Latest / Man in America Podcast / "Sudden Deaths are at an ALL TIME HIGH" w/Dr. William Makis

Transcript

"Sudden Deaths are at an ALL TIME HIGH" w/Dr. William Makis · Man in America Podcast

• 0:00
  Seth Holehouse: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. An unfortunate part of doing this show is reporting on the difficult and the dark and somewhat depressing subjects of what the reality of our world is right now. And it's unfortunate because we do live in somewhat of a dark dystopian time as you're probably aware of, very well aware of as well. And one of those topics has been the COVID vaccine, the rollout the rollout of the vaccine, the propaganda surrounding it, the lockdowns, the pandemic.
• 0:35
  But a big part has also been just what the vaccine is doing to the population, the injuries, the deaths, the side effects, the stories. And so joining me today is Doctor. William Mackus, someone who has been on the forefront of trying to raise awareness to about what this vaccine is actually doing to people. And what he does primarily is compile the individual stories of all the different deaths of people, the sudden deaths. But then he pieces them together and creates a narrative and shows that yes, it's the professions that had mandates like hospitals, first responders, teachers, etc, where he sees these spikes and deaths.
• 1:15
  And so today, we're gonna be getting an update from him on what he's seeing with this data. But also, he's someone that has extensive background in diagnosing and treating cancer. So we're talking about what's happening with turbo cancer, how he thinks that ties in to Pfizer's forty three billion dollar acquisition of a cancer company, but also some information about the future plans for Moderna, Pfizer, and big pharma to all of a sudden have this big pivot into treating cancers, but also predictions about where things will be at in 2025 and beyond, which seem to be quite concerning. So folks, please enjoy this interview with doctor William Maccas. Doctor Maccas, it's great to have you back on.
• 2:02
  Thank you for joining us.
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: Thank you for having me again.
• 2:06
  Seth Holehouse: So you've made quite a name for yourself in in so much as that what you've done is you've just been someone who's tracking the effects of the vaccine. And like diligently, I you know, I follow you on Twitter, I'm subscribed to your Substack. And what I'm seeing is that you're constantly updating articles and okay, here's 50 teachers that have since died. Here's 100 military, here's this. So you're you're really keeping an eye on the individual stories.
• 2:36
  And you oftentimes, what you'll do is you'll go and you'll show, here's the person, here's their, you know, their their go, you know, give send or whatever, give send go, whatever campaign they used to raise money because they had they had cancer. Here's their Facebook profile, I got the vaccine. You'll paint that picture. But what the picture it also paints is not just that of the individuals, but the larger trends. And so as someone that has really focused on tracking and compiling this data, what are the trends that you're seeing with the I guess, what are the main illnesses and cause of deaths that you're seeing that you would attribute to the vaccine?
• 3:12
  And what are the trends in those?
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Seth. Well, you know, it's, I've been reporting on a regular basis the sudden deaths, and the individual stories, going back earlier this year. Initially, it had started by tracking I had started by tracking the sudden deaths of Canadian doctors. And then, you know, I noticed Canadian high school kids were dying suddenly, and no one was reporting on that, no one was tracking that. And, you know, to this day, no one else is tracking the deaths of Canadian doctors.
• 3:48
  And everyone asks me, you know, every now and then, what's the tally of dead Canadian doctors now who've died suddenly? Because the medical authorities have covered it up, and they went to great lengths to cover it up. They don't want the population to know about it. They deleted over a thousand Canadian doctor deaths from their own websites. They've put, disinformation gurus, on the case who, are smearing me, are attacking me professionally, like, lawyer Timothy Caulfield at University of Alberta, who's won the order of Canada for fighting misinformation and disinformation as they call it, who's received, you know, I think over $2,000,000 from the Trudeau government to really cover up these deaths.
• 4:32
  And so, I, of course, then started started covering deaths in The United States. And then then I noticed, the the patterns that I noticed were wherever the vaccine was enforced, wherever the COVID vaccine mandates were rolled out, that's where you're seeing, you know, the the skyrocketing, sudden and unexpected deaths or, you know, they're now being referred to as excess deaths, because we have we have skyrocketing excess deaths in all the highly COVID vaccinated countries, whether it's United States. Doctor Pierre Coury has recently, you know, put out an op ed on that. We have excess deaths in Canada, in The United Kingdom, and the authorities will throw up their hands and say, we have no idea what's causing these excess deaths. And, you know, I've reported about four thousand, you know, of these sudden and unexpected deaths of mostly young people, and it's really where the vaccines were mandated.
• 5:33
  So this is young, sports players, you know, kids in in 12, 13, 14 years old who just wanted to play hockey. They were mandated the vaccines so they could play hockey. You had, universities and colleges, especially, I think there wasn't a single university or college in North America that at some point didn't mandate the COVID nineteen vaccines for the students to be able to continue, studying at that university. And now we're only seeing the effects of that, you know, a year or two later. We're still seeing the effects of that where, young university and college students are collapsing.
• 6:12
  They're coming down with myocarditis, blood clots, autoimmune diseases, neurological diseases, and cancers. And then it's the vaccine mandated professions. And the professions that had the most aggressive mandates obviously were healthcare. So I've tracked the deaths of doctors in all the vaccinated countries, not just Canada, but United States, Ireland, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Nurses, all types of health care workers were mandated COVID vaccines to keep their jobs. And then we have first responders like, ambulance drivers, police officers, firefighters, city workers, and teachers.
• 6:54
  That was another big category of of individuals who were mandated vaccine, who and and the vast majority of whom abided by the vaccine mandates, and now we're seeing tremendous amount of injuries and deaths among teachers and then, of course, the military as well.
• 7:11
  Seth Holehouse: And are you okay. So if you look at the when the vaccine campaign rolled out, and when most people, I think, got those vaccines, that time period, obviously, they've had the boosters that followed up. But we've seen the percentage of people that actually went and got the second, the third, the fourth, the fifth booster, it's a sharp drop off. Now it's I think in the low low one digits of a percentage of people that actually got the most recent booster. So now, depending on how long it takes for the vaccine side effects to then kick in, one might say that, okay, perhaps there was a big spike of deaths and injuries initially.
• 7:53
  But now that the the boosters and all that has really kind of worn off and people are no longer rushing to get them, that you would expect perhaps that the deaths are also then starting to trend downward. Is that what you're seeing in your data? Or are you seeing that we're actually continuing to see even more deaths happen, which might indicate that there's longer terms effects of the vaccine that are starting to manifest themselves.
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: What's fascinating is that that's actually not what what I'm seeing. So, you know, as you describe it, you would expect to see spikes when when the vaccines were rolled out. And then, of course, you know, with the booster shots, the the uptake of the booster shot was much lower. So if if the uptake of the initial two doses was, let's say, eighty to eighty five percent, well, maybe only fifty percent of of people took the booster shot, and then maybe only twenty percent took the second booster shot. And now, you know, this latest booster shot, I think it's down to, like, ten percent uptake.
• 8:53
  That's it's plateaued at about ten percent in in, you know, most of the countries where there was high uptake initially. And unfortunately, when it comes to the all cause mortality, when it comes to cardiac mortality, cardiac specific mortality, and when it comes to cancer specific mortality, the mortality has very steadily been going up since the beginning of 2021 when the vaccines rolled out. So it's very fascinating that there is clearly a long term effect of these vaccines where, the damage just continues to manifest itself two years down the road, know, two and a half years down the road. And people will tell me, you know, it's shocking because I will put the vaccine status of an individual who's died suddenly, and I can only find, you know, let's say the first two shots that they had in 2021, or maybe they had the booster shot in late twenty twenty one. And then, you know, there's no evidence that they took another shot again, and they die suddenly two years later.
• 9:59
  And and you can tell that they haven't really struggled with their health or that there weren't any kind of warning signs. And two years later, they're developing blood clots in their lungs, or they have a heart attack, or they have myocarditis and they have heart damage, heart failure. And it's always the doctors don't know why. Doctors are always baffled they don't know what's happening. You know, all kinds of neurological problems, autoimmune diseases, and especially the two categories that are growing the most right now are, neurological issues, neurological injuries, and turbo cancers.
• 10:36
  So these extremely aggressive cancers that are showing up in young people at a late stage, usually stage four. And so this trend has been very steadily going up. And what's alarming about this is that I don't I don't really have an idea where this trend is gonna start to drop off because it hasn't been dropping off. As I said, it hasn't been dropping off for all cause mortality, not for cardiac mortality or cancer mortality. So for now, the trend in 2023, it just continues upwards.
• 11:10
  And and and it's the situation is worse than it was in 2021 or 2022, and I don't see any sign of it slowing down despite the fact that ninety percent of people have stopped taking the booster shots.
• 11:23
  Seth Holehouse: Hey, folks. I've got a quick message for you. So I'm sure you've heard a lot of people, myself included, talking about the importance of buying precious metals, gold and silver. But what's really behind that? Is it just a thing of, hey, buy this gold, buy this silver.
• 11:37
  Right? Or is there something deeper that we should be looking at? So I recently came across some figures about house prices. So in 1930, the average family home was approximately $4,000. Fast forward to 02/2023, the average family home is just over $400,000.
• 11:54
  So you have to ask yourself, why is that? Is it because things have just gotten more expensive? No, it's actually because the dollar has lost 99% of its value since 1930. Right? When people talk about the collapse the dollar or inflation, this is what it means.
• 12:08
  Now let's take a look at gold. So in 1930, if you wanted to purchase your home in gold, it would take approximately 200 gold coins. So 200 gold coins would purchase the average family home in 1930, about $4,000. Now, if you instead of buying a home with that gold or cash, you set those aside. If you set aside $4,000 in cash in 1930, it would be worth $4,000 today.
• 12:35
  What can you buy with $4,000? Can you buy a family home? No, you can't even buy a crappy used car. But if you set aside $4,000 worth of gold coins in 1930, which is 200 gold coins, 1 ounce coins, that would be worth approximately $400,000 today. And this is the key lesson about precious metals.
• 12:57
  It's not about getting rich. It's about putting your money into an asset that protects you against inflation and against the destruction of the currency, which is what happens to all fiat currencies, especially now we're in the end days of the dollar. And so that's why it's important, maybe not all of your money, but a portion of your money, a portion of what you have, I highly recommend putting it into precious metals of gold and silver because what it's doing is it's protecting you. This is an asset that has stood the test of time, not just stood the test of time since the 1930s, we're talking about the rise and fall of civilizations. Gold was used to buy houses back in ancient Rome.
• 13:36
  It's still around. It's an asset that will forever have its value. So folks, if you want to do this and you need someone you can trust, there's no person I can recommend more than Doctor. Kirk Elliott. He's a very good friend of mine.
• 13:48
  He's a strong Christian patriot, and he's out to really help people to protect their savings and what you've worked for against the destruction of the dollar, not to mention also protecting it against the dangers of a central bank digital currencies. So to learn more about this, go to goldwithseth.com or call (720) 605-3900. Again, that's goldwithseth.com or (720) 605-3900. Both those places will allow you to set up a quick appointment where you can talk to a wealth advisor that will help get you started on this path. Again, goldwithseth.com 7 2 0 6 0 5 3 9 0 zero.
• 14:29
  And that's almost more worrying than the initial, where we could at least tie it to the up to, you know, the increase in the vaccines being taken because then it's predictable. And you can say, okay, well, these mean doses were given, and this is the, you know, say, a two percent chance of x happening, and as the doses drop down, and that also drops down as well. It's frightening to think about what what's gonna happen in the next, say, two two years from now, the next five years. What are we gonna see down the line? That's where, to me, I don't think that we'll understand the real damage this vaccination campaign has done to mankind.
• 15:08
  It could take generations to understand it. It's like now we're we're looking back and looking at agent orange. Right? And we're saying, wow, we're still seeing deformations from that. And and so it took multiple generations to really understand how that affects things.
• 15:24
  And so I I know that your your background is is oncology and cancer. And so two two parts to this question. One is if you can just give a quick kind of highlight of your background with cancer. Because it's important for people to understand when you talk about turbo cancers, you're coming from a a wealth of experience treating and diagnosing cancers. So I want you to do that, also just explain to us specifically what you're seeing happen with these turbo cancers.
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: Certainly. So this is a very controversial topic. Right now, turbo cancer, it's fascinating because the medical establishment is in complete denial about this phenomenon. They're basically saying it doesn't exist. There are fact checks saying it doesn't exist.
• 16:09
  You know, you've got, there's a surgical oncologist, Doctor. David Gorski, for example, who's come out and written articles about how this is a completely made up phenomenon that anti vaxxers made up. And you know, I'm I'm seeing it. And, you know, I'm giving the snapshot at the ground level. I'm giving the clinical examples of of of of this phenomenon.
• 16:35
  And, you know, we're gonna need to to get data, and we're gonna need whistleblowers to get the data on how, you know, cancer is exploding population wise. And there's bits and pieces of that data. And of course, the CDC is trying to hide that data, so they're going to be massaging that data that is, you know, released to the public so that, you know, they don't alarm the public. But we are seeing bits and pieces of it, for example, in The UK, disability application that, it's showing up there. In some of the individual states, it's showing up where there isn't as much manipulation.
• 17:07
  So it is showing up. Now in terms of my background, I'm a nuclear medicine physician. Nuclear medicine is a five year specialization that mostly deals with diagnostic imaging. It's a branch of diagnostic radiology. However, because we deal with nuclear medicine, and medical isotopes, which are used in treatment of certain cancers, we do get training and background in oncology as well.
• 17:38
  And so, my practice, for, the last decade has been about 50% diagnostics and 50% treatment, cancer treatment. So I've had several hundred cancer patients under my care as their primary oncologist. Now what I usually have to do is, I have to diagnose the cancer. That means I have to review their CT imaging, their MRI imaging. I conducted the PET CT imaging, which is the standard of care for most cancers for diagnostics.
• 18:10
  I have to, of course, correlate it, not just clinically, but I have to correlate it with the pathology, with the type of cancer the patient has. And so I've done, you know, tens of thousands of scans in my career and I've treated hundreds of cancer patients, over my career. Not every type of cancer, but certain types of cancers, I specialized in. And so, you know, I do have a solid background, in cancer care, cancer diagnostics, and cancer treatment. And I started seeing this phenomenon.
• 18:42
  I actually, ironically enough, started seeing it in Canadian doctors Because I was tracking the deaths of, the sudden deaths of Canadian doctors, and there I started to see extremely aggressive cancers that were growing rapidly. They were presenting at a late stage in young doctors, and they were behaving very unusually. You know, you would have a lung cancer that would show up in a 40 year old doctor, and then it would kill them in less than a year, and you think that that is very bizarre. And then you would see strange brain tumors showing up in medical students. And again, it would kill them in less than a year, you know, maybe six months.
• 19:16
  These are bizarre cases. And you could, you know, you could take the odd case, one or two cases, and you could say, well, that's a one off. And, you know, you will see, rare cancers that behave extremely aggressively. You will see a couple of those in your career. No question about that.
• 19:35
  However, when you're seeing dozens of them, and you know, it's always the same clinical situation. It's a young person who, let's say, was mandated COVID vaccines by the university or it's a medical student or it's a nursing student who has mandated COVID vaccines. And you know, a year later they develop a stage four cancer, stage four breast cancer, stage four lung cancer. And so I started started seeing this pattern over and over again, but other doctors started seeing it as well. And so Professor Daigleish in The United Kingdom started sounding the alarm because he saw his melanoma patients, for example, would have a booster shot and they were in remission, and then their cancer would come roaring back, would be spread everywhere.
• 20:16
  And the only thing that had changed, they were stable for many years. The only thing that had changed was they recently had a COVID booster shot. And he said, there's something wrong with these COVID shots, these COVID vaccines. It requires investigation. And of course, he was attacked for it.
• 20:34
  And we've had pathologists, Doctor. Ryan Cole in The United States. We've had other doctors, Doctor. Peter McCullough, Doctor. Pierre Corre, they are seeing this phenomenon because they're not blinded by a sort of an obedience to the pharmaceutical industry, to the pharmaceutical complex where you basically have to stay blind because you've given, you know, a thousand of your patients, you've given these vaccines and now if they start coming down with cancers, your career is finished.
• 21:03
  Now imagine as an oncologist, you've given all your cancer patients that maybe they've had a surgery and the cancer was removed, and now you've given them a cancer causing vaccine. Or, you know, they had stable, they were in remission and, you know, they've been cancer free for many years, now you've given them a cancer causing vaccine. You know, it's terrible to be put in the position as the physician where you are basically causing cancer in your patient. And I think that's why we're seeing such blanket denial in the medical establishment where most doctors don't even want to entertain the possibility. And yet I've reported hundreds of cases of turbo cancer on Twitter in my Substack.
• 21:52
  I've broken it down by the different types of turbo cancer. The top five turbo cancers that I'm seeing are lymphoma, brain cancers, mainly glioblastoma, breast cancers, and it's mainly triple negative breast cancer. So they are negative for their hormone receptors. So they're ER negative, PR negative, HER2 negative. And those are the most aggressive types.
• 22:15
  Then I'm seeing colon cancers and lung cancers. These are at least from what I'm seeing anecdotally, the top five, turbo cancers. And then, you know, if you want to extend it to the top 10, I see leukemias, I see testicular and ovarian cancers, I see melanomas, skin cancers, sarcomas, which are musculoskeletal cancers, and kidney cancers. And that pretty much rounds out the top 10 of the types of of turbo cancers that I'm seeing, exploding and, that we're gonna see large, numbers of.
• 22:55
  Seth Holehouse: And so when you mentioned that, I think you said that the two of the biggest causes of death or injury that you're seeing are the neurological and the cancers. Right? So with the cancers, specifically, when they call it turbo cancer, you know, I've heard various people describe what that means. You know, it's a very aggressive tumors, tumors that are, they show up and they change the type of tumor that they are as well going from a slow growing to a fast growing. So give us this a little kind of breakdown of what the anomalies that you're seeing with the cancer itself is compared to all the cancers that you've diagnosed before.
• 23:35
  What what makes these turbo cancers?
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: It's the it's the behavior. I would say it's it's it's the key is the behavior of that cancer is completely, unexpected, what you would expect for that type of particular cancer. And the, course of the cancer really seems to be on fast forward. That's what's fascinating about this. And and so I want to say that turbo cancer, and I always get attacked on this, is is they'll say, well, it's not in the literature.
• 24:10
  Well, yes, it's not going to be in the literature if it's a if it's a brand new phenomenon or a recent phenomenon, and especially if it's a phenomenon where there are, you know, there's a $200,000,000,000 vaccine industry depending on this phenomenon, you know, not being recognized. But, you know, now there are research papers that are being published, preprints that are starting to use the term turbo cancer because other doctors are seeing it as well. And and so it's it's the behavior of these cancers, and it's it's it's the COVID vaccination, does something. These COVID vaccines are doing something that, sets up either an environment in the body, so damage some kind of damage to the immune system, or there's potentially genetic damage, when we talk about things like the DNA plasmids contaminations, and those could be, you know, integrating, you know, the plasmids having the SV40 oncogenic, primer sequence in it. This is in the Pfizer vaccines, for example.
• 25:16
  With multiple vaccination, we see again a shift in the immune system to to IgG4 production, which again, know, destroys cancer surveillance, whatever the mechanism is, and no one knows exactly what the mechanism is right now. So there's a lot of theories, but no one knows the precise mechanism. However, when you look at the behavior of these cancers, they are on fast forward. They are on fast forward in terms of growth, so very rapid growth. And what that does is, and, you know, I I discussed this with, Del Bigtree on the high wire when he was asking me, well, you know, why are people not having symptoms of these cancers?
• 25:54
  Why are they just presenting at stage four? Why are we not picking them up at stage one? Because if we pick them up at stage one, and, you know, we could potentially treat them, you know, maybe we could get ahead of this and actually save some of these people's lives. And instead, they're they're usually showing up at stage four. And I think it's just the rapid growth as these tumors grow very rapidly.
• 26:18
  And so a tumor that normally might take several years to grow and then show up and be causing symptoms and give you a chance to discover it, you know, it might take several years of growth and just do it over several months. And then if you're having, you know, a little bit of something, you know, you might blow it off, some discomfort, but the growth is so rapid that by the time you go to your doctor of course, now people are hesitant to go to their doctors. We've had a lot of, you know, cancellations. Doctors don't wanna see, patients, in person, for example. We've had that situation.
• 26:55
  And so now by the time people go to their doctor, it's at stage four, And it's that rapid growth that happened over a course of months where, you know, by the time they start feeling something, it's already at stage four. And, then it's it's an interesting situation because the oncologist, usually, they think they still have time. And and so they will make a plan. And sometimes, the management, even in stage four, will be, well, let's surgically remove as much tumor as possible. Let's get the tumor out, and and, you know, maybe we can control the cancer and then you could of course deal with lymph nodes with radiation or chemotherapy.
• 27:35
  And so what they do is they'll surgically remove the tumor and they think they have it under control because there might just be some lymph nodes to deal with. But the oncologist, what they'll often find is after they've done the surgery, cancer has already spread, and it has spread it has spread to the bones and has spread to the lungs, and it catches the oncologist completely off guard. And what's fascinating is that the oncologists are not reporting this into the literature. Normally, if if you're when you're when you're as an oncologist faced with a new phenomenon, what a lot of us will do and and and a lot of us who publish, for example, I have over a hundred publications, and this is again what sets me apart from many doctors is that I have over a hundred publications in cancer diagnostics and treatment. The vast majority of oncologists don't have publications.
• 28:22
  They just follow the protocols from big pharma. They, you know, prescribe the what what you know, whatever is the most expensive chemotherapy so that big pharma makes their money so that hospitals make their money and they go on with their lives. You know, as a cancer researcher, I'm very in what's in front of me. And if there's a new phenomenon, I want to learn about it and I want to publish about it. And doctors are not publishing about this.
• 28:46
  You know, I've done a report on my substack. There's only been about 10 case reports about turbo cancer published, and a lot of them are being published in Japan because the Japanese have that curiosity. And and when they're seeing a phenomenon in front of them that they don't fully understand, they'll just publish it. They'll say, look, this guy had, you know, the vaccine, and then they came down with this bizarre side effect, and then they just publish it. And they say, look, this is people should you know, doctors should be alerted to this phenomenon happening.
• 29:19
  And and so the Japanese are very good at that. They're very good at at getting things out there and getting published. But US Doctors, Canadian Doctors are not doing this. And and so what you'll notice in these, testimonials that patients write is that my oncologist was shocked. My oncologist was not expecting this rate of tumor growth.
• 29:40
  My oncologist thought that I had five years to live and then the patient dies two months later. You know, this is where, like, like, there's a huge disconnect between the way the oncologists are interpreting the phenomenon in front of them. And and they're giving patients false information. They're saying, look, we're gonna put you you know, this chemotherapy regimen works in ninety percent of patients, and it's gonna gonna give you an extra three years, four years. And the chemo doesn't work, and the patient dies a few months later.
• 30:09
  And the family is like, what the hell? You know, that's not what the oncologist told us. I'm seeing these stories over and over. The oncologists are getting it wrong. So the oncologists, they are not ready for that growth, that rapid growth that is on fast forward, the rapid spread and the resistance.
• 30:27
  These tumors, these turbo cancers are highly resistant to conventional chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and even cutting edge immunotherapy. And that's the fascinating thing again, that these tumors, either you'll get a partial response where the tumor is contained maybe for a couple of months and then it just starts growing rapidly again, or these cancers will grow right through the chemotherapy regimen. And so the patient will be taking six rounds of chemo, eight rounds of chemo, the cancer is just growing right through it. And that's fascinating. That's just, that's not what you typically see.
• 31:03
  And so, you know, I've seen hundreds of these stories now and I try to put them out on my substack. And I try to, you know, bring attention to the kind of rapid growth, rapid spread, and the very poor prognosis that these patients have. They have extremely poor prognosis. And I can usually, you know, give you an estimate of these prognoses. For most of the turbo cancers, it's six to twelve months and it'll kill you.
• 31:30
  Six to twelve months after diagnosis. And it doesn't matter what you do. It doesn't matter if you do surgery or chemotherapy, radiation therapy, these patients are usually going to be dead within twelve months. And for, you know, the brain cancers, it's going to be faster. It's going to be three, four, six months.
• 31:49
  Some of the lymphomas are extremely aggressive, it's going to be a few months. And then of course, some of the leukemias, very, very aggressive, you could be dead in a matter of weeks, days, or even hours. And the oncologists should be screaming this from the rooftop rooftops. They should be going on social media saying there's something terrible here. There's a phenomenon of these turbo cancers.
• 32:12
  They don't have to call it turbo cancer. They can call it something else if they want to. But it's it's it's specifically in patients who've had COVID vaccines, and it is I would say it is specifically mRNA vaccines. I am not seeing these turbo cancers in patients who've only had AstraZeneca or J and J. Now there is the occasional report, and it's literally one or two reports that I've come across, but ninety nine percent of these turbo cancers are showing up in people who've had Pfizer and Moderna vaccines specifically.
• 32:45
  Seth Holehouse: Which is incredible if you look at which you just reported this, that Pfizer just acquired C Gen. Folks, as you know, my friend Mike Lindell has a passion to help everyone get the best sleep of your life. And he didn't start just by simply creating the best pillow. He created the Giza dream bedsheets. They look and feel great, which means an even better night's sleep for me, which is crucial for my busy schedule.
• 33:12
  Mike found the world's best cotton called Giza. It's ultra soft and breathable, but extremely durable. So Mike's Giza bedsheets come with sixty day money back guarantee and a ten year warranty. Giza dream sheets come in a variety of sizes and colors. Mike's latest incredible deal is the sale of the year.
• 33:30
  So folks, for a limited time, you'll receive 50% off the Giza dream sheets. You'll receive a set for as low as $29.98. So go to mypillow.com and click on the radio podcast square and use promo code man. That's m a n, as in man in America. There, you'll find not only this amazing offer, but also deep discounts on all MyPillow products, including including the MyPillow two point o mattress topper, MyPillow kitchen towel sets, and now even flannel sheets, and so much more.
• 33:59
  So call 809858966. Again, it's (800) 985-8966. Use the promo code MAN. Go to mypillow.com. Make sure you use promo code MAN.
• 34:13
  Right. So Pfizer acquired C Gen for, was it $43,000,000,000? This was just these past couple of days. And how C Gen is a if I understand, it's a a multinational cancer, you know, research and treatment development company. So I mean, to think that, okay, so yes, as you mentioned, it's primarily the Pfizer, the mRNA vaccines.
• 34:37
  We have this this phenomenon of all this cancer coming out, and you'd think that, okay, well, maybe more people will see through it, and they'll start going after Pfizer. And we, you know, we saw Pfizer shares have been, you know, down over the past year almost almost 50%. But no, it's like, actually, they're just they're just moving. Maybe they're gonna stop, you know, making the COVID vaccines and going to cancer research. So it's like what is and when you saw this story break of them acquiring C Gen, what's running through your head?
• 35:01
  You also mentioned that they overpaid too, which I wanna hear you explain that as well.
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: Absolutely. So, you know, it's it this is a fascinating acquisition because Pfizer initially announced this acquisition back in March of twenty twenty three. And, of course, because it's such a big acquisition, it's they offered they Pfizer offered $43,000,000,000 for this company. Now I don't know exactly what this company is worth, but this company has about $2,000,000,000 in revenue for the, for the for the cancer drugs that are already approved. And, of course, then they have a pipeline.
• 35:39
  But, when others have done analysis of this deal, they said there's there's really no blockbuster drugs in the pipeline to justify, Pfizer dishing out $43,000,000,000 to to acquire this company. And and so, you know, when you look at this deal, it it it doesn't really make sense. Now, you know, you know, you do have big acquisitions in in the pharmaceutical industry. But apparently, you know, with this particular acquisition, it would take, you know, maybe a decade. It's estimated that it would take a decade for Pfizer just to break even on the deal.
• 36:16
  And they're dishing out $43,000,000,000, which for a company, you know, that's made a lot of money on Pfizer vaccines, in the last two years. You know, maybe that maybe to them, it's it's not, a lot of money because they're flushed with cash. But what but why are they overpaying for a company that's not generating, more than $2,000,000,000 in revenue right now? It it's certainly not, you know, going to add. In fact, the analyses that I've read have said that the shareholders are actually not happy with the acquisition because it's not actually going to help the share price, in the short or or midterm because the numbers are just not adding up.
• 36:57
  And so why is Pfizer pouring $43,000,000,000 to acquire a company that has a few, you know, cancer drugs in its portfolio and maybe a few cancer drugs in its pipeline? And it's fascinating when you look at, the Pfizer CEO, Albert Burla, has done some interviews about this, and I and I've and I've really paid close attention to to what he's been saying because clearly this is a person who's in the know, and he knows things that, you know, the rest of us are certainly not privy to. And so, you know, recently he was on, Jim Kramer's Mad Money, show, and he said, listen, cancer is the next big thing. Cancer is the next thing for us. That's it.
• 37:42
  It's cancer. You know? And he said, you know, like, the COVID vaccines, he was disappointed that the uptake was only about ten percent. I think at the time he did the interview, it was only about seven or eight percent, uptake of the new COVID booster. And he said, well, you know, at least our, Prevnar vaccine is is doing very well.
• 38:00
  And, you know, obviously, the blood thinner like Eliquis is doing well because everyone's coming down with blood clots. So Pfizer's still getting their money on the, injuries that people are suffering and on other vaccines. But he basically said, like, the COVID vaccines are done and cancer is the next big thing. Now that's an odd thing to say because, you know, why would cancer all of a sudden be the next big thing? And then I watched his interviews in regard to this, C Gen, acquisition, And he kept saying, we're going to we're going to bring these cancer drugs and we're going to scale up the production.
• 38:43
  And we're going to do exactly what we did with mRNA vaccines, and we're gonna scale it up and we're gonna scale it up. And he kept using this term scale up over and over. And again, I thought, well, that's very bizarre because, you know, I mean, cancer normally is a very sort of a steady, cancer is on a very steady trend long term. You don't see huge spikes in cancer. You may see a general increase in the trend of certain cancers over twenty years.
• 39:13
  But nothing that would justify scaling up the production of of cancer drugs, in a way that you will scale up the production of mRNA in a viral outbreak. And yet this is the language that he's using. He said, you know, this company that we, you know, acquired, we believe in the technology, and we're gonna scale it up. And and we're going to scale it up on a scale that the world has never seen. And then, you know, I encourage anyone to to look at those interviews.
• 39:42
  What the hell is he talking about? Why would the world need a scaling up of cancer drugs? And then I'm looking at, okay. Well, what kind of cancer drugs, has Pfizer paid top dollar for to acquire this, c gen company for $43,000,000,000? And it's basically, you know, cancer drugs for breast cancer, for lymphomas, or for hematologic malignancies like lymphoma, leukemia.
• 40:07
  This is what I was talking about, the top turbo cancers that are showing up. And the ones that, Pfizer didn't have anything in their portfolio, colon cancer or colorectal cancer, lung cancers. And there's a couple of others as well, kidney cancer, big one, heavily investing into that. And so in a way, and, you know, whether I'm right about this or wrong, I'm not sure at this point, but it seems like Pfizer is covering itself for most of the turbo cancers that I'm describing right now that I see skyrocketing in the general population. And and as you mentioned, we actually don't know what this is gonna look like long term.
• 40:50
  So is he telling us that there's going to be such a skyrocketing of cancers in the vaccinated population that he's basically acquired this company, and he intends to use Pfizer's resources and infrastructure to scale up the production of cancer drugs. And, you know, it's it's going to be such a profitable thing, and that's what he kept stressing that it will be profitable for Pfizer, that, you know, that basically he's anticipating effectively an epidemic of cancer in the population. And another thing I found fascinating in his interviews was he said one third of people will get cancer. And it was like a matter of fact. It's like one third of people in the world will get cancer.
• 41:38
  And then he said, but even more people will be affected by cancer. And that's, again, are odd things to say. And he said, because entire families will be affected by cancer. And so it'll be, you know, it'll be your mother, your father, and and, you know, your aunts and uncles, your cousins, and and and, you know, entire families. So it's even more than, you know, one third of the population will be deeply impacted by cancer.
• 42:04
  And Pfizer's standing right there, you know, ready to to profit from from the human misery that apparently the Pfizer CEO is anticipating, like, in the coming years.
• 42:16
  Seth Holehouse: And that's the scary part. Because if they're just making that kind of an acquisition to treat this recent influx, that's one thing. But if this is part of a long term plan where they're pumping a ton of money into r and d and developing new medicines and and the distribution networks. And as you you mentioned, people that are analyzing and say, look, it'll take at least ten years to be profitable. That also, to me, it says he knows something about the long term of this that we don't know.
• 42:49
  And that you won't you only pay that kind of money for that kind of company if you're planning on it making sense in the long term. That's a short term gain. It's not like he's a hedge fund buying a company and they can, you know, redo the distribution network and flip it and sell it for somebody. This is a long term game. It sounds like that they're actually orienting this their company around this.
• 43:11
  Like, was the vaccines and now it's the now it's the cancer. So I I it just brings up all kinds of questions about what do they know that we don't know? What they what they knowingly put into these drugs that
• 43:23
  Speaker 2: Exactly.
• 43:24
  Seth Holehouse: Would cause this. I mean, it's just it's it's sickening.
• 43:27
  Speaker 2: And you know
• 43:29
  Seth Holehouse: Folks, have a quick message for you. Look, the twenty twenty four election is do or die for the globalist and communists that have infiltrated our country and are currently running it. And they either have to win or they're gonna destroy America so nothing is left either way. And if you're the person that's watching this show and following this information, unfortunately, you have the weight on your shoulders of making sure that your family is prepared, especially as we head in to this next year in this next election cycle because unfortunately, I think it's gonna get rough. And one of the ways I know they're going to target us is through our food supply.
• 44:02
  You can see all the food factories burned down, you can see the warnings of coming famines and food shortages and everything like that. And food is one of the number one ways totalitarian regimes have always used to control the populations destroy the food supply. So if you don't have at least two, three, four, five, six months worth of stored food, I highly recommend you take that very seriously. Because look, as I mentioned, if you're the person that's watching this, you're the person that carries the burden of making sure your family is prepared. I would recommend at least six months, if not a year of storable food.
• 44:34
  So if things go haywire, whether it's grid down or terrorist attack from what's coming across the border, that your family can safely stay in place and you can feed your family. So folks today, go to heavensharvest.com and make sure you get your storable food that'll last for up to twenty five years. Just in case things go south, you know that you have what's gonna take to feed your family, which is so so critical for us to get through this next stage of history. So go to heavensharvest.com today, order your food that'll last up to twenty five years and use promo code Seth to save fifteen percent on your entire order. Again, that's heavensharvest.com and use promo code Seth, s e t h, to save 15% on your entire order.
• 45:16
  Speaker 2: It's exactly. And and, you know, it's it's fascinating because when we talk about long term, you know, people might think, well, you know, long term is maybe 2040, '20 '50. He actually gives a timeline, where he expects, this, and he's he specifically said 2025. And he said this is gonna fill a gap for us from 2025 to 02/1930. And and and that is the timeline that he's looking at.
• 45:42
  2025 to 02/1930 is what he's given in several interviews. And, that's fascinating why this particular time period. You know, 2025 is is only about, a year away. Right? A year and a bit away.
• 45:57
  So that's not that far off. And so he's clearly anticipating that, this acquisition and then, you know, scaling up the production or whatever that means. And he's looking at that period, and he specifically was targeting 2025. Another interesting thing is that, Moderna, of course, is also targeting the cancer market. They're doing it through the mRNA vaccines.
• 46:22
  And so they want to roll out personalized mRNA cancer vaccines. And we know that, right now, you know, they're making it sound like, well, we're going to customize these, cancer vaccines, tailored to the specific individual's cancer. So they will actually take a sample of your tumor. They will run it through their, you know, sequencing machines, and they will take certain aspects, certain parts of that that cancer, and then they'll they'll make the mRNA, and then they'll inject you back with the mRNA that is supposed to then teach your immune system to attack cancer. So it's basically, you know, you're just using mRNA again to treat a problem that mRNA created to begin with, which which is just, you know, absolutely ridiculous.
• 47:14
  But there is an Australian, physician, professor Scolier, who, developed brain cancer, of course, vaccinated now, and he's developed what he describes as the most aggressive breast oh, sorry, brain cancer there is. It's a glioblastoma with very poor prognostic features. And, he's been very vocal about his diagnosis. He, you know, he was on a hiking trip in, Germany, I believe, and he collapsed and they discovered he has this, brain cancer. And fully vaccinated Australian, doctor, specialist in melanoma, actually, cancer specialist.
• 47:56
  And he has jumped on this technology, this Moderna's, mRNA technology, and he's, volunteered to be a test subject for their mRNA vaccine outside of a clinical trial setting. So what happened was, Moderna started clinical trials, phase three clinical trials of their mRNA cancer vaccine in Australia this past summer. And they have this, cancer vaccine in collaboration with Merck. Now Merck is the, pharmaceutical company that had ivermectin under patent and had come out in 2021 and said ivermectin doesn't work for COVID nineteen. Well, now they're being richly rewarded by a partnership with, Moderna on bringing, these mRNA cancer vaccines to market.
• 48:46
  So they're partnered fifty fifty in this, venture. They started the phase three trials in Australia, and he signed up and he said, look, I want to be treated with this technology. And he's been very vocal about it. He's done, you know, public speeches about it. And, I think they've already, given him a couple of treatments of this, of this mRNA vaccine.
• 49:08
  Of course, they're mixing it with other treatments, to kinda try to maybe help the results along so they could maybe fudge the results and make the, you know, mRNA, look better than it probably is. But this is, and so Moderna, this is very interesting. So there was a recently, Moderna said, you know, they had some preliminary results and they said we have fantastic results for our mRNA cancer vaccine. And they said, you know, even though our timeline was 2028, we want we believe that we can get it we can get approval fast tracked for 2025. So now here we have Moderna saying we want to fast track our cancer vaccines, mRNA vaccines to be available and approved in 2025.
• 49:54
  Same time frame that Pfizer wants to have their cancer drugs ready to go. So clearly, they don't know they know something that they're not telling us, and they're ready to to stand and financially benefit from whatever explosion of cancers we're gonna see in 2025, apparently.
• 50:12
  Seth Holehouse: Which is just it's just crazy. I mean, it's but by the same token, it makes perfect sense once you've really opened your eyes and you pulled the wool off to look at what's really happening here. And that's not not to mention the government's involvement, the media's involvement in this, the taxpayer money going towards this development. It's I can only hope that more people develop what you talked about earlier, which is that distrust towards this medical system. As much as I I don't like certain parts of that, because I know that the medical system has done good things, and there's good things it can do.
• 50:50
  It's these this this the parasitic giant multinational corporations that are working in a lot of ways controlling governments controlling media controlling big tech, because they have this have so much power and that they're able to, to do this and get away with it. I just I hope that I hope that in some way that we see justice. Like that's the only thing that I can kind of come to is I hope in some way that we see that justice is dealt to these people because it's it makes agent orange look like, you know, the guy that put laxatives in the school cake and made some make some get some kids sick. I mean, looks it's so much bigger. And the concern that I have is just the long term.
• 51:37
  And we haven't talked about fertility, talked about some of these things that these are Yep. Like, you increase of death and and then a an increase of infertility. This is what shapes the population. This is what leads to population collapse. I mean, this is it's not a minor thing that's being done here.
• 51:54
  Speaker 2: I honestly believe that 2024 is when this is all gonna unravel. And, you know, I I think a lot of these globalist institutions like the WHO, and we know that the WHO has this pandemic treaty that they wanna push through, and now several countries are standing up to the pandemic treaty. We saw Estonia, Slovakia, Slovenia, these small countries, but they're standing up to the, you know, to the tyranny of the WHO and saying, no, we don't wanna give up our sovereignty and let you control, you know, future pandemics that you're gonna declare at will and then control however you wish. But, you know, that battle is upon us right now, is is this this WHO pandemic treaty, you know, they're they're trying to ram that through over the next few months. But I think in terms of the, you know, the the true scope of the vaccine injuries and deaths, I think it's really going to unravel this coming year in 2024.
• 52:55
  You know, because unfortunately, the myocarditis, the blood clots, it continues to happen, and it continues to happen pretty much at a record rate. I always say that, you know, the sudden deaths are at an all time high based on, you know, the the data that I've seen. It just continues. And it's you're not gonna be able to sweep that under the rug. Same thing with the cancers.
• 53:18
  It's you know, thousands of people are coming down with these cancers. You're not gonna you're not going to be able to sweep that under the rug forever. There's going to be nurses coming forward whistleblowing. There's going to be more doctors coming forward. And I do believe doctors, you know, who've taken the vaccine, some of them have been horrifically injured.
• 53:35
  Some of them will have their family members injured, or they'll have their family members come down with cancer. I'm starting to get some of those contacts through email, private emails and private messages is that people in the medical field, they're either developing cancer themselves or their loved ones are developing cancer. And so you're not you know, people are not going to be able to ignore this forever. And I think 2024 is really when all of this is going to start unraveling. And in a way, you know, all of us, physicians and scientists right now who are trying to expose this right now, we are being, you know, heavily attacked.
• 54:13
  You know, I'm being attacked constantly by bots, on Twitter. There are people that are that are constantly reporting me trying to get me suspended. Right now, you know, there are people who, write these community notes. And and, you know, I think I have a team that goes and tries to write a community note on every single one of my posts. And you know what they say?
• 54:36
  CDC says there's no such thing as turbo cancer. These vaccines cannot cause cancer. These vaccines cannot enter the nucleus and so on. You know, they're trying to deny, deny, deny. And of course, because, you know, this this cancer like, they're anticipating an explosion of cancers.
• 54:56
  I suppose by 2025, they're anticipating that there'll be so many cancers that Pfizer and Moderna are gonna be, you know, be able to make billions of dollars in profit from treating these cancers. But they don't want people to link these long term effects, which we're now getting into long term effects because if people stopped taking their vaccines in late twenty twenty one and it's 2023, '2 years later, and they're starting to come down with cancers, for example, that's a long term effect. These are long term effects that Pfizer and Moderna never studied for the COVID nineteen vaccines. They say it in their approval documents. I urge anyone, go look at the Pfizer or or Moderna approval documents that that got them the emergency approval.
• 55:41
  They say, we did not study for genotoxicity because we don't see how the mRNA can do can create DNA damage. We did not study carcinogenicity because we don't see how mRNA can cause cancer. They literally say this in their documents. They say, we didn't study it because we don't see how it can happen. Like, that's not how you do medicine.
• 56:03
  That's not how you like, these products should have never been approved under these circumstances. And so I do believe and and, know, I'm optimistic in this regard. I do believe that this is all going to unravel in 2024, and I hope that people get on the right side of this. And I and that, you know, that is a message to other physicians and other health care workers, nurses, and other, health care providers. Get on the right side of this.
• 56:32
  Become a whistleblower or expose expose what you see going on and and help us wake people up, to, you know, really the scale of the long term effects of these COVID nineteen vaccines.
• 56:48
  Seth Holehouse: Which is something you've done an exceptional job at, and I thank you for that. Before we sign off, I just wanna draw attention to your Twitter. This is where I most of your information. So just macusmd. And there's also the link in your Twitter to your Substack macusmd.substack.com, which I'll pull up here as well.
• 57:08
  Both very valuable resources because you're right, you know, to make the right change to make it so that the majority population doesn't just rush off to Pfizer's new cancer treatment in two years, which will probably cause a new problem. We'll have a new solution for it. We need to help more people understand what's really happening. And that's what this all comes down to. So Doctor.
• 57:28
  Macus, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with us today. I really appreciate what you're doing and having you on the show.
• 57:35
  Speaker 2: Thank you very much for having me again.
• 57:37
  Seth Holehouse: Of course.