Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / Can Quantum mechanics Collapse Reality?

Transcript

Can Quantum mechanics Collapse Reality? · The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the quark Side. Quantum Physics podcast, an exploration
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: of the fundamental structure of reality, where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: and understanding begins at the smallest scales.
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: Imagine you are holding your mourning coffee mug like you
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: can actually feel the weight of it right, the heat
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: of the ceramic, the handle against your fingers. It's solid,
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: and it's right there in.
• 0:36
  Speaker 3: Your hands, right, totally normal morning, exactly.
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: But now try to imagine that exact same coffee mug
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: simultaneously sitting on the kitchen counter, I don't know, ten
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: feet away, and not a copy of the mug, but
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: the actual mug itself existing in two entirely different places
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: at the exact.
• 0:55
  Speaker 3: Same time, which just sounds completely absurd. It goes against
• 0:58
  Speaker 3: literally everything we experience.
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: On a daily basis totally. But if we zoom in
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: far enough down to the microscopic world, a particle existing
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: in two different places at once isn't just some weird
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: thought experiment. It's a proven reality. In quantum mechanics. It's
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: called superposition, and it is.
• 1:15
  Speaker 3: Arguably the most jarring disconnect in all of science, honestly,
• 1:18
  Speaker 3: because we know for a fact that the foundational building
• 1:21
  Speaker 3: blocks of our universe electrons, photons, quirks, they exist in
• 1:25
  Speaker 3: this blurry state of multiple possibilities at once.
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but we don't. We live in a macroscopic world
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: of definite singular states. Your coffee mug is either in
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: your hand or on the counter, I mean it is
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: never both exactly, which brings us to the core mission
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: the really massive mystery we are exploring today, the measurement problem.
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: At some point between that microscopic realm of infinite possibilities
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: and the macroscopic realm of everyday life reality, just well.
• 1:53
  Speaker 3: It collapses, It snaps into place.
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: Right the moment a quantum system is measured or even
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: just interacts with this environment, all those blurry possibilities collapse
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: into a single fixed state. And today we are exploring
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: how scientists are actively trying to catch that exact microscopic
• 2:10
  Speaker 2: moment of collapse, like they are using a massive subterranean
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: dark matter detector in Italy to do it.
• 2:16
  Speaker 3: And we really need to emphasize the stakes here solving
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: this measurement problem. It isn't just about particle physics or
• 2:21
  Speaker 3: tying up some mathematical loose end. It's the key to
• 2:24
  Speaker 3: bridging the seemingly impassable gulf between quantum mechanics and general relativity,
• 2:29
  Speaker 3: which is basically gravity, right right gravity. Finding the mechanism
• 2:33
  Speaker 3: behind this collapse, it could honestly give us the holy
• 2:35
  Speaker 3: grail of modern physics, which is a unified theory of
• 2:39
  Speaker 3: quantum gravity.
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's unpack this because before we go a kilometer
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: underground to look at this Italian detector, we need to
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: understand exactly what scientists are trying to catch. So quantum superposition,
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: we're talking about a particle not sitting in a neat spot,
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: but existing as a wave function.
• 2:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's essentially smeared out across space. It's representing a
• 2:58
  Speaker 3: probability of being in multiple places simultaneously.
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: Then it interacts with something and boom, that smeared out
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: wave function abruptly collapses. The particle snaps into a single location.
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: And for what nearly a century, the question has been why?
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: What physically causes that snap?
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: Well, early on, some theorists actually propose that the act
• 3:18
  Speaker 3: of observation by a conscious mind triggered the collapse.
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: Which is, come on, that feels way too mystical for physics,
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: the idea that human consciousness dictates physical reality.
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: Oh, most modern physicists are very uncomfortable with that leap.
• 3:32
  Speaker 3: It's exactly that discomfort that drove the development of theoretical
• 3:35
  Speaker 3: models to explain the collapse without needing an observer at all.
• 3:39
  Speaker 3: The two big ones are the continuous spontaneous localization model
• 3:43
  Speaker 3: or the CSL model, and the Doc Penrose model.
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: So starting with CSL, the name kind of gives it away.
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: Continuous meaning it's happening all the time, spontaneous meaning no
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: conscious human observer is needed, and localization because it forces
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: that smearreed out particle into a local, definite spot right.
• 4:03
  Speaker 3: And the CSL model proposes that this collapse is driven
• 4:06
  Speaker 3: by a constant random background noise in the universe, like
• 4:09
  Speaker 3: a universal jitter that occasionally forces a particle to localize.
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: But then you have the Doc Penrose model, which is wild.
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: It looks at gravity as the trigger because if a
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: particle is in superposition, it mathematically exists in two places
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: at once, right exactly, which means it has mass in
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: two different places at.
• 4:24
  Speaker 3: Once, And that is the core gravitational contradiction. General relativity
• 4:30
  Speaker 3: tells us mass bends space time, but space time is rigid.
• 4:34
  Speaker 3: It cannot sustain two conflicting gravitational curvatures generated by the
• 4:39
  Speaker 3: very same object.
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: So the sheer physical strain of that contradiction builds up
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: until spacetime just forces the particle to pick a lane.
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: Gravity itself is the observer precisely.
• 4:49
  Speaker 3: But here is the critical part. Both the CSL and
• 4:53
  Speaker 3: the doc Penrose models share one highly testable prediction. When
• 4:57
  Speaker 3: this spontaneous collapse happens, it shouldn't be totally silent.
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: It leads a footprint.
• 5:02
  Speaker 3: Yes, specifically, the collapse should emit a very faint burst
• 5:05
  Speaker 3: of X ray radiation. It's a phenomenon called Bremstralung, or
• 5:09
  Speaker 3: breaking radiation. When a charged particle suddenly decelerates or localizes,
• 5:13
  Speaker 3: it has to shed excess energy.
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: It's like a magician making a balloon pop, but instead
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: of a loud bang, the universe emits a tiny, incredibly
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: faint X ray flash.
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: That's a great way to visualize it. And what's fascinating
• 5:24
  Speaker 3: here is how these models take a purely abstract mathematical mystery,
• 5:27
  Speaker 3: the wave function collapse, and turn it into a physical,
• 5:30
  Speaker 3: measurable event that we can actually build a trap for right.
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: If there's a flash, we can catch it. But that
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: brings up a massive problem. These theoretical X ray flashes
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: are incredibly faint. How do you build a trap sensitive
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: enough to catch one?
• 5:43
  Speaker 3: You don't build one from scratch, You borrow a trap
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: built for something else entirely, which.
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: Leads us to Grand Sasso, Italy. Deep underground tell us
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: about xxinon.
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: So Xenon is a highly sensitive detector located inside the
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: INFN Grand Sasso National Laboratory, protect did by roughly a
• 6:01
  Speaker 3: kilometer of solid rock which shields it from cosmic rays.
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: And the machine itself is just massive. It's a huge
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: cylinder filled with a liquid xenon, almost six tons of it, right.
• 6:09
  Speaker 3: Nearly six tons, yes, cooled to minus ninety five degrees celsiu.
• 6:13
  Speaker 3: So it becomes this ultrapure dense liquid, and floating right
• 6:17
  Speaker 3: at the top is a thin layer of xenon gas.
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: Okay, so how does it work as a trap? Say
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: a quantum collapse happens inside the liquid xenon and emids
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: that tiny X ray.
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: So if an X ray hits the xenon, it excites
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: the atoms. Those atoms instantly produce an initial flash of light.
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: We call that signal one or S one, with.
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: A quick prompt flash exactly.
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: But the X ray also knocks a few electrons completely free,
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: and there is a strong electric field running through the
• 6:41
  Speaker 3: liquid that acts like a current, pushing those loose electrons.
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: Upward, up toward the gas layer, right.
• 6:47
  Speaker 3: And by measuring how long they take to rise, we
• 6:49
  Speaker 3: know the exact depth of the event. Once they hit
• 6:52
  Speaker 3: the gas layer, a second electric field accelerates them, violently,
• 6:55
  Speaker 3: creating a second, brighter flash of light signal two or sne.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: So you combine the S one flash and the S
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: two flash, and you know the exact energy and the
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: precise three D location of the pod.
• 7:06
  Speaker 3: You've perfectly mapped it.
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: Okay, but wait, xi and is a dark matter detector.
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: That's what it was built for. Isn't using a dark
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: matter detector to look for quantum collapse, like, I don't know,
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: using a telescope to look for a microbe? It just
• 7:19
  Speaker 2: seems like the wrong tool.
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: I get why you'd think that, But there is this
• 7:22
  Speaker 3: concept we call Moore's law of xenon detectors. They started
• 7:25
  Speaker 3: out using just a few kilograms of xenon. Now they
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: are up to multiple tons.
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: They just keep scaling up.
• 7:31
  Speaker 3: Exponentially, and because they've grown so massive while also keeping
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: background noise incredibly low, they have extremely low energy thresholds.
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: They've essentially evolved into the Swiss Army Knives of astroparticle physics.
• 7:45
  Speaker 3: They can detect things they were never originally designed to see.
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: That is wild. Okay, so we have the Swiss Army knife,
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: but having the trap is only half the battle. If
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: you're a scientist looking at the monitors, you have to
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: know what that quantum X ray flash actually looks like.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Otherwise it's just background noise.
• 8:02
  Speaker 3: Absolutely, and this is where the theorists come back in. Initially,
• 8:06
  Speaker 3: they had done all their math for these collapse models
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: using germanium atoms because older detectors use solid germanium.
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: But xenon T is liquid xenon. That's a totally different
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: atomic structure exactly.
• 8:17
  Speaker 3: So theoretical physicists had to completely recalibrate their math for xenon,
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: and the breakthrough they had was stunning. They calculated that
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: a quantum collapse in xenon wouldn't just produce a flat,
• 8:28
  Speaker 3: smooth energy.
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: Signal because of the atomic effects.
• 8:30
  Speaker 3: Right, Yes, the specific arrangement of electron shells and xenon
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: means the signal would have very distinct bumps at specific
• 8:37
  Speaker 3: low energies.
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: Here's where it it's really interesting. Instead of looking for
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: a needle in a massive haystack, the theoretical physicists basically
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: painted the exact needle they were looking for neon pink like.
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: Having those predictable bumps makes the statistical analysis so much
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: more powerful, and.
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: This raises an important question about how science actually gets done.
• 8:58
  Speaker 3: Neither side could make this sleep alone. The theorists provided
• 9:02
  Speaker 3: the exact neon pink map, and the experimentalists provided the
• 9:06
  Speaker 3: ultra quiet hardware to actually find it.
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: But getting that ultra quiet hardware is a nightmare. They
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: are a kilometer underground, but they still have to deal
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: with trace radioactivity, specifically rate on gas. Right.
• 9:17
  Speaker 3: Radon is the eternal enemy of underground physics. It seeps
• 9:20
  Speaker 3: out of the rock, decays into an isotope called lead
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: two fourteen, and causes background noise inside the detector.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: So how did they fix that?
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: Through a technique called fiducialization. They didn't analyze the whole
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: five point nine ton tank. They only looked at the
• 9:33
  Speaker 3: innermost four point three seven ton subvolume.
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: Oh, they used the outer layers of the liquid xenon
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: as a radiation shield for the center. That is so smart. Okay,
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: So the trap is set, the background noise is handled,
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: the neon pink signal is defined. What happened in the
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: twenty twenty one science campaign.
• 9:51
  Speaker 3: They analyzed data from July sixth to November tenth, and
• 9:55
  Speaker 3: the result was definitive. They didn't find the predicted X ray.
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: Burs nothing at all.
• 10:01
  Speaker 3: Nothing.
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: So what does so all mean? I mean they spent
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: months looking, built this massive subterranean trap, mapped out the
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: exact signal, and found absolutely nothing. How is that not
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: a massive failure.
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: Because in experimental physics, finding nothing is extremely powerful. By
• 10:17
  Speaker 3: not finding the signal, they proved it doesn't exist within
• 10:20
  Speaker 3: those specific energy ranges. They constrained the continuous spontaneous localization
• 10:25
  Speaker 3: model to be more than one hundred times more sensitive
• 10:27
  Speaker 3: than previous leading experiments.
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: Oh so they didn't kill the theories, but they shrank
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: the wiggle room.
• 10:32
  Speaker 3: Drastically shrank it. They forced the models into a much
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: tighter mathematical corner.
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: But wait, if they just ran the machine longer, wouldn't
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: they eventually hear the pops. Why stop there?
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: Because they hit an unbeatable wall of background noise, the
• 10:45
  Speaker 3: ultimate background noise. Solar neutrinos own the neutrino fog. Right
• 10:50
  Speaker 3: our sun is constantly blasting out these ghostly particles. Right
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: now as we speak, roughly seventy billion solar neutrinos are
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: passing through an area the size of your thumbnail every
• 11:00
  Speaker 3: single second.
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: Seventy billion through a thumbnail every second. That is terrifying.
• 11:05
  Speaker 3: And they pass right through the rock, through the lead shielding,
• 11:08
  Speaker 3: straight into the xenon. Mostly they leave no trace, but
• 11:12
  Speaker 3: with a detector this sensitive, eventually a neutrino strikes a
• 11:15
  Speaker 3: xenon atom perfectly and it creates a flash that perfectly
• 11:19
  Speaker 3: mimics the exact X ray signal we are looking for.
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: Wow, so you can't shield against it. It's an irreducible
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: background noise, the neutrino fog. So how does science move forward?
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: Are we just stuck?
• 11:29
  Speaker 3: Not at all? The future is an upcoming detector called XLZD.
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: It's a mega collaboration merging the xinon LZ and Darwin teams.
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: They are going to pack five to ten times the
• 11:39
  Speaker 3: massive current detectors into.
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: One machine to push deep into the fog.
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: Exactly, if you have a mass of enough volume you
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: can precisely characterize the solar neutrino signature, model it and
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: then mathematically subtract it from your data.
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: That is brilliant. And this brings us back to the
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: Doc Penrose model and gravity because if they actually push
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: through the fog and find this collect as, it changes
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: how we view reality.
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: Right fundamentally, the Dooce Penrose model suggests that space time
• 12:06
  Speaker 3: might not be perfectly smooth. It implies a fundamental microscopic fuzziness,
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: an intrinsic limitation in the structure of reality.
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: Like space time is pixelated, yes.
• 12:17
  Speaker 3: Which is an idea of discreteness that dates all the
• 12:20
  Speaker 3: way back to the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus. He thought
• 12:23
  Speaker 3: everything was eventually made of discrete parts. If space time
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: is fundamentally pixelated, that fuzzy, uncertain texture might be exactly
• 12:31
  Speaker 3: what forces a quantum superposition to collapse. Spacetime just can't
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: handle the contradiction across its rigid pixels.
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: It's amazing to think that building massive vats of liquid
• 12:41
  Speaker 2: xenon underground is ultimately about gravitizing quantum mechanics, proving that
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: space and time are pixelated.
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: And if we connect this to the bigger picture, it
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: goes so far beyond quantum mechanics. It is our absolute
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: best pathway toward testing a unified theory of quantum gravity,
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: reconciling Newton's gravity with the quantum realm once and for all.
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: We have covered so much ground today, from the absolute
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: absurdity of a coffee mug being in two places at once,
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: down into a subterranean Italian vault filled with liquid xenon,
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: to hunting the neutrino fog, and finally arriving at the
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: pixelated fabric of space time itself.
• 13:18
  Speaker 3: It is a phenomenal time to be watching this field.
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: It really is. So next time you look at a
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: solid object, whether it's your coffee mug or the wall
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: next to you, consider this. Its stable, singular existence right
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: there in front of you might just be the result
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: of a microscopic, fuzzy texture of space time quietly measuring it.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: It might be emitting an invisible chorus of tiny X
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: rays as it constantly forces itself into reality, and humanity
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: is finally on the absolute verge of being able to
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: hear it,