Latest / Unshaken & Unafraid with Joe Pags / Brandon Gill Exposes the Soros DA Who Protected a Rapist

Transcript

Brandon Gill Exposes the Soros DA Who Protected a Rapist · Unshaken & Unafraid with Joe Pags

0:00
Speaker 1: Have you seen this illegal alien who raped an underage American?
0:04
Speaker 1: Your office reduced those charges to a misdemeanor charge of
0:08
Speaker 1: consensual sex with a child fifteen years and older. You
0:12
Speaker 1: offered him a ninety day suspended jail sentence. Is that correct?
0:17
Speaker 1: So based on the evidence that we had in the case,
0:19
Speaker 1: so it is correct.
0:20
Speaker 2: How about this.
0:21
Speaker 1: You're an advocate for abortion for abortion policy. What's your
0:25
Speaker 1: favorite type of abortion?
0:28
Speaker 3: I am an advocate for patients having access to the
0:31
Speaker 3: full realm of reproductive healthcare.
0:33
Speaker 2: Would you have a preferred method of abortion that you like?
0:37
Speaker 4: I do not.
0:39
Speaker 1: I mean read through a couple of different methods and
0:41
Speaker 1: I want to get your take on how much you
0:43
Speaker 1: like these. The first type is called a suction abortion.
0:48
Speaker 1: This is when the cervix is dilated and a strong
0:52
Speaker 1: suction twenty nine times the power of a household vacuum
0:55
Speaker 1: cleaner tears the baby's body apart and sucks.
0:58
Speaker 2: It through the hose into it container. Do you prefer
1:01
Speaker 2: that method?
1:03
Speaker 3: I stand by my former testimony.
1:05
Speaker 2: That sounds kind of gross, doesn't it? Or this?
1:08
Speaker 1: Do you think the white people should pay reparations? I
1:11
Speaker 1: have never said that, sir, Yes you did.
1:13
Speaker 2: You said it.
1:14
Speaker 1: In January of twenty twenty, you tweeted, yes, the North, yes,
1:17
Speaker 1: all of us, Yes, America, Yes, our original collective stin
1:21
Speaker 1: and unpaid debt. Yes, reparations, yes on this day.
1:24
Speaker 3: I don't believe that was a reference to fiscal reparations, sir.
1:27
Speaker 2: What kind of reparations was it a reference to?
1:30
Speaker 1: I think it was just a reference to the idea
1:31
Speaker 1: that we all owe much to the people who came
1:34
Speaker 1: before us.
1:35
Speaker 2: That's a bizarre way to frame what you tweeted.
1:38
Speaker 5: Then you already know Representative Brandon gil has zero patients
1:42
Speaker 5: for the radical left, and I sat down with him.
1:44
Speaker 5: I'm watching the other day and there's some loon who
1:46
Speaker 5: thinks that abortion is reproductive healthcare, and you decided to
1:50
Speaker 5: ask her what her favorite form of abortion was. And
1:53
Speaker 5: what I loved even more is it wasn't a gotcha question.
1:56
Speaker 5: You literally started talking about what's some different forms of
1:59
Speaker 5: a are and every single form that you brought up
2:03
Speaker 5: kills the baby. Did you think that she was gonna
2:05
Speaker 5: that she was gonna answer it all? I mean, I
2:07
Speaker 5: thought your question was very well thought out.
2:09
Speaker 1: Well, you know, before that, I had asked her, essentially,
2:12
Speaker 1: is there any form of abortion that you disagree with.
2:15
Speaker 1: Do you believe in any restrictions whatsoever on abortion? And
2:19
Speaker 1: her answer was essentially no. So I thought, if you
2:22
Speaker 1: truly don't, then why don't I describe to you some
2:25
Speaker 1: of the common methods of abortion and see which one
2:28
Speaker 1: you prefer. I mean, this is somebody, by the way,
2:30
Speaker 1: who is she calls herself a reproductive rights advocate. I
2:33
Speaker 1: mean she says it very condescendingly, very ugly, she's an
2:37
Speaker 1: abortion advocate. And if you're going to advocate for abortion,
2:39
Speaker 1: why don't you explain which form you prefer? So I
2:43
Speaker 1: asked her that, and she didn't have a preference, she said,
2:46
Speaker 1: so I just described to her a few different methods
2:49
Speaker 1: and asked her which one she likes the best. The
2:52
Speaker 1: reality is, whenever you describe those methods, you realize how
2:56
Speaker 1: incredibly horrific they are. I mean, these are really brutal,
3:00
Speaker 1: gruesome procedures, I mean, very barbaric, incredibly painful for the baby.
3:05
Speaker 1: And she didn't want to talk about it.
3:08
Speaker 5: Well, what's interesting is she then tried to as you said,
3:11
Speaker 5: she was being condescending anyway, She tried to tell you
3:14
Speaker 5: the purpose for the hearing. She tried to say, that's
3:16
Speaker 5: not why we're here. And that's happened quite a few
3:18
Speaker 5: times with you when you question somebody on what does
3:21
Speaker 5: this pronoun mean? Can you describe it? Or when you
3:24
Speaker 5: ask somebody are you hiring only one race of people?
3:27
Speaker 5: And then and then you shut up and wait for
3:29
Speaker 5: them to answer, and their answer, almost exclusively is that's
3:33
Speaker 5: not why I'm here. Right, But you're a human being,
3:35
Speaker 5: and you're somebody who actually advocates for this stuff, or
3:37
Speaker 5: this is in your bylaws and whatever organization you're with,
3:40
Speaker 5: or you love every form of abortion, why can't we
3:43
Speaker 5: talk about it? Brandon? When you're asking questions like that,
3:45
Speaker 5: when you're confronting these people who are obviously lunatics, do
3:49
Speaker 5: you think to yourself, I'm going to ask the question
3:51
Speaker 5: because I might actually get them to think about what
3:54
Speaker 5: it is that they're doing. Or are you doing it
3:57
Speaker 5: for us because it does benefit us? I think there
3:59
Speaker 5: are a lot of people that didn't realize abortion can
4:01
Speaker 5: be that brutal. I think there are a lot of
4:03
Speaker 5: people who didn't realize that. Even those who are pushing
4:05
Speaker 5: pronouns like this don't know what they mean. Are you
4:07
Speaker 5: doing it for us? Or are you hoping that they'll
4:09
Speaker 5: have a come to Jesus.
4:11
Speaker 2: Well, it's always a little bit of both. You know.
4:14
Speaker 1: One of my favorite things is whenever they tell me
4:16
Speaker 1: that they didn't come here to talk about whatever question
4:19
Speaker 1: I'm asking them. But my questions are always pertinent to
4:22
Speaker 1: the conversation. I mean that abortion hearing was a hearing
4:24
Speaker 1: about the Face Act, which is about a bill that
4:29
Speaker 1: the Left is weaponized to stop Christians from praying outside
4:32
Speaker 1: of abortion clinics, and to hearing about abortion clinics. I
4:36
Speaker 1: think it's totally fair to ask you about abortion if
4:38
Speaker 1: you're an abortion advocate, which, by the way, if you're
4:41
Speaker 1: an abortion advocate, if that's somebody that something you've spent
4:44
Speaker 1: decades of your life talking about, I would think you
4:46
Speaker 1: would want to have the platform of a congressional hearing
4:49
Speaker 1: to elucidate your views for everybody to hear.
4:52
Speaker 2: So that was entirely pertinent. But you know, the.
4:55
Speaker 1: Purpose of these is to clarify what the witness believes. Yeah,
5:00
Speaker 1: you know, whether it's about pronouns or about abortion or
5:03
Speaker 1: any other topic. And I think that that's something that's helpful,
5:06
Speaker 1: should be helpful for them, but it's helpful for the
5:09
Speaker 1: American people to see, and it's helpful for us as
5:11
Speaker 1: members of Congress to better understand what the other side believes.
5:14
Speaker 1: And I think that the left owes that to the
5:17
Speaker 1: American people. If they're going to push pronouns on us,
5:21
Speaker 1: actually define them for us. If you're going to tell me,
5:24
Speaker 1: for instance, or try to say that not using somebody's
5:28
Speaker 1: preferred pronoun is sort of tantamount to putting them in
5:33
Speaker 1: a deathly position, or you're increasing the rate of trans suicide,
5:37
Speaker 1: which is the kind of stuff they say, Why don't
5:39
Speaker 1: you define what those pronouns mean?
5:41
Speaker 2: I think that's a fair question.
5:42
Speaker 5: I think, well, well, without doubt it is, and she
5:44
Speaker 5: couldn't answer. And then I really love the wry smile,
5:47
Speaker 5: and I know that it's genuine that you put on
5:49
Speaker 5: and your like sounds kind of dumb when I say it, right,
5:52
Speaker 5: I mean, you know it, and when they always genuflex two,
5:56
Speaker 5: let's get back to the topic at hand. I love
5:58
Speaker 5: that you hold their feet to the fire. It's Brandon
6:00
Speaker 5: gill Us Representative District twenty six, Gildotthouse dot gov. There
6:04
Speaker 5: was one yesterday, and I apologize. I don't have all
6:06
Speaker 5: the information in front of me. But it appeared to
6:08
Speaker 5: be a prosecutor, and your line of questioning was, did
6:11
Speaker 5: you give this person, this bad guy, this guy who
6:16
Speaker 5: committed a crime, did you give him a lighter sentence
6:18
Speaker 5: because he's here illegally or because of his immigration status?
6:21
Speaker 5: What was that all about? Were they Are they giving
6:23
Speaker 5: special preference to people who broke the law to get here?
6:26
Speaker 5: Are they getting off easier on crimes?
6:29
Speaker 1: The short answer is yes. And this is one of
6:31
Speaker 1: the more the darker hearings that we've done. This was
6:36
Speaker 1: a Fairfax County essentially a Fairfax County district attorney who
6:40
Speaker 1: is a Soros backed, Soros backed attorney right, and he has,
6:45
Speaker 1: as a matter of policy, tells his prosecutors to change
6:49
Speaker 1: their charges that they bring against illegal aliens so that
6:52
Speaker 1: they don't have adverse immigration consequences. And that's part of
6:56
Speaker 1: a policy memorandum that he put out to his attorneys.
6:59
Speaker 1: I had it with me in the hearing. So what
7:01
Speaker 1: that means is that if an illegal alien has caught,
7:05
Speaker 1: you know, murdering somebody, raping somebody, stealing from somebody, whatever,
7:08
Speaker 1: they will take into account the risk that the charges
7:12
Speaker 1: that they bring against that illegal alien might increase the
7:14
Speaker 1: probability the illegal gets deported, so oftentimes they'll downgrade the charges.
7:19
Speaker 2: Wow, well they've done this often and it.
7:22
Speaker 1: Is infuriating, and I think it's one of those things
7:25
Speaker 1: that whenever the American people see this, they're just beside
7:28
Speaker 1: themselves with outrage, and they should be. And I highlighted
7:33
Speaker 1: one particular case where you had a Guatemalan illegal alien
7:37
Speaker 1: who came into who was arrested in March of twenty
7:40
Speaker 1: twenty four, who was initially charged with raping an underaged American,
7:46
Speaker 1: and what his office, the prosecutor's office, did was downgrade
7:51
Speaker 1: that illegal aliens charge to a misdemeanor charge with a
7:55
Speaker 1: ninety day and he ended up getting a ninety day
7:58
Speaker 1: suspended jail sentence, which means that he didn't serve that
8:01
Speaker 1: full ninety days. And what I wanted to know was
8:04
Speaker 1: did you downgrade those charges because this was an illegal
8:07
Speaker 1: alien in question, and he certainly didn't want to answer
8:11
Speaker 1: answer my question. We spent four minutes going back and
8:13
Speaker 1: forth and he could never provide a clear answer, and
8:16
Speaker 1: I think it's I think whenever you see that, it's
8:19
Speaker 1: very very clear to the American people what's going on.
8:21
Speaker 5: Well, Brandon, he tried to say no, and then you
8:23
Speaker 5: read the actual part of that statute or whatever the
8:27
Speaker 5: hell it is that said that you will take into
8:30
Speaker 5: consideration the possibility of adverse immigration consequences. Now, maybe I'm
8:34
Speaker 5: an idiot and there's a good chance, but adverse immigration
8:37
Speaker 5: consequences for whom, not for the people of Fairfax County.
8:40
Speaker 5: They'd be happy to get rid of a rapist who
8:41
Speaker 5: came here illegally, Not for me, who of the father
8:44
Speaker 5: of five and the grandfather of three, Not for you,
8:46
Speaker 5: the dad of two. We would like to see. That
8:48
Speaker 5: would be a good consequence, in my opinion. So he
8:51
Speaker 5: weaseled his way out of it. But let me ask you,
8:53
Speaker 5: maybe a broader question. Why is Fairfax County the petri Dish?
8:57
Speaker 5: Are they just are ac Blue and Soros and all
8:59
Speaker 5: these left nutjobs. Are they just injecting as much money
9:02
Speaker 5: as they can to see if if we can make
9:04
Speaker 5: this the Marxist, progressive, leftist capital of the United States,
9:09
Speaker 5: maybe we can do it elsewhere. Why is it always
9:10
Speaker 5: Fairfax County?
9:12
Speaker 1: Well, in this particular case, this was a Soros back
9:15
Speaker 1: da somebody that George Soros has spent hundreds of thousands
9:19
Speaker 1: of dollars helping get into office. And you know, I
9:23
Speaker 1: think what George Soros basically found is that he's a
9:26
Speaker 1: multi billionaire, one of the wealthiest people in the world,
9:30
Speaker 1: is that it's almost like a political arbitrage where he
9:33
Speaker 1: can spend relatively small amounts of money compared to his
9:37
Speaker 1: net worth and da races like this that can have
9:41
Speaker 1: a profound impact on American society. You fundamentally change the
9:46
Speaker 1: United States whenever you can undermine law and order to
9:49
Speaker 1: the degree that he has by putting these lawless das
9:52
Speaker 1: in office. And that's exactly what we saw here. Fairfax
9:56
Speaker 1: County seems to be the epicenter of so many things,
9:59
Speaker 1: whether it's or whether it's parental rights right, but that
10:02
Speaker 1: is clearly an area that the left is targeted.
10:06
Speaker 5: It is Brandon gil District twenty six, Republican, Great State
10:08
Speaker 5: of Texas. He's a great follow on social media. Go
10:10
Speaker 5: do that right now, and also check him out at
10:13
Speaker 5: Guild dot house, dot Govett. Again, if you see his
10:15
Speaker 5: face pop up on your feed, stop and pay attention.
10:18
Speaker 5: He's done his homework. It's going to be good. Let
10:20
Speaker 5: me ask you about illegal immigration. And now that we're
10:22
Speaker 5: talking about the Fairfax County thing. Let me broaden that
10:25
Speaker 5: out a little bit. During the four years of Biden.
10:27
Speaker 5: We don't know if it's eight million. We don't know
10:28
Speaker 5: if it's twenty million. But I had Lily Tang Williams
10:30
Speaker 5: on yesterday. She's running. She's a Republican running for the
10:33
Speaker 5: House of Representatives out of New Hampshire. She is somebody
10:35
Speaker 5: who escaped the CCP, She got away from communists China,
10:38
Speaker 5: and she says there are eighty thousand, that least Chinese
10:42
Speaker 5: Communist nationals in this country. All of them are men,
10:45
Speaker 5: all of the military aged. And these are the ones
10:47
Speaker 5: that are showing up at military installations. Oh, we got
10:49
Speaker 5: lost to googled maps didn't work. But these people are
10:52
Speaker 5: here for a reason. We know that the Chinese Communist
10:55
Speaker 5: Party has been infiltrating our schools, academia. They've been infiltrating Hollywood.
11:00
Speaker 5: What do you make of the president being there now
11:03
Speaker 5: and knowing that we have potentially eighty thousand Chinese spies
11:06
Speaker 5: at least in this country that won't even know where
11:09
Speaker 5: they are.
11:10
Speaker 2: And I think at least is the key.
11:12
Speaker 1: I mean, we really don't know how many Chinese spies
11:15
Speaker 1: are in the United States. I will say one thing
11:18
Speaker 1: that I'm glad is that we've got a president who
11:20
Speaker 1: can put our people first and who recognizes these problems.
11:24
Speaker 1: This is an issue that we're going to be addressing
11:26
Speaker 1: with the task force that was just formed on the
11:29
Speaker 1: House Oversight Committee, which I'm chairing. It's the Task Force
11:32
Speaker 1: on Defending Constitutional Rights in Exposing Institutional Abuses, and we've
11:37
Speaker 1: already launched an investigation into four different birth tourism companies,
11:42
Speaker 1: some of these connected with the CCP, who are facilitating,
11:46
Speaker 1: I think, a process that completely undermines the meaning and
11:49
Speaker 1: the value of American citizenship, where you have businesses who
11:52
Speaker 1: are making money by bringing people into the country for
11:56
Speaker 1: the purpose of giving birth so that their children can
11:59
Speaker 1: be American citizens. And we know there's an enormous number
12:02
Speaker 1: of Chinese nationals who have engaged in this birth tourism practice.
12:06
Speaker 1: That's a huge national security threat to the United States.
12:10
Speaker 1: In the long run, these are people who will be
12:12
Speaker 1: able to come back under current law and vote in
12:14
Speaker 1: American elections, and that's something that future generations are going
12:18
Speaker 1: to have to deal with, and that's something we ought
12:20
Speaker 1: to be very very serious about right now.
12:23
Speaker 5: You know, I went to China to adopt my daughter
12:25
Speaker 5: Jia of fifteen years ago. They got me in there,
12:28
Speaker 5: got me out in fifteen days, got a bunch of
12:30
Speaker 5: brand new cash from me, which is what they wanted.
12:32
Speaker 5: And the one thing I noticed, I couldn't do brand
12:34
Speaker 5: and I couldn't buy any land there. I couldn't buy
12:36
Speaker 5: myself a townhouse in Beijing or sell or Guanzhou. So
12:39
Speaker 5: why is it that we would ever allow foreign nationals
12:42
Speaker 5: to come in secretly or I mean, it's not even
12:44
Speaker 5: being reported in the news, and by thousands of acres
12:48
Speaker 5: of land here spend four times the amount of the
12:51
Speaker 5: purchase price just to make sure that they get the
12:53
Speaker 5: deal done, and some of it's even adjacent with military installations.
12:56
Speaker 5: Have we just been dumb?
12:58
Speaker 4: Mean?
12:58
Speaker 5: Why would we allow that?
13:00
Speaker 1: You know, I don't think it makes any sense at
13:02
Speaker 1: all to allow foreign nationals of the United States is
13:05
Speaker 1: number one geopolitical adversary to be buying land in our country,
13:10
Speaker 1: especially if they will not let our people buy land
13:13
Speaker 1: in their country. I've got a bill called the Land
13:16
Speaker 1: Act which would stop that practice. It simply says that
13:19
Speaker 1: if we can't buy land in your country, your people
13:21
Speaker 1: can't buy land in our country, which I think is
13:24
Speaker 1: very common sense. It's simply a reciprocal agreement. But I
13:28
Speaker 1: think that these are the kinds of things that, you know,
13:31
Speaker 1: maybe there's a short term economic benefit to somebody to
13:35
Speaker 1: be able to sell their land to a Chinese agent,
13:37
Speaker 1: but our children and our grandchildren are going to be
13:40
Speaker 1: dealing with the consequences of having foreign nationals of hostile
13:44
Speaker 1: regimes owning land on our soil, owning our soil quite literally,
13:50
Speaker 1: and that's something, especially whenever it's adjacent to a military base,
13:54
Speaker 1: that comes with all kinds of risks. And these are
13:57
Speaker 1: things we've got to be smart about.
13:59
Speaker 2: The world is changing really quickly.
14:01
Speaker 1: It's very easy to hop on a plane and fly
14:04
Speaker 1: across the globe and have a baby, or now to
14:06
Speaker 1: buy land in other countries, and we ought to recognize
14:09
Speaker 1: that it is in our interests to stop these practices.
14:13
Speaker 2: Now, you know what I.
14:14
Speaker 5: Always envisioned when I hear about stories like this, I
14:17
Speaker 5: envision them going, really, we could just walk in the
14:19
Speaker 5: Boter's open. I envisioned them going, really, we could buy
14:22
Speaker 5: land there. That's crazy. Really, we can infiltrate their academia,
14:25
Speaker 5: and they're taking our money to do Confucius institutes Brandon,
14:29
Speaker 5: It's like, we're the dumb guy. They're like, wow, really,
14:31
Speaker 5: they've got a constitution that we can use against them.
14:34
Speaker 5: So how do you tighten it up while still being
14:36
Speaker 5: constitutionally sound and making sure no civil rights or constitutional
14:39
Speaker 5: rights for Americans or those who are here legally are
14:42
Speaker 5: being suspended. Can you do it? I would? I think
14:45
Speaker 5: you just spelled it out. You're our biggest geopolitical adversary.
14:48
Speaker 5: You can't buy land here. That's kind of simple.
14:51
Speaker 2: That's very simple.
14:52
Speaker 1: And in many cases here we're talking about foreign nationals,
14:55
Speaker 1: not American citizens, which and I think we've got to,
14:58
Speaker 1: you know, putting the birth tourists aspect a side of this.
15:01
Speaker 1: Oftentimes these are people who are not American citizens buying
15:04
Speaker 1: land in our country, and that should be a very
15:06
Speaker 1: straightforward legal.
15:08
Speaker 2: Question for us.
15:09
Speaker 1: But you're exactly right, you framed it correctly, which is,
15:11
Speaker 1: you've got foreigners who are using the left's classical excuse me,
15:16
Speaker 1: using the West's classical liberal values against us, using our
15:20
Speaker 1: own constitutional rights to the detriment of the American people.
15:25
Speaker 2: And that's a problem.
15:26
Speaker 5: Well to the point of let's talk about our state
15:28
Speaker 5: of Texas, you've got people that are actively pushing for
15:31
Speaker 5: enclaves of Sharia law. I'm not being you know, somebody
15:35
Speaker 5: who's who's making something up to be somehow sensational. This
15:40
Speaker 5: is really happening. They want to do Epic City. That's
15:42
Speaker 5: an enclave that would be in the middle of this
15:44
Speaker 5: great state of Texas. Be a bunch of mosques there.
15:46
Speaker 5: You'd have to be Muslim to live there. Sure, real
15:48
Speaker 5: law could be alive and well there, because it's a
15:50
Speaker 5: no go zone for other police. I mean, it's kind
15:53
Speaker 5: of crazy. So, I mean, you've got that going on
15:55
Speaker 5: right now? Can we Because again you're right, we've got
15:59
Speaker 5: these Western yep, you've got free speech and you can
16:02
Speaker 5: freely enjoy your religion, so on and so forth. What
16:05
Speaker 5: can we do to say, Hey, this ain't gonna work.
16:08
Speaker 5: You can't be pushing an ideology that is not only
16:12
Speaker 5: a religion, it's also a government way of life. Can
16:15
Speaker 5: we stop that?
16:16
Speaker 2: We can?
16:17
Speaker 1: And I think there are two ways to do it.
16:19
Speaker 1: The first is through immigration policy. So many of these
16:23
Speaker 1: issues can be alleviated by tightening up who can actually
16:26
Speaker 1: come into the country. Of course, we all agree that
16:29
Speaker 1: the border should be secure and illegal immigration should stop.
16:33
Speaker 1: But I think we ought to look at legal immigration
16:35
Speaker 1: as well. You know, I don't believe that it's in
16:38
Speaker 1: America's national interest to allow, for instance, mass migration from
16:43
Speaker 1: the Islamic world into American communities that does fundamentally transform
16:48
Speaker 1: our home land with a culture that is incompatible with
16:52
Speaker 1: our own, and we ought to be straightforward about that.
16:54
Speaker 1: So I think that's the first area that we need
16:56
Speaker 1: to be taking the hardest look at is tightening up
17:00
Speaker 1: our immigration laws. But secondly, oftentimes, whenever you have these
17:05
Speaker 1: sharia areas, these are essentially parallel legal institutions operating within
17:11
Speaker 1: our own borders, and that should be entirely banned. We
17:15
Speaker 1: should not tolerate a legal institution within our borders that
17:19
Speaker 1: they believe supersedes that the laws and the constitution of
17:22
Speaker 1: the United States.
17:23
Speaker 2: Right.
17:23
Speaker 5: Well, what's interesting is I think it goes back to
17:25
Speaker 5: the point that you made a little while ago. Could
17:28
Speaker 5: we have mass migration from the United States of America
17:32
Speaker 5: into all of Northern Africa? Could we have mass migration
17:35
Speaker 5: millions of Americans just infiltrating every country in the Middle East,
17:39
Speaker 5: all those twenty two Islamic countries. The answer is simple,
17:42
Speaker 5: A's no, of course not. So why are we so
17:45
Speaker 5: dumb that we think that we, by some dictative God,
17:48
Speaker 5: have to allow everybody in while the rest of the
17:50
Speaker 5: world says we're not letting anybody in.
17:53
Speaker 2: Right, it's idiotic.
17:55
Speaker 1: And not only can we not do that, but most
17:58
Speaker 1: I think a lot of Americans would say there would
17:59
Speaker 1: be something wrong if we went into other countries that
18:02
Speaker 1: have different cultures and said we're going to fundamentally transform
18:05
Speaker 1: it by mass migrating, and.
18:07
Speaker 5: We call racist in islamaphobic and everything else. How dare
18:10
Speaker 5: you do that? But if we raise anything here, we're
18:13
Speaker 5: the idiots. So how do we how do we get
18:15
Speaker 5: people to the point to where they stop with this
18:18
Speaker 5: suicidal empathy? To steal a title of Gadsod's book, How
18:22
Speaker 5: do because you see what's going on in England, right,
18:24
Speaker 5: that's going to be coming here. I mean there's a
18:26
Speaker 5: guy who's dead, was was stabbed to death in England
18:29
Speaker 5: and when the police arrived they put him in hindcuffs
18:31
Speaker 5: because he might have said something racist. I'm not kidding,
18:34
Speaker 5: and he died in hindcuffs in custody. Are we on
18:37
Speaker 5: the precipice of possibly having that happen?
18:39
Speaker 2: Here.
18:40
Speaker 1: I think that we're getting there. We're not as far
18:43
Speaker 1: along as Western Europe, but we're heading in the same
18:45
Speaker 1: direction that they've gone. And you've got areas of Western
18:48
Speaker 1: Europe and London or Parish that Paris that are essentially
18:51
Speaker 1: no go zones for Londoners and Parisianers, and that that
18:56
Speaker 1: is something that ought to offend Europeans as much as
19:00
Speaker 1: scares Americans. And we had to recognize we don't want
19:03
Speaker 1: that here. And I think this is kind of a
19:05
Speaker 1: black and white issue. Do you want your community to
19:08
Speaker 1: be community, your hometown to be fundamentally transformed with alien cultures?
19:13
Speaker 2: And most people say.
19:15
Speaker 1: No, right and again, this is an immigration issue, which
19:18
Speaker 1: is something that we can stop right now.
19:20
Speaker 2: Mass migration is.
19:22
Speaker 1: A policy choice, and I'm so glad that we've got
19:25
Speaker 1: a White House now who recognizes that we don't have
19:28
Speaker 1: to make that policy choice. In fact, the Trump administration
19:31
Speaker 1: has been incredibly strong on this issue, saying that we
19:34
Speaker 1: are not going to throw away our heritage and our
19:37
Speaker 1: culture by allowing infinity people into our communities that change
19:41
Speaker 1: it for the worse.
19:42
Speaker 5: He's on the Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform and Budget committees.
19:45
Speaker 5: It's Brandon Gill District twenty six, Republican race, State of Texas.
19:49
Speaker 5: Let's finish you with this in It might take a
19:51
Speaker 5: second because there's massive fraud. There's massive fraud going on, Brandon,
19:54
Speaker 5: and there are still people on the left that want
19:56
Speaker 5: me to believe that nobody who's here illegally is getting medicaid.
19:59
Speaker 5: You and I have both that's not true. In fact,
20:02
Speaker 5: if you want to spell it out, and I think
20:03
Speaker 5: you and I have talked about this before, and correct
20:04
Speaker 5: me if I get anything wrong. What they're doing in
20:06
Speaker 5: California is they're getting the medicaid money from the federal
20:09
Speaker 5: government from the taxpayers around the country. They're not giving
20:13
Speaker 5: it directly to illegal aliens. They're giving it to healthcare
20:16
Speaker 5: providers that are getting that as a tax rebate or
20:20
Speaker 5: tax tax refund, so in other words, they pay a fee,
20:23
Speaker 5: they pay their tax. The government gets money in California
20:26
Speaker 5: from the rest of US, then gives it to the
20:28
Speaker 5: healthcare providers. The healthcare providers then offer healthcare to illegal aliens,
20:32
Speaker 5: but it's not called medicaid. You see the debate and switch.
20:35
Speaker 5: That's what they're doing, and there are millions of people
20:37
Speaker 5: getting it. So how deep is the fraud. I know
20:40
Speaker 5: that you're in charge of looking at the new task
20:42
Speaker 5: force or you're on this new task force about Ohio specifically.
20:46
Speaker 5: But we see what's happening in Minnesota nine billion, if
20:49
Speaker 5: not eighteen billion. We see what's happening in Maine. It's
20:52
Speaker 5: in the millions and millions of dollars. In California it
20:54
Speaker 5: might be two hundred billion dollars. Can we stop this?
20:57
Speaker 5: Can we identify all of it? Are you feeling good
21:00
Speaker 5: that we can.
21:01
Speaker 1: I'm feeling good. It's going to take some time because
21:04
Speaker 1: the rot is quite deep. And this task force that
21:07
Speaker 1: I'm cheering, we launched this task force with an investigation
21:11
Speaker 1: into medicaid fraud in Ohio, which is our next that
21:14
Speaker 1: is our current target. You know, we went after Minnesota,
21:17
Speaker 1: We're going after Ohio now and I think there will
21:18
Speaker 1: be more states to come. And what you see in
21:21
Speaker 1: Ohio specifically is a variety of shell LLCs that are
21:25
Speaker 1: oftentimes run by foreigners who are facilitating Medicaid payments for
21:30
Speaker 1: home health services, which by the way, includes companionship and conversation.
21:36
Speaker 1: And within these programs it's insane. I mean, it really
21:40
Speaker 1: is insane. And within these programs. There's no verification that
21:44
Speaker 1: the person and you're actually not required to be any
21:47
Speaker 1: kind of medical professional to engage in these services. There's
21:51
Speaker 1: no cap on the spending limit, so and there's no
21:54
Speaker 1: way to prove that these services are actually being provided.
21:57
Speaker 1: So you've got a massive amount of money that's been
22:00
Speaker 1: defrauded from American taxpayers. So these are incredibly shady LLCs
22:04
Speaker 1: to begin with. And this is the kind of stuff
22:07
Speaker 1: that I think the American people are sick of. And
22:08
Speaker 1: it's not just Ohio, to your point, It's in Maine,
22:11
Speaker 1: it's in California, it's in many other states. But we've
22:14
Speaker 1: got quite a few structural problems that we need to
22:19
Speaker 1: we need to resolve, and I think we're going to
22:21
Speaker 1: get to solutions as we go state by state, and understand,
22:24
Speaker 1: you see similar patterns, but different dynamics in each state,
22:28
Speaker 1: and we're going to go after them one by one.
22:30
Speaker 5: Vice President jd Vance alluded to this the other day.
22:32
Speaker 5: Over a billion dollars is being withheld from California. Can't you,
22:36
Speaker 5: as the purse dring holders got Brandon, I'm sick and
22:38
Speaker 5: tired of my entire life. I've heard that you guys
22:40
Speaker 5: in the House fund everything. You guys in the House
22:42
Speaker 5: have the purse strings, and yet not you, but the
22:45
Speaker 5: body itself is not want to ever utilize that. Can
22:49
Speaker 5: you just put your feet down as a collective Republican
22:52
Speaker 5: conservative House of Representatives and say, you're not getting a
22:55
Speaker 5: dime until you show me that why you have a
22:58
Speaker 5: five thousand storefronts that don't exist in this state or
23:01
Speaker 5: in that state. You're not getting a dime until you
23:02
Speaker 5: show me that you're not paying off doctors and healthcare
23:05
Speaker 5: providers to give medicaid illegally to illegal aliens.
23:08
Speaker 2: Can't you guys just do that?
23:10
Speaker 1: We can And a lot of these programs or programs
23:13
Speaker 1: that are part of mandatory spending, which is spending that
23:15
Speaker 1: you can think of it as almost spending that goes
23:17
Speaker 1: out automatically, and there are certain programs that fall within
23:20
Speaker 1: that bucket. But we certainly have the ability to reform
23:23
Speaker 1: these programs. And by the way, the purpose of reforming
23:27
Speaker 1: something like medicaid is to ensure that it actually operates
23:31
Speaker 1: and is financially viable for the people it was designed
23:34
Speaker 1: to serve, which does not include fraudsters or illegal aliens.
23:39
Speaker 1: And there are illegal aliens getting medicaid that in the
23:42
Speaker 1: method you just described. I mean, if any ill legal
23:44
Speaker 1: alien goes to a hospital, they're going to get medical care.
23:47
Speaker 2: We're paying for it.
23:48
Speaker 1: That's part of the reason your lines are so long
23:50
Speaker 1: and your medical bills are so high. And by the way,
23:53
Speaker 1: their children are getting it as well. The Foundation for
23:56
Speaker 1: American Immigration Reform estimates that the United States, this is
24:00
Speaker 1: an old statistic from twenty twenty three, spends about one
24:04
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty billion dollars. We lose about one hundred
24:06
Speaker 1: and fifty billion dollars every single year to welfare to
24:10
Speaker 1: illegal aliens. And that is net of tax receipts. That's
24:14
Speaker 1: just what we're losing. I mean, these numbers are enormous,
24:18
Speaker 1: and again that's what people are sick of, and that's
24:20
Speaker 1: what this task force is going to be going after.
24:22
Speaker 2: I know you're busy.
24:23
Speaker 5: I appreciate you giving us some time today, just very quickly.
24:25
Speaker 5: How do you feel about the midterms? I think with
24:26
Speaker 5: the redistricting being legalized now and the Supreme Court saying,
24:30
Speaker 5: of course you can't use race as your guide to
24:33
Speaker 5: draw a map and make an Anaconda district, do you
24:35
Speaker 5: feel good about Republicans possibly holding onto the House this.
24:38
Speaker 1: November, we're certainly feeling a whole lot better, and our
24:41
Speaker 1: goal in Congress should be to put the pedal to
24:43
Speaker 1: the floor, to execute on our agenda and to get
24:46
Speaker 1: people out to vote. It is so important that we
24:50
Speaker 1: hold control of the House because if we don't, it's
24:53
Speaker 1: not just the fact that Hakeem Jefferies is going to
24:55
Speaker 1: be Speaker and Democrats are going to be using all
24:58
Speaker 1: of their floor time to investigate and ultimately impeach the
25:01
Speaker 1: President and probably every member of his cabinet, whether they
25:04
Speaker 1: have information or.
25:05
Speaker 2: Not, or justification or not. Of course they don't.
25:09
Speaker 1: But it also means that all of these investigations are
25:12
Speaker 1: going to go away. Democrats are not going to continue
25:14
Speaker 1: any kind of real investigation into fraud or do anything
25:18
Speaker 1: about it. That's the risk that we have. So we've
25:21
Speaker 1: got to get our side, Republicans to get to the
25:24
Speaker 1: polls in November to make sure that we can keep
25:27
Speaker 1: control of the House, that we can continue this work.
25:30
Speaker 5: My man, great stuff. Every time you pop up in
25:32
Speaker 5: my feet, I share it, I watch it. I make
25:34
Speaker 5: sure everybody else watches it. Keep up the great work.
25:36
Speaker 5: District twenty six, Republican Great State of Texas, my great
25:39
Speaker 5: friend Brandon gill. Brandon, thanks thanks for having me you bet.
25:43
Speaker 5: I hope you enjoyed this episode, and don't forget click
25:46
Speaker 5: that subscribe button. It doesn't cost you anything and it
25:48
Speaker 5: helps me out. It helps the algorithm. It gets more
25:50
Speaker 5: of these out to more people. Hopefully you'll do that
25:53
Speaker 5: for me. Now, before I let you go, I'm going
25:55
Speaker 5: to give you some more long form of Brandon Gill
25:57
Speaker 5: Us Representative District twenty six Fitt of Texas going at
26:01
Speaker 5: some lefty loon who's sitting there as a witness in
26:03
Speaker 5: front of some hearing in the House of Representatives. If
26:06
Speaker 5: every one of the five hundred and thirty five in
26:08
Speaker 5: the House and Senate did what Brandan gild does, I
26:11
Speaker 5: think we'd have a much better country.
26:12
Speaker 2: Enjoy.
26:13
Speaker 1: Here's a tweet that you guys put out in June
26:16
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty one. I just want to ask you
26:20
Speaker 1: what is what does E mean as a pronoun?
26:25
Speaker 2: It's E.
26:27
Speaker 3: To be honest, I'm not sure, Okay, do.
26:29
Speaker 1: You know what what M means as a pronoun?
26:32
Speaker 3: I'm also not sure?
26:33
Speaker 1: Okay. Don't you think it's important to know what these mean?
26:38
Speaker 1: You guys are In this post, you wrote, or somebody
26:42
Speaker 1: on your comms team wrote that using the correct pronouns
26:45
Speaker 1: impacts trans people's health can reduce the risk of depression
26:49
Speaker 1: in suicide. That's a pretty serious claim. It seems like
26:52
Speaker 1: if you're going to demand people use these pronouns, you
26:54
Speaker 1: would know what they mean, right.
26:57
Speaker 3: I Delegate twenty three? Mind a lot of people, we
27:01
Speaker 3: had six.
27:02
Speaker 2: You're CEO though, right, I was CEO.
27:03
Speaker 3: But it doesn't mean I can oversee every single post.
27:06
Speaker 1: Well, this is a very very politically charged post that
27:10
Speaker 1: you guys put out.
27:10
Speaker 2: I would think that you would have a view on that.
27:14
Speaker 1: Can you tell us what is the difference between Z
27:17
Speaker 1: and Z One of them is ZE and one.
27:19
Speaker 2: Is x E.
27:21
Speaker 3: I'm not up to speed on that, Okay.
27:23
Speaker 1: Does it concern you that not understanding this might increase
27:27
Speaker 1: the risk of depression and suicide amongst trans people.
27:30
Speaker 3: I support my research team that that felt that, you know,
27:34
Speaker 3: it's important for us to be inclusive of everybody.
27:37
Speaker 1: And it was very much quite I agree, But it
27:39
Speaker 1: doesn't seem very inclusive if you don't know what they mean, right.
27:43
Speaker 3: I respect that the social team and the research team
27:46
Speaker 3: that put that post together.
27:48
Speaker 2: M hmm.
27:49
Speaker 1: But you don't know what any of these pronouns mean.
27:51
Speaker 1: But you guys are promoting it.
27:52
Speaker 3: I assume it's it's different ways people like to be
27:55
Speaker 3: referred to.
27:56
Speaker 1: Would you describe Baltimore as a safe city?
28:03
Speaker 4: What's your definition of safety?
28:05
Speaker 1: I'm asking you, is it is Baltimore's safe city? Is
28:08
Speaker 1: it the kind of city that you would want to
28:10
Speaker 1: raise a family and maybe go jogging in without having
28:13
Speaker 1: to be worried about being murdered or raped.
28:16
Speaker 6: I grew up in Baltimore, My family is in Baltimore.
28:19
Speaker 6: My mother still is in the same house in West Baltimore.
28:22
Speaker 2: Is it a safe city?
28:23
Speaker 4: Plus years so the answer is definitely yes.
28:26
Speaker 1: You think Baltimore is a safe city? Of course it is, okay.
28:28
Speaker 1: Do you know what the homicide rate is in Baltimore.
28:33
Speaker 4: Exactly?
28:33
Speaker 1: No, It's about thirty five per one hundred thousand. Do
28:38
Speaker 1: you know what the homicide rate is and the rest
28:40
Speaker 1: of the United States?
28:42
Speaker 4: No, I don't.
28:43
Speaker 2: I can tell you that the.
28:44
Speaker 1: Homicide rate in Baltimore is about five times the national average.
28:49
Speaker 1: Do you know how Baltimore's robbery rate compares to the
28:52
Speaker 1: rest of the United States.
28:54
Speaker 4: At the moment?
28:55
Speaker 2: No?
28:55
Speaker 4: I don't.
28:55
Speaker 2: You don't.
28:55
Speaker 1: It's about eight point four times the national average. Do
28:59
Speaker 1: you know how Baltimore's assault rate compares to the national average. No,
29:04
Speaker 1: I know, it's about three point four times higher. Does
29:07
Speaker 1: that sound like a safe city to you?
29:09
Speaker 4: Safe to me and my family members?
29:11
Speaker 2: That's safe to you?
29:12
Speaker 1: Thirty excuse me, five times higher than the national average
29:16
Speaker 1: for homicides.
29:16
Speaker 2: That's a safe city perception. It's what excuse me?
29:21
Speaker 6: I said, it's what the for instance, it's it's perception.
29:25
Speaker 6: Is what you feel as a president in Baltimore City.
29:28
Speaker 2: I don't if you're murdered, I don't think it matters
29:30
Speaker 2: what you feel to you.
29:31
Speaker 1: It is it your testimony that the safety Baltimore.
29:35
Speaker 2: City depends on how people feel.
29:37
Speaker 4: To me, Baltimore City is a safe city.
29:39
Speaker 1: To you, it's a safe city. I don't think it's
29:41
Speaker 1: safe to the people who are being murdered every single
29:43
Speaker 1: weekend there. Do you believe that America should be a
29:47
Speaker 1: colorblind society? I, for instance, should people be treated differently
29:53
Speaker 1: based on their race?
29:57
Speaker 2: It's just a yes or no question. It's not a
29:59
Speaker 2: yes or no quote.
30:00
Speaker 7: It is a As I said in the beginning of
30:05
Speaker 7: my testimony, I guess it's done right by indigenous peoples,
30:10
Speaker 7: by black people, by Asian American and Pacific Islander.
30:13
Speaker 1: People be treated differently based on their race, Yes or no.
30:17
Speaker 7: People should receive the services and the support and the
30:20
Speaker 7: remedies that you're insold to them.
30:22
Speaker 1: That they should be treated differently based on their race.
30:24
Speaker 7: They should receive the remedies that are owed to them
30:27
Speaker 7: because of the systemic racism you believe.
30:30
Speaker 1: Do you believe that race should be considered an employer
30:32
Speaker 1: hiring practices?
30:35
Speaker 7: I do not believe that white people are the only
30:39
Speaker 7: qualified people.
30:39
Speaker 1: For I didn't say that. Nobody said that. I asked
30:42
Speaker 1: you if race should be considered an employer hiring practices,
30:45
Speaker 1: and you're not going to intimidate me by slandering me
30:48
Speaker 1: as a racist.
30:49
Speaker 7: You're also I did not call you a racist. You're
30:51
Speaker 7: not going to intimidate me. I called your question. It's
30:55
Speaker 7: a yes or no question.
30:56
Speaker 1: Should race be considered an employer hiring practices?
31:00
Speaker 2: Yes? Or no?
31:01
Speaker 7: I believe that diversity ought to be considered as companies
31:05
Speaker 7: and other organizations attempt their customers our country, I'll take
31:10
Speaker 7: that as a yes. Which race do you think should
31:12
Speaker 7: be preferred? I do not think that a single race
31:16
Speaker 7: should be preferred.
31:17
Speaker 1: You just you just said that you believe that race
31:20
Speaker 1: should be considered an employer hiring practices.
31:23
Speaker 7: There's going to be a transcript of this hearing. I
31:25
Speaker 7: didn't say that in that way.
31:27
Speaker 2: Okay, why why don't you explain what you believe?
31:29
Speaker 7: What I and and what I believe is that the
31:33
Speaker 7: demographic composition of workplaces, military, our Congress ought to reflect
31:41
Speaker 7: the diversity of the of a.
31:44
Speaker 1: Meraphic composition racial demographic Is that?
31:46
Speaker 2: Is that what you're saying? Racial gender?
31:49
Speaker 1: Okay, So race should be a factor in employer hiring practices. Yeah,
31:54
Speaker 1: that that's what you're saying, Is it not?
31:56
Speaker 7: Organizations ought to attempt to match the diversity of there
32:00
Speaker 7: I've been around the question.
32:01
Speaker 2: No, I am answering quite straightforward term in which races
32:05
Speaker 2: are preferred. I don't.
32:10
Speaker 7: I already told you I don't have a single You
32:13
Speaker 7: just told me that you believe that the demograph, the
32:15
Speaker 7: racial demographic makeup, should be taken into account and hiring practices,
32:19
Speaker 7: and it should be reflected in all levels of companies
32:24
Speaker 7: and other organizations.
32:25
Speaker 1: Let's let's talk about college admissions. If two different children
32:29
Speaker 1: are applying for college. Let's say one is white and
32:32
Speaker 1: one is black, and there's one slot available. Should they
32:35
Speaker 1: evaluate be evaluated based on the same objective criteria test scores?
32:40
Speaker 2: For instance? Are you familiar with holistic admission?
32:43
Speaker 1: Should they be held to the same standards regarding test scores?
32:47
Speaker 7: I am a proponent of holistic admissions, yes or no question? Yeah, no,
32:52
Speaker 7: I can't answer that question for you as a proponent
32:55
Speaker 7: of holistic admissions.
32:56
Speaker 2: Got it. I'll take that as a no, thank you, mister. Yeah,