Latest / World Ablaze with George Fontes / 28 - 2024 TRUMP VS BIDEN DEBATE BREAKDOWN AND FACT CHECK

Transcript

28 - 2024 TRUMP VS BIDEN DEBATE BREAKDOWN AND FACT CHECK · World Ablaze with George Fontes

• 0:00
  Download Whiskey Hell Podcast.
• 0:02
  We call attention to the mainstream media narratives weekly
• 0:05
  in hopes that you'll have fun with how ridiculous the news really is.
• 0:09
  We don't want to change your mind.
• 0:11
  We just want to give you perspective so that you can choose more wisely
• 0:14
  and be more aware.
• 0:15
  Couple that with great craft beer, hilarious stories,
• 0:18
  deep thoughts, and real conversations.
• 0:20
  We know you're going to enjoy it.
• 0:22
  Download Whiskey Hell Podcast anywhere you find outstanding shows.
• 0:30
  You are listening to a Fonce Media Network production.
• 0:37
  Welcome to this special edition of World of Blaze with yours truly, George Fonce.
• 0:42
  Today I have a couple of special guests with me to help me break down the 2024 presidential election debate.
• 0:50
  We focus on a few topics of concern.
• 0:54
  One, the economy.
• 0:56
  Two, border security.
• 0:57
  three we discuss the controversial black jobs statement and number four the january 6 capital
• 1:07
  riots we offer verifiable facts to fact check this debate as it relates to the topics that
• 1:15
  we are discussing in this episode we also offer insightful opinions a bit of laughter
• 1:20
  and there is even a bit of tension between us as we express our views.
• 1:27
  We appreciate you listening and we hope that you enjoy this episode.
• 1:31
  Today I have with me Rick Knowlton, who I call the political enthusiast slash super researcher.
• 1:39
  Been around the block. He's also a military veteran.
• 1:42
  Don't hit the mic.
• 1:44
  Of course, that signals that my brother Manuel Fonts from the Stretch Goose podcast is here.
• 1:49
  I have to bump this thing at least 100 times per show.
• 1:53
  No, I know it.
• 1:53
  I know it.
• 1:54
  And we don't have our usual broadcast mics today, so our voices will sound a little bit different.
• 1:57
  I know that Rick took notes.
• 2:00
  My brother is tired.
• 2:01
  I never take notes.
• 2:03
  See?
• 2:03
  So it doesn't matter.
• 2:04
  So I got a surprise.
• 2:05
  I got a writer requirement fulfillment for my brother.
• 2:08
  Did you honor the contract this time?
• 2:10
  I want two pounds.
• 2:12
  That's not even two pounds.
• 2:13
  You're a piece of shit.
• 2:14
  Listen, asshole.
• 2:14
  They're M&M's.
• 2:15
  I almost bought a pack of them myself.
• 2:17
  They're peanut butter M&M's.
• 2:18
  My favorite.
• 2:19
  Thank you, sir.
• 2:19
  There.
• 2:21
  A little pep for the step.
• 2:22
  I'm addicted to those damn things.
• 2:24
  Aren't they?
• 2:24
  Are you really?
• 2:25
  Especially the peanut butter ones, right?
• 2:26
  See?
• 2:27
  They're crazy.
• 2:28
  A pound a person.
• 2:29
  That's the requirement for this deal.
• 2:31
  There's a pick of it.
• 2:32
  All right, good.
• 2:33
  Now, with these mics, you kind of got to talk right into them because they're made for like
• 2:36
  live stage.
• 2:36
  All right, good.
• 2:37
  Then I can totally make noise.
• 2:39
  To a degree.
• 2:40
  All right, first, before we get going, I'll just get your general opinions of what you
• 2:43
  guys thought about the debate in general.
• 2:44
  And then I want to dive into specific questions.
• 2:47
  and we'll play those clips and see what you guys think.
• 2:50
  Hopefully we'll do a little bit of fact-checking.
• 2:53
  But in general, I'll ask Rick,
• 2:55
  what did you think of this debate in general
• 2:56
  as far as Trump versus Biden,
• 2:58
  how they handled themselves,
• 3:00
  and just your thoughts on the debate?
• 3:02
  I was looking forward to this debate for some time
• 3:04
  and I had a lot of concerns
• 3:07
  about how it was going to be presented.
• 3:09
  And I was really surprised
• 3:11
  in the way that it was presented.
• 3:13
  I was feeling that since these individuals that were doing asking the questions, I believe was a Trump hater to begin with.
• 3:24
  So we'll move on from there.
• 3:26
  I think that debate was, I guess, said those concerns that I had.
• 3:33
  I was suspecting that they would do a lot of cutting off Trump's microphone.
• 3:38
  And the questions presented to Biden, I think, were surprising that they were so specific knowing his issues with Alzheimer's.
• 3:54
  The first 15 minutes of this particular debate just showed how incognite Biden is and that he no longer needs to be president of the United States.
• 4:08
  So I would say that as far as the moderators with Jake Tapper and whatnot, basically, I expect it to be way more anti-Trump, like more hard left leaning.
• 4:22
  Yes.
• 4:22
  A lot more interruptions, but I think they played as fair as they could, and I'm probably thinking they did because CNN's been getting kicked in the ass so much for just how they've been handling media and how they've been leaning when they do try to, I guess, report the news in big air quotes.
• 4:38
  I think the ratings have a lot to do with that, and that's one of the reasons why they sold the broadcast rights to other networks so that they could generate more capital.
• 4:47
  I agree, but remember the 2016 debate, they were very, very much more, you could see pro-Biden on that one.
• 4:55
  Yes, they were.
• 4:55
  For this one, they were a lot more neutral.
• 4:57
  Well, I think that's why they switched.
• 4:58
  Yeah, they still threw their jabs, but it was nowhere near the way it was before.
• 5:02
  Well, I think they were very sneaky in the question presentations, and they had a very different way of presenting the questions.
• 5:09
  I think, for example, they avoided asking Biden questions or bringing up China.
• 5:18
  Well, yeah, and they did avoid the Robert Hur report that basically exposed him.
• 5:25
  And that's a whole other conversation.
• 5:29
  You know, how do you get all this evidence, but Dean, you can't go ahead and prosecute him because he's not fit to stand trial because his memory is horrible and he can't recollect anything or even know where he is.
• 5:39
  But yet all this evidence is there against him.
• 5:41
  No, they didn't press him on that and ask him.
• 5:43
  I think the timing of the questions were a little interesting, too.
• 5:45
  Well, I think that was all in Biden's favor, and I think they knew that, and that's why they didn't present any of these questions.
• 5:51
  I also noticed where the rules were, you're not supposed to have notes or anything, but you can clearly see the whole time in the debate that Biden kept looking down at something.
• 5:59
  Well, Biden did have notes.
• 6:00
  Absolutely, and Trump didn't.
• 6:02
  And he also had a pin as things were going, and he was crossing out and writing things, which according to the debate rules, you weren't supposed to do.
• 6:09
  Yes, that's correct.
• 6:10
  But it didn't look like it helped him anyway.
• 6:12
  Manu, what did you think?
• 6:13
  In regards to the moderators and the whole CNN thing, I think it's very hard to support a guy when the ship is sinking.
• 6:23
  so once that happened you start to slide away those questions and go well let's
• 6:29
  let's just keep this thing floating for the next 90 minutes and whatever happens happens we're not
• 6:36
  going to press we're not going to do anything to make us as a network sound dumber than we are
• 6:41
  right and if he falls he falls and then we got plan b which is what they're doing now
• 6:48
  which is full-scale meltdown crying you know calling for the replacement right i think i think
• 6:54
  they had two two sets of things which was if biden doesn't look dead which he did if biden doesn't
• 7:03
  lose his train of thought and he stays pretty you know level then you would have seen more
• 7:08
  mic cutting you would have seen more attack but the second biden went then it was like we got to
• 7:16
  save this fucking train somehow.
• 7:18
  So in your opinion, they were forced to be neutral
• 7:20
  because they already know he was on the decline.
• 7:23
  I don't think they wanted to sit there
• 7:25
  and start attacking Trump
• 7:26
  and then look like outright defending a guy.
• 7:29
  Maybe that was an attack they used to keep Trump
• 7:31
  from really tearing him apart.
• 7:34
  Like they didn't open the door for Trump
• 7:36
  to really go after him as they usually were
• 7:38
  by staying neutral.
• 7:38
  What was it, the third question in,
• 7:40
  he loses his train of thought and he starts drooling.
• 7:43
  Then it's like, fuck, what do we do now?
• 7:45
  I think there's times Biden looked like a robot that had like a glitch.
• 7:49
  Exactly.
• 7:50
  Exactly.
• 7:51
  So what do you do as a network?
• 7:52
  His eyes were so wide.
• 7:53
  It looked like he was high on meth.
• 7:54
  I'm not saying he was, but he was definitely on something.
• 7:56
  And then all of a sudden it looked like he malfunctioned and he would just be looking off into space, not knowing where he is.
• 8:03
  Poor guy.
• 8:03
  I mean, you don't want to wish on anybody, but I don't have remorse because I think he's a traitor to the country, period.
• 8:09
  And it's going to come out.
• 8:10
  They have the evidence.
• 8:11
  The only reason they haven't gone after him is because if they do, it's going to expose everybody else as well.
• 8:15
  And the other reason they don't go after him is because at this point, we can't afford to look any worse to the rest of the world.
• 8:22
  They can't see America to look any worse.
• 8:23
  I mean, if it really comes out that our president, current president, is a traitor and we prosecute him as a traitor and he gets the full extent of the law and justice as a traitor, we're going to lose even more credibility.
• 8:35
  So I think that's never really going to happen.
• 8:36
  Well, we have the Department of Justice covering up for them, and obviously they've hidden a lot of information, kept a lot of information from the general public.
• 8:46
  Yes, they did.
• 8:46
  And as such, the House is still investigating it.
• 8:52
  They pretty well got all of their information and input together.
• 8:56
  And I think after if hopefully Trump gets elected, then they will have enough people in the Senate as well as the House to prosecute Biden and expose the end.
• 9:11
  They've also got a number of they're taking the Department of Justice, the head of the Department of Justice, the court for refusing to turn over these documents.
• 9:24
  So I think within the next week or two, the court will make their decision on whether or not that information is going to be available for the House.
• 9:38
  And from all inside information, the court should render their decisions to the House.
• 9:46
  So I don't think it's ever going to get there.
• 9:49
  Okay, here's why.
• 9:50
  before they get to that point, I guarantee all of this information is going to be super,
• 9:55
  super classified at a level that no one's going to be able to look at it.
• 9:59
  And when they try to actually release the documents, they'll be so redacted,
• 10:02
  that's going to look like a giant Sharpie just went through every single page.
• 10:05
  Well, I think a lot of the rhinos with the Republican Party have left the House,
• 10:12
  and a lot of Democrats are leaving if they haven't left already.
• 10:18
  So I think I disagree. I think that this is going to be pushed.
• 10:24
  No telling how far it will go, but there's court actions against the Department of Justice to release this information that they've occurred and hand over all these documents that they have because they didn't show up to the subpoenas that Congress had sent to them.
• 10:43
  Well, I think that's a possibility.
• 10:47
  But to this day, over 60 years later, they still haven't released anything regarding JFK's assassination.
• 10:51
  So how are we going to believe that they would be so forthright all of a sudden and so pro-America that they would just release whatever evidence they have against Biden when they still haven't released anything against JFK?
• 11:05
  Well, we're in a different type of generation now than we were back then.
• 11:08
  No, I agree.
• 11:09
  The information, I was listening to his son talk about that assassination and the information that was readily available or not available to the general public.
• 11:21
  He has seen it.
• 11:22
  He's had some questions about it.
• 11:24
  There's always been a lot of controversy on whether or not there was more than one shooter there at the grassy knoll.
• 11:32
  Well, I personally hope you're right.
• 11:35
  I would love for Biden to go to prison for his treasonous actions.
• 11:39
  There's just too much evidence for that not to happen outside of someone higher up in government somewhere in some organization suppressing it and just literally classifying and sealing documents.
• 11:53
  If that doesn't happen, then I think they should go after him.
• 11:57
  And it's not a vendetta as far as for Trump to do, but it just should happen.
• 12:02
  Yeah, absolutely.
• 12:03
  Those examples, if you violate the law, as they say, you need to be prosecuted, irregardless of who it is, is what they're saying.
• 12:13
  Well, go ahead and pursue these issues.
• 12:16
  If nothing else, it'll establish an example to future politicians.
• 12:22
  Set the precedent, right, moving forward.
• 12:25
  What do you think?
• 12:26
  You think it'll ever come out, man?
• 12:27
  You think they'll ever prosecute and go after him?
• 12:29
  No.
• 12:29
  No?
• 12:29
  No.
• 12:31
  Because I don't know when this is going to come out,
• 12:35
  but as of today,
• 12:37
  he's having his meeting like we were talking about before we got on.
• 12:42
  And let's just say Biden and the family get together and they go,
• 12:46
  you know what?
• 12:47
  We're not going to do this.
• 12:49
  And he just completely leaves like tomorrow.
• 12:52
  And then he throws Kamala to the wolves.
• 12:55
  And then he just runs I mean the impeachment kind of dies at that point all those documents maybe the thing just gets shelved by by harris maybe i mean when trump was was the president he tried to release
• 13:10
  jfk stuff and it didn't happen he ran into all the all the bureaucrats if you will so i don't
• 13:17
  if that's if that happens when trump's in office trying to do that there's no you know this could
• 13:23
  happen here too.
• 13:24
  That's just kind of...
• 13:25
  Well, the head of the Department of Justice is being subpoenaed.
• 13:29
  No, I know, but that's...
• 13:30
  To court now.
• 13:31
  No, I know Merrick Garland's getting subpoenaed and taken to court and everything.
• 13:35
  I'm just saying, like, the timing of this, the west of the debate, I just think that
• 13:39
  the Democrats are going to put their foot on the gas these last four months and just
• 13:44
  do whatever they can through their legal whatever to try to bury it as deep as they can.
• 13:50
  It's kind of what I'm getting at.
• 13:51
  I mean, we still don't even have the Epstein list.
• 13:53
  I don't think you're going to get that either.
• 13:56
  I'm just saying it's quite evident that...
• 14:00
  The only reason it's going to come out is if the entire Democratic Party uses Biden as a scapegoat
• 14:08
  and washes their hands of him so that they all look squeaky clean moving forward.
• 14:12
  That's kind of what I'm getting at.
• 14:13
  And then they can just blame Biden for everything.
• 14:16
  That would be the only way I can see it.
• 14:18
  It's going to be hard, though, when you know Obama is tied to it.
• 14:21
  So I'm not sure how they're going to approach that.
• 14:24
  Obama is a part of somebody else is making these decisions for Biden.
• 14:29
  He is obviously not competent enough to make those decisions.
• 14:34
  You don't think Obama is involved at all?
• 14:34
  No.
• 14:35
  So it's said that through various news sources that Obama is a part of the shadow group that's making the decisions for Biden at this time.
• 14:47
  And I believe that.
• 14:49
  I'd like to know who else is involved in his cabinet that is actually running this country.
• 14:56
  And I'd also like to see, have that investigated.
• 15:00
  Because if Obama is actually running this as a shadow president, then we need, as the American citizens need to know that and take legal action if any of these laws are violated.
• 15:17
  It seems we have a two-step justice system in this country, and it needs to be fixed.
• 15:25
  And I think this is a great time to fix this and prosecute those that have violated these laws in Congress to the full extent of the law.
• 15:35
  And shadow support groups are communistic type in appearance and quite common in communist societies and politics.
• 15:48
  So you're basically saying that the Democratic Party is acting like a communist organization on –
• 15:52
  Oh, absolutely. I mean, take a look at this.
• 15:55
  And I think one of the things with CNN and the way they presented this debate was to start to soften and gradually make a transition from Biden's support and exposing him to all of the issues associated with his Alzheimer's disease.
• 16:18
  You know what's funny is everyone's talking about Biden's mental faculty, right?
• 16:24
  And the fact that he looks like he has early stage or even middle stage dementia is what people say.
• 16:31
  Yes.
• 16:32
  It took the debate.
• 16:34
  Okay.
• 16:35
  It took the debate where America slowed down to actually watch and pay attention for everyone to actually notice.
• 16:40
  This is how he has been his entire presidency.
• 16:43
  Yes, it is.
• 16:44
  From the beginning.
• 16:45
  And no one noticed for some reason.
• 16:47
  Well, they did.
• 16:48
  The conservative broadcasting networks exposed him at the beginning of it, but the fake news industry did.
• 16:56
  I guess I'm referring to the general public, like the non-media, just the everyday person.
• 17:01
  The fake news covered for Biden for four years.
• 17:06
  Now the general public and those Biden supporters that have been brainwashed by the fake news media has been exposed.
• 17:17
  And now that the fake news media has been exposed for all of their misinformation over the last four years since Biden has been in office is, like I said, exposed.
• 17:31
  And now I think that they're going to be looking at ways to make a transition to where they're still supporting Biden, irregardless of his condition, and trying to cover up for him now.
• 17:47
  But I see a little trend in where that is starting to subside.
• 17:52
  There are very few things that general public will get up for.
• 17:55
  No, I understood. They just read the headlines and it'll go deeper.
• 17:57
  So the Super Bowl is won, right?
• 17:59
  presidential debates or another so one night that you got what was it 80 90 million eyeballs on this
• 18:07
  yep now you can't hide it no you can't so now it's now everybody's running for cover you know
• 18:13
  little cover your ass type thing good point because remember remember a couple weeks before
• 18:17
  it was uh artificial intelligence videos of him babbling right yeah which was all bullshit
• 18:22
  and then like i said 80 90 million you have a good point because it it goes it's something that i i've
• 18:28
  said, you've said, and
• 18:30
  Rick's even said this in conversations
• 18:32
  off the mic, like when we've just been hanging out,
• 18:34
  but the general public doesn't pay attention.
• 18:37
  They read the headline, go on with their day.
• 18:39
  You know, and they just take
• 18:40
  everything for face value or fact.
• 18:43
  They don't dig deeper.
• 18:44
  They don't question anything. It's like they don't want
• 18:46
  to be bothered with it, but you're right.
• 18:48
  Super Bowl, like large events where
• 18:50
  you know it's like, wait, we've got to pay attention
• 18:52
  and watch this. Now they're all
• 18:54
  shocked. It's like, well, you've been supporting this guy the
• 18:56
  whole time and talking all this crap
• 18:58
  about MAGA and Republicans
• 19:01
  and anybody who's not part of the Democratic Party, basically.
• 19:04
  And then you finally get those people that,
• 19:07
  whatever the ratings are on some of these networks,
• 19:09
  finally watching it.
• 19:10
  And they're watching that their favorite anchors are going,
• 19:13
  holy shit, this guy is feeble, this guy is this, this guy is that.
• 19:18
  So now they're taking it in and going,
• 19:20
  fuck, who do we vote for now?
• 19:21
  I think it's too late in the game for them.
• 19:23
  They keep talking about replacing them,
• 19:24
  but I think it's too late in the game.
• 19:25
  They're too invested, but we're going to tackle that later.
• 19:28
  Well, the delegates are already pledged and everything for this guy.
• 19:32
  It's too hard to move the money around.
• 19:33
  It's not going to happen.
• 19:35
  I mean, outside of him going, I can't, you're in charge, Vice.
• 19:41
  There's ways to do it, but let's go down that.
• 19:44
  I thought it was funny that Gavin Newsom was the only guy.
• 19:47
  I know.
• 19:47
  Okay, let's kick that can down the road a bit.
• 19:50
  Sorry.
• 19:51
  No, I want to talk about that.
• 19:52
  I thought it was hilarious.
• 19:53
  We'll circle back to that.
• 19:54
  Go ahead and go through some clips.
• 19:55
  Let's actually go through some of the debate issues.
• 19:59
  And there's always key issues that the general public always is concerned with.
• 20:04
  One of them has always been the economy.
• 20:05
  And this one's really good because when this debate came out,
• 20:09
  especially when it came to the economy,
• 20:11
  there's a few things on here I'm going to point out later.
• 20:13
  The traffic on Twitter, X, whatever you want to call it,
• 20:15
  all over social media, everyone immediately,
• 20:18
  all your favorite Democratic wannabe correspondent
• 20:22
  came out and was just, everyone called Trump a liar.
• 20:27
  They said he lied 34 times, 50 times, 400 times, whatever.
• 20:31
  And they would just say, oh, he's a liar, he's a liar, he's a liar,
• 20:34
  but they would never back up their statement with any facts.
• 20:38
  So hopefully we can go through that.
• 20:39
  I'm going to play the clip here.
• 20:40
  Let's go ahead.
• 20:41
  I think this question was the first question of the night,
• 20:43
  and it had to do with the economy.
• 20:49
  Gentlemen, thanks so much for being here.
• 20:51
  Let's begin the debate and let's start with the issue that voters consistently say is their top concern, the economy.
• 20:58
  President Biden, inflation has slowed, but prices remain high.
• 21:03
  Since you took office, the price of essentials has increased.
• 21:06
  For example, a basket of groceries that cost $100 then now costs more than $120.
• 21:13
  And typical home prices have jumped more than 30 percent.
• 21:16
  What do you say to voters who feel they are worse off under your presidency than they were under President Trump?
• 21:22
  We got to take a look at what I was left when I became president and what Mr. Trump left me.
• 21:27
  We had an economy that was in free fall.
• 21:29
  The pandemic was so badly handled.
• 21:32
  Many people were dying.
• 21:33
  All he said was, it's not that serious.
• 21:35
  Just inject a little bleach into your arm.
• 21:37
  You'll be all right.
• 21:38
  The economy collapsed.
• 21:39
  There were no jobs.
• 21:41
  Unemployment rate rose to 15 percent.
• 21:43
  It was terrible.
• 21:44
  And so what we had to do is try to put things back together again.
• 21:47
  And that's exactly what we began to do.
• 21:49
  We created 15,000 new jobs.
• 21:52
  We brought out a position where we have 800,000 new manufacturing jobs.
• 21:57
  But there's more to be done.
• 21:58
  There's more to be done.
• 21:59
  Working class people are still in trouble.
• 22:01
  I come from Scranton, Pennsylvania.
• 22:03
  I come from a household where the kitchen table,
• 22:05
  if the things weren't able to be met during the month, it was a problem.
• 22:08
  The price of eggs, the price of gas, the price of housing,
• 22:11
  the price of a whole range of things.
• 22:12
  That's why I'm working so hard to make sure I deal with those problems and we're going
• 22:17
  to make sure that we reduce the price of housing.
• 22:20
  We're going to make sure we build 2 million new units.
• 22:22
  We're going to make sure we cap rents so corporate greed can't take over.
• 22:26
  The combination of what I was left with and corporate greed is the reason why we're in
• 22:29
  this problem right now.
• 22:31
  In addition to that, we're in a situation where if you had to take a look at all that
• 22:35
  was done in his administration, he didn't do much at all.
• 22:38
  By the time he left, things were in chaos, literally chaos.
• 22:43
  And so we put things back together.
• 22:44
  We created, I said, those jobs.
• 22:46
  We make sure we had a situation where we now, we brought down the price of prescription
• 22:51
  drugs, which is a major issue for many people, to $15 for an insulin shot as opposed to $400.
• 22:59
  No senior has to pay more than $200 for any drug, all the drugs they can include beginning
• 23:05
  next year.
• 23:06
  And the situation is we're going to make that available to everybody, to all Americans.
• 23:10
  So we're working to bring down the price around the kitchen table.
• 23:13
  And that's what we're going to get done.
• 23:15
  We don't need Trump talking.
• 23:17
  Let's just go off of that.
• 23:19
  Well, we don't.
• 23:20
  Not on this one.
• 23:21
  But anyway, Manuel, sounds like you have something to say about that.
• 23:26
  What do you think of Biden's response here in regard to the economy?
• 23:29
  We can start with Jake Tapper lying about the cost of food.
• 23:32
  It's higher than that.
• 23:34
  It's higher than that.
• 23:36
  I just, anyway.
• 23:41
  Well, it was said that the cost, $100 worth of food now costs a minimum of $172.
• 23:47
  Yeah, that's what it was.
• 23:48
  I was going to say that.
• 23:49
  And most of this food, what I buy on just stuff that my wife lets me pick out for me,
• 23:57
  like cereal, I'm going to use that as an example.
• 24:00
  I used to buy a medium box of cereal, Cheerios, for about $3.40.
• 24:05
  Now they're $5.50.
• 24:08
  It's almost double.
• 24:10
  So there's a 100% increase in the cost of my cereal.
• 24:15
  And groceries.
• 24:15
  What do you think, Mel?
• 24:16
  No, that's what I was going to say.
• 24:18
  But just the way Biden, like the economy was garbage when he picked it.
• 24:26
  I think the inflation was like two point something when Trump left.
• 24:31
  The gas was nationally a 260 something a gallon.
• 24:35
  unemployment was 6%, and then he takes over, mandates the COVID stuff,
• 24:43
  keeps things closed, and then turns around and injects trillions of dollars
• 24:47
  into the economy.
• 24:49
  Supply chains go belly up because Buttigieg, how do you say his name?
• 24:54
  Yeah, Buttigieg.
• 24:54
  Buttigieg.
• 24:55
  Buttigieg.
• 24:55
  Whatever.
• 24:56
  Well, he injected $7 trillion into the U.S. debt.
• 25:02
  I was just trying to be nice.
• 25:03
  conservative yeah he just and then and then we can't get the ships into port and all of a sudden
• 25:12
  six or six percent uh unemployment becomes 15 20 and inflation is now in the 13 14 within the first
• 25:19
  year and a half and then and he's over here saying this is all trump's fault i just that alone just
• 25:25
  kind of kind of like made me laugh really hard on the couch i don't know all right so well before
• 25:31
  Before COVID hit, Trump had the unemployment rate down at an all-time low at about, I believe it was 2.5%.
• 25:42
  Yeah.
• 25:43
  And then Biden's coming in saying since he's been president, the unemployment rate has dropped lower.
• 25:51
  Where he gets that from, I'll never know.
• 25:53
  He must have had a nightmare or something or a dream.
• 25:57
  That possible all he doing is confirming what Robert Hur said in the first question Bag of spaghetti Bag of spaghetti Oatmeal brain Alright so here
• 26:09
  I've
• 26:10
  gone down this road a few times. I have
• 26:13
  so many facts and whatnot, but
• 26:15
  I'm going to break down
• 26:17
  not the grocery price because we all know it sucks.
• 26:19
  Gas is indisputable.
• 26:21
  He was saying that
• 26:23
  he walked into a bad economy
• 26:25
  that Trump left him behind.
• 26:27
  Now, if I would trust anyone about business and finance, let's just go to Forbes.
• 26:31
  Forbes actually broke all of this down.
• 26:33
  Okay.
• 26:33
  The inflation, for example, he keeps talking about how the inflation was horrible when
• 26:36
  he took over.
• 26:38
  This is where you get the fact check me, right?
• 26:40
  I fact check everybody.
• 26:41
  Inflation was far worse during Biden administration.
• 26:45
  Okay.
• 26:45
  It was up 19.9% over the first 41 months of Biden's term compared to only 5.4% during
• 26:52
  Trump's first 41 months.
• 26:54
  Okay.
• 26:54
  not sure how biden thinks he walked into a bad inflationary period but he created that all right
• 27:02
  according to government's consumer price index year over year inflation peaked under biden at
• 27:06
  a four decade high of nine percent in 2022 before falling to just over three percent which biden has
• 27:12
  blamed on coven 19's lingering impact and the russia ukraine war okay i mean maybe don't keep
• 27:19
  sending 60 something billion every time
• 27:21
  frickin' Zelensky calls you.
• 27:23
  How about we don't do that?
• 27:25
  But whatever.
• 27:27
  So there's that.
• 27:29
  Gas prices, Rick, like you said earlier, the average
• 27:31
  cost of a gallon of gasoline dipped from
• 27:33
  $2.37 to $2.28
• 27:36
  from December
• 27:36
  2016 to 2020.
• 27:39
  All during Trump's term. Except for California.
• 27:41
  California doesn't count. Let's not talk
• 27:43
  about California. That's a whole different...
• 27:45
  You're going to make me go off on Gavin Newsom.
• 27:47
  We don't want to see that.
• 27:48
  Okay, so I was off by 40 cents.
• 27:51
  No, you're good.
• 27:52
  I'm just fact-checking good old Joe freaking Biden over here.
• 27:57
  So according to the Energy and Information Administration,
• 28:00
  gas prices rose to an all-time high of over $5 per gallon in 2022
• 28:05
  shortly after Russia's invasion.
• 28:07
  See, the only thing I don't like about this force breakdown
• 28:09
  is they try to keep shifting the blame over to the Russia-Ukraine war,
• 28:12
  but that isn't really what affected it.
• 28:14
  No.
• 28:14
  Because at the time, Trump had us pretty much energy independent.
• 28:20
  We weren't buying that much oil from everybody.
• 28:23
  That's true.
• 28:23
  We were using most of our own.
• 28:25
  Absolutely.
• 28:26
  After Biden came in, he did reduce how we process and drill for oil.
• 28:31
  We still are doing it, but he also sold off and drained a lot of our reserves and sold it off to foreign nations.
• 28:37
  Well, he shut down the pipelines that were the oil industry was able to lower the gas prices on the impression that they were going to be able to continue with this pipeline.
• 28:53
  And he shut all that down.
• 28:55
  And we had to, like you said, import more oil.
• 28:58
  Yeah.
• 28:58
  Killed thousands of jobs doing it.
• 29:00
  Yeah.
• 29:00
  Yes.
• 29:01
  They lost 3,000 jobs within the first, I believe it was the first three weeks, say a month of Biden being.
• 29:07
  That absolutely affected gas prices.
• 29:08
  It wasn't really the Ukraine war in and of itself.
• 29:11
  No.
• 29:12
  I mean, he was already on the road to basically killing the gas price issue
• 29:19
  and making sure that we were reliant on foreign oil.
• 29:23
  And we already know why they do that is because at the time when they didn't,
• 29:27
  they didn't go ahead and renew that 50-year long or whatever long contract with Saudi Arabia.
• 29:32
  They're no longer trading barrels of oil according to the standard of the dollar now.
• 29:36
  Okay, that's the only reason the United States was continuing to buy the oil and push everybody to buy foreign oil was because of that.
• 29:43
  It was based off the U.S. dollar as a standard and measure of how much it was worth.
• 29:48
  Now that it's not there, now what?
• 29:51
  Now what do we do?
• 29:53
  Should we not just use our own oil?
• 29:55
  You drain the oil reserves.
• 29:57
  Well, our oil reserves, that is one.
• 30:00
  He claims that the oil price.
• 30:02
  That was one of his deals.
• 30:03
  I just wanted to bring it up.
• 30:06
  That's all.
• 30:06
  The oil reserves, Biden has said that the gas prices are dropping.
• 30:15
  They've dropped a small, tiny fraction because he's been using, like you said earlier, our reserves that are actually used for emergencies for the military.
• 30:26
  Yes.
• 30:27
  But we shouldn't even have to use those reserves.
• 30:28
  And as such, he has exhausted that reserve.
• 30:33
  The last statistic I heard was that our oil reserves right now are at 3%.
• 30:40
  So that is very, very bad news for the security of this country.
• 30:49
  Doesn't it?
• 30:50
  Given the state of where we're at.
• 30:52
  True.
• 30:53
  What did you say?
• 30:53
  What I was going to say is, what the hell is her name?
• 30:57
  The press secretary?
• 31:00
  Pierre Jean-Pierre.
• 31:01
  Whatever her name is.
• 31:02
  Jean-Pierre.
• 31:03
  And she made a statement a few weeks ago talking about how he wanted to go into the reserves again.
• 31:09
  So if we're at 3%, we're going to get down to 1%.
• 31:12
  Well, there's an issue with that.
• 31:16
  Wow.
• 31:17
  Okay.
• 31:18
  Okay.
• 31:18
  He reduced and handcuffed the oil industry from drilling and processing.
• 31:23
  He never stopped it, but he extremely reduced it.
• 31:26
  He closed a major pipeline that would have made everything more efficient.
• 31:30
  Well, that was one of many things that he's done with the oil industry.
• 31:32
  Understood.
• 31:33
  would have made it more efficient and would have drove down the price of oil.
• 31:37
  So those two things in combination with him continuing to now dip into our reserves
• 31:41
  is going to put us in trouble and make us reliant on foreign oil again.
• 31:46
  The only difference is we're going to be screwed even worse
• 31:48
  because now it's not based on the value of the dollar anymore.
• 31:51
  It's not backed by the dollar.
• 31:52
  That's right.
• 31:53
  Good old Biden, right?
• 31:55
  All right, so I think we're done with economy.
• 31:59
  Well, no, I have one more thing for you.
• 32:01
  Uh-oh.
• 32:01
  we didn't get to it because it comes up later in this question,
• 32:03
  but we'll just skip past.
• 32:04
  I think we got a little bit out the federal debt.
• 32:06
  So everyone said that everything was worse under Trump.
• 32:08
  They always say,
• 32:09
  Oh,
• 32:09
  highest debt ratio ever in four years of any president.
• 32:13
  Forbes says different says the federal debt of 34.75 trillion is 25% higher
• 32:19
  than the day Biden took office.
• 32:23
  So it's higher after he took office by 34.75 trillion after rising 39%
• 32:29
  during Trump's presidency, up from $19.9 trillion.
• 32:32
  In January 2017, with the U.S. running a total deficit of $5.85 trillion
• 32:36
  from its 2021 to 2023 fiscal years,
• 32:40
  compared to $2.43 trillion from 2017 to 2019,
• 32:45
  and a record $3.13 trillion in 2020 alone.
• 32:50
  So they keep making a statement it was worse under Trump, our debt,
• 32:54
  but it clearly was worse under Biden once he took office.
• 32:58
  Yes.
• 32:58
  So why do they keep telling that lie?
• 33:00
  Because the general public doesn't fact check it.
• 33:04
  And it's just typical of everything else they've been saying over the last four years of his office.
• 33:10
  True.
• 33:11
  And that was brought up by Trump in the debate, the economy and the inflation rate.
• 33:23
  So in short, Biden is the worst president we've had in American history.
• 33:30
  And when you fact check it, you will find that that is the case.
• 33:35
  You know, what's funny with the fact checking stuff is the government has to, if it's not classified, they have to report everything to the public.
• 33:45
  Okay.
• 33:46
  They have to.
• 33:48
  The problem is the people don't realize that.
• 33:53
  And so if they don't see it in the news, like you said, Rick, or they don't see it in a headline, they don't think it happened or it's not a fact.
• 33:59
  Well, the news gets their information someplace, and that is from the government.
• 34:04
  And so the Democratic Party is keeping those facts from them.
• 34:08
  But if they have what they used to have.
• 34:10
  It's from the Department of the Press Secretary, obviously.
• 34:12
  But what I'm saying is every time I fact check, I could go to the direct government websites, not the news sources, not the press secretary's websites.
• 34:22
  You can go to the actual government websites and find all this data, which is where I pull most of it.
• 34:27
  And every time you look at it, it totally makes Biden out to be a liar every single time.
• 34:33
  Well, that's the part of the news media and the fake news is they don't bring these things up.
• 34:37
  OK, well, and I'm not going to disagree with you.
• 34:40
  I mean, it's evident that the government does have control of the media and does sway them.
• 34:44
  but regardless
• 34:46
  the information
• 34:48
  you can actually find on
• 34:50
  actual government websites
• 34:52
  yes but the American
• 34:54
  public doesn't go there
• 34:56
  no I understand
• 34:57
  that's not my argument
• 34:59
  I agree with you I'm just saying the information is there
• 35:02
  you're not going to find news
• 35:03
  so I guess yeah
• 35:04
  go past the headline do a little research
• 35:07
  well if they had investigated journalism
• 35:08
  like they used to have
• 35:10
  that's dead that ain't happening
• 35:12
  Then you end up like Julian Assange in jail for 12, 14 years or whatever it was.
• 35:17
  Well, what you do and what you've been able to research is through social media.
• 35:22
  Now, with the advent of social media, the people are now being able to get that information.
• 35:31
  People have just gotten lazy.
• 35:33
  Yeah, they are lazy.
• 35:34
  That's all you can say.
• 35:36
  Well, they're kind of giving up on the government.
• 35:39
  Right.
• 35:39
  I mean, you take – and I don't think it's lazy.
• 35:41
  I know when I worked, if I was awake, pretty much, I was working.
• 35:47
  So if you work eight hours a day, you get up an hour earlier, you get home an hour after you're off,
• 35:55
  and then that's 10 hours a day, you prepare dinner and do the chores that you have to do when you get home.
• 36:02
  You know, you're looking at 12 hours a day, and you're exhausted.
• 36:07
  So you don't have the time and you're in to get into the political scheme of things.
• 36:15
  And you have to believe in the sources that are available to you, which is the fake news source.
• 36:22
  I agree with you.
• 36:23
  And the other thing is the reality is life these days for most people.
• 36:29
  I mean, they get enough bad news every day just in their in their interactions throughout the day.
• 36:34
  last thing they want to hear is what's going on in politics because politics is one of those
• 36:39
  it's one of those topics where right away if you mention hey i want to talk about for example like
• 36:44
  we're talking about the debate people right away put their hands up going oh well hold on i don't
• 36:48
  know if i want to talk about that that's that's a little sensitive well you know these things that's
• 36:52
  you're exactly right i mean they're just uh too tired to and they rely on those news sources and
• 36:59
  And if they're getting, what they're actually doing is getting brainwashed by these liberal news stations.
• 37:05
  Well, if this debate proves anything, is it backs up your statement,
• 37:10
  and is backing up what you were saying earlier, Manuel,
• 37:12
  on the fact that if you don't pay attention, this is where we end up.
• 37:16
  And we got a president who has to be jacked up on adrenaline just to function.
• 37:21
  I don't think it's adrenaline.
• 37:21
  Can't access information.
• 37:23
  I don't think it's adrenaline.
• 37:24
  How dangerous is it for a guy who makes a decision on whether or not we're going to go into World War III?
• 37:32
  I mean, what if he accesses the wrong part of his brain?
• 37:36
  You brought up an interesting fact.
• 37:38
  Can we just real quick?
• 37:40
  When there's a missile strike against the United States or a threat, he's got six minutes to respond.
• 37:46
  Yes.
• 37:46
  And if he's that flabbergasted during this presentation or this debate, where do we stand in the advance of a defense with incoming missiles?
• 37:57
  I don't know.
• 37:58
  What if he has another robotic glitch?
• 37:59
  Uh-huh.
• 38:00
  Yeah.
• 38:01
  What if he goes, what's he going to do?
• 38:04
  That's what I was saying.
• 38:05
  Staring off in his face, freaking drooling off his chin.
• 38:08
  This is my thing is, do you guys really think it's dementia or Alzheimer's, or is it just general aging?
• 38:14
  aging no because he because in this debate even though he's drooling and falling apart
• 38:20
  he is recalling things and he does have some kind of i'm just throwing this out here it's
• 38:27
  kind of the other side of it he does sort of mentally recall events and they're fairly accurate
• 38:33
  as you get older that will prod that we're what he's suffering now they've already had
• 38:39
  particular psychologists come on and doctors come on to analyze what they're able to see
• 38:45
  while he's on television okay and they uh were very conservative in saying that he suffers
• 38:52
  that they didn examine him so they can give a a can give a definitive diagnosis right a definitive answer visually but they saying that he about at least 6 you know suffering at about 6 of dementia
• 39:10
  On that, he's already on that, okay.
• 39:11
  And as you get older, that just gets worse and worse and worse,
• 39:14
  and then eventually you have to be, or you may be at hospital,
• 39:17
  you turn into this.
• 39:18
  I would say, though, beyond age, though, okay?
• 39:21
  Like, I honestly am busier than hell with everything I do.
• 39:25
  And there's times that my brain goes faster than my mouth to let things out, and I actually will sometimes do what Biden does, but not to that level.
• 39:34
  But that's different.
• 39:35
  He doesn't necessarily, you can see where he blanks out.
• 39:38
  It's like he doesn't realize where he is, and then all of a sudden it's just like he wakes up and snaps into it.
• 39:44
  Would that be similar to McConnell blanking during a couple of press conferences where he just froze?
• 39:50
  Could be, actually.
• 39:52
  Because he's, what is he, 80?
• 39:53
  Yeah.
• 39:53
  Yeah, so he's probably the same.
• 39:55
  Age is a factor, but I've spoken to many people in his age range,
• 40:00
  and there are some people that are snappy, like those synapses,
• 40:04
  everything's still going, okay?
• 40:05
  And then I've been around people, and so have you, you know,
• 40:09
  that had dementia when they were in their older age,
• 40:12
  and you can tell the difference.
• 40:15
  You can tell when it's starting to settle in.
• 40:17
  And I think he may be there.
• 40:19
  Again, we're not doctors, but I've been around it.
• 40:22
  Well, with his dementia.
• 40:24
  It's very close.
• 40:24
  You know, like you said earlier, that sometimes you have issues addressing certain things during your day-to-day activities.
• 40:35
  And that's human nature.
• 40:37
  I think in his case here, like they said, he spent, what, a week at Camp David preparing for this.
• 40:44
  I know, that's scary.
• 40:45
  And what the fake news hasn't told anybody is that there was a lot, from what I'm gathering, is news media people were there at that site, and it was set up like a stage.
• 41:01
  I don't know the dude's name, but there's a guy that's been by his side since he was in the Senate when he was 30-something, and the dude's 85 years old.
• 41:12
  So that's one of his advisors.
• 41:14
  Gotcha.
• 41:14
  So you have an 85-year-old and an 81 in the room talking about a debate.
• 41:19
  Well, when you get into these debates and the legalities of it, like what you were saying earlier, like I was going to say, is when you're a doctor or you're a lawyer or whatever, lawyers have legal libraries.
• 41:34
  And they start discussing aspects of the law, irregardless of what age they are.
• 41:39
  You have memory retention.
• 41:41
  So as you get older, you tend to lose some of that memory retention.
• 41:45
  It's just a natural thing that occurs.
• 41:50
  But in your younger days, there is so much in each one of these professions that you need to know that you need to reference libraries.
• 42:00
  I think you're being nice, Rick, and I'm going to go ahead and debunk everything you're trying to say in support of Biden being old.
• 42:08
  because I don't think it's just age.
• 42:10
  No.
• 42:11
  Listen, there's videos where he turns around and tries to shake the air.
• 42:15
  He walks off in different directions.
• 42:18
  He calls people different names.
• 42:19
  He doesn't even know what country he's in sometimes.
• 42:21
  He falls up the stairs.
• 42:25
  It's more than age.
• 42:27
  It's more than accessing information under stress
• 42:30
  because if you're stressed, I'm stressed, I'm stressed, I'm stressed,
• 42:32
  I'm sure you've got a lot being thrown at you.
• 42:35
  And someone asks you, hey, what color do you want?
• 42:37
  nice to buy. He is mentally deranged, and that is brought to the public's attention because now
• 42:44
  they can't hide it. Okay, so let me finish my example. We're all busier than hell, right? You
• 42:50
  got a million things going on. You have a big family event. You're cooking. You're making sure
• 42:54
  the hotel rooms are booked for your family. Everything's going on. All of a sudden, your
• 42:57
  wife or staff is like, hey, we need a new jacket. We're going out to snow. You want blue or red,
• 43:02
  and you're right in the middle of writing a check to whoever for the food you're ordering,
• 43:06
  and then you're also thinking about, oh, shit, I've got to go gas up.
• 43:08
  Right when she asks you, what is your brain going to do?
• 43:11
  You ask your blue, you go, huh?
• 43:14
  You're going to turn around.
• 43:15
  Wait a minute, what?
• 43:16
  Because you're not focused on it.
• 43:17
  Okay, that's different.
• 43:19
  This guy is not there.
• 43:20
  Okay, he looks like a robot that glitches and malfunctions.
• 43:23
  Did you see, okay, after this whole debate, they had a press conference.
• 43:28
  Remember, you just brought up in New Jersey, correct?
• 43:30
  Or wherever it was.
• 43:30
  They had a press conference.
• 43:31
  That little rally thing, yeah.
• 43:32
  Did you not see he's amped up?
• 43:34
  The guy's eyes are wider than hell.
• 43:35
  He's on some kind of cocktail.
• 43:37
  And then all of a sudden, right in the middle of it, he's feeling good.
• 43:39
  He goes, yeah, whatever.
• 43:40
  He turns to the right and puts his hand out like this with this big old grinning smile.
• 43:43
  And then he realizes there's no one there.
• 43:45
  And he kind of like hops off like, oh, I meant to do that bullshit.
• 43:49
  This guy's gone.
• 43:50
  This guy's gone.
• 43:51
  Well, you know what bothers me is he is the leader.
• 43:54
  And you're exactly right in what you see.
• 43:57
  He is the leader of this country.
• 43:59
  Yes.
• 44:00
  And the world looks to this country for support.
• 44:05
  And he is not able to provide that support, and he is a threat to this country's security.
• 44:11
  You're dead on.
• 44:13
  And he needs to be removed.
• 44:15
  Now, I understand that the cabinet, his cabinet can remove him from office.
• 44:21
  They could.
• 44:22
  And under the 25th Amendment.
• 44:26
  I don't think they're going to do that, but it's going to be interesting to see how this plays out as we get closer, right?
• 44:29
  The 25th Amendment and his mental state of mind is such to where it would fall under those guidelines of the 25th Amendment, and it states there that his cabinet has the authority to remove him from office.
• 44:45
  Well, let's come back to his obvious mental deficiencies, and let's move on to another question that was asked.
• 44:52
  And this was all over social media.
• 44:54
  okay they're trying to play this up and basically push trump into the corner of being of course
• 45:01
  a world-class racist the question and how he responds and when he said black jobs okay you
• 45:09
  guys aware of what's been going around social media with this yeah okay all of a sudden every
• 45:13
  race baiter in the world is out there saying what do you mean by black jobs well obviously what he
• 45:18
  meant by black jobs was in reference to a question where they specifically were asking about black
• 45:23
  unemployment and how black individuals make less than white people.
• 45:28
  So if you're saying black, black, black in reference to black,
• 45:31
  how are you supposed to answer the question if you're not using black as the
• 45:35
  descriptor to whatever it is you're trying to respond to?
• 45:38
  Well, I find it interesting that the black people that appear on some of these
• 45:42
  conservative talk shows.
• 45:44
  You can't say black people.
• 45:46
  Well, I'm just messing with you.
• 45:48
  Well, we're white people.
• 45:49
  I'm messing with you.
• 45:50
  I'm messing with you.
• 45:51
  I don't look at it in this day and age as racist.
• 45:55
  No.
• 45:56
  Racist is a word that blacks and whites use as a direction to accuse somebody of being a racist.
• 46:08
  It's crazy because—
• 46:09
  If you watch sports, you watch shows like various conservative news broadcasting networks,
• 46:16
  They bring black people in that are highly intelligent and some of the best in the world of what they do.
• 46:24
  So a couple of things here for me, I am personally tired of referring to and segregating people into colors and then correlating their color to why they're poor and why they're in dire straits and why they don't get this or that.
• 46:41
  And then they try to make that particular group reliant on the government.
• 46:44
  Well, that's what the system has created.
• 46:48
  The other thing is, if something happens, okay, a crime happens, for example, how are you going to describe a particular car?
• 46:57
  Make, model, and color.
• 47:00
  How are you going to describe a particular person?
• 47:03
  By their color, period.
• 47:05
  If a white guy did it, it was a white male, 6'2", whatever.
• 47:10
  Black guy did it, it's a black male, 6'2", whatever.
• 47:13
  If it's a Mexican, it's a Mexican or brown person, 6'2", whatever.
• 47:18
  If you don't have that major descriptor of who the person is, how the fuck do you ever
• 47:23
  go to find them?
• 47:24
  You've got to define what the person is in terms of color when you're talking about description.
• 47:31
  But it should never be used to categorize a person.
• 47:36
  Put them in a certain category as, oh, you're black, you can't do this job, and this is the
• 47:41
  economic state you're supposed to live in.
• 47:43
  That is not true. That is racism. But how can you not? I mean, when they're asking you a specific question about black unemployment and black economic status.
• 47:53
  But that was created years ago by the various institutions that got after the news.
• 47:59
  I know, redlining the whole deal. I get it. Let's go ahead and go here on this question because you'll see.
• 48:08
  What do you say to black voters who are disappointed with the progress so far?
• 48:13
  I say I don't blame them.
• 48:14
  Okay, again, what do you say to black voters, right?
• 48:18
  Okay, he's black voters.
• 48:20
  What do you say to black voters who are disappointed with the progress so far?
• 48:24
  I say I don't blame them for being disappointed.
• 48:27
  Inflation is still hurting them badly.
• 48:29
  For example, I provided for the idea that any black family first-time home buyer should get a $10,000 tax credit to be able to buy their first home so they can get started.
• 48:40
  I made sure that we're in a situation where all those black families and those black individuals who provide...
• 48:45
  I'm sorry, hold on.
• 48:47
  Okay, so when this thing opens, he blames the inflation on Trump and then says the inflation is low now.
• 48:55
  But now the inflation is too high for black people.
• 49:00
  So the inconsistency is amazing to me.
• 49:06
  Like he's not sticking to anything.
• 49:08
  That happened through the whole debate.
• 49:09
  I just wanted to say that. Go ahead.
• 49:11
  I mean, they only make a point of convenience, right?
• 49:14
  I guess. It's just weird because it was low because of me.
• 49:17
  It was high because of him, but now it's high again for them.
• 49:21
  But I thought it was low.
• 49:22
  I'm not disagreeing.
• 49:25
  We got student loans that were ballooning,
• 49:29
  that if they were engaged in nursing,
• 49:31
  anything having to do with volunteerism,
• 49:35
  if they paid their bills for 10 years under student debt,
• 49:39
  All the rest is forgiven after 10 years.
• 49:41
  Millions have benefited from that.
• 49:43
  And we're going to do a whole lot more for black families.
• 49:47
  Thank you, President Trump.
• 49:48
  And he caused the inflation.
• 49:50
  He's blaming inflation.
• 49:52
  And he's right.
• 49:52
  It's been very bad.
• 49:54
  He caused the inflation.
• 49:55
  And it's killing black families and Hispanic families and just about everybody.
• 49:59
  It's killing people.
• 50:00
  They can't buy groceries anymore.
• 50:02
  You look at the cost of food where it's doubled and tripled and quadrupled.
• 50:07
  They can't live.
• 50:08
  they're not living anymore. He caused this inflation. I gave him a country with no,
• 50:14
  essentially no inflation. It was perfect. It was so good. All he had to do is leave it alone.
• 50:19
  He destroyed it with his Green News scam and all of the other, all this money that's being thrown
• 50:24
  out the window. He caused inflation. As sure as you're sitting there, the fact is that his big
• 50:31
  kill on the black people is the millions of people that he's allowed to come in through the border.
• 50:37
  They're taking black jobs now, and it could be 18, it could be 19, and even 20 million people.
• 50:43
  They're taking black jobs, and they're taking Hispanic jobs, and you haven't seen it yet,
• 50:47
  but you're going to see something that's going to be the worst in our history.
• 50:51
  Thank you.
• 50:52
  All right, so there's the comment, or there's a statement, black jobs.
• 50:58
  Do you guys hear any racism in that?
• 51:01
  Not at all.
• 51:02
  We don't care what they're saying on X.
• 51:05
  But it's everywhere.
• 51:06
  Okay.
• 51:07
  It's not just X.
• 51:08
  It's they're trying to use this as something against Trump.
• 51:11
  Okay.
• 51:13
  I agree.
• 51:14
  It's not a racist statement.
• 51:16
  He's just using black jobs in reference to the question to respond to
• 51:19
  questions about specifically black people.
• 51:22
  So I don't know.
• 51:24
  Did you also catch the student loan forgiveness there?
• 51:29
  I caught that.
• 51:30
  Yeah, the illegal.
• 51:31
  And I also caught while he was making a statement about the black community,
• 51:34
  he threw in gay people there too?
• 51:36
  I just wish Trump should have shot that.
• 51:37
  Well, here's a part of his dementia issues
• 51:40
  is the Supreme Court has already said
• 51:42
  that he cannot supplement.
• 51:45
  No, I know, but he mentioned that he did it.
• 51:47
  It's just kind of like...
• 51:48
  Well, he didn't do it.
• 51:50
  He didn't do it?
• 51:51
  So we got nothing else to say on that one, huh?
• 51:53
  No, that's...
• 51:54
  So people are just full of shit
• 51:56
  and they just need to pull their head out of their asses
• 51:57
  and stop trying to turn this into some racial issue
• 52:00
  that was never, ever there.
• 52:02
  No.
• 52:02
  No matter what you say,
• 52:04
  in this country or what you do in this country,
• 52:07
  you're always going to have somebody have something negative to say about what you have spoken about.
• 52:14
  And with that, we're going to go ahead and move on to the next question in the debate
• 52:20
  or the next question that we want to go over and cover,
• 52:23
  which is border security, which is a big concern for everybody.
• 52:27
  So obviously, we went through economy, which is huge.
• 52:29
  border security is probably number two, sometimes flips over to number one in terms of concern for
• 52:35
  the American public. Let's go ahead and dive into this. I might play the whole thing, but if you guys
• 52:41
  want to interject, just tell me to pause or just whatever, if you want to say something. We don't
• 52:45
  have to hear the entire question before you guys have something to say. Just let me know. Thank you.
• 52:50
  Let's turn now to the issue of immigration and border security. President Biden, a record number
• 52:54
  of migrants have illegally crossed the southern border on your watch. Overwhelming border states,
• 52:59
  and overburdening cities such as New York and Chicago,
• 53:02
  and in some cases causing real safety and security concerns.
• 53:05
  Given that, why should voters trust you to solve this crisis?
• 53:09
  Because we worked very hard to get a bipartisan agreement
• 53:12
  that not only changed all of that,
• 53:15
  made sure that we are in a situation where you had no circumstance
• 53:19
  where they could come across the border
• 53:21
  with the number of border police there are now.
• 53:23
  We significantly increased the number of asylum officers.
• 53:26
  By the way, the Border Patrol endorsed me.
• 53:29
  endorsed my position. In addition to that, we find ourselves in a situation where when he was
• 53:34
  president, he was taking, separating babies from their mothers, putting them in cages.
• 53:39
  Well, we can stop there for a second if you like. Go for it. First of all, the Border Patrol did not
• 53:44
  support, they didn't validate them. No, they didn't. And they came on
• 53:50
  the next day and made it known by the head of the Border Patrol that they are not supporting
• 53:58
  Biden. They never supported him and never will support him.
• 54:03
  In addition, actually, after he made the statement
• 54:06
  within, I think, within the hour, the U.S. Border Patrol
• 54:11
  Union posted on X that they not now, nor
• 54:15
  have they ever, nor will they ever support or endorse Joe Biden.
• 54:19
  Yes, and it was videoed, it was reported
• 54:23
  a video report on it also. But yet they say Trump lied 400 times in this
• 54:27
  whole debate.
• 54:27
  ...were separated.
• 54:28
  That's not the right way to go.
• 54:30
  What I've done since I've changed the law, what's happened?
• 54:34
  I've changed it in a way that now you're in a situation where there are 40% fewer people
• 54:39
  coming across the border illegally.
• 54:41
  That's better than when he left office.
• 54:42
  I got facts for that later.
• 54:43
  And I'm going to continue to move until we get the total ban on the total initiative relative
• 54:49
  to what we're going to do with more Border Patrol and more asylum officers.
• 54:54
  President Trump?
• 54:55
  I really don't know what he's saying.
• 54:57
  at the end of this. I don't think he knows
• 54:59
  what he said either. Look,
• 55:00
  we had the safest border in the history of our country.
• 55:03
  Look at his...
• 55:04
  Look, the glitch. The glitch we're talking
• 55:07
  about. Well put, I thought.
• 55:09
  He doesn't know where he is.
• 55:13
  But he's right. What did he
• 55:15
  just say?
• 55:16
  First he said he was endorsed, which he wasn't, right?
• 55:19
  And then he said that
• 55:20
  they're increasing...
• 55:22
  Measures? Increasing measures,
• 55:25
  which... I don't think he's...
• 55:26
  measures to support the asylum officers more asylum officers and then separate the whole
• 55:32
  separating kid thing he blames trump for that that's mandatory because if they're a criminal
• 55:38
  they have to take they move the kid from from that situation they're bringing these that's how
• 55:44
  i remember parents so you've got to provide a place for them to stay yeah that and when he
• 55:50
  referred to separating the kids and the parents and putting people in cages that was actually
• 55:54
  initiative that was put into place under the policies by obama yes it was they built the cages
• 56:00
  so what are you gonna do like literally all right let's hear what trump has to say even though he
• 56:04
  couldn't understand what he said at the end but all he had to do is leave it he decided to open
• 56:09
  up our border open up our country to people that are from prisons people that are from mental
• 56:17
  institutions insane asylum terrorists we have the largest number of terrorists coming into our
• 56:21
  country right now, all terrorists, all over the world, not just in South America, all over the
• 56:26
  world. They come from the Middle East, everywhere, all over the world. They're pouring in. And this
• 56:31
  guy just left it open. And he didn't need legislation because I didn't have legislation.
• 56:36
  I said, close the border. We had the safest border in history. In that final couple of months of my
• 56:41
  presidency, we had, according to Border Patrol, who is great. And by the way, who endorsed me for
• 56:46
  president, but I won't say that, but they endorsed me for president. Brandon, just speak to him.
• 56:51
  Brandon.
• 56:53
  Brandon.
• 56:54
  I brought that up on my last show I did
• 56:57
  because I did a little breakdown and I had
• 56:59
  three topics I went over, but I wanted to
• 57:01
  save some of the other stuff for when you guys were here.
• 57:03
  So the whole Brandon thing,
• 57:04
  did you catch that? A lot of people didn't catch that.
• 57:08
  Brandon was what?
• 57:09
  Let's go Brandon, right? That's what it refers to,
• 57:11
  which was a cover-up for the crowd saying,
• 57:13
  fuck Joe Biden.
• 57:14
  That's right.
• 57:16
  I love how he threw that in there.
• 57:17
  Most people didn't catch it.
• 57:20
  Most people didn't catch it.
• 57:21
  I didn't know if you wanted to present that. Oh, absolutely. Look, we had the safest border in history. Now we have the worst border in history. There's never been anything like it. And people are dying all over the place, including the people that are coming up.
• 57:34
  Thank you, President Trump.
• 57:35
  President Biden?
• 57:37
  The only terrorist who's done anything across the border is one who came along and killed three under his administration,
• 57:43
  killed an al-Qaeda person coming in his administration, killed three American soldiers, killed three American soldiers.
• 57:52
  That's the only terrorist that's there.
• 57:53
  I'm not saying no terrorist ever got through, but the idea they're emptying their prisons, we're welcoming these people.
• 57:59
  That's simply not true.
• 58:00
  There's no data to support what he said.
• 58:02
  All right, bullshit.
• 58:03
  So, firstly, he had to, in that statement, say, I didn't say there weren't anyone coming over the border, but he will not own up to what the numbers are or to the levity or gravity of the situation.
• 58:16
  Okay.
• 58:17
  No, he won't.
• 58:18
  And there was just eight of them that were arrested down in L.A. for illegally coming in the country and threatening.
• 58:28
  This is where I'm going to kick into the data now.
• 58:30
  Okay.
• 58:31
  Okay.
• 58:31
  Because Biden is full of shit.
• 58:33
  on everything because I've done so much research on this border thing.
• 58:37
  Okay.
• 58:37
  I did one episode where I dove in and tore apart Ilhan Omar's past and her
• 58:41
  nefarious actions.
• 58:42
  And in that I went into the whole border issue we had,
• 58:45
  and this is way before this came up.
• 58:47
  And I even had to respond to some fucking idiot on,
• 58:49
  on X.
• 58:49
  So I'm just going to read my response.
• 58:50
  It kind of leads right into this has some of the data that has to do with
• 58:53
  terrorists that have come over.
• 58:55
  So this guy was saying Trump lied 30 times.
• 58:58
  Okay.
• 58:58
  So I said,
• 58:59
  those who say that Trump lied over 30 times,
• 59:01
  of the debate don't actually know the truth and are just regurgitating what's said by the media
• 59:05
  when he said the border was out of control and the terrorists were entering the United States.
• 59:09
  He was correct. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, thus far
• 59:13
  in 2024, they have recorded encounters with 316
• 59:17
  terrorists on the watch list and the year isn't even over. In 2023,
• 59:21
  they recorded encounters with 736 terrorists on the watch list.
• 59:25
  These numbers only account for those individuals who have been apprehended
• 59:29
  while entering all ports of entry.
• 59:31
  So just the ones that they apprehended.
• 59:32
  Not talking about the Godaways or the people that snuck in.
• 59:35
  These are the people they just actually had met and apprehended.
• 59:38
  There have been a measurable increase in terrorist encounters in the United States
• 59:41
  with a total of 1,703 under Joe Biden's presidency so far.
• 59:46
  The only year that saw a dismal amount of encounters was 2021,
• 59:49
  which was the start of the COVID pandemic, period.
• 59:53
  Over 1,703 terrorists that were actually caught apprehended
• 59:58
  that they know of, by the way, under Biden's watch.
• 1:00:02
  You want some more data.
• 1:00:03
  So check this out.
• 1:00:04
  Oh, no, yes, you need it.
• 1:00:08
  So there's two types of encounters they have.
• 1:00:10
  I'm not going to talk about terrorists.
• 1:00:11
  So they have field operation encounters,
• 1:00:14
  which involve people who are seeking asylum legally, for example,
• 1:00:17
  and they may be rejected after investigation.
• 1:00:20
  Then they have other encounters which are illegal encounters.
• 1:00:24
  So I'm going to read the illegal encounters.
• 1:00:25
  So 2017, Trump's first year in office.
• 1:00:29
  They had 310,531 encounters from all parts of entry.
• 1:00:34
  First year of Biden in office, okay, 2021, 1,662,167 people.
• 1:00:45
  Second year of office for Trump was 404,142 people.
• 1:00:50
  Second year for Biden, it jumped up to 2,214,652.
• 1:00:56
  2019 for Trump's third year, 859,501 people.
• 1:01:02
  Third year for Biden, 2,063,692.
• 1:01:06
  And of course, it didn't end any different.
• 1:01:08
  2020, it dipped down for Trump to 405 and 36, so 405,000.
• 1:01:13
  at the last run of his term right now for Biden.
• 1:01:18
  We're at 1,293,375, but we're not done with the year.
• 1:01:21
  We're about halfway through or so.
• 1:01:24
  So tell me how Biden tried to say that he inherits
• 1:01:28
  a very bad border situation from Trump
• 1:01:31
  and then tries to say he never got support from the Republicans.
• 1:01:34
  He's the first person to come together and make a bipartisan deal
• 1:01:37
  when Trump, even in his response, said,
• 1:01:40
  I had no support from anyone, but somehow I still made it work.
• 1:01:43
  The evidence is here.
• 1:01:44
  In this example, what I talked about earlier, Rick, you don't see these stats anywhere, but it's right here.
• 1:01:49
  It's on the U.S. Customs and Border Protection website.
• 1:01:53
  The data is right there.
• 1:01:54
  I'd seen those stats on Newsmax, and like you said, you won't see them on any other liberal news media source at all.
• 1:02:03
  And, you know, I am so disgusted with the news media sources that it's unreal.
• 1:02:09
  They are a, during the wars, the First World War or whatever, they had what they used to call Tokyo Rose.
• 1:02:17
  And Tokyo Rose was a woman that would talk about various battlefronts.
• 1:02:24
  And her ideology or her job was to discourage the enemy from different functions of various battlefronts.
• 1:02:36
  and intimidate them and to scare them and have a psychological impact on these soldiers
• 1:02:45
  that were in the battlefields trying to advance.
• 1:02:51
  And she was very well known.
• 1:02:54
  And I correlate the news media to that as a brainwashing technique to the American people.
• 1:03:04
  and we had mentioned earlier that most people have to work to support their families and don't
• 1:03:11
  have time for research so i think the news media knows that the fake news media source and as such
• 1:03:20
  they are no different than tokyo rose was during the war and misrepresenting what is actually going
• 1:03:27
  on politically in this country and supporting Biden.
• 1:03:31
  So you're basically saying, if I'm right in what you're saying or how I'm interpreting
• 1:03:37
  you, that the modern news media of today is nothing but a giant psyop to keep the American
• 1:03:41
  people in subjugation to the government?
• 1:03:43
  Yes, and they don't to the Democratic Party.
• 1:03:48
  Right.
• 1:03:49
  And so I really would like to see when Trump came on during his office and had something to say to the American people, like the state of the country addresses and the news media sources, the fake news media sources would block it out.
• 1:04:08
  I think for that reason alone.
• 1:04:11
  The news media becomes a not a meat news source.
• 1:04:17
  they are a propaganda source
• 1:04:20
  and they need their broadcasting
• 1:04:22
  licenses suspended
• 1:04:24
  or removed
• 1:04:26
  so just in the little bit
• 1:04:28
  of fact checking we've done on this show
• 1:04:30
  so far we've already
• 1:04:31
  basically supported
• 1:04:33
  your point and what you said
• 1:04:36
  Mando what do you think on the border security issue
• 1:04:39
  yeah I got
• 1:04:39
  I mean he's allowed
• 1:04:42
  almost well Trump's
• 1:04:44
  numbers aren't really that accurate
• 1:04:46
  but it is tens of millions.
• 1:04:48
  I don't think it's 20 million.
• 1:04:50
  For what?
• 1:04:51
  For letting them in.
• 1:04:53
  Yeah, it is.
• 1:04:54
  Is it 20 million?
• 1:04:55
  Yeah, it's reached what they claim is 20 million now.
• 1:04:58
  Yeah, I mean, I can go over that.
• 1:05:00
  My last time I looked at it it was somewhere around 11 or 12 I guess it is 20 Yeah in the last few weeks they updated that model
• 1:05:13
  I mean, I'm going to be totally honest.
• 1:05:15
  The border issue is a pipe dream no matter what president you got.
• 1:05:20
  Because every four years, the next guy comes in and sets it on fire
• 1:05:24
  and does what he thinks is right.
• 1:05:26
  and we already know that most of the time the democratic party whoever they nominate will come
• 1:05:33
  in rip the wall down and let in the next wave of democratic voters they're going to hand them all
• 1:05:39
  the all the freebies and then the republicans will try to shut it down they won't be highly
• 1:05:46
  successful this is just a big circle jerk for me and i just i mean there's no way in four years
• 1:05:54
  Trump is really going to drag that number down now.
• 1:05:58
  I disagree.
• 1:06:00
  He's just going to keep, in my opinion anyway,
• 1:06:03
  it's just going to continue to snowball.
• 1:06:05
  I think what Trump's going to do is he's going to continue building that wall
• 1:06:13
  and drive that number back down.
• 1:06:16
  Assuming he gets 100% support in Congress.
• 1:06:19
  Right.
• 1:06:20
  Well, he was able, like he said earlier in this, he was able to do it without Congress's support, though.
• 1:06:27
  Well, listen, Trump didn't have the support then, and the numbers were lower regardless.
• 1:06:32
  Yes.
• 1:06:32
  Like a quarter of what Biden's presidency has done.
• 1:06:35
  I think he's going to have the abilities to do that.
• 1:06:38
  One of the things that he did skate it over also was when they asked him how he was going to remove these people from the country.
• 1:06:46
  and they don't have you can't use the police department they're not big enough so he's going
• 1:06:53
  to have to use the military maybe but i think okay so if we just get image alone is going to make
• 1:07:02
  trump i think i think look like a dictator on it will but i don't i don't think he'll do that
• 1:07:08
  he's got 62 plus percent of the american people i don't think he's gonna call the military because
• 1:07:13
  He knows it'll work against them.
• 1:07:15
  Look, he'll just bolster and enforce.
• 1:07:17
  The National Guard, I refer as military.
• 1:07:19
  He'll just bolster and enforce ICE and probably put more money into ICE and into Border Patrol
• 1:07:25
  so that they have more agents so they can do their jobs.
• 1:07:29
  That's the only answer for him.
• 1:07:30
  Well, that's a possibility.
• 1:07:32
  The big issue I have with the border and why I'm so pissed about it.
• 1:07:35
  So the economy obviously affects everybody.
• 1:07:38
  The problem I have with the border is everyone gets stuck on how many people cross versus who didn't cross, and that's all they talk about.
• 1:07:46
  What they're not talking about is the ramifications and the danger we have in playing with the border and just using these people as talking notes.
• 1:07:56
  Pawns.
• 1:07:57
  And as pawns for their political objectives, which is fucking stupid.
• 1:08:00
  especially when I just read that
• 1:08:03
  when they had 1700
• 1:08:05
  something terrorists caught
• 1:08:07
  coming over the border
• 1:08:08
  1700, it only takes one
• 1:08:11
  to radicalize 20
• 1:08:13
  people, and then you just keep
• 1:08:15
  multiplying that, 20 can radicalize
• 1:08:17
  200 and it keeps going
• 1:08:18
  the issue we have is they're not taking it serious
• 1:08:21
  you can't do this
• 1:08:22
  go try this shit in China, not going to happen
• 1:08:25
  try this in Thailand, not going to happen
• 1:08:26
  Malaysia is not going to let you do that, North Korea
• 1:08:28
  It doesn't let anybody go in the war.
• 1:08:30
  What you said is absolutely correct.
• 1:08:31
  And one of the things that you learn in the service is they used to use the term guerrilla warfare, which they did in Vietnam.
• 1:08:38
  Yeah, well, that's when it was first coined, right?
• 1:08:40
  Now, what happens is China and these groups, they'll bring in and they'll break down guerrilla groups.
• 1:08:45
  We're going to say they can be three, four, five people, and in some cases, just one or two.
• 1:08:51
  But generally, they're a small group of people, a couple, two, or three, or four.
• 1:08:55
  They go into a particular area unknown, and you can't protect against that not knowing that they're there because they're dressed like the rest of the civilians like we've got in this country and move into a territory or an object that they want to blow up, destroy, or in that small group number and do their damage.
• 1:09:25
  and it's very, very difficult to fight against that type of combat.
• 1:09:33
  So with this border opened up and these terrorists that you said
• 1:09:38
  that are coming in from various parts of the world, Iran, Iraq.
• 1:09:43
  Do you know where a lot of these people are coming from, though?
• 1:09:46
  Well, they're coming in from China.
• 1:09:49
  They're coming from everywhere, but do you know where a lot of the terrorists
• 1:09:52
  that they're catching are coming from?
• 1:09:53
  From Iran and Iraq.
• 1:09:55
  Somalia.
• 1:09:56
  Yeah.
• 1:09:57
  Which congressperson do we have that is from Somalia?
• 1:10:00
  Oh, she doesn't have that much pull.
• 1:10:02
  Ilhan Omar.
• 1:10:03
  Stop it.
• 1:10:04
  Really, in her own state, in her own state,
• 1:10:06
  they caught a terrorist who was allowed to stay there
• 1:10:10
  and roam for one whole year before they did anything.
• 1:10:14
  Do you think she's got the paperwork on every one of them?
• 1:10:17
  You know, her father was the general of enforcement in the military
• 1:10:22
  of the terrorist ruler back where she lived.
• 1:10:27
  She's the daughter of that guy.
• 1:10:29
  I know that, but let me rephrase this.
• 1:10:31
  I'm just saying there's ties.
• 1:10:33
  Do you think she has the intelligence?
• 1:10:36
  Somalia sending it to her.
• 1:10:38
  I don't think you could underestimate her.
• 1:10:40
  I don't like her.
• 1:10:41
  You can't rule anything out.
• 1:10:42
  I think she should be removed.
• 1:10:44
  And there's too many coincidences where her name comes up.
• 1:10:49
  Yeah.
• 1:10:50
  Period.
• 1:10:50
  Okay, so outside of terrorism,
• 1:10:51
  And this is what I was going to try to say earlier before I started going down the Ilhan Omar Road.
• 1:10:59
  The wall isn't enough.
• 1:11:00
  It isn't enough.
• 1:11:02
  Okay.
• 1:11:02
  The other thing they need to do is stop foreign governments and allowing them to buy fucking property and assets in the United States.
• 1:11:12
  Did you know, I don't know if you know this, Rick, man, maybe you heard this, but the Chinese, the People Republic of China,
• 1:11:20
  were so bold as they bought buildings in different states.
• 1:11:27
  They were just caught recently running their own fucking state-ran police station in New York City.
• 1:11:33
  Yes.
• 1:11:34
  And they've had these, I'm going to call them posts, in other states as well.
• 1:11:42
  Yeah, we're not talking about a consulate.
• 1:11:44
  No.
• 1:11:44
  We're talking about right out in the open, an actual police force ran by the People's Republic
• 1:11:50
  of China in the United States to police Chinese people in the U.S.
• 1:11:56
  Exactly.
• 1:11:58
  Enforcing their own laws and agendas in the United States.
• 1:12:03
  Well, you know, this Congress needs to be evaluated in its structure now.
• 1:12:14
  And something needs to be evaluated.
• 1:12:15
  You know what they need to do?
• 1:12:15
  They all need to be lined up.
• 1:12:17
  They need to run down there in a golf cart.
• 1:12:19
  Guy holds out a stick with a giant fucking rubber hand.
• 1:12:22
  They all need to get slapped in the face as they're driving by really quick.
• 1:12:25
  Round them up and just kick them out of the house and kick them out.
• 1:12:28
  They're done.
• 1:12:28
  Just start over.
• 1:12:29
  Absolutely.
• 1:12:30
  I mean, what these foreign countries are doing to this country and what this country is allowing them to do, which has been predominantly the Democratic Party because they've had the control of Congress so long.
• 1:12:45
  And all these outside activities of invasion, we'll call it, to this country is a direct consequence of the Democratic Party, period.
• 1:12:57
  Okay.
• 1:12:58
  So let me ask a question again.
• 1:13:01
  I'll ask now.
• 1:13:01
  Do you think it's okay for foreign governments to be allowed to buy property and own assets within another country?
• 1:13:07
  No.
• 1:13:08
  What do you think, man?
• 1:13:09
  No, it's not okay, but it's legal in our country, though.
• 1:13:17
  The only way to solve it is, like he's saying, passing some kind of law.
• 1:13:21
  How is it legal?
• 1:13:22
  Well, I can go to a foreign country and buy something.
• 1:13:26
  The concept is what I'm getting at.
• 1:13:28
  You're not going to be able to go to China and buy land.
• 1:13:31
  No.
• 1:13:31
  Okay, so example.
• 1:13:33
  Well, I can pick up Portugal because you can't just go there and buy a property.
• 1:13:38
  You have to be a citizen.
• 1:13:39
  Right.
• 1:13:40
  You can't just go to Italy and buy a property without being vetted, approved, and going through many, many different processes.
• 1:13:46
  Well, I've got family that attempted that.
• 1:13:48
  So they know and they had told me they were interested in moving to various parts of France or Italy.
• 1:13:53
  It's not easy, is it?
• 1:13:54
  No, it's not.
• 1:13:55
  What they have to do is they have to show, they have to have something like $200,000.
• 1:14:01
  We discussed this a few years ago, so I may not be exact with the dollar amount.
• 1:14:06
  But still, it's not like you can just go do it.
• 1:14:07
  If you have a minimum of $200,000 in the bank and X amount of dollars as an income, they're not going to support you.
• 1:14:16
  And the government has to approve it.
• 1:14:17
  And you have to be self-sufficient and show that you have enough money and enough reserve in the bank to support yourself.
• 1:14:25
  And the government has to approve you.
• 1:14:26
  And the government has to approve you.
• 1:14:27
  Even if you just have the money, they don't just let you buy property.
• 1:14:30
  I've known years ago people that moved to Mexico and bought houses down there in a resort area that was being built and advertised on American TV in Mexico.
• 1:14:43
  And the Mexican government comes in and confiscates the property after the people moved in and paid out all that money for it and took the homes away from it.
• 1:14:52
  Let's get back to the heart of this question.
• 1:14:55
  Okay, Manuel, you made a point, but that more refers in what you're talking about, Rick, to individuals buying residential property.
• 1:15:02
  I'm talking about governments.
• 1:15:03
  Okay, the Chinese government owns bridges in America.
• 1:15:08
  They actually own farmland in America.
• 1:15:11
  The government, not an individual.
• 1:15:13
  Well, I understand the farmland.
• 1:15:14
  I didn't know that they own, quote, bridges.
• 1:15:17
  They do.
• 1:15:18
  So that's what I'm talking about.
• 1:15:20
  Government's able to buy.
• 1:15:22
  I know a company could buy, I guess you can make investments.
• 1:15:25
  But even then, like Rick said, as with residential purchases, you're vetted.
• 1:15:28
  You can't just do it.
• 1:15:31
  Well, yeah, but it's kind of what I was saying.
• 1:15:34
  You can go to a foreign country and buy something, but you have to go through the steps.
• 1:15:38
  Many steps.
• 1:15:39
  Yes, but you still can.
• 1:15:41
  And in America, it's legal for somebody to come from China and buy something.
• 1:15:46
  Well, we're talking about individuals.
• 1:15:48
  We're not talking about countries.
• 1:15:50
  Government.
• 1:15:51
  Especially buying land next to all military bases.
• 1:15:56
  Yes, government in any country, a government shouldn't be able to purchase and just own land. Usually there will be an exception to where it would fall under, I forget the actual title, but it becomes kind of like a consulate, for example, or an embassy, right?
• 1:16:16
  it's treated that way to where it's treated as sovereign soil and recognized
• 1:16:20
  as thus,
• 1:16:21
  but it's also recognized as a government agency allowed to have a presence.
• 1:16:26
  Okay.
• 1:16:27
  It's not looked at as a government just can go,
• 1:16:30
  I'm going to buy this farmland.
• 1:16:31
  I'm going to buy this bridge.
• 1:16:32
  I'm going to buy,
• 1:16:32
  you know,
• 1:16:33
  this lake and I'm going to own this dam.
• 1:16:36
  That doesn't happen.
• 1:16:37
  And that shouldn't happen.
• 1:16:38
  You're basically selling your country off.
• 1:16:39
  I will,
• 1:16:41
  I will back into my cave and close the door.
• 1:16:44
  I don't know.
• 1:16:45
  No,
• 1:16:45
  no,
• 1:16:45
  no,
• 1:16:45
  no,
• 1:16:46
  you get okay all right i stand i just i will take my l it's not a correction it's i'm
• 1:16:55
  i'm not giving i will take my loss i'm not giving you a correction when i'm going to my locker room
• 1:17:00
  i'm giving kind of an opinion on how i don't think that should ever be allowed in the united
• 1:17:04
  states you should not allow a foreign government a foreign agent to own any property in the united
• 1:17:10
  States. An exception to be
• 1:17:12
  treated as an embassy or a place that
• 1:17:14
  is treated as sovereign soil
• 1:17:16
  that is approved and
• 1:17:18
  monitored by the U.S. government themselves
• 1:17:20
  is one thing, but to have
• 1:17:21
  the government making private investments
• 1:17:24
  and holding those
• 1:17:26
  assets and controlling them, and like
• 1:17:28
  Rick said earlier, where they're buying property strategically
• 1:17:30
  around bases, which is happening
• 1:17:32
  right now in California.
• 1:17:35
  If you look at the map, I can't pull it up
• 1:17:36
  now because I wasn't prepared for this, but basically they bought enough
• 1:17:38
  farmland that China has
• 1:17:40
  Which base was it?
• 1:17:41
  Well, they got San Diego down there.
• 1:17:43
  Yeah, down in San Diego area.
• 1:17:44
  And then they've got, there's somewhere, I believe San Francisco or Oakland, but I'm not sure exactly where it's at.
• 1:17:51
  I know there's two areas, and I do remember San Diego, but they've strategically bought land that is basically surrounding one of our bases.
• 1:18:00
  I'd have to look it up.
• 1:18:01
  I believe the other one might be Long Beach but yes I bring it up I might revisit this later in a different episode but this is fact You know this is what I do when I get in this situation to where I know I just
• 1:18:14
  don't recall. I just tell the audience,
• 1:18:16
  go Google it. Go look it up. It's easy
• 1:18:18
  to find. If we can find it, you can find it.
• 1:18:20
  When I mentioned Tokyo Rose, that's actually
• 1:18:22
  the Second World War, not the First World War
• 1:18:24
  because you get people to correct you over
• 1:18:26
  the system. That's true, but sometimes you got
• 1:18:28
  to put it on the audience to go do your
• 1:18:30
  research because, you know,
• 1:18:31
  So we need to start training people to dig into the truth.
• 1:18:35
  Yes.
• 1:18:36
  Period.
• 1:18:36
  Well, it's just general information.
• 1:18:38
  And if you want to know more about it, like you said, you can take it upon yourself to dig into what has been said.
• 1:18:49
  Agreed.
• 1:18:49
  You got something there, Manuel?
• 1:18:50
  Yeah.
• 1:18:51
  Just the Chinese company that owns 370 acres in Grand Forks, North Dakota, is the Fu Feng Group.
• 1:19:01
  right next to the
• 1:19:04
  Air Force Base out there.
• 1:19:07
  And then there's another one
• 1:19:08
  called WH Group.
• 1:19:09
  They own Smith Foods.
• 1:19:13
  That's
• 1:19:14
  2013 was the biggest
• 1:19:16
  purchase of pork in the country.
• 1:19:19
  I guess it's a pork farm.
• 1:19:21
  That's also
• 1:19:21
  somewhere near our military base.
• 1:19:26
  Yeah, so
• 1:19:27
  I mean, you guys are right that these companies are doing it.
• 1:19:30
  But I don't
• 1:19:31
  Well, maybe it's just Google.
• 1:19:33
  They're not telling me if they're tied to any government entity.
• 1:19:36
  They are.
• 1:19:38
  And those businesses, and many like that in China,
• 1:19:41
  one of the biggest shareholders in those businesses is the actual Chinese government.
• 1:19:45
  Well, I guess you cannot operate a government there without China being a partner in your government.
• 1:19:50
  Like I said, I'll take my L.
• 1:19:52
  I'll just go over here.
• 1:19:54
  China L, but I'm glad you looked it up because I couldn't recall where it was.
• 1:19:57
  They use those businesses as a cover-up.
• 1:20:00
  Absolutely.
• 1:20:00
  so that the generalized American public
• 1:20:03
  don't catch it.
• 1:20:04
  I got a perfect example
• 1:20:06
  to support both of your guys'
• 1:20:09
  statements here.
• 1:20:11
  Alibaba. Remember Alibaba?
• 1:20:13
  Remember the owner where he wouldn't pay
• 1:20:15
  X amount of dollars to the Chinese government?
• 1:20:17
  The Chinese government is a big partner
• 1:20:19
  in Alibaba. What happened to that guy?
• 1:20:21
  He disappeared for how many months and then suddenly
• 1:20:23
  resurfaced out of nowhere with a whole
• 1:20:25
  different attitude, different tune?
• 1:20:28
  Right?
• 1:20:28
  The Chinese government is involved in most any large corporation.
• 1:20:33
  You think Huawei just gets away with whatever they do with other communications technologies without having the Chinese government, you know, with their hands in their pocket and directing what they do?
• 1:20:43
  Not going to happen.
• 1:20:44
  Well, you know what I think that happened, what needs to be done is in laws imposed where the U.S. government and military can go into these barns and buildings that China has bought and check them out and find out what type of equipment and transmission equipment that they have in them.
• 1:21:07
  And they should.
• 1:21:07
  And whether or not they're being able to tap into communication sources, whether it's radar or whatever type, and find out if that's what they're doing.
• 1:21:23
  And if that's what they're doing, and I don't then confiscate the property and kick them out of the country.
• 1:21:29
  Well, all of them.
• 1:21:31
  In conclusion to all this border security question, Biden's a freaking liar.
• 1:21:37
  It was proven statistically that it was much better under Trump, regardless of partisan support, period.
• 1:21:45
  Yeah, I agree.
• 1:21:46
  Yeah, that's kind of obvious at this point.
• 1:21:49
  Yeah, it is.
• 1:21:50
  And while they were giving that debate, they were having funeral services for one 12, 13-year-old girl that was brutally murdered by one of the illegals that came into the country under Biden's watch.
• 1:22:07
  Yeah.
• 1:22:07
  Yeah.
• 1:22:08
  It's sad.
• 1:22:09
  And so, and what we just did was bring up other issues with border security that most people didn't hear, you know, they don't know about or hear about that isn't talked about.
• 1:22:18
  So, I don't know.
• 1:22:20
  Hopefully people get something out of this and they take the time to do their own research to really dig into the truth.
• 1:22:24
  But I'm just tired of the border issue being treated as just some talking point, you know, because it's more than that.
• 1:22:32
  It's our national fucking security.
• 1:22:34
  Let's move on, though.
• 1:22:35
  January 6th
• 1:22:37
  it's been asked
• 1:22:39
  and people have always
• 1:22:41
  say that Trump deflects
• 1:22:43
  doesn't want to give a direct answer
• 1:22:45
  into his involvement
• 1:22:47
  how he treated it whether or not he
• 1:22:49
  incited the riot
• 1:22:50
  I'm just going to play the question
• 1:22:52
  I still don't know how he incited it
• 1:22:54
  this will probably be more opinion than fact
• 1:22:57
  because a lot of facts have been suppressed
• 1:22:58
  but I do have a little bit of information to bring up on it
• 1:23:01
  let's go ahead and play this
• 1:23:03
  we're paying everybody's bills
• 1:23:04
  Let's turn to the issue of democracy.
• 1:23:07
  Former President Trump, I want to ask you about January 6, 2021.
• 1:23:11
  After you rallied your supporters that day, some of them stormed the Capitol to stop the constitutionally mandated counting of electoral votes.
• 1:23:19
  As president, you swore an oath to, quote, preserve, protect and defend, unquote, the Constitution.
• 1:23:25
  What do you say to voters who believe that you violated that oath through your actions and inaction on January 6 and worry that you'll do it again?
• 1:23:31
  Well, I don't think too many believe that.
• 1:23:33
  And let me tell you about January 6th.
• 1:23:35
  On January 6th, we had a great border.
• 1:23:39
  Nobody coming through, very few.
• 1:23:41
  On January 6th, we were energy independent.
• 1:23:43
  On January 6th, we had the lowest taxes ever.
• 1:23:46
  We had the lowest regulations ever.
• 1:23:48
  On January 6th, we were respected all over the world.
• 1:23:51
  All over the world, we were respected.
• 1:23:53
  And then he comes in and we're now left at.
• 1:23:56
  We're like a bunch of stupid people.
• 1:23:58
  What happened to the United States' reputation
• 1:24:01
  under this man's leadership is horrible, including weaponization, which I'm sure at some point you'll
• 1:24:07
  be talking about, where he goes after his political opponent because he can't beat him fair and square.
• 1:24:12
  You have 80 seconds left. My question was, what do you say to those voters who believe that you
• 1:24:18
  violated your constitutional oath through your actions and inaction on January 6th, 2021,
• 1:24:23
  and worry that you'll do it again? Well, I didn't say that to anybody. I said peacefully and
• 1:24:28
  patriotically. And Nancy Pelosi, if you just watched the news from two days ago, on tape to
• 1:24:34
  her daughter, who's a documentary filmmaker, aren't they saying? But she's saying, oh no, it's my
• 1:24:40
  responsibility. I was responsible for this because I offered her 10,000 soldiers or National Guard
• 1:24:46
  and she turned them down. And the mayor of, in writing, by the way, the mayor in writing turned
• 1:24:51
  it down, the mayor of DC. They turned it down. I offered 10,000 because I could see, I had
• 1:24:58
  virtually nothing to do. They asked me to go make a speech. I could see what was happening. Everybody
• 1:25:03
  was saying they're going to be there on January 6th. They're going to be there. And I said, you
• 1:25:06
  know what? There's a lot of people coming. You could feel it. You could feel it too. And you
• 1:25:10
  could feel it. And I said, they ought to have some national guard or whatever. And I offered it to
• 1:25:16
  her. And she now admits that she turned it down. And it was the same day she was, I don't know,
• 1:25:22
  he can't be very happy with her daughter because it made her into a liar. She said, I take full
• 1:25:26
  responsibility for January 6th. President Biden? Look, he encouraged those folks who go up on Capitol Hill, number one. I sat in the dining room off the Oval Office. He sat there for three hours, three hours watching, begging, being begged by his vice president and a number of his colleagues on the Republican side as well to do something, to call for a stop, to end it. Instead, he talked about these people being patriots and great patrons of America.
• 1:25:56
  In fact, he says he'll now forgive them for what they've done.
• 1:26:01
  They've been convicted.
• 1:26:02
  He says he wants to commute their sentences and say no.
• 1:26:07
  He went to every single court in the nation.
• 1:26:09
  I don't know how many cases, scores of cases, including the Supreme Court, and they said,
• 1:26:15
  they said, no, no, this guy is responsible for doing what was done.
• 1:26:20
  He did do a damn thing.
• 1:26:22
  And these people should be in jail and they should be the ones who are being held accountable.
• 1:26:28
  And he wants to let them all out.
• 1:26:29
  And now he says if he loses again, such a whiner that he is, that there could be a bloodbath.
• 1:26:34
  Thank you, President Biden.
• 1:26:35
  President Trump.
• 1:26:36
  What they've done to some people that are so innocent, you ought to be ashamed of yourself.
• 1:26:42
  What you have done, how you've destroyed the lives of so many people.
• 1:26:46
  they ripped down Portland, when they ripped down many other cities, you go to Minnesota,
• 1:26:52
  Minneapolis, what they've done there with the fires all over the city. If I didn't bring in
• 1:26:57
  the National Guard, that city would have been destroyed. When you look at all of the, they took
• 1:27:02
  over big chunks of Seattle. I was all set to bring in the National Guard. They heard that,
• 1:27:06
  they saw them coming and they left immediately. What he said about this whole subject is so off,
• 1:27:13
  peacefully patriotic. One other thing, the unselect committee, which is basically two horrible
• 1:27:21
  Republicans that are all gone now out of office and Democrats, all Democrats, they destroyed and
• 1:27:28
  deleted all of the information they found because they found out we were right. We were right. And
• 1:27:33
  they deleted and destroyed all of the information. They should go to jail for that. If a Republican
• 1:27:38
  did that, they'd go to jail. Thank you, President Trump. President Biden, I want to give you a minute.
• 1:27:41
  The only person in this stage is a convicted felon is the man I'm looking at right now.
• 1:27:46
  And the fact of the matter is, what he's telling you is simply not true.
• 1:27:51
  The fact is that there was no effort on his part to stop what was going on up in Capitol
• 1:27:57
  Hill.
• 1:27:58
  And all those people, every one of those who were convicted, deserves to be convicted.
• 1:28:02
  The idea that they didn't kill somebody, just went in and broke down doors, broke the windows,
• 1:28:07
  occupied offices, turned over desks, turned over statutes. The idea that those people are
• 1:28:14
  patriots? Come on. When I asked him the first two debates we had, the debates we had the
• 1:28:20
  first time around, I said, will you denounce the Proud Boys? He said, no, I'll tell them
• 1:28:25
  to stand by. The idea he's refusing to, will you denounce these guys? Will you denounce
• 1:28:31
  the people we're talking about now? Will you denounce the people who attacked that Capitol?
• 1:28:36
  are you going to do what do you guys think so far well i think biden's in la la land one he has no
• 1:28:43
  idea what he's referring to he's just going by what he used to do over the years in the way that
• 1:28:52
  he rejects positive information okay and i don't he's uh and what trump has said is actual factual
• 1:29:01
  and that news media source where...
• 1:29:05
  It was a documentary that...
• 1:29:07
  Talk about Pelosi.
• 1:29:08
  Yeah, it was Pelosi's documentary.
• 1:29:09
  Nancy Pelosi was...
• 1:29:10
  I forgot the daughter's name.
• 1:29:12
  I don't care who the daughter was.
• 1:29:13
  But her daughter, yeah, made the documentary.
• 1:29:17
  So she's on tape saying, yeah, I should have taken the $10,000.
• 1:29:20
  I should have done this.
• 1:29:21
  I should have done that, yeah.
• 1:29:22
  I think all that information is going to wind up in his...
• 1:29:25
  But does she actually say she should have taken the $10,000?
• 1:29:27
  Yeah, in the documentary, she's talking about regretting
• 1:29:30
  the way January 6th went down, how she should have accepted the 10,000 troops.
• 1:29:37
  So she did say that.
• 1:29:39
  Have you seen that video?
• 1:29:41
  I saw that documentary a little while ago.
• 1:29:43
  Well, no, this was just released.
• 1:29:47
  The video was, yes.
• 1:29:48
  They were in the car.
• 1:29:48
  I saw a documentary of her with her daughter falling around.
• 1:29:52
  It was released at least a year or two ago.
• 1:29:54
  No, well, this one here.
• 1:29:55
  I'm sorry to remember.
• 1:29:56
  No, this one here.
• 1:29:57
  That one, this one's relatively new.
• 1:29:59
  I have
• 1:30:00
  and it came out what a week or two
• 1:30:03
  ago was it? It was a few
• 1:30:05
  weeks ago. Well you know
• 1:30:07
  what? This is where we do our crackpot
• 1:30:10
  research as Manuel says. Yeah that's where you put that
• 1:30:11
  typewriter sound effect in there.
• 1:30:14
  I might.
• 1:30:16
  But one of the things that
• 1:30:17
  right here hold on hold on I think I found it.
• 1:30:20
  And
• 1:30:20
  let's see if this comes up
• 1:30:23
  Manuel.
• 1:30:25
  I'm waiting for this.
• 1:30:29
  for trespassing on the Capitol grounds.
• 1:30:32
  I'm going to punch him out and I'm going to go to jail
• 1:30:34
  and I'm going to be happy.
• 1:30:35
  That's not CNN.
• 1:30:37
  Okay, that doesn't say anything. That's not an admission.
• 1:30:40
  Where's the other video at?
• 1:30:41
  That wasn't even the video.
• 1:30:43
  Yeah, it said it was, but that's the one that...
• 1:30:45
  You would be able to pick that.
• 1:30:47
  Right here. Was she riding in a car?
• 1:30:49
  Yes.
• 1:30:49
  Okay, found it.
• 1:30:51
  We should have.
• 1:30:53
  Let me back this up.
• 1:30:54
  We have responsibility, Terry.
• 1:30:56
  We did not have any accountability.
• 1:30:59
  for what was going on there and we should have.
• 1:31:03
  This is ridiculous You gonna ask me in the middle of the thing when they already breached the inaugural stuff that should we call the Capitol Police I mean the National Guard
• 1:31:18
  Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with?
• 1:31:23
  They thought that they had sufficient resources.
• 1:31:24
  No, there's not a question of how they had made it. They don't know. They clearly didn't know and I
• 1:31:30
  take responsibility for not having to just prepare for more okay so she's lying there that they didn't
• 1:31:37
  know there's a whole timeline out there of what happened and during that whole time leading up to
• 1:31:45
  the event there was already chatter that was caught by white house security about the possibility
• 1:31:51
  of an actual militia coming together to write on the capitol they found weapons and bombs like
• 1:31:56
  I'll try to pull it up, but there's a whole timeline where they had sufficient time to react to what was going on.
• 1:32:03
  Some of that with the bombs turned out there was a pipe that was miles away that they thought was a pipe bomb.
• 1:32:08
  No, no, I'm not referring to the pipe bomb.
• 1:32:09
  I'm talking to the chatter on the radio and everything else that they caught.
• 1:32:13
  They knew in advance, and they knew during the day as things were progressing
• 1:32:19
  that things were going to happen according to the chatter that they intercepted over radio frequencies.
• 1:32:24
  They literally had the timeline.
• 1:32:27
  Like, at 10 o'clock, this happened.
• 1:32:29
  This threat happened.
• 1:32:30
  This chatter happened.
• 1:32:31
  They knew.
• 1:32:32
  And in that timeline, they say only the Capitol Police and the Sergeant of Arms.
• 1:32:37
  Okay, here's a problem that they don't get through their heads.
• 1:32:41
  They keep saying the National Guard can only be called in by the governor.
• 1:32:46
  There is no governor for the District of Columbia.
• 1:32:49
  It's not a state.
• 1:32:51
  That's what people don't understand.
• 1:32:52
  It's not a state.
• 1:32:53
  well all that's not the issue at this point that was a separate thing what's being brought up now
• 1:32:59
  is what he said with nancy pelosi admitting that she did not but i'm not done takes responsibility
• 1:33:07
  the timeline shows the timeline shows that they had plenty of time to react and them claiming
• 1:33:13
  that the whole thing about the national guard or emergency services were not approved is bullshit
• 1:33:20
  So here we go.
• 1:33:22
  It says right here, Memorandum for Security of the Army.
• 1:33:27
  This was dated January 4th.
• 1:33:30
  This memorandum responds to your January 4th, 2021 memorandum regarding the District of Columbia request for District of Columbia National Guard, DCNG,
• 1:33:39
  in support and response to planned demonstrations from January 5th through 6th.
• 1:33:44
  So they already knew ahead of time something was cooking.
• 1:33:47
  It says you are authorized and approve the requested support.
• 1:33:53
  You're authorized to approve the request of support subject to my guidance below.
• 1:33:58
  Now, it does say there's a couple of things that they said you can't do unless he authorizes it.
• 1:34:05
  It says you can't issue weapons, ammunition, bayonets, batons, ballistic protection.
• 1:34:09
  Basically, you can't take the military to attack U.S. citizens, right?
• 1:34:14
  Right.
• 1:34:14
  You can't have them physically interact.
• 1:34:16
  you can't employ any riot control agents
• 1:34:19
  share equipment with law enforcement agencies
• 1:34:21
  because a military organization
• 1:34:22
  can't act in the same way
• 1:34:24
  that the police can
• 1:34:26
  they can't
• 1:34:27
  because then now you're attacking your own citizens
• 1:34:30
  but it does say
• 1:34:32
  it did say at all times the DCNG
• 1:34:34
  will remain under the operational and administrative
• 1:34:37
  command and control of the commanding general
• 1:34:39
  of the DCNG who reports to
• 1:34:41
  the Secretary of Defense
• 1:34:42
  to the Secretary of the Army
• 1:34:43
  you may employ
• 1:34:45
  the DCNG, the District of Columbia National Guard, quick reaction force, only as a last resort,
• 1:34:52
  and in response to a request from an appropriate civil authority.
• 1:34:58
  If the QRF is so employed, DCNG personnel will be clearly marked and or distinguished
• 1:35:03
  from civilian law enforcement personnel, and you will notify me immediately upon your authorization.
• 1:35:09
  So they had the power at any time to call the National Guard.
• 1:35:14
  if they needed to escalate the situation, they had to get approval to do so.
• 1:35:20
  But it didn't say they couldn't.
• 1:35:21
  It just said, I have to approve it if you're going to escalate their response,
• 1:35:26
  if they're going to have to use weapons and what right you're –
• 1:35:29
  but it doesn't say anywhere they were denied.
• 1:35:31
  But that is accurate.
• 1:35:33
  It is accurate.
• 1:35:34
  However, but the person that they can get the approval from is the President of the United States
• 1:35:39
  authorizing or making a request to Nancy Pelosi,
• 1:35:44
  who has the authority to do that as Speaker of the House.
• 1:35:48
  Yes, it didn't have to.
• 1:35:49
  And that's why she admitted in this recent video
• 1:35:52
  that she had the authority to do it and she turned it down.
• 1:35:55
  It did not need the president's approval.
• 1:35:58
  No, it didn't have to have the president's approval either.
• 1:36:01
  It clearly states it here.
• 1:36:03
  And in that timeline I told you about, they recorded the events,
• 1:36:06
  They actually requested support of the National Guard three times, and they got no response.
• 1:36:12
  Who was responsible for that?
• 1:36:14
  Pelosi.
• 1:36:14
  Exactly.
• 1:36:16
  So fact-checking is fun, right?
• 1:36:19
  But exactly.
• 1:36:19
  That's just exactly what he was saying.
• 1:36:21
  Here's the issue I have with Trump on January 6th.
• 1:36:25
  Why did he wait three hours to make a move to control the crowd?
• 1:36:28
  That crowd moved while he was having his speech at that time.
• 1:36:33
  He didn't wait till three hours afterwards.
• 1:36:36
  He made that statement days in advance that there was going to be X amount of people there and that he felt that they needed the National Guard for security.
• 1:36:48
  No, that's true.
• 1:36:48
  I'm talking about the other statement you just made turned out to be false information.
• 1:36:56
  No.
• 1:36:56
  Yes, it was.
• 1:36:57
  It was false information.
• 1:36:58
  He doesn't he's on a stage preparing for his speech there at that instant.
• 1:37:07
  And he did not know what was going on at that time.
• 1:37:12
  Also, it was said that there was also agents there, FBI agents that was involved in some of this situation at the Capitol.
• 1:37:23
  So at the same token, these people on January the 6th were being waved in by capital security.
• 1:37:32
  They opened up the gates, waving them in.
• 1:37:35
  It's going to be interesting to see how far Trump goes with this once he becomes president,
• 1:37:41
  because one of the people that keeps popping up is one of the security guards.
• 1:37:46
  They keep asking what his name was that opened up the gate and waving all these people in from the capital.
• 1:37:53
  And so Trump didn't wait. He is the at that time he did. He wasn't in a position. I won't say he was in a position, but hindsight.
• 1:38:10
  is, you know, it's like Monday night football.
• 1:38:14
  You come in in hindsight and said he should have, he could have, and why didn't he?
• 1:38:21
  And at that particular time, he had already offered the protection that was needed
• 1:38:27
  given the size of the people that were showing up for the event.
• 1:38:30
  And he wasn't responsible.
• 1:38:33
  He didn't know at the time.
• 1:38:34
  and it was said by him and other support groups that he wasn't aware of what was going on at the Capitol
• 1:38:42
  during the time frame that he was getting prepared to give his speech there.
• 1:38:47
  So he did make reference in exactly what he said, that these people need to legally and blah, blah, blah.
• 1:38:59
  He knows they're going to the Capitol, but they need to protest legally.
• 1:39:03
  in short and uh you know mobs are hard to control i i don't i don't think trump should get off with
• 1:39:12
  that i i don't i mean the district of columbia doesn't have a you know a governor like you say
• 1:39:20
  but that is the president's area that's his yard well it's also congress's certain people in
• 1:39:25
  congress's responsibility when the president offers the national guard which he can do
• 1:39:31
  But he doesn't have to offer it, though.
• 1:39:33
  He really has to sit there and go, will you take this, please?
• 1:39:36
  I mean, the District of Columbia is where the White House is all his area.
• 1:39:42
  Right?
• 1:39:43
  Or am I?
• 1:39:43
  I don't know.
• 1:39:44
  I don't know how the chain goes out there.
• 1:39:45
  The person who will make that call is the sergeant at arms for Congress.
• 1:39:50
  Okay.
• 1:39:50
  And that's not Nancy Pelosi, by the way.
• 1:39:53
  No.
• 1:39:53
  And it's not Donald Trump.
• 1:39:55
  So Trump just can't drop a thousand troops there?
• 1:39:58
  He can offer, but you can't just offer military force.
• 1:40:03
  It has to be National Guard, which is still military.
• 1:40:05
  But you can't say, I'm sending the Marines in to control U.S. citizens.
• 1:40:10
  Well, that's a whole different energy.
• 1:40:12
  It is.
• 1:40:12
  It is.
• 1:40:12
  I'm just saying.
• 1:40:13
  Maybe I'm going to take another L here.
• 1:40:15
  I don't know.
• 1:40:15
  No, you're not, because there are conversations.
• 1:40:18
  They're saying they can't find evidence, but there's a lot of people that came out that say,
• 1:40:21
  in conversations, Trump did offer to send National Guard in.
• 1:40:27
  But in the end, it's a...
• 1:40:28
  They also sent that letters to Pelosi suggesting that she approve it in that due to the size of the...
• 1:40:38
  Right.
• 1:40:38
  And this letter here I read, this memorandum, signed by Christopher Mitchell.
• 1:40:43
  Miller?
• 1:40:44
  Okay.
• 1:40:44
  Or, I'm sorry, Christopher Miller.
• 1:40:46
  I know, Mitchell in there.
• 1:40:47
  Sorry, Miller.
• 1:40:49
  That he did give them authorization to approve the request.
• 1:40:54
  He just said you can't do any of these military actions with the National Guard against U.S. citizens without—
• 1:41:00
  Roll that back up.
• 1:41:01
  Without his express approval.
• 1:41:02
  What he's saying is memorandum of the Secretary of the Army.
• 1:41:07
  Yeah, for the Secretary of the Army.
• 1:41:10
  So everything that he said in there from the military, the National Guard, is the National Guard.
• 1:41:18
  They're a separate entity.
• 1:41:19
  Listen, read it right here.
• 1:41:21
  It's employment guidance for DC's National Guard.
• 1:41:25
  Look at this.
• 1:41:26
  It says it right here.
• 1:41:28
  Okay.
• 1:41:29
  This memorandum response to your January 4th memorandum regarding District of Columbia request for District of Columbia National Guard support response to plan demonstrations for January 5 and 6.
• 1:41:41
  You are authorized to approve the requested support.
• 1:41:45
  and the only thing it says without my subsequent personal authorization they're not allowed to be
• 1:41:55
  issued weapons ammunition bayonets batons or ballistic protection equipment such as helmets
• 1:42:00
  and body armor and it goes to a whole little a whole list here you can't employ helicopters or
• 1:42:04
  any other air assets conduct search and seizures arrest or anything else without his personal
• 1:42:11
  authorization. Now, with that being said, if this was approved and the National Guard was actually
• 1:42:17
  deployed as they were approved to do so if they needed them and it did escalate, that means what
• 1:42:22
  would have happened? The Sergeant of Arms or Pelosi or whoever was in charge had to call back over
• 1:42:26
  here and say, hey, this is where we're at. We need to escalate this. And he would have to approve
• 1:42:31
  that. That's correct. Okay. It's right there. Yes. So the problem I have is Trump's response.
• 1:42:39
  he's not the bad guy I think
• 1:42:40
  but here's your timeline
• 1:42:42
  Trump tweets
• 1:42:44
  8.17am he does a tweet about Pence
• 1:42:47
  blah blah blah
• 1:42:47
  the secret service sends an alert
• 1:42:51
  that there are more than 10,000 people
• 1:42:52
  in the line at the ellipse where President Trump
• 1:42:54
  is scheduled to speak
• 1:42:55
  before January 6th they already knew something was going to happen
• 1:42:58
  in their cooking which is why they request the National Guard
• 1:43:00
  if you keep going through all of this
• 1:43:02
  there is a lot on here
• 1:43:04
  that says that they had encounters
• 1:43:06
  with people and heard chatter
• 1:43:09
  about stuff that was going to happen.
• 1:43:10
  Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen has a nine-minute call
• 1:43:13
  with a White House lawyer, Eric Henschman, blah, blah, blah,
• 1:43:15
  and it just keeps going.
• 1:43:17
  And then you see how it starts to escalate and escalate.
• 1:43:19
  10.59, police recover two firearms from an unattended vehicle
• 1:43:22
  north of National Mall.
• 1:43:24
  11 a.m., Capitol Police is aware of a large crowd around the Capitol building,
• 1:43:28
  including a group of approximately 200 Proud Boys.
• 1:43:31
  Jeffrey Rosen receives a call from Patch, whatever,
• 1:43:34
  but I'm just saying it just keeps going.
• 1:43:36
  You slowly start to see things escalate.
• 1:43:37
  Okay. Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Missile, I keep saying Miller, sir,
• 1:43:42
  Miller participates in tabletop exercise regarding Defense Department contingency response options.
• 1:43:48
  Let's stop there for a minute.
• 1:43:49
  Hold on. 1130, they're already talking about Defense Department contingency response options.
• 1:43:55
  Of the day of the event. But let's stop there for a second.
• 1:44:01
  Okay.
• 1:44:02
  Right there and then are all events that are happening on the day of that speech.
• 1:44:09
  Yes.
• 1:44:09
  Yes.
• 1:44:09
  Trump would not necessarily know all of what's going on here.
• 1:44:15
  So let's stop there for a second.
• 1:44:17
  But that's not what I said.
• 1:44:18
  That's not what I said.
• 1:44:19
  There was a number of days before when he contacted Nancy Pelosi, who can give this guy a call and tell him that they want the National Guard.
• 1:44:33
  That's not what I'm disputing.
• 1:44:36
  So he sent that.
• 1:44:37
  My point is not Trump.
• 1:44:39
  My point being is the White House, Congress already knew things were going to happen.
• 1:44:45
  Yes.
• 1:44:45
  They were already approved to use National Guard support.
• 1:44:48
  They dropped the ball.
• 1:44:50
  Right.
• 1:44:50
  Pelosi dropped it because she's the one that has the Speaker of the House.
• 1:44:54
  Pelosi and the Sergeant of Arms dropped the ball because the Sergeant of Arms is the one who has to make the call ultimately.
• 1:45:01
  With Pelosi's permission.
• 1:45:05
  Sergeant of Arms is charged with security.
• 1:45:07
  Who does he report to?
• 1:45:09
  Sergeant Arms is almost like the police.
• 1:45:12
  They can literally take action when they have to.
• 1:45:15
  They need authorization.
• 1:45:17
  Regardless, there's enough here to show that they knew things were happening.
• 1:45:22
  Oh, absolutely.
• 1:45:23
  They didn't take appropriate measures, and they tried to pin it all on Trump.
• 1:45:27
  The problem, once I get to it, is that Trump made a speech.
• 1:45:31
  They started walking out over there.
• 1:45:33
  It's all in the timeline.
• 1:45:34
  He gets driven back.
• 1:45:36
  I'm not saying he did anything wrong,
• 1:45:37
  but seeing things escalate, he could have went out to make another speech earlier than he did.
• 1:45:45
  He did the one speech, but he did come out later to address them again,
• 1:45:48
  and he made a tweet to try to get people to calm down,
• 1:45:51
  but he should have acted sooner is what I'm trying to say.
• 1:45:53
  That was all one speech. He didn't give two that day. It was one speech.
• 1:45:58
  Okay.
• 1:46:00
  And so anyway, that's history at this point,
• 1:46:05
  But the new one is in this evidence that came forward with Pelosi making that statement in the car relieved Trump from the legalities associated with his court case.
• 1:46:16
  And it appears at this time, although they haven't said it, you know, there's some deviance in it, that there is enough evidence with this tape that Pelosi was the one that accepted responsibility for what happened at the Capitol, which will relieve, should relieve him from that lawsuit.
• 1:46:34
  It took them till 2.14.
• 1:46:37
  It says a handwritten National Guard timeline says CG told that the guard told to stand by by the Secretary of the Army.
• 1:46:45
  At 2.14, 2.15, the doors of capital have been breached.
• 1:46:49
  So you're right.
• 1:46:51
  They dropped the ball.
• 1:46:52
  And again, I'm not blaming Trump.
• 1:46:53
  What I'm saying is most everyone was there to support Trump.
• 1:46:58
  And what I'm trying to say and what I have been saying is he could have.
• 1:47:02
  See, he makes another tweet, not related.
• 1:47:05
  There's plenty of time to say something to try to calm down the crowd.
• 1:47:10
  He didn't incite it.
• 1:47:11
  We all saw the speech.
• 1:47:13
  He didn't say anything.
• 1:47:14
  He said, peacefully, right?
• 1:47:16
  Exactly right.
• 1:47:17
  He didn't incite the riot.
• 1:47:18
  And actually, that was said a number of times throughout his speech.
• 1:47:22
  Yes, it was.
• 1:47:23
  But he had plenty of time to respond, and he should have responded because he could have probably calmed things down if he did.
• 1:47:31
  Well, would have and should have could refer back to what you just said with Pelosi.
• 1:47:36
  She would have and should have activated the National Guard before this ever occurred.
• 1:47:40
  You said he didn't say anything, he only said it once.
• 1:47:43
  2.38 p.m., Donald Trump tweets,
• 1:47:45
  Please support our Capitol Police and law enforcement.
• 1:47:47
  They are truly on the side of our country.
• 1:47:49
  Stay peaceful.
• 1:47:50
  Former Deputy White House Press Secretary Siri Matthews later testified that Press Secretary Kayla McHenry
• 1:47:56
  had told her that Trump hadn't wanted to include the word peace in the tweet,
• 1:48:00
  which is probably bullshit.
• 1:48:01
  But it says right here, he didn't respond to support police until 2.38.
• 1:48:06
  All of this crap was going.
• 1:48:07
  His speech was at, what, 12?
• 1:48:08
  I don't know what time the speech was and what time it was started,
• 1:48:12
  how long it took him to get prepared for it and get him set up,
• 1:48:15
  and I don't know what time he left.
• 1:48:17
  He returned to the White House after his speech at 1.20.
• 1:48:19
  But we already found some faults in that information that we just went over.
• 1:48:24
  I'm just saying he had already an hour or two to respond to try to calm things down.
• 1:48:29
  he was making tweets already from his vehicle about Mike Pence and everybody else.
• 1:48:34
  So again, I can't read his mind.
• 1:48:37
  I wasn't there.
• 1:48:39
  So irregardless, at the time that he was, when did he...
• 1:48:43
  Rick, all you got to do is agree.
• 1:48:44
  No.
• 1:48:45
  Just agree.
• 1:48:46
  No, you don't have to agree.
• 1:48:47
  Because he is going to swing this bat for another 20 minutes.
• 1:48:51
  Listen, when you have the evidence, did I say Trump did it?
• 1:48:57
  No.
• 1:48:58
  Have they proven?
• 1:48:58
  No, he didn't.
• 1:48:59
  I know, but your overall point is he took way too long to knock this down.
• 1:49:02
  Well, you know what's going to be interesting out of all that we just discussed is this is going to be brought up now in a court of law.
• 1:49:09
  So if that information is—
• 1:49:11
  But my question still stands, and this is one thing Trump doesn't answer every time he's asked.
• 1:49:15
  Why did it take him so long to come back and try to calm down the ground?
• 1:49:20
  He's never going to answer that.
• 1:49:21
  All he's going to do is cross himself up.
• 1:49:23
  But that's the issue that I have.
• 1:49:25
  That's the only lingering thing out there that they can hold him for is that, his response.
• 1:49:30
  Why did he not?
• 1:49:31
  A speech doesn't solve it, though.
• 1:49:34
  It doesn't solve it, but if people are there under the guise of supporting him because they don't agree that the election results were correct, and they're going to storm the Capitol, he could have said something.
• 1:49:46
  The speech doesn't solve anything.
• 1:49:48
  They're already in riot mode.
• 1:49:49
  the only action he can take is an action you're saying that he can't do without Pelosi saying yes.
• 1:49:55
  No, no.
• 1:49:56
  Which is sending anything in there.
• 1:49:58
  No, that's not what I said.
• 1:49:59
  I didn't say Donald Trump send National Guard.
• 1:50:02
  No, I'm saying, I'm saying.
• 1:50:04
  Because he could have communicated.
• 1:50:05
  In that timeline you're pulling up here, when it gets to that gap before he makes a speech or a tweet or whatever about calming down,
• 1:50:15
  In that gap there, he could have sent some bodies in there to break that up, but he can't do that because you guys have both said that Pelosi has to sign off with Miller.
• 1:50:28
  So where would Trump win in that?
• 1:50:33
  That's not the point.
• 1:50:34
  The point is he could have responded and said something to everybody.
• 1:50:38
  Well, we can't read his mind, though, during that window because it's a short window.
• 1:50:42
  So he may not, like he said, he didn't know what was going on at the time.
• 1:50:47
  But it's still in question.
• 1:50:49
  Well, it could be in question.
• 1:50:52
  But the whole thing here from a realistic standpoint is that the president of the United States told Nancy Pelosi that given the size of attendance of these protesters, that they need national security.
• 1:51:09
  And she turned it down.
• 1:51:11
  If she would not have turned it down, they would have been able to deal with this issue, and these people may not or would not have been able to storm the Capitol.
• 1:51:22
  Well, she also, with the prior knowledge.
• 1:51:25
  That is the bottom line to all of this.
• 1:51:27
  I'm going to say something you're not going to like.
• 1:51:29
  Yes, do it.
• 1:51:30
  If you have the information and means to stop a murder in a court of law, when they find out you have the information and means to do so, you don't.
• 1:51:37
  You become an accessory?
• 1:51:38
  You're an accessory.
• 1:51:40
  Okay?
• 1:51:41
  If you know.
• 1:51:44
  You can't mix apples and oranges, and that's just what you get.
• 1:51:47
  They're all fruits.
• 1:51:49
  No, they're not.
• 1:51:52
  Again, I don't think he started it.
• 1:51:55
  He didn't cite it.
• 1:51:56
  I just wished he would have went out there and tried to do more to calm the people down.
• 1:52:00
  So let's say if he would have come in with the after statement, how are they going to get the message?
• 1:52:07
  they've already left the area where he's at.
• 1:52:11
  It doesn't matter.
• 1:52:12
  Something could have been done.
• 1:52:14
  According to the timeline, it's true.
• 1:52:18
  They knew about it.
• 1:52:18
  That's why they set the barriers up.
• 1:52:21
  But they didn't put the bodies there.
• 1:52:23
  In the end, Trump didn't incite the riot.
• 1:52:27
  His speech, we all saw it.
• 1:52:28
  There's nothing there that said,
• 1:52:29
  let's go take this Capitol.
• 1:52:32
  Let's bring it down and take it back.
• 1:52:33
  He never said any of that.
• 1:52:35
  So I've never said that either.
• 1:52:36
  I'm just saying, I know he just said.
• 1:52:38
  That's true.
• 1:52:38
  The only thing you the only controversy is the timeline and why he didn say something while this is occurring That all I saying But the fault lies on the Sergeant of Arms and Nancy Pelosi and they kept lying and
• 1:52:53
  saying, oh, we never got authorization.
• 1:52:55
  We were never approved.
• 1:52:56
  My question is, is why didn't Nancy Pelosi and the Sergeant of Arms respond to Trump's
• 1:53:04
  request to have the National Guard there?
• 1:53:07
  There is where the problem is.
• 1:53:08
  But she said in the video.
• 1:53:09
  Yeah, exactly.
• 1:53:11
  She said in the video that she's aware that it was offered, but it was already too late.
• 1:53:15
  They're already inside.
• 1:53:16
  True, but even beyond.
• 1:53:17
  No, this was before when he originally said.
• 1:53:20
  Oh, back in the letter.
• 1:53:22
  Yeah, this was before.
• 1:53:23
  But even before that, we see Chris Miller did give authorization and did approve them to authorize the use.
• 1:53:32
  He would have activated the National Guard, providing he had authorization from Nancy Pelosi.
• 1:53:37
  No, it says he gave them authorization to request, meaning they were greenlighted.
• 1:53:44
  Yeah.
• 1:53:44
  So she could have requested it.
• 1:53:47
  That's what I was saying, but in a different term.
• 1:53:50
  And the only reason I'm saying that, Rick, is because at this point, Trump's irrelevant.
• 1:53:54
  It doesn't matter if he offers them or not.
• 1:53:56
  The ball's in her court.
• 1:53:57
  Well, bottom line to the whole decision, again.
• 1:54:01
  Listen, we're all on the same side.
• 1:54:03
  I'm just playing devil's advocate here.
• 1:54:05
  I agree, and it's a good idea to bring up these different points of view.
• 1:54:09
  That's what you learn from.
• 1:54:10
  And I brought this up because I saw something where they made the same argument.
• 1:54:15
  So I'm like, okay, why? Let's talk about that. Why?
• 1:54:19
  That's all they have, though. That's all they have.
• 1:54:22
  Well, this is going to be—the question is whether or not Biden is capable of running this country for another four years,
• 1:54:34
  and he is not.
• 1:54:36
  He's not capable of running it now.
• 1:54:38
  He was never capable of running it before he became president.
• 1:54:43
  The news sources have covered him up for the last four years,
• 1:54:47
  and they still have another debate coming up in September.
• 1:54:52
  That's not going to happen.
• 1:54:53
  And it's going to be interesting to see what happens between now and September.
• 1:54:58
  His cabinet has the authority, and the only authority from the information that I got,
• 1:55:04
  to remove him from office.
• 1:55:07
  I think with everything we've been talking about,
• 1:55:10
  even though I push some buttons,
• 1:55:12
  sometimes you have to,
• 1:55:14
  we've called them out.
• 1:55:16
  For as much as they say Trump lied,
• 1:55:18
  there's a document or there's an eyewitness testimony
• 1:55:21
  that supports Trump
• 1:55:23
  and totally makes Biden and the Democratic Party
• 1:55:27
  look exactly like what they are,
• 1:55:28
  bold-faced liars, period.
• 1:55:31
  They don't have anything on their side
• 1:55:33
  to prove anything against Trump.
• 1:55:35
  They even had to make up charges in New York
• 1:55:37
  to put some bullshit felony charge together.
• 1:55:42
  I mean...
• 1:55:43
  Well, here's what I'd like you to do.
• 1:55:46
  I don't think you've ever done this.
• 1:55:48
  But go to Google and print up or type up
• 1:55:53
  Alan Dorsifitz.
• 1:55:55
  And when that occurs,
• 1:55:56
  you're going to hear Alan Dorsifitz.
• 1:55:59
  You can open up a window that will allow you
• 1:56:02
  to see an interview with Alan Dorsavitz and Fox News.
• 1:56:09
  And Fox News talked about the trial,
• 1:56:13
  the 34 charges that were brought against Trump.
• 1:56:17
  And remember that Alan Dorsavitz,
• 1:56:20
  he is a professor of law.
• 1:56:23
  He's a scholar and a professor of constitutional law and law.
• 1:56:29
  and his wife was as well
• 1:56:32
  and she died several years ago.
• 1:56:36
  Rick.
• 1:56:36
  Now the point is,
• 1:56:37
  is he sat in on that case.
• 1:56:39
  Yeah, you brought that up last time
• 1:56:40
  and honestly,
• 1:56:41
  I did a whole episode on this
• 1:56:43
  and I actually went through
• 1:56:44
  every single document you could find
• 1:56:46
  and I'm very versed on the case
• 1:56:48
  and how they came about
• 1:56:49
  to try to turn into a felony charge.
• 1:56:51
  It's bullshit, period.
• 1:56:52
  The whole thing was made up.
• 1:56:53
  It's crap.
• 1:56:55
  The issue we have here is
• 1:56:59
  basically the Democratic Party is trying to keep control.
• 1:57:04
  They're losing control, and they know they're going to be outed.
• 1:57:07
  Well, absolutely.
• 1:57:08
  I mean, you know, it's just like in any investigation.
• 1:57:11
  The truth comes out eventually.
• 1:57:13
  Yeah.
• 1:57:14
  And the news media is a fraud.
• 1:57:16
  The Democratic Party is a socialist activity that's fallen in line with the Democrat,
• 1:57:22
  and the news media has fallen in line with the Democratic Party.
• 1:57:25
  Can't disagree with you there.
• 1:57:26
  And it's a step away from communism.
• 1:57:29
  Yeah, actually, I think you're very right on that one.
• 1:57:32
  Very right. What do you think, Mano?
• 1:57:33
  Do you think the Democrats will hold the Senate?
• 1:57:36
  I'm hoping not.
• 1:57:37
  I think it's looking right now that that's a possibility that they're not.
• 1:57:43
  I mean, I know the Republicans are only, what, two-seat in the House?
• 1:57:47
  Are they going to hold that?
• 1:57:49
  Who, the Democrats?
• 1:57:50
  No, the Republicans have a two-seat majority.
• 1:57:53
  The Republicans right now feel that they're going to take the House back,
• 1:57:56
  and they have a very good possibility of taking over the Senate,
• 1:57:59
  and I hope to hell that happens.
• 1:58:01
  Okay, so on the second time around, if they do get total control,
• 1:58:08
  do you guys think that Trump will actually complete some stuff?
• 1:58:12
  Because I know in the first two years he had control,
• 1:58:14
  and the only thing he can drag out was that tax cut.
• 1:58:17
  And the last two years of his presidency was Democratic-controlled House and Senate.
• 1:58:23
  Well, that had all, and also don't forget.
• 1:58:26
  I'm just wondering if he does get control, do you think he's going to bulldoze and start swinging?
• 1:58:31
  I'm hoping he does.
• 1:58:31
  I think he is.
• 1:58:33
  He's already presented or said that he's already prepared and formulated his cabinet.
• 1:58:41
  So when he goes into office, if he does get up elected as president, that he's ready to go full speed ahead the day that he's appointed president.
• 1:58:51
  So his cabinet and his establishment has already been confirmed by him.
• 1:58:58
  And so I think that he will be able to achieve more.
• 1:59:03
  I had read a while back, and I'd have to go back and review it.
• 1:59:07
  And, George, I think this would be an interesting one for you as well and possibly a later discussion.
• 1:59:13
  that when the president of the United States is allowed to run for two terms of office,
• 1:59:22
  unless he has interference from his duties, his job, and his responsibilities,
• 1:59:28
  then he could be eligible for a third term.
• 1:59:32
  Now, I had read that a while back.
• 1:59:33
  I heard that too.
• 1:59:34
  And I'm curious about that.
• 1:59:36
  I'd like to look into that.
• 1:59:37
  Since he had his first time in office with the Russian lies, which started up in the latter part of his term in office when he started to run for president again.
• 1:59:58
  So he was still president of the United States, and he's got to investigate these sources and find out about whether or not he was, you know, how this impacted him and his abilities to handle situations and the laws and to do his job.
• 2:00:16
  So there is a, it appears as though there are grounds at this point where he may be able to utilize that and actually run for president for a third term.
• 2:00:31
  Interesting.
• 2:00:33
  Now, I've also.
• 2:00:34
  You know where I first heard that third term thing?
• 2:00:36
  Remember, they were trying to say that that was something Obama was going to try to pull?
• 2:00:40
  Uh-huh.
• 2:00:41
  Remember that?
• 2:00:42
  No, for a third term.
• 2:00:43
  Yeah, he was going to try to push for it.
• 2:00:45
  Now that you mention it, there was some thought of that, I think, at one time.
• 2:00:50
  I don't remember the circumstance on how that would happen, but can I ask this question?
• 2:00:55
  Do you think it would be wise to have Trump do a third term, or should we just let him do his second term and just call it?
• 2:01:02
  And some say there's too old for the job, but Trump has shown to be.
• 2:01:08
  And as he entered this debate session his it had received word from his staff that he had passed all his physical aspects for running for office So I think depending on how it goes this time
• 2:01:31
  I think it might be a good idea to run him for a third office.
• 2:01:35
  But that's kind of premature.
• 2:01:38
  You'd have to know who's running against him,
• 2:01:40
  what that person's background and experience is,
• 2:01:43
  and who the candidate is in short.
• 2:01:47
  I think that the answer here, period,
• 2:01:52
  between these two guys, Biden and Trump,
• 2:01:55
  is Trump, hands down, period.
• 2:01:57
  But I think, personally,
• 2:02:00
  that it really looks like Trump's going to win.
• 2:02:03
  I mean, I don't know how he's not going to win this
• 2:02:05
  unless we get another midnight, 2 a.m.,
• 2:02:08
  sudden 300,000 extra votes out of nowhere
• 2:02:10
  like we did last time.
• 2:02:11
  But I think that if he serves these next four years, that I think that should be it.
• 2:02:18
  I think that should be a sign for an end of an era.
• 2:02:20
  And we need to bring in younger, fresher Republican candidates to move the party forward.
• 2:02:26
  Well, I think that's too far advanced in order to make that decision.
• 2:02:29
  It's a possibility.
• 2:02:30
  Well, I'm saying after he serves his second term is what I'm saying.
• 2:02:33
  Yeah, well, that's what I'm saying.
• 2:02:35
  It's kind of far out.
• 2:02:36
  We're looking at four more years down the road.
• 2:02:39
  he may not have the abilities to run for a third term.
• 2:02:42
  No, no, no, exactly.
• 2:02:44
  What I'm saying is after he serves his next four years,
• 2:02:47
  just let him, like, that's it.
• 2:02:49
  Well, I think his first term in office,
• 2:02:52
  there was too much stuff thrown at him legally
• 2:02:55
  to be able to effectively address all the needs
• 2:02:58
  that the President of the United States had to address at that time
• 2:03:02
  that the Democratic Party created.
• 2:03:05
  I understand what you're saying.
• 2:03:06
  I just think we should move on after.
• 2:03:08
  You know what I mean?
• 2:03:09
  Get Biden out of the way.
• 2:03:10
  Reset the country.
• 2:03:11
  Get it right.
• 2:03:12
  Let Trump do what he has to do.
• 2:03:14
  And then after that, the next election, we need young, fresh blood that understands what's going on.
• 2:03:18
  Because, listen, we can't keep trying to elect people well into their years.
• 2:03:23
  What I like, though, with Trump is he's not this country like my other half with Liz when I were discussing about the other night was that Trump is a businessman.
• 2:03:39
  He's not a politician. And this country needs a businessman to run it, not a lawyer and somebody that addressed law school.
• 2:03:49
  You can have those people as a part of your cabinet for legal opinions and advice.
• 2:03:56
  So running the national, operating the national debt and running this country as a business, which I feel should be ran in that light or that way.
• 2:04:08
  And it would be economically feasible because he can address the finances around the world and how to utilize this country's finances and other countries' finances in retrospect to eliminate wars and support this country.
• 2:04:31
  like the various things that he imposed on China and Iran
• 2:04:38
  in regards to winning their respect.
• 2:04:42
  You take their money away from them
• 2:04:44
  and their abilities to support their country.
• 2:04:47
  I like that he runs it like a business person
• 2:04:49
  because, yes, one part of the government that people always overlook
• 2:04:52
  is the money being spent, period, and who's accountable.
• 2:04:57
  That's right.
• 2:04:57
  It's our money.
• 2:04:58
  That's exactly right.
• 2:05:00
  I'm going to make it frivolously.
• 2:05:01
  And this clown we got in office right now is spending it like water.
• 2:05:05
  Manuel, you've been silent over there munching the M&Ms.
• 2:05:08
  Because I want to munch the M&Ms.
• 2:05:10
  I apologize.
• 2:05:11
  You got anything to add to this at all?
• 2:05:14
  I know you do.
• 2:05:16
  I do.
• 2:05:16
  The two-term thing was, I had to refresh.
• 2:05:21
  It's in the Constitution.
• 2:05:23
  You only get two.
• 2:05:23
  No, it is.
• 2:05:24
  The only way you can get more than eight years is if you're doing a succession
• 2:05:28
  like Kennedy getting shot.
• 2:05:30
  And the only reason this amendment exists is because FDR went four terms, 33 to 45.
• 2:05:38
  Okay.
• 2:05:39
  So Trump's only limited to four years.
• 2:05:42
  Yeah, that's been standard procedure with that.
• 2:05:46
  But I was heard him discussing. Such as like you just said, other ways of.
• 2:05:58
  Interferences occurring to the president and his abilities to perform his job.
• 2:06:02
  Well, that window is open. It may be that he has to go to court or something in order.
• 2:06:07
  Yeah, but I'm assuming I'm assuming it would be like.
• 2:06:11
  the world war that they're involved in
• 2:06:13
  that interferes with the term limits
• 2:06:15
  something like that maybe
• 2:06:16
  then I can see them keeping him
• 2:06:19
  in office
• 2:06:20
  some kind of catastrophic thing
• 2:06:24
  something we would have to
• 2:06:25
  deep dive on
• 2:06:26
  I personally know I heard rumblings of that
• 2:06:29
  I have and I heard it during Obama's administration
• 2:06:31
  but I have no idea
• 2:06:33
  how the third term would ever
• 2:06:35
  be enacted or approved
• 2:06:37
  I have trouble
• 2:06:38
  I attempted to look some of this up, and I had trouble finding that information in regards to that issue of him being able to run for a third term.
• 2:06:56
  And right now, we can thank God that he had the monetary background to be able to fight off the Democratic Party.
• 2:07:07
  They went after him for every possible way that they could in order to get him out.
• 2:07:14
  And can you imagine if we had another politician that came in that they attacked in this format?
• 2:07:21
  He would not be able to afford to run for office.
• 2:07:25
  Be done.
• 2:07:26
  And we would be under the Democratic control.
• 2:07:29
  Well, it looks like we're going to have Trump for president again unless Gavin Newsom steps in somehow.
• 2:07:34
  Well, you know, one of the other interesting things is we can research, too.
• 2:07:38
  I had heard that the Democratic Party and Biden had been flying illegals in from other countries and having them sign voter, giving them American IDs and having them sign voting forms.
• 2:07:59
  I heard that, actually.
• 2:08:01
  and since you said that let's ask this
• 2:08:03
  I'm going to ask this last question because we're
• 2:08:04
  already going over two hours here
• 2:08:06
  Jesus Christ
• 2:08:07
  and this is going to be important
• 2:08:10
  it's coming up
• 2:08:12
  should we
• 2:08:14
  have people present IDs to vote
• 2:08:17
  I'm
• 2:08:18
  very
• 2:08:19
  no it's not
• 2:08:20
  it's a question still in contention
• 2:08:23
  I don't know why it's still being contested
• 2:08:24
  I have no idea why
• 2:08:26
  I'm throwing it out there
• 2:08:28
  give me your dumb ass opinion
• 2:08:30
  I did it's a dumb question to ask
• 2:08:34
  you've got to know who you are
• 2:08:37
  elaborate
• 2:08:38
  no that's it
• 2:08:39
  you need your ID
• 2:08:42
  stupid question
• 2:08:43
  they say the only argument I keep hearing is it
• 2:08:46
  disenfranchises people
• 2:08:47
  from voting because they can't get
• 2:08:50
  IDs which I don't understand that either
• 2:08:51
  because I
• 2:08:52
  you hear that from the Democratic Party
• 2:08:56
  yeah people get IDs I've seen it
• 2:08:58
  I've even seen them stand in line
• 2:09:01
  Now they may not be getting
• 2:09:02
  driver's licenses if they can't drive
• 2:09:05
  but everybody can get a state ID
• 2:09:07
  That's all they want
• 2:09:08
  So yeah
• 2:09:09
  Yeah if you've got the proof that you're an American
• 2:09:12
  citizen show an ID
• 2:09:14
  but coming out of Silicon Valley
• 2:09:16
  and the workforce there
• 2:09:18
  there are tens of thousands of people
• 2:09:21
  that came into this country
• 2:09:22
  illegally that got
• 2:09:24
  false IDs in San Jose
• 2:09:26
  Fair enough
• 2:09:27
  And that's good enough to vote too.
• 2:09:30
  Because a lot of those things pass.
• 2:09:31
  But listen, I'm going to answer my own stupid question.
• 2:09:34
  Please.
• 2:09:36
  And this is just beating the drum because everybody says, but it's true.
• 2:09:39
  You can't get a prescription without it.
• 2:09:41
  You can't see a doctor without it.
• 2:09:43
  Can't drive without it.
• 2:09:44
  You can't get into an airplane without it.
• 2:09:47
  Hell, you can't even take a train without it.
• 2:09:49
  So why is it okay for these things?
• 2:09:52
  Somehow this doesn disenfranchise anybody When it comes to voting all of a sudden everyone disenfranchised The simple answer to that question is is the Democratic
• 2:10:02
  Party's pushing that so that
• 2:10:04
  they can get support from all
• 2:10:06
  the illegals that they've dumped into this country?
• 2:10:09
  Of course. And that
• 2:10:10
  is the obvious answer.
• 2:10:11
  The underlying truth of it all, but still
• 2:10:14
  the statement is ridiculous
• 2:10:16
  because, like Manuel
• 2:10:18
  said, it disenfranchises
• 2:10:20
  people, as they say, but they can't
• 2:10:22
  prove how it does so when you need an ID
• 2:10:24
  to do every other thing in
• 2:10:26
  America.
• 2:10:27
  You can't even...
• 2:10:30
  You can't drink. In some cases, you can't
• 2:10:32
  even get into a concert without it, right?
• 2:10:33
  You may have your tickets, but they still want to see your ID
• 2:10:35
  sometimes. You can't even open a bank account without one.
• 2:10:38
  You can't buy a gun, and you can't buy any alcohol.
• 2:10:41
  Yeah.
• 2:10:41
  You can't get into a bar.
• 2:10:44
  No. It's stupid
• 2:10:45
  to think that this
• 2:10:47
  disenfranchises people. And California
• 2:10:49
  is streamlining it because now they're going to take the passport and the license and the state
• 2:10:53
  ID and make it one. That's that real ID thing. Yeah, I already got my real ID. I don't know
• 2:10:59
  when that started. I'm still on the old license. Well, that's what I've got. I've got a real ID.
• 2:11:04
  That real ID is only good for certain areas. You can go to Canada, you can go to Mexico and Hawaii.
• 2:11:09
  But you still need the actual passport if you go out there. If you're going to Europe,
• 2:11:13
  you still need the actual passport. To leave the actual country, yeah.
• 2:11:16
  Overseas to Europe, you need the actual passport. So it's a stupid ID?
• 2:11:19
  No, it isn't because even within the United States,
• 2:11:22
  if you don't have a real ID, you can't board a plane.
• 2:11:25
  So real ID is all 50 states?
• 2:11:28
  Yeah, I believe so.
• 2:11:30
  God, I got to get on that.
• 2:11:31
  I believe it is.
• 2:11:32
  Is what we're saying?
• 2:11:34
  I missed it.
• 2:11:34
  Oh, I was asking if it's all 50 states going to have the real ID.
• 2:11:38
  Because I only know about it.
• 2:11:39
  Yeah, it's nationwide.
• 2:11:40
  Oh, it's nationwide?
• 2:11:40
  Yes.
• 2:11:41
  You can't board a plane without it.
• 2:11:43
  So if you want to fly from here to Nashville for a vacation,
• 2:11:45
  you can't if you don't have a real ID.
• 2:11:47
  yeah and if you want to fly to just certain places out of the continental limits the united states
• 2:11:52
  like hawaii canada mexico yes they've got a you can do that i gotta get on that so in conclusion
• 2:11:58
  afraid to go to mexico and show my idea not be able to get back into the country without a real
• 2:12:03
  idea because i think that's phony yeah because it's so in conclusion we fact check everybody
• 2:12:11
  Trump hasn't lied as much as they all said.
• 2:12:14
  He may embellish, but he didn't lie.
• 2:12:16
  And then we have found that Biden actually lied more than Trump supposedly did.
• 2:12:22
  And that, well, I guess vote Trump, right?
• 2:12:26
  Well, that sounds like a winner to me.
• 2:12:30
  Or is RFK going to come at it?
• 2:12:33
  You know, that's interesting.
• 2:12:35
  Here's my take on him.
• 2:12:36
  I like the guy, but he's not a communicator.
• 2:12:42
  And unfortunately, it's just like the job market.
• 2:12:46
  You've got to fit, and you've got to impress.
• 2:12:50
  And him as a world leader is not impressive.
• 2:12:55
  He has a vocal issue, and I don't know what that is,
• 2:12:59
  but when he speaks, he has something wrong with his throat.
• 2:13:03
  Son of a bitch.
• 2:13:04
  spasmatic dystonia
• 2:13:06
  dysphonic
• 2:13:06
  but it's more
• 2:13:08
  nasmatic
• 2:13:09
  spasmatic
• 2:13:11
  son of a bitch
• 2:13:13
  what does it do
• 2:13:14
  it has something
• 2:13:15
  to do with his
• 2:13:15
  vocal cords
• 2:13:16
  yeah it's got
• 2:13:17
  something to do
• 2:13:17
  with your
• 2:13:18
  the vocal cords
• 2:13:19
  just continue to
• 2:13:20
  spasm and it
• 2:13:21
  sounds like you're
• 2:13:21
  gurgling
• 2:13:22
  and if it's severe
• 2:13:24
  you just can't
• 2:13:25
  talk
• 2:13:25
  yeah so
• 2:13:26
  he's a step
• 2:13:28
  above him
• 2:13:29
  he doesn't have
• 2:13:31
  a mental
• 2:13:31
  disarrangement
• 2:13:32
  no he doesn't
• 2:13:33
  But he's got a communication problem.
• 2:13:37
  Yeah, no, he's intelligent.
• 2:13:38
  We need somebody that can speak the English language proficiently
• 2:13:43
  and communicate proficiently.
• 2:13:46
  How dare you, Rick?
• 2:13:48
  How dare you want someone who can communicate?
• 2:13:51
  But you've got to admit, RFK is a smart guy.
• 2:13:54
  RFK is an intelligent individual.
• 2:13:56
  He's very smart.
• 2:13:57
  He's not stupid.
• 2:13:58
  And when he makes statements, he does back them up.
• 2:14:01
  He's still a Democrat.
• 2:14:02
  if you want to be a hard party line type of person, regardless.
• 2:14:06
  But he's not dumb.
• 2:14:07
  I think he should have been the guy that the Democratic Party would have backed.
• 2:14:11
  But you can't because traditionally you back the standing president, right?
• 2:14:16
  Well, you hear pros and cons on him.
• 2:14:19
  But Trump and the Republican Party are saying that he is more liberal
• 2:14:26
  than Biden and a lot of people in Congress.
• 2:14:30
  well he's he's kind of the dark horse right now i think he's slowly gaining more support i don't
• 2:14:36
  know how much impact he's going to ultimately have just because they won't even let him debate
• 2:14:39
  if he did that'd be quite honest it'd be very interesting i think if we're smart as rfk is
• 2:14:46
  though trump would still shut him down yeah simply english he would just shut him down
• 2:14:52
  yeah he's too charismatic i don't think that's modic dysphonia that's what's called that's what
• 2:14:58
  it's called. Neurological disorder affecting
• 2:15:00
  the voice and muscles.
• 2:15:02
  That's what it's called.
• 2:15:04
  Did you say mental
• 2:15:06
  too? No.
• 2:15:08
  Neurological.
• 2:15:09
  It's the brain.
• 2:15:11
  Oh God, I gotta look back.
• 2:15:13
  I had it. Something to do with the vocal cords.
• 2:15:15
  Well, I got that part, but he said something to do
• 2:15:18
  with neurologic.
• 2:15:19
  I was skimming, but
• 2:15:22
  we'll go. Okay, the neurological disorder
• 2:15:24
  that affects the voice, muscles, and the larynx
• 2:15:26
  causing involuntary spasms.
• 2:15:28
  These spasms make the voice sound strained, hoarse, shaky.
• 2:15:32
  It's a rare condition, and the exact cause is not well understood.
• 2:15:37
  It can significantly impact communication, but various treatments,
• 2:15:41
  Just as Rick said.
• 2:15:42
  including Botox injections.
• 2:15:44
  What?
• 2:15:44
  I guess steroids, I guess.
• 2:15:46
  That's funny.
• 2:15:47
  into the vocal cords can help manage the symptoms to some extent.
• 2:15:50
  Kennedy has been open about the condition, which he has lived with for many years.
• 2:15:57
  So there you go.
• 2:15:57
  Rick was right.
• 2:15:58
  We need a communicator.
• 2:15:59
  Yeah, we don't need a guy.
• 2:16:01
  The whole time.
• 2:16:02
  Yeah, and I do find it hard to understand him.
• 2:16:05
  I do.
• 2:16:05
  Like he has points, but it's like it's really hard to kind of make out what he's saying.
• 2:16:10
  Put him in perspective.
• 2:16:11
  Yeah, you're right.
• 2:16:12
  We do need that.
• 2:16:13
  I mean, that right there could be what holds him back in and of itself, right?
• 2:16:19
  I would think so.
• 2:16:20
  Well, I mean, when you go to visit the other heads of state that don't have any mental issues,
• 2:16:26
  no communication issues, and are very knowledgeable of why they're there
• 2:16:33
  and what they're going to present to the world,
• 2:16:36
  and you introduce somebody from this country that is mentally deranged, not saying that he is,
• 2:16:43
  but as an example, they've got to be neurologically sound and be unable to communicate.
• 2:16:50
  Well, it would be my impression.
• 2:16:53
  It would be a really get laughed at more than we would totally vote for him, because then we'd go from that to a guy that can't talk.
• 2:17:01
  I was just going to say I was just actually going to say something like that.
• 2:17:04
  All I know is what a way to go down the hill.
• 2:17:07
  We can't do another four years of Biden, period.
• 2:17:10
  No, period.
• 2:17:11
  That's that's been proven.
• 2:17:12
  I think what remains to be seen is just what at this point is going to happen because he doesn't seem – this debate was an excellent opportunity for the Republican Party to take advantage or expose the news media and the Democratic Party for covering it up for the last four years and lying to the American people.
• 2:17:37
  It's evident that whatever cocktail they have to keep them going,
• 2:17:41
  they're running low on.
• 2:17:42
  Yes.
• 2:17:43
  Okay.
• 2:17:43
  Absolutely.
• 2:17:44
  Like I said, he's a robot with a glitch at this point.
• 2:17:47
  Yeah.
• 2:17:47
  And I'm going to end it here, guys, because I think we all agree
• 2:17:51
  we don't need another Biden.
• 2:17:52
  And I think we dispelled the myth of how Trump is a pathological liar
• 2:17:59
  with a bunch of facts that we already just read today.
• 2:18:02
  What did you just say?
• 2:18:03
  dispelled the myth
• 2:18:06
  that Trump is a pathological liar.
• 2:18:08
  Okay.
• 2:18:09
  All right.
• 2:18:09
  I wasn't paying attention.
• 2:18:10
  I'm sorry.
• 2:18:10
  Because we just read
• 2:18:12
  a bunch of facts
• 2:18:13
  that support that.
• 2:18:15
  I,
• 2:18:15
  I,
• 2:18:15
  I'm fading.
• 2:18:17
  I apologize.
• 2:18:17
  Don't worry about it.
• 2:18:19
  Anyway,
• 2:18:20
  that's that.
• 2:18:22
  Here's to a better America.