Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Sacraments | John Calvin

Transcript

The Sacraments | John Calvin · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed Thinking. We're the show that digs into
0:03
complex theological works, specifically John Calvin's, and,
0:07
well, we try to pull out the clearest and most essential
0:10
ideas for you. Today we're beginning a deep
0:13
dive into Calvin's really rigorous analysis of the
0:16
Christian sacraments. We're drawing this straight from
0:19
the central sections of his Institutes of the Christian
0:22
Religion. And the source material, we
0:24
should say it's dense. It's not light reading, but it's
0:27
absolutely vital if you want a precise handle on the Reformed
0:31
view of these visible signs of God's grace.
0:34
Our mission is pretty clear. We're here to be your guides,
0:37
really, to structure Calvin's arguments in a way that just
0:40
cuts through a lot of the confusion and maybe
0:43
misinformation that's out there. We want to give you a shortcut
0:45
to understanding the the theological architecture that
0:48
Calvin built around. This, and the goal for you
0:50
listening, is clarity. We want you to walk away with a
0:53
solid grasp of the sacrament's exact purpose, how they
0:56
function, to support faith, how they're tied to God spoken
0:59
promise. And this is so critical how they
1:02
relate to the Holy Spirit's exclusive work.
1:05
Right, we have to define what they are by also being very
1:08
clear about what they are not. OK, so let's start right way
1:10
Calvin starts, which is establishing a really clear
1:12
definition. He gives the sacrament a dual
1:15
character right away, describing what God does and then what we
1:18
do. What are those two actions?
1:20
The first part is entirely from God.
1:21
To us a sacrament is an outward sign, and by this sign the Lord
1:27
seals the promises of His goodwill on our consciences.
1:30
On our consciences. So it's an internal
1:32
confirmation. Yes, and the whole point of that
1:35
is to sustain our weak and frail faith.
1:37
It's God confirming His faithfulness to us, for us.
1:41
So that's the inward benefit. But there's a second part which
1:44
is about our response, the public part.
1:46
Precisely. We, in receiving that sign,
1:49
attest our piety toward him. It's a public and a private
1:52
demonstration of our allegiance. A visible pledge, you could say.
1:55
It is. It's a pledge before other
1:57
people, but also before the Lord and his angels, that we belong
2:01
to Christ and we embrace his covenant.
2:03
So when Calvin gives a shorter version, a testimony of divine
2:06
grace confirmed by an outward sign with our mutual attestation
2:10
of piety, he's making sure both sides are there, the divine
2:14
origin and the human response. And this dual definition feels
2:17
very deliberate. He links it back to Augustine,
2:20
who had that famous shorthand. A sacrament is a visible sign of
2:25
a sacred thing, or a visible form of an invisible grace,
2:29
right? So if Augustine definition was
2:31
so classic, so respected, why did Calvin feel he needed to add
2:35
to it, to elaborate so much? Because Augustine's brevity, as
2:39
beautiful as it is, had been sort of exploited over the
2:42
centuries leading up to the Reformation, Calvin felt he had
2:45
to provide a much fuller statement, one that was
2:47
explicitly designed to dispel doubt and bring theological
2:50
precision, especially for, as he says, those less educated who
2:55
could be easily misled. So if you just say a visible
2:57
sign of a sacred thing, what's the danger there?
2:59
The danger is that people start to focus on the visible sign as
3:03
the sacred thing itself. Calvin's expansion immediately
3:08
directs your mind to the promise that's being sealed by the sign.
3:12
The promise is primary. That makes a lot of sense.
3:14
The definition itself becomes a guardrail against corruption.
3:18
OK, so let's talk about the word itself.
3:20
Sacrament. It didn't start its life as a
3:23
term for a Christian right, did it?
3:24
Not at all, no. The ancient translators of the
3:27
Bible, when they were rendering the Greek New Testament into
3:29
Latin, they often used the word sacramentum to translate the
3:33
Greek word Dustrian or mysterion.
3:36
Which just means mystery or secret.
3:39
Just the secret. And you see it all over Paul's
3:40
letters, right in Ephesians. He talks about the mystery of
3:43
God's will being made known. Or in Colossians, Speaking of
3:45
the secret, hidden for ages, but now revealed, which is Christ in
3:49
you, the hope of glory. Yes.
3:51
The old translator just didn't want to call something so grand
3:54
a simple secret, so they picked sacramentum.
3:56
It originally meant a secret that was applied to a secret
3:59
thing. From there it was a natural step
4:01
to apply it to signs that represent the sublime spiritual
4:04
matters. So the Greeks called the
4:06
mysteries. The Latins called them
4:08
sacraments. And that identity of meaning
4:10
just confirms that we're dealing with signs that are meant to
4:12
convey deep spiritual truths. OK, this brings us to a really
4:16
crucial link, the word and the sign.
4:20
If the sacrament is a seal, we have to talk about what it's
4:23
sealing. What's the fundamental
4:25
requirement for any sign to function according to Calvin?
4:28
The sign is never ever a standalone item.
4:31
It's always an appendix. It's an appendix to a preceding
4:35
promise. Its whole job is to confirm and
4:38
seal that promise. So if the promise, the word of
4:40
God is misses. Then the sign is empty,
4:42
meaningless. Which raises an obvious
4:45
question, a critical objection someone might have If the Word
4:48
of God is inherently perfect, firm, sufficient in itself, why
4:53
on earth do we need an appendix? Isn't adding a sign sort of
4:57
redundant? Doesn't it maybe even undermine
4:59
the idea that the word alone is sufficient?
5:01
It's a very fair challenge, and Galvin addresses it head on.
5:04
He insists that adding the sign isn't needed to confirm God's
5:06
truth. God's truth is absolutely firm.
5:08
It can't be confirmed better by any source other than itself.
5:11
So the need is entirely on our side.
5:13
Completely. It's a matter of God's infinite
5:15
kindness, his condescension toward our weakness.
5:17
So the supplement is for our benefit.
5:20
It's to address our ignorance, our dullness, our the feeble
5:24
nature of our faith. Precisely.
5:26
If we were purely spiritual beings, you know, like angels,
5:29
the bare word would be enough. But Calvin says we are creatures
5:33
who always creep on the ground, cleave to the flesh.
5:36
We struggle to conceive of anything purely spiritual.
5:39
So God, out of compassion, tempers Himself to our capacity.
5:43
He leads us to Himself using earthly visible elements.
5:46
Right. The sign becomes a kind of
5:48
physical conduit. He calls it a mirror of
5:51
spiritual blessings that's set before us in the flesh.
5:54
It gives us material anchor for an immaterial promise.
5:57
And the mechanism here is that the spiritual gifts themselves
5:59
aren't bestowed with the physical things, right?
6:02
The water doesn't magically become grace.
6:04
No, but the element is marked with spiritual meaning solely by
6:07
God's specific command. The physical element itself is
6:10
just water, is just bread, until God's decree and promise are
6:14
attached to it. This leads right into a huge
6:16
point of contention in the 16th century, the idea that the word
6:20
has to explain the sign. Calvin just rejects any notion
6:23
that the word in the sacrament is some kind of magic formula.
6:26
Oh, absolutely. He rejects it completely.
6:28
He says the word is not a whispered without meaning and
6:31
without faith, a mere noise like a magic incantation.
6:35
He's directly targeting a practice where the sign had been
6:38
totally divorced from any understanding.
6:40
So the word in the context of the sacrament has to be the
6:43
preached doctrine. It has to be a public
6:45
proclamation that makes us understand what the visible sign
6:49
means. And this is just a devastating
6:51
critique of what Calvin calls the monstrous profanation of the
6:55
mysteries that happened under papal tyranny.
6:57
The priests thought it was enough if they just mumbled the
7:00
consecration formula, the word in Latin, often in a whisper.
7:03
Well, the people just stood there bewildered, with no idea
7:06
what was being said or done right.
7:09
The spiritual meaning was completely hidden from them.
7:11
That whole practice intentionally kept the lady in
7:15
the dark. It reinforced this idea that
7:18
consecration was a magical technical act done by the
7:21
priest, not a spiritual grasp of God's promise by the people.
7:24
It's the exact opposite of a sacrament, being an aid to
7:27
faith. It is, and Calvin loved
7:30
Augustine's statement here. Let the word be added to the
7:32
element, and it will become a sacrament.
7:35
But he immediately points out the crucial thing Augustine
7:37
himself said next. Which is.
7:39
It becomes a sacrament, not because the word is said or
7:42
mumbled, but because it is believed.
7:44
And belief requires comprehension, yes.
7:47
The preaching is essential. The Sacramento word, that is the
7:50
promise proclaimed in a clear voice publicly, in a language
7:53
people can understand, is required to generate and sustain
7:56
faith. The spoken doctrine leads people
7:58
by the hand to the divine reality the sign is pointing to.
8:01
OK, so once we've established that the promise is primary, the
8:04
function of the sign is confirmation.
8:06
Calvin really solidifies this by bringing in Paul's analogy from
8:09
Romans 4, where circumcision is called a seal.
8:13
That comparison is so helpful. A seal is added to a document
8:17
not because the document itself is untrustworthy, but because
8:20
the seal provides an extra layer of assurance of clarity.
8:24
A seal on a blank piece of parchment is meaningless.
8:27
Exactly. It's nothing, but when you add
8:29
it to the written text, it confirms and legally ratifies
8:33
what's already written there. So the sacraments are the seals
8:36
that God adds to the document of his promises, and this means
8:39
they bring the promises into a sharper focus, Calvin says.
8:42
They represent God's promises as painted in a picture from life.
8:46
That pictorial representation is so critical for us, given what
8:49
he calls our dull capacity. The physical sign helps us rise
8:54
in devout contemplation to the lofty spiritual mysteries that
8:58
are hidden within it. It's a physical thing that
9:00
focuses the mind on an otherwise invisible reality.
9:03
Calvin then expands this idea of ratification to human covenants.
9:07
In ancient times, when people made covenants, they'd perform
9:10
these solemn physical acts. Like the slaughter of an animal
9:13
or giving a right hand to symbolize the agreement.
9:16
But the thing that actually established the covenant wasn't
9:18
the ACT itself. It was the preceding word, the
9:22
part that defined the laws and conditions of the agreement.
9:25
The physical act just confirmed the verbal decree.
9:28
I mean, if the words of the covenant hadn't been spoken, the
9:31
slaughter of a sow is just meaningless butchery, and this
9:35
applies perfectly to God's covenants.
9:37
So the sacraments are exercises which make us more certain of
9:40
the trustworthiness of God's Word.
9:42
They instruct us visually. Agustin captured this so well
9:46
when he called the sacrament a visible word.
9:49
It's a word spoken in the language of sight.
9:52
It graphically portrays God's promises right before our eyes.
9:55
There are other analogies, too. Calvin suggests thinking of the
9:59
Word as the foundation of our faith.
10:01
Right, the absolute foundation and then the sacraments are the
10:04
columns or the pillars. Faith rests on the Word, but
10:07
when you add the sacraments, that faith rests more firmly
10:10
supported by those visible columns.
10:12
He also calls them mirrors. Mirrors where we can contemplate
10:15
the riches of God's grace. They attest His goodwill toward
10:19
us even more expressly than the bare word alone can.
10:22
We have to pause here though and think about a logical objection.
10:25
If faith is true and genuine, some people would argue it's
10:29
already complete. If it's unshaken, it shouldn't
10:32
need confirmation from signs. This assumes the kind of perfect
10:37
static faith in this life. And that assumption is precisely
10:40
what Calvin wants to demolish. He would argue that anyone who
10:44
thinks they have perfect faith would be better off praying with
10:47
the apostles to increase their faith like they do in Luke 17.
10:51
No son of Adam has ever reached that kind of perfection in this
10:54
life. We aren't robots who just flip a
10:57
switch from zero faith to perfect faith.
10:59
We're constantly in a battle with the world, the flesh and
11:02
the devil that brings doubt and wavering.
11:04
Our faith is always in a state of progress.
11:06
We have to remember that famous cry from the man in Mark 9.
11:09
I believe. O Lord, help thou, my unbelief.
11:12
That faith, even though it was just beginning, was genuine and
11:15
good. But it desperately needed
11:17
improvement. So because we confess we are
11:20
weak sinners, we have to attribute the need for these
11:23
seals, the sacraments, to the imperfection of our own faith.
11:27
God supplies these physical aids because we're not yet perfectly
11:31
spiritualized. The objection could also be
11:33
framed around Acts 8, where Philip tells the Ethiopian
11:36
eunuch he can be baptized if he believes with all his heart.
11:40
Right. If faith fills the whole heart,
11:42
what size is left for it to be confirmed?
11:44
That's a good question. And it comes down to
11:46
interpreting Scripture in its context.
11:48
Calvin clarifies that believing with all our heart does not mean
11:53
believing perfectly. It signifies sincerity, depth.
11:57
It means you're embracing Christ sincerely and completely, but
12:00
you're not satisfied with the faith you have.
12:02
You're still hungry and thirsty and aspiring to Him.
12:05
So in scripture, when an action is done with the whole heart, it
12:08
usually means it's done sincerely, as opposed to someone
12:10
acting with a double heart or hypocritically.
12:13
That's it. Our faith has to progress
12:15
through all the stages of life until it reaches full maturity,
12:19
full manhood. As Paul talks about in Ephesians
12:21
4, the sacraments are God's appointed means to drive that
12:25
progression forward, sustaining a step by step as we move toward
12:29
Christian maturity. OK, so if faith is constantly
12:32
being increased and sustained through the sacraments, we have
12:35
to be really careful to avoid the misunderstanding that the
12:39
Holy Spirit is somehow secondary, or that the outward
12:42
right itself has some kind of apparent saving quality.
12:46
This is the theological danger zone.
12:48
Calvin is insistent that we keep a clear distinction about the
12:51
three concurrent works of God and faith.
12:54
And the Holy Spirit is the sole author of faith to begin it,
12:57
sustain it, and bring it to its end.
12:59
The Spirit's work is non negotiable completely.
13:01
So what are those 3 concurrent works that Calvin talks about?
13:04
First, God teaches and instructs us by his written word.
13:07
That's the foundation. Second, He confirms that word by
13:10
the visible signs, the sacraments and 3rd, and this is
13:13
the most crucial part, he illumines our minds by the light
13:16
of the Holy Spirit. Opening our hearts.
13:18
Opening our hearts so that both the Word and the visible signs
13:21
can genuinely enter in and have an effect on us.
13:25
Without the Spirit, the Word and sacraments would just strike our
13:28
ears. It appeared before our eyes, but
13:30
they'd never Pierce the hardness of our hearts.
13:32
So the Holy Spirit is the true internal teacher, but the
13:37
sacraments still have a specific ministry that they fulfill.
13:40
Yes, but that outward ministry is fulfilled only when the
13:43
Spirit, the inward teacher, comes to them.
13:46
The ultimate power to act rests exclusively with the Spirit.
13:50
The physical ministry. You know, the outward act of
13:52
applying water or receiving bread and wine, That's left to
13:55
the physical element. And apart from the Spirit's
13:58
action, that ministry is, in His words, empty and trifling.
14:02
The analogy he uses here is incredibly strong.
14:05
He says if the spirit is missing, the sacraments
14:07
accomplished nothing more in our minds than the splendor of the
14:10
sun shining upon blind eyes or a voice sounding in deaf ears.
14:14
Which really highlights our spiritual condition.
14:17
We are naturally blind and deaf to spiritual things, unless the
14:20
spirit grants as a kind of supernatural sharpness of vision
14:23
and hearing. So the physical elements are
14:25
useless to us until the Spirit quickens our souls.
14:28
Right. And This is why we don't take
14:29
away credit from the Spirit for confirming faith.
14:32
Rather, we say the Spirit is the one who prepares our minds
14:35
through internal illumination to receive the confirmation that
14:39
the outward sacrament offers. So the Word in sacrament set
14:43
God's goodwill before our eyes externally, but the Spirit
14:47
confirms it by engraving that confirmation internally on our
14:50
minds, making the external testimony effective.
14:53
And this doctrine is the bulwark against what Calvin saw as the
14:57
most devastating corruption of his day.
14:59
This clear division of Labor protects against the deadly and
15:03
pestilential error of a magical view of the sacraments.
15:07
This is where we need to define the Sophist schools.
15:10
Who exactly were these theological opponents Calvin was
15:13
targeting so sharply? Sophists is Calvin's, let's say,
15:16
derogatory term for the late medieval scholastic theologians,
15:20
thinkers like Peter Lombard and later the Dominican and
15:23
Franciscan schools who heavily formalized Sacramento theology
15:26
in the centuries before the Reformation.
15:28
And their teachings often led to a very mechanical view of grace.
15:32
And the specific error Calvin is attacking is the doctrine of
15:36
opus operatum. Explain that phrase.
15:38
Opus operatum means by the work having been worked, the Sophists
15:42
taught that the sacraments of the new Law justified and
15:45
conferred grace automatically as long as the recipient didn't
15:49
actively put up a barrier of mortal sin.
15:51
So the grace was inherent in the ritual itself.
15:53
It relied on the priest doing it correctly, not on the
15:56
recipient's faith. The grace transfer was tied to
15:59
the physical ritual, not the spiritual relationship.
16:02
Precisely. And this notion that grace just
16:06
flows directly from the physical act, Calvin calls it diabolical.
16:10
Strong language. Why?
16:11
Because by promising righteousness without the
16:13
necessity of faith, it basically hurls souls toward destruction.
16:17
It draws the true 'cause of righteousness from the physical
16:19
elements of the sacrament and binds vulnerable minds to a mere
16:23
physical appearance rather than to Christ Himself, who is the
16:26
only source of righteousness. So if a person just relied on
16:29
the sign, thinking the performance of the ritual
16:31
guaranteed salvation, they were deeply deceived.
16:33
Deeply, any person who thinks anything more is conferred on
16:37
them through the sacraments than what is first offered by God's
16:40
Word and then received by them in true faith.
16:44
They are falling into this error.
16:45
The crucial insight here is that assurance of salvation does not
16:48
depend on participating in the ceremony, as if justification
16:51
somehow lives in the sign. No justification is lodged in
16:54
Christ alone, and it's communicated no less by the
16:57
preaching of the gospel than by the seal of the sacrament.
17:01
It can stand totally unimpaired without the visible sign.
17:05
As Agustin says, you can have invisible sanctification, true
17:08
grace without a visible sign. And you can have a visible sign
17:12
without true sanctification, like with hypocrites.
17:14
Right. To avoid this deadly error,
17:16
Calvin insists, we have to distinguish clearly between the
17:19
figure, the sign and the truth. The matter or substance must not
17:24
confuse them. That separation is essential.
17:27
We have to recognize that the sign and the truth are not so
17:30
linked that they can't be separated.
17:32
This directly pushes back on the idea that grace is automatically
17:35
conferred on anyone who receives the physical sign.
17:37
Calvin uses Agustin's idea that in the elect alone, the
17:40
sacraments affect what they represent.
17:43
The outward washing of baptism is common to all, but the actual
17:47
grace of cleansing is not common to all.
17:49
The Lord's Supper gives us a pretty stark example of this
17:52
separation. Agustin asks.
17:53
Why is it that many receive from the altar and die and die in
17:57
receiving? And the example of Judas
17:59
receiving the SOP from Christ is a perfect illustration.
18:02
Judas's morsel was poison. Yes, but not because of the food
18:06
itself was evil. It was good food from the Lord.
18:09
It was poison because an evil faithless man received a good
18:12
thing evilly. The sacrament is one thing, the
18:15
saving power of the sacrament is another.
18:17
The wicked get the former, only the faithful get the latter.
18:20
So you have to eat inwardly with the heart spiritually, not just
18:24
press with the teeth. The sacrament is separated from
18:27
its truth by the unworthiness of the one receiving it, leaving
18:30
just a vain and useless figure. To get the truth, you have to
18:33
apprehend the Word and promise that are included there and
18:35
receive it in faith. This brings us to the core
18:38
identity of the sacraments. The matter or the substance of
18:41
all the sacraments is Christ. They promised nothing, confirm
18:45
nothing and accomplish nothing apart from him.
18:47
To define them in any other way, like Peter Lombard did by making
18:50
them causes of righteousness, is just totally unacceptable.
18:54
The effectiveness is not mechanical, it's proportional to
18:57
how much the ministry of the sign helps us foster, confirm,
19:01
and increase a true knowledge of Christ.
19:03
And that only happens when we receive what's offered in true
19:06
faith. Right.
19:07
The divine ordinance stays firm no matter who receives it.
19:10
God offers Christ faithfully, but the physical sign itself
19:13
does not benefit a wicked or impious man.
19:16
He receives it carnally, without the necessary spiritual
19:19
apprehension. So in concluding this section,
19:22
Calvin warns against giving extravagant praise to the
19:25
sacrament. They have the same office as the
19:27
Word to offer and set forth Christ.
19:30
They're useless unless they're received in faith.
19:32
He uses the analogy of pouring liquid into a closed vessel.
19:35
If you pour wine into a stopper bottle, the liquid just flows
19:39
away, splashes the outside, but the bottle inside remains empty.
19:42
It's the same with us without the spirit opening the heart
19:46
through faith, the sign just touches the outside of the
19:48
person. This warning is so important
19:51
because it leads people to think a hidden force is joined and
19:54
fastened to the physical elements.
19:56
As if grace were infused into the water or the wine, as wine
20:00
is given in a cup. That's the view to be avoided.
20:04
The function of the elements is simply to attest and ratify
20:06
God's goodwill. The Spirit alone brings the
20:09
graces of God and makes the outward ministry fruitful by
20:13
opening our minds and hearts to this visible testimony.
20:16
The inner grace of the Spirit must always be held distinct
20:19
from the outward ministry. Let's shift our focus a bit.
20:22
We've established a function of the ordinary church signs, but
20:25
let's look at the general application of the term
20:27
sacrament in a wider sense, Calvin says.
20:30
It can embrace all those signs God has ever given to people to
20:33
make them more certain of His promises throughout history.
20:35
Indeed. And sometimes God uses natural
20:38
things, sometimes miracles, to serve this purpose.
20:41
The earliest examples are right there in creation in early
20:44
history. Like the Tree of Life in Eden,
20:47
it was given to Adam as a visible physical guarantee of
20:50
immortality contingent on his obedience.
20:53
And then after the flood, the rainbow, he was given to Noah as
20:59
a token, a promise against another total flood destruction.
21:02
So these natural things were regarded as sacraments by Adam
21:05
and Noah, but not because the tree could magically grant
21:08
immortality or the rainbow could physically hold back water.
21:12
No, they were signs because they had a special mark engraved upon
21:16
them by God's Word. This divine stamp gave them a
21:19
new valuation. It's like an economic analogy.
21:21
A piece of crude silver from the earth is just a metal of a
21:24
certain weight. But when the government stamps
21:26
it with an official mark, it becomes a coin and gets a new
21:30
standardized value. In the same way, God can take
21:33
any created thing and mark it with His word, transforming a
21:36
bare element into a seal of His covenant.
21:39
And we see a lot of miraculous examples where God instituted a
21:41
sign just to confirm a feeble faith in a moment of great
21:44
doubt. Like the light in the smoking
21:46
firepot shown to Abraham when he was doubting the promise in
21:49
Genesis 15, or Gideon's fleece being alternately wet and dry.
21:53
Even the sundial shadow moving backward for Hezekiah.
21:57
Because these events were done to support and seal specific
22:00
promises making them physically visible, they were also
22:03
sacraments in this general sense.
22:05
However, our main focus has to come back to the ordinary
22:08
sacraments, the ones the Lord willed to be constant regular
22:12
rites in the Church meant to nourish His worshippers in one
22:16
faith forever. And these ordinary sacraments
22:19
consists not just in simple one off signs, but in repeatable
22:22
ceremonies. Ceremonies involve a community,
22:25
a public demonstration. Calvin notes that people can't
22:28
really be welded together in any religion unless they're bound by
22:31
some partnership of visible signs.
22:33
Which is why we focus only on the signs ordained by God.
22:36
We set aside any degenerate rites or mysteries of the
22:39
Gentiles because those lacked any grounding in God's prior
22:42
word. So these ordinary ceremonies
22:44
function as mutual agreements or covenants.
22:46
There are testimonies of grace from God to us.
22:49
But there are also marks of profession from us by which we
22:51
openly swear allegiance to Him. God promises reconciliation in
22:56
Christ, and we pledge ourselves to piety and innocence.
22:59
So the purpose of the ordinary ceremonies is dual exercising
23:03
God's people inwardly to Foster and confirm faith, and visibly
23:07
attesting our religion and allegiance before other people.
23:10
And this leads to the restriction of the term speaking
23:12
strictly of the ordinary perpetual ceremonies for the use
23:15
of the whole Church after Christ abrogated the Mosaic law, the
23:19
number is 2. Baptism and the Lord's Supper.
23:22
Calvin is very clear he's not including other rights, like the
23:25
laying on of hands for ministers in the specific list of ordinary
23:29
seals. The Old Testament, sacraments,
23:31
circumcision, sacrifices, purifications, they all look to
23:35
the exact same goal as ours do. They were instruments to direct
23:39
and lead people by the hand to Christ.
23:41
That continuity is the critical insight here.
23:43
They're all seals of God's promises, and since no promise
23:46
has ever been offered to humanity accepting Christ, all
23:49
sacraments from whatever age have to show forth Christ.
23:52
The difference, then, isn't in the object of the promise, but
23:55
in the clarity of the presentation.
23:57
The ancient signs foreshadowed a Christ who is still awaited.
24:00
Whereas our New Testament signs attest to a Christ who is
24:03
already given, revealed and resurrected.
24:05
We should detail this a bit. Take circumcision.
24:08
For the Jews, it was a symbol that admonished them that
24:11
whatever comes from man's natural seed is corrupt and
24:14
needs spiritual pruning. But more than that, it was a
24:16
seal of the righteousness that comes by faith.
24:19
It confirmed the promise of the blessed seed Christ that was
24:22
made to Abraham. Paul makes this very explicit in
24:26
Romans 4IN Galatians 3. They were awaiting Christ to
24:29
recover what they had lost in Adam.
24:31
What about the ceremonial purifications and baptisms of
24:34
the old law? They disclosed the Israelites
24:37
own uncleanness and filth, but at the same time they promised
24:40
another greater cleansing, which is Christ's blood.
24:44
The promise inside those purification rites was that
24:47
Christ's purity would wash us, allowing us to bring his
24:50
righteousness before God to cover all our deficiencies.
24:52
And the sacrifices, that endless cycle of bulls and goats, what
24:56
did they seal? The sacrifices constantly made
24:59
them aware of their deep unrighteousness.
25:01
They taught them that a satisfaction had to be paid to
25:04
God's justice, but that their own offering was not enough.
25:07
So they taught the need for a high priest and mediator.
25:10
Yes, for Christ, who would make satisfaction by shedding his own
25:15
blood, Himself being the obedient victim once and for
25:18
all. And then we moved to the New
25:19
Testament, and our two ceremonies, baptism and the
25:22
Supper, present Christ far more clearly because the full
25:24
revelation has come. Right.
25:26
Baptism attests to cleansing, symbolized by water.
25:29
The Supper attest to redemption and satisfaction symbolized by
25:33
blood. And these two spiritual
25:35
realities are found in Christ, who, as John says, came in water
25:38
and blood. The Spirit is the primary
25:40
witness who makes sure we're certain of this testimony and
25:44
that lofty mystery. The wellspring of our sacraments
25:47
was visibly demonstrated when water and blood flowed from
25:50
Christ's side on the cross. OK, now we get to the critical
25:53
theological fight here, the scholastic dogma.
25:55
This is the false doctrine that claimed Old Testament sacraments
25:58
only foreshadowed or symbolized grace, while New Testament
26:02
sacraments actually give it as a present reality.
26:04
That view has to be decisively rejected.
26:07
It cheapens the relationship the Old Testament fathers had with
26:09
Christ. Paul proves this dogma wrong in
26:13
1st Corinthians 10 when he teaches that the Fathers ate the
26:16
same spiritual food as we and drank the same spiritual drink,
26:20
and that rock from which they drank was Christ.
26:23
If the food and drink were the same Christ, then we can't treat
26:26
what revealed that true communion of Christ to the Jews
26:29
as if it were just an empty and effective sign.
26:31
No. Calvin argues that for Paul's
26:34
comparison to hold any water, there can't be a fundamental
26:37
inequality between US and the Jews in the spiritual benefits
26:41
we received through our respective signs.
26:43
Paul makes them equal in this vital aspect.
26:46
So they received Christ with all his spiritual riches.
26:49
They felt the same saving influence in their signs.
26:51
And they have the same seals of divine goodwill toward them, all
26:54
looking to eternal salvation through the promised Messiah.
26:58
This refutation is critical because if the OT signs only
27:01
offered a shadow, it would imply the OT believers had only a
27:04
partial or a weaker Christ. Would you directly contradicts
27:07
Paul? It does.
27:09
It would imply the spiritual benefits of the covenant.
27:11
We're less certain or less complete before Christ's advent,
27:15
which is just not true. The Jews who believe the promise
27:18
receive Christ fully, just as we do.
27:21
Sometimes opponents would try to use Paul's words about the
27:23
circumcision of the letter in Romans 2, claiming it confers
27:26
nothing, trying to lessen the dignity of the Old Testament
27:29
sign far below our baptism. But Calvin just points out that
27:33
the very same thing could be said of our New Testament sign.
27:36
God cares nothing about the outward watching of baptism
27:39
unless the heart is also inwardly cleansed by the Spirit.
27:43
Peter himself says the true benefit of baptism isn't in the
27:47
outward washing, but in the appeal to God for a clear
27:50
conscience through the resurrection of Christ.
27:53
And the seeming disparagement in Colossians 2, where Paul
27:56
compares circumcision made with hands to Christ's circumcision.
28:00
That's not a reduction to the OT science dignity when it was used
28:03
rightly. It's a contextual argument.
28:05
It is. He's arguing against those who
28:07
are demanding circumcision after its divine purpose had been
28:10
fulfilled. Paul is telling believers to
28:12
forsake the old shadows precisely because they now have
28:16
the clear revelation of the reality which is Christ.
28:20
Once Christ appeared, the ceremonies were fittingly
28:22
abrogated. As Calvin says, the shadows
28:24
vanished in the clear light of the sun.
28:26
Paul is speaking in a controversy, addressing people
28:29
who insisted piety must consistent ceremonies alone
28:32
without any regard to Christ and cut off from Christ.
28:36
All ceremonies OT or NT are stripped of their force.
28:40
The meaning is gone. The signs are reduced to
28:42
nothing. My Gaston provides the final
28:44
consensus here, confirming the absolute continuity.
28:47
The OT sacraments foretold Christ, but ours tell forth
28:51
Christ. That distinction sums it up
28:53
perfectly, he said. They were different in their
28:55
signs, but equal in the things signified.
28:57
Different invisible appearance, but equal in spiritual virtue.
29:00
They drank from the spiritual rock which was Christ.
29:02
We drink what is put on the altar, which spiritually is
29:05
Christ. The inner signification is
29:07
identical, so the single final difference is purely what?
29:10
A presentation not of essence. Our sacraments are fewer in
29:14
number, more majestic and signification, more excellent in
29:17
efficacy because they show forth Christ more richly and fully now
29:21
that He's already accomplished the work of salvation and is
29:24
revealed to the world. Hashtag #outro.
29:26
So this deep dive really gives us a unified vision of the
29:29
sacraments. They are divine seals instituted
29:32
for one purpose, to compensate for human weakness.
29:36
They are inextricably linked to the word of proclamation and
29:40
utterly reliant on the internal action of the Holy Spirit for
29:43
any benefit at all. They are not under any
29:46
circumstance magical devices or containers of grace that
29:49
dispense blessing by the work having been worked.
29:52
That mechanical view is the fundamental error that separates
29:55
the soul from Christ and blinds the mind to the need for genuine
29:58
living faith. They function as visible words,
30:01
as seals, and as mirrors, designed only to Foster and
30:04
confirm a faith that the Spirit has already begun.
30:07
So what does this highly structured theology mean for
30:10
your daily practice? Calvin offers a final thought
30:13
for reflection, especially when he's talking about the sophists
30:16
errors, if their error suggested that the believer contributes
30:20
something, even passively, just by being there to merit the
30:23
grace conferred in the sign. Then the true doctrine is that
30:26
believers should bring nothing to it but begging.
30:29
So consider this as you approach the Lord's table or you witness
30:32
a baptism, what does it mean for your piety to receive the
30:35
sacraments entirely as a passive act of accepting God's gift
30:39
rather than an active work you perform?
30:41
Calvin wrote that in receiving the sacraments, believers do
30:43
nothing to deserve praise, and that even in this act, no work
30:48
can be ascribed to them. If your receipt of the sign is
30:51
seen as a purely passive reception of God's gift, how
30:54
does that shift your personal preparation, your focus, and
30:57
your resulting gratitude? That's the tension we'll leave
31:00
you with.