Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Nathan Cooper: Waikato University Environmental Law professor on whether NZ should remain in the Paris Agreement
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Right's New Zealand's future involvement in the Paris Agreement is
- 0:03Speaker 1: up in the air. David Seymour has hinted that ACT
- 0:06Speaker 1: may campaign on leaving the accord after the twenty twenty
- 0:09Speaker 1: six election. Now, Donald Trump's already pulled the United States
- 0:12Speaker 1: from the scheme in his Fortnight of Action, and there's
- 0:14Speaker 1: concerned that other big admitters could pack their bags too.
- 0:17Speaker 1: Talks it up to fifty percent of the people. It
- 0:19Speaker 1: might be countries might be leaving now. The Associate Professor
- 0:22Speaker 1: of Environmental Law at the University of Wayhadow is doctor
- 0:25Speaker 1: Nathan John Cooper, who joins her now Hella.
- 0:27Speaker 2: Nathan Kyoda, good morning.
- 0:31Speaker 1: Is the whole agreement in trouble with so many people
- 0:33Speaker 1: saying we're pulling out, Well.
- 0:36Speaker 2: I think that's premature. One of the great successes of
- 0:39Speaker 2: the Paris Agreement was just how many countries signed up,
- 0:43Speaker 2: and so while while obviously the US has signaled that
- 0:46Speaker 2: it's beginning to withdraw, I think the vast majority of
- 0:50Speaker 2: countries are going to remain in that framework for this
- 0:52Speaker 2: civil future.
- 0:53Speaker 1: But if the bigger misters leave, you know, if the
- 0:55Speaker 1: US leaves as it already has, if China and India
- 0:59Speaker 1: decide to SCARPA, why should a little old New Zealand stay.
- 1:04Speaker 2: Well, I don't think China, India or Russia are likely
- 1:10Speaker 2: to leave. However, I think climate change, which obviously is
- 1:15Speaker 2: the big challenge that the Paris Agreement is there to
- 1:18Speaker 2: respond to. It's a global challenge, and so it really
- 1:21Speaker 2: doesn't make sense for individual countries to move away from
- 1:25Speaker 2: a framework that pulls together our contributions, coordinates things, monitors
- 1:30Speaker 2: them in favor of just some sort of independent action.
- 1:34Speaker 1: But it's a bit to say that a lot of
- 1:35Speaker 1: people have fallen out of the Paris Climate Accords because
- 1:38Speaker 1: of the mechanisms used to combec climate change, that they
- 1:41Speaker 1: feel theoretical, that they don't feel like they're actually going
- 1:44Speaker 1: to make any change, and they're expensive.
- 1:48Speaker 2: Sure, there's no doubt that some of the action that's
- 1:53Speaker 2: required is expensive, and it's inconvenient as we transition towards
- 1:57Speaker 2: sort of low carbon options. That's all pretty inconvenient, But
- 2:04Speaker 2: at the end of the day, that needs to be
- 2:06Speaker 2: balanced against the size of the problem that's being faced.
- 2:09Speaker 2: The problem.
- 2:09Speaker 1: I know the problem, but does the Climate Accords the solution?
- 2:14Speaker 1: Are they working? Have we seen any of these mechanisms work.
- 2:22Speaker 2: I suppose it depends what you mean by work. Ultimately,
- 2:24Speaker 2: the Paris agreement's there to try to strengthen global response
- 2:28Speaker 2: to climate change, principally by limiting global average temperature rise. Now,
- 2:33Speaker 2: we saw in twenty twenty four that actually over the
- 2:35Speaker 2: course of that year, the average temperature rise compared to
- 2:38Speaker 2: perior industrial levels was around about that one point five degrees,
- 2:41Speaker 2: which has always been the sort of first Paris Paris target.
- 2:45Speaker 2: So in that respect, the world is warming, it's warming
- 2:49Speaker 2: quicker than we wanted to, and so you could say
- 2:53Speaker 2: that it's not succeeding. But if we look a little
- 2:55Speaker 2: bit deeper as to why maybe there's less success under
- 2:58Speaker 2: the Paris Agreement than we were of liked, a lot
- 3:01Speaker 2: of it is that commitments are made by countries, but
- 3:03Speaker 2: that we don't actually follow through with those commitments, so.
- 3:07Speaker 1: In which case it doesn't work. So people it's what
- 3:11Speaker 1: people will say is it's virtue signaling. We go to
- 3:14Speaker 1: a meeting, we say big stuff, we do nothing, So
- 3:17Speaker 1: what's the point.
- 3:19Speaker 2: Sure, I think there's a long way between doing everything
- 3:22Speaker 2: that's required and the alternatives doing nothing. So countries are
- 3:27Speaker 2: stepping up and it's been encouraging to see recently that
- 3:30Speaker 2: some countries newly announced nationally determined contributions they're kind of
- 3:37Speaker 2: pledged for the next round of emissions reductions have been
- 3:42Speaker 2: pretty ambitious. Unfortunately, I don't think New Zealand's own pledge
- 3:47Speaker 2: has been as ambitious as it could have been. But
- 3:50Speaker 2: there's definitely a big catorry. No, but there's definitely quite
- 3:55Speaker 2: a lot of examples there as to how the Paris
- 4:00Speaker 2: Agreement is encouraging countries to step up in a way
- 4:04Speaker 2: that we've never seen before. I mean, this is the biggest,
- 4:07Speaker 2: it's the biggest climate agreement, is the biggest international treaty
- 4:12Speaker 2: that we've seen.
- 4:13Speaker 1: All Right, Doctor Nathan John Cooper, I thank you for
- 4:15Speaker 1: your time, Associate Professor of Environmental Law, University of Waykata Day.
- 4:20Speaker 2: For more from earlier edition with Ryan Bridge, listen live
- 4:23Speaker 2: to News Talks it be from five am weekdays, or
- 4:26Speaker 2: follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.