Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / MS-13 & Harvard-Democrats Defend More Illegal Aliens, More Gang Members, More Anti-Semites & More Anti-American Radicals

Transcript

MS-13 & Harvard-Democrats Defend More Illegal Aliens, More Gang Members, More Anti-Semites & More Anti-American Radicals · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Welcome and his verdic with Center. Ted Kruz, Ben Ferguson
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: with You and Center. This may be one of the
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: most interesting stories we've gotten to talk about in a while,
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: and that is Democrats are so hell bent on being
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: the opposite of Donald Trump and Conservatives that they're now
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: advocating for people that are members of terrorist gang organizations
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: and demanding that we bring illegals back into America. You
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: cannot make this up. Well.
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: Ever since the election in November, Democrats have been flailing about.
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: They have been unable to coalesce behind any clear platform,
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: any clear policy agenda other than hatred for Donald Trump
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: and anger at rage at the voters for re electing him.
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: They've now seemed to settle on two policy positions, which
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: I have to admit are curious policy positions for a
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: party that was just resoundingly defeated at the polls. Number One,
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: Democrats have apparently decided the issue that's going to bring
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: them back to power is that Democrats want more illegal aliens,
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: and especially more illegal aliens who have been found by
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: courts to be members of MS thirteen. That's a fairly
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: remarkable position, and yet that is where they are Secondly,
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: they have decided that what we need in our college
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: campuses is more anti Semitism, more radicals, more Prohamas protesters,
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: and more anti American zealots who hate our nation. Now,
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: I got to say, Ben, as I say both of
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: those propositions, the words coming out of my mouth sound
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: absurd except for the fact that that is exactly where
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: today's Democrat party has decided to land. We're going to
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: lay out the facts behind both of those, both the
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: all in Democrat rush to get behind bringing more illegals
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: who are MS thirteen gang members back into this country,
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: and the Democrats defense of Harvard University, which is decided
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: they're not going to change a damn thing. They're going
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: to continue to discriminate on race, and they're going to
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: continue to let in every anti Semite they want to,
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: and who the heck is the federal government to try
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: to enforce civil rights laws against them. We're going to
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: break both those stories down today.
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it really is incredible. I also want to remind you, guys,
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: many of you may be listening to the show and
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: you're new to the show. Hit that subscribe or auto
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: download button so you do not miss an episode. So
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: do that right now as well. Also, I want to
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: tell you about our friends at the International Fellowship of
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: Christians and Jews. Israel is still under attack right now.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: Missile fire has resumed from the Houthis, from Hesblah and
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: from Hamas and enemies that are seeking Israel destruction. Is
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: unfortunately what Israel's having to deal with every day. Here
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: in America, we cannot imagine living under constant threat of
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: terrorism and rocket attacks. Well, this is the reality in Israel.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: Parents taking their children to school, falling to the ground
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: to lay on top of their small children, trying to
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: comfort them as the sirens blair. The next attack against
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: Israel is happening now. With little Tom, I'm to prepare
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: and that's why I'm asking for your help. That is
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: also why it's so important that you know about the
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They provide life saving
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: aid and security essentials, and your urgently need a gift
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: today will help provide security essentials like bomb shelters, flag jackets,
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: and bulletproof vests for the first responders. They also provide
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: armored security vehicles, armored ambulances, and so much more. So
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: join me and stand with Israel. You can make a
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: donation by calling eight to eight for eight eight IFCJ.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: That's eight eight eight four eight eight four three two five,
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: or go online to support IFCJ dot org one word
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: support IFCJ dot org. So center, let's go back to
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: this story, and Democrats are now coalescing around an individual
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: that was deported out of this cunt. And not only
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: are they rallying, but they're putting together apparently a dead
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: delegation that they want to send down to L. Salvador
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: to quote stand up for the illegal immigrant that's a
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: MS thirteen gang member.
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: Well, there was an illegal immigrant whom the Trump administration
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: deported to L.
• 4:19
  Speaker 3: Salvador.
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: Abrego Garcia is his name, and he was here illegally.
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: Everyone admits that he came into this country illegally, and
• 4:28
  Speaker 2: he was also adjudicated not once, but twice to be
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: an MS thirteen gang member. Now President Trump has determined
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: MS thirteen to be a terrorist organization, and so he
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: was apprehended and he was deported by the Trump administration. Now,
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: it so happened that there was a court order that
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: said not that Abrego Garcia could not be deported, but
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: that he could not be deported back to l Salvador,
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: which is where he's from. He's an El Salvadorian national,
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: and that court order was a long it was an
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: older court order that was miss that was over looked,
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: and he was deported and sent to El Salvador. And
• 5:02
  Speaker 2: the Democrats have decided that that error is sufficient reason
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: they are jumping on airplanes and headed down to El
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: Salvador to apparently go camp outside the prison camp where
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: terrorists and murders and rapists are held, to say, you
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: know what America needs is more of those terrorists, murderers,
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: and rapists back in America. Now, I got to say
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: that that's a stunning position. So here's how the Washington
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: Examiner put it. Quote to hear Democrats like Chris Murphy
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: tell it, Garcia was just an innocent, doting father who
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: was randomly targeted by the Trump administrations to be sent
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: to El Salvador's terrorism confinement. Senator the Supreme Court then
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: ordered Trump to return this quote legal resident back to
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: the United States. Trump is refused, sending our nation into
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: a constitutional crisis. Senator Van Holland has even announced that
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: he's going to personally travel to El Salvador. To bring
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: Garcia home because you know that's what you want. It's
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: Democrats trafficking an illegal immigrants. Sure, the problem is that
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: Democrats leave a lot out of Garcia's story, and the
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: truth makes Trump's failure to return him quite reasonable. For starters,
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: Garcia was not in the United States legally, by the way.
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: Nobody disputes that. That is undisputed by his lawyer's own admission.
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: He enters the country illegally in twenty eleven. Then eight
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: years later, Garcia was arrested at home Depot while illegally
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: soliciting employment the Princes The Prince George's County Police Department
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: then transferred him to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which began
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: deportation proceedings against him. As a defense to deportation, Garcia
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: tried to claim asylum, claiming that his life was in
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: danger from the Barrio eighteen gang. But his asylum claim
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: was denied and the judge ordered his removal. Let me
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: repeat that statement. But his asylum claim was denied and
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: the judge ordered his removal. Now here's the sentence that
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: complicates it. The judge did, however, grant Garcia a quote
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: withholding of removal order forbidding his removal to l Salvador,
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: but that did not make him a legal resident, as
• 7:19
  Speaker 2: Garcia's own lawyers admit, should the Trump administration wish to
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: remove plain if Ibrego Garcia to any other country, they
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: would have no legal impediment in doing so. And so
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: these are the facts that the Democrats have decided their
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: party is all about. You want to know what is
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: today's Democrat party stand for? More illegal immigrants, more gang
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: members that you know what? This ain't your grandfather's Democrat party.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: So you've done international trips before. And if I remember
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: the name, I think it's Codell. So does is this
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: an official delegation? If it's senators and consciencemen going down there,
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: this is a real Codell. The American taxpayer is going
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: to pay for this photo op.
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: Yes, And and look that's that's one of the prerogatives
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: of being in the Senate is that you can travel
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: internationally on official travel, and each senator can make it
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: a termination of where he or she wants to go.
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: And it should be related to your responsibilities, related to
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: your work. But particularly for someone like Van Holland or Murphy,
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: they both served with me on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: and so that in and of itself gives you a
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: significant justification to travel abroad work related. Let me give
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: you an example of that. If you go back during
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: the first Trump administration, when President Trump moved our embassy
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: in Israel to Jerusalem. That's something I had been fighting
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: for for for the entire time I've been in the Senate.
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: Presidents from both parties, both Republicans and Democrats, had promised
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: to move our embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and presidents
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: in both parties had broken that promise. Well, Donald Trump
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: followed through on that promise, and it was the right
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: thing to do it with something that I advocated vigorously
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: to President Trump repeatedly in the Oval Office for him
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: to do so when he did. When we were opening
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: our embassy about a year later, I decided I wanted
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: to be there and and so I went down and
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: and I traveled down, and there were a number of
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: other Senators, number of other House members that went. And
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: you know what was striking ben is is when the
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: embassy was opened. It was actually on the date of
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: the seventieth anniversary of the creation of the modern state
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: of Israel. Not a single Democrat member of Congress came.
• 9:32
  Speaker 2: Chuck Schumer didn't come. No Democrat senators came, No Democrat
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: House members came. By the way, historically many congressional Democrats,
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: including Chuck Schumer, had called for moving our embassy to Jerusalem,
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: but what it was actually moved. None of them came,
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: and several of them whined publicly, well, the Trump administration
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: didn't invite us. Well, you know what, they didn't invite
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: me either. I don't think they invited any members of Congress.
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: They just opened the embassy. I ended up going, and
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: I actually ended up going with with my and Lindsey Graham,
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: and I was literally walking along in the Capitol and
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: I turned to Mike, who's a very dear friend of mine,
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: and I said, Mike, We're going to open the embassy
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: in Jerusalem. I've been fighting for this for years. I
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: want to be there. Do you want to be there too?
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: He said absolutely, Let's go. And Lindsay wanted to come
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: to and so we went out of our official budgets
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: with the ability to purchase plane tickets and travel, and
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: so we traveled there to be there. We met with
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: Prime Minister net and Yah who we met with Senior
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: government officials. That's part of the job. So look, can
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: the Democrats travel Del Salvador if they want and is
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: that part reasonably of their work? Yes, But what they're
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: doing is traveling there in order to highlight we want
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: to bring this illegal immigrant, whom two courts have found
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: as an MS thirteen member back to America. That's astonishingly
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: bad policy and I think astonishingly bad politics.
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: You mentioned that this is I agree with you, astonishing
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: policy and bet politics. But the media has been giving
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: them cover on this story. If you listen to the media.
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: I was I was watching MSNBC, for example, and they
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: were they were talking, you were the one we had, Yeah,
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: I was the one, right, and I was I was
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: watching and they had the mother who said where it's
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: the next number of days since he has disappeared. And
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: I'm like, well, well, hold on, if he's disappeared, then
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: how do you guys know where to go to find
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: him and see him and to have this delegation go
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: down there. Which one is it he's disappeared or you
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: know exactly where he is? And of course the answer
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: is they obviously know where he is. But MSNBC was like,
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: we stand with you. To the mother, like we're with
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: you in solidarity right now to his wife. And I'm
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: laughing because none of the facts have come up about
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: not one, but two courts saying this guy's MS thirteen
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: gang member.
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: None of these Democrats could even bring themselves to utter
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: the name Lincoln Riley. None of these Democrats could bring
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: themselves to utter the name Joscelyn Nungary. None of these
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: Democrats could bring themselves to utter the name Rachel Brand.
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: The American victims who were murdered by criminal illegal aliens
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: whom Democrats had released, they won't acknowledge, they won't fight for,
• 12:08
  Speaker 2: they don't care about. At the State of the Union
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: when Alexis Nungary, Jocelyn Nungare's mom was sitting next to
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: the First Lady, Milania Trump, and the President introduced her.
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: I know Jocelyn's mom really well. She's an incredible young
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: woman who's shown great courage and fortitude. Not a single
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: Democrat in the Chamber would applaud for. So they cannot
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: bring themselves to stand with Americans whose children have been
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: murdered by violent illegal immigrants whom they released. But you
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: give them an illegal immigrant ordered deported by a court
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: determined to be an MS thirteen gang member, and they
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: are all in and I want you to listen to
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: this exchange. So in the Oval office, the president of
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: El Salvador, President Bucelly, was here this week and he
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: met with President Trump in the Oval Office and there
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: were a number of members of the cabinet there, and
• 12:58
  Speaker 2: CNN of course immediately asked are you going to send
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: this individual back? And the exchanges is quite striking President Bukelly,
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: his answer was quite strong, and President Trump asked as
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: three people asked Pambondy, the Attorney General, asked Stephen Miller,
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: who's the deputy chief of staff and an expert on
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: immigration law, and asked Marco Rubio all to respond to
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: CNN's questions. And I got to say that their answers
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: were a masterclass in how to deal with media misinformation
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: and disinformation. It's a lengthy excerpts, but it's worth hearing
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: because it really does lay out the truth and expose
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: the media lies. Give a listen and.
• 13:41
  Speaker 4: Who your administration says was mistaken which the man who
• 13:45
  Speaker 4: was mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
• 13:47
  Speaker 5: Well, let me ask Pam, would you as to answer.
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: That question, Sir President, First and foremost, he was illegally
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: in our country. He had been illegally in our country.
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: And in twenty nineteen two an immigration court and an
• 14:01
  Speaker 3: appellate immigration court ruled that he was a member of
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: MS thirteen and he was illegally in our country right now.
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: It was a paperwork, it was additional paperwork had needed
• 14:13
  Speaker 3: to be done. That's up to El Salvador if they
• 14:17
  Speaker 3: want to return him. That's not up to us. The
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: Supreme Court rule President that if as El Salvador wants
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: to return him, this is international matters, foreign affairs. If
• 14:27
  Speaker 3: they wanted to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning
• 14:31
  Speaker 3: provide a plane.
• 14:35
  Speaker 6: And if you are doing a great job, and you
• 14:39
  Speaker 6: just also respond to that question because you know it's
• 14:42
  Speaker 6: asked by CNN, and they always ask it with a
• 14:44
  Speaker 6: slant because they're totally slanting because they don't know what's happening.
• 14:48
  Speaker 5: That's why nobody's watching them. But would you answer that
• 14:51
  Speaker 5: question also gladly?
• 14:53
  Speaker 4: So, as Pam mentioned, there's the illegal alien from El Salvador.
• 14:58
  Speaker 4: So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador.
• 15:03
  Speaker 4: So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest
• 15:07
  Speaker 4: that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle
• 15:09
  Speaker 4: their own citizens as a starting point, as two immigration
• 15:13
  Speaker 4: courts found that he was a member of MS thirteen.
• 15:15
  Speaker 4: When President Trump declared MS thirteen to be a foreign
• 15:18
  Speaker 4: terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible
• 15:22
  Speaker 4: under federal law, which I'm sure you know you're very
• 15:24
  Speaker 4: familiar with, the iona that he was no longer eligible
• 15:27
  Speaker 4: for any form of immigration or relief in the United States.
• 15:30
  Speaker 4: So we had a deportation order that was valid, which
• 15:34
  Speaker 4: meant under our law he's not even allowed to be
• 15:36
  Speaker 4: present in the United States and had to be returned
• 15:40
  Speaker 4: because of the foreign terrorist designation. This issue was then
• 15:44
  Speaker 4: by a district court judge completely inverted, and a district
• 15:48
  Speaker 4: court judge tried to tell the administration that they had
• 15:51
  Speaker 4: to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him
• 15:53
  Speaker 4: back here. That issue was raised at the Supreme Court,
• 15:56
  Speaker 4: and the Supreme Court said the district court order was
• 15:59
  Speaker 4: unallowed and its main components were reversed nine zero, unanimously
• 16:04
  Speaker 4: stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the President
• 16:08
  Speaker 4: could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen
• 16:12
  Speaker 4: of El Salvador from Al Salvador, who again is a
• 16:15
  Speaker 4: member of m S thirteen, which is I'm sure you understand, rapes,
• 16:19
  Speaker 4: little girls, murderer's woman, murder's children, is engaged in the
• 16:23
  Speaker 4: most barbaric activities in the world. And I can promise
• 16:25
  Speaker 4: you if he was your neighbor, you would move right away.
• 16:27
  Speaker 5: So you don't plank the Supreme Court. In the Supreme
• 16:32
  Speaker 5: Court save was it nine to nothing?
• 16:34
  Speaker 4: Yes, there's a nine zero in our favor against the
• 16:38
  Speaker 4: district court ruling saying that no district court has the
• 16:41
  Speaker 4: power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States.
• 16:44
  Speaker 4: As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this
• 16:48
  Speaker 4: individual at El salvad Or sole discretion was sent back
• 16:52
  Speaker 4: to our country, that we could deport him a second time. Well,
• 16:55
  Speaker 4: no version of this legally ends up with him ever
• 16:57
  Speaker 4: living here, because he is a citizen of El Sis
• 17:00
  Speaker 4: that is the President of Old Salvador. Your questions about
• 17:03
  Speaker 4: it for the court can only be drifted to him, I.
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: Asked, President, do you plan to return him?
• 17:11
  Speaker 3: Well? Yeah, and post your guys suggested that I smuggle
• 17:14
  Speaker 3: the terrorists in today United States?
• 17:16
  Speaker 5: Right, how can I smuggle how can I return him today?
• 17:20
  Speaker 5: ULA's just like I smuggled him into the United States
• 17:23
  Speaker 5: or whether we do, of course, I'm not going to
• 17:24
  Speaker 5: do it.
• 17:25
  Speaker 4: It's like, I mean, the.
• 17:27
  Speaker 5: Question is preposterous. How can I smuggle the terrorists in today?
• 17:31
  Speaker 5: United States? I don't have the power to return him
• 17:33
  Speaker 5: to the United States. You can release inside of but
• 17:37
  Speaker 5: I'm not releasing. I mean, we're not very fond of
• 17:39
  Speaker 5: releasing terrorists into our country.
• 17:40
  Speaker 3: We just turned the murder capital of the world into
• 17:42
  Speaker 3: the safest country of the Western hemisphere.
• 17:44
  Speaker 6: And he want us to go back into the releasing
• 17:47
  Speaker 6: criminals so they can go back to being the murder
• 17:49
  Speaker 6: capital of the world. And that's that's not kind of
• 17:51
  Speaker 6: But they'd love to have a criminal you know, schedule
• 17:54
  Speaker 6: I mean, I mean there's a fascino.
• 17:57
  Speaker 5: Yeah, sick piece of shick people. Markuld gives something to say.
• 18:02
  Speaker 7: Yeah, I mean, Stephen Iland, I don't understand what the
• 18:04
  Speaker 7: confusion is. This individual is a citizen of Alsavador. He
• 18:08
  Speaker 7: was illegally in the United States and was returned to
• 18:11
  Speaker 7: his country. That's where you deport people back to their
• 18:13
  Speaker 7: country of origin, except for Venezuela. That wasn't refusing to
• 18:16
  Speaker 7: take people back of places like that. I can tell
• 18:18
  Speaker 7: you this, mister President. No, the foreign policy of the
• 18:21
  Speaker 7: United States is conducted by the President of the United States,
• 18:24
  Speaker 7: not by a court. And no court in the United
• 18:26
  Speaker 7: States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of
• 18:28
  Speaker 7: the United States.
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: Is that some senator?
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: You can hear it there. They laid out the facts,
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: the facts that the media are not telling the American people.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: They laid out the connections to the terrorist organization, which
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: is MS thirteen. They laid out the facts that not
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: one but two judges have said he's an MS thirteen
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: gang member. And oh, by the way, when the media
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: says this guy did nothing wrong, he was in the
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: country illegally. He broke into the United States of America.
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: So the entire thing is propaganda from the left.
• 18:57
  Speaker 5: It is.
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: And by the way, I will say on multiple media
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: outlets have tweeted about this illegal immigrant who's been adjudicated
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: to be a gang member. They keep describing him as
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: a quote Maryland father. So since when does an illegal
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: immigrant who happen to be living in Maryland make him
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: a Maryland father. Yes, he was in fact apprehended in Maryland,
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: but he is. He is from l Salvador. It's why. Actually,
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: they asked the president of El Salvador, are you to
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: send him back? And at the end of the day,
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: the president of Al Salvador said, look, why am I?
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: Why would I smuggle a terrorist into the United States.
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: This is someone who's been found to be a member
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: of MS thirteen. It is illegal for him to come
• 19:36
  Speaker 2: to America. You're asking me, would I bring an illegal
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: immigrant terrorist into America? My answer is no. And the
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: media has no answer for that. They're like, no, no, no,
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: we want that. And what's astonishing, Okay, nobody's surprised. CNN
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: wants more illegal immigrant terrorists into this country. MSNBC wants
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: more illegal immigrant terrorists into this country. Now, to be fair,
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: CNN and MSNBC don't have to get votes. They just
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: have to appeal to radical leftists. But Democrats presumably want
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: to get votes from normal people. This is a very
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: curious issue for them to lean all in on. But
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: I got to say this defines who today's Democrat party is.
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: Let me tell you about Patriot Mobile real quick. If
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: you've got a cell phone and your cell phone is
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: not with Patriot Mobile, then the question I got to
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: ask you, is why why have you not made the switch? Well,
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: you should make the switch, and the deal is really easy.
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: You get cutting edge technology. Switching has never been easier.
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: There's no store visits, no hassles. You get to keep
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: your same phone number you have right now. You get
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: to keep your same phone you've got now or upgrade
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: to a new one. And they have a one hundred
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: percent US based team that can activate you literally in minutes.
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: The other thing that I love about Patriot Mobile is
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: this they have access to all three major networks, meaning
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: you get exceptional nationwide coverage. I use Patriot Mobile and
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: half for years. They can even put a second number
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: on a different network on your phone. It's like carrying
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: two phones in one. You can have a work number
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: and a personal number. It's amazing. They have unlimited data plans,
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: mobile hotspots, international roaming, Internet on the go devices, and
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: home internet backup as well. You can get all of
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: this from Patriot Mobile. So why are you waiting? Make
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: the switch today? And by the way, when you pay
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: your bill, you know that about five percent of that
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: bill every month is going back to support conservative causes,
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: causes that stand for our first and or Second Amendment rights,
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: the rights of unborn children. And they stand with our veterans,
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: our first responders, our police and firemen, are EMTs and
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: are wounded warriors. So make a difference. With every call
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: you make. Go to Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict or
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: nine to seven to Patriot right now, use the promo
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: code vertict. You'll get a free month of service. So
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: switch to Patriot Mobile and defend freedom with every call
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: in text you make. That's Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: or nine to seven to Patriot Make the switch today Center.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: Which this issue that we just talked about brings us
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: to another double down issue with Democrats that again they
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: without leadership in the Democratic Party right now. It's pretty
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: clear they're trying to a figure out who's in charge,
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: and b the radicals are getting to push the agenda,
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: which brings us to Harvard, and Trump has said we
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: are freezing the funding going to Harvard. They have slashed
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: over two point two billion in funding to Harvard after
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: the school is defied federal law, and the White House
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: says we're not playing around. A lot of Americans, by
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: the way, may not realize that two point two in fact,
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: a lot more than that is going to Harvard of
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: your tax dollars.
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Harvard gets roughly nine billion dollars in federal taxpayer dollars,
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: so it gets an enormous amount. Now, it's a huge
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: research institution, and it does some good research. It does
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: medical research and scientific research, and some of that researches
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: is valuable. But but what the Trump administration is announced,
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: the Joint Task Force on Combating Anti Semitism has announced
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: that it's freezing over two billion dollars in multi year
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: grants and contracts to Harvard. Uh And and that was
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: following the school's president putting out a statement saying it
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: would not comply with the Trump administration's demands on on
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: anti semitism. And and I got to say, this is
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: a battle that that Harvard and a lot of academic
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: institutions are putting out statements in support of Harvard. So brave,
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: so brave. Now, I will say most other institutions, when
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: the Trump administration has threatened their funding, they've caved, and
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: they've caved very quickly. But the other institutions are happy
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: to applaud Harvard and say yes, yes, yes, lose your
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: funds you're you're so brave. Uh and I And what
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: is striking is that Democrats, Barack Obama, the Democrat governor Massachusetts,
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: are all lining up behind Harvard and and and there
• 23:59
  Speaker 2: is a reason when you look at the core basis
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: of the Democrat Party.
• 24:04
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: You know, there was a time in a prior generation
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: when the Democrat Party was considered a blue collar party.
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: And in the age of FDR, it was a party
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: of union members and working class uh and and and
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: in fact, one of the reasons that that FDR was
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: was treated with contempt is because he was a very
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: wealthy person, as many Democrats are. But but he was
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: considered a quote traitor to his class because he was
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: a rich man who became a historic Democrat leader. Well,
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: that Democrat Party doesn't exist anymore. The Democrat Party no
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: longer cares about the blue collar and in fact, they
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: routinely destroyed blue collar jobs. Today's Democrat Party is a
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: party of coastal elites. And and it is a party
• 24:44
  Speaker 2: that is comprised of big universities and and and big
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: business and big tech and big Hollywood, all of whom
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: have overlapping problems. All of them are are in bed
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: with China and and and all of them have been
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: taken over by radical leftism, by cultural Marxism.
• 25:05
  Speaker 3: As you know.
• 25:06
  Speaker 2: The most recent book I wrote is entitled Unwoke, How
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America, And each chapter breaks
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: down a different major institution that's been captured by the
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: radical left. The first chapter is entitled Universities the Wuhan
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: Lab of the Woke Virus. And what I argue is
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: that it is universities and sadly, my alma mater, Harvard,
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: where the woke virus was first created in a lab,
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: and then it mutated and spread, and it spread throughout
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: just about every other major institution in this country. And
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: so Harvard has been the locusts of much of the
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: radical leftism and cultural Marxism that has done enormous damage
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: to our institutions. And Harvard is digging in, and they're
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: claiming that they're digging in in defense of free speech.
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: But what they're really digging in on on it is
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: they don't want to change their policies. Number One, that
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: discriminate on race. They love discriminating on race. They love
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: dei that they love putting race front and center, which
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: by the way is directly contrary to federal civil rights law.
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: And they also want to continue admitting radical anti Semites.
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: They want to continue looking the other way at prohamas
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: protesters who threaten Jewish students, who threaten violence, who threaten intimidation,
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: who call for genocide, And they want to continue admitting
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: and promoting anti American radicals. And that includes both students
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: and faculty. And so when the administration put a series
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: of demands in place that Harvard said, no, I got
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: to tell you, Harvard thinks they want this fight. In
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: my opinion, the Trump administration is eager for this fight
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: with Harvard. And you could not ask Harvard has an
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: endowment of over fifty billion dollars. And you know, one
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: of my favorite responses to that to Harvard, Everard's supposed
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: stance on principle, where they talked about standing for the
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: First Amendment, is Hillsdale College, which is a great college.
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: It is a conservative college, a free market college. But
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: one of the things they do is they don't take
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: federal money. And Hillsdale actually twigted, well, you can say
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: anything you like, just don't take federal money. And oddly enough,
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: Harvard doesn't want to do that. They want the taxpayers
• 27:23
  Speaker 2: to fund them, but they want to continue to be
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: embracing racism and vitriolic anti American sentiment while at the
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: same time being funded by American tax payers.
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: So when you look at this fight, I do think
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: one of the very interesting parts of all of this
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: that we're talking about is now Americans are really waking
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: up and realizing like where their money has been going,
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: how much of it is going. And you're right, there's
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: some of this as research, and that's thing we can
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: be proud of, and that's a good thing, But a
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: lot of this is going to indoctrinating kids with radical
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: leftist ideals. And that's part of the reason why I
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: think they need this money, right, They want the money
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: for that reason. They've been doing a great job of
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: doing that for the last several decades. So if the
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: money does dry up at places like Harvard and then
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: we start to see more questions being asked about other money.
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: Not only could this change universities in a positive way,
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: I think, for free speech and not having one set
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: of views that are indoctrinated, but it could also save
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: the taxpayers a hell of a lot of money because
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: it's not just Harvard that's getting cash.
• 28:28
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, but Harvard is the perfect test subject. And
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: our universities right now have become indoctrination labs. They've become
• 28:36
  Speaker 2: places that enforce rigid orthodoxy. And if you say something
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: that is contrary to the radical leftist view, you risk
• 28:44
  Speaker 2: being disciplined, you risk being having your grades, and you
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: also risk just not being admitted. And look, some of
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: the question comes down to a very simple what is
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: it that the administration was requesting? Because if the administration
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: was demanding Harvard must teach in every class that Donald
• 29:03
  Speaker 2: Trump is the greatest president who have ever lived, I
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: would agree with Harvard that no university could give in
• 29:09
  Speaker 2: to a government demand about a specific position like that,
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: particularly if it's one they disagree with. But that's not
• 29:17
  Speaker 2: what the Trump administration said. And I have in front
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: of me the letter that the Trump administration said. It's
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: five pages. I'm not going to read it all, but
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: I'm going to read some of the portions of it.
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: So it is addressed both to Alan Garber, who is
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: the president of Harvard University, and the Penny Prisker, who
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: is the lead member of the Harvard Corporation. Penny Pritzker,
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: by the way, was a cabinet member under Barack Obama.
• 29:39
  Speaker 2: And the Harvard Corporation runs all of Harvard. And it's
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: this privately held corporation of all Democrats that run Harvard
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: as this left wing bastion. Here's how the letter begins.
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: Dear doctor Garber, the United States has invested in Harvard
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: University's operation because of the value to the country of
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: scholarly discovery and academic excellence. But an investment is not
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: an entitlement. It depends on Harvard upholding federal civil rights law,
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: and it only makes sense if Harvard fosters the kind
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: of environment that produces intellectual creativity and scholarly rigor, both
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: of which are antithetical to ideological capture. Harvard has in
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: recent years failed to live up to both the intellectual
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment, but we
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: appreciate your expression of commitment to repairing those failures and
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: welcome your collaboration in restoring the university to its promise.
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: We therefore present the below provisions as the basis for
• 30:35
  Speaker 2: an agreement in principle that will maintain Harvard's financial relationship
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: with the federal government. Here's the first governance and leadership reforms.
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: By August twenty twenty five, Harvard must make meaningful governance
• 30:49
  Speaker 2: reform and restructuring to make possible major change consistent with
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: this letter, including fostering clear lines of authority and accountability.
• 30:58
  Speaker 2: Apparently that was objectionable. Empowering tenured professors and senior leadership,
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: and from among the tenured professorate and senior leadership exclusively
• 31:08
  Speaker 2: those most devoted to the scholarly mission of the university
• 31:11
  Speaker 2: and committed to the changes indicated in this letter. Reducing
• 31:15
  Speaker 2: the power held by students and untenured faculty. Reducing the
• 31:19
  Speaker 2: power held by faculty, whether tenured or untenured, at administrators
• 31:23
  Speaker 2: more committed to activism than scholarship. Now, again, this is
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: something Harvard found unacceptable. We're not willing to focus on
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: scholarship instead of activism. Note that's a violation of what
• 31:35
  Speaker 2: we want to do. And reducing forms of governance bloat, duplication,
• 31:39
  Speaker 2: or decentralization that interfere with the possibility of reforms indicating
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: this letter. So that's the first one. Apparently something was
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: objectionable about that.
• 31:48
  Speaker 3: What's the next one?
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: Merit based hiring reform by August twenty twenty five, the
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: university must adopt and implement merit based hiring policies and
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: ceased all preferences based on race, color, religion, sex, or
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: national origin throughout its hiring, promotion, compensation, and related practices
• 32:06
  Speaker 2: among faculty, staff, and leadership. Now, mind you, that is
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: existing federal civil rights law, you cannot discriminate against based
• 32:14
  Speaker 2: on race. And yet for Harvard that is it is outrageous.
• 32:19
  Speaker 2: Of course they want to discriminate based on race. It's
• 32:22
  Speaker 2: an ideological commitment. What's the next one? Merit based admissions reform?
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: By August twenty twenty five, the university must adopt and
• 32:29
  Speaker 2: implement merit based admission policies and cease all preferences based
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: on race, color, national origin, or proxies thereof throughout its
• 32:37
  Speaker 2: undergraduate program, each graduate program, individual, each of its professional schools,
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: and other programs. Again, the idea of actually admitting students
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: based on merit rather than discriminating based on race, which
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: minds you? Discriminating based on race as illegal under federal
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: civil rights law. To Harvard is anathema. What's the next one?
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: International admissions reform? By August twenty twenty five, the university
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: must reform its recruitment, screening, and admission of international students
• 33:06
  Speaker 2: to prevent admitting students hostile to the American values and
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: institutions inscribed in the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence,
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: including students supportive of terrorism or anti Semitism. Again, apparently
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: that is outrageous and unacceptable. The next one viewpoint diversity
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: and admission and hiring. By August twenty twenty five, the
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: university shall commission an external party which will satisfy the
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: Federal Government as to its competence and good faith, to
• 33:39
  Speaker 2: audit the student body, faculty, staff, and leadership for viewpoint
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: diversity such that each department, field, or teaching unit must
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: be individually viewpoint diverse. Now, notably, they're not saying higher conservatives.
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: They're not saying hire Trump supporters. They're saying you cannot
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: have a faculty that is aversally orthodox and indoctrinating that
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: all have the same view that. You know, the left
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: loves to prattle on abo about diversity as our strength,
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: and by diversity they mean we must all be leftist
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: to believe the same thing, but saith though with different
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: skin colors. Now, I actually think diversity means having different ideas,
• 34:19
  Speaker 2: confronting ideas you disagree with. Look, I go through these
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: to give an example. I think each of those demands
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: are very reasonable. They're saying, comply with federal law. Be
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: an institution that actually does what you say, what you
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: claim to be doing. And yet Harvard is outraged. How
• 34:38
  Speaker 2: dare you hold us to the terms of federal law.
• 34:42
  Speaker 2: We cannot comply with that.
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's truly incredible. Don't forget. We do this show Monday, Wednesday,
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: and Friday. Hit that subscriber auto download button. Also, we
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: have a very special guest that's going to join us
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: on Friday's show, So make sure you tune in on Friday.
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: You do not want to miss Friday's show. So hit
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: that subscriber or that auto download button in the center
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: and I will see you back here on Friday morning.