Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: The Ambiguity of Political Provocations

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: The Ambiguity of Political Provocations · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: The the realities of uh of the ward order. It's
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: it's obvious. It's obvious, and the the inability to accept
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: the change in the war is equally obvious. M The
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: stability of the present international geopolitical crisis. It's what every
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: nation should be sick and clamor and for. And the
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: consequences of the second the world should be something that
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: is still fresh in the minds of humans. The minds
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: of humans, the devastation and the atrocities, the death. And
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: some people ask, now, for what reason why do so
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: many people die? Many good people, parents, mhm, young people,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: the millions, Why did they die? And it's much about
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: politics and politicians, hyper polism and egregiousness, you know, flamboyance
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: of speech, that provoke, that provokes. We must be very
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: careful do not force ourselves into the Third Ord War.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: And the fears is that the Third World War risks
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: come in from Asia. We must be very sensitive with
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: a Taiwan straight issue m hm. We must acknowledge reality
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: and acknowledged history. And now that when we are pushing buttons,
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: we are pushing very sensitive buttons and provocations. Sometimes it's
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: in neither strategic, no preemptive or proactive, speaking tough, acting tough.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: It can lead to very dangerous results. There are red
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: lines that countries draw, and countries as powerful as China
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: or America always try to respect the red lines. If
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: if you want to ignore the red line, then you
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: act by your provocation of whatever you say. Don't cross
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: the red line just to cross the red line. You know,
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: when politicians come to office that they should. It's easy
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: when you're not in government, to be provocative speech, to
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: be hyperbolic, to be you know, a flame thrower out
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: to the same coded messages. You know, but when you
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: when you're empowered, you must be very mindful and very strategic.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: Some people, and some politicians and some countries the belief
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: that the social media or the public media that you
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: need to say something. You need you need to prove tough.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: You know, you need to point fingers, you need to
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: cry far, you need to be a victim. You need
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: to throw some other countries on uh on the bus
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: y y you need to to make to create uneasiness
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: in some capitals around the world. If that is a
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: Joe political strategy, what is it? The world today will
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: not be led by military might. The military of the future.
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: It's just a guarantee of UH national strength. The world
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: today is mostly driven by economics, not theoretical economics, but
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: practical economics, nations to their nations, to their more realistic
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: and what they need. And with the intendet and artificial intelligence,
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: nations and citizens are becoming very intelligent and very sensitive.
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: When you come to power, you don't need to be
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: so provocative and cross red lines and pressed unpressable buttons.
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: Those two a peace some capitals around the world with
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: the risk of exposing your economy to catastrophe and threatening
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: global piece or the peace of a region. For strategic
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: statements that are no way calculated or that are not
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: well timed. The timing, the time mhm. When to say
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: particular words, UH do particular things through geo politics, it
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: should be way calculated. How is away the magnitude of
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: what you say, and how it affects the person to
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: whom you are directing your message too. The geo political
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: realities of today. It's not the Joe political realities of
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: fifty years ago. Power today is economic hmm. Supply chain, production, chain, minerals, minerals, acquisition, shipping,
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: shipping routes, and corporation and reliability, consistency and stability being
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: the things that is driving the economics and the multilateral system.
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: Leaders must be very careful. They might have good intentions,
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: but the way you speak very concious, not to cross
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: the red lines when there is nothing after that. Right
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: when we speak to look tough, to to annoy somebody,
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: or is speaking to to to be seen as tough
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: or standing up? Yeah, tough for what? Standing up for? What?
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: What would that change? What would be different? Ambiguity it's
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: a political strategy. Some people see ambiguityous weakness. Some people
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: see ambiguityous strength in great power, in great powers, dynamics, dynamics,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: ambiguities very important. Clarity on sensitive issues may be diplomatically suicidal.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: You know, politicians no sticking points, they know talking points
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: that will affect national policy, national pride, and once you
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: cross those red lines, you know the nationalism they did,
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: the nationalists cry foul. And because of the fear of
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: nationalist rejection, rejection when foreign countries says says statements that
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: threaten the sovereignty or internal policies of certain countries, the
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: politicians cannot just let the go amsta be weak for
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: fear of a nationalists revolved. Politicians become so hawkish, so provocative,
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: because the woe who looks strong, and if we are
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: not careful, we send the wrong sickness and a risk
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: lead into war. Most wars are not actually started by calculation,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: comes from missteps, misstatements and missignals, and the role has
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: introduced the war war. We do not want that countries
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: can work together and still maintain their status. The status
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: of the world today is based on economic impact. Are
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: your system in your economy influenced the lives of others?
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: I create more capital than a foreign investment, build infrastructures,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: build institutions, great jobs, and be able to leverage your
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: industrial intellect, intelligence and scientific and nartificial intelligence powers to
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: make countries to needy and want here a new order
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: creates necessity, no corrosion, not false the clique and the
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: gangs and the blocks. It does not change economics, does
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: not advanced popular technology or science, and does not improve
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: the lives of the people. Some countries didn't understand not
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: the civilization in which we are in. Humans want to
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: have a better life. Humans don't like war in this
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: new century. Humans don't cherish war. Humans want to do business,
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: countries want to have friendly, friendly relationship. Countries want to scientills,
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: free trade agreements, work together to solve all issues. Stop wars.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: See that the American presidents trying to stop wars around
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: the world because that's what humanity wants. Now. People don't
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: like people die because they have seen a lot of
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: death and the reason for such ends up to be
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: not equal to ward to the lives and resources and
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: trillions of dollars last the world is where it tastes
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: to die because of history. China did not fall from disguise,
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: and China did not surprise anybody, unless those who underestimated
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: China for some reasons, who could not see the rise
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: of China. China is already here. You can decouple with
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: some strategic industries, but are your own risk. Chinese is
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: proven to be strong and powerful economically, technologically, part geopractically, militarily,
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: and they got one point four plus billion people, and
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: they got a lot of capital and open for business
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: as but degree and America is the greatest country in
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: the world. It's proven to be the greatest country in
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: the world economically, militarily, socio culturally, partically, philanthropically, artistically, I
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: P related to the greatness of America cannot be underestimated,
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: and the greatness of China cannot be underestimated. They time
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: to suppress China was possible like ten twenty years ago.
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: Once the genius is out of the battle, it's efficult
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: to bring it back. You cannot reverse the WTO. You
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: cannot reverse companies to print ups to China. You cannot
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: reverse American companies signing tread day deals with China and
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: some accepting to to to to release their critical technologies
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: to the Chinese for profit profit and you cannot accept.
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: You cannot deny the cloud of China, Chinese contribution and
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: the lastness of the investments and infrastructure and development in
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: development countries, and you cannot deny that. At the same time,
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: you cannot deny the greenness of America. Who is better
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: than who? But in these two countries? Who will not
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: be determined by military mind because those both countries are
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: number one and number two in military technologies, and so
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: you will not destroy yourself. You know, I see America
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: going to war with China. That would be unintelligent and
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: vice versa. Wars will be fought by proxies. Proxy countries
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: will for some nationalistic reasons will loose a lot of people.
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: American China can the vital proxies. Proxies they cannot face
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: one another. That will never happen. No, no nuclear state.
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: We ever face in nuclear state and go that law.
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: You see India and Pakistan try during their border crisis.
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: He did not go that long. It did not last
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: for weeks. Even un mistaken because they are nuclear powers,
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: something terrible might happen that can lead to an explosion
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: and destroy humanity. The issue of Taiwan is very sensitive
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: and it can be resolved peacefully. They don't need to
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: be resolved with war, because if you had to resolve
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: the Taiwan issue with war, they're going to destroy the
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: beautiful country that you're fighting for. The resolution to the
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: Taiwan issue can only be peacefully. That's the best choice
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: that humanity has, and those who provoke into a war
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: will pay the price of it. I don't need bloodshed,
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: We don't need people to die a lot for no
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: good reason. Go back to history. Sometimes people die in
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: their millions and actually nothing actually changes. We need to
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: be mindful. Partians need to be very mindful. We know
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: that the different capitals in the world structures of power.
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: You know they they have their own plans on strategy.
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: Just make sure you calculated very well and the long
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: term effect the consequences. They'll fall out. Don't be a
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: dog that backs all the time. They cannot bite even
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: today's ward. If the dog is biting somebody, the dog
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: is biting itself. Because your world today is intertwined, interconnected, interdependent.
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: Countries today are not cannot be isolated to themselves. Countries
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: today cannot do business just with particular countries, then you
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: are not a capitalist country. They lose a lot of
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: money when when, for some for no reasons, for some
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: selfish reasons, you refuse not to do business with other countries.
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: It's out of your detriment. I who don't buy gus
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: guys from let's say country air, the gas prices will go,
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: China will be China, America with America, we're gonna work
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: together for the sake of human prosperity, for the sake
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: of capital, and for the sake of science and technology.
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: Humanity wants to live in peace. Politicians to be mindful
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: with what this sigh, the way of thinking, and when
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: people ask for forgiveness of the side, it it's a choice.
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: International diplomacy shouldn't be international provocation. Provocation leads to war,
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: Innocent people die. Philosopher Prince Aire Intelligences Philosopher Princess Reserved
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: November fifteen, twenty twenty five, from the Great City of
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: Last Vegas, on the ambiguity of political provocation. Thank you,