you
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: have states to say no, thank you. California allows trans
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: women to.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: Compete, and California always will.
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: Justice Sonia Soda, Mayor, who is insanely liberal, of course,
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: dissented and she said that the court denies transgender athletes
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: the benefits of participating in school sports simply because it
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: thinks they have an inherent athletic advantage, even if the
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: facts show that they do not. How are they ever
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: gonna know? Isn't winning a sport or doing well in
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: a sport? Individual? Is it because we can prove that
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: the biological difference is somehow is a difference.
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: Maybe, but I don't think so. So oh in the end,
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: is it unfair? Yeah? I think so. Then the other court.
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: Then the court what they did, this is an interesting one,
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: is lifted spending limits on political parties and candidates. And
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: this has to do with limits that the federal government
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: has on the amount of money that a candidate or
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: can or a pack political action committee can spend on
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: a campaign. Now, a campaign itself, the campaign can only
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: get I think twenty five hundred dollars the Canada, you
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: can donate, and the court said that's no, no longer.
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: Now the candidacy, the actual.
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: The actual political organization of the candidate has unlimited money.
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: It really doesn't change anything because you have the packs,
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: the political action committees that have unlimited amount of money
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: that they can run for a candidacy. They just can't
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: be with the with the candidate itself. They just have
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: to separate themselves, which is really easy to do. So
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: I don't think this has a whole lot or a
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: big impact. And so now and started with wealthy people contributing,
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: and I'm talking about insanely wealthy people Caruso and Huffington
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: and meig what's your face who spent one hundreds of
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: millions of dollars on their own campaign. And the court said, yeah,
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: you can't stop someone from spending that amount of money
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: on your own campaign, violation of First Amendment rights. You
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: have the right to spend what you want. Is so
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: it's basically a political right. You can't stop it. And
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: so now they're basically saying there's no limitation and it
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: doesn't change much of anything. But what it does point out,
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: and I wouldn't bring this up, is that it's an interpretation.
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: This is what the courts do, and some people have
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: a hard time with this that the Court determines. You know,
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: for example, yesterday Neil and I are the day before
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: Neil and I talked about the First Amendment, and that
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: is a freedom of religion. The actual language of the
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: First Amendment says Congress shall make no law respecting the
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise they're up.
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: So during the seventy the Court said separation of church
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: is absolutely adamant and fundamental, which means that no religion
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: can be promulgated or pushed in the public schools. And
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: the Court now says and will say that all in
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: Congress does is you can't prohibit the free exercise or
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: the establishment of which means that you can have public
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: schools pitch Christianity because that's freedom of religion. School Boards
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: have the power or Judaism or Islam or Islam, you
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: can't stop it because you have the freedom of religion.
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: It's not really a separation of church and state.
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: It's saying that any organization publicly can in a public space, schools, parts, etc.
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: Practice their religion by effectively practicing their religion. It's changed completely,
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: it's gone the other way. This is what the Court
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: does thing. You'll see with the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment,
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: there were all kinds of restrictions with a Heller decision
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: in I think Chicago or Detroit, people could own guns.
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: Before that, you couldn't own a gun, You couldn't have
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: a gun at home. And that started with you had
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: the absolute right to own a gun, and that's now
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: been expanded. The Court is going to hear a case
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: on assault weapons. Does the state have the right to
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: ban or restrict assault weapons or magazines? And those of
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: us who are in favor of gun control and you
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: know where I sit, are saying, wait a minute, the
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: state does have the right to restrict and the court's
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: going to hear it. I'm going to tell you what's
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: going to happen. The Court is going to say the
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: states do not have the right to restrict the ownership
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: of assault weapons. Right now, they can't restrict guns. Oh,
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: and the other thing is issuance of gun permits. Effectively,
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: anybody who meets the standards can go ahead and get
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: a gun permit La County. It was impossible to get
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: a gun permit. Now they can't stop it. So again,
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: it's an interpretation of what the court says, and then
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: that boils down to two different schools of thought. One
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: is originalism. The originalists Scalia look at the actual language
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: of the Constitution. Congress will make no law respecting an
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: establishment or prohibiting the free exercise of religion, which means
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: religion in any form, anyway, anywhere, including public buildings, or
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: wait a minute, you can't pitch religion at all in
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: public spaces, public schools. Different interpretation. Second Amendment, different interpretation
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: freedom of speech, although everybody pretty well agrees you can't
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: yell fire in a crowded theater. Now, there's a case
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: that the Second Amendment case that is going to be
• 12:58
  Speaker 2: heard that the Court says we'll hear next term has
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: to do with the restriction of assault weapons. Can the
• 13:04
  Speaker 2: state ban or control assault weapons? The Court has in
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: fact consolidated cases where you have basically the same case,
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: the same argument going up, and they consolidate them and
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: make the decision. And the one that's going up is
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: that assault ban and also the restriction that says that
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: the state cannot ban the ownership or use of low
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: grade nuclear weapons because the Second Amendment allows you unbridled weaponry.
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: And so Howitzer's artillery, the tactical nuclear weapons. Is that
• 13:40
  Speaker 2: part of Second Amendment. Clarence Thomas is going to say, yes,
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: I guarantee you all right. Coming up, and there were more,
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: but we don't have time to go into those. Maybe
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: I'll do them tomorrow.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: Now I want to talk about laws in Californifornia that
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: are going into effect local jurisdiction.
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: This is minimum wage.
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: LA County are updating their minimum wage ordinance. And currently
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: California's minimum wage is sixteen dollars and ninety cents per hour,
• 14:17
  Speaker 2: and that's the minimum across California. Keep in mind, the
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: federal minimum wage has not changed in what fifty years,
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: It's still seven dollars and twenty five cents an hour.
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: Congratulations. Okay, so here it goes.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: LA County now is eighteen dollars and forty seven cents
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: and instead of the minimum California wage sixteen ninety City
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: of La eighteen forty two, Santa Monica eighteen forty seven,
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: Pasadena eighteen fifty seven, Malibu seventeen ninety one. So we
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: have the highest minimum wage in the country. Basically now
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: a hotel and hospitality. This was controversial as hell and
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: Neil and I spent a lot of time talking about this,
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: and that is hotel and hospitality minimum wage are far
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: higher than La County City, certainly state city of La
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: Santa Monica, Glendale twenty.
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: Five dollars an hour.
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: Now we're talking about enough wages to actually eat and
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: support yourself and a family. Long Beach twenty six fifty
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: an hour. West Hollywood twenty dollars and eighty seven cents
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: an hour.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: Healthcare workers also.
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: Get more money than the minimum wage almost any place
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: they live, and that is with healthcare workers large hospitals
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: facilities with over ten thousand full time employees, they get
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: twenty five dollars an hour, where in general they get
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: twenty three dollars an hour. For a medical facility clinics
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: except for urgent care twenty two dollars an hour. Independent
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: rural hospitals nineteen dollars and twenty eight cents. But independent
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: rural hospitals can pay less because it costs less money
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: to live in a rural place, and you can pay
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: for medical services with sides of bacon, for example, And
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: your car sits on concrete blocks and it doesn't drive
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: as well.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: As other places. Okay, We're going to.
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: Come back and do more school food and beverage. We
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: have a few more new laws in California starting today.
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: All right, laws that are kicking in today here in California.
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: We just talked about the minimum wage yesterday. Neil talked
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: about the minimum wage for fast food employees, which is, well, say,
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: it is pretty impressive. It's twenty dollars an hour, I believe,
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: and that a lot of restaurants, a lot of fast
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: food places have just simply say they can't afford it.
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: That's and we've talked about that before.
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: But other than the minimum wage, I want to go
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: on and talk about some other laws that kicked in today.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: Food and beverage. Labeling. We spend a lot of time
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: talking about it with Neil. AB six sixty is standardizing
• 17:26
  Speaker 2: how goods food to be sold, how they are labeled,
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: more specific phrasing, and when products expire.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: So there are only two.
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: Ways of describing best used by or best if frozen by.
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: It indicates the window of peak product quality, taste, or freshness,
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: which means you can go way beyond that. As Neil said,
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: this is just the peak, and there are plenty of
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: food stuffs that keep their vitality, their nutrition, maybe not
• 18:04
  Speaker 2: their looks. One of the things Neil talked about is,
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: for example, hamburger meat, when it starts getting a little
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: bit gray, it's fine, it's just a little bit gray.
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: We'llbly time to make it at that point.
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: But yeah, and so sell by dates are going to
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: be banned for the most part. Wine butlers can note
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: packaging dates, and deli and prepared foods grocery stores are
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: permitted to use a packed on label. There are exemptions
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: infant formula, eggs, and beer. And so the two that
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: are the big ones is best if used or best
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: or best if frozen by, and that is best if
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: used or used by and one says that you know,
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: go ahead and use it even if it's gone beyond
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: use by and freeze by. The other one is well,
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: the reality is used if best buy or frozen by
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: it just indicates when you're going to die. I think
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: that's fair, all right. Allergen disclosures, that's big.
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: Now. We're the first date in the Union to mandate that.
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: Large restaurant change disclose the most common food allergens, which
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: you've already seen on menus. If you are allergic to milk, eggs, peanuts,
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: tree nuts, wheat, soybeans, fish, shellfish, sesame those signs and
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: on the restaurant's menus they have to be published. They're
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: adding a new one is the most common food allergies
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: that are being used for the food. Here is everything
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: you may ever put in your mouth. If you are
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: allergic to, do'nt it, thank you very much. It's like
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: those ads for medicinesarmaceuticals that you see on TV. Lists
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: all the side effects and then the bottom. If you
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: are allergic to any of these, don't use it, Thank
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: you very much. Your geniuses. School cell cell phone ban.
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: Every school in California should have a policy in place
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: to limit or prohibit to use the smartphones by students
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: on school campuses.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: And we know what that's about.
• 20:24
  Speaker 2: Reducing transdistractions, protect students' mental health. The all gender bathrooms, boy,
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: is that conversational? And is that a little bit in
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: the world of discussion. SB seven and sixty requires all
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: public and charter schools to have at least one non
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: gendered restroom for students, and it has to come with
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: clear signage notifying that it's open to all students.
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: With gender identity.
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: Then you have crisis hotlines all middle high schools as
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: well as colleges universities. I have to have suicide prevention
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: hotline numbers on the student IDs. Okay, I don't know
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: if somebody's going to be upset about that one. Technology
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: streaming platforms like YouTube and peacock. Oh, this one is
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: a big one. Regulating the audio volume of commercials and
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: prohibit them from streaming ads at a volume louder. Now,
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: this is streaming platforms. One of the things that just
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: really angers me. Has have you noticed that when you
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: have this show, when you're listening to music on a
• 21:34
  Speaker 2: music station or talk on a talk station or a
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: sports station. Okay, here's the level that I'm speaking at,
• 21:41
  Speaker 2: and now a commercial comes on which is so jacked
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: up volume wise, it seems like it's almost screaming. And
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: they do that to somehow break through the mold and
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: somehow well, they want to grab your attention, and one
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: of the ways of doing that is streaming at much louder.
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: I don't know why we don't have a law that
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: does that. I really don't. No, we have technology that
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: does that, CONO that equalizes everything, and is that just
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: not being used? Are the commercials ignoring that.
• 22:15
  Speaker 3: No, they're not ignoring it. They just it's a limitter,
• 22:18
  Speaker 3: so it doesn't go too high. But if if it's
• 22:21
  Speaker 3: too low, I don't think that matters, and then some
• 22:23
  Speaker 3: will test the limits of a limitter.
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, because I noticed, and I complain all the time.
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: Here we are, I break to a commercial and all
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: of a sudden the volume explodes, and you go, come on, guys,
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: you know, I mean, that's not fair. It's not fair
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: to the listeners. It's not fair to us that are
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: on the air. All right, we're done with that. Coming up,
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: I want to talk about a little bit of history,
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: a little handle history, and that has to do with
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: Americans and how history is viewed at two fifty years
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: coming up, and of course we're going to go back
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: into history of the United States, and I want to
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: talk about how we're looking at it depending on where
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: you sit politically. Of course, everything is in the mind
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: of whoever is looking at it, right, everybody's biased. And
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: I'll explain a couple of myths actually, and how eight
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: Americans have shaped history. We just don't agree on how
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: and what and what side and how we view them.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: We'll be back with that KFI am six point.
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: You've been listening to the Bill handle Show.
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: Catch my Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app