Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 092426 - Education Before Action: How Knowledge Dissolves Intimidation

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 092426 - Education Before Action: How Knowledge Dissolves Intimidation · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:13
  Unknown: Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 0:23
  This mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:26
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:28
  for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial
• 0:35
  function is kind of like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:44
  That is snap,phat,.com.
• 0:47
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International Terahertz frequency wand
• 0:53
  through iteroplanet.com.
• 0:56
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 1:55
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:56
  there we go with our prophetic familiar lyrics from Alvin Lee from so many decades ago. I guess we're going to maybe have a radio show today if the Internet will hold up,
• 2:06
  which happened to us Friday. Of course, Roger Sails with you, Radio Ranch. People's Patriot Network, got Michael and Chris on the line already with us this morning,
• 2:15
  and let me just before we launch into anything else,
• 2:19
  let me give you an explanation because Friday
• 2:22
  really aggravated
• 2:23
  me to to say the least, you know, and we've I I think everybody virtually in the audience knows that about my favorite show of the week is Friday because I enjoy
• 2:33
  convers conversing with Brent so much and the subjects that we cover and the things that spontaneously
• 2:40
  arise
• 2:41
  for discussion, knowledge, and understanding.
• 2:43
  I know everybody kind of feels that way. That's feedback I get anyway.
• 2:48
  So, this past Friday was a particularly
• 2:52
  particularly important Friday for two reasons. First of all, it was Good Friday and secondly, it was Patriot Day combined on the same day as Good Friday, a pretty unusual event, I was really psyched up, I wanted to do the program, and ten minutes before the program, the damn Internet goes down.
• 3:09
  I have a system wide problem of some sort, and my Internet doesn't get back up till Saturday night about 09:00.
• 3:19
  Now, of course, it was three day Easter weekend,
• 3:22
  and
• 3:23
  I just have to say, you know, I've been down here in South America about a little over ten years now on going on eleven,
• 3:30
  and understanding
• 3:31
  and living in these cultures
• 3:33
  down here, and it's the damnedest thing when there's a holiday,
• 3:38
  or in Argentina
• 3:39
  particularly,
• 3:40
  you
• 3:41
  say one word,
• 3:43
  Chris and Michael, and people's eyes
• 3:46
  glaze over,
• 3:47
  and that one word is vacationi.
• 3:51
  All you have to do is say vacationi,
• 3:53
  and they almost go into a catatonic state, and I'm not kidding you. And so we had a combination of a holiday and a three day Easter weekend and all that stuff, and things just don't operate the way they normally do during that type of interruption.
• 4:12
  It was an interesting weekend for me. I can't say it was a good one. Kind of tailed. I got a little better by yesterday, but had a lot of frustration and got a couple things done though. Anyway, I hope your Easter weekend was
• 4:25
  good and
• 4:26
  certainly better than the people in Sri Lanka
• 4:29
  and some of the other outrageous things that we're seeing happening around the world revolving
• 4:34
  around the faith which we profess.
• 4:37
  And
• 4:38
  so anyway, here we go on Monday. It's not the last it's the last full week of April,
• 4:45
  a dastardly
• 4:46
  month,
• 4:47
  of course, because of the annual
• 4:49
  bloodletting that happens around the middle of the Ides of April, if you will, and so we're about to get that behind us and May is
• 4:59
  staring us right in the corner and
• 5:01
  before we know it, we're going to be finished with the first half of the year.
• 5:06
  Second half promises to be
• 5:09
  extremely
• 5:10
  volatile.
• 5:12
  So anyway, we got Michael on with us. We got Chris on with us. Hey, guys. Did you have a pretty good weekend?
• 5:20
  Unknown: Absolutely.
• 5:22
  Unknown: Good. Well, I was having a Michael called in first here right before the program and he and I were having a little conversation and I was asking him how things are going and he said that he had sent his affidavit in.
• 5:35
  Michael, are you there?
• 5:37
  You messed up? Yes, I'm here. Okay, you got your mute off now. Well, Michael said he sent it to the Secretary of State and might as well kick off the week this way and I said, don't send it to the Secretary of State till you send it to the Secretary of The United States. Let's see if we can go over this again.
• 5:54
  The fish
• 5:56
  rots from the head down.
• 5:58
  They control
• 6:00
  from the top down. They've gone to great lengths
• 6:04
  to get every control of every element of our lives they can get their greedy little proboscises
• 6:10
  in and they do it all from the top down.
• 6:13
  Now we have as a group, my experience, I'll bet Chris, he's been around a little bit or probably agree with me. We always insist.
• 6:23
  Our patriot group are like minded people here that want to fight this beast of Babylon and Revelation.
• 6:29
  We always insist on fighting it from the bottom up.
• 6:35
  Have you ever seen Chris We don't move it either way. In in your experience, how many years you've been in this shooting match?
• 6:42
  Unknown: Oh, I guess you could go back to around the 2 thousands, maybe a little before. I woke up a little before, but that's why I really got serious. Okay. So let's say twenty years, right?
• 6:54
  Unknown: I guess so. Have you in your
• 6:58
  twenty years of involvement, and it's pretty heavy involvement because you're very very learned in all of this intricacies
• 7:04
  of the evil empire.
• 7:06
  Have you ever seen anybody that didn't wanna fight this some bitch from the bottom up?
• 7:12
  Unknown: Well, I think they don't know how they haven't examined it critically to discern
• 7:17
  and to realize that they're fighting it from the bottom up, you can't know what you don't know. Well, let me throw another object in because of the excellent
• 7:25
  Unknown: intimidation
• 7:26
  that they've done and accomplished over so many years, and people are scared to go to the federal government, and they come up with rationales like, Oh, that federal government doesn't have any power on me, I'm gonna go to the state. Well, that's ridiculous.
• 7:39
  Wait, they don't have any power on you? Your whole life is molded into their deal. What do you mean they don't have any power on you?
• 7:47
  Oh, well, what kind of a ridiculous statement is that?
• 7:53
  Unknown: Pretty well uninformed,
• 7:54
  Unknown: I'd say. Well, you know Or at least ignoring the other. Well, and and my point of all of this right here is all of us have had that. I had it, Chris. If I wouldn't have had that intimidated fear imposed on me, I probably would have gone and grabbed a passport application ten years earlier and found the answer ten years earlier.
• 8:15
  I was actually scared to interact with the federal government.
• 8:19
  I hate to use the word scared, let's say intimidated
• 8:23
  or apprehensive or whatever you want. It's not like, Oh, hey, Mr. Federal Government. Well, that changes, you see.
• 8:30
  Change? How does that empowerment
• 8:32
  process work? It's only by learning the education.
• 8:36
  The more you learn, the more you understand what a fraud it is, the more you understand that the power that they've imposed on us is only to continue to steal your power. They really don't have any except that when they start pulling triggers, okay,
• 8:52
  and it's all based on fraud.
• 8:54
  And the more you learn and understand that, the more less susceptible you are to their fear and intimidation
• 9:02
  which is nothing but continuing to suck your power,
• 9:05
  okay? They started at birth,
• 9:08
  they sucked your power away for almost you even took your first or second breath, okay? And then, later on, as you go up and you get in a mindset where your mind works, then, they continue to steal that power by the by the overuse of sheer force
• 9:24
  and putting, I mean, look, what is it? Go to the Oxford English Dictionary. Michael, do you know what the Oxford English Dictionary is? It's the finest dictionary in the world.
• 9:38
  If
• 9:39
  you go in to a library that has one, there's like 13 or 14 volumes and they take up an entire shelf or more if they got small shelves.
• 9:50
  It's recognized
• 9:51
  across the board as the finest dictionary in the world.
• 9:55
  Have you ever gone to the Oxford English
• 9:58
  Dictionary,
• 9:59
  Michael, and looked up the word terrorism?
• 10:06
  I know you haven't, it's a rhetorical question. Do you know what the definition in the finest, most recognized as the finest dictionary in the world is of this word that's being thrown around so liberably every damn day in our lives these days? Terrorism?
• 10:22
  The definition of terrorism No,
• 10:25
  intimidation
• 10:27
  by government.
• 10:29
  That is the definition of terrorism in the finest dictionary of the world and it goes on as started in the French Revolution.
• 10:41
  Okay, they do that terrorism
• 10:43
  to continue
• 10:45
  to keep you
• 10:46
  powerless.
• 10:49
  The one way you start down the path of curing
• 10:53
  that, of overcoming that, is to educate yourself because the more you educate yourself,
• 10:59
  the more you understand the fraud, where the weaknesses are, how the system's set up, and that is empowering
• 11:07
  to you.
• 11:09
  Now, the first time that you've gone through this,
• 11:12
  what is it? Is it is it like a baptism or something, Chris? You you dunk people in water and bring em up and they're Uh-huh.
• 11:21
  Okay. But you go through that through that ceremony and the ceremony is
• 11:28
  that you submit your document
• 11:30
  be it affidavit or statement, to the proper authority
• 11:34
  as to what your correct status is.
• 11:37
  That's your graduation.
• 11:39
  Everything else up to that point you've been in school, okay, but you get up to to that point, you got an education and you find you got your little sheepskin,
• 11:47
  you got you got your little all your little accoutrements,
• 11:51
  you know, pomp and circumstance,
• 11:52
  all that kind of stuff, and bam, now you're in the free real world. Now then you go out there and you got a little of this knowledge, you're still apprehensive,
• 12:00
  but you've gone through the previous steps,
• 12:03
  and you gotta go do something like apply for something, apply for social security,
• 12:08
  or go apply for this, apply for that, and you go in, you're somewhat reticent,
• 12:13
  and you go in and and have an interaction with the person that you're supposed to be dealing with, the nice bureaucrat,
• 12:19
  and all of a sudden, they do exactly for the most part what you want them to do and everything's nice and you walk away and you go, holy smokes, that was easy.
• 12:28
  And so now you see what's happened. You've gotten into consciousness,
• 12:33
  you've graduated from school, and now you're starting to build on the basis of your empowerment
• 12:39
  because that
• 12:40
  interaction you just had when you walk away go, Wow, well they did what I wanted them to do.
• 12:45
  Okay, and now you start here's the change.
• 12:48
  That's where the change happens because now instead of reticently having to go talk to the bureaucrat,
• 12:56
  now you've gotten partially empowered a little bit and you start looking for situations
• 13:01
  where you can go interact with them.
• 13:05
  The more you interact with them and the more they do what you want them to do, the more empowered
• 13:12
  you get,
• 13:13
  the freer you get, man.
• 13:15
  And you can only start it with education,
• 13:18
  and to my knowledge there's
• 13:20
  process to go through. Now, there may be some that I don't know about but this is the one I've personally gone through and that I've seen many of you go through too.
• 13:30
  Unknown: Well, Roger, there's a couple of things you mentioned there. One, is familiarity
• 13:36
  leads success.
• 13:37
  Yes. So as we go out and experience, engage,
• 13:41
  we become more comfortable with the process and less fearful.
• 13:44
  In fact, it's my contention
• 13:47
  that fear
• 13:48
  is the absence of knowledge.
• 13:51
  Unknown: I think fear is the absence of power.
• 13:55
  Unknown: Well, certainly
• 13:57
  not knowing the powers, I agree with that. I
• 14:02
  Unknown: mean, stands you know, I heard this thirty, forty years ago. Fear stands for fantasized
• 14:07
  experiences
• 14:09
  appearing real.
• 14:11
  Okay, there's another acronym Okay, for it out
• 14:13
  what let's analyze that fantasized
• 14:16
  experiences, and I guarantee you, everybody in this audience has
• 14:21
  had in your past at least once this has happened to you, and that's as you gotta do something and you conjure up this, oh my god, what can happen? This, that, and the other, and all of those questions,
• 14:33
  and that's fear,
• 14:35
  and that stops you from doing what it is that needs to be done.
• 14:41
  And then at some point,
• 14:43
  you're going to get to a point where you gotta do it,
• 14:46
  and you go do it and you look back and you go, What the hell was I scared of?
• 14:51
  Now, yeah, I know that's happened to everybody that's hearing these words because I think it's basically a human situation
• 14:58
  that's
• 14:59
  common denominator to all of us, and that is that fantasized experience appearing real. Now I'm going to give you a perfect example I alluded to earlier.
• 15:09
  When I had to go pick up that passport application because I knew I was leaving the country and I'd never had one before and I knew they had them at the post office because I used to work for Pitney Bowes and I was in a bunch of post offices all the time. Okay?
• 15:24
  And so,
• 15:26
  I I I had made the decision to move to move and leave the country. I'd made the decision to move to Argentina and I knew damn well I couldn't do it if I didn't have a passport.
• 15:36
  So, reluctantly,
• 15:38
  with much reticence,
• 15:39
  I went to the post office to pick up the form and there at the top of the first page is the answer I've been looking for for fifteen years.
• 15:55
  Been looking
• 15:57
  for for fifteen
• 15:59
  years and was held back because of fear.
• 16:09
  You can't do it. You've got to come in and intellectually,
• 16:12
  emotionally get over it and realize here that we're going back to a real base document, okay? Vattel's Law of Nations. It was written in the 1700.
• 16:22
  That v a t t e l, I believe, isn't it, Chris? Two t's?
• 16:27
  Unknown: I think it is two t's and it is a very interesting
• 16:31
  fact that Frederick Bastet also wrote one called The Law. The Law is really quite clear. Lot of them are writing. Law is exceptional
• 16:40
  Unknown: from Bastier in about '18 when do you write that? Thirty five, forty, eighteen? Oh, I don't remember what year. Well, well, it was in the '18 It was in the first half, middle of their eighteen hundreds. Just a short read. It's unbelievably
• 16:55
  profound.
• 16:56
  But you
• 16:58
  know, he was what his trade was, he was an economist.
• 17:02
  He wasn't a lawyer. Yes.
• 17:04
  Okay?
• 17:05
  But
• 17:07
  Vattel, V A T T E L, let's say that if it's V A if there's any deviation of that, it's one T,
• 17:14
  okay? It's V as in Victor,
• 17:17
  V as in Victor,
• 17:18
  Vattel's
• 17:19
  Law of Nations
• 17:20
  is a big wide ranging law book from a guy that was legally oriented
• 17:26
  that wrote this very scholarly
• 17:29
  tome that every country in the world signed on to and adheres to to this day by
• 17:36
  most part.
• 17:38
  And
• 17:39
  in those basic building block foundational books and ideas
• 17:43
  from Wattel
• 17:44
  was that every man has the right of personal
• 17:49
  political,
• 17:50
  self determination.
• 17:52
  What does that mean? That means I can go be with whatever bunch I wanna be with.
• 18:00
  Unknown: Well, that's kind of the
• 18:02
  ability to speak or not to speak, to associate or not to associate. In fact, I think it's a duty rather than a right, a responsibility
• 18:10
  to be very selective
• 18:12
  and protective about who
• 18:15
  Unknown: you communicate with, who you talk to, who you give evidence to potentially. Well, I was gonna take it in the specific direction of the conversation we've been having this morning started by really Michael
• 18:26
  in the fact that Vattel says you have the right to be with who you want to, okay?
• 18:32
  Which means that it's your choice,
• 18:35
  alright? So, if you gotta look at it this way, welcome Darryl on board here. If they tell you what you are, if they tell you what you are, it's tyranny.
• 18:46
  I'm gonna tell you that you're a slave.
• 18:49
  Boom. Okay?
• 18:51
  If they they can't do that because tyranny is absolutely
• 18:55
  you look at the news today, any kind of tyrannical stuff, everybody goes nuts. It's against the law of nations, but they can turn that thing around,
• 19:05
  set it up with all these screwy eight words with opposite definitions,
• 19:10
  put you in a condition of servitude that is
• 19:13
  voluntary,
• 19:14
  and then ask you to confirm it,
• 19:17
  and that's what they've been doing. They don't have any power. It's all based on fraud, and that's what we gotta get our people down to where they lose a lot of their fear and get re empowered. Hey, Darryl. What's going on, buddy? Did you have a good Easter weekend?
• 19:33
  Unknown: Man,
• 19:34
  I I had a great resurrection Sunday.
• 19:37
  Yeah.
• 19:38
  So,
• 19:39
  yeah,
• 19:42
  you guys are playing in my sandbox this morning.
• 19:46
  Unknown: Oh, boy. And
• 19:48
  Unknown: yeah. And
• 19:50
  because you're talking about Vattel and Bastille.
• 19:53
  And,
• 19:55
  I mean, listen.
• 19:57
  If anybody doesn't have
• 19:59
  the book Bastiat the law by Bastiat,
• 20:01
  b a s t I a t
• 20:04
  I said that fast, didn't I? Sorry.
• 20:07
  Get it. You'll you'll treasure it.
• 20:13
  So yeah.
• 20:16
  It's
• 20:17
  he he wrote that in 1850.
• 20:19
  It was published in 1850 right prior to the
• 20:23
  civil war in The States here.
• 20:25
  So
• 20:27
  the
• 20:28
  well, Mattel's Law of Nations,
• 20:32
  I have it
• 20:34
  I I can't read it all the way through because it's voluminous,
• 20:37
  but it has
• 20:39
  I've I've looked at it a fair amount.
• 20:42
  And
• 20:43
  so everything Roger was saying is spot on
• 20:48
  as to who he was, the premise,
• 20:51
  everybody signing on to it at that period of time
• 20:56
  in the
• 20:59
  seventeen hundreds. Yeah. And
• 21:03
  so
• 21:06
  here's what I've got to add to that.
• 21:10
  I've been looking
• 21:12
  at New Zealand, Australia,
• 21:17
  in different
• 21:19
  places, particularly those
• 21:21
  of the British Commonwealth
• 21:24
  or their or their ex Commonwealth.
• 21:28
  And
• 21:30
  it's appearing more and more I'm getting more evidence
• 21:34
  in my mind that they're not playing by that rule book anymore.
• 21:40
  And
• 21:42
  Let me it
• 21:44
  appears
• 21:45
  Unknown: go ahead, Roger. Go ahead. Well, I'll give you a specific example.
• 21:51
  The way the US government
• 21:53
  adheres to Vattel,
• 21:55
  on that statement, every man has the right of political self determination,
• 22:01
  is they tell you and have a system where you can expatriate,
• 22:07
  what they call, okay? Yeah. And it's a formal system. You gotta go through the guy at the embassy.
• 22:12
  You gotta go. Here's the process,
• 22:14
  okay?
• 22:15
  It is they, you gotta go get a second passport
• 22:19
  first.
• 22:20
  Passport. Okay? Then, you gotta go to the embassy and pay now, I think, for over $4.00
• 22:27
  and
• 22:27
  you gotta go through a specific
• 22:30
  guy
• 22:30
  at the embassy because I met one of em, okay? And you gotta go through this long process which used to take an afternoon
• 22:38
  that now takes over three or four months,
• 22:41
  okay? And that's how they adhere to Vatel
• 22:45
  telling you that you can trade one slave passport for another slave passport.
• 22:50
  They don't tell you that you can repatriate
• 22:54
  to your old original status.
• 22:56
  They hide that, as we know so skillfully,
• 22:59
  and I mean they do it skillfully.
• 23:04
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 23:05
  Yeah.
• 23:07
  So
• 23:10
  they
• 23:12
  the days,
• 23:13
  the the US State Department,
• 23:17
  Treasury,
• 23:18
  and
• 23:19
  so on and so forth, they
• 23:23
  ostensibly
• 23:26
  adhere to Patel's law of nation,
• 23:30
  but that's a fixed game too because
• 23:33
  you're not expatriating
• 23:35
  out of what you originally should have been to begin with anyway. Correct. And
• 23:41
  so it's
• 23:42
  there there again, it's a it's a house of mirrors.
• 23:47
  Sleight of hand. And so you in Ecuador
• 23:50
  yeah. In in in Ecuador
• 23:53
  yeah. Which which cup is to pee under?
• 23:55
  In Ecuador, you have a lot of expats
• 23:58
  who probably done that very thing. Right? Am I am I thinking correct there?
• 24:04
  Unknown: I don't. I've met a couple. Oh, you go to lunch with them, don't you? Yeah, I do. They're down here, but most of them haven't
• 24:12
  expatriated.
• 24:13
  They just got residency down here. Now, you know, one of the while we're on that while we're on that, let me interject something here. There are a lot of people that want a second passport
• 24:23
  and go pay quarter to $500,000
• 24:26
  or more to some of the islands and stuff to go get them,
• 24:29
  okay?
• 24:30
  If
• 24:31
  you get residency here after a couple of years, you're eligible for a passport. I think it's $25.
• 24:37
  Okay?
• 24:38
  And then you can have two passports.
• 24:41
  As many of the expats here do have two passports.
• 24:47
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 24:50
  I
• 24:52
  well, that that whole word's loaded for me, Roger.
• 24:55
  That whole word is very loaded for me.
• 24:58
  And
• 24:59
  I'm not sure I wanna be anybody's res ident.
• 25:04
  Unknown: Hear. Hear. Because
• 25:08
  Unknown: it's
• 25:10
  it it that word is full of pitfalls. Of course it is. It's as problematic as the word person and citizen.
• 25:16
  Unknown: Well and you go go back and look at Vattel. Have you gotten to the point of Vattel where he deals with residents and residency?
• 25:26
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 25:28
  Unknown: Every time
• 25:29
  I believe I've got it marked. Every time he uses the word, Darryl will confirm this,
• 25:35
  he uses the word resident alien.
• 25:37
  They never use just the word resident.
• 25:44
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 25:45
  And
• 25:46
  Unknown: So let me send my personal thing. Let me inject this, Darryl, before you get off on it. I didn't do any residency
• 25:53
  in Argentina
• 25:55
  for nine years and I lived in the country illegally for nine years well, about eight and a half years, I guess.
• 26:02
  Unknown: I'm proud of you. It
• 26:05
  Unknown: made life a lot more difficult
• 26:08
  in some standpoints.
• 26:10
  They didn't stop
• 26:12
  you on the street and say, As your resident,
• 26:14
  although I did as I was leaving, if you'll remember,
• 26:18
  they had a blackout in Buenos Aires.
• 26:21
  If you had an expired visa, you couldn't rent a hotel room,
• 26:26
  so they were clamping down on some of that,
• 26:29
  but I went ahead and did it here just because of that experience
• 26:34
  and the standpoint that I figured I'm gonna be here for a while and it there if you don't get it and overstay your visa, some countries are
• 26:43
  more more finicky than others about it.
• 26:48
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 26:51
  So
• 26:53
  being in the situation you're in in the circumstances,
• 26:57
  which amounts to a foreign country,
• 27:02
  somewhat,
• 27:05
  You don't have the the Bill of Rights to fall back upon that that other
• 27:11
  that other status.
• 27:15
  Yeah. You know, I I don't I haven't read the Ecuadorian constitution,
• 27:19
  but I I don't think they have the
• 27:22
  a
• 27:24
  Unknown: the Bill of Rights or maybe mean, I that's just an assumption on my part. Well, with the new president in there, the way they 've ridden roughshod over Assaj,
• 27:34
  kinda tells you that there may be some subject to interpretation
• 27:38
  rules there.
• 27:40
  Unknown: That ain't nothing but a doggone through the paper.
• 27:46
  Unknown: Well,
• 27:47
  what
• 27:49
  so
• 27:52
  where where I'm going with this is that
• 27:56
  as I follow
• 27:58
  as I track the difference between what is or what what what we're told it is and what it really is.
• 28:06
  Okay.
• 28:07
  And,
• 28:08
  I mean, I can't I can't even emphasize how important that is for people to track that
• 28:14
  track
• 28:16
  the contradictions. You know, you're told this is what it is,
• 28:19
  but
• 28:20
  then you see something different.
• 28:23
  And
• 28:24
  so they they keep telling us,
• 28:27
  or a lot of people talk about
• 28:31
  the constitution.
• 28:32
  You hear about the Bill of Rights. You hear about Patel. Not very often.
• 28:37
  Okay? And then when you track, you track what's supposed to be going on with that.
• 28:42
  Well, something completely different is going on,
• 28:45
  and you find
• 28:47
  that there's a whole other different parallel set of legality is going on.
• 28:54
  And then when you start tracing that back, find out that you're
• 29:00
  not in Ecuador, you're not in in Great Britain
• 29:04
  or or England. You're not really in this thing called The United States. You're in the United Nations.
• 29:12
  And
• 29:14
  and
• 29:15
  they're operating under
• 29:17
  different international
• 29:20
  law
• 29:22
  than
• 29:24
  Battelle
• 29:26
  and what people had originally agreed to. Okay? So remember, you know, so the the origin you know, the The United States Of America,
• 29:35
  okay,
• 29:36
  signed up with Vattel,
• 29:38
  but, you know
• 29:41
  Unknown: we're not really in that place. For appearances only. Don't forget what it says in Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars that Tom brought out that couple of times.
• 29:50
  What we do may not always
• 29:53
  be lawful,
• 29:55
  but it will always be legal,
• 29:59
  and there's your difference in lawful and legal. There's the difference in Vattel
• 30:04
  and the law merchant.
• 30:06
  Now what they've done, I heard this a number of years ago, I've mentioned it on the show before, but it's a very succinct
• 30:15
  description of what's gone on.
• 30:18
  When we were under the common law,
• 30:20
  the common law is public law. It's for everybody,
• 30:24
  and we were using public law, but we were using it for private purposes.
• 30:30
  What they've done is brought in the law merchant,
• 30:33
  the UCC,
• 30:35
  and so now we're using
• 30:36
  private law instead of public law, and we're using private law for public purposes.
• 30:44
  Unknown: Exactly.
• 30:46
  That's exactly And
• 30:47
  so here's here's where it gets really interesting too. Okay. I can I can I can put the
• 30:54
  put the whipped cream on that
• 30:56
  is that
• 30:57
  United States citizens
• 31:00
  are
• 31:01
  public citizens
• 31:04
  of a private corporation?
• 31:05
  So they're they're they're corporate private citizens.
• 31:09
  They're corporate public citizens.
• 31:12
  Okay?
• 31:13
  So if you're a corporate public citizen, you're you're an article in commerce under the the UCC,
• 31:20
  under the law of merchant, under mercantilism,
• 31:23
  under okay.
• 31:25
  You know?
• 31:27
  Unknown: How about this, Derek? How about private
• 31:30
  corporate
• 31:31
  property?
• 31:34
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 31:35
  Yeah. That
• 31:37
  that works for me. Okay because
• 31:40
  that's what
• 31:41
  okay that right there okay exactly what you said Roger that right there is exactly.
• 31:48
  A resident.
• 31:50
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 31:51
  Yeah. And, you know, from my standpoint here, let me just because I got a personal experience here with this on both sides of the fence. Oh. And the reason I did it was so that I figured I'm going to stay here some years and I didn't want to be hassled,
• 32:06
  and the main thing is if you don't have that connection and that identification,
• 32:12
  whatever they call it in whatever country,
• 32:15
  you can't go open a bank account, you can't go get a connection for a utility, you generally can't go out if you don't know somebody and go rent someplace because everybody wants to see that
• 32:28
  ID card
• 32:29
  that gives them some kind of recourse,
• 32:33
  and you're not some foreigner. Now let me tell you, the reason is because a lot of foreigners that come down to these countries here, I'm sure around the world, that don't do that,
• 32:44
  and they go and rent someplace,
• 32:47
  and they run up all these bills,
• 32:49
  and then they skip out and the landlord's
• 32:51
  got no recourse.
• 32:55
  Unknown: Yeah. If I may. I I mean, it it go ahead.
• 33:00
  Unknown: Well, I was going to note that I am always correcting people when they're asking me for that
• 33:06
  treacherous tricky question. Do you have any ID?
• 33:09
  That ID relates to residency, and I'm not one of those. I do have documents, credentials, and papers if you'd like to see them, but I've been not being a resident. I can't give you ID.
• 33:20
  Unknown: No. There you go. Also,
• 33:22
  Unknown: everything is legal. Nothing is illegal
• 33:25
  unless someone makes the allegation.
• 33:28
  And if you don't rebut the presumption,
• 33:30
  then it stands as truth rebut un rebutted, and you become guilty by not replying and rebutting the presumption. Silence. Well, that's what's dangerous about legal versus lawful. Lawful, you're either in law or out of law. It's clear, bright line. But legal,
• 33:44
  Unknown: there are more than 50 shades of gray. Yep. Let me also bring up another point, especially some of you guys that are new, how much I harp on this substantive law, that video, the science law,
• 33:56
  knowing those formulas and understanding
• 33:59
  interactions and how it works.
• 34:02
  So, Darryl and any of you that file an affidavit that stay in The US
• 34:07
  and don't have to go through what I've gone through and people that do, okay,
• 34:12
  You have revoked your residency,
• 34:14
  you've rebutted it, and yet you live where you still lived.
• 34:19
  So let me ask Michael because he's kind of a new guy here. Michael,
• 34:24
  when
• 34:26
  you get your affidavit
• 34:27
  up there to the Secretary of State to the right place and the right people,
• 34:32
  where is your residency?
• 34:34
  You've said in the affidavit that you're not a resident under the fourteenth amendment in The United States,
• 34:40
  but you're still in The United States,
• 34:43
  so where is your residency?
• 34:45
  Well,
• 34:49
  Unknown: I've thought in that code, the National Area Code, I have one of those, I'm not sure Okay. How to answer
• 34:56
  Unknown: Well, let me explain it to you.
• 34:58
  If you go back and learn those basics of law, the formula
• 35:02
  is r plus d equals R.
• 35:05
  All laws on the entire planet revolve under that formula:
• 35:10
  rights plus duties
• 35:12
  equal remedies,
• 35:14
  and if you're a person,
• 35:16
  it depends on which
• 35:17
  group of law you get your rights from
• 35:20
  as to where you owe your correlative
• 35:23
  duties.
• 35:25
  So if you're not getting them from the fourteenth amendment,
• 35:28
  where are you getting them?
• 35:32
  Unknown: Natural law.
• 35:35
  Unknown: You get your laws now from God the way the
• 35:38
  country was originally founded and since you get your laws from God, you owe your duties to him and to heaven. So, your residency, when you file that paperwork and still live in The US,
• 35:50
  your residency is heaven
• 35:53
  legally.
• 35:57
  Okay. So I have to put I have to put that on there? No. No. You don't. But you gotta learn the information. That's what I'm trying to hammer over to all you guys. You gotta learn these if you you don't have to. Okay? If you don't wanna understand, you wanna fumble through things, don't do it. But if you wanna have command of this and command to yourself and your freedom, you'll learn those substantive
• 36:20
  issues of law. Brian,
• 36:22
  you can't. Brian,
• 36:25
  you can't call me on my private number. I'm over on the other computer on the show link, but if you want to call, I'll entertain your call. But that formula,
• 36:34
  I cannot impress
• 36:36
  how important it is to have total command of that and what is a person and how that fits into the fourteenth amendment,
• 36:43
  and if you will get that or you know it in your sleep,
• 36:47
  you can cut through anything they throw at you like a hot knife through butter. Hey, Brian. Brian.
• 36:57
  Unknown: Oh, you're getting him hooked up there. I'm out. Oh, we're
• 37:01
  Unknown: we're hooked up. It was a little on his eye. How you doing, buddy? A little on his eye. Hold on. Let me turn my computer off here. Sorry, Roger. I got two playing.
• 37:11
  Okay. You got it with the show on in the background?
• 37:15
  Unknown: While he's doing that Yes. Perhaps more
• 37:19
  proper terms or at least more appropriate terms might be that you're domiciled
• 37:24
  rather than reside,
• 37:25
  and you're permanent your domicile is your person at place you live,
• 37:30
  abide
• 37:31
  in heaven.
• 37:32
  Correct.
• 37:33
  That's where you're domiciled,
• 37:35
  your permanent place. Yep. As opposed to being a mere transient zone sojourner here on
• 37:41
  Terra,
• 37:43
  well, land here on Earth.
• 37:46
  These are very, very
• 37:48
  critical definitions that we have to delineate specificity
• 37:52
  Unknown: or else we risk having them termed as war dart weapons against us. Well, that's what John used to like the word domicile. Hey, Brian, have you got your things straightened down over there? I
• 38:02
  Unknown: think I have. Can you hear me okay? Loud and clear.
• 38:06
  Okay. Hello.
• 38:07
  Unknown: Hey, man. Have a good weekend. You
• 38:10
  and the family and the girls have a good weekend.
• 38:13
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 38:14
  We had a nice weekend, pretty relaxed around here. Good morning, everybody.
• 38:18
  Thought I'd hop in. Was definitely interested in the conversation.
• 38:25
  Unknown: Well, did you have anything to add or you just wanna hop in?
• 38:29
  Unknown: I'll hop in, maybe add here at some point. I don't know. Was just listening in. I thought I'd hop in.
• 38:35
  Daryl and I were chatting a little bit, email earlier on the
• 38:39
  status thing and once again the birth certificate stuff came up. So obviously that's always on
• 38:46
  the tip of my mind because it
• 38:49
  always just relates back to this dang thing how they got us at our birth. And
• 38:54
  Unknown: they
• 38:55
  snuck the whole feudal system in under where your status is assigned from birth because that came from the feudal system and once they got the camel's nose under the tent, they just brought the rest of it. They just didn't tell any of us.
• 39:13
  Unknown: Yep.
• 39:16
  Unknown: Okay,
• 39:17
  so the whole thing goes back to that presumption
• 39:20
  right there that from birth
• 39:23
  you're considered to be their property, it's a presumption presumption of law, and if you want to go to the Lawlight Dictionary
• 39:30
  and go look up the phrase presumption of law, and it says based upon another fact. Well, when the other fact is fraud,
• 39:39
  this is easily dismissible.
• 39:48
  Unknown: Hey, good morning, Daryl and Chris. Yeah.
• 39:52
  Unknown: Morning, Brian. Hey,
• 39:55
  Unknown: Daryl,
• 39:56
  you mentioned something earlier. I just thought, hey, you might wanna mention it because you had two really good points. I had brought up something that, you know, I had gone into the hospital, which everyone's aware of, and I have the original documents,
• 40:09
  the medical file,
• 40:11
  supposedly the entire medical file.
• 40:14
  And
• 40:15
  I thought of,
• 40:16
  you know, and you Daryl, you could probably go into this deeper, you know, regarding
• 40:22
  Tommy Schram's experience, but it seems to be this presumption of the birth certificate regardless of how we say we're resident, non resident,
• 40:32
  US national,
• 40:33
  American national, etcetera, whatever
• 40:36
  is
• 40:38
  I'm starting to think this is like regardless of what we do,
• 40:42
  presumption until that birth certificate bond is returned,
• 40:49
  annulled,
• 40:50
  disputed, disputed, revoked,
• 40:52
  etcetera, whatever process you wanna call it. And until that thing's really officially challenged,
• 40:59
  then they just continue to
• 41:01
  it's almost, Roger, like you you put it when you first I started learning this stuff from you is if we don't go rebut our status at the top level, well, we've done that, but yet we still haven't gone back and rebutted and basically tried to challenge this bursary to But you don't have to because that's fraud. When you rebutted a fraud at the top, all the rest of the frauds go along the wayside.
• 41:23
  Unknown: I don't believe that you've got to go back and take every one of those ever confirmatory
• 41:29
  contracts
• 41:30
  that they use to confirm your status of voluntary servitude.
• 41:35
  I think all that's wiped away,
• 41:38
  Brian.
• 41:41
  Let me tell you one of the things, and I don't have any verification on this, I wish I did, and
• 41:47
  that was this guy that called in to help me with Skype a couple of months ago
• 41:53
  that I don't have any kind of relationship with except peripheral,
• 41:57
  and he said that he had worked for 15 or 20 agencies
• 42:01
  and he didn't have a top
• 42:03
  security clearance, but he had friends in some of those agencies he's made that did,
• 42:09
  and they checked his status
• 42:11
  and they came back and told him that he was listed under
• 42:16
  a courier
• 42:17
  with ambassadorial
• 42:19
  basically status.
• 42:22
  Now
• 42:22
  that was new to me, I don't have any confirmation from it,
• 42:26
  except
• 42:27
  what he told me, but then two weeks later we get the story about Victoria and her husband, who her husband was the naturalized
• 42:36
  guy in Texas,
• 42:38
  the first one that got a passport,
• 42:40
  and their experience through LAX coming back from Christmas,
• 42:44
  and those two things happen within two weeks of each other. So I think there's a change in status in the background. Change in status. Exactly.
• 42:52
  Unknown: Add to that, the discovery that I found on the state department's website
• 42:58
  and the one having to do with a diplomatic immunity for law
• 43:03
  officers guide
• 43:05
  that
• 43:06
  the citizen
• 43:08
  US national that special other status, a US citizen on passport form, page three, bottom of the morning block, not a US citizen. Title eight, best deep, seven zero one,
• 43:20
  parenthetical
• 43:21
  small a,
• 43:22
  parenthetical 22,
• 43:24
  parenthetical capital b explicitly,
• 43:28
  gives aspects
• 43:29
  that are tantamount to diplomatic,
• 43:31
  ambassadorial,
• 43:32
  or
• 43:33
  consular immunity,
• 43:35
  and that might explain the special and curious
• 43:39
  treatment
• 43:40
  that those individuals
• 43:43
  experience.
• 43:44
  Unknown: I mean, you know, listen, Brian. They wouldn't call at the back of the State Department in their own nomenclature,
• 43:52
  they would not call it citizenship
• 43:55
  evidence
• 43:57
  citizenship
• 43:59
  evidence
• 44:01
  if they didn't take it seriously.
• 44:06
  Unknown: I
• 44:07
  definitely agree with you. I'm just wondering out
• 44:11
  of the box here, really, I'm not saying, Hey, do this or that. It just seems that the I think we all agree that the birth this
• 44:19
  process of basically creating this,
• 44:23
  you know,
• 44:24
  registering
• 44:25
  and creating a an entity corporation,
• 44:29
  something separate than me, the living piece of flesh, you know, was created when they registered and created this
• 44:35
  corporation,
• 44:36
  basically, in an all caps thing. So my my my living body came out. You know, I was born. I wasn't birthed.
• 44:44
  And then
• 44:45
  Daryl actually sent me a good video, but, you know, it has to do with the seventy two hours thing. I'm not sure if I'm totally on board with that, but
• 44:53
  regardless,
• 44:53
  then they go and they register.
• 44:56
  And you guys all know the story with the documentation
• 45:00
  that we discovered was the verification of VOF, the verification of facts that was
• 45:05
  done even to my two daughters that birth certificates were created without my
• 45:10
  Unknown: consent or me and my wife didn't sign nothing. We weren't even asked to sign anything. You're you're a piece of property. Why would they ask you to sign something?
• 45:18
  Unknown: I I agree. I I I agree with that for sure. Okay.
• 45:22
  Unknown: So there's the presumption.
• 45:24
  It came from you and your wife and to your two daughters.
• 45:28
  It was also instituted
• 45:30
  when you got born and when your parents got born and more than likely when your grandparents got born. And your grandchildren. Okay?
• 45:38
  And that's the feudal era, but when you, Brian Howard,
• 45:43
  want to volunteer out just like in the old feudal era, because all those laws evidently apply,
• 45:50
  you go to the lord of the manor, the secretary of state, you give him your I'm leaving letter,
• 45:56
  and you leave.
• 46:00
  Unknown: I'm out of here.
• 46:02
  Okay, now
• 46:03
  Unknown: this is I've done that. You see here, this is where I think is really important to this discussion
• 46:09
  and I believe John is absolutely correct
• 46:12
  in his
• 46:14
  idea
• 46:15
  that there
• 46:17
  are a lot of ambient noise. If somebody could hit your mute and get some of that out of there, I'd appreciate it. I think John thought that the birth
• 46:26
  certificate
• 46:27
  was a commercial document
• 46:30
  called the warehouse
• 46:31
  receipt.
• 46:32
  Have you done any research on warehouse receipts, Brian?
• 46:38
  Unknown: Yes.
• 46:38
  It's absolutely a warehouse receipt. It's it's on bond paper.
• 46:43
  It's a financial instrument. It's registered.
• 46:46
  It's held in a private vault, as you guys know. I mean, I went in and hell there's armed guards basically somewhere
• 46:52
  in this building in the health, every state's
• 46:55
  health records department,
• 46:57
  there's a vault right back behind that door according to the guy that described
• 47:02
  in detail of the verification of facts and the computer system and all that stuff.
• 47:07
  It's held in a bank vault, so absolutely it's It's a warehouse receipt. Warehouse
• 47:14
  Unknown: receipt. It's a specific legal instrument. Now, what is the unique part of a warehouse receipt that makes it so powerful?
• 47:29
  Unknown: Don't know the answer to that, but I would say probably
• 47:32
  the connection to
• 47:35
  the
• 47:36
  bond or the fund of some type. I'm not sure, I can't answer that. Warehouse A numerical designator.
• 47:43
  Unknown: Go ahead, Chris.
• 47:45
  I said the numerical designator. What makes a warehouse receipt as a commercial instrument so powerful
• 47:52
  is because the paper
• 47:55
  actually
• 47:56
  becomes
• 47:57
  the good.
• 48:01
  You had a bale of cotton if
• 48:04
  you had a bale of cotton in a warehouse, Brian,
• 48:07
  and you, not in New Orleans, but over there in Texas, you had the warehouse receipt,
• 48:13
  that bale of cotton is in your backyard
• 48:17
  because you have constructive
• 48:19
  possession of it. The good becomes the paper.
• 48:25
  Unknown: I agree. Okay.
• 48:27
  Unknown: Now, the a couple of years ago, you remember when that sleazy Corzine,
• 48:32
  John Corzine,
• 48:33
  who was Goldman
• 48:35
  Sachs baby and then he went on to become a senator and he became the mayor of New Jersey, the governor of New Jersey,
• 48:42
  and then he left and he started a company called MF Global,
• 48:45
  and he commingled funds and he got caught on the backside of the Russian bond deal, and he went in and took everybody's
• 48:52
  goods
• 48:53
  to satisfy
• 48:55
  his personal
• 48:56
  downside,
• 48:57
  and the day after that happened, Brian, I saw a headline from a guy with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
• 49:05
  This
• 49:06
  is within the last ten years,
• 49:08
  and the guy's going, he can't have stolen the gold.
• 49:12
  We have the warehouse
• 49:15
  receipts
• 49:16
  Unknown: warehouse
• 49:17
  receipts.
• 49:23
  Yeah. So
• 49:26
  a
• 49:27
  when you have a a warehouse receipt,
• 49:31
  what that's also telling you is that it's not fungible.
• 49:34
  It it can't be interchanged.
• 49:37
  It can't be interchanged
• 49:38
  with
• 49:41
  the other other like items. Correct. It it is what it is.
• 49:46
  And so that's
• 49:48
  I I hope I can make this clear to give you an example of the opposite of that.
• 49:53
  Your currency
• 49:54
  is fungible.
• 49:55
  So your your paper dollars or your your your your coinage,
• 50:00
  it's all fungible because because one one is has no more
• 50:04
  legal tender value than any other one. They're all interchangeable.
• 50:09
  And so
• 50:11
  the warehouse receipt
• 50:13
  designates,
• 50:13
  in this case, a birth certificate saying that we're not interchangeable. Now you might be property
• 50:19
  legally, but you're not interchangeable.
• 50:21
  You're you're unique.
• 50:24
  And that number identifies you as being unique.
• 50:28
  Unknown: Okay. So the warehouse
• 50:30
  receipt is a contract,
• 50:33
  and if there's fraud involved
• 50:35
  and the good was falsely put in the warehouse, the warehouse receipt was drawn off of,
• 50:41
  then the warehouse receipt is null and void.
• 50:46
  Yeah.
• 50:55
  Unknown: So
• 50:56
  I I basically agree with everything that's being said.
• 51:02
  The
• 51:03
  the the point the point where we we we seem to be encountering
• 51:08
  some interference and some rub is
• 51:11
  when we have people that don't even have
• 51:15
  certificate and
• 51:17
  they're they're being
• 51:20
  oppressed into
• 51:21
  municipal jurisdiction.
• 51:24
  And
• 51:25
  so there there was never even a warehouse receipt created on
• 51:30
  some on somebody I know.
• 51:32
  And
• 51:33
  and they they still have been
• 51:36
  Shanghai depressed
• 51:38
  impressed
• 51:40
  into
• 51:42
  what can only be described as tyranny and oppression.
• 51:45
  Well And
• 51:48
  Unknown: You're talking about my old friend, Tom, and and my godson,
• 51:52
  Josh. Okay?
• 51:53
  And and I've known them for a long time, and I've known just about everything Tom has been through in the last thirty years almost,
• 52:01
  and I'm gonna say and make a statement
• 52:04
  that his
• 52:05
  particular situation, to bring that up and apply it to everybody
• 52:10
  may not be applicable
• 52:12
  like bringing Chris's passport application
• 52:16
  up and saying that everybody's gonna have the same situation with their passport application.
• 52:24
  Unknown: I had an epiphany.
• 52:28
  Unknown: God, was it painful?
• 52:29
  It
• 52:31
  Unknown: it just about.
• 52:33
  When I had been conversing with someone last night about the
• 52:38
  deceit the
• 52:40
  deceitious word Shanghai,
• 52:42
  Jihad,
• 52:45
  I e d,
• 52:46
  is an improvised
• 52:49
  exploitative
• 52:50
  device.
• 52:53
  Unknown: So go you broke up a little bit on the front end of that. Make the statement again from the start, Chris, if you would. Sure. Try again.
• 53:01
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I said that the word term Shanghai
• 53:05
  that Daryl had used, I'd used last night explaining to someone how our words have been twisted,
• 53:11
  and they push the characters together to create confusion.
• 53:15
  And it's actually,
• 53:18
  the ancient ancient Hebrew,
• 53:20
  not Chinese whatsoever.
• 53:22
  And when he said the shanghide,
• 53:25
  that I e d at the end
• 53:27
  caused me to think
• 53:29
  that that's an improvised
• 53:31
  exploitative
• 53:33
  device is what this claim jumping of the name, the hijacking of the live flesh and bone and
• 53:40
  man or woman that's born in from the
• 53:44
  mourns of the woman and the man's assimilation
• 53:47
  and the creator's spirit provision into
• 53:50
  is truly human trafficking. It's felony, criminal conversion
• 53:53
  Unknown: of a live human into a fungible asset. It's slavery. It's good god, man. It's mass slavery.
• 54:03
  Unknown: Well, you know, Trump,
• 54:05
  here here I go saying Trump. Well, he signed this, executive order here recently that most people listening to this are aware of
• 54:14
  about,
• 54:15
  human trafficking
• 54:17
  and
• 54:18
  financial crimes
• 54:20
  and
• 54:21
  and confiscation of property
• 54:24
  for people who have
• 54:26
  been involved or perpetrated that.
• 54:29
  And
• 54:30
  I I found it somewhat ironic that
• 54:33
  the
• 54:34
  organization that he's the principal resident of
• 54:38
  is
• 54:40
  probably
• 54:41
  more guilty of that than any other entity on the planet. Yep.
• 54:47
  And
• 54:48
  it's
• 54:49
  it so that's that's that's human bond trafficking.
• 54:53
  And
• 54:55
  it it has the same effect as to whether or not
• 55:00
  you're you're put in put in chains.
• 55:05
  So
• 55:06
  I I mean, I I just I don't know,
• 55:08
  you know, what the outcome of that executive order is gonna be or how they're gonna apply it, but it was done for a purpose.
• 55:16
  I
• 55:17
  I'm reluctant to think that it was done for a purpose that we'll appreciate,
• 55:22
  Unknown: but I I could be wrong on that going forward. We'll see how it plays out, man. I mean, you know, I just I know we've got a core answer,
• 55:31
  and I know we got something of great substance here, and we've got a number of people that have adhered to it, a number of you like Daryl and Brian and Chris that have incorporated
• 55:41
  it into your day to day lives,
• 55:43
  okay, and we're doing the right thing and we got the right message.
• 55:47
  All we got to do is wait for the rest of the populace
• 55:51
  to get to a point where they're open to listen or else they're
• 55:56
  positively
• 55:57
  looking for answers, and we've had a couple of those lately. Our new guy Rob from Ohio,
• 56:02
  he was out looking for answers. Thomas Thomas Maddox and his bunch out of Texas, they were looking for answers.
• 56:09
  And there's gonna be more and more of that. K?
• 56:14
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 56:15
  Well, I mean,
• 56:18
  I I'm always looking for the practical things to do because I'm
• 56:22
  I I I like to think I'm a practical kinda guy. And
• 56:27
  so if anybody listening to this
• 56:30
  has not and and you wanna do something,
• 56:34
  re resend your voter
• 56:37
  application.
• 56:38
  Okay? Your your voter card.
• 56:40
  Get get get out of the voting system.
• 56:43
  Okay?
• 56:44
  Absolutely get out of that. Okay? That's easy.
• 56:47
  You know? I mean, that's just a start, and and the only thing that's gonna happen to you is is good things.
• 56:54
  Alright?
• 56:55
  And and that is a another point of rebuttal.
• 56:59
  Okay? They they can't they can't identify you.
• 57:05
  So
• 57:06
  it would be interesting to me that people, if they file the affidavit,
• 57:10
  okay, that would be a test. You know? They filed the affidavit, but they're called for jury duty because they they registered to vote.
• 57:18
  And you say, well, no. I don't have to. Now are the guys gonna show up with guns? And or he'll
• 57:24
  fine you, you know, or
• 57:27
  petition you to come in anyway.
• 57:31
  But you you don't wanna you don't wanna be voting. I I I had this conversation this weekend. I said, well, I I I don't vote, and I don't pay taxes. Taxes. And and the question was, well, why? Why don't you vote? And I said, well, I don't willingly
• 57:43
  knowingly participate in fraud.
• 57:45
  And I don't pay taxes because I don't willingly contribute to a criminal crime organization.
• 57:51
  Okay? Now if you want to, if you wanna be involved in fraud and contribute to a crime
• 57:57
  syndicate,
• 57:58
  you know, you want you're free to do that. But
• 58:01
  I I personally think it's hypocrisy
• 58:05
  to do that, and that's
• 58:09
  of course, I have a lot of family and friends that still do it, but
• 58:13
  and I love them dearly.
• 58:15
  Unknown: But that's just my position. And they do it voluntarily,
• 58:18
  and you voluntarily choose not to.
• 58:21
  Unknown: You know, Darrel and Yeah. It
• 58:25
  Unknown: makes more sense if you consider that you're giving them your proxy vote whenever you vote.
• 58:32
  And that is a very familiar con for most stockholders,
• 58:36
  but most Americans don't realize when they sign up to vote, breaking the law, voting for people they don't have any lawful authority
• 58:43
  to vote for.
• 58:44
  They are giving their proxy vote by castly admitting they're criminals or not sophisticated or ignorant and voting for these criminals as you wisely
• 58:54
  observe them and this professional cabal
• 58:57
  of deceivers of the great deceiver
• 58:59
  himself.
• 59:01
  Unknown: When the more you participate in the system, the more you're involved in their system.
• 59:09
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. So you I mean, you have
• 59:13
  I mean, I I don't want to berate anybody.
• 59:17
  Find that doesn't work too good but
• 59:19
  the here's here's some facts.
• 59:23
  You can you can everybody can look at themselves and say you know you're one of these three things you're either compliant complacent, or complicit.
• 59:32
  And then just say, well, which one am I?
• 59:36
  And and I I
• 59:39
  I to that conclusion a long time ago. I said, well, I'm,
• 59:43
  you know, I'm I'm one of these, and in some cases, I'm more than one of those.
• 59:47
  And
• 59:49
  so
• 59:50
  I had to I I was looking for the door out because I I can't stand
• 59:56
  hypocrisy, and hypocrisy is just another form of lying,
• 59:59
  and hypocrites are lying to themselves.
• 1:00:02
  And and I I hate a liar.
• 1:00:05
  And
• 1:00:07
  and so I I was ashamed of myself and
• 1:00:12
  because I I I
• 1:00:15
  I was using situational ethics.
• 1:00:18
  And when you're dealing with somebody who espouses situational ethics, you're dealing with a known liar. Yep.
• 1:00:23
  That might be you.
• 1:00:25
  You it might be yourself to yourself.
• 1:00:28
  And
• 1:00:30
  so
• 1:00:31
  I
• 1:00:33
  I mean I mean, that's that's sort of the personal side of what motivates, drives me to,
• 1:00:39
  as Brent would say, find the gumption to exercise your will.
• 1:00:43
  And, you you know, you have to have a willer.
• 1:00:47
  And,
• 1:00:49
  you know, I I just wanna say I've I live a very
• 1:00:53
  independent
• 1:00:54
  sort of way,
• 1:00:56
  and I've never been happier in my life. Nobody bothers me.
• 1:01:00
  Of course, I don't bother anybody else.
• 1:01:03
  And so,
• 1:01:05
  of course, I don't I don't go for their bet I don't look for their benefits either.
• 1:01:10
  And
• 1:01:11
  so, you know, for the you know, I
• 1:01:14
  I'm just stating openly that
• 1:01:17
  I've had nothing but good outcomes for what I've done and how I do it. So
• 1:01:23
  I hope that encourages people.
• 1:01:26
  I
• 1:01:27
  Unknown: would guess,
• 1:01:28
  Daryl, most of listeners on here,
• 1:01:32
  that you're probably
• 1:01:34
  do not consent, will not comply, and I will not stop resisting evil until I'm in the ground.
• 1:01:42
  Unknown: That's that's exactly right. I I
• 1:01:46
  I
• 1:01:48
  I can't say that any more forcefully than than you just did. And and
• 1:01:54
  then I I do
• 1:01:55
  I make decisions where I don't re encumber myself
• 1:01:59
  and
• 1:02:02
  and and so then he has to start living different. Okay?
• 1:02:06
  And that might mean you lose some friends or that might mean that you you you have different activities.
• 1:02:11
  You know, I
• 1:02:13
  I really enjoy flying airplanes,
• 1:02:15
  and I did it professionally for a long time. And I really can't go back into doing that
• 1:02:22
  and not re encumber myself.
• 1:02:24
  And
• 1:02:26
  so I I don't do it.
• 1:02:29
  Okay. I
• 1:02:30
  I I I I conduct a form of trade and and exchange
• 1:02:37
  in how I support myself
• 1:02:40
  that is
• 1:02:42
  not
• 1:02:44
  a corporation.
• 1:02:46
  So I have to get out of being a corporation.
• 1:02:49
  Right?
• 1:02:50
  And it's these little things. So when I got rid of being a corporation,
• 1:02:55
  being identified as the administrator,
• 1:02:58
  the trustee of that corporation,
• 1:03:01
  guess what they did?
• 1:03:03
  They stopped sending me
• 1:03:06
  invoices in the mail for taxes
• 1:03:10
  because I wasn't a corporation.
• 1:03:14
  So,
• 1:03:16
  you know, I'm I'm just giving you some practical practical experience
• 1:03:20
  where,
• 1:03:21
  you know, some people's lives are very messed up and busy and complicated and
• 1:03:27
  mine isn't.
• 1:03:29
  And
• 1:03:30
  I I don't want to have anything to do with these people.
• 1:03:34
  I I
• 1:03:35
  really
• 1:03:37
  and and and and our our our brother Chris here is doing his very best to get
• 1:03:44
  disengaged from him.
• 1:03:47
  Would you say that's correct, Chris?
• 1:03:50
  Unknown: Here here.
• 1:03:51
  Can put
• 1:03:54
  Unknown: Okay. Chris, you have a Yeah.
• 1:03:56
  You joined us and we were in a lively discussion. So yes, you may. Yes.
• 1:04:02
  Unknown: Yes, I put my affidavit through
• 1:04:05
  I sent a copy to the president Donald Trump for other purposes.
• 1:04:11
  But, yes, he does have it on file.
• 1:04:13
  I doubt that the
• 1:04:16
  the military
• 1:04:18
  complex would allow
• 1:04:19
  him to, like, look into it further, but I'm not sure. But he does have it on Well, Shane, it doesn't he ain't the lord of the manor.
• 1:04:28
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:04:29
  He's a figurehead. The lord of the manor
• 1:04:32
  is a guy that's involved with the bankruptcy
• 1:04:36
  and putting this system into place, and that has been designated
• 1:04:40
  even before that event by more from the founding of our country, as far as I can tell
• 1:04:46
  by the Secretary of State,
• 1:04:49
  and that's the guy you've got to go through. Now, Darrell, earlier you mentioned Tom.
• 1:04:54
  You see here, Tom continues
• 1:04:56
  to try and you said his municipal
• 1:04:59
  involvements,
• 1:05:00
  right?
• 1:05:03
  Yeah. And that's where he's having Well, actually Joshua's.
• 1:05:06
  Yeah, Joshua's. Tom's fighting
• 1:05:09
  the good fight for him, but you see what Tom has not and refuses to do is to take the case instead of prosecuting
• 1:05:16
  it there at the municipal level in state offices that aren't manned by anybody anymore,
• 1:05:23
  should go to the International
• 1:05:25
  Court of Claims
• 1:05:28
  it there, but he won't do that. I think he'd find some remedy and relief there, but he won't do it.
• 1:05:35
  Well,
• 1:05:37
  Unknown: I mean,
• 1:05:38
  it it's yet to be seen. He
• 1:05:40
  he
• 1:05:42
  he's
• 1:05:43
  he's
• 1:05:44
  valiantly
• 1:05:45
  and
• 1:05:49
  done everything else. So
• 1:05:51
  I
• 1:05:52
  I I wouldn't be I wouldn't be surprised to see that that come about either. Well, I think it I think you'll find some relief there,
• 1:06:00
  Unknown: and I think you'll find that what he did is what a lot of our people do, and this isn't singling out Tom,
• 1:06:06
  because a lot of us have done it, and that's we beat our head against the wall
• 1:06:10
  simply because it feels so damn good when you stop.
• 1:06:16
  Unknown: Well, the point
• 1:06:20
  I would make concerning Joshua
• 1:06:23
  is that
• 1:06:25
  regardless of, you know, whether
• 1:06:27
  I know him or you know him or whatever,
• 1:06:30
  if we just look at the facts,
• 1:06:33
  which are
• 1:06:34
  this
• 1:06:36
  young man
• 1:06:38
  child who is now a young man,
• 1:06:42
  never even had a warehouse receipt. Correct. Never even had a birth certificate. Correct.
• 1:06:47
  They did they did
• 1:06:50
  everything
• 1:06:51
  they could
• 1:06:53
  to coerce,
• 1:06:54
  compel,
• 1:06:56
  extort,
• 1:06:59
  him
• 1:07:02
  into
• 1:07:03
  consenting
• 1:07:04
  to be
• 1:07:06
  in their that person. Okay. That's right. Important. And even
• 1:07:10
  even without
• 1:07:12
  even without, he ever
• 1:07:14
  Unknown: he didn't even have a birth certificate to rebut. Okay. That's right. But you see, that's what I keep telling you guys. The birth certificate's
• 1:07:21
  not the nexus.
• 1:07:23
  The nexus is the system that you're born into.
• 1:07:27
  Certificate represents it as a warehouse receipt.
• 1:07:29
  They had proof that he was born. He got born picked up on the census.
• 1:07:34
  I lived right out there by him at the same time. The presumption is still there even though the birth certificate's
• 1:07:41
  missing.
• 1:07:42
  Yeah.
• 1:07:46
  Unknown: They
• 1:07:50
  play pretty dirty. Yep. And And see, Joshua's situation
• 1:07:55
  Unknown: is the perfect situation to expose what the system really is,
• 1:08:00
  and I think that's why they're dragging their feet.
• 1:08:04
  Yeah.
• 1:08:07
  Unknown: I mean,
• 1:08:09
  of course, I I have to
• 1:08:11
  I I have to,
• 1:08:14
  you know, take into consideration. And I have
• 1:08:18
  very
• 1:08:19
  close,
• 1:08:20
  strong feelings for for Tommy and Joshua because I I've known both personally.
• 1:08:25
  And
• 1:08:28
  but when I just look at the facts,
• 1:08:33
  they
• 1:08:34
  in this particular case,
• 1:08:36
  and it might be because of that very fact,
• 1:08:43
  have been you know very unwilling
• 1:08:46
  acknowledge.
• 1:08:50
  And if they actually they've escalated
• 1:08:52
  what's the word I'm looking for? They have
• 1:08:57
  oh, you know, when somebody doubles down,
• 1:09:01
  they they they they just keep going in deeper and deeper and deeper
• 1:09:06
  and like it's personal. Yeah. Well, you know, there's an I think it is I think it is with that with that with that lady judge over there in
• 1:09:17
  in
• 1:09:17
  Georgia County.
• 1:09:19
  She's she's taken this as a
• 1:09:22
  Unknown: sort of personal. Yeah. Yeah. Well, that, you know, and but you gotta you gotta go above her. Okay? And that's you gotta sever this at the top, and if you can't get any cooperation at the top, the top's so you're gonna have to fight,
• 1:09:35
  alright? And until Tom decides to do that, I don't think his situation's gonna improve, and I hate to say that,
• 1:09:41
  but I think that's the real We fact of the have somebody join us on a phone number here, 260.
• 1:09:49
  Who's calling from 260 area code and wants to have a little conversation?
• 1:09:55
  Roger, Yes. Are you
• 1:09:57
  Unknown: Okay. This
• 1:09:59
  is Ted from Indiana. It's been a while since I've called and talked to you.
• 1:10:04
  I don't know if you remember or not. But, anyway, I I the reason I called the first a time ago was because of this thing I have with the sewer district.
• 1:10:13
  Unknown: Oh, I think I remember that. Yeah. I do.
• 1:10:16
  Unknown: Okay. Well, it's still ongoing.
• 1:10:19
  Okay?
• 1:10:20
  But it's kinda got ramped up some. What
• 1:10:23
  they're doing is they're trying
• 1:10:26
  over a period of one year, they've taken all these monthly
• 1:10:30
  statements that I'm supposed to pay them,
• 1:10:33
  and they've lumped it all together and filed a lien against the land or the property.
• 1:10:41
  And they've done it through another corporation,
• 1:10:44
  so a city utilities.
• 1:10:47
  Yep.
• 1:10:48
  See, the sewer district has filed this lien
• 1:10:51
  through another corporation called city utilities, which is here in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
• 1:10:57
  And what I've got an I've got the ammunition I need to fight this thing. But what I'm looking to do is what kind of a legal
• 1:11:04
  document or whatever can I file in the court
• 1:11:07
  Unknown: to to challenge them on this? Have you had do you have an affidavit on file with the secretary of state already, Ted? Oh, yes. When when did you do that again?
• 1:11:18
  Unknown: Well, that was about four years ago, I think. Okay.
• 1:11:21
  Unknown: So that was filed before the commencement of this trying to force you into sewer payments. Oh, yeah.
• 1:11:29
  They're trying to force you onto city sewer and you've got a septic tank and don't wanna pay. Is that the
• 1:11:36
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:11:37
  it's a county thing, Okay? I'm not a part of the city. I'm outside the city limits. I'm in the county.
• 1:11:43
  But they've attached this lien and they've done it through a city utilities.
• 1:11:48
  They haven't done it themselves.
• 1:11:50
  They've gone to another corporation.
• 1:11:53
  Unknown: Well, if you're not in the if you're not in the city, how can the city attach a lien to you?
• 1:12:00
  Unknown: Well, that's a good question. I don't I don't understand that.
• 1:12:04
  Unknown: Well, that's the that's the first that's the first point I'd concentrate on right there.
• 1:12:11
  Jurisdiction. Couple of Jurisdiction.
• 1:12:13
  Unknown: Go ahead, Chris. Yeah. Well, you're talking about jurisdiction.
• 1:12:18
  That's challenging jurisdiction.
• 1:12:20
  That's the one thing. The other thing is that the other entity they transferred to is attempting to act as a debt collector. That falls under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, title 15 USC c nine two at sec requiring
• 1:12:34
  them to validate the debt and how they got protectual
• 1:12:38
  hypothecated
• 1:12:39
  Unknown: authority over property that doesn't lie within the city would be a critical thing that you want them to delineate with specificity, I would expect. Ted, I would imagine you're gonna to find you an attorney to deal with this, and, you know, we don't give legal advice here, obviously, even though the laws against that don't apply to us, and they couldn't apply them anyway.
• 1:12:58
  But
• 1:13:00
  I think, you know, with the intricacies of this,
• 1:13:03
  you're just gonna have to talk to somebody that's skilled in this.
• 1:13:08
  Unknown: I I understand that. And that's why I was thinking that maybe I should go down to we've got a pretty good law lair law library here in town,
• 1:13:17
  And maybe I could go down there and get some help so that I can file,
• 1:13:21
  you know, myself,
• 1:13:23
  but I have to do it properly.
• 1:13:25
  Unknown: Let
• 1:13:26
  me tell you where all of our people have you ever filed a lawsuit before, Ted?
• 1:13:30
  No.
• 1:13:32
  Man, you don't know the procedural
• 1:13:34
  nightmares that are involved in this. Chris, tell him.
• 1:13:40
  Unknown: Well, the best thing is to stay out of court because they're not to your advantage. The city as a subcorp and they hire the judges and the attorneys for the prosecution,
• 1:13:50
  you would be going into their courts. And the county's probably in cahoots with them because they're the principal court,
• 1:13:56
  the incorporation
• 1:13:57
  leader.
• 1:13:59
  Really,
• 1:14:01
  if you can do that debt validation
• 1:14:03
  letter, demand for debt validation, that's pursuant to that
• 1:14:07
  fair debt collection practices act I was citing.
• 1:14:10
  There are some really good resources online.
• 1:14:13
  In fact, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
• 1:14:18
  it's been relabeled. I don't remember. Maybe it's the financial protection.
• 1:14:22
  They've rechanged the name just recently.
• 1:14:25
  And it
• 1:14:27
  has some templates online.
• 1:14:29
  There's a Dale
• 1:14:32
  let's see if I can remember his name.
• 1:14:34
  The American Bar Association
• 1:14:36
  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. If you search that out, you'll find about a 45
• 1:14:41
  page treatise from
• 1:14:43
  Dale something. I can't remember his name right now. I apologize.
• 1:14:46
  Unknown: It's very powerful. ADA and That Fair Debt Collection Act is very powerful, Ted. What I would also suggest
• 1:14:54
  is that you go and try and find the blanket law that they're trying to bring you in under this, under,
• 1:15:01
  and see if it isn't written for persons.
• 1:15:04
  See what persons it's written for because if you filed that affidavit already four years ago, bringing that out and challenging that might get you out of it too.
• 1:15:15
  Unknown: Might. Might. I don't know. Yeah. Yeah. Right. Right. Right. Right. Roger? Yes. Roger.
• 1:15:20
  Roger.
• 1:15:21
  Yes. I I had a question for I have a question for Ted.
• 1:15:25
  Yes. Ted, when
• 1:15:27
  when you
• 1:15:28
  get some
• 1:15:30
  postal
• 1:15:31
  correspondence
• 1:15:32
  from these people,
• 1:15:34
  Unknown: how are they spelling your name? Well, that's another thing. See, they're filed. They're duly using all capital letters. There's
• 1:15:41
  Unknown: the presumption. Okay. Good. There's the presumption. That's that's Well, yeah. Yeah. Because That's that's good, Ted. So so alright.
• 1:15:48
  So
• 1:15:49
  did did you did you open that? Did you open the correspondence?
• 1:15:53
  Unknown: Yes.
• 1:15:55
  Okay. So why were you opening somebody else's mail? Well, that yes. That's that well, that's one of the things I'm gonna I'm gonna I wanted to do to find something, see, with the with the measures bring out all the so That's one of my points. Yes.
• 1:16:09
  Unknown: I have. So so when you get when you get a I'm sorry, Chris. When you get a when you get a a piece of postal correspondence
• 1:16:18
  like that and it's addressed to somebody that's not you, okay,
• 1:16:22
  then you should turn that you should turn that letter
• 1:16:26
  on its side at 45 degrees in a black felt tip marketer say, address the unknown, return to sender.
• 1:16:33
  And because that ain't you. And it's a federal crime to open up somebody else's mail. And
• 1:16:40
  I've actually done this on a couple of occasions,
• 1:16:43
  and it worked like a charm.
• 1:16:46
  Unknown: Okay. Okay. Yes. Well, see, I've always debated on whether or not to open these things, but I wouldn't know about these things unless I opened it up.
• 1:16:55
  Unknown: Don't open I up
• 1:16:56
  Unknown: don't open up their monthly statements. See, they send me a monthly statement every month saying I owe this. Well, I don't open those, but I got a letter from a lawyer.
• 1:17:05
  And and that's opened up because I had to know what was going on.
• 1:17:10
  Unknown: And that was the letter of them telling you that Yes. A lane
• 1:17:15
  Unknown: I've gotten that one.
• 1:17:18
  Unknown: I have that name complete now if you like. Okay. Okay.
• 1:17:22
  Unknown: Dale
• 1:17:24
  Unknown: W
• 1:17:25
  Pittman,
• 1:17:26
  p I p t m a n.
• 1:17:28
  Okay. Procational Council PC,
• 1:17:32
  the Eliza Spotswood House. We've also got a couple other locations.
• 1:17:36
  Myfairdebt.com.
• 1:17:39
  Apparently,
• 1:17:40
  is his website.
• 1:17:42
  My And that's on the fairdebtmypractices
• 1:17:45
  at. Myfairdebt.com.dotcom.dotcom.
• 1:17:52
  Yes. And it's a it's a really wonderful treatise. You'll wanna look on especially pages
• 1:17:57
  eight through 11 and then go over to page 43,
• 1:18:01
  four, five, and six.
• 1:18:03
  And you'll find that attorneys are particularly
• 1:18:06
  egregious violators of fair debt collection practices act because they have no relation with the people they're trying to collect from.
• 1:18:13
  There's some other case law that speaks to that in particular.
• 1:18:17
  But attorneys or representatives, they have no first party competent knowledge to the validity of the alleged debt that they're trying to collect, and they've been hired as a representative agent to collect as a debt collector.
• 1:18:29
  And so they have a diminished capacity of representation in your situation.
• 1:18:35
  Unknown: Well, Ted, there's two approaches for you. Go
• 1:18:38
  go after the fair debt and do a little research on that and start researching into the top down jurisdiction that they're coming at you under.
• 1:18:47
  Unknown: Okay. Well, see Yeah. I did mention this, and we'll be done here in just a minute, but see, I got my recent
• 1:18:53
  my property property tax tax bill. Bill. Of Of course, course, I I still still have have a a mortgage mortgage on on the the house.
• 1:18:57
  But they they in that, they've added
• 1:19:01
  this lien
• 1:19:02
  onto my property taxes.
• 1:19:09
  Unknown: Well, if you got a mortgage,
• 1:19:11
  you can't get your house off the property rolls.
• 1:19:15
  Unknown: I understand that. Yes. I do understand that. But they've added this lien onto
• 1:19:21
  Unknown: my spring statement. Well, you're gonna have to go back and fight the lien and get it removed if you can.
• 1:19:27
  I you know, the jurisdictional
• 1:19:29
  approach in trying to find out how they're coming at you, what what that law is written for and challenge in that jurisdiction would be something I think that would be very I think time spent on that endeavor might pay off for you.
• 1:19:44
  Easier than going to court and any of that crap, but
• 1:19:48
  my suggestion, and I'm not proficient super proficient in this, would be to attack the Debt Collection Act and to go and look for the overall jurisdictional nexus and link.
• 1:20:00
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:20:02
  Alright. Well, I will, I'll get back with you and let you know how this is going. Okay. Yeah, please do Ted. Keep us informed Yeah, and
• 1:20:10
  Unknown: Ted? Yeah, go ahead. Daryl wants to say something to you. Yeah, want Yeah,
• 1:20:16
  Unknown: Ted Ted, listen up here.
• 1:20:20
  So an another way to approach this too is that if this is going through a debt collection agency,
• 1:20:28
  a re representation,
• 1:20:30
  you have to ask them for the original bill.
• 1:20:34
  Okay? Now if they're sending you invoices,
• 1:20:37
  those aren't the original bills.
• 1:20:39
  And they have to send you you ask them that
• 1:20:42
  because unless they can present to you
• 1:20:45
  the original bill,
• 1:20:49
  they don't they don't have a real claim.
• 1:20:51
  Okay? And so when they give you the bill, you ask them if they did present you a bill, you'd ask them, well, how do you want me to pay that? Because if they're asking you to pay that
• 1:21:01
  if they're asking you to pay this, you can't pay
• 1:21:05
  with the with Federal Reserve notes. You can only discharge.
• 1:21:09
  And so then you attack that.
• 1:21:11
  You attack their the presumption that you can pay anything.
• 1:21:15
  You you say, well, do do you want me you know? So they're using they're you're using conflating terms.
• 1:21:21
  You can't pay it. You can only discharge it.
• 1:21:24
  And so you ask them if how you want how you want to them to pay. If you wanna pay that, you want me to pay you in gold or silver,
• 1:21:32
  you know, or what what was it you wanted me to pay you with? Okay. Otherwise, it's just a discharge.
• 1:21:38
  Alright. So, I mean,
• 1:21:43
  I've had I've had actually really good success with this and
• 1:21:47
  from particularly if they're going through a third party with a bill collector like that. So Yeah. That's what I can tell you what they're doing.
• 1:21:56
  And if you go to another website,
• 1:21:59
  it's actually a UK based website, but this is all UCC feudal system. Okay. What you're experiencing right now is the feudal system.
• 1:22:08
  This is a primary example of of a feudal system
• 1:22:12
  and
• 1:22:14
  event.
• 1:22:15
  And if you go to a website called
• 1:22:17
  Get Out Of Free
• 1:22:19
  Get Out Of sorry. Get Out Of Debt Free.
• 1:22:22
  Just spell it like that. Put it in your search engine.
• 1:22:25
  Get out of debt free and read what these guys have been doing in The UK and around
• 1:22:32
  the Western world for the last about eight years now. They've had great success.
• 1:22:38
  Unknown: Great success. Okay. So Okay. Alright. Yeah. Okay. And I and also that thing about the person is saying, yeah, that that's another thing too.
• 1:22:46
  You know, sending it to the wrong person.
• 1:22:49
  Okay. Alright.
• 1:22:51
  Okay. You give me you give me some ammunition to go with. So yeah. Okay. Alright. Alright. Well, hey. It's been good talking to you, Alright.
• 1:22:59
  Unknown: Ted, before you run off here,
• 1:23:01
  John has sent a message, and it says, tell him to get Marshall,
• 1:23:06
  M A R S H A L L,
• 1:23:11
  Schroeder,
• 1:23:12
  S C H R O E D E R. Marshall
• 1:23:17
  Schroeder
• 1:23:18
  evidently has a book
• 1:23:20
  on debt collection. He said everything's in there that you need to know.
• 1:23:25
  Unknown: Oh, okay. But what is there a name of the book? No. All I know is the author, Marshall Schroeder.
• 1:23:33
  Unknown: Okay. So I think I could get that online maybe. I put his search his name in a search engine to see what came up. Okay.
• 1:23:40
  Unknown: Okay. Okay. Good. Alright. Okay. Well, I'm a let you guys go. Thanks a lot. Alright. You've given me a lot to go on. Okay, Ted. I appreciate, and I will definitely let you know how this ends up turning out. Alright. Well, you know, listen. As as as we all are learning freedom isn't free.
• 1:23:57
  No. It sure isn't. No. No.
• 1:24:00
  Okay. Alright. You guys have a good day, and I appreciate
• 1:24:03
  Unknown: Eagwow. Back at you. Thanks for checking in. Glad you're out there.
• 1:24:07
  Alright. Anybody wanna take this anywhere else here? We got a little over half hour or so to go.
• 1:24:15
  Unknown: We could probably talk a little bit about the
• 1:24:19
  so called bombings in Sri Lanka. Not that they didn't occur, but being that the globalist
• 1:24:25
  perpetrate
• 1:24:26
  this stuff
• 1:24:28
  and are trying to give the pretext that it was Muslims
• 1:24:32
  or somebody else.
• 1:24:34
  Flaming the blame on the intent victim is something they're pretty, artful about, and I suspect it's the usual suspects.
• 1:24:41
  And, they did have several weeks prior intel notice that this coming, and yet they did nothing,
• 1:24:48
  which tells you they wanted it to hap allowed it to happen and able it to happen, and therefore, they could not have potentially
• 1:24:56
  claimed that they didn't know what they didn't know.
• 1:24:59
  Unknown: Here's a headline that says zero hedge while we've been on the air,
• 1:25:04
  and it's part of the sorrow
• 1:25:07
  of this incident.
• 1:25:09
  Denmark's richest
• 1:25:10
  man
• 1:25:11
  lost three children in those bombings.
• 1:25:18
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I I wanna know where Timothy McVeigh is when this happened.
• 1:25:22
  Where was Timothy McVeigh? What
• 1:25:25
  are you talking about?
• 1:25:27
  Unknown: It's
• 1:25:28
  Yeah. It's getting to the point of being sickening and repulsive.
• 1:25:32
  Obama and Hillary Clinton evidently both tweeted something about it, and they just used the term Easter worshippers or something, they won't even use the word Christian,
• 1:25:43
  and
• 1:25:45
  don't forget that just with the Notre Dame incident last week, what was it? There was eight
• 1:25:51
  seventy five church desecrations in the last year in France.
• 1:25:56
  875?
• 1:26:00
  Unknown: Well, here's a here's a quinky dink for you. I mean I mean, what are the what are the odds that this would happen? So
• 1:26:07
  during the New Zealand shooting here
• 1:26:09
  three or four weeks ago,
• 1:26:12
  the the day before
• 1:26:14
  and leading up to it, John Podesta was in New Zealand. Right. And then
• 1:26:21
  what was it?
• 1:26:22
  During the Notre Dame Notre Dame fire,
• 1:26:28
  Michelle Obama
• 1:26:30
  was in
• 1:26:32
  Notre Dame and watched she was on the river, and she watched it. Right.
• 1:26:36
  And
• 1:26:38
  then what was the other one? This
• 1:26:42
  this lady
• 1:26:44
  in Ireland,
• 1:26:46
  this so called reporter
• 1:26:48
  correspondent
• 1:26:49
  was shot
• 1:26:50
  and killed.
• 1:26:52
  And
• 1:26:53
  guess who was in Ireland?
• 1:26:56
  None other than Hillary Clinton. I mean I mean, what a what a coincidence.
• 1:27:00
  I'm just these coincidences are just amazing to me.
• 1:27:06
  Unknown: The world the world the world is in a mill of a Hess,
• 1:27:11
  and I believe honestly there's not too many refuges for sanity,
• 1:27:17
  but I really truly believe we've got one here because at least we can explain it.
• 1:27:22
  These other people don't really understand
• 1:27:25
  the gravity and the severity and the overreach of what's going on.
• 1:27:33
  Unknown: Well, I mean I mean, you know, since since
• 1:27:36
  the Murrow Farrell Building was blown up
• 1:27:40
  and
• 1:27:42
  Waco
• 1:27:43
  and
• 1:27:44
  911
• 1:27:46
  and
• 1:27:47
  so on and so forth and yada yada yada, none of these things ever get reconciled.
• 1:27:53
  Nobody's ever brought to justice. They just keep doing it. Okay?
• 1:27:57
  And
• 1:27:59
  so, I mean,
• 1:28:01
  this is this is why we have to
• 1:28:04
  dig in at some point and say no more. Yep. Because it will just continue to
• 1:28:10
  it's it's, you know, it's it's self licking ice cream cone. You know? It just keeps on
• 1:28:14
  it just keeps on going on. They just keep on doing it. You know? It I guess you could say it even started,
• 1:28:21
  you know, another good example was the 1993,
• 1:28:25
  bombing of,
• 1:28:26
  the FBI bombing of the, World Trade Center. Right. The first one. So,
• 1:28:32
  yeah. And and, you know, there's there's there's volumes of evidence that demonstrate
• 1:28:39
  and and can be foited that
• 1:28:42
  and have been that, you know, reveal that they were part of a
• 1:28:50
  a setup
• 1:28:51
  in
• 1:28:53
  in that original bombing. And I believe that was '93, wasn't it? Yeah. So I it it just I I mean, at what point at what point does Brian Williams
• 1:29:03
  and the people that listen to him,
• 1:29:06
  you know, stop
• 1:29:08
  I I don't know. I don't know what it's gonna take. Is it does it take a,
• 1:29:13
  something happening here, like, that's even bigger? You know? I mean You know, it's interesting Third World War, would that cause a of those accident?
• 1:29:21
  Unknown: Of those incidents you mentioned, the first bombing
• 1:29:24
  and then the other one that comes to mind is Waco.
• 1:29:27
  And those two the I went to Las Vegas two times
• 1:29:31
  to be at John and Glenn functions out there,
• 1:29:35
  and the first time when I was flying back was when they did the bombing in New York on the first time, and the second time was Waco.
• 1:29:43
  Okay, so both times I went to Las Vegas to deal with some kind of a symposium or seminar with them, those tragedies happened on the way back to Atlanta,
• 1:29:51
  and it would really I remember both times I'm going, Holy smokes!
• 1:29:56
  Let's see, what has John got to say here?
• 1:29:59
  Unknown: How can we What was that? English
• 1:30:01
  Oxford
• 1:30:03
  Dictionary, what was terrorism?
• 1:30:05
  Unknown: Intimidation
• 1:30:07
  by government. Listen, here for Ted. Ted, if you're still listening, and I think you probably are,
• 1:30:12
  the name of that book, by Marshall Schroeder,
• 1:30:15
  is How to Defeat Any Debt Collector.
• 1:30:20
  How to Defeat Any
• 1:30:22
  Debt Collector
• 1:30:23
  by Marshall
• 1:30:25
  Schroeder,
• 1:30:26
  s c h r o e
• 1:30:29
  d e r.
• 1:30:31
  Thank you, John. To Darrell,
• 1:30:34
  Unknown: it is problematic at the very least
• 1:30:38
  whenever
• 1:30:39
  the Invest ligators
• 1:30:41
  or the perpetrators,
• 1:30:43
  they don't seem to find their posterior
• 1:30:46
  or a hole in the ground with both hands
• 1:30:49
  because they are conflicted as they know who did it. And if you don't wanna find the perpetrators,
• 1:30:54
  you would spend all kinds of money going through all kinds of
• 1:30:58
  stage acting to give the illusion that you're investigating
• 1:31:02
  whenever you find somebody like the Russian hoax and blame blame the blame on the victim that you wanted to put it on in the first place. I was gonna say That's exactly blindspeak. I was gonna say, can we all say collectively collectively Robert Robert Mueller? Mueller?
• 1:31:16
  Mueller. Well,
• 1:31:18
  Unknown: yeah.
• 1:31:19
  Yeah. I I mean, you know, so that's that's a that's an example in the investigatory
• 1:31:25
  world or the intelligence world, but then you have you have the judges and the judiciary and the justice sis the injustice system being the perpetrators and and who's gonna hold them accountable. So, I mean, this is why this is why I don't vote, and this is why I don't pay their taxes because it's fraud,
• 1:31:44
  and you and and taxes are donating to a criminal
• 1:31:48
  crime syndicate.
• 1:31:50
  You know? I I mean,
• 1:31:53
  you know, even if you're not even if you're not a Christian
• 1:31:57
  or or identify yourself as our the Lord and savior, Yeshua, you know,
• 1:32:02
  of that,
• 1:32:03
  at least have some morals. If you don't have any virtue or righteousness, at least have some morals.
• 1:32:12
  Unknown: Anyway Well, that's part of, you know, what this information does to people, Darryl, is it shows you there's a path that is a righteous one compared to the one you've been walking most of your life, and as you start to get this information in and get empowered,
• 1:32:28
  and your life starts to go down there because now you've got a conscious decision. Before you could slough it off, now you've got a conscious decision if you're going to adhere to these principles that you've decided to take on,
• 1:32:41
  and over
• 1:32:43
  time many of your life's problems will straighten out. They won't all straighten out life's problems and
• 1:32:50
  challenges,
• 1:32:51
  but it'll
• 1:32:53
  sure give you a clear line of demarcation
• 1:32:56
  on how to
• 1:32:58
  act on yourself and with others, doesn't it?
• 1:33:03
  Unknown: Well, yeah. I mean, I I'm I've been accused of being judgmental and I embrace that.
• 1:33:09
  And my response to being accused with the accusation of being called judg mental
• 1:33:14
  is that what's the point of knowing anything if you're not gonna use judgment?
• 1:33:18
  Okay. So yeah. I mean, so
• 1:33:21
  I I mean, listen.
• 1:33:22
  The charge against someone of being judgmental is typically invoked as a lame personal defense for not knowing anything
• 1:33:30
  relevant.
• 1:33:31
  You know? That's that's just somebody's you know, we used to call that a cop out.
• 1:33:36
  Alright. Now you know an act. I'm an act. That's why that's
• 1:33:41
  why that's why a lot of people that's why a lot of lot of persons were very receptive to Bill Clinton saying,
• 1:33:48
  what is is
• 1:33:50
  and and not judging Bill because,
• 1:33:53
  you know, to judge Bill, to have a judgment on that situation
• 1:33:58
  would have meant that they would have had
• 1:34:01
  it could be it could be said that they need they place judgment upon themselves.
• 1:34:07
  Alright? Listen. If you can operate
• 1:34:10
  as a a if a nation and a people and a society,
• 1:34:15
  which is actually another word of saying company, you know, if you look up the word society, it means company.
• 1:34:22
  If you can operate at the lowest lowest common denominator,
• 1:34:26
  alright, that gets you off the hook, doesn't it?
• 1:34:29
  Yep. Alright. Oh, listen. I I you can always point to somebody else. It's getting harder. It's getting harder, but you can always point to somebody else. Okay. Well, don't forget, Daryl. When you point Daryl, don't forget when you point one finger out Yeah. There's always three pointing back at you.
• 1:34:47
  Unknown: Let me welcome Chuck to join us. Hey, Chuck. How are things going in the b world?
• 1:34:55
  Unknown: Oh, b world.
• 1:34:57
  I don't even
• 1:34:58
  I'm
• 1:34:59
  not even worried about that right now. So
• 1:35:02
  I'm just trying to recover from losing my van on Saturday. Uh-oh. Because my daughter
• 1:35:08
  yeah. My daughter had a wreck. Uh-oh. And so
• 1:35:12
  I'm trying to recover from that. Yep.
• 1:35:16
  But I was just gonna say to
• 1:35:21
  I forgot the caller's name. Ted. Ted.
• 1:35:24
  I was just gonna say to Ted that you can't
• 1:35:28
  When you get the mail you have to do something with it you can't you have to respond in some way you can't hold on to it because that's what gets you in trouble and then you will find a lean up on you.
• 1:35:39
  Or you could if you don't read address So either address it the way I like what
• 1:35:47
  Daryl just said. I hadn't I hadn't heard of that process, but I've just done the it ain't me letter
• 1:35:54
  and sent that stuff off. Now it doesn't always stop them from
• 1:35:58
  contacting me again
• 1:36:01
  but I just opened it up, put the it ain't me in there, it's and not a I put the address back to them. I put their address back on there instead of mine
• 1:36:12
  and address it back to them and it's always stopped them. I've never had a problem.
• 1:36:16
  Eventually, I may have to do this several times though. That's the only thing. Under the Fair Debt Collection Act that Chris referenced earlier,
• 1:36:25
  Unknown: one of the clauses,
• 1:36:26
  if you're getting hassled by a debt collector,
• 1:36:29
  all you have to do is send them a fax,
• 1:36:33
  they used to say fax, I guess you could do it in a letter, and invoke
• 1:36:37
  the Fair Debt Collection Act, and they can't do that contacting or contacting your neighbors and all that stuff anymore, and these people recognize it. Evidently, the Fair Debt Collection Act has some teeth.
• 1:36:52
  Unknown: Yeah, it does. I know a group of guys that were going back when they would when they would go and look at their credit records unauthorized,
• 1:37:00
  they would go in soon
• 1:37:02
  over that. So
• 1:37:04
  that may have been
• 1:37:06
  may have been a F.
• 1:37:08
  What was the F?
• 1:37:10
  Federal communications.
• 1:37:11
  It may be FCA thing.
• 1:37:14
  But some seminar along those lines they would go back and sue them. And I think it's a $1,200 fine or something for checking your credit
• 1:37:24
  Well,
• 1:37:26
  Unknown: point here is there are some remedies at our disposal. What I think Ted's
• 1:37:30
  best ace in the hole is, is that he filed an affidavit four years ago and he might can bring that in and really put him to the test on it. So we'll see how his situation develops.
• 1:37:43
  Unknown: Yeah, yep.
• 1:37:45
  I'm not I don't know what to do about the lien though other than
• 1:37:49
  Unknown: well, challenging Well, if if the lien is based on a bogus debt, the lien can go bye bye.
• 1:37:57
  Unknown: Yeah, yeah, well he's got to challenge it, that's Yeah, the so
• 1:38:02
  Unknown: what
• 1:38:03
  Chuck, I sent you, you and I had some communication last week, did you have any of that five inch hail that guy
• 1:38:09
  was predicting there in your area?
• 1:38:12
  Unknown: No. We had now see the
• 1:38:16
  I'm in Oklahoma City which is about
• 1:38:19
  probably the middle point of Oklahoma.
• 1:38:21
  Right. And
• 1:38:23
  the northern part of the state, the it was coming from the South.
• 1:38:28
  Unknown: South West
• 1:38:30
  Unknown: and then moving Northwest.
• 1:38:32
  So
• 1:38:33
  we've got some of that and we did get a little bit of hell, but it's just, you know, marble sized hell maybe or something He like wasn't saying it was gonna happen, he just said all of the ingredients
• 1:38:44
  Unknown: were there for it to get severe like that.
• 1:38:48
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. But I don't I didn't watch the weather that close.
• 1:38:52
  Unknown: I just got other things at noon, so Well, was flipping along through, you know, Mike Rivera's site and it says
• 1:38:59
  possible
• 1:38:59
  five inch hail in Oklahoma or something, and I clicked on it and said, well, I hope I hope Chuck knows about this, and I just shot him the link to that thing. So that's for the audience how that how that happened. But
• 1:39:12
  Unknown: I'm glad she Wouldn't be the first time since that happened.
• 1:39:15
  That remember I I told you that that lady I used to work had hail go through her roof. I mean, we're talking
• 1:39:23
  big big
• 1:39:25
  hail.
• 1:39:26
  I was in Argentina They say they've had
• 1:39:29
  Unknown: where I was in Argentina because it's the highest part of the Andes
• 1:39:33
  and the clouds have to squeeze out all of that
• 1:39:37
  moisture on Chile's side to get over the Andes, that's why Chile is so lush and green, and where we were there in the high desert,
• 1:39:45
  behind the highest part of the Andes, their biggest natural disaster is hail,
• 1:39:50
  and I saw some hellacious hailstorms while I was there, but none
• 1:39:55
  even rivaled the one that happened the year before.
• 1:39:59
  And the year before I got there, in July, at 11:00 at night, they had a storm of that five inch hail.
• 1:40:07
  Okay? It stripped
• 1:40:09
  every
• 1:40:10
  leaf off of every tree in town, and there's a bunch of trees along those irrigation ditches,
• 1:40:17
  and literally roof damage,
• 1:40:19
  cut people's cars that were out in it, just demolished.
• 1:40:23
  It looked like the gremlins, each one of them having a ball peen hammer,
• 1:40:27
  came and just beat the hell out of the car over the whole body. And I mean, it was dramatic. I saw tables with fist sized holes through them. You know, those plastic tables that people put in their backyard? And that thing come right down in the middle of one of those panels and it just took the whole panel out.
• 1:40:44
  So it was real severe. It happens.
• 1:40:48
  Unknown: It it does. And
• 1:40:50
  I've not unfortunately,
• 1:40:53
  by God's grace, I have not
• 1:40:57
  had the experience of anything that crazy.
• 1:41:01
  Yep. So been around torpedoes and stuff, but not
• 1:41:04
  still haven't really been affected directly by em. So,
• 1:41:10
  Unknown: that's why. Well, you know. I get on. Thank thank god for all the blessings that we're all still here because I bet just about everybody on this call has been had a near death experience. I know Daryl has.
• 1:41:22
  I know I've had several. I'm pretty sure Chris's life is an ongoing one.
• 1:41:29
  Unknown: At least two.
• 1:41:32
  Unknown: I'll say this, you know, my daughter was trying to turn into a resident
• 1:41:37
  residential area the other day,
• 1:41:39
  and there was another car stopped in front of her trying to turn the opposite way, and she goes to she edges out there, didn't see anybody coming from either lane of by behind that car turns left
• 1:41:50
  and eases
• 1:41:51
  eases noses her puts the nose out there trying to see make sure it's still clear and then to her it's clear so she goes across and the guy somebody
• 1:42:00
  hits her in the middle of the van and
• 1:42:04
  turns it perpendicular
• 1:42:06
  parallel with the street
• 1:42:08
  and flips it on its side. Holy smokes. So
• 1:42:12
  he's not she's not hurt. Nobody got hurt but
• 1:42:16
  the guy that hit her, he had a little Honda
• 1:42:19
  Civic and that
• 1:42:21
  his Civic does it just got the front and has a little damage to it. Bit the hood a little bit. Didn't no nothing was leaking. No radiator fluid. I guess it didn't mess up the radiator fluid, which I don't understand.
• 1:42:33
  They say minivans are easy to flip, but to move it to where it's sideways and
• 1:42:40
  parallel with the street.
• 1:42:42
  Unknown: Well, I Would that is that gonna be considered her fault? Sounds like it.
• 1:42:48
  Unknown: I don't know.
• 1:42:50
  Because the guy well, there's no breaks. There's no skid marks or anything showing that the guy even tried to stop.
• 1:42:57
  So
• 1:42:58
  Unknown: No fault. Couldn't tell you to yield.
• 1:43:05
  Unknown: Speak again, Chris. You're breaking up right when you start speaking.
• 1:43:10
  Unknown: Sorry, I said it could be either a no fault or a failure to yield the right of way to oncoming traffic. Those are the two potentialities
• 1:43:19
  I foresee.
• 1:43:20
  Unknown: You know, there was no ticket written so it's up to the insurance companies to figure out who's at fault, I guess. But the
• 1:43:28
  wrecker
• 1:43:29
  driver went over and asked the cop
• 1:43:32
  who he thought was at fault because I didn't know anything. Just showed up on the scene.
• 1:43:37
  Said that the cop told him that he thought that my daughter was at
• 1:43:42
  if she's at fault, we may be in some big trouble.
• 1:43:46
  So Well, I'm sorry to
• 1:43:50
  Unknown: have that to know that's befallen you, Chuck.
• 1:43:55
  Unknown: At least it's only property.
• 1:43:59
  Unknown: Yeah, it's only property.
• 1:44:01
  But if I if we that there's a potential that the insurance company may not pay
• 1:44:07
  for it and then, you know, we could because
• 1:44:10
  she was
• 1:44:12
  I don't understand this, but she was delivering for Amazon
• 1:44:15
  and Amazon's supposed to cover them while they're in
• 1:44:20
  on the route for them. But
• 1:44:22
  they say you're supposed to have comprehensive
• 1:44:25
  Now this thing's a '99 Mercury Villager,
• 1:44:28
  so I only have liability on it. And they say that you're supposed to have comprehensive
• 1:44:34
  and collision
• 1:44:35
  on your own vehicle
• 1:44:37
  or car
• 1:44:39
  in order for them to pay
• 1:44:41
  comprehensive or collision,
• 1:44:44
  which I don't understand.
• 1:44:47
  I don't know why they would require the the driver to have that and what or what would keep them from paying. Give give them another reason not to pay.
• 1:44:59
  Well, that's what it sounds like to me
• 1:45:02
  because they don't stipulate that you have to have a certain type a certain year of car to drive and then
• 1:45:09
  that could mean anybody like us where you're just why would I carry full coverage on the on that 99
• 1:45:17
  when they're not gonna pay
• 1:45:19
  I mean, the blue book value, I don't know what it is, but it's probably it could be 500, 1,000 or whatever. So
• 1:45:26
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:45:27
  as I said, Chuck, I'm sure sorry. Everybody, I'm sure feels the same way that you're having having to go through that, man. And your daughter was was unhurt, though. Right?
• 1:45:37
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. Bruised up, a little shook shook and shaken up. We as a matter of fact, when I got my dad's van, that big old two fifty Econo line he's got delivered,
• 1:45:49
  we finished the route. And as we were going along at first, she felt okay. And as we were going along, you know how shock sets in later. Yep. So
• 1:45:57
  we were she was fine at first. And then as we went the day went on, she's like, man,
• 1:46:03
  I
• 1:46:04
  and
• 1:46:05
  I just do not feel good. And I probably shouldn't have ran ran this and just stayed home. And I was like, well, probably so. But Well, how's she We got the job. How's that been since? That happened Saturday, you say?
• 1:46:18
  Yeah.
• 1:46:20
  She's just sore and bruised.
• 1:46:23
  Her bruises are showing up. They weren't showing up at first, but
• 1:46:27
  Unknown: she's okay. She doesn't have any neck problem no
• 1:46:29
  neck problems, does she?
• 1:46:32
  Unknown: I
• 1:46:34
  don't know.
• 1:46:35
  She did say something about.
• 1:46:38
  I think her back was bothering her or something at some point in time, but we have an inversion table so.
• 1:46:46
  She can use that,
• 1:46:50
  Unknown: you know. Well,
• 1:46:52
  Unknown: sure sorry, man. You gotta, you know, you one of the things you learn
• 1:46:56
  in this life
• 1:46:58
  is you just gotta
• 1:47:00
  mull over every damn decision that you make no matter if it seems small or large
• 1:47:06
  because they can all have repercussions and consequences.
• 1:47:12
  Unknown: Yep,
• 1:47:13
  Unknown: yes they can. You know it's one of the reasons that this information on the status change and knowing how all these systems work,
• 1:47:23
  to me it allows you to make more accurate decisions because the system,
• 1:47:29
  as you're talking about here and giving us a perfect example, Chuck,
• 1:47:33
  the system
• 1:47:34
  is designed against you. It's designed to be the lawnmower and your blade of grass and the more that you can understand it and get out of the way of the lawnmower,
• 1:47:44
  the better your life's gonna be.
• 1:47:47
  Unknown: Yes.
• 1:47:48
  Yes.
• 1:47:49
  Unknown: That's and that's what it sounds like Darryl's done. So, that's what we're trying to get. Well, we got, you know, there's a couple other people like Patrick in in Memphis is hell bent to leather to apply this to all their dealings up there, him and Ike, and some of the other guys out there, and Thomas Maddox is trying to incorporate it in with his new state of Texas enterprise out there, and you know, we've got some pretty positive things going on, really, it's just slow.
• 1:48:15
  It's slower than a lot of us would but
• 1:48:18
  I would bet
• 1:48:19
  if I took a poll on our listeners
• 1:48:22
  that most of the people that
• 1:48:24
  adhere to this and have taken it to themselves
• 1:48:29
  are people that are generally ahead of the curve in life. Daryl, when you were younger, were you generally ahead of the curve of most people on things?
• 1:48:41
  Unknown: Yeah. I I guess you could say that. I mean,
• 1:48:44
  I I dropped out of high school my freshman year because I thought it was stupid. Does that put me ahead of the curve? I guess so.
• 1:48:51
  Yeah.
• 1:48:52
  Yeah. So
• 1:48:56
  I I don't I don't know. I
• 1:48:59
  I I've always I've I've always been contrary,
• 1:49:03
  and,
• 1:49:04
  yeah, you had to show me evidence to why I had to do something.
• 1:49:08
  And if you couldn't show me, I figured you were full of it. Kind of a rebel. You were always a rebel. Yeah.
• 1:49:17
  Yeah. I was. I I've been called that my whole life and that's why I moved to the South. Me too. You know? Me too. But no. I yeah. So That's me.
• 1:49:26
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, there's a common denominator
• 1:49:29
  trait for the most part in in in most of us. And being ahead of the curve and being a rugged individual and not wanting to conform to the crowd and all those kind of characteristics I think probably apply to us.
• 1:49:43
  I have not had a chance, just change gears here a little bit, because I think this may myth may be really something for us and we'll see as it develops, but, you know, last week I met a new member of our little Tuesday group
• 1:49:57
  that is a retired Secretary of State employee that evidently thinks like we do, and I was going to try and get with him over the weekend, but this weekend
• 1:50:06
  schedule and things that happened to me and Easter weekend and his wife's Ecuadorian, they probably got family commitments and stuff, so we didn't get together. I'll see him tomorrow,
• 1:50:16
  but we had talked about him being on the show this week, and I'm real anxious to get to know Corey more because he's a heck of a nice guy, seems like, and to also see if he's got any insight
• 1:50:29
  that might benefit us from being employed
• 1:50:33
  by the chief agency that we
• 1:50:37
  use to seek our freedom.
• 1:50:43
  Unknown: So Yeah. Well,
• 1:50:46
  maybe he could, if he's if he's leery of talking, maybe he can just use a pseudonym No. Let me tell you Daryl? And He he ain't he didn't seem leery of talking one bit.
• 1:50:58
  Unknown: Okay? And what I'm anxious to sit down is once he understands the whole program
• 1:51:03
  is to see what
• 1:51:06
  intuitions
• 1:51:06
  he had
• 1:51:08
  and what he saw that he could talk about if he wants to from the inside
• 1:51:13
  on things that can
• 1:51:15
  help us maybe,
• 1:51:17
  what particular office to go to in some of these things, where to mail the affidavit cold if you just mail the affidavit up there, you know, those kind of questions. Questions. Now the other exciting thing, even more so, is because he did tell me that his specialty is The Middle East,
• 1:51:34
  and that's a pretty important part of the world and has been for some time, and if he wants to do a program,
• 1:51:41
  maybe once a week for some time,
• 1:51:44
  and do nothing but discuss
• 1:51:47
  The Middle East with his knowledge, background, and all that stuff on it, I think it'd probably be a real big I think something the audience would listen to and other people might be very interested in listening to also.
• 1:52:00
  Unknown: Hear. Hear. Yeah. I
• 1:52:02
  yeah. I I maybe he maybe he has some insight insight or knows something about American Samoa too. Who knows? He doesn't just never know. So
• 1:52:14
  Unknown: we'll see, and I'll see him tomorrow at lunch. I doubt if we'll try and schedule him in tomorrow. Of course, John, usually we do financial stuff,
• 1:52:22
  but John got ahold of me at the top of the hour and was enjoying the conversation so much that he didn't want to interrupt.
• 1:52:29
  So we continued along the vein we were on. We'll get John and Cathy on next week. There wasn't a whole bunch of financial stuff to discuss regardless.
• 1:52:38
  It's the calm before the storm,
• 1:52:41
  and we'll just wait and see which day it's gonna start happening on because we're not far away from seeing fireworks.
• 1:52:51
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, you know, those
• 1:52:54
  those those 200 people
• 1:52:57
  over in that
• 1:52:59
  Unknown: what what what was that at? Caira Caira Lime that explosion, they already saw some. Yeah. They saw plenty of fireworks, didn't they? Very so. Blame and now the Muslims, of course, are taking credit for it today, I see. But I think and there's no way we'll ever know. But when these course of events all continue to to go along the same course. Let me paraphrase
• 1:53:21
  the declaration of independence.
• 1:53:24
  When the sufferings become insufferable,
• 1:53:27
  you see, the sufferings that we've undergone have not become unsufferable yet.
• 1:53:32
  Insufferable.
• 1:53:34
  Unknown: They will. No. No.
• 1:53:36
  They will. Yeah. Well, that's that's
• 1:53:40
  when I don't know if you remember
• 1:53:43
  when we when everybody got together over in Atlanta at that Chinese
• 1:53:48
  Unknown: Oh, yes. Deli, you know? Yeah. I was think I was thinking about that over the weekend, man.
• 1:53:54
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:53:55
  We were we were we were sitting beside each other side by side literally rubbing elbows,
• 1:54:01
  and I had that nice lady that was sitting beside me. I don't remember her name. And
• 1:54:06
  I I made the comment to her. I mean, I I said it pretty loud for everybody to hear. And I said when when my friend's suffering shows up, it'll it'll change a lot of attitudes.
• 1:54:17
  And
• 1:54:19
  and I I call suffering my friend. So when you when you suffer enough,
• 1:54:24
  then it'll it'll change your perspective. You know? Reality is perspective.
• 1:54:28
  And so
• 1:54:30
  the only thing that's gonna change reality is for you to change your perspective,
• 1:54:34
  and suffering will do that. That's right. And
• 1:54:38
  I I I
• 1:54:39
  that's why I called my friend because I had to suffer through a lot of my own ignorance and stupidity. And when I got tired of being ignorant and stupidity, self afflicted,
• 1:54:49
  then I wasn't willing to accept
• 1:54:52
  that was that which was hoisted on me.
• 1:54:55
  So I became very intolerant
• 1:54:57
  of of suffering,
• 1:54:59
  and I stopped doing it
• 1:55:01
  Well, yeah. As much as I can. Well, when they tell us I I tried to you know, every
• 1:55:06
  Unknown: When they accuse us of being intolerant when they accuse us of being intolerant, they're right. I will not tolerate their crap anymore in my life, and and I just won't do it. And I'll go out of my way to be a belligerent claimant and to get right in their face because every time that's happened, they go away.
• 1:55:27
  Unknown: Yeah. Well well, yeah, I I
• 1:55:30
  I just think we just have to apply our knowledge and make good choices and and try to,
• 1:55:38
  you know, manifest wisdom.
• 1:55:41
  And I try to share with people. I I'm I'm never trying to take anything away from anybody. I'm always trying to help with here,
• 1:55:49
  but I'm intolerant
• 1:55:50
  of of
• 1:55:54
  the status quo.
• 1:55:56
  And but I try to do it with blindness
• 1:55:59
  and
• 1:56:01
  uncompromisingly.
• 1:56:02
  And those those aren't contradictory
• 1:56:04
  qualities.
• 1:56:06
  And so
• 1:56:08
  Unknown: Your phone Anyway. Your phone connection's real strong today, by the way, Daryl. So I don't know, unusually. So
• 1:56:16
  we're at the Oh, yeah. Back of the hour here. I don't know what we'll we'll do tomorrow. I just kind of opened up the microphone not knowing what really to talk about today, and Michael graciously called ahead of time and we got off on this topic, and I think we've covered some real good ground today, especially for people that are newer.
• 1:56:34
  For the folks that are veterans out there, Ben and some of you guys, you can't hear this information enough.
• 1:56:41
  You cannot hear it enough.
• 1:56:45
  I hear the whistler. You got the whistler in the background, and that means it's about time for us to check out.
• 1:56:51
  Thank everybody for that contributed, Ted. Real good to hear from you and let us know how your situation
• 1:56:57
  progresses,
• 1:56:58
  and we'll be back tomorrow. If something happens, we'll have somebody on, but I know we'll have a good lively discussion and things topical to talk about. Chris, you might check up on your passport today and follow-up again to see if you can find out anything on that, and maybe we can talk about that tomorrow. So you guys have a good day. Of course. Get back into the routine, and we'll see you tomorrow. Hopefully, no Internet problems. Have a great day from Ecuador.
• 1:57:24
  I'll see y'all manana.
• 1:57:26
  Ciao. Ciao. Daryl? Yippee yay. Yippee ki yay, buddy. Have a good day.
• 1:57:31
  Thanks, everybody. Bye.
• 1:58:23
  Unknown: Blasting the Voice of Freedom Worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 1:58:29
  Unknown: Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.