Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Inside The OIG Interview: The Testimony Of An Unnamed R&D Officer From MCC (Part 5) (5/11/26)

Transcript

Inside The OIG Interview: The Testimony Of An Unnamed R&D Officer From MCC (Part 5) (5/11/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:02
  Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to dive right
• 0:06
  back in to the interview given by the R and
• 0:09
  D officer from MCC to the OIG inspectors. Question, Okay,
• 0:14
  so at what point should control then at some point though,
• 0:17
  call the shoe and say Rays isn't coming back? Answer
• 0:21
  if the count's not bad, They wouldn't know to call
• 0:23
  them and say they wouldn't say that, no question. So
• 0:27
  the shoe very well may never have been contacted or
• 0:30
  would have been contacted saying Rays isn't coming back? Consider
• 0:34
  him gone? Answer correct question? Okay, So they would have
• 0:38
  only known that based upon doing rounds and counts, is
• 0:41
  what you're saying. Answer right, But if they don't know
• 0:45
  that he needs to sell mate, because I don't believe
• 0:47
  there was any notification that another individual had to be
• 0:51
  placed in a cell with them, So nobody would know
• 0:53
  that even if you're making rounds and counting your unit,
• 0:57
  you wouldn't know that we need if there's no note
• 1:00
  vacation question. Well, notifications were made and the people were
• 1:04
  saying that they passed it along to other shifts saying yeah,
• 1:07
  he's required davisselmate. However, they're saying that Reyus is gone,
• 1:12
  possibly not returning, make sure to get him a bunkie
• 1:15
  if he doesn't. So it's kind of like, at what
• 1:18
  point does it determine when is Reyus not getting a bunkie?
• 1:22
  When Israeus not coming home coming back. We've also been
• 1:26
  told by a number of people though they say R
• 1:28
  and D would call us to say, yeah, Reyus isn't
• 1:31
  coming back. But to you, you're saying, no, that doesn't happen.
• 1:35
  We don't call SHO. We would have called them to
• 1:37
  say that Reyus he gets cut off by the guard.
• 1:42
  It's a possibility we could have called. But then sometimes
• 1:45
  we don't call. You know, if there is a miscount,
• 1:47
  there would be no reason for us to call. We
• 1:49
  would just key the in mad out. Sometimes they call
• 1:52
  us back and say, hey, inmates, so and so went
• 1:55
  out to court. Is he coming back? Some units will
• 1:57
  call and ask question, so they'll call rather than the
• 2:01
  other way around. Answer. Sometimes they call us question all right, answer,
• 2:07
  but the only way they'll know what the inmates might
• 2:10
  And then because of the shift change, you might have
• 2:12
  an officer from the specific set of ours and then
• 2:15
  now you have a new officer coming in at these
• 2:18
  specific set of hours, they won't know who went out
• 2:21
  to court. Unless they read their court list or they
• 2:24
  look at their log, they probably wouldn't know. And if
• 2:27
  they're doing account and their account is what it's supposed
• 2:30
  to be, they won't know. Question. So you're a very
• 2:33
  unique person that we're talking to is both has both
• 2:36
  sets of knowledge with the facts that you've worked with
• 2:38
  custody as well as non custody, and you know how
• 2:42
  these things work when people are removed. If the people
• 2:45
  in the shoe knew, and let's say let's just say,
• 2:48
  for this example, say everybody in the shoe knows that
• 2:51
  Epstein is required to have a cell mat Reyes leaves
• 2:54
  at eight thirty, he has a pre removal. At what
• 2:57
  time do you believe they should have reassigned a new
• 3:00
  cell mate to Epstein? Answer? Well, if they knew that
• 3:04
  he was a pre removal, then they would be trying
• 3:06
  to work on that immediately as soon as possible. But
• 3:09
  that's if they knew. Question. So, if they knew, let's
• 3:13
  say he gets cut off by the guard and if
• 3:16
  that was what was required. Question, Let's say the OIC
• 3:20
  absolutely knows he's WAB not to return, do you believe
• 3:24
  that he should have immediately then started working on a
• 3:27
  new cell mate. Answer, he would notify the lieutenant. Hey, move,
• 3:33
  That's what he would do if that was what was required.
• 3:37
  Question so, and if their argument or let's say that
• 3:40
  the lieutenants and the oics are arguing, that's premature. He
• 3:44
  could always return, So we pass it on to the
• 3:46
  next shift, saying he gets cut off by the guard. Well,
• 3:50
  it's premature if you don't know that the inmate's not
• 3:53
  coming back. Question in this case, though, if he's WAB,
• 3:57
  do you believe that he's still premature? Answer no. If
• 4:00
  he is WAB, but looking at this, I don't know.
• 4:04
  Question no. No, I'm just saying if he was WAB
• 4:08
  at that point, do you think that it's still premature
• 4:10
  or do you think at the time it's appropriate? Answer No,
• 4:13
  If it was okay, if it was known that this
• 4:16
  inmate was leaving and he wasn't coming back, and if
• 4:19
  it was known that this individual needed to have someone
• 4:21
  else in the cell with him, then yes, at that
• 4:23
  time it would be required to replace or move them
• 4:26
  in the cell with somebody else. So yeah, Question so,
• 4:30
  when you're saying non though, So I mean known that
• 4:33
  he's a WAB, he gets cut off by the guard,
• 4:37
  known that he's WAB, and also known that this individual
• 4:40
  requires a cell mate at all times, cannot be housed alone. Now,
• 4:44
  there are some inmates that have to reckon a cell alone,
• 4:49
  and there are signs on their doors, and that there
• 4:51
  are some inmates that might be required to have a
• 4:53
  cell mate. But if there's no notification, and I work
• 4:56
  a unit and this is not my normal unit, and
• 4:59
  I'm working this unit and I'm just filling in here,
• 5:01
  and then then I'm working and I don't know, and
• 5:04
  there's nothing placed on the walls that state that, or
• 5:07
  on this inmate, on the door or maybe on the clipboard.
• 5:10
  I wouldn't know that question. No, No, that's not what
• 5:13
  I'm saying. What I'm saying is I think you've probably
• 5:17
  specifically talking about the Tova and Michael Thomas I'm talking
• 5:21
  about in the morning at eight thirty am, prior to
• 5:24
  that time, they get a court list WAB and the
• 5:27
  OIC says, yeah, he's WAB. He is likely not to return,
• 5:32
  he's got his bag. You know, I'm taking him down.
• 5:34
  I'm giving them off I know, he says, I know
• 5:37
  Epstein's required DA have a cell mate. Answer, Oh, well,
• 5:41
  if he knows it. Question, but is it a legitimate
• 5:45
  argument in your opinion to say placing Epstein with a
• 5:47
  new cell mate is premature because Reyes could return. Is
• 5:51
  that a valid argument? Answer? Well, based on what you
• 5:55
  just said, knowing she gets cut off by the investigator
• 5:58
  with WAB and with knowing Epstein requires right. Answer, Well,
• 6:05
  based on what you just said, knowing that he's WAB,
• 6:09
  that would not be premature because he's leaving. Question right answer. Now,
• 6:13
  if for some reason it gets canceled and they say, hey,
• 6:16
  we're not moving this inmate, We're going to move him
• 6:18
  at a later time, because those things do happen, his
• 6:21
  trip he got canceled, But knowing that he's going to
• 6:24
  be leaving, I don't think that would be premature, no question.
• 6:28
  So if he leaves at eight thirty eight in the
• 6:30
  morning and the OIC shift ends that two PM, does
• 6:34
  that is there? Would he know that the trip got canceled?
• 6:38
  I guess the way I would be asking, he knows
• 6:40
  the guy left at eight thirty eight WAB, and I
• 6:43
  guess by that time, I would think by two pm
• 6:46
  if a trip got canceled, they would know correct answer yeah,
• 6:49
  because the inmate would have went back upstairs. He would
• 6:52
  have went back to the unit. Question right, So how
• 6:56
  often do inmates that go WAB and their trips don't
• 7:00
  get canceled? How often do those inmates actually return? Answer? Oh,
• 7:04
  they go upstairs immediately. Question No No. So I'm saying
• 7:07
  if Raus is listed as WAB, he left at eight
• 7:10
  thirty in the morning, his trip didn't get canceled by
• 7:12
  two pm because he never came back upstairs. How often
• 7:16
  do WAB inmates actually come back to the institution? Answer
• 7:21
  it's happened with inmates going on in airlift. The marshals
• 7:24
  take inmates all the way out of their institution and
• 7:27
  then have to bring them all the way back. It's happened. Question.
• 7:30
  And let's say if out of one hundred WABS answer,
• 7:35
  I'll say about if I had to count, maybe about
• 7:37
  it's happened. It's happened question. But I mean, does it
• 7:40
  happen like very random and seldomly, or does it happen
• 7:44
  like one out of five times this happens? Or are
• 7:48
  we talking about like one out of one hundred or
• 7:51
  one out of a thousand. Answer, I'll say maybe like
• 7:54
  ten out of one hundred. Question, So about ten percent
• 7:58
  of the time it does happen. Answer, it has happened, yep.
• 8:01
  Question Okay, so ten percent of the time, all right,
• 8:08
  answer it's happened. It might be something with the airlift,
• 8:10
  the paperwork is not right, she gets cut off. So
• 8:14
  then with keeping that in mind, that ten percent of
• 8:16
  the time that has happened, then do you believe that
• 8:20
  is slightly a valid argument to say, yeah, we know
• 8:22
  that he needs a cell mate, but we don't think
• 8:25
  it's appropriate to do it in this shift. It should
• 8:28
  be done on the next shift when we're verifying that
• 8:30
  he's in fact not coming back. Answer Yeah, I would
• 8:34
  say that's appropriate question. Okay, answer, because you don't know.
• 8:38
  You just don't know. Anything is subject to change, so
• 8:41
  I would say that's appropriate question. Okay. So it's different
• 8:45
  with you. You're saying airlift Now we're talking about pre
• 8:48
  removed specifically for court. Answer, well, airlifts could be pre removed. Question.
• 8:54
  But what I'm saying is it's wab because the person
• 8:58
  is going to court, nothing to do with transport's getting
• 9:01
  messed up. If this inmate is WAB going to court?
• 9:04
  How often do the inmates going to court wab actually
• 9:08
  return answer? They mostly go question, So it's like maybe
• 9:13
  one in one hundred answer. Maybe one in one hundred
• 9:17
  that might have come back, but most of the time
• 9:19
  they go question. So even one in one hundred is
• 9:22
  like yeah. No, They pretty much are always gone answer yeah. Question.
• 9:27
  So then that argument of he gets cut off by
• 9:31
  the guard, it's got to be something drastic that they
• 9:34
  might not have come back. But most of the time
• 9:36
  they go question. So that argument that we needed to
• 9:39
  wait until verification, that really doesn't hold. Wait then if
• 9:43
  they know he was going to court, wab answer. If
• 9:46
  they know he was going to court, wab Yeah, question,
• 9:49
  then the argument doesn't hold wait answer. It's a catch
• 9:53
  twenty two because I've seen so many things that have
• 9:55
  happened that you might think somebody is gone and they
• 9:58
  bring them back question. Sure, but it sounds like he
• 10:03
  gets cut off by the guard. He might get on
• 10:05
  that side and something might come up in his paperwork
• 10:08
  where they're like, oh, we got a new case, we
• 10:10
  got a new charge, and we're not transferring him. We
• 10:13
  got to sort this out. I mean, it has happened
• 10:16
  where somebody has come back to the jail, but most
• 10:18
  of the time they do go question and it sounds
• 10:21
  like it's extremely rare circumstances. Answer yeah, question all right,
• 10:28
  So at that point, do you think that they should
• 10:30
  have taken action immediately if they knew it was wab
• 10:33
  and going to court knowing the fact that Epstein needed
• 10:35
  a sell mate. We know Reyes left, Epstein needed a
• 10:38
  sell mate, the OIC and the Shoe officers knew that
• 10:41
  he needed a cell mat. Should they have taken action immediately? Answer?
• 10:46
  Maybe they should have notified their supervisor. Answer who would
• 10:50
  they have notified of this? Answer the Shoe lieutenant and
• 10:53
  let them know, Hey, the guard gets cut off by
• 10:55
  the investigator indiscernible, No, Shoe lieutenant. Should it be the
• 11:01
  ops lieutenant indiscernible lieutenant? Answer the ops or the acting
• 11:05
  lieutenant notify, Hey, we got bunkin mates, so up with
• 11:09
  so and so he can't be housed by himself. Question Okay, Answer,
• 11:13
  but like I said, communication around here is not at
• 11:17
  its best. So what should have happened, what should have
• 11:20
  taken place might not necessarily happen because everybody doesn't know
• 11:24
  everything that's going on around here, everybody does not communicate
• 11:28
  the way that they should. So you might know it,
• 11:31
  but just because you know it, you might assume I
• 11:33
  know it and we're working together. Not necessarily true. Question, sure,
• 11:39
  and yeah, we would only go off of what people
• 11:41
  tell us directly, like did you know this? Yes, I
• 11:44
  knew it, okay, and you know so so he gets
• 11:47
  cut off by the guard because it's not like if
• 11:50
  I was working up there, that's not my normal unit.
• 11:53
  If I was working up there, I would not know
• 11:55
  that question, right answer. You know, if I'm coming from
• 11:59
  another department and that's not my steady post, I would
• 12:02
  not know that question. Yeah, and that's why we're listing
• 12:05
  people like, oh I see shoe, Lieutenant, Ops, Lieutenant, Activities lieutenant,
• 12:09
  these people that he gets cut off. You know, it's
• 12:13
  so hard to say yes and no. But if you
• 12:15
  know someone new, then yes. But everybody that works in
• 12:18
  this institution, we're all over the place. Sometimes we don't
• 12:21
  know we don't know everything about every unit, So that's
• 12:25
  the unfortunate part. Question do you recall anyone calling R
• 12:28
  and D looking for the status of REUS that day? Answer?
• 12:31
  I don't remember. No, I'm not going to I don't
• 12:33
  remember that, no question, All right, do you have anything
• 12:38
  else on the topic before the other investigator jumps in,
• 12:42
  I don't think so. We kind of beat it, all right, folks.
• 12:45
  We're gonna wrap up right here, and in the next
• 12:47
  episode dealing with the topic, we're gonna pick up where
• 12:49
  we left off. All the information that goes with this
• 12:52
  episode can be found in the description box.