Latest / Honey Badger Radio / And now, a word from our recent history | HBR Talk 379

Transcript

And now, a word from our recent history | HBR Talk 379 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three seventy nine. And
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: now a word from our recent history. We don't have sponsors,
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: because we do have patrons, but we don't have sponsors
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: that ask us to give you a word, So you
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: just got to listen to us talk about something that
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: we've already talked about a little bit previously, quite a
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: bit actually during the past several months, and that is
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: the us AIDS infection that has gone around the world,
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: the pandemic of us AIDS that has infected the world
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: under the Human initiative Humanitarian Initiative VEIL. We have a
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: new development that I thought we had better bring to
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: you as soon as we learned about it, rather than
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: waiting until later so that we can finish ragging on
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: you and women. Although we will eventually get back to that,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: because I do want to finish that article. They do
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: have a bunch of bullshit for us to address there too.
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: So whenever I.
• 1:13
  Speaker 3: Hear the phrase new directions, my brain is nude erections.
• 1:20
  Speaker 3: Whenever I hear the phrase new developments, I hear nude envelopments.
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: And there we do.
• 1:28
  Speaker 3: Some of you may not know what I mean by that,
• 1:30
  Speaker 3: but I'm referring to it's the top of the show,
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: so we'll have to call it grape. Envelopment is a
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: word we don't use because it means female grape. I
• 1:44
  Speaker 3: just I just wanted to throw in that bit of
• 1:47
  Speaker 3: poetic license.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Well it's kind of fitting here because usaides, the us
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: AIDS infection has been primarily spread in the name of
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: tecting women. So there you go. There's there's quite a
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: bit that they've done that has relied extensively on Guyino
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: centrism historically. But as we talked about previously on several
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: other episodes, the current administration had done some digging into
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: what this this agency was involved in, what this organization
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: was involved in, and what your tax dollars as US
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: citizens were being used to do in foreign nations and
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: two foreign nations by you and or not you and women,
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: but US AIDS, the US AID system, and so you know,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: they defunded it, and of course the federal offices went
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: into a panic, right, the government offices went into a panic,
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: and they did everything that they could to try to
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: salvage whatever they could and so on. But U but
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: there was more to it than that. They they really
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: worked hard to try to undermine us interests. So but
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: before we get into all of that, before we talk
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: about what we're going to talk about today, we do
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: still have to do what we're gonna do, what we
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: gotta do. So I'm your host, Hannah Wallen here with
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks, and you just heard the personification
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: of perceptivity, Mike Stevenson. We also have the Doge in
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: Charge in the background. Huh, it doesn't matter, It doesn't matter.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: We also have the Doge in Charge, Brian Martinez, working
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: in the background to make sure things go smoothly and tonight,
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: you already know what we're talking about, so I don't
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: have to introduce it. But before we get into that,
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: we do have to do what we gotta do. As always,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio dishes out Ace Mortgage Board of Thought
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: provoking discussions, and as experiences both recent and long past
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: have demonstrated, the provoked thoughts are fighting back. They've made
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: it clear that for people like us relying on third
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: party payment platforms like Patreon to fund our work is
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: treading on thin ice or building our house in the
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: path of a rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: we strongly encourage our supporters to switch at least their
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: support for us to feed the Badger dot com the
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: most stable way to help us out. And if you
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: want to tip us directly instead of relying on any
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: social media platforms, tip jar. The link for that is
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip. And
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: as always, the same risk applies to our social media platforms,
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: which is why you should further provoke the thought police
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: by tracking our thought provoking discussions on Honey Badger Brigade
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: dot com, where you can find your way to all
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: of our content, as well as a link to feed
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com in the drop down menu at
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: the top of the page. And with that, we do
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: have some people who uh decided to help feed the
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: Badger through feed Thebadger dot com slash just the tip.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: And I will read off two superchows. One of them
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: we missed on Tuesday, and so I'm reading it tonight
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: because we don't want to miss these. And that is
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: from Michael Emrick Windberg who gave us sorry, okay, Michael
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: Emrick Windberg who gave us five dollars and said, in
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: response to something that we talked about regarding protests, I
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: believe I am reminded of the woman in Iran who
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: was beaten to death by police because she wouldn't wear
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: the he job. She was killed because she didn't know
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: her place. Obviously, such a thing does not happen to men.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: Because men know their place. They know better than to
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: wear beyond the approved attire, because no civil war will
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: be fought over them. This also touches something I have
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: mentioned to a friend. Mohammed's wife, Aisha, the woman to
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: whom he pledged to take responsibility, was six, and I've
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: been told she was nine, but it's still a child.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: At what age were his soldiers, the boys he forced
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: to take responsibility for his life? Nobody tends to ask
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: this question, I'm afraid. And both of these are interesting
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: things to state. The The bit about men knowing their
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: place something that that I'll point out. You know this
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: is this is true and not true in that you know,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: men know, men pick their battles right. They're not going
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: to risk bloodshed so that they do have to wear
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: or don't have to wear hats, or do have the
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: right to wear hats, or you know, cover up their hair,
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: wear a suit to well, you know any any type
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: of you must wear steel toad boots on the job. Whatever.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: If you tell a man something like that, he's like, okay,
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: I'll deal with that. Uh, that's that's not what men
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: fight over. Men fight over things like you are taking
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: half my money and using it to send my son
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: to war when I when I do my job right,
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: then then then they fight over that. They go go
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: protest their government and risk life and limb in civil
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: wars against stuff like that. You are changing our whole
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: way of life, or threatening to change our whole way
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: of life without a plan for how are our economic
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: system is going to survive that? Right? Men will start
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: a war over that. You are enslaving our people. Men
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: will start a war over that if they think they can,
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: they have a chance to win, or they think it's
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: worth being exterminated if they lose.
• 8:03
  Speaker 3: Try going Try going into a bank as a man, right,
• 8:07
  Speaker 3: Try going into a bank dressed in a nicab that's
• 8:12
  Speaker 3: the one with just the letterbox over the eyes. You'll
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: soon be arrested as some kind of bank rob because
• 8:19
  Speaker 3: a man would only go into a bank in that
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: kind of mask if he intends to rob someone or
• 8:27
  Speaker 3: you know, fuck someone over in some way? Am I
• 8:30
  Speaker 3: talking about the West or the Middle East? Well, it's both.
• 8:34
  Speaker 3: In both of these societies, a man is not permitted
• 8:37
  Speaker 3: to do anything wearing a mask, especially especially not any
• 8:43
  Speaker 3: situation in which you are expected to show your face.
• 8:47
  Speaker 3: This is something the West and the Middle East have
• 8:49
  Speaker 3: in common. It is only women.
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: Who are allowed to shroud their face from recognition. How
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: could you be so misogynistic? No, yeah, it's some.
• 9:05
  Speaker 3: Somehow misogynistic in both of these worlds.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: It's difficult.
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: Similarly, people to understand that we have similarities and in
• 9:17
  Speaker 3: the Middle East, and it's the women are allowed to
• 9:20
  Speaker 3: shroud their identities and men are not.
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: Similarly, it's considered unprofessional for a man to go into
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: a serious professional environment like an office or an institution
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: of education or anything of that nature. Right, go into
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: a business meeting, work as a supervisor somewhere, or even
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: as a salesperson, right and have his chest showing down
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: to the space between his nipples. A man can't do
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: that and be taken seriously. Generally speaking, you don't see
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: men with bare shoulders in professional environments either right, or
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: having their legs show, you know, especially not above the knee.
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: Or blow the knee or blow the ankle.
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: Right, you don't see any skin aside from the neck
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: up the wrist down, and that's it. You know, you
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: don't see their toes or their heels, or the tops
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: of their feet. You know, you don't see their back
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: all the way down to the waist. You know, if
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: if a man showed up at work wearing a bra,
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: you wouldn't know because his clothing is never transparent enough
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: for you to notice that. Right, But all of these
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: things a women. A woman can can make all of
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: these things visible to you and be considered professional. And
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: this extends in the West.
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: This extends to China and Japan. This is this is
• 11:14
  Speaker 3: something that travel vloggers like to inform us about, Like
• 11:18
  Speaker 3: if you go to Japan and you're a man, you
• 11:21
  Speaker 3: cannot show your legs, like not above the knee or
• 11:25
  Speaker 3: below the knee or anything to the ankle. It's like
• 11:28
  Speaker 3: in the West when it comes to weddings and funerals,
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: like men absolutely cannot show their limbs, anything above the
• 11:36
  Speaker 3: hand or any part of the leg. And they tell
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: us this as though it's completely unfamiliar to us in
• 11:44
  Speaker 3: the West. No, this is almost a global rule. That
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: men's arms and legs are offensive and cannot be shown
• 11:55
  Speaker 3: in any polite situation. And people are like, yeah, well
• 12:03
  Speaker 3: this must be a way of oppressing women somehow.
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and then women act like women are the only
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: ones that get a dress code. It's because men's dress
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: code is universal and largely unspoken. Your boss doesn't have
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: to tell you to wear pants if you're a man.
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: Your boss does have to tell you that your skirt
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: can't show your underwear if you're a woman. Your boss
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: doesn't have to tell you that your areolas can't show
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: through your clothing or outside of your clothing if you're
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: a man. But in some instances, women have had to
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: be told that at work. Now your boss can't can't
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: can't just tell you that without someone in the room either,
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: because they get accused of sexual harassment. Your boss can't.
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: Your boss can't tell you some things. It can't tell
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: you not to wear a skirt. But it doesn't have
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: to listen to your complaints about air conditioning. Right, Maybe
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: the air conditioning situation exists because women don't have to
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: dress like men. So yeah, men men don't complain about
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: this either, like they never there's never a big to
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: do about Gosh, men aren't allowed to wear things they
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: like to wear at work. Only women get to do that,
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: even on casual days when women might show up, you know,
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: wearing wearing a mini skirt and flip flops. You know
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: that men don't, for the most part, dress quite that casually. God,
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: I hope not.
• 13:57
  Speaker 4: I that's not anything I want to see, especially in
• 14:02
  Speaker 4: my line of work. I don't want any of that. No,
• 14:06
  Speaker 4: thank you, sir and ma'am.
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: I would prefer that nobody do that. But although I
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: will admit I do like I do like legs, but
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: the workplace isn't the place to be scoping people out either.
• 14:21
  Speaker 5: No, it's not.
• 14:22
  Speaker 3: And I'm not complaining about it either. I don't particularly
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: want to show my arms on my legs. I'm just
• 14:27
  Speaker 3: pointing out the double standard. If women want to, they're
• 14:31
  Speaker 3: completely allowed to and if any if anyone complains about it,
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: it's rucially men that they're just not. You're a misogagous
• 14:39
  Speaker 3: how dare you?
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: Oh? My soggins? The horror And it is bad because
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: women will set the environmental temperature at work for the
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: styles of dress that they are allowed to wear, and
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: when men complain that they're too hot. They just they
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: just call it mansplaining, even though, like dude is wearing
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: three layers of clothes, right, he has a T shirt,
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: a a business shirt, a button down shirt, and a
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: suit jacket and you're in a blouse and a skirt
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: and open toed shoes, which is why you're cold and
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: he's not. But yeah, as far as that that goes,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: Like again, it's it's a know your place thing. Nobody,
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: nobody is allowed to criticize women for that. Men aren't
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: allowed to complain about their expectations, and for the most part,
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: you don't hear men upset women. Well, you're a misogynist.
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: You're a misogeist. You're a misogynist if you don't think
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: the environment should be set up to facilitate our clothing choices.
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: If I have to wear a sweater to be comfortable
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: in an environment where you're wearing three layers of clothing,
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: you're a misogynist. If I have to even in situations
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: like factory work, what do you mean I have to
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: take off all my bangles and dangles? I want to
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: wear this necklace. What's wrong with you? Oh you mean
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: the conveyor belt might cut my half, Well, that's misogynistic.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: And I had a coworker at a plant that I
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: worked at for a short time lose a finger because
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: she refused to take a ring off when she was
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: working with a conveyor belt and it got caught on something,
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: and the conveyor belt doesn't forgive. Metal is stronger than
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: every part of your body, so it just ripped it
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: off kind of slowly. And you know, I guess that's
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: misogyny too, right.
• 17:14
  Speaker 4: Is it misogyny if I actually want to see that happen.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: I didn't want to see that happen.
• 17:22
  Speaker 6: I was.
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: I was sorry that it happened to her, but I
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: was really glad that I was in a different part
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: of the building where I couldn't even hear it. But
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: we all got told about it, you know, because there
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: were a lot of women that were like, well, you know,
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: I'm not gonna take off my wedding ring. I kept
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: my wedding ring in my wallet while I was working
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: because I like my fingers. I used them for a
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: lot of stuff and I don't want to lose even one.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: So it makes it very hard to type when one
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: of them is injured, you know, especially if it's all
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: gone altogether. But yeah, yeah, and then and the worst
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: part of it is that women will like if you
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: dress in more reasonable attire for the environment. You're going
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: into long pants, a long skirt instead of a short skirt,
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: closed toed shoes, warm outfits, things like that. Women who
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: don't want to do that will accuse you of making
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: things hard for them. They get mad about that too.
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: And of course, the fashion industry run by women, the
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: fashion media industry run by women, so women will complain
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: about women's stress codes that women impose and then that
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: women can violate without any further repercussion than other women
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: saying shitty things to you, which you know, okay, you
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: said something shitty to me. I will now get on
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: with my day bye, you know. But some women are
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: just completely devastated if if another woman doesn't like their
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: outfit for some reason. I learned to get over that
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: in high school. But yeah, women, women will bitch about
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: this as though men have imposed it, when in fact
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: men simply are focused on doing their jobs. And and yeah,
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: when when men are going to fight for something, they
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: usually pick something that is worth fighting and dying for,
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: because chances are that's what's going to happen, and they
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: know it, and and they don't take that risk unless
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: you know something is so bad that it's it's better
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: to to risk death than to continue tolerating it. Richard
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: Bierre gave us five dollars. Hannah, I have to apologize
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: to you. There is a twenty twenty three documentary film
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: in two parts that is called Pretty Baby Brookshields and
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: it's about her early life as a child actress. So
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: when New Zealand Dingbat was talking about the documentary film
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: Pretty Baby, she likely wasn't talking about the nineteen seventy
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: eight film, I hope, although she might consider the Netflix
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: a less sense to be a documentary too, especially since
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: Parliament was using that mini series as a foundation to
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: formulate a public policy. Okay, well that makes more sense
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: because the idea of referring Pretty Baby wasn't about a
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: situation that actually happened, and it didn't have anything in
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: it that examined prostitution or brothels or what life is
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: like in them. It just was gratuitously sexual and like
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: I feel like it was abused to put Brookshields in
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: that movie. That was that she was way too young
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: to be doing something like that, and I think she
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: was aware of what she was portraying, because at one
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: point she had to portray faking an orgasm, and at
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: another a couple of points she had to portray making
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: love to a man, a grown man, as like a
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: thirteen year old, And I believe she was about the
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: age of the character when she did that movie. Hollywood
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: likes to shame adult men as predators, but they did
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: that right. And they're the ones that the Open Secret
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: Documentary and Open Secret Documentary was about, where not not
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: just one, but many boys have talked about being sexually
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: abused as a result of a system Hollywood use to
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: facilitate their ability to work in movies and television shows.
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: So there's not really a place that's significantly more predatory
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: toward children in the United States than Hollywood. And yet
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: guess who gets the most criticism from Hollywood. It isn't Hollywood.
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: It's you. They don't like you, they think you're awful,
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: especially if you don't want your child's school teacher confusing
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: your child about his sexuality and his identity as a
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: human being. So yeah, both of these are excellent comments
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: and important, but and I'm glad to know I thought
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: there might be there might have been a documentary about
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: that movie, because I remember seeing reference to it and
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: at least one article I read about that, And I
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: remember seeing that movie when I was a kid, not
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: a young kid, but like high school and thinking and
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: did her mom agree to her doing that? Because I
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: know my mom would never have let me do that
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: if I wanted to be an actress, which I don't,
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: she wouldn't have let me act in a movie like
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: that when I was a kid. And that wasn't the
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: only one. I don't know if she was an adult
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: or underage. I think she was underage when she did
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: The Blue Lagoon two. So yeah, then we also have
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: one from Meredith Jee just gave us five dollars just now,
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: said HBr Talk three seventy nine. I've been working in
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: an office environment since the nineteen nineties, and there I
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: remember how much problems we faced when business was established.
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: I worked in the financial services industry, which is one
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: of the most conservative dress codes around. Oh yeah, if
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: you're asking somebody to trust you, making, you know, for advice,
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: or any kind of handling of their money, making their
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: financial decisions anything, you better look respectable. I'm certainly not
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: going to trust somebody that doesn't look and carry themselves
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: in a respectable manner, and they seem like they're not
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: focused on the job right. So yeah, particularly if you
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: are client facing. Even when some places went full business casual,
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: the thermostat remained unchanged, not for men's comfort, but because
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: the computer equipment required attempts. I remember that back in
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: the day, even before the nineteen nineties, there were a
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: lot of places I worked at a newspaper and the
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: building was kept cool. They still were using ad computers
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: ranging from at the time the most up to date
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: Apple Macintosh, and back then PCs were called IBM compatible.
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: But they had all that and copy machines and stuff,
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: and then a huge printer that gave off a lot
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: of heat. But their equipment went all the way back
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: to There was a Commodore sixty four that they relied
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: on still for some things because they hadn't updated the
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: way they did those things. Commodore sixty four did not
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: have a cooling system. It didn't have a fan, it
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: didn't have anything. So if it was allowed to get overheated,
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: it burned itself out. Basically, it damaged itself internally and Uh,
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: they're just just the little metal components on on the
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: motherboard would would fry basically. Uh, and and you would
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: end up with a useless motherboard, and that would be
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: a problem, especially since it but by that time it
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: was difficult to get another one that worked, you know,
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: so then they were gonna then they would have been
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: in trouble. They would have to update real quick. In
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: any case, Yeah, you did have to keep the temperature low.
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: Any room that had a lot of computers in it,
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: you had to keep the temperature low because if you
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: let them get it get overheated, they're a bit fragile
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: toward that. Even when the computers. When the computers go down,
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: productivity halts. On a side note, if you have a
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: menopausal woman in the office and dare to touch the thermostat,
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: expect to lose a finger. Yeah, that's that's the other thing, right.
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: The women that are a bit about it being too
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: cold are in their twenties and thirties and maybe their
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: early forties, and about the time you start getting pre
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: pre menopausal in your late forties early fifties, you know,
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: unless you have early menopause, when it hits a little earlier,
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: you get the exact opposite. I'm the one that gets
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: overheated at home now if the thermostat's too high. And
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: you know, the other thing is it's more often women
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: who are slim. When you put on a little weight,
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: especially in combination with being older, you get you get
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: overheated more easily. And it's a lot easier to put
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: on a sweater if you're a little chili than it is.
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: There's only so much clothing you can take off, even
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: at work, especially at work, but even at home, even
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: if you're female, there's still only so much clothing you
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: can take off before like there's nothing left to remove
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: and you're still too hot. So nobody. Nobody wants to
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: see a menopausal fat woman do that either, not very
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: many people anyway. The ones that do are willing to
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: pay for it.
• 28:27
  Speaker 3: But nobody even wants to see a physically fit man
• 28:30
  Speaker 3: show is limbs.
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: And I say this to someone with beautifully thick calves, but.
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: I'm still not gonna My calves are not for display
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: in the general public.
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: It's just for me and.
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: My dog, correct, ye see, I I love that. My husband,
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: for for years and years he wore shorts all year round,
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: like they were below the knee shorts, but they were
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: still shorts, and so I got to see his calf
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: muscles all the time and and just absolutely love that.
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: But yeah, now, like I said, we're in the fifties.
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: This is this is the first year that, aside from
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: when he has to wear them to work, that he
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: has consistently worn pants instead of shorts. So we're we're
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: at that age where we're starting to flip the the script.
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: But in any case, you know there's another thing too.
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: By the way, if you're in a northern part of
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: the world or or a southern part of the world
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: below the equator most of the year, unless your employer
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: pays through the nose to change your work environment, it's
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: going to be chilly as opposed to warm. And you
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: know here in Ohio, like I've worked in places where
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: the heating system basically creates an environment that fluctuates between
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: too warm and too cold all day and you just
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: learn to deal with it, right, But it is significantly
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: easier if you're an asthmatic. It is significantly easier to
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: breathe in temperatures between sixty and seventy than it is
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: upwards of seventy and so it's better if it's chili
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: and you wear warm clothes than if it's too warm.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: And it's also a lot cheaper for your employer if
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: they don't have to maintain a temperature above seventy degrees fahrenheit,
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: which I don't know what that translates to celsius. Sorry, guys,
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: not something I can do in my head in the moment,
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: because we never have to use that here in the States.
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: But women who are asking for a warmer environment in
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: the workplace outside of a narrow band around the center
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: of the earth, you're basically asking your employer to pay
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: extra money to make you comfortable so that you can
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: expose your skin to the air instead of covering it
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: up and holding the heat in. So crazy cat gentlemen says,
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: seventy degrees fahrenheit is twenty one degrees celsius. So there
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: you go. If your employer is having to keep it
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: higher than that in the workplace, and for me, that's
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: actually too warm. But if your employer is keeping it
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: higher than that in the workplace to make women comfortable,
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: your employer is wasting money.
• 31:49
  Speaker 4: I just keep a space heater at my desk because
• 31:51
  Speaker 4: it is always too cold. For me, it's kind of
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: the opposite in my situation. They just keep keep like
• 32:00
  Speaker 4: the bay door open, and you know, when we receive
• 32:04
  Speaker 4: receive a delivery, and you know those guys, they're they're
• 32:09
  Speaker 4: up there about they're working, they're moving around, and while I'm.
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: Sad at a desk all day. Oh yeah, still well,
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: and you're dealing with a situation where the employer cannot
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: heat the building. If the bay door is going to
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: be open, the temperature is not going to be controlled.
• 32:24
  Speaker 3: Yeah, so it's difficult to heat the warehouse anyway, even
• 32:29
  Speaker 3: though there's there's cause sort of with some kind of
• 32:32
  Speaker 3: local heat involved. If it's surrounded by concrete, there's a
• 32:36
  Speaker 3: fairly high ceiling, it's really difficult to keep it, you know,
• 32:41
  Speaker 3: thermally regulated anywhere near human body temperature.
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: The thing I've always felt is funniest about this whole discussion, though,
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: is the women that mostly complain about this, right are
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: office workers. You don't usually hear women in my job.
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: They they'll they'll say something here and there, but mostly
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: they're they're wearing a sweater, you know, or or focused
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: on the needs of the person under their care. Is
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: that individual cold? What can we do about that? Is
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: that individual too warm? What can we do about that?
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: Because you're providing care, right, I worked. I worked out
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: doors when I was in high school and college quite
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: frequently in heat and cold, not in a in a thing,
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: in a job where I was doing heavy labor, though,
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: like men do that, men who do road construction for instance,
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: or roofing, you know, housing construction, building construction, anything like that.
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: The men who go out and repair the power lines
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: after a big storm, including like we've been sort of
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: threatened with potential ice storms this year by by the
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: weather people. They're saying the weather is going to be
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: weird in in in you know, the northern hemisphere this year.
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: I don't know what they're talking about for the southern
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: Hemisphere because I usually don't get the weather for that,
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: but my area they're they're talking about. It could rain
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: a lot, it could snow a lot, It could be
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: unseasonably warm, but it could be unseasonably borderline enough that
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: we get ah. It starts out as rain, finishes as
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: snow and coats everything in ice basically on the way down.
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: And the problem with that is ice is heavy and
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: so tree branches fall, power lines get hit power lines,
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: break utility poles, break bits of people's buildings that are
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: weak come off. It does damage to your roof, It
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: does damage to your gutter system. Anything it gets inside
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: and expands gets damaged. It can actually damage parts of
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: your car that way too, if you have any leaks
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: into places where you shouldn't have water going. And so
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: it does a lot of damage. And it also makes
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: it impossible to drive anywhere because you're essentially bamby on
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: ice right in your car, especially in states where you're
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: not allowed to have snow tires, like like Ohio, you're
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: not allowed to have snow tires. They can damage the roads,
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: I guess. But and the thing is when chains are
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: off the off limits too, we don't usually have ice
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: or snow that is heavy enough to merit them. You
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: can have tires that are more appropriate for winter. There
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: are winter tires that are not no tires, and they
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: do recommend that you not have old balding tires. But yeah,
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: it's it's it's not like driving in say New York,
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: where New York they're threatening New York with a nor'easter
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: this year. Yeah, yeah, it's just looking Yeah, I think
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: I sent you a thing about it, because I saw that,
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: I was just like, oh god, you know, like they're
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: talking about places where it is going to snow more,
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: it's going to be heavier than usual. The men who
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: have to handle the damage that gets done and the
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: inconveniences that are caused. People don't have power, people don't
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: have gas, lines get get damaged. Water lines break when
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: water freezes in them. One of the big problems that
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: happens in a lot of homes and apartments is that
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: the pipes going into or close to the building will freeze.
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: The water in the pipes will freeze, and it'll it'll
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: break the pipe and and then you have a leak,
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: and then you have a serious issue. And so the
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: men that have to to do that, they don't get
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: to turn up the heat when they're working because they're
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: outdoors most of the time. So it's one way to
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: prevent that in your home. By the way, if you
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: have like a drafty home and you have heat problems
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: and your home is you know, your your cupboards get
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: cold on the inside, and that's the risk. You just
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: open them and leave them open all night. So when
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: you heat your house, you're heating the inside of your
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: cupboards where like under your sink where your pipes are,
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: and stuff that can prevent some of it, but which
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: can save you some serious cash. You know, open the
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: door to your basement so that there's some air circulation
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: down there. Hey, are beneficial.
• 38:01
  Speaker 6: You know.
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: They eat those nasty little bloodsucking motherfucking bitches, because all
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: mosquitoes that bite you are female by the way, that
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: that carry West Nile virus and zica or whatever it's called.
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: And yeah, spiders eat mosquitoes. They eat a lot of mosquitoes,
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: so do Martins. Like if you if you attract Martins
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: to your like purple Martins especially, you know as the
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: one I've seen in this area, If you attract Martins
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: to your backyard, the elaite mosquitoes. But yeah, if.
• 38:41
  Speaker 3: You had prepared us to be more more afraid of
• 38:45
  Speaker 3: flies than we are of spiders, it doesn't make sense
• 38:48
  Speaker 3: because there are spiders that can kill you, but they're
• 38:50
  Speaker 3: very rare. I suppose evolution has prepared us for the
• 38:55
  Speaker 3: existence of spiders that can kill you, and there aren't
• 38:57
  Speaker 3: flies that can kill you.
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, spiders that can kill you are easier to
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: avoid than flies and mosquitoes. They can kill you.
• 39:07
  Speaker 3: Mosquitoes can kill you, folks believe We covered this in
• 39:10
  Speaker 3: a recent after the show. Half of the humans who
• 39:13
  Speaker 3: have ever lived have been killed by mosquitoes because of
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: malaria and various other things. And flies can do that
• 39:19
  Speaker 3: as well, to a lesser extent because they carry diseases
• 39:24
  Speaker 3: and all sorts of this shit.
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 39:26
  Speaker 3: No, I get over your a rachnophobia people. I know
• 39:30
  Speaker 3: it's easier said than done, but you should be more
• 39:33
  Speaker 3: afraid of flies than you are of spiders, and way
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: more afraid of mosquitoes than you are of spiders.
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: Besides, if you've ever seen loos up pictures of spiders
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: with their little googly eyes, they are actually really goofy
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: looking and cute. They can they can be Yeah, like this,
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: big googly eyed little murder muppets that eat the bugs
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: that carry nastiest germs on the planet. I almost died
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: from a mosquito bite mosquito from virus from a mosquito
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: bite when I was twelve. I had We don't even
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: know what the virus was. We suspect but don't know
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: for sure, equine encephalitis or West Nile virus, one of
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: one of those. If they're not the same virus, and
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: that it combined with my mosquito bite allergy, because of
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: course I would be as allergic to mosquito bites.
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: But mosquitoes look like.
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: The flying bits of lint, so it's just a flying
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: bit of lint. It can't possibly her, you know, Yeah,
• 40:42
  Speaker 3: they can, They can and will fucking kill you.
• 40:46
  Speaker 2: It's like it's like the difference between men and women.
• 40:49
  Speaker 3: People are naturally afraid of men, but when they see
• 40:52
  Speaker 3: women that are like, oh, they're so harmless. No, no,
• 40:56
  Speaker 3: women are a great deal more harmful than men.
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: What miss yet? Yeah?
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah no, And they also look like little flying bits
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: of fluff.
• 41:04
  Speaker 3: Sometimes indeed, women will instill you with diseases that will
• 41:08
  Speaker 3: absolutely fucking kill you, whereas spiders like you got it's
• 41:13
  Speaker 3: a chance of a spider killing you. Well even figure out,
• 41:18
  Speaker 3: get over your evolutionary niches and any us.
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: Most most of the spiders here don't even cause any
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: serious harm. We have two types of spiders that can
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: cause a lot of pain and suffering. One of them
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: can cause infection, and the infection can kill you. If
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: you have a weakness to that, you can get septic
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: from it. Then that's the brown recluse. But the bite
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: itself and the poison itself are not deadly. They're they're
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: very inconvenient. They can cause it's a necrotizing poison. There's
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: a cousin to that spider that lives like don't don't
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: walk in the tall grass around lakes and rivers without
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: cover on your legs, and you know like that that
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: there's a cousin of the brown recluse that lives there
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: that people don't know about. And I can't remember what
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: it's call. It starts with an M. But in any case,
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: those are the only and they're not anything like you
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: know some spiders in Australia. People in Australia are listening
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: to us, going, you guys are crazy, because there are
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: spiders that just come right into your house that have bites.
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: They can be deadly, especially if you have a heart condition,
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: where like you have to be in really weak condition
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: to get killed by a black widow. It's it's it's
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: a horrible experience to go through the night of pain
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: and suffering in the hospital that you go through if
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: you get bit by a black widow. But for the
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: most part, they don't hang around in your house like
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: they don't don't. They don't try to be around people,
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: whereas the uh, what is it called the Huntsman spider
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: or something like that in Australia will come into your
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: house because they eat mice, and mice do try to
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: be around people, so the spider does too. But in
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: any case, speaking of predatory insects or we're going to
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: talk about this non government organization that relies on government
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: funding and for actually spiders aren't insects either, but that's
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: beside the point. So this what we want to talk
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: about tonight here is uh, this secret signal chat. And
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: I've seen a little bit of argument that this the
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: person who discovered this is making a bigger deal out
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: of it than is than it is. And I don't
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: think that's the case, right, because you don't hide, you
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: don't try to hide what you're what you're doing that
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: isn't a problem for the people that you're trying to
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: hide it from. You hide something if there's consequences for
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: people knowing about it. So Red State, which is a
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: right wing publication, just so people know that the the
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: perspective on this is going to be conservative and so on.
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: But this this publication noted this this x dot com thread.
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: This is one of the one of the commenters. Actually,
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: I think I follow this data Republican too. I may
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: have seen this because I followed data Republican rather than
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: because it was published in Red State, but I think
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: I found this article through Bongino dot com so or
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: the bonginoreport dot com or whatever it's called. It's Van
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: Bongino's answer to the Drudge Report, essentially, and he doesn't
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: run it anymore because of what he's doing now, so
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: that in any case, it says one of the better
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: posters slash commenters on X is the aptly named at
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: Data Republican, who does some great work digging and data
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: crunching numbers and taking big nessa snakes and laying them
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: all out straight and uncovering things that just generally make
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: the left uncomfortable. And that is true. That account does
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: a lot of exposing things that the left is doing
• 45:53
  Speaker 1: under the radar, and also analyzing and explaining things that
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: the Left is using complexity to eclipse the meaning of,
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: or the implications of, or the nature of. So that's
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: a good description for that account. She's outdone herself on
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: this thread. And we go to the thread rather than
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: looking here in the article. So she says major breaking
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: international actors are involved in the State Department led Color Revolution,
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: and so you know the characterization color Revolution refers to
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: a Marxist effort to overthrow a non Marxist system. X
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: USAID employees describe how before January twentieth, they moved internal
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: groups off government systems into encrypted signal chats, then quickly
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: attempt at creating a cover Color Revolution isn't new news.
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: This was this part was already reported in UH notice
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: earlier this year. And so you know what notice is here?
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: Is there about page This is a news organization that
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: is it's essentially a big news conglomerate, a paper, a
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: that I don't know if it publishes a paper newspaper anymore,
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: but a news site, a publication that has reporters that
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: have worked for other news organizations working with reporters that
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: have never been in in the business. It covers a
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: wide variety of places, wide area and is essentially it's
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: it's designed to garner a broad spectrum of perspectives and
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: not just approach from one one point of view. So
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: if they're reporting on something, you'll see more, you'll see
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: more of a broad outlook on it than say from
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: Red State. But so notice exposed that earlier this year.
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: But that's not the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: it as a global anti authoritarian movement, by which I
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: will say they mean a global effort to stop incoming
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: authoritarians from cutting or eliminating funding that outgoing authoritarians were
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: giving them. Right, because this is in the bottom line
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: of this. It will be about money. It'll be about
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: the money laundering that the u USAID system was used
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: to do. So they've coordinated with JOHNS Hopkins International Democracy
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: and Conflict Mitigation Spaces. Again, when they say democracy, they're
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: approaching it from the communist perspective, not from the idea
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: that you have a say in whether or not the
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: government imposes something on you. But if they can persuade
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: enough people to agree that it should be imposed on you,
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: you lose your say because democracy. So at what point
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: does this become treason? And here is there's a five
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: minute video here and we'll kind of look into a
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: little bit of this, So bear with me. I want
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: to make sure I think I have a sound on
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: this on that's it. I have it too low.
• 50:00
  Speaker 6: US Agency for International Development, just to put it into
• 50:03
  Speaker 6: scope and scale. It has been around for more than
• 50:06
  Speaker 6: sixty years. It has been had bipartisan support, strong b
• 50:12
  Speaker 6: partisan support. It has had earmarks in every budget. So
• 50:16
  Speaker 6: this was a well established agency of some ten to
• 50:20
  Speaker 6: fourteen thousand staff, of forty dollars in procurement.
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: So I just want to I want to stop there.
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: When we talked about this, it's one of the things
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: that we pointed out. This isn't something that you know,
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: uh Obama came up with that the Trump administration eliminated.
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: It's not something Biden started that the trumpet administration eliminated. Uh.
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: This has existed since gen X were kids, and and
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: it's exists. It's actually existed since before many of us
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: were even born. Uh. And it's been using US taxpayer
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: dollars the entire time. I'm not sure if I can
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: make this louder. I apologize. I've got it. I think
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: at the top volume here, but it's not going to
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: be particularly loud.
• 51:19
  Speaker 6: Every year we had all read Project twenty five. We
• 51:23
  Speaker 6: were somewhat prepared for this administration.
• 51:26
  Speaker 5: And in other ways not prepared at.
• 51:28
  Speaker 6: All, so ahead of the inauguration, some groups, such as
• 51:34
  Speaker 6: our Office of Transition Initiatives, which works specifically in countries
• 51:42
  Speaker 6: and places that are transitioning from perhaps authoritarian governments or
• 51:50
  Speaker 6: you know, wartime into more peaceful and structured, hopefully democratic governments.
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm gonna go back over that. I could not.
• 52:07
  Speaker 2: More peaceful slash hopefully democratic.
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: This is this is the.
• 52:14
  Speaker 6: Thing, and structured hopefully democratic governments.
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: Her oums are driving me nuts. I know I do
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: that all the time too. What she's basically talking about
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: here is the idea that if the general public uh
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: gets more of a say, that that automatically makes things
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: more peaceful. But the general public is what they're telling us.
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: Burnt down Kenosha, Wisconsin, and took over the entire neighborhood
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: in Portland and one in Seattle and violently attacked anybody
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: that came in. So even even first responders coming in
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: to help people who had been injured in conflicts were
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: under threat. They couldn't even go like em EMTs, who
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: by the way, also work out doors and all kinds
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: of weather. So yeah, peaceful public, Right, It.
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: Didn't end at the shores of the USA, by the way,
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: that this is for all the hatred that is pushed
• 53:32
  Speaker 3: in the American people's direction from European countries like the UK,
• 53:36
  Speaker 3: Like that all went on hold when the fucking BLM
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: riots bled through into the UK and into the rest
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: of Europe, and into Australia and the rest of the
• 53:48
  Speaker 3: anglosphere and presumably beyond. Like everyone who only complains about
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: about Americans suddenly like didn't give a shit anymore. They
• 53:58
  Speaker 3: were like, oh, fucking criminal in Minnesota died from a
• 54:05
  Speaker 3: drug overdose. Oh now, well, now we all get to
• 54:08
  Speaker 3: write in the streets because because of something that happened
• 54:11
  Speaker 3: in America.
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: These are the people who who.
• 54:19
  Speaker 3: It's it's such a complicated phenomenon, like xenophobia.
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: Is illegal in Europe.
• 54:26
  Speaker 3: I don't know if you've noticed this, Like, well, we
• 54:28
  Speaker 3: will actually be arrested for xenophobia for any social media
• 54:33
  Speaker 3: post we make that might seem in the least bit xenophobic,
• 54:36
  Speaker 3: unless it's xenophobic against Americans.
• 54:40
  Speaker 2: The Americans are the only people who we are allowed
• 54:44
  Speaker 2: to be xenophobic about.
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: In fact, we are encouraged and rewarded to be xenophobic
• 54:49
  Speaker 3: about Americans, except when it comes to b LM, except
• 54:53
  Speaker 3: when it comes to to whatever Marxist movements happened who
• 55:00
  Speaker 3: have originated in the USA, and then it's like, oh,
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: oh absolutely, oh yes we we we should do what
• 55:07
  Speaker 3: the Americans are telling you, what the Democrat Americans are
• 55:11
  Speaker 3: telling us, what the fucking marksist racist Americans are telling us.
• 55:15
  Speaker 3: They don't hate Americans, they don't hate America. They just
• 55:21
  Speaker 3: don't want America putting America first, just like we, just
• 55:26
  Speaker 3: like they don't want British people put in Britain first.
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: For some reason, they shouldn't want this. There's a there's
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: a connection there.
• 55:35
  Speaker 3: I think it's because everyone knows the cultural ar say
• 55:43
  Speaker 3: ethnic connection between between Europe and America.
• 55:47
  Speaker 5: Like it.
• 55:49
  Speaker 3: Because because America is doing better than Europe is at
• 55:54
  Speaker 3: this point, at at accentuating the success of of of
• 56:02
  Speaker 3: the European dream with which which is which has been
• 56:05
  Speaker 3: reconstructed as the American dream of you know, of of
• 56:10
  Speaker 3: of being wealthy through your own blood, sweat and tears,
• 56:15
  Speaker 3: through your own elbow grease. That's that's that's that's that's
• 56:19
  Speaker 3: why Europeans are encouraged to hate Americans. That's why Americans
• 56:23
  Speaker 3: are encouraged to hate Americans because it's because America is
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: largely occupied by Europeans, and it's Europeans aren't allowed to
• 56:40
  Speaker 3: thrive even by their own blood, sweat and tears, even
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: by their own elbow grease.
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: It's because there's great strength and economic independence. And economic
• 56:49
  Speaker 1: independence is the underlying scaffolding of the dream, whether you
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: call it European or British or American or whatever the
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: the the dream itself is a dream of economic independence
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: that fosters economic security, and that fosters economic and industrial
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: and medicinal and scientific advancement that benefits the economic secure
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: population of the nation, and that that really doesn't lend
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: itself to a cabal of wealthy individuals at the center
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: of a world government controlling the population through scarcity and
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: threats from the outside right through in insecurity and unsurety
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: of their future by by saying, well, we will provide
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: you with that security, and therefore you have to do
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: what we say. They can't do that if you have
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: economic independence that fosters all of those things without their help.
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: So they need you to need their help. So they
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: need your country to fail. They need your economic system
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: to fail, They need your political system to be so
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: contentious that your people can't get along with their neighbors
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: so that they can come in and say, well, let
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: us fix all these problems, but you have to do
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: what we say. You have to give us control, let
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: us micromanage your lives so that we can skim more money,
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: more wealth, more economic disparity between ourselves and you off
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: of your labor, which we will benefit from and you
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: will not. And in a nutshell, that is essentially what
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: the World I can form is about. It is not
• 59:02
  Speaker 1: about benefiting you in any way, shape or form. It
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: is about using the illusion that you need them to
• 59:08
  Speaker 1: take away your freedom. And where USAID fits then, so
• 59:13
  Speaker 1: what we just heard her do is claim that democracy,
• 59:21
  Speaker 1: which is when they say democracy, they essentially mean, you know,
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner, not
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: the parliamentary system wherein uh people get equal opportunity to
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: to to exercise a check and a balance on a
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: on a system of government that could otherwise exercise abusive
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: authority to do exactly what the World Economic Forum is
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: trying to do. She just suggested the worst system of
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 1: government in order to foster this change. And what we
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: learned in our previous examinations of USAID. Besides the fact
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: that USAID was promoting violence against Women Act style, gendered
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 1: discriminatory and due process, attacking law federal law or national law,
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: criminal law in various countries, and also male genital mutilation
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: and abortion, they were also using the Humanitarian Initiative veil
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: as a cover to infect nations all over the world
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: with communist movements, communist efforts at you know, overthrowing the
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: existing system of government and way of life. So the
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: local culture was being intact everywhere, USAID manifested everywhere, that
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 1: that the the Humanitarian Initiative veil infection manifested into full
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: blown us aids. That that's what was happening. They were
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: pushing communism on people that were not naturally and and
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: organically gravitating towards those ideas and causing conflict in the
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: process all over the world. So what have they done here?
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: And and as she's talking about this, you know, you know,
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: you'll kind of get an idea.
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 5: Has been a major player.
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 6: So they pre organized because, as Danielle said, they had
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 6: organized during the previous Trump administration to respond to the
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 6: threats to our US democracy.
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 1: Right, So what she just said there, okay, was that
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: this organization, this government funded organization, organized to oppose the government,
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: the the democratically elected government that funded them. And they
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: did this in the name of democracy, in the name
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: of democracy. They were opposing democracy. Now, why would they
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: do that in the name of democracy. We're opposing democracy? Why, Well,
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 1: because they didn't do what we wanted. So, do you
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: believe in democracy or not?
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: Reinvented colonialism, Like it used to be that.
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 3: Rich, affluent countries would invade other countries and impose their
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 3: nationality on those countries. But now they've well, we'll just
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 3: invade foreign countries and impose feminism and democracy and eventually
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 3: socialism and eventually communism on these countries. And that's different, right,
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 3: that's not colonialism. Like when you look at the Sea
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 3: door map of how look at all these countries that
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 3: don't give women all all the rights that we give them.
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 3: We need to invade those countries, not not by military force,
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 3: but by bureaucratic force, like forcing them to take rights
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 3: away from men and siphon them into women. And that's
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 3: that's not the same thing. Don't too worry about it.
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 3: That's totally not the same thing. We're not imposing our
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 3: cultural values on on these countries.
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 2: It's it's just that.
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: The the these countries have these horrible backward approaches to
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 3: human rights where they don't give women free gibbs forever,
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 3: and they don't give truons free gibbs forever.
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 2: So we need to we need.
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 3: To force them through cultural and financial.
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 2: Means to do this.
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 3: And and they're acting like this isn't colonialism, Like this
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 3: is even more sinister than military colonialism. Like you can
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 3: fight back against a military force. It's been proven in
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: Vietnam and Afghanistan that you can indeed fight back militarily
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 3: against these forces, but it's so much more difficult to
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 3: fight back against these cultural forces that are just are
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 3: just supplied by this endless funding, uh, supplied by the taxpayers,
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 3: whether they're like it or not. And just you're telling
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 3: everyone just be gay, just be gay, everyone, just be
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 3: effeminate and gay and uh, and that that'll fix all
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 3: your problems.
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 2: What problems with You're you're poor, you're poor, Yeah, you
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 2: were a bit poor.
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 3: Well, just just be gay and feminine and and and
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 3: transactional and that will solve all your problems, will it?
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: How many of your problems. Does it solved?
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 3: Well, it's get shut up, you fucking your fucking racist foreigners.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 3: Just be gay and feminine and transsexual. You would, you would,
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 3: And yeah, it's the only reason that the West is
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 3: able to indulge in these gender cults is it's because
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 3: they can already afford it. This is it's it's what
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 3: happens with every empire that gets so rich and so
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 3: decadent they can that they can finally afford it.
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: And that's you.
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 3: Know, fine, that's what happens to any empire that becomes
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 3: so decadent they can afford it. And we're here trying
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: to sort of talk them down from the ledge. But
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 3: you know, these third world countries don't, don't, don't, don't
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 3: have so many people who have the opportunity to opportunity
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 3: to talk them down from this ledge as long as
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 3: the USAID is providing billions in funds to talk them
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: to the end of the plank, to talk them right
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 3: to the precipice of the building, like and like fucking
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 3: forcing them to jump off the end of it, like
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: fucking lemmings. And I and some of them are going,
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: can we not? No, Yes, you must, you absolutely must well,
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 3: we will force you to adopt our culture. I don't
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 3: know what fucking adjectives to use about this that aren't
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 3: euphemisms our liberalist cult, our leftist cult.
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 2: Our.
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: Well. The the difficult thing is, like you have to
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: understand what the goals are in order to understand what
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: type of cult it is, and it's it's what it
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: really is. It's ultimately a safety net addiction cult, yes, right,
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: which you can't make a pronounceable acronym for that. I'll
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: have to come up with something. But there's a there's
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: a to understand this. You have to kind of understand.
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: You actually have to kind of understand the history of
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: the parliamentary system in voting rights and what they're trying
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: to undo because prior to the parliamentary system, you had
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: a monarch system, which is essentially a dictator system that
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: is funded by the like the next layer down of
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: smaller dictators. It was based on a landlord system that
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: came from the Roman landlord system, and so what you
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: had was your king or your queen was the decision
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: maker if the nation was going to go to war
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: by land sell land change currency. You know, if there
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 1: was going to be a national policy of some sort
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: where the law of the land was you must do this,
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: you cannot do this, you must pay this, you know,
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 1: and so on. But then you had the barons paid
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: into that system, and they were confiscating part of what
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: they paid into that system from the people who lived
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: on their land, and that that would then go to
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: smaller and smaller, until you had the individual who lived
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: on a small patch of land and on paper had
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: some degree of ownership of it, but really belonged to
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: the next level up of government. And you found that
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: out if you didn't pay your taxes, right, which is
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: is pretty much the same as we have now, except
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: then you got very little say in whether your government
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: abused power against you or not, how much the government
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: decided to take from you, whether the government decided that
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: the men of your household all had to go get
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: into a fight with the men of the households of
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: France for a stretch of land that the king shouldn't
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: have given up in the first place, You know, things
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: like that, right, And then King John did a bunch
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: of stupid shit that the barons didn't want to support anymore.
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: They were losing money, they were losing men, and they
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: had a huge fight about it, the First Barons War,
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: and then they had to have that same fight with
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: the next administration, the Second Barons War. And between those
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: two fights the parliamentary system developed sort of proto parliament
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: first and then an actual parliament. Prior to parliament, there
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: was a concept called a common Council in which the
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: king listened to the people that were paying his bills
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: and that were fighting his wars. And one of the
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: dumb things that King John did that pissed off the
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: Barons was he stopped listening. And then I believe it
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: was his son, not his grandson, that did the same thing,
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: and that was the Second Barons War. The parliamentary system
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: that developed out of that developed out of the bloodshed
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: of men who did not like having their labor exploited
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: and their ability to fight exploited, their deaths, their mutilation
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: in war. If they survived and dying in battle back
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 1: then it wasn't the same as it's horrible no matter what.
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: But it wasn't as quick of a death as if
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: you step on an explosive and it just completely obliterates you,
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: or you get shot and you're you're killed by the
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: bullet going through a part of you that you can't
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: survive having punctured. Men died from sepsis more than anything
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 1: if they didn't bleed out slowly on the battlefield. And
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: so you know, while those things still happen, it was
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: significantly more common where you get a slash or a
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: hack to your to your leg or your arm that
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: doesn't kill you. There weren't antibiotics. There weren't you hospitals. There,
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: there was no first aid, didn't exist, none of that
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: like in terms of what we have today. So the men's,
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: the blood of the men that that formed this, that
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: influenced what voting was. Right. Voting wasn't I want X
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: y Z from government, give me, give me, give me.
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: It was I want to say, I want to decide
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: who gets to influence in government to determine whether or
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: not I have to go do this horrible thing. Right,
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: And so when men voted, they weren't voting to get
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 1: things from the government. They were voting to stop the
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: government from abusing power against them and taking things from them.
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: And unfortunately, after centuries of development of that system of
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 1: men being able to say, all right, you can have
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: this concept of government, but if you start using it
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: to oppress us and to oppress our wives and children.
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: We are going to shed blood to stop you yours
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: and ours right, and therefore you have to listen to
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 1: us when we say we don't want to do this
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: or that, when we send somebody to tell you, no,
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 1: this is not okay. It went from that to when
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: women got the vote, well, we need to use government
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: to regulate more and more stuff. We need to use
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: government to stop people from being able to just freely
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 1: do certain things, you know, like consuming alcohol or marrying
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: the wrong person. The regulation became a much bigger, tolerated,
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: publicly tolerated element of government rather than a thing that
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: the public rebelled against and started wars because it was
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: being too much by the government, done too much by
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: the government. And women not only didn't understand the bloody
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: history of how voting became a thing in Western culture,
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: they also didn't understand it as a check and a
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: balance on that government abuse of power, but rather as
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: a means of exploiting government power to get control over
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: their neighbors and take from people who had plenty and
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: use that money for their own purposes, often self aggrandizing
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: purposes or self serving purposes, and as a result, people
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: have become so addicted to government as a safety net
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: that they've become complicit and complacent. And the complacence is okay, well,
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 1: that's not a bridge too far, you know, at any
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: time the government takes another step over the bounds of
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: your independence, in your individuality, your right to retain the
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: fruits of your labor and retain control of the property
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: that you own. And the complicity is that they've become
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: complicit in the reshaping of government into a nanny state.
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: And that's largely been female driven. There have been men involved,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: but a lot of that is men who have been
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: taught by their mothers that this is what the government
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: is for. It's not. It isn't a historic fact that
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: government was for that, and it isn't a fact today
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: that government is for that. It didn't even start to
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: become for that until King Henry the eight wanted a
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: divorce in the church said no, so he decided to
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: reshape the church and took over a great deal of
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: its finances, and suddenly the government became responsible for the
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: system that assisted the poor that the church was running
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: prior to that. So, in other words, people voluntarily donating
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: to the church as opposed to people having their money
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: confiscated against their will and just handed over. Welfare systems
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: didn't exist really in Western culture prior to that. It
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: wasn't the government's job to feed you. So all of
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: that said, what USA than came along and did was
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: took advantage of that mentality and fostered in nations all
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 1: over the world the feminine idea that government is your keeper,
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: as opposed to government having limited functions and the public
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: being the government's overseer to prevent government power from being
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: abused to control the public. And in doing that, they
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: did the same thing that the CIA was doing in
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: multiple nations, attempting to overthrow various government systems and cultural systems.
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: And the result of that type of interference has always
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: been war and death. So this is an incredibly dangerous organization.
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: And what we're hearing from them is how they essentially
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: did what how IT did in Space Space Odyssey that it's,
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: you know, the this this idea of insulating themselves from
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: being shut down and undermining the the people that we're
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: trying to end, their efforts to undermine peace in the world.
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: Essentially, Yeah, it's this phenomenon we call the culture war,
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 3: And yeah, I know that's a euphemism for whatever the
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 3: fock else it is. But it's not just a domestic
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 3: issue where where we're trying to save the West from
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 3: the forces that that would destroy the West, that are
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 3: pretty much explicitly trying to destroy the West. No, those
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 3: same forces are trying to destroy everything else. They're trying
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 3: to destroy the East and the Middle East and and
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 3: the it's southern Hemisphere and all and all that shit.
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 3: Now we're fighting back against, ironically enough, the West, the
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: the forces in the West. The dare I say, the
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 3: communist forces in the West. And I'm not going to
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 3: blame anyone in particular, Well I am, it's fucking Mars,
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 3: It's fucking it's it's it's it's the communist forces that
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 3: are that arose largely in Germany and then Russia and
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: then the rest of Europe, and then it spread to
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 3: China and South America and Central America and all these places.
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 2: The culture war is not just East versus West. It's nothing.
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 3: There's nothing like as as false dichotomus as that is.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 3: The culture war is is between well, I guess you
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 3: could call it conservatism versus the enemies of conservatism, because
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 3: conservatism it is something that is different for every country,
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 3: yet yet the same for every country.
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 2: It's it's it's every.
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 3: Country should get to define its own rules and its
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 3: own traditions, as vastly different as those rules might be
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 3: for various other countries. Like like if the Middle East
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 3: wants to be Islamic, fine, Like if that's what the
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 3: majority of the public wants, fine.
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 2: You you do that. If the East wants to be.
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 3: Whatever it is, has this worship of ancestral roots, yeah,
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 3: that's fine too. That's like any anyone, anyone who wants
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 3: to pertain to their own ancient traditions absolutely by all means,
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: please please do. We don't want you invading us, and
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 3: we don't want us invading you. And when I say us,
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 3: I mean it quite wrongly because I'm referring to the government.
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 3: We don't want our government invading you with our Dare
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 3: I say cultural norms. Dare I say any of the
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 3: of the of the of the archaophobic cultish behavior that
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 3: has that has invaded the West, like we at Honeybadger Radio,
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: and in in various other avenues of of of speech,
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 3: like we we we don't want our culture imposing our
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 3: culture on you any more than we want your culture
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 3: imposing itself on us. And it it would be so
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 3: helpful if everyone could could draw the lines between the
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 3: people and the government, like just like your governments do
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 3: not represent the people, our governments do not represent the people.
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 3: I mean, even even even when it appears as though
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: our governments are ostensibly telling us that they are putting
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: our nation first, usually they are not. I mean, sometimes
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: they're trying. I mean, I hold out some hope for
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 3: the Trump administration that they are indeed putting America first.
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 3: And I hope there's some political party in the UK
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 3: that has any hope of putting Britain first.
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 2: Good luck to But yeah, this this, this is what,
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 2: this is what us A lot.
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 3: In the in the space leper corner of the Internet
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: are trying to say, like it it's it's okay for
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 3: any given nation, any given society, any given civilization, to
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 3: have their own rules, to have their own customs, and
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 3: we don't want to impose our customs on you, and
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 3: we don't want you to impose our customs on us.
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 3: And and it's it's difficult to get this across when
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 3: we are all and I mean all of us without exception,
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 3: are having our ideals to say, our idealism, I'm completely
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 3: fucked in the face of globalism. And yeah, in every
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 3: country there's these globalists who are like, yeah, no, we
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 3: need a one world government. Wouldn't it be great if
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 3: all of these different customs, different countries, different civilizations, it
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 3: all came together in the same, one glorious whole. And
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 3: I'm like, yeah, no, like you already are one glorious whole,
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 3: namely namely one glorious asshole. No, this like and and
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 3: and and this is and this is really what it
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 3: comes down to between, uh, the euphemism of progressivism and
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 3: the euphemism of conservatism.
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: Like.
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 3: That that it has to stop somewhere, Like it would
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 3: be nice if we, well, I say it were nice
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 3: if that if there were no common rules between any
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 3: given household, like if everything was just tribes, like like
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 3: it was in in In In Germany for most of
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 3: its history before it became Germany, it was it was
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 3: just thousands of different tribal regions like it was in
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 3: in In pretty much the entire world before countries were invented,
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 3: Like yeah, for the for the longest time, it was
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 3: just empires and everything else was just this divided region
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 3: of thousands of different tribes. Yeah, I'm not saying we
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 3: should go back to just everything is a tribe with
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 3: like a half square mile radius of its own rules. Like, Yeah,
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 3: that that had its disadvantages as well, but complete global
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 3: domination of the same administration is even worse than that.
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 3: And yes, there is a happy medium. There is that
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 3: there is a place we can stop, and that place
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 3: is countries. That place is nations. You stop at some
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 3: point and it's at the border of nations. This should
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 3: be easy when it comes to nations like Great Britain,
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 3: which is a fucking island, it should be easy to say, yeah,
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 3: our nation stops at the fucking shore where there's fucking
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 3: sea around everyone. Can we count Can we stop it there?
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 3: But our government is like, no, no, we can't. We
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 3: want to be part of Europe and we want Europe
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 3: to be part of euro Afro, Eurasia and all this
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 3: ship And that's yes, I believe all well on just
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 3: one diousehip like that and the yeah, and yeah, I
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 3: don't I don't know what the eventual answer is because
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 3: at some point you encounter arbitrary borders. There's like a
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 3: thousand arbitrary borders in Europe where one country ends in
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 3: the other and another country begins and like, and you
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 3: can ask, well, why does the why does that border
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 3: end there? And well it's but it's this sorts itself
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 3: out because there are different ethnicities that have been there
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 3: for thousands of years, and there are different ethnicities on
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 3: the other side of that border. It's more complicated for
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 3: America because because yes, every every American nation, North American
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 3: and South American is they are all nations of immigrants
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 3: and yeah, I get it. So it's it's a whole
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 3: different kettle of fish over there. And this is why,
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 3: this is why we have this difference between whether you're
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 3: a citizen by blood or a citizen by land or soil.
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 3: It's all about blood and soil. And you know, it's, uh,
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 3: we're going to be arguing about this forever. But it's
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 3: better to be arguing about this forever as to where
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 3: borders should be rather than just destroy all borders and
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 3: and and see what happens if if the whole fucking
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 3: earth is one nation, good God, no like and now
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 3: people should be pushing back against this idea of just
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 3: destroying all orders, because it's much like in corporate capitalism,
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 3: like if you have competition between corporations, like with your
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 3: internet service provider, like as many countries have seen, if
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 3: there's only one internet service provider throughout the entire region,
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 3: then they have no competition. And if you ever complain
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 3: to them, they can just go fuckut what you're gonna do?
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 3: You can't do ship you only have one option. So
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 3: what why should we bother being competitive when there's no competition.
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 3: You just have to do what we say and there's
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 3: nothing you can do about. And that's what's gonna happen
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 3: with countries if if, if the whole thing is is
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 3: is melded together into one gooey blob of what was
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 3: once nations, like like like I say, yes, micro nations
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: of just tribes is not the ideal option, and a
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 3: one world nation is not the ideal option.
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 2: So let's find a middle ground. And we already found
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 2: a middle ground. And you know.
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 3: It is called nationalism. I'm sorry, I know that's a
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 3: dirty word. I know the euphemism for it is patriotism
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 3: or whatever. But one way or another, like we have
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 3: to draw the lines somewhere, because if we don't draw
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 3: the lines, we're fucked. And if and if we keep
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 3: drawing the lines smaller and smaller, we're fucked. But I
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 3: think we I think we already found a decent compromise.
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 3: And it starts with if you're an island nation, then
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 3: you already have your lines. It's I say, it's more
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 3: complicated if if you don't. But most of the nations
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 3: in the world are not islands. So you have to
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 3: draw the fucking boundaries somewhere, and it's good that you
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 3: do so that if your country becomes a totalitarian healthscape,
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 3: you at least have the option of crossing a border
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 3: to another nation. And it's it's fucking ironic that we're
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 3: not talking about the UN for the first time in
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 3: several months, because the UN, as you may know, is called.
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 2: The United Nations.
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 3: And I don't think it's much of a stretch to
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 3: say that the United Nations has U has always has
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 3: has always had part of its goal to be to
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 3: unite all the nations. And this is why so many
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 3: people think that the devil has manifested as the United Nations.
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 3: Like I know, I know that sounds over the top,
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 3: but it's really not like that's exactly what the devil
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 3: would do, and it would it takes the form in
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 3: the USAID, because that's that's that's the way of of
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 3: of spreading whatever globalist ideas. One nation has two other nations,
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 3: and and and if it is left untrammeled in its desires,
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 3: then that is what will happen. So yeah, we we
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 3: haven't stopped talking about the U n We're still talking
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 3: about it in the USA and the UN are the
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 3: same globalist agenda. I know it sound like Alex Jones
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 3: right now, but Alex Jones was right about too many things.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 1: So many things, only crap. Even the gay frogs, yes,
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: the trans frogs, but no, he said the same he
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 1: said gay frogs. So you know, but and that's the thing.
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 1: The ultimate reason why they're trying to feminize boys and
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 1: men is because they need to overcome men's recognition that
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: voting rights are a means of preventing government from exploiting you,
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: not a means of providing you as a as a
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: way to exploit the government and against your neighbors. Right,
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: it's and it's something that the women haven't grasped, women
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: haven't recognized women. Women use the government as a weapon
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 1: of exploitation, and and Mangatka ninety actually mentioned this in
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 1: Our Life chat. Men view voting as a tool to
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 1: prevent exploitation, while women use it as a weapon of exploitation. Right, So,
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 1: if these people can feminize men, and if they can
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: create enough households without fathers that are still masculine and
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 1: still raise their children as masculine men do, then they
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: can create future generations that don't recognize voting as a
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 1: tool to prevent exploitation and don't necessarily recognize taxation as
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: a form of exploitation, and overregulation is a form of oppression,
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: And they will become more complicit in their own enslavement
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 1: until they have no framework upon which to base a
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: fight against it. And then suddenly, years and years down
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 1: the road, ideas of freedom and independence will become new again,
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: because nobody will remember them, and the people that come
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: up with them will probably be killed for it, you know, initially,
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 1: so you'll have a whole new fight again to bring
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: about that balance between you having an administrative system within
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 1: large populations of humans and maintaining the individuality of all
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: of the humans within that population. That's the battle We've
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: been fighting for the last several centuries, in various forms,
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: in various regimes, in various empires throughout history. And every
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: time we take the balance too far in the direction
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 1: that the administrators are become responsible for the welfare of
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: the people and therefore entitled to control them, that the
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: empire begins to fail. There's no way to run things
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: like that, especially with currency involved, centrally fund it and
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: not not essentially create the same downfall that the mouse
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: experiment creates, and people have to struggle. You lose this,
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: you lose the ability to struggle, You lose the ability
• 1:36:51
  Speaker 1: to exercise your creativity. And when you lose your ability
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: to exercise your creativity, you stop progressing and you stop
• 1:36:59
  Speaker 1: living and you merely exist instead. And it creates, it
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: creates the precursor for war, usually civil war, and men
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 1: get killed, men have to fight, men have to kill,
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: and all of those things are bad. We're gonna listen
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: to a little bit more of this, and at nine
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: o'clock we're going to end and go into the after show.
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: So let me let me go ahead and hit play again.
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 6: Also terribly organized that I'm proud about is our gender
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 6: and Sexual Minorities and Employee Resource Group. We are cautious
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 6: community and well prepared for We saw the writing on
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 6: the wall and the attacks that were already happening during
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 6: the election cycle, and so we had already moved our
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 6: group away from the USA main systems into signal chats
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 6: to participate.
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: So again, like I said, the reason they're trying to
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 1: feminize men is because it is easier to control them,
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: just like it's easier to control women than it is
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 1: to control men. So these groups that she's talking about,
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 1: these alternative sexuality and sexual identity groups, that's what that's for. There,
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 1: they were hiding their activities from the government that because
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 1: their opposition to the government comes first protect our community.
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 6: There. January twenty happens inauguration. One of the two hundred
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 6: executive orders was to thought foreign assistance, so that was
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 6: a ninety day pause on all funding. In addition to that,
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 6: I think we're well aware of that there are other
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 6: executive orders to stop DEI programming, which affected a large
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 6: number of our awards immediately.
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 5: So in that first week.
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 6: We experienced a lot of threatening emails across the staff,
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 6: a takeover of what it was it DEI a truth
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 6: at opm dot gov, which was unusual to have centralized
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 6: emails sent to all government staff.
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 5: And then.
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 6: Many staff who are under a particular hiring mechanism in
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 6: that first week were immediately put on furlough.
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 5: Or laid off.
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 1: That's the next complaint is that remember we've talked a
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 1: lot about DEI in these systems, right, and how that
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: has contributed to bringing in more of the communist mentality,
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 1: and it's it's been an instrument essentially of ideological takeover
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: of of the government bureaucracy and the government adjacent bureaucracy
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: such as these government funded in g o s and
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: so on that us AID was funding. What's important about
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: this is, uh, they're they're using They're they're essentially using
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: hiding from the state, hiding their communications from the state,
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 1: and insulating themselves against being governed by the government that
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 1: they rely on for their funding and and and actually
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: being essentially overseen by their overseeing agencies that they're they're
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 1: essentially making themselves able to act against the nation that
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: is their host as being the parasite and foreign nations
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: in our name. So it'd be like if you had
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: an organization that you were contractually obligated to pay for
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: a service, and you found out that actually, on the surface,
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: they're tentatively providing a fraction of that service, but an
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: iceberg underneath that service was full of them sabotaging you
• 1:41:48
  Speaker 1: in various ways among your neighbors, so that your neighbors
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: now hate you because their households are being corrupted and
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: damaged in various ways by this organization. So you're like, well,
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 1: I'm going to stop paying them. That's crazy, I'm not
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: doing this anymore, right, I'm going to just band my
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: connection to this organization and I'm going to stop all funding.
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 1: So the USAID system was funding a whole host of
• 1:42:23
  Speaker 1: these types of organizations. So imagine your bank that's the
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: USAID system saying, well, we're going to figure out a
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: way to surreptitiously still take your money and give it
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: to these organizations to continue to poison the waters between
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: you and your neighbors by doing damage to their households
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 1: in your name. Will just create other fees and other
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 1: avenues of drawing from your income behind your back, yeah,
• 1:43:02
  Speaker 1: bank fees, whatever, and and hide it all. And so
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 1: what we're gonna do is create a set of communications
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 1: within the system outside of the bank that you're not
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 1: privy to, so that you don't know we're doing this,
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 1: you'd be wanting to sue somebody for fraud, right and theft,
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 1: And that's what she's talking about doing here, and that's
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 1: what she's talking about.
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 6: Uh.
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: You know, it's such a threat that they eliminated DEI
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 1: hires and and eliminated DEI systems within because those are
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: those were some of the things that were sort of
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 1: used to insulate against that, you know, stoppage that you
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 1: can't stop them from doing this.
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 6: I am a part of that him. Then within that
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 6: at the very beginning of I think over the weekend
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 6: of that first week, our senior staff, including our general counsel,
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 6: we're uh uh, we're put on administratively, so we uh leave.
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 6: So we had decapitation of the agency leadership. But as
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 6: I said, we were responding quickly and immediately we had
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 6: what's called the USA Stop Work Order.
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 5: Website and signal group was stood up.
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 6: This was done by a long time implementing partner for
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 6: a strategic communications specialist and they went and moved immediately
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 6: to start gathering people, creating community and collecting information. This
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 6: is also when you know, some of the first lawsuits
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 6: that I'll talk about will get started within that second weekend.
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 1: There's the the other thing that she said there. That's
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: that's really and I'm sorry this is so quiet again.
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 1: This is it's the website. It's not me. And I
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 1: haven't found a way to change the volume for this
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 1: without changing the overall volume. And I don't know if
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 1: it would translate into it's changing anything as it is
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 1: sent in through I'm sharing on discord, and then Brian
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 1: is directing it through OBS. So it's it's the whole
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 1: difficult thing. But what she said there about lawsuits is
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 1: that is where I partly where I get the comparison
• 1:45:43
  Speaker 1: to how this is a government system. The USAID system
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: is a government system. It is a government funding system.
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 1: It's like having a business account as opposed to your
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 1: personal account, having an account specifically for charitable activities in
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: other countries incorporated, which is what it's supposed to be.
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 1: It was intended to according to what the federal government
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 1: said when they created it, it was it was intended
• 1:46:26
  Speaker 1: to assist in funding organizations that provide food to nations
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 1: and a famine and medical care to nations. And that
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 1: that don't have the medical care they need, and so on,
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 1: not promote abortion and male genital mutilation and communism in
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 1: other countries, which it did ended up doing. And so
• 1:46:52
  Speaker 1: imagine if your bank sued you for saying, well, my
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 1: business is shutting down, we're going to stop running charitable
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: organizations in other nations incorporated, or charitable initiatives and other
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: nations incorporated. Therefore we don't need a bank account for
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 1: that company because that company is now defunct. And your
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 1: bank went, oh, you can't, you can't not have that account.
• 1:47:20
  Speaker 1: We're going to sue you and force you to continue
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 1: funding these charitable organizations in other countries. And you have
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: to maintain this bank account. You have to keep putting
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: money in it, even though you're closing the business. That's
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 1: what these lawsuits were.
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 5: There are more signal groups stood up.
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 6: Like I said, this is an agency of about ten
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 6: to fourteen thousand people.
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 5: Within the US, we have about fifty thousand people.
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 1: Fifty thousand people is the size of a city. Ten
• 1:47:54
  Speaker 1: to fourteen thousand people is bigger than the population of
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 1: the town where I grew up. So this government organization
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 1: employed more people than lived in the community. That funded
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 1: the school system I went to when I was growing up,
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 1: who are.
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 6: Hired into the ecosystem of awards and grants that are
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 6: contracted by USAID. And so this community started really gathering
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 6: in signal, especially as we saw the disinformation about USAID
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 6: coming out of x as Elon Musk excalated attacks.
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 1: I love how they blame Elon Musk, who is a
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 1: citizen who has the right to criticize what the government
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 1: is doing because he is a citizen. He can't run
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 1: for president because he is an immigrant, a legal immigrant
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 1: by the way, but he can criticize you are taking
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 1: my money and doing bad things with it in other countries.
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 1: I want you to stop because he is a citizen
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 1: and he is a taxpayer. In fact, he pays a
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 1: huge amount of the taxes that go to fund this
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 1: type of thing. And by the way, they're not directly
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 1: funding anything the taxes that you pay today, they're going
• 1:49:24
  Speaker 1: to pay the interest on debt that your government has
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: accrued in your name to pay for this shit because
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 1: they're spending more than they're receiving.
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 3: British government officials really don't like it when Ila Musk
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 3: says things that might sway the British people in the
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 3: direction of their own interests, like, how dare this far
• 1:50:00
  Speaker 3: foreigner interfere in in in our process as a country?
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 2: Are you going to keep letting in millions of foreigners too.
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 3: To suckle on the government heat and and and get
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 3: paid to do nothing from from that the taxpayers?
• 1:50:21
  Speaker 2: Pound what what? Shut up? You're a racist. Elon Musk
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 2: is a foreigner and we should not be We should
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 2: not be.
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 3: Pandering to foreigners. But the foreigners that we keep paying
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 3: from the You get what I'm saying right.
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 2: Fucking maddening.
• 1:50:42
  Speaker 3: If a foreigner so much as says anything that might
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 3: that might make Britain great again, he's an enemy of
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 3: the state. But the fucking millions of people who hate
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 3: Britain and will outwardly, unashamedly fucking tell everyone, oh, yeah,
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 3: we hate to make we hate to make Britain Pakistan.
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 3: We've got to take over your country, bro, we We've
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 3: got We're gonna make your country Pakistan.
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 2: Bros. That's fine, is it?
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 3: Yeah?
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 2: That's your hunch. The wall there's so many.
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 1: This is the tough thing about well, like we started
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 1: out the show reading our super chats and we talked
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 1: our super chows, and we talked about the fact that,
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 1: unlike women, men pick their battles and they pick what
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 1: they're going to shed their blood over and what they're
• 1:51:37
  Speaker 1: gonna kill for. All right, women do it over having
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 1: to wear a headscarf, and and they make that the
• 1:51:46
  Speaker 1: focus of the battle when the thing that they're really
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: objecting to is not being allowed to go places without
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: a male chaperone, or not having recourse if they're in
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: an abusive relationship, not having recourse if they don't want
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 1: to get married, and their family says, you're gonna do
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 1: it anyway when they're nine, right, But no, it's all
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 1: about the headscarf, and you have to you have to
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 1: make that the focus and make that the symbol, because
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 1: if you talk about the other things too much, people
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 1: are so horrified they won't listen. Men, on the other hand,
• 1:52:26
  Speaker 1: they fight their own battles, so they're not looking for
• 1:52:30
  Speaker 1: symbols to get other people riled up to fight for them.
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 1: They're looking for causes to get other people riled up
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 1: to stand with them and fight side by side. And
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 1: it's a whole different thing. But because men will tolerate
• 1:52:52
  Speaker 1: so many cultural changes, so many impositions, so many requirements,
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 1: obligations and restrictions on themselves in the name of maintaining
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 1: peace and in the name of brotherhood right or in
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 1: the name of multicultural acceptance of each other. As you know, like, well,
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 1: these men are also men, we're men, they're men. We
• 1:53:23
  Speaker 1: can be men together because they will do that. It
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 1: is easy for people, under the pretense of trying to
• 1:53:33
  Speaker 1: escape tyranny, trying to simply have the same goals as
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 1: the men of a country that they're invading in this manner,
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 1: to under the radar sneak in. Well, actually, we want
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: to completely undermine and change your entire culture and eliminate
• 1:53:55
  Speaker 1: the things that makes make it prosperous and foster your
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 1: economic independence. And it takes a culture clash that includes
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 1: violence and includes destruction of the local like the local
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 1: culture and the local peace and the local comfort, local
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 1: cleanliness and so on to get men riled up. And
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 1: so now you have protests going on in the UK.
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: Now you have protests going on in France and other
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: nations where this has been happening. But it was able
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 1: to sneak in because men pick their battles, so that's
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 1: their weakness. That's the weakness of men. The weakness of
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 1: women is that women don't pick their battles. And so
• 1:54:54
  Speaker 1: when they notice that this is happening and they sound
• 1:54:59
  Speaker 1: the alarm, they have sounded the alarm over small, unimportant
• 1:55:07
  Speaker 1: things that aren't really infringements major infringements so often and
• 1:55:14
  Speaker 1: for so long that nobody listens to them. They have
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 1: cried wolf too many times, and their credibility is shit.
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: And and therefore the entire alarm system that men would
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 1: rely on to tell them when there's a battle they're
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 1: not fighting that they should be has been eliminated. So
• 1:55:44
  Speaker 1: that's part of the goal of feminism.
• 1:55:46
  Speaker 3: Women do pick women to pick their battles, by the way,
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 3: and they tend to gravitate towards what we call relational aggression.
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 3: I'm sure I don't need to explain it.
• 1:55:55
  Speaker 1: To Well, that's the fighting style, not what what they're
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: fighting over it. Go ahead, well, no, it is.
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 3: It is what they're fighting women. I mean, there's there's
• 1:56:06
  Speaker 3: a reason that in in China that they have one
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 3: symbol for grief or disruption, and it's the same symbol
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 3: as the symbol for women twice or three times, like
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 3: when when women are put together, they argue amongst themselves.
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 3: When a when a you know, when a woman is
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 3: is put together with a bunch of men, she will
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 3: fight for herself. It shouldn't need to be explained that
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 3: women are evolutionarily dare say, designed to fight over the
• 1:56:52
  Speaker 3: domestic situation, whereas men a broaden out their horizons.
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 2: Men men men look. Men look to the horizons, women
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 2: look to the home.
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 3: And it kind of it kind of works to some
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 3: extent that because women are largely in charge of the
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 3: domestic arena, and and and and men are in charge
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 3: of the of the outward arena. And so it makes
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 3: sense that when you when you put women in charge,
• 1:57:25
  Speaker 3: they will focus their efforts on shaking up the the domicile,
• 1:57:31
  Speaker 3: the the the inward margins of of all they can
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 3: even conceive of. And if they want to change things,
• 1:57:43
  Speaker 3: all they can think of is changing the oikos, changing
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 3: the family, changing the internal structure of wherever they happen
• 1:57:53
  Speaker 3: to exist, because that's that's what they're built to do.
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 3: Not all bloody hashtag to all the ship. But you
• 1:58:02
  Speaker 3: know what I mean, you know the generalization that I'm
• 1:58:05
  Speaker 3: going for.
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah, controlling their men, And yes, a good example of this, though,
• 1:58:11
  Speaker 1: when I when I say women don't pick their battles,
• 1:58:15
  Speaker 1: is that it's it's fair, uh for women to say,
• 1:58:22
  Speaker 1: don't hit us if we're not doing anything to you,
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 1: if we're not hitting you first, Right, that's a fair
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 1: battle to fight. Right for women to make an equally
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 1: big deal about some guy whistling when they're walking down
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 1: the street is ridiculous at at at The nicest thing
• 1:58:46
  Speaker 1: I can say about it is that it's ridiculous if
• 1:58:50
  Speaker 1: a woman is upset by the way a man expresses himself,
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 1: he's in the wrong for expressing himself. When in any
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 1: other instance, women will support all forms of freedom of expression,
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 1: including obscenity and offensiveness, and and pissing on the symbol
• 1:59:08
  Speaker 1: for somebody's religious faith and calling it art right. They'll
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 1: defend that, but not wooh, sexy legs. That's that's a
• 1:59:19
  Speaker 1: bridge too far, right, Women's So women's bridge too far
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: is often something that actually does no harm. There is
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 1: no effect you. You decide how that affects you. You
• 1:59:36
  Speaker 1: may you may get upset, You may enjoy the fact
• 1:59:40
  Speaker 1: that somebody thinks your legs are sexy, and hold your
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 1: head up and go my legs are sexy. Huh. You know,
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 1: it's up to you how you respond to that. So
• 1:59:50
  Speaker 1: it's not somebody else doing damage to you. That's not
• 1:59:53
  Speaker 1: an effect. It's you doing damage to yourself. If you
• 1:59:57
  Speaker 1: decide that you have been victimized because somebody has expressed
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 1: that they think your legs are sexy or that you
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 1: have a nice ass, even if they say something crude obnoxious,
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 1: you can walk away from that. And until somebody does
• 2:00:13
  Speaker 1: something violent, it is not affecting you. It is simply
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 1: annoying and you know, or complimentary, depending on how you
• 2:00:26
  Speaker 1: decide to take it and how it was expressed. And
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 1: it can be a detriment to the guy too, because
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 1: if he's obnoxious and uh, doesn't endear himself to women,
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 1: nobody will date him. They won't. They won't respond by
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 1: being like, well, here's my phone number. You know, if
• 2:00:48
  Speaker 1: he's if he's a fuck nut, then then she's gonna
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 1: walk away. So that's his punishment right there, that there's
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 1: nothing else needs to happen unless he starts it's getting grabby,
• 2:01:01
  Speaker 1: and then you can respond to a physical assault with
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 1: a physical self defense or calling the authorities. But women
• 2:01:10
  Speaker 1: fight that battle as if it is the same battle
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 1: as the smallest percentage of domestic violence, where the only
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 1: violent person in the house is the is the man
• 2:01:26
  Speaker 1: right where the rest of domestic vit that's thirteen percent.
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 1: By the way of domestic violence, the entire rest of
• 2:01:31
  Speaker 1: it is either two way or one way, and seventy
• 2:01:36
  Speaker 1: percent of one way domestic violence is female perpetrated. It's
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: the woman hitting. Just for the record, So yeah, that's
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 1: that's what I mean when I say women don't fight
• 2:01:49
  Speaker 1: those battles, or women don't pick their battles, and the
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 1: result of that is that the system that men use
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 1: to help advise them on you know, well, these are
• 2:02:03
  Speaker 1: the battles that we need to fight if we want
• 2:02:06
  Speaker 1: to keep our wives and children safe from problems caused
• 2:02:11
  Speaker 1: by culture clashes or invasive criminals from other countries. That
• 2:02:19
  Speaker 1: system is destroyed by that because they can't trust it.
• 2:02:23
  Speaker 1: You know, if women are constantly accusing men of being
• 2:02:28
  Speaker 1: sexually predatory and doing harm to women through innocent actions
• 2:02:36
  Speaker 1: or impotent actions, because yelling something at someone in the
• 2:02:41
  Speaker 1: street is a completely impotent action. You can't actually do
• 2:02:47
  Speaker 1: anything to the person by yelling. They can hear you,
• 2:02:52
  Speaker 1: but they don't have to react to it the way
• 2:02:55
  Speaker 1: that you want, right, So it's an impotent action. If
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 1: women are forcing as an issue, men must respond to
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 1: this completely impotent action that we view as an attack
• 2:03:13
  Speaker 1: the same way that they would ask men to stop
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 1: somebody from raping them. Then men don't know when to
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: take them seriously. It sounds like they don't need to
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 1: be taken seriously ever. And of course you have years
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 1: and years, especially when you have feminists going, well, you know,
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 1: not these men. You can't criticize these men like just Phillips, right.
• 2:03:43
  Speaker 1: And in the long run, what you end up then
• 2:03:46
  Speaker 1: with is the current situation in the UK where there's
• 2:03:54
  Speaker 1: been all this violence and it's no longer possible to
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 1: hide it. And you know, the men of the nation
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 1: have been doing what they're told and keeping their heads
• 2:04:06
  Speaker 1: down for so long, and the government has been going
• 2:04:10
  Speaker 1: farther and farther to the left and farther and farther
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: to the nanny state and doing nothing for the people.
• 2:04:16
  Speaker 1: That now that it's all coming out and people are protesting,
• 2:04:20
  Speaker 1: it may be it may be too late, and it's
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 1: probably too late for a peaceful solution, and it's probably
• 2:04:34
  Speaker 1: going to get very ugly before it gets better, much
• 2:04:37
  Speaker 1: uglier than it is today. But in the meantime, it
• 2:04:41
  Speaker 1: is after nine o'clock and I do have to get
• 2:04:43
  Speaker 1: us into the after show. If this was a night
• 2:04:47
  Speaker 1: when I didn't have to go to work after the show,
• 2:04:49
  Speaker 1: I could, I could take us later, but I can't,
• 2:04:53
  Speaker 1: So we'll continue listening. We'll go through the last part
• 2:04:57
  Speaker 1: of this because there's some important information in the last
• 2:04:59
  Speaker 1: part of this, and we'll read a little more of
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 1: this threat next week. We may not watch all the videos.
• 2:05:07
  Speaker 1: I haven't watched all the videos yet, only this one,
• 2:05:09
  Speaker 1: so I just know that there's more in this one
• 2:05:11
  Speaker 1: that we need to hear. But we'll do that next week,
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: and we'll continue a little bit with this before we
• 2:05:17
  Speaker 1: get back to You and Women. Because the You and
• 2:05:20
  Speaker 1: Women thing, as bad as it is, it's they tried
• 2:05:24
  Speaker 1: to do this and failed and went a different route
• 2:05:28
  Speaker 1: to do it this. They didn't fail at this. They're
• 2:05:33
  Speaker 1: now in the process of getting caught in what they
• 2:05:36
  Speaker 1: actually did, and I think it has a higher implication
• 2:05:42
  Speaker 1: in terms of potential future civil violence, like civil war
• 2:05:52
  Speaker 1: type violence in various nations than what You and Women
• 2:05:55
  Speaker 1: has done. You and Women, the big threat with you
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: and women is more in terms of family law and
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 1: domestic violence law, which it's still a threat.
• 2:06:08
  Speaker 3: I just want to say before we finish, women fight
• 2:06:11
  Speaker 3: from the bottom up and men fight from the top down.
• 2:06:13
  Speaker 3: Now sounds like an innuendo, and it is, but it's
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 3: an innuendo that relates metaphorically to the political That's not
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 3: to say that women are always victims.
• 2:06:26
  Speaker 2: It's just that they.
• 2:06:28
  Speaker 3: Fight from the bottom if you or indeed the legs
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 3: which are even further bottom from the bottom, and and
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 3: that men fight from the top, which is not just
• 2:06:37
  Speaker 3: the shoulders but.
• 2:06:38
  Speaker 2: The yeah, yeah, you know what I mean.
• 2:06:41
  Speaker 3: And that's and that's why socialism and communism always gravitated
• 2:06:47
  Speaker 3: towards the women, because because it gravitates towards those who
• 2:06:53
  Speaker 3: have the illusion of fighting from the grassroots even if
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 3: they're not, whereas whereas men fight from the top down,
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 3: even though that might allude to the sky daddy, but
• 2:07:04
  Speaker 3: it's not because these are crossed metaphors, and I don't
• 2:07:10
  Speaker 3: have time to get into that. We'll perhaps get into
• 2:07:13
  Speaker 3: it later on.
• 2:07:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I think a good way to Mangaica ninety
• 2:07:20
  Speaker 1: two is very very good at making salient summaries of
• 2:07:26
  Speaker 1: a lot of the points that we make. And here
• 2:07:30
  Speaker 1: he said men pick their battles, women pick men's battles.
• 2:07:37
  Speaker 1: And that is true, very true, yes, because women don't
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: fight their battles right. Men fight their battles by doing
• 2:07:47
  Speaker 1: the fighting. Women fight their battles, fight in quotes, by
• 2:07:53
  Speaker 1: appealing for help and getting it from men. So that
• 2:07:58
  Speaker 1: is an excellent way of putting that. But but with that,
• 2:08:04
  Speaker 1: make sure we don't have any more. The last rumble
• 2:08:07
  Speaker 1: rant I read, not rumble rant. The last super chaw
• 2:08:14
  Speaker 1: I read, is the last super chow we got. There
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 1: aren't any paid rumble rants, no super chats, So I
• 2:08:23
  Speaker 1: will thank everybody for listening. We're going to continue this
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 1: next week because this is a big deal and there's
• 2:08:30
  Speaker 1: more to say about how usaid the connection between USA
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: and civil wars all over the world just like the
• 2:08:39
  Speaker 1: connection it's just like the connection between the CIA and
• 2:08:42
  Speaker 1: civil wars all over the world. It just hits from
• 2:08:45
  Speaker 1: a different direction, but it's it's something that we just
• 2:08:52
  Speaker 1: can't cover entirely in one show because we are talking
• 2:08:56
  Speaker 1: about this from a perspective of gender issue and not
• 2:09:01
  Speaker 1: just politics in general. So that's what you have to
• 2:09:05
  Speaker 1: look forward to for a little while, and I will
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 1: maintain we will get back to the unwomen when we
• 2:09:16
  Speaker 1: get through with this, and then we'll finished up with that,
• 2:09:20
  Speaker 1: and eventually I want to get back to talking about
• 2:09:23
  Speaker 1: suffrage because this issue of the difference between how men
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: vote and how women vote, I think is fundamental to
• 2:09:31
  Speaker 1: both of these things. The US wouldn't stay involved with
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 1: the UN, and there wouldn't be such a long term
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 1: existence of government agencies and government organizations like this if
• 2:09:46
  Speaker 1: it weren't for the way that women voted. So with that,
• 2:09:53
  Speaker 1: thanks everybody for listening to this, and thanks to my
• 2:09:56
  Speaker 1: two co hosts for going over it with me. Thanks
• 2:09:59
  Speaker 1: to everybody who were in the background to make HBr
• 2:10:02
  Speaker 1: Talk happen, especially Ryan, and good night all,