Latest / International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better / Shots Fired, Wars Ignored, and Leaders Adored: Another Calm Week in America’s Totally Stable Political Circus

Transcript

Shots Fired, Wars Ignored, and Leaders Adored: Another Calm Week in America’s Totally Stable Political Circus · International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better

0:00
Hello, happy Monday to you.
0:02
I am Samuel Trapp, and this is the
0:04
first show of the week, isn't it, on
0:06
DAM Radio?
0:08
And here I am coming to you live
0:10
from the Lake Ozark Real Estate of the
0:12
Art Studio.
0:13
Listen every day at damradio.com forward slash
0:17
live for great music like some of that
0:19
that was just playing.
0:20
I've actually got a couple of songs I
0:21
picked out for this for this program today,
0:24
and I don't know why I'm usually not
0:26
a huge into the music arena on my
0:29
programs, having plenty to talk about with the
0:33
lunacy of the world today.
0:35
But I have a couple of songs that
0:38
I don't know what happened.
0:40
They showed up in a playlist I was
0:41
listening to whilst driving somewhere, and it was
0:44
a long time since I heard either one
0:46
of these songs.
0:47
So you know what I did?
0:48
I added them to the mix, and we're
0:50
going to be listening to them even later,
0:53
probably around the half hour mark.
0:55
I got three sort of concrete topics I'm
1:00
going to discuss today with you, and by
1:03
the way, feel free to call in 573
1:04
-746-8020 should you feel the urge to
1:08
discuss any of these things or have an
1:10
opinion on the news of the day.
1:13
Don't go off the wall with weird stuff
1:15
from out of nowhere.
1:16
I don't really care for that.
1:17
I'd like to stick with the show.
1:18
The big news, everything on everybody's lips is
1:23
about the dinner.
1:28
Let's call it the correspondence dinner, which has
1:30
been a joke most of the time anyway
1:32
that you watch that thing.
1:34
It's just a time for people to get
1:36
together and congratulate themselves on being in power
1:41
and every once in a while to make
1:43
fun of each other.
1:44
The old Trumpster didn't go for many years
1:46
because they were beating up on him so
1:49
much.
1:50
I always used to say that if they
1:52
beat up on you a lot, that really
1:54
means that they're frightened of you.
1:57
If that's all they've got, that's the tool
2:00
is to beat up on you, to laugh
2:05
about you, to kick you out of the
2:07
room, and that's all they got.
2:09
That means you're a pretty powerful mofo.
2:12
Wouldn't that be right?
2:15
I've said that about the Trumpster.
2:17
You can hate him, you can dislike him,
2:19
you can disagree like I do on many,
2:21
many, many, many things internationally with what the
2:25
old Trump monster does, but he's a hell
2:28
of a lot better than the Biden, the
2:30
Obidinator, whatever he was, and the Obominator before
2:33
him.
2:34
Those guys are nuts.
2:37
I'm starting to worry.
2:39
You know the saying, the whole world is
2:41
crazy but me and thee, and often I
2:43
worry about thee, that kind of thing.
2:46
If you're looking around the room and wondering
2:49
who's the craziest, it's probably you, right?
2:55
But anyway, it's a crazy old world out
3:00
there, especially right now, and this attack, I've
3:02
been listening to things, four or five programs
3:07
on it yesterday, commentaries, some of the news
3:10
stuff, and what this lunacy means, and I
3:18
don't know, it just seemed, and I listened
3:20
to several that were, called it a false
3:23
flag sort of thing, and I listened to
3:25
several that were, oh gee, look, just shows
3:27
how wonderful Trump is, and everybody's after Trump,
3:30
therefore we go.
3:31
I saw the little snippet where Carolyn Leavitt
3:36
said, shots will be fired tonight, you know,
3:40
like that.
3:41
She made some kind of commentary like that
3:43
right before the program.
3:45
I wrote most of the, wrote the speech,
3:48
or I participated in writing the speech, and
3:50
shots will be fired tonight.
3:53
Well, you know, a little bit apropos, don't
3:56
you think?
3:57
But there you have it.
3:59
I wanted to talk a little bit about
4:03
that.
4:04
So, you know, here on International Flavor, where
4:07
the truth just tastes better, we wonder if
4:10
the truth will ever be known about any
4:13
of this.
4:14
I suppose the biggest question for me is,
4:17
why isn't this guy dead?
4:21
And I don't mean that he should be,
4:23
I'm not into this, you know, shoot first,
4:25
ask questions later, normally.
4:28
But if you watch the little videos, they
4:36
didn't jump to protect Trump.
4:38
Everybody ran for J.D. Vance.
4:41
It's like, let's save J.D. And they
4:44
didn't guard the president.
4:47
It just looks a little on the odd
4:49
side to me.
4:51
And that maybe it was the way it
4:55
was supposed to be, but Trump's just sitting
4:57
there.
4:59
You know, nothing happened, just wondering what's going
5:02
on.
5:03
And nobody's protecting him.
5:06
But you know, here in America, unfortunately, this
5:09
is always just another incident, another headline.
5:12
And we're far too comfortable with this sort
5:15
of chaos.
5:15
I mean, I'm even here joking about it.
5:17
It's disgusting.
5:19
And, you know, this is not how the
5:22
world is supposed to be.
5:23
But, you know, why don't we slow it
5:26
down just a tiny bit, wind it back
5:28
a tiny, tiny bit, and look at what
5:32
happened at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
5:36
And I don't know, maybe it is just
5:38
an isolated act of violence.
5:40
Maybe it is something more telling, more revealing
5:44
about a system that is becoming more and
5:48
more volatile to, you know, especially the participants.
5:54
And you know me from my Civic Outlaws
5:57
broadcasts on Fridays and my continual discussions of,
6:03
you know, neocons, all of the RINO chat
6:10
and all of the horror story of alleged
6:14
leadership today, where the leadership portion of leadership
6:19
is definitely lacking.
6:21
Power is not, but leadership definitely is.
6:25
And, you know, I wouldn't follow any of
6:29
these people, you know, to try to take
6:32
over a drug store, you know, no way.
6:35
This is not the people that I would
6:37
admire as a leader or want to follow
6:40
or execute a plan.
6:43
I don't think so.
6:44
And I keep looking at this and just
6:46
going, what are these people thinking?
6:49
And it's unfortunately the obtuse bureaucracy, which is
6:56
all power, all the time.
6:59
And that's that.
7:01
And so I hate to be so blunt
7:03
about it, but geez, you can always, you
7:05
know, you can always tell when the bureaucrats
7:09
are in charge, you get endless wars, you
7:11
get stuff that makes no sense.
7:13
All the way down the line, you get
7:15
massive money.
7:17
You know, I remember when I was actually
7:19
living in Washington, D.C. and checking out
7:22
the $30,000 conference table because we had
7:26
money left over toward the end of the
7:28
year, or, you know, the bag of screws
7:31
way back then that you would find these
7:33
bolts that you could buy in any, you
7:36
know, I don't know, Ace hardware for, you
7:39
know, $3 and you're charging 78 bucks or
7:43
something for a bunch of screws because a
7:47
government contractor is involved.
7:49
You watch people like my buddy telling me
7:52
several weeks ago that, you know, bidding on
7:55
a state contract meant he had to increase
7:58
the rates of pay for his his workers,
8:01
which are just service.
8:03
I don't mean just.
8:04
I mean, it's I just mean that their
8:07
their pay rate was in the $20 an
8:09
hour range anyway.
8:11
And he found out in order to apply
8:13
for a government contract, he'd have to charge
8:15
40, pay them 45 bucks an hour when
8:18
they were working for the state or where
8:21
they're working for a municipality.
8:23
He's got to pay prevailing wage.
8:25
And it's and that is contracting one to
8:27
one.
8:28
If you're going to jump in, the best
8:30
bet is to triple charge for everything because
8:34
that's what everybody else is doing.
8:35
And frankly, that's what they expect, because the
8:38
bureaucrat wants to go in and go, oh,
8:40
my God, it's like the rich person who
8:42
likes to flaunt his money and going, oh,
8:45
my God, it cost me eight thousand dollars
8:48
to fix my muffler on my car.
8:51
Isn't that terrible?
8:52
Well, yeah, it is terrible.
8:53
You idiot.
8:54
Why would you pay a thousand dollars to
8:56
fix your car and go get a new
8:59
one, do something else?
9:01
But the people who got to focus on
9:04
the cash all the time, that's the bureaucrat.
9:06
Oh, look at the we got this contract.
9:09
They want to go home and tell their
9:11
spouse that, oh, gee, I had to deal
9:14
with some some multimillion dollar contracts, not telling
9:18
anybody that.
9:19
Oh, by the way, we could have gotten
9:20
a competitor bid for three hundred thousand, you
9:23
know, but we can't hire that guy.
9:26
Well, because he's not paying prevailing wage.
9:28
You know, you can't do that.
9:29
We have to pay three times more.
9:31
So when you look at the failures of
9:33
government, you know, you wonder, at least I
9:37
do, if the failures of government are what
9:41
occurred at the correspondent's dinner when they rushed
9:45
to protect the vice president and leave Donald
9:49
Trump sitting on a chair.
9:52
I don't know.
9:53
At the Hilton, during one of the most
9:55
high profile, profile, political and media gatherings in
10:00
the US every year, an armed individual, I
10:04
think they said he was 32 or something
10:06
like that, made his way into the building.
10:08
He had a room there.
10:09
He wasn't outside on the street.
10:11
He wasn't stopped in some disparate perimeter.
10:13
He was inside the hotel.
10:16
He was a guest.
10:17
He was carrying weapons that should have never
10:19
been anywhere near that event.
10:21
At some point near a security screening area,
10:24
shots were fired.
10:26
Law enforcement did respond quickly.
10:27
An officer was struck, but protected by a
10:29
vest.
10:30
The attacker was stopped before reaching the ballroom
10:33
itself.
10:34
You got pictures of him laying on the
10:35
floor.
10:36
No blood, no shots, no nothing.
10:38
And there's got to be armed people all
10:40
over that place.
10:42
And nobody, you know, and I'm not saying
10:44
they should have been, but that's a fact,
10:47
you know, and where the president, the vice
10:50
president, concentration of political and media folks were
10:54
hanging out.
10:55
And that's the official version.
10:57
That's the version that, you know, fits into
11:00
your little news package.
11:01
You know, process, oh, geez, somebody, another nut
11:04
came to get it.
11:06
But if you believe that, then I think
11:08
you might be just missing the point, the
11:10
tiniest of bits, because what you had in
11:13
that building at that moment wasn't something you
11:17
should, you know, just ignore.
11:21
It's something that should make any serious observer
11:24
pause.
11:25
Think about it.
11:26
You had the sitting president, you had the
11:27
vice president, you had cabinet level officials, you
11:31
had the upper tier of the national press,
11:33
people who filter, shape, mold, and distribute what
11:41
we're supposed to understand with the way they
11:45
sell it to us.
11:47
They're supposed to mold all that to us.
11:50
And all in one place, in one room,
11:54
not just a dinner.
11:55
This isn't just tradition.
11:57
This is concentrated power, political power.
12:02
You get invited.
12:03
This 32-year-old kid, you know, engineer
12:05
from California, I'm sure, probably isn't among that
12:11
list of people, okay?
12:14
You have political power, information power, symbolized, you
12:20
know, symbolic, all of it, power under one
12:23
roof.
12:24
By its very nature, it shouldn't function as
12:27
a hardened security environment.
12:29
But they should have one, right?
12:33
Because the question isn't simply what did this
12:36
guy do?
12:37
It's how is it possible that he was
12:38
in a position to do it at all?
12:41
That's the question.
12:43
Hotels are complicated.
12:44
I used to go into DC hotels.
12:47
I've been at functions nowhere near as vital
12:51
as this.
12:52
But constantly when I was in the on
12:55
-site inspection agency in the military, we were
12:58
subordinate to the State Department in a lot
13:01
of stuff.
13:02
We worked basically with the foreign ministries, right?
13:07
And so when a team of diplomats would
13:12
arrive from the Soviet Union, later Russia, any
13:16
other countries, you know, and we would go
13:18
to, there was always an advanced team, right?
13:21
And that advanced team would go clear the
13:24
spaces, clear of everything.
13:26
The Soviet people would have their security people
13:29
come in and do the exact same thing,
13:32
setting it up.
13:32
You know, there are people outside, you know,
13:34
that generally didn't sit in on the meetings
13:37
or anything, but security was a big part
13:39
of it.
13:40
And it was, you know, you had your
13:41
briefings before and against all the security people
13:44
would call you in and go, okay, here's
13:46
how security is going to work.
13:47
Here's where you enter in.
13:49
Don't bring those diplomats any other way, but
13:51
this way, blah, blah, blah.
13:52
And you'd get all of these instructions on
13:58
what you're going to do.
13:59
And I assume that anybody who's going to
14:02
this correspondence dinner isn't just going to the
14:05
hotel and having a hotel security guard do
14:07
it when the president and vice president and
14:09
tons of other important dignitaries, you know, prior
14:13
presidents are going to be sitting there.
14:15
You know, there's got to be security up
14:18
the wazoo.
14:20
There's got to be tons of it.
14:22
And then hotels are complicated environments.
14:25
We all know this, many entrances, many exits.
14:27
They have to be because of laws and
14:29
because of what we have.
14:30
And they have guests, staffs, deliveries, elevators, service
14:34
corridors, back entrance, constant flow of movement, right?
14:38
And it's different from having a secure government
14:42
facility.
14:43
And when we would take these conference rooms,
14:45
we would ask for the conference room closest
14:47
to the farthest outlying wing door or whatever,
14:51
where we could meet these people.
14:53
And unless it was some kind of a
14:54
final mission and there would be, you know,
14:56
we've done a whole liquidation of a whole
14:58
series or a whole type of weapon that
15:04
we were eliminating.
15:05
We'd ask for something bigger, like, you know,
15:07
if you're inviting dignitaries and stuff, but it's
15:09
just the teams.
15:10
Well, then the teams would be, you know,
15:12
and the teams are about eight, 10 people
15:14
on the nuclear side.
15:16
There's sometimes 26 scientists, you know, is about
15:19
the largest that we ever got to, right?
15:22
But you had to think about security.
15:24
I mean, hell, have me as your, you
15:28
know, your $100 an hour, or maybe more
15:32
than that, but done your security consultant to
15:36
go do the correspondence dinner.
15:38
It's like, geez, what were these guys doing?
15:40
What are they getting paid for?
15:42
You know, what are they getting paid for?
15:44
I don't know.
15:46
Well, paid to be there, you know, of
15:50
course, but what do you do?
15:53
You know, it's great to be at these
15:54
parties, but they're not supposed to be a
15:56
party for you.
15:57
You're supposed to be working.
15:59
And so you can control a ballroom, don't
16:02
you think?
16:03
You can control a checkpoint, but controlling a
16:05
hotel is going to be a little bit
16:07
more difficult.
16:09
But that is where one of the most
16:10
sensitive gatherings in the country takes place year
16:13
after year under the assumption that the system's
16:16
going to, you know, hold up, everything will
16:18
be fish efficient and nothing will slip through.
16:21
But somebody got lazy because it did.
16:23
So this isn't just about security, but the
16:26
illusion of security, because for years, the American
16:28
public has been told that the system works.
16:31
Agencies are in control.
16:33
Protective apparatus around leadership is impenetrable.
16:37
You'll never get to him.
16:38
And this guy didn't get to him.
16:40
So I suppose that's a victory.
16:42
Right.
16:42
And yet, what we saw here is an
16:44
impenetrability.
16:46
We saw permeability.
16:48
A man with weapons got in the building.
16:50
He made it close enough to create a
16:52
real and active threat.
16:54
And if one or two variables had shifted
16:56
timing position, the conversation today would be a
16:59
little bit different.
17:00
But let's talk about the tone, because this
17:02
is important.
17:03
This isn't about partisan politics.
17:05
It's not about whether you like Donald Trump
17:08
or you dislike him.
17:09
It's not about Republicans and Democrats.
17:12
If you reduce it to that, you're once
17:14
again missing the story.
17:16
This is about a system, a political system,
17:18
a security system, a system of society that
17:23
is showing visible signs of inability of strain.
17:28
These signs aren't subtle any longer.
17:31
This is happening too much.
17:32
And I'm one of those guys that, you
17:34
know, geez, you know, everybody checked their phone,
17:39
you know, before you come in the hotel.
17:41
So you're not taking pictures of so and
17:44
so or everybody getting cavity searched.
17:47
You know, I'm not for that.
17:48
But obviously, we need more than what we've
17:51
been getting, especially under the old Trumpster.
17:53
Now, Trump threw something out there.
17:55
He said, well, you know, somebody asked him
17:59
why they think he was attacking it.
18:01
I'm paraphrasing.
18:02
But he said something about, well, they only
18:04
go after the guys that are significant, the
18:06
ones that matter.
18:08
Well, you shouldn't be proud of you shouldn't
18:11
be proud of the some of the things
18:12
that you've done.
18:13
And I don't mean that you shouldn't be,
18:15
but you shouldn't be proud of the fact
18:16
that people are coming to get you.
18:18
And, you know, there are a lot of
18:20
people talking about this was a false flag.
18:22
I listened to a couple of them yesterday.
18:25
And I get the point.
18:26
But I'm more a bit in the middle
18:29
on this.
18:29
I don't think so.
18:31
And I wouldn't put it past the FBI
18:34
for doing something like that, you know, for
18:36
getting someone to do it.
18:39
That wouldn't surprise me a bit.
18:41
You know, don't don't get me thinking that
18:44
it cannot happen.
18:45
It has happened.
18:46
You know, I'm I'm probably far more on
18:49
the side of that.
18:52
The Kennedy assassination was, I don't want to
18:58
say planned, but certainly supported, in my view,
19:03
by by some insiders.
19:06
Let's let's say political violence in the U
19:10
.S. isn't an abstract concern any longer.
19:13
It's no longer something you read about in
19:15
the history book.
19:16
It's here.
19:17
It's present.
19:18
It's it's increasing.
19:20
It's increasing in boldness and perhaps most troubling.
19:23
It's becoming normalized.
19:26
We've reached a point where an incident like
19:28
this occurs and within hours it's already been
19:31
absorbed, categorized, debated, and pushed aside to make
19:35
room for the next attack.
19:37
Right.
19:38
It's depressing, really.
19:40
And that's not stability.
19:42
It's acclimation and or acclimatization.
19:47
You know, you're getting used to it, you
19:51
know.
19:52
And when society begins to get used to
19:55
this kind of instability, then it's a danger,
19:57
not necessarily the next incident, but the gradual
20:00
erosion of what you expect.
20:04
We expect this now because it happens so
20:07
often.
20:07
We just expect it.
20:09
And nobody has to be a professional anymore.
20:12
Nobody has to.
20:12
For example, you don't shoot to kill.
20:15
You go and you knock him over, you
20:17
know, and you know, well, OK, I'm generally
20:20
against killing perpetrators.
20:22
You know, I don't think that's the result.
20:25
But if you're actively killing someone or you're
20:29
an immediate threat to someone or if you
20:32
got weapons, you're shooting and nobody knows what's
20:36
going to happen.
20:37
Better you than me.
20:38
Right.
20:39
And you're the idiot out here with guns.
20:41
You you took that choice.
20:43
And so you if you off somebody in
20:47
that regard.
20:48
OK.
20:49
You know, I don't like shoot first, ask
20:53
questions later as a general theory.
20:55
You know, I don't like it, but I
20:58
don't say that it's not sometimes, unfortunately, necessary.
21:04
But security failures are unfortunate, but they're not
21:09
shocking any longer.
21:11
And once that mindset takes a hold, the
21:14
threshold of what's considered acceptable.
21:18
Varies, right?
21:20
There are details around this event that raise
21:23
legitimate questions, not wild theories, not conclusions, but
21:27
questions.
21:28
Reports say that the attacker wasn't immediately neutralized
21:32
in a high threat environment.
21:36
And there are conflicting descriptions of exactly how
21:40
far he got, exactly what level of access
21:43
he was able to get and exactly how
21:45
the response unfolded.
21:47
There are discussions about how individuals were evacuated,
21:50
in what order and under what protocols and
21:54
grabbing the vice president first.
21:57
I'm not so sure.
21:59
I mean, not that he shouldn't be protected,
22:01
but it seems to me he's second in
22:05
command.
22:06
That's the way it is.
22:07
These aren't trivial details.
22:09
These are the kind of details that in
22:11
any serious security review would determine whether an
22:14
incident is contained effectively or whether it exposed
22:17
procedural weaknesses like I believe this one did.
22:21
And then there's a strange coincidence is it
22:24
should be treated as nothing more than that.
22:27
It's a coincidence which involved the pre-event
22:30
remark of the phrase shots fired by Carolyn
22:34
Levin.
22:34
She says, oh yeah, there'll be some shots
22:37
fired tonight.
22:38
She's talking about the speech, a bad phraseology
22:43
right there.
22:43
But it happened, you know, clearly intended in
22:47
a rhetorical or comedic sense.
22:49
And in politics, that phrase, you know, isn't
22:51
unusual.
22:53
But it means a verbal attack, sharp remarks,
22:56
live exchanges.
22:58
But when actual gunfire follows later the same
23:01
evening, it creates a moment, not no proof,
23:05
no conspiracy, but of something that goes, you
23:08
know, there's a forecast for you.
23:11
It reminds you that language, tone and reality
23:13
aren't as separate as sometimes we pretend they
23:16
are.
23:16
But they're going to be those who immediately
23:18
jump to conclusions.
23:19
And I've heard some of them already.
23:22
Some will say this was simply a lone
23:23
actor.
23:24
I doubt that.
23:25
Me personally, a disturbed individual exploiting opportunity.
23:29
Others will say the security failures are too
23:32
significant to ignore and that something about the
23:35
situation just doesn't add up.
23:37
That's me.
23:38
And then inevitably there will be those who
23:40
move further on the speculation realm and say
23:43
this was orchestrated.
23:45
It's a false flag staging the narrative or
23:48
manipulating outcomes.
23:49
Now, I'm not saying that doesn't happen in
23:51
government all the time.
23:53
They're a bunch of manipulative a-holes.
23:56
You know, it's all there is to it.
23:57
And they, you know, will definitely manipulate a
24:01
story to squeeze the most out of it.
24:03
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
24:07
Right.
24:07
The responsible position I try to maintain sometimes
24:11
without success is not to embrace these conclusions,
24:16
but also not to get rid of the
24:18
questions, because skepticism should work both ways.
24:23
You know, I'm a skeptic, no doubt, but
24:25
I'm generally a skeptic in both directions.
24:29
You don't trust any of them.
24:31
They're all a bunch of lying a-holes.
24:33
That's it.
24:33
And they tell you what they think you
24:35
want to hear, because the truth doesn't matter.
24:39
What matters is what you want to hear.
24:41
And these people at this event are the
24:44
kings and queens of that theory, no doubt.
24:48
But it's irresponsible to just accept every official
24:52
explanation without digging a little deeper or assume
24:55
every inconsistency is evidence of something more sinister.
24:59
Right.
24:59
Somebody explains something.
25:01
Oh, that's it then.
25:03
You know, the truth, as always, requires patience,
25:07
evidence, and willingness to sit in uncertainty longer
25:11
than most people are comfortable with.
25:13
For years, I have been one of those
25:16
people that, if possible, takes my time to
25:24
make decisions.
25:26
And people go, well, I already told you
25:27
everything you need to know.
25:28
Yeah, but I need to process it.
25:31
You know what I mean?
25:32
I need to process.
25:34
And so, you know, I remember practicing law,
25:37
I'd write some big brief, some big something
25:39
I had to file somewhere in federal court
25:41
or whatever.
25:41
And, you know, I tried to write it
25:44
at least three times, you know, write it
25:48
once, get my initial arguments, what I thought,
25:51
you know, and then leave it sit a
25:53
couple of days and then come and write
25:55
it again.
25:56
And then, you know, maybe a week before
26:00
it was due, try to write it a
26:01
third time, you know, do some research, put
26:04
some thought process.
26:05
And it mixes in your brain, you know,
26:08
while you're sitting there thinking about it, and
26:11
you come to your conclusion.
26:12
Now, a lot of people, that takes too
26:15
long.
26:16
And a lot of time, you can't take
26:18
that much time to figure out your path
26:20
into where you're going to go.
26:22
But for me, once you've done that, and
26:25
you're solid and where you want to be,
26:27
you know, all the arguments, you know, all
26:29
the counter arguments, you know, everything to it.
26:31
But it's nice to take something like this
26:34
and discuss, you know, what does it mean?
26:38
And how do you think about it?
26:40
So this does, this thing, again, revealed another
26:44
issue, you can say this with confidence, okay?
26:49
A serious breach occurred at a high profile,
26:52
high security environment, it exposed vulnerability, whether that
26:57
was logistic, procedural, structural, that shouldn't exist at
27:02
that high of a level, it demonstrated the
27:04
protective bubble around political leadership sucks, you know,
27:10
again, once again, and it highlighted once again,
27:14
internal stability of the US isn't as solid
27:16
as it's portrayed.
27:18
And perhaps most importantly, it revealed something about
27:22
the times in which we are living.
27:25
This is a country where political tension is
27:27
high, where trust in institutions and in government
27:31
is extraordinarily low, where rhetoric has become sharp,
27:37
more personal, far more aggressive than it used
27:39
to be.
27:40
It's a country where a significant portion of
27:43
the population is disconnected from the system.
27:46
They are ignored by leadership of this type.
27:50
And they're increasingly willing to view politics, not
27:53
as a process, but as a battleground.
27:56
When those conditions exist, as they do here,
28:01
incidents like this aren't entirely surprising, but they're
28:05
not inevitable either.
28:08
And then, you know, unfortunately, they're not unthinkable
28:12
these days.
28:13
And that's an uncomfortable reality.
28:15
Because it means that this event isn't just
28:18
about one guy, it's about the environment in
28:21
which that individual exists, the pressure, the narrative,
28:25
the tension that shape behavior of idiots that
28:29
have nothing to do with any of it.
28:31
Over time, you can't separate that act from
28:35
the context in which it occurs.
28:37
So, you know, I suppose the question shouldn't
28:40
simply be what happened at the dinner.
28:43
The question should really be, what does it
28:45
say about who we are?
28:48
If political leadership of a country and the
28:50
media leadership of a country can be back
28:52
gathered in one place in a major city
28:54
under heavy security and still face a one
28:58
-off lone dude, what does that tell you
29:00
about the broader system?
29:02
Seriously, if the illusion of control can be
29:05
broken this easily, even momentarily, what else is
29:10
less secure than we think it is?
29:13
What else isn't as, what else aren't they
29:15
telling us?
29:16
And if this becomes just another story, just
29:18
another headline, what does that say about what
29:21
we're used to?
29:22
We're used to this idiocy.
29:24
Well, so there you have it.
29:26
I tell you what, it is a bother
29:29
to me that this kind of thing goes
29:33
on and it goes on far too often.
29:37
I'm going to share with you something to
29:39
break the mood because I tell you what,
29:42
this is one of the songs I heard
29:44
and it's only a couple minutes long, but
29:46
it's probably not something you'll hear on this
29:49
station very much, you know, it's, but I
29:52
like it and we're going to listen to
29:56
it in its entirety.
29:58
It is called Freaks.
32:20
Tell me where the freaks at.
32:55
Freaks everywhere, including at the correspondence dinner.
33:00
Oh, here he is on the headline, shooter
33:02
behind the headline.
33:04
There he is laying on the floor.
33:06
He's all laying on the floor.
33:09
Wonder how he feels after that?
33:11
Well, he got a little bit attacked there,
33:13
didn't he?
33:15
But he didn't get shot.
33:17
So, I don't know.
33:19
That's the end of that tune.
33:20
What we're going to, what did Trump say?
33:22
Trump says he ordered the Navy to shoot
33:23
and kill the Iran mine laying boats in
33:27
the Straits of Hormuz.
33:28
I've ordered the United States Navy to shoot
33:30
and kill any boat, small boat, as though
33:34
they may be at the bottom of the
33:38
sea.
33:38
That is putting mines in the water in
33:41
the Straits of Hormuz.
33:42
There is to be no hesitation, et cetera,
33:45
et cetera.
33:46
Yep.
33:47
This is getting better, isn't it?
33:50
No, it's not.
33:53
I'm going to do a segment on Iran
33:55
as well that we're going to go through.
33:58
But I want to go to, where am
34:02
I going?
34:02
I'm going, I believe, to Ukraine, going off
34:09
to Ukraine.
34:11
And I want to, where am I?
34:14
I'm still in the correspondence dinner.
34:17
Hold on.
34:19
We're going to, let's see.
34:24
Oh, that's the Iran one.
34:26
Sorry.
34:26
We're going to get to Iran in just
34:27
a minute.
34:28
But we need some, well, you know what?
34:34
Let's do Iran second.
34:35
We're going to, no, Ukraine.
34:38
So, the core argument, so Lavrov gave some
34:41
speeches over the weekend.
34:43
Zakharova gave a speech.
34:45
I listened to both of them whilst driving
34:46
somewhere.
34:48
And they're interesting.
34:52
And Lavrov's core argument is that the collective
34:56
West has openly moved from indirect pressure to
35:00
open war.
35:02
So, over the weekend, there was a series
35:06
of, so Russia is testing borders.
35:10
Okay?
35:10
So, one, I listened to another guy that
35:14
analyzes war all the time.
35:16
And I forget which one it was, whether
35:19
it was Alex Cristoforo or whether it was
35:21
a military summary channel guy, I don't remember.
35:24
But they showed the video and showed the
35:26
radar scenario of, call it 40 to 50
35:32
Russian drones flying over the Black Sea into
35:38
Odessa area, and then going south toward the
35:41
Romanian border.
35:42
Okay?
35:43
And they were headed toward the Romanian border.
35:46
And suddenly, two thirds of them disappeared.
35:53
Suddenly, a little bit further.
35:55
And normally, that would be if they all
35:57
were blown, you know, had reached their target
36:00
and blown something up.
36:01
Of course, they're no longer going to be
36:02
visible as a signal, you know, radar signal
36:07
that you have it.
36:09
But the curiosity in the method of this
36:16
attack, so the Russians have been doing in
36:20
the neighborhood of 600, there was a big
36:24
deal about 666, everybody knows the three sixes
36:28
deal, 666 drones flying into Ukraine in the
36:34
one day period, you know, that the Ukrainians
36:36
were attacking.
36:37
And then the curiosity of how they went
36:40
then, this one came up.
36:41
And so, Russia is pushing because the summer
36:44
offensives are all coming.
36:46
And Ukraine doesn't have any people left.
36:48
So, the joke is that they've received $90
36:52
,000 from people that don't have the money
36:54
to loan them, Europe, to fight a war
36:58
they cannot win against Russia, to buy weapons
37:03
from the United States that no longer exist,
37:06
because the US has either used them all
37:09
or has refused to sell them because they're
37:13
going to need them for their own purposes,
37:16
with, and all this is going to be
37:17
done with a $90 billion that's going to
37:23
help defend soldiers that can't use any of
37:26
the weapons anyway, because they don't exist either.
37:29
So, the only thing that does exist is
37:32
the 90 billion in Zelensky's pocket.
37:35
There was a story, where is this, that,
37:38
uh, hang on a second, I got to
37:42
find this, where the Zelensky is headed now,
37:48
because Zelensky, he's, he's going everywhere trying to
37:52
get more people.
37:52
I reported that last week, where he was
37:54
going all over Europe trying to get more
37:56
people.
37:56
And he's trying to, to, to get them
37:58
to send their, at least the men back
38:02
to stop giving them free money, stop giving
38:05
them free housing, and ship them back to
38:07
Ukraine, so he can send them to the
38:08
front lines to die.
38:10
And so, Kiv, right now, Zelensky's in the
38:14
Middle East, and he's trying to sell his
38:17
war experience to United Arab Emirates, to Saudi
38:23
Arabia, to Qatar, he's trying to, you know,
38:26
to Bahrain, he wants to sell this.
38:28
And so, his activity in the Middle East
38:30
is an attempt to find new political financial
38:33
oxygen at a moment when usual supporters are
38:36
far less reliable.
38:38
For years, he's been able to build its
38:40
strategy on the assumption that the US and
38:42
Europe are going to continue to give him
38:45
weapons, money, intelligence, and diplomatic protection as a
38:50
non-president for the second year now.
38:53
But now, American support, nobody wants it.
38:57
I mean, what the hell have we heard
38:59
about Ukraine here lately?
39:01
Nothing.
39:02
There are people that are very angry about
39:04
this, a lot of Democrats still want their
39:05
money laundering schemes to be going on, but
39:08
now the money laundering is exclusively the territory
39:11
of Europe, you know, and Europe is the
39:21
one given 90 billion.
39:23
They are the money launderer, and they launder
39:25
the money through Ukraine, just like everybody else
39:29
did.
39:30
But now, you know, it doesn't go to
39:31
the Bidenopolis, you know, to come in and
39:35
go to Biden's son through Burisma.
39:39
Well, now it's figuring out how to fund
39:41
Jared Kushner.
39:42
It's the other way around.
39:44
Everybody else gets the money.
39:46
And so, we just exchange it around.
39:50
But Zelensky either way is finding out that
39:52
a lot of these things are no longer
39:54
as profitable for him, and he's trying to,
39:58
you know, maybe every once in a while
40:00
he is still trying to protect his country
40:02
long term.
40:03
It just doesn't seem like it.
40:05
You know, everybody's dying, and you've got to
40:08
stop the bleeding first.
40:10
So, you know, his, you know, European concert
40:15
tour, and now his Middle East concert tour,
40:18
where he gets to take the comedy on
40:20
the road, aren't going to pan out for
40:23
him, is what, you know, there's an entire
40:25
article on it, if you're interested in reading
40:27
it, that somebody wrote.
40:29
And I'm not going to share the whole
40:31
thing, but it's written by a guy who's
40:33
the president of Middle East Studies, and a
40:36
visiting lecturer at the, Moscow, it's an international
40:42
political institute, a guy named Murad Zadigzadya, I
40:50
can't spell it, Zadigzadya, I can't sell it,
40:53
say it correctly.
40:58
I don't know, crazy times indeed, crazy, crazy
41:02
times.
41:02
But in Ukraine, they're not being treated as
41:05
a sovereign country by the West, and haven't
41:08
been for a long time.
41:10
And this activity on the south border of
41:14
Ukraine, and the activity of Zelensky in the
41:18
Middle East, are just indicators of what's really
41:22
going on.
41:24
Allegedly, now, there's no, I haven't finalized this
41:29
review yet, to see whether it really occurred.
41:32
It wouldn't surprise me if it did.
41:35
But the talk is that these, that Europe
41:39
has taken an additional step further, specifically Great
41:42
Britain, England has taken another step.
41:46
And what happened was, as these Ford 30
41:49
to 50 missiles were headed toward the border
41:53
of Romania, which, you know, they would have
41:58
never crossed anyway, in my view, but they
42:01
were attacking south of Odessa.
42:04
It wouldn't surprise me if there was some
42:06
kind of a test, because they've been talking
42:08
about it for a long time.
42:09
The drones are coming from, from the Ukrainian
42:13
side, they're flying over NATO territories and coming
42:16
across.
42:17
And so, you know, Finland is talking about
42:20
removing everything for nuclear weapons.
42:22
And so Russia is prepping also for a
42:27
war by 2030 with Europe, all of it,
42:31
because the Europeans are pushing for that.
42:33
And so the Russians, you know, what do
42:34
you think they're going to do, not defend
42:36
themselves?
42:37
And so now they're testing because they believe
42:39
two things.
42:40
One, that some huge shipments of new missiles,
42:43
new weaponry is coming up specifically through the
42:46
ports, but they'll land instead of the city
42:49
of Odessa, they'll land in port cities in
42:51
Bulgaria and Romania, come that way, right?
42:56
And on the Black Sea, and Romania is
42:59
just south of Odessa.
43:00
And so what they will do is, what
43:03
Russia, I believe, was doing, it was make
43:06
reasonable sense to me, is flying these drones
43:09
up to the border to see what had
43:12
happened and taken, there's a couple of small
43:14
cities, I forget what they are, but they
43:16
were attacking some of those cities.
43:18
And there were a decent amount of attacks
43:19
in those two cities, but they're only three,
43:22
four kilometers from the border of Romania.
43:26
And so what they're alleging occurred is that
43:31
the British foreign ministry gave the authority to
43:39
British fighter pilots flying in Romania to shoot
43:46
down Russian drones over Ukraine.
43:51
Now that's an act of war against Russia.
43:55
And there's no doubt of it.
43:58
Remember, there was huge talks about whether Poland
44:01
could shoot down Russian drones that are flying
44:04
in the western half of Ukraine because Ukraine
44:08
doesn't have enough air defense to do it.
44:10
And Russia has said consistently, you shoot down
44:15
our airplanes, our drones, our missiles, that is
44:21
an act of war.
44:23
You are involved, and there's no doubt that's
44:25
true.
44:26
You're involved.
44:27
So it's definitely an act of war.
44:34
And now that Romania has done it, the
44:36
British have quickly said, nope, not us.
44:38
The Romanians are going, yeah, they did.
44:41
Romanians are saying they sure did give the
44:44
authority to these British pilots flying British planes
44:48
over Romania to fire into Ukraine and take
44:52
out drones in Ukraine, Russian drones in Ukraine.
44:58
Now that's an air defense because there is
45:00
no air defense down there really.
45:02
Ukraine's out of air defense anyway.
45:04
So basically it's the British providing air defense.
45:07
So Lavrov coming out and saying Ukraine isn't
45:10
being treated as a sovereign country by the
45:13
West, it's being treated as a weapons system.
45:17
And he says that the US, unlike Europe,
45:19
has at least publicly acknowledged some of the
45:22
concerns of Russia, no NATO for Ukraine, recognition
45:26
of territorial reality after the referendums.
45:29
The Europeans are still speaking the language of
45:31
total victory, just like Trump is in Iran.
45:34
They're talking about total victory.
45:35
We're winning.
45:36
You're not winning.
45:38
And Russia has to move away.
45:42
We don't move.
45:43
Why?
45:43
Because the rules only apply to others, never
45:47
to us.
45:49
The Americans sometimes are speaking the language of
45:53
ugly reality, according to Lavrov.
45:55
That does not make Washington innocent.
45:58
It just means Europe may be more delusional
46:01
than Washington, which isn't a contest anyone should
46:05
really want to win.
46:07
These people are nuts.
46:08
And the Ukraine is reportedly received or is
46:12
approved for this 90 billion euro loan package
46:15
and already has signaled that it needs another
46:17
20 billion.
46:19
We need another 20 billion.
46:20
90 billion is not enough.
46:21
That's only going to cover us, you know,
46:23
that'll only mean we can keep this war
46:25
going another year and a half.
46:27
We need a full two years out of
46:28
it or we're never going to beat those
46:30
ruskies.
46:31
We're not going to beat them.
46:33
We're not going to beat them anyway.
46:36
And the fact that all of Europe is
46:39
leaning toward this total global thermonuclear war, they
46:44
should bring in.
46:47
What was the kid from war games?
46:49
Um, same kid from Ferris Bueller's day off,
46:54
you know, bringing that guy.
46:57
Let's play.
46:58
Shall we play a game global thermonuclear war?
47:02
That's where we're headed, people.
47:04
If you listen to all the smarty pants
47:09
is in Europe, that's where we're headed.
47:13
And that is truly what they wish for
47:17
the rest of us.
47:18
And, uh, I don't know.
47:21
I, I'm, I mean, think about this.
47:25
Here's the Finnish government here.
47:27
Here's what the Finnish government says to us.
47:33
Well, her name is Rika Pura.
47:36
She has warned of growing pressure on the
47:40
country's finances.
47:42
The warrant, this is Finland of a pretty
47:44
rich country.
47:45
The warning comes just days after the government
47:48
unveiled a multi-year fiscal plan, increasing military
47:52
aid to Ukraine and domestic spending cuts to
47:58
their own citizenry.
48:00
The government's fiscal plan for 2027 to 2030
48:04
was presented earlier this week.
48:07
It includes 240 million Euro in cuts to
48:12
social and healthcare spending, but increase of 30,
48:16
300 million to increase military support for Ukraine.
48:22
The state of public finances, she said, is
48:26
extremely difficult.
48:27
And the debt to GDP ratio ratio is
48:30
approaching 90%.
48:32
She said in an interview on Saturday, we've
48:35
been hit not only by external shocks.
48:38
She said, adding the nation struggles with high
48:42
unemployment, zero economic growth, and an aging population.
48:47
The fiscal plan agreed to by the government
48:49
sets out public spending cuts and changes to
48:52
household costs and welfare healthcare, but planned savings
48:57
are higher customer fees.
48:59
You know, that's okay.
48:59
We'll pass it on to them across the
49:02
healthcare system, covering specialist exams, surgery, outpatient visits,
49:07
health center, and dental care, as well as
49:10
charges for storing a deceased person and determining
49:14
his cause of death, meaning they're not going
49:18
to spend as much time on that.
49:20
Apart from providing increased military support for Ukraine,
49:23
the plan allocates additional fundings to strengthen drone
49:26
defense.
49:28
In further setting out for more money, they
49:33
want the ambition to gradually raise the defense
49:37
target toward the 5% that daddy Trump
49:41
required for NATO.
49:43
Finland joined NATO in April of 2023.
49:46
According to the world bank, the country spent
49:50
around 1.3 to 1.7% of
49:53
GDP on defense prior to that time.
49:57
Helsinki has since increased its defense budget with
50:00
plans to raise spending to 3.2%
50:03
by 2030, bringing the nation closer to the
50:07
target of 3.5% by 2035.
50:11
Finnish officials repeatedly echo other NATO members claiming
50:15
that Russia is a permanent threat to EU
50:18
members.
50:20
And while increasing defense spending to counter it,
50:23
Finland shares a 1300 kilometer or 800 mile
50:29
border with the Russkies.
50:31
The Kremlin and me reject these claims and
50:35
accuse the West of fueling Russophobia to justify
50:39
military buildup and also to divert attention from
50:43
their own domestic problems.
50:45
Everything has to be blamed by the, blamed
50:51
on the Russians.
50:51
There was an interesting article.
50:54
And I wonder if it's a, just a
50:56
movie.
50:57
No, they have the article too.
51:00
A guy named Sergei Karaganov.
51:04
He was on a program in an interview
51:09
with Alexander Karevsky on Russia 24.
51:12
And he argued that it's been a source
51:14
of global conflict.
51:16
He said, Western Europe is becoming increasingly drawn
51:19
into the war in Ukraine, citing the stuff
51:22
going on South of Odessa and this idiocy
51:27
going on in the rest of Europe.
51:32
Statements are already being made by officials and
51:35
news reports regarding EU prep for war with
51:39
more concerns and questions.
51:41
How should Russia respond?
51:42
As an example, he said, let's mention the
51:45
news.
51:46
The Germans have already produced 5,000 drones
51:49
based on Ukrainian designs.
51:51
It's laughable to hear that.
51:53
What Ukrainian designs?
51:54
He said, it is clear the German defense
51:57
industry is directly working on drones striking Russia.
52:01
And you remember the Taurus missiles?
52:04
The Germans have made a clever move.
52:07
They don't formally supply such weapons.
52:10
And now they've decided to say they provide
52:13
drones.
52:13
And what they're doing is they're manufacturing them
52:15
now or claiming that they're manufactured in Ukraine.
52:22
But the targeting still has to be provided
52:25
by the Germans, just like our tomahawks would
52:30
require U.S. and the storm shadow would
52:33
require British or whichever was French.
52:35
And it's nuts.
52:37
So sooner or later, a countermeasure will have
52:39
to be found for drones that are drones
52:43
are far more dangerous than missiles nowadays.
52:46
And that depends on how they're being used.
52:49
But the issue is still very complex.
52:51
And Sergei Shoygu said that there are legitimate
52:55
targets on EU territory because they were talking
52:59
about drones being shot down over Ukraine by
53:03
other countries.
53:04
And he says that makes them just like
53:07
U.S. providing tomahawks would make the U
53:09
.S. an enemy combatant.
53:12
And they've been pretty consistent in saying that.
53:16
And the Europeans have generally been fairly careful
53:21
about making sure that they don't cross those
53:24
lines.
53:24
But they're crossing.
53:26
You know, they're seizing, trying to seize ships.
53:28
Somebody said they wanted to take Kaliningrad.
53:30
Kaliningrad is a little chunk of Russia that
53:33
is west of the Baltic states.
53:35
It's separate from Russia, just like the part
53:40
in Moldova Transnistria that is a separate sliver
53:44
of Moldova that stayed with Russia.
53:46
And Kaliningrad, same thing.
53:48
It's on the Baltic Sea, but it's not
53:50
connected to the rest of Russia.
53:52
And you got to go through Latvia, Estonia,
53:54
Lithuania, you know, to get there, a little
53:56
bit of Poland, even certainly Belarus, to be
53:59
over there.
54:00
And so it's not attached.
54:03
And so there's somebody else, the Englands, they're
54:06
going to take Kaliningrad.
54:08
We're just going to take Kaliningrad.
54:11
Russians can't have that.
54:12
Let's have an act of war.
54:13
I mean, it was a sort of tongue
54:16
in cheek, you know, like I used to
54:18
think that Donald Trump, oh, geez, we're stealing
54:21
Greenland, you know, kind of the same thing.
54:23
But people are just the world's nuts these
54:26
days.
54:27
And so Sergei Shigu said that there are
54:31
legitimate targets in the EU.
54:33
Ministry of Defense published a list of locations
54:35
where the drones are being manufactured.
54:37
I shared that with you last week.
54:38
And in response, the EU spokesperson, Anita Hipper,
54:42
stated that here's a quote, the European Commission
54:45
has no evidence of the Russian Federation claims.
54:48
In other words, in their view, we're making
54:50
up attacks on our cities, on our infrastructure.
54:54
This is, what's his name, continuing to speak,
54:59
Alexander Kerevsky.
55:01
Actually, he was interviewing this other guy.
55:03
But he said the country's reported includes strategic
55:07
civilian infrastructure.
55:09
Countries reported this.
55:10
Finland, Baltic states are pretending they don't know
55:13
anything about these drones flying over their territory.
55:17
And they said, we see something flying past
55:19
here.
55:20
And they didn't.
55:21
It was a way to say that Russia
55:22
was flying.
55:23
Anyway, these type of stories are becoming more
55:26
and more prevalent.
55:29
I mean, he also said, he made in
55:32
his comment, he said, World War Lavrov did
55:37
in this part, he said, World War Three
55:39
is already upon us.
55:41
That is what he said.
55:43
And he said, you know, in a lot
55:44
of respects, World War Three is already here.
55:49
And, you know, it's hard to stay out
55:57
of it.
55:58
You know, it's hard to not believe that
56:01
kind of thing.
56:02
And, you know, the global military spending is
56:05
freaking unbelievable these days.
56:09
It is a record high.
56:11
There was a report that came out.
56:14
The continent's expenditure, the European continent, the expenditure
56:20
has risen by 14%.
56:23
European military spending has propelled global defense expenditures
56:28
to a record high of nearly $3 trillion
56:33
in 2025, despite the U.S. decreasing its
56:37
own outlay.
56:39
This was reported by the Stockholm International Peace
56:41
Research Institute.
56:44
Worldwide military expenditures rose 2.9% in
56:48
real terms last year to $2.887 trillion,
56:55
marking the 11th consecutive annual increase and lifting
57:00
the global military burden to 2.5%
57:04
of GDP.
57:08
CPRI experts explain the trend by citing several
57:11
conflicts and persisting geopolitical tensions.
57:16
The entire European continent accounted for the largest
57:19
increase with spending going up 14% to
57:24
$864 billion.
57:27
CPRI linked the surge to the Ukraine conflict,
57:30
a standoff with Russia, the ongoing pursuit of
57:33
European self-reliance and increasing pressure from the
57:36
United States for burden sharing within the alliance.
57:42
In total, NATO members in Europe spent a
57:45
combined $559 billion in 2025.
57:49
Germany's outlays all by itself
57:59
went up 24% to $114 billion, and
58:04
Spain jumped up 50% to $40 billion,
58:08
but they're still far too low.
58:09
U.S. military expenditure fell 7.5%
58:15
to $954 billion.
58:19
CPRI linked a surprise decline to the Trump
58:23
administration's refusal to approve new assistance to Ukraine,
58:27
in contrast to previous years when $127 billion
58:31
in direct military support was authorized.
58:33
The U.S. continues deliveries through the NATO
58:38
-coordinated programs and other Western countries are footing
58:41
the bill.
58:42
So that's the difference.
58:43
Last week, Pentagon officials said Trump was advocating
58:46
a military budget.
58:47
I brought this to you.
58:49
$1.5 trillion to provide new funds for
58:53
a Golden Dome missile system, AI capabilities, and
58:57
a new class of battleship.
59:03
I'm not for this.
59:04
That's the silence part right there.
59:07
CPRI noted Russia's defense expenditure is $190 billion,
59:12
while Ukraine's spending went up by 20%
59:16
to $84 billion, the equivalent of 40%
59:21
of its GDP, which is the seventh largest
59:24
military spender in the world.
59:26
China increased its military spending by 7.4
59:30
% to $336 billion, and Japan went up
59:35
to $62 billion.
59:36
Taiwan is at $18.2 billion.
59:40
Moscow condemns what it described as reckless militarization
59:45
by the EU, especially since it is aimed
59:48
at Russia.
59:49
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said that the
59:54
European propaganda seeks to turn Russia into a
59:58
model external enemy to divert attention from their
1:00:03
own internal crises.
1:00:07
Things in Europe.
1:00:11
There's something that I might end up sharing
1:00:14
with you after I watch it later this
1:00:16
week.
1:00:16
There's something called Chernobyl 40, the true story
1:00:21
of the world's worst nuclear catastrophe, is something
1:00:25
in my block to watch, because we are
1:00:31
the 40th anniversary of that.
1:00:35
So I played a song that I heard
1:00:38
over the weekend, and I haven't heard it
1:00:41
in forever, and so I played it for
1:00:43
you earlier.
1:00:44
Here is another one, and this might bring
1:00:46
back some memories as it did for me,
1:00:49
because this was a little bit on the
1:00:52
funny side for me.
1:00:56
I hope you enjoy it.
1:01:07
You know what?
1:01:08
We're going to start that over.
1:01:09
I've moved up the wrong panel, so we're
1:01:12
going to start over, just because we don't
1:01:14
want to miss it.
1:01:15
This is a song that we're going to
1:01:16
ruin if we don't hear it all.
1:02:04
I ain't going to put that basketball underneath
1:02:06
my pillow.
1:02:08
Maybe that's why I can't sleep at night.
1:02:11
I need help, ladies and gentlemen.
1:02:14
I need someone to stand beside me.
1:02:16
I need someone to set a pit for
1:02:19
me at the free throw line of life.
1:02:22
Someone I can pass to.
1:02:24
Someone to hit the open man on the
1:05:04
terrible, terrible times.
1:05:05
That was what?
1:05:07
1970-something?
1:05:09
You know who that was?
1:05:11
That was Cheech and Chong, actually, that came
1:05:15
out with that song.
1:05:16
I remember my older brothers playing that song.
1:05:19
So when you have 11 kids in your
1:05:20
family, you share a bedroom, right?
1:05:24
Me and my brother were in a basement
1:05:26
room with a concrete floor.
1:05:28
It was mostly an unfinished basement, and it
1:05:32
had a living area down there that was
1:05:36
always full of Dad's old...
1:05:38
Dad always took TVs and radios, tore them
1:05:42
apart, and would, you know, make new ones
1:05:46
or turn around.
1:05:47
So he played with electronics and stuff like
1:05:49
that in his very little bit of spare
1:05:52
time.
1:05:52
And then my brothers were on the other
1:05:56
end of the house.
1:05:57
They were the three older, older, in the
1:05:59
basement anyway, it was all, there were five
1:06:01
of us boys in the basement.
1:06:04
And then, geez, that was a crowded little
1:06:08
house.
1:06:11
But you'd hear my brothers playing their music
1:06:14
and you'd get stuff like this.
1:06:16
Lots of Jethro Tull coming from that end
1:06:18
of the house too, though, but also plenty
1:06:20
of Cheech and Chong, and that was a
1:06:24
Cheech and Chong album.
1:06:25
I want to finish off the show today
1:06:29
with a little bit of discussion about Iran.
1:06:36
And I've had some time to think about
1:06:40
this and put things together, but I, you
1:06:43
know, I don't want to, you know, the
1:06:48
advertising going around about this from the powers
1:06:54
that be doesn't match reality.
1:06:57
And I think that's important to note from
1:07:01
the jump.
1:07:02
But I don't want to frame Iran as
1:07:05
winning.
1:07:06
I don't think anyone is winning this war.
1:07:10
It is not the, I don't know, presumption
1:07:17
I want to put out there.
1:07:18
It is too cheap, too childish for the
1:07:21
scale of what is really happening.
1:07:23
Iran has suffered assassinations, decapitations of power up
1:07:29
on top, bombing all over, economic pressure everywhere,
1:07:33
infrastructure threat.
1:07:34
And I mean, here we are back again
1:07:36
to what was going on two, three weeks
1:07:38
ago.
1:07:39
We're going to take out all your power
1:07:40
plants and we're going to destroy all your
1:07:43
desalinization and any water abilities and blah, blah,
1:07:47
blah.
1:07:48
And then the decapitation strikes are going to
1:07:50
continue.
1:07:51
We're going to take out the next level.
1:07:52
Well, that's not victory for Iran.
1:07:57
Sure as hell isn't victory for the United
1:07:59
States.
1:08:00
But the mistake in Washington, in my view,
1:08:05
is assuming that because Iran has and is
1:08:09
suffering, Iran has lost and Iran is therefore
1:08:14
broken.
1:08:15
This is the old imperial fantasy still, still
1:08:20
rearing its ugly head, you know, hit a
1:08:23
country, a country hard enough, kill enough of
1:08:26
its leaders, freeze enough of its money, seize
1:08:30
enough of its ships, and eventually the people
1:08:33
will crawl out from under the table and
1:08:35
thank you for allowing them the opportunity, in
1:08:40
fact, the privilege of surrendering and allowing you
1:08:44
to be the new leader of their country.
1:08:48
I don't think that's going to happen.
1:08:50
That is not how old civilizations behave.
1:08:53
That's not how a proud country behaves.
1:08:57
And it's especially not how Iran behaves after
1:09:01
nearly a half a century of resisting American
1:09:06
pressure.
1:09:07
Trump said something about, well, you know, all
1:09:12
these other, all these other presidents before me
1:09:15
for the last 50 years have just been
1:09:18
idiots.
1:09:18
You know, we were in charge of Iran
1:09:20
under the Shah.
1:09:22
I mean, sure, that was another imperial.
1:09:26
We're like imperial stormtroopers from Star Wars.
1:09:29
We're in charge of Iran.
1:09:31
That doesn't mean Iran wanted us there even
1:09:33
then, you know.
1:09:35
And, you know, I was just a kid
1:09:39
when that happened.
1:09:41
You know, when 79, I remember it.
1:09:44
You know, I remember the assassinations.
1:09:47
I remember all of those things that went
1:09:49
on and what happened in Iran.
1:09:52
Trump is still complaining about that.
1:09:54
And he made some commentary that, well, you
1:09:57
know, all these other presidents, they should have
1:09:59
done something.
1:09:59
And people are bringing up this 49 years,
1:10:03
you know, we've been fighting Iran.
1:10:04
Well, because you had put in a leadership
1:10:09
that wasn't their leadership.
1:10:11
You know what I mean?
1:10:12
It was your leadership.
1:10:14
It was totally subordinate to America.
1:10:17
And that's that.
1:10:19
And it had to, you know, you had
1:10:20
to do what the CIA told you to
1:10:22
do.
1:10:22
And that's the end.
1:10:24
And they got out of that.
1:10:27
Whether you agree with it or not, doesn't
1:10:29
matter that that is their country, their self
1:10:32
-determination U.S. is not the colonialist of
1:10:36
the world or shouldn't be, in my humble
1:10:38
opinion.
1:10:39
Anyway, the Trump's policy of non-negotiation, capitulation
1:10:46
dressed up as diplomacy, you know, another demand
1:10:49
every day, another demand every day, something different
1:10:53
where we demand X.
1:10:56
And, you know, this capitulation is all he's
1:10:59
after.
1:11:00
Same thing that the Europeans are demanding of
1:11:03
Russia.
1:11:03
Well, capitulate.
1:11:04
We're right.
1:11:06
You're wrong.
1:11:07
We're we're important.
1:11:08
You're not.
1:11:10
Our opinions are important.
1:11:12
Yours are not.
1:11:14
And that is absolutely not the case.
1:11:19
If you're an Iranian, they don't think that
1:11:22
way.
1:11:22
So I'm not.
1:11:24
And I don't know.
1:11:25
I'm only taking this from the point of
1:11:27
view of claiming that, you know, we've already
1:11:29
won, you know, and put me in coach.
1:11:32
Seth is always ready to, you know, talk
1:11:36
about, oh, we already won.
1:11:38
You know, it's over.
1:11:39
We're done.
1:11:39
We're we're up here, you know, that we
1:11:43
don't need peace.
1:11:43
We just need to keep on bombing them.
1:11:45
And eventually they'll give up.
1:11:48
Well, I'm not so sure that's the case.
1:11:51
Financially, I'm totally positive.
1:11:53
I'm almost positive it's not the case.
1:11:55
But financially, they've been they've been sanctioned forever,
1:12:03
you know, and they've been, you know, their
1:12:04
assets frozen forever.
1:12:06
The money has been, you know, probably the
1:12:09
same as our Social Security system has already
1:12:12
been robbed.
1:12:13
It's gone.
1:12:15
And so this Trump is demanding that Iran
1:12:20
surrender to America and Israel and then says
1:12:24
it plainly, you know, the Iranians say, well,
1:12:27
that ain't happening.
1:12:28
We're not we're not just going to surrender.
1:12:31
It will not happen.
1:12:33
So the point isn't that Iran is invincible.
1:12:36
They're not.
1:12:37
The point is that the Trump assumption that
1:12:39
they will capitulate is wrong.
1:12:42
You can continue to hurt Iran.
1:12:44
You can continue to make them bleed.
1:12:46
You can even continue to punish them.
1:12:49
But the idea that is going to, you
1:12:51
know, fold, the government's going to fold because
1:12:54
Netanyahu and Trump want to or because Trump
1:12:58
says I'm not going to be Mr. Nice
1:13:00
guy anymore is schoolyard bully policy.
1:13:04
That's it.
1:13:06
And it's not going to happen.
1:13:09
You know, it's not going to happen.
1:13:12
And Americans have no appetite right now for
1:13:17
sending troops, putting them on the ground inside
1:13:19
another Afghanistan.
1:13:22
And this would be worse than Afghanistan by
1:13:25
far worse.
1:13:28
And I think that is a crucial point.
1:13:31
Trump needs to have an exit strategy because
1:13:35
the U.S. has no military option that
1:13:38
can allow it to win the war.
1:13:40
Now, I watched something over the weekend with
1:13:43
two allegedly the not the top level, not
1:13:47
not the secretary of the army or secretary
1:13:50
of defense, but the so Trump is the
1:13:53
one who gives the orders.
1:13:55
Those orders go to the operational commander sent
1:13:59
Central Command and stuff like that, and that
1:14:02
those commanders have pushed back hard and said
1:14:07
this is this is not a good idea,
1:14:10
no matter how you slice it.
1:14:12
This is it's not something that, you know,
1:14:15
is going to be.
1:14:18
Profitable, there's also been a lot of reports
1:14:20
over the weekend, and I suggest you check
1:14:23
them out that the that the depth of
1:14:25
destruction of American military might in the Middle
1:14:29
East is vastly underreported, at least as far
1:14:34
as the major bases like Al Udeid in
1:14:38
Qatar and whichever the ones are in Bahrain
1:14:42
and even into Saudi Arabia that the there's
1:14:46
been stories for a long time about the
1:14:49
U.S. military that were housed on those
1:14:52
bases living in local hotels.
1:14:55
A couple of hotels have been blown up
1:14:57
and then they twist the the rhetoric to
1:15:00
say, well, look, these guys are attacking hotels.
1:15:03
They're attacking hotels because those the ones where
1:15:05
the military are staying, that they are moving
1:15:09
into hotels and the depth of destruction of
1:15:12
American might in the Middle East, at least
1:15:16
on land in these air in these bases
1:15:18
that were initially bombed is astronomical.
1:15:23
And it'd be nice to go over there
1:15:24
and check this out.
1:15:25
Truthfully, I'd like to go see it myself,
1:15:27
but I don't believe necessarily either side of
1:15:31
that.
1:15:31
But there are plenty of stories about it.
1:15:34
And, you know, this allegation that the U
1:15:37
.S. has no military option to allow it
1:15:40
to win the war is only the escalation
1:15:43
ladder favors Iran, not Washington.
1:15:46
And I think that's an important point.
1:15:49
The U.S. can bomb.
1:15:50
It can seize more ships.
1:15:51
It can threaten bridges, power plants, refineries and
1:15:55
ports.
1:15:55
But if Iran ran response by fully disrupting
1:15:59
the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea, Gulf energy
1:16:02
infrastructure, desalinization plants and continues to affect these
1:16:07
vital shipping arteries, then Washington is no longer
1:16:10
punishing Iran all by itself.
1:16:13
And unfortunately, that's what's happening.
1:16:17
So one some economist or another, I forget
1:16:19
who I was listening to, said that.
1:16:23
We're now eight weeks in to the war
1:16:26
in Iran, eight weeks, and the eight weeks
1:16:30
of war is about the length of time
1:16:34
it takes for shipping of container ships and
1:16:39
oil ships and aluminum ships and whatever, fertilizer
1:16:45
ships from the Straits of Hormuz area, from
1:16:51
the, you know, Iran area, from Iranian ports
1:16:57
to around the world.
1:16:59
And that the first ones that left those
1:17:01
days, the last that were leaving, are arriving
1:17:04
right now.
1:17:06
And so we don't even recognize how much
1:17:10
the next four weeks, let's say, is going
1:17:15
to have an effect on the prices, because
1:17:17
now is when it's going to become far
1:17:21
more noticeable because of the ship, just the
1:17:29
realities of shipping and how it works.
1:17:32
So I don't know.
1:17:33
That doesn't mean Iran's won a victory, not
1:17:36
remotely.
1:17:37
Nobody has.
1:17:38
But Iran has survived the very first premise
1:17:41
of the war, which said that it would
1:17:43
collapse, panic, surrender.
1:17:45
And that's the real story.
1:17:47
And if we just hit them and they
1:17:49
fold, you know, put me in coach can
1:17:51
say, you know, well, we got him.
1:17:56
We got him on the run.
1:17:57
He can fire a few more generals if
1:17:59
he likes, you know, for disagreeing and for
1:18:01
saying that everything isn't absolutely positive.
1:18:04
You know, let's fire the next level of
1:18:05
them.
1:18:06
You know, who are we decapitating here?
1:18:08
You get rid of all your military experience
1:18:12
in the command.
1:18:13
And that's the end of that.
1:18:15
Right.
1:18:16
It just it doesn't go that way.
1:18:20
Let's see here.
1:18:21
Perhaps we'll take a take a call here.
1:18:29
Hello, sir.
1:18:30
How may I help you?
1:18:34
Hey, how are you doing?
1:18:36
Pretty good on a Monday.
1:18:39
Awesome.
1:18:40
Hey, on the Iran topic, suppose those 13
1:18:46
bases are blown up and you know, if
1:18:51
they won't talk about the aircraft carriers won't
1:18:54
charge right into the Gulf and dominate, right?
1:18:57
Oh, they won't do that.
1:18:59
And that'd be a fool's errand to do
1:19:01
that.
1:19:02
It really would.
1:19:04
So why did they send another aircraft carrier
1:19:07
then?
1:19:07
Well, because they're there.
1:19:09
All we have left are threats and stealing
1:19:13
of other people's shipments.
1:19:16
You know, we stopped another Iranian ship today.
1:19:19
And I don't believe it's going to work.
1:19:22
And you know that.
1:19:22
But how does the news get away with,
1:19:26
like you said, if we're winning, won't they
1:19:29
show a tally?
1:19:32
You know what I'm saying?
1:19:33
I think one thing I'd like to see
1:19:36
have been hit and three out of four
1:19:38
thads have been knocked out.
1:19:41
And yeah, I'm certain of that.
1:19:42
And those those that those that radars, I
1:19:45
don't believe many of them exist.
1:19:47
And those are extreme, extremely expensive.
1:19:52
I went to when I lived in Qatar,
1:19:54
I was on Al Udeid rather frequently, I
1:19:57
could go out there and use the PX
1:19:59
and go buy stuff out there, stuff like
1:20:00
that.
1:20:01
And I tried to get a couple of
1:20:03
contracts out there, you know, speaking Russian or
1:20:06
something, going out and trying to do something.
1:20:08
And I was in the contractor pool out
1:20:10
there.
1:20:11
And so I would go out and see
1:20:13
what they were doing in there.
1:20:14
And there didn't appear to be a ton
1:20:17
of defense.
1:20:18
Now it was 2015, the year that I
1:20:20
lived there.
1:20:21
So that's 10 years ago.
1:20:23
But what I have, what I would love
1:20:26
to do, and I haven't been to Qatar.
1:20:27
I was there a couple of years ago.
1:20:29
I went, went and got her.
1:20:31
Yeah, it's Qatar.
1:20:33
They say Qatar.
1:20:34
And so that's how I say it.
1:20:35
But but it doesn't matter.
1:20:37
And it's I was out there and I
1:20:41
would go and check these places out.
1:20:44
And I would love to.
1:20:46
And I think if I go back, I'm
1:20:47
trying to schedule a trip to to Egypt.
1:20:51
And I'm also trying to get back to
1:20:53
Turkey and maybe go into southern Russia again
1:20:57
later this summer.
1:20:58
And I think I'm going to take Qatar
1:21:02
Airways because I like flying into Doha.
1:21:05
And there's a couple of things I want
1:21:06
to take care of in Doha that I
1:21:08
want to break in for a second, please.
1:21:11
Uh, what?
1:21:13
So it's going to hurt the Iranians if
1:21:16
they have to stop pumping oil, but it's
1:21:18
not going to hurt the Saudis or.
1:21:21
It's absolutely going to hurt all of them.
1:21:23
And that's the unfortunate part is we're just
1:21:26
going to notice this right now, because right
1:21:30
now it's eight weeks later and the real
1:21:34
effect.
1:21:35
Everything is talked about oil futures.
1:21:38
But what about oil today's oil today?
1:21:42
What's being delivered today is far more important
1:21:46
than the futures of what's coming on.
1:21:48
And every time one of some, whether it's
1:21:51
a Trump ally or not, making millions and
1:21:54
millions of dollars betting on oil futures, that
1:21:57
doesn't matter.
1:21:59
What matters is the actual flow.
1:22:01
And all over East Asia, they are without,
1:22:06
they have strict limits on how much they
1:22:09
can buy.
1:22:10
And we don't want that to come to
1:22:11
this country.
1:22:12
I mean, I hate it that it's in
1:22:13
those countries, you know, they have, they're just
1:22:15
normal people do trying to get through their
1:22:18
days in the government.
1:22:19
And we, we meaning Iran, Israel, United States
1:22:24
are cocking it up for the rest of
1:22:26
the world.
1:22:27
That's what's happening, unfortunately.
1:22:29
And it's affecting everyone.
1:22:33
I listened to another show and the guy
1:22:36
says that Trump's going to wrap it all
1:22:38
up and they're going to win the midterms.
1:22:42
And I am less sure of that.
1:22:47
I am not sure of that at all.
1:22:53
Not sure at all.
1:22:56
Not remotely sure.
1:22:58
I mean, all kinds of bets, people bet
1:23:00
out there.
1:23:02
And, you know, did you hear about the
1:23:05
guy who bet on Maduro?
1:23:06
And he was a member of the, of
1:23:09
the strike team.
1:23:10
And he put a $30,000 bet that
1:23:13
Maduro would be taken out of power.
1:23:15
And he made $400,000 on his bet.
1:23:18
Did you hear about that?
1:23:19
Did you hear, did you hear about the
1:23:22
Trump son buying into the drone company that
1:23:26
they got the giant contract?
1:23:28
Yeah, I know.
1:23:31
It's funny how mega people learn the leering
1:23:35
center.
1:23:36
They know, they know some, some, some things
1:23:38
that are so inconsequential and they know how
1:23:41
Hunter Biden had a cush ass job, but
1:23:44
ask any of them if they know anything
1:23:45
about their, their coin exchange or, or taking
1:23:52
money for that ballroom.
1:23:53
Well, I'm, I'm not a, I'm not an
1:23:55
anti-Trumper by any stretch.
1:23:57
I am, I am anti-Trump ideas of
1:24:01
internationally for sure.
1:24:03
If it's not, if it's not a dictatorship,
1:24:06
it sure is close because the Congress ain't
1:24:08
going to do anything to him.
1:24:09
Well, no, but they're lazy anyway.
1:24:11
They don't do anything to anybody.
1:24:13
You know, that does, that's not necessarily Trump's
1:24:16
fault.
1:24:16
He just using the system as it's presented
1:24:19
and, uh, that's America's fault.
1:24:22
Well, but it's the same in any party.
1:24:24
I mean that, that, that I have equal
1:24:26
contempt for all the way across the board.
1:24:28
You know, it doesn't matter who's in charge.
1:24:31
I'm against it in a, you're supposed to
1:24:34
rule upon some sort of consensus and consensus
1:24:37
never matters.
1:24:38
Day one, new president comes in, everything reverses
1:24:42
180 degrees and you're supposed to hate everybody
1:24:45
that was there the day before.
1:24:47
And that is exactly how, what we do.
1:24:50
The same thing's going to happen in two
1:24:51
and a half years when the next guy
1:24:53
comes in and it's going to be the
1:24:55
same thing.
1:24:56
That's America, buddy.
1:25:00
Yay.
1:25:01
Yay.
1:25:03
All right.
1:25:03
I got to wrap up the show.
1:25:04
We only have a few more minutes.
1:25:05
I appreciate your call.
1:25:06
You have a very nice day.
1:25:08
Okay.
1:25:09
Well, and there he goes.
1:25:13
So, uh, I want to, you know, I
1:25:15
kind of call this, um, you know, if
1:25:18
I, if I had to come up with
1:25:19
something that, you know, I'd call the Trump
1:25:22
presidency kind of a stick in the eye
1:25:24
sort of presidency.
1:25:27
Trump's posture on many, many things.
1:25:29
Um, and, and by the way, again, I'm
1:25:32
not anti-Trump, especially nationally, you know, nationally.
1:25:36
I like a lot of that.
1:25:37
I wouldn't go as far as he did,
1:25:39
you know, on a many things, you know,
1:25:41
like, uh, I don't know what, I don't
1:25:44
want to want to pick them, but I
1:25:45
wouldn't go as far as some of the
1:25:47
things he did.
1:25:47
Tariffs, international stuff.
1:25:49
I've disagreed with a lot of this stuff.
1:25:51
Not saying absolutely not, but there are better
1:25:53
ways to skin a cat.
1:25:55
And the Trump way is less like diplomacy
1:26:00
and more like a guy trying to close
1:26:02
a hostile business deal.
1:26:05
Has he ever had a friendly business deal?
1:26:07
That's what I want to know.
1:26:08
Is it always gotta be hostility?
1:26:10
He never says here's some mutual guarantees, Iran.
1:26:14
Here's some mutual guarantees, Russia, Ukraine.
1:26:17
Let me help resolve this.
1:26:18
Here's the security architecture.
1:26:20
He says, surrender, call me.
1:26:23
I'll take care of everything after that.
1:26:25
You don't need leaders.
1:26:27
I'll appoint your leaders.
1:26:29
Or I'll, if you don't do that, I'll
1:26:31
just destroy more of your country.
1:26:33
And it's like, it's an incredible arrogance.
1:26:38
I mean, it's just, I'm God, that's that.
1:26:41
And I don't, you know, I understand and
1:26:46
appreciate that he's a successful and, uh, I
1:26:50
don't know what, I still, you know, think
1:26:52
highly of some of the things that he
1:26:53
does, but more and more internationally, you know,
1:26:57
there's a lot of, um, lack of MAGA
1:27:00
support for what he's doing.
1:27:02
And because people are finally catching on that,
1:27:05
this really isn't a good idea and it's
1:27:08
really not.
1:27:09
And, uh, I'm definitely on that side, although
1:27:12
I, you know, this is not a part
1:27:14
of a deeper disease.
1:27:16
Trump didn't invent it.
1:27:17
Trump didn't invent this disease.
1:27:19
People, he just says it louder with less
1:27:22
diplomacy.
1:27:26
He doesn't pretty it up at all.
1:27:28
And he puts more exclamation points and capital
1:27:31
letters in it.
1:27:32
And so the Obama Biden comparison, you know,
1:27:34
you think these guys had, you know, they
1:27:37
had, you know, some day one stick in
1:27:40
the eye policies.
1:27:41
We won, we're doing it, live with it.
1:27:43
Elections have consequences, you know, that kind of
1:27:46
thing.
1:27:46
This is what we have watched for my
1:27:49
entire adult life.
1:27:51
It's crap.
1:27:52
You know, it's really crap.
1:27:54
This is not what normal thinking people want.
1:27:58
They want stability and we don't have it.
1:28:01
Every four years we have some kind of
1:28:02
weird upheaval and a bunch of people on
1:28:05
TV saying, you know, cheerleading and that's it.
1:28:08
We have lunatics running into, uh, uh, press
1:28:11
correspondence dinners and trying to kill people.
1:28:14
We have people shooting at politicians.
1:28:17
It's nuts.
1:28:18
This is not persuasive to me, any of
1:28:22
it.
1:28:22
And it's not state craft.
1:28:24
It's dominant performance brought to you by Hollywood
1:28:27
and the people that believe this is how
1:28:30
you're, it's supposed to be.
1:28:32
We have a hero at the end of
1:28:34
every movie.
1:28:35
The heroes got to win, right?
1:28:38
The heroes got to win.
1:28:39
That ain't how life works.
1:28:41
It sure as hell ain't how state craft
1:28:42
really works.
1:28:43
It's performative.
1:28:45
It's politics of humiliating the other side in
1:28:51
public and then acting surprised when the other
1:28:54
side doesn't cooperate with you.
1:28:57
It might work for campaign rallies, but it
1:28:59
doesn't work with nations that have history, pride,
1:29:02
religion, memory, and their own dead bodies all
1:29:06
over the ground.
1:29:07
The political cost is very real.
1:29:10
And I'm not so sure that in November,
1:29:13
people aren't going to be punished for this.
1:29:16
I appreciate you listening to the show.
1:29:18
This is international flavor.
1:29:20
I am Samuel Trapp.
1:29:22
You're listening to damn radio and we're damn
1:29:24
glad that you do listen to us all
1:29:27
the time.
1:29:28
Um, damn radio.com forward slash live.
1:29:33
If you'd like the international flavor shows, go
1:29:36
on out to international flavor.com and download
1:29:38
them all for your listening pleasure.
1:29:41
And, uh, damn radio.com forward slash podcast
1:29:44
for all the rest of the programs.
1:29:46
Have a beautiful mid Missouri week.