Latest / Tom Althouse Podcast / The Real Story of The Glitch in the Matrix is Coming Soon

Transcript

The Real Story of The Glitch in the Matrix is Coming Soon · Tom Althouse Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Hello, Tom.
• 0:02
  Speaker 2: It is good to see you, and we have not
• 0:04
  Speaker 2: caught up in a long time about what you have
• 0:06
  Speaker 2: going on, and you have a lot of updates. So
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: first off, thank you for coming back and having a chat.
• 0:13
  Speaker 2: Second off, what do you have going on that's new?
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: What's kind of updated and fun for everybody?
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: Well, what's really interesting is I curbed back on conferences
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: so we could work on the documentary and work with you, too.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: So it's like that has been a good decision, I think.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: So rather than traveling around and speaking at events, it's
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: been focusing on getting the evidence done and getting in
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: a library of evidence. It's so important in the way
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: they've played this game, the opposition has played this game
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: of the studios blocking access, blocking accessibility, making sure the
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: story is the way they want it, and then drawing
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: everything we have as if it's their narrative. And Blocking
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: the evidence is very, very important. That's the thing they
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: don't have. Their weakness is they don't have the evidence.
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: They have nothing. That's why they move to make sure
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: that no evidence would ever be seen or lack of
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: evidence on their part with a false.
• 1:08
  Speaker 3: We're just talking about that.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So that is important. Yeah.
• 1:12
  Speaker 3: Are you seeing that a lot?
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: Like when are you seeing where you mentioned something and
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: then they'll answer it somewhere or talk about it trending
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: wise in a big way?
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: In a crazy way. It's like if I, it's like
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: they're following so closely. We've seen this through our phones
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: and our devices where there will actually be voices appearing
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: on the phone. Like there'll be a conversation they forgot
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: to put the mute switch and you'll hear two guys talking.
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Or they'll type something across the screen like your apartment
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: number or your house number backwards with 666. It's like
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: they're just messing with you.
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: I think it feels so safe that no one's going
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: to pay attention, you know, while, you know, down the numbers.
• 1:49
  Speaker 3: It's hard to mention that stuff.
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: That's like, So that's an interesting point because the targeting
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: individual community talks about that all the time. And it
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: supposedly is like when someone who says that they have
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: those things happen to them all the time, it's called
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: gang stalking.
• 2:05
  Speaker 3: And it's an illegal federal crime.
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: But it's really hard to say it happened because everything
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: that happens is so... like small amount to just trigger
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: your nervous system, not necessarily upset the whole apple cart.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: They just want your nervous system heightened, right? So you've
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: seen a lot of things where it was just like
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: a small thing, but if you mention it, it almost
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: sounds a little outlandish.
• 2:28
  Speaker 3: It couldn't have happened. So it makes you sound a
• 2:29
  Speaker 3: little crazy to mention it, but it happened.
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: So, and they do that all the time to people
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: like you with a story like this, right?
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they said they put me in my own story.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: So I'll have producers from Hollywood say, We put you
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: in your own story. And what happens in the original story,
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: in the original Matrix story, the immortals, you have the
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: character hearing things, you know, brain to skull or skull.
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: And it's like you'll be a message.
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: The voice to skull technology that just won a Nobel
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: Prize almost.
• 2:59
  Speaker 3: Exactly.
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: So it's like so they're using the tech on the
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: writers who are the ones that first visualize this or
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: downloaded it happening. And so that's what's so wild about
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk getting that award from Trump. Where it's like,
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: come on, the guy obviously doesn't have a brain cell
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: really firing. And it's like, or a synapsis. And it's like,
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: there he is getting this award. And he's like bobbleheading.
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: He's just not home. So that's why.
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a lot around that.
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the tech from the story, the immortal story. Well,
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: in awards too.
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: I know the tech being taken out of your story
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: with that being trending tech right now.
• 3:36
  Speaker 3: How does that make you feel?
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: Annoyed, really annoyed that they're taking it and giving to
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: the failed people. That's the formula that gets me, Jen,
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: is the failed people are handed the work of visionaries
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: and geniuses. And we're the ones that actually are. You
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: can see that we are by the way we interact
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: with others. And it's like when you see Elon Musk
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: up there, he's not a genius. That's a person, as
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: psychiatrists say, playing a smart person. They're trying to pretend
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: they're like Larry Wachowski does, or they call him Lana now.
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: Still a dude. But he's like, he's acting, trying to
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: act smart. And then they'll use humor and deflection and
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: things like this to try to get away from the
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: fact that they don't know what they're talking about. And
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: so what would that be like to get awards for
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: tech you didn't create or stories you didn't write? And
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: what does that do to your demeanor and your interactive state?
• 4:26
  Speaker 3: And your answers.
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: Like, do you eventually get bitter about the praise because
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: it wasn't yours? And so people only like you for
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: something that's not yours?
• 4:37
  Speaker 3: So that has to feel awkward to the twins.
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: If they are consistently getting this nerdy praise over like
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: the idol worship of, oh, my gosh, you created this
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: amazing thing that changed my life.
• 4:53
  Speaker 3: That has to feel at some point in time. A
• 4:57
  Speaker 3: little bit.
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: I'm annoyed by only hearing about that. What about something
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: else I created?
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: That is so important what you just said. Exactly. There's
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: this almost anger reflex, I think, that happens to them
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: where they're like, don't you love me for who I am?
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: It's like, you know, and that happened. That happened at
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: an awards ceremony where the announcer announced where Larry, he's
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: still Larry, really, before he gets up there, this dude
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: who's dressed like a lady. He hasn't been autonomically changed.
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: And so, you know, growth hormones maybe. But they announce
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: him and say, okay, We bring you now, whatever, the
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: creator of Matrix, Speed Racer, Cloud Atlas, V for Vendetta.
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: And he's like, and Larry comes up to the mic.
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: And the first thing he says, you see this reaction
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: that you're describing. He gets up there and he goes,
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: how come nobody ever talks about Bound? Because Bound's the
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: only thing you actually originally did. Everything else is still
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: at work. So he let loose on that. It's basically saying,
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: why don't you love me for something besides the stolen
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: stuff I took?
• 5:59
  Speaker 3: The stuff I did.
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah. What I actually created. So there's an emptiness.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: There's got to be an emptiness.
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: That's an interesting response for somebody who might be listening
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: that's a psychiatrist that could look at why somebody would
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: do that.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Right. Now flip it. Flip it, Jen. Go to the
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: reactions of the original writers and for us that are creators.
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: How do we actually feel We see people taking stolen work,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: taking work in this case, which was written for the
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: glory of God, and then making themselves the God center
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: of it. And it's like using hero worship. What happens
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: to us when we see it? Well, interestingly enough, the
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: other side will pour on attacks. They'll put things, like
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: you said, they'll try to put you down publicly. They'll say,
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: like the article in TMZ where the Wartowskis were put
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: big-faced on their faces. saying Tom Oldhouse is just, you know,
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: we didn't jack your work, you're just a know-nothing, you're
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: famous for nothing, just a hack. Well, the more they
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: pile that stuff on, I can honestly answer the reaction
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: you feel in this case, for me, is I feel
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: like they're saying you're a know-nothing, famous for nothing, yet
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: they're making me a person of note by attacking. And
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: they're actually.
• 7:14
  Speaker 3: Why are they noticing?
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah. If you're a know-nothing, why bring me to light?
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: And it's like, why dwell on it? Why keep attacking?
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: Why keep imitating my work? And why be so upset
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: about it and pour all these attorneys and money into
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: trying to stop me and even the FBI involved trying
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: to put me away?
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: Well, and the merger and the sale.
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: I don't have it up right now and we can
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: probably discuss it, but there was a time when you
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: had done something big with your case, and then Joel
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: Silver resigned, and then you did something big with your case,
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: and then Joel Silver moved or did something else, and
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: then you did something big with your case, and then.
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: Warner Brothers and Paramount are merging.
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: And splitting and getting rid of certain rights to things
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: that include the Matrix.
• 7:58
  Speaker 3: Which is all prepped for a case. So it's interesting
• 8:00
  Speaker 3: timing if you don't matter, right?
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: Right, right.
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: Like if you're just a whatever, why are the timelines different?
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: That's a very good point. Why would, within 30 days,
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: why would Mike Lang of Disney, who's directly involved in
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: the theft, and Joel Silver, who's directly involved in the theft,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: a franchise owner, and if he's the owner, how could
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers fire him from his own franchise?
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: You know what?
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: So they do it within 30 days.
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: And why did it include the Matrix release that was
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: out of his thing? Like, out of all the movies
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: he's done, the Matrix was included in what he's not
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: going to have access to.
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: That's the part that's like, Very good point. And why
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: don't they have successors? And why is it that they
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: do this as a surprise? Same thing happened to Bob Iger.
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: When the day that he had said, and we had
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: a recorded call, and his top secretary at his office,
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: which takes a long channel to get to, said, wait,
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: I'll talk to Bob Iger. Hold on, hold on, stay
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: on the phone. On the hold for 15 minutes. And
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: then he gets back on and says, Bob Iger wants
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: to talk to you tomorrow. We'll set up for tomorrow.
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: And he wants to have a conference with you over
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: the matrix. It's on tape. And the next day he's
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: fired without a successor.
• 9:14
  Speaker 3: I wonder who has that tape.
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: We have the tape. We have a recording on one
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: of our recorders here. So record it off the phone.
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: You betcha. And so, yeah.
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: We should play that sometime.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And so what happens is.
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: I can put that on the podcast too.
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: Well, this is amazing. I got some really good ones
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: for Sophia Stewart too to give you, by the way,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: where she's like accusing me of being on set on
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: The Matrix. And that the reason my stuff's in there,
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: the personal information, the interrogation scene, my high school birthday,
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: my dad's name, which is irrefutable evidence that they tried
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: to block.
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: Impertuity. There she's saying you were on set. That's why
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: it's there. You were on set.
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: Well, so she thinks you had a hand in all
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: the graphic design and cut final scene. positions?
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that I was involved in the major project.
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: But yet they don't know you and you're not anybody
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: and none of this happened.
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: So how does she think that's the case?
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: Whatever fits your boat. That's how these people think.
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: Whichever they want to row it, they'll row it. Backwards, forwards, sideways,
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: upside down.
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: She even admits that there's some sort of an elite
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: group working to get your information in the matrix.
• 10:20
  Speaker 3: She just says it's because she wrote it.
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah. She claims that she, yeah, that's that.
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: Well, she doesn't have anything. She never wrote a screenplay. 33,
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: it's less than 33 pages. They showed it cited in
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: the court documents, which she lost in 2005 summary judgment
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: that she had nothing. It was just star Wars in
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: the Bible. There was nothing. It's a Christ story with
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: star Wars mixed in. Which is two major plagiarisms. And
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: it's like, you got that with nothing to do with
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: Terminator and Matrix. Nothing at all.
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: Well, and that's what she says all the time, too,
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: is that she didn't win because she has the Matrix
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: trademark or because she wrote the screenplay. She won because,
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: what does she say strategically? And it's like, well, yeah,
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: but that's not the claim that you're making right now.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: That's not the claim. That's right. That's right. And Warner
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: Brothers doesn't claim the Matrix title. And Sophia Stewart saw
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: that they weren't claiming the Matrix title. Sophia Stewart didn't
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: come up with the Matrix title.
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: And she even says that you can't claim the Matrix
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: because it's a word and everybody can use it. She said,
• 11:22
  Speaker 2: what if somebody else wants to do this? Or if
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: you want to do this? Or if you want to
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: do this? Or if you want to do this?
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: That's not a word you can claim.
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: Right, right.
• 11:29
  Speaker 3: So that's an interesting... I mean, and you have personal
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: experience with her. I don't have personal experience with her,
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: so I don't have any hate.
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: It's just from a personal expression of watching both stories.
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: Hers doesn't match up, and it comes with so much
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: immediate passion hatred for the things that I don't latch
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: on to as like, yeah, I would also have passion
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: hatred for that.
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: That's exactly it. They pile the emotions.
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a weirdly charged story that doesn't seem to
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: align up much. And then when, like, because I always
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: talk about marketing, marketing is mind control and like where
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: to spot it. I see like things happen with your name,
• 12:13
  Speaker 2: with her name, with the matrix itself. And it's just,
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: it's so strange because it's not a natural reaction. The
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: algorithm wouldn't do that. The words don't naturally happen that way.
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: They have to be programmed naturally. And that means somebody
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: knew when that answer was programmed in. So it just
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: like there's things that happen with both of your cases.
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: And I challenge anyone listening, like ask AI about it
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: and see what AI says. And it's like the one
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: thing that happens all the time is if I ask
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: AI names that you've dropped in your story, like just different,
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: you know, particular parts of your story that are very traumatic,
• 12:58
  Speaker 2: that pieces of that puzzle helped you write this script,
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: they're not really talked about online much, which is interesting.
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: But when you ask AI about that person, they only
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: find that it's a conspiracy story that Tom Althaus has discussed.
• 13:13
  Speaker 3: Now, these people do have real names.
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: They do have real websites. They do have real things
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: written about them. They have written things that could be
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: pulled by a search that can pull words from public places.
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: There's all kinds of other stories that a narrative that
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: has the ability to think like AI could could say
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: anything about these people.
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: And they always, in my.
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: You know, use come back with a that's a conspiratorial
• 13:40
  Speaker 2: something from somebody like Tom Aldhouse, who's speaking these on
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: public podcasts. So I'm like, why are those names leashed?
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: to give that narrative. It doesn't make sense. So I
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: would challenge your view because we know.
• 13:56
  Speaker 3: That AI lies. It'll tell you it lies.
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: It apologizes for lying after you give it the proof.
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: So it's interesting what it's not able to find on
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: its own naturally, given its talents of able to find
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: things and what it does find in your case.
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: Well, tell us a little bit about what you found
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: doing that when you called it out, like an example
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: of calling it out. I would love, you know, it's defensive.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: But then you say to take the parameters off and
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: just answer honestly.
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: It will.
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: So chat GPT at the time would unleash and I
• 14:31
  Speaker 2: was able to get it to then see what you
• 14:34
  Speaker 2: were saying with your evidence. And then it would answer
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: properly and it would say, yeah, that does look like
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: that's an improbable call. You know, he's got so many
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: matchups in there. There's no way somebody in the room
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: didn't know about that. These are the probabilities like it
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: finally believed me. What I've found with AI bots like
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: a Claude or, you know, Anthropic or Gemini, so Grok,
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: which is interesting, Grok from Elon, finds a lot of
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: points in your data. So it doesn't necessarily leash as much. Now,
• 15:11
  Speaker 2: I don't ask it as many questions because I don't
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: want to, and I don't give it information. I just
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: kind of ask its permission. to analyze certain thoughts of,
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: like when a post comes up about the Matrix and
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: it's trending about the blue pill and stuff, I'll ask
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: Grok to tell me about it. And then I'll say,
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: but what about what Tom Althaus says about this? And
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: it doesn't necessarily lie. It won't find truth. It won't
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: find things. But I haven't found it lie. I've seen
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: GPT lie. I've seen Claude lie. I've seen Gemini lie.
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: Gemini will lie up the yin-yang, and that's from Google.
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: And when I say lie, I mean like it has
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: the ability to find public information and read it and
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: it chooses not to and then says this doesn't exist.
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: That's a conspiracy. That doesn't happen. That never happened. This
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: isn't found anywhere on the Internet. This never was existent.
• 16:05
  Speaker 2: And then I'll, you know, I'll show it a screenshot
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: of its own resource and I'll say, but you said this.
• 16:12
  Speaker 3: And it'll go, oh, right. I'm sorry.
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: You can find it here. So something immediate is programmed
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: on your story to hit a wall for whatever purpose.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: Well, that goes back to Windows. The whole thing with Windows,
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: when I was at the university as a young man,
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: I pitched that whole idea of Windows to three computer
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: profs at Millersville University. And it was a class I
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: never attended. And so I came in the last day
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: and just said, I'm sorry I never showed up, but
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: I just find these systems archaic and boring. And I
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: was like, here's an idea I had about central learning areas,
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: data centers. And you open from this, information is then
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: channeled to your home. You personalize everything. It could be
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: your phone, movie, everything else. This is 1980. And it's
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: like you have windows that open to expound on information.
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: You can open another window to expound on information if
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: you need more information on that particular topic from central
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: learning areas. And it's like, here we are, right, with
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: all that happening. So they've been trying to shut down
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: the idea that the Matrix author, the Immoralist writer, First,
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: what was the seeds that were planted in the field
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: was the idea of windows and central learning areas and Internet.
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: So there I was in 1980 with that. And that
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: feeds out from these professors to Steve Jobs and Bill Gates,
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: who then fight over it and even say they borrow
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: stuff and steal stuff. So the precursor to the Matrix
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: story was the Internet creation.
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: And that came from the response.
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: Which is also a psyop.
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: So that's the progression of a creative thought process. which
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: copyright is supposed to protect that so that it gets
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: developed to fullest from the person who creates it or
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: downloads it. And then it goes on to further development
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: to others. That process has not been followed here. It
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: was hijacked and taken. And now we got Elon Musk
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: receiving an award for something he never even understood or created.
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: Neural Enhancer, Neuralink is not his baby, just like Tesla
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: cars are not his baby. Someone else developed them. And
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: so they gave it to failures to control. And that's
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: the matrix story in real life. If we're in the matrix,
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: this is the matrix where we got failed people getting
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: credit for what they never created. And they're professionals at it.
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: So Elon Musk with Choskies, they're all people that are
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: like Edison. They took from others and claimed it for themselves.
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: And I thought you had an interesting thought about that.
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: That's why that quote from Trump recently, like this is,
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: we're recording this in October and Trump just said to
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: Elon giving that award, he's like the Edison of your generation.
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: Our generation knows that Edison was the crook. So whether
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: he was smart or not, we know he was the crook.
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: So why are you saying that now? And what's also
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: interesting is Trump, supposedly there's theories that he has connections
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: to the Tesla tech.
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: So whether that was Tesla himself, whether his father got
• 19:03
  Speaker 3: Tesla stuff, whatever happened, I don't know. There's a lot
• 19:06
  Speaker 3: of different stories.
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: But you have to imagine that something in that realm
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: of discussion is true. So he knows what happened in
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: Tesla's story. And he says to Musk in 2026, you're
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: the Edison of our generation of some such statement like that.
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: What you're saying right there proves that he's and I
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: don't know about Trump.
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: I'm not standing up for him or saying good, bad,
• 19:29
  Speaker 3: what are the other?
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: Everybody's a vessel, it seems like in politics. But it
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: seems like he's being used to say something right there
• 19:36
  Speaker 2: to give a coded message.
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: Like, well, Elon, I don't know. Like, it's weird.
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: It was Trump's uncle who was in the FBI who
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: was responsible for raiding Tesla. place after Tesla died.
• 19:51
  Speaker 3: There it is.
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: And they kept it quiet. So for three days, he
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: was dead, apparently, in this apartment. And he was penniless.
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: And so they raided Tesla's place and there was like
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: 30 trunks.
• 19:59
  Speaker 3: Penniless because they made him penniless.
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: That's right. That's right. And there was like 30 different
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: trunks and they only revealed maybe five or 10 or something.
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: So the FBI took his work, his manuscripts, his work
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: and everything, just like they took my work. And so
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: we have Elon Musk benefiting off of Trump's uncle's FBI theft.
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: And they have the FBI raiding me to make sure that,
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: putting me away, to make sure that Elon Musk gets
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: the material too. So Elon Musk is the failed village
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: idiot that gets to get everything so they can keep
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: control of Elon Musk. And now they say Elon Musk
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: is controlling Trump. So it's interesting that, yeah. So, I mean,
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: he bought his way in by paying a million dollars
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: in Butler or whatever. So it's like what you've got
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: is complete psyop. You've got a situation where the film
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: studios are running away from us bringing forward our evidence
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: in a documentary and having a library of evidence. So
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: they've got to now, not to change the topic, but
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: it kind of blends in. They have to join and
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: form Skydance, I think it is, right? So they go
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: and join Paramount.
• 21:01
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the merger.
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: But Paramount's the one where they sent their attorney, get this,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: their main attorney, legal staff, Saucy Pope and Pamela Kirsch.
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: They were the ones that were handling me initially with
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: my submissions. And so then they end up going to Paramount.
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: She goes to Paramount. And they run NeuroEnhancer on Star
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: Trek Discovery, right? The series. Season one, episode six. They
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: run my very name, NeuroEnhancer. Say it again, NeuroEnhancer. They
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: say it twice in the clip.
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: And then they change it to NeuroOnLink. So Elon Musk
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: didn't even come up with a name. They're using my
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: name for my screenplay for NeuroEnhancer. And then they change
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: it to NeuroLink on the same program from Paramount. And
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: then they gave it to Elon Musk after they featured
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: him in Iron Man 2 and in Young Sheldon, Stealing Tech.
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: Which Iron Man and Marvel is like MKUltra in the movies.
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: Yes. So what they're doing is they're laughing in people's face.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: They don't think anybody will be able to follow it.
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: This is an opportunity for audiences to say, look, we're
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: not stupid. We're smart. We can follow this. Now they
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: got to shut down AI processing. They got to shut
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: it down, put a leash on it, like you said.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: because it's supposed to extrapolate from all these different sources.
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: And if it didn't, honestly, it'd be like, oh my God,
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: here it is. Come on, people, look. It's all lined
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: up perfectly. Look at how they all took this, all
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: the evidence and monkeyed it around and gave it to
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: failed writers. Look at the formulas, they're so obvious. Take
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: failed people, give them credit, give them rewards. Throw them
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: dog biscuits if they're a dog. Ring the dog bell,
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: Pablo's dog. And they're drooling for these awards and they
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: give them these awards. And so we got idiots running
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: our world. We really do.
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: I think when you mentioned Pavlov's dog, knowing what you
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: said about Trump being. If that's true, I think somebody
• 22:59
  Speaker 2: has taken Trump's name and made it a Pavlov's dog
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: for an immediate anger response, because if he's as powerful
• 23:06
  Speaker 2: as he is and he has that technology, then we'd
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: have to imagine that the, you know, time travel stories
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: and some of that kind of stuff is true also.
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: So somebody is using our mind control ability, our malleability
• 23:20
  Speaker 2: against us. Because whether he says the sky is blue,
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: you know, that apple is red, it doesn't matter what
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: he says. People hate him and say he didn't say it.
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: So that's not a normal reaction. And he is doing
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: bad things. And he is doing what is being positioned
• 23:41
  Speaker 2: as good things. And we're not able to see any
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: of that. because Trump is bad, orange man bad. And
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: so I think it's interesting that the concept of voice
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: to skull technology, programmability, those types of things were involved
• 23:59
  Speaker 2: in your technology and we're seeing them in real life
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: being used one way or the other or both ways
• 24:06
  Speaker 2: by both sides of the political bird to control the narrative.
• 24:11
  Speaker 3: But none of it is think for yourself.
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: What you said is so important because if you look
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: at it, you can crack this nut, Democrat, Republican, whatever.
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: The whole system is one bird and one nut. So
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: you can crack it by getting one to come over
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: and come to the truth of this all, who's in power.
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: And so that could be Putin, anybody, China, you name it.
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: They could come over. They already know about longevity. They
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: already know about it. They talk about it on those
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: hot mics about, you know, like 70 is now the
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: young 30.
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: What you see is, like Roseanne Barr said, she said,
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: Trump's family knows your whole story, Tom. They say it's
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: the biggest story, greatest story ever. They tell me this
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: on the phone. And what she then did was said,
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: when I asked, well, why isn't Trump doing something about it?
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: She said, he's waiting for the right moment. So is
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: he playing dumb? I don't know. But the thing is,
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: if he did the right- Who's.
• 25:02
  Speaker 3: Told the same thing about our family? So that's a
• 25:04
  Speaker 3: very- There you go. What moment is he waiting for?
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: Exactly. And- It's interesting. Those mergers are getting invested as
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: Obama did in Netflix, which is where other staff went.
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: Besides Paramount, they went to Netflix. The very architects that
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: stole the Matrix story went over to Paramount and Netflix.
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: And here they're investing in them. And it's like both
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: Obama's and Trump heavily invested in them. So, you know,
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: taking all the arguments aside of keep your enemies close, whatever,
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: shedding those. It's like it comes down to the facts
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: and timing, and timing is essential. It's everything. So if
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: Trump does reveal this in the proper way, sure, I'll
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: commend it. I'll say that's a brilliant thing. I'd almost
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: say don't try to explain to me your thinking on it.
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: I'm just glad it was done because, yeah. Another thing
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: on overloaded thoughts, the Neuralink. I would never want Neuralink
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: or Neuronhancer. First of all, two things. the way they're
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: going to structure it, which is in the screenplay, you're
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: going to have a higher level for the elite and
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: a lower level for the common people. And that means
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: that the elite will always be smogger, even though they're like,
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: you saw that clip a little while ago about Larry Wachowski.
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: We saw Elon Musk on stage, bobbleheading around like that
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: Einstein from Night at the Museum bobbleheads. It's like, you know,
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: nobody's home. They're not smart. They deflect, like you said.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: But the thing is, They would be able to enhance
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: their minds somewhat and sound smarter with a neural link.
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: But for people like ourselves, it wouldn't work. I don't
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: need an influx of more steady stream of information in
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: my skull. What I need into my cortex is actually nothing.
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: My mind can factor layers. That's what geniuses do.
• 26:49
  Speaker 3: I need no poisons put in.
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: That's right. We don't need that for sure. So being
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: a free mind, which is in the original Matrix story,
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: the immortals, you have Neo detach from the link. And
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: the Trinity character actually says to him when he asks,
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: how do I function when it's removed? She says, think
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: on what matters. So that takes us back the way
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: God designed us to think on loved ones, relationships, faith, caring, benevolence,
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: creating a better world. That's what we're going to be
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: focused on that are not We're a free range away
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: from Neuralink. Those on Neuralink will basically be dependent on,
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: it's like being fed intravenously information, like internet being fed
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: right into our brains. It's going to be a rush
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: for them. But if you actually have compassion, faith and
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: love and ability and genius, it's not going to enhance you.
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: It's going to crowd your mind. It's going to distract
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: your mind. It's not going to help you function at
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: a superior rate. You know, so I as the guy
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: who came up with the concept.
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: That's interesting.
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah. It's not going to help us. And that's what
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: the elite are afraid of. They're concerned that we that
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: don't use it, they want us all enslaved on it
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: because now you've got control, especially what you were talking
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: about off camera about the Nobel Prize and what it
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: actually means and what it's actually addressing is frightening as
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: it applies to the original Matrix story. It's frightening with
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: a blue light.
• 28:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah. I encourage everyone to look up who won the
• 28:20
  Speaker 2: 2026 Nobel Prize now knowing what we're talking about here
• 28:23
  Speaker 2: and knowing that they've also said that there are patented
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: devices that are doing the things that targeted individuals discuss
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: happening to them. We know that voice to skull exists.
• 28:34
  Speaker 2: We know that nerve irritants exist. We know that things
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: are able. And then the Nobel Prize says we can
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: hijack this DNA and put it in a virus and
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: release it so that Anybody who then takes that virus
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: now has this foreign thing inside of them that will
• 28:52
  Speaker 2: then grow these foreign things on their.
• 28:54
  Speaker 3: Cell that will be receptors for this blue light.
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: And when we have this blue light that is in
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: their video implanted through like a camera laser through the brain,
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: but I'm sure that that would work for eyes if
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: our eyes are taking in any blue light, which of
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: course none of us do on a daily basis. the
• 29:15
  Speaker 2: blue light controls the neurons now. So those receptors that
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: grow from the vaccine or the virus that was, you know,
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: injected with this DNA from an algae is now able
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: to be controlled by a blue light laser. So it
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: would really suck if any of those viruses were released
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: and put into weapon status so that the people with
• 29:39
  Speaker 2: the blue laser control had access to do things with
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: those neurons that they wanted to do because it said
• 29:44
  Speaker 2: that the neurons could be restructured to do this or
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: this or this or this you know whatever it needed
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: to do cause stop anxiety attacks stop panic attacks so
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: what if instead the blue laser guy wanted to start
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: anxiety attacks Star panic attacks. Would it be hard to
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: do that now that you can control the neurons? So
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: we know the science exists. We're awarding the science. And
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: the science is the targeting that real people are discussing.
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: And what we're hearing is Tom wrote that story after
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: being targeted and traumatized. And they're still using that tech
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: and his story and his discussions about the truth of
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: his story in the new propaganda and the new science.
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: That's where there's a danger.
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: That's why this is not just a conspiracy discussion, movement,
• 30:35
  Speaker 2: topic of fun.
• 30:36
  Speaker 3: Let's discuss movies. This is like.
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: Your brains are being hacked and they're asking you to
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: buy the movie ticket to do it. Right. Exactly.
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: Well, that's such an important point, too, is they keep
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: now pushing the narrative that we are inside a matrix
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: and they are marketing this to death. and getting people
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: to follow along blindly, basically, pretty much in mass, almost
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: in mass, to say, oh, yeah, we're in a matrix program. Well,
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: that sort of takes away responsibility. You know, it's like,
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: we're in a program. So, hey, we're in a program.
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: It almost opens the door like a Pandora box to
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: all kinds of bad things being justified. You know, well,
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: we're in a simulation anyway. The point is that as
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: the writer myself, the idea I had originally given was,
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: was not that we're in a matrix. It's that we're
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: made to think we're in a matrix. And therefore, what
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: we do is we enslave ourselves by volunteering to walk
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: into that concept. We walk into the idea that we're
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: in a matrix. We've created our own jail cell. We
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: have stepped into something that isn't even tangible or real.
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: But if we envision it as we're in a matrix
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: and a mass of people are accepting it, that we're
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: in a matrix and it's being pushed on us, that
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: we're in a matrix, by my very own work being
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: pushed hijacked and plagiarized, then what happens is we will
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: behave as if we're in a jail cell. And it's like,
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: that's the, that's the danger is they've been able to
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: entice people to walk into their own cells that they
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: created in their own minds. And you got that, um,
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: Neil T. St. Degrassi, T.
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: St.
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: Whatever.
• 32:14
  Speaker 3: Yeah. Neil Degrassi.
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah. As a spokesperson for Warner brothers. As if he's
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: the authority on the Matrix.
• 32:21
  Speaker 3: He is a spokesperson for science.
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: He's supposed to be, but now he's a spokesperson for
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: the Matrix.
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: He's like this generation's Bill Nye, and we know how
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: Bill Nye went. Yeah.
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: So he bought him off, and now he acts like
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: he's the authority, and poor Fishburne has to be in
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: these clips across from him going like, oh, yeah, that's amazing.
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: And he acts like he knows all about the Matrix.
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: The guy doesn't know anything about really the Matrix at all,
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: except what Warner Brothers tells him to say, pretty much.
• 32:48
  Speaker 3: Well, that's what's so interesting. I didn't mean to cut
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: you off.
• 32:52
  Speaker 2: No. Go on.
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: I'm done.
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: Have you ever watched your fans, like the fans of
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: the Matrix movie, and what they're liking about the words
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: that you wrote? Obviously, like a lot of that tech
• 33:03
  Speaker 2: came from your story and a lot of the storyline
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: that they love.
• 33:06
  Speaker 3: Have you ever watched the way that they fan out
• 33:09
  Speaker 3: over these things?
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: And then the writers, the directors, the actors, anybody who
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: was actually involved with it, They don't know jack shit
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: about it. They're not interested in it. They don't have
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: a depth of it. They don't have the passion for it.
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: They're not, like, so interested in the Matrix like the
• 33:27
  Speaker 2: fans are. I find that very interesting because the movie itself, like, you.
• 33:35
  Speaker 3: I was watching.
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: with you, that clip with Neil Patrick Harris, he was
• 33:39
  Speaker 2: talking about being such a fan of this franchise and
• 33:44
  Speaker 2: how it was such a big movie franchise. And then
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: being on it, he hopes that everyone can see that
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: Lana has.
• 33:53
  Speaker 3: A good, bright, light heart. So it's like, where was
• 33:55
  Speaker 3: your disenfranchisement?
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: Like, you were so excited to watch it from the movie,
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: the way they presented it to us, and then.
• 34:02
  Speaker 3: You were in it, and now you're just.
• 34:08
  Speaker 3: I hope we can see Lana's bright light.
• 34:10
  Speaker 2: That's a very interesting turnabout because if you were in
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: it and you saw it and you were part of
• 34:16
  Speaker 2: that giant tech thing and you believe the matrix and
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: you fangled.
• 34:20
  Speaker 3: You'd have a lot more to say.
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: Exactly.
• 34:23
  Speaker 3: So it's just very interesting.
• 34:25
  Speaker 2: The narrative control that doesn't, I was telling you this
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: as a marketing person, you, you see like if someone
• 34:32
  Speaker 2: knew that, that this story wasn't true, that this product
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: doesn't work, this thing we have to market isn't true,
• 34:40
  Speaker 2: and we have to act like it is, then we're
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: going to have to watch every angle of this narrative.
• 34:45
  Speaker 2: We're going to have to watch every person, director, actor
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: who is in it, people, extras, what they talk about,
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: and make sure that the narrative stays.
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: In line of control.
• 34:55
  Speaker 2: And they can't give too many details because everybody's details aren't.
• 34:59
  Speaker 3: Going to be the same if it's not true.
• 35:01
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 35:02
  Speaker 3: So they're going to have to control that whole story, right?
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: And you've seen that with a lot of the matchups
• 35:08
  Speaker 2: that you have and a lot of the fans that
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: have said things and they've come out about it. And
• 35:12
  Speaker 2: then the directors don't have anything. The actors don't have anything.
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: There's no passion behind what they say. They, you know,
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: remember there being no planning at all.
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: There was no.
• 35:23
  Speaker 2: How do you have that big of tech that's now trending,
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: that's causing all these crimes against humanity with the tech
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: that was in it, and there was no planning behind it,
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: you didn't mean to write it, you're not sure when
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: you wrote it, and it was just really fun.
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: How is that the story?
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: Right. No, it's okay. That's the thing, too, is they
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: don't know how to define it. They can't define the story.
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: They didn't understand the story. And in fact, the article
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: from 1995 says, They had the Wachowskis brought forward with
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: Joel Silver at a meeting with the suits from Warner Brothers.
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: And they were told to explain the meeting. The suits
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: actually opened with the idea saying, we know we have
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: something cool. We don't understand it. Can you explain it
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: to us? And they couldn't. The Wachowskis, Larry got upset,
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: left the table and was screaming because they were thinking
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: of replacing him on the phone. While Joel Silver's getting
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: it wrong, saying it's agents in the program. No, it's
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: not agents in the program. In the original work, it's
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: robot-like agents. And he gets that right in Oblivion later
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: with Disney. After the case is thrown, having all my
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: deposition information given to him, like in 2012, he then
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: goes and does oblivion with robot-like agents that are actually
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: human in feel. So he gets it right then. It's
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: like they're trying to hold back a wall of evidence
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: from coming forward from a piece they don't understand and
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: never could define. That's why I think the documentary team
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: and what you've done also have gotten it right, saying, look,
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: they never understood it. They never understood the work they stole.
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: And that's why they get these long things of like
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: dodging questions, deflecting, like you said, at interviews and then
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: ending them suddenly when they actually get to a point
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: that they can't explain at all. And that's what's so
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: amazing is they concentrate on the personalities and making them
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: like circus-like like clowns. So we're not paying attention to
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: content or actual questions. Meanwhile, people are blown away and
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: supposed to be focusing on the celebrities and not the
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: content that can't be explained. And the teams that can
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: explain it, like ourselves, are shut down on the net.
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: Check anyone to see if you can find us anywhere, basically.
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: We're being shut down completely. While Warner Brothers is so concerned,
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: Paramount's so concerned, Skydance now, Netflix, Disney is so concerned,
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: and the FBI is so concerned of us getting traction
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: or getting heard or the evidence being seen. That's why, Jen,
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: I'm excited about this, what you're doing. The website's beautiful.
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: It's getting out there. The documentary is going to have
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: a library of evidence, which I also want to have
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: on the website also with us, that people can access
• 37:45
  Speaker 1: all these materials. Finally, it'll be presented in a way
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: that people... Beautiful.
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: That's interesting.
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: I did watch something on her about that because I
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: was curious. I saw that she was talking, and this
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: is why I think it's so interesting, because she was
• 37:58
  Speaker 2: talking about how in Matrix 4, they had no creativity.
• 38:02
  Speaker 2: They were unable to duplicate because the artist... that wrote
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: the original screenplay wasn't involved in it. So they had
• 38:08
  Speaker 2: no matchups and no this and none of that. And
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: so she says the right things, but it doesn't necessarily
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: align with what her other story was or what the
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: real story that she actually sued for and things.
• 38:23
  Speaker 3: So there's holes in her story. But I mean, you know, exactly. Exactly.
• 38:30
  Speaker 2: She's taking words that you have said, which you know
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: she watches your podcast.
• 38:34
  Speaker 3: So, hi, I don't mean any hate to you. I'm
• 38:37
  Speaker 3: curious as a viewer.
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: What I'm trying to find out is why tactics would
• 38:42
  Speaker 2: be used by you, Miss Stewart, to do things like
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: the elites do to Tom. Like, if you are the
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: real author, why are you treating Tom the way you're
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: treating him? with the gang stalking and the threats and
• 38:59
  Speaker 2: the law enforcement threats and the different, you know, like
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: hatred ad hominem attacks and.
• 39:04
  Speaker 3: Just weird, um, weird out of left field things.
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: Like, like I understand you guys have had your words
• 39:11
  Speaker 2: and that's, that's what happens. But I don't understand if
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: one person is telling the truth and they know they're
• 39:16
  Speaker 2: telling the truth, why is there animosity towards the other
• 39:20
  Speaker 2: person who's telling the truth? Dom doesn't seem to have
• 39:23
  Speaker 2: animosity towards Sophia. he seems to have animosity towards what
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: Sophia has done to him because he's telling the truth
• 39:31
  Speaker 2: which seems like to me a normal reaction but what
• 39:35
  Speaker 2: I've seen is is is actual attacks actual messages actual
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: threats actual like you better stop type situation.
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: Um from her side of the table.
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: And that's where I find it very, very, very strange
• 39:53
  Speaker 2: because that wouldn't happen if she was telling the truth.
• 39:57
  Speaker 3: Well, that's fascinating.
• 39:58
  Speaker 2: So I was in the middle of a rant to
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: Miss Stewart about her abilities and threats and your internet
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: cut your stream.
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: So, so I don't know.
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: Who we were talking about that might use witchcraft, but
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: no weapon forms against either of us shall prosper. No
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: weapon formed against any innocence shall prosper. And I didn't
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: mean any harm. I'm just getting to the truth. So
• 40:23
  Speaker 2: there's no need for attacks and they'll be blocked off here.
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: Well, what did you say? You found something interesting, Tom.
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, that's that's an FBI move, too. I mean,
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: Sophia Stewart claims herself that the FBI is on her
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: side and that anything anyone ever questions her, the FBI
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: will coming at them. And so it's interesting that she's
• 40:41
  Speaker 1: actually bragging.
• 40:42
  Speaker 3: About questioning her.
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying I'm not saying the FBI is going
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: to come to you. I'm saying that the FBI is
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: part of the studios. Yeah, the studio thing. Yeah. Hi, guys.
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: You know me well, too. Anyway, so the same guys
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: that'll then say behind the scenes, you know, actually a
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: really cool guy. We know you wrote it. Yeah, whatever, thanks.
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: But what you saw was what you tapped upon by
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: addressing Sophia Stewart was you hit the Achilles heel. You
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: hit the Achilles heel of Warner Brothers Studios, the FBI,
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: and everything else. You just hit their heel because she's
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: their weakest link. So Sophia Stewart is, it's a joke
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: what she's trying to propound when she didn't really win
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: any proof that she won the Matrix. And she doesn't
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: even have a screenplay. She has less than 33 pages.
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: And it has nothing to do with Matrix. Anyway, all
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: that aside, what you did was when bringing her up,
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: that sends chills and scares into the studios. Because if
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: you reveal her and the fraud she's done, including attacking
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: me on phone calls that are recorded, mocking the death
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: of my sons and things like this, then that brings
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers down. That reveals that they employed somebody, which
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: we have a letter, proof that she was employed by
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers, offered money from 2009 to 2013. to address
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: the original author. And then she'd be paid millions, five
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: million or so, if she handled the author. So I
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: think it's really amazing. That is the same person that
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: was at my deposition, Kate Chilton, who's now at Netflix.
• 42:01
  Speaker 3: Wasn't that what she sued about, was the bribe money?
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: No, what she sued about was she claimed her attorneys
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: weren't representing her well. Which, if Warner Brothers was, like
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: what they did with me, is Warner Brothers would have
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: supported those attorneys. Instead, what they did was she allowed
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: her to save face because she's their player, brought in
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: to be a first claimant, brought into Warner Brothers. So
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: she's allowed to save face, not by proving she wrote
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: The Matrix, but by having a case where the guys
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: don't show up, basically, is what I understand, that Warner
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: Brothers allows her to save face by default and nothing
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: to do with proving Matrix at all. Nothing to do
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: with Matrix at all because they don't want her proving that.
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: So it's a way for audiences where they think audiences
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: aren't smart certain level that they can allow her to
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: save face. And that's why she called me. And I
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: taped that call. I taped that call too, where she
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: called me and she's going, I've got the letter. I've
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: got the letter singing a song like that, where she
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: says that she has the letter from me in 2001
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: to Warner brothers, where I'm saying, I'm, I want to investigate, um,
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: demolition man. And I saw, um, uh, Jackson neck and matrix.
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: I said, I saw that part, but I'm not claiming matrix.
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: I'm claiming at the time I'm claiming demolition man. where
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: it's like, this doesn't seem right. And I enclosed the
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: script again to Warner Brothers. So she's saying she's got
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: that letter that'll prove that I discovered in 2001 that
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: the Matrix was taken. Well, I'm not saying the Matrix
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: was taken in 2001, but she's using that to say
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: that she gets the millions because she completed her job
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: with Warner Brothers to throw my case. See?
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: So her job wasn't to prove she wrote it. Her
• 43:43
  Speaker 2: job was to throw your case.
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: Yes, her job was to destroy the original writer by
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: making him claim Matrix 2 and 3 and not Matrix 1.
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: That was her job. Make me claim 2 and 3 as, quote,
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: the missing link, she branded me on that first call.
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: And so she's saying, like, we'll work together. And by
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: having me not claim Matrix 1, they then used that.
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: She was working with the attorneys from Warner Brothers that
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: they would say, so any matchups in Matrix 1 don't count.
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: And they used the supplied attorney with a suspended license,
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: defense attorney, classmates of their attorneys, defense attorneys, DMZ attorney,
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: that they used him to say, okay, you can't claim
• 44:19
  Speaker 1: matrix one either. He ran the clock out on the discovery.
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: Three years he ran the clock out for me discovering.
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: At the end of those three years, I said I
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: was going to go forward. That's when Joel Silver and
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: Mike Lang resigned immediately. So you see the interconnection of
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: all of them.
• 44:32
  Speaker 2: All of them.
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: And Stewart was a main player.
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: Ended us again.
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, of course it's going to end us again. This
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: is the FBI.
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: It ended again.
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: FBI and the studios do not want this out. Because
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: we're making too much sense. Sophia Stewart is the player
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: hired by Warner Brothers and the FBI, protected by the FBI,
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: to make the claim FBI profits off the studios stealing
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: work instead of protecting writers. FBI profits off it by
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: allowing the studios to steal. Yes, along with trafficking. So
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: you have a piece that writes about both. And you
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: got Sophia Stewart brought in as a failed writer to
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: make sure it works by handling the attorney, handling the author.
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: And she gets paid for the period of 2009 to 2013.
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: She lost her case in 2005, summary judgment, 65 pages
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: or so. So what happens is 2009, she's hired in
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: a letter to handle the author. And that's when I'm
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: first approached in 2009. And they don't need her in
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: the end because they did it themselves with their supplied attorneys,
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: their defense attorneys, supposing it's mine. So they don't need her.
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: So they tell her in a letter they're not going
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: to pay her because they don't need her anymore. And
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: that's when she gets mad and posts the letter so
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: that people will think she was going to get millions
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: of dollars from Warner Brothers. Since they're not going to
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: pay her the millions of dollars and it shows in
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: the letter, she gets in trouble. I point out the
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: letters on her site. She strikes it that very same day.
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: And the Warner Brothers executive in charge of Warner Brothers
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: is fired. She was removed at that point the same day.
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: And they started striking other major website broadcasts like Red
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: Pill 78 and Sarah Westall. Their sites got struck the
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: same day also. So letter of Sophia Stewart being revealed.
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: She posts on her site to show that she's going
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: to get millions from Warner Brothers. Warner Bros. gets upset
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: when I then go on the air and say that
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: letter's on her site. She's showing that she was paid
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: off by Warner Brothers promised millions of dollars. Immediately after
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: I do that, Sophia Stewart takes the letter down. Warner
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: Brothers exec is removed after the whole time for about
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: 20 some years running the cover up of the theft.
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: She's removed. And the websites are taken down by mainstream
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: interviewers like Sarah Westall and Red Pill 78, Zach. Both
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: websites come down that had my interviews on it fresh.
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: There you go. So that's what's going on. That's why
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: your signal's being interrupted. Twice now, we bring up Sophia Stewart, SS.
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: That sets off a chain.
• 46:53
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that's very, that's very like.
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: She's their weakest link. She's their weakest link.
• 46:57
  Speaker 3: Targeted attack because we were talking about a whole lot
• 46:59
  Speaker 3: of shady shows.
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah. She has the most ridiculous claims and her only
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: focus on getting that money and being a celebrity. She
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: never wrote a screenplay. She never did. It's 33 pages
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: of gobbledygook. By less than 33 pages. And that's pointed
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: out in the court summary. So her only claim to
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: fame is really when it comes down to it in
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: the future is she was used, employed to doubt the
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: original author and to mock him by trying to agitate
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: him by calling him constantly and mocking the death of
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: his sons to try to get him in a state
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: of agitation.
• 47:27
  Speaker 3: Which is the exact playbook of a smear campaign.
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: Exactly.
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: And they do usually pay somebody who's running a smear campaign, so.
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: And she feels very safe.
• 47:39
  Speaker 3: And if they fail, they usually don't get paid.
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: Right. Now, her behavior, too, Jen, like you're saying, is
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: one that feels very protected. A lot of power behind her.
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: The FBI has vowed that no one will do anything
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: about her claimsy flimsy story and that she has no
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: proof and she hasn't created anything, really. The third eye
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: is a joke. It's just it's it's a Star Wars
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: and the Bible mixed together. So what you've got is
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: she doesn't have anything to stand on. Only urban legend.
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: That's it. And a myth that she somehow won. She
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: did not prove any claim that she wrote the matrix.
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: She was brought in.
• 48:14
  Speaker 3: Well, that's an interesting, that's an interesting bunny trail there.
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: I was just going through the Marvel universe because they're
• 48:21
  Speaker 2: releasing Avengers and I was rewatching some of.
• 48:25
  Speaker 3: Them in timeline order, um.
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: For historical purposes, because I know there's a lot of
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: researchers and truthers that say that the Marvel universe, um,
• 48:35
  Speaker 2: is like MKUltra Universe, like they're disclosing their projects and
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: project paperclip and other things like that.
• 48:42
  Speaker 3: And so seeing it in action, in order, really makes.
• 48:49
  Speaker 2: Me wonder about this a little bit more because the
• 48:52
  Speaker 2: technology was discussed in Winter Soldier. I think everybody should
• 48:56
  Speaker 2: really watch Winter Soldier with this in mind because they
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: discussed how they took that one And then he was
• 49:07
  Speaker 2: able to, as this giant computer data center, control everybody
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: and know everything and do everything. And he was the
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: one behind all the problems, Hydra or whatever that is, right?
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: um and so they also in that same movie dropped
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: the and i say this code not to trigger anybody
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: who had this in there i know that this movie
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: and this code was used in a lot of survivor
• 49:34
  Speaker 2: stories so i'm saying it for awareness not for triggering
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: there's um The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes was a movie
• 49:41
  Speaker 2: that was used for a lot of different reasons. And
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: there's lines, shall we play a game? And that was
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: used in Winter Soldier while they're discussing the.
• 49:57
  Speaker 3: Computer guy's brain. I'm not calling him Hydra. I forget
• 50:00
  Speaker 3: his name.
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: While they're discussing the computer guy's brain, they're dropping the
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: Computer Wore Tennis Shoes line.
• 50:08
  Speaker 3: Oh, it was in a movie and a joke.
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: And then they go on to discuss all of these
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: other situations that are voice to skull, super soldier, technology
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: going into the brain to help it do things, technology
• 50:26
  Speaker 2: going into the body to help the military do things.
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: If you're looking at it from that perspective, they're literally
• 50:33
  Speaker 2: showing us the whole process in Winter Soldier. using codes
• 50:38
  Speaker 2: that we know today. You have mentioned these MKUltra tactics
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: and Masonic or other organizational tactics. You've mentioned these in
• 50:50
  Speaker 2: your stories, and that aligns with a lot of the
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: things that other survivors have mentioned. Allie Carter has mentioned
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: the MKUltra tactics. and her mom, Shelly Carter, discusses the
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: way that the brain is organized in alters and how
• 51:07
  Speaker 2: the MKUltra codes are used by the handlers to be
• 51:10
  Speaker 2: able to access those brain compartments and things like that
• 51:17
  Speaker 2: one movie line could trigger people to do things. So
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: they're using movies like yours, scripts like yours, things like
• 51:26
  Speaker 2: control mechanisms, technology, different aspects of it. They're putting it mainstream,
• 51:31
  Speaker 2: and then they're telling you they're doing it in movies
• 51:34
  Speaker 2: like Winter Soldier with not jokingly similar discussions, but the
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: actual same code words and code phrases and mechanisms that
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: they use on MKL survivors who maybe have watched Marvel,
• 51:51
  Speaker 2: but they're not watching it enough to every single one
• 51:54
  Speaker 2: of them have take that story and make it their
• 51:57
  Speaker 2: personal testimony. So you have to wonder why they would
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: be telling us through the Marvel Universe what happened after
• 52:05
  Speaker 2: World War I and II, what they were doing, how
• 52:07
  Speaker 2: they took that technology, how they mimicked that technology. And
• 52:11
  Speaker 2: then wait a minute, didn't we say that Elon Musk
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: was in Iron Man 3 right before Winter Soldier?
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: Iron Man 2, right.
• 52:18
  Speaker 2: So he's in the Iron Man movie discussing that he
• 52:22
  Speaker 2: has this project about they walk past him like he
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: doesn't mean anything. And then all of a sudden he's
• 52:28
  Speaker 2: the Neuralink guy and President Trump's, you know, like favorite
• 52:33
  Speaker 2: and all these different things. It's just a very weird
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: line of events to happen for the future to look
• 52:39
  Speaker 2: back like our grandkids looking back.
• 52:42
  Speaker 3: Going like that.
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Didn't they see all that lined up? Didn't they
• 52:45
  Speaker 2: see that propaganda? Didn't they see that that's what they
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: were doing? But I think to a lot of us,
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: it's just a movie. It's the Marvel.
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: It's the comic books.
• 52:53
  Speaker 2: They've been around forever, right? Like, it doesn't mean anything.
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: You know, it's just The Matrix. That was just a
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: really big franchise movie. Like, everybody loves Keanu, right?
• 53:02
  Speaker 3: Like, isn't that?
• 53:04
  Speaker 2: So, I mean, we need to really step inside our
• 53:07
  Speaker 2: brains and think for this stuff because they're showing us,
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: they're telling you, they're labeling it different, they're calling it
• 53:13
  Speaker 2: different things, but they're harming you, they're hurting you, they're
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: putting it together, they're telling you how, and then they're
• 53:19
  Speaker 2: stealing artist technology and profiting off of it and making
• 53:22
  Speaker 2: you pay for it back. We really need to think
• 53:25
  Speaker 2: for ourselves.
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: So dirty. So, not to interrupt, but it's so dirty.
• 53:28
  Speaker 2: No.
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: Because what they do is they take the genius of
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: ideas where many of us are passionately warning, passionately warning
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: about what's coming, they take it and go from the
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: idea of the first one to say it wins. So
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: if we claim it first and say it first, that's
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: what they're doing. They call it using up the rest
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: of the story. Use up the story, as Joel Silver said.
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: We hope we use up the story. And then by
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: doing that, they take the passion out. So what we
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: have done is we come up with downloads that are
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: warnings about what's coming and plans they have. They take
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: it and use it to not only profit off of,
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: but to make it light and go, we said it first.
• 54:05
  Speaker 1: That was done. We did that. You're just taking off
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: what we did to make it lose its impact. Take
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: the warning and turn it into entertainment where it's no
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: longer a warning. And they can control that narrative by saying, look,
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: you shouldn't be listened to. Even though you're the one
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: that created the idea, you shouldn't be listened to because
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: that's our work. You're just trying to steal our thunder.
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: And it's like, that's one of those things that's very,
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: very dangerous that they're taking warnings, and tech and making
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: it like candy store, packaging it and making it like
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: something that's more for entertainment when these warnings have been
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: taken and disassembled. And then they profit off of taking
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: the work at the same time so they can keep
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: the power over the others. And one of the things
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: they do, too, is they say that we are, those
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: of us that actually create this stuff, that we're out
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: for popularity, ego, we want to be famous. That's the
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: first thing Sophia Stewart said on the phone when she
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: got on the phone. She had her minion on there
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: with me. Jackson was his name, Nico Jackson. He got
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: on there and said, and she's like, is that Tom Aldous?
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: Put me on. And the first thing she's saying to
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: me is, you're the missing link. And then she goes,
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: your life's over as you know it. You're gonna be
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: a celebrity like me now. You're gonna be a celebrity. Well,
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: it's like, no, that's not what drives the geniuses. The
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: real geniuses, unlike Elon Musk and others like Edison, we're
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: not driven for popularity. We're driven out of a need.
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: I wanted to be a farmer, but I am doing
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: this writing and stuff like that because I have to.
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: I have to step up to the plate if I'm
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: called to do it, if God calls me to call
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: out something and bring it to light and maybe help
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: a world get back on the right path. And then
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: to have it stolen? and accused of wanting popularity to
• 55:41
  Speaker 1: be famous, that's not what drives my engine. My engine
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: is try to please God and do what's right. That
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: makes a difference for the children, the elderly, and others,
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: and make a better world, a safer world. That's my engine.
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: So when they offer rewards, it doesn't work on us.
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: That's why they need failed people to come in, because
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: they do drool at the bell of a reward for
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: the dog. That's the biscuit. So we don't, and they
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: call us difficult. So we're not driven by rewards and honors.
• 56:08
  Speaker 3: You're expensive to control.
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: If you don't bite at the first 15, you know, tries,
• 56:13
  Speaker 2: they have to actually think about how to control you.
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: And that's, you know, very expensive, very problematic, especially if
• 56:20
  Speaker 2: you have a voice. That's why you see a lot
• 56:22
  Speaker 2: of these whistleblowers being silenced in some way, shape or form.
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: You know, that's why, like, you'll have a big message
• 56:28
  Speaker 2: and then all of a sudden there's a headache or
• 56:30
  Speaker 2: a brain fog. You know, you've got something going on,
• 56:33
  Speaker 2: you've got a big talk or something like that, and
• 56:36
  Speaker 2: there'll be trending news about something else, so nobody will
• 56:39
  Speaker 2: pay attention.
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: That's right.
• 56:41
  Speaker 2: It's just there's always a silence campaign of some sort
• 56:44
  Speaker 2: because authenticity is the most powerful emotion, and you can't
• 56:51
  Speaker 2: fake authenticity. They've really tried. I mean, reality TV is
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: literally trying to fake authenticity, and you can see how
• 56:57
  Speaker 2: it's scripted. So.
• 56:59
  Speaker 3: People love reality because it's authentic, right? It's real. It's
• 57:03
  Speaker 3: not a script, right? But it is scripted.
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: So if you can start telling yourself, look, the world
• 57:09
  Speaker 2: was scripted. What am I to believe? What am I
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: actually seeing? What am I in charge of? Then you
• 57:15
  Speaker 2: can see through this stuff. And once you know the
• 57:17
  Speaker 2: people who are giving the codes and throwing the codes
• 57:20
  Speaker 2: and the people who are abusing the survivors for remembering
• 57:24
  Speaker 2: and they're throwing the codes out, like, You're not going
• 57:27
  Speaker 2: to be controlled by that anymore. And I think what
• 57:29
  Speaker 2: Tom's doing by talking and speaking and telling his story,
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: and if you're listening to Tom's story and you've been
• 57:37
  Speaker 2: in any sort of a research realm, you can hear
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: the pillars of the story connects to everything, and he's
• 57:42
  Speaker 2: got the proof from every angle. So if you're researching
• 57:46
  Speaker 2: and you understand that the churches are corrupt, the Christian
• 57:49
  Speaker 2: schools are corrupt, the Hollywood is corrupt, the CIA is corrupt,
• 57:53
  Speaker 2: Your psychologists are involved because everybody's schizophrenic, right? You've got
• 57:59
  Speaker 2: all these different situations where normally there would be fingers
• 58:06
  Speaker 2: of control that are really hard to control because that's
• 58:09
  Speaker 2: a lot of people involved. And miraculously, all these survivors
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: have similar stories of those being able to be controlled.
• 58:16
  Speaker 2: And now we're in 2026 and we see that, yes,
• 58:19
  Speaker 2: the schools are problematic. We're talking about liberty being problematic, right?
• 58:24
  Speaker 2: We're talking about the churches being problematic. We're talking about
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: different government organizations being problematic. We're talking about words controlling things.
• 58:33
  Speaker 2: So everything Tom has talked about and said in these
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: discussions for years is now being used either as truth
• 58:42
  Speaker 2: or as a reverse. So pay attention to that and
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: pay attention to what is being said that hasn't changed.
• 58:51
  Speaker 2: And pay attention to how people say things and what
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: their face does when they say things, because there's certain
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: things that can't lie to you. And there's certain people
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: that can try and mimic things, but, you know, the
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: truth and authenticity will win.
• 59:05
  Speaker 3: And you can see when, I can see when.
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: Tom tells a story about what happened and the trauma
• 59:12
  Speaker 2: that happened and where it happened and he has these
• 59:15
  Speaker 2: details and he has these letters and he has all
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: this discussion, you have to understand that in order to
• 59:21
  Speaker 2: be somebody that that happened to and then fake all
• 59:25
  Speaker 2: of that evidence would take a whole lot of effort.
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: And then to keep that story the same this entire
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: time would take a whole lot of effort. And that's
• 59:36
  Speaker 2: not apparent. Tom, you come off as authentic. You come
• 59:39
  Speaker 2: off as I'm thinking. You come off as this is
• 59:43
  Speaker 2: my creative ability. And they're thwarted by that because you
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: can't copy something that is natural. And that's what they're
• 59:54
  Speaker 2: having trouble with. So I would challenge everybody who watches
• 59:59
  Speaker 2: these movies, watches Marvel, watch it through a lens of
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 2: if they have scripted this to control a narrative, what
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 2: are they disclosing or lying about here? And what has
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 2: a whistleblower said that's of a similar theme?
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: Is there something? Because there's a lot. There's a lot.
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 2: And we really need to be looking into what whistleblowers
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 2: say and what Tom says and supporting him on the
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 2: website and stuff because he's saying a lot. You're saying
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 2: the truth and you've been speaking the truth, Tom. Thank
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 2: you for saying the words that you were naturally gifted
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: to say and then somebody stole from you. And then
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: you decided instead of biting the bullet, instead of taking
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 2: their bait, instead of, you know, advancing through their rituals
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 2: and giving in and claiming whatever they claimed, you said, no,
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: I'm going to tell what happened. And that's really hard.
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 3: So thank you for doing that because I think that
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 3: is authentic and people can have inspiration to be true
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 3: to themselves, which grows more awareness. When we're true to ourselves,
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 3: we can see truth. When we're lying to ourselves, we're
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 3: gummed up by drama.
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: Exactly. Well said. And that's the thing. If you're coming
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: from a place of wanting to make a difference, to
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: make a better world, to actually have compassion and humility,
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: then that's your drive. they've crafted a system where somehow
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: that looks like you're crazy or you're not natural because
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: you're not having the ambition or striving for fame. And
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: it's like they do this. It's almost like they're saying
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: if you strive for fame, you're a normal, balanced person.
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: If you don't strive for fame, there's something wrong with you.
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: You're too caught up in stuff. It's like you're not
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: a normal person. And now they just changed the rules
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: that if you have a disability or inflicted in any way,
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: Trump apparently assigned something where you can now be put away.
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: Rather than having benefits at home for disability, you can
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: be institutionalized. So what's interesting is we're heading down that
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: road now where those that are actually gifted and things
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 1: like this, one of the ways to destroy creativity is
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: to crowd us together. Put us together in a room
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: or a crowded area, a holding facility or insane asylum
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 1: or something. with others that inflict interjections or distractions or hostility,
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: and you won't be able to create. And we're heading
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: that way where soon we'll have stadiums full of people
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: that have been mass displaced or detention centers that have
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: been refurbished to hold masses of people. And it won't
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: just be immigrants. It'll be people who are considered a threat.
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: And that just has to be stamped by the sign
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: of a pen. And you're stuck away. Yeah.
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 2: Well, we know a lot of people can sign a
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: pen and cause things to change. I mean, Kamala said
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: that is her speech one time was you can just
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: use the pen and sign it and change somebody's life.
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 2: And the fact that what you're talking about with the
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 2: centers and the crazy houses that I've seen trend right now,
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: it's a really interesting topic for me because I know
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 2: that there were a lot of mental facilities. And then
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 2: in the 80s, I think it was Reagan shut them
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 2: all down. and let everybody out on the street. And
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: that created a giant problem. Like there were mental facilities,
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: and then all of a sudden all these people who
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 2: maybe didn't have families, who maybe didn't have the cognizance
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: to get a job or own an apartment or something,
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: were just, the doors were opened and they were let
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: out into these towns. And so now 30, 40 years later,
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: you've got towns where those people people, those patients were
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: let out and then they've created families, they've multiplied, they've got,
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 2: you know, generations who are either homeless or impoverished or,
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: you know, they've moved on and done things, but it
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 2: created a culture in that town.
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 3: And you just have to ask, like, why?
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 2: Why? Because we know that when the 1913 switchover with
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: the finances and all that stuff was going on, that
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: they instituted in institutions for the mentally insane. And then
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: a lot of people who weren't insane were put in there. Um,
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: and then, you know, everything changed our food, our music, our,
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 2: you know, everything changed. So you have to ask what's
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 2: going to change in the next few years. If they've
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: started instituting mental facilities again, what are they trying to
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 2: wipe away? You know, um, because A lot of people
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 2: are saying that the mental institutions that he just signed
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: in were because of the autism debate and because there's
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: a lot of violent autism, autistic children or adults who
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: have no care facilities available to them. But also, like,
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 2: that's not what's going to happen, and we all know that.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: So history repeats itself unless we step in.
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's interesting that the signal went out when you
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: were talking. Again, it went out. So I didn't hear
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: all of that because.
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 3: It was like I wonder if it recorded. This is nuts.
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: It's because you're hitting on the topics. If you talk
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: about FBI, Sophia Stewart and because the FBI is a
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: weak link also in the Warner Brothers story in the
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: studio's theft. The FBI is a liability because their actions
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: were so blatant, especially with that Brian Fitzpatrick, that gay congressman.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: They're they're so out of limb with that, with him
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 1: being on the Ways and Means Committee. And that we
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: know exactly what was involved with the sister being employed
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: to be involved in that, my sister. So it's like
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: the FBI is a weak link. Sophia Stewart is a
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: weak link. And it's all crushing back on the theft
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: of the Matrix. So which is worth billions of dollars
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: and had so much influence, like you saw people responding
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: to Larry as a dressed up like a lady. Anyway,
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: so I know that what we're doing right now with
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: everything coming forward, organized with the library of evidence with
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: the website so meticulously, beautifully done that I think that
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: maybe AI will come around. There'll be an AI engine
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: that will actually be supportive of the facts and evidence
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: and will lead the way for other AIs failing in that.
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: So I think that word will come out. I think
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: their side knows about that. I think that's what I
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: think you alluded to, too, that Skydance was formed. The
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: merger was done to distance Warner Brothers and Disney and
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: Paramount from and Netflix too, from being revealed in a lawsuit,
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: being targeted. So they went and created another platform, put
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: the thieves together in one studio and conglomerate to make
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: it so that, oh, well, that's not us anymore. We're
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: not Warner Brothers. Right before we're about to launch the
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: mortals being made the way it's supposed to be after
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: all these years that they were so concerned about. In fact,
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: Sophia Stewart had made a call saying you can't make
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 1: that film. You can't. They'll put injunctions on you, which
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: means matchups. So they're concerned about that. They're concerned about
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: documentary coming out. They're concerned about the website being so
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 1: well done. And you're doing these things right here. They're
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: very concerned. The interruptions show that. So they are dodging now.
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 1: They are running for the hills right now. They are
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 1: very concerned right now. And some can say it's just
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: a preliminary move to protect themselves. But like the test
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: audience showed in the documentary episode, first being shown and
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: to test audiences that no one could stop watching. That's
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: a problem because Sophia Stewart also in the call where
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: she said that you can't make the film. She said,
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: no one's going to watch. Well, no one could stop watching.
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: So we're in a situation now where the evidence will
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: fully come forward. That'll open doors for other situations like
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: others that have gone through this. We'll finally be able
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: to have their day also. And, uh, Yeah, yeah.
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 2: You have to imagine if this was so big and
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 2: so powerful, what other things have controlled the masses and
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: where did those originate? You know, I mean, if this
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: can blow open the doors and take out some propaganda
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: corruption rings, I don't think anybody would be mad.
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 3: And you deserve justice in the story.
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 2: I mean, the whole traumatic episode, your sons, the whole
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: situation to be summed up as like a conspiracy drama, just...
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: is like a humiliation tactic in itself. So when history
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: looks back on this, when your grandchildren look back on
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 2: this and they see, you know, all the lines of
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 2: stuff that were used against.
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 3: You, that's the other thing.
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: You've got all, you and a lot of whistleblowers, you
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: have avenues of all these big, powerful organizations, government organizations, companies,
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: like working together in some way, shape, or form at
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 2: every angle to get you.
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 3: If you don't matter, if you're not telling the truth,
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 3: then why do they spend their time and energy? If
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 3: it's not true, why do they... even care.
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: Right and our situation is so unique too Jen because
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: I was groomed on the inside I was in Pat
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: Robertson's organization I was being groomed to be the face
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 1: of the Christian Coalition I was working with Pat Robertson
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: directly also with the FBI and the Masons and the
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: studios so I was brought into all that you know
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: all at the same time Well, in quick succession. So
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: what you've got is being groomed for the inside to
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 1: be a leader inside. So then turning that into a
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: script to whisper through art what their plans are, that
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: is a red light, red alert going off for them.
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: It's like we got an insider whispering through a film,
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: That became a blockbuster that lays out all the plans
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: when we were grooming them for leadership. That is, that
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: says legitimacy. And what's interesting is like, I'm looking for
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: the day where they realize people say the blue pill
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: is the good pill. And we say also that Warner
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: Brothers took the work obviously, and it's evident. And here's
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: the evidence to prove it. And there's no brainer about it.
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: So I'm looking forward to that happening. It's going to happen.
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 1: I can see it happening. And these tools, what you've done, website, documentary,
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: everything else is going to crack it open where AI
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 1: will finally say, yeah, this is real. And that Judge
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: Klosner had no right, rolling with prejudice, on something where
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: he blocked all the evidence. And they're claiming that I
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: had six pages of scribbled notes when I have a
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: full screenplay. It's in there. Any chat ATP can drive
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: that too, is that we have a copyrighted screenplay in
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: 1995 that is the Matrix story. And they don't have
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 1: a copy of The Matrix. This is ridiculous that they
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: get away saying you don't have a screenplay at all.
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: But it's going to come out. It's going to come out.
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: They have nothing. We have everything. So I'm looking for
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: that day.
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 3: Your story is showing that it's so much bigger than.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 2: That is really interesting. So 1995, too. Yeah, you do
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 2: have all the pieces. It's definitely interesting that they have
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 2: taken it this far. But if people can think for themselves,
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 2: they'll be able to see the evidence and the why
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: and the how and then look at other options and
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: see where else they've been lied to.
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: Because your story is quite large.
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: When you mentioned Pat Robertson, if people who are young
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: and listening, he was a 700 Club owner or something
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: like that.
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's a creator.
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 2: And then he was running for president and he was
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: a big leader of the Christian organizations.
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 3: Everybody knew who he was.
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 2: Tom's story there's a blog about it i think we
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: talked about you showed the resume of the pastor that
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: came in after a pastor left because they had had
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: an affair with him so a homosexual sex cult within
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 2: the christian organization to coercively control people would really be
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 2: interesting wouldn't it.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: Right isn't that something so we got the theft of
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: the screenplays we've got the sexual rings involved we got
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: disney we got the religious right got the fbi We've
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: got Warner Brothers, Paramount, Netflix, all of them involved. And
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: it's like maneuvering their personnel, top personnel around as reacting
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: to whatever we say. And it's like even that thing
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 1: with Tom Hanks appearing as a writer in front of
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: the desk, you pointed out, after I said that Tom
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: Hanks isn't a writer. And it's like, yeah, after I
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: pointed out that he's on the copyright for Warner Bros.
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: and HBO on the Immortals title. And that's right before,
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: that's in 1998, right before 1999, right before they released it.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: So he was a candidate to write The Matrix. And
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 1: it says he commissioned an order to write The Immortal
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: Story and has certificate of authorship on my work. That's incredible.
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: So what we have is these reactions where they put
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: up a picture of him as an author. So anyway,
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: I appreciate you doing this so much. Because there's so
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: much to it. That's why the documentary and the website
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: is so important that you created. So important that people
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: that use critical thinking can see the evidence. Warner Brothers
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: does not want the evidence being shown. FBI does not
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: want the evidence being shown. The legislature does not want
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 1: the evidence being shown. And we'll see where Trump stands later.
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: But the thing is, it is being shown. It's just
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: a matter of go there. See for yourself.
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 3: Well, it exists.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: It exists in more people's minds than just yours too, Tom.
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 2: And that's what they're worried about, I think, is that
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 2: when you talk, when people who are a whistleblower and
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: they talk and they tell the story, they're inspiring other
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 2: people who were there, who were part of something. And
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 2: those people now have a choice. You can speak up
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: and say, oh my god, I was a part of that.
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 2: I had no clue that this weird thing that happened
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 2: to me on that set was part of your story.
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 3: You might need to know this.
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: And they've been very scared to find out that that
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 2: avenue of communication between portions of these projects exists.
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: So.
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 2: In Tom's story, if you are listening and you were
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 2: on a set somewhere and somebody mentioned his name, if
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: somebody mentioned the script, it wasn't the real script, this, that,
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 2: and the other, if you know anything because you were
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: there and something was weird, he's got a spot on
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: his website where you can submit your details or submit
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 2: a contact. And I highly suggest that if you are
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 2: a whistleblower and you follow anybody's story or a listener
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 2: and you follow any whistleblower stories and you do have information,
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 2: please send it to them because they might be looking
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: for that one teeny tiny puzzle piece. And if you
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: have it, you don't know what it means as much
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: as it does. So if you have some puzzle pieces,
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 2: now's the time that we turn them over and we
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 2: all collaborate. We work together and we put this big
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: giant puzzle together because if Marvel is telling the truth,
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 2: if the Matrix was made around the truth and then
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 2: lied to, you really have to ask yourself why and who.
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 2: And he's alluded to the Masons, and I'm not trying
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: to get cut off here again, but, you know, the
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 2: Masons tend to have some sort of a power structure
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 2: when it comes to controlling all of this stuff. So
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 2: I do have to ask, when were you introduced to
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: those Masonic rituals you said you were fast-tracked to? At
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 2: what point in time of your journey was that?
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: Same time the Foe case was going on. Same time
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers was doing the case. So, same time.
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 3: So like that was what, 93?
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: 2013, 2014, 2013, 2013. Yeah. So.
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: When were you introduced to America's, what was it, America's Most.
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: Wanted, John Walsh? America's Most Wanted, 1993. I'm sorry, no, 1988.
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: 1988 when Robertson was running for president. Robertson was running
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: for president. That's when I got that part.
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 3: And you were on one of his episodes, you said.
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: I was on a season premiere. They were number one show,
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: season premiere. Yeah.
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 3: And so you played a part in one of their
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 3: crime stories?
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: Robert Witt. Robert Witt. Yeah, the guy who broke into
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: the Naval Credit Union in Portsmouth, Virginia. Oh, interesting. Yeah,
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: and they caught him because of it.
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 3: Wait, that's interesting.
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's how it started.
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 2: So you played a criminal who was a military person
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: that broke into something?
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: Lead role. Yeah, a guy who broke into a federal
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: credit union and escaped from jail. So, yeah.
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 2: Did they ever, in your timeline— I know the answer to
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 2: this— paint you as dangerous?
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: All the time. Right away. They did it right away. So,
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: Robertson did— the FBI gave me the card, like John Walsh
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: gave me the card at dinner with the FBI heads.
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: It's done every courtesy of Tom Holt House. We have
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: that now, that card.
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 3: You have that? That should go everywhere. We should put
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 3: that places.
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I can hold it up. It's in the other
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: room there. I can grab it if you want.
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that's important.
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so— Yeah. So all this is, uh, beginning at
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: that time in 1988 when Robertson was running for president. And, uh,
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: but yeah, there's so many things in the head. That's
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: why I'm so glad we're doing the documentary. I'm so
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 1: glad we have the website because there's so much information.
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 3: Let's talk about that.
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: You've got new stuff coming out. What's your documentary and,
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 2: and talk about that.
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: Well, it's called, um, the glitch in the matrix. And, um,
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: this team did an amazing job, really, really amazing job.
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: We got the trailer now and, uh, They had test audiences,
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: everything else. They're looking to release at the end of Christmas. Now,
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers and the FBI will try to stop this
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: because this will present the evidence in such a powerful way.
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: Even the trailer lays it out so well where it says,
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: you know, uses my own voice and stuff. And it's
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: saying about, you know, why I wrote it was as
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: a gift to humanity and that it was to help
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: bring us together and make a better world. And it goes,
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: let's do that. And I just love it. I just
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: love that it really capsulizes on that it wasn't for fame.
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: It was to be a gift. It was to make
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: a difference in our world. And this documentary lays it
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 1: out so well. Warner Brothers and the FBI has to
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: stop this project because when this comes out, just like
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 1: the test audiences responded, it was too, too effective and
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: people couldn't stop watching. So we're going to have that
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: battle coming up. I know that. So it's a sensitive
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: time before it's released because Warner Brothers can do everything
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: possible to shut it down. And they'll unleash anybody they got,
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: like Sophia Stewart or Minions, anybody to try to shut
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: this down. So you're going to see a lot of
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: maneuvering now, such as that merger. to make themselves less accessible.
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: Because the plan is to then make the movie the
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: way it's supposed to be, the Immortals as it's copyrighted,
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: which they have tried to shut that down. The Sophia Stewart,
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers has tried it. They had the Cypherman guy,
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: Jim Anderson, come involved and say, look, let's do a
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: blend of Cypherman and make Immortals. It's like they tried
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: everything to not have the facts come out that show
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: that it's similar. And that's why Sophia Stewart even threatened
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: that they put an injunction because there's similarities. Well, that
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: proves we're right. So the judge loses face. All these
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: people lose face. They use that as an argument saying
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: too many lies will be affected, too many families will
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: be affected if the truth comes out and people get it.
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: So they're waiting for that switchover where people actually find
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 1: the facts here and see just how bad this has been.
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: and all the frauds that have been involved, like Larry
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: Wachowski and Andy Wachowski and Keanu Reeves involved and Sophia
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: Stewart and all the players from Warner Brothers and Netflix
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: and Disney and Paramount and now Skydance and Steven Spielberg.
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 3: So, yeah.
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 2: Anyway. Yeah, which we know every single one of those
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 2: players you just named has a survivor who has spoken
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 2: out about how corrupt they are.
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: They are very corrupt. Very corrupt. And just taking the
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: fact they brag about what they got away with. Wyrmwood's attorneys,
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: we got it on tape from one of their main players,
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: where they said, yeah, they were bragging about how much
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: you're being screwed, how much you're worth, over $ 500 million
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: at the time. They said they have your attorney with
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: your back against the wall. They have him in their pocket.
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: You have no idea how much you're being screwed. Yeah,
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: we have that intake. So it's like, yeah. So anyway,
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: all the proofs, they have to come out in an
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: organized fashion because people aren't taught these days to use
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: critical thinking. They're used to just a soundbite, sound smart,
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: off you go, play golf. It's like we really haven't
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: been involved in like really investing and taking a piece apart,
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: looking at it. They're pushing an agenda forward with the ideas.
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: What's in it for them? What's in it for yourself?
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: What's in it for you? Rather than what can we
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: do for each other? It's kind of like Kennedy going,
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 1: instead of ask not what you can do for yourself,
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: ask what you can do for your country. It's like
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: inverting it back to ask what you can do for yourself.
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 1: It's turning it back again.
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 2: That's the whole MO, it looks like, is everything in
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 2: the government has become a for-yourself type situation with the
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: mask of we're doing it for your safety.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 1: That's right. And talk about doing it for the good
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: of things. Thank you for taking all the time you do.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: I can't even factor how much time you spent bringing
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: forward this truth when it's not a popular thing to do.
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: It's like they've structured it that there is penalties and
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 1: things like that. And you've hung in there so well
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: and brought it forward. It's like you definitely are a pepper.
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: It's incredible. So, yeah.
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 3: Well, it's interesting to me. I appreciate that praise.
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 2: It's just interesting to me how much your story and
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 2: mine align and we have different pieces that are very similar.
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 2: So I stick to it because I kind of have to,
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 2: and they know that, and I don't have a price
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 2: and they know that.
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 3: Um, so it is what it is.
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 2: I mean, they kind of found, I mean, I, I
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 2: kind of have no choice in this factor, but I
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 2: find it, I'm a, I'm, I'm a dog with a
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: bone on the truth and, and I don't like it
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 2: when I've been lied to, especially if I bought it. Um,
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: and so when I find out that I've been lied
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 2: to and I bought it, like I can usually see
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 2: the other pieces. And so it really gets frustrating when when,
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 2: you know, there's there's good people like your story that
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 2: you who have these pieces, this truth, you're just trying
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 2: to be authentic. And a lot of dollars and resources
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 2: are spent to just destabilize you.
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: And that's the point, too. It's like Sophia Stewart and
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 1: others would say, you know, you're just looking for popularity.
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: It's like this has been over 33 some years fighting this.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: And it's like. If I was doing it for popularity,
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: why would I continue? Because I'm getting kicked in the
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 1: teeth all the time. It's like I'm doing this because
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: it's the truth and it's real. And I promised my
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 1: son I'd see it through. And it's in memory of
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: my dead sons that were killed and murdered. And that's
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 1: in the documentary trailer, too. So I think they did
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 1: a great job. And you did a great job bringing
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: forward the truth.
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 3: I'm going to play it up here.
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and the real feeling of it. So I'd like
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: to end it with that. Just thank you that we're
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: doing this and we're bringing it forward. That's why we're
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: not stopping. So to answer Sophia Stewart, it's not about fame.
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: It's about when you know you've been robbed and you
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: had something as a gift to humanity to make a
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 1: better world. And it's becoming more needed more than ever now,
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 1: more necessary. You're not going to stop. So I'm not
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 1: going to stop. I'm going to keep bringing forth this truth.
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: Blue is good. Red is bad. We're going to finish
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: the job.
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: Absolutely.
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 2: Amen.
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 3: Thank you, Tom.