Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 17th July 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 17th July 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. It's Wednesday, the seventeenth of July twenty twenty four, just
0:11
after one o'clock. Welcome to the UK Colin News. I'm your host Mike
0:14
Robinson. Joining me in the studio today, Charles Mallett. Welcome to the
0:16
program, Charles, and from Damascus, Vanessa Billy. Now we're going to
0:22
get kicked off with, of course, the State Opening of Parliament, the
0:25
King's speech. It was deeply engaging for anybody that watched it. So let's
0:31
just run through the key points here. So they're going to focus the new
0:36
Labor government apparently is going to focus on illegal migration. I'll explain why illegal
0:41
is in bold sorry, in a minute. Online Safety of course, we
0:47
talked about that on Monday. Energy Railways. They're going to renationalize the railways,
0:52
but they're not going to buy back the shares. They're going to wait
0:55
for the We're going to wait for the contracts to expire and then basically take
1:00
controlled back. So that's could be another public private partnership. Undoubtedly devolution planning
1:06
will come on to these in the second. Mental health and homeschooling are I
1:11
suppose the key ones. But if we look at the migration situation. First,
1:15
here is a graph from nineteen ninety one up until up to date.
1:19
The red line there being the number of people that have come into the country,
1:23
so that's basically a rolling annual quantity, and then the green line being
1:27
the number of people that have left the country and the gray line being the
1:32
net migration. And if we look at the peak there, which is one
1:37
point two million people, so this is in June twenty twenty three. So
1:41
this is the figure of people that came into the country between June twenty twenty
1:44
two and June twenty twenty three, one point two million people and of those
1:49
fifty two five hundred and thirty were considered to be illegal migrants. So my
1:55
question is if migration is an issue for most people, then why are why,
2:00
as Nigel farage wise, everybody focusing on illegal or so called irregular migration.
2:07
It's the regular migration which is the really having the major impact on population
2:14
in the UK. So but Liver Party, continuing with the same narrative we
2:20
mentioned online safety on Monday, Liver will build on the Online Safety Act,
2:25
they said in their manifesto, and before the election they had said that they
2:30
absolutely supported the idea of legal but harmful. Now, if you remember,
2:35
this was the concept that speech on the Internet which was legal but was viewed
2:40
as being harmful, should be censored. Well, they are intending to bring
2:46
this back. Charles is going to be covering a little bit on energy in
2:49
a minute. But of course we also mentioned on Monday the setting up of
2:53
the so called Mission Control for Clean Power twenty thirty and well maybe we'll Charles
3:00
will be covering how they're going to implement this later on in the program.
3:05
But just to comment on this briefly, the King speech says astro trader to
3:10
see legislation to create gb Energy. Now a couple of interesting points about that.
3:15
GiB Energy will be based in Scotland. But he goes on to say
3:19
a confused attempt to set up a nationalized energy company. Oddly it will neither
3:23
generate part or sell it, but instead designed to pass on to taxpayers projects
3:29
private sector decided are not viable. This may be true, but I think
3:34
it's not the whole story. I think again we're looking at public private partnerships
3:38
in anger here and so we keep an eye on this to see how that
3:42
develops. Mental health was mentioned and particular of particularly of interest, and we've
3:49
got to keep our eyes out for this. They're talking about the amending the
3:53
ways that people can be sectioned or the terms under which people can be sectioned.
3:59
It's not clear to me yet and I haven't seen very many comments about
4:02
it in various media sources what exactly that means. So that's another one we've
4:08
got to keep an eye on. And then of course we've got the question
4:13
of education. And you're going to have to remind me the name of the
4:17
Education Secretary Phillipson, Richard Phillipson. It's on screen for gonna sake, right
4:23
anyways, she was giving a speech before the election. Again it's on the
4:27
liberal list if anybody is in the slightest bit interested in going to see the
4:30
pantomime. But the key point about here the usual rhetoric about rising educational standards
4:35
and so on. But it does look, Charles like they are going to
4:39
implement a national register of homeschoolers. I don't know if you've got any thoughts
4:44
on that. Well, it seems, sir. I mean, it's yet
4:46
another instance where the net has been cast wide in effect to capture, they
4:54
say, to capture people who are not being educated in a correct manner.
5:00
Therefore the parents of in effect abrogated responsibility. But of course what they really
5:03
mean to do is to capture everybody within this net, including all the homeschoolers
5:09
who are giving perfectly sufficient or more than a better education than the state might
5:14
be might be putting on. So it's really a sort of smoke screen,
5:17
I think, to bring under control those that are seeking to operate outside the
5:24
government's tentacles. And another issue mentioned was devolution. So let's listen to Angela
5:30
Renner from a day or two ago speaking about this. Well, first of
5:34
all, this is an opportunity for those councils that haven't had a devolution package
5:40
to really get on board, and I hope that they'll take up that offer
5:43
and we can devolve things like skills, housing planning and employment support to really
5:49
kick start what's happening in their local area. As the Prime Minister set out,
5:55
those with skin in the game are at the forefront of really making the
5:59
change for us to get that growth across the whole of the country. We
6:02
know that we have to work in partnership with local authorities, with mayors and
6:05
to really kick start our economy everywhere. You'll have noticed that I changed the
6:12
department name to put local government right at the heart of it again. You
6:15
know, these local authorities provide some of the most critical services to people every
6:20
single day, and I recognize that. I recognize the challenge that they've faced
6:25
over the last fourteen years, and that's why I want to put them on
6:29
stable footing for the future and really bring them around the table to tackle some
6:32
of the inequalities and the things that are holding them back. So the question
6:40
is nationalization of local authorities because we know that many many local authorities in major
6:47
financial difficulties at the moment and effectively bankrupt. But of course, this whole
6:51
devolution the agenda has been going on for quite a long time. It's part
6:55
of Agenda twenty one. And again, if you haven't picked up a copy
6:58
of Your Life in their Hands, please do so from the UK column shop,
7:01
because we explain the devolution process and how that's changed over the last twenty
7:05
or thirty years and why it's being done. It is part of Agenda twenty
7:10
one and therefore Agenda twenty thirty and they're probably not going to stop there.
7:15
They're also talking about setting up consoles of the type that Ben Ruben has been
7:21
speaking about with a view to replacing the House of Lords. They're certainly talking
7:26
about getting rid of the remaining hereditary peers, so any independent or non party
7:31
political members of the House of Lords will go and so on. There's a
7:36
big discussion to be had on the House of Lords and so on, but
7:42
that's for another time. And the other thing that was mentioned that I just
7:45
wanted to throw into the mix hereies They were very very clear that while Britain
7:53
will stay within NATTO and will support NATTO till its dying breath, there is
7:58
renewed momentum into building a European defense capability and a new treaty being talked about
8:05
with which is effectively going right back to the whole European Defense Union agenda that
8:09
we were speaking about in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen up until
8:13
Brexit, so that policy has not disappeared. But Charles Watt is the situation
8:22
then with defense slash war in general, because of a review coming there is
8:28
there absolutely is yes, another one and this is really prefixed with what Ron
8:33
and Mike indeed been talking about, certainly with regard to the new government and
8:37
John Healey, the Defense Minister, effectively talking about not only the defense of
8:41
the United Kingdom beginning with the defense of Ukraine, as though there is some
8:46
existential threat to the United Kingdom because of what's happening in Ukraine and Russia,
8:50
but also that you, as a member of the population, are too stupid
8:56
to understand exactly what's going on. However, they are going to set it
8:58
out for us, and they've commissioned a new strategic defense review. And if
9:03
this gives you the sense of deja vous, that will be because some of
9:07
the people involved in it this time around are the same as last time.
9:11
So here we see the effectively the press release on the government website and they
9:16
talk about it requiring a new type of review. Of course, the last
9:18
sort of comparable one was in twenty ten, the Strategic Defense and Security Review
9:22
in the Cameron Coalition government. But here we have it being led by well,
9:28
effectively being led by the Defense sectory John Healey, but really underlying that
9:33
by Lord Robertson fear in a Hill and General Richard Barons. So we'll go
9:39
through them one by one. The first thing to say about Robertson, of
9:43
course, is that he was there in ninety eight for the Strategic Defense Review
9:48
of the then Blair government, and since then he's been involved in a number
9:54
of different places, but most significantly BP, where an actual fact, has
9:58
been a special advisor with regard to Russian investments. Interestingly, but also he
10:03
has been involved with the United States based Cohen Group, set up by William
10:09
Cohen, the former American Defense Secretary in the late nineties early two thousands,
10:13
So it's very obvious which way we are looking with regard to this defense review.
10:18
Also, I thought i'd point out that the Guardian here reporting back in
10:22
ninety nine when Tony Blair nominated Robertson to go for the Secretary General of NATO
10:28
job, he said, if George gets the job, he can be replaced
10:31
as Defense Secretary without too much trouble, effectively saying that he wasn't perhaps going
10:39
to be the best person for that job. Now, the reason I mentioned
10:41
Blair is that we've looked at this again in the past, but the Institute
10:45
for Global Change, of course, is very much heating up their defense rhetoric,
10:50
and they've recently had their Reimagining Defense conference and new capability. So that
10:54
would be the time to mention the appointment of Nick Carter, former head of
10:58
the Armed Forces here and his connections to Helsing Defense and their cyber AI and
11:03
drone capabilities. So the theme of vested interests here is a very very strong
11:11
one. Then we've got Fiona Hill, the presidential advisor to the White House
11:16
twenty seventeen to twenty nineteen under Donald Trump, and of course bearing in mind
11:20
that the likely bet now, especially in light of what's happened, is that
11:24
Trump might well be in the chair again later this year. She of course
11:28
has the contact, but just to give an idea of what sort of a
11:31
view she has on defense and the current situation now, this is an article
11:35
from Politico in February twenty twenty two saying yes he would, meaning that Putin
11:41
would absolutely use nuclear weapons. Her sort of summary of what she stated in
11:46
that interview that was transcribed into an article. She believes that there's been a
11:50
long term policy failure by NATO, in fact, not to contain Russia and
11:56
stand up to Russia. She believes that Russia will not stop at Ukraine.
11:58
They really are after a territorial conquering of other parcels of land, that there
12:05
needs to be an international response to stop Russia, i e. Beyond NATO,
12:09
beyond the EU and international response. She absolutely believes that Putin wants to
12:13
use nuclear weapons, and she has gone as far as directly comparing Putin to
12:18
Hitler. So that's how she sees things, and of course she is going
12:22
to be very influential. I should have mentioned also that set out in the
12:26
government press release, it was made very clear that this wasn't going to be
12:31
something that just happened within government. It was also going to be without and
12:35
we've already looked at some of the vested interests here and indeed the connections,
12:37
so we should be under no illusion that this is going to involve an awful
12:43
lot of interested parties well outside the arena of government. Now, the next
12:48
person to look at is Baron's General, Sir Richard Barons, who was Commander
12:54
of the Joint My apologies, I forget the previous job he held in the
13:01
Army Commander Joint Force Command, that's what it was. Anyway, you won't
13:05
be surprised to know that he is now involved with Universal Defense and Security solutions,
13:09
so is in effect in the defense industry, and worth noting that he
13:13
is specializing very much on AI, the cyber part of it, as well
13:18
as space, which of course we've talked about recently, and indeed the modernization
13:24
of defense. And Mike's just got another point on this, the other point
13:28
to make. But General Sir Richard Barns. Of course, he's a personal
13:30
friend of Chris Donnelly and therefore, and I believe he was part of the
13:33
Institute for Staircraft at the time, so he is an absolute Russophobe. Yeah,
13:39
absolutely, And Russifobe was the tag really that I should have applied to
13:41
Fiona Hill. I mean, obviously in the mainstream she's referred to as a
13:45
Russia specialist, but these days it's increasingly hard to find a Russia specialist that
13:48
is not, in actual fact a Russo foe. So these are a sort
13:52
of snapshot into the people that are going to be leading this defense review and
13:56
the likely direction it's going to go in, which is going to be a
14:00
very close tie to the United States and a sole focus on being part of
14:05
NATO, that is pursuing a proxy war against Russia by keeping in all likelihood
14:13
keeping Ukraine at arm's length, because of the Article five responsibility to become involved
14:18
directly with Russia should NATO become well, so sorry, should Ukraine become a
14:24
member of NATO. So what we do now is we'll just look back at
14:28
sort of how we've got here and the situation we are in. And I'm
14:31
going to mention Patrick Sanders, General Patrick Sanders, who has just finished as
14:35
head of the British Army and joins that very long list of generals who says
14:39
all the important stuff. The moment he's left the army. He has just
14:43
said that he believes that the British Army is in such a parlor state that
14:48
they might be able to fight a small war for approximately one month, but
14:54
no more than that. And I've put the picture on screen of kirst armor
14:56
in his probably not particularly well and combat. So he's getting amongst it and
15:03
he's being pushed on by people like Sanders speaking out against this. But of
15:09
course, whilst Sanders's views should be taken well, certainly with perhaps a pinch
15:18
of salt, they should also be viewed in the context of the suggestions of
15:22
both national service and conscription, because in effect, the provocation of response is
15:28
meant to be that we are in a situation where there is an existential threat
15:31
to the United Kingdom, and in order to counter that and put Ukraine first
15:35
and the uk first, people need to get behind defense and to support it
15:39
by putting young men and women in the firing line. So that's why I
15:43
mention Sanders in particular. But really we have to look at who benefits from
15:50
this, and this is from the Financial Times this morning, showing the five
15:54
year chart for the all share aerospace and defense industries, with the red arrows
15:58
showing first of all when the Ukraine conflict started in February twenty twenty two and
16:03
then Gaza in October twenty twenty three. And it's very clear that all of
16:07
these people who are going to be involved in this review are benefiting in some
16:12
way from the upward trajectory of that graph, and that really is a huge
16:18
part of what it's about. So also where we are now with regard to
16:21
the integrating Integrated Operating Concept the IOC, which again we've talked about Lot four,
16:26
but I put it previously that we are somewhere between the third and fourth
16:32
stages constrained being proactive and assertive. It may involve the use of force,
16:36
and of course the next step being warfighting. So Mike, I'm sure you've
16:40
got some follow up comments to make and we'll keep an eye on how this
16:44
does go, but that they're saying it's going to be conducted at pace and
16:47
we'll be delivered early in twenty twenty five. Yes, you mentioned the integrated
16:52
operating concept. We've got to always keep in mind that that was the military
16:56
doctrine that where the UK openly declare that its own population is potentially as much
17:03
an enemy as any foreign population. Perfect, good point. Yes, so
17:07
let's welcome Vanessa to the program, and Vanessa, you've got a bit more
17:12
on Donald Trump. Yes, I just wanted to cover the rather dramatic events.
17:21
I'm not going to go into huge details about what I consider to be
17:23
the huge anomalies in the entire narrative, but I just wanted to point out,
17:30
you know, the idea that this might be either a structural deep event,
17:36
and we can see the definition of that from from the Wiki Life,
17:45
which is basically it's effectively deep state creating an environment in which the political landscape
17:56
or enormous changes to society can be brought about. You then, also,
18:02
of course have the state crime against democracy, which is the current state carrying
18:07
out a crime in order to bring about certain events. So I would recommend
18:15
watching Kevin Ryan Genocide and Emperor identifying structural deep events and state crimes against democracy
18:23
in real time to better understand how this might tie in with what has just
18:30
happened in the United States. Now, one of the or two of the
18:33
main reasons that I consider that this could have been some kind of orchestrated event
18:40
is the speed with which Trump paraphernalia appeared on market stores and on social media
18:48
and across the board following the alleged attempted assassination, including T shirts, posters,
18:56
etc. And the in unice and very jingoistic emotional messaging being put out
19:03
by a certain high level social media commentators and media people, including Tucker Carlson
19:11
and Scott Ritter. And then these kind of videos that suddenly also appeared promoting
19:18
Trump as some kind of cult figure and very much appealing to the Christian Zionist
19:23
and the Christian market in the United States, depicting him as having been saved
19:30
by God from death. So let's just have a quick look or dip into
19:34
one of these videos. I'm going to look you in the eyes, and
19:40
I'm going to tell you the future. It's an American story, and that's
19:44
why Americans are going to love it. People are going to build you up,
19:48
God are they going to. Because when you're great and new, we
19:52
love you. Man. We'll build you into something that doesn't even exist.
19:57
You're going to change the fucking world. But you know what, once they've
20:03
built you as high as they possibly can, they're going to tear you back
20:07
down. It's the most predictable pattern. We build you into something that doesn't
20:11
exist, and that means you have to try to be that thing. I'm
20:18
not sure if I recommend watching the full video, but anyway, that gives
20:22
you some idea of the messaging that's now really permeating social media and media at
20:29
the center and right and all of what I call the America First crowd are
20:37
now absolutely on fire. As I said, very jingoistic messaging. Donald Trump
20:44
is going to end all wars. Donald Trump is going to prevent the escalation
20:48
of nuclear war with Russia. But there's almost complete silence on what Donald Trump
20:55
might actually do to prevent the ongoing genocide in so that suddenly seems to have
21:00
completely dropped off the radar from many of these commentators, although they're pushing back
21:07
on that commentary and observation from some of us. So I want to now
21:14
just have a quick look at who Donald Trump is, what his previous administration
21:19
achieved or didn't achieve in the Middle East. So, first of all,
21:23
Donald Trump is a Zionist fan. He's been given more than one million by
21:33
APAK by the pro Israel lobby. If we look at Trump's messaging, particularly
21:40
towards Israel and the Middle East. Of course, he said very clearly we
21:45
should have kept the oil in Iraq, So no condemnation, they're of the
21:51
US policy to invade Iraq, and then a very quick video showing him explaining
21:56
why he was keeping US military in So we want to worry about our things.
22:03
We're keeping the oil. We have the the oil is secure. We
22:07
left troops behind only for the oil. So we left troops behind only for
22:15
the oil, not to fight Isis, of course, which is what the
22:18
general pretext for the United States military footprint inside Syria, occupying Syrian resources in
22:25
the northeast. He then went on to say, after fifty two years,
22:29
it's time for the United States to fully recognize Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights,
22:34
which is of critical strategic and security importance to the State of Israel and
22:41
regional stability. Of course, Israel takes thirty percent of its water resources from
22:48
the occupied Doland Heights, which of course is Syrian territory. Message from Parish
22:53
Shahabi, they're basically saying, you will never have stability in the region while
22:57
you allow Israel to occupy our territory and to cause exodus from our territory.
23:06
He then recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and ordered the US embassy to move and
23:12
in fact, Natanyahu even called for the new Goland Settlement named after Trump.
23:19
He also brought in under his administration the Abraham Accords, claiming that it was
23:26
the dawn of a new Middle East. He celebrated the Abraham Accords with White
23:30
House signing ceremony. Of course, the Abraham Accords is recognized by the majority
23:36
of the Palestinian nationalist movements as being a complete betrayal of their movement, and
23:42
to a degree, of course, it's bringing in the success of the Greater
23:47
Israel project by aligning Israel with particularly the Gulf States and Egypt, and then
23:55
let's have a look at a recent video from Trump where he's actually pushed for
24:00
Israel to go harder in Gaza. So number one, they have to finish
24:06
the job. Israel has to finish that job. They have to finish it
24:08
quickly, strongly, and they have to get back to life again because it's
24:15
taken too long. They have to finish the job, saying, go win,
24:18
win, and finish. Got to win, got to win. Israel,
24:21
they don't have the back end that they once had. You'll give it
24:23
to them. I'm good, I'm good, But they don't have the back
24:27
in. Even Schumer has become like a Palestinian. Chuck Schumer, Jewish,
24:33
always strong for Israel. He's become like a Palestinian. I mean quite incredible
24:41
that there is no mention, as I said, of the Israeli genocide of
24:45
Palestinians in Gaza and in the occupied territories, and also the use of the
24:52
term Palestinian as a race of racist, disparaging label. And he does it
24:59
again and in the debate with Biden, if we just quickly roll that actually
25:06
Israel is the one and you should let him go and let him finish the
25:08
job. He doesn't want to do it. He's become like a Palestinian.
25:11
But they don't like him because he's a very bad Palaestinian. He's a weak
25:15
one. So they should finish the job. One assumes that means the full
25:22
ethnic cleansing of Gaza and Palestinian territory. Then let's have a look at JD.
25:29
Vance. Trump has selected him as running mate after a last minute push
25:36
from his son. So let's have a look at jd Vance again, backed
25:40
by the Zionists and by Apak one hundred and sixty seven thousand there in.
25:45
I think that's twenty twenty two jd Vance. I will be a strong advocate
25:48
for Israel in the Senate. And then let's have a look at Vance's messaging
25:53
almost immediately regarding Iran. So if we roll the video, a lot of
25:59
people recognize that we need to do something with Iran, but not these weak
26:03
little bombing runs. If you're going to punch the Iranians, you punch it
26:06
hard. And that's what he did when he took out sol the Money.
26:10
Of course, Solemoney, the commander of the IRGC who defeated ISIS in Iraq
26:17
and Syria effectively was assassinated by Trump and then let's have a look at what
26:22
Vance has to say about the Abraham Accords that I mentioned. See, maybe
26:27
the most important diplomatic breakthrough of the Trump administration was the Abraham Cords. If
26:32
you want to check Iran, the way to do it is to one withdraw
26:36
their oil money, which of course Joe Biden's been bad about it. But
26:38
you've also got to enable the Israelis and the Sunni Ara of States to work
26:42
together and actually provide a counterbalance to Iran. Joe Biden has done nothing.
26:47
You had the infrastructure there sitting there to week in Iran to strengthen our ally
26:52
Israel. Joe Biden's done nothing with it. Donald Trump and reinvigorated I think
26:56
one know about you, but I understand this is very clear messaging that the
27:03
destruction of the Middle East is part of Trump's policy. Finally, with a
27:08
war with Iran, and I think it's also important to look at the Christian
27:14
Zionist element and the Zionist element within Trump's administration and following and I do recommend
27:21
that everybody rewatches if they have already seen it, and watches again they have,
27:26
or watches if they haven't. Dark Crusade a look at the origins of
27:30
Christian Zionists with Clifford Kirikoff in an interview that you did, Mike. But
27:37
I think you know all of these so called America First promoters that are on
27:42
social media now and in the media claiming that Trump is going to put America
27:48
first. I actually remember in twenty twenty one when everybody was saying, oh
27:55
my god, you know, we have to have something better than Trump,
27:57
and so they voted in Biden. Now we have oh my god, we
28:02
have to have something better than Biden, so we'll bring back in Trump.
28:06
I mean, it's kind of I don't know, goldfish politics, as far
28:10
as I can see, keeps going around in the same cycle. But I
28:15
think the dangers are with Trump and his administration is that we're going to see
28:22
a ramping up of support for Israel and for the Zionist a gender and hegemony
28:27
in the region, which will mean the destruction of Palestine, potentially Lebanon,
28:34
Syria, Iraq, and eventually Iran. So while the America First crew are
28:41
claiming that Trump is better because he will prevent a nuclear war with Russia,
28:45
they are effectively ignoring the potential threat for West Asia. And of course America
28:53
first for me means Israel first. That's the end of it. And it's
28:57
no different with Biden to try two sides of the same coin. And and
29:04
you know, okay, Trump is saying we need to end the war in
29:07
Ukraine. Russia is not really the target, but he is absolutely focused on
29:11
China. He wants to take that argument into the into the South China Sea
29:17
uh and and into Iran. So Iran has been on the US hit list
29:21
for so many years now and that hasn't changed. And Trump is not a
29:25
peacemaker. And that's the key point here. And for the people that are
29:29
you know, that are fighting or at least arguing against the Ukraine war,
29:33
but are claiming support for Trump, this this is missing the point, I
29:37
think. And well we could talk about a little bit more about that in
29:41
Extra. So thank you for that, Vanessa. Okay, if you like
29:45
what the UK Column does, you would like to support us. Support dot
29:48
UK column. Dot organs the place to go options to help us out there
29:52
five points a month for membership. If you join us as a member,
29:56
you can watch Extra, which we stream following the news every Monday, Wednesday
30:02
and Friday, as well as taking part in the community. So please join
30:04
us if you possibly can. We are being censored, continuing to be censored,
30:11
and if you can therefore help be the algorithm as it were, and
30:15
share our material and some sort of sidestep the limitations that the algorithms on the
30:21
various platforms provide, then please do that. UK column dot Org and UK
30:25
column extrac Stock the UK are the places to go for that, and you
30:30
could pick something up at the UK column Shop. Now a couple of interviews.
30:34
First of all, Laura Demery Charles that's right, Yeah, that's now
30:38
up on the website, went out last week, but I really would encourage
30:41
you to listen to it. We've spoken a lot about the doctrine of the
30:44
lesser Magistrates and inter position and Laura, as a registered nurse, has been
30:48
going to county commissioners and appealing to them to stop the MR and A vaccines
30:52
due to the harm they've been causing. She had no legal background, but
30:56
she's achieved amazing success just through shit determinations. I really would encourage you to
31:00
listen to that because she is actually going out there and doing it and inspiration
31:03
absolutely and Cheryl Grainger talking on them. Sorry, taking on the MHRA and
31:10
asking are they harmon nibblers? That is up on the website as well.
31:14
If you haven't seen that, please do have a look at it. And
31:17
then tomorrow an interview with John down Yes, I think that's how we pronounced
31:22
it. Talking about death statistics in the United States absolutely essential. Everybody watches
31:30
this if you possibly can. He has managed to get access to millions of
31:34
death records and looking for patterns there and discovering patterns there, particularly since the
31:41
vaccine rollouts. We do join one pm for that tomorrow. Another reminder did
31:47
for your Dary Saturday, the nineteenth of October twenty twenty four Bristol UK column
31:52
really live come along to that but keep that did free announcements to be made
31:56
in the next day or two and where does that died Suddenly? Yeah,
32:01
there's going to be an exhibition and art exhibition in November this year in London.
32:07
Exact location to be decided. But this is to do with the unexplained
32:13
deaths and the massive rise in excess death. It's being coordinated by an artist,
32:17
a very good portraitist, Jake Fern. So if you'd like to know
32:21
more about it, you'd like to help or you have stories with relate to
32:27
people who have died suddenly in an excess death, please get in touch with
32:30
Jake mistyped his email. Sorry it's Jake h Fern, so disregard the one
32:37
that's written in big black letters. It's Jake H Fern. I will make
32:40
sure that's redone for the next thing. Jake apologies, but you will get
32:44
him if you go to his website, which is Jakefern dot co dot uk.
32:49
Jake Jak E Fern f e r n dot co dot uk. So
32:52
that's going to be a terrific exhibition in November, but he would like help
32:55
with it and for people to come forward with their stories, so please get
32:59
in touch with him. So the email addresses Jake h fornat Jahud are called
33:02
at uk okay. So we were talking about energy with respect to the king
33:07
speech. What's the litist. Well, the latest is having talked about energy
33:13
and climate and defense last week, the boundary has been pushed yet further and
33:20
the Royal College of Physicians, believe it or not, have just released a
33:22
document called the Green Physician Toolkit, which looks like it's designed for children,
33:29
and certainly the intent is that patients of GPS are to be treated like children.
33:34
So here we see that understanding the link between climate change and health in
33:37
the UK is the first bit. So you have to you have to understand
33:42
how these links between health and climate affect themselves, and these are being broken
33:46
down into four easy steps with little pictures. So the boning of fossil fuels
33:51
increases land temperatures and air temperatures, causes extreme weather events, melts sea ice
33:55
and glaciers, warms the oceans and creates air but it's already impacting health.
34:02
And when we consider Jake's forthcoming exhibition have Died suddenly interesting to note. Therefore,
34:07
there are now three and seventy one excess deaths attributable to climate change somehow
34:14
in the summer of twenty twenty two, and thousands of them annually. Of
34:19
course, this goes back to the mental health that Mike was talking about in
34:22
the King's speech to precton anxiety and PTSD amongst the population is exposed to flooding,
34:25
which of course Debbie has spoken about a great length on a regular basis,
34:30
and then we see the groups that are more vulnerable. So this suggestion
34:32
are vulnerable groups that need to be helped. And we see there if you
34:36
can't see the screen, there's a picture of a man with brown skin and
34:42
wearing a face mask for reasons that are not entirely clear, but presumably to
34:45
do with air pollution. But these vulnerable groups are older people, infants and
34:50
children, people with pre existing conditions, coastal and low lying populations, people
34:54
experiencing homelessness, and it's going to get worse. That's what the the Health
35:00
Security Agency project. They say the heat related death could increase by five hundred
35:04
and eighty percent. Now that is a figure plucked from thin air. An
35:08
increase in cold related death sixty one increase sixty one percent, increase people at
35:15
flooding risk by twenty fifty. Anyway, you get the idea. This is
35:17
very much aimed at well physicians in the first instance, probably for the public
35:22
to be viewed, and the whole thing has been infantilized to a staggering degree.
35:27
Anyway, gps are given guidance on how to actually talk to the people.
35:30
But the way this is termed is that they are described as being uniquely
35:35
placed as a trusted member of the community. Now, I think after what
35:38
happened in twenty twenty and beyond. I would say that is a waning reputation.
35:43
But nonetheless, those that do still go to GPS will be helped within
35:46
their communities to understand how climate change will affect their health and how to protect
35:50
themselves. It's an absolute abuse of trust. They should now be asked to
35:53
talk about something that they are not trained in, and that indeed the science
35:58
has certainly not settled on anyway. Now very much involved in climate change,
36:02
and they have some key points to talk to patients about. They say,
36:07
keep the message simple and repeat it often. Well, we've heard and seen
36:10
the effects of that before in twenty twenty and beyond. Focus on human health,
36:15
understand the local context, don't use jargon, well okay. Empower people
36:22
to make good decisions about their health. It's looking increasingly like one such decision
36:27
might not be to go to the GP in the first place. Anyway,
36:31
talk about the health benefits of climate action. So this is sort of in
36:35
effect galvanizing people into a state of political activism, which is an extraordinary expansion
36:42
of the remiss of a health practitioner to tell stories to connect with people,
36:46
and I think this is absolutely critical to it. They don't mean it in
36:50
this way, but I would say that telling stories is absolutely what this is
36:52
all about. Avoid polarizing languages, talk about climate change during extreme weather events.
36:57
So there we go conflate things that may otherwise not have any bearing on
37:00
one another. And the biggest one at the last point involved don't debate the
37:07
science. And there's quite a good reason for that, and just to recap,
37:09
because the science effectively says that there is a belief that the approximately three
37:16
percent of emissions of overall carbon dioxide emissions over the course of a year that
37:22
are created by man's activities included of course, farming and all the other things
37:28
that are being demonized at the minute, that that three percent of the overall
37:30
carbon dioxide emitted is going to affect the total amount of cobon dioxide, which
37:37
is zero point not four percent of the overall atmosphere, and it will change
37:45
the climate, it will change the weather, it will heat up the world.
37:49
That is the science upon which this is based. So it's very important
37:52
to consider that. Whenever anyone says, don't debate the science, I would
37:58
say, it's perfect clear why not. Anyway, We'll go and have a
37:59
look at Gavino, the sort of Bill Gates spin off vaccine well business,
38:06
I suppose want for a better word, And they say no vaccine climate change.
38:08
When this used to be a joke in twenty twenty that was going to
38:10
be a vaccine climate change, they are actually now sort of talking about it.
38:14
There is no vaccine for climate change and never will be. However,
38:17
there are multiple readily available health interventions and prevention measures. So as I say,
38:22
we've now got this association not just between defense and climate, but also
38:30
very much between medicine and climate, and there seems to be no end to
38:34
it. We've talked also in the King speech about the push towards net zero
38:37
and how the whole planning space is to be reshaped around this belief that climate
38:43
and energy is completely into link. Climate and defense is interlinked, Climate and
38:45
medicine is interlinked. And so I just go to a small announcement made yesterday
38:52
about this Sunnaca energy farm which has been going to take up two five hundred
38:57
acres in East Anglia, and really just the amazing disregard for democracy here we
39:02
see that local communities are continuing to be given the opportunity of being involved.
39:08
They were able to participate in this examination and full consideration to all local views
39:15
was given. So just to wind up, we see here from the Nuclear
39:20
Energy Initiative, I think, sorry, I can't remember what any it exactly
39:23
stands for, but they talk about the comparison between these technologies. Wind farms
39:29
require up to three hundred and sixty times as much land area to produce the
39:31
same amount of energy, and PV solar requires up to seventy five times the
39:36
land area. So that's where we sit with it, and it is quite
39:39
extraordinary the amount the labor government. We're not joking when they were talking about
39:44
change. We'll get into the detail of all the planning that's going to be
39:47
completely upended over the next few weeks. Okay, let's quick change of topic.
39:53
I want to bring this article from the BBC on screen. The headline
39:58
ism I five does not have to confirm abusive man was a spy and well,
40:04
what are they saying here? This is basically a domestic violence case.
40:07
So let's bring this up to the Security Service can continue to neither confirm nor
40:12
deny whether a man who attacked his girlfriend with a machete was an MI five
40:15
agent. Judges have ruled in twenty twenty two BBC News investigation established through multiple
40:21
sources of the man known as X for legal reasons was an MI five agent.
40:25
He uses MI five roar oll to coercively controlled Beth not her real name,
40:30
his ex partner. He was physically and sexually abusive and was filmed threatening
40:34
to kill her and then attacking her with a machete. Now she is asking
40:38
for the fact of whether he is an MI five agent to be brought to
40:44
the trial whenever there is a trial in a few months time. But this
40:49
is not clear that it's going to be permitted that they certainly MI five is
40:52
refusing to confirm or deny, so she's bringing the case to the Investigatory pars
40:57
Tribunal call themselves an independent judicial body, they say, we provide the right
41:02
of redress to anyone who believes they've been a victim of unlawful action by a
41:07
public authority using covert intelligence techniques or sorry, investigative techniques. We also consider
41:12
complaints about conduct by or on behalf of the UK Intelligence Services, Security Service,
41:17
the Secret Intelligence Service and GCHQ and so on. Now, of course
41:22
their hearings can buy our all non non public. They can either be completely
41:27
secret, in which case no evidence is shared with the complainant, or they
41:31
can be just held in private, in which case evidence is shared with the
41:36
complainant. But the reason this particular topic was of interest to me was just
41:42
to remind everybody again of this piece of legislation. It was a bill,
41:45
it's not an act. It is law now Covert Human Intelligence Sources Brackets,
41:51
Criminal Conduct Act, And just remind everybody of the range of organizations who are
41:57
entitled to authorize criminal behavior by their so called agents, so police forces,
42:02
National Crime Agency, Serious Fraud Office, Intelligence agencies, her Majesty's Forces,
42:07
her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, Department of Health, the Home Office, Ministry
42:12
of Justice, Competition and Markets Authority, the Environment Agency, the Financial Conduct
42:16
Authority, the Food Standards Agency, and the Gambling Commission. And so the
42:22
key point that I'd like to make here is, you know, is there
42:25
no public interest in this case or any other case in the public known knowing
42:30
whether criminality was being committed by a member of the Security Services five of whomever.
42:37
And my understanding is that in this case I five has even removed evidence
42:43
from the police evidence stores. So this becomes really tricky situation. And you
42:51
know, if they continue in maintaining this idea of non disclosure of whether somebody
42:58
is a member of a security service or or not, particularly in this case,
43:01
which is effectively a domestic violence case, it's not related to any intelligence
43:06
gathering work. If they're prepared to do that in this case, then what
43:09
else are they covering up? And I think it's extremely dangerous when we're in
43:13
the situation that we have no oversight. Now we can talk in extra Charles,
43:17
because obviously you have been in the police about whether or how much of
43:23
a problem it is for agencies if they can't behave in certain ways if they're
43:28
evidence gathering. But well, we'll keep that for extra that conversation. But
43:34
let's move on to this. Then. Another issue that the labor government is
43:38
facing is overcrowding in our prisons, and of course they're already announced that they're
43:44
going to start releasing prisoners they have. Yeah, so you know, here
43:47
we go again, because this course is a topic that's been effectively in the
43:52
new since the Victorian era, where the number of people that are effectively consigned
43:57
to internment is increase. But here we go. The comment from Charlie Taylor,
44:01
the Inspector Chief Inspector of Prisons, just last week, and of course
44:07
it's concern really with the political capital that's attempting to be scored on this basis.
44:12
But within his comment he has effectively said that it was at a point
44:16
where no decision could really be taken without any risk, which I suppose is
44:20
fairly obvious part of decision making process. But this notion of risk and people
44:25
being described as risky offenders, so the idea is that people would be released
44:30
at the point of having served forty percent of their sentence. Exactly how they
44:34
get that seems a little bit of nuance in that, but of course the
44:37
effect that is to be borne by the Prison Service and probation will be the
44:42
massive increase in their workload as they try and determine how this is to be
44:45
affected and then actually do it. Taylor then says it's to break the cycle
44:51
of reoffending and to protect the public from future harm. Of course, all
44:54
perhaps noble goals, but nonetheless they do deserve further investoration and scrutiny, And
45:00
just prior to this, on the eighth of July, the House Commons Library
45:05
produced statistics on the prison population. But I think the first thing I'd like
45:08
to draw your attention to is how wildly inaccurate the government are when it comes
45:13
to forecasting this sort of thing. So it might not be particularly clear,
45:16
but there's a dark green line that shows the actual prison population, how it's
45:22
fluctuated over the last ten years or so, and then a load of gray
45:24
lines which are there forecasts which possibly by general trend going roughly the right direction,
45:30
but they are still quite significantly far off what the total has turned out
45:36
to be. Is this started line or the distance that they're intending to put
45:39
in prison well exactly. You see, this is a very good question,
45:43
and it comes back to the cost of what you know to talking about the
45:47
Victorian period of massive prison building projects and whether or not that cost can be
45:52
justified. But then the other thing to look at is the offenses by prison
45:55
group, because I think it's very easy to fall into the trap of thinking
45:59
that reason prisons are full is because more people are doing more criminal things.
46:04
Now, that's not necessarily and probably more likely to be not the case.
46:07
It is, however, an indicator of how police and courts are behaving with
46:13
regard to particular demographics or particular offenses. So we see here as a good
46:19
example, the number of youths, the number of juveniles fifteen to seventeen who
46:22
are in prison by percentage for violence against person's criminal offenses concerning violence, which
46:29
is well over fifty percent, an enormous percentage of them. Of course,
46:32
for adults, the big ones are violence against person's sexual offenses and drugs.
46:37
But of course it's introducing this notion of risk if they are back on the
46:42
street. Now I use this slide a few months ago and we talked about
46:45
reoffending rates. This is out of date data, as it often is with
46:50
government, but nonetheless we see that there's a reoffending over reoffending rate of thirty
46:54
three percent, but for those having a sentence of less than twelve months,
46:58
a reoffending rate of fifty six percent, which is absolutely staggering, and we
47:02
have to question the whole sort of area of criminal justice. But we have
47:07
from the Institute of Government a performance tracker and again a graph know, statistics
47:13
sort of being used to demonstrate that something went right and then wrong again.
47:16
So the change of methodology in terms of violence within prisons, and of course
47:22
then we see a sharp drop in twenty twenty, so they ascribe this well.
47:28
First of all, some of the issues in prisons are that prisons are
47:31
in many cases kept in cells for up to twenty two hours per day.
47:35
Female self harm has gone up by nearly one hundred and twenty percent since twenty
47:37
nineteen. Half the prison staff at the moment reckon to have less than five
47:42
years experience, And the sharp increase in prisoners, which again could have been
47:46
absolutely determined at the time, was due to the backlog from the lockdown periods
47:51
the internment. In twenty twenty to twenty twenty one, magistrates have had their
47:54
maximum sentencing increased to twelve months and then reduced back down to six months,
48:00
and staff believe this is an interesting one. Staff believe that violence is reduced
48:04
by confinement so effectively the decrease that was seen in the lockdowns has been used
48:12
as a way in which to suggest that actually this is a sensible thing to
48:15
do with prisoners because it reduces the workload of the prison service and it contains
48:19
violence within the prisons. Now, I want to also make mention in the
48:23
king speech of the push of the expression of anti extremist rhetoric and the work
48:31
in particular that Lord Walney has been doing on this, and the suggestion that
48:35
there are many many people who are effectively worthy of prison time, sam Milia
48:40
being one that we've highlighted. But now what what are they going to do?
48:44
And the reason I talk about this is because we have a defense review
48:46
going on, we're talking about conscription, we're talking about national service. What
48:50
is going to happen to people that need prison spaces or we're told need prison
48:53
spaces but they don't have prison spaces for very good question. Okay, thank
48:59
you for that, Charles Vanessa. Let's come back to you then and give
49:01
us an update on the situation in Gaza. Yes, I just wanted to
49:07
point out that in the last hour the headline at CNN as Secret Service ramped
49:12
up security after receiving intel of Iranian plot to assassinate Trump. So I think
49:17
that's quite a good follow on from my Trump sector. So I want to
49:24
point out that the genocide in Gaza is ongoing. In fact, it's increasing,
49:31
if that's even possible, with some fairly horrendous massacres and events this week.
49:37
So clearly Natania, who feels no threat either from biolin or from the
49:43
potential of an incoming Trump administration. This is a report in Almadin three hundred
49:50
and twenty cases of severe burns in forty eight hours in Gaza. Israel as
49:54
using prohibited weapons against Palestinians in Gaza, resulting in up to three twenty cases
50:00
of severe burns. Gaza's government media office said, of course, we know
50:06
that Israel has historically used white phosphorus. White phosphorus if it comes into contact
50:13
with human flash, that literally melts the flash away from the bone and it's
50:20
very difficult to stop the spread of that burn. So martyred and injured Palestinians
50:29
were brought into hospitals and Gaza with severe burns due to Israel's usage of internationally
50:35
prohibited weapons. In a statement on Monday, these are unconventional and internationally prohibited
50:42
weapons banned for use against humans and mostly American made, adding that the bodies
50:46
were severely burned due to the Israeli occupations armies use of these weapons. And
50:53
then I just wanted to show a very quick video. There have actually been
50:58
two massacres in Mawaii Camp near Hanunas, which was designated a safe zone by
51:07
Israel for the refugees from the north and other areas of Gaza to go to
51:12
and to set up their camp cities. I'm not going to show anything particularly
51:16
distressing regarding dead bodies, but this is the actual capture of the first Israeli
51:24
strike on Mahwasi Camp, which is crowded with thousands of tens of thousands of
51:31
refugees. Let's roll this from what I back. I'm in fumis Has.
51:42
I'm a lucky. I'm a lucky And it's been pointed out that the two
52:21
thousand pound Mk eighty four was used in this attack, and at least five
52:27
missiles were used against as I said, heavily populated civilian encampment. If we
52:34
look at what the Mk eighty four does, it can effectively. It's usually
52:39
used against heavy machinery, against armored vehicles, against tanks, and against infrastructure.
52:47
It can create massive craters, and it can basically kill civilians within a
52:57
range of over three hundred meters from the impact point. More than one hundred
53:02
were killed in this attack and hundreds more were injured. Hospitals overwhelmed trying to
53:08
deal with them. Since October the seventh, one hundred and sixty journalists have
53:15
now been killed by Israel and of course their families have been targeted during the
53:21
various assassination attempts. And this is a story that I really wanted highlight to
53:28
demonstrate the inhumanity of the Israeli forces. In Gaza, a Palestinian with down
53:36
syndrome was left to die by Israeli soldiers. This is a report in Middle
53:40
East Eye. After combat dog attack, Muhammad, who was like a one
53:45
year old, was separated from his family by the soldiers and then the dog
53:51
was basically allowed to maul him and he was desperately trying to defend himself.
53:58
If we look at the rest or another section of the report, soldiers expelled
54:06
everyone from the house except for Muhammed, who was taken to a separate room.
54:09
Unable to see him. His mother could only guess his fate from the
54:14
screams as she was forced to leave the area at gunpoint. Seven agonizing days
54:20
of waiting passed before Israeli troops finally withdrew from Shujaya. The family rushed back
54:24
to the apartment on Wednesday, they found Mohammed's decomposing body. People can read
54:31
that for themselves, but basically the dog was allowed to maul him to death,
54:37
a defenseless guy with down syndrome. Yes, okay, thank you Vanessa
54:45
for that. No, let's end today with this story. With this story.
54:52
This is the propaganda and focused website Pierce Robson's rep website, one website
54:58
that he contributes to at least the tragedy of Julia Scripple. This is an
55:01
article by Tim Norman. Tim Norman has written an article we've published on the
55:07
scrip Al case for anybody that doesn't remember, of course, Sergei and Yulia
55:12
Scripple allegedly poisoned by the Russian government with Novichok, so called nerve agent in
55:19
Salisbury. This was a massive story at the time, So if you just
55:22
put that back on screen for a second and look at to have a looked
55:25
at some of the text here it says the effect of Novichok poisoning is an
55:30
important part of the tragedy of Julia Scrippl, but not because it killed her
55:34
or her father, because of course didn't. Rather, Tim says, admit
55:37
them both vanish. Like Julia. Sergei disappeared after his alleged exposure to and
55:43
recovery from this deadly nerve agent, and like Julia, no one can ask
55:47
serge about what happened to them. Now. It is a fact that the
55:52
last time we mentioned the scrip Al case on UK column news, one or
55:57
two people that hadn't been watching UK Column at the time were a little surprised,
56:01
a little taken aback that we were suggesting that this was a fake event.
56:06
So if we put that back on screen, we'll look at the next
56:08
next paragraph here, because this sort of sums up the situation. The military
56:13
grid poison, this is novichok, did not seem to have an effect on
56:16
either of them, that's Julia or Sergei for several hours. This is following
56:22
exposure. Sergei drove them into the city center where they fed ducks on the
56:25
River Avon. There they passed quite close by the two They were passed quite
56:30
close by the two Russian secret agents who poisoned them, as there would be
56:34
assassins that apparently decided to take the opportunity to do a bit of window shopping
56:37
in Salisbury after carrying out their orders, rather than leaving the city immediately,
56:43
Julia and Sergei then went to a restaurant and a pub. It was after
56:46
this while they were walking in a shopping area of Salisbury called the Maltings.
56:50
That the nerviage, and that it supposedly been separately exposed to a few hours
56:53
earlier, dramatically entered thet bloodstreams. It apparently had time to sit on a
56:59
public bench in the Maltings as they were almost simultaneously overcome together by its powerful
57:05
effects. And the article goes on to say, fortunately for them, the
57:07
British Army's most senior nurse happened to be passing by with her daughter and they
57:13
gave Julia and Sergei first aid. The coincidences here are off the charts.
57:19
The ten goes on to say. This goes on to talk about Don Sturgis,
57:22
who of course died a couple of days later, and also allegedly poisoned
57:29
by Novichok, having picked up having her boyfriend having picked up a perfume bottle
57:37
apparently and her thinking that it was perfume. So the article says, the
57:39
Sturgist family had been fighting ever since for an inquest to find out how the
57:44
events in Saulisbury led to Down's death, and after Dawn's daughter won legal case
57:49
against the coroner's initial judgment, the UK government converted the inquest into a public
57:53
inquiry so it could hide evidence from them in the name of national security.
57:58
And this is all well, Reverend, so do click on the links that
58:00
are in this article. The article because on to say. The inquiry is
58:05
due to begin in October twenty twenty four, but atn initial hearing on the
58:08
twenty first of June, Jack Holborn, a barrister appointed by UK government to
58:13
represent Julia and Sergei in the legal process, stated that Julia and Sergei feared
58:19
for their safety if they give evidence to the inquiry because no measures, no
58:22
security measures are perfect and giving testimony would cause them distress. So they are
58:29
apparently not going to be taking part in this inquest. And it is an
58:34
inquest, and we know from previous in quests that any suggestion that the government
58:39
would hide evidence from them is absolutely valid. Many many questions continued needing to
58:46
be asked of this incident and the accusation that Russia had carried out a chemical
58:52
weapons attack on British soil. As I say, Tim Norman wrote this article,
58:58
which is on the UK Column website some time ago in twenty twenty two,
59:01
the day of the script out. If you haven't seen this yet,
59:05
please go and read it and share it. Now. The point of this
59:07
article is that it is a timeline of all the mainstream It's basically showing a
59:12
timeline of all the mainstream coverage of the script all kids, from the beginning
59:16
to the end. And what comes across very starkly from this timeline is how
59:22
ridiculous the official narrative of the whole thing is. And so we do recommend
59:29
that you have a look at that. And another article on the UK column
59:30
website that we want to point out is sorry, it's not the same one,
59:36
so apologies for that. Let's see do we have no, we don't.
59:38
So the other one is Alex Thompson's article on Russi and if you just
59:46
search on the UK Colinn website for a Rousi web you will see the article
59:51
and do have a look at that one as well. But the question we
59:53
want to end with, as we always do when we talk about the script
59:55
ales, is where are they? They disappeared after this, They've never been
59:59
heard at all for seeing again, and some people speculating they're in New Zealand,
1:00:04
but nobody really knows for sure, and certainly they don't seem to be
1:00:08
making an appearance for the forthcoming in quest. Many many questions still to be
1:00:14
asked on this and answered, but we will have to leave it there for
1:00:17
today. I'm going to say thank you very much to Charles and Vanessa for
1:00:21
joining us. Plenty to talk about in Extra. If you're not a UK
1:00:24
Call member, please consider joining and joining them there for us for Extra and
1:00:30
we will see everybody that is on Extra in a couple of minutes, but
1:00:34
otherwise see it Friday as usual one pm. Bye bye,