Latest / Bloomberg Intelligence / Fed Day, Jay Powell, Banks, and Crypto

Transcript

Fed Day, Jay Powell, Banks, and Crypto · Bloomberg Intelligence

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: with essential market moving news. I'm the Bloomberg Markets Podcast
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's get
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: to these banks. That is clearly a big issue. We've
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: got a nice little round table here because if I'm
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: the feeder reserve, I got to deal with the banks.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: So let's talk to Alison Williams and Bloomberg Intelligence. Plus
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: I got to, you know, talk interest rates. So now
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: I gotta talk to Ira Jersey. He's actually in the
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg studio, which is a rarity, John Tucker, I mean,
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: and pretty a shot, so we'll take it. He's all,
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: guest Blazer, did you see this? He's all, he's looking
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: all right. So we've got Alison Williams covers the banks
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: joining us. Phone Ira Jersey in studio. Allison, you know,
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: we framed this discussion today with FED chairman j pal
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: that he has to address not only interest rates, which
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: is why we have ire here, but he's also got
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: to talk about the banking sector and the Fed's role
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: in monitoring and regulating it. What do you think he
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: should say about the banks and the role of the FED. Well,
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: I think it is I think it is tricky, and
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: I think that you know, a lot of the questions uh,
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: percolating and that I've kind of led to this, um
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: do relate to market sentiment, and so you are seeing
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: regulators sort of more pulling back and just pointing to,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: you know, the strong capital of the banks and sort
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: of that as a broad picture. Um general, I think
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: that and I'll let I'll let I always speak to
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: what the FED does today, but you know, in general,
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: I think for what the banks are really waiting for
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: is an answer on deposit insurance and what can be
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: done there. We're hearing a lot of politicians throwing around
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: around a lot of different ideas, but I think we
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: do need something sort of broad, perhaps temporary, to help
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: stabilise sentiment, which is really the issue at this point. Well, Ira,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: come on in here and talk to us about that
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: stabilizing sentiment piece. Alison, just reference twenty five basis points
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: priced into the market. What does the pause look like
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: in the bontod market. Well, if I think if the
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: FED worred to pause, or as I suspect that they'll do,
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: they'll hike twenty five basis points and hint that they
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: may pause at the main meeting. Is I think as
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: long as they're dovish enough, I think that for risk
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: assets probably things are okay. But I agree with Alison,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: you know, the issue here is things like how do
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: you quell deposit flight? Right, and raising interest rates actually
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: doesn't hurt that one way or the other, except in
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: so far as the way the financial system has been
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: developed over the last couple of decades is that if
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: banks don't offer a competitive interest rate on their deposits,
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: on their CDs or whatever, people then do what happened
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: over the last week and a half and they move
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: their money into money market mutual funds which have market
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: based yields. And now so with the so the FED
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: actually hiking could actually, you know, enhance some of this
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: deposit flight unless banks figure out a way to keep
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: depositors in their in their firms. So I think it's
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: a balancing act that the FED has to do today.
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: And I think the J. Powell has to be dovish,
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: and that the statement will probably take out a line
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: that talks about that continued great hikes, like they won't
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: promise basically that they're going to continue hiking. They could, right,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: but I think they have to take that out and
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: give themselves more optionality. Alison, you know, the reality is
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: for me, at least, it seems like in the past
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: couple of weekends, I haven't come into work on Monday
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: like we did back in two thousand and eight with
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: another bank or handful of banks failing. The argument can
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: certainly be made that this is kind of look, it
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: is syncratic to a couple of institutions here, and that
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: if others broadly had problems, we'd hear about it. By now,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: How are you thinking about a day to day as
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: we kind of figure out that this may or may
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: not be systemic? So I think, um, I mean, I
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: think it's not systemic in the sense that, uh, you know,
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: it's more it's more a clause. It's more sort of
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: having things in common versus um, you know, one bank's
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: downfall causing another bank's downfall. So credit tweets, for example,
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: the issues there could have been systema because there are
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: a lot of inter relationships, even though we we expect
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: that the US banks manage those down significantly over time. UM,
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: certainly there are inter relationships, especially to the other banks
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: with the US banks. You know. The issue is just that, um,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: you know, this this setup could cause an issue if
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: we continue to have this negative sentiment. And that's why
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: I think you need more of a broad statement, right
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: because you had uh, you know, we've had a few
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: banks now, um that event that have failed. Everyone's watching
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: a couple of more banks. But and those banks find
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: their answers. You know, investors will continue, I think, to
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: go onto the next and the next until there is
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: some kind of stability, some kind of broad answer that
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: that quells those fears. Well, Alison, I want to get
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: your quick read on the PacWest story. This morning, they
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: access that fed facility from US sixteen billion. They got
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: about one point four billion financing from Atlas as well.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: A lot of people will worry that PacWest was the
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: next shoe to drop. Are we in the clear now
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: from that? I mean, you know, the thing that I
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: think investors will focus on is that is the deposit flight.
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: And so again I think we have a situation where
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: one particular bank is coming out and talking about, you
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: know that they've stabilized things, but people are focusing on
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: the deposits, the past of those deposits, and again worried
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: about what's happening at other banks, and there's not a
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: lot of transparency. So I think that I think, again,
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: you need something that that can kind of broadly stabilize
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: that we're not going to continue to go you know, bank,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: my bank, right, my story? Right? Iver, what's the key
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: thing that I'm not a FED watcher, thank goodness, But
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: what's the one thing a non Fed watcher should be
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: listening for today at two thirty? Yeah, I think well,
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: so at two thirty, I think it's the um you know,
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: how the tone of j Powell's comments around the banking crisis, right, So,
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: how concerned is the FED that it could become systemic? Because,
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: like Allison mentioned, you know, Credit Suite was potentially a
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: systemic institution, right. The problem with two thousand and seven,
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: two thousand and eight was that you had large financial
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: institutions that were very interconnected. So far, at least, we
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: haven't had you know, a lot of a big bank
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: outside of Credit Suite that was very interconnected to the
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: rest of the system, that could make the whole system collapse.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: But of course you get enough smaller institute that do
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: that and suddenly become systemic. So I think it's how
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: concerned is he and the more concerned he sounds, the
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: more dovish that should be. And you should note then
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: that maybe the FED is going to be done after
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: today's hike. All right, great stuff. Really appreciate getting two
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: of the smartest minds we've got in the building together
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: at one time, Alison Williams, Senior Global Banks annalyst for
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence, and Ira Jersey, chief US interest rates strategists
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: with Bloomberg Intelligence getting them together, And you know right
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: we did that is because the FED is thinking they've
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: got two mandates today, that's to deal with the banking
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: issues and then obviously deal with the interest rates and inflation.
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: And that's how we want to approach it. Right here,
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: you're listening to the Team Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: I Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: listen on demand wherever you get your podcast. Consensus seems
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: to be the Federal raised twenty five basis points. My
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: question is, if it weren't for the bank in challenges
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: out there in a market marketplace, the turmoil in some
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: of these regional banks, would that change the Fed's behavior.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: Lets check in with one of our favorite FED watchers,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: Danielle d Martino Booth. She's a CEO and chief strategist
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: for Quill Intelligence. She's also a former advisor at the
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: Federserve Bank at Dallas, so she knows how they make
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: the sauces down there at the FED. So, Danielle, do
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: you think if it were not for the banking turmoil
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: that the FED would maybe go fifty basis points here? No,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: I think that I think that the CPI report, I
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: think that the inflation data had been a little bit
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: hotter than what was expected. But on the flip side
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: of that, I think that there's more evidence. Now we've
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: got what eighty four percent of the US population is
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: living in states with rising initial jobless claims. Uh, you know,
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: that's that's a pretty that's it's it's a huge chunk
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: of America. There's more a recognition among average working men
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: and women that the labor cycle has turned. So I
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: think that that in conjunction with inflation not being you know,
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: super red hot, would have kept the FED at twenty
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: five basis points. I actually think they're going as much
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: as they wanted to go to day. Danielle, again, we
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: got to talk about this kind of minority view in
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: the markets, which is there may at the end of
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: the day be a pause. Would a pause, although perhaps
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: creating panic, be justified from an economic point of view.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: From an economic point of view, I think that a
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: pause would be justified. I just said that, you know,
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: eighty four percent of Americans live in states with rising
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: jobless claims. But I think that at this point it
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: would it would upset the markets. You've got a ninety
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: percent probability going in of this twenty five basis points,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: and I think that it wouldn't supprise me to have
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: Powell echo to a certain extent Christine Lagarde last week
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: and say, you know, four guidances, bye bye, We're we're
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: just going to try and take this on a day
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: by day basis. Obviously, if systemic risk comes on glued, uh,
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: you know, he will he will pause. But I think
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: Powell's trying to fight a war on two fronts. I
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: think he's trying to maintain tight monetary policy. I don't
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: think it necessarily keeps him up at night that the
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: credit cycles um underway, that bankruptcies are happening, that the
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: risk is operators with the worst business models are are
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: having to restructure. I think he's okay with that. I
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: think he's okay with that being an outgrowth of his policy.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: The flip side of that is credit standards are tightening
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: real quick here. So that's that that could be something
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: that that that that should be staying his hand today
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: because try and get try and get a cash out refinancing,
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: try and get a car loan, try and get a
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: commercial real estate loan. Good luck. So, Danielle, I just
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: typed into my terminal d ots dots go. This is
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: a FED meeting where we do get the dot thing right?
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: Is that still a thing I need to pay attention to.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: I think that I think that the dots right now
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: are more like you know, playing darts in the sense
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: that given the magnitude I mean, we just watched one
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: of the world's thirty largest banks go bye bye. Given
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: the magnitude of the backdrop, I think the dots mean less.
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: What I think people will be paying attention to, though,
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: is when said leaders anticipate the first rate cut. If
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: they all stand their ground, remember Leo Brainer's gone, She's
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: not there in the room these last two days. If
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: they all stand their ground, that we're not going to
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: be that the Fed is not going to be lowering
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: interest rates until twenty twenty four. I think that that
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: will definitely raise an eyebrow or two. Danielle. You talked
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: about the dots a little bit, but let's talk then
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: about when it comes to kind of economic forecast, the
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: GDP picture as well. I had an interview last week
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: with the CEO of DHL and he said, look, the
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: economy is still expanding. They're still hiring, they're still seeing
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: volumes grow on a quarter by quarter basis. From a
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: kind of GDP growth point of view, Danielle, the economy
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: is still growing. Why is that such a bad thing.
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: It's not a bad thing that the economy is still growing.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: The economy is about to have a full blown heart
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: attack and stop growing, but it's not a bad thing
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: that we still had economic output going into where we
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: are today. But whether you're talking to people in logistics
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: or trucking or industrial packaging. They have seen unlike the
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: gentleman from DHL, they've seen a sudden stop in the economy.
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: The New York said put out you guys had it
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: on the terminal. Yesterday, the New York FD put out
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: a new survey. People are getting rejected for credit left
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: and right, whether it's trying to do a cash out refinancing,
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: or get or get a car loan. So prior to
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: even the banking crisis setting in, there were definitely signs
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: in the economy of slowing or if nothing else, slowing
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: to come. What is your call here on the labor market,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: because that's been one of the issues, Danielle, that a
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: lot of folks are put pushing back on a recession scenario,
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: saying you can't have a recession with this level of unemployment.
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: What's your view there, Look, I think that I think
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: that the labor market is is pushing out unequivocal evidence
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: of how bad things are getting. A Walmart closes about
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: once a week. They're clearly passed there. It's just usual
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: business type of model. We have four hundred foot lockers
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: announced that they were closing just a few days ago.
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: So retail mcgeddon is picking up stream about steam and
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: we're you know, we've just seen Amazon dot Com go
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: through it's with its third round of layoffs one two three,
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: So I mean, it's it's good to say, look look
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: at the unemployment rate, it's still so low. Or look
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: at unemployment claims, there's still still on a level basis,
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: that's the case, But sixty seven percent of states have
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: rising claims. Again, eighty four percent of the population lives
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: in a state with rising claims on a year over
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: year basis, So that's tangible. So you're talking about the
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: labor market here. Should we be worried about the housing market?
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: I still don't feel like a lot of people are
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: raising the alarm bells when it comes to housing. You
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: know how things a funny thing, right, because we had
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: this dip in mortgage rates. Everybody rushed in in these
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: months that are typically seasonally very weak December, January, February,
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: and yet if you don't have an income, it's really
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: hard to get a mortgage. And that is why I
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: think it was critical to pay attention to the Federal
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: Reserve's most recent Senior Loan Officer survey that said even
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: for residential mortgages that lending standards were tightening, and you
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: see that in the fact that the ten year treasury
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: yield has come down but the thirty year fixed mortgage
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: rate has gone up in the last ten days. That's
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: telling you something about lender's willingness to extend credit into
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: a housing market when they foresee trouble down the pipe,
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: which is that's what you get when you have a
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: labor cycle right, It's going to lead into intrastrate sensitive
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: sectors and sectors where you have to have an income
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: to get the financing to buy it. Danielle again, the
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: release of the statement at two pm Wall Street time,
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: and then the press commerce at two thirty. Is there
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: a mistake that Chairman Pal could make today that's in
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: the back of your mind that you're saying, boy, I
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: hope he doesn't do this because that could be really
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: bad for the markets. I think he needs to be
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: unscripted today. I think he needs to not be so
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: nervous at the podium that he's reading his answers. He
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: has to come out and exude confidence at a time
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: of a lot of people being really freaked out. He
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: has to stand up and be a leader. And I
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: think that that could be challenging for him because this
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: is probably the hardest podium time he'll ever have in
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: his entire life. But the last few meetings he's been
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: very perfunctory reading his answers. I think he needs to
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: be ready for what's going to be asked of him
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: and be confident in his reply and say, we've got
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: macroprudential solutions that we can attach to this financial banking
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: type of crisis. It's burgeoning. We think we can handle this.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: At the same time, we think we can also run
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: monetary policy on a separate track. We can wage a war,
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: we can wage more, you know, on two fronts. Daniel, lastly,
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: just about thirty seconds, based upon what we know today,
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: is the banking turmoil systemic or not? Do we know?
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: I don't think we know if the banking turmoil is systemic.
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: I suspect that is, it is potentially systemic, because quietly
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: First Republic, like Silicon Valley, has not been able to
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: raise capital. So when we cross these rubicons, Uh, there's
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: definitely something along with the system when banks cannot raise capital.
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: All right, we'll have to see a busy, busy day today.
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: We appreciate getting a few minutes of your time. You
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: know you're busy. Danielle Danielle di Martino Booth CEO and
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: chief strategists at Quill Intelligence. Some great stuff there. Follow
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: her work. She's got a great Twitter game as well.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: I follow her on Twitter. Lots of good discussion there
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: with Danielle and some of her colleagues. She was a
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: former advisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. So
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: again we love talking to her about the FED critty
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: because she knows kind of how inner workings go. Yeah,
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: and when you have a FED meeting like today, it's
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: good to check in with those folks. Yeah, It's nice
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: to hear kind of how they go about thinking about
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: this because I gotta say, Paul, you could not Paey
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: to be an a condist at the Federal Reserve right now.
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: This feels like quite literally being stuck between a rock
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: and hard place. Yeah. So we'll have to see what
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: we hear from the Federal Reserve later today, and of
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: course we'll have full coverage of it. You're listening to
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: the Tape cats a our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, in APT, Bloomberg
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: dot Com and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: jo Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. One of our
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: favorite topics to discuss is ETF exchange traded funds, so
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: much so that we ask Katie Greifeld from Bloomberg News
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: to join us here because she is the ETF boss
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: here for Bloomberg News. She joins us here in a
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Interactive broker studio because we have a great guest
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: to check out. Joanna Gayego's co founder of Bond Blocks,
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: joins us here in our studio. Joanna, can you remind
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: us again what you guys at Bondblocks do. What we
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: do Bonblocks is fixed income ets. Yes, we're the only
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: fixed income issuer that's one hundred percent focus on fixed income,
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: and so we build out precision fixed income tools for investors.
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: And let's talk about the year that fixed income ETFs
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: are having, because my terminal is just booting up. But
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: if you look at the flows year to date into
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: the ETF universe, over all fixed income and equity ETFs
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: are like neck and Neck. I think fixed income might
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: have surpassed the flows into equities in the past day
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: or so. Have to check. I can't remember the last
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: time that happened when overall for the year more money
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: was going into bonds. I mean, just speak to the
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: appetite that we're seeing in the wrapper right now for
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: fixed income. Yeah, it's very simple. It's because of what
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: happened in twenty twenty two and yields being back. So
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: people say bonds are back, and it makes sense. But
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: what people need to consider is that total return is
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: more important than ever in your portfolio. And so with
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: yields having moved over four hundred and fifty bases points
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two and you know will continue to rise,
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: is what expectations call bonds are really important tool for
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty three because it's probably the most simplest way
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: to see return in your portfolio. And where is that
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: return though, when you look across the curve, obviously we're
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: seeing biblical volatility in the front end. But still I
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: hear lot of calls that basically you just want to
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: sit in cash. You want to sit in short of
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: the shorter end of the yield curve. When you think
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: about duration the curve and its totality. What's your thoughts. So, yes,
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: in duration, which is a measure of interest rate risks,
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: you are seeing a lot of flows in the short
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: end because that there's less duration, there's less interest rate
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: risk in something like a six month treasury or one
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: year a treasury. That's just intuitive cash management use. You
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: should be on the short end with zero risk, easy
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: easy decision. But what we see and what we've done
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: in fixed income is we've cut up parts of the
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: credit and part of the risk spectrum of fixed income,
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: so you can see different opportunities amongst those areas. And
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: so what's really compelling is that if you look at
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: things in high yield or even across IG you're not
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: seeing spreads from that risk free rate that are different
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: or very much or very much away from their non
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: recession levels. So I think people have been waiting for
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: like this massive bottom in fixed income before they come in.
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: But with the yields increasing and doubling over the last year,
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: you're seeing fourteen percent in triple c's, which is sort
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: of the highest credit rating, highest credit risk you could
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: have in high yield, all the way down to something
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: like five hundred in something in a in a double
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: B or a B. Those are normal levels, and so
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: it's kind of one of those confounding things we're seeing
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: in economic data where you're seeing a lot of demand,
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: you're seeing low job, low unemployment, but you're also not
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: seeing a lot of distress and high yield, and so
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: we think there's a lot of interesting areas of risk
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: to think about in fixed income. So I think it's yes,
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: everyone is in on the short end, but we really
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: don't think people are taking enough action and looking at
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: the risk assets in fixed income, which are pretty straightforward
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: given those yields for twenty twenty to be pretty brave
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: though I don't know, to go into high yield right
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: now doesn't say high risk, high reward. Yeah, it sounds
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: like it's let the entire argument on those at one bonds,
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: it's like, well they're super risky, but they could yield
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: and juicy returns. That's sort of what bond box is about.
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: We're about making sure that people can see those individual
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: opportunities across the risk spectrum. So yeah, you don't have
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: to take the full risk of triple c's, but it's
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: there for you to compare and break out of what
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: you're seeing in broad bet based thoughts about high yield
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: like that, Yes, high yield is an exchange of risk
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: and in return, but there are opportunities amongst them. We
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: want people to see those in individual products. You know.
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: With this banking turmoil, which is a term I'm most
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: comfortable with as opposed to a crisis, what we are
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: seeing as a lot of deposits come out of a
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: lot of banks and the expectations to going to money
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: market funds are going to maybe some bigger banks. Are
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: you seeing that in your business and the fund flows, yes, okay,
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: talking about that. So the short as Katie mentioned, the
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: short end of the curve and products and ETFs are
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: seeing a lot of flow. ETFs are interesting is that
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: it allows an investor in and not have to reinvest
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: their their short term cash or their strategy to cash.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: So um like a like a money market fund, you're
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: going to be getting a yield that continues with you
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: within the market. So ETFs are an alternative to deposits,
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: but they are not locked up up. There's something you
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: can withdraw on any day of the week and their
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: yield is going to grow or contract with the market.
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: So it's a very simple, convenient way to get access
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: to treasury yields or short term risk. If I think
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: about the past two weeks, one of the I don't know,
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know how I want to describe it. One
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: of the more interesting facts to me is that when
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: you think about what happened at Silicon Valley Bank, at
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: the end of the day, it was just duration risk.
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: They were holding long dated treasuries, you know, government bonds.
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: It's not like it was anything that's supposed to be risky,
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: but it was duration risk. In the end. What are
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: your clients thinking about when it comes to longer dated debt? Yeah,
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: so if you want to take on duration, we actually
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: wanted to solve this problem for investors. We wanted to
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: put it on the label exactly how much interest rate
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: risk you're taking in a treasury product, and so we
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: created products that are duration targeted. So what we see
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: the clients are generally in fixing portfolios. When you want
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: to take on more risk, you're adding duration because of
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: interest rate risk that's coming up. So what we see
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: is obviously most of the flows are going into the
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: shorter side on the interest rate side, because there's been
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: expectations all year that there'd be increasing interest rate hikes,
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: but with sort of the back and forth we've seen
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: in the last few weeks, there is a view that
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: interest rates may be coming down as soon as the
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: end of the year or even very early in twenty
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: twenty four, and so we are seeing people taking longer
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: duration five to seven, even ten and twenty. I think
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: having that precision to be able to see which your
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: interest rate risk is is critical right now, and we
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: actually launched those products so that people could more precisely
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: put duration into their portfolio, even in the treasury space. Well,
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: I like think you said more precisely, because I want
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: to talk to specifically about not the bond market, but
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: the vehicle through which you're investing in the bond market.
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: Essentially ETFs as a product themselves. Given this kind of
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: environment where liquidity in treasuries is a concern, perhaps not immediately,
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: but it was a couple of months ago and might
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: be again, our et then considered more attractive as kind
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: of a tool to get your hands on them. They
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: democratize access to our financial markets. They always have. They
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: have been really important vehicles to source. I call it
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: the first port of liquidity. It's like the first call
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: it's where you can go to see where a market
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: is trading, and in treasuries it's no different. And so
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: the way that those markets function, they're very easy to
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: access for all investors. It's not something that's exclusive to
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: someone that's in an institution or doesn't know how, doesn't
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: have a you know, a way to access the bonds directly.
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: Anybody with a brokerage account and trade in ETF So
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: they're a really important tool for liquidity for all investors. Joan,
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: just real quick here, what do you expect from the
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: Fed today? Well, the consensus, as you guys have been
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: talking about the last few minutes, is that they are
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: going to raise another another quarter point. I think what
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: we really need to expect from the Fed is sort
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: of what they say and how they're sort of responding
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: to the stability and this line they're trying to balance
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: between financial stability the economic data that has come in
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: in this quarter, which is sort of our portfolio manager
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: Elias Schwartz like to say, has been flashing red lights
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: and green lights to the bond market. You don't know
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: which which is going to happen on any given day.
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: So what they say is going to be really important
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: for us to understand next steps. But we need more trends,
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: we need more data, and we'll have to see what
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: the great stuff. Johanna, thank you so much for coming
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: into our Bloomberg Get Interactive Broker Studio. Really appreciate that.
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: Joanna Gayego's co founder of bond Blocks. She co found
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: at Bondblocks in twenty twenty one. You're listening to the
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: team Ken's our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the r Heard radio
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: app and the Bloomberg Business app. We're listening on demand
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcast. You know what's doing well here?
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: John just called it out. Bitcoin. It's up another one
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: point nine percent today. It's you know, pushing twenty nine
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: thousand on bitcoin. Where's Tom Keane with his bitdog right?
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: You need it getting closer to that third leash thousand level. Also, Paul,
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: if you look back and in a sense function over
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: the past ten days, it's up close to thirty four percent.
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: Admit of this big sella. Obviously we've seen banks rebound,
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: but during this heightened volatility over the past few weeks,
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: seeing bitcoin, what are the winners here? Exactly. So when
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: I want to talk anything crypto, I want to talk
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: with Mike McLoone senior macro strategist with Bloomberg in Intelligence.
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: You know, Mike, what is going on with bitcoin here
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: and does it relate at all to what we've been
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: experienced our last couple of weeks with some of these
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: regional banks born hey, Paul, Born of the last financial crisis.
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: This financial crisis seems to be defining bitcoin, and it's
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: quite impressive. I mean, I've been looking for an inflection
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: point to bitcoin to be trading more like gold and
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: long bonds, and it's happening. So one good example is
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: Je mentioned bitcoins up about seventy three percent in the year.
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: But part of this is what's been happening with that
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: Great Scale Bitcoin Trust and GBTC. It just hit one
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: hundred percent mark on the year today, and that's the
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: litigation that might allow ETFs on the lane. But the
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: macro is significant. People are seeing this as Okay, well,
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: this is no one's project, no one's liability, no one's risk.
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: Banks aren't involved, and we're seeing it as a bit
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: of a flight to quality, flight to safety. It is
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: a digital reserve asset and actually some of this is
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: coming from this the crypto dollars, the stable coins which
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: aren't being somewhat looked at it and so okay, so
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: they have full reserves. That's quite impressive. So, Mike, has
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: Bitcoin reached its inflection point versus stocks yet? And if not,
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: what are you watching to gauge when that could potentially happen.
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: I think it's happening right now, Jessin. That's you know,
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: and we're seeing it in real time. But the key
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: thing to think about is I'm worried about what Gina
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: Martin Adams says. She's our equity stratis and she's been
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: spot on. And when she says that the FED hiking
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: is bad for equities and five percent tea bills is
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: bad for equities, I expect that. So I fully expect
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: after we yet today and the FED hikes into what's
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: turning out to me a significant deflationary periody of look
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: at banking and housing and commodities that we get that
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: downturn inequities. Bitcoin will fall, but it is showing divergence trick.
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: It's quite impressive, and it's doing it more than most
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: of the other cryptos it's you know, it's that single
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: thing like gold and like and T bonds where people
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: are saying, okay, well, what's my risk here? There's no
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: one to bail this out, which might be better, And
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: so I think we're at that now. Also Bitcoin outperforming
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: commodities as well. Right, Yes, I've enjoyed writing about that
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: for quite a while. When people are talking about commoditis
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: supercycle last year, Paul's I hear Paul giggling because I
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: just pointed out the key facts about bitcoin is it's
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: low and early days for adoption in his definable diminishing supply.
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: Now you look what's happening to crude oil since last
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: year when people were calling from one fifty, we're learning
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: that crude oil is the world's none those one, world's
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: most significant in commodity, but it's the world's most autoco
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: correlated acid. It goes down because it goes up, and
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: that's because it crushes that demand and brings on more supply.
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: And to me, that's what's happening. People are realizing, well,
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: this supercycle might be happening in bitcoin. So oil here
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: I'm looking at wtat crude oil. At seventy we were
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: below seventy today? Is this just you know, the marketplace
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: saying I think we got to demand problem looking forward
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: here it's all the above pots. I love how people
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: making excuses those of us who really got you know,
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: I was initially wrong last year and I said crudel
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: is going back to fifty. I think it's getting there.
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: And the key thing is it always does that. It
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: looks very similar to what it did in nineteen ninety.
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: I was in a trading pitst initially got all signs,
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: but it went to forty, back to twenty, and then
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: it took about fourteen years agave above that high. The
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: difference is now the US is a net energy exporter.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: This has never happened, and we're seeing what normally happens
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: in crude oil. It's the world's most autocorrelated acid when
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: it goes up and makes it go down. But the
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: key is the key thing at this similar stage in
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, when we had that pump and
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: the FED was aggressively easy. Now they're still tightening. And
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: one thing I need to point out is back in
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: two thousand and nine was the last time we had
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: the worst than the most negative PPI Producer Price Index
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: ever really driven by commodities. We are going towards that
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: too when we get to July. July thirteenth says, when
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: we're going to get June PPI, it's very likely going
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: to be negative on a year over year basis because
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: of plunging commodities in crudel. And that's not profound, that's
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: just the way the math is going at the moment.
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: And something I'm curious about because I've had sources talk
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: about when they're specifically looking at equities, they don't want
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: to see oil treading around fifty dollars. Again, when it
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: comes to crypto, if you're seeing that happening in the
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: crude markets, what do you think that means potentially for
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: bitcoin if that would happen. Yeah, So I'm glad you
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: mentioned that. This is part of been my premise to
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: be bullish gold because I see what's happening in crudel
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: and commodities is what is crudels an enduring bear market
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: that bounced last year and it's tilting back towards that
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: bear market, which means deflation. And you look at things
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: like gold and bitcoin, they're enduring bull markets. They have
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: dipped and probably tipping back towards bull markets. And for
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: that tilt, you need the deflation to come back, and
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: it's clearly going there. So let's look at one example
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: for crudel is the benchmark for heat, electricity, and fertilizer
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: in this country's natural gas. It's down eighty percent from
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: last year's high. It's returned to his cost of production
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: around two and I fully expect the same thing in
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: crude oil, which is around forty to fifty dollars a barrel.
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: Forty dollars or fifty dollars a barrel is the cost
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: of production and the world's largest producer of crude oil
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: and liquid fuels, and that's the US. And by the way,
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: for our listeners, Mike made that call like when oil
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: was at one hundred and twenty five dollars a barrel.
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: So if you listen to Mike, you made some dough
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: Ray me. Mike, you cover everything from crypto to pork bellies.
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: What are you looking at now? What's getting your tension here? Well,
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: obviously to be the macro is overwhelming, Paul, and I
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: think that's what people are missing, the fact that the
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: FED and DCB are still tightened versus all the forward
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: looking measures. Aren't just plunging. Commodities aren't just falling, they're collapsing.
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: The bloomer combany in next is down over twenty percent
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: over the year of basis, and it's been we've had
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: the history of since nineteen sixty. The FED is never
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: tightened in that environment, Yet they still are. We see
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: a housing market pinking, and now we have a banking crisis,
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: and they're still pointing out lagging inflation. And I pointed
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: out with PPI in July and the year of year
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: is probably gonna be negative. So to me, that's a
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: ten on a scale of everything one to ten and
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: everything else is a five or lower. Just the fact
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: that today we're talking about tightening when a year from now,
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: I sally expect when we speak and we're gonna be
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: talking about and during inflation partly sparked by the FED
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: who just was a little bit too late on the
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: inflation and then way too aggressive fighting it. And now
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: it's way past I mean, the ship is turning and
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: they're still tainting. Wow, all right, folks, what you just
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: heard is an analyst on the top of his or
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: her game for a couple of reasons. One, he knows
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: his stuff, he does the work, he does the math. Second,
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: he provides his opinions and his analysis with conviction. I
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: mean what you just heard there was analysis, got conviction
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: in his call. Yet conviction oil going forty to fifty one,
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: twenty five, and we get conviction again whether we're talking
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: pork bellies or crypto. So we're fortunate to have Mike
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: McLoone with us. He's a sconce down in Miami, holding
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: down the Bloomberg Intelligence, a Southern tier down there in Miami.
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: You're listening to the take Ken's a our live program,
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: the tun In half, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: Business alf. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleven thirty. I want to get to right to
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: our next guest, Lisian Sanders, chief investment strategist at Charles
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: Schwab Lizards a million ways a week ago here, and
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: we'll certainly get to the fed. But I'd love to
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: ask a veteran strategists such as yourself what do you
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: make of the last two weeks with Silicon Valley Banks,
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: Signature Bank, and some of these other California banks. What's
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: your take? So my take is maybe broader than what's
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: been the focus in the past couple of weeks. Yes,
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: there is a crisis going on here in the banking system,
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: but I think it's part parcel of a broader story
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: about the end of the end of the era of
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: easy money coming off the zero bound, the capital misallocation
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: that occurred during that era, just ample liquidity and zero rates,
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: and now I think we're sort of paying the piper.
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: And there's just been so much concentration on the banking
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: part of this. But I think this is a broader
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: story of of you know, who's swimming naked when the
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: liquidity tide goes out? Liz, I have to ask, how
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: frustrating is it when the narratives keep changing in market
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: pricing and also trying to position specifically around that. Well, yeah,
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: it is frustrating. It's unique in terms of how rapidly
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: not just information is changing, but the reaction function. But
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: I'm not a trader, and I don't I don't advise
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: short term traders, so we're not trying to kind of
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: play every wiggle in here. That the lead into the
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: FED meeting is extraordinary in terms of how dramatic the
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: change in expectations have been from as recently as March eighth,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: an assumption of fifty by the FED or hikes between
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: now and year end, you know, five to seven on
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: the terminal rate, and now we're sub five. Still a
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: bias toward twenty five. But even thinking that, maybe they pause. Yeah,
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: So if you're if you're trying to trade around this stuff,
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: good luck. But so liszt intantly having God, No, I
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: was just gonna ask, you know, we've got the FED
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: coming up later today, and this is a unique meeting
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: for FED Chairman j Pals. He does have this kind
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: of simmering banking turmoil out there in addition to his
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: remit on inflation and everything. What would you like, What
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: do you think he should do today? What do you
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: think the message should be today? I think they should pause,
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: but certainly the market is saying that they're not going to.
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: It's eighty six percent chance of twenty five. My guests, though,
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: is that if they hike, it'll be a a hike,
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: or if they pause, it'll be a hawkish pause, and
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: that just means I think if they if they hike,
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: it's consistent with market expectations. They tend to go along
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: with market expectations, but they will talk a lot about
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: what their facilities are, that we have the tools that
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: you know, we're probably closer to the end. Conversely, if
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: they opt to pause, which would be against market expectations,
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: I think the messaging might be more about our inflation
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: fight may not be done. If things settle down in
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: the financial system, hikes could be back on the table.
• 37:32
  Speaker 1: So that's my best guests heading into what is a
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: very tricky meeting. And Liz, everybody obviously has been talking
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: about the dot plots that are quarterly we're going to
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: get another update on those and the meeting plot back
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: at that December meeting was five point one percent for
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty three. But are you expecting, I mean, how
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: are you expecting markets to respond to that, because obviously
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: we won't just get them for this year, we'll get
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: them for the next coming years as well. But what
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: are you expecting to see there and how do you
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: think market Frankly, markets shouldn't respond dramatically to the Summary
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: of Economic Projections or the dots plot. There's not been
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: a lot of accuracy in those, but it does represent
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: a bit of a signal for me. The issue will
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: be is there consistency in terms of the message within
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: the Summary of Economic Projections. What might be odd to
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: see and I think would be disconcerting is if the
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: dots and suggests that rate cuts are very much on
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: the table before year end, but it's not reflected in
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: a deterioration in the economic projections. That I think would
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: be a troubling message, which is, hey, we think we're
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: going to be cutting rates, not because the economy is
• 38:41
  Speaker 1: going to suffer, but you would infer that it meant
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: we think the financial system problem is larger. If the
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: economic growth expectations are weaker and inflation expectations are lower,
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: and the FED suggests rate cuts might be on the table,
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: I think that's a better broader message. So I think
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: it's sort of the combination of what the SEP and
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: the dots show, and I think that dissecting is going
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: to be more important this time. What are you thinking
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: in terms of any potential descents when it comes to
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: the FED and whether or not they could raise questions
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: as far as potentially, what do they see that maybe
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: we aren't seeing right now? Yeah, that's you know, normally,
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: particularly when it's you, it was unanimous that nobody pays
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: much attention, and at times there might be a dissent
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: or two and it doesn't tend to capture headlines. But clearly,
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: in this environment, if it's say more than one off descent,
• 39:34
  Speaker 1: I think that will garner attention. I would be surprised
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: if if Powell gets asked about that, but to see
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: that wouldn't surprise me. There's got to be uncertainty that
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: leads to voting members having different perspectives on things. In fact,
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: I'd be a bit more surprised if there was unanimity. Liz,
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: how do you think Chairman Powell should respond to questions
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: about banking turmoil out there, whether it's how it impacted
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: the defense decision over the past couple of days, or
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: how well or not well the bank did in terms
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: of dealing with some of these banks are preventing some
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: of these issues. How do you think he should respond? Well,
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: I think he should stick with the facts and the
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: data and not speculate too much. If it's on the
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: basis of just his perspective on what happens. So I
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: think he should talk about the take up at the
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: discount window and maybe a sense of what that's going
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: to look like when it's released on Thursday this week.
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: I think that's become sort of the hot piece of
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: news now that comes out. We were all obsessed with
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: inflation data points. Now I think it's that weekly Thursday
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: release of of how much borrowing is happening at the
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: discount window. So I I you know, I'm sure he's
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: going to try to offer suthing words that has the
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: tools and the resources, but I would assume he's not
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: going to provide over its speculation without a backed up
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: by the data we all are in possession of and
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: maybe a bit more from what the FED as all Right,
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: So putting all this together, you know the FED, what
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: we're dealing with in the banking system, where we are
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: with economic growth. What is your call to Schwab investors
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: these days about how they should be investing. Well, one
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: of my lines that I've always used in Tupper times,
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: a panic is not an investment strategy, and I think
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: great times that that applies. I think we're actually seeing
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: some perhaps rational action in the market. You know, there's
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: been a lot of concern why haven't the equity market
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: reflected this with more downside? But when you look at
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: where leadership shifts have occurred, kind of up the cap spectrum,
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: out the quality spectrum, the equity market may be sending
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: a message that all right, the FED may stop tightening,
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: but now banks are going to probably tighten. So small
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: and regional bank take off take up where the Fed
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: left off, and that has different implications depending on whether
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: you have higher interest costs, do you have the cash flow?
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: So I think that there's a sort of a factor
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: story that we're trying to emphasize. What types of characteristics
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: do you want to look for in companies within the
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: equity market for this very unique period of time, as
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: opposed to making a you know, all in, all out
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: broad equities call. I think this is where you have
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: to add a lot of specificity in terms of what
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: you're screening for. For lack of a better term, All right, Lizianne,
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us. I know this
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: is a busy, busy day for you, like it is
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: for many folks in the marketplace. Lizian Saunders, she's a
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab. Just I think one
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: of the very highly respected voices in the marketplace, and
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: certainly Schwab has, you know, so many accounts out there,
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: so many clients out there, that she has a big
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: impact on a big part of the market. So we
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: appreciate getting some of Lizze's time there. You're listening to
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: the tape cans are live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, tuning app, Bloomberg dot Com,
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Let's bring on our
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: next guests we're talking about we get some great guests hour.
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: How about this this guy, Cam Harvey, professor of finance
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: at the Duke University Fuqual School of Business. Disclosure, he
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: was my professor. I took a couple of his classes,
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: and there's lots of math in his classes, and I
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: think that you got his khd from Chicago that might
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: have something to do with it. But I'm just not
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: that matthy of a guy. So there was a challenge
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: for me, but I did make it through cam. There's
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: a million things we could talk about here, the FED,
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: the yield curve, but I want to start off with
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: Silicon Valley Bank and some of these other banks on
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: the West Coast. It's not every day we get bank runs.
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: What do you make of it? So I make of it.
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of blame to go around here. And
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: Number one, this is a gross failure of regulatory supervision.
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: So this is obviously a regulated bank, the state chartered bank,
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: but regulated by the FED. But it's less than two
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty billion dollars, so they're not held to
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: the same regulatory standard, for example, the stress test. But
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: even if they had to do the stress test, they
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: would have passed. So what's going on. It turns out
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: that the regulator put together the stress test not realizing
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: what is going to happen to the FED funds rate.
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: So the extreme scenario that the FED gives the bank
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: to stress test is not extreme enough. And it's it's
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: the regulator, the FED, that actually creates this scenario outside
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: of their own extreme scenario. So that is a failure.
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: Now it's not just a regulatory failure. This is a
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: regional bank, and it's also a bank that caters to
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: a particular industry, and that means that your loan book
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: is not and your clients are not diversified, both geographically
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: and across industry. So that means that you need to
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: be held to a higher risk standard. And the other
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: thing is that it's kind of remarkable, and we can
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: talk about this more that these banks, and Silicon Valley
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: Bank in particular, doesn't seem to understand one of the
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: most basic risk concepts. And Paul, I think this was
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: Lecture three of Finance one oh one, and that's duration risk.
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: So just because you buy a long dated tric rate
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: doesn't mean it doesn't have any risk. It doesn't have
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: a default risk, but it's got interest rate risk. So
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: they didn't do any hedging. So banks can hedge, and
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: it turns out that SVB in the past had hedged,
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: but then they let the hedges expire they're too expensive.
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: How systemic, if at all, do you think this is
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: CAM or do you think this is more specific to
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: SVB or maybe even just a handful of banks that
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: that catered to that customer base. So the last time
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: I was on we talked about the Eel curve, and
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: the Oel curve is relevant for this particular situation because
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: you think the usual banking model, you gather deposits and
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: you're paying your depositors a short term interest rate savings rate,
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: and then you lend some money out to companies and
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: things like that, or you buy long dated treasuries. So
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: what you're getting is, in terms of revenue, is a
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: longer term rate and what you're paying is a shorter
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: term rate. And that works great if the yield curve
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: has got a positive slope, which meaning the long term
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: rates are higher than short term rates. But when the
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: yield curve inverts, that puts stress on the banking system
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: because all of a sudden, what they have to pay
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: out in savings deposits is high, and it could also
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: be the case that the value of the liabilities changes.
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: So this is the reason to actually do some hedging,
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: but not all banks do the hedging. And because the
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: Yeld curve inverse stresses the banks, it kind of makes
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: sense that the FED should take that into account. So
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: I'm very interested in reading the minutes of the FOM
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: at C five years from now when they actually come
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: out to see if they actually did their homework and say, oh, well,
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: we're thinking of inverting theeal curve even more. How many
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: banks does that put at risk? Okay, so I was
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: going to ask you, because you're specifically bringing up the
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: yield curve when you're looking at that, is it telling
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: us or we headed into a big event? Or did
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: the big event already happen? So, so think of it
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: this way. The yeld curve's got information has been very
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: accurate in terms of forecasting processions. It is something that
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: precedes economic bad times. And you can the yeal curve
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: has been inverted for quite a while now, and you
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: can see some of the damage that is doing. So
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: we went in like a year ago, our financial system
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: was very robust, in very good shape, leverage less than
• 49:14
  Speaker 1: it was, for example, before the global financial crisis. But
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: once you start to engineer a yield curve inversion, it
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: puts at risk the basic banking model and for those
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: banks that are not sufficiently hedged, that puts them at risk. So,
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: and this is exactly what's happened. So the FED, in
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: taking these actions, has weakened the banking system. And again
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: this is not just a regulatory problem. It's also a
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: problem of moral hazard because these banks, well, why should
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: we hedge. The Fed's going to bail us out. Yeah,
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: that's kind of what it seems like at this point.
• 50:03
  Speaker 1: But so now now you're the Federal Reserve, your j
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: pal today at two o'clock, Cam, what do you do here? Okay,
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: So the last time I was on your show was
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: just before the previous announcement, where I said that they
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: should stand down and pause and collect more data, and
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: they did not do that. I considered that a mistake,
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: and indeed that could have been the tipping point that
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: hike to invert the OL curve just a little bit more,
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: that that could have been the pivot point to push
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: us into a potential serious banking crisis. So what I
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: would like to do today if I was at the
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: FED would be the cut twenty five base of points.
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: I know that's not going to happen because it would
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: be a sign of a panic of desperate measures. But
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: the right thing to do, and I agree with Lisian
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: who's on previously, is to stand down, to pause and
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: say we need to collect more data. And really what
• 51:13
  Speaker 1: this means is we need to collect the data that
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: we should have collected last time and the time before
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: to do the analysis of the banks to figure out
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: what their risk actually is and how it was induced
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: with the yeal curve inversion, and and is it the
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: case that the equity in these banks, if we look
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: at their assets and mark them to market, has taken
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: a hit, potentially a two trillion dollars hit. There's an
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: academic paper that suggests that there's hundreds of banks that
• 51:53
  Speaker 1: could be underwater right now, and the FED needs to
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: do that work. And that work includes not just looking
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: at the balance sheet, but also looking at off balance sheet.
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: So we need to know if for these companies are
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: hedging and how they're hedging, so they should be hedging
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: their interest rate risk, but we don't know. That's very
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: opaque right now. The Fed, it's got four hundred PhD economists.
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: They should give this high priority. All right, KEM, thank
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: you so much. We appreciate it. Clear and concise as always,
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: Cam Harvey. He's a professor of finance at the Duke
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: University's Fuqua School of Business. I survived his classes. No
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: walk in the park. You had to bring your a game,
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: but the better for it, I think. Thanks for listening.
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: To the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: seventy three and on ball Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: worldwide at Bloomberg Radio