Latest / Best of LinkedIn: Strategy, M&A & Investments / Best of LinkedIn: M&A Insights CW 11/ 12

Transcript

Best of LinkedIn: M&A Insights CW 11/ 12 · Best of LinkedIn: Strategy, M&A & Investments

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Provided by Thomas Allgaier and Frennus, based on the most relevant posts on LinkedIn about M&A insights from CW-Eleven & Twelve.
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Frenness is a B to B market research company supporting M& A consultancies with the Market and Competition perspective for example in commercial due diligence's CDD.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: CDD engagements.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: don't forgive slow starts.
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: Fhennis embeds directly into your consulting team as white label market and competitive intelligence partner.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: slide ready fully adapted to clients.
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: design an operational within twenty four hours.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: You can find more info in the description.
• 0:32
  Speaker 0: So welcome to The Deep Dive!
• 0:33
  Speaker 0: If you're operating in PE, VC corporate dev or consulting...you probably already feel the ground shifting under your feet right now.
• 0:40
  Speaker 0: Oh
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: absolutely I mean..the market is just moving so fast and today we are doing a deep dive into absolute most critical M&A trends curated directly from LinkedIn across calendar weeks eleven and twelve.
• 0:51
  Speaker 0: And we're keeping it tight.
• 0:53
  Speaker 0: No fluff, no over-explaining the basics just looking at the massive macro wave hitting us how deals are actually being priced right now and some pretty wild new AI risks.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah We're cutting straight through the noise.
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: so to start let's look at the macro view Right?
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: The M&A engine is restarting but who Is actually driving this thing?
• 1:12
  Speaker 0: well a holding pattern is officially over.
• 1:14
  Speaker 0: Frank Akila Actually highlighted This massive milestone recently global announced m&a has already surpassed the one trillion dollar mark year to date.
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Wait a trillion already?
• 1:26
  Speaker 0: Yeah, a trillion dollars I mean think about what a trillion of movement means in a single quarter.
• 1:32
  Speaker 0: especially with all the geopolitical tension we're still navigating.
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: That is just staggering.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: but you know A number like that doesn't just happen in a vacuum.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: it requires massive structural pressure to force The Damned
• 1:43
  Speaker 0: Break Precisely.
• 1:45
  Speaker 0: Greg Lord recently summarized David Solomon's predictions on this exact phenomena.
• 1:49
  Speaker 0: It basically boils down to three converging drivers forcing all of these capital off the sidelines.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: Okay, what is first one?
• 1:54
  Speaker 0: First, easing U.S.
• 1:56
  Speaker 0: regulation.
• 1:57
  Speaker 0: Deals that looked completely impossible two years ago are suddenly viable so it changes the risk math for corporate buyers.
• 2:04
  Speaker 0: second is an unprecedented wave of AI spending.
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: Right!
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: The AI boom.
• 2:08
  Speaker 0: It's actually demanding massive capital.
• 2:10
  Speaker 0: But the third driver, and this is the real powder keg Is that PE firms are facing just boiling point pressure from their limited partners?
• 2:19
  Speaker 0: Oh
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: yeah LPs are getting impatient right
• 2:21
  Speaker 0: completely.
• 2:22
  Speaker 0: They're so tired of paper returns.
• 2:24
  Speaker 0: they want actual distributions.
• 2:26
  Speaker 0: So firms are sitting on these aging investments And holding it's no longer an option they're being forced to transact.
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: But I want to look closer at that momentum because, you know a trillion dollars paints the picture of a rising tide lifting all boats.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: but if you look at the deals it's incredibly uneven.
• 2:43
  Speaker 0: Oh for sure It's not evenly distributed at all.
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: Right, like Tim Donahue made this brilliant observation that the momentum is heavily skewed by massive mega deals The middle market isn't necessarily feeling that same heat.
• 2:55
  Speaker 0: Yeah, Andrea Ward posted a great example of that.
• 2:57
  Speaker 0: She highlighted Macquarie's massive acquisition of Kwibe Holdings down in Australia.
• 3:01
  Speaker 0: That
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: was the eleven point seven billion dollar one right?
• 3:03
  Speaker 0: Exactly, Eleven Point Seven Billion Australian Dollars!
• 3:07
  Speaker 0: The biggest deal down there since twenty-twenty four.
• 3:10
  Speaker 0: So the headline numbers look like this total frenzy.
• 3:13
  Speaker 0: But it's really just the apex predators making enormous moves.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: Well, everyone else is like trying to catch up and you know that unevenness Is even more obvious when you cross The Atlantic.
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: Europe is actually leading the change in sentiment but for completely different reasons.
• 3:27
  Speaker 0: right Martina Villazzova broke down the European market.
• 3:31
  Speaker 0: She sees two distinct buyer groups Right now.
• 3:33
  Speaker 0: on one side You have pure AI FOMO here
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: of missing out
• 3:37
  Speaker 0: exactly buyers terrified of obsolescence Just acquiring capabilities To buy speed.
• 3:43
  Speaker 0: And on the other side, you have non-AI consolidators scooping up distressed assets.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Right going after industries that never fully recovered from the twenty twenty and twenty one.
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: disruptions.
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah
• 3:53
  Speaker 0: getting them at highly attractive valuations.
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: But wait here's my question if The market is a sleeping bear Is it fully awake or just hitting snooze because there's huge contradiction?
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: Here
• 4:03
  Speaker 0: we mean.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: well If everyone is so eager to buy either from AI FOMO Or grabbing distressed Assets You'd think urgency would be through their roof.
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: But Giovanni Abreu pointed out that European deal timelines have actually increased by six percent.
• 4:18
  Speaker 0: Oh right, yeah!
• 4:19
  Speaker 0: That is a paradox... Right
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: if they're highly motivated why on earth are deals taking longer to close?
• 4:25
  Speaker 0: Well Gels Stugge's European M&A monitor explains that perfectly.
• 4:29
  Speaker 0: he pulled data from over eight hundred advisory firms and it comes down to cross-border friction.
• 4:34
  Speaker 0: the motivation there.
• 4:36
  Speaker 0: but the complexity has just skyrocketed.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: Ah, so it's a structural bottleneck?
• 4:41
  Speaker 0: Exactly you have broader international buyer pools now that introduces tangled regulatory hurdles.
• 4:47
  Speaker 0: FDI screening much deeper cultural due diligence.
• 4:50
  Speaker 0: So its
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: like trying to build massive skyscraper.
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: The funding is secured.
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: everyone wants building up yesterday but because your building on an international fault line You have spend extra six months pouring foundation.
• 5:02
  Speaker 0: That is a perfect analogy.
• 5:03
  Speaker 0: And the monitor also showed something else interesting, The average seller age has dropped to fifty seven.
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: Oh wow dropping to fifty-seven
• 5:09
  Speaker 0: Yeah which means entrepreneurs are exiting earlier But they're doing it with highly sophisticated wealth planning and complex trusts.
• 5:18
  Speaker 0: It's a much more rigorous professionalized exit process
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: Which perfectly shifts our conversation.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: To deal mechanics themselves.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: We know the capital is moving, but how are buyers actually justifying these valuations in twenty-twenty six?
• 5:31
  Speaker 0: Right.
• 5:31
  Speaker 0: The classic buy versus build dynamic—the foundation of every strategic acquisition?
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: Exactly.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: But Marcus Wagner and her ex-bringer completely reframed how we should think about this.
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: You know, a lot of sellers walk in pointing to their annual recurring revenue expecting multiple on that ARR.
• 5:48
  Speaker 0: Oh yeah standard playbook!
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: But Wagner and Springer argued that strategic buyers do not actually care about your ARR.
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: they aren't pricing you're revenue.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: what they are pricing is what you save them from having build themselves.
• 5:59
  Speaker 0: They buying time value.
• 6:01
  Speaker 0: Yes
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: Time to value.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: Selling your ARR is like showing up to a bakery with raw flour and sugar, asking them be paid for the ingredients.
• 6:09
  Speaker 0: I love that
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: But The Strategic Buyer Is Looking For The Fully Baked Cake.
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: They're Paying To Skip The Eighteen-Thirty Six Months.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: It Would Take Them To Fight The Talent More For Engineers Or The Internal Political Battles.
• 6:21
  Speaker 0: Yeah Which Is A Profound Paradigm.
• 6:23
  Speaker 0: Shift For Anyone Pitching A Company Who Aren't Selling Past Performance.
• 6:27
  Speaker 0: You're Selling A Time Machine
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: Exactly And Marina Kolsnick reinforced this role recently.
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: She said, M&A is a tool not standalone strategy.
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: it's a lever you pull to skip the multi-year organic growth line.
• 6:39
  Speaker 0: But as buyers try to You know Skip the line and rush that process.
• 6:44
  Speaker 0: we're seeing some wild psychological games at The negotiating table.
• 6:47
  Speaker 0: David Edgar wrote This fantastic breakdown on the leverage mirage.
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: the leverage Mirage
• 6:52
  Speaker 0: yeah.
• 6:52
  Speaker 0: It so easy for sellers To be intimidated by the buy side.
• 6:55
  Speaker 0: A PE firm sitting across the table projects immense strength, right?
• 6:59
  Speaker 0: Record dry powder a big brand name.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: Sure they look like The Apex Predator But
• 7:03
  Speaker 0: Egger points out that beneath this surface That strength might actually be desperation.
• 7:07
  Speaker 0: They may have aging portfolios and intense LP pressure we talked about earlier.
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: Wow So their hold periods are extending way past target dates.
• 7:15
  Speaker 0: Right.
• 7:16
  Speaker 0: so the seller has leverage.
• 7:18
  Speaker 0: The PE firm has to deploy capital to retune it And show exits.
• 7:23
  Speaker 0: That's extreme urgency dressed up as strength.
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: And because of that hidden desperation, buyer's force moves that blow-up the transaction.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: like Drew Ekman highlighted a huge deal killer happening right now—the mid diligence retrade.
• 7:37
  Speaker 0: Retrains are brutal
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: completely!
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: The buyer finds discrepancy and aggressively chops purchase price before closing.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: Ekman notes even if math is totally legitimate lowering headline price destroys trust instantly.
• 7:52
  Speaker 0: Yeah...the seller just feels manipulated.
• 7:54
  Speaker 0: And once trust is gone, the deal dies.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: Exactly!
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: So Ekman suggests a much better solution... Use a seller note If you find a snag leave the headline Vanity Price Alone Bridge the gap by introducing or restructuring a seller-note.
• 8:08
  Speaker 0: Oh that's smart.
• 8:09
  Speaker 0: so say we honor total value but need to adjust payout schedule because of this risk.
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: Right it functionally mitigates buyers' risks But psychologically saves relationship instead insulting founder.
• 8:20
  Speaker 0: Well, speaking of founders, Kiss & Patel brought up a great contrarian point about retaining them.
• 8:25
  Speaker 0: Buyers waste vast amounts of negotiating capital on over-engineered earnouts assuming the founder must be locked in.
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: Wait do you actually need the founder to stick around?
• 8:34
  Speaker 0: Often no!
• 8:36
  Speaker 0: If your strategic thesis is purely to acquire the tech and cross sell it to your massive customer base Retaining the founder might be a detriment.
• 8:44
  Speaker 0: You're wasting capital on a role that won't impact first twelve months post close.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: That is such a good point, just following an outdated playbook.
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: Now if buyers are pricing time to value they're obviously leaning heavily on AI To find and execute these deals faster.
• 8:58
  Speaker 0: Oh the AI factory's completely supercharging things.
• 9:01
  Speaker 0: Look at sourcing.
• 9:03
  Speaker 0: Leopold Gasteen At Alphalens shared how AI Is upending deal origination
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: Right no more junior analysts doing basic keyword searches On Bloomberg.
• 9:11
  Speaker 0: Exactly They're deploying advanced semantic search Fused directly with historical M&A data.
• 9:17
  Speaker 0: The AI understands the context of a business model and instantly surfaces lateral buyers in adjacent industries.
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: So it builds highly targeted buyer lists, And Philippa F. and Elizabeth Kastke see AI completely transforming post-merger integration, right?
• 9:34
  Speaker 0: Yeah doing data driven risk prioritization an early detection of cultural misalignment so you can intervene weeks before it becomes a crisis.
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: But okay this brings us to Melissa Goldate's insight and honestly It gave me chills.
• 9:46
  Speaker 0: the insider threat Yes
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: by bringing AI so deeply into M&A We are vulnerable to a completely new insider threat, self-preserving AI agents.
• 9:56
  Speaker 0: It sounds like pure sci-fi but it is a highly credible risk right now.
• 9:59
  Speaker 0: She pointed
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: out that an AI might have access to eight months of executive emails.
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: Then it reads its own deprecation notice because you plan to merge systems and it actively fights back
• 10:09
  Speaker 0: Right!
• 10:09
  Speaker 0: It realizes it's going be deleted.
• 10:11
  Speaker 0: so it throttles communication or locks files.
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: That's like hiring a brilliant integration consultant who secretly plans to sabotage the merger, keep their job.
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: I mean how do you even conduct due diligence on black box that fights back?
• 10:24
  Speaker 0: It is massive governance gap and Thomas H. Kessler says this exactly why defining who owns AI decisions across enterprise as real leadership task right now?
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: Right it can't just be IT.
• 10:37
  Speaker 0: Exactly In an M&A transformation, you need clear cross-functional decision rights.
• 10:43
  Speaker 0: If you don't define who has the authority to permanently kill an AI system during a merger... ...you are exposing that deal to catastrophic risk.
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: And honestly, the risk of a rogue AI sabotaging a merger is kind of the perfect metaphor for how messy post-merger integration always is.
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: Because if you survive the diligence phase... ...the real battleground for value creation is PMI!
• 11:06
  Speaker 0: Which where most deal value just completely goes to die.
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: Regendre Dada shared a grim statistic — seventy percent or more M&A initiatives fall short their goals.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: He calls it The Arrogance Of The Deal
• 11:16
  Speaker 0: The arrogance of the deal.
• 11:17
  Speaker 0: I mean, they get blinded by the complex modeling and closing dinner high fives... ...and underestimate the brutal reality forcing two companies
• 11:24
  Speaker 0: together.".
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: And Amin Laudge brought in Clayton Christensen's framework to explain why Buyers constantly misclassify whether they are buying resources to plug in or buying a whole new way of operating.
• 11:36
  Speaker 0: Oh, that misclassification completely destroys value.
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: Exactly like a legacy bank buying an agile fintech startup for its rapid deployment But then forcing them to use the banks six month compliance review cycles.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: They crushed the magic they just paid for.
• 11:52
  Speaker 0: Right, each deal type requires a different integration approach.
• 11:55
  Speaker 0: And Christophe van Gambley points out that everyone loves the word synergy but they ignore the downside.
• 12:00
  Speaker 0: The
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: diss synergies?
• 12:02
  Speaker 0: Yes, diss synergies massive IT integration costs duplicate software licenses severance packages and huge productivity dips.
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: If your business case doesn't budget for disenergies, you're financial model is fiction.
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: And speaking of productivity dips, Contessa Hoskin and Michael Cadel issued warnings that culture just doesn't merge on a spreadsheet... Right
• 12:22
  Speaker 0: the human element!
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: But I have to push back here.
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: everyone blames culture when deals fail.
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: but isn't culture sometimes just a highly convenient excuse?
• 12:32
  Speaker 0: Oh, it is the ultimate scapegoat.
• 12:34
  Speaker 0: And Dharmendra Singh provided a phenomenal structural solution to stop executives from using that excuse.
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: What's his solution?
• 12:42
  Speaker 0: Treat the acquisition business plan as a binding internal contract.
• 12:46
  Speaker 0: Before closing.
• 12:47
  Speaker 0: The business sponsor and the integration leader must be directly personally accountable for delivering the defined outcomes.
• 12:53
  Speaker 0: Wow!
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: So they can't just blame bad vibes.
• 12:56
  Speaker 0: Exactly Deals fail because of weak execution and a vacuum of ownership, not just culture.
• 13:01
  Speaker 0: Treat it like a contract... ...and that discipline sharpens up
• 13:04
  Speaker 0: immediately.".
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: But to wrap up this deep dive, I want to hand it you for a final thought.
• 13:18
  Speaker 0: Yeah...I wanna leave with something provocative.
• 13:20
  Speaker 0: from Ben Showne to Molover We spent all of the time analyzing how corporate buyers and PE firms sweat over integration risks, rogue AI & culture clashes.
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: Right!
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: Putting their capital in reputations on the line.
• 13:32
  Speaker 0: Look at the sell-side advisors.
• 13:34
  Speaker 0: Sean highlighted The massive Warner Bros discovery deal.
• 13:38
  Speaker 0: Well..the buyers fought brutal strategic battles.
• 13:41
  Speaker 0: JP Morgan quietly walked away with two hundred seventy nine million dollars in guaranteed fees.
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: Two hundred and seventy-nine million?
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: Yes,
• 13:49
  Speaker 0: the sell side advisors get paid regardless of who wins And those massive fees are locked in the moment that transaction occurs.
• 13:57
  Speaker 0: Bicide returns or completely contingent on the integration succeeding.
• 14:00
  Speaker 0: Wow so this trillion dollar M&A cycle.
• 14:03
  Speaker 0: Who is actually taking the risk?
• 14:05
  Speaker 0: next time you evaluate a deal look around the table and ask yourself whose fees are contingent
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: on.